Figure 4. Structure of artificial neural network [37]

Turbulent Flow Modeling at Tunnel Spillway Concave Bends and Prediction of Pressure using Artificial Neural Network

터널 배수로 오목 굴곡에서 난류 유동 모델링 인공 신경망을 이용한 압력 예측 및 예측

Zeinab Bashari Moghaddam 1
Hossein Mohammad Vali Samani2
Seyed Habib Mousavi Jahromi 3

Abstract

터널 배수로는 높은 자유 표면 유속이 설정되는 배수로 유형 중 하나입니다. 회전 가속과 난류 흐름의 불규칙성으로 인해 오목한 수직 굽힘에서 압력이 증가합니다. 물리적 모델은 이 현상을 분석하는 가장 좋은 도구입니다.

모든 실제 프로토 타입 상태 분석을 포괄하는 데 필요한 물리적 모델의 수가 너무 많아 배치 및 비용 측면에서 비실용적입니다. 따라서 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어는 가능한 모든 실제 대안을 포괄하는 오목한 굴곡 터널의 난류 흐름 데이터베이스를 분석하고 생성하기 위해 선택되었습니다.

이 소프트웨어는 방전과 형상이 다른 다양한 터널을 시뮬레이션했습니다. 수치 결과는 Alborz Dam 터널 배수로의 건설 된 물리적 모델의 실험 결과로 검증되었으며 만족스러운 동의를 얻었습니다. 차원 분석은 문제의 관련 변수를 차원 없는 매개 변수로 그룹화하는 데 사용됩니다.

이러한 매개 변수는 인공 신경망 시뮬레이션에 사용됩니다. 결과는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어로 얻은 무 차원 매개 변수와 신경망에 의해 예측된 변수 사이의 상관 계수 R2 = 0.95를 보여 주었으며, 이와 관련하여 난류 모델링을 통해 얻은 데이터베이스를 기반으로 한 인공 신경망이 결론을 내릴 수있었습니다. 압력 예측을 위한 강력한 도구입니다.

Keywords: Flow-3D, Tunnel spillway concave bend, Numerical simulation, Turbulent flow,
Artificial neural network

본문 내용 생략 : 본문 내용은 내용 하단부에 첨부된 본문 링크를 참조하시기 바랍니다.

Figure 1. Flow in a concave curvature
Figure 1. Flow in a concave curvature
Figure 2. Flow in the curvature of the flip bucket
Figure 2. Flow in the curvature of the flip bucket
Figure 3. The location of piezometers on the bed of the concave curvature of tunnel spillway in Alborz Dam
Figure 3. The location of piezometers on the bed of the concave curvature of tunnel spillway in Alborz Dam
Figure 4. Structure of artificial neural network [37]
Figure 4. Structure of artificial neural network [37]
Figure 5. Correlation coefficient of the Neural Network simulation and Flow-3D in the training
stage
Figure 6. Correlation coefficient of the Neural Network simulation and Flow-3D in the validation stage
Figure 6. Correlation coefficient of the Neural Network simulation and Flow-3D in the validation stage
Figure 7. Comparison 0f the Simulated Neural Network and Flow-3D Results of the validation stage
Figure 7. Comparison 0f the Simulated Neural Network and Flow-3D Results of the validation stage
Figure 8. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (1)
Figure 8. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (1)
Figure 9. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (2)
Figure 9. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (2)
Figure 10. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (3)
Figure 10. Correlation coefficient of the Flow-3D numerical results and Equation (3)

현재 연구에서 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어는 처음에 다양한 크기와 배출의 터널 배수로에서 난류 흐름을 시뮬레이션하는데 사용되었습니다. 결과는 이란 에너지부 물 연구소에서 제공한 Alborz 저장 댐에서 얻은 실제 데이터와 비교하여 검증되었습니다.

시뮬레이션에는 다양한 난류 모델이 사용되었으며 RNG 방법이 관찰된 실제 결과와 가장 잘 일치하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 직경이 3 ~ 15m 인 다양한 터널 배수로, 곡률 반경 3 개, 거의 모든 실제 사례를 포괄하는 3개의 배출이 시뮬레이션에 사용되었습니다.

차원 분석을 사용하여 무 차원 매개 변수를 생성하고 문제의 변수 수를 줄였으며 마지막으로 두 개의 주요 무 차원 그룹이 결정되었습니다. 이러한 무 차원 변수 간의 관계를 얻기 위해 신경망을 사용하고 터널 배수로의 오목한 굴곡에서 압력 예측 단계에서 0.95의 상관 계수를 얻었습니다.

압력 계산 결과는 다른 일반적인 방법으로 얻은 결과와 비교되었습니다. 비교는 신경망 결과가 훨씬 더 정확하고 배수로 터널의 오목한 곡률에서 압력을 예측하는 강력한 도구로 간주 될 수 있음을 나타냅니다.

References

  1. Kim, D. G., & Park, J. H. (2005). Analysis of flow structure over ogee-spillway in
    consideration of scale and roughness effects by using CFD model. KSCE Journal of Civil
    Engineering, 9(2), 161-169.
  2. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R., Rostami, F., & Mastorakis, N. E. (2008, March). Simulation of selfaeration at steep chute spillway flow using VOF technique in a 3D finite volume software. In
    Am. Conf. on Appl. Maths. Harvard, Mass, 24-28.
  1. Nohani, E. (2015). Numerical simulation of the flow pattern on morning glory spillways.
    International Journal of Life Sciences, 9(4): 28-31.
  2. Parsaie, A., Dehdar-Behbahani, S., & Haghiabi, A. H. (2016). Numerical modeling of
    cavitation on spillway’s flip bucket. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 10(4),
    438-444.
  3. Teuber, K., Broecker, T., Bay´on, A., N¨utzmann, G. and Hinkelmann, R. (2019) ‘CFDmodelling of free surface flows in closed conduits’, Progress in Computational Fluid
    Dynamics, 19(6), 368–380.
  4. Ghazanfari-Hashemi, R.S., Namin, M.M., Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh, M. and Fadaei-Kermani,
    E., 2020. A Numerical Study on Three-Dimensionality and Turbulence in Supercritical Bend
    Flow. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(3), 381-391.
  5. Sha, H. F., Wu, S. Q., & Zhou, H. (2009). Flow characteristics in a circular-section bend of
    high head spillway tunnel. Advances in Water Science, (6), 14.
  6. Liu, Z., Zhang, D., Zhang, H., & Wu, Y. (2011). Hydraulic characteristics of converse
    curvature section and aerator in high-head and large discharge spillway tunnel. Science
    China Technological Sciences, 54(1), 33-39.
  7. Zheng, Q. W., Luo, S. J., & Zhang, F. X. (2012). The Effect of Concave Types on the
    Hydraulic Characteristics in Spillway Tunnels with High-Speed Velocity. China Rural
    Water and Hydropower, 4.
  8. Hongmin, G. U. O., Jiang, L. I., Shan, Q. I. N., & Yang, X. I. E. (2014). Three-Dimensional
    Numerical Simulation on Spillway Tunnel of Pankou Hydropower Station. Water Resources
    and Power, (4), 22.
  9. Wan, W., Liu, B., & Raza, A. (2018). Numerical Prediction and Risk Analysis of Hydraulic
    Cavitation Damage in a High-Speed-Flow Spillway. Shock and Vibration, 2018.
  10. Wei, W., Deng, J. and Xu, W. (2020). Numerical investigation of air demand by the free
    surface tunnel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1-8.
  11. Xu, W., Dang, Y., Li, G., Shao, J. and Chen, G. (2007) ‘Three-dimensional numerical
    simulation of the bi-tunnel spillway flow [J] ‘, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 1, 56-
    60.
  12. Huang, H.Y., Gong, A.M., Qiu, Y. and Wangliang, Z.A. (2015) ‘ 3D Numerical Simulation
    and Experimental Analysis of Spillway Tunnel’ In Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans
    Tech Publications Ltd. 723, 171-175.
  13. Li, S., Zhang, J. M., Xu, W. L., Chen, J. G., Peng, Y., Li, J. N., & He, X. L. (2016).
    Simulation and experiments of aerated flow in curve-connective tunnel with high head and
    large discharge. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(1), 23-33.
  14. Shilpakar, R., Hua, Z., Manandhar, B., Shrestha, N., Zafar, M. R., Iqbal, T., & Hussain, Z.
    (2017, August). Numerical simulation on tunnel spillway of Jingping-I hydropower project
    with four aerators. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 82, 012013.
  15. Song, C. C., & Zhou, F. (1999). Simulation of free surface flow over spillway. Journal of
    Hydraulic Engineering, 125(9), 959-967.
  16. Fais, L.M.C.F., Filho, J.G.D., Genovez, A.I.B. (2015). Geometry influence and discharge
    curve correction in morning glory spillways. Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World
    Congress.
  17. Falvey, H. T. (1990). Cavitation in chutes and spillways. Denver: US Department of the
    Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 49-57.
  18. Chaudhry, M. H. (2007). Open-channel flow. Springer Science & Business Media.
  1. Novak, P., Moffat, A. I. B., Nalluri, C., & Narayanan, R. (2007). Hydraulic structures.
    Fourth Edition, Taylor & Francis, New York , 246–265.
  2. Jorabloo, M., Maghsoodi, R., Sarkardeh, H., & Branch, G. (2011). 3D simulation of flow
    over flip buckets at dams. Journal of American Science, 7(6), 931-936.
  3. Khani, S., Moghadam, M. A., & Nikookar, M. (2017). Pressure Fluctuations Investigation
    on the Curve of Flip Buckets Using Analytical and Numerical Methods. Vol. 03(04), 165-
    171.
  4. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous
    activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5(4), 115-133.
  5. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective
    computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8), 2554-2558.
  6. Wu,C.L. Huang, B. Xie, C.B. (2008) . Comparison of calculation methods for irrigation
    district water inlet, China Rural Water and Hydropower ,5 (71) ,74–77.
  7. Qiu,J. Huang, B.S. . Lai, G.W. (2002). Research and application of discharge coefficient of
    wide crest weir, China Rural Water and Hydropower ,9 ,41–42.
  8. Xiang, H.Q .Ba,D.D. Liu, J.J. (2012) . Acquiring of curved practical weir flow coefficient by
    curve-fitting based on Matlab, Hydropower Energy Sci. 3 ,97–99.
  9. Ye,Y.T. He,J.J.(2013).Experimental study on hydraulic calculation of discharge under plane
    gate on broad-crested weir, J. Water Resour. Archit. Eng. 11 (2), 138–141.
  10. Salmasi, F., Yıldırım, G., Masoodi, A., & Parsamehr, P. (2013). Predicting discharge
    coefficient of compound broad-crested weir by using genetic programming (GP) and
    artificial neural network (ANN) techniques. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(7), 2709-
    2717.
  11. Noori, R.; Hooshyaripor, F. (2014). Effective prediction of scour downstream of ski-jump
    buckets using artificial neural networks. Water Resour. 41, 8–18.
  12. Flow-Science. (2014). FLOW-3D user manual. version11. In: Flow Science Santa Fe, NM.
  13. Yakhot, V. S. A. S. T. B. C. G., Orszag, S. A., Thangam, S., Gatski, T. B., & Speziale, C. G.
    (1992). Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique.
    Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4(7), 1510-1520.
  14. Report on the hydraulic model of Alborz dam reservoir. (2001). Iran Water Research
    Institute
  15. Lippman, R. (1987). An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE Assp magazine,
    4(2), pp.4-22.
  16. Baylar, A., Ozgur, K.I.S.I. and Emiroglu, M.E. (2009). Modeling air entrainment rate and
    aeration efficiency of weirs using ANN approach. Gazi University Journal of Science, 22(2),
    107-116.
  17. Maureen, C. and Caudill, M. (1989). Neural network primer: Part I. AI Expert, 2(12),
    p.1987.
Figure 1. Geometries and bed topography settings of the nine computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with channel curvature (C) changed from 0.77 to 0

The Straightening of a River Meander Leads to Extensive Losses in Flow Complexity and Ecosystem Services

Abstract

하천 복원 노력을 지원하기 위해 우리는 하천 파괴 속도를 늦출 필요가 있습니다. 이 연구는 하천 곡률 보호를 위해 구불 구불 한 하천이 곧게 펴질 때 수리적 복잡성 손실에 대한 자세한 설명을 제공합니다.

전산 유체 역학 (CFD) 모델링을 사용하여 채널 곡률 (C)이 잘 확립된 사행 굽힘 (C = 0.77)에서 곡률이 없는 직선 채널 (C = 0)로 저하되는 9 개의 시뮬레이션에서 유동 역학의 차이를 문서화했습니다.

공변량을 제어하고 수리적 복잡성에 대한 손실률을 늦추기 위해 각 9 개 채널 구현은 동등한 베드 형태 지형을 가졌습니다. 분석된 수력학적 변수에는 흐름 표면 고도, 흐름 방향 및 횡단 단위 배출, 흐름 방향, 가로 방향 및 수직 방향의 유속, 베드 전단 응력, 흐름 함수 및 채널 베드에서의 수직 저 유량 유속 비율이 포함되었습니다.

수력 복잡성의 손실은 처음에 수로를 C = 0.77에서 C = 0.33 (즉, 수로의 반경이 수로 폭의 3 배임) 할 때 점차적으로 발생했으며, 추가 직선화는 수력 복잡성에 대한 급속한 손실을 초래했습니다.

다른 연구에서는 수리적 복잡성이 중요한 하천 서식지를 제공하고 생물 다양성과 양의 상관 관계가 있음을 보여주었습니다. 이 연구는 강을 풀 때 수력학적 복잡성이 점진적으로 사라졌다가 빠르게 사라지는 방법을 보여줍니다.

To assist river restoration efforts we need to slow the rate of river degradation. This study provides a detailed explanation of the hydraulic complexity loss when a meandering river is straightened in order to motivate the protection of river channel curvature. We used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to document the difference in flow dynamics in nine simulations with channel curvature (C) degrading from a well-established tight meander bend (C = 0.77) to a straight channel without curvature (C = 0). To control for covariates and slow the rate of loss to hydraulic complexity, each of the nine-channel realizations had equivalent bedform topography. The analyzed hydraulic variables included the flow surface elevation, streamwise and transverse unit discharge, flow velocity at streamwise, transverse, and vertical directions, bed shear stress, stream function, and the vertical hyporheic flux rates at the channel bed. The loss of hydraulic complexity occurred gradually when initially straightening the channel from C = 0.77 to C = 0.33 (i.e., the radius of the channel is three-times the channel width), and additional straightening incurred rapid losses to hydraulic complexity. Other studies have shown hydraulic complexity provides important riverine habitat and is positively correlated with biodiversity. This study demonstrates how hydraulic complexity can be gradually and then rapidly lost when unwinding a river, and hopefully will serve as a cautionary tale.

Figure 1. Geometries and bed topography settings of the nine computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with channel curvature (C) changed from 0.77 to 0
Figure 1. Geometries and bed topography settings of the nine computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with channel curvature (C) changed from 0.77 to 0
Figure 2. Flow surface elevation (h) normalized by H at C = 0.77, C = 0.33, and C = 0 conditions. n denotes the lateral coordination with n = 0 at channel center and B denotes the channel width.
Figure 2. Flow surface elevation (h) normalized by H at C = 0.77, C = 0.33, and C = 0 conditions. n denotes the lateral coordination with n = 0 at channel center and B denotes the channel width.
Figure 3. Normalized flow surface profiles for the nine simulations at the point bar apex 1.5 s/B. The insert plot shows the second order derivative of normalized flow surface elevation in the transverse direction, Fh00(n/B), which gives the convexity or concavity of the surface profile curves.
Figure 3. Normalized flow surface profiles for the nine simulations at the point bar apex 1.5 s/B. The insert plot shows the second order derivative of normalized flow surface elevation in the transverse direction, Fh00(n/B), which gives the convexity or concavity of the surface profile curves.
Figure 4. Streamwise unit discharge qs/UH for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 4. Streamwise unit discharge qs/UH for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 5. Transverse unit discharge qn/UH for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 5. Transverse unit discharge qn/UH for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.

Reference : https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1680

Figure 6. Transverse unit discharge averaged over the transverse direction. The inset shows the R2 of transverse unit discharge < qn/UH > between each curvature, C, and the straight channel condition (C = 0, R2 = 1); a lower R2 suggests greater hydraulic complexity for transverse unit discharge.
Figure 6. Transverse unit discharge averaged over the transverse direction. The inset shows the R2 of transverse unit discharge < qn/UH > between each curvature, C, and the straight channel condition (C = 0, R2 = 1); a lower R2 suggests greater hydraulic complexity for transverse unit discharge.
Figure 7. Normalized depth averaged streamwise velocity <vs>/U for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 7. Normalized depth averaged streamwise velocity /U for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 8. The first moment of normalized depth averaged streamwise velocity <vs>/U, which represents center of gravity of the streamwise flow distribution, along the channel. The inset shows the R2 of the first moment of <vs>/U between each curvature and the straight channel condition (C = 0, R2 = 1); a lower R2 suggests greater hydraulic complexity for the first moment of depth averaged streamwise velocity.
Figure 8. The first moment of normalized depth averaged streamwise velocity /U, which represents center of gravity of the streamwise flow distribution, along the channel. The inset shows the R2 of the first moment of /U between each curvature and the straight channel condition (C = 0, R2 = 1); a lower R2 suggests greater hydraulic complexity for the first moment of depth averaged streamwise velocity.
Figure 9. Distribution of river channel bed shear Cf for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 9. Distribution of river channel bed shear Cf for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions.
Figure 10. Normalized vertical hyporheic flux vzbed/U at 2 mm below sediment surface for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions. Positive indicates upwelling of groundwater into the river channel.
Figure 10. Normalized vertical hyporheic flux vzbed/U at 2 mm below sediment surface for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions. Positive indicates upwelling of groundwater into the river channel.
Figure 11. Normalized vertical velocity <vz>/U for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions, with positive values upward flows, negative values downward flows.
Figure 11. Normalized vertical velocity /U for channel curvature C = 0.77, 0.33, and 0 conditions, with positive values upward flows, negative values downward flows.
Figure 12. Transverse stream function distribution ψ/UBH reveals the secondary circulation of transverse flow cells rotating at the meander apex 1.5 s/B for channel curvature C = 0.77 (A), C = 0.33 (B), and C = 0 (C), with positive values representing clockwise rotation direction when facing upstream, and negative values representing counter-clockwise rotation when facing upstream.
Figure 12. Transverse stream function distribution ψ/UBH reveals the secondary circulation of transverse flow cells rotating at the meander apex 1.5 s/B for channel curvature C = 0.77 (A), C = 0.33 (B), and C = 0 (C), with positive values representing clockwise rotation direction when facing upstream, and negative values representing counter-clockwise rotation when facing upstream.

References

  1. Paper 422-H); U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1966.
  2. Leopold, L.B.; Wolman, M.G. River meanders. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 196071, 769–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wohl, E. Rivers in the Landscape; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dietrich, W.E.; Smith, J.D. Influence of the point bar on flow through curved channels. Water Resour. Res. 198319, 1173–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Harvey, J.W.; Bencala, K. The effects of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountains catchments. Water Resour. Res. 199329, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bridge, J.S. Rivers and Floodplains: Forms, Processes, and Sedimentary Record; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schumm, S.A. Patterns of alluvial rivers. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 198513, 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vermeulen, B.; Hoitink, A.J.F.; Labeur, R.J. Flow structure caused by a local cross-sectional area increase and curvature in a sharp river bend. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2015120, 1771–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Konsoer, K.M.; Rhoads, B.L.; Best, J.L.; Langendoen, E.J.; Abad, J.D.; Parsons, D.R.; Garcia, M.H. Three-dimensional flow structure and bed morphology in large elongate meander loops with different outer bank roughness characteristics. Water Resour. Res. 201652, 9621–9641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, B.D.; Zhang, X.H.; Tang, H.S.; Tsubaki, R. Influence of deflection angles on flow behaviours in openchannel bends. J. Mt. Sci. 201815, 2292–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gualtieri, C.; Abdi, R.; Ianniruberto, M.; Filizola, N.; Endreny, T.A. A 3D analysis of spatial habitat metrics about the confluence of Negro and Solimões rivers, Brazil. Ecohydrology 202013, e2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gualtieri, C.; Ianniruberto, M.; Filizola, N.; Santos, R.; Endreny, T. Hydraulic complexity at a large river confluence in the Amazon basin. Ecohydrology 201710, e1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kozarek, J.; Hession, W.; Dolloff, C.; Diplas, P. Hydraulic complexity metrics for evaluating in-stream brook trout habitat. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2010136, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McCoy, E.D.; Bell, S.S.; Mushinsky, H.R. Habitat structure: Synthesis and perspectives. In Habitat Structure; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1991; pp. 427–430. [Google Scholar]
  15. Re-Engineering Britain’s Rivers. The Economist. 6 March 2020. Available online: https://www.latestnigeriannews.com/news/8279579/reengineering-britains-rivers.html (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  16. Palmer, M.A.; Bernhardt, E.; Allan, J.; Lake, P.S.; Alexander, G.; Brooks, S.; Carr, J.; Clayton, S.; Dahm, C.; Follstad Shah, J.; et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 200542, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abad, J.D.; Rhoads, B.L.; Güneralp, İ.; García, M.H. Flow structure at different stages in a meander-bend with bendway weirs. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008134, 1052–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Blanckaert, K.; Schnauder, I.; Sukhodolov, A.; van Balen, W.; Uijttewaal, W. Meandering: Field Experiments, Laboratory Experiments and Numerical Modeling. Technical Report. 2009. Available online: https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/146621/files/2009-695-Blanckaert_et_al-Meandering_field_experiments_laboratory_experiments_and_numerical.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  19. Constantinescu, G.; Koken, M.; Zeng, J. The structure of turbulent flow in an open channel bend of strong curvature with deformed bed: Insight provided by detached eddy simulation. Water Resour. Res. 201147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sawyer, A.H.; Bayani Cardenas, M.; Buttles, J. Hyporheic exchange due to channel-spanning logs. Water Resour. Res. 201147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, T.; Endreny, T. Meander hydrodynamics initiated by river restoration deflectors. Hydrol. Process. 201226, 3378–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 198139, 201–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Balen, W.; Uijttewaal, W.; Blanckaert, K. Large-eddy simulation of a curved open-channel flow over topography. Phys. Fluids 201022, 075108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blanckaert, K. Topographic steering, flow recirculation, velocity redistribution, and bed topography in sharp meander bends. Water Resour. Res. 201046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeng, J.; Constantinescu, G.; Blanckaert, K.; Weber, L. Flow and bathymetry in sharp open-channel bends: Experiments and predictions. Water Resour. Res. 200844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elliott, A.H.; Brooks, N.H. Transfer of nonsorbing solutes to a streambed with bed forms: Laboratory experiments. Water Resour. Res. 199733, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, T.; Endreny, T.A. Reshaping of the hyporheic zone beneath river restoration structures: Flume and hydrodynamic experiments. Water Resour. Res. 201349, 5009–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lane, S.; Bradbrook, K.; Richards, K.; Biron, P.; Roy, A. The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches. Geomorphology 199929, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vardy, A. Fluid Principles; McGraw-Hill International Series in Civil Engineering; McGraw-Hill: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rozovskii, I.L. Flow of Water in Bends of Open Channels; Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR: Kiev, Ukraine, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  31. Blanckaert, K.; De Vriend, H.J. Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends. J. Fluid Mech. 2004498, 353–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johannesson, H.; Parker, G. Linear theory of river meanders. River Meand. 198912, 181–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Camporeale, C.; Perona, P.; Porporato, A.; Ridolfi, L. Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Rev. Geophys. 200745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, L. Distribution of primary and secondary currents in sine-generated bends. Water SA 201844, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liao, J.C.; Beal, D.N.; Lauder, G.V.; Triantafyllou, M.S. Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science 2003302, 1566–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Crispell, J.K.; Endreny, T.A. Hyporheic exchange flow around constructed in-channel structures and implications for restoration design. Hydrol. Process. 20091168, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hester, E.T.; Gooseff, M.N. Moving Beyond the Banks: Hyporheic Restoration Is Fundamental to Restoring Ecological Services and Functions of Streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 201044, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 12 Experimental set-up of particle image velocimetry (PIV) system.

A comparison study between CFD analysis and PIV technique for velocity distribution over the Standard Ogee crested spillways

Rizgar Ahmed Karim 1Jowhar Rasheed Mohammed 2Affiliations expand

Free PMC article

Abstract

실험 및 수치 모델을 사용하여 표준 Ogee-crested 여수로에서 유속, 평균 속도, 수직 속도 분포 및 최대 속도 dm이 발생하는 위치를 비교하기 위해 포괄적인 연구가 수행되었습니다. 미국 육군 공병대 (USACE)의 사양에 따라 rigid foam으로 5 가지 다른 모델이 제작되었습니다.

유동의 속도는 0.50, 1.00 및 1.33의 다른 비 차원 수두 비 H/Hd를 갖는 모든 모델에 대해 모델의 하류 곡선을 따라 기록되었습니다. 입자 이미지 유속계 (PIV)를 사용하여 유속을 측정했습니다. 속도 분포는 Matlab 코드를 사용하여 캡처된 일련의 이미지를 분석하여 얻었습니다.

시판되는 CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) 소프트웨어 패키지인 Flow-3D가 실험 모델 설정을 모델링하는데 사용되었습니다. Flow-3D는 레이놀즈 평균 Navier-Stokes 방정식을 분석하고 배수로 흐름 분석 분야에서 사용하기 위해 널리 검증되었습니다.

수치와 실험의 최대 차이는 수두비의 모든 값에 대해 6.2 %를 초과하지 않는 평균 속도 값을 나타냅니다. PIV 기법에 의해 기록 된 최대 속도의 보간된 값은 수치적으로 계산 된 값보다 작습니다.

낮은 d m 위치에서 이 지역 간의 백분율 차이는 -8.65 %에 이릅니다. 상위 위치는 2.87 %입니다. 수직 위치 (d m)는 상류 수두가 증가하면 아래쪽 위치로 떨어지고 배수로 축으로부터의 거리가 선형으로 감소합니다.

A comprehensive study was performed to compare flow rate, mean velocity, vertical velocity distribution, and locations where the maximum velocity, d m , occurs on standard Ogee-crested spillways using experimental and numerical models. Five different models were constructed from rigid foam according to the specifications of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The velocity of the flow was recorded along the downstream curve of the model for all models with different non-dimensional head ratios H/H d of 0.50, 1.00, and 1.33. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the flow velocities. Velocity distributions were obtained by analyzing a series of captured images using Matlab codes. A commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software package, Flow-3D, was used for modelling the experimental model setups. Flow-3D analyzes the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and is widely verified for use in the field of spillway flow analysis. The maximum difference between numerical and experimental results in mean velocity values that do not exceed 6.2% for all values of head ratios. The interpolated values of recorded maximum velocity by the PIV technique are smaller than those values numerically computed. In the lower d m locations, the percent difference between these regions reaches -8.65%; the upper locations are 2.87%. The vertical location (d m ) drops to the lower location when the upstream head increases, and the distance from the spillway axis decreases linearly.

Keywords: Applied fluid mechanics; Civil engineering; Computational fluid dynamics; Finite element methods; Hydraulics; Hydrodynamics; Ogee-crested spillway; Particle image velocimetry; Physical model; Velocity distribution.

Figure 1 Dimensions of standard ogee-crested spillway, (a) dimensions and flow parameters, and (b) detail of upstream quadrant.
Figure 1 Dimensions of standard ogee-crested spillway, (a) dimensions and flow parameters, and (b) detail of upstream quadrant.
Figure 2 Side view of the experimental model.
Figure 2 Side view of the experimental model.
Figure 3 Laboratory setup.
Figure 3 Laboratory setup.
Figure 4 Discharge Coefficients of Experimental and Numerical results plotted together with USACE-WES Published Data, (a) for model No. 1, (b) for model No. 3.
Figure 4 Discharge Coefficients of Experimental and Numerical results plotted together with USACE-WES Published Data, (a) for model No. 1, (b) for model No. 3.
Figure 5 Rating curves of theoretical discharge and flowmeter reading.
Figure 5 Rating curves of theoretical discharge and flowmeter reading.
Figure 6 Mesh geometry.
Figure 6 Mesh geometry.
Figure 7 Numerical model geometry.
Figure 7 Numerical model geometry.
Figure 8 Mesh geometry.
Figure 8 Mesh geometry.
Figure 9 Boundary conditions of the Modeling.
Figure 9 Boundary conditions of the Modeling.
Figure 10 Normalized discharge comparison.
Figure 10 Normalized discharge comparison.
Figure 11 Relative percent difference in discharge.
Figure 11 Relative percent difference in discharge.
Figure 12 Experimental set-up of particle image velocimetry (PIV) system.
Figure 12 Experimental set-up of particle image velocimetry (PIV) system.
Figure 13 (a) Spillway Model setup, (b) Raw Image, and (c) Post-processed Image.
Figure 13 (a) Spillway Model setup, (b) Raw Image, and (c) Post-processed Image.
Figure 14 Cross-correlation algorithm.
Figure 14 Cross-correlation algorithm.
Figure 15 Velocity field and streamlines measured by PIV and simulated with CFD for flow over ogee spillway, (a) model no. 1 and (b) model no. 3.
Figure 15 Velocity field and streamlines measured by PIV and simulated with CFD for flow over ogee spillway, (a) model no. 1 and (b) model no. 3.
Figure 16 Comparison of head-mean velocity of experimental and numerical analysis for all models.
Figure 16 Comparison of head-mean velocity of experimental and numerical analysis for all models.
Figure 17 Sketch of velocity profile and its position for model no. 1.
Figure 17 Sketch of velocity profile and its position for model no. 1.
Figure 18 Vertical Distribution of Velocity for Different Runs of model No. 1.
Figure 18 Vertical Distribution of Velocity for Different Runs of model No. 1.
Figure 19 Vertical location of maximum velocity.
Figure 19 Vertical location of maximum velocity.

Conclusions

이 연구는 최대 속도를위한 수직 위치를 선택하는 동시에 설계 헤드보다 높은 수두에 대해 제어 된 환경에서 Ogee 볏이있는 배수로의 흐름을 더 잘 이해하는 데 기여하기 위해 수행되었습니다. 여기에서 5 개의 실험 모델이 USACE-WES 표준 여수로 모양에 따라 설계 및 제작되었으며 실험실 수로에서 테스트되었습니다. PIV 카메라는 유속을 측정하는 데 사용되었으며 CFD 소프트웨어는 실험 설정을 모델링하는 데 사용되었습니다.

수치 결과는 실험과 잘 일치했습니다. 등급 곡선 결과는 수치 값과 PIV 값의 최대 차이가 평균 속도 값이 모든 수 두비 값에 대해 5.59 %를 초과하지 않음을 나타냅니다. 정규화 된 WES 공개 데이터와 실험 결과 간의 최대 차이는 -7.54 %였습니다.

PIV 카메라로 기록 된 평균 속도는 CFD 모델에서 수치 적으로 분석되었으며, 비교 결과는 수치 데이터와 실험 데이터가 잘 일치 함을 보여줍니다. 최대 차이는 모든 헤드 비율에 대해 6.54 %를 초과하지 않습니다.

속도 비 (v / vmax.)의 실험적 보간 데이터는 dm 이하의 위치에서 수치 적으로 계산 된 데이터보다 작지만 반대로 dm보다 높은 위치에 있습니다. 이 현상은 수치 모델링에서 표면 거칠기를 고려하지 않았기 때문에 발생합니다. 방수로 모델의 표면은 매끄러운 표면으로 가정되었습니다. 최대 속도가 발생하는 수직 위치는 상류 수두가 증가함에 따라 낮은 위치에 있습니다. 위치는 방수로 축으로부터의 거리에 따라 거의 선형 적으로 증가합니다.

필요한 메시 미세 조정 및 구성은 원하는 데이터 유형에 따라 다릅니다. 일반적으로 속도 프로파일을 모델링하는 데는 0.33cm 메쉬로 충분했으며 더 작은 그리드 크기도 평가했지만 변경 사항은 없습니다.

실험적 모델링과 수치 적 모델링의 비교와 관련하여 실험적 모델링이 여전히 더 확립되어 있음이 분명합니다. CFD 모델은 실험 모델보다 속도와 난류에 대해 더 자세한 정보를 제공 할 수 있지만 경우에 따라 더 경제적 일 수 있습니다.

References

  • Adrian R.J. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1991;23(1):261–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Adrian L., Adrian R.J., Westrweel J. Cambridge University Press; 2011. Particle Image Velocimetry. [Google Scholar]
  • Chanel P.G. University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: 2009. An Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Spillway Modeling.http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3112 M.Sc. Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Engineers U.A. C.o. Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg, Miss. 1952. Corps of Engineers hydraulic design criteria. [Google Scholar]
  • Fujita I. Large-scale particle image velocimetery for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications. J. Hydraul. Res. 1998;36(3):397–414. [Google Scholar]
  • Ho D.K. Taylor and Francis group; London, UK: 2006. Application of Numerical Modelling to Spillways in Australia; pp. 951–959. [Google Scholar]
  • Kanyabujinja P.N. Stellenbosch university; Stellenbosch, South Africa: 2015. CFD Modelling of Ogee Spillway Hydraulics and Comparison with Experimental Mosel Tests.http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/96787 M.Sc. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Khatsuria R.M. CRC Press; 2004. Hydraulics of Spillways and Energy Dissipators. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim D.G., Park J.H. Analysis of flow structure over ogee-spillway in considration of scale and roughness effects by using CFD model. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 2005;9(2):161–169. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuok K.k., Chiu P.C. Application of particle image velocimetry (PIV) for measuring water velocity in laboratory sedimentation tank” IRA Int. J. Technol. Eng. 2017;9(3):16–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Maynord S.T. Technical Report HL-85-1, US Army Engineering Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 1985. General spillway investigation: hydraulic model investigation.https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a156686.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Peltier Y. 2nd International Workshop on Hydraulic Structure. Coimbra; Portugal: 2015. Pressure and velocity on an ogee spillway crest operating at high head ratio: experimental measurements and validation; pp. 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Peltier Y., Dewals B., Archambeau P., Pirotton M., Erpicum S. Pressure and velocity on an ogee spillway crest operating at high head ratio: experimental measurements and validation. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 2018;19:128–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Savage B.M., Johnson M.C. Flow over ogee spillway:experimental and numerical model case study” J. Hydraul. Eng. 2001;127(8):640–649. [Google Scholar]
  • Sveen J.K., Cowen E.A. Advances in Coastal and Ocean/Engineering PIV and Water Waves. Would Scientific; 2004. Quantitative imaging techniques and their application to wavy flows, in PIV and water waves” pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
  • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation . Water Resources Technical Publication, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation; 1987. Design of Small Dams. [Google Scholar]
  • Willey J., Ewing T., Wark B., Lesleighter E. Commission International Des Grands Barrages,Kyoto. 2012. Complementary use of experimental and numerical modelling techniques in spillway design refinement; pp. 1–22.https://books.google.com_books_about_An_Introduction_to_Computati [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental flume used (a) Side view of the flume; (b) Pool detail.

Modelling of Pool-Type Fishways Flows: Efficiency and Scale Effects Assessment

by Ana L. Quaresma *OrcID andAntónio N. PinheiroOrcID
CERIS—Civil Engineering for Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Bommanna Krishnappan
Water 2021, 13(6), 851; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060851
Received: 16 January 2021 / Revised: 8 March 2021 / Accepted: 18 March 2021 / Published: 20 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecohydraulics of Pool-Type Fishways)

Abstract

이 연구에서는 전산 유체 역학 (CFD) 소프트웨어 (FLOW-3D®)를 사용하여 바닥 오리피스가 있는 풀형 어로에서 흐름의 3D 수치 모델링을 수행했습니다. 수치 결과는 음향 도플러 속도계 (ADV) 및 입자 이미지 속도계 (PIV) 측정에서 얻은 실험 데이터와 비교되었습니다.

흐름 깊이, 흐름 패턴, 수속, 난류 운동 에너지, Reynolds 수직 응력 및 바닥 구성 요소에 평행한 Reynolds 전단 응력과 같이 어로 효율에 영향을 미치는 여러 유체 역학적 변수를 정성 및 정량적으로 비교했습니다.

수치 모델은 복잡한 유동장을 정확하게 재현하여 수치 모델 예측과 분석 된 변수에 대한 실험 데이터 사이에 전반적으로 좋은 일치를 보여줍니다. 분석중인 모든 매개 변수에 대한 수치 모델 검증 수행의 중요성이 강조되었습니다.

또한 프로토 타입 어로의 업 스케일 된 수치 모델을 실행하여 스케일링 효과를 분석했습니다. 스케일 효과의 증거없이 실제 모델과 프로토 타입 치수 모두에 대해 유사한 정확도로 모델을 수행했습니다.

현재 연구는 CFD 모델 (즉, FLOW-3D®)이 새로운 수영장 유형 어로 형상을 위한 적절하고 효율적인 설계 및 분석 도구로 사용될 수 있으며 물리적 모델 테스트를 줄이고 보완 할 수 있다고 결론지었습니다.

In this study, the 3D numerical modelling of flow in a pool-type fishway with bottom orifices was performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software (FLOW-3D®). Numerical results were compared with experimental data obtained from acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. Several hydrodynamic variables that influence fishways efficiencies, such as flow depths, flow patterns, water velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, Reynolds normal stresses, and Reynolds shear stress parallel to the bottom component, were qualitatively and quantitatively compared. The numerical model accurately reproduced the complex flow field, showing an overall good agreement between the numerical model predictions and the experimental data for the analysed variables. The importance of performing a numerical model validation for all the parameters under analyses was highlighted. Additionally, scaling effects were analysed by running an upscaled numerical model of the prototype fishway. The model performed with similar accuracy for both physical model and prototype dimensions with no evidence of scale effects. The present study concludes that CFD models (namely FLOW-3D®) may be used as an adequate and efficient design and analysis tool for new pool-type fishways geometries, reducing and complementing physical model testing.Keywords: pool-type fishways3D numerical modellingLESscale effectsflow patternsCFD model assessment

Introduction

강의 종단 연결성을 복원하는 것은 담수 생태계의 회복에있어 여전히 중요한 문제입니다 [1,2]. 잘 설계되고 건설된 경우 어로는 물고기가 댐과 둑을 지나 계속 이동할 수 있는 경로를 제공합니다.

물고기 통과 효율성에 대한 검토에서 Noonan et al. [3]은 기존의 많은 어로의 설계 특성이 어종의 요구를 적절하게 충족시키지 못했지만, 풀형 어로가 모든 어류 그룹에 대해 가장 높은 효율성을 보여 주었다는 것을 발견했습니다.
여러 어종에 적합한 수영 조건을 제공하는 것은 어항의 흐름과 난류 패턴이 성공에 중요한 역할을 하기 때문에 다소 어려운 일입니다 [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].

물리적 모델링은 풀형 유형 어로의 유체 역학을 연구하기 위한 주요 접근 방식이었습니다 (예 : [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]). 그러나 물리적 실험은 비용과 시간이 많이 소요됩니다. 따라서 컴퓨터 기술의 발전으로 인해 물리적 모델 테스트를 줄이기 위해 복잡한 기하학적 구조를 가진 유압 구조의 흐름 패턴을 분석하는 데 전산 유체 역학 (CFD) 3 차원 (3D) 모델이 점점 더 많이 사용되고 있습니다 [23,24].

따라서 이러한 모델은 어로 유체 역학 연구 및 효율적인 어로 설계에 필수적인 역할을 할 수 있습니다.
어로에 대한 수치 모델링 연구는 주로 수직 슬롯 어로에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다 [12,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. 수영장의 주요 부분에서 수직 슬롯 어로 흐름은 거의 2 차원 (2D)이고 수직 속도 구성 요소가 수평 요소 [26]보다 훨씬 작기 때문에 이러한 연구의 대부분은 2D 모델을 사용했습니다.

바닥 오리피스가있는 수영장 유형 어로에서는 흐름이 매우 복잡하고 3D이므로 정확한 유동장 특성화를 얻기 위해 3D 모델을 사용해야합니다. 이 어로 구성을 모델링하는 것은 높은 속도 구배, 높은 와도 및 높은 전단 영역을 포함하기 때문에 다소 어렵습니다.

이 연구에서는 FLOW-3D® (Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA)를 사용하여 바닥 오리피스가 있는 수영장 유형 어로의 3D 수치 시뮬레이션을 수행하여 흐름 깊이, 속도 및 난류 패턴을 예측하는 능력을 평가했습니다. .

최근 몇 년 동안 실내에 가까운 프로토 타입 수영장 형 어로가 사이프 린드 종의 행동과 움직임을 연구하는데 사용되었습니다 [1,7,8,11,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Silva et al. [38]은 노치, 급락 및 스트리밍에 대한 두 가지 다른 유동 체제와 관련하여 조정 가능한 치수를 가진 침수된 오리피스와 표면 노치의 동시 존재에 대한 Iberian barbel Luciobarbus bocagei (Steindachner, 1864)의 반응을 평가했습니다.

이 연구의 결과는 이베리아 바벨이 어로를 협상하기 위해 오리피스 (76 %)를 선호했으며 어로에 들어가는 데 걸리는 시간도 오리피스에 비해 훨씬 적다는 것을 보여주었습니다.

Silva et al. [39] 오프셋 및 직선 오리피스가있는 수영장 유형 어로의 이베리아 바벨에 대한 적합성을 테스트했습니다. 이 연구는 오프셋 구성이 직선 오리피스 레이아웃 (28 %)에 비해 물고기 통과 성공률 (68 %)이 훨씬 더 높음을 발견했습니다. 어로를 성공적으로 협상하는 데 걸리는 시간도 오프셋 구성, 특히 작은 성인의 경우 훨씬 더 낮았습니다.

이 연구에서는 유속과 난류 매개 변수가 물고기 수영 성능에 미치는 영향을 분석했습니다. 수영장의 유동장을 특성화하기 위해 음향 도플러 속도계가 사용되었습니다.

이 연구의 결과에 따르면 레이놀즈 전단 응력은 어로 내 이베리아 미늘의 움직임에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 매개 변수임이 입증되었습니다. Branco et al. [40] 두 가지 다른 흐름을 가진 오리피스와 노치가 있는 풀형 유형 어로에서 형태 학적 및 생태학적 특성이 다른 두 종, 바닥 지향 이베리아 바벨 Luciobarbus bocagei 및 물기둥 수영 자 Iberian chub Squalius pyrenaicus의 거동과 성능을 평가했습니다.

풀의 유체 역학을 특성화하기 위해 음향 도플러 속도계가 사용되었습니다. 결과는 두 종 모두 흐름 흐름이있는 노치를 선호했으며 이 흐름 체제로 상류로 이동하는데 더 성공적이었습니다.
이 연구에서는 이 시설의 1 : 2.5 스케일 어로 모델을 사용하여 Silva et al.에 의해 테스트된 바닥 오리피스 구성이 있는 풀형 유형 어로의 속도와 난류를 측정했습니다.

[7,38] 효과가 입증된 바벨 사용. 2D 입자 이미지 속도계 (PIV) 시스템 및 음향 도플러 속도계 (ADV)를 사용하여 순간 속도의 광범위한 측정을 수행하고, 후 처리하고, 수치 모델 정확도를 평가하는 데 사용했습니다.

Haque et al. [44] 대부분의 경우 수치 모델의 검증에 사용할 수있는 실험 데이터 세트에 높은 측정 오류가 있고 / 또는 측정 메시가 너무 거칠어 서 이들의 예측 기능을 올바르게 평가할 수없는 문제를 언급했습니다.

