Figure 11: Effect of voltage and current on the tensile strength.

๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฐ•๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ์ตœ์ ํ™”

๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฐ•๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ์ตœ์ ํ™”

OPTIMIZATION OF WELD STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF TUNGSTEN INERT GAS MILD STEEL WELDS USING THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ๋ถ€์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(TIG) ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•(RSM)์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋„์ถœํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‚ฐ์—… ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Paper Metadata

  • Industry: ์ œ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ€๊ณต์—… (Manufacturing and Metal Fabrication)
  • Material: 10mm ๋‘๊ป˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ (Mild Steel Plate)
  • Process: ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ (TIG / GTAW)

Keywords

  • ์šฉ์ ‘ (Welding)
  • ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ (Gas Tungsten Arc Welding)
  • ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ (Tensile Strength)
  • ๊ฒฝ๋„ (Hardness)
  • ๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ• (Response Surface Methodology)
  • ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™” (Process Optimization)

Executive Summary

Research Architecture

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” 10mm ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(TIG)์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์  ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์—๋Š” ์ค‘์‹ฌ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•(Central Composite Design, CCD)์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด 30ํšŒ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋Ÿฐ(Run)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜(Welding Current), ์•„ํฌ ์ „์••(Arc Voltage), ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(Gas Flow Rate), ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ(Filler Rod Diameter)์˜ ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Key Findings

๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA) ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์—๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฝ๋„์—๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์š”์ธ์ž„์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ „๋ฅ˜ 170.12 A, ์ „์•• 19.84 V, ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ 23.92 L/min, ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ 2.4mm ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ 497.555 N/mmยฒ์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„ 192.556 BHN์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ F-๊ฐ’์€ 12.69, ๊ฒฝ๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ F-๊ฐ’์€ 8.51๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์ด ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Industrial Applications

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ค‘๊ณต์—… ๋ฐ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์ œ์กฐ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์—ฐ๊ฐ• ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ˆ™๋ จ๊ณต์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์„ค์ • ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ํŒŒ์†์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ƒ์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ๊ฐ•ํŒ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Theoretical Background

๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ• (Response Surface Methodology, RSM)

๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ฐ’์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ 2์ฐจ ๋‹คํ•ญ์‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ ํ•ฉ์‹œ์ผœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ค‘์‹ฌ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•(CCD)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜ ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ˜์‘(์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„, ๊ฒฝ๋„) ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ (TIG Welding)

๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(TIG)์€ ๋น„์†Œ๋ชจ์„ฑ ํ……์Šคํ… ์ „๊ทน๊ณผ ๋ชจ์žฌ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์•„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ์ผœ ์šฉ์ ‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ, ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ณ  ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์€ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜, ์ „์••, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„ ๋“ฑ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ฐ•์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณดํ˜ธ ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ์ตœ์  ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ด๋ก ์  ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Results and Analysis

Experimental Setup

์‹คํ—˜์—๋Š” 10mm ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ์‹œํŽธ์€ 50mm x 100mm ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ ˆ๋‹จ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ณต๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ์žฅ๋น„๋กœ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜ 140-200 A, ์ „์•• 15-25 V, ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ 20-24 L/min, ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ 2.4-3.2 mm๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ›„ ์‹œํŽธ์€ ASTM E8/E8M-11 ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€๊ณต๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์œ ๋‹ˆ๋ฒ„์„ค ์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ(UTM)์™€ ๋กœํฌ์›ฐ ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Visual Data Summary

3D ํ‘œ๋ฉด๋„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ์ „์••์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ์ง€์ ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ƒ์Šนํ•˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์ดํ›„ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์ด ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์—์„œ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ด ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฝ๋„์™€ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž„์„ ์‹œ๊ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ๋„ํ‘œ(Reliability Plot)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ด€์ธก๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ฐ’์ด ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„(Rยฒ > 0.88)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์ด ์ฆ๋ช…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Variable Correlation Analysis

๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜(A)์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(C)์˜ ์„ ํ˜• ํ•ญ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ด๋“ค์˜ ์ œ๊ณฑ ํ•ญ(Aยฒ, Cยฒ) ๋ฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ํ•ญ(AD, BC)๊ณผ๋„ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(C)๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ(D)์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋…๋ฆฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ P-๊ฐ’(0.0001 ๋ฏธ๋งŒ)์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋…ธ์ด์ฆˆ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์˜ค์ฐจ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด 0.01% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ž„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 11: Effect of voltage and current on the tensile strength.
Figure 11: Effect of voltage and current on the tensile strength.

Paper Details

OPTIMIZATION OF WELD STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF TUNGSTEN INERT GAS MILD STEEL WELDS USING THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

1. Overview

  • Title: OPTIMIZATION OF WELD STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF TUNGSTEN INERT GAS MILD STEEL WELDS USING THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
  • Author: S. O. Sada
  • Year: 2018
  • Journal: Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH)

2. Abstract

๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ณ ์žฅ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ทธ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์€ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅธ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•(RSM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 10mm ๋‘๊ป˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ์˜ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ๊ฐ•๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ(์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๋„)์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์—๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด, ๊ฒฝ๋„์—๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ F-๊ฐ’์€ 12.69(P=0.0001), ๊ฒฝ๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ F-๊ฐ’์€ 8.51(P=0.0001)๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์ด ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 170.12 A, ์ „์•• 19.84 V, ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ 23.92 L/min, ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ 2.4mm์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋•Œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” 497.555 N/mmยฒ, ๊ฒฝ๋„๋Š” 192.556 BHN์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

3. Methodology

3.1. ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ค€๋น„: 10mm ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ•ํŒ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ 50mm x 100mm ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ์‹œํŽธ์œผ๋กœ ์ ˆ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๋งˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ค€๋น„ํ•จ.
3.2. ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„: ์ค‘์‹ฌ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•(CCD)์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ , 8๊ฐœ์˜ ์ถ• ์ง€์ , 16๊ฐœ์˜ ์š”์ธ ์ง€์ ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ด 30ํšŒ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋Ÿฐ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•จ.
3.3. ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •: ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋””์ž์ธ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆญ์Šค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(TIG)์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œํŽธ์„ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์ž์—ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐํ•จ.
3.4. ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์‹œํ—˜: ASTM E8/E8M-11 ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์„ ๊ฐ€๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  UTM์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋กœํฌ์›ฐ ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•จ.
3.5. ํ†ต๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„: Design Expert ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ANOVA ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  2์ฐจ ๋‹คํ•ญ์‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋„์ถœํ•จ.

4. Key Results

์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ์ตœ์†Œ 460.3 MPa์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 496.8 MPa์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฝ๋„๋Š” 169.8 RHB์—์„œ 192.3 RHB ์‚ฌ์ด๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ANOVA ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Rยฒ)๋Š” ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ 0.9221, ๊ฒฝ๋„ 0.8881๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ผ์ • ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ๋ฉด ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ €ํ•˜๋˜๋Š” ํฌํ™” ์ง€์ ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•จ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ํ™•๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 14: Effect of filler rod and gas flow rate on the hardness value.
Figure 14: Effect of filler rod and gas flow rate on the hardness value.

5. Mathematical Models

$$Tensile strength = 496.27 + 2.25A – 1.03B + 6.31C + 0.05D + 2.44AB – 0.74AC – 4.67AD – 3.53BC + 1.51BD – 2.29CD – 4.02A^2 – 2.82B^2 – 4.92C^2 – 4.16D^2$$
$$Hardness = 189.55 + 1.01A + 0.89B + 4.57C – 3.35D + 1.57AB – 0.89AC + 0.11AD + 0.91BC – 0.19BD – 1.82CD – 2.26A^2 – 1.17B^2 – 1.93C^2 – 1.40D^2$$
(์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ A: ์ „๋ฅ˜, B: ์ „์••, C: ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰, D: ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•จ)

Figure List

  1. Figure 1: Sample Specimen (์‹คํ—˜ ์‹œํŽธ ํ˜•์ƒ)
  2. Figure 2: Welded Specimens (์šฉ์ ‘ ์™„๋ฃŒ๋œ ์‹œํŽธ)
  3. Figure 3: Tensile test specimen (์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ)
  4. Figure 4: ANOVA table for validating the model significance in optimizing tensile strength
  5. Figure 5: ANOVA table for validating the model significance in optimizing hardness
  6. Figure 6: Goodness of fit statistics for validating Model (Tensile Strength)
  7. Figure 7: Goodness of fit statistics for validating Model (Hardness Value)
  8. Figure 8: Optimal equation in terms of actual factors for maximizing the Tensile Strength and hardness
  9. Figure 9: Observed versus predicted tensile strength
  10. Figure 10: Observed versus predicted hardness
  11. Figure 11: Effect of voltage and current on the tensile strength (3D Surface Plot)
  12. Figure 12: Effect of filler rod and gas flow rate on the tensile strength (3D Surface Plot)
  13. Figure 13: Effect of voltage and current on the hardness value (3D Surface Plot)
  14. Figure 14: Effect of filler rod and gas flow rate on the hardness value (3D Surface Plot)

References

  1. Satish, R. and Naveen, B. (2012). “Weldability and process parameter optimization of dissimilar pipe joints using GTAW”.
  2. Kim, I. S. (2005). “An Investigation into an Intelligent System for Predicting Bead Geometry in GMA Welding Process”.
  3. Lee, J. I. and Um, K. W. (2000). “A prediction of welding process parameters by prediction of back-bead geometry”.
  4. Montgomery, D. C. et al. (2011). “RSM Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments”.
  5. Benyounis, K. Y. and Olabi, A. G. (2008). “Optimization of Different Welding Processes using Statistical and Numerical Approaches”.

Technical Q&A

Q: ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ANOVA ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜(Current)์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(Gas Flow Rate)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ F-๊ฐ’์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ด ๊ฐ•๋„ ํ™•๋ณด์— ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ๊ฒฝ๋„(Hardness) ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

๊ฒฝ๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ(Filler Rod Diameter)์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด ์ž‘์„์ˆ˜๋ก, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ ์ • ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ง€๋ ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ฒฝ๋„ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ƒ์Šนํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์›์†Œ์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•(RSM) ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋Š” ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(R-Squared)์™€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ Rยฒ๋Š” 0.9221, ๊ฒฝ๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ Rยฒ๋Š” 0.8881๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ 88% ์ด์ƒ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Adeq Precision ๊ฐ’์ด 10 ์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋Œ€ ์žก์Œ๋น„๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ํ™•๋ณด๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ์ „์••์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ์ƒ์Šนํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

์•„๋‹ˆ์š”, ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3D ํ‘œ๋ฉด๋„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ์ „์••์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ์ž„๊ณ„์ ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ์ƒ์Šนํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์€ ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์—ด์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ™”๋‚˜ ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ)์˜ ์—ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ตœ์ข… ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 170.12 A, ์•„ํฌ ์ „์•• 19.84 V, ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ 23.92 L/min, ์šฉ์ ‘๋ด‰ ์ง๊ฒฝ 2.4mm์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” 497.555 N/mmยฒ, ๊ฒฝ๋„๋Š” 192.556 BHN์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Conclusion

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ„์„๋ฒ•(RSM)์ด TIG ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž„์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ 2์ฐจ ๋‹คํ•ญ์‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋†’์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ฐ• ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์ „๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ตœ์  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฐ์—… ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Source Information

Citation: S. O. Sada (2018). OPTIMIZATION OF WELD STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF TUNGSTEN INERT GAS MILD STEEL WELDS USING THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH).

DOI/Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i2.15

Technical Review Resources for Engineers:

โ–ถ Access the original research paper (PDF)
โ–ถ FLOW-3D ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜ ํŒ€๊ณผ ํ˜‘์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์‹œ๋ ค๋ฉด..

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited.
Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Figure 6. SEM Micrographs. a) Joint zone, b) Base material

ํœ  ๋ฆผ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

ํœ  ๋ฆผ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

Effect of flash butt welding parameters on mechanical properties of wheel rims

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ํœ  ๋ฆผ ์ œ์กฐ์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” SPFH 590 ๊ณ ์žฅ๋ ฅ ์ €ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ฐ•(HSLA)์˜ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘(Flash Butt Welding, FBW) ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.

Paper Metadata

  • Industry: ์ž๋™์ฐจ (Automotive)
  • Material: SPFH 590 ๊ฐ• (JIS G 3134)
  • Process: ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ (Flash Butt Welding)

Keywords

  • Flash Butt Welding
  • SPFH 590 steel
  • Voltage
  • Flashing time
  • Upset height
  • Microstructure
  • Acicular ferrite

Executive Summary

Research Architecture

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” 400kVA ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ Swift-Ohio 91-AA ๋ชจ๋ธ ์šฉ์ ‘๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘๊ป˜ 2.3mm์˜ SPFH 590 ๊ฐ•ํŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์ „์••(Voltage), ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด(Upset height), ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(Flashing time)์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜์ค€(High)๊ณผ ์ €์ˆ˜์ค€(Low)์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด 8๊ฐ€์ง€ ์กฐํ•ฉ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘๋œ ์‹œํŽธ์€ AWS B4.0M ๋ฐ JIS G 3134 ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜, ๊ตฝํž˜ ์‹œํ—˜, Rockwell ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์‹œํ—˜์„ ๊ฑฐ์ณค์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ ์ „์ž ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(SEM)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ํŒŒ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Figure 1. Schematic of the flash butt welding process.
Figure 1. Schematic of the flash butt welding process.

Key Findings

์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 5V ์ „์••, 2.3mm ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด, 2์ดˆ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ(Treatment 1)์—์„œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ 596.85 MPa์™€ ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ 30%๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ชจ์žฌ์˜ ์ธต์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ์—์„œ ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ(Acicular ferrite)๋กœ ๋ณ€ํƒœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ(Widmanstatten ferrite) ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰(๋†’์€ ์ „์•• ๋ฐ ๊ธด ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„)์€ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ™”์™€ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ์ƒ์˜ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ์„ 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ์ทจ์„ฑ ํŒŒ๊ดด๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

Industrial Applications

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ž๋™์ฐจ ํœ  ๋ฆผ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์žฅ๋น„์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์„ค์ • ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ณ ์žฅ๋ ฅ๊ฐ• ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์† ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ œ์–ดํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰๋ฅ ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ›„ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํƒˆํƒ„์ธต ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์œ ์ž…์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ท ์—ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.


Theoretical Background

ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘(FBW)์˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜

ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์ ‘ํ•ฉํ•  ๋‘ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ฉด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ์  ์•„ํฌ(ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ€์—ดํ•œ ํ›„, ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์••๋ ฅ(์—…์…‹)์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•ด ์ ‘ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณต์ •์€ ๋ณ„๋„์˜ ์šฉ๊ฐ€์žฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š” ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์šฉ์œต๋œ ๊ธˆ์†๊ณผ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ์—…์…‹ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์™ธ๋ถ€๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ชจ์žฌ์™€ ๋™๋“ฑํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณ ํšจ์œจ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ณต์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ž๋™์ฐจ ํœ  ๋ฆผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์ œ์กฐ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค.

HSLA ๊ฐ•์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณ€ํƒœ

SPFH 590๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณ ์žฅ๋ ฅ ์ €ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ฐ•(HSLA)์€ ์—ด๊ฐ„ ์••์—ฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ์ธต์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ฐ ํŽ„๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์—ด๊ณผ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์‚ฌ์ดํด์€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€(WZ) ๋ฐ ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ)์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์˜ค์Šคํ…Œ๋‚˜์ดํŠธ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ•ต์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„์™€ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋Š” ํŒ์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ์‘๋ ฅ ์ง‘์ค‘์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์ธ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์›์ธ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.

Results and Analysis

Experimental Setup

์‹คํ—˜์—๋Š” JIS G 3134 ํ‘œ์ค€์˜ SPFH 590 ๊ฐ•ํŒ(๋‘๊ป˜ 2.3mm)์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ™”ํ•™ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์€ ํƒ„์†Œ 0.09%, ๋ง๊ฐ„ 1.69% ๋“ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋Š” ์ „์••(5V, 7V), ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด(2.3mm, 4.6mm), ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(2s, 4s)์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œํŽธ์€ 200 x 1086 mm ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ค€๋น„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ›„ ๋น„๋“œ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ๋ฐ ์™ธ๊ด€ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด Knoop ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ 1m/min ์†๋„์˜ ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Visual Data Summary

๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋ฐฑ์ƒ‰์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง์„  ํ˜•ํƒœ์ธ ํƒˆํƒ„์ธต(Decarburized layer)์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํƒ„์†Œ๊ฐ€ ํ™•์‚ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์—…์…‹ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์••์ถœ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์ด๋‹ค. SEM ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 4์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ธฐ๊ณต์˜ ์œ ์ฐฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 8์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ท ์—ด์ด ์ „ํŒŒ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ํŒŒ๊ดด(Mixed fracture) ์–‘์ƒ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์œ ์ž…์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ท ์—ด์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 6. SEM Micrographs. a) Joint zone, b) Base material
Figure 6. SEM Micrographs. a) Joint zone, b) Base material

Variable Correlation Analysis

๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰(Heat input)์€ ์ „์••๊ณผ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ์ „์••(7V)๊ณผ ๊ธด ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(4s)์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ž…์—ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ•ด์ง€๊ณ  ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ํ•˜๋ฝํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์„ ๋ฐฐ์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์น˜๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ํšŒ๋ณต์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „์••๊ณผ ์งง์€ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—ฐ์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด์— ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•จ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.


Paper Details

Effect of flash butt welding parameters on mechanical properties of wheel rims

1. Overview

  • Title: Effect of flash butt welding parameters on mechanical properties of wheel rims
  • Author: Rodolfo Rodrรญguez Baracaldo, Mauricio Camargo Santos, Miguel Arturo Acosta Echeverrรญa
  • Year: 2018
  • Journal: Scientia et Technica Aรฑo XXII, Vol. 23, No. 01

2. Abstract

SPFH 590 ๊ฐ•์˜ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ฐ ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€๋Š” ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜, ๊ตฝํž˜ ์‹œํ—˜, Rockwell ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ ์ „์ž ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ถ„์„์œผ๋กœ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์ธต์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ์—์„œ ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํƒœ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๊ธธ์ญ‰ํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ฅ๊ทผ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌ์ด๋“œ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์ธ์ž ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์ด ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ค‘ 5V(์ „์••), 2.3mm(์—…์…‹), 2s(ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„) ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ ์กฐํ•ฉ(๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ์„ฑ)์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค.

3. Methodology

3.1. ์‹œํŽธ ์ค€๋น„: JIS G 3134 ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ SPFH 590 ๊ฐ•ํŒ์„ 200 x 1086 mm ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ ˆ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „ ์„ธ์ฒ™ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•จ.
3.2. ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •: 400kVA Swift-Ohio ์šฉ์ ‘๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 8๊ฐ€์ง€ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ(์ „์••, ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด, ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„)์œผ๋กœ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•จ.
3.3. ์™ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ: 10๋ฐฐ ํ™•๋Œ€๊ฒฝ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์™ธ๊ด€ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ํ›„, 5% Nital ์—์นญ์•ก์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ SEM์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•จ.
3.4. ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€: AWS B4.0M ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ตฝํž˜ ์‹œํ—˜๊ณผ JIS G 3134 ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  Knoop ๊ฒฝ๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•จ.

4. Key Results

์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 1(LV, LUH, LFT)์€ 596.85 MPa์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ 30%์˜ ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ๋ชจ์žฌ(624 MPa, 22%) ๋Œ€๋น„ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 8(HV, LUH, LFT)์€ 369.6 MPa์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ 2.1%์˜ ๊ทนํžˆ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์—์„œ ํŒŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๋„ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฝ๋„๊ฐ’์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์—…์…‹ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๊ฒฝํ™”์™€ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ตฝํž˜ ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ๋„ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ์‹œํŽธ๋“ค๋งŒ์ด ๊ท ์—ด ์—†์ด ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Figure List

  1. ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๊ฐœ๋žต๋„
  2. ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ (JIS G 3134 ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜)
  3. SPFH 590 ๋ชจ์žฌ์˜ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ ์‚ฌ์ง„ (์ธต์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ)
  4. ๋ชจ์žฌ์˜ SEM ์‚ฌ์ง„ (ํŽ„๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ฐ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ถ„ํฌ)
  5. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ฐ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ
  6. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์™€ ๋ชจ์žฌ์˜ SEM ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„
  7. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ํšก๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ํƒˆํƒ„์ธต ๊ด€์ฐฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
  8. ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜ ํ›„ ํŒŒ๋‹จ๋œ ์‹œํŽธ์˜ ์™ธ๊ด€
  9. ์‹œํŽธ๋ณ„ Knoop ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ฒฝ๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„
  10. ๊ตฝํž˜ ์‹œํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์žฅ์น˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ
  11. ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 4์˜ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ํŒŒ๊ดด๋ฉด SEM ์‚ฌ์ง„
  12. ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 8์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ํŒŒ๊ดด ๋ฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ท ์—ด SEM ์‚ฌ์ง„

References

  1. Y. Ichiyama, et al. (2007). Flash-Butt Welding of High Strength Steels.
  2. ASM Handbook: Welding, Brazing, and Soldering (1994).
  3. AWS Welding Handbook: Welding Processes (2001).
  4. D. E. Ziemian, et al. (2008). Flash butt-welding process optimization.
  5. JIS G 3134:2006. Hot-rolled high strength steel plate for automobile.

Technical Q&A

Q: ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ(Acicular Ferrite)์˜ ์—ญํ• ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ธต์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํƒœ๋˜์–ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌด์งˆ์„œํ•œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๋•๋ถ„์— ๊ท ์—ด ์ „ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ์žฌ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ์™€ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ด์•ผ๋งŒ ์ทจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ์™œ ๋†’์€ ์ „์••๊ณผ ๊ธด ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ค๋‚˜์š”?

์ „์••๊ณผ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉด ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์— ๊ฐ€ํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ์ด ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ณผ๋„ํ•ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ)์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ง์„ ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ณ , ์ทจ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ์ƒ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ๋Œ€ํญ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‘๋ ฅ ์ง‘์ค‘์ด ์‹ฌํ™”๋˜์–ด ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์กฐ๊ธฐ ํŒŒ๋‹จ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ํšก๋‹จ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ๋ฐฑ์ƒ‰ ์„ (White line)์˜ ์ •์ฒด๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

์ด ๋ฐฑ์ƒ‰ ์„ ์€ ํƒˆํƒ„์ธต(Decarburized layer)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ๊ณ ์˜จ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋œ ๊ธˆ์† ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ํƒ„์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์‚ฐ๋˜์–ด ์†Œ์‹ค๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์—…์…‹ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํƒ„์†Œ๊ฐ€ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ๊ธˆ์†์ด ์™ธ๋ถ€๋กœ ์••์ถœ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์ „ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๋ถˆ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์œ ์ž…์ด ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด 8์˜ ํŒŒ๋‹จ๋ฉด SEM ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์œ ์ž…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ท ์—ด(Superficial cracking)์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘ ์œ ์ž…๋œ ์ˆ˜์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์—ด ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ถˆ์—ฐ์† ์ง€์ ์— ์ถ•์ ๋˜์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ์••๋ ฅ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ๊ณ„์— ๋†’์€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•ด ๊ท ์—ด์„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q: ํœ  ๋ฆผ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ๋Š” 5V ์ „์••, 2.3mm ์—…์…‹ ๋†’์ด, 2์ดˆ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(Treatment 1)์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๋ชจ์žฌ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ์‹ ์œจ(30%)์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ดํ›„ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๊ตฝํž˜์ด๋‚˜ ์ปฌ๋ง(Curling) ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๊ท ์—ด ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Conclusion

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด SPFH 590 ๊ฐ•์˜ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ฒ„ํŠธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณ€ํƒœ์™€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ž…์—ด๋Ÿ‰ ์ œ์–ด๋Š” ์นจ์ƒ ํŽ˜๋ผ์ดํŠธ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ž…์—ด์€ ์œ„๋“œ๋งŒ์Šคํ…Œํ… ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์กฐ๋Œ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์ทจ์„ฑ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ 5V ์ „์••๊ณผ ์งง์€ ํ”Œ๋ž˜์‹ฑ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ํœ  ๋ฆผ ์ œ์กฐ์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„-์—ฐ์„ฑ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•จ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ์‚ฐ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.


Source Information

Citation: Rodolfo Rodrรญguez Baracaldo, Mauricio Camargo Santos, Miguel Arturo Acosta Echeverrรญa (2018). Effect of flash butt welding parameters on mechanical properties of wheel rims. Scientia et Technica.

DOI/Link: Not described in the paper

Technical Review Resources for Engineers:

โ–ถ Access the original research paper (PDF)
โ–ถ FLOW-3D ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜ ํŒ€๊ณผ ํ˜‘์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์‹œ๋ ค๋ฉด..

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited.
Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)

CFD์™€ AI์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ: ํ™์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฅผ ๋ง‰๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Kuo-Wei Liao ์™ธ ์ €์ž๊ฐ€ 2016๋…„ SpringerPlus์— ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods”๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์•ฝํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword:ย ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€
  • Secondary Keywords:ย ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„, ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS), ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM, ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, CFD

Executive Summary

  • ๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ:ย ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋“ฑ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” HEC-RAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„(Bayesian LS-SVM)๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ:ย ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ 3,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ๋Œ€์‹  ๋‹จ 150๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฒฐ๋ก :ย ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  CFD ๋ฐ AI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ: ์™œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ CFD ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์—๊ฒŒ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ๊ฐ€

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์ ๊ฒ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์–‘์‹(PIEF)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ‰๊ฐ€์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋กœ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ํŠน์ • ์žฌํ˜„ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„(์˜ˆ: 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜์น˜(๊ณ ์ •๋œ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ๋‹น์‹œ ๋ณด๊ฐ• ๊ณต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ์นœ ์†ฝ์œ„์•ˆ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทนํ•œ ์žฌํ•ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋“ฑ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋ณธ์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๋‚ดํฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ์‹œ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ๊ณผ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)
Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)

์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ถ„์„

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  1. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์ •์˜:ย ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ, ๋ง๋š ์ถ• ์‘๋ ฅ, ๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ ๋“ฑ 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง:
    • ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ (์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†):ย HEC-RAS ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋งค๋‹ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด:ย ๊ธฐ์กด์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 7๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜:ย ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(SPT-N ๊ฐ’)๊ณผ ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋˜ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM) ๊ตฌ์ถ•:ย ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“œ๋Š” ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„(Bayesian LS-SVM)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ผํ‹ด ํ•˜์ดํผํ๋ธŒ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง(LHD)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  4. ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:ย ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow
Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow

๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ: ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 1: ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์˜ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ํ–ฅ์ƒ

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM)์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV) 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 3,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ํ‘œ 7์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ RSM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ 150๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ(ฮผ ยฑ 3ฯƒ ๋ฒ”์œ„)๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ MCS์™€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ (2.32 x 10โปยน)์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV)๋Š” 0.01๋กœ ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 5%์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ 80๊ฐœ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ค„์—ฌ๋„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 2: ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด

์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ 6์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„(RMSE)์™€ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ 50๊ฐœ์—์„œ 150๊ฐœ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ๋ณ€์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ RMSE๋Š” 3.45%์—์„œ 0.32%๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์€ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ, ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ์ธ LS-SVM๊ณผ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ์ธ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ‘์•ˆ์ „’ ๋˜๋Š” ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด’๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ , 0๊ณผ 1 ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๊ฐ’์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฌ์„ธํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ 50์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ COV๋ฅผ 0.09(LS-SVM)์—์„œ 0.03(Bayesian LS-SVM)์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์งˆ์  ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ 

  • ํ† ๋ชฉ/์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด:ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์•ˆ์ „์œจ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด, ์„ธ๊ตด๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฐ ๋•Œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์œ„ํ—˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ž:ย ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ณด์ˆ˜๋ณด๊ฐ• ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฐ ์ž์› ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ์žˆ์–ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ •๋ณด์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • CFD ํ•ด์„ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€:ย ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(HEC-RAS), ๋จธ์‹ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹(LS-SVM), ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(MCS)์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ •๋ณด


A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods (ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€)

1. ๊ฐœ์š”:

  • ์ œ๋ชฉ:ย A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods
  • ์ €์ž:ย Kuo-Wei Liao, Yasunori Muto, Wei-Lun Chen and Bang-Ho Wu
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„:ย 2016
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ํ•™์ˆ ์ง€/ํ•™ํšŒ:ย SpringerPlus
  • ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ:ย Bridge safety, Flood-resistant reliability, MCS, Bayesian LS-SVM

2. ์ดˆ๋ก:

ํ•˜์ฒœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ, MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์€ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”๋„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์ž์ฃผ ์ฑ„ํƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ํ›„ MCS๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์ธ์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด์ „์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ ์„ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์— ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  HEC-RAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๋‹น ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ํ•ด๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ MCS๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์˜ˆ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค.

3. ์„œ๋ก :

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ข…์ข… 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์ ๊ฒ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์–‘์‹(PIEF)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. PIEF์˜ ์ „์ฒด ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋ฉด, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ‘ธ์‹œ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. PIEF๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ์ž ์žฌ์  ์œ„ํ˜‘์ด ๋˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ์ค‘์š”๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ• ๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜์˜ ํ•ฉ์€ 100์ด๋‹ค. Chern ๋“ฑ์ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ PIEF์˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์œ ํ˜•, ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ๊ฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์˜ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ์‹œ์„ค ์œ ๋ฌด, ์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๋Œ์˜ ์œ ๋ฌด๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด๋œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

4. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์š”์•ฝ:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ:

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ทนํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ, ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ:

๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์™”๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, Carturan ๋“ฑ์€ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๊ณ , Wu ๋“ฑ์€ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํŒŒ๊ดด ๋ฌธ์ œ, ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์— MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ํฐ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM)์ด ๋งŽ์ด ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ :

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์š”์ธ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„์„ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ (1) HEC-RAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ํฌ์ฐฉ, (2) ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, (3) ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ(๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ, ์ถ• ์‘๋ ฅ, ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์ถ•, (4) ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค.

5. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก 

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๋ก€์ธ ์†ฝ์œ„์•ˆ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ํ›„, MCS๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:

  • ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย HEC-RAS ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ๋งค๋‹ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย 7๊ฐœ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 270๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย ํ˜„์žฅ ์ง€์งˆ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€๊ด€์ž…์‹œํ—˜(SPT-N) ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:ย ๋ผํ‹ด ํ•˜์ดํผํ๋ธŒ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋Š” 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ(๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ, ์ถ•๋ ฅ, ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ)๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ง๋ ฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

6. ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•์€ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ 3000๊ฐœ์—์„œ 150๊ฐœ๋กœ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถ„์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์€ 2.3 x 10โปยน๋กœ, ๊ตญ์ œํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๊ธฐ๊ตฌ(ISO)์˜ ๊ถŒ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์ค€์น˜(1.00 x 10โปยณ)๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ƒํšŒํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋‹ค.
  • ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ(COV)์„ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ(์ƒ˜ํ”Œ 50๊ฐœ ๊ธฐ์ค€, 0.09 โ†’ 0.03) ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ๋Šฅ(๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ๋ณ€์œ„) ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์œ ์†๊ณผ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.
Fig. 10 Detailed information for the Bayesian LS-SVM classifier in Fig. 9. a Square abcd, b square efhg
Fig. 10 Detailed information for the Bayesian LS-SVM classifier in Fig. 9. a Square abcd, b square efhg

Figure ๋ชฉ๋ก:

  • Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)
  • Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow
  • Fig. 3 The equivalent force of water pressure when pile head is free: a the original pile; b, c the equivalent pile, d pile with equivalent force
  • Fig. 4 The equivalent force of water pressure when pile head is restrained: a the original pile; b, c the equivalent pile, d pile with equivalent force
  • Fig. 5 Using superposition to calculate pile demand: a the original pile; b the equivalent pile, c pile with original external force only, d pile with equivalent force only
  • Fig. 6 Water surface profile and the analyzed cross section
  • Fig. 7 Results of local scour depth using empirical formulae
  • Fig. 8 The flowchart of the proposed reliability analysis
  • Fig. 9 Two established classifiers for the pile head displacement
  • Fig. 10 Detailed information for the Bayesian LS-SVM classifier in Fig. 9. a Square abcd, b square efhg

7. ๊ฒฐ๋ก :

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋˜๋Š” ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ์ข…์ข… ์ฑ„ํƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ํƒœํ’ ์ดํ›„, ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋“ค์€ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊นจ๋‹ฌ์•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•„์š”๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณผ ์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ PIEF๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋ฐ ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜๋ฉฐ, LHS๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘ MCS์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋œ๋‹ค.

8. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ:

  1. Adarsh S, Reddy MJ (2013) Reliability analysis of composite channels using first order approximation and Monte Carlo simulations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:477โ€“487
  2. Alipour A, Shafei B, Shinozuka M (2013) Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: scour and earthquake. J Bridge Eng 18:362โ€“371
  3. Carturan F, Islami K, Pellegrino C (2012) Reliability analysis and in-field investigation of a r.c. bridge over river Adige in Verona, Italy. Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability 2850โ€“2855
  4. Chang YL, Chou NS (1989) Changโ€™s simple side pile analysis approach. Sino-Geotech 25:64โ€“82
  5. Chern JC, Tsai IC, Chang KC (2007) Bridge monitoring and early warning systems subjected to scouring. Directorate General of highways
  6. Davis-McDaniel C, Chowdhury M, Pang WC, Dey K (2013) Fault-tree model for risk assessment of bridge failure: case study for segmental box girder bridges. J Infrastruct Syst 19(3):326โ€“334
  7. Fischenich C, Landers M (1999) Computing scour. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg
  8. HEC-18 (2012) Hydraulic engineering circular no. 18. US Department of Transportation, Washington
  9. Jain SC (1981) Maximum clear-water scour around cylin-drical piers. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 107(5):611โ€“625
  10. Jain SC, Ficher EE (1980) Sour around bridge piers at high flow velocities. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 106:1827โ€“1842
  11. Li TC, Liu JB, Liao YJ (2011) A discussion on bridge-closure according to the water stage. Sino-Geotech 127(1):79โ€“86
  12. Liao KW, Chen WL, Wu BH (2014) Reliability analysis of bridge failure due to floods, life-cycle of structural systems. In: Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management, pp 1636โ€“1640
  13. Liao KW, Lu HJ, Wang CY (2015) A probabilistic evaluation of pier-scour potential in the Gaoping River Basin of Taiwan. J Civ Eng Manag 21(5):637โ€“653
  14. Ministry of Transportation and Communications R. O. C (2009) The bridge design specifications. A government report
  15. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
  16. Natural Resources Conservation Service of United States Department of Agriculture (2010) The national engineering handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service of United States Department of Agriculture, Washington
  17. NCREE (2010) A pilot project for building a bridge detection system via advanced technology. Directorate General of Highways, Taipei
  18. Neill CR (1965) Measurements of bridge scour and bed changes in a flooding sand-bed river. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England
  19. Saydam D, Frangopol DM, Dong Y (2013) Assessment of risk using bridge element condition ratings. J Infrastruct Syst 19(3):252โ€“265
  20. Sheen SW (2012) Flood frequency analysis of watersheds in Taiwan. J Soil Water Conserv Technol 7(1):11โ€“21
  21. Shen HW, Shneider VR, Karaki SS (1966) Mechanism of local scour. Colorado State University, Colorado
  22. Shen HW, Shneider VR, Karaki SS (1969) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 95:1919โ€“1940
  23. Sun Z, Wang C, Niu X, Song Y (2016) A response surface approach for reliability analysis of 2.5 DC/SiC composites turbine blade. Compos. Part B Eng. 85:277โ€“285
  24. Sung YC, Wang CY, Chen C, Tsai YC, Tsai IC, Chang KC (2011) Collapse analysis of Shuanyang bridge caused by Morakot Typhoon. Sino-Geotech 127:41โ€“50
  25. Suykens JAK, Gestel TV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore
  26. Wang H, Wang CY, Chen CH, Lin C, Wu TR (2011) An integrated evaluation on flood resistant capacity of bridge foundations. Sino-Geotech 127:51โ€“60
  27. Water Resources Agency (2009) Analyses of rainfall and flow discharge for Typhoon Morakot. A government report
  28. Wu SJ, Yang JC, Tung YK (2011) Risk analysis for flood-control structure under consideration of uncertainties in design flood. Nat Hazards 58(1):117โ€“140
  29. Wu TR, Wang H, Ko YY, Chiou JS, Hsieh SC, Chen CH, Lin C, Wang CY, Chuang MH (2014) Forensic diagnosis on flood-induced bridge failure. II: framework of quantitative assessment. J Perform Constr Facil 28(1):85โ€“95
  30. Zhao W, Qiu Z (2013) An efficient response surface method and its application to structural reliability and reliability-based optimization. Finite Elem Anal Des 67:34โ€“42
  31. Zhao B, Tung YK, Yeh KC, Yang JC (1997) Reliability analysis of hydraulic structures considering unit hydrograph uncertainty. Stoch Hydro Hydraul 11:33โ€“50
  32. Zhao YG, Zhong WQ, Ang AH-S (2007) Estimating joint failure probability of series structural systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 133(5):588โ€“596

Expert Q&A: ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์˜ ์งˆ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ๋‹ต๋ณ€

Q1: ์™œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ FORM ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ง๋š์˜ ์ง€์ง€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ฐ”๋€Œ์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹จ์ผ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ „์ฒด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ๋” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์„ ํƒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A2: ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๋ก๊ณผ ๋ณธ๋ฌธ์— ๋ช…์‹œ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ์ด๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(SPT-N ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ ์ฒ˜์Œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™๊ณผ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด HEC-RAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A3: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 9ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  HEC-RAS ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋งค๋‹(Manning’s) ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ฐ’์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋‚ด์žฌ๋œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ (100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด 2.3 x 10โปยน)์€ ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋‚˜์š”?

A4: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 17ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ๊ตญ์ œํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๊ธฐ๊ตฌ(ISO)์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€์น˜์ธ 1.00 x 10โปยณ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถ„์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ๋‹น์‹œ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณตํ•™์  ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ฃผ๋œ ์ด์ ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 16ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ ๋‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ž์ฒด๋Š” ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ(COV)์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM์ด ‘์•ˆ์ „’ ๋˜๋Š” ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด’๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋†“๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ 0๊ณผ 1 ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ’์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ด๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋” ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅํ•œ ๊ธธ

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” CFD ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„, AI(๋จธ์‹ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•œ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ํฐ ์ž์—ฐ์žฌํ•ด์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ณตํ•™์  ํ†ต์ฐฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์‚ฐ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ „๋…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ์šด์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ €ํฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ํŒ€์— ์—ฐ๋ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›์น™์„ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0442
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ์ •๋ณด

  • ์ด ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋Š” “Kuo-Wei Liao” ์™ธ ์ €์ž์˜ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods”๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ถœ์ฒ˜:ย https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2366-3

์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด ์ œ๊ณต ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๋‹จ ์ƒ์—…์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๊ธˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)

CFD์™€ AI์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ: ํ™์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฅผ ๋ง‰๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Kuo-Wei Liao ์™ธ ์ €์ž๊ฐ€ 2016๋…„ SpringerPlus์— ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods”๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์•ฝํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword:ย ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€
  • Secondary Keywords:ย ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„, ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS), ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM, ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, CFD

Executive Summary

  • ๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ:ย ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋“ฑ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” HEC-RAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„(Bayesian LS-SVM)๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ:ย ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ 3,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ๋Œ€์‹  ๋‹จ 150๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฒฐ๋ก :ย ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  CFD ๋ฐ AI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ: ์™œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ CFD ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์—๊ฒŒ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ๊ฐ€

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์ ๊ฒ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์–‘์‹(PIEF)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ‰๊ฐ€์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋กœ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ํŠน์ • ์žฌํ˜„ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„(์˜ˆ: 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜์น˜(๊ณ ์ •๋œ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ๋‹น์‹œ ๋ณด๊ฐ• ๊ณต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ์นœ ์†ฝ์œ„์•ˆ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทนํ•œ ์žฌํ•ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋“ฑ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋ณธ์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๋‚ดํฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ์‹œ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ๊ณผ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)
Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)

์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ถ„์„

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  1. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์ •์˜:ย ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ, ๋ง๋š ์ถ• ์‘๋ ฅ, ๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ ๋“ฑ 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง:
    • ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ (์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†):ย HEC-RAS ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋งค๋‹ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด:ย ๊ธฐ์กด์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 7๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜:ย ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(SPT-N ๊ฐ’)๊ณผ ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋˜ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM) ๊ตฌ์ถ•:ย ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“œ๋Š” ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„(Bayesian LS-SVM)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ผํ‹ด ํ•˜์ดํผํ๋ธŒ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง(LHD)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  4. ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:ย ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ: ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 1: ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์˜ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ํ–ฅ์ƒ

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM)์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV) 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 3,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ํ‘œ 7์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ RSM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ 150๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ(ฮผ ยฑ 3ฯƒ ๋ฒ”์œ„)๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ MCS์™€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ (2.32 x 10โปยน)์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV)๋Š” 0.01๋กœ ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 5%์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ 80๊ฐœ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ค„์—ฌ๋„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow
Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 2: ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด

์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ 6์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„(RMSE)์™€ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ 50๊ฐœ์—์„œ 150๊ฐœ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ๋ณ€์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ RMSE๋Š” 3.45%์—์„œ 0.32%๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์€ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ, ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ์ธ LS-SVM๊ณผ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ์ธ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ‘์•ˆ์ „’ ๋˜๋Š” ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด’๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ , 0๊ณผ 1 ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๊ฐ’์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฌ์„ธํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ 50์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ COV๋ฅผ 0.09(LS-SVM)์—์„œ 0.03(Bayesian LS-SVM)์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์งˆ์  ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ 

  • ํ† ๋ชฉ/์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด:ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ์•ˆ์ „์œจ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด, ์„ธ๊ตด๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฐ ๋•Œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์œ„ํ—˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ž:ย ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ณด์ˆ˜๋ณด๊ฐ• ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฐ ์ž์› ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ์žˆ์–ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ •๋ณด์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • CFD ํ•ด์„ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€:ย ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(HEC-RAS), ๋จธ์‹ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹(LS-SVM), ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(MCS)์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ •๋ณด


A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods (ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€)

1. ๊ฐœ์š”:

  • ์ œ๋ชฉ:ย A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods
  • ์ €์ž:ย Kuo-Wei Liao, Yasunori Muto, Wei-Lun Chen and Bang-Ho Wu
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„:ย 2016
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ํ•™์ˆ ์ง€/ํ•™ํšŒ:ย SpringerPlus
  • ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ:ย Bridge safety, Flood-resistant reliability, MCS, Bayesian LS-SVM

2. ์ดˆ๋ก:

ํ•˜์ฒœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ, MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์€ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”๋„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์ž์ฃผ ์ฑ„ํƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ ์ตœ์†Œ์ œ๊ณฑ ์ง€์ง€๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ํ›„ MCS๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์ธ์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด์ „์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ ์„ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์— ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  HEC-RAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๋‹น ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ํ•ด๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ MCS๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์˜ˆ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค.

3. ์„œ๋ก :

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ข…์ข… 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์ ๊ฒ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์–‘์‹(PIEF)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. PIEF์˜ ์ „์ฒด ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋ฉด, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ‘ธ์‹œ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. PIEF๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ์ž ์žฌ์  ์œ„ํ˜‘์ด ๋˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ์ค‘์š”๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ• ๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜์˜ ํ•ฉ์€ 100์ด๋‹ค. Chern ๋“ฑ์ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ PIEF์˜ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์œ ํ˜•, ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ๊ฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์˜ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ์‹œ์„ค ์œ ๋ฌด, ์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๋Œ์˜ ์œ ๋ฌด๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด๋œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

4. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์š”์•ฝ:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ:

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ทนํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ, ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ:

๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์™”๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, Carturan ๋“ฑ์€ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๊ณ , Wu ๋“ฑ์€ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํŒŒ๊ดด ๋ฌธ์ œ, ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์— MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ํฐ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•(RSM)์ด ๋งŽ์ด ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ :

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์š”์ธ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„์„ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ (1) HEC-RAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ํฌ์ฐฉ, (2) ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, (3) ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ(๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ, ์ถ• ์‘๋ ฅ, ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์ถ•, (4) ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค.

5. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก 

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๋ก€์ธ ์†ฝ์œ„์•ˆ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ํ›„, MCS๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:

  • ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย HEC-RAS ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ๋งค๋‹ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย 7๊ฐœ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์‹๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 270๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ:ย ํ˜„์žฅ ์ง€์งˆ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€๊ด€์ž…์‹œํ—˜(SPT-N) ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:ย ๋ผํ‹ด ํ•˜์ดํผํ๋ธŒ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™๊ณ„์ˆ˜(COV)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋Š” 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ(๋ง๋š ์ „๋‹จ, ์ถ•๋ ฅ, ๋ณ€์œ„, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ธ๋ฐœ๋ ฅ)๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ง๋ ฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

6. ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•์€ ์ง์ ‘ MCS ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ 3000๊ฐœ์—์„œ 150๊ฐœ๋กœ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถ„์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์€ 2.3 x 10โปยน๋กœ, ๊ตญ์ œํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๊ธฐ๊ตฌ(ISO)์˜ ๊ถŒ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์ค€์น˜(1.00 x 10โปยณ)๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ƒํšŒํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋‹ค.
  • ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ(COV)์„ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ(์ƒ˜ํ”Œ 50๊ฐœ ๊ธฐ์ค€, 0.09 โ†’ 0.03) ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ๋Šฅ(๋ง๋š๋จธ๋ฆฌ ๋ณ€์œ„) ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ƒํƒœ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์œ ์†๊ณผ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.

Figure ๋ชฉ๋ก:

  • Fig. 1 Collapse of Shuangyuan Bridge (2009/8/10) (photo courtesy of Apple Daily)
  • Fig. 2 The pressure distribution of water flow
  • Fig. 3 The equivalent force of water pressure when pile head is free: a the original pile; b, c the equivalent pile, d pile with equivalent force
  • Fig. 4 The equivalent force of water pressure when pile head is restrained: a the original pile; b, c the equivalent pile, d pile with equivalent force
  • Fig. 5 Using superposition to calculate pile demand: a the original pile; b the equivalent pile, c pile with original external force only, d pile with equivalent force only
  • Fig. 6 Water surface profile and the analyzed cross section
  • Fig. 7 Results of local scour depth using empirical formulae
  • Fig. 8 The flowchart of the proposed reliability analysis
  • Fig. 9 Two established classifiers for the pile head displacement
  • Fig. 10 Detailed information for the Bayesian LS-SVM classifier in Fig. 9. a Square abcd, b square efhg

7. ๊ฒฐ๋ก :

๋Œ€๋งŒ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋˜๋Š” ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ์ข…์ข… ์ฑ„ํƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ํƒœํ’ ์ดํ›„, ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋“ค์€ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊นจ๋‹ฌ์•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•„์š”๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณผ ์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ PIEF๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋ฐ ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ ์‘๋‹ต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜๋ฉฐ, LHS๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘ MCS์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋œ๋‹ค.

8. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ:

  1. Adarsh S, Reddy MJ (2013) Reliability analysis of composite channels using first order approximation and Monte Carlo simulations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:477โ€“487
  2. Alipour A, Shafei B, Shinozuka M (2013) Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: scour and earthquake. J Bridge Eng 18:362โ€“371
  3. Carturan F, Islami K, Pellegrino C (2012) Reliability analysis and in-field investigation of a r.c. bridge over river Adige in Verona, Italy. Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability 2850โ€“2855
  4. Chang YL, Chou NS (1989) Changโ€™s simple side pile analysis approach. Sino-Geotech 25:64โ€“82
  5. Chern JC, Tsai IC, Chang KC (2007) Bridge monitoring and early warning systems subjected to scouring. Directorate General of highways
  6. Davis-McDaniel C, Chowdhury M, Pang WC, Dey K (2013) Fault-tree model for risk assessment of bridge failure: case study for segmental box girder bridges. J Infrastruct Syst 19(3):326โ€“334
  7. Fischenich C, Landers M (1999) Computing scour. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg
  8. HEC-18 (2012) Hydraulic engineering circular no. 18. US Department of Transportation, Washington
  9. Jain SC (1981) Maximum clear-water scour around cylin-drical piers. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 107(5):611โ€“625
  10. Jain SC, Ficher EE (1980) Sour around bridge piers at high flow velocities. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 106:1827โ€“1842
  11. Li TC, Liu JB, Liao YJ (2011) A discussion on bridge-closure according to the water stage. Sino-Geotech 127(1):79โ€“86
  12. Liao KW, Chen WL, Wu BH (2014) Reliability analysis of bridge failure due to floods, life-cycle of structural systems. In: Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management, pp 1636โ€“1640
  13. Liao KW, Lu HJ, Wang CY (2015) A probabilistic evaluation of pier-scour potential in the Gaoping River Basin of Taiwan. J Civ Eng Manag 21(5):637โ€“653
  14. Ministry of Transportation and Communications R. O. C (2009) The bridge design specifications. A government report
  15. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
  16. Natural Resources Conservation Service of United States Department of Agriculture (2010) The national engineering handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service of United States Department of Agriculture, Washington
  17. NCREE (2010) A pilot project for building a bridge detection system via advanced technology. Directorate General of Highways, Taipei
  18. Neill CR (1965) Measurements of bridge scour and bed changes in a flooding sand-bed river. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England
  19. Saydam D, Frangopol DM, Dong Y (2013) Assessment of risk using bridge element condition ratings. J Infrastruct Syst 19(3):252โ€“265
  20. Sheen SW (2012) Flood frequency analysis of watersheds in Taiwan. J Soil Water Conserv Technol 7(1):11โ€“21
  21. Shen HW, Shneider VR, Karaki SS (1966) Mechanism of local scour. Colorado State University, Colorado
  22. Shen HW, Shneider VR, Karaki SS (1969) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 95:1919โ€“1940
  23. Sun Z, Wang C, Niu X, Song Y (2016) A response surface approach for reliability analysis of 2.5 DC/SiC composites turbine blade. Compos. Part B Eng. 85:277โ€“285
  24. Sung YC, Wang CY, Chen C, Tsai YC, Tsai IC, Chang KC (2011) Collapse analysis of Shuanyang bridge caused by Morakot Typhoon. Sino-Geotech 127:41โ€“50
  25. Suykens JAK, Gestel TV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore
  26. Wang H, Wang CY, Chen CH, Lin C, Wu TR (2011) An integrated evaluation on flood resistant capacity of bridge foundations. Sino-Geotech 127:51โ€“60
  27. Water Resources Agency (2009) Analyses of rainfall and flow discharge for Typhoon Morakot. A government report
  28. Wu SJ, Yang JC, Tung YK (2011) Risk analysis for flood-control structure under consideration of uncertainties in design flood. Nat Hazards 58(1):117โ€“140
  29. Wu TR, Wang H, Ko YY, Chiou JS, Hsieh SC, Chen CH, Lin C, Wang CY, Chuang MH (2014) Forensic diagnosis on flood-induced bridge failure. II: framework of quantitative assessment. J Perform Constr Facil 28(1):85โ€“95
  30. Zhao W, Qiu Z (2013) An efficient response surface method and its application to structural reliability and reliability-based optimization. Finite Elem Anal Des 67:34โ€“42
  31. Zhao B, Tung YK, Yeh KC, Yang JC (1997) Reliability analysis of hydraulic structures considering unit hydrograph uncertainty. Stoch Hydro Hydraul 11:33โ€“50
  32. Zhao YG, Zhong WQ, Ang AH-S (2007) Estimating joint failure probability of series structural systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 133(5):588โ€“596

Expert Q&A: ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์˜ ์งˆ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ๋‹ต๋ณ€

Q1: ์™œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ (MPP) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ FORM ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(MCS)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ง๋š์˜ ์ง€์ง€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ฐ”๋€Œ์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹จ์ผ ์ตœ์šฐ์ถ”์ •์ ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” MPP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ „์ฒด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ๋” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์„ ํƒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A2: ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๋ก๊ณผ ๋ณธ๋ฌธ์— ๋ช…์‹œ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ์ด๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๊ณ , ์œ ์†, ๊ตญ์†Œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ํ† ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(SPT-N ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ’ํ•˜์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ ์ฒ˜์Œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™๊ณผ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด HEC-RAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A3: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 9ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  HEC-RAS ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๋งค๋‹(Manning’s) ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ฐ’์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์œ„์™€ ์œ ์†์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋‚ด์žฌ๋œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ (100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„ ํ™์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด 2.3 x 10โปยน)์€ ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋‚˜์š”?

A4: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 17ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ๊ตญ์ œํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๊ธฐ๊ตฌ(ISO)์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€์น˜์ธ 1.00 x 10โปยณ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถ„์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ํƒœํ’ ๋ชจ๋ผ๊ผฟ ๋‹น์‹œ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ์‚ฌ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณตํ•™์  ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ฃผ๋œ ์ด์ ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 16ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ ๋‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ž์ฒด๋Š” ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ(COV)์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ํ‘œ์ค€ LS-SVM์ด ‘์•ˆ์ „’ ๋˜๋Š” ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด’๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋†“๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์€ 0๊ณผ 1 ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ‘ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ’์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๋” ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ด๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋” ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅํ•œ ๊ธธ

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์  ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” CFD ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„, AI(๋จธ์‹ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•œ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒ ์ด์ง€์•ˆ LS-SVM์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‘๋‹ตํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ฒ•์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ํฐ ์ž์—ฐ์žฌํ•ด์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌํšŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ณตํ•™์  ํ†ต์ฐฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์‚ฐ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ „๋…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ์šด์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ €ํฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ํŒ€์— ์—ฐ๋ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›์น™์„ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0442
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ์ •๋ณด

  • ์ด ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋Š” “Kuo-Wei Liao” ์™ธ ์ €์ž์˜ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “A probabilistic bridge safety evaluation against floods”๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ถœ์ฒ˜:ย https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2366-3

์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด ์ œ๊ณต ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๋‹จ ์ƒ์—…์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๊ธˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Fig 1 weld bead geometry

PCA-Taguchi ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW) ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”: ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ P. Sreeraj๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ 2016๋…„ International Journal of Integrated Engineering์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌํ•œ “Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding process Parameters Using PCA-Based Taguchi Approach.” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์•ฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword:ย ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ (Submerged Arc Welding)
  • Secondary Keywords:ย PCA, Taguchi, ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•, ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„, ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”, ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™”

Executive Summary

  • The Challenge:ย ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW) ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์šฉ์ž…, ๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ๋ณด๊ฐ• ๋“ฑ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Method:ย ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ(Taguchi) ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ L25 ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹จ์ผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Key Breakthrough:ย PCA ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋“ฑ๊ฐ€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ(I4 S3 V1 T4)์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Bottom Line:ย ์ด ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ, SAW ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Challenge: Why This Research Matters for CFD Professionals

์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW)์€ ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ, ๊นŠ์€ ์šฉ์ž…, ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋งˆ๊ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋•๋ถ„์— ์กฐ์„  ์‚ฐ์—… ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์ , ํ™”ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ(weld bead geometry)์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ขŒ์šฐ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด ํ˜•์ƒ์€ ์ „์••, ์ „๋ฅ˜, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„, ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(์˜ˆ: ์šฉ์ž…, ๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ๋ณด๊ฐ•, ํฌ์„๋ฅ )๋“ค์ด ์„œ๋กœ ์ƒ์ถฉ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋ ค๋‹ค ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ €ํ•˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ์—๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig 1 weld bead geometry
Fig 1 weld bead geometry

The Approach: Unpacking the Methodology

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)๊ณผ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„:ย ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ L25 ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด 25ํšŒ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ์žฅ๋น„:ย ๋ชจ์žฌ๋Š” IS 2062 ์—ฐ๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์šฉ๊ฐ€์žฌ๋Š” EH 14 ์™€์ด์–ด๋ฅผ, ํ”Œ๋Ÿญ์Šค๋Š” ASK74S๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ (์ž…๋ ฅ):ย ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•  4๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ฐ 5๊ฐœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ (I): 350, 420, 500, 580, 650 A
    • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„ (S): 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 mm/min
    • ์ „์•• (V): 24, 26, 28, 30, 32 V
    • ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ (T): 30, 32.5, 35, 37.5, 40 mm
  • ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ (์ถœ๋ ฅ/์‘๋‹ต):ย ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ์šฉ์ž… (Penetration, P)
    • ๋น„๋“œ ํญ (Bead Width, W)
    • ๋ณด๊ฐ• (Reinforcement, R)
    • ํฌ์„๋ฅ  (Percentage Dilution, D)
  • ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:
    1. ์„œ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์‘๋‹ต(P, W, R, D)์„ PCA๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„(Principal Components)์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    2. ๊ฐ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ(accountability proportion)์„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค์„ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(Multi-response Performance Index, MPI)๋ผ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    3. ์ด MPI๋ฅผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์†์‹ค(quality loss)๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ S/N๋น„(Signal-to-Noise ratio) ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด ์†์‹ค์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ฐพ์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Table 2 Welding Parameters and their Levels
Table 2 Welding Parameters and their Levels

The Breakthrough: Key Findings & Data

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” PCA ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ SAW ๊ณต์ •์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Finding 1: ๋‹ค์ค‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋‹จ์ผ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต์  ๋ณ€ํ™˜

PCA ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 4๊ฐœ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ์š”์•ฝ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์ด ์ „์ฒด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ 100%๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Table 8). ๊ฐ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ(AP)์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.695, 0.251, 0.054์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋‹จ์ผ MPI๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์‹์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

MPI = ฮจโ‚ ร— 0.695 + ฮจโ‚‚ ร— 0.251 + ฮจโ‚ƒ ร— 0.054

์ด๋กœ์จ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผํ™”๋œ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋งˆ๋ จํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Finding 2: ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋„์ถœ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๊ฒ€์ฆ

์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ MPI(ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์†์‹ค)๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ S/N๋น„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์€ Iโ‚„ Sโ‚ƒ Vโ‚ Tโ‚„๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Fig 2, Table 9). ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 580A(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4), ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„ 50 mm/min(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 3), ์ „์•• 24V(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 1), ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ 37.5 mm(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4)์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Table 11). ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Iโ‚ Sโ‚ Vโ‚ Tโ‚)์—์„œ์˜ ์ „์ฒด S/N๋น„๋Š” -14.618์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ์ธก์ •๋œ S/N๋น„๋Š” -7.639๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ฐ’์ธ -7.822์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, S/N๋น„๊ฐ€ 8.660๋งŒํผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Practical Implications for R&D and Operations

  • For Process Engineers:ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ(Iโ‚„ Sโ‚ƒ Vโ‚ Tโ‚„)์ด ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ณต์ • ๋ ˆ์‹œํ”ผ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Quality Control Teams:ย ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Table 7์€ ๊ฐ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํŠน์„ฑ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, PCA์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Design Engineers:ย ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ข… ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ํฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š”, ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„(Design for Manufacturing)์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ตœ์ข… ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋ถ€์„œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ธด๋ฐ€ํ•œ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Paper Details


Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding process Parameters Using PCA-Based Taguchi Approach.

1. Overview:

  • Title:ย Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding process Parameters Using PCA-Based Taguchi Approach.
  • Author:ย P. Sreeraj
  • Year of publication:ย 2016
  • Journal/academic society of publication:ย International Journal of Integrated Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 3 (2016) p. 21-32
  • Keywords:ย SAW, Taguchi’s concept, orthogonal array, bead geometry, PCA

2. Abstract:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” IS 2062 ์—ฐ๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW) ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ L25 ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋Œ€ ์žก์Œ๋น„(S/N ratio)๊ฐ€ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ž…(P), ๋น„๋“œ ํญ(W), ๋ณด๊ฐ•(R), ํฌ์„๋ฅ (D)์ด ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ฐ€์ •์„ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋จผ์ € ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์‘๋‹ต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต๋“ค์€ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์ด๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๊ฐ€ ๋„์ž…๋˜์–ด ๋“ฑ๊ฐ€์˜ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA) ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ ์ ˆ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ํ™”์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์€ ํ™•์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ๋‹ค.

3. Introduction:

์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ๋‹ค์ธ์ž, ๋‹ค๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ, ๊นŠ์€ ์šฉ์ž…, ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋งˆ๊ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์กฐ์„  ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „์••, ์ „๋ฅ˜, ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ข‹์€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ํ™”ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋‹ฌ๋ ค ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์€ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ(OA)๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ท ํ˜• ์žกํžŒ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋  ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋Œ€ ์žก์Œ๋น„(S/N ratio)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋˜๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜๊ณ  ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋‚˜ ์‘๋‹ต์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ํŠน์ • ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์˜ ์˜๋„์ ์ธ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์˜์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

4. Summary of the study:

Background of the research topic:

์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW)์€ ์ฃผ์š” ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ข… ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ณต์ •์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ์€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ์ง๊ฒฐ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.

Status of previous research:

์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”์œผ๋‚˜, SAW์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ๋ฌธ์ œ์—๋Š” ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์› ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ถ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‘๋‹ต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.

Purpose of the study:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ SAW ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต(์šฉ์ž…, ๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ๋ณด๊ฐ•, ํฌ์„๋ฅ )์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

Core study:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ L25 ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ SAW ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธก์ •๋œ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ PCA๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ๊ด€์—†๋Š” ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค์„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘ ํ•ฉ์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด MPI๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ S/N๋น„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์†Œํ™”(ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์†์‹ค ์ตœ์†Œํ™”)ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜(์ „๋ฅ˜, ์†๋„, ์ „์••, ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ) ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

5. Research Methodology

Research Design:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ L25 ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. 4๊ฐœ์˜ 5์ˆ˜์ค€ ์ œ์–ด ์ธ์ž(์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„, ์ „์••, ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ)๋ฅผ ์ง๊ต๋ฐฐ์—ดํ‘œ์— ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด 25ํšŒ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods:

์šฉ์ ‘ ํ›„ ๊ฐ ์‹œํŽธ์—์„œ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ์ฑ„์ทจํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ(๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ์šฉ์ž…, ๋ณด๊ฐ•)์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ํฌ์„๋ฅ ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋จผ์ € ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋œ ํ›„, ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ S/N๋น„ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์„(ANOVA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

Research Topics and Scope:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” IS 2062 ์—ฐ๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW)์˜ ๋น„๋“œ ์˜จ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ(bead on plate) ์šฉ์ ‘์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜๋‹ค.

6. Key Results:

Key Results:

  • 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ ์‘๋‹ต ๋ณ€์ˆ˜(๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ์šฉ์ž…, ๋ณด๊ฐ•, ํฌ์„๋ฅ )๊ฐ€ PCA๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด 3๊ฐœ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค์ด ์ „์ฒด ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ 100%๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ์„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • MPI์˜ S/N๋น„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์ ์˜ SAW ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ด Iโ‚„ Sโ‚ƒ Vโ‚ Tโ‚„ (์ „๋ฅ˜ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4, ์†๋„ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 3, ์ „์•• ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 1, ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4)์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ™•์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ S/N๋น„๊ฐ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋Œ€๋น„ 8.660๋งŒํผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์–ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์ด ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.
Table 4 Orthogonal array and Observed Values of weld Bead Geometry
Table 4 Orthogonal array and Observed Values of weld Bead Geometry

Figure List:

  • Fig 1 weld bead geometry
  • Fig 2 Main plot for S/N ratios.

7. Conclusion:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋น„๋“œ ํ˜•์ƒ๊ณผ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด PCA ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)๊ณผ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ์˜ ๊ฐ•๊ฑด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์ตœ์ ํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

  1. ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์ด๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋น„์ƒ๊ด€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๋‹ต ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด PCA ์ ์šฉ์ด ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ(AP)๊ณผ ๋ˆ„์  ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ(CAP)์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ, PCA ๋ถ„์„์€ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์‘๋‹ต ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์‘๋‹ต ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์œจ(AP)์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ, ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„์„ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์‘๋‹ต ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋‹ค.
  4. ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ณต์ •/์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ฐœ์„  ๋ฐ ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

8. References:

  • [1] Kannan, T.; Murugan, N;.Effect of flux cored arc welding process parameters on duplex stainless steel clad quality journal of Material Processing Technology vol.176,(2016), pp 230-239.
  • [2] Ugur Esme ;Melih Bayramoglu; Yugut Kazanancoglu; Sueda Ozgun ; Optimization of weld bead geometry in TIG welding process using Grey relational analysis and Taguchi method, Materials and technology Vol.43,(2009), pp 143-149.
  • [3] Jagannatha, N.; Hiremath, S.S; Sadashivappa, K ;.Analysis and parametric optimization of abrasive hot air jet machining for glass using Taguchi method and utility concept, International Journal of Mechanical and materials engineering. Vol. 7, (2012), pp. 9 โ€“ 15, No.1.9.15.
  • [4] Norasiah Muhammed; Yupiter HP Manurung; Muhammed Hafidzi, Optimization and modelling of spot welding parameters with simultaneous response consideration using multi objective Taguchi method and utility concept. Journal of Mechanical science and Technology. Vol.26 (8),(2012), pp. 2365 – 2370.
  • [5] Thakur, A.G; Nandedkar, V.M, Application of Taguchi method to determine resistece spot welding conditions of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304,journal of scientific and industrial research .Vol- 69,(2010),pp 680-683.
  • [6] Tarng, Y.S; Yang;W.H ; Optimization of weld bead geometry in gas tungsten arc welding by the Taguchi method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol-14,(1998), pp 549-554.
  • [7] Saurav Datta; Ashish Bandyopadhyay; Pradip Kumar Pal;. Grey based Taguchi method for optimization of bead geometry in submerged arc bead on plate welding, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol-39, (2008), pp 1136-1143.
  • [8] Gunaraj, V.; Murugan, N; Prediction and comparison of the area of the heat effected zone for the bead on plate and bead on joint in SAW of pipes, Journal of Material processing Technology. Vol. 95,(2009), pp. 246 – 261.
  • [9] Katherasan,D; Madana Sashikant; P; Sathiya, P ;.Flux cored arc welding parameter optimization of AISI 316L (N) austenitic stainless steel, World academy of science, Engineering and Technology Vol.6,(2012), pp.635-642
  • [10] Sanji Moshat; Saurav Datta; Ashish Bandyopadhyay, Pradeep Kumar Pal; Optimisation of CNC end milling process parameters using PCA-based Taguchi method, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol (2),(2010),pp 92-102.

Expert Q&A: Your Top Questions Answered

Q1: ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์— ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์™œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‚˜์š”?

A1: ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ(์‘๋‹ต)์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ ์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์šฉ์ž…, ๋น„๋“œ ํญ, ๋ณด๊ฐ•, ํฌ์„๋ฅ  ๋“ฑ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œ์ผœ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์€ ์„œ๋กœ ์ƒ์ถฉ ๊ด€๊ณ„(trade-off)์— ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A2: PCA๋Š” ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. PCA๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” 4๊ฐœ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„œ๋กœ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ(์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š”) ‘์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„’์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ, ์ด ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค์„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ€์ค‘ ํ•ฉ์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ‘๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‘๋‹ต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)’๋ผ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ ์ ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A3: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ S/N๋น„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ‘œ(Table 9)๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด, ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ธํƒ€(Delta) ๊ฐ’์ด ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ MPI์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„(S)์˜ ๋ธํƒ€ ๊ฐ’์ด 25.832๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ปธ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ค‘ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ(MPI)์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A4: ์ตœ์ ํ™”์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ™•์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Table 11์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ž„์˜์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Iโ‚Sโ‚Vโ‚Tโ‚)์—์„œ S/N๋น„๋Š” -14.618์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, PCA-Taguchi ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด(Iโ‚„Sโ‚ƒVโ‚Tโ‚„)์—์„œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์‹ค์ œ S/N๋น„๋Š” -7.639๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์น˜์ธ -7.822์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, S/N๋น„๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 8.660๋งŒํผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์–ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์‹คํšจ์„ฑ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

A5: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ Iโ‚„Sโ‚ƒVโ‚Tโ‚„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” Table 2์˜ ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 580A(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4), ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„ 50 mm/min(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 3), ์ „์•• 24V(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 1), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋…ธ์ฆ-๋ชจ์žฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ 37.5 mm(๋ ˆ๋ฒจ 4)์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Conclusion: Paving the Way for Higher Quality and Productivity

์„œ๋ธŒ๋จธ์ง€๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(SAW) ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ œ์กฐ์—…๊ณ„์˜ ์˜ค๋žœ ๊ณผ์ œ์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(PCA)๊ณผ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์ฐŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ํ•ด๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋‹จ์ผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜(MPI)๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐพ์•„๋ƒˆ๊ณ , ํ™•์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์‚ฐ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ „๋…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ์šด์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ €ํฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ํŒ€์— ์—ฐ๋ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›์น™์„ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0442
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

Copyright Information

  • This content is a summary and analysis based on the paper “Optimization of Submerged Arc Welding process Parameters Using PCA-Based Taguchi Approach.” by “P. Sreeraj”.
  • Source: International Journal of Integrated Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 3 (2016) p. 21-32

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Table 6. The square value of Xij

MOORA ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™”: ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ P. Sreeraj๊ฐ€ ์ €์ˆ ํ•˜์—ฌ Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (2016)์— ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “ฮŸฮกฮคฮ™ฮœฮ™ฮ–ATION OF RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS PARAMETERS USING MOORA APPROACH”๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์•ฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword:ย ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™”
  • Secondary Keywords:ย MOORA ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”, ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ, AISI 316L, ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘

Executive Summary

  • ๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ:ย ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘(RSW) ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ข…์ข… ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค์— ์˜์กดํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV)์™€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ MOORA(๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋น„์œจ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ(๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘)๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ:ย AISI 316L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ(์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 14kA, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 12 ์‚ฌ์ดํด, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ 220Kgf, ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 10 ์‚ฌ์ดํด)์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฒฐ๋ก :ย SDV-MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ž„์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—๋„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ CFD ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์—๊ฒŒ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ด์œ 

์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘(RSW)์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณต์ • ์ œ์–ด ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ข… ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์š”์ธ, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ธˆ์† ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ณต์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ข…์ข… ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ ธ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜์—ฌ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ด ์ง€์ ์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ณต์žกํ•œ RSW ๊ณต์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 3. Scanned specimens
Figure 3. Scanned specimens

์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹: ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ถ„์„

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” AISI 316L ์˜ค์Šคํ…Œ๋‚˜์ดํŠธ๊ณ„ ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ(140mm x 40mm x 1mm)์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„:ย ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜(Taguchi)์˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด 4๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ 4๊ฐœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด 16๋ฒˆ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜:
    • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜(I):ย 8, 10, 12, 14 kA
    • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(T):ย 10, 12, 14, 16 ์‚ฌ์ดํด
    • ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ(F):ย 180, 200, 220, 240 Kgf
    • ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(C):ย 10, 20, 30, 40 ์‚ฌ์ดํด
  • ์ธก์ • ์‘๋‹ต (๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜):
    • ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ (Weld Nugget Diameter)
    • ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€ (Heat Affected Zone, HAZ)
    • ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘ (Max breaking load)
  • ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•:ย ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด MOORA(Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ๊ฐ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•จ์ˆ˜(๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋Š” ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(Standard Deviation, SDV) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ(์˜ˆ: ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”) ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์ ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Table 6. The square value of Xij
Table 6. The square value of Xij

๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ: ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ

์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ MOORA ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1: ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ ๊ทœ๋ช…

MOORA ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 16๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ค‘ 14๋ฒˆ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(Table 9, Rank 1). ์ด ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜:ย 14 kA (Level 4)
  • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„:ย 12 ์‚ฌ์ดํด (Level 2)
  • ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ:ย 220 Kgf (Level 3)
  • ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„:ย 10 ์‚ฌ์ดํด (Level 1)

์ด ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€๋Š” ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋ถ€ ํ…์ŠคํŠธ์—๋Š” ์ผ๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๊ฐ’(์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ)์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์žฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ˆœ์œ„ ๋ถ„์„ํ‘œ(Table 9)์™€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ‘œ(Table 3, Table 2)์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์ƒ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ตœ์  ์กฐํ•ฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 2: SDV-MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ์ž…์ฆ

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” SDV-MOORA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ž„์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ณผ์ •(Table 5)์—์„œ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ, ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜: 0.411653)์™€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘(๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜: 0.390104)์ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ(๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜: 0.199576)๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์—ฌ๋ฐ›์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ, HAZ์™€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์ด ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋” ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ ˆ์ถฉ์•ˆ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐพ์•„๋ƒˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์งˆ์  ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ 

  • ๊ณต์ • ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด:ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ(์˜ˆ: ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜)๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํŠน์ • ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ AISI 316L ๊ฐ•์žฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋†’์€ ์ „๋ฅ˜(14kA)์™€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์งง์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์กฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜์™€ MOORA๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋‚˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์—๋„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํŒ€:ย ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(Table 4)๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์™€ ์ตœ์ข… ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ(๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, HAZ, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘) ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ํŠน์ • HAZ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ๊ฒฉ/๋ถˆํ•ฉ๊ฒฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์„ค๊ณ„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด:ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒฌ๋”œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ(robust) ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€์˜ ์š”๊ตฌ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ •๋ณด


ฮŸฮกฮคฮ™ฮœฮ™ฮ–ATION OF RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS PARAMETERS USING MOORA APPROACH

1. ๊ฐœ์š”:

  • ์ œ๋ชฉ:ย ฮŸฮกฮคฮ™ฮœฮ™ฮ–ATION OF RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS PARAMETERS USING MOORA APPROACH (MOORA ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”)
  • ์ €์ž:ย P. Sreeraj
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„:ย 2016
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ํ•™์ˆ ์ง€/ํ•™ํšŒ:ย Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology
  • ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ:ย RSW; SDV; Orthogonal array; MOORA; HAZ

2. ์ดˆ๋ก:

AISI 316L ์˜ค์Šคํ…Œ๋‚˜์ดํŠธ๊ณ„ ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘(RSW) ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜(Taguchi)์˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด(OA) ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋Œ€ ์žก์Œ๋น„(S/N ratio)๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์ด ๋ชฉ์  ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋น„์œจ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”(MOORA)๊ฐ€ ์ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV)์™€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ MOORA๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV)๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์–ป์€ ์‘๋‹ต๋“ค์„ ์ •๊ทœํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 14kA, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 14 ์‚ฌ์ดํด, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ 200Kgf, ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 10 ์‚ฌ์ดํด์ด ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ๋„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

3. ์„œ๋ก :

์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘(RSW)์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณต์ • ์ œ์–ด ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์š”์ธ, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ธˆ์† ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ณต์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์€ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ์˜ํ•ด ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์„ ํƒ์€ ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค๋ฉฐ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด, ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž…๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

4. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์š”์•ฝ:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ:

์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๋น„ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ ๋‹ค.

์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ:

๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฉ”ํƒˆ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(GMAW), ํ”Œ๋Ÿญ์Šค ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘(FCAW), ํ……์Šคํ… ๋ถˆํ™œ์„ฑ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์šฉ์ ‘(TIG) ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ • ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, MOORA ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(MTM) ๋“ฑ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ :

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ SDV-MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ AISI 316L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ:

4๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ(์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ, ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 4๊ฐœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ 16๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธก์ •๋œ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‘๋‹ต(๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, HAZ, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด SDV๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , MOORA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ˆœ์œ„๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฒจ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

5. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก :

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•์ธ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜(Taguchi)์˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4๊ฐœ์˜ 4์ˆ˜์ค€ ์ธ์ž๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 16๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:

  • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘:ย ๊ฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œํŽธ์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜๊ณ , ํˆด๋ฉ”์ด์ปค ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋งŒ๋Šฅ์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ(UTM)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ์žฅ-์ „๋‹จ ์‹œํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:ย ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ์˜์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •(MCDM) ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€(์‘๋‹ต)์˜ ์ค‘์š”๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. MOORA ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋Š” ์ •๊ทœํ™”, ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ์ ์šฉ, ์œ ์ต/๋น„์œ ์ต ๊ธฐ์ค€ ํ•ฉ์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆœ์œ„ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„:

  • ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ:ย AISI 316L ์˜ค์Šคํ…Œ๋‚˜์ดํŠธ๊ณ„ ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ• ํŒ์žฌ์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”.
  • ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„:ย ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ, ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋กœ, ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ), ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

6. ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • MOORA ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 14๋ฒˆ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด(์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 14kA, ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 12 ์‚ฌ์ดํด, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ 220Kgf, ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 10 ์‚ฌ์ดํด)์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ข…ํ•ฉ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV) ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋Š” ์—ด์˜ํ–ฅ๋ถ€(HAZ)๊ฐ€ 0.411653์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์•˜๊ณ , ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์ด 0.390104, ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด 0.199576 ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.
  • ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘๋œ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€๋Š” ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ 7.7mm, ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘ 20.6KN, HAZ 1.072mm์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ผ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. (๊ฐ’์€ Result Analysis ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ์ธ์šฉ)

๊ทธ๋ฆผ ๋ชฉ๋ก:

  • Figure 1. Kirperker RSW welding machine
  • Figure 2. Dimension of specimen
  • Figure 3. Scanned specimens
  • Figure 4. Welded specimen
  • Figure 5. Weld structure of optimized model

7. ๊ฒฐ๋ก :

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘, HAZ ๋ฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ MOORA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์ตœ์†Œ HAZ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘๋ฌผ์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ณต์ •์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ MOORA ๋ถ„์„์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ํšŸ์ˆ˜์˜ ์‹คํ–‰์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ๋Š” MOORA ๊ณต์ • ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฐ’์— ํ• ๋‹น๋œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ๊ณต์ • ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ฌผ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ™•์ธ์‹œ์ผœ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ๋™์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋‚ด๋ฆฐ๋‹ค.

Figure 5. Weld structure of optimized model
Figure 5. Weld structure of optimized model

8. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ:

  1. Gunaraj, V. & Murugan, N. (1999). Prediction and comparison of the area of the heat effected zone for the bead on plate and bead on joint in SAW of pipes, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 95, 246 – 261.
  2. Joseph Achebo & William Ejenavi Odinikuku (2015) Optimization of Gas Metal Arc Welding Process Parameters Using Standard Deviation (SDV) and Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 3, 298-308
  3. Norasiah M., Yupiter HP M. & Muhammed H. (2012). Optimization and modelling of spot welding parameters with simultaneous response consideration using multi objective Taguchi method and utility concept. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26 (8), 2365 – 2370.
  4. Tarng, Y.S & Yang, W.H. (1998) Optimization of weld bead geometry in gas tungsten arc welding by the Taguchi method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 14, 549-554.
  5. Thakur, A.G & Nandedkar, V.M. (2010) Application of Taguchi method to determine resistece spot welding conditions of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 69, 680-683.
  6. Vermal A.B., Ghunage S.U., Ahuja B.B. (2014). Resistance Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steels (AISI 304 with AISI 316) 3, The 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th -14th, 2014, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India.

์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ Q&A: ์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

Q1: ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๋Œ€์‹  MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์„ ํƒ๋œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ง์ ‘ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์•˜์ง€๋งŒ, MOORA๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, MOORA๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ RSW ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: Table 5๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด, HAZ(0.411653)์™€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘(0.390104)์ด ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ(0.199576)๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A2: ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋Š” ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ(SDV) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠน์ • ์‘๋‹ต์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ์‘๋‹ต์ด ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋” ํฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ธฐ์ค€์ด ๋” ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ฒ™๋„์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” HAZ์™€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์ด ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ์ž๋™ ํ• ๋‹น๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” “์ตœ์†Œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ”์ด์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ตœ์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(์‹คํ—˜ 14)๋Š” Table 4์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž‘์€ ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ฐ–์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A3: ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐ”๋กœ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. MOORA ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์„œ๋กœ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ๋งž์ถฅ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋„ˆ๊ฒŸ ์ง๊ฒฝ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  HAZ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์‹คํ—˜ 14์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ท ํ˜• ์žกํžŒ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ๋‹ค๊ตฌ์น˜์˜ L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A4: L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 4๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ 4๊ฐœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์กฐํ•ฉ(4^4 = 256ํšŒ)์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ , L16 ์ง๊ต ๋ฐฐ์—ด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹จ 16๋ฒˆ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๊ฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์ž์›์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ ˆ์•ฝํ•ด ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋ถ€์—๋Š” ์ตœ์  ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ “์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 14 ์‚ฌ์ดํด, ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ 200Kgf”๋ผ๊ณ  ์–ธ๊ธ‰๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‹ค์ œ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ 14์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(Table 2, 3)๋Š” “12 ์‚ฌ์ดํด, 220Kgf”์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์™œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: ํ›Œ๋ฅญํ•œ ์ง€์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋ถ€ ํ…์ŠคํŠธ์— ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€ ๊ฐ’์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜คํƒ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆœ์œ„ ๋ถ„์„ํ‘œ(Table 9)๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹คํ—˜ 14๋ฒˆ์„ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•ด๋‹น ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋Š” Table 2์™€ 3์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ „๋ฅ˜ 14kA(Level 4), ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 12 ์‚ฌ์ดํด(Level 2), ์ „๊ทน ๊ฐ€์••๋ ฅ 220Kgf(Level 3), ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ 10 ์‚ฌ์ดํด(Level 1)๋กœ ์ •์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”์€ ํ›„์ž์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ์ง„์ •ํ•œ ์ตœ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์ž„์„ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋” ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅํ•œ ๊ธธ

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹œํ–‰์ฐฉ์˜ค์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜, SDV-MOORA๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด ์ €ํ•ญ ์  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ์ƒ์ถฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์ ์„ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด์–ด, ์ตœ์ข… ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธธ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ผ๊ด€๋œ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์‚ฐ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ „๋…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ์šด์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ €ํฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ํŒ€์— ์—ฐ๋ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›์น™์„ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0450
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ์ •๋ณด

  • ์ด ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋Š” P. Sreeraj์˜ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “ฮŸฮกฮคฮ™ฮœฮ™ฮ–ATION OF RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS PARAMETERS USING MOORA APPROACH”๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ถœ์ฒ˜:ย https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144558987.pdf

์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด ์ œ๊ณต ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๋‹จ ์ƒ์—…์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๊ธˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Fig. 1 . 3D finite element mesh without the exposure of the foundation

๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ฐ์ง€ ํ˜์‹ : ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Hsun-Yi HUANG ์™ธ ์ €์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ “APPLICATION OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS IN BRIDGE SCOUR DETECTION” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ฐ์ง€
  • Secondary Keywords: ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜, ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(FEM), ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฑด์ „์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง

Executive Summary

  • ๊ณผ์ œ: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ์— ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(FEM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(GA)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ: ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ฆฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŠน์ • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด(6~12m)๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ๋ฉด ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋จ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰์‹ ๋Œ€๋ฆฌ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ ์ œ์ ์ธ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณผ์ œ: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ CFD ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์—๊ฒŒ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ด์œ 

๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ๊ตํ†ต ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์š”์†Œ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ ์•ˆ์ „์€ ๋Š์ž„์—†์ด ์œ„ํ˜‘๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1960๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 1990๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ 1,000๊ฑด ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ์ค‘ 60%๊ฐ€ ‘์„ธ๊ตด(scour)’ ํ˜„์ƒ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ™์ด ๋ฌผ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์นจ์‹๋˜์–ด ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๊ฐ€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ธฐ์šธ์–ด์ง์ด๋‚˜ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์ด ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ™์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์œ ์†์ด ๋น ๋ฅธ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž ์ˆ˜๋ถ€๋‚˜ ์žฅ๋น„๋ฅผ ํˆฌ์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์ค‘์— ์„ค์น˜๋œ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์žฅ์น˜ ๋˜ํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํ›„์— ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์›๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜๋„๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ์ ˆ์‹คํžˆ ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ด ์ง€์ ์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•: ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ถ„์„

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ‘๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜’๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์ฐฉ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋Œ€๋ฆฌ ์ง€ํ‘œ(proxy)๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ ๋จผ์ € ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(Finite Element Method, FEM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰(7๊ฒฝ๊ฐ„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ฑฐ๋”๊ต)์˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜: 0m๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 19m๊นŒ์ง€ ์ด 10๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – ํ† ์–‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜: ํ† ์–‘์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„(์˜๋ฅ )๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 6๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ† ์–‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ FEM ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ํ† ์–‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณดํŽธ์ ์ธ ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ธ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(Genetic Algorithms, GA)์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์†์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด(์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹)๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ํƒ์ƒ‰ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ GA๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FEM ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž˜ ๋งž๋Š”, ์ฆ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ: ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 1: ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค

๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ† ์–‘์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ Figure 10์€ 6๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ† ์–‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Case 1~6)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋œ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ๋ชจ๋“  ์ผ€์ด์Šค์˜ ๊ณก์„ ์ด ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 0m์—์„œ 6m ์‚ฌ์ด์ผ ๋•Œ๋Š” ๊ทธ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋„ ๋น„๊ต์  ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 2: ํŠน์ • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์—์„œ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ‘๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„’ ์กด์žฌ

Figure 9์™€ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์ž„๊ณ„์ ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 0m ~ 6m ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„: ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 6m ~ 10m ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„: ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์€ ‘๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ์ง€์ˆ˜(warning index)’๋กœ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 12m ์ด์ƒ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„: ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 12m์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์†์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋„˜์–ด, ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ‘์ •๋„’๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์งˆ์  ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ 

  • ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฑด์ „์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด ์กฐ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฝ๋ณด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ค€์น˜ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์ง„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฝ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜๋ฉด, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(6m~12m)์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ ๊ฒ€์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์•ˆ์ „ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํŒ€: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Figure 9์™€ Figure 10 ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์•ˆ์ „ ์ž„๊ณ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œก์•ˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํƒ์‚ฌ์—๋งŒ ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹ , ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง์„ ์•ˆ์ „ ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์— ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋œ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ๋น„์œจ ์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์„ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž๋™ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์„ค๊ณ„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๊ฐ€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋™์  ์‘๋‹ต์ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์™€ ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ „์ฒด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ƒ์„ธ ์ •๋ณด


APPLICATION OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS IN BRIDGE SCOUR DETECTION

1. ๊ฐœ์š”:

  • ์ œ๋ชฉ: APPLICATION OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS IN BRIDGE SCOUR DETECTION
  • ์ €์ž: Hsun-Yi HUANG, Wen-Yen CHOU, Shen-Haw JU, and Chung-Wei FENG
  • ๋ฐœํ–‰ ์—ฐ๋„: ์ •๋ณด ์—†์Œ
  • ํ•™์ˆ ์ง€/ํ•™ํšŒ: ์ •๋ณด ์—†์Œ
  • ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ: Natural Frequency, Genetic Algorithm, Scouring around bridge piers

2. ์ดˆ๋ก:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ธฐ์šธ์–ด์ง๊ณผ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ „ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ, ํ‰๊ท  ์œ ์†, ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ์‹œ๋„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ •์˜๋œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํŠน์ • ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์—๋งŒ ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์ž˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ง๋š ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์œ ํ˜•, ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฐพ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต์‹์„ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๋‚ด์—์„œ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.

3. ์„œ๋ก :

๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ๊ตํ†ต ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ณผ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. Shirole๊ณผ Holt๋Š” 1960๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 1990๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ 1,000๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด๋“ค ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ 60%๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค[1]. ๋ฌธํ—Œ [2], [3]์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. Dargahi๋Š” ์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์ธต์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ์™€ ์‹ค๋ฆฐ๋” ํ›„๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. [4] Melville ๋“ฑ์€ “๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด”์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ฑ…์„ ์ถœํŒํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฑ…์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…, ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ดˆ์ ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์ฑ…์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์š”์•ฝ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค[5]. ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์  ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ Johnson์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋ถ•๊ดด ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ต๊ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค[9]. Johnson ๋“ฑ์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ง€์ ์—์„œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ถ•๊ดด๋  ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

4. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์š”์•ฝ:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ:

๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์•ฝ 60%๋Š” ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ† ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฌผ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์นจ์‹๋˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ์— ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์›๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ, ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.

์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ:

๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ, ์œ ์† ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋ ค ํ–ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํŠน์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ํ˜•์—๋งŒ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋‚˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•๋„ ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ถ€์กฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ :

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(FEM)์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(GA)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ณดํŽธ์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ:

ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ FEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ GA๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๊ณต์‹์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค.

5. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก 

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. 7๊ฒฝ๊ฐ„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ฑฐ๋”๊ต๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 3D ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด(0m ~ 19m, 10๋‹จ๊ณ„)์™€ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„(6๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ผ€์ด์Šค)๋ฅผ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•:

  • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ƒ์„ฑ: ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ํ•ด์„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(๋ณธ๋ฌธ ๋ฏธ์–ธ๊ธ‰)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋™์  ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ์œ ์น˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ(eigenproblem)๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ์‡ ์™€ ์™ธ๋ ฅ์„ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ (ฮš - ฯ‰ยฒฮœ)ฮฆ = 0์„ ํ’€๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ถ€๋ถ„๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋ฒ•(subspace iteration method)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜(ฯ‰)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.
Fig. 1 . 3D finite element mesh without the exposure of the foundation
Fig. 1 . 3D finite element mesh without the exposure of the foundation
  • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ถ„์„: ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ (์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด, ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜) ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(GA)์„ ์ ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. GA๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ์  ํ•ด(์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹)๋ฅผ ์—ผ์ƒ‰์ฒด ๋ฌธ์ž์—ด๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ต์ฐจ ๋ฐ ๋Œ์—ฐ๋ณ€์ด ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํ•ด์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๊ณต์‹์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ’ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ ์˜ค์ฐจ(RMSE)๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ํ•ฉ๋„ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰(ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ฑฐ๋”๊ต) ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” (1) ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๊ทœ๋ช…, (2) ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ด ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„, (3) ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ ํƒ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค.

6. ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 0m์—์„œ 6m ์‚ฌ์ด์ผ ๋•Œ, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ† ์–‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์€ ํŠน์ • ๊นŠ์ด์—์„œ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•ด์ง„๋‹ค.
  • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 6m์—์„œ 10m ์‚ฌ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋ฉด ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, 12m์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” 6m~10m ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ด ์„ธ๊ตด ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ‘๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ์ง€์ˆ˜’๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ x, y ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 2.64%~4.58%, 1.42%~4.99%์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.
Fig. 9 The relationship between natural frequency and scour depth for each soil case
Fig. 9 The relationship between natural frequency and scour depth for each soil case

๊ทธ๋ฆผ ๋ชฉ๋ก:

  • Fig. 1 3D finite element mesh without the exposure of the foundation
  • Fig. 2 3D finite element mesh with the exposure of the foundation
  • Fig. 3 Mode 1 in eigen-analysis
  • Fig. 4 Flowchart of GA
  • Fig. 5 GA string
  • Fig. 6 Illustration of transform function selection
  • Fig. 7 The size of the bridge section (unit=m)
  • Fig. 8 The bridge mesh with 13m scour depth
  • Fig. 9 The relationship between natural frequency and scour depth for each soil case
  • Fig. 10 The relationship between normalized natural frequency and scour depth

7. ๊ฒฐ๋ก :

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ‘์ด‰์‹ ์ธก์ • ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€๋ฆฌ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ํ•ด์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์™€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ ๊ด€๊ณ„์‹์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์–ด๋–ค ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋“  ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 0m์—์„œ 6m๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. 6m์—์„œ 10m ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, 12m์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ, 6m์—์„œ 10m์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ์ง€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋‚ด์— ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŠน๋ณ„ ์ ๊ฒ€์ด๋‚˜ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ํ† ์–‘ ์œ ํ˜•, ๊ต๊ฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์„ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๊ณ  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณต์‹์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

8. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ:

  • [1] Shirole A.M., and Holt, R.C., 1991. โ€œPlanning for a Comprehensive Bridge Safety Assurance Program”, Transp. Res. Rec. No. 1290, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 137-142
  • [2] Wardhana, K. and Hadipriono, F.C., 2003. “Analysis of Recent Bridge failures in the United States”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 144-150.
  • [3] Biezma, M.V. and Schanack, F., 2007. โ€œCollapse of Steel Bridges”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 21, pp.398-405.
  • [4] Dargahi, B., 1990. โ€œControlling Mechanism of Local Scouringโ€, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol.116, No.10, pp.1197-1214.
  • [5] Melville, B. W, Coleman, S. E., 2000. Bridge Scour, the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
  • [6] Melville, B.W., 1997. โ€œPier and Abutment Scour: Integrated Approachโ€, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol.123, No. 2, pp. 125-136.
  • [7] Richardson, J.E. and Panchang, V.G., 1998. โ€œThree-Dimensional Simulation of Scour-Inducing Flow at Bridge Piers”, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 5, pp. 530-540.
  • [8] Bolduc, L.C, Gardoni, P. and Briaud, J.L., 2008. “Probability of Exceedance Estimates for Scour Depth around Bridge Piers”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 2, pp. 175-184.
  • [9] Johnson, P.A., 1992. โ€œReliability-Based Pier Scour Engineeringโ€, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 10, pp. 1344-1358.
  • [10] Johnson, P. A. and B. M. Ayyub, 1992. โ€œAssessing Time-Variant Bridge Reliability Due to Pier Scour” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 6, pp. 887-903.
  • [11] Lebeau, K.H. and Wadia-Fascetti, S.J., 2007. โ€œFault Tree Analysis of Constructed Facilitiesโ€, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.320-326.
  • [12] Holland, J. H., 1975. โ€œAdaptation in natural and artificial systemsโ€, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
  • [13] Goldberg, D. E., 1989, “Genetic algorithms in search”, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ Q&A: ์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

Q1: ์™œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๋Œ€์‹  ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(FEM)์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, FEM์€ ๋ง๋š ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์œ ํ˜•, ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์ •์˜๋œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ํŠน์ • ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์—๋งŒ ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, FEM์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: FEM ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(GA)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

A2: FEM ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํฌ์ธํŠธ๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋™์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณดํŽธ์ ์ธ ๊ณต์‹์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ฐ’์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ(RMSE)๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ‘๋งž์ถคํ˜• ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต์‹’์„ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: Figure 10์—์„œ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์™œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ๊ฐ€์š”?

