Figure 1 | Schematic of the present research model with dimensions and macro-roughnesses installed.

경사 낙하의 수력학적 성능: 하류 거시 거칠기 요소의 영향

Farhoud Kalateh a,*, Ehsan Aminvash a and Rasoul Daneshfaraz b
a Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
b Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
*Corresponding author. E-mail: f.kalateh@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

The main goal of the present study is to investigate the effects of macro-roughnesses downstream of the inclined drop through numerical models. Due to the vital importance of geometrical properties of the macro-roughnesses in the hydraulic performance and efficient energy dissipation downstream of inclined drops, two different geometries of macro-roughnesses, i.e., semi-circular and triangular geometries, have been investigated using the Flow-3D model. Numerical simulation showed that with the flow rate increase and relative critical depth, the flow energy consumption has decreased. Also, relative energy dissipation increases with the increase in height and slope angle, so that this amount of increase in energy loss compared to the smooth bed in semi-circular and triangular elements is 86.39 and 76.80%, respectively, in the inclined drop with a height of 15 cm and 86.99 and 65.78% in the drop with a height of 20 cm. The Froude number downstream on the uneven bed has been dramatically reduced, so this amount of reduction has been approximately 47 and 54% compared to the control condition. The relative depth of the downstream has also increased due to the turbulence of the flow on the uneven bed with the increase in the flow rate.

본 연구의 주요 목표는 수치 모델을 통해 경사 낙하 하류의 거시 거칠기 효과를 조사하는 것입니다. 수력학적 성능과 경사 낙하 하류의 효율적인 에너지 소산에서 거시 거칠기의 기하학적 특성이 매우 중요하기 때문에 두 가지 서로 다른 거시 거칠기 형상, 즉 반원형 및 삼각형 형상이 Flow를 사용하여 조사되었습니다.

3D 모델 수치 시뮬레이션을 통해 유량이 증가하고 상대 임계 깊이가 증가함에 따라 유동 에너지 소비가 감소하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 또한, 높이와 경사각이 증가함에 따라 상대적인 에너지 소산도 증가하는데, 반원형 요소와 삼각형 요소에서 평활층에 비해 에너지 손실의 증가량은 경사낙하에서 각각 86.39%와 76.80%입니다.

높이 15cm, 높이 20cm의 드롭에서 86.99%, 65.78%입니다. 고르지 못한 베드 하류의 프루드 수가 극적으로 감소하여 이 감소량은 대조 조건에 비해 약 47%와 54%였습니다. 유속이 증가함에 따라 고르지 못한 층에서의 흐름의 난류로 인해 하류의 상대적 깊이도 증가했습니다.

Key words

flow energy dissipation, Froude number, inclined drop, numerical simulation

Figure 1 | Schematic of the present research model with dimensions and macro-roughnesses installed.
Figure 1 | Schematic of the present research model with dimensions and macro-roughnesses installed.
Figure 2 | Meshing, boundary condition, and solution field network
Figure 2 | Meshing, boundary condition, and solution field network

REFERENCES

Abbaspour, A., Taghavianpour, T. & Arvanaghi, H. 2019 Experimental study of the hydraulic jump on the reverse bed with porous screens.
Applied Water Science 9, 155.
Abbaspour, A., Shiravani, P. & Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A. 2021 Experimental study of the energy dissipation on rough ramps. ISH Journal of
Hydraulic Engineering 27, 334–342.
Akib, S., Ahmed, A. A., Imran, H. M., Mahidin, M. F., Ahmed, H. S. & Rahman, S. 2015 Properties of a hydraulic jump over apparent
corrugated beds. Dam Engineering 25, 65–77.
AlTalib, A. N., Mohammed, A. Y. & Hayawi, H. A. 2015 Hydraulic jump and energy dissipation downstream stepped weir. Flow
Measurement and Instrumentation 69, 101616.
Bayon-Barrachina, A. & Lopez-Jimenez, P. A. 2015 Numerical analysis of hydraulic jumps using OpenFOAM. Journal of Hydroinformatics
17, 662–678.
Canovaro, F. & Solari, L. 2007 Dissipative analogies between a schematic macro-roughness arrangement and step–pool morphology. Earth
Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group 32, 1628–1640.
Daneshfaraz, R., Ghaderi, A., Akhtari, A. & Di Francesco, S. 2020 On the effect of block roughness in ogee spill-ways with flip buckets. Fluids
5, 182.
Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Di Francesco, S., Najibi, A. & Abraham, J. 2021a Three-dimensional study of the effect of block roughness
geometry on inclined drop. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering 6, 1–9.
Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Ghaderi, A., Abraham, J. & Bagherzadeh, M. 2021b SVM performance for predicting the effect of horizontal
screen diameters on the hydraulic parameters of a vertical drop. Applied Science 11, 4238.
Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Ghaderi, A., Kuriqi, A. & Abraham, J. 2021c Three-dimensional investigation of hydraulic properties of
vertical drop in the presence of step and grid dissipators. Symmetry 13, 895.
Dey, S. & Sarkar, A. 2008 Characteristics of turbulent flow in submerged jumps on rough beds. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 134, 49–59.
Ead, S. A. & Rajaratnam, N. 2002 Hydraulic jumps on corrugated beds. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 128, 656–663.
Fang, H., Han, X., He, G. & Dey, S. 2018 Influence of permeable beds on hydraulically macro-rough flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 847,
552–590.
Federico, I., Marrone, S., Colagrossi, A., Aristodemo, F. & Antuono, M. 2019 Simulating 2D open-channel flows through an SPH model.
European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids 34, 35–46.
Ghaderi, A., Dasineh, M., Aristodemo, F. & Aricò, C. 2021 Numerical simulations of the flow field of a submerged hydraulic jump over
triangular macroroughnesses. Water 13, 674.
Ghare, A. D., Ingl, R. N., Porey, P. D. & Gokhale, S. S. 2010 Block ramp design for efficient energy dissipation. Journal of Energy Dissipation
136, 1–5.
Habibzadeh, A., Rajaratnam, N. & Loewen, M. 2019 Characteristics of the flow field downstream of free and submerged hydraulic jumps.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management 172, 180–194.
Hajiahmadi, A., Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh, M. & Khanjani, M. J. 2021 Experimental evaluation of vertical shaft efficiency in vortex flow energy
dissipation. International Journal of Civil Engineering 19, 1445–1455.