모델. Blocken과 Gualtieri [23]는 검증 및 검증 연구가 필수적이며 CFD 연구를 검증하기위한 데이터를 제공하기 위해 고품질 실험이 필요하다고 언급합니다.

Fuentes-Pérez et al. [35]는 특히 난류 메트릭에 대한 어로 연구에서 수치 모델 검증 데이터를 찾는 데 어려움을 언급합니다. 두 가지 측정 기술을 사용하고 상당한 양의 실험 데이터를 얻었기 때문에 이 연구에서는 이러한 문제를 극복했습니다.

물리적 모델은 종종 Froude 수 유사성을 기반으로하며, 두 유사성 법칙을 모두 충족하는 데 어려움이있어 무시되는 레이놀즈 수 유사성입니다. 프로토 타입 레이놀즈 수가 일반적으로 훨씬 더 크기 때문에 레이놀즈 수 관련 스케일 효과가 도입될 수 있습니다.

레이놀즈 수 증가는 속도 분포와 경계층 속성에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다 [45]. 척도 효과를 평가하기 위해 수치 시뮬레이션을 사용할 수 있습니다 [46,47]. 따라서 본 연구에서는 바닥 오리피스 흐름이있는 풀형어도에 대한 스케일 효과를 분석하기 위해 두 가지 크기의 수치 모델을 개발했습니다.

프로토 타입 치수의 대형 모델과 물리적 모델 치수의 스케일 된 소형 모델입니다. .
바닥 오리피스가있는 수영장 형 어로의 유동장은 수직 슬롯 어로 (VSF)의 유동장보다 매우 3 차원 적이며 훨씬 더 복잡합니다. 이는 어로 수치 모델 검증에 대한 이전 연구에서 더 자주 고려 된 설계입니다 [26, 27,28,29,35].

저자가 아는 한, 이것은 바닥 오리피스가있는 풀형 어로에 대한 최초의 CFD 연구이며, 여기에는 실험 속도 데이터와 풀형 어로에 대한 3 차원 수치 모델링 결과 간의 가장 광범위한 비교도 포함됩니다. 두 가지 다른 측정 기술 (PIV 및 ADV)이 사용되어 자세한 비교가 가능하고 이러한 유형의 유동장에 대한 CFD 시뮬레이션 결과에 대한 확신을 제공합니다.

이 연구는 다른 어로 유형의 이전 수치 모델 연구에서 제시되지 않았던 난류 매개 변수를 포함하여 수치 모델 결과와 측정 간의 일치에 대한 통계적 테스트를 통해 정성적 비교 뿐만 아니라 상세한 정량적 비교도 제공합니다. 스케일 효과도 다룹니다.

따라서 이 연구는 전 세계적으로 가장 많이 사용되는 풀 유형 어로의 CFD 모델 검증을 원활하게 할 것이며 [10] 설계자들의 사용을 장려 할 것입니다.
또한 새로운 풀 유형 어로 형상을 위한 설계 도구로 CFD 모델 (즉, FLOW 3D®)을 사용하는 방법에 대해 설명합니다.

Figure 1. Experimental flume used (a) Side view of the flume; (b) Pool detail.
Figure 1. Experimental flume used (a) Side view of the flume; (b) Pool detail.
Figure 2. Three dimensional representations of a pool showing the measurement planes and the acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) measurement grid (a) measurement planes parallel to the flume bottom; (b) vertical measurement planes (ADV measurement grid is only shown in one plane).
Figure 2. Three dimensional representations of a pool showing the measurement planes and the acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) measurement grid (a) measurement planes parallel to the flume bottom; (b) vertical measurement planes (ADV measurement grid is only shown in one plane).
Figure 3. Computational domain, showing Pool 3 mesh block.
Figure 3. Computational domain, showing Pool 3 mesh block.
Figure 4. Streamlines of time-averaged velocities (left: PIV; right: mesh Amodel): (a,b) plane 2 (z = 0.088 m); (c,d) plane 5 (y = 0.20 m).
Figure 4. Streamlines of time-averaged velocities (left: PIV; right: mesh Amodel): (a,b) plane 2 (z = 0.088 m); (c,d) plane 5 (y = 0.20 m).
Figure 5. Longitudinal variation of velocity components: (a,c,e) planes 1 and 6 intersection (y = 0.36 m and z = 0.04 m); (b,d,f) planes 2 and 5 intersection (y = 0.20 m and z = 0.088 m).
Figure 5. Longitudinal variation of velocity components: (a,c,e) planes 1 and 6 intersection (y = 0.36 m and z = 0.04 m); (b,d,f) planes 2 and 5 intersection (y = 0.20 m and z = 0.088 m).
Figure 6. Longitudinal variation of Reynolds normal stress components and Reynolds shear stress parallel to the bottom component: (a,c,e,g) planes 1 and 6 intersection (y = 0.36 m and z = 0.04m); (b,d,f,h) planes 2 and 5 intersection (y = 0.20 m and z = 0.088 m).
Figure 6. Longitudinal variation of Reynolds normal stress components and Reynolds shear stress parallel to the bottom component: (a,c,e,g) planes 1 and 6 intersection (y = 0.36 m and z = 0.04m); (b,d,f,h) planes 2 and 5 intersection (y = 0.20 m and z = 0.088 m).

References

  1. Santos, J.M.; Branco, P.J.; Silva, A.T.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.N.; Viseu, T.; Ferreira, M.T. Effect of two flow regimes on the upstream movements of the Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei) in an experimental pool-type fishway. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2012, 29, 425–430. [CrossRef]
  2. Williams, J.G.; Armstrong, G.; Katopodis, C.; Larinier, M.; Travade, F. Thinking like a fish: A key ingredient for development of
    effective fish passage facilities at river obstructions. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28, 407–417. [CrossRef]
  3. Noonan, M.J.; Grand, J.W.A.; Jackson, C.D. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish Fish. 2012, 13, 450–464. [CrossRef]
  4. Haro, A.; Kynard, B. Video Evaluation of Passage Efficiency of American Shad and Sea Lamprey in a Modified Ice Harbor Fishway. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1997, 17, 981–987. [CrossRef]
  5. Odeh, M.; Noreika, J.F.; Haro, A.; Maynard, A.; Castro-Santos, T. Evaluation of the Effects of Turbulence on the Behavior of Migratory Fish; Contract no. 00000022, Project no. 200005700 (BPA Report DOE/BP-00000022-1); Report to the Bonneville Power
    Administration: Portland, Oregon, 2002.
  6. Enders, E.C.; Boisclair, D.; Roy, A.G. The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juveniles of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003, 60, 1149–1160. [CrossRef]
  7. Silva, A.T.; Santos, J.M.; Ferreira, M.T.; Pinheiro, A.N.; Katopodis, C. Effects of water velocity and turbulence on the behaviour of Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei, Steindachner, 1864) in an experimental pool-type fishway. River Res. Appl. 2011, 27, 360–373. [CrossRef]
  8. Silva, A.T.; Katopodis, C.; Santos, J.M.; Ferreira, M.T.; Pinheiro, A.N. Cyprinid swimming behaviour in response to turbulent flow. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 44, 314–328. [CrossRef]
  9. Lacey, R.W.J.; Neary, V.S.; Liao, J.C.; Enders, E.C.; Tritico, H.M. The IPOS framework: Linking fish swimming performance in altered flows from laboratory experiments to rivers. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28, 429–443. [CrossRef]
  10. Santos, J.M.; Silva, A.T.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, P.J.; Pinheiro, A.N.; Bochechas, J.; Ferreira, M.T. Ecohydraulics of pool-type fishways: Getting past the barriers. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 48, 38–50. [CrossRef]
  11. Branco, P.J.; Santos, J.M.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.N.; Ferreira, M.T. Effect of flow regime hydraulics on passage performance of Iberian chub (Squalius pyrenaicus) (Günther, 1868) in an experimental pool-and-weir fishway. Hydrobiologia 2013, 714,
    145–154. [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, Z.; Andersson, H.I.; Dai, H.; Jiang, F.; Zhao, L. A new Eulerian-Lagrangian agent method to model fish paths in a vertical slot fishways. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 88, 217–225. [CrossRef]
  13. Rajaratnam, N.; Katopodis, C.; Mainali, M. Pool-orifice and pool-orifice-weir fishways. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 1989, 16, 774–777. [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, S.; Rajaratnam, N.; Katopodis, C. Structure of flow in vertical slot fishway. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1999, 125, 351–360. [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.H. Hydraulic characteristics by weir type in a pool-weir fishway. Ecol. Eng. 2001, 16, 425–433. [CrossRef]
  16. Ead, S.A.; Katopodis, C.; Sikora, G.J.; Rajaratnam, N. Flow regimes and structure in pool and weir fishways. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2004, 3, 379–390. [CrossRef]
  17. Puertas, J.; Pena, L.; Teijeiro, T. Experimental approach to the hydraulics of vertical slot fishways. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2004, 130,10–23. [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, M.; Rajaratnam, N.; Zhu, D.D. Mean flow and turbulence structure in vertical slot fishways. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2006, 132,765–777. [CrossRef]
  19. Yagci, O. Hydraulic aspects of pool-weir fishways as ecologically friendly water structure. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 36–46. [CrossRef]
  20. Tarrade, L.; Pineau, G.; Calluaud, D.; Texier, A.; David, L.; Larinier, M. Detailed experimental study of hydrodynamic turbulent flows generated in vertical slot fishways. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2011, 11, 1–21. [CrossRef]
  21. Calluaud, D.; Pineau, G.; Texier, A.; David, L. Modification of vertical slot fishway flow with a supplementary cylinder. J. Hydraul. Res. 2014, 52, 614–629. [CrossRef]
  22. Ballu, A.; Calluaud, D.; Pineau, G.; David, L. Experimental study of the influence of macro-roughnesses on vertical slot fishway flows. La Houille Blanche 2017, 2, 9–14. [CrossRef]
  23. Blocken, B.; Gualtieri, C. Ten iterative steps for model development and evaluation applied to computational fluid dynamics for
    environmental fluid mechanics. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 33, 1–22. [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Tejada-Martínez, A.E.; Zhang, Q. Developments in computational fluid dynamics-based modeling for disinfection
    technologies over the last two decades: A review. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 58, 71–85. [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, L.A. A Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Model Analysis of Free Surface Hydrodynamics and Fish Passage Energetics in a Vertical-Slot Fishway. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2006, 26, 255–267. [CrossRef]
  26. Cea, L.; Pena, L.; Puertas, J.; Vazquez-Cendon, M.E.; Peña, E. Application of several depth-averaged turbulence models to simulate flow in vertical slot fishways. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2007, 133, 160–172. [CrossRef]
  27. Barton, A.F.; Keller, R.J.; Katopodis, C. Verification of a numerical model for the prediction of low slope vertical slot fishway hydraulics. Aust. J. Water Res. 2009, 13, 53–60. [CrossRef]
  28. Chorda, J.; Maubourguet, M.M.; Roux, H.; George, J.; Larinier, M.; Tarrade, L.; David, L. Two-dimensional free surface flow numerical model for vertical slot fishways. J. Hydraul. Res. 2010, 48, 141–151. [CrossRef]
  29. Bombaˇc, M.; Novak, G.; Rodiˇc, P.; Cetina, M. Numerical and physical model study of a vertical slot fishway. ˇ J. Hydrol. Hydromech.
    2014, 62, 150–159. [CrossRef]
  30. Bombaˇc, M.; Novak, G.; Mlacnik, J.; Cetina, M. Extensive field measurements of flow in vertical slot fishway as data for validation ˇ of numerical simulations. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 84, 476–484. [CrossRef]
  31. Bombaˇc, M.; Cetina, M.; Novak, G. Study on flow characteristics in vertical slot fishways regarding slot layout optimization. ˇ Ecol.
    Eng. 2017, 107, 126–136. [CrossRef]
  32. Marriner, B.A.; Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Thiem, J.D.; Cooke, S.J.; Katopodis, C. Field and numerical assessment of turning pool hydraulics in a vertical slot fishway. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 63, 88–101. [CrossRef]
  33. Marriner, B.A.; Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Cooke, S.J.; Katopodis, C. The hydraulics of a vertical slot fishway: A case study on the multi-species Vianney-Legendre fishway in Quebec, Canada. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 190–202. [CrossRef]
  34. Quaranta, E.; Katopodis, C.; Revelli, R.; Comoglio, C. Turbulent flow field comparison and related suitability for fish passage of a standard and a simplified low-gradient vertical slot fishway. River Res. Appl. 2017, 33, 1295–1305. [CrossRef]
  35. Fuentes-Pérez, J.F.; Silva, A.T.; Tuhtan, J.A.; García-Vega, A.; Carbonell-Baeza, R.; Musall, M.; Kruusmaa, M. 3D modelling of
    non-uniform and turbulent flow in vertical slot fishways. Environ. Model. Softw. 2018, 99, 156–169. [CrossRef]
  36. Stamou, A.; Mitsopoulos, G.; Rutschmann, P.; Bui, M. Verification of a 3D CFD model for vertical slot fish-passes. Environ. Fluid
    Mech. 2018, 18, 1435–1461. [CrossRef]
  37. Sanagiotto, D.; Rossi, J.; Bravo, J. Applications of computational fluid dynamics in the design and rehabilitation of nonstandard
    vertical slot fishways. Water 2019, 11, 199. [CrossRef]
  38. Silva, A.T.; Santos, J.M.; Franco, A.C.; Ferreira, M.T.; Pinheiro, A.N. Selection of Iberian barbel Barbus bocagei (Steindachner, 1864)
    for orifices and notches upon different hydraulic configurations in an experimental pool-type fishway. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2009, 25,
    173–177. [CrossRef]
  39. Silva, A.T.; Santos, J.M.; Ferreira, M.T.; Pinheiro, A.N.; Katopodis, C. Passage efficiency of offset and straight orifices for upstream movements of Iberian barbel in a pool-type fishway. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28, 529–542. [CrossRef]
  40. Branco, P.; Santos, J.M.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.; Ferreira, M.T. Pool-Type Fishways: Two Different Morpho-Ecological Cyprinid Species Facing Plunging and Streaming Flows. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65089. [CrossRef]
  41. Romão, F.; Quaresma, A.L.; Branco, P.; Santos, J.M.; Amaral, S.; Ferreira, M.T.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.N. Passage performance
    of two cyprinids with different ecological traits in a fishway with distinct vertical slot configurations. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 105, 180–188. [CrossRef]
  42. Romão, F.; Branco, P.; Quaresma, A.L.; Amaral, S.; Pinheiro, A.N. Effectiveness of a multi-slot vertical slot fishway versus a standard vertical slot fishway for potamodromous cyprinids. Hydrobiologia 2018, 816, 153–163. [CrossRef]
  43. Romão, F.; Quaresma, A.L.; Santos, J.M.; Branco, P.; Pinheiro, A.N. Cyprinid passage performance in an experimental multislot fishway across distinct seasons. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2019, 70, 881–890. [CrossRef]
  44. Haque, M.M.; Constantinescu, G.; Weber, L. Validation of a 3D RANS model to predict flow and stratification effects related to fish passage at hydropower dams. J. Hydraul. Res. 2007, 45, 787–796. [CrossRef]
  45. Dargahi, B. Flow characteristics of bottom outlets with moving gates. J. Hydraul. Res. 2010, 48, 476–482. [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, W.; Yang, Q.; Xiao, H. CFD modelling of scale effects on turbulence flow and scour around bridge piers. Comput. Fluids 2009, 38, 1050–1058. [CrossRef]
  47. Heller, V. Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J. Hydraul. Res. 2011, 49, 293–306. [CrossRef]
  48. Larinier, M. Pool fishways, pre-barrages and natural bypass channels. Bull. Français de la Pêche et de la Piscic. 2002, 364, 54–82. [CrossRef]
  49. Quaresma, A.L.; Ferreira, R.M.L.; Pinheiro, A.N. Comparative analysis of particle image velocimetry and acoustic Doppler
    velocimetry in relation to a pool-type fishway flow. J. Hydraul. Res. 2017, 55, 582–591. [CrossRef]
  50. Flow Science, Inc. Flow-3D Version 11.2 User Manual; Flow Science, Inc.: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2016.
  51. Hirt, C.W.; Sicilian, J.M. A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Washington, DC, USA, 4 September 1985.
  52. Savage, B.M.; Johnson, M.C. Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2001, 127, 640–649. [CrossRef]
  53. Abad, J.D.; Rhoads, B.L.; Güneralp, I.; García, M.H. Flow structure at different stages in a meander-bend with bendway weirs. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134, 1052–1063. [CrossRef]
  54. Bombardelli, F.A.; Meireles, I.; Matos, J. Laboratory measurements and multi-block numerical simulations of the mean flow and
    turbulence in the non-aerated skimming flow region of steep stepped spillways. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2011, 11, 263–288. [CrossRef]
  55. Bayon, A.; Valero, D.; García-Bartual, R.; López-Jiménez, P.A. Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 80, 322–335. [CrossRef]
  56. Duguay, J.M.; Lacey, R.W.J.; Gaucher, J. A case study of a pool and weir fishway modeled with OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 103, 31–42. [CrossRef]
  1. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comp. Phys. 1981, 39, 201–225. [CrossRef]
  2. Van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J. Comp. Phys. 1977, 23, 276–299. [CrossRef]
  3. Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.; Freitas, C.J.; Coleman, H.; Raad, P.E. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due
    to Discretization in CFD Applications. J. Fluids Eng. 2008, 130, 078001 (4pages). [CrossRef]
  4. Smagorinsky, J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The Basic Experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 1963,
    91, 99–164. [CrossRef]
  5. Meyers, J.; Geurts, B.J.; Baelmans, M. Database analysis of errors in large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 2003, 15, 2740–2755.[CrossRef]
  6. Celik, I.B.; Cehreli, Z.N.; Yavuz, I. Index of Resolution Quality for Large Eddy Simulations. J. Fluids Eng. 2005, 127, 949–958. [CrossRef]
  7. Freitag, M.; Klein, M. An improved method to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering. J. Turbul. 2006, 7, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  8. Gousseau, P.; Blocken, B.; van Heijst, G.J.F. Quality assessment of Large-Eddy Simulation of wind flow around a high-rise building: Validation and solution verification. Comput. Fluids 2013, 79, 120–133. [CrossRef]
  9. Celik, I.; Li, J.; Hu, G.; Shaffer, C. Limitations of Richardson Extrapolation and Some Possible Remedies. J. Fluids Eng. 2005, 127, 795–805. [CrossRef]
  10. Pope, S.B. Turbulent Flows; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  11. Legates, D.R.; McCabe, G.J., Jr. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35, 233–241. [CrossRef]
  12. Bennett, N.D.; Crok, B.F.W.; Guariso, G.; Guillaume, J.H.A.; Hamilton, S.H.; Jakeman, A.J.; Marsili-Libelli, S.; Newhama, L.T.H.; Norton, J.P.; Perrin, C.; et al. Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 40, 1–20. [CrossRef]
  13. Willmott, C.J.; Robeson, S.M.; Matsuura, K. A refined index of model performance. Int. J. Climatol. 2012, 32, 2088–2094. [CrossRef]
  14. Lane, S.N.; Richards, K.S. The “validation” of hydrodynamic models: Some critical perspectives. In Model Validation for Hydrological
    and Hydraulic Research; Bates, P.D., Anderson, M.G., Eds.; John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 413–438.
  15. Bradbrook, K.F.; Biron, P.M.; Lane, S.N.; Richards, K.S.; Roy, A.G. Investigation of controls on secondary circulation in a simple confluence geometry using a three-dimensional numerical model. Hydrol. Process. 1998, 12, 1371–1396. [CrossRef]
  16. Bradbrook, K.F.; Lane, S.N.; Richards, K.S.; Biron, P.M.; Roy, A.G. Role of bed discordance at asymmetrical river confluences. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2001, 127, 351–368. [CrossRef]
  17. Ferguson, R.I.; Parsons, D.R.; Lane, S.N.; Hardy, R.J. Flow in meander bends with recirculation at the inner bank. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39, 1322–1334. [CrossRef]
  18. Haltigin, T.W.; Biron, P.M.; Lapointe, M.F. Predicting equilibrium scour-hole geometry near angled stream deflectors using a three-dimensional numerical flow model. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2007, 133, 983–988. [CrossRef]
  19. Haltigin, T.W.; Biron, P.M.; Lapointe, M.F. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of flow around stream deflectors: The effects of obstruction angle and length. J. Hydraul. Res. 2007, 45, 227–238. [CrossRef]
  20. Han, S.S.; Biron, P.M.; Ramamurthy, A.S. Three-dimensional modelling of flow in sharp open-channel bends with vanes. J. Hydraulic Res. 2011, 49, 64–72. [CrossRef]
  21. Klein, M. An Attempt to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2005, 75, 131–147. [CrossRef]
FLOW-3D 용어 사전 테이블

FLOW-3D Glossary | FLOW-3D 용어 사전

FLOW-3D 용어 사전 / 용어 설명

FLOW-3D 용어 사전 테이블
FLOW-3D 용어 사전 테이블

FLOW-3D 용어 사전 / 용어 설명

Drift Flux

드리프트 모델은 밀도가 서로 다른 두 혼합 유체 구성 요소의 상대적 흐름을 설명합니다. 구성 요소는 상이 다를 수도 있고, 상이 같지만(불가침) 유체가 다를 수도 있습니다. 분산된 위상 입자 크기가 클 경우 드리프트 모델의 적용성에 대한 제한이 존재할 수 있습니다. 이러한 제한은 일반적으로 메쉬 셀 크기의 10% 미만으로 분산된 위상 입자 크기를 유지함으로써 방지할 수 있습니다.

배플

얇은 형상 조각을 나타내는데 사용되는 2 차원 개체입니다. 이들은 전처리기에 의해 셀면으로 이동되고 유체의 흐름을 부분적으로 또는 완전히 차단하는 역할을 합니다. 배플은 지정된 열 전달 계수를 가질 수 있으며 배플을 통과하는 양(플럭스 표면)을 측정하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다.

Two-dimensional objects that are used to represent thin pieces of geometry. They are moved by the preprocessor to cell faces and act to partially, or completely block the flow of fluid. Baffles can have heat transfer coefficients specified and can be used to measure quantities that pass through them (a flux surface).

경계 조건

도메인의 범위에서 솔루션을 정의합니다. 경계 위치에서 흐름의 실제 상태를 나타내는 경계 조건을 선택하는 것이 중요합니다.

Defines the solution at the extents of the domain. It is important to choose boundary conditions that represent the true condition of the flow at the boundary location.

CFD

CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics)는 수치 솔루션을 통해 컴퓨터의 유체 흐름을 시뮬레이션 하는 유체 역학의 한 분야입니다.

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), the branch of fluid mechanics dedicated to simulating the flow of fluid on a computer via numerical solutions.

Complements

Complements를 정의합니다. 예를 들어, 솔리드 구의 complements는 솔리드 재료로 둘러싸인 구형 구멍입니다.

The inverse of a shape defines the complement. For example, the complement of a solid sphere is a spherical hole surrounded by solid material.

Client

클라이언트 컴퓨터는 자신이 FLOW-3D를 실행하고 있지만, FLOW-3D 소프트웨어 라이선스는 다른 컴퓨터 (서버 컴퓨터)에서 획득하는 컴퓨터를 의미합니다.

A client machine is a computer that runs FLOW-3D  but acquires the software license from a different machine (the server machine)

Components

Components는 공간의 개체를 정의하며 하위 구성 요소로 구성됩니다. 구성 요소는 열 전도율, 비열 및 표면 거칠기와 같은 재료 특성을 가질 수 있습니다.

Components define objects in space and are comprised of subcomponents. A component can have material properties such as thermal conductivity, specific heat and surface roughness.

Custom result

시뮬레이션 중 또는 완료 후 사용자가 생성한 데이터를 그래픽으로 표시합니다. 생성하려면 사용자가 flsgrf결과 파일을 연 다음 플로팅 매개 변수(예 : 플로팅 할 도메인 부분, 플로팅 할 수량 등)를 선택해야 합니다.

Graphical displays of data generated by the user during the simulation or after it has completed. To generate, the user must open an flsgrf results file and then select the plotting parameter (e.g., portion of domain to plot, quantity to plot, etc.).

Domain

지배 방정식을 풀 영역입니다. 이것은 메쉬의 범위에 의해 정의됩니다.

The region in which the governing equations are to be solved. This is defined by the extents of the mesh.

Diagnostics

전 처리기 및 솔버의 진행 상황과 오류 및 경고에 대한 정보가 포함된 파일 세트입니다.

A suite of files that contain information on the progress of the preprocessor and solver as well as errors and warnings.

EPSI

압력/연속 반복이 어느 지점에서 수렴되는지를 결정하는데 사용된 수렴 기준입니다. 기본 숫자 설정을 사용하면 이 값은 FLOW-3D에 의해 자동으로 계산되며 시간 단계가 증가함에 따라 작아집니다.

The convergence criterion that was used to determine at what point the pressure/continuity iterations have converged. With the default numerical settings, this value is automatically computed by FLOW-3D  and becomes smaller as the time step increases.

Existing result

prpplt.* 또는 flsplt.* 파일은 전처리 종료 솔버 실행 종료시 또는 자동으로 생성되는 플롯 파일입니다.

A plot file that is automatically created, either at the end of preprocessing or the end of the solver run- prpplt.* or flsplt.*.

F3D_HOME

FLOW-3D 프로그램 파일이 있는 디렉토리를 정의하는 환경 변수.

Environment variable that defines the directory where the FLOW-3D  program files are located.

Floating license

FLOW-3D는 서버 시스템에 라이센스를 액세스하는 각 클라이언트 컴퓨터와 컴퓨터 네트워크에서 실행합니다. 허용하는 라이센스 최대 동시 시뮬레이션 수는 구매한 솔버 토큰 수에 의해 제한됩니다.

A license that allows FLOW-3D  to be run on a network of computers with each client machine accessing the license on a server machine. The maximum number of concurrent simulations is limited by the number of solver tokens purchased.

Flsgrf file

솔버가 생성한 결과 파일. 이 파일은 사전에 정의된 시간 간격으로 생성된 정보를 포함하며 그래픽 디스플레이를 생성하는 데 사용됩니다. 사용자 정의 플로팅 중에 포스트 프로세서에서 사용합니다.

Results file produced by the solver. This file contains information produced at predefined time intervals and is used to produce graphical displays. Used by the postprocessor during custom plotting.

Flsplt file

솔버가 자동으로 생성한 플롯 파일입니다. 이 파일에는 시뮬레이션의 히스토리 데이터, 메시 등에 대한 기본 정보와의 $GRAFIC 이름 목록에 사전 정의된 그래픽 요청이 포함되어 prepin.* 파일 안에 있습니다.

Plot file produced automatically by the solver. This file contains basic information on history data, mesh, etc. from the simulation as well as any pre-defined graphics requests in the $GRAFIC namelist in prepin.*.

Fluid #1 surface area

선택한 길이 단위의 자유 표면 영역을 제곱 됩니다. 인터페이스가 예리한 문제에만 해당됩니다.

The free-surface area in the chosen length units squared. This is only relevant for problems with a sharp interface.

Fluid thermal energy

영역에 존재하는 모든 유체에 포함된 총 열 에너지 (에너지 전송이 켜져 있는 시뮬레이션에만 해당).

The total thermal energy contained by all the fluid present in the domain (relevant only for simulations with energy transport turned on).

Free surface

유체와 유체 사이의 인터페이스. FLOW-3D에서 이 인터페이스는 전단이 없는 것으로 가정되며, 이는 빈 공간에 있는 가스가 유체에 무시할 수 있는 트랙션을 발휘함을 의미한다.

The interface between fluid and void. In FLOW-3D , this interface is assumed to be shear-free, meaning that any gas in the void space exerted negligible traction on the fluid.

GUI

” Graphical User Interface”.  GUI는 사용자가 FLOW-3D를 제어할 수 있는 그래픽 패널, 대화 상자 및 창을 제공합니다.

“Graphical User Interface”. The GUI presents the graphical panels, dialog boxes and windows that allow the user to control FLOW-3D .

Iteration count

각 시간 단계에서 필요한 압력/연속 반복 횟수입니다. 압력/연속성 반복은 유체 볼륨이 유지되도록 하고 유체 전체에서 올바른 압력을 계산하는 데 필요합니다.

The number of pressure/continuity iterations required at each time step. The pressure/continuity iterations are necessary to ensure that the fluid volume is maintained and to compute the correct pressure throughout the fluid.

License file

사용자가 FLOW-3D 를 실행할 수 있도록 암호화된 정보가 포함된 Flow Science에서 제공하는 전자 파일 입니다.

Electronic file provided by Flow Science that contains encrypted information enabling the user to run FLOW-3D .

License server

플로팅 라이센스 시스템의 작동을 활성화하기 위해 FLEXlm 라이센스 소프트웨어가 설치된 시스템. FLOW-3D는 License Server에 설치할 필요가 없습니다.

Computer on which the FLEXlm licensing software is installed to enable the operation of a floating license system. FLOW-3D  does not need to be installed on the license server.

Licensing

FLOW-3D 실행을 제어하는 ​​FLEXlm 소프트웨어.

FLEXlm software that controls the running of FLOW-3D .

Max. residual

압력/연속성 반복의 최종 반복에서 연속성 방정식의 실제 발산. 이 값은 메시지가 나타나지 않는 한 일반적으로 epsi보다 작습니다 .

The actual divergence of the continuity equation on the final iteration of the pressure/continuity iterations. This value is usually smaller than epsi unless the message, pressure iteration did not converge in xxxx iterations appears.

Mean kinetic energy

모든 계산 셀의 운동 에너지의 합을 도메인에 존재하는 총 유체 질량으로 나눈 값입니다. 이 양이 시간이 지남에 따라 변하지 않으면 정상 상태에 도달했음을 나타내는 좋은 지표입니다.

The sum of kinetic energy of all the computational cells, divided by the total mass of fluid present in the domain. When this quantity ceases to change over time, it is a good indicator that steady-state has been reached.

Node-locked license

특정 컴퓨터에 고정된 라이센스. 노드 잠금 라이센스는 네트워크를 통해 액세스 할 수 없으므로 일반적으로 모든 작업을 한 컴퓨터에서 수행해야하는 경우에만 사용됩니다.

A license that is locked to a particular computer. A node-locked license cannot be accessed across a network, and so is typically only used when all work is to be done on one computer.

Non-inertial reference frame

가속화되는 참조 프레임. 비 관성 참조 프레임은 움직이는 컨테이너를 모방하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다.

A frame of reference that is accelerating. A non-inertial reference frame can be used to mimic a moving container.

Pltfsi

1D 및 2D 플롯을 생성하는 FLOW-3D에 포함된 그래픽 디스플레이 프로그램.

Graphics display program included with FLOW-3D  that produces 1D and 2D plots.

Postprocessor

FLOW-3D 내의 Postprocessor 프로그램은 FLOW-3D 또는 타사 시각화 프로그램에서 읽을 수 있는 데이터 파일을 생성하거나 타사 소프트웨어 프로그램에서 읽을 텍스트 데이터를 생성하는 솔버 출력 데이터를 처리하는 프로그램입니다.

The program within FLOW-3D  that processes the solver output data to produce data files that can be read by FLOW-3D ’s or third-party’s visualization programs, or produce text data to be read by third party software programs.

Prepin file

FLOW-3D 시뮬레이션을 실행하는데 필요한 모든 정보가 포함된 텍스트 파일 입니다. GUI를 사용하거나 텍스트 편집기를 사용하여 수동으로 작성할 수 있습니다.

Text file that contains all of the information necessary to create a FLOW-3D  simulation. It can be created using the GUI or manually with a text editor.

Preprocessor

솔버의 실행을 준비하기 위해 입력 파일을 기반으로 메쉬 및 초기 조건을 생성하는 FLOW-3D 내의 프로그램 입니다.

The program within FLOW-3D  that generates the mesh and initial conditions based on the input file in preparation for the running of the solver.

Prpgrf file

전처리기에 의해 생성된 결과 파일로 전 처리기의 정보를 포함하며 후 처리기에서 사용자 플롯을 생성하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 이 파일은 미리보기 버튼을 선택하거나 시뮬레이션에서 사전 프로세서(runpre 사용)를 실행하는 경우에만 실행됩니다.

Results file produced by the preprocessor. Contains information from the preprocessor and can be used by the postprocessor to create custom plots. This file is produced only when the Preview button is selected or if only the pre-processor is run on the simulation (using runpre).

Prpplt file

전처리기에 의해 자동으로 생성된 파일을 플롯 합니다. 메시, 구성 요소, 초기 조건 및 재료 특성에 대한 정보가 포함되어 있습니다.

Plot file produced automatically by the preprocessor. Contains information on meshing, components, initial conditions and material properties.

Restart simulation

이전 시뮬레이션에서 계속되는 시뮬레이션입니다. 이전 시뮬레이션의 결과는 다시 시작 시뮬레이션을 위한 초기 조건 및 (선택적으로) 경계 조건을 생성하는 데 사용됩니다.

A simulation which continues from a previous simulation. The results from the previous simulation are used to generate the initial conditions and (optionally) boundary conditions for the restart simulation.

Server

라이센스 서버를 호스팅하는 시스템

The machine that hosts the license server.

Stability limit

각 시간 단계에서 사용할 수 있는 최대 시간 단계. 더 큰 시간 단계는 수치적 불안정성과 비물리적 결과로 이어질 것이다.

The maximum time step that can be used during each time step. A larger time step will lead to numerical instabilities and nonphysical results.

STL (Stereolithography) File

.STL 파일 형식은 일련의 삼각형이 있는 솔리드 모델의 표면에 근접한 표준 데이터 전송 형식이다. 삼각형은 가장자리에서 결합해야 하며 일관된 방향을 가리키는 정규식이 있어야 한다.

The .STL file format is a standard data transmission format that approximates the surfaces of a solid model with a series of triangles. The triangles must join at the edges and must have normals that point in a consistent direction.

Solid fraction

응고된 영역의 유체 분율 (응고 모델이 켜져 있는 시뮬레이션에만 해당).

The fraction of fluid in the domain that has become solidified (relevant only for simulations where the solidification model has been turned on).

Solver

입력 파일에 정의된 흐름 문제를 시뮬레이션하는 방정식을 계산하는 FLOW-3D 내의 솔버 프로그램 입니다.

The program within FLOW-3D  that solves the system of equations that simulate the flow problem defined in the input file.

STL Viewer

스테레오리소그래피(STL) 파일을 표시하는 특수 유틸리티입니다. STL 파일은 CAD 소프트웨어로 제작되며 3 차원 객체의 표면을 형성하는 많은 삼각형으로 구성됩니다. 의 STL 뷰어 FLOW-3D는 메인 메뉴에서 유틸리티/STL 뷰어를 클릭하여 GUI를 통해 액세스 할 수 있습니다. 그러면 뷰어가 별도의 창에서 열립니다. 메쉬 및 형상 탭에서 STL 파일을 열고 볼 수도 있습니다.

A special utility that displays stereolithography (STL) files. STL files are produced by CAD software and are composed of many triangles that form the surface of a three-dimensional object. The STL Viewer in FLOW-3D  is accessible via the GUI by clicking Utilities/STL Viewer in the main menu. This causes the viewer to open in a separate window. STL files can also be opened and viewed in the Meshing and Geometry tab.

Subcomponents

하위 구성 요소는 구성 요소라고하는 더 큰 모양을 형성하기 위해 결합할 수 있는 기하학적 모양입니다. 하위 구성 요소는 재료를 추가하거나 (고체로) 다른 하위 구성 요소에서 재료를 제거하거나 (구멍으로) 또는 모양 외부에 재료를 추가하도록 정의할 수 있습니다.

Subcomponents are geometric shapes that can be combined to form larger shapes, called components. A subcomponent can be defined to add material (as solids), remove material from other subcomponents (as holes), or add material outside of the shape (as a complement).

Time-step size

계산에 사용된 실제 시간 단계. 이 값은 안정성 한계와 같거나 작을 수 있습니다.

The actual time step used in the computation. This value can be equal to or less than the stability limit.

Units

Units are based upon the values set for the physical properties. Items such as mesh block extents and cell lengths automatically conform to the units used for setting these physical properties.

단위는 물리적 특성에 설정된 값을 기반으로 합니다. 메쉬 블록 범위 및 셀 길이와 같은 항목은 이러한 물리적 속성을 설정하는 데 사용되는 단위를 자동으로 따릅니다.

Volume error (%)

주어진 시간에 도메인에 존재하는 총 유체의 백분율로 설명되지 않은 유체 부피의 백분율을 의미합니다. 따라서 단순히 총 부피가 작기 때문에 유체가 시스템 밖으로 배출되는 시뮬레이션에서 큰 비율의 부피 오류가 발생할 수 있습니다.

The percentage of fluid volume not accounted for as a percentage of the total fluid present in the domain at a given time. Therefore, a large percentage volume error can occur for simulations where fluid is draining out of the system simply because the total volume present is small.

Volume of fluid #1

선택한 길이 단위로 입방체에 존재하는 유체 #1의 총 부피입니다. 2 유체 문제의 경우, 유체 #2의 부피는 항상 도메인 부피에서 유체 #1의 부피를 뺀 값입니다.

The total volume of fluid #1 present in the system, in the chosen length units cubed. For two-fluid problems, the volume of fluid #2 is always the domain volume minus the volume of fluid #1.

Wall shear stress

FLOW-3D 옵션은 벽면 및 객체 인터페이스에서 전단 응력 계산을 켜거나 끌 수 있도록 해줍니다. “no-slip” 인터페이스의 효과를 모델링 하려면 벽면 전단 응력을 켜야 합니다.

The FLOW-3D  option that allows the user to turn on or off the computation of shear stress at wall and object interfaces. Wall shear stress must be turned on to model the effect of “no-slip” interfaces.

Workspace

작업 공간은 시뮬레이션 프로젝트를 위한 파일 컨테이너입니다. 작업 공간은 사용자가 FLOW-3D 뿐만 아니라 하드 드라이브에서도 작업을 구성하는 데 도움이 됩니다.

A workspace is a file container for simulation projects. Workspaces help the user organize their work, not only within FLOW-3D , but also on their hard drive.

FLOW-3D 및TruVOF는 미국 및 기타 국가에서 등록 상표입니다.

FLOW-3D 기술자료로 이동

Figure 9: Predicted three-dimensional spreading splats for a 90 µm diameter Nylon-11 droplet.

Effect of Substrate Roughness on Splatting Behavior of HVOF Sprayed Polymer Particles: Modeling and Experiments

International Thermal Spray Conference – ITSC-2006
Seattle, Washington, U.S.A., May 2006

M. Ivosevic, V. Gupta, R. A. Cairncross, T. E. Twardowski, R. Knight,
Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
J. A. Baldoni
Duke University, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

거친 표면에 대한 입자 충격 및 변형의 3 차원 모델이 HVOF 스프레이 폴리머 입자에 대해 개발되었습니다. 유체 흐름 및 입자 변형은 FLOW-3D® 소프트웨어를 사용하는 유체 부피 (VoF) 방법으로 예측되었습니다. 스플래팅(splatting) 및 최종 스플랫 모양(splat shapes)의 역학에 대한 거칠기의 영향은 몇 가지 프로토타입 거친 표면을 사용하여 탐색 되었습니다 (예: 단계와 그루브)

또한 실제 그릿 블라스팅(grit blasted)된 강철 표면의 광학 간섭 측정에 의해 생성된 보다 사실적인 거친 표면의 수치 표현도 모델에 통합되었습니다. 예측된 스플랫 모양을 그릿 블라스팅 된 강철 기판에 증착된 나일론 11 스플랫의 SEM 이미지와 비교했습니다. 거친 기판은 부드러운 기판의 스플래팅 시뮬레이션에서 거의 관찰되지 않는 손가락 및 기타 비대칭 3 차원 불안정성을 생성했습니다.

Introduction

기판 거칠기가 용사 코팅의 접착력과 접착력을 향상 시킨다는 사실은 잘 알려져 있으며 일반적으로 받아 들여지고 있습니다 [1]. 스프레이하기 전에 기판 표면은 일반적으로 알루미나 또는 SiC와 같은 50 – 300 µm 각 세라믹 입자로 그릿 블라스팅으로 거칠게 처리됩니다.

기판 표면에 증착된 초기 스플랫의 형태는 코팅 / 기판 인터페이스의 무결성과 결과 코팅의 접착 강도에 중요한 역할을합니다. 단단하고 불규칙한 표면에 대한 열 스프레이 액적의 충격 및 변형은 액적 표면의 복잡한 대규모 3 차원 변형이 특징입니다.

충돌하는 물방울의 “스플래싱”이 발생하는 경우, 운지법 또는 위성 입자 생성 및 분리 중 새로운 표면 생성은 일반적으로 축 대칭이 아니므로 사실적인 splat 예측을 위해 3 차원 모델이 필요합니다. 이것은 정확한 3 차원 스플래팅 모델의 개발에 많은 수치적 도전을 야기합니다.

Fauchais et al. [2]는 스플랫 형성 과정과 관련하여 발표 된 논문의 대부분 (~ 98 %)이 매끄러운 표면에 대한 정상적인 액적 충격을 설명한다고보고했습니다. 게시된 작업의 2 % 미만은 매끄러운 표면에 대한 비정상적인 입자 영향과 관련이 있으며 ~ 0.1 %만이 거친 기판과 관련됩니다.

여러 저자 [3, 4]는 2 차원 모델을 사용하여 비평면 표면과 물방울의 상호 작용을 연구했거나 평행 그루브가 있는 표면에 대한 3 차원 충격 [5]을 연구했습니다. 그러나 이 접근법의 주요 단점은 거친 표면에 스플래팅의 비축 대칭 측면을 연구합니다.

최근 Raessi et al. [6] 이전에 개발된 VoF 모델 [7]을 확장하여 평평한 기판에 액적 스플래팅을 프로토 타입 거친 표면과 액적 상호 작용으로 확장했습니다. 표면 거칠기는 규칙적으로 정렬 된 정사각형 블록으로 근사화 되었습니다. Feng et al. [8]은 평평한 표면의 마찰 조건에 의해 표면 거칠기가 근사된 3 차원 Lagrangian 유한 요소 모델을 사용했습니다.

이 접근 방식은 소규모 점성 및 축 대칭 자유 표면 흐름과 관련하여 매우 정확할 수 있지만 fingering 생성 또는 satellites 생성 및 breakups 중 새로운 표면 생성과 관련된 물방울이 튀기는 경계 맞춤 기술에 적합하지 않습니다.

또한, 열 분무에 사용되는 그릿 블라스팅 표면의 평균 표면 거칠기 (Ra)는 일반적으로 50μm의 평균 액적 크기에 비해 ~ 5 ~ 30 % (~ 2 ~ 15μm)입니다. 평평한 표면에 간단한 마찰 흐름.

본 연구의 목표는 임의의 거친 기질에 영향을 미치는 HVOF 분무 중합체 입자의 모델을 개발하는 것이다. 매끄럽지 않은 표면에 대한 입자 분할 모델은 표면의 기하학적 불규칙성이 분할 거동과 최종 분할 형태에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 더 잘 이해할 수 있게 해줄 것입니다.