A3: ์ด ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”์‹œ์ผœ ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ต๊ฐ ์•„๋ž˜์˜ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์งˆ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ผ๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์—†์ด๋„ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์–ด, ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: 6m์—์„œ 12m ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ‘๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ์ง€์ˆ˜’๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์˜ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์˜๋ฏธ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

A4: ์ด๋Š” ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž„๊ณ„์ ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 6m ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์•„ ๊ฐ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, 6m๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ๋ฉด์„œ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๊ฒŒ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  12m์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›Œ์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์•ฝํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜๋ฉด ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ์ •๋ฐ€ ์ ๊ฒ€ ๋ฐ ๋ณด๊ฐ• ์กฐ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. “x ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ y ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์•ฝ 2.64%~4.58%์™€ 1.42%~4.99%์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋‚ด์— ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค”๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ช…์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์‹ค์ œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋” ๋†’์€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธธ

๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์ฃผ๋ฒ”์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋งŽ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์œ  ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ฐ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ํ† ์–‘ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํŠน์ • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์—์„œ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ‘๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„’์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๋งˆ๋ จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์‚ฐ์—… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ตœ์„ ์„ ๋‹คํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ์šด์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ €ํฌ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ํŒ€์— ์—ฐ๋ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›์น™์„ ๊ท€์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0450
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ์ •๋ณด

  • ์ด ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋Š” Hsun-Yi HUANG ์™ธ ์ €์ž์˜ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “APPLICATION OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS IN BRIDGE SCOUR DETECTION”์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด ์ œ๊ณต ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๋‹จ ์ƒ์—…์  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๊ธˆ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Figure 3. The simulated temperature distribution and single-layer multi-track isothermograms of LPBF Hastelloy X, located at the bottom of the powder bed, are presented for various laser energy densities. (a) depicts the single-point temperature distribution at the bottom of the powder bed, followed by the isothermograms corresponding to laser energy densities of (b) 31 J/mm3 , (c) 43 J/mm3 , (d) 53 J/mm3 , (e) 67 J/mm3 , and (f) 91 J/mm3 .

An integrated multiscale simulation guiding the processing optimisation for additively manufactured nickel-based superalloys

์ ์ธต ๊ฐ€๊ณต๋œ ๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

Xing He, Bing Yang, Decheng Kong, Kunjie Dai, Xiaoqing Ni, Zhanghua Chen
& Chaofang Dong

ABSTRACT

Microstructural defects in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metallic materials are correlated with processing parameters. A multi-physics model and a crystal plasticity framework are employed to predict microstructure growth in molten pools and assess the impact of manufacturing defects on plastic damage parameters. Criteria for optimising the LPBF process are identified, addressing microstructural defects and tensile properties of LPBF Hastelloy X at various volumetric energy densities (VED). The results show that higher VED levels foster a specific Goss texture {110} <001>, with irregular lack of fusion defects significantly affecting plastic damage, especially near the material surface. A critical threshold emerges between manufacturing defects and grain sizes in plastic strain accumulation. The optimal processing window for superior Hastelloy X mechanical properties ranges from 43 to 53 J/mm3 . This work accelerates the development of superior strengthductility alloys via LPBF, streamlining the trial-and-error process and reducing associated costs.

Figure 3. The simulated temperature distribution and single-layer multi-track isothermograms of LPBF Hastelloy X, located at the bottom of the powder bed, are presented for various laser energy densities. (a) depicts the single-point temperature distribution at the bottom of the powder bed, followed by the isothermograms corresponding to laser energy densities of (b) 31 J/mm3 , (c) 43 J/mm3 , (d) 53 J/mm3 , (e) 67 J/mm3 , and (f) 91 J/mm3 .
Figure 3. The simulated temperature distribution and single-layer multi-track isothermograms of LPBF Hastelloy X, located at the bottom of the powder bed, are presented for various laser energy densities. (a) depicts the single-point temperature distribution at the bottom of the powder bed, followed by the isothermograms corresponding to laser energy densities of (b) 31 J/mm3 , (c) 43 J/mm3 , (d) 53 J/mm3 , (e) 67 J/mm3 , and (f) 91 J/mm3 .

References
[1] DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components โ€“ process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112โ€“224. doi:10.
1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
[2] Mostafaei A, Ghiaasiaan R, Ho IT, et al. Additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys: A state-of-the-art
review on process-structure-defect-property relationship.
Prog Mater Sci. 2023;136:101108. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.
2023.101108
[3] Akande IG, Oluwole OO, Fayomi OSI, et al. Overview of
mechanical, microstructural, oxidation properties and
high-temperature applications of superalloys. Mater
Today Proc. 2021;43:2222โ€“2231. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.
2020.12.523
[4] Sanchez S, Smith P, Xu Z, et al. Powder bed fusion of
nickel-based superalloys: a review. Int J Machine Tools
Manuf. 2021;165:103729. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.
103729
[5] Xie Y, Teng Q, Shen M, et al. The role of overlap region
width in multi-laser powder bed fusion of Hastelloy X
superalloy. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2142802.
doi:10.1080/17452759.2022.2142802
[6] Yuan W, Chen H, Cheng T, et al. Effects of laser scanning
speeds on different states of the molten pool during
selective laser melting: simulation and experiment.
Mater Des. 2020;189:108542. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.
108542
[7] He X, Kong D, Zhou Y, et al. Powder recycling effects on
porosity development and mechanical properties of
Hastelloy X alloy during laser powder bed fusion
process. Addit Manuf. 2022;55:102840. doi:10.1016/j.
addma.2022.102840
[8] Sanaei N, Fatemi A. Defects in additive manufactured
metals and their effect on fatigue performance: a stateof-the-art review. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;117:100724.
doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100724
[9] Pourbabak S, Montero-Sistiaga ML, Schryvers D, et al.
Microscopic investigation of as built and hot isostatic
pressed Hastelloy X processed by selective laser
melting. Mater Charact. 2019;153:366โ€“371. doi:10.1016/j.
matchar.2019.05.024
[10] He X, Wang L, Kong D, et al. Recrystallization effect on
surface passivation of Hastelloy X alloy fabricated by
laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Sci Technol.
2023;163:245โ€“258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016j.jmst.
2023.06.003.
[11] Sabzi HE, Maeng S, Liang X, et al. Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: alloy
design and process optimisation. Addit Manuf.
2020;34:101360. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360
[12] Yu C, Chen N, Li R, et al. Selective laser melting of GH3536
superalloy: microstructure, mechanical properties, and
hydrocyclone manufacturing. Adv Powder Mater. 2023:

doi:10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100134
[13] Ye C, Zhang C, Zhao J, et al. Effects of post-processing on
the surface finish, porosity, residual stresses, and fatigue
performance of additive manufactured metals: a review.
J Mater Eng Perform. 2021;30(9):6407โ€“6425. doi:10.
1007/s11665-021-06021-7
[14] Zhang W, Zheng Y, Liu F, et al. Effect of solution temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of
Hastelloy X superalloy fabricated by laser directed energy
deposition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;820:141537. doi:10.
1016/j.msea.2021.141537
[15] Lehmann T, Rose D, Ranjbar E, et al. Large-scale metal
additive manufacturing: a holistic review of the state of the art and challenges. Int Mater Rev. 2021;67(4):410โ€“459. doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1971427

[16] Wu S, Hu Y, Yang B, et al. Review on defect characterization and structural integrity assessment method of additively manufactured materials. J Mech Eng. 2021;57 (22):3โ€“34. doi:10.3901/JME.2021.22.003

[17] Keller C, Mokhtari M, Vieille B, et al. Influence of a rescanning strategy with different laser powers on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X elaborated by powder bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;803:140474. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140474

[18] Keshavarzkermani A, Marzbanrad E, Esmaeilizadeh R,et al. An investigation into the effect of process parameters on melt pool geometry, cell spacing, and grain refinement during laser powder bed fusion. Optics & Laser Technol. 2019;116:83โ€“91. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec. 2019.03.012

[19] Watring DS, Benzing JT, Hrabe N, et al. Effects of laserenergy density and build orientation on the structureproperty relationships in as-built Inconel 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101425. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101425

[20] Xiao H, Liu X, Xiao W, et al. Influence of molten-pool cooling rate on solidification structure and mechanical property of laser additive manufactured Inconel 718. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;19:4404โ€“4416. doi:10.1016/j. jmrt.2022.06.162

[21] Wang J, Zhu R, Liu Y, et al. Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization. Adv Powder Mater. 2023;2(4):100137. doi:10.1016/j. apmate.2023.100137

[22] Li Z, Deng Y, Yao B, et al. Effect of laser scan speed on pool size and densification of selective laser melted CoCr alloy under constant laser energy density. Laser Optoelectronics Progress. 2022;59(7):0736001. doi:10. 3788/LOP202259.0736001

[23] Zhang J, Yuan W, Song B, et al. Towards understanding metallurgical defect formation of selective laser melted wrought aluminum alloys. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1 (4):100035. doi:10.1016/j.apmate.2022.100035

[24] Rui H, Meiping W, Chen C, et al. Effects of laser energy density on microstructure and corrosion resistance of FeCrNiMnAl high entropy alloy coating. Optics & Laser Technol. 2022;152:108188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016j. optlastec.2022.108188.

[25] Zhao Y, Sun W, Wang Q, et al. Effect of beam energy density characteristics on microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based alloys manufactured by laser directed energy deposition. J Mater Process Technol. 2023;319:118074. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118074

[26] Tan P, Zhou M, Tang C, et al. Multiphysics modelling of powder bed fusion for polymers. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2257191. doi:10.1080/17452759.2023. 2257191

[27] Tan P, Shen F, Shian Tey W, et al. A numerical study on the packing quality of fibre/polymer composite powder for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2021;16(sup1):S1โ€“S18. doi:10.1080/17452759. 2021.1922965

[28] Kusano M, Watanabe M. Microstructure control of Hastelloy X by geometry-induced elevation of sample temperature during a laser powder bed fusion process. Mater Des. 2022;222:111016. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022. 111016

[29] Lee YS, Zhang W. Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:178โ€“188. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003

[30] Lv F, Liang HX, Xie DQ, et al. On the role of laser in situ remelting into pore elimination of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd. 2021;854:156866. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156866

[31] Prithivirajan V, Sangid MD. The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity. Mater Des. 2018;150:139โ€“153. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.022

[32] Huang Y. A user-material subroutine incroporating single crystal plasticity in the ABAQUS finite element program. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.

[33] Pilgar CM, Fernandez AM, Lucarini S, et al. Effect of printing direction and thickness on the mechanical behavior of SLM fabricated Hastelloy-X. Int J Plasticity. 2022;153:103250. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103250

[34] Garlea E, Choo H, Sluss CC, et al. Variation of elastic mechanical properties with texture, porosity, and defect characteristics in laser powder bed fusion 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;763:138032. doi:10.1016/j. msea.2019.138032

[35] Sanchez-Mata O, Wang X, Muรฑiz-Lerma JA, et al. Dependence of mechanical properties on crystallographic orientation in nickel-based superalloy Hastelloy X fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. J Alloys Compd. 2021;865:158868. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021. 158868

[36] Gu H, Wei C, Li L, et al. Multi-physics modelling of molten

pool development and track formation in multi-track, multi-layer and multi-material selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;151:119458. doi:10.1016/j. ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119458

[37] Johnson L, Mahmoudi M, Zhang B, et al. Assessing printability maps in additive manufacturing of metal alloys. Acta Mater. 2019;176:199โ€“210. doi:10.1016/j.actamat. 2019.07.005

[38] Wang S, Ning J, Zhu L, et al. Role of porosity defects in metal 3D printing: formation mechanisms, impacts on properties and mitigation strategies. Mater Today. 2022;59:133โ€“160. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.014

[39] Guo Y, Collins DM, Tarleton E, et al. Measurements of stress fields near a grain boundary: exploring blocked arrays of dislocations in 3D. Acta Mater. 2015;96:229โ€“doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.041
[40] Kong D, Dong C, Ni X, et al. Hetero-deformation-induced
stress in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel.
Mater Res Lett. 2020;8(10):390โ€“397. doi:10.1080/
21663831.2020.1775149

Figure 3 Velocity Distribution from Plan View and Profile View (Case 2)-1

Power Intake Velocity Modeling Using FLOW-3D at Kelsey Generating Station

FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ Kelsey ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์œ ์† ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ 

๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜

  • Manitoba Hydro๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” Supply Efficiency Improvement Program์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ค‘์ž„.
  • Kelsey ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ(224MW)๋Š” Upper Nelson River์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, 7๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „ ์œ ๋‹›์„ ๋ณด์œ .
  • ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์ž…๊ตฌ ์ฑ„๋„์—๋Š” ์•”๋ฐ˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ(rock knob)์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์œ ๋™์„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ์œ ๋‹› 6, 7์˜ ํšจ์œจ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นจ.
  • ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜(re-runnering) ํ›„ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด 1700mยณ/s์—์„œ 2200mยณ/s๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์œ ์ž… ์œ ๋™ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•จ.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ 

  • FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Kelsey ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ์œ ์ž… ์œ ๋™์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜.
  • ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์ž…๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด์— ์ œ๊ณต.
  • ์•”๋ฐ˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์žฌ์„ค์น˜ ํ›„ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์œ ๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์„ค์ •

  • FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•.
  • ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์„ค๊ณ„๋„๋ฉด์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์š” ์ž…๊ตฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ๋‹จ ์ž‘์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ(ํŠธ๋ž˜์‹œ ๋ž™, ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ ๋“ฑ)์€ ์ œ์™ธ.
  • ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค(Case 1~3) ์„ค์ •:
    1. Case 1: ์œ ๋‹› 1~7 ์ „๋ถ€ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜ ํ›„ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ(Full Gate, FG)
    2. Case 2: ์œ ๋‹› 1-5๋งŒ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜, ์œ ๋‹› 67 ๊ธฐ์กด ์ƒํƒœ ์œ ์ง€(FG)
    3. Case 3: ์œ ๋‹› 1-5๋งŒ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜, ์œ ๋‹› 67 ๊ธฐ์กด ์ตœ์  ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ(Best Gate, BG)
  • ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด:
    • ์ƒ๋ฅ˜: ์ผ์ • ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์ ์šฉ
    • ํ•˜๋ฅ˜: ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์†Œ๋ชจ(mass sink) ๋ฐฉ์‹ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ˜์˜
  • ๊ฒฉ์ž ์„ค์ •:
    • ์ž…๊ตฌ ์ฑ„๋„์€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํฐ ๊ฒฉ์ž ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์ž…๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฉ์ž๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ.

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

์œ ๋™ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„

  • Case 1(์ „ ์œ ๋‹› ์žฌ์„ค์น˜)์—์„œ ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ท ์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ.
  • Case 2, 3์—์„œ๋Š” ์•”๋ฐ˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์œ ๋‹› 6, 7์—์„œ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์™€๋ฅ˜(vortex) ํ˜•์„ฑ, ์ด๋Š” ํšจ์œจ ์ €ํ•˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ.
  • ์‹ค์ œ 1990๋…„ ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ, ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์ผ์น˜.

๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

  • FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด Kelsey ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์žฌํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธ.
  • ์•”๋ฐ˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์ด ์œ ๋‹› 6, 7์˜ ์œ ๋™์„ ์™œ๊ณกํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ํšจ์œจ์„ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ.
  • ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์œ ์† ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณต.

ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ

  • ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜ ํ›„ ์‹ค์ธก ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋น„๊ต ๊ฒ€์ฆ.
  • ์•”๋ฐ˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๋™ ๊ฐœ์„  ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ.
  • ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ CFD ํ•ด์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์˜์˜

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์œ ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์žฌ์„ค์น˜ ํ›„ ์œ ๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์šด์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

References

  1. Efrem Teklemariam and Joe L. Groeneveld. 2000. Solving Problems in Design and Dam Safety with Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hydro Review, Vol. 5: 48-52.
  2. Efrem Teklemariam, Brian W. Korbaylo, Joe L. Groeneveld and David M. Fuchs. 2002. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Diverse Applications in Hydropower Projectโ€™s Design and Analysis, CWRA 55th Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA, pp: 1-20.
  3. Flow Science Inc. 2006. Flow 3D version 9.1 user manual.
  4. Fuamba, M., Role. 2006. Behavior of Surge Chamber in Hydropower: Case of the Robert Bourassa Hydro Power Plant in Quebec, Canada, Dams and Reservoir, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century- Berga et al (eds) @ 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 0415 40423 1.
  5. Joe L. Groeneveld, Kevin M. Sydor, David M. Fuchs, Efrem Teklemariam and Brian W. Korbaylo. 2001. Optimization of Hydraulic Design using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Waterpower XII, July 9-11, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  6. Marc St. Laurent, Efrem Teklemariam, Paul Cooley and Joe Groeneveld. 2002. Application of Hydraulic Models for the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Wuskwatim Generating Station, June 11-14, CWRA 55th Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA.
  7. Michael C. Johnson and Bruce M. Savage. 2006. Physical and Numerical Comparison of Flow over Ogee Spillway in the Presence of Tail water, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 312, pp: 1353-1357.
Crossbar

FLOW-3D: Flow-Based Computing on 3D Nanoscale Crossbars with Minimal Semiperimeter

FLOW-3D: ์ตœ์†Œ ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…


์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

  • ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜: ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ง‘์•ฝ์  ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ธ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๋Œ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ 2D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐ ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ด์Šค ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„์— ์ง๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ชฉํ‘œ: Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋กœ ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ(semiperimeter)๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฉด์ , ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„, ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด 2D ๋„๊ตฌ๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์ด๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

  1. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด ๋ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜
    • Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด BDD(Binary Decision Diagram)์™€ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉ.
    • BDD์˜ ๋…ธ๋“œ์™€ ์—์ง€์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์™€์ด์–ด์™€ ๋ฉค๋ฆฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ ์ ˆํžˆ ๋งคํ•‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ “L-labeling ๋ฌธ์ œ”๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ILP(์ •์ˆ˜ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•)๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•œ๋‹ค.
  2. FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ
    • ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ: ์ž…๋ ฅ๋œ BDD๋ฅผ DAG(Directed Acyclic Graph)๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ 0 ํ„ฐ๋ฏธ๋„ ๋…ธ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ.
    • L-labeling ๋‹จ๊ณ„: ๊ฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ• ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ธˆ์† ์ธต์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธ์ ‘ ์ธต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์ œ์•ฝ(์—์ง€ ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ ์ œ์•ฝ)์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
    • ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ํ• ๋‹น: ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ œ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ๋„์ถœ.
  3. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€
    • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” 2D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ, ๋ฉด์ , ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„, ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 61%, 84%, 37%, 41%์˜ ๊ฐœ์„  ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„.
    • RevLib ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

  • ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ ์ œ์•ˆ: Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋กœ ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆ.
  • ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ: FLOW-3D๋Š” ILP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ L-labeling ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์˜ ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฉด์  ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋น„๋ฅผ ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ด.
  • ๋น„๊ต ํ‰๊ฐ€: ๊ธฐ์กด 2D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ ๋Œ€๋น„, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ๊ณผ ์‘๋‹ต ์†๋„ ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„.

๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

  • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์—์„œ Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆ.
  • ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํšŒ๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

Reference

  1. John Backus. 1978. Can programming be liberated from the von Neumann style?CACM 21, 8 (1978), 613โ€“641.
  2. ABC Berkeley. 2009. A system for sequential synthesis and verification.
  3. Debjyoti Bhattacharjee et al. 2020. CONTRA: area-constrained technology mapping framework for memristive memory processing unit. In ICCADโ€™20. 1โ€“9.
  4. Dwaipayan Chakraborty et al. 2017. Automated synthesis of compact crossbarsfor sneak-path based in-memory computing. In DATEโ€™17. IEEE, 770โ€“775.
  5. IBM ILOG Cplex. 2020. IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio 20.1. InternationalBusiness Machines Corporation (2020). https://www.ibm.com/products/ilog-cplexoptimization-studio
  6. Hadi Esmaeilzadeh et al. 2011. Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling. InISCAโ€™11. IEEE, 365โ€“376.
  7. Miao Hu et al. 2018. Memristor-based analog computation and neural networkclassification with a dot product engine. Advanced Materials 30, 9 (2018), 1705914.
  8. Sumit Jha et al. 2016. Computation of boolean formulas using sneak paths incrossbar computing. US Patent 9,319,047.
  9. Shahar Kvatinsky et al. 2013. Memristor-based material implication (IMPLY)logic: Design principles and methodologies. IEEE VLSI 22, 10 (2013), 2054โ€“2066.
  10. Shahar Kvatinsky et al. 2014. MAGICโ€”Memristor-aided logic. IEEE TCAS-II 61,11 (2014), 895โ€“899.
  11. Shuangchen Li et al. 2016. Pinatubo: A processing-in-memory architecture forbulk bitwise operations in emerging non-volatile memories. In DAC. IEEE, 1โ€“6.
  12. Yibo Li et al. 2018. Review of memristor devices in neuromorphic computing:materials sciences and device challenges. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 51, 50 (2018),503002.
  13. Jiale Liang, Stanley Yeh, S Simon Wong, and H-S Philip Wong. 2013. Effect ofwordline/bitline scaling on the performance, energy consumption, and reliabilityof cross-point memory array. ACM JETC 9, 1 (2013), 1โ€“14.
  14. Thomas N Theis and H-S Philip Wong. 2017. The end of mooreโ€™s law: A newbeginning for information technology. CiSE 19, 2 (2017), 41โ€“50.
  15. Sven Thijssen et al. 2021. COMPACT: Flow-Based Computing on NanoscaleCrossbars with Minimal Semiperimeter. In DATEโ€™21. IEEE, 232โ€“237.
  16. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2014. Parallel computing using memristivecrossbar networks: Nullifying the processor-memory bottleneck. In IDTโ€™14. IEEE,147โ€“152.
  17. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2015. Automated synthesis of crossbars fornanoscale computing using formal methods. In NANOARCHโ€™15. IEEE, 130โ€“136.
  18. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2016. Parallel boolean matrix multiplication inlinear time using rectifying memristors. In ISCASโ€™16. IEEE, 1874โ€“1877.
  19. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2018. Brief announcement: Parallel transitiveclosure within 3d crosspoint memory. In SPAAโ€™18. 95โ€“98.
  20. Robert Wille et al. 2008. RevLib: An online resource for reversible functions andreversible circuits. In ISMVLโ€™08. IEEE, 220โ€“225.
  21. Cong Xu et al. 2015. Overcoming the challenges of crossbar resistive memoryarchitectures. In HPCAโ€™15. IEEE, 476โ€“488.
setting

Predicting and Optimizing the Infuenced Parameters for CulvertOutlet Scouring Utilizing Coupled FLOW 3Dโ€‘Surrogate Modeling

Culvert Outlet Scouring์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”: FLOW-3D์™€ ์„œ๋กœ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ


์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

  • ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜: ๋ฐ•์Šคํ˜• ์ˆ˜๋กœ(culvert) ์ถœ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์นจ์‹(scouring)์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ชฉํ‘œ: ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์‹คํŒจ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•: ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง(FLOW-3D)๊ณผ Box-Behnken ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์„œ๋กœ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

  1. FLOW-3D:
    • Reynolds ํ‰๊ท  Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
    • ์นจ์‹ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์œ„ํ•ด RNG ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ.
  2. Box-Behnken ์„ค๊ณ„:
    • ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜: ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(Flow Discharge, QQQ), ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ(Slope, SSS), ํ† ์–‘ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ(d50d_{50}d50โ€‹).
    • ์ด 15๊ฐœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด ๋ฐ ์œ„์น˜ ๊ฐ„ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์„.
  3. ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:
    • ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ์œ„์น˜)์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”.
  4. ์ตœ์ ํ™”:
    • ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด ๋ฐ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ ๋„์ถœ.

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

  • ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ:
    • ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„: R2=0.931R^2 = 0.931R2=0.931
    • ์นจ์‹ ์œ„์น˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„: R2=0.969R^2 = 0.969R2=0.969
  • ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„:
    • ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€: ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ์œ„์น˜์— ์„ ํ˜•์ (๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ) ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นจ.
    • ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€: ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŒจํ„ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ.
    • ํ† ์–‘ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€: ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ํŒจํ„ด ํ™•์ธ.
  • ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„:
    • ์นจ์‹ ๊นŠ์ด ์ตœ์†Œํ™”: ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ํ† ์–‘ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ, ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์„ค์ •.
    • ์นจ์‹ ์œ„์น˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”: ์œ ๋Ÿ‰, ํ† ์–‘ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ, ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆ.

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

  • FLOW-3D์™€ ์„œ๋กœ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง: ์นจ์‹ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ณผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ.
  • ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ: ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์นจ์‹ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํžˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€.
  • ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ œ์•ˆ: ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋„์ž… ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ์„ .

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Reference

  1. Abt SR, Ruf JF, Doehring FK (1985) Culvert slope efects on outlet scour. J Hydraul Eng 111(10):1363โ€“1367. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:10(1363)
  2. Ahmad N, Mohammed TA, Melville BW, Ali FH, Yusuf B (2017) Modelling the efect of sediment coarseness on local scour at wide bridge piers. Pertanika J Sci Technol 25(1):191โ€“200
  3. Amini A, Parto AA (2017) 3D numerical simulation of fow feld around twin piles. Acta Geophys 65(6):1243โ€“1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0094-x
  4. Amini A, Solaimani N (2018) The efects of uniform and nonuniform pile spacing variations on local scour at pile groups. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 36(7):861โ€“866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1392658
  5. Bui DT, Shirzadi A, Amini A, Shahabi H, Al-Ansari N, Hamidi S, Ghazvinei PT et al (2020) A hybrid intelligence approach to enhance the prediction accuracy of local scour depth at complex bridge piers. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031063
  6. Chiew Y-M, Lim S-Y (1996) local scour by a deeply submerged horizontal circular jet. J Hydraul Eng 122(9):529โ€“532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:9(529)
  7. Dey S (2014) Bed-load transport. Fluv Hydrodyn Hydrodyn Sediment Transp Phenom. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19062-9_5
  8. Elsebaie IH (2013) An experimental study of local scour around circular bridge pier in sand soil. Int J Civ Environ Eng IJCEE-IJENS 13(1):23โ€“28
  9. Falconer RA (1991) Computational fluid dynamics. By M. B. ABBOTT and D. R. BASCO. Longman, 1989. 425 pp. J Fluid Mech 229:689โ€“689. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091213233
  10. Flow Science I (2012) FLOW-3D, version 12.0 userโ€™s manual. In: I Flow Science (ed). FLOW-3D [Computer software]. Flow Science, Inc, Santa Fe. https://www.fow3d.com
  11. Galรกn ร, Gonzรกlez J (2019) Efects of shape, inlet blockage and wing walls on local scour at the outlet of non-submerged culverts: undermining of the embankment. Environ Earth Sci 79(25):1โ€“16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8749-3
  12. Gรผnal M, Gรผnal AY, Osman K (2019) Simulation of blockage efects on scouring downstream of box culverts under unsteady fow conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(9):5305โ€“5310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02461-w
  13. Hariri-Ardebili MA, Seyed-Kolbadi SM, Noori M (2018) Response surface method for material uncertainty quantifcation of infrastructures. Shock Vib 2018:1โ€“14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1784203
  14. Hosseini R, Fazloula R, Saneie M, Amini A (2018) Bagged neural network for estimating the scour depth around pile groups. Int J River Basin Manag 16(4):401โ€“412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1372449
  15. Kincl M, Turk S, Vreฤer F (2005) Application of experimental design methodology in development and optimization of drug release method. Int J Pharm 291(1):39โ€“49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.07.041
  16. Klun M, Kryลพanowski A, Schnabl S (2016) Application of response surface method in analysis of hydraulic structures. Acta Hydrotech 29(51):103โ€“123
  17. Kocaman S (2014) Prediction of backwater profles due to bridges in a compound channel using CFD. Adv Mech Eng 6:905217โ€“905217. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/905217
  18. Mehnifard MA, Dalfardi S, Baghdadi H, Seirfar Z (2015) Simulation of local scour caused by submerged horizontal jets with Flow-3D
  19. numerical model. Desert 20(1):47โ€“55 Najafzadeh M (2016) Neurofuzzy-based GMDH-PSO to predict maximum scour depth at equilibrium at culvert outlets. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 7(1):06015001
  20. Najafzadeh M, Kargar AR (2019) Gene-expression programming, evolutionary polynomial regression, and model tree to evaluate local scour depth at culvert outlets. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 10(3):04019013
  21. Nariman NA, Hussain RR, Msekh MA, Karampour P (2019) Prediction meta-models for the responses of a circular tunnel during earthquakes. Undergr Space 4(1):31โ€“47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.06.003
  22. Othman Ahmed K, Amini A, Bahrami J, Kavianpour MR, Hawez DM (2021) Numerical modeling of depth and location of scour at culvert outlets under unsteady fow conditions. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 12(4):04021040
  23. Pasma SA, Daik R, Maskat M, Hassan O (2013) Application of boxbehnken design in optimization of glucose production from oil palm empty fruit bunch cellulose. Int J Polym Sci 2013:1โ€“8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/104502
  24. Sorourian S (2015) Study of blockage efects on scouring pattern downstream of box culverts. (PhD), University of Technology Sydney, Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/44198
  25. Soulsby R (1997) Dynamics of marine sands: a manual for practical applications. Telford, London
  26. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
  27. Taha N, El-Feky MM, El-Saiad AA, Fathy I (2020) Numerical investigation of scour characteristics downstream of blocked culverts. Alex Eng J 59:3503โ€“3513
  28. Wang L, Melville BW, Guan D (2018) Efects of upstream weir slope on local scour at submerged weirs. J Hydraul Eng 144(3):04018002.
  29. Xiong W, Cai CS, Kong B, Kong X (2016) CFD simulations and analyses for bridge-scour development using a dynamic-mesh updating technique. J Comput Civ Eng 30(1):04014121.
Local Scour Depth Around Bridge Piers: Performance Evaluation of Dimensional Analysis-based Empirical Equations and AI Techniques

Local Scour Depth Around Bridge Piers: Performance Evaluation of Dimensional Analysis-based Empirical Equations and AI Techniques

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), and dimensional analysis-based empirical equations (DAEEs), can estimate scour depth around bridge piers. AIโ€™s accuracy depends on various architectures, while DAEEsโ€™ performance depends on experimental data. This study evaluated the performance of AI and DAEEs for scour depth estimation using flow velocity, depth, size of bed sediment, critical approach velocity, and pier width. The data from a smooth rectangular (20 m ร— 1 m) flume and a high-precision particle image velocimetry to study the flow structure around the pier – width: 1.5 โ€“ 91.5 cm evaluated DAEEs. Various ANNs (5, 10, and 15 neurons), double layer (DL) and triple layers (TL), and different ANFIS settings were trained, tested, and verified. The Generalized Reduced Gradient optimization identified the parameters of DAEEs, and Nashโ€“Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and Mean Square Error (MSE) evaluated the performance of different models. The study revealed that DL ANN-3 with 10 neurons (NSE = 0.986) outperformed ANFIS, other ANN (ANN1, ANN2, ANN4 & ANN5) models, and empirical equations with NSE values between 0.76 and 0.983. The study found pier dimensions to be the most influential parameter for pier scour.

ย This is a preview of subscription content,ย log in via an institutionย ย to check access.

Abdul Razzaq Ghumman,ย Husnain Haider,ย Ibrahim Saleh Al Salamah,ย Md. Shafiquzzaman,ย Abdullah Alodah,ย Mohammad Alresheedi,ย Rashid Farooq,ย Afzal Ahmedย &ย Ghufran Ahmed Pasha

Similar content being viewed by others

Prediction of local scour around bridge piers using the ANFIS method

Article 18 September 2015

Live-Bed Scour Depth Modelling Around the Bridge Pier Using ANN-PSO, ANFIS, MARS, and M5Tree

Article 22 May 2024

Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Scour Depth Prediction Upstream of Bridge Piers

Article 08 November 2023

References

  • Abadie J (1969) Generalization of the Wolfe reduced gradient method to the case of non-linear constraints.ย Optimization, 37โ€“47
  • Abd El-Hady Rady R (2020) Prediction of local scour around bridge piers: Artificial-intelligence-based modeling versus conventional regression methods.ย Applied Water Scienceย 10(2):57, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1140-4Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Afzali SH (2016) New model for determining local scour depth around piers.ย Arababian Journal of Science and Engineeringย 41(10):3807โ€“3815, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1983-4Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Akhlaghi E, Babarsad MS, Derikvand EM, Abedini M (2020) Assessment the effects of different parameters to rate scour around single piers and pile groups: A review.ย Archives of Computational Methods in Engineeringย 27(1):183โ€“197, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-09304-wArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Alharbi S, Mills G (2022) Assessment of exposure to flash flooding in an arid environment: A case study of the jeddah city neighborhood abruq ar rughamah, saudi arabia. In: Wadi Flash Floods: Challenges and Advanced Approaches for Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer Nature Singapore, 383โ€“397Chapterย Google Scholarย 
  • Annad M, Lefkir A (2022) Analytic network process for local scour formula ranking with parametric sensitivity analysis and soil class clustering.ย Water Supplyย 22(11):8287โ€“8304, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.357Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Annad M, Lefkir A, Mammar-kouadri M, Bettahar I (2021) Development of a local scour prediction model clustered by soil class.ย Water Practice & Technologyย 16(4):1159โ€“1172, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.065Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Arifin F, Robbani H, Annisa T, Maโ€™Arof N (2019) Variations in the number of layers and the number of neurons in artificial neural networks: Case study of pattern recognition.ย Journal of Physics: Conference Seriesย 1413(1):12016, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1413/1/012016Google Scholarย 
  • Arneson LA, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF, Clopper PE (2012) Evaluating scour at bridges. Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-003 HEC-18, National Highway Institute, Arlington, VA, USAGoogle Scholarย 
  • Azamathulla HM, Ghani AA, Zakaria NA, Guven A (2010) Genetic programming to predict bridge pier scour.ย Journal of Hydraulic Engineeringย 136(3):165, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY1943-7900.0000133Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Benedict ST, Caldwell AW (2014) A pier-scour database: 2427 Field and Laboratory Measurements of Pier Scour, Data Series No. 845, US Department of the Interior, US Geol. Surv. Reston, VA, USAGoogle Scholarย 
  • Briaud JL, Ting FCK, Chen HC, Gudavalli R, Perugu S, Wei G (1999) SRICOS: Prediction of scour rate in cohesive soils at bridge piers.ย Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineeringย 125(4): 237โ€“246, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:4(237)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Cao J, Chen J, Zhu D, Wei S (2021) Evaluation of local scour calculation equations for bridge piers in sandy riverbed.ย IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Scienceย 692(4):042022, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/692/4/042022Google Scholarย 
  • Chabert J (1956) Etude des affouillements autour des piles de ponts. Laboratoire National dโ€™Hydraulique, ChatouGoogle Scholarย 
  • Chavan R, Gualtieri P, Kumar B (2019) Turbulent flow structures and scour hole characteristics around circular bridge piers over nonuniform sand bed channels with downward seepage.ย Waterย 11(8):1580, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081580Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Chavan R, Kumar B (2020) Downward seepage effects on dynamics of scour depth and migrating dune-like bedforms at tandem piers.ย Canadian Journal of Civil Engineeringย 47(1):13โ€“24, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0640Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Choi SU, Choi S (2022) Prediction of local scour around bridge piers in the cohesive bed using support vector machines.ย KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringย 26(5):2174โ€“2182, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-1803-9Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Ciancimino A, Anastasopoulos I, Foti S, Gajo A (2022) Numerical modelling of the effects of foundation scour on the response of a bridge pier.ย Acta Geotechย 17(9):3697โ€“3717, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01591-9Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Cikojeviฤ‡ A, Gilja G, Kuspiliฤ‡ N (2019) Sensitivity analysis of empirical equations applicable on bridge piers in sand-bed rivers, Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering, September 5โ€“7, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
  • Dang NM, Tran Anh D, Dang TD (2021) ANN optimized by PSO and Firefly algorithms for predicting scour depths around bridge piers,ย Engineering with Computersย 37(1):293โ€“303, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00824-yArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, Papanicolaou P (2021) A global-scale investigation of stochastic similarities in marginal distribution and dependence structure of key hydrological-cycle processes.ย Hydrologyย 8(2):59, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020059Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Ettema R (1980) Scour at bridge piers: A report submitted to the National Roads Board. PhD Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholarย 
  • Farooq R, Ghumman AR, Ahmed A, Latif A, Masood A (2021) Performance evaluation of scour protection around a bridge pier through experimental approach.ย Tehniฤki Vjesnikย 28(6):1975โ€“1982, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20200213211932Google Scholarย 
  • Fattah MY, Hassan WH, Rasheed SE (2018) Behavior of flexible buried pipes under geocell reinforced subbase subjected to repeated loading.ย International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineeringย 9(1):22โ€“41, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGEE.2018010102Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • FHWA (1998) Recording and coding guide for the structural inventory and appraisal of the nationsโ€™ bridges. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-001, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Office of Engineering, Washigton DC, USAGoogle Scholarย 
  • Fouli H, Elsebaie IH (2016) Reducing local scour at bridge piers using an upstream subsidiary triangular pillar.ย Arabian Journal of Geosciencesย 9(12):598, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2615-3Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Hafez YI (2016) Mathematical modeling of local scour at slender and wide bridge piers.ย Journal of Fluidsย 2016:1โ€“19, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4835253Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Hamidifar H, Zanganeh-Inaloo F, Carnacina I (2021) Hybrid scour depth prediction equations for reliable design of bridge piers.ย Waterย 13(15):2019, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152019Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Hassan WH, Hussein HH, Alshammari MH, Jalal HK, Rasheed SE (2022) Evaluation of gene expression programming and artificial neural networks in PyTorch for the prediction of local scour depth around a bridge pier.ย Results in Engineeringย 13:100353, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100353Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Hassan WH, Jalal HK (2021) Prediction of the depth of local scouring at a bridge pier using a gene expression programming method.ย SN Applied Sciencesย 3(2):159, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04124-9Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Huang J, Yu H, Guan X, Wang G, Guo R (2016) Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change.ย Nature Climate Changeย 6(2):166โ€“171, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2837Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Imhof D (2004) Risk assessment of existing bridge structures. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholarย 
  • Jalal HK, Hassan WH (2020) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of local scour around circular bridge pier using Flow-3D software.ย IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineeringย 745(1): 12150, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012150Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Khassaf SI, Ahmed SI (2021) Development an empirical formula to calculate the scour depth at different shapes of non-uniform piers.ย Journal of Physics: Conference Seriesย 1973(1):012179, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1973/1/012179Google Scholarย 
  • Lasdon LS, Waren AD, Jain A, Ratner M (1978) Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for non-linear programming.ย ACM Transactions on Mathematical Softwareย 4(1):34โ€“50, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1145/355769.355773Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Liang F, Wang C, Yu X (2019) Performance of existing methods for estimation and mitigation of local scour around bridges: Case studies.ย Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilitiesย 33(6):4019060, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001329Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Lin C, Han J, Bennett C, Parsons RL (2014) Case history analysis of bridge failures due to scour.ย Climatic Effects on Pavement and Geotechnical Infrastructureย 2014:204โ€“216, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413326.021Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Maddison B (2012) Scour failure of bridges.ย Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-forensic Engineeringย 165(1):39โ€“52, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1680/feng.2012.165.1.39Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Melville BW (1984) Live-bed scour at bridge piers.ย Journal of Hydraulic Engineeringย 110(9):1234โ€“1247, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:9(1234)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Mohammadpour R (2017) Prediction of local scour around complex piers using GEP and M5-Tree.ย Arabian Journal of Geosciencesย 10(18):416, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3203-xArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Mohammadpour R, Ghani AA, Sabzevari T, Fared Murshed M (2021) Local scour around complex abutments.ย ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineeringย 27(1):165โ€“173, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2019.1607783Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.ย Transactions of ASABEย 50(3): 885โ€“900, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Moussa YAM (2013) Modeling of local scour depth downstream hydraulic structures in trapezoidal channel using GEP and ANNs.ย Ain Shams Engineering Journalย 4(4):717โ€“722, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.04.005Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Muzzammil M, Alama J, Danish M (2015) Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression programming.ย Aquatic Procediaย 4:789โ€“796, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.098Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Namaee MR, Li Y, Sui J, Whitcombe T (2018) Comparison of three commonly used equations for calculating local scour depth around bridge pier under ice covered flow condition.ย World Journal of Engineering and Technologyย 6(2):50โ€“62Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Ogunbo JN, Alagbe OA, Oladapo MI, Shin C (2020) N-hidden layer artificial neural network architecture computer code: Geophysical application example.ย Heliyonย 6(6):e04108, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04108Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • OฤŸuz K, Bor A (2022) Prediction of local scour around bridge piers using hierarchical clustering and adaptive genetic programming.ย Applied Artificial Intelligenceย 36(1), DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2001734
  • Omara H, Abdeelaal GM, Nadaoka K, Tawfik A (2020) Developing empirical formulas for assessing the scour of vertical and inclined piers.ย Marine Georesources and Geotechnologyย 38(2):133โ€“143, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2018.1559901Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Onen F (2014) Prediction of Scour at a Side-Weir with GEP, ANN and Regression Models.ย Arabian Journal of Science and Engineeringย 39(8):6031โ€“6041, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1244-yArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Pal M, Singh NK, Tiwari NK (2011) Support vector regression based modeling of pier scour using field data.ย Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligenceย 24(5):911โ€“916, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2010.11.002Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Pandey M, Zakwan M, Khan MA, Bhave S (2020) Development of scour around a circular pier and its modelling using genetic algorithm.ย Water Supplyย 20(8):3358โ€“3367, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.244Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Park CW, Park HI, Cho YK (2017) Evaluation of the applicability of pier local scour formulae using laboratory and field data.ย Marine Georesources Geotechnologyย 35(1):1โ€“7, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2014.954658Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Parola AC, Hagerty DJ, Mueller DS, Melville BW, Parker G, Usher JS (1997) The need for research on scour at bridge crossings, 1997. Proceedings of the 27th IAHR World Congress. San Fransisco, CA, USA
  • Pizarro A, Manfreda S, Tubaldi E (2020) The science behind scour at bridge foundations: A review.ย Waterย 12(2):374, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020374Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Pizarro A, Samela C, Fiorentino M, Link O, Manfreda S (2017) BRISENT: An entropy-based model for bridge-pier scour estimation under complex hydraulic scenarios.ย Waterย 9(11):889, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110889Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Pregnolato M, Winter AO, Mascarenas D, Sen AD, Bates P, Motley MR (2022) Assessing flooding impact to riverine bridges: An integrated analysis.ย Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciencesย 22(5):1559โ€“1576, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1559-2022Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Saad NY, Fattouh EM, Mokhtar M (2021) Effect of L-shaped slots on scour around a bridge abutment.ย Water Practice and Technologyย 16(3):935โ€“945, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.037Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sarshari E, Mullhaupt P (2015) Application of artificial neural networks in assessing the equilibrium depth of local scour around bridge piers. ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, May 31โ€“June 5, St. Johnโ€™s, NL, Canada
  • Sharafati A, Tafarojnoruz A, Yaseen ZM (2020) New stochastic modeling strategy on the prediction enhancement of pier scour depth in cohesive bed materials.ย Journal of Hydroinformaticsย 22(3):457โ€“472, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.047Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sheela KG, Deepa SN (2013) Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks.ย Mathematical Problems in Engineeringย 2013:425740, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sreedhara BM, Patil AP, Pushparaj J, Kuntoji G, Naganna SR (2021) Application of gradient tree boosting regressor for the prediction of scour depth around bridge piers.ย Journal of Hydroinformaticsย 23(4): 849โ€“863, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2021.011Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Wang C, Yu X, Liang F (2017) Comparison and estimation of the local scour depth around pile groups and wide piers. In Geotechnical Frontiers, American Scciety of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, 11โ€“19Google Scholarย 
  • Wardhana K, Hadipriono FC (2003) Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.ย Journal of Performance of Constricted Facilitiesย 17(3):144โ€“150, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Youssef AM, Abu-Abdullah MM, AlFadail EA, Skilodimou HD, Bathrellos GD (2018) The devastating flood in the arid region a consequence of rainfall and dam failure: Case study.ย Al-Lith flood on 23th November 2018, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Zeitschrift fรผr Geomorpholย 63(1):115โ€“136, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.1127/zfg/2021/0672Google Scholarย 
  • Zhang B, Zhao H, Tan C, OBrien EJ, Fitzgerald PC, Kim CW (2022) Laboratory investigation on detecting bridge scour using the indirect measurement from a passing vehicle.ย Remote Sensingย 14(13):3106, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133106Articleย Google Scholarย 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors also thank โ€œThe US Department of the Interior,โ€ US Geol. Surv. Reston, VA, USAโ€ for providing access to scour data. The Researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2024-9/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi ArabiaAbdul Razzaq Ghumman,ย Husnain Haider,ย Ibrahim Saleh Al Salamah,ย Md. Shafiquzzaman,ย Abdullah Alodahย &ย Mohammad Alresheedi
  2. Dept. of Civil Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad, 44000, PakistanRashid Farooq
  3. Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47050, PakistanAfzal Ahmedย &ย Ghufran Ahmed Pasha

  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1161-x


Keywords

An investigation of the effect of the pulse width and amplitude on sand bed scouring by a vertical submerged pulsed jet

An investigation of the effect of the pulse width and amplitude on sand bed scouring by a vertical submerged pulsed jet

์ˆ˜์ง ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํŽ„์Šค ์ œํŠธ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์ธต ์ •๋ จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŽ„์Šค ํญ๊ณผ ์ง„ํญ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

Chuanย Wangย abc,ย Haoย Yuย b,ย Yangย Yangย b,ย Zhenjunย Gaoย c,ย Binย Xiย b,ย Huiย Wangย b,ย Yulongย Yaoย b

aInternational Shipping Research Institute, GongQing Institute of Science and Technology, Jiujiang, 332020, ChinabCollege of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, ChinacCollege of Mechanical and Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117324

Highlights

  • Numerical simulations and experiments were combined to investigate pulsed jet scour.
  • The effect mechanism of pulse amplitude on the variation of scour hole depth was analyzed.
  • Models for the prediction of relative low pulse width with the inlet pulse amplitude have been developed.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of the pulse width and amplitude on the scouring of sand beds by vertical submerged pulsed jets using a combination of experimental and numerical calculations. The reliability of the numerical calculations is verified through a comparison between the numerical simulations with the sedimentation scour model and the experimental data at a low pulse width T2 of 0, with the result that the various errors are within 5%. The results show that the scour hole depth |hmin| grows with the relative low pulse width T3 throughout three intervals: a slowly increasing zone I, a rapidly increasing zone II, and a decreasing zone III, producing a unique extreme value of |hmin|. The optimal scouring effect equation was obtained by analytically fitting the relationship curve between the pulse amplitude V and the relatively low pulse width T3. Including the optimal T3 and optimal duty cycle ฦž. The difference in the scour hole depth |hmin| under different pulse amplitudes is reflected in the initial period F of the jet. With an increasing pulse amplitude, |hmin| goes through three intervals: an increasing zone M, decreasing zone N, and rebound zone R. It is found that the scouring effect in the pulse jet is not necessarily always stronger with a larger amplitude. The results of the research in this paper can provide guidance for optimizing low-frequency pulsed jets for related engineering practices, such as dredging and rock-breaking projects.