Katourani, S. & Kashefipour, S. M. 2012 Effect of the geometric characteristics of baffle on hydraulic flow condition in baffled apron drop.
Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 37, 51–59.
Kurdistani, S. M., Varaki, M. E. & Moayedi Moshkaposhti, M. 2024 Apron and macro roughness as scour countermeasures downstream of
block ramps. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1–9.
Lopardo, R. A. 2013 Extreme velocity fluctuations below free hydraulic jumps. Journal of Engineering 1–5.
Mahmoudi-Rad, M. & Najafzadeh, M. 2023 Experimental evaluation of the energy dissipation efficiency of the vortex flow section of drop
shafts. Scientific Reports 13, 1679.
Matin, M. A., Hasan, M. & Islam, M. R. 2018 Experiment on hydraulic jump in sudden expansion in a sloping rectangular channel. Journal of
Civil Engineering 36, 65–77.
Moghadam, K. F., Banihashemi, M. A., Badiei, P. & Shirkavand, A. 2019 A numerical approach to solve fluid-solid two-phase flows using time
splitting projection method with a pressure correction technique. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, an International Journal
19, 357–367.
Moghadam, K. F., Banihashemi, M. A., Badiei, P. & Shirkavand, A. 2020 A time-splitting pressure-correction projection method for complete
two-fluid modeling of a local scour hole. International Journal of Sediment Research 35, 395–407.
Moradi-SabzKoohi, A., Kashefipour, S. M. & Bina, M. 2011 Experimental comparison of energy dissipation on drop structures. JWSS –
Isfahan University of Technology 15, 209–223. (in Persian).
Mouaze, D., Murzyn, F. & Chaplin, J. R. 2005 Free surface length scale estimation in hydraulic jumps. Journal of Fluids Engineering 127,
1191–1193.
Nicosia, A., Carollo, F. G. & Ferro, V. 2023 Effects of boulder arrangement on flow resistance due to macro-scale bed roughness. Water 15,
349.
Ohtsu, I. & Yasuda, Y. 1991 Hydraulic jump in sloping channel. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117, 905–921.
Pagliara, S. & Palermo, M. 2012 Effect of stilling basin geometry on the dissipative process in the presence of block ramps. Journal of
Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 138, 1027–1031.
Pagliara, S., Das, R. & Palermo, M. 2008 Energy dissipation on submerged block ramps. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 134,
527–532.
Pagliara, S., Roshni, T. & Palermo, M. 2015 Energy dissipation over large-scale roughness for both transition and uniform flow conditions.
International Journal of Civil Engineering 13, 341–346.
Parsaie, A., Dehdar-Behbahani, S. & Haghiabi, A. H. 2016 Numerical modeling of cavitation on spillway’s flip bucket. Frontiers of Structural
and Civil Engineering 10, 438–444.
Pourabdollah, N., Heidarpour, M. & Abedi Koupai, J. 2018 Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps in different stilling basins.
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management. Thomas Telford Ltd, pp. 1–11.
Roushangar, K. & Ghasempour, R. 2019 Evaluation of the impact of channel geometry and rough elements arrangement in hydraulic jump
energy dissipation via SVM. Journal of Hydroinformatics 21, 92–103.
Samadi-Boroujeni, H., Ghazali, M., Gorbani, B. & Nafchi, R. F. 2013 Effect of triangular corrugated beds on the hydraulic jump
characteristics. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 40, 841–847.
Shekari, Y., Javan, M. & Eghbalzadeh, A. 2014 Three-dimensional numerical study of submerged hydraulic jumps. Arabian Journal for
Science and Engineering 39, 6969–6981.
Tokyay, N. D., Evcimen, T. U. & Şimsek, Ç. 2011 Forced hydraulic jump on non-protruding rough beds. Canadian Journal of Civil
Engineering 38, 1136–1144.
Wagner, W. E. 1956 Hydraulic model studies of the check intake structure-potholes East canal. Bureau of Reclamation Hydraulic Laboratory
Report Hyd, 411.
Witt, A., Gulliver, J. S. & Shen, L. 2018 Numerical investigation of vorticity and bubble clustering in an air-entraining hydraulic jump.
Computers & Fluids 172, 162–180.