HVOF 제트에서 미크론 크기의 공급 원료 입자로의 강제 대류는 높은 대류 열 전달 계수 (h ~ 5000 – 17,000 W / (m2 K))를 특징으로 합니다. 이로 인해 입자 표면 온도가 급격히 증가하지만 폴리머 입자의 높은 내부 열 저항 (높은 Bi 수)은 입자 내부가 동일한 속도로 가열되는 것을 방지합니다. 결과적으로 더 큰 (예 : 90 µm 직경) 나일론 11 입자는 기판에 충격을 주기 전에 코어와 표면 사이에 급격한 온도 구배를 나타냅니다 (그림 1) [9, 10, 11].

Figure 1: Temperature of a 90 µm diameter Nylon 11 particle with respect to normalized particle radius (r/R) [10].
Figure 1: Temperature of a 90 µm diameter Nylon 11 particle with respect to normalized particle radius (r/R) [10].
Figure 2: (a) Velocity field within a spreading 90 µm diameter particle; (Left): velocity magnitude, (Right): velocity vectors, (b) example Nylon 11 splat deposited via swipe test onto a room temperature glass slide.
Figure 2: (a) Velocity field within a spreading 90 µm diameter particle; (Left): velocity magnitude, (Right): velocity vectors, (b) example Nylon 11 splat deposited via swipe test onto a room temperature glass slide.

또한 가파른 내부 온도 구배를 가진 HVOF 스프레이 폴리머 입자가 얇은 디스크 중앙에 크고 거의 반구형 인 코어가있는 특징적인 “튀김 달걀”모양으로 퍼졌다고 보고되었습니다 [10]. 이 모양은 저온, 고점도 코어와 고온, 저점도 표면의 유동 특성 간에 큰 방사형 차이가 있음을 나타냅니다.

변형된 입자의 예측 된 모양 (그림 2a)은 유리 슬라이드에 증착된 실험적으로 관찰 된 스플랫과 좋은 질적 일치를 나타 냈습니다 (그림 2b). 액적의 오른쪽에 표시된 속도 장 벡터 (그림 2a)는 저점도 “피부”가 고점도 코어 주위를 흐르면서 특징적인 “튀김 달걀” splat 모양이 형성되었음을 나타냅니다.

이 작업에서 보고된 실험 중에 사용된 HVOF 스프레이 매개 변수는 나일론 11을 증착하는데 사용할 수 있는 일반적인 HVOF 스프레이 매개 변수를 나타냅니다. 그러나 실험 기준 매개 변수를 중심으로 개발된 수치 모델은 개별 스플랫의 흐름 거동을 더 잘 이해하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 증착 효율 향상을 위한 공정 최적화를 지원합니다.

Figure 3: Boundary conditions, initial conditions and crosssection of a typical mesh used in Flow-3D
Figure 3: Boundary conditions, initial conditions and crosssection of a typical mesh used in Flow-3D
Figure 5: Cross section of four steel substrates: (a) polished with ~1 Pm alumina suspension, (b) grit blasted with #120 grit, (c) grit blasted with #50 grit, (d) grit blasted with #12 grit. Top image shows optical interferometry scan of # 120 grit blasted surface.
Figure 5: Cross section of four steel substrates: (a) polished with ~1 Pm alumina suspension, (b) grit blasted with #120 grit, (c) grit blasted with #50 grit, (d) grit blasted with #12 grit. Top image shows optical interferometry scan of # 120 grit blasted surface.
Figure 6: Nylon-11 splats deposited during a single run over steel substrates with roughnesses as per Figure 5.
Figure 6: Nylon-11 splats deposited during a single run over steel substrates with roughnesses as per Figure 5.
Figure 7: Nylon-11 splat on a grit blasted steel substrate, (a) close up of a peripheral splat finger.
Figure 7: Nylon-11 splat on a grit blasted steel substrate, (a) close up of a peripheral splat finger.
Figure 8: Cross-sections of predicted three-dimensional spreading splats for a 90 µm diameter Nylon-11 particle on four different surface roughnesses (dimensionless time t* = t/(D/v o (p))).
Figure 8: Cross-sections of predicted three-dimensional spreading splats for a 90 µm diameter Nylon-11 particle on four different surface roughnesses (dimensionless time t* = t/(D/v o (p))).
Figure 9: Predicted three-dimensional spreading splats for a 90 µm diameter Nylon-11 droplet.
Figure 9: Predicted three-dimensional spreading splats for a 90 µm diameter Nylon-11 droplet.

중략…….

References

  1. Davis, J. R., (Ed.) et al, Handbook of Thermal Spray Technology, ASM International®, 1st Ed., Materials Park,
    OH, (2004).
  2. Fauchais, P., Fukomoto, M., Vardelle, A. and Vardelle, M., Knowledge Concerning Splat Formation: An Invited
    Review, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 13 (3), pp. 337 – 360, (2004).
  3. Liu, H., Lavernia, E. J. and Rangel, R. H., Modeling of Molten Droplet Impingement on a Non-flat Surface, Acta
    Metall. Mater, 43(5), pp. 2053 – 2072, (1995).
  4. Sobolev, V. V., Guilemany, J. M. and Martin, A. J., Influence of Surface Roughness on the Flattening of
    Powder Particles during Thermal Spraying, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 5(2), pp. 207 – 214, (1996).
    5 Patanker, N. A. and Chen, Y., Numerical Simulation of Droplet Shapes on Rough Surfaces, Proc. Int. Conference
    on Modeling and Simulations of Microsystems – MSM 2002, pp. 116 – 119, (2002)
    6 Raessi, M., Mostaghimi, J. and Bussmann, M., “Droplet Impact during the Plasma Spray Coating Process-Effect of
    Surface Roughness on Splat Shapes,” Proc. 17th Int. Symposium on Plasma Chemistry – ISPC 17, Toronto,
    Canada, (2005)
    7 Pasandideh-Fard, M., Chandra, S. and Mostaghimi, J., A Three-dimensional Model of Droplet Impact and
    Solidification, Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 2229 – 2242, (2002).
    8 Feng, Z. G., Domaszewski, M., Montavon, G. and Coddet, C., Finite Element Analysis of Effect of Substrate Surface
    Roughness on Liquid Droplet Impact and Flattening Process, J. of Thermal Spray Technology, 11(1), pp. 62-68,
    (2002).
    9 Petrovicova, E., “Structure and Properties of Polymer Nanocomposite Coatings Applied by the HVOF Process,”
    Ph.D. Dissertation, Drexel University, (1999).
    10 Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A., Knight, R., Impact Modeling of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Particles, Proc.
    ITSC-2005 International Thermal Spray Conference, DVS/IIW/ASM-TSS, Basel, Switzerland, (2005).
    11 Bao, Y., Gawne, D. T. and Zhang, T., The Effect of Feedstock Particle Size on the Heat transfer Rates and
    Properties of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Coatings, Trans. I. M. F., 73(4), pp 119 – 124, (1998).
    12 Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A. and Knight, R., “Heating and Impact Modeling of HVOF Sprayed Polymer
    Particles,” Proc. 2004 International Thermal Spray Conference (ITSC-2004), DVS/IIW/ASM-TSS, Osaka,
    Japan, (2004).
    13 Hirt, C. W. and Nichols, B. D., Volume of Fluid (VoF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries, Journal of
    Computational Physics, 39, pp. 201 – 225, (1981).
Figure 1.1: A water droplet with a radius of 1 mm resting on a glass substrate. The surface of the droplet takes on a spherical cap shape. The contact angle θ is defined by the balance of the interfacial forces.

Effect of substrate cooling and droplet shape and composition on the droplet evaporation and the deposition of particles

기판 냉각 및 액적 모양 및 조성이 액적 증발 및 입자 증착에 미치는 영향

by Vahid Bazargan
M.A.Sc., Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2008
B.Sc., Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 2006
B.Sc., Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 2006

고착 방울은 평평한 기판에 놓인 액체 방울입니다. 작은 고정 액적이 증발하는 동안 액적의 접촉선은 고정된 접촉 영역이 있는 고정된 단계와 고정된 접촉각이 있는 고정 해제된 단계의 두 가지 단계를 거칩니다. 고정된 접촉 라인이 있는 증발은 액적 내부에서 접촉 라인을 향한 흐름을 생성합니다.

이 흐름은 입자를 운반하고 접촉 선 근처에 침전시킵니다. 이로 인해 일반적으로 관찰되는 “커피 링”현상이 발생합니다. 이 논문은 증발 과정과 고착성 액적의 증발 유도 흐름에 대한 연구를 제공하고 콜로이드 현탁액에서 입자의 침착에 대한 통찰력을 제공합니다. 여기서 우리는 먼저 작은 고착 방울의 증발을 연구하고 증발 과정에서 기판의 열전도도의 중요성에 대해 논의합니다.

현재 증발 모델이 500µm 미만의 액적 크기에 대해 심각한 오류를 생성하는 방법을 보여줍니다. 우리의 모델에는 열 효과가 포함되어 있으며, 특히 증발 잠열의 균형을 맞추기 위해 액적에 열을 제공하는 기판의 열전도도를 포함합니다. 실험 결과를 바탕으로 접촉각의 진화와 관련된 접촉 선의 가상 움직임을 정의하여 고정 및 고정 해제 단계의 전체 증발 시간을 고려합니다.

우리의 모델은 2 % 미만의 오차로 500 µm보다 작은 물방울에 대한 실험 결과와 일치합니다. 또한 유한한 크기의 라인 액적의 증발을 연구하고 증발 중 접촉 라인의 복잡한 동작에 대해 논의합니다. 에너지 공식을 적용하고 접촉 선이 구형 방울의 후퇴 접촉각보다 높은 접촉각을 가진 선 방울의 두 끝에서 후퇴하기 시작 함을 보여줍니다. 그리고 라인 방울 내부의 증발 유도 흐름을 보여줍니다.

마지막으로, 계면 활성제 존재 하에서 접촉 라인의 거동을 논의하고 입자 증착에 대한 Marangoni 흐름 효과에 대해 논의합니다. 열 Marangoni 효과는 접촉 선 근처에 증착 된 입자의 양에 영향을 미치며, 기판 온도가 낮을수록 접촉 선 근처에 증착되는 입자의 양이 많다는 것을 알 수 있습니다.

Figure 1.1: A water droplet with a radius of 1 mm resting on a glass substrate. The surface of the droplet takes on a spherical cap shape. The contact angle θ is defined by the balance of the interfacial forces.
Figure 1.1: A water droplet with a radius of 1 mm resting on a glass substrate. The surface of the droplet takes on a spherical cap shape. The contact angle θ is defined by the balance of the interfacial forces.
Figure 2.1: Evaporation modes of sessile droplets on a substrate: (a) evaporation at constant contact angle (de-pinned stage) and (b) evaporation at constant contact area (pinned stage)
Figure 2.1: Evaporation modes of sessile droplets on a substrate: (a) evaporation at constant contact angle (de-pinned stage) and (b) evaporation at constant contact area (pinned stage)
Figure 2.2: A sessil droplet with its image can be profiled as the equiconvex lens formed by two intersecting spheres with radius of a.
Figure 2.2: A sessil droplet with its image can be profiled as the equiconvex lens formed by two intersecting spheres with radius of a.
Figure 2.3: The droplet life time for both evaporation modes derived from Equation 2.2.
Figure 2.3: The droplet life time for both evaporation modes derived from Equation 2.2.
Figure 2.4: A probability of escape for vapor molecules at two different sites of the surface of the droplet for diffusion controlled evaporation. The random walk path initiated from a vapor molecule is more likely to result in a return to the surface if the starting point is further away from the edge of the droplet.
Figure 2.4: A probability of escape for vapor molecules at two different sites of the surface of the droplet for diffusion controlled evaporation. The random walk path initiated from a vapor molecule is more likely to result in a return to the surface if the starting point is further away from the edge of the droplet.
Figure 2.5: Schematic of the sessile droplet on a substrate
Figure 2.5: Schematic of the sessile droplet on a substrate. The evaporation rate at the surface of the droplet is enhanced toward the edge of the droplet.
Figure 2.6: The domain mesh (a) and the solution of the Laplace equation for diffusion of the water vapor molecule with the concentration of Cv = 1.9×10−8 g/mm3 at the surface of the droplet into the ambient air with the relative humidity of 55%, i.e. φ = 0.55 (b).
Figure 2.6: The domain mesh (a) and the solution of the Laplace equation for diffusion of the water vapor molecule with the concentration of Cv = 1.9×10−8 g/mm3 at the surface of the droplet into the ambient air with the relative humidity of 55%, i.e. φ = 0.55 (b).
Figure 3.1: The portable micro printing setup. A motorized linear stage from Zaber Technologies Inc. was used to control the place and speed of the micro nozzle.
Figure 3.1: The portable micro printing setup. A motorized linear stage from Zaber Technologies Inc. was used to control the place and speed of the micro nozzle.
Figure 4.6: Temperature contours inside the substrate adjacent to the droplet
Figure 4.6: Temperature contours inside the substrate adjacent to the droplet
Figure 4.7: The effect of substrate cooling on the evaporation rate, the basic model shows the same value for all substrates.
Figure 4.7: The effect of substrate cooling on the evaporation rate, the basic model shows the same value for all substrates.

Bibliography

[1] R. G. Picknett and R. Bexon, “The evaporation of sessile or pendant drops in still air,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 61, pp. 336–350, Sept. 1977. → pages viii, 8, 9, 18, 42
[2] H. Y. Erbil, “Evaporation of pure liquid sessile and spherical suspended drops: A review,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 170, pp. 67–86, Jan. 2012. → pages 1
[3] R. Sharma, C. Y. Lee, J. H. Choi, K. Chen, and M. S. Strano, “Nanometer positioning, parallel alignment, and placement of single anisotropic nanoparticles using hydrodynamic forces in cylindrical droplets,” Nano Lett., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 2693–2700, 2007. → pages 1, 54, 71
[4] S. Tokonami, H. Shiigi, and T. Nagaoka, “Review: Micro- and nanosized molecularly imprinted polymers for high-throughput analytical applications,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 641, pp. 7–13, May 2009. →pages 71
[5] A. A. Sagade and R. Sharma, “Copper sulphide (CuxS) as an ammonia gas sensor working at room temperature,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 133, pp. 135–143, July 2008. → pages
[6] W. R. Small, C. D. Walton, J. Loos, and M. in het Panhuis, “Carbon nanotube network formation from evaporating sessile drops,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, pp. 13029–13036, July 2006. → pages 71
[7] S. H. Ko, H. Lee, and K. H. Kang, “Hydrodynamic flows in electrowetting,” Langmuir, vol. 24, pp. 1094–1101, Feb. 2008. → pages 42
[8] T. T. Nellimoottil, P. N. Rao, S. S. Ghosh, and A. Chattopadhyay, “Evaporation-induced patterns from droplets containing motile and nonmotile bacteria,” Langmuir, vol. 23, pp. 8655–8658, Aug. 2007. → pages 1
[9] R. Sharma and M. S. Strano, “Centerline placement and alignment of anisotropic nanotubes in high aspect ratio cylindrical droplets of nanometer diameter,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 6065, 2009. → pages 1, 54, 71
[10] V. Dugas, J. Broutin, and E. Souteyrand, “Droplet evaporation study applied to DNA chip manufacturing,” Langmuir, vol. 21, pp. 9130–9136, Sept. → pages 2, 71
[11] Y.-C. Hu, Q. Zhou, Y.-F. Wang, Y.-Y. Song, and L.-S. Cui, “Formation mechanism of micro-flows in aqueous poly(ethylene oxide) droplets on a substrate at different temperatures,” Petroleum Science, vol. 10, pp. 262–268, June 2013. → pages 2, 34, 54
[12] T.-S. Wong, T.-H. Chen, X. Shen, and C.-M. Ho, “Nanochromatography driven by the coffee ring effect,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, pp. 1871–1873, Mar. 2011. → pages 71
[13] J.-H. Kim, S.-B. Park, J. H. Kim, and W.-C. Zin, “Polymer transports inside evaporating water droplets at various substrate temperatures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, pp. 15375–15383, Aug. 2011. → pages 54
[14] S. Choi, S. Stassi, A. P. Pisano, and T. I. Zohdi, “Coffee-ring effect-based three dimensional patterning of Micro/Nanoparticle assembly with a single droplet,” Langmuir, vol. 26, pp. 11690–11698, July 2010. → pages
[15] D. Wang, S. Liu, B. J. Trummer, C. Deng, and A. Wang, “Carbohydrate microarrays for the recognition of cross-reactive molecular markers of microbes and host cells,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 20, pp. 275–281, Mar. PMID: 11875429. → pages 2, 54, 71
[16] H. K. Cammenga, “Evaporation mechanisms of liquids,” Current topics in materials science, vol. 5, pp. 335–446, 1980. → pages 3
[17] C. Snow, “Potential problems and capacitance for a conductor bounded by two intersecting spheres,” Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, vol. 43, p. 337, 1949. → pages 9
[18] R. D. Deegan, O. Bakajin, T. F. Dupont, G. Huber, S. R. Nagel, and T. A. Witten, “Contact line deposits in an evaporating drop,” Physical Review E, vol. 62, p. 756, July 2000. → pages 10, 14, 18, 27, 53, 54, 71, 84
[19] H. Hu and R. G. Larson, “Evaporation of a sessile droplet on a substrate,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, pp. 1334–1344, Feb. 2002. → pages 12, 18, 29, 43, 44, 48, 49, 53, 61, 71, 84
[20] Y. O. Popov, “Evaporative deposition patterns: Spatial dimensions of the deposit,” Physical Review E, vol. 71, p. 036313, Mar. 2005. → pages 14, 27, 43, 44, 45, 54
[21] H. Gelderblom, A. G. Marin, H. Nair, A. van Houselt, L. Lefferts, J. H. Snoeijer, and D. Lohse, “How water droplets evaporate on a superhydrophobic substrate,” Physical Review E, vol. 83, no. 2, p. 026306,→ pages
[22] F. Girard, M. Antoni, S. Faure, and A. Steinchen, “Influence of heating temperature and relative humidity in the evaporation of pinned droplets,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 323, pp. 36–49, June 2008. → pages 18
[23] Y. Y. Tarasevich, “Simple analytical model of capillary flow in an evaporating sessile drop,” Physical Review E, vol. 71, p. 027301, Feb. 2005. → pages 19, 54, 62, 72
[24] A. J. Petsi and V. N. Burganos, “Potential flow inside an evaporating cylindrical line,” Physical Review E, vol. 72, p. 047301, Oct. 2005. → pages 22, 55, 62, 68, 71
[25] A. J. Petsi and V. N. Burganos, “Evaporation-induced flow in an inviscid liquid line at any contact angle,” Physical Review E, vol. 73, p. 041201, Apr.→ pages 23, 53, 55, 72
[26] H. Masoud and J. D. Felske, “Analytical solution for stokes flow inside an evaporating sessile drop: Spherical and cylindrical cap shapes,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 21, pp. 042102–042102–11, Apr. 2009. → pages 23, 55, 62, 71, 72
[27] H. Hu and R. G. Larson, “Analysis of the effects of marangoni stresses on the microflow in an evaporating sessile droplet,” Langmuir, vol. 21, pp. 3972–3980, Apr. 2005. → pages 24, 28, 53, 54, 56, 62, 68, 71, 72, 74, 84
[28] R. Bhardwaj, X. Fang, and D. Attinger, “Pattern formation during the evaporation of a colloidal nanoliter drop: a numerical and experimental study,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, p. 075020, July 2009. → pages 28
[29] A. Petsi, A. Kalarakis, and V. Burganos, “Deposition of brownian particles during evaporation of two-dimensional sessile droplets,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 65, pp. 2978–2989, May 2010. → pages 28
[30] J. Park and J. Moon, “Control of colloidal particle deposit patterns within picoliter droplets ejected by ink-jet printing,” Langmuir, vol. 22, pp. 3506–3513, Apr. 2006. → pages 28
[31] H. Hu and R. G. Larson, “Marangoni effect reverses coffee-ring depositions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, pp. 7090–7094, Apr. 2006. → pages 29, 74
[32] K. H. Kang, S. J. Lee, C. M. Lee, and I. S. Kang, “Quantitative visualization of flow inside an evaporating droplet using the ray tracing method,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 1104–1112, June 2004. → pages 34
[33] S. T. Beyer and K. Walus, “Controlled orientation and alignment in films of single-walled carbon nanotubes using inkjet printing,” Langmuir, vol. 28, pp. 8753–8759, June 2012. → pages 42, 71
[34] G. McHale, “Surface free energy and microarray deposition technology,” Analyst, vol. 132, pp. 192–195, Feb. 2007. → pages 42
[35] R. Bhardwaj, X. Fang, P. Somasundaran, and D. Attinger, “Self-assembly of colloidal particles from evaporating droplets: Role of DLVO interactions and proposition of a phase diagram,” Langmuir, vol. 26, pp. 7833–7842, June→ pages 42
[36] G. J. Dunn, S. K. Wilson, B. R. Duffy, S. David, and K. Sefiane, “The strong influence of substrate conductivity on droplet evaporation,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 623, no. 1, p. 329351, 2009. → pages 44
[37] M. S. Plesset and A. Prosperetti, “Flow of vapour in a liquid enclosure,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 78, pp. 433–444, 1976. → pages 44
[38] S. Das, P. R. Waghmare, M. Fan, N. S. K. Gunda, S. S. Roy, and S. K. Mitra, “Dynamics of liquid droplets in an evaporating drop: liquid droplet coffee stain? effect,” RSC Advances, vol. 2, pp. 8390–8401, Aug. 2012. → pages 53
[39] B. J. Fischer, “Particle convection in an evaporating colloidal droplet,” Langmuir, vol. 18, pp. 60–67, Jan. 2002. → pages 54
[40] J. L. Wilbur, A. Kumar, H. A. Biebuyck, E. Kim, and G. M. Whitesides, “Microcontact printing of self-assembled monolayers: applications in microfabrication,” Nanotechnology, vol. 7, p. 452, Dec. 1996. → pages 54
[41] T. Kawase, H. Sirringhaus, R. H. Friend, and T. Shimoda, “Inkjet printed via-hole interconnections and resistors for all-polymer transistor circuits,” Advanced Materials, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 16011605, 2001. → pages 71
[42] B.-J. de Gans, P. C. Duineveld, and U. S. Schubert, “Inkjet printing of polymers: State of the art and future developments,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 203213, 2004. → pages 71
[43] H. Sirringhaus, T. Kawase, R. H. Friend, T. Shimoda, M. Inbasekaran, W. Wu, and E. P. Woo, “High-resolution inkjet printing of all-polymer transistor circuits,” Science, vol. 290, pp. 2123–2126, Dec. 2000. PMID:→ pages
[44] D. Soltman and V. Subramanian, “Inkjet-printed line morphologies and temperature control of the coffee ring effect,” Langmuir, vol. 24, pp. 2224–2231, Mar. 2008. → pages 54
[45] R. Tadmor and P. S. Yadav, “As-placed contact angles for sessile drops,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 317, pp. 241–246, Jan. 2008. → pages 56
[46] J. Drelich, “The significance and magnitude of the line tension in three-phase (solid-liquid-fluid) systems,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 116, pp. 43–54, Sept. 1996. → pages 56
[47] R. Tadmor, “Line energy, line tension and drop size,” Surface Science, vol. 602, pp. L108–L111, July 2008. → pages 69
[48] C.-H. Choi and C.-J. C. Kim, “Droplet evaporation of pure water and protein solution on nanostructured superhydrophobic surfaces of varying heights,” Langmuir, vol. 25, pp. 7561–7567, July 2009. → pages 71
[49] K. F. Baughman, R. M. Maier, T. A. Norris, B. M. Beam, A. Mudalige, J. E. Pemberton, and J. E. Curry, “Evaporative deposition patterns of bacteria from a sessile drop: Effect of changes in surface wettability due to exposure to a laboratory atmosphere,” Langmuir, vol. 26, pp. 7293–7298, May 2010.
[50] D. Brutin, B. Sobac, and C. Nicloux, “Influence of substrate nature on the evaporation of a sessile drop of blood,” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 134, pp. 061101–061101, May 2012. → pages 71
[51] D. Pech, M. Brunet, P.-L. Taberna, P. Simon, N. Fabre, F. Mesnilgrente, V. Condra, and H. Durou, “Elaboration of a microstructured inkjet-printed carbon electrochemical capacitor,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 195, pp. 1266–1269, Feb. 2010. → pages 71
[52] J. Bachmann, A. Ellies, and K. Hartge, “Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 231232, pp. 66–75, May 2000. → pages 71
[53] H. Y. Erbil, G. McHale, and M. I. Newton, “Drop evaporation on solid surfaces: constant contact angle mode,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 2636–2641, 2002. → pages
[54] X. Fang, B. Li, J. C. Sokolov, M. H. Rafailovich, and D. Gewaily, “Hildebrand solubility parameters measurement via sessile drops evaporation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, pp. 094103–094103–3, Aug.→ pages
[55] Y. C. Jung and B. Bhushan, “Wetting behaviour during evaporation and condensation of water microdroplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 229, no. 1, p. 127140, 2008. → pages 71
[56] J. Drelich, J. D. Miller, and R. J. Good, “The effect of drop (bubble) size on advancing and receding contact angles for heterogeneous and rough solid surfaces as observed with sessile-drop and captive-bubble techniques,”
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 179, pp. 37–50, Apr. 1996. →pages 72, 75
[57] D. Bargeman and F. Van Voorst Vader, “Effect of surfactants on contact angles at nonpolar solids,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 42, pp. 467–472, Mar. 1973. → pages 73
[58] J. Menezes, J. Yan, and M. Sharma, “The mechanism of alteration of macroscopic contact angles by the adsorption of surfactants,” Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 365–390, 1989. → pages
[59] T. Okubo, “Surface tension of structured colloidal suspensions of polystyrene and silica spheres at the air-water interface,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 171, pp. 55–62, Apr. 1995. → pages 73, 76
[60] R. Pyter, G. Zografi, and P. Mukerjee, “Wetting of solids by surface-active agents: The effects of unequal adsorption to vapor-liquid and solid-liquid interfaces,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 89, pp. 144–153, Sept. 1982. → pages 73
[61] T. Mitsui, S. Nakamura, F. Harusawa, and Y. Machida, “Changes in the interfacial tension with temperature and their effects on the particle size and stability of emulsions,” Kolloid-Zeitschrift und Zeitschrift fr Polymere, vol. 250, pp. 227–230, Mar. 1972. → pages 73
[62] S. Phongikaroon, R. Hoffmaster, K. P. Judd, G. B. Smith, and R. A. Handler, “Effect of temperature on the surface tension of soluble and insoluble surfactants of hydrodynamical importance,” Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, vol. 50, pp. 1602–1607, Sept. 2005. → pages 73, 80
[63] V. S. Vesselovsky and V. N. Pertzov, “Adhesion of air bubbles to the solid surface,” Zh. Fiz. Khim, vol. 8, pp. 245–259, 1936. → pages 75
[64] Hideo Nakae, Ryuichi Inui, Yosuke Hirata, and Hiroyuki Saito, “Effects of surface roughness on wettability,” Acta Materialia, vol. 46, pp. 2313–2318, Apr. 1998. → pages
[65] R. J. Good and M. Koo, “The effect of drop size on contact angle,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 71, pp. 283–292, Sept. 1979. → pages

FLOW-3D What’s New Ver.12.0

FLOW-3D v12.0은 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 (GUI)의 설계 및 기능에서 매우 큰 변화를 이룬 제품으로 모델 설정을 단순화하고 사용자 워크 플로를 향상시킵니다. 최첨단 Immersed Boundary Method(침수경계 방법)은 FLOW-3D v12.0 솔루션의 정확성을 높여줍니다. 다른 주요 기능으로는 슬러지 침강 모델, 2-Fluid 2-Temperature 모델 및 Steady State Accelerator가 있으며,이를 통해 사용자는 자유 표면 흐름을 더욱 빠르게 모델링 할 수 있습니다.

Physical and Numerical Model

Immersed boundary method

힘과 에너지 손실에 대한 정확한 예측은 고체 주위의 흐름과 관련된 많은 엔지니어링 문제를 모델링하는 데 중요합니다. 새 릴리스 FLOW-3 Dv1.2.0에는 이러한 문제점 해결을 위해 설계된 새로운 고스트 셀 기반 Immersed Boundary Method (IBM)가 있습니다. IBM은 내 외부 흐름 해석을 위해, 벽 근처에서 보다 정확한 해를 제공하여 드래그 앤 리프트 힘의 계산을 향상시킵니다.힘과 에너지 손실의 정확한 예측은 고체 주위의 흐름을 포함하는 많은 공학적 문제를 모델링 하는데 중요합니다.

Two-field temperature for the two-fluid model

2 유체 열전달 모델은 각 유체에 대한 에너지 전달 방정식을 분리하기 위해 확장되었습니다. 각 유체는 이제 자체 온도 변수를 가지므로 인터페이스 근처의 열 및 물질 전달 솔루션의 정확도가 향상됩니다. 인터페이스에서의 열전달은 이제 시간의 표 함수가 될 수 있는 사용자 정의 열전달 계수에 의해 제어됩니다.

블로그 보기

Sludge settling model

새로운 슬러지 정착 모델은 수처리 애플리케이션에 부가되어 사용자들이 수 처리 탱크와 클래리퍼의 고형 폐기물 역학을 모델링 할 수 있게 해 줍니다. 침전 속도가 분산상의 액적 크기의 함수 인 드리프트-플럭스 모델과 달리, 침전 속도는 슬러지 농도의 함수이며 기능 및 표 형식으로 입력 할 수 있습니다.

개발노트 읽기

Steady-state accelerator for free surface flows

이름에서 알 수 있듯이 정상 상태 가속기는 정상 상태 솔루션에 대한 접근을 빠르게합니다.
이것은 작은 진폭 중력과 모세관 표면파를 감쇠시킴으로써 달성되며 자유 표면 흐름에만 적용 할 수 있습니다.

개발노트 읽기

Void particles

Void particles 가 기포 및 상 변화 모델에 추가되었습니다. Void particles는 붕괴 된 Void 영역을 나타내며, 항력 및 압력을 통해 유체와 상호 작용하는 작은 기포로 작용합니다. 주변 유체 압력에 따라 크기가 변하고 시뮬레이션이 끝날 때의 최종 위치는 공기 유입 가능성을 나타냅니다.

Sediment scour model

퇴적물 수송 및 침식 모델은 정확성과 안정성을 향상시키기 위해 정비되었습니다. 특히 퇴적물 종의 질량 보존이 크게 개선되었습니다.

개발 노트 읽기>

Outflow pressure boundary condition

고정 압력 경계 조건에는 압력 및 유체 분율을 제외한 모든 유량이 해당 경계의 상류의 유량 조건을 반영하는 ‘유출’옵션이 포함됩니다. 유출 압력 경계 조건은 고정 압력 및 연속 경계 조건의 하이브리드입니다.

Moving particle sources

시뮬레이션 중에 입자 소스를 이동할 수 있습니다. 시간에 따른 병진 및 회전 속도는 표 형식으로 정의됩니다. 입자 소스의 운동은 소스에서 방출 된 입자의 초기 속도에 추가됩니다.

Variable center of gravity

기변 무게중심은 중력 및 비관 성 기준 프레임 모델에서, 시간의 함수로서 무게 중심의 위치는 외부 파일에서 테이블로서 정의 될 수있다. 이 기능은 연료를 소비하고 분리 단계를 수행하는 로켓과 같은 모형을 모델링 할 때 유용합니다.

공기 유입 모델

가장 간단한 부피 기반 공기 유입 모델 옵션이 기존 질량 기반 모델로 대체되었습니다. 질량 기반 모델은 부피와 달리 주변 유체 압력에 따라 부피가 변화하는 동안 흡입된 공기량이 보존되기 때문에 물리학적 모델입니다.

Tracer diffusion

유동 표면에서 생성된 추적 물질은 분자 및 난류 확산 과정에 의해 확산될 수 있으며, 예를 들어 실제 오염 물질의 동작을 모방한다.

Model Setup

Simulation units

온도를 포함하여 단위 시스템은 완전히 정의해야하는데 표준 단위 시스템이 제공됩니다. 또한 사용자는 다양한 옵션 중에서 질량, 시간 및 길이 단위를 정의 할 수 있으므로 사용자 정의가 가능한 편리한 단위를 사용할 수 있습니다. 사용자는 압력이 게이지 또는 절대 단위로 정의되는지 여부도 지정해야합니다. 기본 시뮬레이션 단위는 기본 설정에서 설정할 수 있습니다. 단위를 완전히 정의하면 FLOW-3D 가 물리량의 기본값을 정의하고 범용 상수를 설정하여 사용자가 요구하는 작업량을 최소화 할 수 있습니다.

Shallow water model

Manning’s roughness in shallow water model

Manning의 거칠기 계수는 지형 표면의 전단 응력 평가를 위해 얕은 물 모델에서 구현되었습니다. 표면 결함의 크기를 기반으로 기존 거칠기 모델을 보완하며 이 모델과 함께 사용할 수 있습니다. 표준 거칠기와 마찬가지로 매닝 계수는 구성 요소 또는 하위 구성 요소의 속성이거나 지형 래스터 데이터 세트에서 가져올 수 있습니다.

Mesh generation

하단 및 상단 경계 좌표의 정의만으로 수직 방향의 메시 설정이 단순화되었습니다.

Component transformations

사용자는 이제 여러 하위 구성 요소로 구성된 구성 요소에 회전, 변환 및 스케일링 변환을 적용하여 복잡한 형상 어셈블리 설정 프로세스를 단순화 할 수 있습니다. GMO (General Moving Object) 구성 요소의 경우, 이러한 변환을 구성 요소의 대칭 축과 정렬되도록 신체에 맞는 좌표계에 적용 할 수 있습니다.

Changing the number of threads at runtime

시뮬레이션 중에 솔버가 사용하는 스레드 수를 변경하는 기능이 런타임 옵션 대화 상자에 추가되어 사용 가능한 스레드를 추가하거나 다른 태스크에 자원이 필요한 경우 스레드 수를 줄일 수 있습니다.

Probe-controlled heat sources

활성 시뮬레이션 제어가 형상 구성 요소와 관련된 heat sources로 확장되었습니다. 히스토리 프로브로 열 방출을 제어 할 수 있습니다.

Time-dependent temperature at sources     

질량 및 질량 / 운동량 소스의 유체 온도는 이제 테이블 입력을 사용하여 시간의 함수로 정의 할 수 있습니다.

Emissivity coefficients

공극으로의 복사 열 전달을위한 방사율 계수는 이제 사용자가 방사율과 스테판-볼츠만 상수를 지정하도록 요구하지 않고 직접 정의됩니다. 후자는 이제 단위 시스템을 기반으로 솔버에 의해 자동으로 설정됩니다.

Output

  • 등속 필드 솔버 옵션을 사용할 때 유량 속도를 선택한 데이터 로 출력 할 수 있습니다 .
  • 벽 접착력으로 인한 지오메트리 구성 요소의 토크 는 기존 벽 접착력의 출력 외에도 일반 이력 데이터에 별도의 수량으로 출력됩니다.
  • 난류 모델 출력이 요청 될 때 난류 에너지 및 소산과 함께 전단 속도 및 y +가 선택된 데이터로 자동 출력됩니다 .
  • 공기 유입 모델 출력에 몇 가지 수량이 추가되었습니다. 자유 표면을 포함하는 모든 셀에서 혼입 된 공기 및 빠져 나가는 공기의 체적 플럭스가 재시작 및 선택된 데이터로 출력되어 사용자에게 공기가 혼입 및 탈선되는 위치 및 시간에 대한 자세한 정보를 제공합니다. 전체 계산 영역 및 각 샘플링 볼륨 에 대해이 두 수량의 시간 및 공간 통합 등가물 이 일반 히스토리 로 출력됩니다.
  • 솔버의 출력 파일 flsgrf 의 최종 크기 는 시뮬레이션이 끝날 때보 고됩니다.
  • 2 유체 시뮬레이션의 경우, 기존의 출력 수량 유체 체류 시간 및 유체 가 이동 한 거리는 이제 유체 # 1 및 # 2와 유체의 혼합물에 대해 별도로 계산됩니다.
  • 질량 입자의 경우 각 종의 총 부피와 질량이 계산되어 전체 계산 영역, 샘플링 볼륨 및 플럭스 표면에 대한 일반 히스토리 로 출력되어 입자 종 수에 대한 현재 출력을 보완합니다.
  • 예를 들어 사용자가 가스 미순환을 식별하고 연료 탱크의 환기 시스템을 설계하는 데 도움이 되도록 마지막 국부적 가스 압력이 옵션 출력량으로 추가되었습니다. 이 양은 유체가 채워지기 전에 셀의 마지막 간극 압력을 기록하며, 단열 버블 모델과 함께 사용됩니다.

New Customizable Source Routines

사용자 정의 가능한 새로운 소스 루틴이 추가되었으며 사용자의 개발 환경에서 액세스 할 수 있습니다.

소스 루틴 이름설명
cav_prod_cal캐비 테이션 생산 및 확산 속도
sldg_uset슬러지 정착 속도
phchg_mass_flux증발 및 응축에 의한 질량 흐름
flhtccl유체#1과#2사이의 열 전달 계수
dsize_cal2상 유동에서의 동적 낙하 크기 모델의 충돌 및 이탈율
elstc_custom.점탄성 유체에 대한 응력 방정식의 소스 용어

Brand New User Interface

FLOW-3D의 사용자 인터페이스가 완전히 재설계되어 사용자의 작업 흐름을 획기적으로 간소화하는 최신의 타일 구조를 제공합니다.

Dock widgets 설정

Physics, Fluids, Mesh 및 FAVOR ™를 포함한 모든 설정 작업이 형상 창 주위의 dock widgets으로 변환되어 모델 설정을 단일 탭으로 압축 할 수 있습니다. 이 전환을 통해 이전 버전의 복잡한 트리가 훨씬 깔끔하고 효율적인 메뉴 표시로 바뀌어 모델 설정 탭을 떠나지 않고도 모든 매개 변수에 쉽게 액세스 할 수 있습니다.

New Model Setup icons
With our new Model Setup design comes new icons, representing each step of the setup process.
New Physics icons
Our Physics icons are designed to be easily differentiated from one another at a glance, while providing clear visual representation of each model’s purpose and use.

RSS feed

새 RSS 피드부터 FLOW-3D v12.0 의 시뮬레이션 관리자 탭이 개선되었습니다 . FLOW-3D 를 시작하면 사용자에게 Flow Science의 최신 뉴스, 이벤트 및 블로그 게시물이 표시됩니다.

Configurable simulation monitor

시뮬레이션을 실행할 때 중요한 작업은 모니터링입니다. FLOW-3Dv12.0에서는 사용자가 시뮬레이션을 더 잘 모니터링할 수 있도록 Simulation Manager의 플로팅 기능이 향상되었습니다. 사용자는 시뮬레이션 런타임 그래프를 통해 모니터링할 사용 가능한 모든 일반 기록 데이터 변수를 선택하고 각 그래프에 여러 변수를 추가할 수 있습니다. 이제 런타임에서 사용할 수 있는 일반 기록 데이터는 다음과 같습니다.

  • 최소/최대 유체 온도
  • 프로브 위치의 온도
  • 유동 표면 위치에서의 유량
  • 시뮬레이션 진단(예:시간 단계, 안정성 한계)
Runtime plots of the flow rate at the gates of the large dam / Large dam with flux surfaces at the gates

Conforming mesh visualization

사용자는 이제 새로운 FAVOR ™ 독 위젯을 통해 적합한 메쉬 블록을 시각화 할 수 있습니다 .

Large raster and STL data

데이터를 처리하는 데 걸리는 시간으로 인해 큰 형상 데이터를 처리하는 것은 어려울 수 있습니다. 대형 지오메트리 데이터를 처리하는 데 여전히 상당한 시간이 소요될 수 있지만 FLOW-3D는 이제 이러한 대형 데이터 세트를 백그라운드 작업으로로드하여 사용자가 데이터를 처리하는 동안 완벽하게 응답하고 중단없는 인터페이스에서 계속 작업 할 수 있습니다.

Sediment Transport Model

Sediment Transport Model

Sediment Transport Model

FLOW-3D의 침전물 이송 모델을 사용하여 세굴 및 침전물을 평가할 수 있으며, 여기서 3차원 유량 구성 요소가 세굴 프로세스를 주도하고 있습니다. Flow-3D의 유체역학 모델은 유체물리학을 설명하는 정전기적이지 않은 레이놀즈-평균화된 Navier-Stokes 방정식을 완벽하게 해결합니다. 유체역학적 솔버는 침전물 운반 모듈과 완전히 결합되어 있어 침전물 운반 및 비접착 토양의 부유식 침식, 인포테인먼트 및 침식을 시뮬레이션합니다(Wei et al., 2014). 베드로드, 인포테인먼트 및 정착 프로세스에 사용되는 모든 경험적 관계는 완전히 사용자 정의 가능하며, 최대 10개의 침전물 종(곡물 크기, 질량 밀도, 임계 전단 응력 등 서로 다른 특성을 가진)을 정의할 수 있습니다. FLOW-3D는 짧은 경과 시간 척도에 대한 국부적 스쿠어를 시뮬레이션하는 데 이상적입니다.

FLOW-3D‘s Sediment Transport model can be used to evaluate scour and deposition, where three-dimensional flow components are driving the scouring process. FLOW-3D’s hydrodynamic model solves the full unsteady non-hydrostatic Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations that describe the flow physics. The hydrodynamic solver is fully coupled with a sediment transport module that simulates bedload and suspended sediment transport, entrainment and erosion for non-cohesive soils (Wei et al., 2014). All empirical relationships used in bedload, entrainment and settling processes are fully customizable, and up to 10 different sediment species (with different properties such as grain size, mass density and critical shear stress) can be defined. FLOW-3D is ideal for simulating local scour over short episodic time scales.

Modeling Capabilities
– Unsteady 3D mobile bed modeling
– Bedload and suspended sediment transport
– Non-cohesive sediment
– 10 individual grain size fractions
– Suspended sediment settling and entrainment
– Critical angle of repose
Applications
– River and coastal morphodynamics
– Bridge pier and abutment scour
– Local scour at hydraulic structures
– Sedimentation basins
– Reservoir flushing

Sediment Transport Model

Sentral Transport 모델은 8.0 버전(Brethour, 2009년)에서 처음 도입되었으며, 11.1 버전(Wei et al., 2014년), 가장 최근에는 12.0 버전(Flow Science, 2019년)에서 광범위한 개정을 거쳤습니다. 숫자 모델에서 시뮬레이션된 물리적 프로세스의 개략도가 아래에 나와 있습니다.

The Sediment Transport model was first introduced in version 8.0 (Brethour, 2009), and has gone through extensive revisions in version 11.1 (Wei et al., 2014), and most recently in version 12.0 (Flow Science, 2019). A schematic of the physical processes simulated in the numerical model is illustrated below.

The different processes modeled by the Sediment Transport Model.

수치 모델에서 침전물은 포장된 Bed로서 일시 중단된 상태로 존재할 수 있습니다. 포장된 Bed는 PRIPT™ 기법을 사용하여 복잡한 솔리드 경계(Hirt 및 Sicilian, 1985)에 표현된 지울 수 없는 솔리드 객체입니다. 이것은 유체역학 용해기의 고체 물체를 나타내는 데 사용되는 방법과 동일합니다. 포장된 Bed의 형태학적 변화는 침전물 질량의 보존에 의해 좌우됩니다.

In the numerical model, sediment can exist as packed bed and in a suspended state. A packed bed is an erodible solid object that is represented using the FAVOR™ technique for complex solid boundaries (Hirt and Sicilian, 1985). This is the same method used to represent solid objects in the hydrodynamic solver. The morphological change in the packed bed is governed by the conservation of sediment mass.