Introduction

Submerged jet scouring technology is widely used in marine engineering and dredging projects due to its high efficiency and low cost, and a wide range of research exists on the topic (Zhang et al., 2017; Thaha et al., 2018; Lourenรงo et al., 2020). Numerous scholars studied the scouring caused by different forms of jets, such as propeller jets (Curulli et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2020), plane jets (Sharafati et al., 2020; Mostaani and Azimi, 2022), free-fall jets (Salmasi and Abraham, 2022; Salmasi et al., 2023), and moving jets (Wang et al., 2021). Among them, vertical jets were more popular than inclined jets due to theirs simple equipment and good silt-scouring performance (Chen et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2017). So, a large number of scholars have proposed relevant static and dynamic empirical equations for the scour depth of submerged jets. Among them, Chen et al. (2022) and Mao et al. (2023) investigated the influence of jet diameters, jet angles, exit velocities, and impinging distances on scouring effects. Finally, based on a large amount of experimental data and theoretical analysis, a semi-empirical equation for the dynamic scour depth in equilibrium was established. Amin et al. (2021) developed semi-empirical prediction equations for asymptotic lengths and empirical equations for the temporal development of lengths. Shakya et al. (2021, 2022) found that the ANN model in dimensionless form performs better than the ANN model in dimensioned form and proposed an equation for predicting the depth of static scour under submerged vertical jets using MNLR. Kartal and Emiroglu (2021) proposed an empirical equation for predicting the maximum dynamic scour depth for a submerged vertical jet with a plate at the nozzle. The effect of soil properties on jet scour has also been studied by numerous scholars. Among them, Nguyen et al. (2017) investigated the effects of compaction dry density and water content on the scour volume, critical shear stress, linear scour coefficient, and volumetric scour coefficient using a new jet-scour test device. Dong et al. (2020) investigated the effect of water content on scour hole size through experiments with a vertical submerged jet scouring a cohesive sediment bed. It was found that the depth and width of the scour holes increased with the increasing water content of the cohesive sediments, and equations for the scour depth and width in the initial stage of scouring and the calculation of the scouring rate were proposed. Kartal and Emiroglu (2023) studied the scouring characteristics of different nozzle types produced in non-cohesive sands. The results of the study found that the air entrainment rate of venturi nozzles was 2โ€“6.5 times higher than that of circular nozzles. Cihan et al. (2022) investigated the effect of different proportions of clay and sand on propeller water jet scouring. And finally, he proposed an estimation equation for the maximum depth and length of the scour hole under equilibrium conditions. From the above summary, it is clear that a great deal of research has been carried out on submerged jet scouring under continuous jet flows.

Pulsed jets have advantages such as higher erosion rates and entrainment rates compared to continuous jets and have therefore received more attention in the development of engineering fields such as cleaning and rock breaking (Raj et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Kang et al., 2022; Y. Zhang et al., 2023). In the study of jet structure, Li et al. (2018, 2019a, 2019b, 2023) investigated the effects of the jet hole diameter, the number of jet holes, the jet distance, and the tank pressure on pulse jet cleaning. It was found that the transient pressure below the injection hole gradually increased along the airflow direction of the injection pipe, and the peak positive pressure at the inner surface of the injection pipe also increased. Liu and Shen (2019) investigated the effect of a new venturi structure on the performance of pulse jet dust removal. It was found that the longer the length of the venturi or the shorter the throat diameter of the venturi, the greater the energy loss. Zhang et al. (2023b) studied jet scouring at different angles based on FLOW-3D. It was found that counter flow scouring is better than down flow scouring. In the study of pulsed structure, Li et al. (2020) investigated the effects of different pulse amplitudes, pulse frequencies, and circumferential pressures on the rock-breaking performance. It was found that the rock-breaking performance of the jet increased with increasing pulse amplitude. However, due to the variation in pulse frequency, the rock-breaking performance does not show a clear pattern. The effect of Reynolds number on pulsating jets impinging on a plane was systematically investigated by H. H Medina et al. (2013) It was found that pulsation leads to a shorter core region of the jet, a faster decrease in the centerline axial velocity component, and a wider axial velocity distribution. Bi and Zhu (2021) investigated the effect of nozzle geometry on jet performance at low Reynolds numbers, while Luo et al. (2020) studied pulse jet propulsion at high Reynolds numbers and finally found that higher Reynolds numbers accelerate the formation of irregular vortices and symmetry-breaking instabilities. Cao et al. (2019) investigated the effect of four different pulse flushing methods on diamond core drilling efficiency. It was found that the use of intermittent rinsing methods not only increases penetration rates but also reduces rinse fluid flow and saves power.

Previous research on vertical submerged jet scouring has primarily focused on the effect of jet structure on scouring under continuous jet conditions. However, there have been fewer studies conducted on scouring under pulsed jet conditions. We found that the pulsed jet has a high erosion rate and entrainment rate, which can significantly enhance the scouring effect of the jet. Therefore, to address the research gap, this paper utilizes a combination of numerical calculations and experiments to investigate the effects of high pulse width, low pulse width, and amplitude on the scouring of vertically submerged jets. The study includes analyzing the structure of the pulsed jet flow field, studying the evolution of the scouring effect over time, and examining the relationship between the optimal pulse width, duty cycle, and amplitude. The study’s conclusions of the study can provide a reference for optimizing the performance of pulse jets in the fields of jet scouring applications, such as dredger dredging and pulse rock breaking, as well as a theoretical basis for the development of submerged pulse jets.

Section snippets

Model and calculation settings

Fig. 1 shows the geometric model of the submerged vertical jet impinging on the sand bed, which was built in Flow-3D on a 1:1 dimensional scale corresponding to the experiment. The jet scour simulation was set up between four baffles, where the top baffle was used to ensure that the jet entered only from the brass tube, and the remaining three tank baffles were used to fix the sediment and water body. The computational domain consisted of only solid and liquid components, with the specific

The effects of the pulse width on submerged jet scouring

The blocking pulsed jet, indicated as A and C in Fig. 8(a)โ€“is discontinuous and divided into a water section and a pulse interval section. The water section in region A is not a regular shape, due to part of the water section near the side wall being affected by the wall friction and the falling speed being lower, but this also shows that the wall plays a certain buffer role. Region B of Fig. 8(a) shows the symmetrical vortex generation that occurs below the nozzle as the water section is

conclusions

In this paper, the effects of the pulse width and pulse amplitude on jet scour under submerged low-frequency pulse conditions are discussed and investigated, and the following conclusions have been reached.

  • (1)The errors of between the Flow-3D simulation and the experimental measurements were within 5%, which proves that the sedimentation scouring model of Flow-3D can reliably perform numerical calculation of the type considered in this paper.
  • (2)The change in the high pulse width T1 in the pulse cycle 

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chuan Wang: Data curation, Conceptualization. Hao Yu: Writing โ€“ original draft. Yang Yang: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Supervision. Zhenjun Gao: Supervision, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Bin Xi: Resources, Project administration. Hui Wang: Software, Data curation. Yulong Yao: Validation, Software.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (44)

Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

ํ•ด์ € ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ์“ฐ๋‚˜๋ฏธ์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ง„ํญ ์ถ”์ •: 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•

Ramtin Sabeti a, Mohammad Heidarzadeh ab

aDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA27AY, UK
bHydroCoast Consulting Engineers Ltd, Bath, UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102360

Highlights

  • โ€ขLandslide travel distance is considered for the first time in a predictive equation.
  • โ€ขPredictive equation derived from databases using 3D physical and numerical modeling.
  • โ€ขThe equation was successfully tested on the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami event.
  • โ€ขThe developed equation using three-dimensional data exhibits a 91โ€ฏ% fitting quality.

Abstract

Landslide tsunamis, responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage in recent years, necessitate the allocation of sufficient time and resources for studying these extreme natural hazards. This study offers a step change in the field by conducting a large number of three-dimensional numerical experiments, validated by physical tests, to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides. We first conducted a few 3D physical experiments in a wave basin which were then applied for the validation of a 3D numerical model based on the Flow3D-HYDRO package. Consequently, we delivered 100 simulations using the validated model by varying parameters such as landslide volume, water depth, slope angle and travel distance. This large database was subsequently employed to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial tsunami amplitude. For the first time, we considered travel distance as an independent parameter for developing the predictive equation, which can significantly improve the predication accuracy. The predictive equation was tested for the case of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami and produced satisfactory results.

Keywords

Tsunami, Subaerial landslide, Physical modelling, Numerical simulation, FLOW-3D HYDRO

1. Introduction and literature review

The Anak Krakatau landslide tsunami on 22nd December 2018 was a stark reminder of the dangers posed by subaerial landslide tsunamis (Ren et al., 2020Mulia et al. 2020a; Borrero et al., 2020Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 2021). The collapse of the volcano’s southwest side into the ocean triggered a tsunami that struck the Sunda Strait, leading to approximately 450 fatalities (Syamsidik et al., 2020Mulia et al., 2020b) (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1, landslide tsunamis (both submarine and subaerial) have been responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage to coastal communities worldwide. These incidents underscored the critical need for advanced research into landslide-generated waves to aid in hazard prediction and mitigation. This is further emphasized by recent events such as the 28th of November 2020 landslide tsunami in the southern coast mountains of British Columbia (Canada), where an 18 million m3 rockslide generated a massive tsunami, with over 100โ€ฏm wave run-up, causing significant environmental and infrastructural damage (Geertsema et al., 2022).

Fig 1

Physical modelling and numerical simulation are crucial tools in the study of landslide-induced waves due to their ability to replicate and analyse the complex dynamics of landslide events (Kim et al., 2020). In two-dimensional (2D) modelling, the discrepancy between dimensions can lead to an artificial overestimation of wave amplification (e.g., Heller and Spinneken, 2015). This limitation is overcome with 3D modelling, which enables the scaled-down representation of landslide-generated waves while avoiding the simplifications inherent in 2D approaches (Erosi et al., 2019). Another advantage of 3D modelling in studying landslide-generated waves is its ability to accurately depict the complex dynamics of wave propagation, including lateral and radial spreading from the slide impact zone, a feature unattainable with 2D models (Heller and Spinneken, 2015).

Physical experiments in tsunami research, as presented by authors such as Romano et al. (2020), McFall and Fritz (2016), and Heller and Spinneken (2015), have supported 3D modelling works through validation and calibration of the numerical models to capture the complexities of wave generation and propagation. Numerical modelling has increasingly complemented experimental approach in tsunami research due to the latter’s time and resource-intensive nature, particularly for 3D models (Li et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021). Various numerical approaches have been employed, from Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks to depth-averaged and Navierโ€“Stokes models, enhancing our understanding of tsunami dynamics (Si et al., 2018Grilli et al., 2019Heidarzadeh et al., 20172020Iorio et al., 2021Zhang et al., 2021Kirby et al., 2022Wang et al., 20212022Hu et al., 2022). The sophisticated numerical techniques, including the Particle Finite Element Method and the Immersed Boundary Method, have also shown promising results in modelling highly dynamic landslide scenarios (Mulligan et al., 2020Chen et al., 2020). Among these methods and techniques, FLOW-3D HYDRO stands out in simulating landslide-generated tsunami waves due to its sophisticated technical features such as offering Tru Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for precise free surface tracking (e.g., Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). TruVOF distinguishes itself through a split Lagrangian approach, adeptly reducing cumulative volume errors in wave simulations by dynamically updating cell volume fractions and areas with each time step. Its intelligent adaptation of time step size ensures precise capture of evolving free surfaces, offering unparalleled accuracy in modelling complex fluid interfaces and behaviour (Flow Science, 2023).

Predictive equations play a crucial role in assessing the potential hazards associated with landslide-generated tsunami waves due to their ability to provide risk assessment and warnings. These equations can offer swift and reasonable evaluations of potential tsunami impacts in the absence of detailed numerical simulations, which can be time-consuming and expensive to produce. Among multiple factors and parameters within a landslide tsunami generation, the initial maximum wave amplitude (Fig. 1) stands out due to its critical role. While it is most likely that the initial wave generated by a landslide will have the highest amplitude, it is crucial to clarify that the term “initial maximum wave amplitude” refers to the highest amplitude within the first set of impulse waves. This parameter is essential in determining the tsunami’s impact severity, with higher amplitudes signalling a greater destructive potential (Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). Additionally, it plays a significant role in tsunami modelling, aiding in the prediction of wave propagation and the assessment of potential impacts.

In this study, we initially validate the FLOW-3D HYDRO model through a series of physical experiments conducted in a 3D wave tank at University of Bath (UK). Upon confirmation of the model’s accuracy, we use it to systematically vary parameters namely landslide volume, water depth, slope angle, and travel distance, creating an extensive database. Alongside this, we perform a sensitivity analysis on these variables to discern their impacts on the initial maximum wave amplitude. The generated database was consequently applied to derive a non-dimensional predictive equation aimed at estimating the initial maximum wave amplitude in real-world landslide tsunami events.

Two innovations of this study are: (i) The predictive equation of this study is based on a large number of 3D experiments whereas most of the previous equations were based on 2D results, and (ii) For the first time, the travel distance is included in the predictive equation as an independent parameter. To evaluate the performance of our predictive equation, we applied it to a previous real-world subaerial landslide tsunami, i.e., the Anak Krakatau 2018 event. Furthermore, we compare the performance of our predictive equation with other existing equations.

2. Data and methods

The methodology applied in this research is a combination of physical and numerical modelling. Limited physical modelling was performed in a 3D wave basin at the University of Bath (UK) to provide data for calibration and validation of the numerical model. After calibration and validation, the numerical model was employed to model a large number of landslide tsunami scenarios which allowed us to develop a database for deriving a predictive equation.

2.1. Physical experiments

To validate our numerical model, we conducted a series of physical experiments including two sets in a 3D wave basin at University of Bath, measuring 2.50โ€ฏm in length (WL), 2.60โ€ฏm in width (WW), and 0.60โ€ฏm in height (WH) (Fig. 2a). Conducting two distinct sets of experiments (Table 1), each with different setups (travel distance, location, and water depth), provided a robust framework for validation of the numerical model. For wave measurement, we employed a twin wire wave gauge from HR Wallingford (https://equipit.hrwallingford.com). In these experiments, we used a concrete prism solid block, the dimensions of which are outlined in Table 2. In our experiments, we employed a concrete prism solid block with a density of 2600โ€ฏkg/m3, chosen for its similarity to the natural density of landslides, akin to those observed with the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami, where the landslide composition is predominantly solid rather than granular. The block’s form has also been endorsed in prior studies (Watts, 1998Najafi-Jilani and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2008) as a suitable surrogate for modelling landslide-induced waves. A key aspect of our methodology was addressing scale effects, following the guidelines proposed by Heller et al. (2008) as it is described in Table 1. To enhance the reliability and accuracy of our experimental data, we conducted each physical experiment three times which revealed all three experimental waveforms were identical. This repetition was aimed at minimizing potential errors and inconsistencies in laboratory measurements.

Fig 2

Table 1. The locations and other information of the laboratory setups for making landslide-generated waves in the physical wave basin. This table details the specific parameters for each setup, including slope range (ฮฑ), slide volume (V), kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ), water depth (h), travel distance (D), surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ), Reynolds number (R), Weber number (W), and the precise coordinates of the wave gauges (WG).

Labฮฑ(ยฐ)V (mยณ)h (m)D (m)WG’s Location(ฮฝ) (mยฒ/s)(ฯƒ) (N/m)Acceptable range for avoiding scale effects*Observed values of W and R โŽโŽ
Lab 1452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2470.070X1=1.090 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R > 3.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105R1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.80โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y1=1.210 m
W1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.19โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z1=0.050mW >5.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ103
Lab 2452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2460.045X2=1.030 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.78โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y2=1.210โ€ฏmW2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.13โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z2=0.050 m

โŽ

The acceptable ranges for avoiding scale effects are based on the study by Heller et al. (2008).โŽโŽ

The Reynolds number (R) is given by g0.5h1.5/ฮฝ, with ฮฝ denoting the kinematic viscosity. The Weber number (W) is Wโ€ฏ=โ€ฏฯgh2/ฯƒ, where ฯƒ represents surface tension coefficient and ฯโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ1000kg/m3โ€…is the density of water. In our experiments, conducted at a water temperature of approximately 20โ€ฏยฐC, the kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ) and the surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ) are 1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’6 mยฒ/s and 0.073โ€ฏN/m, respectively (Kestin et al., 1978).

Table 2. Specifications of the solid block used in physical experiments for generating subaerial landslides in the laboratory.

Solid-block attributesProperty metricsGeometric shape
Slide width (bs)0.26 mImage, table 2
Slide length (ls)0.20 m
Slide thickness (s)0.10 m
Slide volume (V)2.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3
Specific gravity, (ฮณs)2.60
Slide weight (ms)6.86 kg

2.2. Numerical simulations applying FLOW-3D hydro

The detailed theoretical framework encompassing the governing equations, the computational methodologies employed, and the specific techniques used for tracking the water surface in these simulations are thoroughly detailed in the study by Sabeti et al. (2024). Here, we briefly explain some of the numerical details. We defined a uniform mesh for our flow domain, carefully crafted with a fine spatial resolution of 0.005โ€ฏm (i.e., grid size). The dimensions of the numerical model directly matched those of our wave basin used in the physical experiment, being 2.60โ€ฏm wide, 0.60โ€ฏm deep, and 2.50โ€ฏm long (Fig. 2). This design ensures comprehensive coverage of the study area. The output intervals of the numerical model are set at 0.02โ€ฏs. This timing is consistent with the sampling rates of wave gauges used in laboratory settings. The friction coefficient in the FLOW-3D HYDRO is designated as 0.45. This value corresponds to the Coulombic friction measurements obtained in the laboratory, ensuring that the simulation accurately reflects real-world physical interactions.

In order to simulate the landslide motion, we applied coupled motion objects in FLOW-3D-HYDRO where the dynamics are predominantly driven by gravity and surface friction. This methodology stands in contrast to other models that necessitate explicit inputs of force and torque. This approach ensures that the simulation more accurately reflects the natural movement of landslides, which is heavily reliant on gravitational force and the interaction between sliding surfaces. The stability of the numerical simulations is governed by the Courant Number criterion (Courant et al., 1928), which dictates the maximum time step (ฮ”t) for a given mesh size (ฮ”x) and flow speed (U). According to Courant et al. (1928), this number is required to stay below one to ensure stability of numerical simulations. In our simulations, the Courant number is always maintained below one.

In alignment with the parameters of physical experiments, we set the fluid within the mesh to water, characterized by a density of 1000โ€ฏkg/mยณ at a temperature of 20 ยฐC. Furthermore, we defined the top, front, and back surfaces of the mesh as symmetry planes. The remaining surfaces are designated as wall types, incorporating no-slip conditions to accurately simulate the interaction between the fluid and the boundaries. In terms of selection of an appropriate turbulence model, we selected the kโ€“ฯ‰ model that showed a better performance than other turbulence methods (e.g., Renormalization-Group) in a previous study (Sabeti et al., 2024). The simulations are conducted using a PC Intelยฎ Coreโ„ข i7-10510U CPU with a frequency of 1.80โ€ฏGHz, and a 16 GB RAM. On this PC, completion of a 3-s simulation required approximately 12.5โ€ฏh.

2.3. Validation

The FLOW-3D HYDRO numerical model was validated using the two physical experiments (Fig. 3) outlined in Table 1. The level of agreement between observations (Oi) and simulations (Si) is examined using the following equation:(1)๏ฟฝ=|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ|ร—100where ฮต represents the mismatch error, Oi denotes the observed laboratory values, and Si represents the simulated values from the FLOW-3D HYDRO model. The results of this validation process revealed that our model could replicate the waves generated in the physical experiments with a reasonable degree of mismatch (ฮต): 14โ€ฏ% for Lab 1 and 8โ€ฏ% for Lab 2 experiments, respectively (Fig. 3). These values indicate that while the model is not perfect, it provides a sufficiently close approximation of the real-world phenomena.

Fig 3

In terms of mesh efficiency, we varied the mesh size to study sensitivity of the numerical results to mesh size. First, by halving the mesh size and then by doubling it, we repeated the modelling by keeping other parameters unchanged. This analysis guided that a mesh size of โˆ†xโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ0.005โ€ฏm is the most effective for the setup of this study. The total number of computational cells applying mesh size of 0.005โ€ฏm is 9.269โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ106.

2.4. The dataset

The validated numerical model was employed to conduct 100 simulations, incorporating variations in four key landslide parameters namely water depth, slope angle, slide volume, and travel distance. This methodical approach was essential for a thorough sensitivity analysis of these variables, and for the creation of a detailed database to develop a predictive equation for maximum initial tsunami amplitude. Within the model, 15 distinct slide volumes were established, ranging from 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 to 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 (Table 3). The slope angle varied between 35ยฐ and 55ยฐ, and water depth ranged from 0.24โ€ฏm to 0.27โ€ฏm. The travel distance of the landslides was varied, spanning from 0.04โ€ฏm to 0.07โ€ฏm. Detailed configurations of each simulation, along with the maximum initial wave amplitudes and dominant wave periods are provided in Table 4.

Table 3. Geometrical information of the 15 solid blocks used in numerical modelling for generating landslide tsunamis. Parameters are: ls, slide length; bs, slide width; s, slide thickness; ฮณs, specific gravity; and V, slide volume.

Solid blockls (m)bsโ€…(m)sโ€…(m)V (m3)ฮณs
Block-10.3100.2600.1556.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-20.3000.2600.1505.85โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-30.2800.2600.1405.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-40.2600.2600.1304.39โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-50.2400.2600.1203.74โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-60.2200.2600.1103.15โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-70.2000.2600.1002.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-80.1800.2600.0902.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-90.1600.2600.0801.66โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-100.1400.2600.0701.27โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-110.1200.2600.0600.93โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-120.1000.2600.0500.65โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-130.0800.2600.0400.41โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-140.0600.2600.0300.23โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-150.0400.2600.0200.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60

Table 4. The numerical simulation for the 100 tests performed in this study for subaerial solid-block landslide-generated waves. Parameters are aM, maximum wave amplitude; ฮฑ, slope angle; h, water depth; D, travel distance; and T, dominant wave period. The location of the wave gauge is X=1.030โ€ฏm, Y=1.210โ€ฏm, and Z=0.050โ€ฏm. The properties of various solid blocks are presented in Table 3.

Test-Block Noฮฑ (ยฐ)h (m)D (m)T(s)aM (m)
1Block-7450.2460.0290.5100.0153
2Block-7450.2460.0300.5050.0154
3Block-7450.2460.0310.5050.0156
4Block-7450.2460.0320.5050.0158
5Block-7450.2460.0330.5050.0159
6Block-7450.2460.0340.5050.0160
7Block-7450.2460.0350.5050.0162
8Block-7450.2460.0360.5050.0166
9Block-7450.2460.0370.5050.0167
10Block-7450.2460.0380.5050.0172
11Block-7450.2460.0390.5050.0178
12Block-7450.2460.0400.5050.0179
13Block-7450.2460.0410.5050.0181
14Block-7450.2460.0420.5050.0183
15Block-7450.2460.0430.5050.0190
16Block-7450.2460.0440.5050.0197
17Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0199
18Block-7450.2460.0460.5050.0201
19Block-7450.2460.0470.5050.0191
20Block-7450.2460.0480.5050.0217
21Block-7450.2460.0490.5050.0220
22Block-7450.2460.0500.5050.0226
23Block-7450.2460.0510.5050.0236
24Block-7450.2460.0520.5050.0239
25Block-7450.2460.0530.5100.0240
26Block-7450.2460.0540.5050.0241
27Block-7450.2460.0550.5050.0246
28Block-7450.2460.0560.5050.0247
29Block-7450.2460.0570.5050.0248
30Block-7450.2460.0580.5050.0249
31Block-7450.2460.0590.5050.0251
32Block-7450.2460.0600.5050.0257
33Block-1450.2460.0450.5050.0319
34Block-2450.2460.0450.5050.0294
35Block-3450.2460.0450.5050.0282
36Block-4450.2460.0450.5050.0262
37Block-5450.2460.0450.5050.0243
38Block-6450.2460.0450.5050.0223
39Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0196
40Block-8450.2460.0450.5050.0197
41Block-9450.2460.0450.5050.0198
42Block-10450.2460.0450.5050.0184
43Block-11450.2460.0450.5050.0173
44Block-12450.2460.0450.5050.0165
45Block-13450.2460.0450.4040.0153
46Block-14450.2460.0450.4040.0124
47Block-15450.2460.0450.5050.0066
48Block-7450.2020.0450.4040.0220
49Block-7450.2040.0450.4040.0219
50Block-7450.2060.0450.4040.0218
51Block-7450.2080.0450.4040.0217
52Block-7450.2100.0450.4040.0216
53Block-7450.2120.0450.4040.0215
54Block-7450.2140.0450.5050.0214
55Block-7450.2160.0450.5050.0214
56Block-7450.2180.0450.5050.0213
57Block-7450.2200.0450.5050.0212
58Block-7450.2220.0450.5050.0211
59Block-7450.2240.0450.5050.0208
60Block-7450.2260.0450.5050.0203
61Block-7450.2280.0450.5050.0202
62Block-7450.2300.0450.5050.0201
63Block-7450.2320.0450.5050.0201
64Block-7450.2340.0450.5050.0200
65Block-7450.2360.0450.5050.0199
66Block-7450.2380.0450.4040.0196
67Block-7450.2400.0450.4040.0194
68Block-7450.2420.0450.4040.0193
69Block-7450.2440.0450.4040.0192
70Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0190
71Block-7450.2480.0450.5050.0189
72Block-7450.2500.0450.5050.0187
73Block-7450.2520.0450.5050.0187
74Block-7450.2540.0450.5050.0186
75Block-7450.2560.0450.5050.0184
76Block-7450.2580.0450.5050.0182
77Block-7450.2590.0450.5050.0183
78Block-7450.2600.0450.5050.0191
79Block-7450.2610.0450.5050.0192
80Block-7450.2620.0450.5050.0194
81Block-7450.2630.0450.5050.0195
82Block-7450.2640.0450.5050.0195
83Block-7450.2650.0450.5050.0197
84Block-7450.2660.0450.5050.0197
85Block-7450.2670.0450.5050.0198
86Block-7450.2700.0450.5050.0199
87Block-7300.2460.0450.5050.0101
88Block-7350.2460.0450.5050.0107
89Block-7360.2460.0450.5050.0111
90Block-7370.2460.0450.5050.0116
91Block-7380.2460.0450.5050.0117
92Block-7390.2460.0450.5050.0119
93Block-7400.2460.0450.5050.0121
94Block-7410.2460.0450.5050.0127
95Block-7420.2460.0450.4040.0154
96Block-7430.2460.0450.4040.0157
97Block-7440.2460.0450.4040.0162
98Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0197
99Block-7500.2460.0450.5050.0221
100Block-7550.2460.0450.5050.0233

In all these 100 simulations, the wave gauge was consistently positioned at coordinates X=1.09โ€ฏm, Y=1.21โ€ฏm, and Z=0.05โ€ฏm. The dominant wave period for each simulation was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function in MATLAB (MathWorks, 2023). Furthermore, the classification of wave types was carried out using a wave categorization graph according to Sorensen (2010), as shown in Fig. 4a. The results indicate that the majority of the simulated waves are on the border between intermediate and deep-water waves, and they are categorized as Stokes waves (Fig. 4a). Four sample waveforms from our 100 numerical experiments are provided in Fig. 4b.

Fig 4

The dataset in Table 4 was used to derive a new predictive equation that incorporates travel distance for the first time to estimate the initial maximum tsunami amplitude. In developing this equation, a genetic algorithm optimization technique was implemented using MATLAB (MathWorks 2023). This advanced approach entailed the use of genetic algorithms (GAs), an evolutionary algorithm type inspired by natural selection processes (MathWorks, 2023). This technique is iterative, involving selection, crossover, and mutation processes to evolve solutions over several generations. The goal was to identify the optimal coefficients and powers for each landslide parameter in the predictive equation, ensuring a robust and reliable model for estimating maximum wave amplitudes. Genetic Algorithms excel at optimizing complex models by navigating through extensive combinations of coefficients and exponents. GAs effectively identify highly suitable solutions for the non-linear and complex relationships between inputs (e.g., slide volume, slope angle, travel distance, water depth) and the output (i.e., maximum initial wave amplitude, aM). MATLAB’s computational environment enhances this process, providing robust tools for GA to adapt and evolve solutions iteratively, ensuring the precision of the predictive model (Onnen et al., 1997). This approach leverages MATLAB’s capabilities to fine-tune parameters dynamically, achieving an optimal equation that accurately estimates aM. It is important to highlight that the nondimensionalized version of this dataset is employed to develop a predictive equation which enables the equation to reproduce the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM) for various subaerial landslide cases, independent of their dimensional differences (e.g., Heler and Hager 2014Heller and Spinneken 2015Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022b). For this nondimensionalization, we employed the water depth (h) to nondimensionalize the slide volume (V/h3) and travel distance (D/h). The slide thickness (s) was applied to nondimensionalize the water depth (h/s).

2.5. Landslide velocity

In discussing the critical role of landslide velocity for simulating landslide-generated waves, we focus on the mechanisms of landslide motion and the techniques used to record landslide velocity in our simulations (Fig. 5). Also, we examine how these methods were applied in two distinct scenarios: Lab 1 and Lab 2 (see Table 1 for their details). Regarding the process of landslide movement, a slide starts from a stationary state, gaining momentum under the influence of gravity and this acceleration continues until the landslide collides with water, leading to a significant reduction in its speed before eventually coming to a stop (Fig. 5) (e.g., Panizzo et al. 2005).

Fig 5

To measure the landslide’s velocity in our simulations, we attached a probe at the centre of the slide, which supplied a time series of the velocity data. The slide’s velocity (vs) peaks at the moment it enters the water (Fig. 5), a point referred to as the impact time (tImp). Following this initial impact, the slides continue their underwater movement, eventually coming to a complete halt (tStop). Given the results in Fig. 5, it can be seen that Lab 1, with its longer travel distance (0.070โ€ฏm), exhibits a higher peak velocity of 1.89โ€ฏm/s. This increase in velocity is attributed to the extended travel distance allowing more time for the slide to accelerate under gravity. Whereas Lab 2, featuring a shorter travel distance (0.045โ€ฏm), records a lower peak velocity of 1.78โ€ฏm/s. This difference underscores how travel distance significantly influences the dynamics of landslide motion. After reaching the peak, both profiles show a sharp decrease in velocity, marking the transition to submarine motion until the slides come to a complete stop (tStop). There are noticeable differences observable in Fig. 5 between the Lab-1 and Lab-2 simulations, including the peaks at 0.3โ€ฏs . These variations might stem from the placement of the wave gauge, which differs slightly in each scenario, as well as the water depth’s minor discrepancies and, the travel distance.

2.6. Effect of air entrainment

In this section we examine whether it is required to consider air entrainment for our modelling or not as the FLOW-3D HYDRO package is capable of modelling air entrainment. The process of air entrainment in water during a landslide tsunami and its subsequent transport involve two key components: the quantification of air entrainment at the water surface, and the simulation of the air’s transport within the fluid (Hirt, 2003). FLOW-3D HYDRO employs the air entrainment model to compute the volume of air entrained at the water’s surface utilizing three approaches: a constant density model, a variable density model accounting for bulking, and a buoyancy model that adds the Drift-FLUX mechanism to variable density conditions (Flow Science, 2023). The calculation of the entrainment rate is based on the following equation:(2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’2๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)]1/2where parameters are: Vair, volume of air; Cair, entrainment rate coefficient; As, surface area of fluid; ฯ, fluid density; k, turbulent kinetic energy; gn, gravity normal to surface; Lt, turbulent length scale; and ฯƒ, surface tension coefficient. The value of k is directly computed from the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) (kw) calculations in our model.

In this study, we selected the variable densityโ€ฏ+โ€ฏDrift-FLUX model, which effectively captures the dynamics of phase separation and automatically activates the constant density and variable density models. This method simplifies the air-water mixture, treating it as a single, homogeneous fluid within each computational cell. For the phase volume fractions f1and f2โ€‹, the velocities are expressed in terms of the mixture and relative velocities, denoted as u and ur, respectively, as follows:(3)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0(4)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

The outcomes from this simulation are displayed in Fig. 6, which indicates that the influence of air entrainment on the generated wave amplitude is approximately 2โ€ฏ%. A value of 0.02 for the entrained air volume fraction means that, in the simulated fluid, approximately 2โ€ฏ% of the volume is composed of entrained air. In other words, for every unit volume of the fluid-air mixture at that location, 2โ€ฏ% is air and the remaining 98โ€ฏ% is water. The configuration of Test-17 (Table 4) was employed for this simulation. While the effect of air entrainment is anticipated to be more significant in models of granular landslide-generated waves (Fritz, 2002), in our simulations we opted not to incorporate this module due to its negligible impact on the results.

Fig 6

3. Results

In this section, we begin by presenting a sequence of our 3D simulations capturing different time steps to illustrate the generation process of landslide-generated waves. Subsequently, we derive a new predictive equation to estimate the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide-generated waves and assess its performance.

3.1. Wave generation and propagation

To demonstrate the wave generation process in our simulation, we reference Test-17 from Table 4, where we employed Block-7 (Tables 34). In this configuration, the slope angle was set to 45ยฐ, with a water depth of 0.246โ€ฏm and a travel distance at 0.045โ€ฏm (Fig. 7). At 0.220โ€ฏs, the initial impact of the moving slide on the water is depicted, marking the onset of the wave generation process (Fig. 7a). Disturbances are localized to the immediate area of impact, with the rest of the water surface remaining undisturbed. At this time, a maximum water particle velocity of 1.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.2โ€ฏm/s is seen around the impact zone (Fig. 7d). Moving to 0.320โ€ฏs, the development of the wave becomes apparent as energy transfer from the landslide to the water creates outwardly radiating waves with maximum water particle velocity of up to around 1.6โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.8โ€ฏm/s (Fig. 7b, e). By the time 0.670โ€ฏs, the wave has fully developed and is propagating away from the impact point exhibiting maximum water particle velocity of up to 2.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 2.1โ€ฏm/s. Concentric wave fronts are visible, moving outwards in all directions, with a colour gradient signifying the highest wave amplitude near the point of landslide entry, diminishing with distance (Fig. 7c, f).

Fig 7

3.2. Influence of landslide parameters on tsunami amplitude

In this section, we investigate the effects of various landslide parameters namely slide volume (V), water depth (h), slipe angle (ฮฑ) and travel distance (D) on the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM). Fig. 8 presents the outcome of these analyses. According to Fig. 8, the slide volume, slope angle, and travel distance exhibit a direct relationship with the wave amplitude, meaning that as these parameters increase, so does the amplitude. Conversely, water depth is inversely related to the maximum initial wave amplitude, suggesting that the deeper the water depth, the smaller the maximum wave amplitude will be (Fig. 8b).

Fig 8

Fig. 8a highlights the pronounced impact of slide volume on the aM, demonstrating a direct correlation between the two variables. For instance, in the range of slide volumes we modelled (Fig. 8a), The smallest slide volume tested, measuring 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, generated a low initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0066โ€ฏm) (Table 4). In contrast, the largest volume tested, 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, resulted in a significantly higher initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0319โ€ฏm) (Table 4). The extremities of these results emphasize the slide volume’s paramount impact on wave amplitude, further elucidated by their positions as the smallest and largest aM values across all conducted tests (Table 4). This is corroborated by findings from the literature (e.g., Murty, 2003), which align with the observed trend in our simulations.

The slope angle’s influence on aM was smooth. A steady increase of wave amplitude was observed as the slope angle increased (Fig. 8c). In examining travel distance, an anomaly was identified. At a travel distance of 0.047โ€ฏm, there was an unexpected dip in aM, which deviates from the general increasing trend associated with longer travel distances. This singular instance could potentially be attributed to a numerical error. Beyond this point, the expected pattern of increasing aM with longer travel distances resumes, suggesting that the anomaly at 0.047โ€ฏm is an outlier in an otherwise consistent trend, and thus this single data point was overlooked while deriving the predictive equation. Regarding the inverse relationship between water depth and wave amplitude, our result (Fig. 8b) is consistent with previous reports by Fritz et al. (2003), (2004), and Watts et al. (2005).

The insights from Fig. 8 informed the architecture of the predictive equation in the next Section, with slide volume, travel distance, and slope angle being multiplicatively linked to wave amplitude underscoring their direct correlations with wave amplitude. Conversely, water depth is incorporated as a divisor, representing its inverse relationship with wave amplitude. This structure encapsulates the dynamics between the landslide parameters and their influence on the maximum initial wave amplitude as discussed in more detail in the next Section.

3.3. Predictive equation

Building on our sensitivity analysis of landslide parameters, as detailed in Section 3.2, and utilizing our nondimensional dataset, we have derived a new predictive equation as follows:(5)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.90(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11where, V is sliding volume, h is water depth, ฮฑ is slope angle, and s is landslide thickness. It is important to note that this equation is valid only for subaerial solid-block landslide tsunamis as all our experiments were for this type of waves. The performance of this equation in predicting simulation data is demonstrated by the satisfactory alignment of data points around a 45ยฐ line, indicating its accuracy and reliability with regard to the experimental dataset (Fig. 9). The quality of fit between the dataset and Eq. (5) is 91โ€ฏ% indicating that Eq. (5) represents the dataset very well. Table 5 presents Eq. (5) alongside four other similar equations previously published. Two significant distinctions between our Eq. (5) and these others are: (i) Eq. (5) is derived from 3D experiments, whereas the other four equations are based on 2D experiments. (ii) Unlike the other equations, our Eq. (5) incorporates travel distance as an independent parameter.

Fig 9

Table 5. Performance comparison among our newly-developed equation and existing equations for estimating the maximum initial amplitude (aM) of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Parameters: aM, initial maximum wave amplitude; h, water depth; vs, landslide velocity; V, slide volume; bs, slide width; ls, slide length; s, slide thickness; ฮฑ, slope angle; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ, volume of the final immersed landslide. We considered ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ= V as the slide volume.

EventPredictive equationsAuthor (year)Observed aM (m) โŽโŽCalculated aM (m)Error, ฮต (%) โŽโŽโŽโŽ
2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami (Subaerial landslide) *๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=1.32๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„ŽNoda (1970)1341340
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.667(0.5(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž)2)0.334(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.754(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.506(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)1.631Bolin et al. (2014) โŽโŽโŽ13459424334
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.25(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž2)0.8Robbe-Saule et al. (2021)1343177
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.4545(tan๏ฟฝ)0.062(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.296(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.235Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022b)1341266
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.911(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11This study1341302.9

โŽ

Geometrical and kinematic parameters of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide based on Heidarzadeh et al. (2020)Grilli et al. (2019) and Grilli et al. (2021)V=2.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ107 m3h= 50โ€ฏm; s= 114โ€ฏm; ฮฑ= 45ยฐ; ls=1250โ€ฏm; bs= 2700โ€ฏm; vs=44.9โ€ฏm/s; D= 2500โ€ฏm; aM= 100โ€ฏm โˆ’150โ€ฏm.โŽโŽ

aM= An average value of aMโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ134โ€ฏm is considered in this study.โŽโŽโŽ

The equation of Bolin et al. (2014) is based on the reformatted one reported by Lindstrรธm (2016).โŽโŽโŽโŽ

Error is calculated using Eq. (1), where the calculated aM is assumed as the simulated value.

Additionally, we evaluated the performance of this equation using the real-world data from the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Based on previous studies (Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 20192021), we were able to provide a list of parameters for the subaerial landslide and associated tsunami for the 2018 Anak Krakatau event (see footnote of Table 5). We note that the data of the 2018 Anak Krakatau event was not used while deriving Eq. (5). The results indicate that Eq. (5) predicts the initial amplitude of the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami as being 130โ€ฏm indicating an error of 2.9โ€ฏ% compared to the reported average amplitude of 134โ€ฏm for this event. This performance indicates an improvement compared to the previous equation reported by Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022a) (Table 5). In contrast, the equations from Robbe-Saule et al. (2021) and Bolin et al. (2014) demonstrate higher discrepancies of 4200โ€ฏ% and 77โ€ฏ%, respectively (Table 5). Although Noda’s (1970) equation reproduces the tsunami amplitude of 134โ€ฏm accurately (Table 5), it is crucial to consider its limitations, notably not accounting for parameters such as slope angle and travel distance.

It is essential to recognize that both travel distance and slope angle significantly affect wave amplitude. In our model, captured in Eq. (5), we integrate the slope angle (ฮฑ) through the tangent function, i.e., tanโ€…ฮฑ. This choice diverges from traditional physical interpretations that often employ the cosine or sine function (e.g., Heller and Hager, 2014Watts et al., 2003). We opted for the tangent function because it more effectively reflects the direct impact of slope steepness on wave generation, yielding superior estimations compared to conventional methods.

The significance of this study lies in its application of both physical and numerical 3D experiments and the derivation of a predictive equation based on 3D results. Prior research, e.g. Heller et al. (2016), has reported notable discrepancies between 2D and 3D wave amplitudes, highlighting the important role of 3D experiments. It is worth noting that the suitability of applying an equation derived from either 2D or 3D data depends on the specific geometry and characteristics inherent in the problem being addressed. For instance, in the case of a long, narrow dam reservoir, an equation derived from 2D data would likely be more suitable. In such contexts, the primary dynamics of interest such as flow patterns and potential wave propagation are predominantly two-dimensional, occurring along the length and depth of the reservoir. This simplification to 2D for narrow dam reservoirs allows for more accurate modelling of these dynamics.

This study specifically investigates waves initiated by landslides, focusing on those characterized as solid blocks instead of granular flows, with slope angles confined to a range of 25ยฐ to 60ยฐ. We acknowledge the additional complexities encountered in real-world scenarios, such as dynamic density and velocity of landslides, which could affect the estimations. The developed equation in this study is specifically designed to predict the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis for the aforementioned specified ranges and types of landslides.

4. Conclusions

Both physical and numerical experiments were undertaken in a 3D wave basin to study solid-block landslide-generated waves and to formulate a predictive equation for their maximum initial wave amplitude. At the beginning, two physical experiments were performed to validate and calibrate a 3D numerical model, which was subsequently utilized to generate 100 experiments by varying different landslide parameters. The generated database was then used to derive a predictive equation for the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide tsunamis. The main features and outcomes are:

  • โ€ขThe predictive equation of this study is exclusively derived from 3D data and exhibits a fitting quality of 91โ€ฏ% when applied to the database.
  • โ€ขFor the first time, landslide travel distance was considered in the predictive equation. This inclusion provides more accuracy and flexibility for applying the equation.
  • โ€ขTo further evaluate the performance of the predictive equation, it was applied to a real-world subaerial landslide tsunami (i.e., the 2018 Anak Krakatau event) and delivered satisfactory performance.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ramtin Sabeti: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Software, Visualization, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Mohammad Heidarzadeh: Methodology, Data curation, Software, Writing โ€“ review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

RS is supported by the Leverhulme Trust Grant No. RPG-2022-306. MH is funded by open funding of State Key Lab of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, grant number SKHL2101. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund. MH is also funded by the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation grant no. 6217 (awarded in 2023).

Acknowledgements

Authors are sincerely grateful to the laboratory technician team, particularly Mr William Bazeley, at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Bath for their support during the laboratory physical modelling of this research. We appreciate the valuable insights provided by Mr. Brian Fox (Senior CFD Engineer at Flow Science, Inc.) regarding air entrainment modelling in FLOW-3D HYDRO. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund.

Data availability

  • All data used in this study are given in the body of the article.

References

Fig 1. (a) The Location of the Bahman Shir dam (upstream), (b) Bahman Shir dam (downstream dam) and (c) Mared Dam. Note: The borders of the countries are not exact.

Initial Maintenance Notes about the First River Ship Lock in Iran

M.T. Mansouri Kia1,2, H.R. Sheibani 3, A. Hoback 4
1 Manager of Dam and Power Plant Construction, Khuzestan Water and Power Authority (KWPA), Ahwaz, Iran.
2 Ph.D., Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of PNU University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Professor of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, University of Detroit Mercy Civil, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Mared Dam in northern Abadan is under construction on the Karun River and it is the first ship lock in Iran. In this study, the ship’s lock was examined. Every vessel must pass through this lock in order to transport water from Arvand River to Karun and vice versa. The interior dimensions of the Mared Shipping Lock are 160 meters long, 25 meters wide and 8 meters deep. Several important times are calculated for lock operation. ๐‘‡is the first time the gates open, ๐‘‡15 the time the initial gates remain open until the height difference between the two sides reaches 150 mm, ๐‘‡filled is the duration between the start of the opening the gates till the difference between the two ends becomes zero after ๐‘‡15. Finally, T is the total time required for opening or closing the gates completely. The rotational speeds of the gates range from 5 to 35 radians per minute. Numerical modeling has been used to study fluid behavior and interaction between fluid and gates in flow 3D software. Different lock maintenance scenarios have been analyzed. Important parameters such as inlet and outlet flow rate changes from gates, water depth changes at different times, stress and strain fields, hydrodynamic forces acting on different points of the lock have been calculated. Based on this, the forces acting on hydraulic jacks and gates have been calculated. The minimum time required for the safe passage of the ship through the lock is calculated.

๋ถ๋ถ€ ์•„๋ฐ”๋‹จ์˜ ๋งˆ๋ ˆ๋“œ ๋Œ์€ ์นด๋ฃฌ ๊ฐ•์— ๊ฑด์„ค ์ค‘์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ž€ ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ž ๊ธˆ ์žฅ์น˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ์ž๋ฌผ์‡ ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Arvand ๊ฐ•์—์„œ Karun์œผ๋กœ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ทธ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ๋ฌผ์„ ์šด์†กํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋ชจ๋“  ์„ ๋ฐ•์ด ์ด ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Mared Shipping Lock์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด 160m, ๋„ˆ๋น„ 25m, ๊นŠ์ด 8m์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž ๊ธˆ ์ž‘๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๐‘‡์€ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ฒ˜์Œ ์—ด๋ฆด ๋•Œ, ๐‘‡15๋Š” ์–‘์ชฝ์˜ ๋†’์ด ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ 150mm์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋ฆฐ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ๐‘‡filled๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ์ž‘๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ดํ›„ ๋‘ ๋์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ 0์ด ๋  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๐‘‡15. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ T๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์—ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‹ซ๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ์˜ ํšŒ์ „ ์†๋„๋Š” ๋ถ„๋‹น 5~35๋ผ๋””์•ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ์œ ๋™ 3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ์œ ์ฒด์™€ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž ๊ธˆ ์œ ์ง€ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ์˜ ์ž…๊ตฌ ๋ฐ ์ถœ๊ตฌ ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ๋ณ€ํ™”, ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ํ•„๋“œ, ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ง€์ ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ํž˜๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์••์žญ๊ณผ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ•์ด ์ž๋ฌผ์‡ ๋ฅผ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ตœ์†Œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig 1. (a) The Location of the Bahman Shir dam (upstream), (b) Bahman Shir dam (downstream dam) and (c) Mared Dam. Note: The borders of the countries are not exact.
Fig 1. (a) The Location of the Bahman Shir dam (upstream), (b) Bahman Shir dam (downstream dam) and (c) Mared Dam. Note: The borders of the countries are not exact.