형태학적 변경은 모형에 숫자로 표시되는 여러 가지 물리적 프로세스에 의해 제어됩니다. 이러한 프로세스에는 베드로드 운송, 인포테인먼트 및 증착이 포함됩니다. 베드로드 이송은 침전물이 서스펜션에 전달되지 않고 채널을 따라 횡방향으로 이동하는 물리적 과정입니다. 인포테인먼트란 난류 에디가 패킹 베드 상단의 곡물을 제거하고 일시 중단된 상태로 전환하는 과정입니다. 포장이란 곡물이 현수막에서 안착되어 포장된 침대에 퇴적하는 과정입니다. 수치 모델에서 이것은 일시 중단된 상태에서 포장된 베드 상태로의 전환입니다.

The morphological changes are governed by several different physical processes that are represented numerically in the model. These processes include bedload transport, entrainment and deposition. Bedload transport is the physical process of sediment moving laterally along the channel without being carried into suspension. Entrainment is the process by which turbulent eddies remove the grains from the top of the packed bed and transition to the suspended state. Packing is the process of grains settling out of suspension and depositing onto the packed bed. In the numerical model, this is the transition from the suspended to the packed bed state.

인포테인먼트 및 패킹의 상대적 비율은 포장된 베드와 부유 상태 사이의 침전물 질량 교환을 제어합니다. 이 모델은 Meyer-Peter Müler(1948), Nielsen(1992) 또는 Van Rijn(1984)의 방정식을 사용하여 베드 인터페이스가 포함된 각 메시 셀에서 베드로드 전송을 계산합니다. 메쉬 셀에서 이웃의 각 메쉬 셀로 이동하는 곡물의 양을 결정하기 위해 하위 메쉬 방법이 사용됩니다. 인포테인먼트에서 곡물의 리프팅 속도는 Winterwerp 등(1992)의 방정식을 사용하여 계산됩니다. 안착 속도는 Soulsby(1997년)를 사용하여 계산됩니다. 베드 인터페이스가 포함된 메시 셀에서 인터페이스의 위치, 방향 및 면적을 계산하여 베드 전단 응력, 무차원 전단 응력, 베드로드 전송 속도 및 인포테인먼트 속도를 결정합니다. 3D 난류 흐름의 베드 전단 응력은 표준 벽 함수를 사용하여 중간 곡물 크기에 비례하는 베드 표면 거칠기를 고려하여 평가됩니다.

The relative rates of entrainment and packing control the exchange of sediment mass between the packed bed and suspended states. The model calculates bedload transport in each mesh cell containing the bed interface using the equation of Meyer-Peter Müller (1948), Nielsen (1992) or Van Rijn (1984). A sub-mesh method is employed to determine the amount of grains moving from the mesh cell into each mesh cell in its neighbor. The lifting velocity of grains in entrainment is calculated using the equation of Winterwerp et al. (1992). The settling velocity is calculated using Soulsby (1997). In the mesh cells containing the bed interface, location, orientation and area of the interface are calculated to determine the bed shear stress, dimensionless shear stress, bedload transport rates and entrainment rates. Bed shear stress in 3D turbulent flows is evaluated using the standard wall function with consideration of bed surface roughness that is proportional to the median grain size.

부유된 침전물은 유체의 스칼라 질량 농도로 표시됩니다. 농도는 주어진 셀에서 균일한 것으로 가정되며 유체 셀 밀도 및 점도와 결합됩니다. 각 종에 대해, 부유 침전물 농도는 수송 방정식을 풀어서 계산됩니다.

The suspended sediment is represented as a scalar mass concentration in the fluid. The concentration is assumed to be uniform in a given cell and is coupled with the fluid cell density and viscosity. For each species, the suspended sediment concentration is calculated by solving a transport equation.

Validations

다음 5가지 검증 사례는 실험 데이터와 FLOW-3D의 침전물 이송 모델의 시뮬레이션 결과를 비교합니다.

마오(1986년)
Mao는 수중 수평 파이프라인 아래 침대의 무서운 프로파일을 얻기 위해 실험 작업을 수행했습니다. 아래 그림은 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 얻은 결과와 실험 결과를 비교합니다.

그림 A는 파이프라인 아래의 최대 scour깊이를 시간 경과에 따라 비교하는 반면, 그림 B ~ F는 스터디의 scour프로필(빨간색 점으로 표시됨)과 FLOW-3D 프로필을 오버레이합니다.
Chatterjee et al. (1994)

수평 제트 침수로 인해 국부적인 스쿠어 프로파일을 얻기 위한 실험 작업이 수행되었습니다. 아래 그림은 scour구멍 깊이와 둔부 높이에 대한 실험 대 FLOW-3D의 숫자 결과를 시간의 함수로 비교합니다. 이 애니메이션은 scour구멍과 둔부 높이가 최대 1시간 내에 안정된 상태에 도달한다는 것을 보여줍니다.

Gladstone et al. (1998)

In these experiments the propagation and deposition patterns of particle-laden flows were studied. The plot below compares experimental versus FLOW-3D simulation results from three different setups, labeled case A (100% 0.025mm size particles), case D (50% 0.069mm and 50% 0.025mm size particles), and case G (100% 0.069mm size particles).

Faruque et al. (2006)

이 논문에서, 저자들은 실험을 통해 3차원 벽면 제트기를 물에 잠기게 함으로써 국부적인 악취를 연구했습니다. 아래 표는 세 가지 서로 다른 테일워터 비율에 대한 scour 구멍의 3D 형태학적 변화에 대한 실험과 FLOW-3D 수치 결과를 비교합니다.

Equilibrium bed elevation changes predicted by the numerical model for a cylindrical pier. (A) Isometric view of scour and deposition adjacent to the pier. (B) Comparison between numerical results (top) and physical model measurements (bottom).
Equilibrium bed elevation changes predicted by the numerical model for the diamond pier. (A) Isometric view of scour and deposition adjacent to the pier. (B) Comparison between numerical results (top) and physical model measurements (bottom).

In this paper, the authors studied local scour by submerged three-dimensional wall jets via experiments. The table below compares the experimental versus FLOW-3D numerical results for 3D morphological changes in the scour hole for three different tailwater ratios.

References

Brethour, J.M., Hirt, C.W., 2009, Drift Model for Two-Component Flows,  FSI-14-TN-83, Flow Science, Inc.

Chatterjee, S.S., Ghosh, S.N., and Chatterjee M., 1994, Local scour due to submerged horizontal jet, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 120(8), pp. 973-992.

Faruque, M.A.A., Sarathi, P., and Balachandar R., 2006, Clear Water Local Scour by Submerged Three-Dimensional Wall Jets : Effect of Tailwater Depth, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(6), pp. 575-580.

Flow Science, 2019, FLOW-3D Version 12.0 User Manual, Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science, Inc. https://www.flow3d.com

Fox, B. and Feurich, R., 2019, CFD Analysis of Local Scour at Bridge PiersFederal Interagency Sedimentation and Hydrologic Modeling Conference (SEDHYD), Reno, NV.

Gladstone, C., Phillips, J.C., and Sparks R.S.J., 1998, Experiments on bidisperse, constant-volume gravity currents: propagation and sediment deposition, Sedimentology 45, pp. 833-843.

Hirt, C.W. and Sicilian, J.M., 1985, A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes, 4th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Washington, D.C.

Khosronejad, A., Kang, S., & Sotiropoulos, F., 2012. Experimental and computational investigation of local scour around bridge piers, Advances in Water Resources, 37, pp. 73-85.

Mao, Y., 1986. The interaction between a pipeline and an erodible bed, PhD thesis, Institute of Hydrodynamics and Hydraulic Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Meyer-Peter, E. and Müller, R., 1948, Formulas for bed-load transport, Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Structures Research. pp. 39–64.

Nielsen, P., 1992, Coastal bottom boundary layers and sediment transport (Vol. 4). World scientific.

Soulsby, R., 1997, Dynamics of Marine Sands, Thomas Telford Publications, London.

Van Rijn, L. C., 1984, Sediment Transport, Part I: Bed load transport, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110(10), pp. 1431-1456.

Wei, G., Brethour, J.M., Grüenzner M., and Burnham, J., 2014, The Sediment Scour Model in FLOW-3D, Technical Note FSI-14-TN-99, Flow Science, Inc.

Winterwerp, J.C., Bakker, W.T., Mastbergen, D.R. and Van Rossum, H., 1992, Hyperconcentrated sand-water mixture flows over erodible bed, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118(11), pp. 1508–1525.

[FLOW-3D 물리모델] Viscosity and Turbulence / 점도와 난류

Viscosity and Turbulence

 

Wall Effects: Slip, Shear, and Component Roughness

유체가 고체 주위에서 움직일 때 유동은 유동속도, 난류, 그리고 경계면의 조도에 따른 저항을 만난다. 이런 경계 유동의 효과는 추가의 전단응력, 항력 그리고 (퇴적기반인 경우)부식을 초래한다. 이런 벽(또는 경계)효과를 모델링하는 것은 표면의 미끄러짐의 조건, 표면조도 그리고 벽 효과 속도분포를 적절히 규명할 수 있는 격자크기에 대한 주의를 요한다. 이런 변수 각각을 모델링하는 접근법을 밑에서 기술한다.

Wall Slip 

Slip 은 유동경계에서 상대 유동속도의 존재를 기술한다. 일반적으로 표면조건은 no-slip, partial-slip 그리고 free-slip 으로 기술된다.

Free-slip 표면은 표면에 수직한 속도 분포에 변화가 없는 표면이며 가끔 밀도의 자리 수가 차이가 나는 두 유체(물과 공기같이)간의 경계면을 기술하는데 이용된다. Partial-slip 경계는 경계에서의 유체속도가 부분적으로 감소되는 것을 기술하며, 예를 들면, 파이프 내 유화 처리된 파이프 내의 기름유동을 기술하는데 이용된다. 단연코 가장 흔한 경계조건 형태는 no-slip boundaries 경계이며 거의 모든 유체/고체 경계를 기술한다.

형상요소와 격자 벽에서의 점성경계조건은 벽 전단응력(상세내용은 이론 매뉴얼의 Wall-Shear Stress 참조)에 선형으로 비례하는 slip 속도를 포함한다. 비례계수는 마찰계수이며 지정되지 않은 마찰계수나 벽 형태의 영역 경계를 가지는 고체요소에 전반적으로 적용된다. 이 전반적 계수는 Model Setup → Physics tab → Viscosity and Turbulence dialog → Wall Shear Boundary Conditions → Friction Coefficient 에서 지정될 수 있다. 전반적 마찰계수는 모든 벽 형태의 경계에 적용되고 모든 고체요소에 대한 디폴트 값을 정의한다.

일반적 값 보다 우선하는 요소 특정 마찰계수가 정의될 수 있다: Model Setup → Meshing & Geometry → Component → Surface Properties → Static Friction Coefficient.

 

마찰계수가 무한대에 이를 때, 벽 slip 속도는 0(no-slip)에 근접한다. 임의의 큰 값을 지정하는 것을 피하기 위해 no-slip 선정이 마찰계수에 음의 값을 정의함으로써 활성화된다. 유한한 양의 값은 partial-slip 경계를 뜻한다. 0은 free-slip 경계조건을 지정한다. 유한한 양의 마찰계수는 부분-slip 경계가 된다. 디폴트로 Static friction coefficient = -1.0이며 모든 지정되지 않은 요소는 no-slip 표면을 갖는다.

각주: 부분 slip 이 난류모델 사용 시 기존요소에 대해 정의되면 경고가 나타날 것이다.

No-slip 과 partial-slip 표면은 Model Setup Fluids Properties Fluid # Viscosity 하에서 정의된 동적 점성을 필요로 한다.

 

Wall Shear 

벽 전단응력은 유동이 없는 면적부분에서 접선속도를 0으로 가정함으로써 모델링 된다. 0인 접선속도는 접선속도를 가지는 격자경계에서 그리고 이동체의 표면에 대해 수정될 수 있다.

벽 전단응력은 Viscous Flow Model Setup Physics Viscosity and Turbulence 보조 창에서 활성화되고 양의 유체 ViscosityModel Setup Fluids 탭에서 지정될 때 계산된다.

전단응력은 요소 Surface Roughness 계수(Model Setup Meshing & Geometry Component Surface Properties) 가 음수가 아닌 한(즉, 0이아닌 마찰계수에 대해) 자동적으로(하지만 자동적으로 출력되지는 않는다)요소 no-slip 과 partial-slip 요소에 대해 계산된다. 전단응력은 Model Setup Output Activate Shear Stress 에서 Activate Shear Stress 를 선택하고 General Critical Shear Stress = 0으로 지정함으로써 출력될 수 있다.

요소 특정 전단응력은 관심요소에 대해 Output 탭 하단에서 Pressure and Shear Force Output 를 선택함으로 출력될 수 있다.

전단응력과 밀접하게 연결되어 있는 변형률은 Model Setup Output Additional Output Strain Rate 를 선택함으로써 Restart Selected Data 출력에 추가될 수 있다.

전단응력, 변형률, 그리고 벽 근처 속도 분포를 정확히 모델링 하는 것은 격자가 적절히 해결되어야 한다는 것을 필요로 한다.  고체요소 또는 벽면에 인접한 첫 번째 셀은 로그 또는 층류의 벽 속도 분포가 적용되는 지역에 있어야 한다.  벽을 따라 셀들은 표면이 격자선상에 있으면 표면에 수직이거나 벽면을 포함한다.

유동이 Laminar(Viscosity and Turbulence physics 보조창에서 지정되는)이면 속도분포는 직접 미분에 의해 계산된다. 셀의 평균속도는 항상 정확하고 속도분포는 격자가 정련되면 더 잘 해석된다. 최적 셀 크기는 단지 필요한 분포 정확성과 허용되는 계산시간에 달려있으며 셀의 크기가 작아질수록 증가한다.

Turbulence 모델이 활성화되면 벽이나 고체요소 가까운 첫 번째 셀은 항상 밑에 보여진 로그법칙 구역에 상응하는 로그 분포에 따라 속도를 가지게 된다. 벽을 따르는 첫 번째 셀은 점성 sub-layer 를 포함하고 충분히 경계층의 로그법칙 구역 내에 있도록 크기가 정해져야 한다. 만약에 첫 번째 셀의 바깥쪽이 점성 sub-layer나 외부 또는 자유흐름 지역까지 포함한다면 그 때는 계산된 로그법칙 벽 근처 속도와 전단응력이  물리적 양으로부터 벗어나서 이들은 로그법칙관계와 일치하지 않는다.

 

적절한 범위의 셀 크기를 찾는 것은 고체 표면에 수직한 경계층의 높이(두께)를 추정하는 문제이다. 이에 대한 도움이 되는 값은 벽으로부터의 무차원 수직거리 y+, 가끔 viscous length 라고도 불리며 위의 무차원 속도 u+ 와 관련하여 보여진다. 아래 식에서 uτ 는 전단속도, τw 는 고체상의 전단응력, y 는 고체로부터의 수직거리, ρf 는 유체밀도 그리고 µf 는 유체의 동적(분자) 점도이다.

y+를 추정하기 위해 전단응력 τw 가 수동으로 추정되어야 하고 관심 있는 독자는 이를 위해 수리학 문헌을 참조한다. 일반적으로 y+(셀 크기의 함수로)는 30(이 값에서 내부 층이 로그법칙구역으로 부드럽게 변화하고) 보다 커야 하고 유동의 Reynolds 수와 경계층의 두께에 의존하는 값보다 작아야 한다(일반적으로 100 – 500 합당한 상한이다). τw의 수작업추정이 불가능하면 여러 번의 모사가 관찰값(전단응력 또는 속도)이 안정화되는”최적값”을 위해 반복되어야 한다. 고체표면에서 변수값을 계산하기 위해 이용된 근사값은 유체가 충분히 발달한 유동이라는 것을 가정하고 충분히 발달하지 못한 유동에 대한 결과를 해석할 때는 유의하여야 한다.

요소표면이 격자선 방향과 일치하면 고정점들이 표면에서 그리고 표면으로부터 적절한 거리에서 사용되어야 한다(막 설명된 바와 같이 첫 셀 거리 yy+ 기준을 맞추도록). 물체표면이 격자선과 평행하지 않으면 nested 격자블록을 적절한 곳에서 사용하여 표면에 가장 가까운 셀들이 적절한 간격을 가지도록 한다.

 

Component Roughness

요소표면에서의 벽 전단응력은 표면조도를 정의함으로써 수정할 수 있다. 조도는 길이의 단위를 가지며 분자점도에 fluid_density × roughness × relative velocity의 곱을 더함으로써 통상 전단응력 계산에 포함되고 있는데 여기서 relative velocity는 지역 유체속도와 벽 속도(정지된 벽이나 요소는 0)간의 차이이다. 이를 이행하면 laminar 유동모델의 벽 전단응력은 다음과 같다.

여기서

  • k 는 조도
  • ν 는 동점성계수
  • u 는 상대속도이며
  • δy 는 표면에 interest(관련된) 수직한 길이 규모이다.

조도가 충분히 클 때 응력은 다음에 비례한다.

Turbulent 유동모델에서 벽의 법칙 관계는 점도의 변화(즉 ν 에서 ν + ku로)가 ν/u 에 의해 정의된 특정길이 규모로부터 로그의존도를 k로 자동적으로 변환하는 것을 제외하고는 부드러운 벽에서와 마찬가지의 같은 형태를 지니며 k 는 두 특정 길이 중 큰 것이다.

수치해석에서 의미가 있기 위해 조도는 비록 큰 값이 사용될 수도 있지만 요소경계에서의 격자 셀 크기 보다 작아야 한다. 조도를 가지는 요소는 no-slip 표면(음의 static friction coefficient 를 통해)으로 주어져야 한다.

FLOW-3D 에서 조도변수 k 는 개별적으로 Meshing and Geometry Geometry Component Properties Surface Properties Surface Roughness 의 각 요소에서 지정될 수 있다.

Surface Roughness는 Moody diagrams 에서 기준된 조도처럼 균일하게 분포된 표면조도 요소의 평균 높이로 정의된다. 실제표면이 균일한 조도를 가지면 이 높이가 직접적으로 적용되나 균일하지 않으면 정확한 결과를 줄 equivalent 조도 값이 선정되어야 한다. 예를 들면 일반적인 평균속도, 수력반경, 그리고 수력 구배와 관련된 Manning 방정식은 Manning 계수와 관련된 수리반경이 알려질 때 FLOW-3DSurface Roughness 로 변환될 수 있는 등가의 조도변수(Manning의 n)를 사용한다.

여기서

  • V 는 채널 및 도관 내 평균유속
  • Rh 는 수력반경(윤변에 의해 나누어진 유체 단면적)
  • S 는 유동이 수력 구배, 특히(그리고 가끔 부정확하게) 도관이나 채널의 물리적 구배로 가정되며 1.49는 변화인자이고 모든 다른 단위는 미터/킬로그램/초(SI단위로)이며
  • n 은 Manning 조도이다.

균일하지 않은 표면에서 등가 균일조도는 밑에 보여진 것과 같이 Manning의 n 그리고 추정된 수력반경 또는 직경으로부터 계산될 수 있다. 여기서 Surface RoughnessFLOW-3D 에서 이용되는 조도변수이며 모든 변수들은SI 단위(미터) 이고 유동은 완전한 난류유동이며 수리학적으로 고르지 않다. 수력직경 DhRh 의 4배수로 정의된다(Dh = 4 Rh).

위에서 주어진 환원은 파이프와 등가 도관에 대한 Swamee-Jain 방정식으로부터 유도 된다.

여기서 다음 가정이 적용된다.

  • αmanning 는 feet 일 경우 1.486, meter 일 경우 1.0
  • 는Manning 방정식 가정이 옳을 때 1.0
  • ReD 는 5.74보다 훨씬 크다.이는 Manning의 n이 원래 측정된 유동단계에 상응하는 수리직경에 대해서만 기술적으로 유효하다. 이 변환은 다음과 같이 체크된다: mortar콘크리트에 대한 일반적 문헌 값은 0.013이다. n 이 수력반경 1.25ft(수력직경 5ft)인 채널에서 측정되었고 이때 는 0.0033ft또는 1mm인데 이는 mortar cement의 전형적인 문헌 값이다. 계산된 Surface Roughness 값은 대략 1과 10ft사이의 수력직경에 대한 값이다. 수력직경범위에 대한 제약은 항상 체크되어야 한다.각주: Surface Roughness > 0 는 상 변화 모델에서 요소표면 가까이의 액체에 의한 과열 발생 기능을 정지시킨다(Cavitation and Bubble Formation (Nucleation)를 참조한다).Surface Roughness의 값은 요소/유체 열 전달에 영향이 없다. 요소 – 유체로의 열 유속이 표면조도에 따라 증가되려면 요소에 대한 열 전달 면적의 승수가 되는 Surface Area Multiplier 변수를 사용한다. 디폴트로 Surface Area Multiplier = 1.0이다. Surface Area Multiplier = 0 은 유체와 요소 간 열교환 뿐만 아니라 요소 Mass source (사용되면)기능도 불가능하게 한다.
  • Temperature and Strain Rate Dependent Viscosity

    비뉴튼 유체는 점도가 변하는 유동조건에 따라 일정하지 않은 유체이다. 어떤 유체는 shear-thickening 즉 전단 하에서 농축되고 다른 유체는 shear-thinning(전단유동화), 즉 높은 전단 하에서 점도가 감소한다. 또한 온도가 변하는 모사에서 점도는 일반적으로 온도에 의존한다. 어떤 유체의 점도는 이력에 의존한다; 이런 유체는 thixotropic 이며 Thixotropic Fluids 모델을 필요로 한다.

    FLOW-3D 에서는 유체1만 비뉴튼일 수 있다. 2유체모사에서 비뉴튼 유체를 설정하기 위해 Viscous flow in Physics Viscosity and turbulence 를 활성화시킨다. 난류는 일반적으로 비뉴튼 유동에서 중요하지 않다; 그러나 난류선택은 할 수 있다. Turbulence Models은 비뉴튼 유체거동에 고려되지 않는 경험론에 의존한다. 그러므로 난류모델은 보통 비뉴튼 유동에는 유효하지 않으며 비뉴튼 유체에 대해서는 주의하여 사용되어야 한다.

    Fluids Properties Fluid 1 Viscosity 에서 펼쳐지는 메뉴로부터 점도 모델을 선택할 수 있다. 기본값은 상수이다. 비뉴튼 모델은 Temperature Dependent Table, Strain Rate Dependent Table, Strain Rate Dependent Function, Strain Rate and Temperature Dependent Function, Carreau Function, 그리고 Power Law를 포함한다:

Temperature Dependent Table이나 Strain Rate Dependent Table이 선택되면 온도나 변형률의 함수로 점도의 표 데이터를 입력하게 하는 Tabular 버튼을 클릭한다.

각주: 사용자 정의 표 데이터는 전처리에서 솔버가 최적으로 사용하게 내부데이터 구조로 전환된다. 전환은 입력표의 등 간격을 가지는 새 표로의 remapping(재사상)을 포함한다. 온도 또는 변형률 의존 점도를 위한 내부표의 처음과 마지막 점은 각 입력 표로부터 취해지며 그사이의 점들의 수는 10000으로 고정된다.  선형 보간이 전환 중 이용된다.

이 접근은 일반적으로 부드럽게 변하는 데이터에 대해서는 적합하다. 그러나 점도가 온도나 내부표의 간격에 비교될만하게 변형률의 범주에서 상당히 변하는 경우에 변환은 에러를 발생시킬 수도 있다. 이를 피하는 방법은 가능한 한 최대로 입력 표에서 온도와 변형률의 범위를 줄이는 것이다. 그래서 정확도를 높이기 위해 내부표의 간격을 줄이게 된다.

Strain Rate and Temperature Dependent Function 또는 Strain Rate Dependent Function이 선택되면 유체점도는 사용자지정 계수 λ00, λ0, λ1, λ2, n 그리고 µ를 가지는 변형률 및/또는 온도의 함수로 정의된다. 온도 의존도는 상수 a, b c 로 정의된다.

이 계수들은 다음 구성요소 관계를 가지는 점도를 정의한다.

Where 여기서

그리고 µ0 는 정상 상수 점도값(GUI 에서 Viscosity 옆의)으로 정의되는 전단이 없을 경우의 점도며 T* Fluids Properties Reference Temperature 로 정의된다. 적절한 계수의 선정은 사용자가 비뉴튼 유체거동에 대한 다양한 근사치를 사용하게 한다.

Carreau Function 선택을 택하면 점도를 변형률에 연관시키는 단순한 함수가 사용된다:

 

여기서는 Carreau 모델에 연관된 변수들만 정의되어야 한다; 이들은 GUI에서 활성화 된 것으로 보여진다. 이들은 Carreau 형태 유체의 점도 정의를 단순화한다.

Power Law 모델이 선정되면 또 다른 점도를 변형률에 연관시키는 단순한 함수가 사용된다:

여기서는 power-law 모델에 연관된 변수들만이 정의되어야 한다; 이 들은 GUI 에서 활성화 된 것으로 보여진다. 이들은 power-law 형태 유체의 점도정의를 단순화한다.

어떤 비뉴튼 유체모델이 사용될 때 전처리는 두 개의 추가 그림을 prpplt 파일에 그린다. 하나는 주어진 온도에서의 동적 점도 대 변형률이고 다른 하나는 주어진 변형률에서의 점도 대 온도이다. 전처리가 그림의 범위와 변형률 및 온도의 값을 선택하는 것이 어려우므로 사용자는 Input Variable Summary and Units 장의 User Defined Variables 절에서 기술된 바와 같이 4개의 소위 임시변수를 사용하는 환경을 정의할 수 있다.

  • DUM1은 점도 대 변형률이 그려지는 온도를 정의하며 이는 또한 점도 대 온도 그림을 위한 중앙 온도 값이다;
  • DUM2는 점도 대 온도 그림을 위한 DUM1-0.5*DUM2 로부터 DUM1 + 0.5*DUM2까지의 그림 범위를 정의한다.
  • DUM3는 은 점도 대 온도가 그려지는 변형률을 정의하며 또한 점도 대 변형률 그림을 위한 중앙 변형률 값이다;
  • DUM4는 점도 대 변형률 그림을 위한 DUM3-0.5*DUM4 부터 DUM3 + 0.5*DUM4까지의 그림 범위를 정의한다.

각주:

  • 변형률 의존점도에서 1차변수는 ‖eij‖ = 로 정의되는 변형률 크기이다. 같은 변수가 모사 중에 Strain rate magnitude로 출력된다.
  • 비뉴튼 유체유동은 낮은 Reynolds 수에서 가끔 발생한다. 결과적으로 시간간격 크기는 Explicit viscous stress solver가 사용되면 점성전단응력에 의해 조절된다. 모사속도를 상당히 낮추는 제약을 피하기 위해 Numerics Viscous stress solver options Successive under-relaxation또는Line implicit 를 지정함으로써 Implicit 점성응력 솔버가 대신 이용될 수 있다. 그러나 유동에 커다란 점성 구배가 존재하면 수렴은 늦어질 수도 있다.
  • 수치해석 문제점을 방지하기 위해 최대 점성을 약 1E + 15 로 제한하는 점도 계산 내에 추가  방편이 있다.

또한 다음을 참조한다

  • Outflow Boundary Conditions 에서 격자 경계조건의 논의
  • Thixotropic Fluids
  • Wall Slip. 벽 Slip

Thixotropic Fluids / 요변성 유체

요변성 유체의 겉보기 점도는 시간의 직접 함수이다. 겉보기 유체점도가 국부적 정상상태에 도달하는 속도를 조절하는 묽어짐 과 농축율의 관점에서 시간 의존도가 FLOW-3D에서 기술된다. 정상상태점도는 일반적으로 전단율과 온도의 함수일 것이다. 정상상태의 점도가 겉보기 점도보다 클 때 후자는 농축율에 따라 유동시점에서 증가할 것이다. 반대로 겉보기 점도가 정상상태 점도보다 클 때 묽어지는 율에 따라 겉보기점도는 감소할 것이다. 요변성 유체는 항상 비뉴튼성이고 또한 FLOW-3D 에서 정의되어야 한다 (Temperature and Strain Rate Dependent Viscosity참조).

요변성 점도 모델은 Physics Viscosity and Turbulence Thixotropic viscosity 를 선택함으로써 활성화된다.

묽어짐, Fluids Properties Viscosity Thixotropic Constant Thinning Rate, 그리고 농축, Constant Thickening Rate에 의한 이완율을 위한 두 개의 상수가 있다.

 

 

Strain Rate Sensitivity 계수가 정의되면 묽어지는 비율 α 또한 변형률에 의존할 수 있다.

where:여기서

  • µ0 Constant Thinning Rate 이고
  • µ1 Strain Rate Sensitivity 이다

Constant Thinning rate Constant Thickening rate 는 시간의 역수인 차원을 가지며 Strain Rate Sensitivity 는 무차원이다. 모든 율 계수는 기본값으로0이다. – 즉, 비요변성 효과.

정상상태에서 원하는 재료 거동을 근사하는 비뉴튼 점도모델(see Temperature and Strain Rate Dependent Viscosity참조)을 정의해야 한다. 물질을 정의하기 위해 Fluids Properties Viscosity 가지에서 변수들을 사용한다. 또 트리에서 Initial and boundary viscosity 값을 지정한다.

요변성 모사에서 점도는 매우 커질 수 있으므로 고점도 유동을 위한 외재적 알고리즘에 의해 요구되는 작은 시간단계 크기를 피하기 위해 Numerics Viscous stress solver options 로부터 Successive under-relaxation이나 Line implicit 를 선택할 수 있다.

각주: 입력 및 출력 변형률은 실제로는 변형률의 크기이다.

또한 Wall Slip Temperature and Strain Rate Dependent Viscosity 를 참조한다.

Turbulence

점성 평가(난류 종결)를 위한 6개의 옵션이 FLOW-3D 에 존재한다. 원하는 평가를 Physics > Viscosity and turbulence 에서 선정한다. 모든 모델에서 점성모델이 활성화되어야 하고 약의 동점성 값을 필요로 한다. 먼저 viscous flow 를 활성화한 후 유체 1 (그리고 있으면 유체 2 )의 점도를 Fluids Properties Viscosity 에서 입력한다.

이 모델 각각의 상세내용은 Theory 장의 Turbulence Models 절을 참조한다.

난류의 초기나 경계조건이 지정되지 않으면 초기나 경계에서의 난류운동에너지의 값은 프로그램에 의해 작은 값으로 지정되는데 이는 층류를 나타낸다. 유입유동이 난류이면 경험에 의해 상류유동의 난류 정도는 평균유동속도의 10%에 상응하는 잔잔한 유동에서의 난류유동변동이 가정된다. 예를 들면, 20m/s의 평균상류유동에서 난류속도변동의 크기가 2m/s이고, 난류운동에너지(단위 질량당)의 경계 값은 다음과 같다.

프로그램 기본값은 난류모델에서 나타나는 상수들을 지정하는 데 이용된다. 이 계수 값들은 일반적으로 권고되지 않지만 필요에 따라 변경될 수도 있다.

가장 작은 영역 차원(한 셀을 가지는 방향을 제외한)의 기본값0.07인 형상효과나 실제유동장의 규모를  반영하지 않으므로 Turbulent mixing length가 1방정식 난류에너지모델 사용자에 의해 지정되어야 한다. 이 변수는 유동에 존재하는 난류 와류의 특정규모를 기술하고 난류점도계수 최대 허용치를 정의하는데 이용된다.

Maximum turbulent mixing length는 계산된 난류의 점도가 너무 크지 않게 하도록 난류소산 ε 의 최소제한을 정하기 위해 Two-equation k ε model, the Renormalized group (RNG) model, 그리고 Two-equation k ω model에 의해 이용된다. 이 값은 Dynamically computed 선택이 Fluids Properties Viscosity window(상기 참조)로부터 자동적으로 모사 중에 시간과 위치의 함수로 계산된다. 다른 방법으로는 사용자가 Maximum turbulent mixing length 값을 Constant를 선택하여 옆의 편집상자에 값을 입력함으로써 기술할 수 있다.

Maximum turbulent mixing length가 클수록 모사 중 난류소산은 작아진다.  난류소산은 난류 점도 식의 분모에 나타나므로 난류점도는 특히 작은 전단율을 가지는 유동지역에서 커지게 된다. 역으로 작은 Maximum turbulent mixing length값은 작은 난류점도를 유발할 것이므로 난류를 과도하게 감쇠시킬 것이다.

예를 들면, 여수로 모사에서 Maximum turbulent mixing length 를 계산하는데 이용된 길이 규모가 여수로 상의 유동의 깊이일 수 있다; 고압 주조에서 길이규모는 러너의 가장 작은 폭일 수도 있다; 파이프 및 관 유동에서는 길이 규모는 유동채널의 수력직경일 수 있다. 일단 길이규모가 결정되면 Maximum turbulent mixing length는 길이 규모의 0.07, 또는 7%로 결정된다.

유입경계에서, 사용자는 난류 운동에너지와 소산을 직접 지정할 수 있다. 소산 없이 난류 운동에너지의 값이 주어지면 그 때의 소산 값은 자동적으로 편집상자 내에 정의된 Maximum turbulent mixing length 의 값에 의해 계산되거나 주어지지 않으면 기본값이다.

각주: 난류 평가를 위해 사용된 공식이 프로그램 시작 시 바뀔 수도 있다(General Restart Turbulence 참조). 난류이송방정식  (k ε, RNG, k ω 또는 One-equation) 을 포함하는 난류모델에서 이 방정식에서의 점성 확산 항은 항상 외재적으로 근사되므로 내재적 점성 알고리즘을 사용하는 것은 추천되지 않는다.

See also:

이론 매뉴얼 Turbulence Models 을 참조한다.

Viscous Heating

점성가열 모델은 Physics Viscosity and turbulence Activate viscous heating를 체크함으로써 활성화 된다. Viscous flow Turbulence options 아래서 선택되어야 함에 주의한다.

See also:

이 기능에 대한 상세정보를 위해 Theory 매뉴얼의 Thermal Diffusion and Sources를 참조한다.

Note:

  • 이 옵션은 Physics Heat transfer 가 활성화되어야 한다.
  • 0이아닌 유체 동점성이 Fluids 의 유체 입력에서 정의되는 경우만 사용된다.

Viscosity Output점성 출력

유체점도는 온도, 변형률 또는 난류 같은 다른 변수의 함수일 때 마다 자동적으로 후처리에서 저장된다. 반대로 점도가 상수이면 예를 들어 뉴튼 유체의 층류 유동에서는 일반적으로 후처리에서 이용 하지 못 한다. 사용자는 Output 탭의 Additional Output 절에서 Dynamic Viscosity 를 요청함으로써 디폴트 거동을 무효화할 수 있다. 이 기능은 특히 유체점도가 계산되는 FORTRAN routine mucal.F가 사용자에 의해 수정될 때 유용하다.

 

 

 

래스터 파일 사용 및 가져오기

Using and Importing Raster Files

GIS 어플리케이션과 관련하여, 래스터 데이터는 공간 데이터가 셀의 행렬로 표현되는 현실 세계의 추상화입니다. 데이터의 위치는 값의 순서에 내재되어 있으며 ASCII 형식의 행과 열로 구성된 균일 한 x 및 y 위치를 사용합니다. 행과 열의 각 데이터 값은 수량을 나타냅니다. FLOW-3D에서 이것은 표면 높이 또는 표면 거칠기 일 수 있습니다. 지표면 고도 인 경우 FLOW-3D는 정보를 사용하여 고도 값을 기반으로 토폴로지를 작성합니다. 거칠기가있는 경우 데이터는 표면 변형의 크기를 나타내거나 Manning의 n과 상관 관계가 있습니다. 이 정보는 궁극적으로 흐름에 대한 저항력 (마찰 계수)을 나타냅니다. 이 기사에서는 FLOW-3D의 토폴로지와 표면 거칠기에 대해 래스터 파일을 사용하는 방법에 대해 설명합니다.

Format

여기에 표시된 것은 래스터 파일을 FLOW-3D로 읽는 데 필요한 형식입니다. 6 개의 행의 헤더 데이터와 그 다음에 표면 높이 또는 표면 거칠기를 나타내는 행과 열의 행렬이옵니다. 헤더 데이터에는 다음이 포함됩니다.
– ncols = 데이터 열 수 (즉, x 방향의 위치)
– nrows = 데이터 행 수 (즉, y 방향의 위치)
– xllcorner = 래스터 그리드에서 x 최소 좌표를 식별합니다. 값은 래스터 셀의 절반만큼 오른쪽으로 이동합니다. 셀 가장자리에 있지 않습니다.
– yllcorner  = 래스터 그리드에서 y 최소 좌표를 식별합니다. 값은 래스터 셀의 절반만큼 위쪽으로 이동합니다. 셀 가장자리에 있지 않습니다.
– cellsize = 각 데이터 포인트 간의 x와 y 간격
– nodata_value = 주어진 위치에 값이 없음을 의미하는 값

Importing a raster file

래스터 파일을 가져 오려면 그림 2와 같이 Meshing & Geometry 탭 아래의 ASC 버튼을 새 구성 요소로 선택합니다. 그런 다음 Add 버튼을 선택하고 파일을 탐색합니다. 파일을 추가하고 OK를 선택하면 Solid 또는 Surface Roughness로 추가하라는 메시지가 나타납니다.

그림 3의 대화 상자는 솔리드 서피스로 가져올 지 표면 거칠기로 가져올지를 선택하는 것이며 새 구성 요소를 추가 할 때만 나타납니다. 기존 구성 요소에 추가 할 때마다 유형이 기존 구성 요소 정의의 유형과 자동으로 일치하도록 결정됩니다. 솔리드 유형 인 경우 각 가져 오기는 토폴로지로 간주되는 하위 구성 요소를 추가합니다. 표면 거칠기 유형 인 경우 각 가져 오기는 표면 거칠기로 간주되는 하위 구성 요소를 추가합니다.

Import as a solid

솔리드로 가져 오려면 솔리드 라디오 단추를 선택하고 원하는 경우 이름을 입력하십시오. 래스터 파일의 모든 nodata_value 데이터 포인트에는 누락 된 데이터를 높이를 나타내는 값으로 바꾸는 옵션이 GUI에 있습니다. 따라서 바닥을 만듭니다. GUI에서 이는 토폴로지를 나타내는 가져온 하위 구성 요소 목록 아래에 있습니다.

Import as roughness

거칠기로 가져 오려면 표면 거칠기 라디오 버튼을 선택하고 이름을 입력하십시오 (원하는 경우). 구성 요소 유형은 가져온 표면 거칠기입니다. 또한 필요한 범례 파일에 대한 프롬프트가 표시됩니다. 이 파일은 래스터 조도 파일의 정수 조도 코드와 FLOW-3D의 조도 조도 값을 관련시킵니다.
범례 파일의 형식은 유연합니다. 헤더의 텍스트 정보는 관련 데이터가 첫 번째 행에서부터 읽혀지기 때문에 허용됩니다. 데이터는 공백, 탭 또는 쉼표로 구분할 수있는 두 개의 열로 구성됩니다. 첫 번째 열은 거친 파일의 정수 코드에 해당하고 두 번째 열은 FLOW-3D의 거칠기를 정의합니다.
범례 파일은 전역 목록 아래의 기하학 트리 구조 아래에 추가됩니다.

Applying roughness to components

그림 6은 구성 요소 1이 토폴로지로 가져온 래스터 파일을 사용하여 솔리드를 나타내는 설치의 트리 구조를 나타냅니다. 구성 요소 2는 관련 범례 파일을 포함하는 거칠기로 가져온 래스터 파일을 사용하여 공간적으로 변화하는 표면 거칠기를 정의합니다. 그림과 같이 글로벌 목록 아래에 범례 파일에 대한 경로가 있습니다. 구성 요소 1의 구성 요소 유형은 단색입니다. 구성 요소 2는 표면 거칠기로 구성 요소 유형을 갖습니다.

“표면 거칠기”구성 요소 (구성 요소 2)에 의해 정의 된 공간적으로 변화하는 표면 거칠기는 구성 요소 1의 표면 특성 섹션에서 “조도 파일 사용”플래그를 선택하여 토폴로지 구성 요소 (구성 요소 1)에 매핑됩니다 (그림 7 ). 이 플래그는 솔버가 구성 요소 2가 구성 요소 1과 겹치는 래스터 데이터에 정의 된 표면 거칠기를 사용하도록 지시합니다. 토폴로지 래스터 파일에 해당 위치에 “nodata_value”가 있으면 대신 구성 요소 1에 대해 정의 된 구성 요소 / 하위 구성 요소 조도를 사용합니다 .

Transformation center

가져온 래스터 데이터의 좌표는 종종 좌표 중심점 0,0,0에서 멀리 떨어진 위치를 가질 수 있기 때문에 회전 중심을 회전 및 확대 / 축소에 도움이되는 위치로 변경하는 옵션이 있습니다. 설정하지 않으면 회전 및 확대 / 축소가 좌표축 중심을 기준으로 발생합니다. 따라서 가져온 형상을 탐색하기가 어렵습니다.

로컬 좌표 중심을 기준으로 구성 요소를 회전 시키려면 각 방향에서 최소 및 최대 범위의 평균값을 선택하십시오. 예를 들어, x-min이 9.98e6 미터이고 x-max가 9.96e6 미터 인 경우 평균값 (중간)은 9.97e6 미터입니다. 동일한 논리가 y 방향에 적용됩니다. 그림 8은 구성 요소 1에 대한 변형 중심을 설정하는 예입니다.

Summary

래스터 파일은 토폴로지와 표면 거칠기에 사용할 수있는 일반적인 지형 정보입니다. 이 데이터를 FLOW-3D로 직접 가져올 수 있으면 데이터를 간단하고 직접적으로 가져올 수 있습니다. 이 튜토리얼에서는 사용자가 래스터 데이터를 가져 와서 모델에 적용하는 방법을 알 수 있도록 프로세스를 설명합니다.

The Sedimentation Scour Model [침전 세굴(쇄굴) 모델]

1. Introduction
The three-dimensional sediment scour model for non-cohesive soils was first introduced to FLOW-3D in Version 8.0 to simulate sediment erosion and deposition (Brethour, 2003). It was coupled with the three-dimensional fluid dynamics and considered entrainment, drifting and settling of sediment grains. In Version 9.4 the model was improved by introducing bedload transport and multiple sediment species (Brethour and Burnham, 2010). Although applications were successfully simulated, a major limitation of the model was the approximate treatment of the interface between the packed and suspended sediments. The packed bed was represented by scalars rather than FAVORTM (Fractional Area Volume Obstacle Representation, the standard treatment for solid components in FLOW-3D). As a result, limited information about the packed bed interface was available. That made accurate calculation of bed shear stress, a critical factor determining the model accuracy, challenging.

In this work, the 3D sediment scour model is mostly redeveloped and rewritten. The model is still fully coupled with fluid flow, allows multiple non-cohesive species and considers entrainment, deposition, bedload transport and suspended load transport. The fundamental difference from the old model is that the packed bed is described by the FAVORTM technique. At each time step, area and volume fractions describing the packed sediments are calculated throughout the domain. In the mesh cells at the bed interface, the location, orientation and area of the interface are calculated and used to determine the bed shear stress, the critical Shields parameter, the erosion rate and the bedload transport rate. Bed shear stress is evaluated using the standard wall function with consideration of bed surface roughness that is related to the median grain size d50. A sub-mesh method is developed and implemented to calculate bedload transport. Computation of erosion considers entrainment and deposition simultaneously in addition to bedload transport.

Furthermore, a shallow-water sediment scour model is developed in this work by adapting the new 3D model. It is coupled with the 2D shallow water flows to calculate depth-averaged properties for both suspended and packed sediments. Its main differences from the 3D model are 1) the settling velocity of grains is calculated using an existing equation instead of the drift-flux approach in the 3D model, and 2) turbulent bed shear stress is calculated using a well-accepted quadratic law rather than the log wall function. The drag coefficient for the bed shear stress is either user-given or locally evaluated using the water depth and the bed surface roughness that is proportional to d50 of the bed material. The following sections present the sediment theory used in the model and application and validation cases.

Simulating the Residue left by Evaporating Drops

Background
The “coffee ring” effect is the name given to a well known observation where the evaporative drying of a drop of coffee leaves behind a ring of dark material at the edge of the original drop. On first thought one would expect that the coffee particles, which are uniformly distributed in the drop, would simply be deposited uniformly over the area wetted by the drop. It has only been in recent years that researchers have uncovered the mechanisms that produce the ring effect (Deegan, R.D., et al).
As currently understood, the edges of drops can become pinned because of roughness or chemical elements on the surface on which they lie. Heat transfer to the drops from the substrate or the air induces evaporation, which is usually greater near the drop edge. Surface tension forces then adjust the curvature of the remaining liquid consistent with the pinned edge, which results in a net flow of liquid toward the edge. This flow replenishes the evaporative loss but also moves solute to the edge where it is concentrated by evaporation. Eventually, this mechanism builds up a ring deposit of solute at the original edge of the drop.
The residue from dried drops has implications for many useful applications, including general coating processes, formation of pixel arrays of organic materials for video displays and for a variety of micro-electro-mechanical (MEMS) devices.
Because many factors control the distribution of dried residue it is desirable to have some means to model the fluid dynamics of the process to aid engineers in making the best choices for each specific application. Such a capability has been incorporated into FLOW-3D1 making it possible to computationally investigate the influence of such parameters as the initial solute concentration, fluid viscosity, volatility of the solvent, evaporation rate, surface tension and initial shape of the drop.
This technical note presents a brief description of the residue formation model and illustrates it with several computations of an evaporating drop subject to different physical conditions.

Modeling Roughness Effects in Open Channel Flows

Overview
Flows along rivers, through pipes and irrigation channels encounter resistance that is proportional to the roughness of bounding walls. Roughness can vary considerably from smooth steel, to concrete or sand, pebbles, and even large boulders. In traditional hydraulics the influence of roughness has been cataloged in the form of a roughness coefficient based on data obtained from a wide range of field and laboratory observations.
Roughness coefficients are typically defined in one of two ways: (1) Ch¾zy’s resistance coefficient, or (2) Manning’s n. To understand these terms we must first state the conditions under which they are defined. For this discussion, and much more information about flow resistance caused by roughness, the reader is referred to Open Channel Hydraulics by Ven Te Chow and published by McGraw-Hill, reissued 1988.
Flow losses are defined in terms of a uniform flow state defined as steady flow with a fixed discharge and flow depth. In practice this usually means the flow in a channel of uniform cross section and having a constant slope such that the gravitational acceleration down the slope is balanced by frictional resistance at the boundaries of the channel.

Coating Bibliography

아래는 코팅 참고 문헌의 기술 문서 모음입니다. 
이 모든 논문은 FLOW-3D  결과를 포함하고 있습니다. FLOW-3D를 사용하여 코팅 공정을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션  하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

Coating Bibliography

2021년 5월 Update

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Coating Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D can be used to successfully simulate coating processes.

03-21   Delong Jia, Peng Yi, Yancong Liu, Jiawei Sun, Shengbo Yue, Qi Zhao, Effect of laser­ textured groove wall interface on molybdenum coating diffusion and metallurgical bonding, Surface and Coatings Technology, 405; 126561, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126561

50-19     Peng Yi, Delong Jia, Xianghua Zhan, Pengun Xu, and Javad Mostaghimi, Coating solidification mechanism during plasma-sprayed filling the laser textured grooves, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 142, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118451

01-19   Jelena Dinic and Vivek Sharma, Computational analysis of self-similar capillary-driven thinning and pinch-off dynamics during dripping using the volume-of-fluid method, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 31, 2019. doi: 10.1063/1.5061715

85-18   Zia Jang, Oliver Litfin and Antonio Delgado, A semi-analytical approach for prediction of volume flow rate in nip-fed reverse roll coating process, Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 18, no. 1, Special Issue: 89th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2018. doi: 10.1002/pamm.201800317

80-14   Hiroaki Koyama, Kazuhiro Fukada, Yoshitaka Murakami, Satoshi Inoue, and Tatsuya Shimoda, Investigation of Roll-to-Sheet Imprinting for the Fabrication of Thin-film Transistor Electrodes, IEICE TRAN, ELECTRON, VOL.E97-C, NO.11, November 2014

46-14   Isabell Vogeler, Andreas Olbers, Bettina Willinger and Antonio Delgado, Numerical investigation of the onset of air entrainment in forward roll coating, 17th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium September 7-10, 2014 San Diego, CA, USA

17-12  Chi-Feng Lin, Bo-Kai Wang, Carlos Tiu and Ta-Jo Liu, On the Pinning of Downstream Meniscus for Slot Die Coating, Advances in Polymer Technology, Vol. 00, No. 0, 1-9 (2012) © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Available online at Wiley.

01-11  Reid Chesterfield, Andrew Johnson, Charlie Lang, Matthew Stainer, and Jonathan Ziebarth, Solution-Coating Technology for AMOLED Displays, Information Display Magazine, 1/11 0362-0972/01/2011-024 © SID 2011.

61-09 Yi-Rong Chang, Chi-Feng Lin and Ta-Jo Liu, Start-up of slot die coating, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 49, pp. 1158-1167, 2009. doi:10.1002/pen.21360

26-06  James M. Brethour, 3-D transient simulation of viscoelastic coating flows, 13th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 2006, Denver, Colorado

19-06  Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A., and Knight, R., 3D Predictions of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Splats Modeling Particle Acceleration, Heating and Deformation on Impact with a Flat Substrate, Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49, pp. 3285 – 3297, 2006

9-06  M. Ivosevic, R. A. Cairncross, R. Knight, T. E. Twardowski, V. Gupta, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; J. A. Baldoni, Duke University, Durham, NC, Effect of Substrate Roughness on Splatting Behavior of HVOF Sprayed Polymer Particles Modeling and Experiments, International Thermal Spray Conference, Seattle, WA, May 2006.

26-05  Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A., Knight, R., Impact Modeling of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Particles, Proc. International Thermal Spray Conference [ITSC-2005], Eds., DVS/IIW/ASM-TSS, Basel, Switzerland, May 2005.

11-05  Brethour, J., Simulation of Viscoelastic Coating Flows with a Volume-of-fluid Technique, in Proceedings of the 6th European Coating Symposium, Bradford, UK, 2005

1-05 C.W. Hirt, Electro-Hydrodynamics of Semi-Conductive Fluids: With Application to Electro-Spraying, Flow Science Technical Note #70, FSI-05-TN70

38-04 K.H. Ho and Y.Y. Zhao, Modelling thermal development of liquid metal flow on rotating disc in centrifugal atomisation, Materials Science and Engineering, A365, pp. 336-340, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.044

30-04  M. Ivosevic, R.A. Cairncross, and R. Knight, Impact Modeling of HVOF Sprayed Polymer Particles, Presented at the 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Rochester, New York, September 23-25, 2004

29-04  J.M. Brethour and C.W. Hirt, Stains Arising from Dried Liquid Drops, Presented at the 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Rochester, New York, September 23-25, 2004

20-03  James Brethour, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells–A CFD Analysis, Convertech Pacific October 2002, Vol. 10, No 4, p 34-37

4-03   M. Toivakka, Numerical Investigation of Droplet Impact Spreading in Spray Coating of Paper, In Proceedings of 2003 TAPPI 8th Advanced Coating Fundamentals Symposium, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2003

28-02  J.M. Brethour and H. Benkreira, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells—Experiment and CFD Comparison, 11th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 23-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota

22-02  Hirt, C.W., and Brethour, J.M., Contact Line on Rough Surfaces with Application to Air Entrainment, Presented at the 11th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 23-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Unpublished.

17-01  J. M. Brethour, C. W. Hirt, Moving Contact Lines on Rough Surfaces, 4th European Coating Symposium, 2001, Belgium

16-01  J. M. Brethour, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells–-A CFD Analysis, proceedings of the 4th European Coating Symposium 2001, October 1-4, 2001, Brussels, Belgium

26-00 Ronald H. Miller and Gary S. Strumolo, A Self-Consistent Transient Paint Simulation, Proceedings of IMEC2000: 2000 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 2000, Orlando, Florida

6-99  C. W. Hirt, Direct Computation of Dynamic Contact Angles and Contact Lines, ECC99 Coating Conference, Erlangen, Germany (FSI-99-00-2), Sept. 1999

7-98 J. E. Richardson and Y. Becker, Three-Dimensional Simulation of Slot Coating Edge Effects, Flow Science Inc, and Polaroid Corporation, presented at the 9th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Newark, DE, May 18-20, 1998

6-98  C. W. Hirt and E. Choinski, Simulation of the Wet-Start Process in Slot Coating, Flow Science Inc, and Polaroid Corporation, presented at the 9th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Newark, DE, May 18-20, 1998

3-97  C. W. Hirt and J. E. Richardson of Flow Science Inc, and K.S. Chen, Sandia National Laboratory, Simulation of Transient and Three-Dimensional Coating Flows Using a Volume-of-Fluid Technique, presented at the 50th Annual Conference of the Society for Imaging and Science Technology, Boston, MA 18-23 May 1997

2-96 C. W. Hirt, K. S. Chen, Simulation of Slide-Coating Flows Using a Fixed Grid and a Volume-of-Fluid Front-Tracking Technique, presented a the 8th International Coating Process Science & Technology Symposium, February 25-29, 1996, New Orleans, LA

Water & Environmental Bibliography

다음은 수자원 및 환경 분야에 대한 참고 문 기술 문서 모음입니다.
이 모든 논문은 FLOW-3D  해석 결과를 사용하였습니다. FLOW-3D  를 사용하여 수처리 및 환경 산업을 위한 응용 프로그램을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

Water and Environmental Bibliography

2021년 5월 Update

37-21   Alireza Khoshkonesh, Blaise Nsom, Farhad Bahmanpouri, Fariba Ahmadi Dehrashid, Atefah Adeli, Numerical study of the dynamics and structure of a partial dam-break flow using the VOF Method, Water Resources Management, 35; pp. 1513-1528, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02799-2

36-21   Amir Ghaderi, Mehdi Dasineh, Francesco Aristodemo, Constanza Aricò, Numerical simulations of the flow field of a submerged hydraulic jump over triangular macroroughnesses, Water, 13.5; 674, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/w13050674

35-21   Hongliang Qi, Junxing Zheng, Chenguang Zhang, Modeling excess shear stress around tandem piers of the longitudinal bridge by computational fluid dynamics, Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 2021. doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2021.1884614

31-21   Seth Siefken, Robert Ettema, Ari Posner, Drew Baird, Optimal configuration of rock vanes and bendway weirs for river bends: Numerical-model insights, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 147.5, 2021. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001871

29-21   Débora Magalhães Chácara, Waldyr Lopes Oliveira Filho, Rheology of mine tailings deposits for dam break analyses, REM – International Engineering Journal, 74.2; pp. 235-243, 2021. doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672020740098

27-21   Ling Peng, Ting Zhang, Youtong Rong, Chunqi Hu, Ping Feng, Numerical investigation of the impact of a dam-break induced flood on a structure, Ocean Engineering, 223; 108669, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108669

26-21   Qi-dong Hou, Hai-bo Li, Yu-Xiang Hu, Shun-chao Qi, Jian-wen Zhou, Overtopping process and structural safety analyses of the earth-rock fill dam with a concrete core wall by using numerical simulations, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14; 234, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06639-w

25-21   Filipe Romão, Ana L. Quaresma, José M. Santos, Susana D. Amaral, Paulo Branco, António N. Pinheiro, Performance and fish transit time over vertical slots, Water, 13.3; 275, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/w13030275

23-21   Jiahou Hu, Chengwei Na, Yi Wang, Study on discharge velocity of tailings mortar in dam break based on FLOW-3D, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 6th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xi’an, China, December 11-13, 2020, 643; 012052, 2021. doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/643/1/012052

21-21   Asad H. Aldefae, Rusul A. Alkhafaji, Experimental and numerical modeling to investigate the riverbank’s stability, SN Applied Sciences, 3; 164, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04168-5

20-21   Yangliang Lu, Jinbu Yin, Zhou Yang, Kebang Wei, Zhiming Liu, Numerical study of fluctuating pressure on stilling basin slabwith sudden lateral enlargement and bottom drop, Water, 13.2; 238, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/w13020238

18-21   Prashant Prakash Huddar, Vishwanath Govind Bhave, Hydraulic structure design with 3D CFD model, Proceedings, 25th International Conference on Hydraulics, Water Resources and Coastal Engineering (HYDRO 2020), Odisha, India, March 26-28, 2021.

17-21   Morteza Sadat Helbar, Atefah Parvaresh Rizi, Javad Farhoudi, Amir Mohammadi, 3D flow simulation to improve the design and operation of the dam bottom outlets, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14; 90, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06378-4

15-21   Charles R. Ortloff, Roman hydraulic engineering: The Pont du Gard Aqueduct and Nemausus (Nîmes) Castellum, Water, 13.1; 54, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/w13010054

12-21   Mehdi Karami Moghadam, Ata Amini, Ehsan Karami Moghadam, Numerical study of energy dissipation and block barriers in stepped spillways, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23.2; pp. 284-297, 2021. doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.245

08-21   Prajakta P. Gadge, M. R. Bhajantri, V. V. Bhosekar, Numerical simulations of air entraining characteristics over high head chute spillway aerator, Proceedings, ICOLD Symposium on Sustainable Development of Dams and River Basins, New Dehli, India, February 24 – 27, 2021.

07-21   Pankaj Lawande, Computational fluid dynamics simulation methodologies for stilling basins, Proceedings, ICOLD Symposium on Sustainable Development of Dams and River Basins, New Dehli, India, February 24 – 27, 2021.

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Water & Environmental Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D can be used to successfully simulate applications for the Water & Environmental Industry.

02-21   Aytaç Güven, Ahmed Hussein Mahmood, Numerical investigation of flow characteristics over stepped spillways, Water Supply, in press, 2021. doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.283

01-21   Le Thi Thu Hien, Nguyen Van Chien, Investigate impact force of dam-break flow against structures by both 2D and 3D numerical simulations, Water, 13.3; 344, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/w13030344

125-20   Farhad Bahmanpouri, Mohammad Daliri, Alireza Khoshkonesh, Masoud Montazeri Namin, Mariano Buccino, Bed compaction effect on dam break flow over erodible bed; experimental and numerical modeling, Journal of Hydrology, in press, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125645

124-20   John Petrie, Yan Qi, Mark Cornwell, Md Al Adib Sarker, Pranesh Biswas, Sen Du, Xianming Shi, Design of living barriers to reduce the impacts of snowdrifts on Illinois freeways, Illinois Center for Transportation Series No. 20-019, Research Report No. FHWA-ICT-20-012, 2020. doi.org/10.36501/0197-9191/20-019

123-20   Mohammad Reza Namaee, Jueyi Sui, Yongsheng Wu, Natalie Linklater, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of local scour in the vicinity of circular side-by-side bridge piers with ice cover, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020. doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0360

119-20   Tuğçe Yıldırım, Experimental and numerical investigation of vortex formation at multiple horizontal intakes, Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, , 2020.

118-20   Amir Ghaderi, Mehdi Dasineh, Francesco Aristodemo, Ali Ghahramanzadeh, Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22.6; pp. 1554-1572, 2020. doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.298

117-20   Rasoul Daneshfaraz, Amir Ghaderi, Aliakbar Akhtari, Silvia Di Francesco, On the effect of block roughness in ogee spillways with flip buckets, Fluids, 5.4; 182, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/fluids5040182

115-20   Chi Yao, Ligong Wu, Jianhua Yang, Influences of tailings particle size on overtopping tailings dam failures, Mine Water and the Environment, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s10230-020-00725-3

114-20  Rizgar Ahmed Karim, Jowhar Rasheed Mohammed, A comparison study between CFD analysis and PIV technique for velocity distribution over the Standard Ogee crested spillways, Heliyon, 6.10; e05165, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05165

113-20   Théo St. Pierre Ostrander, Analyzing hydraulics of broad crested lateral weirs, Thesis, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, 2020.

111-20   Mahla Tajari, Amir Ahmad Dehghani, Mehdi Meftah Halaghi, Hazi Azamathulla, Use of bottom slots and submerged vanes for controlling sediment upstream of duckbill weirs, Water Supply, 20.8; pp. 3393-3403, 2020. doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.238

110-20   Jian Zhou, Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy, How does three-dimensional canopy geometry affect the front propagation of a gravity current?, Physics of Fluids, 32.9; 096605, 2020. doi.org/10.1063/5.0019760

106-20   Juan Francisco Macián-Pérez, Arnau Bayón, Rafael García-Bartual, P. Amparo López-Jiménez, Characterization of structural properties in high reynolds hydraulic jump based on CFD and physical modeling approaches, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 146.12, 2020. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001820

105-20   Bin Deng, He Tao, Changbo Jian, Ke Qu, Numerical investigation on hydrodynamic characteristics of landslide-induced impulse waves in narrow river-valley reservoirs, IEEE Access, 8; pp. 165285-165297, 2020. doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022651

102-20   Mojtaba Mehraein, Mohammadamin Torabi, Yousef Sangsefidi, Bruce MacVicar, Numerical simulation of free flow through side orifice in a circular open-channel using response surface method, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 76; 101825, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101825

101-20   Juan Francisco Macián Pérez, Numerical and physical modelling approaches to the study of the hydraulic jump and its application in large-dam stilling basins, Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain, 2020.

99-20   Chen-Shan Kung, Pin-Tzu Su, Chin-Pin Ko, Pei-Yu Lee, Application of multiple intake heads in engineering field, Proceedings, 30th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Online, October 11-17,  ISOPE-I-20-3116, 2020.

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Water & Environmental Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D can be used to successfully simulate applications for the Water & Environmental Industry.

91-20      Selahattin Kocaman, Stefania Evangelista, Giacomo Viccione, Hasan Güzel, Experimental and numerical analysis of 3D dam-break waves in an enclosed domain with a single oriented obstacle, Environmental Science Proceedings, 2; 35, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002035

89-20      Andrea Franco, Jasper Moernaut, Barbara Schneider-Muntau, Michael Strasser, Bernhard Gems, The 1958 Lituya Bay tsunami – pre-event bathymetry reconstruction and 3D numerical modelling utilising the computational fluid dynamics software Flow-3D, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 20; pp. 2255–2279, 2020. doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2255-2020

88-20      Cesar Simon, Eddy J. Langendoen, Jorge D. Abad, Alejandro Mendoza, On the governing equations for horizontal and vertical coupling of one- and two-dimensional open channel flow models, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 58.5; pp. 709-724, 2020. doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1671507

87-20       Mohammad Nazari-Sharabian, Moses Karakouzian, Donald Hayes, Flow topology in the confluence of an open channel with lateral drainage pipe, Hydrology, 7.3; 57, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030057

84-20       Naohiro Takeichi, Takeshi Katagiri, Harumi Yoneda, Shusaku Inoue, Yusuke Shintani, Virtual Reality approaches for evacuation simulation of various disasters, Collective Dynamics (originally presented in Proceedings from the 9th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (PED2018), Lund, Sweden, August 21-23, 2018), 5, 2020. doi.org/10.17815/CD.2020.93

83-20       Eric Lemont, Jonathan Hill, Ryan Edison, A problematic installation: CFD modelling of waste stabilisation pond mixing alternatives, Ozwater’20, Australian Water Association, Online, June 2, 2020, 2020.

77-20       Peng Yu, Ruigeng Hu, Jinmu Yang, Hongjun Liu, Numerical investigation of local scour around USAF with different hydraulic conditions under currents and waves, Ocean Engineering, 213; 107696, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107696

76-20       Alireza Mojtahedi, Nasim Soori, Majid Mohammadian, Energy dissipation evaluation for stepped spillway using a fuzzy inference system, SN Applied Sciences, 2; 1466, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03258-0

74-20       Jackson D., Tellez Alvarez E., Manuel Gómez, Beniamino Russo, Modelling of surcharge flow through grated inlet, Advances in Hydroinformatics: SimHydro 2019 – Models for Extreme Situations and Crisis Management, Nice, France, June 12-14, 2019, pp. 839-847, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_65

73-20       Saurav Dulal, Bhola NS Ghimire, Santosh Bhattarai, Ram Krishna Regmi, Numerical simulation of flow through settling basin: A case study of Budhi-Ganga Hydropower Project (BHP), International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 9.7; pp. 992-998, 2020.

70-20       B. Nandi, S. Das, A. Mazumdar, Experimental analysis and numerical simulation of hydraulic jump, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020 6th International Conference on Environment and Renewable Energy, Hanoi, Vietnam, February 24-26, 505; 012024, 2020. doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/505/1/012024

69-20       Amir Ghaderi, Rasoul Daneshfaraz, Mehdi Dasineh, Silvia Di Francesco, Energy dissipation and hydraulics of flow over trapezoidal–triangular labyrinth weirs, Water (Special Issue: Combined Numerical and Experimental Methodology for Fluid–Structure Interactions in Free Surface Flows), 12.7; 1992, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12071992

68-20       Jia Ni, Linwei Wang, Xixian Chen, Luan Luan Xue, Isam Shahrour, Effect of the fish-bone dam angle on the flow mechanisms of a fish-bone type dividing dyke, Marine Technology Society Journal, 54.3; pp. 58-67, 2020. doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.54.3.9

67-20       Yu Zhuang, Yueping Yin, Aiguo Xing, Kaiping Jin, Combined numerical investigation of the Yigong rock slide-debris avalanche and subsequent dam-break flood propagation in Tibet, China, Landslides, 17; pp. 2217-2229, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01449-9

66-20       A. Ghaderi, R. Daneshfaraz, S. Abbasi, J. Abraham, Numerical analysis of the hydraulic characteristics of modified labyrinth weirs, International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 4.2, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s42108-020-00082-5

65-20      D.P. Zielinski, S. Miehls, G. Burns, C. Coutant, Adult sea lamprey espond to induced turbulence in a low current system, Journal of Ecohydraulics, 5, 2020. doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2020.1775504

63-20       Raffaella Pellegrino, Miguel Ángel Toledo, Víctor Aragoncillo, Discharge flow rate for the initiation of jet flow in sky-jump spillways, Water, Special Issue: Planning and Management of Hydraulic Infrastructure, 12.6; 1814, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12061814

59-20       Nesreen Taha, Maged M. El-Feky, Atef A. El-Saiad, Ismail Fathy, Numerical investigation of scour characteristics downstream of blocked culverts, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59.5; pp. 3503-3513, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.05.032

57-20       Charles Ortloff, The Hydraulic State: Science and Society in the Ancient World, Routledge, London, UK, eBook ISBN: 9781003015192, 2020. doi.org/10.4324/9781003015192

54-20       Navid Aghajani, Hojat Karami, Hamed Sarkardeh, Sayed‐Farhad Mousavi, Experimental and numerical investigation on effect of trash rack on flow properties at power intakes, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ZAMM), online pre-issue, 2020. doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202000017

53-20     Tian Zhou, Theodore Endreny, The straightening of a river meander leads to extensive losses in flow complexity and ecosystem services, Water (Special Issue: A Systems Approach of River and River Basin Restoration), 12.6; 1680, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12061680

50-20       C.C. Battiston, F.A. Bombardelli, E.B.C. Schettini, M.G. Marques, Mean flow and turbulence statistics through a sluice gate in a navigation lock system: A numerical study, European Journal of Mechanics – B/Fluids, 84; pp.155-163, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.06.003

47-20       Mohammad Nazari-Sharabian, Aliasghar Nazari-Sharabian, Moses Karakouzian, Mehrdad Karami, Sacrificial piles as scour countermeasures in river bridges: A numerical study using FLOW-3D, Civil Engineering Journal, 6.6; pp. 1091-1103, 2020. doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091531

44-20    Leena Jaydeep Shevade, L. James Lo, Franco A. Montalto, Numerical 3D model development and validation of curb-cut inlet for efficiency prediction, Water, 12; 1791, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12061791

43-20       Vitor Hugo Pereira de Morais, Tiago Zenker Gireli, Paulo Vatavuk, Numerical and experimental models applied to an ogee crest spillway and roller bucket stilling basin, Brazilian Journal of Water Resources, 2020. doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.252020190005

42-20       Chen Xie, Qin Chen, Gang Fan, Chen Chen, Numerical simulation of the natural erosion and breaching process of the “10.11” Baige Landslide Dam on the Jinsha River, Dam Breach Modelling and Risk Disposal, pp. 376-377, International Conference on Embankment Dams (ICED), Beijing, China, June 5 – 7, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46351-9_40

41-20       Niloofar Aghili Mahabadi, Hamed Reza Zarif Sanayei, Performance evaluation of bilateral side slopes in piano key weirs by numerical simulation, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 6; pp. 1477-1486, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00764-3

40-20       P. April Le Quéré, I. Nistor, A. Mohammadian, Numerical modeling of tsunami-induced scouring around a square column: Performance assessment of FLOW-3D and Delft3D, Journal of Coastal Research (preprint), 2020. doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19-00181

39-20       Jian Zhou, Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy, Impact of ambient stable stratification on gravity currents propagating over a submerged canopy, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 898; A15, 2020. doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.418

37-20     Aliasghar Azma, Yongxiang Zhang, The effect of variations of flow from tributary channel on the flow behavior in a T-shape confluence, Processes, 8; 614, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/pr8050614

35-20     Selahattin Kocaman, Hasan Güzel, Stefania Evangelista, Hatice Ozmen-Cagatay, Giacomo Viccione, Experimental and numerical analysis of a dam-break flow through different contraction geometries of the channel, Water, 12; 1124, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12041124

32-20       Adriano Henrique Tognato, Modelagem CFD da interação entre hidrodinâmica costeira e quebra-mar submerso: estudo de caso da Ponta da Praia em Santos, SP (CFD modeling of interaction between sea waves and submerged breakwater at Ponta de Praia – Santos, SP: a case study, Thesis, Universidad Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, 2020.

31-20   Hamidreza Samma, Amir Khosrojerdi, Masoumeh Rostam-Abadi, Mojtaba Mehraein and Yovanni Cataño-Lopera, Numerical simulation of scour and flow field over movable bed induced by a submerged wall jet, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22.2, pp. 385-401, 2020. doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.091

28-20   Halah Kais Jalal and Waqed H. Hassan, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of local scour around circular bridge pier using FLOW-3D software, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, art. no. 012150, 3rd International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Kerbala, Iraq, November 4-6, 2019745. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012150

25-20   Faizal Yusuf and Zoran Micovic, Prototype-scale investigation of spillway cavitation damage and numerical modeling of mitigation options, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 146.2, 2020. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001671

24-20   Huan Zhang, Zegao Yin, Yipei Miao, Minghui Xia and Yingnan Feng, Hydrodynamic performance investigation on an upper and lower water exchange device, Aquacultural Engineering, 90, art. no. 102072, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102072

22-20   Yu-xiang Hu, Zhi-you Yu and Jian-wen Zhou, Numerical simulation of landslide-generated waves during the 11 October 2018 Baige landslide at the Jinsha River, Landslides, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01382-x

19-20   Amir Ghaderi, Mehdi Dasineh, Saeed Abbasi and John Abraham, Investigation of trapezoidal sharp-crested side weir discharge coefficients under subcritical flow regimes using CFD, Applied Water Science, 10, art. no. 31, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1112-8

18-20   Amir Ghaderi, Saeed Abbasi, John Abraham and Hazi Mohammad Azamathulla, Efficiency of trapezoidal labyrinth shaped stepped spillways, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 72, art. no. 101711, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101711

16-20   Majid Omidi Arjenaki and Hamed Reza Zarif Sanayei, Numerical investigation of energy dissipation rate in stepped spillways with lateral slopes using experimental model development approach, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00714-z

15-20   Bo Wang, Wenjun Liu, Wei Wang, Jianmin Zhang, Yunliang Chen, Yong Peng, Xin Liu and Sha Yang, Experimental and numerical investigations of similarity for dam-break flows on wet bed, Journal of Hydrology, 583, art. no. 124598, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124598

14-20   Halah Kais Jalal and Waqed H. Hassan, Effect of bridge pier shape on depth of scour, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, art. no. 012001, 3rd International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Kerbala, Iraq, November 4-6, 2019671. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012001

13-20   Shahad R. Mohammed, Basim K. Nile and Waqed H. Hassan, Modelling stilling basins for sewage networks, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, art. no. 012111, 3rd International Conference on Engineering Sciences, Kerbala, Iraq, November 4-6, 2019671. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012111

11-20   Xin Li, Liping Jin, Bernie A. Engel, Zeng Wang, Wene Wang, Wuquan He and Yubao Wang, Influence of the structure of cylindrical mobile flumes on hydraulic performance characteristics in U-shaped channels, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 72, art. no. 101708, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101708

10-20   Nima Aein, Mohsen Najarchi, Seyyed Mohammad Mirhosseini Hezaveh, Mohammad Mehdi Najafizadeh and Ehsanollah Zeigham, Simulation and prediction of discharge coefficient of combined weir–gate structure, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Management (ahead of print), 2020. doi.org/10.1680/jwama.19.00047

03-20   Agostino Lauria, Francesco Calomino, Giancarlo Alfonsi, and Antonino D’Ippolito, Discharge coefficients for sluice gates set in weirs at different upstream wall inclinations, Water, 12, art. no. 245, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/w12010245

113-19   Ruidong An, Jia Li, Typical biological behavior of migration and flow pattern creating for fish schooling, E-Proceedings, 38th IAHR World Congress, Panama City, Panama, September 1-6, 2019.

112-19   Wenjun Liu, Bo Wang, Hang Wang, Jianmin Zhang, Yunliang Chen, Yong Peng, Xin Liu, Sha Yang, Experimental and numerical modeling of dam-break flows in wet downstream conditions, E-Proceedings, 38th IAHR World Congress, Panama City, Panama, September 1-6, 2019.

111-19   Zhang Chendi, Liu Yingjun, Xu Mengzhen, Wang Zhaoyin, The 3D numerical study on flow properties of individual step-pool, Proceedings: 14th International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Chengdu, China, September 16-19, 2019.

110-19   Mason Garfield, The effects of scour on the flow field at a bendway weir, Thesis: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

109-19   Seth Siefken, Computational fluid dynamics models of Rio Grande bends fitted with rock vanes or bendway weirs, Thesis: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

108-19   Benjamin Israel Devadason and Paul Schweiger, Decoding the drowning machines: Using CFD modeling to predict and design solutions to remediate the dangerous hydraulic roller at low head dams, The Journal of Dam Safety, 17.1, pp. 20-31, 2019.

106-19   Amir Ghaderi and Saeed Abbasi, CFD simulations of local scouring around airfoil-shaped bridge piers with and without collar, Sādhanā, art. no. 216, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1196-8

105-19   Jacob van Alwon, Numerical and physical modelling of aerated skimming flows over stepped spillways, Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2019.

100-19   E.H. Hussein Al-Qadami, A.S. Abdurrasheed, Z. Mustaffa, K.W. Yusof, M.A. Malek and A. Ab Ghani, Numerical modelling of flow characteristics over sharp crested triangular hump, Results in Engineering, 4, art. no. 100052, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100052

99-19   Agostino Lauria, Francesco Calomino, Giancarlo Alfonsi, and Antonino D’Ippolito, Discharge coefficients for sluice gates set in weirs at different upstream wall inclinations, Water, 12.1, art. no. 245, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w12010245

98-19   Redvan Ghasemlounia and M. Sedat Kabdasli, Surface suspended sediment distribution pattern for an unexpected flood event at Lake Koycegiz, Turkey, Proceedings, 14th National Conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering, Urmia, Iran, July 16-17, 2019.

97-19   Brian Fox, Best practices for simulating hydraulic structures with CFD, Proceedings, Dam Safety 2019, Orlando, Florida, USA, September 8-12, 2019.

96-19   John Wendelbo, Verification of CFD predictions of self-aeration onset on stepped chute spillways, Proceedings, Dam Safety 2019, Orlando, Florida, USA, September 8-12, 2019.

95-19   Pankaj Lawande, Anurag Chandorkar and Adhirath Mane, Predicting discharge rating curves for tainter gate controlled spillway using CFD simulations, Proceedings, 24th HYDRO 2019, International Conference, Hyderabad, India, December 18-20, 2019.

91-19   Gyeong-Bo Kim, Wei Cheng, Richards C. Sunny, Juan J. Horrillo, Brian C. McFall, Fahad Mohammed, Hermann M. Fritz, James Beget, and Zygmunt Kowalik , Three Dimensional Landslide Generated Tsunamis: Numerical and Physical Model Comparisons, Landslides, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01308-2

85-19   Susana D. Amaral, Ana L. Quaresma, Paulo Branco, Filipe Romão, Christos Katopodis, Maria T. Ferreira, António N. Pinheiro, and José M. Santos, Assessment of retrofitted ramped weirs to improve passage of potamodromous fish, Water, 11, art. no. 2441, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w11122441

82-19   Shubing Dai, Yong He, Jijian Yang, Yulei ma, Sheng Jin, and Chao Liang, Numerical study of cascading dam-break characteristics using SWEs and RANS, Water Supply, 2019. doi.org/10.2166/ws.2019.168

81-19   Kyong Oh Baek, Evaluation technique for efficiency of fishway based on hydraulic analysis, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 52.spc2, pp. 855-863, 2019. doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.S-2.855

80-19   Yongye Li, Yuan Gao, Xiaomeng Jia, Xihuan Sun, and Xuelan Zhang, Numerical simulations of hydraulic characteristics of a flow discharge measurement process with a plate flowmeter in a U-channel, Water, art. no. 2392, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w11112382

76-19   Youtong Rong, Ting Zhang, Yanchen Zheng, Chunqi Hu, Ling Peng, and Ping Feng, Three-dimensional urban flood inundation simulation based on digital aerial photogrammetry, Journal of Hydrology, in press, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124308

74-19   Youtong Rong, Ting Zhang, Ling Peng, and Ping Feng, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam discharge and flood routing in Wudu Reservoir, Water, 11, art. no. 2157, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w11102157

70-19   Le Thi Thu Hien, Study the flow over chute spillway by both numerical and physical models, Proceedings, pp. 845-851, 10th International Conference on Asian and Pacific Coasts (APAC 2019), Hanoi, Vietnam, September 25-28, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0291-0_116

69-19   T. Vinh Cuong, N. Thanh Hung, V. Thanh Te, P. Anh Tuan, Analysis of spur dikes spatial layout to river bed degradation under reversing tidal flow, Proceedings, pp. 737-744, 10th International Conference on Asian and Pacific Coasts (APAC 2019), Hanoi, Vietnam, September 25-28, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0291-0_101

67-19   Zongshi Dong, Junxing Wang, David Florian Vetsch, Robert Michael Boes, and Guangming Tan, Numerical simulation of air–water two-phase flow on stepped spillways behind X-shaped flaring gate piers under very high unit discharge, Water, 11, art. no. 1956, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w11101956

66-19   Tony L. Wahl, Effect of boundary layer conditions on uplift pressures at open offset spillway joints, Sustainable and Safe Dams Around the World: Proceedings, 2019. doi.org/10.1201/9780429319778-182

65-19   John Petrie, Kun Zhang, and Mahmoud Shehata, Numerical simulation of snow deposition around living snow fences, Community Center for Environmentally Sustainable Transportation in Cold Climates (CESTiCC), Project Report, 2019.

64-19   Andrea Franco, Jasper Moernaut, Barbara Schneider-Muntau, Markus Aufleger, Michael Strasser, and Bernhard Gems, Lituya Bay 1958 Tsunami – detailed pre-event bathymetry reconstruction and 3D-numerical modelling utilizing the CFD software FLOW-3D, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, under review, 2019. doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-285

63-19   J. Patarroyo, D. Damov, D. Shepherd, G. Snyder, M. Tremblay, and M. Villeneuve, Hydraulic design of stepped spillway using CFD supported by physical modelling: Muskrat Falls hydroelectric generating facility, Sustainable and Safe Dams Around the World: Proceedings, , pp. 205-219, 2019. doi.org/10.1201/9780429319778-19

61-19   A.S. Abdurrasheed, K.W. Yusof, E.H. Hussein Alqadami, H. Takaijudin, A.A. Ghani, M.M. Muhammad, A.T. Sholagberu, M.K. Zainalfikry, M. Osman, and M.S. Patel, Modelling of flow parameters through subsurface drainage modules for application in BIOECODS, Water, 11, art. no. 1823, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/w11091823

59-19     Brian Fox and Robert Feurich, CFD analysis of local scour at bridge piers, Proceedings of the Federal Interagency Sedimentation and Hydraulic Modeling Conference (SEDHYD), Reno, Nevada, June 24-28, 2019.

56-19     Pankaj Lawande, Brian Fox, and Anurag Chandorkar, Three dimensional CFD modeling of flow over a tainter gate spillway, International Dam Safety Conference, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, February 13-14, 2019.

49-19     Yousef Sangsefidi, Bruce MacVicar, Masoud Ghodsian, Mojtaba Mehraein, Mohammadamin Torabi, and Bruce M. Savage, Evaluation of flow characteristics in labyrinth weirs using response surface methodology, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 69, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101617

43-19     Gongyun Liao, Zancheng Tang, and Fei Zhu, Self-cleaning performance of double-layer porous asphalt pavements with different granular diameters and layer combinations, 19th COTA International Conference of Transportation, Nanjing, China, July 6-8, 2019.

42-19     Tsung-Chun Ho, Gwo-Jang Hwang, Kao-Shu Hwang, Kuo-Cheng Hsieh, and Lung-Wei Chen, Experimental and numerical study on desilting efficiency of the bypassing tunnel for Nan-Hua reservoir, 3rd International Workshop on Sediment Bypass Tunnels, Taipei, Taiwan, April 9-12, 2019.

41-19     Chang-Ting Hsieh, Sheng-Yung Hsu, and Chin-Pin Ko, Planning of sluicing tunnel in front of the Wushe dam – retrofit the existing water diversion tunnel as an example, 3rd International Workshop on Sediment Bypass Tunnels, Taipei, Taiwan, April 9-12, 2019.

40-19     Chi-Lin Yang, Pang-ku Yang, Fu-June Wang, and Kuo-Cheng Hsieh, Study on the transportation of high-concentration sediment flow and the operation of sediment de-silting in Deji Reservoir, 3rd International Workshop on Sediment Bypass Tunnels, Taipei, Taiwan, April 9-12, 2019.

39-19   Sam Glovik and John Wendelbo, Advanced CFD air entrainment capabilities for baffle drop structure design, NYWEA 91st Annual Meeting, New York, NY, February 3-6, 2019.

36-19     Ahmed M. Helmi, Heba T. Essawy, and Ahmed Wagdy, Three-dimensional numerical study of stacked drop manholes, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 145, No. 9, 2019. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001414

33-19     M. Cihan Aydin, A. Emre Ulu, and Çimen Karaduman, Investigation of aeration performance of Ilısu Dam outlet using two-phase flow model, Applied Water Science, Vol. 9, No. 111, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s13201-019-0982-0

16-19     Bernard Twaróg, The analysis of the reactive work of the Alden Turbine, Technical Transactions I, Environmental Engineering, 2019. doi: 10.4467/2353737XCT.19.010.10050

14-19     Guodong Li, Xingnan Li, Jian Ning, and Yabing Deng, Numerical simulation and engineering application of a dovetail-shaped bucket, Water, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2019. doi: 10.3390/w11020242

13-19     Ilaria Rendina, Giacomo Viccione, and Leonardo Cascini, Kinematics of flow mass movements on inclined surfaces, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 107-123, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00162-019-00486-y

10-19     O.K. Saleh, E.A. Elnikhely, and Fathy Ismail, Minimizing the hydraulic side effects of weirs construction by using labyrinth weirs, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 66, pp. 1-11, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.016

05-19   Hakan Ersoy, Murat Karahan, Kenan Gelişli, Aykut Akgün, Tuğçe Anılan, M. Oğuz Sünnetci, Bilgehan Kul Yahşi, Modelling of the landslide-induced impulse waves in the Artvin Dam reservoir by empirical approach and 3D numerical simulation, Engineering Geology, Vol. 249, pp. 112-128, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.12.025

96-18     Kyung-Seop Sin, Robert Ettema, Christopher I. Thornton, Numerical modeling to assess the influence of bendway weirs on flow distribution in river beds, Task 4 of Study: Native Channel Topography and Rock-Weir Structure Channel-Maintenance Techniques, U.S. Dept. of the Interior. CSU-HYD Report No. 2018-1, 2018.

95-18   Thulfikar Razzak Al-Husseini, Hayder A. Al-Yousify and Munaf A. Al-Ramahee, Experimental and numerical study of the effect of the downstream spillway face’s angle on the stilling basin’s energy dissipation, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9.8, pp. 1327-1337, 2018.

94-18   J. Michalski and J. Wendelbo, Utilizing CFD methods as a forensic tool in pipeline systems to assess air/water transient issues, Proceedings, 7, pp. 5519-5527, 91st Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition & Conference (WEFTEC), New Orleans, LA, United States, September 29 – October 3, 2018. doi.org/10.2175/193864718825138817

79-18 Harold Alvarez and John Wendelbo, Estudio de 3 modelos matemáticos para similar olas producidas por derrumbes en embalses y esfuerzos en compuertas, XXVIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidráulica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, September 2018. (In Spanish)

70-18   Michael Pfister, Gaetano Crispino, Thierry Fuchsmann, Jean-Marc Ribi and Corrado Gisonni, Multiple inflow branches at supercritical-type vortex drop shaft, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 144, No. 11, 2018. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001530

67-18   F. Nunes, J. Matos and I. Meireles, Numerical modelling of skimming flow over small converging spillways, 3rd International Conference on Protection against Overtopping, June 6-8, 2018, Grange-over-Sands, UK, 2018.

66-18   Maria João Costa, Maria Teresa Ferreira, António N. Pinheiro and Isabel Boavida, The potential of lateral refuges for Iberian barbel under simulated hydropeaking conditions, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 124, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.029

63-18   Michael J. Seluga, Frederick Vincent, Samuel Glovick and Brad Murray, A new approach to hydraulics in baffle drop shafts to address dry and wet weather flow in combined sewer tunnels, North American Tunneling Conference Proceedings, June 24-27, 2018, Washington, D.C. pp. 448-461, 2018. © Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration

62-18   Ana Quaresma, Filipe Romão, Paulo Branco, Maria Teresa Ferreira and António N. Pinheiro, Multi slot versus single slot pool-type fishways: A modelling approach to compare hydrodynamics, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 122, pp. 197-206, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.006

57-18   Amir Isfahani, CFD modeling of piano key weirs using FLOW-3D, International Dam Safety Conference, January 23-24, 2018, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India; Technical Session 1A, Uncertainties and Risk Management in Dams, 2018.