References

  • Ables, J.H., 1978. Filling and Emptying System, New Ship Lock, Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana: Hydraulic Model Investigation, 78. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
  • Army, U., 1964. Corps of Engineers, 1965. National Inventory of Physical Resources. Agency for International Development, Costa Rica.
  • Belzner, F., Simons, F., Thorenz, C., 2018. An application-oriented model for lock filling processes, 34th PIANC-World Congress (Proceedings). Online verfรผgbar unter https://coms.events/piancpanama/data/full_pa pers/full_paper_183.pdf, zuletzt geprรผft am, pp. 2018.
  • Brolsma, J., Roelse, K., 2011. Waterway guidelines 2011. ISBN 9789036900690. Dhanuka, A., Agrawal, S., Mehra, H., 2018. Hydraulic and Structural Design of Navigational Locks. J Civil Environ Eng, 8(297): 2.
  • Gao, Z., Fang, S.L., Shi, X.T., Gu, Z.H., 2013. Computation of Filling Time of a Ship Lock. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 256: 2509- 2513.
  • Hu, Q., Li, Y., Zhu, L., 2024. Effect of Parameters of Ditch Geometry on the Uniformity of Water Filling in Ship Lock Chambers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(1): 86. Iranian sahel Omid Co., Engineer, L.C., 2015. Numerical Modeling of Flow in Lock Chamber, Abadan ship Lock Dam Project. 0920-4741.
  • Iuorio, L., 2024. Dams are fragile: the frenzy and legacy of modern infrastructures along the Klamath and Allegheny Rivers. Water History: 1-26.
  • Li, J., Hu, Y., Wang, X., Diao, M., 2023. Operation safety evaluation system of ship lock based on extension evaluation and combination weighting method. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 25(3): 755-781.
  • Liu, B., Yang, J., Huang, Y., Wang, L., 2022. Hydraulic Research on Filling and Emptying System of Water-Saving Ship Lock for Navigation-Power Junction in Mountainous River, Smart Rivers. Springer, pp. 1492-1501.
  • Mรคck, A., Lorke, A., 2014. Shipโ€lockโ€“induced surges in an impounded river and their impact on subdaily flow velocity variation. River research and applications, 30(4): 494-507. Mahab., S., 1976. Final technical Report of Feasibility study. 25-96.
  • Mansouri Kia, M.T., 2022. Hydraulic design and optimization of navigation lock performance – A case study of Karun and Bahman Shir river locks. . PNU University. The Ph. D thesis (in Civil Engineering).
  • Mansouri Kia, M.T., Ansari, Z., 2008. Feasibility of Water Transport in Karun Waterway. 4th National Congress of Civil Engineering, Tehran University Iran: 1-8 (in Persian).
  • Mansouri Kia, M.T., Rajabi, E., Sheybani, H.R., 2022. Determining the Optimal Dimensions of River Transportation Channel in Iran. . Fourth International Conference of Civil, Architectural and sustainable green city, Hamedan, Iran. (in Persian): 298-309.
  • Moore, F.G., 1950. Three canal projects, Roman and Byzantine. American Journal of Archaeology, 54(2): 97-111.
  • Negi, P., Kromanis, R., Dorรฉe, A.G., Wijnberg, K.M., 2024. Structural health monitoring of inland navigation structures and ports: a review on developments and challenges. Structural Health Monitoring, 23(1): 605-645.
  • Nogueira, H.I., Van Der Hout, A., Oโ€™Mahoney, T.S., Kortlever, W.C., 2024. The Impact of Density Differences on the Hydraulic Design of Leveling Systems: The Case of New Large Sea Locks in IJmuiden and Terneuzen. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 150(1): 05023002.
  • Oโ€™Mahoney, T., De Loor, A., 2015. Paper 55- Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations of the effects of density differences during the filling process in a sea lock. Scott_Wilson;, Piesold., 2005. Karun River, Interim report NO 6, Transportation component.
  • Wang, H.-z., Zou, Z.-j., 2014. Numerical prediction of hydrodynamic forces on a ship passing through a lock. China Ocean Engineering, 28(3): 421-432.
  • Yang, Z., Sun, Y., Lian, F., Feng, H., Li, G., 2024. Optimization of river container port-access transport based on the innovatively designed electric ship in the Yangtze River Delta. Ocean & Coastal Management, 248: 106976.

Coupled CFD-DEM simulation of interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction during binder jet 3D printing

Coupled CFD-DEM simulation of interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction during binder jet 3D printing

๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ œํŠธ 3D ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ… ์ค‘ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์œ ์ฒด-์ž…์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ CFD-DEM ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

Joshua J.ย Wagner,ย C. Fredย Higgsย III

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.116747

Abstract

The coupled dynamics of interfacial fluid phases and unconstrained solid particles during the binder jet 3D printing process govern the final quality and performance of the resulting components. The present work proposes a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and discrete element method (DEM) framework capable of simulating the complex interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction that occurs when binder microdroplets are deposited into a powder bed. The CFD solver uses a volume-of-fluid (VOF) method for capturing liquidโ€“gas multifluid flows and relies on block-structured adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) to localize grid refinement around evolving fluidโ€“fluid interfaces. The DEM module resolves six degrees of freedom particle motion and accounts for particle contact, cohesion, and rolling resistance. Fully-resolved CFD-DEM coupling is achieved through a fictitious domain immersed boundary (IB) approach. An improved method for enforcing three-phase contact lines with a VOF-IB extension technique is introduced. We present several simulations of binder jet primitive formation using realistic process parameters and material properties. The DEM particle systems are experimentally calibrated to reproduce the cohesion behavior of physical nickel alloy powder feedstocks. We demonstrate the proposed modelโ€™s ability to resolve the interdependent fluid and particle dynamics underlying the process by directly comparing simulated primitive granules with one-to-one experimental counterparts obtained from an in-house validation apparatus. This computational framework provides unprecedented insight into the fundamental mechanisms of binder jet 3D printing and presents a versatile new approach for process parameter optimization and defect mitigation that avoids the inherent challenges of experiments.

๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ ฏ 3D ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ… ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์œ ์ฒด ์ƒ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์†๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—ญํ•™์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ํ’ˆ์งˆ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ขŒ์šฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ฏธ์„ธ์•ก์ ์ด ๋ถ„๋ง์ธต์— ์ฆ์ฐฉ๋  ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์œ ์ฒด-์ž…์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD) ๋ฐ ์ด์‚ฐ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•(DEM) ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CFD ์†”๋ฒ„๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด-๊ฐ€์Šค ๋‹ค์ค‘์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด VOF(์œ ์ฒด๋Ÿ‰) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ ์‘ํ˜• ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”(AMR)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด-์œ ์ฒด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ์ฃผ์œ„์˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ตญ์ง€ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. DEM ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์€ 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž์œ ๋„ ์ž…์ž ์šด๋™์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž…์ž ์ ‘์ด‰, ์‘์ง‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์™„์ „ ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋œ CFD-DEM ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์€ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๋„๋ฉ”์ธ ์นจ์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„(IB) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. VOF-IB ํ™•์žฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ƒ ์ ‘์ด‰ ๋ผ์ธ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ œํŠธ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

DEM ์ž…์ž ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ณต๊ธ‰์›๋ฃŒ์˜ ์‘์ง‘ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ณผ๋ฆฝ๊ณผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ์žฅ์น˜์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ์ผ๋Œ€์ผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋Œ€์‘๋ฌผ์„ ์ง์ ‘ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ์ƒํ˜ธ ์˜์กด์ ์ธ ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ ์ž…์ž ์—ญํ•™์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ œํŠธ 3D ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ…์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ „๋ก€ ์—†๋Š” ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹คํ—˜์— ๋‚ด์žฌ๋œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์™„ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์šฉ๋„์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Introduction

Binder jet 3D printing (BJ3DP) is a powder bed additive manufacturing (AM) technology capable of fabricating geometrically complex components from advanced engineering materials, such as metallic superalloys and ultra-high temperature ceramics [1], [2]. As illustrated in Fig. 1(a), the process is comprised of many repetitive print cycles, each contributing a new cross-sectional layer on top of a preceding one to form a 3D CAD-specified geometry. The feedstock material is first delivered from a hopper to a build plate and then spread into a thin layer by a counter-rotating roller. After powder spreading, a print head containing many individual inkjet nozzles traverses over the powder bed while precisely jetting binder microdroplets onto select regions of the spread layer. Following binder deposition, the build plate lowers by a specified layer thickness, leaving a thin void space at the top of the job box that the subsequent powder layer will occupy. This cycle repeats until the full geometries are formed layer by layer. Powder bed fusion (PBF) methods follow a similar procedure, except they instead use a laser or electron beam to selectively melt and fuse the powder material. Compared to PBF, binder jetting offers several distinct advantages, including faster build rates, enhanced scalability for large production volumes, reduced machine and operational costs, and a wider selection of suitable feedstock materials [2]. However, binder jetted parts generally possess inferior mechanical properties and reduced dimensional accuracy [3]. As a result, widescale adoption of BJ3DP to fabricate high-performance, mission-critical components, such as those common to the aerospace and defense sectors, is contingent on novel process improvements and innovations [4].

A major obstacle hindering the advancement of BJ3DP is our limited understanding of how various printing parameters and material properties collectively influence the underlying physical mechanisms of the process and their effect on the resulting components. To date, the vast majority of research efforts to uncover these relationships have relied mainly on experimental approaches [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], which are often expensive and time-consuming and have inherent physical restrictions on what can be measured and observed. For these reasons, there is a rapidly growing interest in using computational models to circumvent the challenges of experimental investigations and facilitate a deeper understanding of the processโ€™s fundamental phenomena. While significant progress has been made in developing and deploying numerical frameworks aimed at powder spreading [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] and sintering [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], simulating the interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction (IFPI) in the binder deposition stage is still in its infancy. In their exhaustive review, Mostafaei et al. [2] point out the lack of computational models capable of resolving the coupled fluid and particle dynamics associated with binder jetting and suggest that the development of such tools is critical to further improving the process and enhancing the quality of its end-use components.

We define IFPI as a multiphase flow regime characterized by immiscible fluid phases separated by dynamic interfaces that intersect the surfaces of moving solid particles. As illustrated in Fig. 1(b), an elaborate IFPI occurs when a binder droplet impacts the powder bed in BJ3DP. The momentum transferred from the impacting droplet may cause powder compaction, cratering, and particle ejection. These ballistic disturbances can have deleterious effects on surface texture and lead to the formation of large void spaces inside the part [5], [13]. After impact, the droplet spreads laterally on the bed surface and vertically into the pore network, driven initially by inertial impact forces and then solely by capillary action [33]. Attractive capillary forces exerted on mutually wetted particles tend to draw them inward towards each other, forming a packed cluster of bound particles referred to as a primitive [34]. A single-drop primitive is the most fundamental building element of a BJ3DP part, and the interaction leading to its formation has important implications on the final part characteristics, such as its mechanical properties, resolution, and dimensional accuracy. Generally, binder droplets are deposited successively as the print head traverses over the powder bed. The traversal speed and jetting frequency are set such that consecutive droplets coalesce in the bed, creating a multi-drop primitive line instead of a single-drop primitive granule. The binder must be jetted with sufficient velocity to penetrate the powder bed deep enough to provide adequate interlayer binding; however, a higher impact velocity leads to more pronounced ballistic effects.

A computational framework equipped to simulate the interdependent fluid and particle dynamics in BJ3DP would allow for unprecedented observational and measurement capability at temporal and spatial resolutions not currently achievable by state-of-the-art imaging technology, namely synchrotron X-ray imaging [13], [14], [18], [19]. Unfortunately, BJ3DP presents significant numerical challenges that have slowed the development of suitable modeling frameworks; the most significant of which are as follows:

  • 1.Incorporating dynamic fluidโ€“fluid interfaces with complex topological features remains a nontrivial task for standard mesh-based CFD codes. There are two broad categories encompassing the methods used to handle interfacial flows: interface tracking and interface capturing [35]. Interface capturing techniques, such as the popular volume-of-fluid (VOF) [36] and level-set methods [37], [38], are better suited for problems with interfaces that become heavily distorted or when coalescence and fragmentation occur frequently; however, they are less accurate in resolving surface tension and boundary layer effects compared to interface tracking methods like front-tracking [39], arbitrary Lagrangianโ€“Eulerian [40], and spaceโ€“time finite element formulations [41]. Since interfacial forces become increasingly dominant at decreasing length scales, inaccurate surface tension calculations can significantly deteriorate the fidelity of IFPI simulations involving <100 ฮผm droplets and particles.
  • 2.Dynamic powder systems are often modeled using the discrete element method (DEM) introduced by Cundall and Strack [42]. For IFPI problems, a CFD-DEM coupling scheme is required to exchange information between the fluid and particle solvers. Fully-resolved CFD-DEM coupling suggests that the flow field around individual particle surfaces is resolved on the CFD mesh [43], [44]. In contrast, unresolved coupling volume averages the effect of the dispersed solid phase on the continuous fluid phases [45], [46], [47], [48]. Comparatively, the former is computationally expensive but provides detailed information about the IFPI in question and is more appropriate when contact line dynamics are significant. However, since the pore structure of a powder bed is convoluted and evolves with time, resolving such solidโ€“fluid interfaces on a computational mesh presents similar challenges as fluidโ€“fluid interfaces discussed in the previous point. Although various algorithms have been developed to deform unstructured meshes to accommodate moving solid surfaces (see Bazilevs et al. [49] for an overview of such methods), they can be prohibitively expensive when frequent topology changes require mesh regeneration rather than just modification through nodal displacement. The pore network in a powder bed undergoes many topology changes as particles come in and out of contact with each other, constantly closing and opening new flow channels. Non-body-conforming structured grid approaches that rely on immersed boundary (IB) methods to embed the particles in the flow field can be better suited for such cases [50]. Nevertheless, accurately representing these complex pore geometries on Cartesian grids requires extremely high mesh resolutions, which can impose significant computational costs.
  • 3.Capillary effects depend on the contact angle at solidโ€“liquidโ€“gas intersections. Since mesh nodes do not coincide with a particle surface when using an IB method on structured grids, imposing contact angle boundary conditions at three-phase contact lines is not straightforward.

While these issues also pertain to PBF process modeling, resolving particle motion is generally less crucial for analyzing melt pool dynamics compared to primitive formation in BJ3DP. Therefore, at present, the vast majority of computational process models of PBF assume static powder beds and avoid many of the complications described above, see, e.g., [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59]. Li et al. [60] presented the first 2D fully-resolved CFD-DEM simulations of the interaction between the melt pool, powder particles, surrounding gas, and metal vapor in PBF. Following this work, Yu and Zhao [61], [62] published similar melt pool IFPI simulations in 3D; however, contact line dynamics and capillary forces were not considered. Compared to PBF, relatively little work has been published regarding the computational modeling of binder deposition in BJ3DP. Employing the open-source VOF code Gerris [63], Tan [33] first simulated droplet impact on a powder bed with appropriate binder jet parameters, namely droplet size and impact velocity. However, similar to most PBF melt pool simulations described in the current literature, the powder bed was fixed in place and not allowed to respond to the interacting fluid phases. Furthermore, a simple face-centered cubic packing of non-contacting, monosized particles was considered, which does not provide a realistic pore structure for AM powder beds. Building upon this approach, we presented a framework to simulate droplet impact on static powder beds with more practical particle size distributions and packing arrangements [64]. In a study similar to [33], [64], Deng et al. [65] used the VOF capability in Ansys Fluent to examine the lateral and vertical spreading of a binder droplet impacting a fixed bimodal powder bed with body-centered packing. Li et al. [66] also adopted Fluent to conduct 2D simulations of a 100 ฮผm diameter droplet impacting substrates with spherical roughness patterns meant to represent the surface of a simplified powder bed with monosized particles. The commercial VOF-based software FLOW-3D offers an AM module centered on process modeling of various AM technologies, including BJ3DP. However, like the above studies, particle motion is still not considered in this codebase. Ur Rehman et al. [67] employed FLOW-3D to examine microdroplet impact on a fixed stainless steel powder bed. Using OpenFOAM, Erhard et al. [68] presented simulations of different droplet impact spacings and patterns on static sand particles.

Recently, Fuchs et al. [69] introduced an impressive multipurpose smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) framework capable of resolving IFPI in various AM methods, including both PBF and BJ3DP. In contrast to a combined CFD-DEM approach, this model relies entirely on SPH meshfree discretization of both the fluid and solid governing equations. The authors performed several prototype simulations demonstrating an 80 ฮผm diameter droplet impacting an unconstrained powder bed at different speeds. While the powder bed responds to the hydrodynamic forces imparted by the impacting droplet, the particle motion is inconsistent with experimental time-resolved observations of the process [13]. Specifically, the ballistic effects, such as particle ejection and bed deformation, were drastically subdued, even in simulations using a droplet velocity โˆผ 5ร— that of typical jetting conditions. This behavior could be caused by excessive damping in the inter-particle contact force computations within their SPH framework. Moreover, the wetted particles did not appear to be significantly influenced by the strong capillary forces exerted by the binder as no primitive agglomeration occurred. The authors mention that the objective of these simulations was to demonstrate their codebaseโ€™s broad capabilities and that some unrealistic process parameters were used to improve computational efficiency and stability, which could explain the deviations from experimental observations.

In the present paper, we develop a novel 3D CFD-DEM numerical framework for simulating fully-resolved IFPI during binder jetting with realistic material properties and process parameters. The CFD module is based on the VOF method for capturing binderโ€“air interfaces. Surface tension effects are realized through the continuum surface force (CSF) method with height function calculations of interface curvature. Central to our fluid solver is a proprietary block-structured AMR library with hierarchical octree grid nesting to focus enhanced grid resolution near fluidโ€“fluid interfaces. The GPU-accelerated DEM module considers six degrees of freedom particle motion and includes models based on Hertz-Mindlin contact, van der Waals cohesion, and viscoelastic rolling resistance. The CFD and DEM modules are coupled to achieve fully-resolved IFPI using an IB approach in which Lagrangian solid particles are mapped to the underlying Eulerian fluid mesh through a solid volume fraction field. An improved VOF-IB extension algorithm is introduced to enforce the contact angle at three-phase intersections. This provides robust capillary flow behavior and accurate computations of the fluid-induced forces and torques acting on individual wetted particles in densely packed powder beds.

We deploy our integrated codebase for direct numerical simulations of single-drop primitive formation with powder beds whose particle size distributions are generated from corresponding laboratory samples. These simulations use jetting parameters similar to those employed in current BJ3DP machines, fluid properties that match commonly used aqueous polymeric binders, and powder properties specific to nickel alloy feedstocks. The cohesion behavior of the DEM powder is calibrated based on the angle of repose of the laboratory powder systems. The resulting primitive granules are compared with those obtained from one-to-one experiments conducted using a dedicated in-house test apparatus. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed framework can simulate more complex and realistic printing operations involving multi-drop primitive lines.

Section snippets

Mathematical description of interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction

This section briefly describes the governing equations of fluid and particle dynamics underlying the CFD and DEM solvers. Our unified framework follows an Eulerianโ€“Lagrangian approach, wherein the Navierโ€“Stokes equations of incompressible flow are discretized on an Eulerian grid to describe the motion of the binder liquid and surrounding gas, and the Newtonโ€“Euler equations account for the positions and orientations of the Lagrangian powder particles. The mathematical foundation for

CFD solver for incompressible flow with multifluid interfaces

This section details the numerical methodology used in our CFD module to solve the Navierโ€“Stokes equations of incompressible flow. First, we introduce the VOF method for capturing the interfaces between the binder and air phases. This approach allows us to solve the fluid dynamics equations considering only a single continuum field with spatial and temporal variations in fluid properties. Next, we describe the time integration procedure using a fractional-step projection algorithm for

DEM solver for solid particle dynamics

This section covers the numerical procedure for tracking the motion of individual powder particles with DEM. The Newtonโ€“Euler equations (Eqs. (10), (11)) are ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for which many established numerical integrators are available. In general, the most challenging aspects of DEM involve processing particle collisions in a computationally efficient manner and dealing with small time step constraints that result from stiff materials, such as metallic AM powders. The

Unified CFD-DEM solver

The preceding sections have introduced the CFD and DEM solution algorithms separately. Here, we discuss the integrated CFD-DEM solution algorithm and related details.

Binder jet process modeling and validation experiments

In this section, we deploy our CFD-DEM framework to simulate the IFPI occurring during the binder droplet deposition stage of the BJ3DP process. The first simulations attempt to reproduce experimental single-drop primitive granules extracted from four nickel alloy powder samples with varying particle size distributions. The experiments are conducted with a dedicated in-house test apparatus that allows for the precision deposition of individual binder microdroplets into a powder bed sample. The

Conclusions

This paper introduces a coupled CFD-DEM framework capable of fully-resolved simulation of the interfacial fluidโ€“particle interaction occurring in the binder jet 3D printing process. The interfacial flow of binder and surrounding air is captured with the VOF method and surface tension effects are incorporated using the CSF technique augmented by height function curvature calculations. Block-structured AMR is employed to provide localized grid refinement around the evolving liquidโ€“gas interface.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Joshua J. Wagner: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing. C. Fred Higgs III: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a NASA Space Technology Research Fellowship, United States of America, Grant No. 80NSSC19K1171. Partial support was also provided through an AIAA Foundation Orville, USA and Wilbur Wright Graduate Award, USA . The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Craig Smith of NASA Glenn Research Center for the valuable input he provided on this project.

References (155)

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 10. ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์ด ๊ณ ๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ์—ด๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ์ฆŒ์— ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์šด์˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ํ๋ฆ„ ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” โ€‹โ€‹๊ธฐ์ˆ , ํ‘ธํ† ์ฝ”๋ฌด๋„ค ์ œ๋ฐฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ๋ฐฉ์— ์ ์šฉ

์š”์•ฝ

๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ํ™์ˆ˜ ๊ตฌํ˜ธ ์ž‘์—…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ๋ฆ„ ํšŒ๋กœ ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์—์„œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋น„๊ต์  ์ž์„ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์•”๊ฑฐ ์ž‘๋™์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์–ธ๊ธ‰๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ค์ œ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ ํƒฑํฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๋’ท๋งˆ๋‹น์˜ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ, ์šดํ•˜ ์ง€๋ถ•์˜ ๋ถ€๋ ฅ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ•๊ดด, ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์ œ๋ฐฉ ๋ณธ์ฒด ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋“ฑ ์•”๊ฑฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„ ํšŒ๋กœ์˜ ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ™์ˆ˜๊ธฐ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์•”๊ฑฐ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์œ ๋™ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์‚ฌ์—…์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์œ ํ•ด์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ๋ฐฉ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ์•”๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋™์  ํšŒ๋กœ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ FLOW-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ๋ฐฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์•”๊ฑฐ ์ž‘๋™์— ์ž ์žฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋™๋งฅ ์œ ํ˜•์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ผ์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋™์‹œ์— ์•”๊ฑฐ์™€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ง€์ ํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ํšŒ๋กœ ํ˜„์ƒ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋” ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Phuc Tho ๋งˆ์„์˜ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ์ง€๋ฅด๋Š” ์•”๊ฑฐ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๋’ค์˜ ํšŒ๋กœ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ๋น„๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์กฐ์น˜๋„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ์šด์˜ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ด€๋กœ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ €ํ•ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ํšŒ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ถ•์†Œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค.

The flow fluctuation has been studied in quite extensively for large-scale flood control works, however, this issue has been less addressed for culverts through levee. The operational experience has shown that there are many negative impacts of flow dynamics on the culvert structure and levee system such as the uplift instability, the local surface erosion of the stilling basin or the downstream channel, collapsing of part of the levee system, etc. According to the requirement of sluice and levee safety during flood season, the task of reducing fluctuation needs to be performed. The article not only pointed out the types of fluctuation that need to pay attention behind the operation gate, but also specified the locations where the sluice and levee could be destructively affected by the fluctuation. In addition, structural and non-structural countermeasures reducing negative impacts of fluctuation are also mentioned. Research has proposed measures to reduce flow dynamics for operating culverts without interfering with their structure.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

Fluctuation, sluice, stilling basin, ํ๋ฆ„ํšŒ๋กœ, ์ œ๋ฐฉ์•”๊ฑฐ, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์†Œ์‚ฐ์กฐ, Flow3D, ํšŒ๋กœ์ €๊ฐ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 10. ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์ด ๊ณ ๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ์—ด๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 10. ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์ด ๊ณ ๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ์—ด๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

References

Hแป‡ thแป‘ng giรกm sรกt thiรชn tai Viแป‡t Nam (2023). http://vndms.dmc.gov.vn/ (Accessed: 28 February 2023).
Viแป‡n Thแปงy Cรดng (2015) Nghiรชn cแปฉu ฤ‘รกnh giรก cรกc sแปฑ cแป‘ ฤ‘รช, cแป‘ng dฦฐแป›i ฤ‘รช vร  ฤ‘แป xuแบฅt giแบฃi phรกp
xแปญ lรฝ. HyCI.
Nguyแป…n Phฦฐฦกng Dung (2017) Thรญ nghiแป‡m xรกc ฤ‘แป‹nh แบฃnh hฦฐแปŸng cแปงa รกp lแปฑc thแปงy ฤ‘แป™ng tแป›i ฤ‘แป™ dร y bแบฃn
ฤ‘รกy bแปƒ tiรชu nฤƒng vร  sรขn sau แปŸ cรดng trรฌnh thรกo. TLU.
Nguyแป…n Chiแบฟn (2015) Tรญnh toรกn thแปงy lแปฑc cรดng trรฌnh thรกo nฦฐแป›c. NXB Xรขy dแปฑng.
Nguyแป…n Ngแปc Thแบฏng (2019) ฤแป cฦฐฦกng ฤแป tร i cแบฅp Bแป™ โ€˜Nghiรชn cแปฉu ฤ‘รกnh giรก nguyรชn nhรขn, cรกc biแป‡n
phรกp ฤ‘รฃ รกp dแปฅng vร  ฤ‘แป xuแบฅt giแบฃi phรกp xแปญ lรฝ sแปฑ cแป‘ cแป‘ng dฦฐแป›i ฤ‘รช ฤ‘แบฃm bแบฃo an toร n chแป‘ng lลฉโ€™.
โ€˜Flow 3Dโ€™ (2023). (Userโ€™s Manual).
Yong Peng (2018) โ€˜Experimental Optimization of Gate-Opening Modes to Minimize Near-Field
Vibrations in Hydropower Stationsโ€™, Water, 10(1435). Available at:
https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/w10101435.
Guibing HUANG (2021) โ€˜Pressure Fluctuations Characteristics of the Stilling Basin with a
Negative Stepโ€™, Hydraulic and Civil Engineering Technology VI [Preprint]. Available at:
https://doi.org/doi:10.3233/ATDE210196.
O. Fecarotta (2016) Experimental results on the physical model of an USBR type II stilling basin.
Taylor & Francis Group.

Figure 1. Experimental setup and materials. (a) Schematic of the DED process, where three types of base materials were adoptedโ€”B1 (IN718), B2 (IN625), and B3 (SS316L), and two types of powder materials were adoptedโ€”P1 (IN718) and P2 (SS316L). (b) In situ high-speed imaging of powder flow and the SEM images of IN718 and SS316L powder particle. (c) Powder size statistics, and (d) element composition of powder IN718 (P1) and SS316L (P2).

Printability disparities in heterogeneous materialcombinations via laser directed energy deposition:a comparative stud

Jinsheng Ning1,6๎ง™, Lida Zhu1,6,โˆ—๎ง™, Shuhao Wang2, Zhichao Yang1๎ง™, Peihua Xu1,Pengsheng Xue3, Hao Lu1, Miao Yu1, Yunhang Zhao1, Jiachen Li4, Susmita Bose5 and Amit Bandyopadhyay5,โˆ—๎ง™

Abstract

์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ฐ”์ด๋ฉ”ํƒˆ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ œ์ž‘ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํ˜ธํ™˜์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์„ฑ์€ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ์„ฑํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ตœ์ข… ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์กฐํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ธ์‡„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋งค๋ ฅ์ ์ธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์กฐํ•ฉ(๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ๋ฐ ์ฒ  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ)์˜ ์ธ์‡„ ์ ์„ฑ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ง€ํ–ฅ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ(DED)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฑฐ์‹œ์  ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์‹œ์  ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฆ์ฐฉ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ณ ์† ์ด๋ฏธ์ง•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์บก์ฒ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฐ ํŠธ๋ž™ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์€ ํŠน์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์ฐฝ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋œ ํŠธ๋ž™๊ณผ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์ด ๋น„๊ต์  ์ •๊ตํ•ด์กŒ๊ณ , ์œ ์ตํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด์ข… ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ(๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ฒฝ๋„)์˜ ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผ์„ฑ์ด ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์Œ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—ด๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์™€ ์‘๊ณ  ์ค‘ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์š”์†Œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ์žฌํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์กฐํ•ฉ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ธ์‡„ ์ ์„ฑ์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์„ ์ง€๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ž‘์—…์€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์ฆ์ฐฉ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ƒํ•™์  ์ฐจ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์ธ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฐ”์ด๋ฉ”ํƒˆ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ DED ์„ฑํ˜•์„ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Additive manufacturing provides achievability for the fabrication of bimetallic and
multi-material structures; however, the material compatibility and bondability directly affect the
partsโ€™ formability and final quality. It is essential to understand the underlying printability of
different material combinations based on an adapted process. Here, the printability disparities of
two common and attractive material combinations (nickel- and iron-based alloys) are evaluated
at the macro and micro levels via laser directed energy deposition (DED). The deposition
processes were captured using in situ high-speed imaging, and the dissimilarities in melt pool
features and track morphology were quantitatively investigated within specific process
windows. Moreover, the microstructure diversity of the tracks and blocks processed with varied
material pairs was comparatively elaborated and, complemented with the informative
multi-physics modeling, the presented non-uniformity in mechanical properties (microhardness)
among the heterogeneous material pairs was rationalized. The differences in melt flow induced
by the unlike thermophysical properties of the material pairs and the resulting element
intermixing and localized re-alloying during solidification dominate the presented dissimilarity
in printability among the material combinations. This work provides an in-depth understanding
of the phenomenological differences in the deposition of dissimilar materials and aims to guide
more reliable DED forming of bimetallic parts.

Figure 1. Experimental setup and materials. (a) Schematic of the DED process, where three types of base materials were adoptedโ€”B1
(IN718), B2 (IN625), and B3 (SS316L), and two types of powder materials were adoptedโ€”P1 (IN718) and P2 (SS316L). (b) In situ
high-speed imaging of powder flow and the SEM images of IN718 and SS316L powder particle. (c) Powder size statistics, and (d) element
composition of powder IN718 (P1) and SS316L (P2).
Figure 1. Experimental setup and materials. (a) Schematic of the DED process, where three types of base materials were adoptedโ€”B1 (IN718), B2 (IN625), and B3 (SS316L), and two types of powder materials were adoptedโ€”P1 (IN718) and P2 (SS316L). (b) In situ high-speed imaging of powder flow and the SEM images of IN718 and SS316L powder particle. (c) Powder size statistics, and (d) element composition of powder IN718 (P1) and SS316L (P2).
Figure 2. Deposition process and the track morphology. (a)โ€“(c) Display the in situ captured tableaux of melt propagation and some physical
features during depositing for P1B1, P1B2, and P1B3, respectively. (d) The profiles of the melt pool at a frame of (t0 + 1) ms, and the flow
streamlines in the molten pool of each case. (e) The outer surface of the formed tracks, in which the colored arrows mark the scanning
direction. (f) Cross-section of the tracks. The parameter set used for in situ imaging was P-1000 W, S-600 mmยทminโ€“1, F-18 gยทminโ€“1. All the
scale bars are 2 mm.
Figure 2. Deposition process and the track morphology. (a)โ€“(c) Display the in situ captured tableaux of melt propagation and some physical features during depositing for P1B1, P1B2, and P1B3, respectively. (d) The profiles of the melt pool at a frame of (t0 + 1) ms, and the flow streamlines in the molten pool of each case. (e) The outer surface of the formed tracks, in which the colored arrows mark the scanning direction. (f) Cross-section of the tracks. The parameter set used for in situ imaging was P-1000 W, S-600 mmยทminโ€“1, F-18 gยทminโ€“1. All the scale bars are 2 mm.

References

[1] Tan C L, Weng F, Sui S, Chew Y and Bi G J 2021 Progress and perspectives in laser additive manufacturing of key aeroengine materials Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 170 103804
[2] Bandyopadhyay A, Traxel K D, Lang M, Juhasz M, Eliaz N and Bose S 2022 Alloy design via additive manufacturing: advantages, challenges, applications and perspectives Mater. Today 52 207โ€“24
[3] Sui S, Chew Y, Weng F, Tan C L, Du Z L and Bi G J 2022 Study of the intrinsic mechanisms of nickel additive for grain refinement and strength enhancement of laser aided additively manufactured Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 4 035102
[4] Xue P S, Zhu L D, Xu P H, Ren Y, Xin B, Meng G R, Yang Z C and Liu Z 2021 Research on process optimization and microstructure of CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy formed by laser metal deposition Opt. Laser Technol. 142 107167
[5] Bandyopadhyay A, Traxel K D and Bose S 2021 Nature-inspired materials and structures using 3D printing Mater. Sci. Eng. R 145 100609
[6] Zuback J S, Palmer T A and DebRoy T 2019 Additive manufacturing of functionally graded transition joints between ferritic and austenitic alloys J. Alloys Compd. 770 995โ€“1003
[7] Feenstra D R, Banerjee R, Fraser H L, Huang A, Molotnikov A and Birbilis N 2021 Critical review of the state of the art in multi-material fabrication via directed energy deposition Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 25 100924
[8] Wei C, Zhang Z Z, Cheng D X, Sun Z, Zhu M H and Li L 2021 An overview of laser-based multiple metallic material additive manufacturing: from macro- to micro-scales Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 3 012003
[9] Gu D D, Shi X Y, Poprawe R, Bourell D L, Setchi R and Zhu J H 2021 Material-structure-performance integrated laser-metal additive manufacturing Science 372 eabg1487
[10] Bandyopadhyay A and Heer B 2018 Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures Mater. Sci. Eng. R 129 1โ€“16
[11] Tammas-Williams S and Todd I 2017 Design for additive manufacturing with site-specific properties in metals and alloys Scr. Mater. 135 105โ€“10
[12] Chen W, Gu D D, Yang J K, Yang Q, Chen J and Shen X F 2022 Compressive mechanical properties and shape memory effect of NiTi gradient lattice structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 4 045002
[13] Svetlizky D, Das M, Zheng B L, Vyatskikh A L, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A, Schoenung J M, Lavernia E J and Eliaz N 2021 Directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing: physical characteristics, defects, challenges and applications Mater. Today 49 271โ€“95
[14] Panwisawas C, Tang Y T and Reed R C 2020 Metal 3D printing as a disruptive technology for superalloys Nat. Commun. 11 2327
[15] Wang S H, Ning J S, Zhu L D, Yang Z C, Yan W T, Dun Y C, Xue P S, Xu P H, Bose S and Bandyopadhyay A 2022 Role of porosity defects in metal 3D printing: formation mechanisms, impacts on properties and mitigation strategies Mater. Today 59 133โ€“60
[16] DebRoy T, Mukherjee T, Milewski J O, Elmer J W, Ribic B, Blecher J J and Zhang W 2019 Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions Nat. Mater. 18 1026โ€“32
[17] Afrouzian A, Groden C J, Field D P, Bose S and Bandyopadhyay A 2022 Additive manufacturing of Ti-Ni bimetallic structures Mater. Des. 215 110461
[18] Bandyopadhyay A, Zhang Y N and Onuike B 2022 Additive manufacturing of bimetallic structures Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 17 256โ€“94
[19] Onuike B, Heer B and Bandyopadhyay A 2018 Additive manufacturing of Inconel 718โ€”copper alloy bimetallic structure using laser engineered net shaping (LENSTM) Addit. Manuf. 21 133โ€“40
[20] Sahasrabudhe H, Harrison R, Carpenter C and Bandyopadhyay A 2015 Stainless steel to titanium bimetallic structure using LENSTM Addit. Manuf. 5 1โ€“8
[21] Li B Y, Han C J, Lim C W J and Zhou K 2022 Interface formation and deformation behaviors of an additively manufactured nickel-aluminum-bronze/15-5 PH multimaterial via laser-powder directed energy deposition Mater. Sci. Eng. A 829 142101
[22] Zhang X C, Pan T, Chen Y T, Li L, Zhang Y L and Liou F 2021 Additive manufacturing of copper-stainless steel hybrid components using laser-aided directed energy deposition J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 80 100โ€“16
[23] Shinjo J and Panwisawas C 2022 Chemical species mixing during direct energy deposition of bimetallic systems using titanium and dissimilar refractory metals for repair and biomedical applications Addit. Manuf. 51 102654
[24] Wang D et al 2022 Recent progress on additive manufacturing of multi-material structures with laser powder bed fusion Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 17 329โ€“65
[25] Lin X, Yue T M, Yang H O and Huang W D 2005 Laser rapid forming of SS316L/Rene88DT graded material Mater. Sci. Eng. A 391 325โ€“36
[26] Melzer D, Dห‡zugan J, Koukolรญkovรก M, Rzepa S and Vavห‡rรญk J 2021 Structural integrity and mechanical properties of the functionally graded material based on 316L/IN718 processed by DED technology Mater. Sci. Eng. A 811 141038
[27] Melzer D, Dห‡zugan J, Koukolรญkovรก M, Rzepa S, Dlouhยดy J, Brรกzda M and Bucki T 2022 Fracture characterisation of vertically build functionally graded 316L stainless steel with Inconel 718 deposited by directed energy deposition process Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 17 821โ€“40
[28] Zhang Y N and Bandyopadhyay A 2018 Direct fabrication of compositionally graded Ti-Al2O3 multi-material structures using laser engineered net shaping Addit. Manuf. 21 104โ€“11
[29] Ben-Artzy A, Reichardt A, Borgonia P J, Dillon R P, McEnerney B, Shapiro A A and Hosemann P 2021 Compositionally graded SS316 to C300 maraging steel using additive manufacturing Mater. Des. 201 109500
[30] Tan C L, Liu Y C, Weng F, Ng F L, Su J L, Xu Z K, Ngai X D and Chew Y 2022 Additive manufacturing of voxelized heterostructured materials with hierarchical phases Addit. Manuf. 54 102775
[31] Chen J, Yang Y Q, Song C H, Zhang M K, Wu S B and Wang D 2019 Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L/CuSn10 multi-material bimetallic structure fabricated by selective laser melting Mater. Sci. Eng. A 752 75โ€“85
[32] Wei C, Gu H, Gu Y C, Liu L C, Huang Y H, Cheng D X, Li Z Q and Li L 2022 Abnormal interfacial bonding mechanisms of multi-material additive-manufactured tungstenโ€“stainless steel sandwich structure Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 4 025002
[33] Zhang Y N and Bandyopadhyay A 2021 Influence of compositionally graded interface on microstructure and compressive deformation of 316L stainless steel to Al12Si aluminum alloy bimetallic structures ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 9174โ€“85
[34] Wei C et al 2022 Cu10Sn to Ti6Al4V bonding mechanisms in laser-based powder bed fusion multiple material additive 15 Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 6 (2024) 025001 J Ning et al manufacturing with different build strategies Addit. Manuf. 51 102588
[35] Li W, Karnati S, Kriewall C, Liou F, Newkirk J, Brown Taminger K M and Seufzer W J 2017 Fabrication and characterization of a functionally graded material from Ti-6Al-4V to SS316 by laser metal deposition Addit. Manuf. 14 95โ€“104
[36] Shi Q M, Zhong G Y, Sun Y, Politis C and Yang S F 2021 Effects of laser melting+remelting on interfacial macrosegregation and resulting microstructure and microhardness of laser additive manufactured H13/IN625 bimetals J. Manuf. Process. 71 345โ€“55
[37] Zhang W X, Hou W Y, Deike L and Arnold C 2022 Understanding the Rayleigh instability in humping phenomenon during laser powder bed fusion process Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 4 015201
[38] Chen Y W, Zhang X, Li M M, Xu R Q, Zhao C and Sun T 2020 Laser powder bed fusion of Inconel 718 on 316 stainless steel Addit. Manuf. 36 101500
[39] Yang Z C, Wang S H, Zhu L D, Ning J S, Xin B, Dun Y C and Yan W T 2022 Manipulating molten pool dynamics during metal 3D printing by ultrasound Appl. Phys. Rev. 9 021416
[40] Hofmann D C, Roberts S, Otis R, Kolodziejska J, Dillon R P, Suh J O, Shapiro A A, Liu Z K and Borgonia J P 2014 Developing gradient metal alloys through radial deposition additive manufacturing Sci. Rep. 4 5357
[41] Tumkur T U et al 2021 Nondiffractive beam shaping for enhanced optothermal control in metal additive manufacturing Sci. Adv. 7 eabg9358
[42] Scipioni Bertoli U, Guss G, Wu S, Matthews M J and Schoenung J M 2017 In-situ characterization of laser-powder interaction and cooling rates through high-speed imaging of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing Mater. Des. 135 385โ€“96
[43] Siva Prasad H, Brueckner F and Kaplan A F H 2020 Powder incorporation and spatter formation in high deposition rate blown powder directed energy deposition Addit. Manuf. 35 101413
[44] Ebrahimi A, Kleijn C R and Richardson I M 2021 Numerical study of molten metal melt pool behaviour during conduction-mode laser spot melting J. Appl. Phys. 54 105304
[45] Mumtaz K A and Hopkinson N 2010 Selective laser melting of thin wall parts using pulse shaping J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210 279โ€“87
[46] Sikandar Iquebal A, Yadav A, Botcha B, Krishna Gorthi R and Bukkapatnam S 2022 Tracking and quantifying spatter characteristics in a laser directed energy deposition process using Kalman filter Manuf. Lett. 33 692โ€“700
[47] Criales L E, Arฤฑsoy Y M, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A and ร–zel T 2017 Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 121 22โ€“36
[48] Coen V, Goossens L and van Hooreweder B 2022 Methodology and experimental validation of analytical melt pool models for laser powder bed fusion J. Mater. Process. Technol. 304 117547
[49] Zhao C, Shi B, Chen S L, Du D, Sun T, Simonds B J, Fezzaa K and Rollett A D 2022 Laser melting modes in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 045002
[50] Wang J H, Han F Z, Chen S F and Ying W S 2019 A novel model of laser energy attenuation by powder particles for laser solid forming Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 145 103440
[51] Haley J C, Schoenung J M and Lavernia E J 2018 Observations of particle-melt pool impact events in directed energy deposition Addit. Manuf. 22 368โ€“74
[52] Chen Y H et al 2021 Correlative synchrotron x-ray imaging and diffraction of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing Acta Mater. 209 116777
[53] Khorasani M, Ghasemi A, Leary M, Cordova L, Sharabian E, Farabi E, Gibson I, Brandt M and Rolfe B 2022 A comprehensive study on meltpool depth in laser-based powder bed fusion of Inconel 718 Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 120 2345โ€“62
[54] Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L and Thompson S M 2015 An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part II: mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control Addit. Manuf. 8 12โ€“35
[55] Ghanavati R, Naffakh-Moosavy H, Moradi M and Eshraghi M 2022 Printability and microstructure of directed energy deposited SS316l-IN718 multi-material: numerical modeling and experimental analysis Sci. Rep. 12 16600
[56] Galbusera F, Demir A G, Platl J, Turk C, Schnitzer R and Previtali B 2022 Processability and cracking behaviour of novel high-alloyed tool steels processed by laser powder bed fusion J. Mater. Process. Technol. 302 117435
[57] Wang A et al 2023 Effects of processing parameters on pore defects in blue laser directed energy deposition of aluminum by in and ex situ observation J. Mater. Process. Technol. 319 118068
[58] Hinojos A, Mireles J, Reichardt A, Frigola P, Hosemann P, Murr L E and Wicker R B 2016 Joining of Inconel 718 and 316 stainless steel using electron beam melting additive manufacturing technology Mater. Des. 94 17โ€“27
[59] Yang Z C, Zhu L D, Wang S H, Ning J S, Dun Y C, Meng G R, Xue P S, Xu P H and Xin B 2021 Effects of ultrasound on multilayer forming mechanism of Inconel 718 in directed energy deposition Addit. Manuf. 48 102462
[60] Yao L M, Huang S, Ramamurty U and Xiao Z M 2021 On the formation of โ€œFish-scaleโ€ morphology with curved grain interfacial microstructures during selective laser melting of dissimilar alloys Acta Mater. 220 117331
[61] Ghanavati R, Naffakh-Moosavy H and Moradi M 2021 Additive manufacturing of thin-walled SS316L-IN718 functionally graded materials by direct laser metal deposition J. Mater. Res. Technol. 15 2673โ€“85
[62] Chen N N, Khan H A, Wan Z X, Lippert J, Sun H, Shang S L, Liu Z K and Li J J 2020 Microstructural characteristics and crack formation in additively manufactured bimetal material of 316L stainless steel and Inconel 625 Addit. Manuf. 32 101037
[63] Xiao Y H, Wan Z X, Liu P W, Wang Z, Li J J and Chen L 2022 Quantitative simulations of grain nucleation and growth at additively manufactured bimetallic interfaces of SS316L and IN625 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 302 117506
[64] Mukherjee T, DebRoy T, Lienert T J, Maloy S A and Hosemann P 2021 Spatial and temporal variation of hardness of a printed steel part Acta Mater. 209 116775
[65] Dinda G P, Dasgupta A K and Mazumder J 2021 Texture control during laser deposition of nickel-based superalloy Scr. Mater. 67 503โ€“6
[66] Tan Z E, Pang J H L, Kaminski J and Pepin H 2019 Characterisation of porosity, density, and microstructure of directed energy deposited stainless steel AISI 316L Addit. Manuf. 25 286โ€“96
[67] Wolff S J, Gan Z T, Lin S, Bennett J L, Yan W T, Hyatt G, Ehmann K F, Wagner G J, Liu W K and Cao J 2019 Experimentally validated predictions of thermal history and microhardness in laser-deposited Inconel 718 on carbon steel Addit. Manuf. 27 540โ€“51 16 Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 6 (2024) 025001 J Ning et al
[68] Zhang L, Wen M, Imade M, Fukuyama S and Yokogawa K 2008 Effect of nickel equivalent on hydrogen gas embrittlement of austenitic stainless steels based on type 316 at low temperatures Acta Mater. 56 3414โ€“21
[69] Zuback J S and DebRoy T 2018 The hardness of additively manufactured alloys Materials 11 2070
[70] Adomako N K, Lewandowski J J, Arkhurst B M, Choi H, Chang H J and Kim J H 2022 Microstructures and mechanical properties of multi-layered materials composed of Ti-6Al-4V, vanadium, and 17โ€“4PH stainless steel produced by directed energy deposition Addit. Manuf. 59 103174

Figure 5. Simulation of the molten pool under low-speed scanning (1.06 m/s). (a) Sequential solidification of the molten pool at the end of the melt track for laser powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (b) Recoil pressure on the molten pool at the keyhole for laser powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (c) The force diagram of the melt at the back of the keyhole at t = 750 ฮผs in case B. (d) Temperature gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case A. (e) Temperature gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case B.