49-18   Jessica M. Thompson, Jon M. Hathaway and John S. Schwartz, Three-dimensional modeling of the hydraulic function and channel stability of regenerative stormwater conveyances, Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, vol. 4, no.3, 2018. doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000861

46-18   A.B. Veksler and S.Z. Safin, Hydraulic regimes and downstream scour at the Kama Hydropower Plant, Power Technology and Engineering, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2-13, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s10749-018-0862-z

45-18   H. Omara and A. Tawfik, Numerical study of local scour around bridge piers, 9th Annual Conference on Environmental Science and Development, Paris, France, Feb. 7-9, 2018; IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol. 151, 2018. doi.org:10.1088/1755-1315/151/1/012013

40-18   Vincent Libaud, Christophe Daux and Yanis Oukid, Practical Capacities and Challenges of 3D CFD Modelling: Feedback Experience in Engineering Projects, Advances in Hydroinformatics, pp. 767-780, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_55

39-18   Khosro Morovati and Afshin Eghbalzadeh, Study of inception point, void fraction and pressure over pooled stepped spillways using FLOW-3D, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, vol. 28, no. 4, pp.982-998, 2018. doi.org/10.1108/HFF-03-2017-0112

34-18   Tomasz Siuta, The impact of deepening the stilling basin on the characteristics of hydraulic jump, Technical Transactions, vol. 3, pp. 173-186, 2018.

32-18   Azin Movahedi, M.R. Kavianpour, M. R and Omid Aminoroayaie Yamini, Evaluation and modeling scouring and sedimentation around downstream of large dams, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 320, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7487-2

31-18   Yang Song, Ling-Lei Zhang, Jia Li, Min Chen and Yao-Wen Zhang, Mechanism of the influence of hydrodynamics on Microcystis aeruginosa, a dominant bloom species in reservoirs, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 636, pp. 230-239, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.257

30-18   Shaolin Yang, Wanli Yang, Shunquan Qin, Qiao Li and Bing Yang, Numerical study on characteristics of dam-break wave, Ocean Engineering, vol. 159, pp.358-371, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.011

27-18   Rachel E. Chisolm and Daene C. McKinney, Dynamics of avalanche-generated impulse waves: three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations and sensitivity analysis, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 1373-1393, 2018. doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1373-2018.

24-18   Han Hu, Zhongdong Qian, Wei Yang, Dongmei Hou and Lan Du, Numerical study of characteristics and discharge capacity of piano key weirs, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 62, pp. 27-32, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.05.004

23-18   Manoochehr Fathi-Moghaddam, Mohammad Tavakol Sadrabadi and Mostafa Rahmanshahi, Numerical simulation of the hydraulic performance of triangular and trapezoidal gabion weirs in free flow condition, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 62, pp. 93-104, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.05.005

22-18   Anastasios I.Stamou, Georgios Mitsopoulos, Peter Rutschmann and Minh Duc Bui, Verification of a 3D CFD model for vertical slot fish-passes, Environmental Fluid Mechanics, June 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s10652-018-9602-z

17-18   Nikou Jalayeri, John Wendelbo, Joe Groeneveld, Andrew John Bearlin, and John Gulliver, Boundary dam total dissolved gas analysis using a CFD model, Proceedings from the U.S. Society on Dams Annual Conference, April 30 – May 4, 2018, © 2018 U.S. Society on Dams.

12-18   Bernard Twaróg, Interaction between hydraulic conditions and structures – fluid structure interaction problem solving. A case study of a hydraulic structure, Technical Transactions 2/2018, Environmental Engineering, DOI: 10.4467/2353737XCT.18.029.8002

06-18   Oscar Herrera-Granados, Turbulence Flow Modeling of One-Sharp-Groyne Field, © Springer International Publishing AG 2018, M. B. Kalinowska et al. (eds.), Free Surface Flows and Transport Processes, GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70914-7_12

05-18  Shangtuo Qian, Jianhua Wu, Yu Zhou and Fei Ma, Discussion of “Hydraulic Performance of an Embankment Weir with Rough Crest” by Stefan Felder and Nushan Islam, J. Hydraul. Eng., 2018, 144(4): 07018003, © ASCE.

04-18   Faezeh Tajabadi, Ehsan Jabbari and Hamed Sarkardeh, Effect of the end sill angle on the hydrodynamic parameters of a stilling basin, DOI 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11837-y, Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2018) 133: 10

03-18   Dhemi Harlan, Dantje K. Natakusumah, Mohammad Bagus Adityawan, Hernawan Mahfudz and Fitra Adinata, 3D Numerical Modeling of Flow in Sedimentation Basin, MATEC Web of Conferences 147, 03012 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814703012 SIBE 2017

02-18   ARKAN IBRAHIM, AZHEEN KARIM and Mustafa GÜNAL, Simulation of local scour development downstream of broad-crested weir with inclined apron, European Journal of Science and Technology Special Issue, pp. 57-61, January 2018, Copyright © 2017 EJOSAT.

62-17   Abbas Mansoori, Shadi Erfanian and Farhad Khamchin Moghadam, A study of the conditions of energy dissipation in stepped spillways with A-shaped step using FLOW-3D, Civil Engineering Journal, 3.10, 2017.

57-17   Ben Modra, Brett Miller, Nigel Moon and Andrew Berghuis, Physical model testing of a bespoke articulated concrete block (ACB) fishway, 13th Hydraulics in Water Engineering Conference, Sydney, Nov. 13-18, 2017; Engineers Australia, pp. 301-309, 2017.

53-17   C. Gonzalez, U. Baeumer and C. Russell, Natural disaster relief and recovery arrangements Fitzroy project, bridge scour remediation, 13th Hydraulics in Water Engineering Conference, Sydney. Nov. 13-18, 2017; Engineers Australia, pp. 274-281, 2017.

52-17   Nigel Moon, Russell Merz, Sarah Luu and Daley Clohan, Utilising CFD modelling to conceptualise a novel rock ramp fishway design, 13th Hydraulics in Water Engineering Conference, Sydney, Nov. 13-18, 2017; Engineers Australia, pp. 382-389, 2017.

50-17   B.M. Crookston, R.M. Anderson and B.P. Tullis, Free-flow discharge estimation method for Piano Key weir geometries, Journal of Hydro-environment Research (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.003.

48-17   Jian Zhou, Physics of Environmental Flows Interacting with Obstacles, PhD Thesis: Colorado State University, Copyright by Jian Zhou 2017, All Rights Reserved.

46-17   Michael Sturn, Bernhard Gems, Markus Aufleger, Bruno Mazzorana, Maria Papathoma-Köhle and Sven Fuchs, Scale Model Measurements of Impact Forces on Obstacles Induced by Bed-load Transport Processes, Proceedings of the 37th IAHR World Congress August 13 – 18, 2017, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

43-17   Paula Beceiro, Maria do Céu Almeida and Jorge Matos, Numerical modelling of air-water flows in sewer drops, Available Online 28 April 2017, wst2017246; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.246

42-17   Arnau Bayon, Juan Pablo Toro,  Fabián A.Bombardelli, Jorge Matose and Petra Amparo López-Jiménez, Influence of VOF technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated, skimming flow in stepped spillwaysJournal of Hydro-environment Research, Available online 26 October 2017

40-17   Sturm M, Gems B, Mazzorana B, Gabl R and Aufleger M, Validation of physical and 3D numerical modelling of hydrodynamic flow impacts on objects (Validierung experimenteller und 3-D-numerischer Untersuchungen zur Einwirkung hydrodynamischer Fließprozesse auf Objekte), Bozen-Bolzano Institutional Archive (BIA), ISSN: 0043-0978, https://bia.unibz.it/handle/10863/3893, 2017

38-17   Tsung-Hsien Huang, Chyan-Deng Jan, and Yu-Chao Hsu, Numerical Simulations of Water Surface Profiles and Vortex Structure in a Vortex Settling Basin by using FLOW-3D, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 531-542 (2017) 531, DOI: 10.6119/JMST-017-0509-1

36-17   Jacob van Alwon, Duncan Borman and Andrew Sleigh, Numerical Modelling of Aerated Flows Over Stepped Spillways, 37th IAHR World Congress, 2017.

35-17   Abolfazl Nazari Giglou, John Alex Mccorquodale and Luca Solari, Numerical study on the effect of the spur dikes on sedimentation pattern, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Available online 8 March 2017.

33-17   Giovanni De Cesare, Khalid Essyad, Paloma Furlan, Vu Nam Khuong, Sean Mulligan, Experimental study at prototype scale of a self-priming free surface siphon, Congrès SHF : SIMHYDRO 2017, Nice, 14-16 June

32-17   Kathryn Plymesser and Joel Cahoon, Pressure gradients in a steeppass fishway using a computational fluid dynamics model, Ecological Engineering 108 (2017) 277–283.

31-17   M. Ghasemi, S. Soltani-Gerdefaramarzi, The Scour Bridge Simulation around a Cylindrical Pier Using FLOW-3D, Journal of Hydrosciences and Environment 1(2): 2017 46-54

27-17   John Wendelbo and Brian Fox, CFD modeling of Piano Key weirs: validation and numerical parameter space analysis, 2017 Dam Safety, San Antonio, September 10-14, 2017, Copyright © 2017 Association of State Dam Safety Officials, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

26-17   Brian Fox and John Wendelbo, Numerical modeling of Piano Key Weirs using FLOW-3D, USSD Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, April 3- 7, 2017

25-17   Rasoul Daneshfaraz, Sina Sadeghfam and Ali Ghahramanzadeh, Three-dimensional Numerical Investigation of Flow through Screens as Energy Dissipators, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0273

23-17   J.M, Duguay, R.W.J. Lacey and J. Gaucher, A case study of a pool and weir fishway modeled with OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D, Ecological Engineering, Volume 103, Part A, June 2017, Pages 31-42

22-17   Hanif Pourshahbaz, Saeed Abbasi and Poorya Taghvaei, Numerical scour modeling around parallel spur dikes in FLOW-3D, https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-2017-21, Drinking Water Engineering and Science, © Author(s) 2017

21-17   Hamid Mirzaei, Zohreh Heydari and Majid Fazli, The effect of meshing and comparing different models of turbulence in topographic prediction of bed and amplitude of flow around the groin in 90-degree arc with movable bed, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, pp 1–16, July 2017

13-17   Lan Qi, Hui Chen, Xiao Wang, Wencai Fei and Donghai Liu, Establishment and application of three-dimensional realistic river terrain in the numerical modeling of flow over spillways, Water Science & Technology: Water Supply | in press | 2017.

11-17   Allison, M.A., Yuill, B.T., Meselhe, E.A., Marsh, J.K., Kolker, A.S., Ameen, A.D., Observational and numerical particle tracking to examine sediment dynamics in a Mississippi River delta diversion, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.06.004.

09-17   Hamid Mirzaei, Zohreh Heydari and Majid Fazli, The effect of meshing and comparing different turbulence models in predicting the topography of bed and flow field in the 90 degree bend with moving bed, M. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2017). doi:10.1007/s40808-017-0336-6

03-17   Luis G. Castillo and José M. Carrillo, Comparison of methods to estimate the scour downstream of a ski jump, Civil Engineering Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, UPCT Paseo Alfonso XIII, 52 – 30203 Cartagena, Spain, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 92 (2017) 171–180.

103-16 Daniel Valero and Rafael Garcia-Bartual, Calibration of an Air Entrainment Model for CFD Spillway Applications, Advances in Hydroinformatics, P. Gourbesville et al. (eds), pp. 571-582, 2016. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-615-7_38

97-16   M. Taghavi and H. Ghodousi, A Comparison on Discharge Coefficients of Side and Normal Weirs with Suspended Flow Load using FLOW-3D, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(3), doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i3/78537, January 2016.

96-16   Luis G. Castillo and José M. Carrillo, Scour, Velocities and Pressures Evaluations Produced by Spillway and Outlets of DamWater 2016, 8(3), 68; doi.org/10.3390/w8030068.

95-16   Majid Heydari and Alireza KhoshKonesh, The Comparison of the Performance of Prandtl Mixing Length, Turbulence Kinetic Energy, K-e, RNG and LES Turbulence Models in Simulation of the Positive Wave Motion Caused by Dam Break on the Erodible Bed, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(7), 2016. doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i7/87856

93-16   Saleh I. Khassaf, Ali N. Attiyah and Hayder A. Al-Yousify, Experimental investigation of compound side weir with modeling using computational fluid dynamic, International Journal of Energy and Environment, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2016 pp.169-178

92-16   Jason Duguay and Jay Lacey, Modeling: OpenFOAM CFD Modeling Case Study of a Pool and Weir Fishway with Implications for Free-Surface Flows, International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage 2016

90-16   Giacomo Viccione, Vittorio Bovolin and Eugenio Pugliese Carratelli, A numerical investigation of liquid impact on planar surfaces, ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Greece, June 2016.

89-16   Giacomo Viccione, A numerical investigation of flow dynamics over a trapezoidal smooth open channel, ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Greece, June 2016.

87-16  Jian Zhou and Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy, Numerical simulations of intrusive gravity currents interacting with a bottom-mounted obstacle in a continuously stratified ambient, Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 17; 191–209, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9454-3

86-16   Charles R. Ortloff, Similitude in Archaeology: Examining Agricultural System Science in PreColumbian Civilizations of Ancient Peru and Bolivia, Hydrol Current Res 7:259. doi: 10.4172/2157-7587.1000259, October 2016.

85-16   Charles R. Ortloff, New Discoveries and Perspectives on Water Management at 300 Bc – Ad 1100 Tiwanaku’s Urban Center (Bolivia), MOJ Civil Eng 1(3): 00014. DOI: 10.15406/mojce.2016.01.00014.

82-16   S. Paudel and N. Saenger, Grid refinement study for three dimensional CFD model involving incompressible free surface flow and rotating object, Computers & Fluids, Volume 143, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.10.025, 17 January 2017, Pages 134–140

77-16   José A. Vásquez, Daniel M. Robb, MODELACIÓN CFD DE ROTURA DE PRESAS EN PRESENCIA DE OBSTÁCULOS, XXVII CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO DE HIDRÁULICA, LIMA, PERÚ, 28 AL 30 DE SETIEMBRE DE 2016.

76-16   José A. Vásquez and Guilherme de Lima, MODELACIÓN CFD DE ONDAS TSUNAMI EN RESERVORIOS, LAGOS Y MINAS CAUSADAS POR DESLIZAMIENTOS DE LADERAS, XXVII CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO DE HIDRÁULICA, LIMA, PERÚ, 28 AL 30 DE SETIEMBRE DE 2016.

75-16   Bernhard Gems, Bruno Mazzorana, Thomas Hofer, Michael Sturm, Roman Gabl and Markus Aufleger, 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1351-1368, 2016, http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/16/1351/2016/, doi:10.5194/nhess-16-1351-2016 © Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

74-16   Roman Gabl, Jakob Seibl, Manfred Pfeifer, Bernhard Gems and Markus Aufleger, 3D-numerische Modellansätze für die Berechnung von Lawineneinstößen in Speicher (Concepts to simulate avalanche impacts into a reservoir based on 3D-numerics), Österr Wasser- und Abfallw (2016). doi:10.1007/s00506-016-0346-z.

73-16   Sebastian Krzyzagorski, Roman Gabl, Jakob Seibl, Heidi Böttcher and Markus Aufleger, Implementierung eines schräg angeströmten Rechens in die 3D-numerische Berechnung mit FLOW-3D (Implementation of an angled trash rack in the 3D-numerical simulation with FLOW-3D), Österr Wasser- und Abfallw (2016) 68: 146. doi:10.1007/s00506-016-0299-2.

71-16   Khosro Morovati, Afshin Eghbalzadeh and Saba Soori, Numerical Study of Energy Dissipation of Pooled Stepped Spillways, Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 2, No. 5, May, 2016.

66-16   Sooyoung Kim, Seo-hye Choi and Seung Oh Lee, Analysis of Influence for Breach Flow According to Asymmetry of Breach Cross-section, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 17, No. 5 pp. 557-565, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.5.557, ISSN 1975-4701 / eISSN 2288-4688.

65-16   Dae-Geun Kim, Analysis of Overflow Characteristics around a Circular-Crested Weir by Using Numerical Model, Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater Vol. 30, No. 2, April 2016.

63-16   Farzad Ferdos and Bijan Dargahi, A study of turbulent flow in largescale porous media at high Reynolds numbers. Part II: flow physics, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2016.1211185.

62-16   Farzad Ferdos and Bijan Dargahi, A study of turbulent flow in largescale porous media at high Reynolds numbers. Part I: numerical validation, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2016.1211184.

60-16   Chia-Lin Chiu, Chia-Ming Fan and Shun-Chung Tsung, Numerical modeling for  periodic oscillation of free overfall in a vertical drop pool, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001236. © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.

54-16   Serife Yurdagul Kumcu, Investigation of Flow Over Spillway Modeling and Comparison between Experimental Data and CFD Analysis, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, (0000) 00(0):1-10, Copyright 2016 Korean Society of Civil Engineers, DOI 10.1007/s12205-016-1257-z.

52-16   Gharehbaghi, A., Kaya, B. and Saadatnejadgharahassanlou, Two-Dimensional Bed Variation Models Under Non-equilibrium Conditions in Turbulent Streams, H. Arab J Sci Eng (2016). doi:10.1007/s13369-016-2258-4

48-16   M. Mohsin Munir, Taimoor Ahmed, Javed Munir and Usman Rasheed, Application of Computational Flow Dynamics Analysis for Surge Inception and Propagation for Low Head Hydropower Projects, Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Pakistan Academy of Sciences, A. Physical and Computational Sciences 53 (2): 177–185 (2016), Copyright © Pakistan Academy of Sciences

46-16   Manuel Gómez, Joan Recasens, Beniamino Russo and Eduardo Martínez-Gomariz, Assessment of inlet efficiency through a 3D simulation: numerical and experimental comparison, wst2016326; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.326, August 2016

45-16   Chia-Ying Chang, Frederick N.-F. Chou, Yang-Yih Chen, Yi-Chern Hsieh, Chia-Tzu Chang, Analytical and experimental investigation of hydrodynamic performance and chamber optimization of oscillating water column system, Energy 113 (2016) 597-614

42-16   Bung, D. and Valero, D., Application of the Optical Flow Method to Velocity Determination, In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June 2016, doi:10.15142/T3150628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

41-16   Valero, D., Bung, D., Crookston, B. and Matos, J., Numerical investigation of USBR type III stilling basin performance downstream of smooth and stepped spillways, In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management. 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June 2016, doi:10.15142/T340628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

40-16   Bruce M. Savage, Brian M. Crookston and Greg S. Paxson, Physical and Numerical Modeling of Large Headwater Ratios for a 15° Labyrinth Spillway, J. Hydraul. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001186, 04016046.

36-16   Kai-Wen Hsiao, Yu-Chao Hsu, Chyan-Deng Jan, and Yu-Wen Su, Characteristics of Hydraulic Shock Waves in an Inclined Chute Contraction by Using Three Dimensional Numerical Model, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 18, EGU 2016-11505, 2016, EGU General Assembly 2016, © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

34-16   Dunlop, S., Willig, I., Paul, G., Cabinet Gorge Dam Spillway Modifications for TDG Abatement – Design Evolution and Field Performance, In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management. 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June, 2016, doi:10.15142/T3650628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

33-16   Crispino, G., Dorthe, D., Fuchsmann, T., Gisonni, C., Pfister, M., Junction chamber at vortex drop shaft: case study of Cossonay, In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June 2016, doi:10.15142/T350628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

32-16  Brown, K., Crookston, B., Investigating Supercritical Flows in Curved Open Channels with Three Dimensional Numerical Modeling, In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June, 2016, doi:10.15142/T3580628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

31-16  Cicero, G, Influence of some geometrical parameters on Piano Key Weir discharge efficiency,In B. Crookston & B. Tullis (Eds.), Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, 6th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Portland, OR, 27-30 June, 2016, doi:10.15142/T3320628160853 (ISBN 978-1-884575-75-4).

28-16   Anthoula Gkesouli, Maria Nitsa, Anastasios I. Stamou, Peter Rutschmann and Minh Duc Bui, Modeling the effect of wind in rectangular settling tanks for water supply, DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1195290, Desalination and Water Treatment, June 22, 2016.

27-16   Eugenio Pugliese Carratelli, Giacomo Viccione and Vittorio Bovolin, Free surface flow impact on a vertical wall: a numerical assessment, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., DOI 10.1007/s00162-016-0386-9, February 2016.

25-16   Daniel Valero and Daniel B. Bung, Sensitivity of turbulent Schmidt number and turbulence model to simulations of jets in crossflow, Environmental Modelling & Software 82 (2016) 218e228.

24-16   Il Won Seo, Young Do Kim, Yong Sung Park and Chang Geun Song, Spillway discharges by modification of weir shapes and overflow surroundings, Environmental Earth Sciences, March 2016, 75:496, 14 March 2016

23-16   Du Han Lee, Myounghwan Kim and Dong Sop Rhee, Evacuation Safety Evaluation of Inundated Stairs Using 3D Numerical Simulation, International Journal of Smart Home Vol. 10, No. 3, (2016), pp.149-158 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.3.15

22-16   Arnau Bayon, Daniel Valero, Rafael García-Bartual, Francisco Jose Valles-Moran and Amparo Lopez-Jimenez, Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump, Environmental Modelling & Software 80 (2016) 322e335.

21-16   Shima Bahadori and Mehdi Behdarvandi Askar, Investigating the Effect of Relative Width on Momentum Transfer between Main Channel and Floodplain in Rough Rectangular Compound Channel Sunder Varius Relative Depth Condition, Open Journal of Geology, 2016, 6, 225-231, Published Online April 2016 in SciRes.

18-16   Ali Ahrari,  Hong Lei, Montassar Aidi Sharif, Kalyanmoy Deb and  Xiaobo Tan, Optimum Design of Artificial Lateral Line Systems for Object Tracking under Uncertain Conditions, COIN Report Number: 2016006

16-16   Elena Battisacco, Giovanni De Cesare and Anton J. Schleiss, Re-establishment of a uniform discharge on the Olympic fountain in Lausanne, Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, (2016) DOI: 10.1080/23249676.2016.1163648.

14-16   Shima Bahadori, Mehdi and Behdarvandi Askar, Investigating the Simultaneous Effect of Relative Width and Relative Roughness on Apparent Shear Stress in Symmetric Compound Rectangular Channels, JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH IN SCIENCE, ISSN 2322-5009 CODEN (USA): JCRSDJ, S (1), 2016: 654-660

12-16   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering Innovations at 100 BC- AD 300 Nabataean Petra (Jordan), In conference proceedings: De Aquaeductu atque Aqua Urbium Lyciae Pamphyliae Pisidiae. The Legacy of Sextus Julius Frontinus, Antalya, Turkey, G. Wiplinger, ed.  ISBN: 978-90-429-3361-3, 2016 Peeters Publisher, Leuven, Belgium.

11-16 G. Robblee, S. Kees and B.M. Crookston, Schnabel Engineering; and K. Keel, Town of Hillsborough, Ensuring Water Supply Reliability with Innovative PK Weir Spillway Design, 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Denver, CO, April 11-15, 2016

10-16 Tina Stanard and Victor Vasquez, Freese and Nichols, Inc.; Ruth Haberman, Upper Brushy Creek Water Control and Improvement District; Blake Tullis, Utah State University; and Bruce Savage, Idaho State University, Importance of Site Considerations for Labyrinth Spillway Hydraulic Design — Upper Brushy Creek Dam 7 Modernization, 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Denver, CO, April 11-15, 2016

09-16 James R. Crowder, Brian M. Crookston, Bradley T. Boyer and J. Tyler Coats, Schnabel Engineering, Cultivating Ingenuity and Safety in Alabama: The Taming of Lake Ogletree Reservoir, 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Denver, CO, April 11-15, 2016

08-16 Frank Lan, Robert Waddell and Michael Zusi, AECOM; and Brian Grant, Montana DNRC, Replacing Ruby Dam Outlet Uses Computational Fluid Dynamics to Model Energy Dissipation, 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Denver, CO, April 11-15, 2016

07-16 Elise N. Dombeck, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Applications of FLOW-3D for Stability Analyses of Concrete Spillways at FERC Projects, 36th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Denver, CO, April 11-15, 2016

06-16   Farhad Ghazizadeh and M. Azhdary Moghaddam, An Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Flow Hydraulic Parameters in Circular Crested Weir Using FLOW-3D, Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 2, No. 1, January, 2016

05-16   Sadegh Dehdar-behbahani and Abbas Parsaie, Numerical modeling of flow pattern in dam spillway’s guide wall. Case study: Balaroud dam, Iran, doi:10.1016/j.aej.2016.01.006, February 2016.

04-16   Oscar Herrera-Granados and Stanisław W. Kostecki, Numerical and physical modeling of water flow over the ogee weir of the new Niedów barrage, DOI: 10.1515/johh-2016-0013, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 64, 2016, 1, 67–74

03-16   B. Gems, B. Mazzorana, T. Hofer, M. Sturm, R. Gabl, M. Aufleger, 3D-hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., doi:10.5194/nhess-2015-326, 2016, Manuscript under review for journal Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., Published: 19 January 2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License.

124-15 Yousef Sangsefidi, Mojtaba Mehraein, and Masoud Ghodsian, Numerical simulation of flow over labyrinth spillways, Scientia Iranica, Transaction A, 22(5), 1779–1787, 2015.

120-15   Du Han Lee, Myounghwan Kim and Dong Sop Rhee, Analysis of Critical Evacuation Condition on Inundated Stairs Using Numerical Simulation, Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.120 (GST 2015), pp.522-525 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.120.104

119-15  Shiqiang Ye and Paul Toth, Bank Erosion Control at Frederickhouse Dam, Ontario, CDA 2015 Annual Conference, Congrès annuel 2015 de l’ACB, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2015 Oct 5-8

118-15  D.M. Robb and J.A. Vasquez, Numerical simulation of dam-break flows using depth-averaged hydrodynamic and three-dimensional CFD models, 22nd Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference, Montreal, Quebec, April 29 – May 2, 2015

117-15 Ashkan. Reisi, Parastoo. Salah, and Mohamad Reza. Kavianpour, Impact of Chute Walls Convergence Angle on Flow Characteristics of Spillways using Numerical Modeling, International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences (IJCEBS), Volume 3, Issue 3 (2015) ISSN 2320–4087 (Online)

115-15  Ivana Vouk, Field and Numerical Investigation of Mixing and Transport of Ammonia in the Ottawa River, Master’s Thesis: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, August 2015, © Ivana Vouk, Canada 2016.

113-15   J. Amblard, C. Pams Capoccioni, D. Nivon, L. Mellal, G. De Cesare, T. Ghilardi, M. Jafarnejad and E. Battisacco, Analysis of Ballast Transport in the Event of Overflowing of the Drainage System on High Speed Lines, International Journal of Railway Technology, Volume 4, 2015. doi:10.4203/ijr, t.4.xx.xx , ©Saxe-Coburg Publications, 2015

111-15   Y. Oukid, V. Libaud and C. Daux, 3D CFD modelling of spillways -Practical feedback on capabilities and challenges, Hydropower & Dams Issue Six, 2015

110-15  Zhiyong Zhang and Yuanping Yang, Numerical Study on Onset Condition of Scour Below Offshore Pipeline Under Reversing Tidal Flow, © EJGE, Vol. 20 [2015], Bund. 25

109-15  He Baohua, Numerical Simulation Analysis of Karst Tunnel Water Bursting Movement, © EJGE, Vol. 20 [2015], Bund. 25

105-15   Ali Yıldız and A. İhsan Martı, Comparison of Experimental Study and CFD Analysis of the Flow Under a Sluice Gate, Proceedings of International Conference on Structural Architectural and Civil Engineering Held on 21-22, Nov, 2015, in Dubai, ISBN:9788193137321

104-15  Yehui Zhu and Liquan Xie, Numerical Analysis of Flow Effects on Water Interface over a Submarine Pipeline, Resources, Environment and Engineering II: Proceedings of the 2nd Technical Congress on Resources, Environment and Engineering (CREE 2015, Hong Kong, 25-26 September 2015), Edited by Liquan Xie, CRC Press 2015, Pages 99–104, DOI: 10.1201/b19136-16.

100-15  Yizhou Xiao, Wene Wang, Xiaotao Hu, and Yan Zhou, Experimental and numerical research on portable short-throat flume in the field, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.11.003, Available online December 8, 2015

99-15   Mehdi Taghavi and Hesam Ghodousi, Simulation of Flow Suspended Load in Weirs by Using FLOW-3D Model, Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 1, No. 1, November 2015

98-15   Azin Movahedi, Ali Delavari and Massoud Farahi, Designing Manhole in Water Transmission Lines Using FLOW-3D Numerical Model, Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 1, No. 1, November 2015

97-15   R. Gabl, J. Seibl, B. Gems, and M. Aufleger, 3-D numerical approach to simulate the overtopping volume caused by an impulse wave comparable to avalanche impact in a reservoir, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2617-2630, doi:10.5194/nhess-15-2617-2015, 2015.

94-15   Jason Matthew Duguay and Jay Lacey, Numerical Study of an Innovative Fish Ladder Design for Perched Culverts, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 10.1139/cjce-2014-0436, November 2015

92-15   H. A. Hussein, R. Abdulla and  M. A. Md Said, Computational Investigation of Inlet Baffle Height on the Flow in a Rectangular Oil/Water Separator Tanks, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 802, pp. 587-592, Oct. 2015

91-15   Mahmoud Mohammad Rezapour Tabari and Shiva Tavakoli, Effects of Stepped Spillway Geometry on Flow Pattern and Energy DissipationArabian Journal for Science and Engineering, October 2015

87-15   Erin R. Ryan, Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Fish Passage – An Evaluation of 2D vs 3D Hydraulic Analysis Methods, Master’s Thesis: Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Summer 2015, Copyright by Erin Rose Ryan 2015

79-15   Ana L. Quaresma, Is CFD an efficient tool to develop pool type fishways? International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage. Paper 20, June 24, 2015

78-15   Amir Alavi, Don Murray, Claude Chartrand and Derek McCoy, CFD Modeling Provides Value Engineering, Hydro Review, October 2015

75-15   Rebekka Czerny, Classification of flow patterns in a nature-oriented fishway based on 3D hydraulic simulation results, International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage. Paper 39, June 22, 2015

73-15   Frank Seidel, Hybrid model approach for designing fish ways – example fish lift system at Baldeney/Ruhr and fishway at Geesthacht /Elbet, International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage 2015

72-15   G. Guyot, B. Huber, and A. Pittion-Rossillon, Assessment of a numerical method to forecast vortices with a scaled model, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

71-15   Abbas Parsaie, Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi and Amir Moradinejad, CFD modeling of flow pattern in spillway’s approach channel, Sustainable Water Resources Management, September 2015, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 245-251

70-15   T. Liepert, A. Kuhlmann, G. Haimer, M.D. Bui and P. Rutschmann, Optimization of Fish Pass Entrance Location at a Hydropower Plant Considering Site-Specific Constraints, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes, Greece, 3-5 September 2015

67-15   Alkistis Stergiopoulou and Efrossini Kalkani, Towards a first CFD study of modern horizontal axis Archimedean water current turbines, Volume: 02 Issue: 04, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal © 2015, IRJET, July 2015

66-15   Won Choi, Jeongbae Jeon, Jinseon Park, Jeong Jae Lee and Seongsoo Yoon, System reliability analysis of downstream spillways based on collapse of upstream spillways, Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(4): 140-150.

64-15   Szu-Hsien Peng and Chuan Tang, Development and Application of Two-Dimensional Numerical Model on Shallow Water Flows Using Finite Volume Method, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2015, 3, 989-996, Published Online August 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2015.38121

62-15   Cuneyt Yavuz, Ali Ersin Dincer, Kutay Yilmaz and Samet Dursun, Head Loss Estimation of Water Jets from Flip Bucket of Cakmak-1 Diversion Weir and HEPP, RESEARCH GATE, August 2015 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3650.5440

54-15   Guo-bin Xu, Li-na Zhao, and Chih Ted Yang, Derivation and verification of minimum energy dissipation rate principle of fluid based on minimum entropy production rate principle, International Journal of Sediment Research, August 2015

50-15   Vafa Khoolosi, Sedat Kabdaşli, and Sevda Farrokhpour, Modeling and Comparison of Water Waves Caused by Landslides into Reservoirs, Watershed Management 2015 © ASCE 2015.

48-15   Mohammad Rostami and Maaroof Siosemarde, Human Life Saving by Simulation of Dam Break using FLOW-3D (A Case Study: Upper Gotvand Dam), www.sciencejournal.in, Volume- 4 Issue- 3 (2015) ISSN: 2319–4731 (p); 2319–5037 (e) © 2015 DAMA International. All rights reserved.

47-15   E. Kolden, B. D. Fox, B. P. Bledsoe and M. C. Kondratieff, Modelling Whitewater Park Hydraulics and Fish Habitat in Colorado, River Res. Applic., doi: 10.1002/rra.2931, 2015

43-15   Firouz Ghasemzadeh, Behzad Parsa, and Mojtaba Noury, Numerical Study of Overflow Capacity of Spillways, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

42-15   Mario Oertel, Numerical Modeling of Free-Surface Flows in Practical Applications, Chapter 8 in Rivers – Physical, Fluvial and Environmental Processes (GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences), by Pawel Rowiński and Artur Radecki-Pawlik, July 2, 2015

39-15   R. Gabl, J. Seibl, B. Gems, and M. Aufleger, 3-D-numerical approach to simulate an avalanche impact into a reservoir, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3, 4121–4157, 2015, www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/3/4121/2015/, doi:10.5194/nhessd-3-4121-2015, © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

37-15   Mario Oertel, Discharge Coefficients of Piano Key Weirs from Experimental and Numerical Models, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

36-15   Jessica Klein and Mario Oertel, Comparison between Crossbar Block Ramp and Vertical Slot Fish Pass via Numerical 3D CFD Simulation, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

35-15   Mario Oertel, Jan P. Balmes and Daniel B. Bung, Numerical Simulation of Erosion Processes on Crossbar Block Ramps, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

33-15   Daniel Valero and Daniel B. Bung, Hybrid Investigation of Air Transport Processes in Moderately Sloped Stepped Spillway Flows, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

32-15   Deniz Velioglu, Nuray Denli Tokyay, and Ali Ersin Dincer, A Numerical and Experimental Study on the Characteristics of Hydraulic Jumps on Rough Beds, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

31-15   J.C.C. Amorim, R.C.R. Amante, and V.D. Barbosa, Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Flow in a Stilling Basin, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

30-15   Luna B.J. César, Salas V. Christian, Gracia S. Jesús, and Ortiz M. Victor, Comparative Analysis of the Modification of Turbulence and Its Effects on a Trapezoidal Section Stilling Basin, E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, 28 June – 3 July, 2015, The Hague, the Netherlands

27-15   L. Castillo, J. Carrillo, and M. Álvarez, Complementary Methods for Determining the Sedimentation and Flushing in a Reservoir, J. Hydraul. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001050 , 05015004, 2015.

22-15   Mohammad Vaghefi, Mohammad Shakerdargah and Maryam Akbari, Numerical investigation of the effect of Froude number on flow pattern around a submerged T-shaped spur dike in a 90º bend, © Turkish Journal of Engineering & Environmental Sciences, 03.04.2015, doi:10.3906/muh-1405-2

18-15   S. Michael Scurlock, Amanda L. Cox, Drew C. Baird, Christopher I. Thornton and Steven R. Abt, Hybrid Modeling of River Training Structures in Sinuous Channels, SEDHYD 2015, Joint 10th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, 5th Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, April 19-23, 2015, Reno, Nevada

13-15   Selahattin Kocaman and Hatice Ozmen-Cagatay, Investigation of dam-break induced shock waves impact on a vertical wall, Journal of Hydrology (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.040.

12-15   Nguyen Cong Thanh and Wang Ling-Ling, Physical and Numerical Model of Flow through the Spillways with a Breast Wall, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (0000) 00(0):1-8, Copyright 2015 Korean Society of Civil Engineers, DOI 10.1007/s12205-015-0742-0, April 10, 2015.

10-15   Yueping Yin, Bolin Huang, Guangning Liu and Shichang Wang, Potential risk analysis on a Jianchuandong dangerous rockmass-generated impulse wave in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, Environ Earth Sci, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4278-x, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

08-15   Yue-ping Yin, Bolin Huang, Xiaoting Chen, Guangning Liu and Shichang Wang, Numerical analysis on wave generated by the Qianjiangping landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir, China, 10.1007/s10346-015-0564-7, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

07-15   M. Vaghefi, A. Ahmadi and B. Faraji, The Effect of Support Structure on Flow Patterns Around T-Shape Spur Dike in 90° Bend Channel, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, February 2015,

06-15   Sajjad Mohammadpour Zalaki, Hosein Fathian, Ebrahim Zalaghi and Farhad Kalantar Hormozi, Investigation of hydraulic parameters and cavitation in Kheir Abad flood release structure, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, February 2015

04-15  Der-Chang Lo, Jin-Shuen Liou, and Shyy Woei Chang, Hydrodynamic Performances of Air-Water Flows in Gullies with and without Swirl Generation Vanes for Drainage Systems of Buildings, Water 2015, 7(2), 679-696; doi:10.3390/w7020679

01-15   William Daley Clohan, Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Subaerial Landslide Generated Waves, Master’s Thesis: Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia (Vancouver), January 2015 © William Daley Clohan, 2015. Available upon request.

136-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in 300 BCE- CE 300 Petra (Jordan), Encyclopedia of Ancient Science, Technology and Medicine in Nonwestern Cultures, Springer Publishing, Berlin Germany, 2014.

135-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Land, Labor, Water and Technology in Precolumbian South America, Encyclopedia of Ancient Science, Technology and Medicine in Nonwestern Cultures, Springer Publishing, Berlin Germany, 2014.

134-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydrologic Engineering of the 300 BCE- CE 1100 Precolumbian Tiwanaku State (Bolivia), Encyclopedia of Ancient Science, Technology and Medicine in Nonwestern Cultures, Springer Publishing, Berlin Germany, 2014.

133-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Water engineering at Petra (Jordan): Recreating the decision process underlying hydraulic engineering of the Wadi Mataha pipeline system, Journal of Archaeological Science, April 2014. 44. 91–97. 10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.015.

132-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in Ancient Peru and Bolivia, Encyclopedia of Ancient Science, Technology and Medicine in Nonwestern Cultures, Springer Publishing, Berlin Germany, 2014.

131-14    Charles R. Ortloff, Water Management in Ancient Peru, Living Reference Work Entry, Encyclopedia of Ancient Science, Technology and Medicine in Nonwestern Cultures, Springer Publishing, Berlin Germany, 2014.

130-14  Kordula Schwarzwälder and Peter Rutschmann, Sampling bacteria with a laser, Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 16, EGU2014-15144, 2014 EGU General Assembly 2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

129-14   Kordula Schwarzwälder, Eve Walters and Peter Rutschmann, Bacteria fate and transport in a river, Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 16, EGU2014-14022, 2014 EGU General Assembly 2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

127-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in Petra, Living Reference Work Entry, Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, pp 1-13, 03 July 2014

124-14  G. Wei. M. Grünzner and F. Semler, Combination of 2D shallow water and full 3D numerical modeling for sediment transport in reservoirs and basins, Reservoir Sedimentation – Schleiss et al. (Eds) © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02675-9.

121-14    A. Bayón-Barrachina, D. Valero, F. Vallès-Morán, and P.A. López-Jiménez, Comparison of CFD Models for Multiphase Flow Evolution in Bridge Scour Processes, 5th International Junior Researcher and Engineer Workshop on Hydraulic Structures, Spa, Belgium, 28-30 August 2014

120-14  D. Valero, R. García-Bartual and J. Marco, Optimisation of Stilling Basin Chute Blocks Using a Calibrated Multiphase RANS Model, 5th International Junior Researcher and Engineer Workshop on Hydraulic Structures, Spa, Belgium, 28-30 August 2014

119-14   R. Gabl, B. Gems, M. Plörer, R. Klar, T. Gschnitzer, S. Achleitner, and M. Aufleger, Numerical Simulations in Hydraulic Engineering, Computational Engineering, 2014, pp 195-224, April 2014

118-14  Kerilyn Ambrosini, Analysis of Flap Gate Design and Implementations for Water Delivery Systems in California and Nevada, BioResource and Agricultural Engineering, BioResource and Agricultural Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 2014

117-14  Amir Moradinejad, Abas Parssai, Mohamad Noriemamzade, Numerical Modeling of Flow Pattern In Kamal Saleh Dam Spillway Approach Channel, App. Sci. Report.10 (2), 2014: 82-89, © PSCI Publications

116-14  Luis G. Castillo and José M. Carrillo, Characterization of the Dynamic Actions and Scour Estimation Downstream of a Dam, 1st International Seminar on Dam Protection against Overtopping and Accidental Leakage, M.Á. Toledo, R. Morán, E. Oñate (Eds), Madrid, 24-25 November 2014

115-14  Luis G. Castillo, José M. Carrillo, Juan T. García, Antonio Vigueras-Rodríguez, Numerical Simulations and Laboratory Measurements in Hydraulic Jumps, 11th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, HIC 2014, New York City, USA

114-14  Du Han Lee, Young Joo Kim, and Samhee Lee, Numerical modeling of bed form induced hyporheic exchangePaddy and Water Environment, August 2014, Volume 12, Issue 1 Supplement, pp 89-97

112-14  Ed Zapel, Hank Nelson, Brian Hughes, Steve Fry, Options for Reducing Total Dissolved Gas at the Long Lake Hydroelectric Facility, Hydrovision International, July 22-24, 2014, Nashville, TN

111-14  Jason Duguay, Jay Lace, Dave Penny and Ken Hannaford, Evolution of an Innovative Fish Ladder Design to Address Issues of Perched Culverts, 2014 Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Montreal, Quebec

106-14   Manuel Gomez and Eduardo Martinez, 1D, 2D and 3D Modeling of a PAC-UPC Laboratory Canal Bend, SimHydro 2014: Modelling of rapid transitory flows, 11-13 June 2014, Sophia Antipolis

105-14 Jason Duguay and Jay Lacey, Numerical Validation of an Innovative Fish Baffle Design in Response to Fish Passage Issues at Perched Culverts, CSPI Technical Bulletin, January 14, 2014

104-14  Di Ning, Di,  A Computational Study on Hydraulic Jumps, including Air Entrainment, Master’s Thesis: Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, 2014, 1569799, Copyright ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2014

103-14  S. M. Sayah, S. Bonanni, Ph. Heller, and M. Volpato, Physical and Numerical Modelling of Cerro del Águila Dam -Hydraulic and Sedimentation, DOI: 10.13140/2.1.5042.1122 Conference: Hydro 2014

102-14   Khosrow Hosseini, Shahab Rikhtegar, Hojat Karami, Keivan Bina, Application of Numerical Modeling to Assess Geometry Effect of Racks on Performance of Bottom Intakes, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, December 2014

98-14  Aysel Duru, Numerical Modelling of Contracted Sharp Crested Weirs, Master’s Thesis: The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, November 2014

97-14  M Angulo, S Liscia, A Lopez and C Lucino, Experimental validation of a low-head turbine intake designed by CFD following Fisher and Franke guidelines, 27th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems (IAHR 2014), IOP Publishing, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 22 (2013) 042014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/22/4/042014

94-14   Hamidreza Babaali, Abolfazl Shamsai, and Hamidreza Vosoughifar, Computational Modeling of the Hydraulic Jump in the Stilling Basin with ConvergenceWalls Using CFD Codes, Arab J Sci Eng, DOI 10.1007/s13369-014-1466-z, October 2014

93-14   A.J. Vellinga, M.J.B. Cartigny, J.T. Eggenhuisen, E.W.M. Hansen, and R. Rouzairol, Morphodynamics of supercritical-flow bedforms using depth-resolved computational fluid dynamics model, International Association of Sedimentologists, Geneva, 2014.

88-14   Marcelo A. Somos-Valenzuela, Rachel E. Chisolm, Daene C. McKinney, and Denny Rivas, Inundation Modeling of a Potential Glacial Lake Outburst Flood in Huaraz, Peru, CRWR Online Report 14-01, March 2014

84-14   Hossein Shahheydari, Ehsan Jafari Nodoshan, Reza Barati, and Mehdi Azhdary Moghadam, Discharge coefficient and energy dissipation over stepped spillway under skimming flow regimeKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 10.1007/s12205-013-0749-3, November 2014

81-14   Gaël Epely-Chauvin, Giovanni De Cesare and Sebastian Schwindt, Numerical Modelling of Plunge Pool Scour Evolution in Non-Cohesive Sediments, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 477–487 (2014).

79-14   Liquan Xie, Yanhui Xu, and Wenrui Huang, Numerical Study on Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Sediment Trapping by Geotextile Mattress with Sloping Curtain (GMSC), Proceedings of the Eleventh (2014) Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium Shanghai, China, October 12-16, 2014 Copyright © 2014 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, ISBN 978–1 880653 90-6: ISSN 1946-004X.

78-14  D. N. Powell and A. A. Khan, Flow Field Upstream of an Orifice under Fixed Bed and Equilibrium Scour ConditionsJ. Hydraul. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000960, 04014076, 2014.

76-14   Berk Sezenöz, Numerical Modelling of Continuous Transverse Grates for Hydraulic Efficiency, Master’s Thesis: The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, October 2014

75-14   Francesco Calomino and Agostino Lauria, 3-D Underflow of a Sluice Gate at a Channel Inlet; Experimental Results and CFD Simulations, Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, Volume 4, Issue 5: 501-508 (2014)

73-14   Som Dutta, Talia E. Tokyay, Yovanni A. Cataño-Lopera, Sergio Serafinod and Marcelo H. Garcia, Application of computational fluid dynamic modeling to improve flow and grit transport in Terence J. O’Brien Water Reclamation Plant, Chicago, Illinois, Journal of Hydraulic Research, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2014.949883, October 2014

72-14   Ali Heidari, Poria Ghassemi, Evaluation of step’s slope on energy dissipation in stepped spillway, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 3 (4) (2014) 501-505, ©Science Publishing Corporation, www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v3i4.3561

70-14   M. Tabatabai, M. Heidarnejad, A. Bordbar, Numerical Study of Flow Patterns in Stilling Basin with Sinusoidal Bed using FLOW-3D Model, Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(13) August 2014, Pages: 787-792

66-14   John S. Schwartz, Keil J. Neff, Frank E. Dworak, Robert R. Woockman, Restoring riffle-pool structure in an incised, straightened urban stream channel using an ecohydraulic modeling approach, Ecol. Eng. (2014), doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.06.002

65-14  Laura Rozumalski and Michael Fullarton, CFD Modeling to Design a Fish Lift Entrance, Hydro Review, July 2014

64-14   Pam Waterman, Scaled for Success: Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis Prompts Swift Stormwater System Improvements in Indianapolis, WaterWorld, August 2014.

63-14   Markus Grünzner and Peter Rutschmann, Large Eddy Simulation  – Ein Beitrag zur Auflösung turbulenter Strömungsstrukturen in technischen Fischaufstiegshilfen; (LES – resolving turbulent flow in technical fish bypasses), Tagungsband Internationales Symposium in Zurich, Wasser- und Flussbau im Alpenraum, Versuchsanstalt fur Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie, ETH Zurich. In German.

62-14   Jason Duguay, Jay Lace, Dave Penny, and Ken Hannaford, Evolution of an Innovative Fish Ladder Design to Address Issues of Perched Culverts, 2014 Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Montreal, Quebec

60-14   Kordula Schwarzwälder, Minh Duc Bui, and Peter Rutschmann, Simulation of bacteria transport processes in a river with FLOW-3D, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 16, EGU2014-12993, 2014, EGU General Assembly 2014, © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

58-14   Eray Usta, Numercial Investigation of Hydraulic Characteristics of Laleili Dam Spillway and Comparison with Physical Model Study, Master’s Thesis: The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, May 2014

57-14   Selahattin Kocaman, Prediction of Backwater Profiles due to Bridges in a Compound Channel Using CFD, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Volume 2014, Article ID 905217, 9 pages, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/905217

54-14   Ines C. Meireles, Fabian A. Bombardelli, and Jorge Matos, Air entrainment onset in skimming flows on steep stepped spillways: an analysis, (2014) Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52:3, 375-385, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2013.878401

53-14   Charles R Ortloff, Groundwater Management in the 300 bce-1100ce Pre-Columbian City of Tiwanaku (Bolivia), Hydrol Current Res 5: 168. doi:10.4172/2157-7587.1000168, 2014

50-14   Mohanad A. Kholdier, Weir-Baffled Culvert Hydrodynamics Evaluation for Fish Passage using Particle Image Velocimetry and Computational Fluid Dynamic Techniques, Ph.D. Thesis: Utah State University (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3078. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3078

48-14   Yu-Heng Lin, Study on raceway pond for microalgae culturing system, Master Thesis: Department of Marine Environment and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, August 2014. In Chinese

38-14   David Ingram, Robin Wallacey, Adam Robinsonz and Ian Bryden, The design and commissioning of the first, circular, combined current and wave test basin, Proceedings of Oceans 2014 MTS/IEEE, Taipei, Taiwan, IEEE, April 2014

36-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in Precolumbian Peru and Bolivia, The Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer-Verlag, Volumes II and III, Heidelberg, Germany, 2014.

35-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in BC 100- AD 300 Petra (Jordan), The Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer-Verlag, Volumes II and III, Heidelberg, Germany, 2014.

34-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Engineering in Precolumbian Peru and Bolivia, The Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer-Verlag, Volumes II and III, Heidelberg, Germany, 2014.

33-14   Roman Gabl, Bernhard Gems, Giovanni De Cesare, and Markus Aufleger, Contribution to Quality Standards for 3D-Numerical Simulations with FLOW-3D, Wasserwirtschaft (ISSN: 0043-0978), vol. 104, num. 3, p. 15-20, Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg-Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden Gmbh, 2014. Available for download at the University of InnsbruckIn German.

31-14   E. Fadaei-Kermani and G.A. Barani, Numerical simulation of flow over spillway based on the CFD method, Scientia Iranica A, 21(1), 91-97, 2014

30-14   Luis G. Castillo  and José M. Carrillo, Scour Analysis Downstream of Paute-Cardenillo Dam, © 3rd IAHR Europe Congress, Book of Proceedings, 2014, Porto, Portugal.

29-14    L. G. Castillo, M. A. Álvarez, and J. M. Carrillo, Numerical modeling of sedimentation and flushing at the Paute-Cardenillo Reservoir, ASCE-EWRI. International Perspective on Water Resources and Environment Quito, January 8-10, 2014

28-14   L. G. Castillo and J. M. CarrilloScour estimation of the Paute-Cardenillo Dam, ASCE-EWRI. International Perspective on Water Resources and Environment Quito, January 8-10, 2014.

27-14   Luis G. Castillo, Manual A. Álvarez and José M. Carrillo, Analysis of Sedimentation and Flushing into the Reservoir Paute-Cardenillo© 3rd IAHR Europe Congress, Book of Proceedings, 2014, Porto, Portugal.

24-14   Carter R. Newell and John Richardson, The Effects of Ambient and Aquaculture Structure Hydrodynamics on the Food Supply and Demand of Mussel Rafts, Journal of Shellfish Research, 33(1):257-272, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2983/035.033.0125, 0125, 2014.

16-14   Han Hu, Jiesheng Huang, Zhongdong Qian, Wenxin Huai, and Genjian Yu, Hydraulic Analysis of Parabolic Flume for Flow Measurement, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.03.002, 2014.

14-14   Seung Oh Lee, Sooyoung Kim, Moonil Kim, Kyoung Jae Lim and Younghun Jung, The Effect of Hydraulic Characteristics on Algal Bloom in an Artificial Seawater Canal: A Case Study in Songdo City, South Korea, Water 2014, 6, 399-413; doi:10.3390/w6020399, ISSN 2073-4441, www.mdpi.com/journal/water

13-14   Kathryn Elizabeth Plymesser, Modeling Fish Passage and Energy Expenditure for American Shad in a Steeppass Fishway using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Ph.D. Thesis: Montana State University, January 2014, © Kathryn Elizabeth Plymesser, 2014, All Rights Reserved.

12-14   Sangdo An and Pierre Y. Julien, Three-Dimensional Modeling of Turbid Density Currents in Imha Reservoir, J. Hydraul. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000851, 05014004, 2014.

09-14   B. Gems, M. Wörndl, R. Gabl, C. Weber, and M. Aufleger, Experimental and numerical study on the design of a deposition basin outlet structure at a mountain debris cone, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 175–187, 2014, www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/14/175/2014/, doi:10.5194/nhess-14-175-2014, © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

07-14   Charles R. Ortloff, Water Engineering at Petra (Jordan): Recreating the Decision Process underlying Hydraulic Engineering of the Wadi Mataha Pipeline System, Journal of Archaeological Science, Available online January 2014.

06-14   Hatice Ozmen-Cagatay, Selahattin Kocaman, Hasan Guzel, Investigation of dam-break flood waves in a dry channel with a hump, Journal of Hydro-environment Research, Available online January 2014.

05-14   Shawn P. Clark, Jonathan Scott Toews, and Rob Tkach, Beyond average velocity: Modeling velocity distributions in partially-filled culverts to support fish passage guidelines, International Journal of River Basin Management, DOI10.1080/15715124.2013.879591, January 2014.

04-14   Giovanni De Cesare, Martin Bieri, Stéphane Terrier, Sylvain Candolfi, Martin Wickenhäuser and Gaël Micoulet, Optimization of a Shared Tailrace Channel of Two Pumped-Storage Plants by Physical and Numerical Modeling, Advances in Hydroinformatics Springer Hydrogeology 2014, pp 291-305.

03-14   Grégory Guyot, Hela Maaloul and Antoine Archer, A Vortex Modeling with 3D CFD, Advances in Hydroinformatics Springer Hydrogeology 2014, pp 433-444.

02-14   Géraldine Milési and Stéphane Causse, 3D Numerical Modeling of a Side-Channel Spillway, Advances in Hydroinformatics Springer Hydrogeology 2014, pp 487-498.

01-14   Mohammad R. Namaee, Mohammad Rostami, S. Jalaledini and Mahdi Habibi, A 3-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Flow Over a Broad-Crested Side Weir, Advances in Hydroinformatics, Springer Hydrogeology 2014, pp 511-523.

104-13   Alireza Nowroozpour, H. Musavi Jahromi and A. Dastgheib, Studying different cases of wedge shape deflectors on energy dissipation in flip bucket using CFD model, Proceedings, 6th International Perspective on Water Resources & the Environment Conference (IPWE), Izmir, Turkey, January 7-9, 2013.

102-13   Shari Dunlop, Isaac Willig and Roger L. Kay, Emergency Response to Erosion at Fort Peck Spillway: Hydraulic Analysis and Design, ICOLD 2013 International Symposium, Seattle, WA.

101-13   Taeho Kang and Heebeom Shin, Dam Emergency Action Plans in Korea, ICOLD 2013 International Symposium, Seattle, WA.

100-13   John Hess, Jeffrey Wisniewski, David Neff and Mike Forrest, A New Auxiliary Spillway for Folsom Dam, ICOLD 2013 International Symposium, Seattle, WA.

98-13   Neda Sharif and Amin Rostami Ravori, Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Flow Separation on Dissipating Energy in Compound Bucket, 2013 5th International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2013); 2013 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering (ICCEN 2013)

97-13  A. Stergiopoulou, V. Stergiopoulos, and E. Kalkani, Contributions to the Study of Hydrodynamic Behaviour of Innovative Archimedean Screw Turbines Recovering the Hydropotential of Watercourses and of Coastal Currents, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Athens, Greece, 5-7 September 2013

96-13   Shokry Abdelaziz, Minh Duc Bui, Namihira Atsushi, and Peter Rutschmann, Numerical Simulation of Flow and Upstream Fish Movement inside a Pool-and-Weir Fishway, Proceedings of 2013 IAHR World Congress, Chengdu, China

95-13  Guodong Li, Lan Lang, and Jian Ning, 3D Numerical Simulation of Flow and Local Scour around a Spur Dike, Proceedings of 2013 IAHR World Congress, Chengdu, China

93-13   Matthew C. Kondratieff and Eric E. Richer, Stream Habitat Investigations and Assistance, Federal Aid Project F-161-R19, Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration, Job Progress Report, Colorado Parks & Wildlife, Aquatic Wildlife Research Section, Fort Collins, Colorado, August 2013. Available upon request

92-13   Matteo Tirindelli, Scott Fenical and Vladimir Shepsis, State-of-the-Art Methods for Extreme Wave Loading on Bridges and Coastal Highways, Seventh National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways (7NSC), May 20-22, 2013, Oakland, CA

91-13   Cecia Millán Barrera, Víctor Manuel Arroyo Correa, Jorge Armando Laurel Castillo, Modeling contaminant transport with aerobic biodegradation in a shallow water body, Proceedings of 2013 IAHR Congress © 2013 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

80-13  Brian Fox, Matthew Kondratieff, Brian Bledsoe, Christopher Myrick, Eco-Hydraulic Evaluation of Whitewater Parks as Fish Passage Barriers, International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage, June 25-27, 2013, Oregon State University. Presentation available for download on the Scholarworks site.

79-13  Changsung Kim, Jongtae Kim, Joongu Kang, Analysis of the Cause for the Collapse of a Temporary Bridge Using Numerical Simulation, Engineering, 2013, 5, 997-1005, (http://www.scirp.org/journal/eng), Copyright © 2013 Changsung Kim et al. Published Online December 2013

76-13   Riley J. Olsen, Michael C. Johnson, and Steven L. Barfuss, Low-Head Dam Reverse Roller Remediation Options, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, November 2013; doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000848.

72-13  M. Pfister, E. Battisacco, G. De Cesare, and A.J. Schleiss, Scale effects related to the rating curve of cylindrically crested Piano Key weirs, Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II – PKW 2013 – Erpicum et al. (eds), © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00085-8.

71-13  F. Laugier, J. Vermeulen, and V. Lefebvre, Overview of Piano KeyWeirs experience developed at EDF during the past few years, Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II – PKW 2013 – Erpicum et al. (eds), © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00085-8.

70-13   G.M. Cicero, J.R. Delisle, V. Lefebvre, and J. Vermeulen, Experimental and numerical study of the hydraulic performance of a trapezoidal Piano Key weir, Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II – PKW 2013 – Erpicum et al. (eds, © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00085-8.

69-13   V. Lefebvre, J. Vermeulen, and B. Blancher, Influence of geometrical parameters on PK-Weirs discharge with 3D numerical analysis, Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II – PKW 2013 – Erpicum et al. (eds), © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00085-8.

65-13 Alkistis Stergiopoulou and Efrossini Kalkani, Towards a First CFD Study of Innovative Archimedean Inclined Axis Hydropower Turbines, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), ISSN: 2278-0181, Vol. 2 Issue 9, September 2013.

58-13  Timothy Sassaman, Andrew Johansson, Ryan Jones, and Marianne Walter, Hydraulic Analysis of a Pumped Storage Pond Using Complementary Methods, Hydrovision 2013 Conference Proceedings, Denver, CO, July 2013.

57-13  Jose Vasquez, Kara Hurtig, and Brian Hughes, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Modeling of Run-of-River Intakes, Hydrovision 2013 Conference Proceedings, Denver, CO July 2013.

56-13  David Souders, Jayesh Kariya, and Jeff Burnham, Validation of a Hybrid 3-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional Flow Modeling Technique for an Instanenous Dam-Break, Hydrovision 2013 Conference Proceedings, Denver, CO July 2013.

55-13  Keith Moen, Dan Kirschbaum, Joe Groeneveld, Steve Smith and Kimberly Pate, Sluiceway Deflector Design as part of the Boundary TDG Abatement Program, Hydrovision 2013 Conference Proceedings, Denver, CO, July 2013.

54-13  S. Temeepattanapongsa, G. P. Merkley, S. L. Barfuss and B. Smith, Generic unified rating for Cutthroat flumes, Irrig Sci, DOI 10.1007/s00271-013-0411-3, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013, August 2013.

53-13 Hossein Afshar and Seyed Hooman Hoseini, Experimental and 3-D Numerical Simulation of Flow over a Rectangular Broad-Crested Weir, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), ISSN: 2249-8958, Volume 2, Issue 6, August 2013

52-13  Abdulmajid Matinfard (Kabi), Mohammad Heidarnejad, Javad Ahadian, Effect of Changes in the Hydraulic Conditions on the Velocity Distribution around a L-Shaped Spur Dike at the River Bend, Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Available online at www.tjeas.com ©2013 TJEAS Journal-2013-3-16/1862-1868 ISSN 2051-0853 ©2013 TJEAS

51-13  Elham Radaei, Sahar Nikbin, and Mahdi Shahrokhi, Numerical Investigation of Angled Baffle on the Flow Pattern in a Rectangular Primary Sedimentation Tank, RCEE, Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 (2013) 79-91.

48-13   Mohammad Kayser, Mohammed A. Gabr, Assessment of Scour on Bridge Foundations by Means of In Situ Erosion Evaluation Probe, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 0361-1981 (Print), Volume 2335 / 2013, pp 72-78. 10.3141/2335-08, August 2013.

47-13  Wei Ping Yin et al., 2013, Three-Dimensional Water Temperature and Hydrodynamic Simulation of Xiangxi River Estuary, Advanced Materials Research, 726-731, 3212, August, 2013.

41-13   N. Nekoue, R. Mahajan, J. Hamrick, and H. Rodriguez, Selective Withdrawal Hydraulic Study Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2013: pp. 1808-1813. doi: 10.1061/9780784412947.177.

40-13  Eleanor Kolden, Modeling in a three-dimensional world: whitewater park hydraulics and their impact on aquatic habitat in Colorado, Thesis: Master of Science, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University. Full thesis available online at Colorado State University.

38-13  Prashant Huddar P.E. and Yashodhan Dhopavkar, CFD Use in Water – Insight, Foresight, and Efficiency, CFD Application in Water Engineering, Bangalore, India, June 2013.

37-13 B. Gems, M. Wörndl, R. Gabl, C. Weber, and M. Aufleger, Experimental and numerical study on the design of a deposition basin outlet structure at a mountain debris cone, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 1, 3169–3200, 2013, www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/1/3169/2013/, doi:10.5194/nhessd-1-3169-2013, © Author(s) 2013. Full paper online at: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

33-13   Tian Zhou and Theodore A. Endreny, Reshaping of the hyporheic zone beneath river restoration structures: Flume and hydrodynamic experiments, Water Resources Research, DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20384, ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

31-13  Francesco Calomino and Agostino Lauria, MOTO ALL’IMBOCCO DI UN CANALE RETTANGOLARE CONTROLLATO DA PARATOIA PIANA. Analisi sperimentale e modellazione numerica 3DFLOW AT THE INTAKE OF THE RECTANGULAR CHANNEL ;CONTROLLED BY A FLAT SLUICE GATE. Experimental and Numerical 3D ModelL’acqua, pp. 29-36, © Idrotecnica Italiana, 2013. In Italian and English.

30-13  Vinod V. Nair and S.K. Bhattacharyya, Numerical Study of Water Impact of Rigid Sphere under the Action of Gravity CFD Application in Water Engineering, Bangalore, India, June 2013. Abstract only.

29-13   Amar Pal Singh, Faisal Bhat, Ekta Gupta, 3-D Spillway Simulations of Ratle HEP (J&K) for the Assessment of Design Alternatives to be Tested in Model Studies, CFD Application in Water Engineering, Bangalore, India, June 2013.

28-13  Shun-Chung Tsung, Jihn-Sung Lai, and Der-Liang Young, Velocity distribution and discharge calculation at a sharp-crested weir, Paddy Water Environ, DOI 10.1007/s10333-013-0378-y, © Springer Japan 2013, May 2013.

27-13  Karen Riddette and David Ho, Assessment of Spillway Modeling Using Computational Fluid DynamicsANCOLD Proceedings of Technical Groups, 2013.

21-13  Tsung-Hsien Huang and Chyan-Deng Jan, Simulation of Velocity Distribution for Water Flow in a Vortex-Chamber-Type Sediment Extractor, EGU General Assembly 2013, held 7-12 April, 2013 in Vienna, Austria, id. EGU2013-7061. Online at: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013EGUGA..15.7061H

19-13  Riley J. Olsen, Hazard Classification and Hydraulic Remediation Options for Flat-Topped and Ogee-Crested Low- Head Dams, Thesis: Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1538. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1538, 2013.

17-13  Mohammad-Hossein Erfanain-Azmoudeh and Amir Abbas Kamanbedast, Determine the Appropriate Location of Aerator System on Gotvandolia Dam’s Spillway Using FLOW-3D, American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (3): 378-383, 2013, ISSN 1818-6769, © IDOSI Publications, 2013.

13-13   Chia-Cheng Tsai, Yueh-Ting Lin, and Tai-Wen Hsu, On the weak viscous effect of the reflection and transmission over an arbitrary topography, Phys. Fluids 25, 043103 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799099 (21 pages).

07-13  M. Kayser and M. A. Gabr, Scour Assessment of Bridge Foundations Using an In Situ Erosion Evaluation Probe (ISEEP), 92nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January 13-17, 2013, Washington, D.C.

06-13   Yovanni A. Cataño-Lopera, Blake J. Landry, Jorge D. Abad, and Marcelo H. García, Experimental and Numerical Study of the Flow Structure around Two Partially Buried Objects on a Deformed Bed, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering © ASCE /March 2013, 269-283.

04-13  Safinaz El-Solh, SPH Modeling of Solitary Waves and Resulting Hydrodynamic Forces on Vertical and Sloping Walls, Thesis: Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, October 2012, © Safinaz El-Solh, Ottawa, Canada, 2013. Full paper available online at uOttawa.

108-12  Hatice Ozmen-Cagatay and Selahattin Kocaman, Investigation of Dam-Break Flow Over Abruptly Contracting Channel With Trapezoidal-Shaped Lateral Obstacles, Journal of Fluids Engineering © 2012 by ASME August 2012, Vol. 134 / 081204-1

102-12 B.M. Crookston, G.S. Paxson, and B.M. Savage, Hydraulic Performance of Labryinth Weirs for High Headwater Ratios, 4th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, 9-11 February 2012, Porto, Portugal, ISBN: 978-989-8509-01-7.

101-12 Jungseok Ho and Wonil Kim, Discrete Phase Modeling Study for Particle Motion in Storm Water Retention, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (2012) 16(6):1071-1078, DOI 10.1007/s12205-012-1304-3.

99-12  Charles R. Ortloff and Michael E. Mosely, Environmental change at a Late Archaic period site in north central coast Perú, Ñawpa Pacha, Journal of Andean Archaeology, Volume 32, Number 2 / December 2012, ISSN: 0077-6297 (Print); 2051-6207 (Online), Left Coast Press, Inc.

98-12  Tao Wang and Vincent H. Chu, Manning Friction in Steep Open-channel Flow, Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, July 9-13, 2012.

96-12  Zhi Yong Dong, Qi Qi Chen, Yong Gang, and Bin Shi, Experimental and Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Cavitation of Orifice Plates with Multiple Triangular Holes, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Volumes 256-259, Advances in Civil Engineering, December 2012.

95-12  Arjmandi H., Ghomeshi M.,  Ahadiayn J., and Goleij G., Prediction of Plunge Point in the Density Current using RNG Turbulence Modeling, Water and Soil Science (Agricultural Science) Spring 2012; 22(1):171-185. Abstract available online at the Scientific Online Database.

84-12  Li Ping Zhao, Jian Qiu Zhang, Lei Chen, Xuan Xie, Jun Qiang Cheng, Study of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Sloping Breakwater of Circular Protective Facing, Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 588 – 589), Advances in Mechanics Engineering, 1781-1785, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.588-589.1781.

83-12 Parviz Ghadimi, Abbas Dashtimanesh, and Seyed Reza Djeddi, Study of water entry of circular cylinder by using analytical and numerical solutions, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. 2012, vol.34, n.3, pp. 225-232 . ISSN 1678-5878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782012000300001.

81-12  R. Gabl, S. Achleitner, A. Sendlhofer, T. Höckner, M. Schmitter and M. Aufleger, Side-channel spillway – Hybrid modeling, Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods 2012, EWRI/ASCE, August 12-15, 2012, Snowbird, Utah.

80-12  Akin Aybar, Computational Modelling of Free Surface Flow in Intake Structures using FLOW-3D Software, Thesis: MS in Civil Engineering, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, June 2012.

74-12  Mahdi Shahrokhi, Fatemeh Rostami, Md Azlin Md Said, Saeed Reza Sabbagh Yazdi, and Syafalni Syafalni, Computational investigations of baffle configuration effects on the performance of primary sedimentation tanks, Water and Environment Journal, 22 October 2012, © 2012 CIWEM.

68-12  Jalal Attari and Mohammad Sarfaraz, Transitional Steps Zone in Steeply Stepped Spillways, 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, May 8-10, 2012, Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran

67-12  Mohammad Sarfaraz, Jalal Attari and Michael Pfister, Numerical Computation of Inception Point Location for Steeply Sloping Stepped Spillways, 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, May 8-10, 2012, Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran

64-12  Anders Wedel Nielsen, Xiaofeng Liu, B. Mutlu Sumer, Jørgen Fredsøe, Flow and bed shear stresses in scour protections around a pile in a current, Coastal Engineering, Volume 72, February 2013, Pages 20–38.

62-12  Ehab A. Meselhe, Ioannis Georgiou, Mead A. Allison, John A McCorquodale, Numerical Modeling of Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport in Lower Mississippi at a Proposed Delta Building Diversion, Journal of Hydrology, October 2012.

60-12  Markus Grünzner and Gerhard Haimerl, Numerical Simulation Downstream Attraction Flow at Danube Weir Donauwörth, 9th ISE 2012, Vienna, Austria.

59-12 M. Grünzner, A 3 Dimensional Numerical (LES) and Physical ‘Golf Ball’ Model in Comparison to 1 Dimensional Approach, Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods 2012, EWRI/ASCE, August 12-15, 2012, Snowbird, Utah

58-12  Shawn P. Clark, Jonathan S. Toews, Martin Hunt and Rob Tkach, Physical and Numerical Modeling in Support of Fish Passage Regulations, 9th ISE 2012, Vienna, Austria.

57-12  Mahdi Shahrokhi, Fatemeh Rostami, Md Azlin Md Said, Syafalni, Numerical Modeling of Baffle Location Effects on the Flow Pattern of Primary Sedimentation Tanks, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Available online October 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.060.

50-12  Gricelda Ramirez, A Virtual Flow Meter to Develop Velocity-Index Ratings and Evaluate the Effect of Flow Disturbances on these Ratings, Master’s Thesis: Department of Civil Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012.

43-12  A. A. Girgidov, A. D. Girgidov and M. P. Fedorov, Use of dispersing springboards to reduce near-bottom velocity in a toe basin, Power Technology and Engineering (formerly Hydrotechnical Construction), Volume 46, Number 2 (2012), 113-115, DOI: 10.1007/s10749-012-0316-y.

40-12  Jong Pil Park, Kyung Sik Choi, Ji Hwan Jeong, Gyung Min Choi, Ju Yeop Park, and Man Woong Kim, Experimental and numerical evaluation of debris transport augmentation by turbulence during the recirculation-cooling phase, Nuclear Engineering and Design 250 (2012) 520-537

39-12  Hossein Basser, Abdollah Ardeshir, Hojat Karami, Numerical simulation of flow pattern around spur dikes series in rigid bed, 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, May 8-10, 2012 Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran

38-12  Sathaporn Temeepattanapongsa, Unified Equations for Cutthroat Flumes Derived from a Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Model, (2012). Thesis: Utah State University, All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1308. Available online at: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1308

36-12 Robert Feurich, Jacques Boubée, Nils Reidar B. Olsen, Improvement of fish passage in culverts using CFD, Ecological Engineering, Volume 47, October 2012, Pages 1–8.

35-12 Yovanni A. Cataño-Lopera and Jorge D. Abad, Flow Structure around a Partially Buried Object in a Simulated River Bed, World Environmental And Water Resources Congress 2012, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, May 20-24, 2012.

33-12  Fatemeh Rostami, Saeed Reza Sabbagh Yazdi, Md Azlin Md Said and Mahdi Shahrokhi, Numerical simulation of undular jumps on graveled bed using volume of fluid method, Water Science & Technology Vol 66 No 5 pp 909–917 © IWA Publishing 2012 doi:10.2166/wst.2012.213.

30-12  Saman Abbasi and Amir Abbas Kamanbedast, Investigation of Effect of Changes in Dimension and Hydraulic of Stepped Spillways for Maximization Energy Dissipation, World Applied Sciences Journal 18 (2): 261-267, 2012, ISSN 1818-4952, © IDOSI Publications, 2012, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.02.492

24-12  Mario Oertel, Jan Mönkemöller and Andreas Schlenkhoff, Artificial stationary breaking surf waves in a physical and numerical model, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50:3, 338-343, 2012.

23-12  Mario Oertel, Cross-bar block ramps:Flow regimes – flow resistance – energy dissipation – stability, thesis, Bericht Nr. 20, 2012, © 2011/12 Dr. Mario Oertel, Hydraulic Engineering Section, Bergische University of Wuppertal. Duplication only with author’s permission.

20-12  M. Oertel and A. Schlenkhoff, Crossbar Block Ramps: Flow Regimes, Energy Dissipation, Friction Factors, and Drag Forces, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering © ASCE, May 2012, pp. 440-448.

19-12  Mohsen Maghrebi, Saeed Alizadeh, and Rahim Lotfi, Numerical Simulation of Flow Over Rectangular Broad Crested Weir, 1st International and 3rd National Conference on Dams and Hydropower in Iran, Tehran, Iran, February 8 – February 9, 2012

18-12  Alireza Daneshkhah and Hamidreza Vosoughifar, Solution of Flow Field Equations to Investigate the Best Turbulent Model of Flow over a Standard Ogee Spillway, 1st International and 3rd National Conference on Dams and Hydropower in Iran, Tehran, Iran, February 8 – February 9, 2012

03-12  Hamed Taghizadeh, Seyed Ali Akbar Salehi Neyshabour and Firouz Ghasemzadeh, Dynamic Pressure Fluctuations in Stepped Three-Side Spillway, Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment 3 (1): 95-104, 2012, ISSN 2079-2115

02-12   Kim, Seojun, Yu, Kwonkyu, Yoon, Byungman, and Lim, Yoonsung, A numerical study on hydraulic characteristics in the ice Harbor-type fishway, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012-02-01, Issn: 1226-7988, pp 265- 272, Volume: 16, Issue: 2, Doi: 10.1007/s12205-012-0010-5.

105-11 Hatice Ozmen Cagatay and Selahattin Kocaman, Dam-break Flow in the Presence of Obstacle: Experiment and CFD Simulation, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechancis, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 541-552, 2011

102-11 Sang Do An, Interflow Dynamics and Three-Dimensional Modeling of Turbid Density Currents in IMHA Reservoir, South Korea, thesis: Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University, 2011.

101-11 Tsunami – A Growing Disaster, edited by Mohammad Mokhtari, ISBN 978-953-307-431-3, 232 pages, Publisher: InTech, Chapters published December 16, 2011 under CC BY 3.0 license, DOI: 10.5772/922. Available for download at Intech.

98-11  Selahattin Kocaman and Hasan Guzel, Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Dam-Break Wave on a Single Building Situated Downstream, Epoka Conference Systems, 1st International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, 19-21 May 2011, EPOKA University, Tirana, Albania.

97-11   T. Endreny, L. Lautz, and D. I. Siegel, Hyporheic flow path response to hydraulic jumps at river steps: Flume and hydrodynamic models, WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 47, W02517, doi:10.1029/2009WR008631, 2011.

96-11   Mahdi Shahrokhi, Fatemeh Rostami, Md Azlin Md Said and Syafalni, Numerical Simulation of Influence of Inlet Configuration on Flow Pattern in Primary Rectangular Sedimentation Tanks, World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (7): 1024-1031, 2011, ISSN 1818-4952, © IDOSI Publications, 2011. Full article available online at IODSI.

94-11  Kathleen H. Frizell, Summary of Hydraulic Studies for Ladder and Flume Fishway Design- Nimbus Hatchery Fish Passage Project, Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2010-04, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Hydraulic Investigations and Laboratory Services Group, December 2011

88-11   Abdelaziz, S, Bui, MD, Rutschmann, P, Numerical Investigation of Flow and Sediment Transport around a Circular Bridge Pier, Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro- Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering, ACT: Engineers Australia, 2011: 2624-2630.

86-11  M. Heidarnejad, D. Halvai and M. Bina, The Proper Option for Discharge the Turbidity Current and Hydraulic Analysis of Dez Dam Reservoir, World Applied Sciences Journal 13 (9): 2052-2056, 2011, ISSN 1818-4952 © IDOSI Publications, 2011

84-11  Martina Reichstetter and Hubert Chanson, Physical and Numerical Modelling of Negative Surges in Open Channels, School of Civil Engineering at the University of Queensland, Report CH84/11, ISBN No. 9781742720388, © Reichstetter and Chanson, 2011.

83-11  Reda M. Abd El-Hady Rady, 2D-3D Modeling of Flow Over Sharp-Crested Weirs, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 7(12): 2495-2505, ISSN 1819-544X, 2011.

78-11  S. Abbasi, A. Kamanbedast and J. Ahadian, Numerical Investigation of Angle and Geometric of L-Shape Groin on the Flow and Erosion Regime at River Bends, World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (2): 279-284, 2011, ISSN 1818-4952 © IDOSI Publications, 2011.

75-11  Mario Oertel and Daniel B. Bung, Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves: laboratory versus VOF, Journal of Hydraulic Research, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2011.639981, Available online: 08 Dec 2011.

73-11  T.N. Aziz and A.A. Khan, Simulation of Vertical Plane Turbulent Jet in Shallow Water, Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 292904, 10 pages, 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/292904.

67-11   Chung R. Song, ASCE, Jinwon Kim, Ge Wang, and Alexander H.-D. Cheng, Reducing Erosion of Earthen Levees Using Engineered Flood Wall SurfaceJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 10, October 2011, pp. 874-881, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000500.

64-11  Mahdi Shahrokhi, Fatemeh Rostami, Md Azlin Md Said, Syafalni, The Effect of Number of Baffles on the Improvement Efficiency of Primary Sedimentation Tanks, Available online 11 November 2011, ISSN 0307-904X, 10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.001.

62-11  Jana Hadler, Klaus Broekel, Low head hydropower – its design and economic potential, World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, Sweden, May 8-13, 2011.

60-11 Md. Imtiaj Hassan and Nahidul Khan, Performance of a Quarter-Pitch Twisted Savonius Turbine, The International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2011, Pattaya City, Thailand, 28-30 September 2011.

59-11   Erin K. Gleason, Ashraful Islam, Liaqat Khan, Darrne Brinker and Mike Miller, Spillway Analysis Techniques Using Traditional and 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling, Dam Safety 2011, National Harbor, MD, September 25-29, 2011.

58-11  William Rahmeyer, Steve Barfuss, and Bruce Savage, Composite Modeling of Hydraulic Structures, Dam Safety 2011, National Harbor, MD, September 25-29, 2011.

57-11  B. Dasgupta, K. Das, D. Basu, and R. Green, Computational Methodology to Predict Rock Block Erosion in Plunge Pools, Dam Safety 2011, National Harbor, MD, September 25-29, 2011.

56-11  Jeff Burnham, Modeling Dams with Computational Fluid Dynamics- Past Success and New Directions, Dam Safety 2011, National Harbor, MD, September 25-29, 2011.

52-11  Madhi Shahrokhi, Fatemeh Rostami, Md Azlin Md Said, and Syafalni, The Computational Modeling of Baffle Configuration in the Primary Sedimentation Tanks, 2011 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology IPCBEE vol 6. (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore.

47-11  Stefan Haun, Nils Reidar B. Olsen and Robert Feurich, Numerical Modeling of Flow over Trapezoidal Broad-Crested Weir, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics Vol 5., No. 3, pp. 397-405, 2011.

42-11  Anu Acharya, Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Flow and Sediment Transport around a Series of Spur Dikes, thesis: The University of Arizona Graduate College, Copyright © Anu Acharya 2011, July 2011.

38-11  Mehdi Shahosseini, Amirabbas Kamanbedast and Roozbeh Aghamajidi, Investigation of Hydraulic Conditions around Bridge Piers and Determination of Shear Stress using Numerical Methods, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011, © ASCE 2011.

35-11  L. Toombes and H. Chanson, Numerical Limitations of Hydraulic Models, 34th IAHR World Congress, 33rd Hydrology & Water Resources Symposium, 10th Hydraulics Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 26 June – 1 July 2011.

34-11  Mohammad Sarfaraz, and Jalal Attari, Numerical Simulation of Uniform Flow Region over a Steeply Sloping Stepped Spillway, 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran, April 26-27, 2011.

30-11  John Richardson and Pamela Waterman, Stemming the Flood, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 133/No.7 July 2011

29-11  G. Möller & R. Boes, D. Theiner & A. Fankhauser, G. De Cesare & A. Schleiss, Hybrid modeling of sediment management during drawdown of Räterichsboden reservoir, Dams and Reservoirs under Changing Challenges – Schleiss & Boes (Eds), © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-68267-1.

24-11  Liaqat A. Khan, Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Emergency Overflows through an Energy Dissipation Structure of a Water Treatment Plant, ASCE Conf. Proc. doi:10.1061/41173(414)155, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011.

23-11  Anu Acharya and Jennifer G. Duan, Three Dimensional Simulation of Flow Field around Series of Spur Dikes, ASCE Conf. Proc. doi:10.1061/41173(414)218, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011.

22-11  Mehdi Shahosseini, Amirabbas Kamanbedast, and Roozbeh Aghamajidi, Investigation of Hydraulic Conditions around Bridge Piers and Determination of Shear Stress Using Numerical Method, ASCE Conf. Proc. doi:10.1061/41173(414)435, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011.

20-11  Jong Pil Park, Ji Hwan Jeong, Won Tae Kim, Man Woong Kim and Ju Yeop Park, Debris transport evaluation during the blow-down phase of a LOCA using computational fluid dynamics, Nuclear Engineering and Design, June 2011, ISSN 0029-5493, DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.05.017.

13-11 Ehab A. Meselhe, Myrtle Grove Delta Building Diversion Project, The Geological Society of America, South-Central Section – 45th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 2011.

12-11  Bryan Heiner and Steven L. Barfuss, Parshall Flume and Discharge Corrections Wall Staff Gauge and Centerline Measurements, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, posted ahead of print February 1, 2011, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000355, © 2011 by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

06-11  T. Endreny, L. Lautz, and D. Siegel, Hyporheic flow path response to hydraulic jumps at river steps- Hydrostatic model simulations, Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, W02518, doi: 10.1029/2010WR010014, 2011, © 2011 by the American Geophysical Union, 0043-1397/11/2010WR010014

03-11  Jinwon Kim, Chung R. Song, Ge Wang and Alexander H.-D. Cheng Reducing Erosion of Earthen Levees Using Engineered Flood Wall Surface, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, © ASCE, January 2011.

02-11  F. Montagna, G. Bellotti and M. Di Risio, 3D numerical modeling of landslide-generated tsunamis around a conical island, Springer Link, Earth and Environmental Science, Natural Hazards, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-010-9689-0, Online First™, 7 January 2011.

83-10   S. Abdelaziz, M.D. Bui and P. Rutschmann, Numerical simulation of scour development due to submerged horizontal jet, River Flow 2010, eds. Dittrich, Koll, Aberle & Geisenhainer, © 2010 Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, ISBN 978-3-939230-00-7.

79-10  Daniel J. Howes, Charles M. Burt, and Brett F. Sanders, Subcritical Contraction for Improved Open-Channel Flow Measurement Accuracy with an Upward-Looking ADVM, J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 2010.136:617-626.

78-10  M. Kaheh, S. M. Kashefipour, and A. Dehghani, Comparison of k-ε and RNG k-ε Turbulent Models for Estimation of Velocity Profiles along the Hydraulic Jump, presented at the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Hydraulics, Athens, Greece, June 2010.

75-10  Shahrokh Amiraslani, Jafar Fahimi, Hossein Mehdinezhad, The Numerical Investigation of Free Falling Jet’s Effect on the Scour of Plunge Pool, XVIII International Conference on Water Resources CMWR 2010 J. Carrera (Ed) CIMNE, Barcelona 2010

74-10  M. Ho Ta Khanh, Truong Chi Hien, and Dinh Sy Quat, Study and construction of PK Weirs in Vietnam (2004 to 2011), 78th Annual Meeting of the International Commission on Large Dams,  VNCOLD, Hanoi, Vietnam, May 23-26, 2010.

72-10  DKH Ho and KM Riddette, Application of computational fluid dynamics to evaluate hydraulic performance of spillways in Australia, © Institution of Engineers Australia, 2010, Australian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 6 No 1, 2010.

71-10  Cecilia Lucino, Sergio Liscia y Gonzalo Duro, Vortex Detection in Pump Sumps by Means of CFD, XXIV Latin American Congress on Hydraulics, Punta Del Este, Uruguay, November 2010; Deteccion de Vortices en Darsenas de Bombeo Mediante Modelacion MatematicaAvailable in English and Spanish.

64-10 Jose (Pepe) Vasquez, Assessing Sediment Movement by CFD Particle Tracking, 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, June 27-July 1, 2010.

63-10 Sung-Min Cho, Foundation Design of the Incheon Bridge, Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA Vol 41 No.4, ISSN0046-5828, December 2010.

61-10  I. Meireles, F.A. Bombardelli and J. Matos, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Non-Aerated Skimming Flow on Stepped Spillways Over Embankment Dams, Presented at the 2010 IAHR European Congress, Edinburgh, UK, May 4-6, 2010.

60-10  Mario Oertel, G. Heinz and A. Schlenkhoff, Physical and Numerical Modelling of Rough Ramps and Slides, Presented at the 2010 IAHR European Congress, Edinburgh, UK, May 4-6, 2010.

59-10  Fatemeh Rostami, Mahdi Shahrokhi, Md Azlin Md Said, Rozi Abdullah and Syafalni, Numerical modeling on inlet aperture effects on flow pattern in primary settling tanks, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc., DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.12.007, December 2010.

56-10  G. B. Sahoo, F Bombardelli, D. Behrens and J.L. Largier, Estimation of Stratification and Mixing of a Closed River System Using FLOW-3D, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #H31G-1091

50-10  Sung-Duk Kim, Ho-Jin Lee and Sang-Do An, Improvement of hydraulic stability for spillway using CFD model, International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 5(6), pp. 774-780, June 2010. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS, ISSN 1992

49-10  Md. Imtiaj Hassan, Tariq Iqbal, Nahidul Khan, Michael Hinchey, Vlastimil Masek, CFD Analysis of a Twisted Savonius Turbine, PKP Open Conference Systems, IEEE Newfoundland and Labrador Section, October 2010

46-10  Hatice Ozmen-Cagatay and Selahattin Kocaman, Dam-break flows during initial stage using SWE and RANS approaches, Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol 48, No. 5 (2010), pp. 603-611, doi: 10.108/00221686.2010.507342, © 2010 International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research.