Revealing formation mechanism of end of processdepression in laser powder bed fusion by multiphysics meso-scale simulation

๋‹ค์ค‘๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ฉ”์กฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง์ธต ์œตํ•ฉ์—์„œ ๊ณต์ • ์ข…๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ•จ๋ชฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๊ณต๊ฐœ

Haodong Chen a,b, Xin Lin a,b,c, Yajing Sund, Shuhao Wanga,b, Kunpeng Zhu a,b,c and Binbin Dana,b

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2326599

ABSTRACT

Unintended end-of-process depression (EOPD) commonly occurs in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), leading to poor surface quality and lower fatigue strength, especially for many implants. In this study, a high-fidelity multi-physics meso-scale simulation model is developed to uncover the forming mechanism of this defect. A defect-process map of the EOPD phenomenon is obtained using this simulation model. It is found that the EOPD formation mechanisms are different under distinct regions of process parameters. At low scanning speeds in keyhole mode, the long-lasting recoil pressure and the large temperature gradient easily induce EOPD. While at high scanning speeds in keyhole mode, the shallow molten pool morphology and the large solidification rate allow the keyhole to evolve into an EOPD quickly. Nevertheless, in the conduction mode, the Marangoni effects along with a faster solidification rate induce EOPD. Finally, a โ€˜stepโ€™ variable power strategy is proposed to optimise the EOPD defects for the case with high volumetric energy density at low scanning speeds. This work provides a profound understanding and valuable insights into the quality control of LPBF fabrication.

์˜๋„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ณต์ • ์ข…๋ฃŒ ํ›„ ํ•จ๋ชฐ(EOPD)์€ LPBF(๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง์ธต ์œตํ•ฉ)์—์„œ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ๋งŽ์€ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ํ”ผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ๋ฉ”์กฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ EOPD ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋งต์„ ์–ป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. EOPD ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณ„๊ฐœ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ๋“œ์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜ค๋ž˜ ์ง€์†๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด EOPD๊ฐ€ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์œ ๋ฐœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์–•์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ํฐ ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ‚คํ™€์ด EOPD๋กœ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋” ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋งˆ๋ž‘๊ณ ๋‹ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ EOPD๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋‚ฎ์€ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ์ฒด์  ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด EOPD ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ‘๋‹จ๊ณ„’ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „๋žต์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ž‘์—…์€ LPBF ์ œ์กฐ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ์˜คํ•œ ์ดํ•ด์™€ ๊ท€์ค‘ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 5. Simulation of the molten pool under low-speed scanning (1.06 m/s). (a) Sequential solidification of the molten pool at the
end of the melt track for laser powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (b) Recoil pressure on the molten pool at the keyhole for laser
powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (c) The force diagram of the melt at the back of the keyhole at t = 750 ฮผs in case B. (d) Temperature gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case A. (e) Temperature
gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case B.
Figure 5. Simulation of the molten pool under low-speed scanning (1.06 m/s). (a) Sequential solidification of the molten pool at the end of the melt track for laser powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (b) Recoil pressure on the molten pool at the keyhole for laser powers of 190 and 340 W, respectively. (c) The force diagram of the melt at the back of the keyhole at t = 750 ฮผs in case B. (d) Temperature gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case A. (e) Temperature gradient at the solidโ€“liquid interface of the molten pool at the moment the laser is deactivated in case B.

References

[1] Zhang C, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. Additive manufacturing of magnesium matrix composites: comprehensive review of recent progress and research perspectives. J Mag
Alloys. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2023.02.005
[2] Webster S, Lin H, Carter III FM, et al. Physical mechanisms in hybrid additive manufacturing: a process design framework. J Mater Process Technol. 2022;291:117048. doi:10. 1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117048
[3] Wang S, Ning J, Zhu L, et al. Role of porosity defects in metal 3D printing: formation mechanisms, impacts on properties and mitigation strategies. Mater Today. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.014
[4] Wei C, Li L. Recent progress and scientific challenges in multi-material additive manufacturing via laser-based powder bed fusion. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2021;16 (3):347โ€“371. doi:10.1080/17452759.2021.1928520
[5] Lin X, Wang Q, Fuh JYH, et al. Motion feature based melt pool monitoring for selective laser melting process. J Mater Process Technol. 2022;303:117523. doi:10.1016/j. jmatprotec.2022.117523
[6] Gockel J, Sheridan L, Koerper B, et al. The influence of additive manufacturing processing parameters on surface roughness and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue. 2019;124:380โ€“388. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025
[7] Nicoletto G. Influence of rough as-built surfaces on smooth and notched fatigue behavior of L-PBF AlSi10Mg. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101251. doi:10.1016/j. addma.2020.101251
[8] Spece H, Yu T, Law AW, et al. 3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;109:103850. doi:10.1115/1.0004270v
[9] Andrukhov O, Huber R, Shi B, et al. Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):1374โ€“1384. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217
[10] Dai N, Zhang LC, Zhang J, et al. Corrosion behavior of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4 V alloy in NaCl solution. Corros Sci. 2016;102:484โ€“489. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2015. 10.041
[11] Li EL, Wang L, Yu AB, et al. A three-phase model for simulation of heat transfer and melt pool behaviour in laser powder bed fusion process. Powder Technol. 2021;381:298โ€“312. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.061
[12] Liao B, Xia RF, Li W, et al. 3D-printed ti6al4v scaffolds with graded triply periodic minimal surface structure for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Eng Perform. 2021;30:4993โ€“ 5004. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-05580-z
[13] Li E, Zhou Z, Wang L, et al. Melt pool dynamics and pores formation in multi-track studies in laser powder bed fusion process. Powder Technol. 2022;405:117533. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117533
[14] Guo L, Geng S, Gao X, et al. Numerical simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow during nanosecond pulsed laser processing of Fe78Si9B13 amorphous alloys. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2021;170:121003. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatma sstransfer.2021.121003
[15] Guo L, Li Y, Geng S, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis for morphology evolution of 6061 aluminum alloy during nanosecond pulsed laser cleaning. Surf Coat Technol. 2022;432:128056. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat. 2021.128056
[16] Li S, Liu D, Mi H, et al. Numerical simulation on evolution process of molten pool and solidification characteristics of melt track in selective laser melting of ceramic powder. Ceram Int. 2022;48(13):18302โ€“18315. doi:10. 1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.089
[17] Aboulkhair NT, Maskery I, Tuck C, et al. On the formation of AlSi10Mg single tracks and layers in selective laser melting: microstructure and nano-mechanical properties. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;230:88โ€“98. doi:10.1016/j. jmatprotec.2015.11.016
[18] Thijs L, Kempen K, Kruth JP, et al. Fine-structured aluminium products with controllable texture by selective laser melting of pre-alloyed AlSi10Mg powder. Acta Mater. 2013;61(5):1809โ€“1819. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.052
[19] Qiu C, Adkins NJE, Attallah MM. Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4 V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;578:230โ€“239. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.099
[20] Kazemi Z, Soleimani M, Rokhgireh H, et al. Melting pool simulation of 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting method, comparison with experimental results. Int J Therm Sci. 2022;176:107538. doi:10.1016/j. ijthermalsci.2022.107538
[21] Cao L. Workpiece-scale numerical simulations of SLM molten pool dynamic behavior of 316L stainless steel. Comput Math Appl. 2021;96:209โ€“228. doi:10.1016/j. camwa.2020.04.020
[22] Liu B, Fang G, Lei L, et al. Predicting the porosity defects in selective laser melting (SLM) by molten pool geometry. Int J Mech Sci. 2022;228:107478. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci. 2022.107478
[23] Ur Rehman A, Pitir F, Salamci MU. Full-field mapping and flow quantification of melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion of SS316L. Materials. 2021;14(21):6264. doi:10. 3390/ma14216264
[24] Chia HY, Wang L, Yan W. Influence of oxygen content on melt pool dynamics in metal additive manufacturing: high-fidelity modeling with experimental validation. Acta Mater. 2023;249:118824. doi:10.1016/j.actamat. 2023.118824
[25] Cheng B, Loeber L, Willeck H, et al. Computational investigation of melt pool process dynamics and pore formation in laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Eng Perform. 2019;28:6565โ€“6578. doi:10.1007/s11665-019- 04435-y
[26] Li X, Guo Q, Chen L, et al. Quantitative investigation of gas flow, powder-gas interaction, and powder behavior under different ambient pressure levels in laser powder bed fusion. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2021;170:103797. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103797
[27] Wu Y, Li M, Wang J, et al. Powder-bed-fusion additive manufacturing of molybdenum: process simulation, optimization, and property prediction. Addit Manuf. 2022;58:103069. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.103069
[28] Wu S, Yang Y, Huang Y, et al. Study on powder particle behavior in powder spreading with discrete element method and its critical implications for binder jetting additive manufacturing processes. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2158877. doi:10.1080/17452759.2022.2158877
[29] Klassen A, Schakowsky T, Kerner C. Evaporation model for beam based additive manufacturing using free surface lattice Boltzmann methods. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2014;47 (27):275303. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/47/27/275303
[30] Cao L. Mesoscopic-scale numerical simulation including the influence of process parameters on slm single-layer multi-pass formation. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51:4130โ€“4145. doi:10.1007/s11661-020-05831-z
[31] Zhuang JR, Lee YT, Hsieh WH, et al. Determination of melt pool dimensions using DOE-FEM and RSM with process window during SLM of Ti6Al4V powder. Opt Laser Technol. 2018;103:59โ€“76. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018. 01.013
[32] Li Y, Gu D. Thermal behavior during selective laser melting of commercially pure titanium powder: numerical simulation and experimental study. Addit Manuf. 2014;1โ€“4:99โ€“109. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.09.001
[33] Dai D, Gu D. Thermal behavior and densification mechanism during selective laser melting of copper matrix composites: simulation and experiments. Mater Des. 2014;55 (0):482โ€“491. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.006
[34] Wang S, Zhu L, Dun Y, et al. Multi-physics modeling of direct energy deposition process of thin-walled structures: defect analysis. Comput Mech. 2021;67:c1229โ€“ c1242. doi:10.1007/s00466-021-01992-9
[35] Wu J, Zheng J, Zhou H, et al. Molten pool behavior and its mechanism during selective laser melting of polyamide 6 powder: single track simulation and experiments. Mater Res Express. 2019;6. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab2747
[36] Cho JH, Farson DF, Milewski JO, et al. Weld pool flows during initial stages of keyhole formation in laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2009;42. doi:10.1088/0022- 3727/42/17/175502
[37] Sinha KN. Identification of a suitable volumetric heat source for modelling of selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V powder using numerical and experimental validation approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;99:2257โ€“2270. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-2631-4
[38] Fu CH, Guo YB. Three-dimensional temperature gradient mechanism in selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136(6):061004. doi:10.1115/1.4028539
[39] Ansari P, Rehman AU, Pitir F, et al. Selective laser melting of 316 l austenitic stainless steel: detailed process understanding using multiphysics simulation and experimentation. Metals. 2021;11(7):1076. doi:10.3390/met11071076
[40] Zhao C, Shi B, Chen S, et al. Laser melting modes in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Rev Mod Phys. 2022;94(4):045002. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94. 045002
[41] Bertoli US, Wolfer AJ, Matthews MJ, et al. On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des. 2017;113:331โ€“340. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037
[42] Dash A, Kamaraj A. Prediction of the shift in melting mode during additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Mater Today Commun. 2023: 107238. doi:10.1016/j. mtcomm.2023.107238
[43] Majeed M, Khan HM, Rasheed I. Finite element analysis of melt pool thermal characteristics with passing laser in SLM process. Optik. 2019;194:163068. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo. 2019.163068

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

Modeling and numerical studies of high-precision laser powder bed fusion

Yi Weiย ;Genyu Chen;Nengru Tao;Wei Zhou
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191504

In order to comprehensively reveal the evolutionary dynamics of the molten pool and the state of motion of the fluid during the high-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) process, this study aims to deeply investigate the specific manifestations of the multiphase flow, solidification phenomena, and heat transfer during the process by means of numerical simulation methods. Numerical simulation models of SS316L single-layer HP-LPBF formation with single and double tracks were constructed using the discrete element method and the computational fluid dynamics method. The effects of various factors such as Marangoni convection, surface tension, vapor recoil, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool have been paid attention to during the model construction process. The results show that the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ shape, in which the temperature gradient at the front end of the pool is significantly larger than that at the tail end, with the highest temperature gradient up to 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. It is also found that the depth of the second track is larger than that of the first one, and the process parameter window has been determined preliminarily. In addition, the application of HP-LPBF technology helps to reduce the surface roughness and minimize the forming size.

Topics

Heat transfer,ย Nonequilibrium thermodynamics,ย Solidification process,ย Computer simulation,ย Discrete element method,ย Lasers,ย Mass transfer,ย Fluid mechanics,ย Computational fluid dynamics,ย Multiphase flows

I. INTRODUCTION

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has become a research hotspot in the field of additive manufacturing of metals due to its advantages of high-dimensional accuracy, good surface quality, high density, and high material utilization.1,2 With the rapid development of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics, the demand for microfabrication technology is increasing day by day.3 High-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) is one of the key manufacturing technologies for tiny parts in the fields of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics because of its process characteristics such as small focal spot diameter, small powder particle size, and thin powder layup layer thickness.4โ€“13 Compared with LPBF, HP-LPBF has the significant advantages of smaller focal spot diameter, smaller powder particle size, and thinner layer thickness. These advantages make HP-LPBF perform better in producing micro-fine parts, high surface quality, and parts with excellent mechanical properties.

HP-LPBF is in the exploratory stage, and researchers have already done some exploratory studies on the focal spot diameter, the amount of defocusing, and the powder particle size. In order to explore the influence of changing the laser focal spot diameter on the LPBF process characteristics of the law, Wildman et al.14 studied five groups of different focal spot diameter LPBF forming 316L stainless steel (SS316L) processing effect, the smallest focal spot diameter of 26โ€‰ฮผm, and the results confirm that changing the focal spot diameter can be achieved to achieve the energy control, so as to control the quality of forming. Subsequently, Mclouth et al.15 proposed the laser out-of-focus amount (focal spot diameter) parameter, which characterizes the distance between the forming plane and the laser focal plane. The laser energy density was controlled by varying the defocusing amount while keeping the laser parameters constant. Sample preparation at different focal positions was investigated, and their microstructures were characterized. The results show that the samples at the focal plane have finer microstructure than those away from the focal plane, which is the effect of higher power density and smaller focal spot diameter. In order to explore the influence of changing the powder particle size on the characteristics of the LPBF process, Qian et al.16 carried out single-track scanning simulations on powder beds with average powder particle sizes of 70 and 40โ€‰ฮผm, respectively, and the results showed that the melt tracks sizes were close to each other under the same process parameters for the two particle-size distributions and that the molten pool of powder beds with small particles was more elongated and the edges of the melt tracks were relatively flat. In order to explore the superiority of HP-LPBF technology, Xu et al.17 conducted a comparative analysis of HP-LPBF and conventional LPBF of SS316L. The results showed that the average surface roughness of the top surface after forming by HP-LPBF could reach 3.40โ€‰ฮผm. Once again, it was verified that HP-LPBF had higher forming quality than conventional LPBF. On this basis, Wei et al.6 comparatively analyzed the effects of different laser focal spot diameters on different powder particle sizes formed by LPBF. The results showed that the smaller the laser focal spot diameter, the fewer the defects on the top and side surfaces. The above research results confirm that reducing the laser focal spot diameter can obtain higher energy density and thus better forming quality.

LPBF involves a variety of complex systems and mechanisms, and the final quality of the part is influenced by a large number of process parameters.18โ€“24 Some research results have shown that there are more than 50 factors affecting the quality of the specimen. The influencing factors are mainly categorized into three main groups: (1) laser parameters, (2) powder parameters, and (3) equipment parameters, which interact with each other to determine the final specimen quality. With the continuous development of technologies such as computational materials science and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the method of studying the influence of different factors on the forming quality of LPBF forming process has been shifted from time-consuming and laborious experimental characterization to the use of numerical simulation methods. As a result, more and more researchers are adopting this approach for their studies. Currently, numerical simulation studies on LPBF are mainly focused on the exploration of molten pool, temperature distribution, and residual stresses.

  1. Finite element simulation based on continuum mechanics and free surface fluid flow modeling based on fluid dynamics are two common approaches to study the behavior of LPBF molten pool.25โ€“28 Finite element simulation focuses on the temperature and thermal stress fields, treats the powder bed as a continuum, and determines the molten pool size by plotting the elemental temperature above the melting point. In contrast, fluid dynamics modeling can simulate the 2D or 3D morphology of the metal powder pile and obtain the powder size and distribution by certain algorithms.29 The flow in the molten pool is mainly affected by recoil pressure and the Marangoni effect. By simulating the molten pool formation, it is possible to predict defects, molten pool shape, and flow characteristics, as well as the effect of process parameters on the molten pool geometry.30โ€“34 In addition, other researchers have been conducted to optimize the laser processing parameters through different simulation methods and experimental data.35โ€“46 Crystal growth during solidification is studied to further understand the effect of laser parameters on dendritic morphology and solute segregation.47โ€“54 A multi-scale system has been developed to describe the fused deposition process during 3D printing, which is combined with the conductive heat transfer model and the dendritic solidification model.55,56
  2. Relevant scholars have adopted various different methods for simulation, such as sequential coupling theory,57 Lagrangian and Eulerian thermal models,58 birthโ€“death element method,25 and finite element method,59 in order to reveal the physical phenomena of the laser melting process and optimize the process parameters. Luo et al.60 compared the LPBF temperature field and molten pool under double ellipsoidal and Gaussian heat sources by ANSYS APDL and found that the diffusion of the laser energy in the powder significantly affects the molten pool size and the temperature field.
  3. The thermal stresses obtained from the simulation correlate with the actual cracks,61 and local preheating can effectively reduce the residual stresses.62 A three-dimensional thermodynamic finite element model investigated the temperature and stress variations during laser-assisted fabrication and found that powder-to-solid conversion increases the temperature gradient, stresses, and warpage.63 Other scholars have predicted residual stresses and part deflection for LPBF specimens and investigated the effects of deposition pattern, heat, laser power, and scanning strategy on residual stresses, noting that high-temperature gradients lead to higher residual stresses.64โ€“67 

In short, the process of LPBF forming SS316L is extremely complex and usually involves drastic multi-scale physicochemical changes that will only take place on a very small scale. Existing literature employs DEM-based mesoscopic-scale numerical simulations to investigate the effects of process parameters on the molten pool dynamics of LPBF-formed SS316L. However, a few studies have been reported on the key mechanisms of heating and solidification, spatter, and convective behavior of the molten pool of HP-LPBF-formed SS316L with small laser focal spot diameters. In this paper, the geometrical properties of coarse and fine powder particles under three-dimensional conditions were first calculated using DEM. Then, numerical simulation models for single-track and double-track cases in the single-layer HP-LPBF forming SS316L process were developed at mesoscopic scale using the CFD method. The flow genesis of the melt in the single-track and double-track molten pools is discussed, and their 3D morphology and dimensional characteristics are discussed. In addition, the effects of laser process parameters, powder particle size, and laser focal spot diameter on the temperature field, characterization information, and defects in the molten pool are discussed.

II. MODELING

A. 3D powder bed modeling

HP-LPBF is an advanced processing technique for preparing target parts layer by layer stacking, the process of which involves repetitive spreading and melting of powders. In this process, both the powder spreading and the morphology of the powder bed are closely related to the results of the subsequent melting process, while the melted surface also affects the uniform distribution of the next layer of powder. For this reason, this chapter focuses on the modeling of the physical action during the powder spreading process and the theory of DEM to establish the numerical model of the powder bed, so as to lay a solid foundation for the accuracy of volume of fluid (VOF) and CFD.

1. DEM

DEM is a numerical technique for calculating the interaction of a large number of particles, which calculates the forces and motions of the spheres by considering each powder sphere as an independent unit. The motion of the powder particles follows the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, including translational and rotational,38,68โ€“70 which are expressed as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝij,

(1)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝijร—๏ฟฝij),

(2)

where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the mass of unit particle i in kg, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the advective acceleration in m/s2, And g is the gravitational acceleration in m/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the force in contact with the neighboring particle ๏ฟฝ in N. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the rotational inertia of the unit particle ๏ฟฝ in kg ยท m2. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the unit particle ๏ฟฝ angular acceleration in rad/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the vector pointing from unit particle ๏ฟฝ to the contact point of neighboring particle ๏ฟฝโ .

Equations (1) and (2) can be used to calculate the velocity and angular velocity variations of powder particles to determine their positions and velocities. A three-dimensional powder bed model of SS316L was developed using DEM. The powder particles are assumed to be perfect spheres, and the substrate and walls are assumed to be rigid. To describe the contact between the powder particles and between the particles and the substrate, a non-slip Hertzโ€“Mindlin nonlinear spring-damping model71 was used with the following expression:๏ฟฝhz=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝijโˆ’๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ’(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)],

(3)

where ๏ฟฝhz is the force calculated using the Hertzian in M. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the radius of unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ in m, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the overlap size of the two powder particles in m. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the elastic constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝij is the unit vector connecting the centerlines of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝeff is the effective mass of the two powder particles in kg. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the viscoelastic damping constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the components of the relative velocities of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the displacement vector between two spherical particles. The schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles is shown in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles.

Because the particle size of the powder used for HP-LPBF is much smaller than 100โ€‰ฮผm, the effect of van der Waals forces must be considered. Therefore, the cohesive force ๏ฟฝjkr of the Hertzโ€“Mindlin model was used instead of van der Waals forces,72 with the following expression:๏ฟฝjkr=โˆ’4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ1.5+4๏ฟฝ*3๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ3,

(4)1๏ฟฝ*=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(5)1๏ฟฝ*=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(6)

where ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent Young’s modulus in GPa; ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent particle radius in m; ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface energy of the powder particles in J/m2; ฮฑ is the contact radius in m; ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Young’s modulus of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, in GPa; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Poisson’s ratio of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively.

2. Model building

Figure 2 shows a 3D powder bed model generated using DEM with a coarse powder geometry of 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰30โ€‰ฮผm3. The powder layer thickness is 30โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity is 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 31.7โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 15โ€“53โ€‰ฮผm. The geometry of the fine powder was 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰20โ€‰ฮผm3, with a layer thickness of 20โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity of 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 11.5โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 5โ€“25โ€‰ฮผm. After the 3D powder bed model is generated, it needs to be imported into the CFD simulation software for calculation, and the imported geometric model is shown in Fig. 3. This geometric model is mainly composed of three parts: protective gas, powder bed, and substrate. Under the premise of ensuring the accuracy of the calculation, the mesh size is set to 3โ€‰ฮผm, and the total number of coarse powder meshes is 1โ€‰704โ€‰940. The total number of fine powder meshes is 3โ€‰982โ€‰250.

FIG. 2.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Three-dimensional powder bed model: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

FIG. 3.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Geometric modeling of the powder bed computational domain: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

B. Modeling of fluid mechanics simulation

In order to solve the flow, melting, and solidification problems involved in HP-LPBF molten pool, the study must follow the three governing equations of conservation of mass, conservation of energy, and conservation of momentum.73 The VOF method, which is the most widely used in fluid dynamics, is used to solve the molten pool dynamics model.

1. VOF

VOF is a method for tracking the free interface between the gas and liquid phases on the molten pool surface. The core idea of the method is to define a volume fraction function F within each grid, indicating the proportion of the grid space occupied by the material, 0โ€‰โ‰คโ€‰Fโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰1 in Fig. 4. Specifically, when Fโ€‰=โ€‰0, the grid is empty and belongs to the gas-phase region; when Fโ€‰=โ€‰1, the grid is completely filled with material and belongs to the liquid-phase region; and when 0โ€‰<โ€‰Fโ€‰<โ€‰1, the grid contains free surfaces and belongs to the mixed region. The direction normal to the free surface is the direction of the fastest change in the volume fraction F (the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction), and the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction can be calculated from the values of the volume fractions in the neighboring grids.74 The equations controlling the VOF are expressed as follows:๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโ‹…(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0,

(7)

where t is the time in s and ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the liquid velocity in m/s.

FIG. 4.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of VOF.

The material parameters of the mixing zone are altered due to the inclusion of both the gas and liquid phases. Therefore, in order to represent the density of the mixing zone, the average density ๏ฟฝยฏ is used, which is expressed as follows:72๏ฟฝยฏ=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ1)๏ฟฝgas+๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝmetal,

(8)

where ๏ฟฝ1 is the proportion of liquid phase, ๏ฟฝgas is the density of protective gas in kg/m3, and ๏ฟฝmetal is the density of metal in kg/m3.

2. Control equations and boundary conditions

Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the HP-LPBF melting process. First, the laser light strikes a localized area of the material and rapidly heats up the area. Next, the energy absorbed in the region is diffused through a variety of pathways (heat conduction, heat convection, and surface radiation), and this process triggers complex phase transition phenomena (melting, evaporation, and solidification). In metals undergoing melting, the driving forces include surface tension and the Marangoni effect, recoil due to evaporation, and buoyancy due to gravity and uneven density. The above physical phenomena interact with each other and do not occur independently.

FIG. 5.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

  1. Laser heat sourceThe Gaussian surface heat source model is used as the laser heat source model with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=2๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2exp(โˆ’2๏ฟฝ12๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2),(9)where ๏ฟฝ is the heat flow density in W/m2, ๏ฟฝ0 is the absorption rate of SS316L, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the radius of the laser focal spot in m, and ๏ฟฝ1 is the radial distance from the center of the laser focal spot in m. The laser focal spot can be used for a wide range of applications.
  2. Energy absorptionThe formula for calculating the laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 of SS316L is as follows:๏ฟฝ0=0.365(๏ฟฝ0[1+๏ฟฝ0(๏ฟฝโˆ’20)]/๏ฟฝ)0.5,(10)where ๏ฟฝ0 is the direct current resistivity of SS316L at 20โ€‰ยฐC in ฮฉ m, ๏ฟฝ0 is the resistance temperature coefficient in ppm/ยฐC, ๏ฟฝ is the temperature in ยฐC, and ๏ฟฝ is the laser wavelength in m.
  3. Heat transferThe basic principle of heat transfer is conservation of energy, which is expressed as follows:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(11)where ๏ฟฝ is the density of liquid phase SS316L in kg/m3, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the specific heat capacity of SS316L in J/(kg K), ๐›ป๏ฟฝ is the gradient operator, t is the time in s, T is the temperature in K, ๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the temperature gradient, ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the velocity vector, ๏ฟฝ0 is the coefficient of thermal conduction of SS316L in W/(m K), and โ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the thermal energy dissipation term in the molten pool.
  4. Molten pool flowThe following three conditions need to be satisfied for the molten pool to flow:
    • Conservation of mass with the following expression:๐›ป๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0.(12)
    • Conservation of momentum (Navierโ€“Stokes equation) with the following expression:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝโ†’=๏ฟฝยท[โˆ’pI+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’+(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)๏ฟฝ)]+๏ฟฝ,(13)where ๏ฟฝ is the pressure in Pa exerted on the liquid phase SS316L microelement, ๏ฟฝ is the unit matrix, ๏ฟฝ is the fluid viscosity in N s/m2, and ๏ฟฝ is the volumetric force (gravity, atmospheric pressure, surface tension, vapor recoil, and the Marangoni effect).
    • Conservation of energy, see Eq. (11)
  5. Surface tension and the Marangoni effectThe effect of temperature on the surface tension coefficient is considered and set as a linear relationship with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝdT(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),(14)where ๏ฟฝ is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature T in N/m, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the melting temperature of SS316L in K, ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ in Pa, and ฯƒdฯƒ/ dT is the surface tension temperature coefficient in N/(m K).In general, surface tension decreases with increasing temperature. A temperature gradient causes a gradient in surface tension that drives the liquid to flow, known as the Marangoni effect.
  6. Metal vapor recoilAt higher input energy densities, the maximum temperature of the molten pool surface reaches the evaporation temperature of the material, and a gasification recoil pressure occurs vertically downward toward the molten pool surface, which will be the dominant driving force for the molten pool flow.75 The expression is as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=0.54๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ€‰expโ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(15)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the gasification recoil pressure in Pa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the ambient pressure in kPa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of evaporation in J/kg, ๏ฟฝ0 is the gas constant in J/(mol K), T is the surface temperature of the molten pool in K, and Te is the evaporation temperature in K.
  7. Solidโ€“liquidโ€“gas phase transitionWhen the laser hits the powder layer, the powder goes through three stages: heating, melting, and solidification. During the solidification phase, mutual transformations between solid, liquid, and gaseous states occur. At this point, the latent heat of phase transition absorbed or released during the phase transition needs to be considered.68 The phase transition is represented based on the relationship between energy and temperature with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ),,(16)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are solid and liquid phase density, respectively, of SS316L in kg/m3. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ unit volume of solid and liquid phase-specific heat capacity, respectively, of SS316L in J/(kg K). ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, are the solidification temperature and melting temperature of SS316L in K. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of the phase transition of SS316L melting in J/kg.

3. Assumptions

The CFD model was computed using the commercial software package FLOW-3D.76 In order to simplify the calculation and solution process while ensuring the accuracy of the results, the model makes the following assumptions:

  1. It is assumed that the effects of thermal stress and material solid-phase thermal expansion on the calculation results are negligible.
  2. The molten pool flow is assumed to be a Newtonian incompressible laminar flow, while the effects of liquid thermal expansion and density on the results are neglected.
  3. It is assumed that the surface tension can be simplified to an equivalent pressure acting on the free surface of the molten pool, and the effect of chemical composition on the results is negligible.
  4. Neglecting the effect of the gas flow field on the molten pool.
  5. The mass loss due to evaporation of the liquid metal is not considered.
  6. The influence of the plasma effect of the molten metal on the calculation results is neglected.

It is worth noting that the formulation of assumptions requires a trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. In the above models, some physical phenomena that have a small effect or high difficulty on the calculation results are simplified or ignored. Such simplifications make numerical simulations more efficient and computationally tractable, while still yielding accurate results.

4. Initial conditions

The preheating temperature of the substrate was set to 393โ€‰K, at which time all materials were in the solid state and the flow rate was zero.

5. Material parameters

The material used is SS316L and the relevant parameters required for numerical simulations are shown in Table I.46,77,78

TABLE I.

SS316L-related parameters.

PropertySymbolValue
Density of solid metal (kg/m3๏ฟฝmetal 7980 
Solid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1658 
Liquid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1723 
Vaporization temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 3090 
Latent heat of melting (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 2.60ร—105 
Latent heat of evaporation (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 7.45ร—106 
Surface tension of liquid phase (N /mโ ) ๏ฟฝ 1.60 
Liquid metal viscosity (kg/m s) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 6ร—10โˆ’3 
Gaseous metal viscosity (kg/mโ€‰s) ๏ฟฝgas 1.85ร—10โˆ’5 
Temperature coefficient of surface tension (N/m K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝT 0.80ร—10โˆ’3 
Molar mass (โ  kg/molโ ) 0.05โ€‰593 
Emissivity ๏ฟฝ 0.26 
Laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 0.35 
Ambient pressure (kPa) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 101โ€‰325 
Ambient temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ0 300 
Stefanโ€“Boltzmann constant (W/m2 K4๏ฟฝ 5.67ร—10โˆ’8 
Thermal conductivity of metals (โ  W/mโ€‰Kโ ) ๏ฟฝ 24.55 
Density of protective gas (kg/m3๏ฟฝgas 1.25 
Coefficient of thermal expansion (/K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 16ร—10โˆ’6 
Generalized gas constant (โ  J/molโ€‰Kโ ) 8.314 

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

With the objective of studying in depth the evolutionary patterns of single-track and double-track molten pool development, detailed observations were made for certain specific locations in the model, as shown in Fig. 6. In this figure, P1 and P2 represent the longitudinal tangents to the centers of the two melt tracks in the XZ plane, while L1 is the transverse profile in the YZ plane. The scanning direction is positive and negative along the X axis. Points A and B are the locations of the centers of the molten pool of the first and second melt tracks, respectively (xโ€‰=โ€‰1.995โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’4, yโ€‰=โ€‰5โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’7, and zโ€‰=โ€‰โˆ’4.85โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’5).

FIG. 6.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of observation position.

A. Single-track simulation

A series of single-track molten pool simulation experiments were carried out in order to investigate the influence law of laser power as well as scanning speed on the HP-LPBF process. Figure 7 demonstrates the evolution of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the single-track molten pool in the time period of 50โ€“500โ€‰ฮผs under a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The powder bed is in the natural cooling state. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the powder is heated by the laser heat and rapidly melts and settles to form the initial molten pool. This process is accompanied by partial melting of the substrate and solidification together with the melted powder. The molten pool rapidly expands with increasing width, depth, length, and temperature, as shown in Fig. 7(a). When tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands more obviously, and the temperature starts to transfer to the surrounding area, forming a heat-affected zone. At this point, the width of the molten pool tends to stabilize, and the temperature in the center of the molten pool has reached its peak and remains largely stable. However, the phenomenon of molten pool spatter was also observed in this process, as shown in Fig. 7(b). As time advances, when tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, solidification begins to occur at the tail of the molten pool, and tiny ripples are produced on the solidified surface. This is due to the fact that the melt flows toward the region with large temperature gradient under the influence of Marangoni convection and solidifies together with the melt at the end of the bath. At this point, the temperature gradient at the front of the bath is significantly larger than at the end. While the width of the molten pool was gradually reduced, the shape of the molten pool was gradually changed to a โ€œcometโ€ shape. In addition, a slight depression was observed at the top of the bath because the peak temperature at the surface of the bath reached the evaporation temperature, which resulted in a recoil pressure perpendicular to the surface of the bath downward, creating a depressed region. As the laser focal spot moves and is paired with the Marangoni convection of the melt, these recessed areas will be filled in as shown in Fig. 7(c). It has been shown that the depressed regions are the result of the coupled effect of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension.79 By tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the width and height of the molten pool stabilize and show a โ€œcometโ€ shape in Fig. 7(d).

FIG. 7.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Single-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

Figure 8 depicts the velocity vector diagram of the P1 profile in a single-track molten pool, the length of the arrows represents the magnitude of the velocity, and the maximum velocity is about 2.36โ€‰m/s. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool takes shape, and the velocities at the two ends of the pool are the largest. The variation of the velocities at the front end is especially more significant in Fig. 8(a). As the time advances to tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands rapidly, in which the velocity at the tail increases and changes more significantly, while the velocity at the front is relatively small. At this stage, the melt moves backward from the center of the molten pool, which in turn expands the molten pool area. The melt at the back end of the molten pool center flows backward along the edge of the molten pool surface and then converges along the edge of the molten pool to the bottom center, rising to form a closed loop. Similarly, a similar closed loop is formed at the front end of the center of the bath, but with a shorter path. However, a large portion of the melt in the center of the closed loop formed at the front end of the bath is in a nearly stationary state. The main cause of this melt flow phenomenon is the effect of temperature gradient and surface tension (the Marangoni effect), as shown in Figs. 8(b) and 8(e). This dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ pool. At tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the tendency of the above two melt flows to close the loop is more prominent and faster in Fig. 8(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the velocity vector of the molten pool shows a stable trend, and the closed loop of melt flow also remains stable. With the gradual laser focal spot movement, the melt is gradually solidified at its tail, and finally, a continuous and stable single track is formed in Fig. 8(d).

FIG. 8.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of single-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) molten pool flow.

In order to explore in depth the transient evolution of the molten pool, the evolution of the single-track temperature field and the melt flow was monitored in the YZ cross section. Figure 9(a) shows the state of the powder bed at the initial moment. When tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ฮผs, the laser focal spot acts on the powder bed and the powder starts to melt and gradually collects in the molten pool. At this time, the substrate will also start to melt, and the melt flow mainly moves in the downward and outward directions and the velocity is maximum at the edges in Fig. 9(b). When tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool increase due to the recoil pressure. At this time, the melt flows more slowly at the center, but the direction of motion is still downward in Fig. 9(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool further increase, at which time the intensity of the melt flow reaches its peak and the direction of motion remains the same in Fig. 9(d). When tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ฮผs, the melt starts to move upward, and the surrounding powder or molten material gradually fills up, causing the surface of the molten pool to begin to flatten. At this time, the maximum velocity of the melt is at the center of the bath, while the velocity at the edge is close to zero, and the edge of the melt starts to solidify in Fig. 9(e). When tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ฮผs, the melt continues to move upward, forming a convex surface of the melt track. However, the melt movement slows down, as shown in Fig. 9(f). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the melt further moves upward and its speed gradually becomes smaller. At the same time, the melt solidifies further, as shown in Fig. 9(g). When tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ฮผs, the melt track is basically formed into a single track with a similar โ€œmountainโ€ shape. At this stage, the velocity is close to zero only at the center of the molten pool, and the flow behavior of the melt is poor in Fig. 9(h). At tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ฮผs, the melt stops moving and solidification is rapidly completed. Up to this point, a single track is formed in Fig. 9(i). During the laser action on the powder bed, the substrate melts and combines with the molten state powder. The powder-to-powder fusion is like the convergence of water droplets, which are rapidly fused by surface tension. However, the fusion between the molten state powder and the substrate occurs driven by surface tension, and the molten powder around the molten pool is pulled toward the substrate (a wetting effect occurs), which ultimately results in the formation of a monolithic whole.38,80,81

FIG. 9.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of single-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰0โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

The wetting ability between the liquid metal and the solid substrate in the molten pool directly affects the degree of balling of the melt,82,83 and the wetting ability can be measured by the contact angle of a single track in Fig. 10. A smaller value of contact angle represents better wettability. The contact angle ฮฑ can be calculated by๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ1โˆ’๏ฟฝ22,

(17)

where ๏ฟฝ1 and ๏ฟฝ2 are the contact angles of the left and right regions, respectively.

FIG. 10.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic of contact angle.

Relevant studies have confirmed that the wettability is better at a contact angle ฮฑ around or below 40ยฐ.84 After measurement, a single-track contact angle ฮฑ of about 33ยฐ was obtained under this process parameter, which further confirms the good wettability.

B. Double-track simulation

In order to deeply investigate the influence of hatch spacing on the characteristics of the HP-LPBF process, a series of double-track molten pool simulation experiments were systematically carried out. Figure 11 shows in detail the dynamic changes of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool in the time period of 2050โ€“2500โ€‰ฮผs under the conditions of laser power of 100โ€‰W, scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. By comparing the study with Fig. 7, it is observed that the basic characteristics of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track. However, there are subtle differences between them. The first track exhibits a basically symmetric shape, but the second track morphology shows a slight deviation influenced by the difference in thermal diffusion rate between the solidified metal and the powder. Otherwise, the other characteristic information is almost the same as that of the first track. Figure 12 shows the velocity vector plot of the P2 profile in the double-track molten pool, with a maximum velocity of about 2.63โ€‰m/s. The melt dynamics at both ends of the pool are more stable at tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ฮผs, where the maximum rate of the second track is only 1/3 of that of the first one. Other than that, the rest of the information is almost no significant difference from the characteristic information of the first track. Figure 13 demonstrates a detailed observation of the double-track temperature field and melts flow in the YZ cross section, and a comparative study with Fig. 9 reveals that the width of the second track is slightly wider. In addition, after the melt direction shifts from bottom to top, the first track undergoes four time periods (50โ€‰ฮผs) to reach full solidification, while the second track takes five time periods. This is due to the presence of significant heat buildup in the powder bed after the forming of the first track, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt and an increased molten pool lifetime. In conclusion, the level of specimen forming can be significantly optimized by adjusting the laser power and hatch spacing.

FIG. 11.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 12.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of double-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 13.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of double-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰2450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰2550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰2600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰2650โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

In order to quantitatively detect the molten pool dimensions as well as the remolten region dimensions, the molten pool characterization information in Fig. 14 is constructed by drawing the boundary on the YZ cross section based on the isothermal surface of the liquid phase line. It can be observed that the heights of the first track and second track are basically the same, but the depth of the second track increases relative to the first track. The molten pool width is mainly positively correlated with the laser power as well as the scanning speed (the laser line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ). However, the remelted zone width is negatively correlated with the hatch spacing (the overlapping ratio). Overall, the forming quality of the specimens can be directly influenced by adjusting the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing.

FIG. 14.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool characterization information on YZ cross section.

In order to study the variation rule of the temperature in the center of the molten pool with time, Fig. 15 demonstrates the temperature variation curves with time for two reference points, A and B. Among them, the red dotted line indicates the liquid phase line temperature of SS316L. From the figure, it can be seen that the maximum temperature at the center of the molten pool in the first track is lower than that in the second track, which is mainly due to the heat accumulation generated after passing through the first track. The maximum temperature gradient was calculated to be 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. When the laser scanned the first track, the temperature in the center of the molten pool of the second track increased slightly. Similarly, when the laser scanned the second track, a similar situation existed in the first track. Since the temperature gradient in the second track is larger than that in the first track, the residence time of the liquid phase in the molten pool of the first track is longer than that of the second track.

FIG. 15.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Temperature profiles as a function of time for two reference points A and B.

C. Simulation analysis of molten pool under different process parameters

In order to deeply investigate the effects of various process parameters on the mesoscopic-scale temperature field, molten pool characteristic information and defects of HP-LPBF, numerical simulation experiments on mesoscopic-scale laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing of double-track molten pools were carried out.

1. Laser power

Figure 16 shows the effects of different laser power on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. When Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, a smaller molten pool is formed due to the lower heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time. This leads to a smaller track width, which results in adjacent track not lapping properly and the presence of a large number of unmelted powder particles, resulting in an increase in the number of defects, such as pores in the specimen. The surface of the track is relatively flat, and the depth is small. In addition, the temperature gradient before and after the molten pool was large, and the depression location appeared at the biased front end in Fig. 16(a). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, the surface of the track is flat and smooth with excellent lap. Due to the Marangoni effect, the velocity field of the molten pool is in the form of โ€œvortex,โ€ and the melt has good fluidity, and the maximum velocity reaches 2.15โ€‰m/s in Fig. 16(b). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W, the heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time is too large, resulting in the melt rapidly reaching the evaporation temperature, generating a huge recoil pressure, forming a large molten pool, and the surface of the track is obviously raised. The melt movement is intense, especially the closed loop at the center end of the molten pool. At this time, the depth and width of the molten pool are large, leading to the expansion of the remolten region and the increased chance of the appearance of porosity defects in Fig. 16(c). The results show that at low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool is dominant. At high laser power, recoil pressure is its main role.

FIG. 16.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different laser powers: (a) Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, (b) Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, (c) Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W.

Table II shows the effect of different laser powers on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. The negative overlapping ratio in the table indicates that the melt tracks are not lapped, and 26/29 indicates the melt depth of the first track/second track. It can be seen that with the increase in laser power, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, and remelted zone show a gradual increase. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also increases. Especially in the process of laser power from 50 to 200โ€‰W, the melting depth and melting width increased the most, which increased nearly 2 and 1.5 times, respectively. Meanwhile, the overlapping ratio also increases with the increase in laser power, which indicates that the melting and fusion of materials are better at high laser power. On the other hand, the dimensions of the molten pool did not change uniformly with the change of laser power. Specifically, the depth-to-width ratio of the molten pool increased from about 0.30 to 0.39 during the increase from 50 to 120โ€‰W, which further indicates that the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is greater than that in the horizontal direction with the increase in laser power. This dimensional response to laser power is mainly affected by the recoil pressure and also by the difference in the densification degree between the powder layer and the metal substrate. In addition, according to the experimental results, the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then decrease during the process of laser power increase, and always stays within the range of less than 33ยฐ. Therefore, in practical applications, it is necessary to select the appropriate laser power according to the specific needs in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE II.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different laser powers.

Laser power (W)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
50 16 54 11 โˆ’10 23 
100 26/29 74 14 18 23.33 33 
200 37/45 116 21 52 93.33 28 

2. Scanning speed

Figure 17 demonstrates the effect of different scanning speeds on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. With the gradual increase in scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. When ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, the slow scanning speed causes the material to absorb too much heat, which is very easy to trigger the overburning phenomenon. At this point, the molten pool is larger and the surface morphology is uneven. This situation is consistent with the previously discussed scenario with high laser power in Fig. 17(a). However, when ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s, the scanning speed is too fast, resulting in the material not being able to absorb sufficient heat, which triggers the powder particles that fail to melt completely to have a direct effect on the bonding of the melt to the substrate. At this time, the molten pool volume is relatively small and the neighboring melt track cannot lap properly. This result is consistent with the previously discussed case of low laser power in Fig. 17(b). Overall, the ratio of the laser power to the scanning speed (the line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ) has a direct effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 17.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different scanning speed: (a) โ€‰๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, (b) โ€‰๏ฟฝ =โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s.

Table III shows the effects of different scanning speed on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. It can be seen that the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. With the increase in scanning speed, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remelted zone, and overlapping ratio show a gradual decreasing trend. Among them, the melt depth and melt width decreased faster, while the melt height and remolten region decreased relatively slowly. In addition, when the scanning speed was increased from 200 to 800โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were significantly accelerated, while the decreasing speeds of overlapping ratio were relatively slow. When the scanning speed was further increased to 1600โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were further accelerated, and the un-lapped condition of the melt channel also appeared. In addition, the contact angle increases and then decreases with the scanning speed, and both are lower than 33ยฐ. Therefore, when selecting the scanning speed, it is necessary to make reasonable trade-offs according to the specific situation, and take into account the factors of melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio, in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE III.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different scanning speeds.

Scanning speed (mm/s)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
200 55/68 182 19/32 124 203.33 22 
1600 13 50 11 โˆ’16.67 31 

3. Hatch spacing

Figure 18 shows the effect of different hatch spacing on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The surface morphology and temperature field of the first track and second track are basically the same, but slightly different. The first track shows a basically symmetric morphology along the scanning direction, while the second track shows a slight offset due to the difference in the heat transfer rate between the solidified material and the powder particles. When the hatch spacing is too small, the overlapping ratio increases and the probability of defects caused by remelting phenomenon grows. When the hatch spacing is too large, the neighboring melt track cannot overlap properly, and the powder particles are not completely melted, leading to an increase in the number of holes. In conclusion, the ratio of the line energy density ๏ฟฝ to the hatch spacing (the volume energy density E) has a significant effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 18.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different hatch spacings: (a) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.03โ€‰mm, (b) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.12โ€‰mm.

Table IV shows the effects of different hatch spacing on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. It can be seen that the hatch spacing has little effect on the melt depth, melt width, and melt height, but has some effect on the remolten region. With the gradual expansion of hatch spacing, the remolten region shows a gradual decrease. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also decreased with the increase in hatch spacing. In addition, it is observed that the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then remain stable when the hatch spacing increases, which has a more limited effect on it. Therefore, trade-offs and decisions need to be made on a case-by-case basis when selecting the hatch spacing.

TABLE IV.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different hatch spacings.

Hatch spacing (mm)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
0.03 25/27 82 14 59 173.33 30 
0.12 26 78 14 โˆ’35 33 

In summary, the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing have a significant effect on the formation of the molten pool, and the correct selection of these three process parameters is crucial to ensure the forming quality. In addition, the melt depth of the second track is slightly larger than that of the first track at higher line energy density ๏ฟฝ and volume energy density E. This is mainly due to the fact that a large amount of heat accumulation is generated after the first track, forming a larger molten pool volume, which leads to an increase in the melt depth.

D. Simulation analysis of molten pool with powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter

Figure 19 demonstrates the effect of different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under a laser power of 100โ€‰W, a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. In the process of melting coarse powder with small laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy cannot completely melt the larger powder particles, resulting in their partial melting and further generating excessive pore defects. The larger powder particles tend to generate zigzag molten pool edges, which cause an increase in the roughness of the melt track surface. In addition, the molten pool is also prone to generate the present spatter phenomenon, which can directly affect the quality of forming. The volume of the formed molten pool is relatively small, while the melt depth, melt width, and melt height are all smaller relative to the fine powder in Fig. 19(a). In the process of melting fine powders with a large laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy is able to melt the fine powder particles sufficiently, even to the point of overmelting. This results in a large number of fine spatters being generated at the edge of the molten pool, which causes porosity defects in the melt track in Fig. 19(b). In addition, the maximum velocity of the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes compared to small powder particle sizes, which indicates that the temperature gradient in the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes and the melt motion is more intense. However, the size of the laser focal spot diameter has a relatively small effect on the melt motion. However, a larger focal spot diameter induces a larger melt volume with greater depth, width, and height. In conclusion, a small powder size helps to reduce the surface roughness of the specimen, and a small laser spot diameter reduces the minimum forming size of a single track.

FIG. 19.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool with different powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter: (a) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰25โ€‰ฮผm, coarse powder, (b) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰80โ€‰ฮผm, fine powder.

Table V shows the maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder sizes and laser focal spot diameters. As can be seen from the table, the maximum temperature gradient is lower than that of HP-LPBF for both coarse powders with a small laser spot diameter and fine powders with a large spot diameter, a phenomenon that leads to an increase in the heat transfer rate of HP-LPBF, which in turn leads to a corresponding increase in the cooling rate and, ultimately, to the formation of finer microstructures.

TABLE V.

Maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters.

Laser power (W)Scanning speed (mm/s)Hatch spacing (mm)Average powder size (ฮผm)Laser focal spot diameter (ฮผm)Maximum temperature gradient (ร—107โ€‰K/s)
100 800 0.06 31.7 25 7.89 
11.5 80 7.11 

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the geometrical characteristics of 3D coarse and fine powder particles were first calculated using DEM and then numerical simulations of single track and double track in the process of forming SS316L from monolayer HP-LPBF at mesoscopic scale were developed using CFD method. The effects of Marangoni convection, surface tension, recoil pressure, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool were considered in this model. The effects of laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing on the dynamics of the single-track and double-track molten pools, as well as on other characteristic information, were investigated. The effects of the powder particle size on the molten pool were investigated comparatively with the laser focal spot diameter. The main conclusions are as follows:

  1. The results show that the temperature gradient at the front of the molten pool is significantly larger than that at the tail, and the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ morphology. At the top of the molten pool, there is a slightly concave region, which is the result of the coupling of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension. The melt flow forms two closed loops, which are mainly influenced by temperature gradients and surface tension. This special dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ molten pool and an almost โ€œmountainโ€ shape in single-track forming.
  2. The basic characteristics of the three-dimensional morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track, but there are subtle differences. The first track exhibits a basically symmetrical shape; however, due to the difference in thermal diffusion rates between the solidified metal and the powder, a slight asymmetry in the molten pool morphology of the second track occurs. After forming through the first track, there is a significant heat buildup in the powder bed, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt, which increases the life of the molten pool. The heights of the first track and second track remained essentially the same, but the depth of the second track was greater relative to the first track. In addition, the maximum temperature gradient was 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s during HP-LPBF forming.
  3. At low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool plays a dominant role. At high laser power, recoil pressure becomes the main influencing factor. With the increase of laser power, the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is superior to that in the horizontal direction. With the gradual increase of scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. In addition, the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. Too large or too small hatch spacing will lead to remelting or non-lap phenomenon, which in turn causes the formation of defects.
  4. When using a small laser focal spot diameter, it is difficult to completely melt large powder particle sizes, resulting in partial melting and excessive porosity generation. At the same time, large powder particles produce curved edges of the molten pool, resulting in increased surface roughness of the melt track. In addition, spatter occurs, which directly affects the forming quality. At small focal spot diameters, the molten pool volume is relatively small, and the melt depth, the melt width, and the melt height are correspondingly small. Taken together, the small powder particle size helps to reduce surface roughness, while the small spot diameter reduces the forming size.

REFERENCES

  1. S. L. Sing and W. Y. Yeong , โ€œ Laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing: Perspectives on recent developments,โ€ Virtual Phys. Prototyping. 15, 359โ€“370 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1779999
    Google ScholarCrossref
  2. A. M. Khorasani , I. G. Jithin , J. K. Veetil , and A. H. Ghasemi , โ€œ A review of technological improvements in laser-based powder bed fusion of metal printers,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108, 191โ€“209 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05361-3
    Google ScholarCrossref
  3. Y. Qin , A. Brockett , Y. Ma , A. Razali , J. Zhao , C. Harrison , W. Pan , X. Dai , and D. Loziak , โ€œ Micro-manufacturing: Research, technology outcomes and development issues,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47, 821โ€“837 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2411-2
    Google ScholarCrossref
  4. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Development of micro selective laser melting: The state of the art and future perspectives,โ€ Engineering. 5, 702โ€“720 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  5. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , J. Xu , and W. Zhou , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of SS316L: Single tracks, defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 145, 107469 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107469
    Google ScholarCrossref
  6. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , M. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , and J. Xu , โ€œ Process optimization of micro selective laser melting and comparison of different laser diameter for forming different powder,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 150, 107953 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107953
    Google ScholarCrossref
  7. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Formation of SS316L single tracks in micro selective laser melting: Surface, geometry, and defects,โ€ Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 9451406.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9451406
    Crossref
  8. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , S. Gao , X. Song , R. Huang , M. Seita , and J. Wei , โ€œ Effect of in-situ laser remelting on the microstructure of SS316L fabricated by micro selective laser melting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 330โ€“336.
    Google ScholarCrossref
  9. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Tailoring surface roughness of micro selective laser melted SS316L by in-situ laser remelting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 337โ€“343.
    Google Scholar
  10. J. Fu , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , Y. Long , H. Li , and M. Fu , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of NiTi shape memory alloy: Defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 131, 106374 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106374
    Google ScholarCrossref
  11. E. Abele and M. Kniepkamp , โ€œ Analysis and optimisation of vertical surface roughness in micro selective laser melting,โ€ Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 3, 034007 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/3/3/034007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  12. S. Qu , J. Ding , J. Fu , M. Fu , B. Zhang , and X. Song , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion processing of pure copper,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 48, 102417 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102417
    Google ScholarCrossref
  13. Y. Wei , G. Chen , M. Li , W. Li , Y. Zhou , J. Xu , and Z. wei , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion of 18Ni300 maraging steel and its SiC reinforcement composite materials,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 84, 750โ€“763 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.049
    Google ScholarCrossref
  14. B. Liu , R. Wildman , T. Christopher , I. Ashcroft , and H. Richard , โ€œ Investigation the effect of particle size distribution on processing parameters optimisation in selective laser melting process,โ€ in 2011 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium ( University of Texas at Austin, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  15. T. D. McLouth , G. E. Bean , D. B. Witkin , S. D. Sitzman , P. M. Adams , D. N. Patel , W. Park , J.-M. Yang , and R. J. Zaldivar , โ€œ The effect of laser focus shift on microstructural variation of Inconel 718 produced by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 149, 205โ€“213 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.019
    Google ScholarCrossref
  16. Y. Qian , Y. Wentao , and L. Feng , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulations of powder bed fusion: Research progresses and conditions,โ€ Electromachining Mould 06, 46โ€“52 (2017).https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-279X.2017.06.012
    Google Scholar
  17. J. Fu , S. Qu , J. Ding , X. Song , and M. W. Fu , โ€œ Comparison of the microstructure, mechanical properties and distortion of stainless Steel 316L fabricated by micro and conventional laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 44, 102067 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  18. N. T. Aboulkhair , I. Maskery , C. Tuck , I. Ashcroft , and N. M. Everitt , โ€œ The microstructure and mechanical properties of selectively laser Melted AlSi10Mg: The effect of a conventional T6-like heat treatment,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 667, 139โ€“146 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.092
    Google ScholarCrossref
  19. S. Y. Chen , J. C. Huang , C. T. Pan , C. H. Lin , T. L. Yang , Y. S. Huang , C. H. Ou , L. Y. Chen , D. Y. Lin , H. K. Lin , T. H. Li , J. S. C. Jang , and C. C. Yang , โ€œ Microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cell porous Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by selective laser melting,โ€ J. Alloys Compd. 713, 248โ€“254 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.190
    Google ScholarCrossref
  20. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , D. Wang , and M. Zhang , โ€œ Influence mechanism of parameters process and mechanical properties evolution mechanism of Maraging steel 300 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 703, 116โ€“123 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.033
    Google ScholarCrossref
  21. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , Z. Xiao , M. Zhang , and D. Wang , โ€œ Process optimization and mechanical property evolution of AlSiMg0.75 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 140, 257โ€“266 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.045
    Google ScholarCrossref
  22. Y. Liu , M. Zhang , W. Shi , Y. Ma , and J. Yang , โ€œ Study on performance optimization of 316L stainless steel parts by high-efficiency selective laser melting,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 138, 106872 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106872
    Google ScholarCrossref
  23. D. Gu , Y.-C. Hagedorn , W. Meiners , G. Meng , R. J. S. Batista , K. Wissenbach , and R. Poprawe , โ€œ Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and wear performance of selective laser melting processed commercially pure titanium,โ€ Acta Mater. 60, 3849โ€“3860 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.006
    Google ScholarCrossref
  24. N. Read , W. Wang , K. Essa , and M. M. Attallah , โ€œ Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: Process optimisation and mechanical properties development,โ€ Mater. Des. 65, 417โ€“424 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  25. I. A. Roberts , C. J. Wang , R. Esterlein , M. Stanford , and D. J. Mynors , โ€œ A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49(12โ€“13), 916โ€“923 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.07.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  26. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Finite element analysis of the effect of volume shrinkage during laser densification,โ€ Acta Mater. 53(18), 4743โ€“4754 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.014
    Google ScholarCrossref
  27. K. Carolin , E. Attar , and P. Heinl , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(6), 978โ€“987 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016
    Google ScholarCrossref
  28. F.-J. Gรผrtler , M. Karg , K.-H. Leitz , and M. Schmidt , โ€œ Simulation of laser beam melting of steel powders using the three-dimensional volume of fluid method,โ€ Phys. Procedia 41, 881โ€“886 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.162
    Google ScholarCrossref
  29. P. Meakin and R. Jullien , โ€œ Restructuring effects in the rain model for random deposition,โ€ J. Phys. France 48(10), 1651โ€“1662 (1987).https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198700480100165100
    Google ScholarCrossref
  30. J-m Wang , G-h Liu , Y-l Fang , and W-k Li , โ€œ Marangoni effect in nonequilibrium multiphase system of material processing,โ€ Rev. Chem. Eng. 32(5), 551โ€“585 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2015-0067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  31. W. Ye , S. Zhang , L. L. Mendez , M. Farias , J. Li , B. Xu , P. Li , and Y. Zhang , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the melting and alloying processes of elemental titanium and boron powders using selective laser alloying,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 64, 1235โ€“1247 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  32. U. S. Bertoli , A. J. Wolfer , M. J. Matthews , J.-P. R. Delplanque , and J. M. Schoenung , โ€œ On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 113, 331โ€“340 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037
    Google ScholarCrossref
  33. W. E. King , H. D. Barth , V. M. Castillo , G. F. Gallegos , J. W. Gibbs , D. E. Hahn , C. Kamath , and A. M. Rubenchik , โ€œ Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(12), 2915โ€“2925 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  34. L. Cao , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the impact of laying powder on selective laser melting single-pass formation,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 141, 1036โ€“1048 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  35. L. Huang , X. Hua , D. Wu , and F. Li , โ€œ Numerical study of keyhole instability and porosity formation mechanism in laser welding of aluminum alloy and steel,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 252, 421โ€“431 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.011
    Google ScholarCrossref
  36. K. Q. Le , C. Tang , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ On the study of keyhole-mode melting in selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Therm. Sci. 145, 105992 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.105992
    Google ScholarCrossref
  37. J.-H. Cho and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Theoretical analysis of keyhole dynamics in polarized laser drilling,โ€ J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40(24), 7638 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/24/007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  38. W. Ye , โ€œ Mechanism analysis of selective laser melting and metallurgy process based on base element powder of titanium and boron,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Nanchang University, 2021).
    Google Scholar
  39. R. Ammer , M. Markl , U. Ljungblad , C. Kรถrner , and U. Rรผde , โ€œ Simulating fast electron beam melting with a parallel thermal free surface lattice Boltzmann method,โ€ Comput. Math. Appl. 67(2), 318โ€“330 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.10.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  40. H. Chen , Q. Wei , S. Wen , Z. Li , and Y. Shi , โ€œ Flow behavior of powder particles in layering process of selective laser melting: Numerical modeling and experimental verification based on discrete element method,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 123, 146โ€“159 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  41. F. Verhaeghe , T. Craeghs , J. Heulens , and L. Pandelaers , โ€œ A pragmatic model for selective laser melting with evaporation,โ€ Acta Mater. 57(20), 6006โ€“6012 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.027
    Google ScholarCrossref
  42. C. H. Fu and Y. B. Guo , โ€œ Three-dimensional temperature gradient mechanism in selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V,โ€ J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136(6), 061004 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028539
    Google ScholarCrossref
  43. Y. Xiang , Z. Shuzhe , L. Junfeng , W. Zhengying , Y. Lixiang , and J. Lihao , โ€œ Numerical simulation and experimental verification for selective laser single track melting forming of Ti6Al4V,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 53(11), 2102โ€“2109โ€‰+โ€‰2117 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.11.007
    Google Scholar
  44. Q. He , H. Xia , J. Liu , X. Ao , and S. Lin , โ€œ Modeling and numerical studies of selective laser melting: Multiphase flow, solidification and heat transfer,โ€ Mater. Des. 196, 109115 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109115
    Google ScholarCrossref
  45. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical simulation including the influence of process parameters on SLM single-layer multi-pass formation,โ€ Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 4130โ€“4145 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05831-z
    Google ScholarCrossref
  46. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical investigation including the influence of process parameters on LPBF multi-layer multi-path formation,โ€ Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 126(1), 5โ€“23 (2021).https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.014693
    Google ScholarCrossref
  47. H. Yin and S. D. Felicelli , โ€œ Dendrite growth simulation during solidification in the LENS process,โ€ Acta Mater. 58(4), 1455โ€“1465 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  48. P. Nie , O. A. Ojo , and Z. Li , โ€œ Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 77, 85โ€“95 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.039
    Google ScholarCrossref
  49. Z. Liu and H. Qi , โ€œ Effects of substrate crystallographic orientations on crystal growth and microstructure formation in laser powder deposition of nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 87, 248โ€“258 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.046
    Google ScholarCrossref
  50. L. Wei , L. Xin , W. Meng , and H. Weidong , โ€œ Cellular automaton simulation of the molten pool of laser solid forming process,โ€ Acta Phys. Sin. 64(01), 018103โ€“018363 (2015).https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.64.018103
    Google ScholarCrossref
  51. R. Acharya , J. A. Sharon , and A. Staroselsky , โ€œ Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Acta Mater. 124, 360โ€“371 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018
    Google ScholarCrossref
  52. M. R. Rolchigo and R. LeSar , โ€œ Modeling of binary alloy solidification under conditions representative of additive manufacturing,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 535โ€“545 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  53. S. Geng , P. Jiang , L. Guo , X. Gao , and G. Mi , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of grain/sub-grain structure evolution during solidification in laser welding of aluminum alloys,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119252 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119252
    Google ScholarCrossref
  54. W. L. Wang , W. Q. Liu , X. Yang , R. R. Xu , and Q. Y. Dai , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of columnar-to-equiaxed transition during laser selective melting of rare earth magnesium alloy,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 119, 11โ€“24 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.029
    Google ScholarCrossref
  55. Q. Xia , J. Yang , and Y. Li , โ€œ On the conservative phase-field method with the N-component incompressible flows,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 012120 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135490
    Google ScholarCrossref
  56. Q. Xia , G. Sun , J. Kim , and Y. Li , โ€œ Multi-scale modeling and simulation of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition technique,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 034116 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141316
    Google ScholarCrossref
  57. A. Hussein , L. Hao , C. Yan , and R. Everson , โ€œ Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 52, 638โ€“647 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070
    Google ScholarCrossref
  58. J. Ding , P. Colegrove , J. Mehnen , S. Ganguly , P. M. Sequeira Almeida , F. Wang , and S. Williams , โ€œ Thermo-mechanical analysis of wire and arc additive layer manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(12), 3315โ€“3322 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.023
    Google ScholarCrossref
  59. Y. Du , X. You , F. Qiao , L. Guo , and Z. Liu , โ€œ A model for predicting the temperature field during selective laser melting,โ€ Results Phys. 12, 52โ€“60 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.031
    Google ScholarCrossref
  60. X. Luo , M. Liu , L. Zhenhua , H. Li , and J. Shen , โ€œ Effect of different heat-source models on calculated temperature field of selective laser melted 18Ni300,โ€ Chin. J. Lasers 48(14), 1402005โ€“1402062 (2021).https://doi.org/10.3788/CJL202148.1402005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  61. J. F. Li , L. Li , and F. H. Stott , โ€œ Thermal stresses and their implication on cracking during laser melting of ceramic materials,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(14), 4385โ€“4398 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  62. P. Aggarangsi and J. L. Beuth , โ€œ Localized preheating approaches for reducing residual stress in additive manufacturing,โ€ paper presented at the 2006 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, The University of Texas in Austin on August 14โ€“16, 2006.
  63. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Thermal and mechanical finite element modeling of laser forming from metal and ceramic powders,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(1), 69โ€“80 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.028
    Google ScholarCrossref
  64. A. H. Nickel , D. M. Barnett , and F. B. Prinz , โ€œ Thermal stresses and deposition patterns in layered manufacturing,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 317(1โ€“2), 59โ€“64 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01179-0
    Google ScholarCrossref
  65. M. F. Zaeh and G. Branner , โ€œ Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting,โ€ Prod. Eng. 4(1), 35โ€“45 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y
    Google ScholarCrossref
  66. P. Bian , J. Shi , Y. Liu , and Y. Xie , โ€œ Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 132, 106477 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106477
    Google ScholarCrossref
  67. B. M. Marques , C. M. Andrade , D. M. Neto , M. C. Oliveira , J. L. Alves , and L. F. Menezes , โ€œ Numerical analysis of residual stresses in parts produced by selective laser melting process,โ€ Procedia Manuf. 47, 1170โ€“1177 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.167
    Google ScholarCrossref
  68. W. Mu , โ€œ Numerical simulation of SLM forming process and research and prediction of forming properties,โ€ MA thesis ( Anhui Jianzhu University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  69. Y. Zhang , โ€œ Multi-scale multi-physics modeling of laser powder bed fusion process of metallic materials with experiment validation,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Purdue University, 2018).
    Google Scholar
  70. Y. Qian , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation studies of key processing issues for powder bed fusion technology,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Tsinghua University, 2019).
    Google Scholar
  71. N. V. Brilliantov , S. Frank , J.-M. Hertzsch , and T. Pรถschel , โ€œ Model for collisions in granular gases,โ€ Phys. Rev. E 53(5), 5382โ€“5392 (1996).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5382
    Google ScholarCrossref
  72. Z. Xiao , โ€œ Research on microscale selective laser melting process of high strength pure copper specimens,โ€ MA thesis ( Hunan University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  73. Z. Li , K. Mukai , M. Zeze , and K. C. Mills , โ€œ Determination of the surface tension of liquid stainless steel,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. 40(9โ€“10), 2191โ€“2195 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1931-x
    Google ScholarCrossref
  74. R. Scardovelli and S. Zaleski , โ€œ Analytical relations connecting linear interfaces and volume fractions in rectangular grids,โ€ J. Comput. Phys. 164(1), 228โ€“237 (2000).https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6567
    Google ScholarCrossref
  75. D.-W. Cho , W.-I. Cho , and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Modeling and simulation of arc: Laser and hybrid welding process,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 16(1), 26โ€“55 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.06.012
    Google ScholarCrossref
    76.Flow3D. Version 11.1.0: User Manual ( FlowScience, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2015).
  76. Y. Tian , L. Yang , D. Zhao , Y. Huang , and J. Pan , โ€œ Numerical analysis of powder bed generation and single track forming for selective laser melting of ss316l stainless steel,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 58, 964โ€“974 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  77. C. Tang , K. Q. Le , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ Physics of humping formation in laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119172 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172
    Google ScholarCrossref
  78. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale simulation of pore evolution during laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 179, 109686 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109686
    Google ScholarCrossref
  79. R. Li , J. Liu , Y. Shi , W. Li , and W. Jiang , โ€œ Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 59(9โ€“12), 1025โ€“1035 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3566-1
    Google ScholarCrossref
  80. S. A. Khairallah and A. Anderson , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(11), 2627โ€“2636 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  81. J. Liu , D. Gu , H. Chen , D. Dai , and H. Zhang , โ€œ Influence of substrate surface morphology on wetting behavior of tracks during selective laser melting of aluminum-based alloys,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19(2), 111โ€“121 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700599
    Google ScholarCrossref
  82. L. Li , J. Li , and T. Fan , โ€œ Phase-field modeling of wetting and balling dynamics in powder bed fusion process,โ€ Phys. Fluids 33, 042116 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046771
    Google ScholarCrossref
  83. X. Nie , Z. Hu , H. Zhu , Z. Hu , L. Ke , and X. Zeng , โ€œ Analysis of processing parameters and characteristics of selective laser melted high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloys: from single tracks to cubic samples,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 256, 69โ€“77 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.030
    Google ScholarCrossref

Lab-on-a-Chip ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† : ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ๊ด€์ 

Review on Blood Flow Dynamics in Lab-on-a-Chip Systems: An Engineering Perspective

  • Bin-Jie Lai
  • ,ย 
  • Li-Tao Zhu
  • ,ย 
  • Zhe Chen*
  • ,ย 
  • Bo Ouyang*
  • ,ย andย 
  • Zheng-Hong Luo*

Abstract

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ํ•˜์—์„œ, “LOC(lab-on-a-chip)” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ์ „๋‹จ ์†๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ ํ˜ˆ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋™์  ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ ๋„ ๋ฐ ํƒ„์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ , ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ ์‚ผํˆฌ์•• ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ต๋ž€์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜ˆ์•ก ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ํ•˜๋Š” LOC ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋…ผ์˜๋˜๊ณ  ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํšจ๊ณผ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ•˜์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์ œํƒ€ ์ „์œ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€์ •๋„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ตฌ๋™๋˜๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ•™์ œ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

KEYWORDS:ย 

1. Introduction

1.1. Microfluidic Flow in Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) Systems

Over the past several decades, the ability to control and utilize fluid flow patterns at microscales has gained considerable interest across a myriad of scientific and engineering disciplines, leading to growing interest in scientific research of microfluidics. 

(1) Microfluidics, an interdisciplinary field that straddles physics, engineering, and biotechnology, is dedicated to the behavior, precise control, and manipulation of fluids geometrically constrained to a small, typically submillimeter, scale. 

(2) The engineering community has increasingly focused on microfluidics, exploring different driving forces to enhance working fluid transport, with the aim of accurately and efficiently describing, controlling, designing, and applying microfluidic flow principles and transport phenomena, particularly for miniaturized applications. 

(3) This attention has chiefly been fueled by the potential to revolutionize diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in the biomedical and pharmaceutical sectorsUnder various driving forces in microfluidic flows, intriguing transport phenomena have bolstered confidence in sustainable and efficient applications in fields such as pharmaceutical, biochemical, and environmental science. The โ€œlab-on-a-chipโ€ (LOC) system harnesses microfluidic flow to enable fluid processing and the execution of laboratory tasks on a chip-sized scale. LOC systems have played a vital role in the miniaturization of laboratory operations such as mixing, chemical reaction, separation, flow control, and detection on small devices, where a wide variety of fluids is adapted. Biological fluid flow like blood and other viscoelastic fluids are notably studied among the many working fluids commonly utilized by LOC systems, owing to the optimization in small fluid sample volumed, rapid response times, precise control, and easy manipulation of flow patterns offered by the system under various driving forces. 

(4)The driving forces in blood flow can be categorized as passive or active transport mechanisms and, in some cases, both. Under various transport mechanisms, the unique design of microchannels enables different functionalities in driving, mixing, separating, and diagnosing blood and drug delivery in the blood. 

(5) Understanding and manipulating these driving forces are crucial for optimizing the performance of a LOC system. Such knowledge presents the opportunity to achieve higher efficiency and reliability in addressing cellular level challenges in medical diagnostics, forensic studies, cancer detection, and other fundamental research areas, for applications of point-of-care (POC) devices. 

(6)

1.2. Engineering Approach of Microfluidic Transport Phenomena in LOC Systems

Different transport mechanisms exhibit unique properties at submillimeter length scales in microfluidic devices, leading to significant transport phenomena that differ from those of macroscale flows. An in-depth understanding of these unique transport phenomena under microfluidic systems is often required in fluidic mechanics to fully harness the potential functionality of a LOC system to obtain systematically designed and precisely controlled transport of microfluids under their respective driving force. Fluid mechanics is considered a vital component in chemical engineering, enabling the analysis of fluid behaviors in various unit designs, ranging from large-scale reactors to separation units. Transport phenomena in fluid mechanics provide a conceptual framework for analytically and descriptively explaining why and how experimental results and physiological phenomena occur. The Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, along with other governing equations, is often adapted to accurately describe fluid dynamics by accounting for pressure, surface properties, velocity, and temperature variations over space and time. In addition, limiting factors and nonidealities for these governing equations should be considered to impose corrections for empirical consistency before physical models are assembled for more accurate controls and efficiency. Microfluidic flow systems often deviate from ideal conditions, requiring adjustments to the standard governing equations. These deviations could arise from factors such as viscous effects, surface interactions, and non-Newtonian fluid properties from different microfluid types and geometrical layouts of microchannels. Addressing these nonidealities supports the refining of theoretical models and prediction accuracy for microfluidic flow behaviors.

The analytical calculation of coupled nonlinear governing equations, which describes the material and energy balances of systems under ideal conditions, often requires considerable computational efforts. However, advancements in computation capabilities, cost reduction, and improved accuracy have made numerical simulations using different numerical and modeling methods a powerful tool for effectively solving these complex coupled equations and modeling various transport phenomena. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical technique used to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of various flow parameters. It serves as a critical approach to provide insights and reasoning for decision-making regarding the optimal designs involving fluid dynamics, even prior to complex physical model prototyping and experimental procedures. The integration of experimental data, theoretical analysis, and reliable numerical simulations from CFD enables systematic variation of analytical parameters through quantitative analysis, where adjustment to delivery of blood flow and other working fluids in LOC systems can be achieved.

Numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element-Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) are heavily employed in CFD and offer diverse approaches to achieve discretization of Eulerian flow equations through filling a mesh of the flow domain. A more in-depth review of numerical methods in CFD and its application for blood flow simulation is provided in Section 2.2.2.

1.3. Scope of the Review

In this Review, we explore and characterize the blood flow phenomena within the LOC systems, utilizing both physiological and engineering modeling approaches. Similar approaches will be taken to discuss capillary-driven flow and electric-osmotic flow (EOF) under electrokinetic phenomena as a passive and active transport scheme, respectively, for blood transport in LOC systems. Such an analysis aims to bridge the gap between physical (experimental) and engineering (analytical) perspectives in studying and manipulating blood flow delivery by different driving forces in LOC systems. Moreover, the Review hopes to benefit the interests of not only blood flow control in LOC devices but also the transport of viscoelastic fluids, which are less studied in the literature compared to that of Newtonian fluids, in LOC systems.

Section 2 examines the complex interplay between viscoelastic properties of blood and blood flow patterns under shear flow in LOC systems, while engineering numerical modeling approaches for blood flow are presented for assistance. Sections 3 and 4 look into the theoretical principles, numerical governing equations, and modeling methodologies for capillary driven flow and EOF in LOC systems as well as their impact on blood flow dynamics through the quantification of key parameters of the two driving forces. Section 5 concludes the characterized blood flow transport processes in LOC systems under these two forces. Additionally, prospective areas of research in improving the functionality of LOC devices employing blood and other viscoelastic fluids and potentially justifying mechanisms underlying microfluidic flow patterns outside of LOC systems are presented. Finally, the challenges encountered in the numerical studies of blood flow under LOC systems are acknowledged, paving the way for further research.

2. Blood Flow Phenomena

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


2.1. Physiological Blood Flow Behavior

Blood, an essential physiological fluid in the human body, serves the vital role of transporting oxygen and nutrients throughout the body. Additionally, blood is responsible for suspending various blood cells including erythrocytes (red blood cells or RBCs), leukocytes (white blood cells), and thrombocytes (blood platelets) in a plasma medium.Among the cells mentioned above, red blood cells (RBCs) comprise approximately 40โ€“45% of the volume of healthy blood. 

(7) An RBC possesses an inherent elastic property with a biconcave shape of an average diameter of 8 ฮผm and a thickness of 2 ฮผm. This biconcave shape maximizes the surface-to-volume ratio, allowing RBCs to endure significant distortion while maintaining their functionality. 

(8,9) Additionally, the biconcave shape optimizes gas exchange, facilitating efficient uptake of oxygen due to the increased surface area. The inherent elasticity of RBCs allows them to undergo substantial distortion from their original biconcave shape and exhibits high flexibility, particularly in narrow channels.RBC deformability enables the cell to deform from a biconcave shape to a parachute-like configuration, despite minor differences in RBC shape dynamics under shear flow between initial cell locations. As shown in Figure 1(a), RBCs initiating with different resting shapes and orientations displaying display a similar deformation pattern 

(10) in terms of its shape. Shear flow induces an inward bending of the cell at the rear position of the rim to the final bending position, 

(11) resulting in an alignment toward the same position of the flow direction.

Figure 1. Images of varying deformation of RBCs and different dynamic blood flow behaviors. (a) The deforming shape behavior of RBCs at four different initiating positions under the same experimental conditions of a flow from left to right, (10) (b) RBC aggregation, (13) (c) CFL region. (18) Reproduced with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2011 Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2022 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.

The flexible property of RBCs enables them to navigate through narrow capillaries and traverse a complex network of blood vessels. The deformability of RBCs depends on various factors, including the channel geometry, RBC concentration, and the elastic properties of the RBC membrane. 

(12) Both flexibility and deformability are vital in the process of oxygen exchange among blood and tissues throughout the body, allowing cells to flow in vessels even smaller than the original cell size prior to deforming.As RBCs serve as major components in blood, their collective dynamics also hugely affect blood rheology. RBCs exhibit an aggregation phenomenon due to cell to cell interactions, such as adhesion forces, among populated cells, inducing unique blood flow patterns and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems. For blood flow in large vessels between a diameter of 1 and 3 cm, where shear rates are not high, a constant viscosity and Newtonian behavior for blood can be assumed. However, under low shear rate conditions (0.1 s

โ€“1) in smaller vessels such as the arteries and venules, which are within a diameter of 0.2 mm to 1 cm, blood exhibits non-Newtonian properties, such as shear-thinning viscosity and viscoelasticity due to RBC aggregation and deformability. The nonlinear viscoelastic property of blood gives rise to a complex relationship between viscosity and shear rate, primarily influenced by the highly elastic behavior of RBCs. A wide range of research on the transient behavior of the RBC shape and aggregation characteristics under varied flow circumstances has been conducted, aiming to obtain a better understanding of the interaction between blood flow shear forces from confined flows.

For a better understanding of the unique blood flow structures and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems, some blood flow patterns are introduced in the following section.

2.1.1. RBC Aggregation

RBC aggregation is a vital phenomenon to be considered when designing LOC devices due to its impact on the viscosity of the bulk flow. Under conditions of low shear rate, such as in stagnant or low flow rate regions, RBCs tend to aggregate, forming structures known as rouleaux, resembling stacks of coins as shown in Figure 1(b). 

(13) The aggregation of RBCs increases the viscosity at the aggregated region, 

(14) hence slowing down the overall blood flow. However, when exposed to high shear rates, RBC aggregates disaggregate. As shear rates continue to increase, RBCs tend to deform, elongating and aligning themselves with the direction of the flow. 

(15) Such a dynamic shift in behavior from the cells in response to the shear rate forms the basis of the viscoelastic properties observed in whole blood. In essence, the viscosity of the blood varies according to the shear rate conditions, which are related to the velocity gradient of the system. It is significant to take the intricate relationship between shear rate conditions and the change of blood viscosity due to RBC aggregation into account since various flow driving conditions may induce varied effects on the degree of aggregation.

2.1.2. Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist Effect

The Fรฅhrรฆusโ€“Lindqvist (FL) effect describes the gradual decrease in the apparent viscosity of blood as the channel diameter decreases. 

(16) This effect is attributed to the migration of RBCs toward the central region in the microchannel, where the flow rate is higher, due to the presence of higher pressure and asymmetric distribution of shear forces. This migration of RBCs, typically observed at blood vessels less than 0.3 mm, toward the higher flow rate region contributes to the change in blood viscosity, which becomes dependent on the channel size. Simultaneously, the increase of the RBC concentration in the central region of the microchannel results in the formation of a less viscous region close to the microchannel wall. This region called the Cell-Free Layer (CFL), is primarily composed of plasma. 

(17) The combination of the FL effect and the following CFL formation provides a unique phenomenon that is often utilized in passive and active plasma separation mechanisms, involving branched and constriction channels for various applications in plasma separation using microfluidic systems.

2.1.3. Cell-Free Layer Formation

In microfluidic blood flow, RBCs form aggregates at the microchannel core and result in a region that is mostly devoid of RBCs near the microchannel walls, as shown in Figure 1(c). 

(18) The region is known as the cell-free layer (CFL). The CFL region is often known to possess a lower viscosity compared to other regions within the blood flow due to the lower viscosity value of plasma when compared to that of the aggregated RBCs. Therefore, a thicker CFL region composed of plasma correlates to a reduced apparent whole blood viscosity. 

(19) A thicker CFL region is often established following the RBC aggregation at the microchannel core under conditions of decreasing the tube diameter. Apart from the dependence on the RBC concentration in the microchannel core, the CFL thickness is also affected by the volume concentration of RBCs, or hematocrit, in whole blood, as well as the deformability of RBCs. Given the influence CFL thickness has on blood flow rheological parameters such as blood flow rate, which is strongly dependent on whole blood viscosity, investigating CFL thickness under shear flow is crucial for LOC systems accounting for blood flow.

2.1.4. Plasma Skimming in Bifurcation Networks

The uneven arrangement of RBCs in bifurcating microchannels, commonly termed skimming bifurcation, arises from the axial migration of RBCs within flowing streams. This uneven distribution contributes to variations in viscosity across differing sizes of bifurcating channels but offers a stabilizing effect. Notably, higher flow rates in microchannels are associated with increased hematocrit levels, resulting in higher viscosity compared with those with lower flow rates. Parametric investigations on bifurcation angle, 

(20) thickness of the CFL, 

(21) and RBC dynamics, including aggregation and deformation, 

(22) may alter the varying viscosity of blood and its flow behavior within microchannels.

2.2. Modeling on Blood Flow Dynamics

2.2.1. Blood Properties and Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology

Under different shear rate conditions in blood flow, the elastic characteristics and dynamic changes of the RBC induce a complex velocity and stress relationship, resulting in the incompatibility of blood flow characterization through standard presumptions of constant viscosity used for Newtonian fluid flow. Blood flow is categorized as a viscoelastic non-Newtonian fluid flow where constitutive equations governing this type of flow take into consideration the nonlinear viscometric properties of blood. To mathematically characterize the evolving blood viscosity and the relationship between the elasticity of RBC and the shear blood flow, respectively, across space and time of the system, a stress tensor (ฯ„) defined by constitutive models is often coupled in the Navierโ€“Stokes equation to account for the collective impact of the constant dynamic viscosity (ฮท) and the elasticity from RBCs on blood flow.The dynamic viscosity of blood is heavily dependent on the shear stress applied to the cell and various parameters from the blood such as hematocrit value, plasma viscosity, mechanical properties of the RBC membrane, and red blood cell aggregation rate. The apparent blood viscosity is considered convenient for the characterization of the relationship between the evolving blood viscosity and shear rate, which can be defined by Cassonโ€™s law, as shown in eq 1.

๐œ‡=๐œ0๐›พห™+2๐œ‚๐œ0๐›พห™โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš+๐œ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+๏ฟฝ

(1)where ฯ„

0 is the yield stressโ€“stress required to initiate blood flow motion, ฮท is the Casson rheological constant, and ฮณฬ‡ is the shear rate. The value of Cassonโ€™s law parameters under blood with normal hematocrit level can be defined as ฯ„

0 = 0.0056 Pa and ฮท = 0.0035 Paยทs. 

(23) With the known property of blood and Cassonโ€™s law parameters, an approximation can be made to the dynamic viscosity under various flow condition domains. The Power Law model is often employed to characterize the dynamic viscosity in relation to the shear rate, since precise solutions exist for specific geometries and flow circumstances, acting as a fundamental standard for definition. The Carreau and Carreauโ€“Yasuda models can be advantageous over the Power Law model due to their ability to evaluate the dynamic viscosity at low to zero shear rate conditions. However, none of the above-mentioned models consider the memory or other elastic behavior of blood and its RBCs. Some other commonly used mathematical models and their constants for the non-Newtonian viscosity property characterization of blood are listed in Table 1 below. 

(24โˆ’26)Table 1. Comparison of Various Non-Newtonian Models for Blood Viscosity 

(24โˆ’26)

ModelNon-Newtonian ViscosityParameters
Power Law(2)n = 0.61, k = 0.42
Carreau(3)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 3.1736 s, m = 2.406, a = 0.254
Walburnโ€“Schneck(4)C1 = 0.000797 Paยทs, C2 = 0.0608 Paยทs, C3 = 0.00499, C4 = 14.585 gโ€“1, TPMA = 25 g/L
Carreauโ€“Yasuda(5)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 1.902 s, n = 0.22, a = 1.25
Quemada(6)ฮผp = 0.0012 Paยทs, kโˆž = 2.07, k0 = 4.33, ฮณฬ‡c = 1.88 sโ€“1

The blood rheology is commonly known to be influenced by two key physiological factors, namely, the hematocrit value (H

t) and the fibrinogen concentration (c

f), with an average value of 42% and 0.252 gdยทL

โ€“1, respectively. Particularly in low shear conditions, the presence of varying fibrinogen concentrations affects the tendency for aggregation and rouleaux formation, while the occurrence of aggregation is contingent upon specific levels of hematocrit. 

(27) The study from Apostolidis et al. 

(28) modifies the Casson model through emphasizing its reliance on hematocrit and fibrinogen concentration parameter values, owing to the extensive knowledge of the two physiological blood parameters.The viscoelastic response of blood is heavily dependent on the elasticity of the RBC, which is defined by the relationship between the deformation and stress relaxation from RBCs under a specific location of shear flow as a function of the velocity field. The stress tensor is usually characterized by constitutive equations such as the Upper-Convected Maxwell Model 

(29) and the Oldroyd-B model 

(30) to track the molecule effects under shear from different driving forces. The prominent non-Newtonian features, such as shear thinning and yield stress, have played a vital role in the characterization of blood rheology, particularly with respect to the evaluation of yield stress under low shear conditions. The nature of stress measurement in blood, typically on the order of 1 mPa, is challenging due to its low magnitude. The occurrence of the CFL complicates the measurement further due to the significant decrease in apparent viscosity near the wall over time and a consequential disparity in viscosity compared to the bulk region.In addition to shear thinning viscosity and yield stress, the formation of aggregation (rouleaux) from RBCs under low shear rates also contributes to the viscoelasticity under transient flow 

(31) and thixotropy 

(32) of whole blood. Given the difficulty in evaluating viscoelastic behavior of blood under low strain magnitudes and limitations in generalized Newtonian models, the utilization of viscoelastic models is advocated to encompass elasticity and delineate non-shear components within the stress tensor. Extending from the Oldroyd-B model, Anand et al. 

(33) developed a viscoelastic model framework for adapting elasticity within blood samples and predicting non-shear stress components. However, to also address the thixotropic effects, the model developed by Horner et al. 

(34) serves as a more comprehensive approach than the viscoelastic model from Anand et al. Thixotropy 

(32) typically occurs from the structural change of the rouleaux, where low shear rate conditions induce rouleaux formation. Correspondingly, elasticity increases, while elasticity is more representative of the isolated RBCs, under high shear rate conditions. The model of Horner et al. 

(34) considers the contribution of rouleaux to shear stress, taking into account factors such as the characteristic time for Brownian aggregation, shear-induced aggregation, and shear-induced breakage. Subsequent advancements in the model from Horner et al. often revolve around refining the three aforementioned key terms for a more substantial characterization of rouleaux dynamics. Notably, this has led to the recently developed mHAWB model 

(35) and other model iterations to enhance the accuracy of elastic and viscoelastic contributions to blood rheology, including the recently improved model suggested by Armstrong et al. 

(36)

2.2.2. Numerical Methods (FDM, FEM, FVM)

Numerical simulation has become increasingly more significant in analyzing the geometry, boundary layers of flow, and nonlinearity of hyperbolic viscoelastic flow constitutive equations. CFD is a powerful and efficient tool utilizing numerical methods to solve the governing hydrodynamic equations, such as the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, continuity equation, and energy conservation equation, for qualitative evaluation of fluid motion dynamics under different parameters. CFD overcomes the challenge of analytically solving nonlinear forms of differential equations by employing numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) to discretize and solve the partial differential equations (PDEs), allowing for qualitative reproduction of transport phenomena and experimental observations. Different numerical methods are chosen to cope with various transport systems for optimization of the accuracy of the result and control of error during the discretization process.FDM is a straightforward approach to discretizing PDEs, replacing the continuum representation of equations with a set of finite-difference equations, which is typically applied to structured grids for efficient implementation in CFD programs. 

(37) However, FDM is often limited to simple geometries such as rectangular or block-shaped geometries and struggles with curved boundaries. In contrast, FEM divides the fluid domain into small finite grids or elements, approximating PDEs through a local description of physics. 

(38) All elements contribute to a large, sparse matrix solver. However, FEM may not always provide accurate results for systems involving significant deformation and aggregation of particles like RBCs due to large distortion of grids. 

(39) FVM evaluates PDEs following the conservation laws and discretizes the selected flow domain into small but finite size control volumes, with each grid at the center of a finite volume. 

(40) The divergence theorem allows the conversion of volume integrals of PDEs with divergence terms into surface integrals of surface fluxes across cell boundaries. Due to its conservation property, FVM offers efficient outcomes when dealing with PDEs that embody mass, momentum, and energy conservation principles. Furthermore, widely accessible software packages like the OpenFOAM toolbox 

(41) include a viscoelastic solver, making it an attractive option for viscoelastic fluid flow modeling. 

(42)

2.2.3. Modeling Methods of Blood Flow Dynamics

The complexity in the blood flow simulation arises from deformability and aggregation that RBCs exhibit during their interaction with neighboring cells under different shear rate conditions induced by blood flow. Numerical models coupled with simulation programs have been applied as a groundbreaking method to predict such unique rheological behavior exhibited by RBCs and whole blood. The conventional approach of a single-phase flow simulation is often applied to blood flow simulations within large vessels possessing a moderate shear rate. However, such a method assumes the properties of plasma, RBCs and other cellular components to be evenly distributed as average density and viscosity in blood, resulting in the inability to simulate the mechanical dynamics, such as RBC aggregation under high-shear flow field, inherent in RBCs. To accurately describe the asymmetric distribution of RBC and blood flow, multiphase flow simulation, where numerical simulations of blood flows are often modeled as two immiscible phases, RBCs and blood plasma, is proposed. A common assumption is that RBCs exhibit non-Newtonian behavior while the plasma is treated as a continuous Newtonian phase.Numerous multiphase numerical models have been proposed to simulate the influence of RBCs on blood flow dynamics by different assumptions. In large-scale simulations (above the millimeter range), continuum-based methods are wildly used due to their lower computational demands. 

(43) Eulerian multiphase flow simulations offer the solution of a set of conservation equations for each separate phase and couple the phases through common pressure and interphase exchange coefficients. Xu et al. 

(44) utilized the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM) to replicate the dynamic behavior and distortion of RBCs subjected to fluidic forces, utilizing the Johnsonโ€“Kendallโ€“Roberts model 

(45) to define the adhesive forces of cell-to-cell interactions. The iterative direct-forcing immersed boundary method (IBM) is commonly employed in simulations of the fluidโ€“cell interface of blood. This method effectively captures the intricacies of the thin and flexible RBC membranes within various external flow fields. 

(46) The study by Xu et al. 

(44) also adopts this approach to bridge the fluid dynamics and RBC deformation through IBM. Yoon and You utilized the Maxwell model to define the viscosity of the RBC membrane. 

(47) It was discovered that the Maxwell model could represent the stress relaxation and unloading processes of the cell. Furthermore, the reduced flexibility of an RBC under particular situations such as infection is specified, which was unattainable by the Kelvinโ€“Voigt model 

(48) when compared to the Maxwell model in the literature. The Yeoh hyperplastic material model was also adapted to predict the nonlinear elasticity property of RBCs with FEM employed to discretize the RBC membrane using shell-type elements. Gracka et al. 

(49) developed a numerical CFD model with a finite-volume parallel solver for multiphase blood flow simulation, where an updated Maxwell viscoelasticity model and a Discrete Phase Model are adopted. In the study, the adapted IBM, based on unstructured grids, simulates the flow behavior and shape change of the RBCs through fluid-structure coupling. It was found that the hybrid Eulerโ€“Lagrange (Eโ€“L) approach 

(50) for the development of the multiphase model offered better results in the simulated CFL region in the microchannels.To study the dynamics of individual behaviors of RBCs and the consequent non-Newtonian blood flow, cell-shape-resolved computational models are often adapted. The use of the boundary integral method has become prevalent in minimizing computational expenses, particularly in the exclusive determination of fluid velocity on the surfaces of RBCs, incorporating the option of employing IBM or particle-based techniques. The cell-shaped-resolved method has enabled an examination of cell to cell interactions within complex ambient or pulsatile flow conditions 

(51) surrounding RBC membranes. Recently, Rydquist et al. 

(52) have looked to integrate statistical information from macroscale simulations to obtain a comprehensive overview of RBC behavior within the immediate proximity of the flow through introduction of respective models characterizing membrane shape definition, tension, bending stresses of RBC membranes.At a macroscopic scale, continuum models have conventionally been adapted for assessing blood flow dynamics through the application of elasticity theory and fluid dynamics. However, particle-based methods are known for their simplicity and adaptability in modeling complex multiscale fluid structures. Meshless methods, such as the boundary element method (BEM), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), and dissipative particle dynamics (DPD), are often used in particle-based characterization of RBCs and the surrounding fluid. By representing the fluid as discrete particles, meshless methods provide insights into the status and movement of the multiphase fluid. These methods allow for the investigation of cellular structures and microscopic interactions that affect blood rheology. Non-confronting mesh methods like IBM can also be used to couple a fluid solver such as FEM, FVM, or the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) through membrane representation of RBCs. In comparison to conventional CFD methods, LBM has been viewed as a favorable numerical approach for solving the Nโ€“S equations and the simulation of multiphase flows. LBM exhibits the notable advantage of being amenable to high-performance parallel computing environments due to its inherently local dynamics. In contrast to DPD and SPH where RBC membranes are modeled as physically interconnected particles, LBM employs the IBM to account for the deformation dynamics of RBCs 

(53,54) under shear flows in complex channel geometries. 