44-10  Marie-Hélène Briand, Catherine Tremblay, Yannick Bossé, Julian Gacek, Carola Alfaro, and Richard Blanchet, Ashlu Creek hydroelectric project- Design and optimization of hydraulic structures under construction, CDA 2010 Annual Conference, Congrès annuel 2010 de l’A CB, Niagra Falls, ON, Canada, 2010 Oct 2-7.

43-10 Gordon McPhail, Justin Lacelle, Bert Smith, and Dave MacMillan, Upgrading of Boundary Dam Spillway, CDA 2010 Annual Conference, Congrès annuel 2010 de l’A CB, Niagra Falls, ON, Canada, 2010 Oct 2-7.

40-10 Selahattin Kocamana; Galip Seckinb; Kutsi S. Erduran, 3D model for prediction of flow profiles around bridges, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2010.507340, Journal of Hydraulic Research, Volume 48, Issue 4 August 2010, pages 521 – 525. Available online at: informaworld

38-10  Kevin M. Sydor and Pamela J. Waterman, Engineering and Design: The Value of CFD Modeling in Designing a Hydro Plant, Hydro Review, Volume 29, Issue 6, September 2010 Available online at HydroWorld.com

33-10  Fabián A. Bombardelli, Inês Meireles and Jorge Matos, Laboratory measurements and multi-block numerical simulations of the mean flow and turbulence, SpringerLink, Environmental Fluid Mechanics, Online First™, 26 August 2010

30-10 Bijan Dargahi, Flow characteristics of bottom outlets with moving gates, IAHR, Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 48, No. 4 (2010), pp. 476-482, doi: 10.1080/00221686.20101.507001, © 2010 International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research

24-10 Shuang Ming Wang and Kevin Sydor, Power Intake Velocity Modeling Using FLOW-3D at Kelsey Generating Station, Canadian Dam Association Bulletin, Vol. 21. No. 2, Spring 2010, pp: 16-21

20-10 Jungseok Ho, Todd Marti and Julie Coonrod, Flood debris filtering structure for urban storm water treatment, DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2010.481834, Journal of Hydraulic Research, Volume 48, Issue 3, pages 320 – 328, June 2010.

16-10 J. Jacobsen and N. R. B. Olsen, Three-dimensional numerical modeling of the capacity for a complex spillway, Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management, Volume 163, Issue 6, pages 283 –288, ISSN: 1741-7589, E-ISSN: 1751-7729.

13-10 J. Ho, J. Coonrod, L. J. Hanna, B. W. Mefford, Hydrodynamic modelling study of a fish exclusion system for a river diversion, River Research and Applications Volume 9999, mIssue 9999, Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

12-10 Nils Rüther, Jens Jacobsen, Nils Reidar B. Olsen and Geir Vatne, Prediction of the three-dimensional flow field and bed shear stresses in a regulated river in mid-Norway, Hydrology Research Vol 41 No 2 pp 145–152 © IWA Publishing 2010, doi:10.2166/nh.2010.064.

11-10 Xing Fang, Shoudong Jiang, and Shoeb R. Alam, Numerical Simulations of Efficiency of Curb-Opening Inlets, J. Hydr. Engrg. Volume 136, Issue 1, pp. 62-66 (January 2010).

54-09    K.W. Frizell, J.P. Kubitschek, and R.F. Einhellig, Folsom Dam Joint Federal Project Existing Spillway Modeling – Discharge Capacity Studies, American River Division Central Valley Project Mid-Pacific Region, Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2009-02, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, September 2009

50-09  Mark Fabian, Variation in Hyporheic Exchange with Discharge and Slope in a Tropical Mountain Stream, thesis: State University of New York, College of Environmental Science & Forestry, 2009. Available online: http://gradworks.umi.com/14/82/1482174.html.

48-09 Junwoo Choi, Kwang Oh Ko, and Sung Bum Yoon, 3D Numerical Simulation for Equivalent Resistance Coefficient for Flooded Built-Up Areas, Asian and Pacific Coasts 2009 (pp 245-251), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on APAC 2009, Singapore, 13 – 16 October 2009

47-09 Young-Il Kim, Chang-Jin Ahn, Chae-Young Lee, Byung-Uk Bae, Computational Fluid Dynamics for Optimal Design of Horizontal-Flow Baffled-Channel Powdered Activated Carbon Contactors, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers, Volume: 26 Issue 1: January 15, 2009.

43-09 Charles R. Ortloff, Water Engineering in the Ancient World: Archaeological and Climate Perspectives on Societies of Ancient South America, Meso-America, the Middle East and South East Asia, Oxford University Press, ISBN13: 978-0-19-923909-2ISBN10: 0-19-923909-6, December 2009 Available at Oxford University Press (clicking on this link will take you to OUP’s website).

40-09 Ge Wang, Chung R. Song, Jinwon Kim and Alexander, H.-D Cheng, Numerical Study of Erosion-proof of Loose Sand in an Overtopped Plunging Scour Process — FLOW-3D, The 2009 Joint ASCE-ASME-SES Conference on Mechanics and Materials, Blacksburg, Virginia, June 24-27, 2009

39-09 Charles R. Ortloff, Water Engineering in the Ancient World: Archaeological and Climate Perspectives on Societies of Ancient South America, the Middle East, and South-East Asia(Hardcover), Oxford University Press, USA (October 15, 2009), ISBN-10: 0199239096; ISBN-13: 978-0199239092 Buy Water Engineering in the Ancient World on Amazon.com.

38-09 David S. Brown, Don MacDonell, Kevin Sydor, and Nicolas Barnes, An Integrated Computational Fluid Dynamics and Fish Habitat Suitability Model for the Pointe Du Bois Generating Station, CDA 2009 Annual Conference, Congres annuel 2009 de l’A CB, Whistler, BC, Canada, 2009 Oct 3-8, pdf pages: 53-66

37-09 Warren Gendzelevich, Andrew Baryla, Joe Groenveld, and Doug McNeil, Red River Floodway Expansion Project-Design and Construction of the Outlet Structure, CDA 2009 Annual Conference, Congres annuel 2009 de l’A CB, Whistler, BC, Canada, 2009 Oct 3-8, pdf pages: 13-26

36-09 Jose A. Vasquez and Jose J. Roncal, Testing River2D and FLOW-3D for Sudden Dam-Break Flow Simulations, CDA 2009 Annual Conference, Congres annuel 2009 de l’A CB, Whistler, BC, Canada, 2009 Oct 3-8, pdf pages: 44-55

33-09 Pamela J. Waterman, Modeling Commercial Aquaculture Systems Employing FLOW-3D, (clicking on this link will take you to Desktop Engineering’s website) Desktop Engineering, November 2009

29-09 Bruce M. Savage, Michael C. Johnson, Brett Towler, Hydrodynamic Forces on a Spillway- Can we calculate them?, Dam Safety 2009, Hollywood, FL, USA, October 2009

27-09 Charles “Chick” Sweeney, Keith Moen, and Daniel Kirschbaum, Hydraulic Design of Total Dissolved Gas Mitigation Measures for Boundary Dam, Waterpower XVI, © PennWell Corporation, Spokane, WA, USA, July 2009

23-09 J.A. Vasquez and B.W. Walsh, CFD simulation of local scour in complex piers under tidal flow, 33rd IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment, © 2009 by International Association of Hydraulic Engineering & Research (IAHR), ISBN: 978-94-90365-01-1

15-09 Kaushik Das, Steve Green, Debashis Basu, Ron Janetzke, and John Stamatakos, Effect of Slide Deformation and Geometry on Waves Generated by Submarine Landslides- A Numerical Investigation, Copyright 2009, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 4-7, 2009

5-09 Remi Robbe, Douglas Sparks, Calculation of the Rating Curves for the Matawin Dam’s Bottom Sluice Gates using FLOW-3D, Conference of the Société Hydrotechnique de France (SHF), 20-21 January 2009, Paris, France. (in French)

4-09 Frederic Laugier, Gregory Guyot, Eric Valette, Benoit Blancher, Arnaud Oguic, Lily Lincker, Engineering Use of Hydrodynamic 3D Simulation to Assess Spillway Discharge Capacity, Conference of the Société Hydrotechnique de France (SHF), 20-21 January 2009, Paris, France. (in French)

50-08   H. Avila and R.Pitt, The Calibration and use of CFD Models to Examine Scour from Stormwater Treatment Devices – Hydrodynamic Analysis, 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2008

47-08    Greg Paxson, Brian Crookston, Bruce Savage, Blake Tullis, and Frederick Lux III, The Hydraulic Design Toolbox- Theory and Modeling for the Lake Townsend Spillway Replacement Project, Assoc. of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO), Indian Wells, CA, September 2008.

46-08  Sh. Amirslani, M. Pirestani and A.A.S. Neyshabouri, The 3D numerical simulation of scour by free falling jet and compare geometric parameters of scour hole with DOT, River flow 2008-Altinakar, Kokipar, Gogus, Tayfur, Kumcu & Yildirim (eds) © 2008 Kubaba Congress Department and Travel Services ISBN 978-605-601360201

44-08  Paul Guy Chanel, An Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Spillway Modeling, thesis: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Copyright © 2008 by Paul Guy Chanel

41-08 Jinwei Qiu, Gravel transport estimation and flow simulation over low-water stream crossings, thesis: Lamar University – Beaumont, 2008, 255 pages; AAT 3415945

37-08 Dae-Geun Kim, Numerical analysis of free flow past a sluice gate, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 11, Number 2 / March, 2007, 127-132.

36-08 Shuang Ming Wang and Kevin Sydor, Power Intake Velocity Modeling using FLOW-3D at Kelsey Generating Station, CDA 2008 Annual Conference, Congres annuel 2008 de l’ACB, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, September 27-October 2, 2008, du 27 septembre au 2 octobre 2008

33-08 Daniel B. Bung, Arndt Hildebrandt, Mario Oertel, Andreas Schlenkhoff and Torsten Schlurmann, Bore Propagation Over a Submerged Horizontal Plate by Physical and Numerical Simulation, ICCE 2008, Hamburg, Germany

32-08 Paul G. Chanel and John C. Doering, Assessment of Spillway Modeling Using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35: 1481-1485 (2008), doi: 10.1139/L08-094 © NRC Canada

31-08 M. Oertel & A. Schlenkhoff, Flood wave propagation and flooding of underground facilities, River Flow 2008, © 2008, International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, Izmir, Turkey, September, 2008

18-08 Efrem Teklemariam, Bernie Shumilak, Don Murray, and Graham K. Holder, Combining Computational and Physical Modeling to Design the Keeyask Station, Hydro Review, © HCI Publications, July 2008

15-08 Jorge D. Abad; Bruce L. Rhoads; İnci Güneralp; and Marcelo H. García, Flow Structure at Different Stages in a Meander-Bend with Bendway Weirs, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering © ASCE, August 2008

11-08 Sreenivasa C. Chopakatla, Thomas C. Lippmann and John E. Richardson, Field Verification of a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Wave Transformation and Breaking in the Surf Zone, J. Wtrwy., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., Volume 134, Issue 2, pp. 71-80 (March/April 2008) Abstract Only

51-07   Richmond MC, TJ Carlson, JA Serkowski, CB Cook, JP Duncan, and WA Perkins, Characterizing the Fish Passage Environment at The Dalles Dam Spillway: 2001-2004, PNNL-16521, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 2007. Available upon request

46-07 Uplift and Crack Flow Resulting from High Velocity Discharges Over Open Offset Joints, Reclamation, Managing Water in the West, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Report DSO-07-07, December 2007

45-07 Selahattin Kocaman, thesis: Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Çukurova, Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Dam Break Problem, 2007. In Turkish. Available on request.

44-07   Saeed-reza Sabbagh-yazdi, Fatemeh Rostami, Habib Rezaei-manizani, and Nikos E. Mastorakis, Comparison of the Results of 2D and 3D Numerical Modeling of Flow over Spillway chutes with Vertical Curvatures, International Journal of Computers, Issue 4, Volume 1, 2007.

43-07    Staša Vošnjak and Jure Mlacnik, Verification of a FLOW-3D mathematical model by a physical hydraulic model of a turbine intake structure, International Conference and exhibition Hydro 2007, 15- 17 October 2007, Granada, Spain. New approaches for a new era: proceedings. [S.l.]: Aqua-Media International Ltd., 2007, 7 str. [COBISS.SI-ID 4991329]

42-07   Merlynn D. Bender, Joseph P. Kubitschek, Tracy B. Vermeyen, Temperature Modeling of Folsom Lake, Lake Natoma, and the Lower American River, Special Report, Sacramento County, California, April 2007

37-07 Heather D. Smith, Flow and Sediment Dynamics Around Three-Dimensional Structures in Coastal Environments, thesis: The Ohio State Unviersity, 2007 (available upon request)

34-07   P.G. Chanel and J.C. Doering, An Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Spillway Modeling, 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, December 2007

29-07   J. Groeneveld, C. Sweeney, C. Mannheim, C. Simonsen, S. Fry, K. Moen, Comparison of Intake Pressures in Physical and Numerical Models of the Cabinet Gorge Dam Tunnel, Waterpower XV, Copyright HCI Publications, July 2007

25-07   Jungseok Ho, Hong Koo Yeo, Julie Coonrod, Won-Sik Ahn, Numerical Modeling Study for Flow Pattern Changes Induced by Single Groyne, IAHR Conference Proc., Harmonizing the Demands of Art and Nature in Hydraulics, IAHR, July 2007, Venice, Italy.

24-07   Jungseok Ho, Julie Coonrod, Todd Marti, Storm Water Best Management Practice- Development of Debris Filtering Structure for Supercritical Flow, EWRI Conference Proc. of World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, May 2007, Tampa, Florida.

21-07 David S. Mueller, and Chad R. Wagner, Correcting Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Discharge Measurements Biased by Sediment Transport, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Volume 133, Issue 12, pp. 1329-1336 (December 2007), Copyright © 2007, ASCE. All rights reserved.

19-07   A. Richard Griffith, James H. Rutherford, A. Alavi, David D. Moore, J. Groeneveld, Stability Review of the Wanapum Spillway Using CFD Analysis, Canadian Dam Association Bulletin, Fall 2007

06-07   John E. Richardson, CFD Saves the Alewife- Computer simulation helps the Alewife return to its Mt. Desert Island spawning grounds, Desktop Engineering, July 2007; Hatchery International, July/August 2007

39-06    Dae Geun Kim and Hong Yeun Cho, Modeling the buoyant flow of heated water discharged from surface and submerged side outfalls in shallow and deep water with a cross flow, Environ Fluid Mech (2006) 6: 501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-006-9006-3

38-06   Cook, C., B. Dibrani, M. Richmond, M. Bleich, P. Titzler, T. Fu, Hydraulic Characteristics of the Lower Snake River during Periods of Juvenile Fall Chinook Salmon Migration, 2002-2006 Final Report, Project No. 200202700, 176 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00000652-29)

37-06  Cook CB, MC Richmond, and JA Serkowski, The Dalles Dam, Columbia River: Spillway Improvement CFD Study, PNNL-14768, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 2006. Available upon request

31-06 John P. Raiford and Abdul A. Khan, Numerical Modeling of Internal Flow Structure in Submerged Hydraulic Jumps, ASCE Conf. Proc. 200, 49 (2006), DOI:10.1061/40856(200)49

29-06    Michael C. Johnson and Bruce Savage, Physical and Numerical Comparison of Flow over Ogee Spillway in the Presence of Tailwater, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering © ASCE, December 2006

28-06   Greg Paxson and Bruce Savage, Labyrinth Spillways- Comparison of Two Popular U.S.A. Design Methods and Consideration of Non-standard Approach Conditions and Geometries, International Junior Researcher and Engineer Workshop on Hydraulic Structures, Report CH61/06, Div. of Civil Eng., The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia-ISBN 1864998687

22-06   Brent Mefford and Jim Higgs, Link River Falls Passage Investigation – Flow Velocity Simulation, Water Resources Research Laboratory, February 2006

27-06  Jungseok Ho, Leslie Hanna, Brent Mefford, and Julie Coonrod, Numerical Modeling Study for Fish Screen at River Intake Channel, EWRI Conference Proc. of World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, May 2006, Omaha, Nebraska.

17-06  Woolgar, Robert and Eddy, Wilmore, Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Address Fish Passage Concerns at the Grand Falls-Windsor Hydroelectric Development, Canadian Dam Association meeting, Quebec City, Canada October 2006

14-06  Fuamba, M., Role and behavior of surge chamber in hydropower- Case of the Robert Bourassa hydroelectric power plant in Quebec, Canada, Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century- Berga et al (eds) @ 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 0 415 40423 1

13-06  D.K.H. Ho, B.W. Cooper, K.M. Riddette, S.M. Donohoo, Application of numerical modelling to spillways in Australia, Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century—Berga et al (eds) © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 0 415 40423 1

4-06 James Dexter, William Faisst, Mike Duer and Jerry Flanagan, Computer Simulation Helps Prevent Nitrification of Storage Reservoir, Waterworld, March 2006, pp 18-24

36-05   P. Coussot, N. Rousell, Jarny and H. Chanson, (2005), Continuous or Catastrophic Solid-Liquid Transition in Jammed Systems, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 17, No. 1, Article 011703, 4 pages (ISSN 0031-9171).

35-05    Dae Geun Kim and Jae Hyun Park, Analysis of Flow Structure over Ogee-Spillway in Consideration of Scale and Roughness Effects by Using CFD Model,  KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. Volume 9, Number 2, March 2005, pp 161 – 169.

31-05 Frank James Dworak, Characterizing Turbulence Structure along Woody Vegetated Banks in Incised Channels: Implications for Stream Restoration, thesis: The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, December 2005 (available upon request)

29-05 Gessler, Dan and Rasmussen, Bernie, Before the Flood, Desktop Engineering, October 2005

25-05   Jorge D. Abad and Marcelo H. Garcia, Hydrodynamics in Kinoshita-generated meandering bends- Importance for river-planform evolution, 4th IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics, October 4-7, 2005, Urbana, Illinois

23-05 Kristiansen T., Baarholm R., Stansberg C.T., Rørtveit G.J. and Hansen E.W., Steep Wave Kinematics and Interaction with a Vertical Column, Presented at The Fifth International Symposium on Ocean Wave Measurement and Analysis (Waves 2005), Spain, July, 2005

16-05 Dan Gessler, CFD Modeling of Spillway Performance, Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress (sponsored by Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers), May 15-19, 2005, Anchorage, Alaska

12-05 Charles Ortloff, The Water Supply and Distribution System of the Nabataean City of Petra (Jordan), 300 BC- AD 300, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15:1, 93-109

33-04    Jose Carlos C. Amorim, Cavalcanti Renata Rodrigues, and Marcelo G. Marques, A Numerical and Experimental Study of Hydraulic Jump Stilling Basin, Advances in Hydro-Science and Engineering, Volume VI, Presented at the International Conference on Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2004

23-04   Jose F. Rodriguez, Fabian A. Bombardelli, Marcelo H. Garcia, Kelly Frothingham, Bruce L. Rhoads and Jorge D. Abad, High-Resolution Numerical Simulation of Flow Through a Highly Sinuous River Reach, Water Resources Management, 18:177-199, 2004.

18-04   John Richardson and Douglas Dixon, Modeling the Hydraulics Zone of Influence of Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Plants Cooling Water Intake Structure, a chapter in The Connecticut River Ecological Study (1965-1973) Revisited: Ecology of the Lower Connecticut River 1973-2003, Paul M. Jacobson, Douglas A. Dixon, William C. Leggett, Barton C. Marcy, Jr., and Ronald R. Massengill, editors; Published by American Fisheries Society, Publication date: November 2004, ISBN 1-888569-66-2

10-04   Bruce Savage, Kathleen Frizell, and Jimmy Crowder, Brains versus Brawn- The Changing World of Hydraulic Model Studies

7-04   C. B. Cook and M. C. Richmond, Monitoring and Simulating 3-D Density Currents and the Confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers, Proceedings of EWRI World

24-03  David Ho, Karen Boyes, Shane Donohoo, and Brian Cooper, Numerical Flow Analysis for Spillways, 43rd ANCOLD Conference, Hobart, Tasmania, 24-29 October 2003

15-03   Ho, Dr K H, Boyes, S M, Donohoo, S M, Investigation of Spillway Behaviour Under Increased Maximum Flood by Computational Fluid Dynamics Technique, Proc Conf 14th Australian Fluid Mechanics, Adelaide, Australia, December 2001, 577-580

14-03   Ho, Dr K H, Donohoo, S M, Boyes, K M, Lock, C C, Numerical Analysis and the Real World- It Looks Pretty, but is It Right?, Proceedings of the NAFEMS World Congress, May 2003, Orlando, FL

13-03 Brethour, J. M., Sediment Scour, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-03-TN62)

26-02   Sungyul Yoo, Kiwon Hong and Manha Hwang, A 3-dimensional numerical study of flow patterns around a multipurpose dam, 2002 Hydroinformatics Conference, Cardiff, Wales

23-02   Christopher B. Cook, Marshall C. Richmond, John A. Serkowski, and Laurie L. Ebner, Free-Surface Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of a Spillway and Tailrace- Case Study of The Dalles Project, Hydrovision 2002, 29 July -†2 Aug, 2002 Portland, OR

13-02   Efrem Teklemariam, Brian W. Korbaylo, Joe L. Groeneveld & David M. Fuchs, Computational Fluid Dynamics- Diverse Applications In Hydropower Project’s Design and Analysis, June 11-14, 2002, CWRA 55th Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA

12-02   Snorre Heimsund, Ernst Hansen, W Nemec, Computational 3-D Fluid Dynamics Model for Sediment Transport, Erosion, and Deposition by Turbidity Currents, 16th International Sedimentological Congress Abstract Volume (2002) XX-XX

9-02   D. T. Souders & C. W. Hirt, Modeling Roughness Effects in Open Channel Flows, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-02-TN60), May 2002

47-01    Fabián A. Bombardelli and Marcelo H. García, Three-dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling of Density Currents in the Chicago River, Illinois, CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES, UILU-ENG-01-2001 Hydraulic Engineering Series No. # 68, ISSN: 0442-1744, 2001

44-01   Christopher B. Cook and Marshall C. Richmond, Simulation of Tailrace Hydrodynamics Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Models, Report Number: PNNL-13467, May 2001

40-01 Joe L. Groeneveld, Kevin M. Sydor and David M. Fuchs (Acres Manitoba Ltd., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) and Efrem Teklemariam and Brian W. Korbaylo (Manitoba Hydro, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada), Optimization of Hydraulic Design Using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Waterpower XII, July 9-11, 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah

39-01   Savage, B.M and Johnson, M.C., Flow over Ogee Spillway- Physical and Numerical Model Case Study, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, August 2001, pp. 640-649

38-01   Newell, Carter, Sustainable Mussel Culture- A Millenial Perspective, Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada, August 2001, pp 15-21

36-01   Diane L. Foster, Ohio State University, Numerical Simulations of Sediment Transport and Scour Around Mines, paper presented to the Office of Naval Research, Mine Burial Prediction Program, 2001

35-01 Heather D. Smith, Diane L. Foster, Ohio State University, The Modeling of Flow Around a Cylinder and Scour Hole, Poster prepared for the Office of Naval Research, Mine Burial Prediction Program, 2002

28-01   Brethour, J.M., Transient 3D Model for Lifting, Transporting, and Depositing Solid Material, Proc. 3rd Intrn. Environmental Hydraulics, Dec. 5-8, 2001, Tempe, AZ

25-01  Yuichi Kitamura, Takahiro Kato, & Petek Kitamura, Mathematical Modeling for Fish Adaptive Behavior in a Current, Proceedings of the 2001International Symposium of Environmental Hydraulics, Chigaski R&D Center

22-01 C. R. Ortloff, D. P. Crouch, The Urban Water Supply and Distribution System of the Ionian City of Ephesos in the Roman Imperial Period, CTC/United Defense Journal of Archeological Science (2001), pp 843-860

13-01 I. Lavedrine, and Darren Woolf, ARUP Research and Development, Application of CFD Modelling to Hydraulic Structures, CCWI 2001, Leicaster United Kingdom, 3-5 September 2001, De Montfort University

4-01 Rodriguez, Garcia, Bombardelli, Guzman, Rhoads, and Herricks, Naturalization of Urban Streams Using In-Channel Structures, Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, July 30-August 2, 2000, Minneapolis, Minnesota

27-00    Tony L. Wahl, John A. Replogle, Brain T. Wahlin, and James A. Higgs, New Developments in Design and Application of Long-Throated Flumes, 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning & Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, July 30-August 2, 2000.

5-00   John E. Richardson and Karel Pryl, Computer Simulation Helps Prague Modernize and Expand Sewer System, Water Engineering and Management, June, 2000, pp. 10-13; and in Municipal World, June, 2000, pp. 19-20,30

3-00 Efrem Teklemariam and John L. Groeneveld, Solving Problems in Design and Dam Safety with Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hydro Review, May, 2000, pp.48-52

1-00 Scott F. Bradford, Numerical Simulation of Surf Zone Dynamics, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, January/February, 2000, pp.1-13

9-99 John E. Richardson and Karel Pryl, Computational Fluid Dynamics, CE News, October, 1999, pp. 74-76

4-99 J. Groeneveld, Computer Simulation Leads to Faster, Cheaper Options, Water Engineering & Management magazine, pp.14-17, June 1999

16-98 C. R. Ortloff, Hydraulic Analysis of a Self-Cleaning Drainage Outlet at the Hellenistic City of Priene, Journal Archaeological Science, 25, 1211-1220, Article No. as980292, 1998

13-98 J. F. Echols, M.A. Pratt, K. A. Williams, Using CFD to Model Flow in Large Circulating Water Systems, Proc. PowerGen International, Orlando, FL, Dec. 9-11, 1998.

12-98 K. A. Williams, I. A. Diaz-Tous, P. Ulovg, Reduction in Pumping Power Requirements of the Circulation Water (CW) System at TU Electric’s Martin Lake Plant Using Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD), ASME Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Jan. 1999

8-98 D. Hrabak, K. Pryl, J. Richardson, Calibration of Flowmeters using FLOW-3D Software, Hydroinform, a.s., Prague, CTU Prague, Flow Science Inc, USA, proceedings from the 3rd International Novatech Conference, Lyon, France, May 4-6, 1998

16-96 E. J. Kent and J.E. Richardson, Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Analysis for Calculation of Scour at Bridge Piers with Fender Systems, Earth Tech, Concord, NK and Flow Science Inc, Los Alamos, NM report, December 1996

12-96 J. E. Richardson, Control of Hydraulic Jump by Abrupt Drop, XXVII IAHR Congress, Water for a Changing Global Community, San Francisco, August 10, 1997

6-96 Y. Miyamoto, A Three-Dimensional Analysis around the Open Area of a Tsunami Breakwater, technical report, SEA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, to be presented at the HYDROINFORMATICS 96 Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 11-13, 1996

4-95 J. E. Richardson, V. G. Panchang and E. Kent, Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Flow Around Bridge Sub-structures, presented at the Hydraulics ’95 ASCE Conference, San Antonio, TX, Aug. 1995

3-95 Y. Miyamoto and K. Ishino, Three Dimensional Flow Analysis in Open Channel, presented at the IAHR Conference, HYDRA 2000, Vol. 1, Thomas Telford, London, Sept. 1995

16-94 M. S. Gosselin and D. M. Sheppard, Time Rate of Local Scour, proceedings of ASCE Conf. on Water Resources Engineering, San Antonio, TX, August 1994

8-94 C. W. Hirt, Weir Discharges and Counter Currents, Flow Science report, FSI-94-00-3, to be presented at the Hydroinformatics Conference, IHE Delft, The Netherlands, Sept. 1994

7-94 C. W. Hirt and K. A.Williams, FLOW-3D Predictions for Free Discharge and Submerged Parshall Flumes, Flow Science Technical Note #40, August 1994 (FSI-94-TN40)

11-93 K. Ishino, H. Otani, R. Okada and Y. Nakagawa, The Flow Structure Around a Cylindrical Pier for the Flow of Transcritical Reynolds Number, Taisei Corp., Honshu Shikoku Bridge Authority, Akashi Kaikyo Ohashi Substructure Construction, Proc. XXV, Congress Intern. Assoc. Hydraulic Res., V, 417-424 (1993) Tokyo, Japan

6-87 J.M. Sicilian, FLOW-3D Model for Flow in a Water Turbine Passage, Flow Science report, July 1987 (FSI-87-36-1)

FLOW-3D/MP Features List

FLOW-3D/MP Features

FLOW-3D/MP v6.1 은 FLOW-3D v11.1 솔버에 기초하여 물리 모델, 특징 및 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스가 동일합니다. FLOW-3D v11.1의 새로운 기능은 아래 파란색으로 표시되어 있으며 FLOW-3D/MP v6.1 에서 사용할 수 있습니다. 새로운 개발 기능에 대한 자세한 설명은 FLOW-3D v11.1에서 새로운 기능을 참조하십시오.

Meshing & Geometry

  • Structured finite difference/control volume meshes for fluid and thermal solutions
  • Finite element meshes in Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates for structural analysis
  • Multi-Block gridding with nested, linked, partially overlapping and conforming mesh blocks
  • Fractional areas/volumes (FAVOR™) for efficient & accurate geometry definition
  • Mesh quality checking
  • Basic Solids Modeler
  • Import CAD data
  • Import/export finite element meshes via Exodus-II file format
  • Grid & geometry independence
  • Cartesian or cylindrical coordinates
Flow Type Options
  • Internal, external & free-surface flows
  • 3D, 2D & 1D problems
  • Transient flows
  • Inviscid, viscous laminar & turbulent flows
  • Hybrid shallow water/3D flows
  • Non-inertial reference frame motion
  • Multiple scalar species
  • Two-phase flows
  • Heat transfer with phase change
  • Saturated & unsaturated porous media
Physical Modeling Options
  • Fluid structure interaction
  • Thermally-induced stresses
  • Plastic deformation of solids
  • Granular flow
  • Moisture drying
  • Solid solute dissolution
  • Sediment transport and scour
  • Cavitation (potential, passive tracking, active tracking)
  • Phase change (liquid-vapor, liquid-solid)
  • Surface tension
  • Thermocapillary effects
  • Wall adhesion
  • Wall roughness
  • Vapor & gas bubbles
  • Solidification & melting
  • Mass/momentum/energy sources
  • Shear, density & temperature-dependent viscosity
  • Thixotropic viscosity
  • Visco-elastic-plastic fluids
  • Elastic membranes & walls
  • Evaporation residue
  • Electro-mechanical effects
  • Dielectric phenomena
  • Electro-osmosis
  • Electrostatic particles
  • Joule heating
  • Air entrainment
  • Molecular & turbulent diffusion
  • Temperature-dependent material properties
  • Spray cooling
Flow Definition Options
  • General boundary conditions
    • Symmetry
    • Rigid and flexible walls
    • Continuative
    • Periodic
    • Specified pressure
    • Specified velocity
    • Outflow
    • Grid overlay
    • Hydrostatic pressure
    • Volume flow rate
    • Non-linear periodic and solitary surface waves
    • Rating curve and natural hydraulics
    • Wave absorbing layer
  • Restart from previous simulation
  • Continuation of a simulation
  • Overlay boundary conditions
  • Change mesh and modeling options
  • Change model parameters
Thermal Modeling Options
  • Natural convection
  • Forced convection
  • Conduction in fluid & solid
  • Fluid-solid heat transfer
  • Distributed energy sources/sinks in fluids and solids
  • Radiation
  • Viscous heating
  • Orthotropic thermal conductivity
  • Thermally-induced stresses
Turbulence Models
  • RNG model
  • Two-equation k-epsilon model
  • Two-equation k-omega model
  • Large eddy simulation
Metal Casting Models
  • Thermal stress & deformations
  • Iron solidification
  • Sand core blowing
  • Sand core drying
  • Permeable molds
  • Solidification & melting
  • Solidification shrinkage with interdendritic feeding
  • Micro & macro porosity
  • Binary alloy segregation
  • Thermal die cycling
  • Surface oxide defects
  • Cavitation potential
  • Lost-foam casting
  • Semi-solid material
  • Core gas generation
  • Back pressure & vents
  • Shot sleeves
  • PQ2 diagram
  • Squeeze pins
  • Filters
  • Air entrainment
  • Temperature-dependent material properties
  • Cooling channels
  • Fluid/wall contact time
Numerical Modeling Options
  • TruVOF Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) method for fluid interfaces
  • First and second order advection
  • Sharp and diffuse interface tracking
  • Implicit & explicit numerical methods
  • GMRES, point and line relaxation pressure solvers
  • User-defined variables, subroutines & output
  • Utilities for runtime interaction during execution
Fluid Modeling Options
  • One incompressible fluid – confined or with free surfaces
  • Two incompressible fluids – miscible or with sharp interfaces
  • Compressible fluid – subsonic, transonic, supersonic
  • Stratified fluid
  • Acoustic phenomena
  • Mass particles with variable density or diameter
Shallow Flow Models
  • General topography
  • Raster data interface
  • Subcomponent-specific surface roughness
  • Wind shear
  • Ground roughness effects
  • Laminar & turbulent flow
  • Sediment transport and scour
  • Surface tension
  • Heat transfer
  • Wetting & drying
Advanced Physical Models
  • General Moving Object model with 6 DOF–prescribed and fully-coupled motion
  • Rotating/spinning objects
  • Collision model
  • Tethered moving objects (springs, ropes, mooring lines)
  • Flexing membranes and walls
  • Porosity
  • Finite element based elastic-plastic deformation
  • Finite element based thermal stress evolution due to thermal changes in a solidifying fluid
  • Combusting solid components
Chemistry Models
  • Stiff equation solver for chemical rate equations
  • Stationary or advected species
Porous Media Models
  • Saturated and unsaturated flow
  • Variable porosity
  • Directional porosity
  • General flow losses (linear & quadratic)
  • Capillary pressure
  • Heat transfer in porous media
  • Van Genunchten model for unsaturated flow
Discrete Particle Models
  • Massless marker particles
  • Mass particles of variable size/mass
  • Linear & quadratic fluid-dynamic drag
  • Monte-Carlo diffusion
  • Particle-Fluid momentum coupling
  • Coefficient of restitution or sticky particles
  • Point or volumetric particle sources
  • Charged particles
  • Probe particles
Two-Phase & Two-Component Models
  • Liquid/liquid & gas/liquid interfaces
  • Variable density mixtures
  • Compressible fluid with a dispersed incompressible component
  • Drift flux
  • Two-component, vapor/non-condensable gases
  • Phase transformations for gas-liquid & liquid-solid
  • Adiabatic bubbles
  • Bubbles with phase change
  • Continuum fluid with discrete particles
  • Scalar transport
  • Homogeneous bubbles
  • Super-cooling
Coupling with Other Programs
  • Geometry input from Stereolithography (STL) files – binary or ASCII
  • Direct interfaces with EnSight®, FieldView® & Tecplot® visualization software
  • Finite element solution import/export via Exodus-II file format
  • PLOT3D output
  • Neutral file output
  • Extensive customization possibilities
  • Solid Properties Materials Database
Data Processing Options
  • State-of-the-art post-processing tool, FlowSight™
  • Batch post-processing
  • Report generation
  • Automatic or custom results analysis
  • High-quality OpenGL-based graphics
  • Color or B/W vector, contour, 3D surface & particle plots
  • Moving and stationary probes
  • Measurement baffles
  • Arbitrary sampling volumes
  • Force & moment output
  • Animation output
  • PostScript, JPEG & Bitmap output
  • Streamlines
  • Flow tracers
User Conveniences
  • Active simulation control (based on measurement of probes)
  • Mesh generators
  • Mesh quality checking
  • Tabular time-dependent input using external files
  • Automatic time-step control for accuracy & stability
  • Automatic convergence control
  • Mentor help to optimize efficiency
  • Change simulation parameters while solver runs
  • Launch and manage multiple simulations
  • Automatic simulation termination based on user-defined criteria
  • Run simulation on remote servers using remote solving
Multi-Processor Computing

FLOW-3D Features

The features in blue are newly-released in FLOW-3D v12.0.

Meshing & Geometry

  • Structured finite difference/control volume meshes for fluid and thermal solutions
  • Finite element meshes in Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates for structural analysis
  • Multi-Block gridding with nested, linked, partially overlapping and conforming mesh blocks
  • Conforming meshes extended to arbitrary shapes
  • Fractional areas/volumes (FAVOR™) for efficient & accurate geometry definition
  • Closing gaps in geometry
  • Mesh quality checking
  • Basic Solids Modeler
  • Import CAD data
  • Import/export finite element meshes via Exodus-II file format
  • Grid & geometry independence
  • Cartesian or cylindrical coordinates

Flow Type Options

  • Internal, external & free-surface flows
  • 3D, 2D & 1D problems
  • Transient flows
  • Inviscid, viscous laminar & turbulent flows
  • Hybrid shallow water/3D flows
  • Non-inertial reference frame motion
  • Multiple scalar species
  • Two-phase flows
  • Heat transfer with phase change
  • Saturated & unsaturated porous media

Physical Modeling Options

  • Fluid structure interaction
  • Thermally-induced stresses
  • Plastic deformation of solids
  • Granular flow
  • Moisture drying
  • Solid solute dissolution
  • Sediment transport and scour
  • Sludge settling
  • Cavitation (potential, passive tracking, active tracking)
  • Phase change (liquid-vapor, liquid-solid)
  • Surface tension
  • Thermocapillary effects
  • Wall adhesion
  • Wall roughness
  • Vapor & gas bubbles
  • Solidification & melting
  • Mass/momentum/energy sources
  • Shear, density & temperature-dependent viscosity
  • Thixotropic viscosity
  • Visco-elastic-plastic fluids
  • Elastic membranes & walls
  • Evaporation residue
  • Electro-mechanical effects
  • Dielectric phenomena
  • Electro-osmosis
  • Electrostatic particles
  • Joule heating
  • Air entrainment
  • Molecular & turbulent diffusion
  • Temperature-dependent material properties
  • Spray cooling

Flow Definition Options

  • General boundary conditions
    • Symmetry
    • Rigid and flexible walls
    • Continuative
    • Periodic
    • Specified pressure
    • Specified velocity
    • Outflow
    • Outflow pressure
    • Outflow boundaries with wave absorbing layers
    • Grid overlay
    • Hydrostatic pressure
    • Volume flow rate
    • Non-linear periodic and solitary surface waves
    • Rating curve and natural hydraulics
    • Wave absorbing layer
  • Restart from previous simulation
  • Continuation of a simulation
  • Overlay boundary conditions
  • Change mesh and modeling options
  • Change model parameters

Thermal Modeling Options

  • Natural convection
  • Forced convection
  • Conduction in fluid & solid
  • Fluid-solid heat transfer
  • Distributed energy sources/sinks in fluids and solids
  • Radiation
  • Viscous heating
  • Orthotropic thermal conductivity
  • Thermally-induced stresses

Numerical Modeling Options

  • TruVOF Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) method for fluid interfaces
  • Steady state accelerator for free-surface flows
  • First and second order advection
  • Sharp and diffuse interface tracking
  • Implicit & explicit numerical methods
  • Immersed boundary method
  • GMRES, point and line relaxation pressure solvers
  • User-defined variables, subroutines & output
  • Utilities for runtime interaction during execution

Fluid Modeling Options

  • One incompressible fluid – confined or with free surfaces
  • Two incompressible fluids – miscible or with sharp interfaces
  • Compressible fluid – subsonic, transonic, supersonic
  • Stratified fluid
  • Acoustic phenomena
  • Mass particles with variable density or diameter

Shallow Flow Models

  • General topography
  • Raster data interface
  • Subcomponent-specific surface roughness
  • Wind shear
  • Ground roughness effects
  • Manning’s roughness
  • Laminar & turbulent flow
  • Sediment transport and scour
  • Surface tension
  • Heat transfer
  • Wetting & drying

Turbulence Models

  • RNG model
  • Two-equation k-epsilon model
  • Two-equation k-omega model
  • Large eddy simulation

Advanced Physical Models

  • General Moving Object model with 6 DOF–prescribed and fully-coupled motion
  • Rotating/spinning objects
  • Collision model
  • Tethered moving objects (springs, ropes, breaking mooring lines)
  • Flexing membranes and walls
  • Porosity
  • Finite element based elastic-plastic deformation
  • Finite element based thermal stress evolution due to thermal changes in a solidifying fluid
  • Combusting solid components

Chemistry Models

  • Stiff equation solver for chemical rate equations
  • Stationary or advected species

Porous Media Models

  • Saturated and unsaturated flow
  • Variable porosity
  • Directional porosity
  • General flow losses (linear & quadratic)
  • Capillary pressure
  • Heat transfer in porous media
  • Van Genunchten model for unsaturated flow

Discrete Particle Models

  • Massless marker particles
  • Multi-species material particles of variable size and mass
  • Solid, fluid, gas particles
  • Void particles tracking collapsed void regions
  • Non-linear fluid-dynamic drag
  • Added mass effects
  • Monte-Carlo diffusion
  • Particle-fluid momentum coupling
  • Coefficient of restitution or sticky particles
  • Point or volumetric particle sources
  • Initial particle blocks
  • Heat transfer with fluid
  • Evaporation and condensation
  • Solidification and melting
  • Coulomb and dielectric forces
  • Probe particles

Two-Phase & Two-Component Models

  • Liquid/liquid & gas/liquid interfaces
  • Variable density mixtures
  • Compressible fluid with a dispersed incompressible component
  • Drift flux with dynamic droplet size
  • Two-component, vapor/non-condensable gases
  • Phase transformations for gas-liquid & liquid-solid
  • Adiabatic bubbles
  • Bubbles with phase change
  • Continuum fluid with discrete particles
  • Scalar transport
  • Homogeneous bubbles
  • Super-cooling
  • Two-field temperature

Coupling with Other Programs

  • Geometry input from Stereolithography (STL) files – binary or ASCII
  • Direct interfaces with EnSight®, FieldView® & Tecplot® visualization software
  • Finite element solution import/export via Exodus-II file format
  • PLOT3D output
  • Neutral file output
  • Extensive customization possibilities
  • Solid Properties Materials Database

Data Processing Options

  • State-of-the-art post-processing tool, FlowSight™
  • Batch post-processing
  • Report generation
  • Automatic or custom results analysis
  • High-quality OpenGL-based graphics
  • Color or B/W vector, contour, 3D surface & particle plots
  • Moving and stationary probes
  • Visualization of non-inertial reference frame motion
  • Measurement baffles
  • Arbitrary sampling volumes
  • Force & moment output
  • Animation output
  • PostScript, JPEG & Bitmap output
  • Streamlines
  • Flow tracers

User Conveniences

  • Active simulation control (based on measurement of probes)
  • Mesh generators
  • Mesh quality checking
  • Tabular time-dependent input using external files
  • Automatic time-step control for accuracy & stability
  • Automatic convergence control
  • Mentor help to optimize efficiency
  • Units on all variables
  • Custom units
  • Component transformations
  • Moving particle sources
  • Change simulation parameters while solver runs
  • Launch and manage multiple simulations
  • Automatic simulation termination based on user-defined criteria
  • Run simulation on remote servers using remote solving
  • Copy boundary conditions to other mesh blocks

Multi-Processor Computing

  • Shared memory computers
  • Distributed memory clusters

FlowSight

  • Particle visualization
  • Velocity vector fields
  • Streamlines & pathlines
  • Iso-surfaces
  • 2D, 3D and arbitrary clips
  • Volume render
  • Probe data
  • History data
  • Vortex cores
  • Link multiple results
  • Multiple data views
  • Non-inertial reference frame
  • Spline clip