(54,55) However, it is essential to acknowledge that the utilization of LBM in simulating RBC flows often entails a significant computational overhead, being a primary challenge in this context. Krรผger et al. 

(56) proposed utilizing LBM as a fluid solver, IBM to couple the fluid and FEM to compute the response of membranes to deformation under immersed fluids. This approach decouples the fluid and membranes but necessitates significant computational effort due to the requirements of both meshes and particles.Despite the accuracy of current blood flow models, simulating complex conditions remains challenging because of the high computational load and cost. Balachandran Nair et al. 

(57) suggested a reduced order model of RBC under the framework of DEM, where the RBC is represented by overlapping constituent rigid spheres. The Morse potential force is adapted to account for the RBC aggregation exhibited by cell to cell interactions among RBCs at different distances. Based upon the IBM, the reduced-order RBC model is adapted to simulate blood flow transport for validation under both single and multiple RBCs with a resolved CFD-DEM solver. 

(58) In the resolved CFD-DEM model, particle sizes are larger than the grid size for a more accurate computation of the surrounding flow field. A continuous forcing approach is taken to describe the momentum source of the governing equation prior to discretization, which is different from a Direct Forcing Method (DFM). 

(59) As no body-conforming moving mesh is required, the continuous forcing approach offers lower complexity and reduced cost when compared to the DFM. Piquet et al. 

(60) highlighted the high complexity of the DFM due to its reliance on calculating an additional immersed boundary flux for the velocity field to ensure its divergence-free condition.The fluidโ€“structure interaction (FSI) method has been advocated to connect the dynamic interplay of RBC membranes and fluid plasma within blood flow such as the coupling of continuumโ€“particle interactions. However, such methodology is generally adapted for anatomical configurations such as arteries 

(61,62) and capillaries, 

(63) where both the structural components and the fluid domain undergo substantial deformation due to the moving boundaries. Due to the scope of the Review being blood flow simulation within microchannels of LOC devices without deformable boundaries, the Review of the FSI method will not be further carried out.In general, three numerical methods are broadly used: mesh-based, particle-based, and hybrid meshโ€“particle techniques, based on the spatial scale and the fundamental numerical approach, mesh-based methods tend to neglect the effects of individual particles, assuming a continuum and being efficient in terms of time and cost. However, the particle-based approach highlights more of the microscopic and mesoscopic level, where the influence of individual RBCs is considered. A review from Freund et al. 

(64) addressed the three numerical methodologies and their respective modeling approaches of RBC dynamics. Given the complex mechanics and the diverse levels of study concerning numerical simulations of blood and cellular flow, a broad spectrum of numerical methods for blood has been subjected to extensive review. 

(64โˆ’70) Ye at al. 

(65) offered an extensive review of the application of the DPD, SPH, and LBM for numerical simulations of RBC, while Rathnayaka et al. 

(67) conducted a review of the particle-based numerical modeling for liquid marbles through drawing parallels to the transport of RBCs in microchannels. A comparative analysis between conventional CFD methods and particle-based approaches for cellular and blood flow dynamic simulation can be found under the review by Arabghahestani et al. 

(66) Literature by Li et al. 

(68) and Beris et al. 

(69) offer an overview of both continuum-based models at micro/macroscales and multiscale particle-based models encompassing various length and temporal dimensions. Furthermore, these reviews deliberate upon the potential of coupling continuum-particle methods for blood plasma and RBC modeling. Arciero et al. 

(70) investigated various modeling approaches encompassing cellular interactions, such as cell to cell or plasma interactions and the individual cellular phases. A concise overview of the reviews is provided in Table 2 for reference.

Table 2. List of Reviews for Numerical Approaches Employed in Blood Flow Simulation

ReferenceNumerical methods
Li et al. (2013) (68)Continuum-based modeling (BIM), particle-based modeling (LBM, LB-FE, SPH, DPD)
Freund (2014) (64)RBC dynamic modeling (continuum-based modeling, complementary discrete microstructure modeling), blood flow dynamic modeling (FDM, IBM, LBM, particle-mesh methods, coupled boundary integral and mesh-based methods, DPD)
Ye et al. (2016) (65)DPD, SPH, LBM, coupled IBM-Smoothed DPD
Arciero et al. (2017) (70)LBM, IBM, DPD, conventional CFD Methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Arabghahestani et al. (2019) (66)Particle-based methods (LBM, DPD, direct simulation Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics), SPH, conventional CFD methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Beris et al. (2021) (69)DPD, smoothed DPD, IBM, LBM, BIM
Rathnayaka (2022) (67)SPH, CG, LBM

3. Capillary Driven Blood Flow in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


3.1. Capillary Driven Flow Phenomena

Capillary driven (CD) flow is a pivotal mechanism in passive microfluidic flow systems 

(9) such as the blood circulation system and LOC systems. 

(71) CD flow is essentially the movement of a liquid to flow against drag forces, where the capillary effect exerts a force on the liquid at the borders, causing a liquidโ€“air meniscus to flow despite gravity or other drag forces. A capillary pressure drops across the liquidโ€“air interface with surface tension in the capillary radius and contact angle. The capillary effect depends heavily on the interaction between the different properties of surface materials. Different values of contact angles can be manipulated and obtained under varying levels of surface wettability treatments to manipulate the surface properties, resulting in different CD blood delivery rates for medical diagnostic device microchannels. CD flow techniques are appealing for many LOC devices, because they require no external energy. However, due to the passive property of liquid propulsion by capillary forces and the long-term instability of surface treatments on channel walls, the adaptability of CD flow in geometrically complex LOC devices may be limited.

3.2. Theoretical and Numerical Modeling of Capillary Driven Blood Flow

3.2.1. Theoretical Basis and Assumptions of Microfluidic Flow

The study of transport phenomena regarding either blood flow driven by capillary forces or externally applied forces under microfluid systems all demands a comprehensive recognition of the significant differences in flow dynamics between microscale and macroscale. The fundamental assumptions and principles behind fluid transport at the microscale are discussed in this section. Such a comprehension will lay the groundwork for the following analysis of the theoretical basis of capillary forces and their role in blood transport in LOC systems.

At the macroscale, fluid dynamics are often strongly influenced by gravity due to considerable fluid mass. However, the high surface to volume ratio at the microscale shifts the balance toward surface forces (e.g., surface tension and viscous forces), much larger than the inertial force. This difference gives rise to transport phenomena unique to microscale fluid transport, such as the prevalence of laminar flow due to a very low Reynolds number (generally lower than 1). Moreover, the fluid in a microfluidic system is often assumed to be incompressible due to the small flow velocity, indicating constant fluid density in both space and time.Microfluidic flow behaviors are governed by the fundamental principles of mass and momentum conservation, which are encapsulated in the continuity equation and the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation. The continuity equation describes the conservation of mass, while the Nโ€“S equation captures the spatial and temporal variations in velocity, pressure, and other physical parameters. Under the assumption of the negligible influence of gravity in microfluidic systems, the continuity equation and the Eulerian representation of the incompressible Nโ€“S equation can be expressed as follows:

โˆ‡ยท๐ฎโ‡€=0โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(7)

โˆ’โˆ‡๐‘+๐œ‡โˆ‡2๐ฎโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๐‰โ‡€โˆ’๐…โ‡€=0โˆ’โˆ‡๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโˆ‡2๏ฟฝโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(8)Here, p is the pressure, u is the fluid viscosity, 

๐‰โ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ represents the stress tensor, and F is the body force exerted by external forces if present.

3.2.2. Theoretical Basis and Modeling of Capillary Force in LOC Systems

The capillary force is often the major driving force to manipulate and transport blood without an externally applied force in LOC systems. Forces induced by the capillary effect impact the free surface of fluids and are represented not directly in the Navierโ€“Stokes equations but through the pressure boundary conditions of the pressure term p. For hydrophilic surfaces, the liquid generally induces a contact angle between 0ยฐ and 30ยฐ, encouraging the spread and attraction of fluid under a positive cosโ€ฏฮธ condition. For this condition, the pressure drop becomes positive and generates a spontaneous flow forward. A hydrophobic solid surface repels the fluid, inducing minimal contact. Generally, hydrophobic solids exhibit a contact angle larger than 90ยฐ, inducing a negative value of cosโ€ฏฮธ. Such a value will result in a negative pressure drop and a flow in the opposite direction. The induced contact angle is often utilized to measure the wall exposure of various surface treatments on channel walls where different wettability gradients and surface tension effects for CD flows are established. Contact angles between different interfaces are obtainable through standard values or experimental methods for reference. 

(72)For the characterization of the induced force by the capillary effect, the Youngโ€“Laplace (Yโ€“L) equation 

(73) is widely employed. In the equation, the capillary is considered a pressure boundary condition between the two interphases. Through the Yโ€“L equation, the capillary pressure force can be determined, and subsequently, the continuity and momentum balance equations can be solved to obtain the blood filling rate. Kim et al. 

(74) studied the effects of concentration and exposure time of a nonionic surfactant, Silwet L-77, on the performance of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannel in terms of plasma and blood self-separation. The study characterized the capillary pressure force by incorporating the Yโ€“L equation and further evaluated the effects of the changing contact angle due to different levels of applied channel wall surface treatments. The expression of the Yโ€“L equation utilized by Kim et al. 

(74) is as follows:

๐‘ƒ=โˆ’๐œŽ(cos๐œƒb+cos๐œƒtโ„Ž+cos๐œƒl+cos๐œƒr๐‘ค)๏ฟฝ=โˆ’๏ฟฝ(cosโก๏ฟฝb+cosโก๏ฟฝtโ„Ž+cosโก๏ฟฝl+cosโก๏ฟฝr๏ฟฝ)

(9)where ฯƒ is the surface tension of the liquid and ฮธ

bฮธ

tฮธ

l, and ฮธ

r are the contact angle values between the liquid and the bottom, top, left, and right walls, respectively. A numerical simulation through Coventor software is performed to evaluate the dynamic changes in the filling rate within the microchannel. The simulation results for the blood filling rate in the microchannel are expressed at a specific time stamp, shown in Figure 2. The results portray an increasing instantaneous filling rate of blood in the microchannel following the decrease in contact angle induced by a higher concentration of the nonionic surfactant treated to the microchannel wall.

Figure 2. Numerical simulation of filling rate of capillary driven blood flow under various contact angle conditions at a specific timestamp. (74) Reproduced with permission from ref (74). Copyright 2010 Elsevier.

When in contact with hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces, blood forms a meniscus with a contact angle due to surface tension. The Lucasโ€“Washburn (Lโ€“W) equation 

(75) is one of the pioneering theoretical definitions for the position of the meniscus over time. In addition, the Lโ€“W equation provides the possibility for research to obtain the velocity of the blood formed meniscus through the derivation of the meniscus position. The Lโ€“W equation 

(75) can be shown below:

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘ก2๐œ‡โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ

(10)Here L(t) represents the distance of the liquid driven by the capillary forces. However, the generalized Lโ€“W equation solely assumes the constant physical properties from a Newtonian fluid rather than considering the non-Newtonian fluid behavior of blood. Cito et al. 

(76) constructed an enhanced version of the Lโ€“W equation incorporating the power law to consider the RBC aggregation and the FL effect. The non-Newtonian fluid apparent viscosity under the Power Law model is defined as

๐œ‡=๐‘˜ยท(๐›พห™)๐‘›โˆ’1๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝห™)๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(11)where ฮณฬ‡ is the strain rate tensor defined as 

๐›พห™=12๐›พห™๐‘–๐‘—๐›พห™๐‘—๐‘–โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝห™=12๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ. The stress tensor term ฯ„ is computed as ฯ„ = ฮผฮณฬ‡

ij. The updated Lโ€“W equation by Cito 

(76) is expressed as

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…[(๐‘›+13๐‘›+1)(๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘…๐‘˜)1/๐‘›๐‘ก]๐‘›/๐‘›+1๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ+13๏ฟฝ+1)(๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)1/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ+1

(12)where k is the flow consistency index and n is the power law index, respectively. The power law index, from the Power Law model, characterizes the extent of the non-Newtonian behavior of blood. Both the consistency and power law index rely on blood properties such as hematocrit, the appearance of the FL effect, the formation of RBC aggregates, etc. The updated Lโ€“W equation computes the location and velocity of blood flow caused by capillary forces at specified time points within the LOC devices, taking into account the effects of blood flow characteristics such as RBC aggregation and the FL effect on dynamic blood viscosity.Apart from the blood flow behaviors triggered by inherent blood properties, unique flow conditions driven by capillary forces that are portrayed under different microchannel geometries also hold crucial implications for CD blood delivery. Berthier et al. 

(77) studied the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn condition, the condition to initiate the spontaneous capillary flow within a V-groove microchannel, as shown in Figure 3(a) both experimentally and numerically. Through experimental studies, the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn filament development of capillary driven blood flow is observed, as shown in Figure 3(b), while the dynamic development of blood flow is numerically simulated through CFD simulation.

Figure 3. (a) Sketch of the cross-section of Berthierโ€™s V-groove microchannel, (b) experimental view of blood in the V-groove microchannel, (78) (c) illustration of the dynamic change of the extension of filament from FLOW 3D under capillary flow at three increasing time intervals. (78) Reproduced with permission from ref (78). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.

Berthier et al. 

(77) characterized the contact angle needed for the initiation of the capillary driving force at a zero-inlet pressure, through the half-angle (ฮฑ) of the V-groove geometry layout, and its relation to the Concusโ€“Finn filament as shown below:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๎€๎€๐œƒ<๐œ‹2โˆ’๐›ผsin๐›ผ1+2(โ„Ž2/๐‘ค)sin๐›ผ<cos๐œƒ{๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝsinโก๏ฟฝ1+2(โ„Ž2/๏ฟฝ)โกsinโก๏ฟฝ<cosโก๏ฟฝ

(13)Three possible regimes were concluded based on the contact angle value for the initiation of flow and development of Concusโ€“Finn filament:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๐œƒ>๐œƒ1๐œƒ1>๐œƒ>๐œƒ0๐œƒ0no SCFSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filamentSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament{๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ1no SCF๏ฟฝ1>๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament

(14)Under Newtonโ€™s Law, the force balance with low Reynolds and Capillary numbers results in the neglect of inertial terms. The force balance between the capillary forces and the viscous force induced by the channel wall is proposed to derive the analytical fluid velocity. This relation between the two forces offers insights into the average flow velocity and the penetration distance function dependent on time. The apparent blood viscosity is defined by Berthier et al. 

(78) through Cassonโ€™s law, 

(23) given in eq 1. The research used the FLOW-3D program from Flow Science Inc. software, which solves transient, free-surface problems using the FDM in multiple dimensions. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method 

(79) is utilized to locate and track the dynamic extension of filament throughout the advancing interface within the channel ahead of the main flow at three progressing time stamps, as depicted in Figure 3(c).

4. Electro-osmotic Flow (EOF) in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


The utilization of external forces, such as electric fields, has significantly broadened the possibility of manipulating microfluidic flow in LOC systems. 

(80) Externally applied electric field forces induce a fluid flow from the movement of ions in fluid terms as the โ€œelectro-osmotic flowโ€ (EOF).Unique transport phenomena, such as enhanced flow velocity and flow instability, induced by non-Newtonian fluids, particularly viscoelastic fluids, under EOF, have sparked considerable interest in microfluidic devices with simple or complicated geometries within channels. 

(81) However, compared to the study of Newtonian fluids and even other electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flows, the literature focusing on the theoretical and numerical modeling of electro-osmotic blood flow is limited due to the complexity of blood properties. Consequently, to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex blood flow behavior under EOF, theoretical and numerical studies of the transport phenomena in the EOF section will be based on the studies of different viscoelastic fluids under EOF rather than that of blood specifically. Despite this limitation, we believe these studies offer valuable insights that can help understand the complex behavior of blood flow under EOF.

4.1. EOF Phenomena

Electro-osmotic flow occurs at the interface between the microchannel wall and bulk phase solution. When in contact with the bulk phase, solution ions are absorbed or dissociated at the solidโ€“liquid interface, resulting in the formation of a charge layer, as shown in Figure 4. This charged channel surface wall interacts with both negative and positive ions in the bulk sample, causing repulsion and attraction forces to create a thin layer of immobilized counterions, known as the Stern layer. The induced electric potential from the wall gradually decreases with an increase in the distance from the wall. The Stern layer potential, commonly termed the zeta potential, controls the intensity of the electrostatic interactions between mobile counterions and, consequently, the drag force from the applied electric field. Next to the Stern layer is the diffuse mobile layer, mainly composed of a mobile counterion. These two layers constitute the โ€œelectrical double layerโ€ (EDL), the thickness of which is directly proportional to the ionic strength (concentration) of the bulk fluid. The relationship between the two parameters is characterized by a Debye length (ฮป

D), expressed as

๐œ†๐ท=๐œ–๐‘˜B๐‘‡2(๐‘๐‘’)2๐‘0โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝB๏ฟฝ2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)2๏ฟฝ0

(15)where ฯต is the permittivity of the electrolyte solution, k

B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the electron temperature, Z is the integer valence number, e is the elementary charge, and c

0 is the ionic density.

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of an electro-osmotic flow in a microchannel with negative surface charge. (82) Reproduced with permission from ref (82). Copyright 2012 Woodhead Publishing.

When an electric field is applied perpendicular to the EDL, viscous drag is generated due to the movement of excess ions in the EDL. Electro-osmotic forces can be attributed to the externally applied electric potential (ฯ•) and the zeta potential, the system wall induced potential by charged walls (ฯˆ). As illustrated in Figure 4, the majority of ions in the bulk phase have a uniform velocity profile, except for a shear rate condition confined within an extremely thin Stern layer. Therefore, EOF displays a unique characteristic of a โ€œnear flatโ€ or plug flow velocity profile, different from the parabolic flow typically induced by pressure-driven microfluidic flow (Hagenโ€“Poiseuille flow). The plug-shaped velocity profile of the EOF possesses a high shear rate above the Stern layer.Overall, the EOF velocity magnitude is typically proportional to the Debye Length (ฮป

D), zeta potential, and magnitude of the externally applied electric field, while a more viscous liquid reduces the EOF velocity.

4.2. Modeling on Electro-osmotic Viscoelastic Fluid Flow

4.2.1. Theoretical Basis of EOF Mechanisms

The EOF of an incompressible viscoelastic fluid is commonly governed by the continuity and incompressible Nโ€“S equations, as shown in eqs 7 and 8, where the stress tensor and the electrostatic force term are coupled. The electro-osmotic body force term F, representing the body force exerted by the externally applied electric force, is defined as 

๐นโ‡€=๐‘๐ธ๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€, where ฯ

E and 

๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ are the net electric charge density and the applied external electric field, respectively.Numerous models are established to theoretically study the externally applied electric potential and the system wall induced potential by charged walls. The following Laplace equation, expressed as eq 16, is generally adapted and solved to calculate the externally applied potential (ฯ•).

โˆ‡2๐œ™=0โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=0

(16)Ion diffusion under applied electric fields, together with mass transport resulting from convection and diffusion, transports ionic solutions in bulk flow under electrokinetic processes. The Nernstโ€“Planck equation can describe these transport methods, including convection, diffusion, and electro-diffusion. Therefore, the Nernstโ€“Planck equation is used to determine the distribution of the ions within the electrolyte. The electric potential induced by the charged channel walls follows the Poissonโ€“Nernstโ€“Plank (PNP) equation, which can be written as eq 17.

โˆ‡ยท[๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡๐‘›๐‘–โˆ’๐‘ขโ‡€๐‘›๐‘–+๐‘›๐‘–๐ท๐‘–๐‘ง๐‘–๐‘’๐‘˜๐‘๐‘‡โˆ‡(๐œ™+๐œ“)]=0โˆ‡ยท[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡(๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ)]=0

(17)where D

in

i, and z

i are the diffusion coefficient, ionic concentration, and ionic valence of the ionic species I, respectively. However, due to the high nonlinearity and numerical stiffness introduced by different lengths and time scales from the PNP equations, the Poissonโ€“Boltzmann (PB) model is often considered the major simplified method of the PNP equation to characterize the potential distribution of the EDL region in microchannels. In the PB model, it is assumed that the ionic species in the fluid follow the Boltzmann distribution. This model is typically valid for steady-state problems where charge transport can be considered negligible, the EDLs do not overlap with each other, and the intrinsic potentials are low. It provides a simplified representation of the potential distribution in the EDL region. The PB equation governing the EDL electric potential distribution is described as

โˆ‡2๐œ“=(2๐‘’๐‘ง๐‘›0๐œ€๐œ€0)sinh(๐‘ง๐‘’๐œ“๐‘˜b๐‘‡)โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=(2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0)โกsinh(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝb๏ฟฝ)

(18)where n

0 is the ion bulk concentration, z is the ionic valence, and ฮต

0 is the electric permittivity in the vacuum. Under low electric potential conditions, an even further simplified model to illustrate the EOF phenomena is the Debyeโ€“Hรผckel (DH) model. The DH model is derived by obtaining a charge density term by expanding the exponential term of the Boltzmann equation in a Taylor series.

4.2.2. EOF Modeling for Viscoelastic Fluids

Many studies through numerical modeling were performed to obtain a deeper understanding of the effect exhibited by externally applied electric fields on viscoelastic flow in microchannels under various geometrical designs. Bello et al. 

(83) found that methylcellulose solution, a non-Newtonian polymer solution, resulted in stronger electro-osmotic mobility in experiments when compared to the predictions by the Helmholtzโ€“Smoluchowski equation, which is commonly used to define the velocity of EOF of a Newtonian fluid. Being one of the pioneers to identify the discrepancies between the EOF of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, Bello et al. attributed such discrepancies to the presence of a very high shear rate in the EDL, resulting in a change in the orientation of the polymer molecules. Park and Lee 

(84) utilized the FVM to solve the PB equation for the characterization of the electric field induced force. In the study, the concept of fractional calculus for the Oldroyd-B model was adapted to illustrate the elastic and memory effects of viscoelastic fluids in a straight microchannel They observed that fluid elasticity and increased ratio of viscoelastic fluid contribution to overall fluid viscosity had a significant impact on the volumetric flow rate and sensitivity of velocity to electric field strength compared to Newtonian fluids. Afonso et al. 

(85) derived an analytical expression for EOF of viscoelastic fluid between parallel plates using the DH model to account for a zeta potential condition below 25 mV. The study established the understanding of the electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow under low zeta potential conditions. Apart from the electrokinetic forces, pressure forces can also be coupled with EOF to generate a unique fluid flow behavior within the microchannel. Sousa et al. 

(86) analytically studied the flow of a standard viscoelastic solution by combining the pressure gradient force with an externally applied electric force. It was found that, at a near wall skimming layer and the outer layer away from the wall, macromolecules migrating away from surface walls in viscoelastic fluids are observed. In the study, the Phan-Thien Tanner (PTT) constitutive model is utilized to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the solution. The approach is found to be valid when the EDL is much thinner than the skimming layer under an enhanced flow rate. Zhao and Yang 

(87) solved the PB equation and Carreau model for the characterization of the EOF mechanism and non-Newtonian fluid respectively through the FEM. The numerical results depict that, different from the EOF of Newtonian fluids, non-Newtonian fluids led to an increase of electro-osmotic mobility for shear thinning fluids but the opposite for shear thickening fluids.Like other fluid transport driving forces, EOF within unique geometrical layouts also portrays unique transport phenomena. Pimenta and Alves 

(88) utilized the FVM to perform numerical simulations of the EOF of viscoelastic fluids considering the PB equation and the Oldroyd-B model, in a cross-slot and flow-focusing microdevices. It was found that electroelastic instabilities are formed due to the development of large stresses inside the EDL with streamlined curvature at geometry corners. Bezerra et al. 

(89) used the FDM to numerically analyze the vortex formation and flow instability from an electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow in a microchannel with a nozzle geometry and parallel wall geometry setting. The PNP equation is utilized to characterize the charge motion in the EOF and the PTT model for non-Newtonian flow characterization. A constriction geometry is commonly utilized in blood flow adapted in LOC systems due to the change in blood flow behavior under narrow dimensions in a microchannel. Ji et al. 

(90) recently studied the EOF of viscoelastic fluid in a constriction microchannel connected by two relatively big reservoirs on both ends (as seen in Figure 5) filled with the polyacrylamide polymer solution, a viscoelastic fluid, and an incompressible monovalent binary electrolyte solution KCl.

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of a negatively charged constriction microchannel connected to two reservoirs at both ends. An electro-osmotic flow is induced in the system by the induced potential difference between the anode and cathode. (90) Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

In studying the EOF of viscoelastic fluids, the Oldroyd-B model is often utilized to characterize the polymeric stress tensor and the deformation rate of the fluid. The Oldroyd-B model is expressed as follows:

๐œ=๐œ‚p๐œ†(๐œโˆ’๐ˆ)๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝp๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(19)where ฮท

p, ฮป, c, and I represent the polymer dynamic viscosity, polymer relaxation time, symmetric conformation tensor of the polymer molecules, and the identity matrix, respectively.A log-conformation tensor approach is taken to prevent convergence difficulty induced by the viscoelastic properties. The conformation tensor (c) in the polymeric stress tensor term is redefined by a new tensor (ฮ˜) based on the natural logarithm of the c. The new tensor is defined as

ฮ˜=ln(๐œ)=๐‘ln(๐šฒ)๐‘ฮ˜=ln(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝโกln(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ

(20)in which ฮ› is the diagonal matrix and R is the orthogonal matrix.Under the new conformation tensor, the induced EOF of a viscoelastic fluid is governed by the continuity and Nโ€“S equations adapting the Oldroyd-B model, which is expressed as

โˆ‚๐šฏโˆ‚๐‘ก+๐ฎยทโˆ‡๐šฏ=๐›€ฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๐+1๐œ†(eฮ˜โˆ’๐ˆ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยทโˆ‡๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ(eฮ˜โˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(21)where ฮฉ and B represent the anti-symmetric matrix and the symmetric traceless matrix of the decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor โˆ‡u, respectively. The conformation tensor can be recovered by c = exp(ฮ˜). The PB model and Laplace equation are utilized to characterize the charged channel wall induced potential and the externally applied potential.The governing equations are numerically solved through the FVM by RheoTool, 

(42) an open-source viscoelastic EOF solver on the OpenFOAM platform. A SIMPLEC (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations-Consistent) algorithm was applied to solve the velocity-pressure coupling. The pressure field and velocity field were computed by the PCG (Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient) solver and the PBiCG (Preconditioned Biconjugate Gradient) solver, respectively.Ranging magnitudes of an applied electric field or fluid concentration induce both different streamlines and velocity magnitudes at various locations and times of the microchannel. In the study performed by Ji et al., 

(90) notable fluctuation of streamlines and vortex formation is formed at the upper stream entrance of the constriction as shown in Figure 6(a) and (b), respectively, due to the increase of electrokinetic effect, which is seen as a result of the increase in polymeric stress (ฯ„

xx). 

(90) The contraction geometry enhances the EOF velocity within the constriction channel under high E

app condition (600 V/cm). Such phenomena can be attributed to the dependence of electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow on the system wall surface and bulk fluid properties. 

(91)

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of vortex formation and streamlines of EOF depicting flow instability at (a) 1.71 s and (b) 1.75 s. Spatial distribution of the elastic normal stress at (c) high Eapp condition. Streamline of an electro-osmotic flow under Eapp of 600 V/cm (90) for (d) non-Newtonian and (e) Newtonian fluid through a constriction geometry. Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

As elastic normal stress exceeds the local shear stress, flow instability and vortex formation occur. The induced elastic stress under EOF not only enhances the instability of the flow but often generates an irregular secondary flow leading to strong disturbance. 

(92) It is also vital to consider the effect of the constriction layout of microchannels on the alteration of the field strength within the system. The contraction geometry enhances a larger electric field strength compared with other locations of the channel outside the constriction region, resulting in a higher velocity gradient and stronger extension on the polymer within the viscoelastic solution. Following the high shear flow condition, a higher magnitude of stretch for polymer molecules in viscoelastic fluids exhibits larger elastic stresses and enhancement of vortex formation at the region. 

(93)As shown in Figure 6(c), significant elastic normal stress occurs at the inlet of the constriction microchannel. Such occurrence of a polymeric flow can be attributed to the dominating elongational flow, giving rise to high deformation of the polymers within the viscoelastic fluid flow, resulting in higher elastic stress from the polymers. Such phenomena at the entrance result in the difference in velocity streamline as circled in Figure 6(d) compared to that of the Newtonian fluid at the constriction entrance in Figure 6(e). 

(90) The difference between the Newtonian and polymer solution at the exit, as circled in Figure 6(d) and (e), can be attributed to the extrudate swell effect of polymers 

(94) within the viscoelastic fluid flow. The extrudate swell effect illustrates that, as polymers emerge from the constriction exit, they tend to contract in the flow direction and grow in the normal direction, resulting in an extrudate diameter greater than the channel size. The deformation of polymers within the polymeric flow at both the entrance and exit of the contraction channel facilitates the change in shear stress conditions of the flow, leading to the alteration in streamlines of flows for each region.

4.3. EOF Applications in LOC Systems

4.3.1. Mixing in LOC Systems

Rather than relying on the micromixing controlled by molecular diffusion under low Reynolds number conditions, active mixers actively leverage convective instability and vortex formation induced by electro-osmotic flows from alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) electric fields. Such adaptation is recognized as significant breakthroughs for promotion of fluid mixing in chemical and biological applications such as drug delivery, medical diagnostics, chemical synthesis, and so on. 

(95)Many researchers proposed novel designs of electro-osmosis micromixers coupled with numerical simulations in conjunction with experimental findings to increase their understanding of the role of flow instability and vortex formation in the mixing process under electrokinetic phenomena. Matsubara and Narumi 

(96) numerically modeled the mixing process in a microchannel with four electrodes on each side of the microchannel wall, which generated a disruption through unstable electro-osmotic vortices. It was found that particle mixing was sensitive to both the convection effect induced by the main and secondary vortex within the micromixer and the change in oscillation frequency caused by the supplied AC voltage when the Reynolds number was varied. Qaderi et al. 

(97) adapted the PNP equation to numerically study the effect of the geometry and zeta potential configuration of the microchannel on the mixing process with a combined electro-osmotic pressure driven flow. It was reported that the application of heterogeneous zeta potential configuration enhances the mixing efficiency by around 23% while the height of the hurdles increases the mixing efficiency at most 48.1%. Cho et al. 

(98) utilized the PB model and Laplace equation to numerically simulate the electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid mixing process within a wavy and block layout of microchannel walls. The Power Law model is adapted to describe the fluid rheological characteristic. It was found that shear-thinning fluids possess a higher volumetric flow rate, which could result in poorer mixing efficiency compared to that of Newtonian fluids. Numerous studies have revealed that flow instability and vortex generation, in particular secondary vortices produced by barriers or greater magnitudes of heterogeneous zeta potential distribution, enhance mixing by increasing bulk flow velocity and reducing flow distance.To better understand the mechanism of disturbance formed in the system due to externally applied forces, known as electrokinetic instability, literature often utilize the Rayleigh (Ra) number, 

(1) as described below:

๐‘…๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ=๐‘ขev๐‘ขeo=(๐›พโˆ’1๐›พ+1)2๐‘Š๐›ฟ2๐ธel2๐ป2๐œ๐›ฟRa๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝev๏ฟฝeo=(๏ฟฝโˆ’1๏ฟฝ+1)2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝel2๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(22)where ฮณ is the conductivity ratio of the two streams and can be written as 

๐›พ=๐œŽel,H๐œŽel,L๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝel,H๏ฟฝel,L. The Ra number characterizes the ratio between electroviscous and electro-osmotic flow. A high Ra

v value often results in good mixing. It is evident that fluid properties such as the conductivity (ฯƒ) of the two streams play a key role in the formation of disturbances to enhance mixing in microsystems. At the same time, electrokinetic parameters like the zeta potential (ฮถ) in the Ra number is critical in the characterization of electro-osmotic velocity and a slip boundary condition at the microchannel wall.To understand the mixing result along the channel, the concentration field can be defined and simulated under the assumption of steady state conditions and constant diffusion coefficient for each of the working fluid within the system through the convectionโ€“diffusion equation as below:

โˆ‚๐‘๐’Šโˆ‚๐‘ก+โˆ‡โ‡€(๐‘๐‘–๐‘ขโ‡€โˆ’๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡โ‡€๐‘๐’Š)=0โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‡โ‡€(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡โ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

(23)where c

i is the species concentration of species i and D

i is the diffusion coefficient of the corresponding species.The standard deviation of concentration (ฯƒ

sd) can be adapted to evaluate the mixing quality of the system. 

(97) The standard deviation for concentration at a specific portion of the channel may be calculated using the equation below:

๐œŽsd=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)โˆ’๐ถm)2d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ๎€ค๎€ข๎€ฃ๎€ฃ๏ฟฝsd=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)โˆ’๏ฟฝm)2d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*

(24)where C*(y*) and C

m are the non-dimensional concentration profile and the mean concentration at the portion, respectively. C* is the non-dimensional concentration and can be calculated as 

๐ถโˆ—=๐ถ๐ถref๏ฟฝ*=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝref, where C

ref is the reference concentration defined as the bulk solution concentration. The mean concentration profile can be calculated as 

๐ถm=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—๏ฟฝm=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*. With the standard deviation of concentration, the mixing efficiency 

(97) can then be calculated as below:

๐œ€๐‘ฅ=1โˆ’๐œŽsd๐œŽsd,0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=1โˆ’๏ฟฝsd๏ฟฝsd,0

(25)where ฯƒ

sd,0 is the standard derivation of the case of no mixing. The value of the mixing efficiency is typically utilized in conjunction with the simulated flow field and concentration field to explore the effect of geometrical and electrokinetic parameters on the optimization of the mixing results.

5. Summary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


5.1. Conclusion

Viscoelastic fluids such as blood flow in LOC systems are an essential topic to proceed with diagnostic analysis and research through microdevices in the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries. The complex blood flow behavior is tightly controlled by the viscoelastic characteristics of blood such as the dynamic viscosity and the elastic property of RBCs under various shear rate conditions. Furthermore, the flow behaviors under varied driving forces promote an array of microfluidic transport phenomena that are critical to the management of blood flow and other adapted viscoelastic fluids in LOC systems. This review addressed the blood flow phenomena, the complicated interplay between shear rate and blood flow behaviors, and their numerical modeling under LOC systems through the lens of the viscoelasticity characteristic. Furthermore, a theoretical understanding of capillary forces and externally applied electric forces leads to an in-depth investigation of the relationship between blood flow patterns and the key parameters of the two driving forces, the latter of which is introduced through the lens of viscoelastic fluids, coupling numerical modeling to improve the knowledge of blood flow manipulation in LOC systems. The flow disturbances triggered by the EOF of viscoelastic fluids and their impact on blood flow patterns have been deeply investigated due to their important role and applications in LOC devices. Continuous advancements of various numerical modeling methods with experimental findings through more efficient and less computationally heavy methods have served as an encouraging sign of establishing more accurate illustrations of the mechanisms for multiphase blood and other viscoelastic fluid flow transport phenomena driven by various forces. Such progress is fundamental for the manipulation of unique transport phenomena, such as the generated disturbances, to optimize functionalities offered by microdevices in LOC systems.

The following section will provide further insights into the employment of studied blood transport phenomena to improve the functionality of micro devices adapting LOC technology. A discussion of the novel roles that external driving forces play in microfluidic flow behaviors is also provided. Limitations in the computational modeling of blood flow and electrokinetic phenomena in LOC systems will also be emphasized, which may provide valuable insights for future research endeavors. These discussions aim to provide guidance and opportunities for new paths in the ongoing development of LOC devices that adapt blood flow.

5.2. Future Directions

5.2.1. Electro-osmosis Mixing in LOC Systems

Despite substantial research, mixing results through flow instability and vortex formation phenomena induced by electro-osmotic mixing still deviate from the effective mixing results offered by chaotic mixing results such as those seen in turbulent flows. However, recent discoveries of a mixing phenomenon that is generally observed under turbulent flows are found within electro-osmosis micromixers under low Reynolds number conditions. Zhao 

(99) experimentally discovered a rapid mixing process in an AC applied micromixer, where the power spectrum of concentration under an applied voltage of 20 V

p-p induces a โˆ’5/3 slope within a frequency range. This value of the slope is considered as the Oโ€“C spectrum in macroflows, which is often visible under relatively high Re conditions, such as the Taylor microscale Reynolds number Re > 500 in turbulent flows. 

(100) However, the Re value in the studied system is less than 1 at the specific location and applied voltage. A secondary flow is also suggested to occur close to microchannel walls, being attributed to the increase of convective instability within the system.Despite the experimental phenomenon proposed by Zhao et al., 

(99) the range of effects induced by vital parameters of an EOF mixing system on the enhanced mixing results and mechanisms of disturbance generated by the turbulent-like flow instability is not further characterized. Such a gap in knowledge may hinder the adaptability and commercialization of the discovery of micromixers. One of the parameters for further evaluation is the conductivity gradient of the fluid flow. A relatively strong conductivity gradient (5000:1) was adopted in the system due to the conductive properties of the two fluids. The high conductivity gradients may contribute to the relatively large Rayleigh number and differences in EDL layer thickness, resulting in an unusual disturbance in laminar flow conditions and enhanced mixing results. However, high conductivity gradients are not always achievable by the working fluids due to diverse fluid properties. The reliance on turbulent-like phenomena and rapid mixing results in a large conductivity gradient should be established to prevent the limited application of fluids for the mixing system. In addition, the proposed system utilizes distinct zeta potential distributions at the top and bottom walls due to their difference in material choices, which may be attributed to the flow instability phenomena. Further studies should be made on varying zeta potential magnitude and distribution to evaluate their effect on the slip boundary conditions of the flow and the large shear rate condition close to the channel wall of EOF. Such a study can potentially offer an optimized condition in zeta potential magnitude through material choices and geometrical layout of the zeta potential for better mixing results and manipulation of mixing fluid dynamics. The two vital parameters mentioned above can be varied with the aid of numerical simulation to understand the effect of parameters on the interaction between electro-osmotic forces and electroviscous forces. At the same time, the relationship of developed streamlines of the simulated velocity and concentration field, following their relationship with the mixing results, under the impact of these key parameters can foster more insight into the range of impact that the two parameters have on the proposed phenomena and the microfluidic dynamic principles of disturbances.

In addition, many of the current investigations of electrokinetic mixers commonly emphasize the fluid dynamics of mixing for Newtonian fluids, while the utilization of biofluids, primarily viscoelastic fluids such as blood, and their distinctive response under shear forces in these novel mixing processes of LOC systems are significantly less studied. To develop more compatible microdevice designs and efficient mixing outcomes for the biomedical industry, it is necessary to fill the knowledge gaps in the literature on electro-osmotic mixing for biofluids, where properties of elasticity, dynamic viscosity, and intricate relationship with shear flow from the fluid are further considered.

5.2.2. Electro-osmosis Separation in LOC Systems

Particle separation in LOC devices, particularly in biological research and diagnostics, is another area where disturbances may play a significant role in optimization. 

(101) Plasma analysis in LOC systems under precise control of blood flow phenomena and blood/plasma separation procedures can detect vital information about infectious diseases from particular antibodies and foreign nucleic acids for medical treatments, diagnostics, and research, 

(102) offering more efficient results and simple operating procedures compared to that of the traditional centrifugation method for blood and plasma separation. However, the adaptability of LOC devices for blood and plasma separation is often hindered by microchannel clogging, where flow velocity and plasma yield from LOC devices is reduced due to occasional RBC migration and aggregation at the filtration entrance of microdevices. 

(103)It is important to note that the EOF induces flow instability close to microchannel walls, which may provide further solutions to clogging for the separation process of the LOC systems. Mohammadi et al. 

(104) offered an anti-clogging effect of RBCs at the blood and plasma separating device filtration entry, adjacent to the surface wall, through RBC disaggregation under high shear rate conditions generated by a forward and reverse EOF direction.

Further theoretical and numerical research can be conducted to characterize the effect of high shear rate conditions near microchannel walls toward the detachment of binding blood cells on surfaces and the reversibility of aggregation. Through numerical modeling with varying electrokinetic parameters to induce different degrees of disturbances or shear conditions at channel walls, it may be possible to optimize and better understand the process of disrupting the forces that bind cells to surface walls and aggregated cells at filtration pores. RBCs that migrate close to microchannel walls are often attracted by the adhesion force between the RBC and the solid surface originating from the van der Waals forces. Following RBC migration and attachment by adhesive forces adjacent to the microchannel walls as shown in Figure 7, the increase in viscosity at the region causes a lower shear condition and encourages RBC aggregation (cellโ€“cell interaction), which clogs filtering pores or microchannels and reduces flow velocity at filtration region. Both the impact that shear forces and disturbances may induce on cell binding forces with surface walls and other cells leading to aggregation may suggest further characterization. Kinetic parameters such as activation energy and the rate-determining step for cell binding composition attachment and detachment should be considered for modeling the dynamics of RBCs and blood flows under external forces in LOC separation devices.

Figure 7. Schematic representations of clogging at a microchannel pore following the sequence of RBC migration, cell attachment to channel walls, and aggregation. (105) Reproduced with permission from ref (105). Copyright 2018 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

5.2.3. Relationship between External Forces and Microfluidic Systems

In blood flow, a thicker CFL suggests a lower blood viscosity, suggesting a complex relationship between shear stress and shear rate, affecting the blood viscosity and blood flow. Despite some experimental and numerical studies on electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow, limited literature has performed an in-depth investigation of the role that applied electric forces and other external forces could play in the process of CFL formation. Additional studies on how shear rates from external forces affect CFL formation and microfluidic flow dynamics can shed light on the mechanism of the contribution induced by external driving forces to the development of a separate phase of layer, similar to CFL, close to the microchannel walls and distinct from the surrounding fluid within the system, then influencing microfluidic flow dynamics.One of the mechanisms of phenomena to be explored is the formation of the Exclusion Zone (EZ) region following a โ€œSelf-Induced Flowโ€ (SIF) phenomenon discovered by Li and Pollack, 

(106) as shown in Figure 8(a) and (b), respectively. A spontaneous sustained axial flow is observed when hydrophilic materials are immersed in water, resulting in the buildup of a negative layer of charges, defined as the EZ, after water molecules absorb infrared radiation (IR) energy and break down into H and OH

+โ€“.

Figure 8. Schematic representations of (a) the Exclusion Zone region and (b) the Self Induced Flow through visualization of microsphere movement within a microchannel. (106) Reproduced with permission from ref (106). Copyright 2020 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Despite the finding of such a phenomenon, the specific mechanism and role of IR energy have yet to be defined for the process of EZ development. To further develop an understanding of the role of IR energy in such phenomena, a feasible study may be seen through the lens of the relationships between external forces and microfluidic flow. In the phenomena, the increase of SIF velocity under a rise of IR radiation resonant characteristics is shown in the participation of the external electric field near the microchannel walls under electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow systems. The buildup of negative charges at the hydrophilic surfaces in EZ is analogous to the mechanism of electrical double layer formation. Indeed, research has initiated the exploration of the core mechanisms for EZ formation through the lens of the electrokinetic phenomena. 

(107) Such a similarity of the role of IR energy and the transport phenomena of SIF with electrokinetic phenomena paves the way for the definition of the unknown SIF phenomena and EZ formation. Furthermore, Li and Pollack 

(106) suggest whether CFL formation might contribute to a SIF of blood using solely IR radiation, a commonly available source of energy in nature, as an external driving force. The proposition may be proven feasible with the presence of the CFL region next to the negatively charged hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer, coating the luminal side of blood vessels. 

(108) Further research can dive into the resonating characteristics between the formation of the CFL region next to the hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer and that of the EZ formation close to hydrophilic microchannel walls. Indeed, an increase in IR energy is known to rapidly accelerate EZ formation and SIF velocity, depicting similarity to the increase in the magnitude of electric field forces and greater shear rates at microchannel walls affecting CFL formation and EOF velocity. Such correlation depicts a future direction in whether SIF blood flow can be observed and characterized theoretically further through the lens of the relationship between blood flow and shear forces exhibited by external energy.

The intricate link between the CFL and external forces, more specifically the externally applied electric field, can receive further attention to provide a more complete framework for the mechanisms between IR radiation and EZ formation. Such characterization may also contribute to a greater comprehension of the role IR can play in CFL formation next to the endothelial glycocalyx layer as well as its role as a driving force to propel blood flow, similar to the SIF, but without the commonly assumed pressure force from heart contraction as a source of driving force.

5.3. Challenges

Although there have been significant improvements in blood flow modeling under LOC systems over the past decade, there are still notable constraints that may require special attention for numerical simulation applications to benefit the adaptability of the designs and functionalities of LOC devices. Several points that require special attention are mentioned below:

1.The majority of CFD models operate under the relationship between the viscoelasticity of blood and the shear rate conditions of flow. The relative effect exhibited by the presence of highly populated RBCs in whole blood and their forces amongst the cells themselves under complex flows often remains unclearly defined. Furthermore, the full range of cell populations in whole blood requires a much more computational load for numerical modeling. Therefore, a vital goal for future research is to evaluate a reduced modeling method where the impact of cellโ€“cell interaction on the viscoelastic property of blood is considered.
2.Current computational methods on hemodynamics rely on continuum models based upon non-Newtonian rheology at the macroscale rather than at molecular and cellular levels. Careful considerations should be made for the development of a constructive framework for the physical and temporal scales of micro/nanoscale systems to evaluate the intricate relationship between fluid driving forces, dynamic viscosity, and elasticity.
3.Viscoelastic fluids under the impact of externally applied electric forces often deviate from the assumptions of no-slip boundary conditions due to the unique flow conditions induced by externally applied forces. Furthermore, the mechanism of vortex formation and viscoelastic flow instability at laminar flow conditions should be better defined through the lens of the microfluidic flow phenomenon to optimize the prediction of viscoelastic flow across different geometrical layouts. Mathematical models and numerical methods are needed to better predict such disturbance caused by external forces and the viscoelasticity of fluids at such a small scale.
4.Under practical situations, zeta potential distribution at channel walls frequently deviates from the common assumption of a constant distribution because of manufacturing faults or inherent surface charges prior to the introduction of electrokinetic influence. These discrepancies frequently lead to inconsistent surface potential distribution, such as excess positive ions at relatively more negatively charged walls. Accordingly, unpredicted vortex formation and flow instability may occur. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to these discrepancies and how they could trigger the transport process and unexpected results of a microdevice.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


  • Corresponding Authors
    • Zhe Chen – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: zaccooky@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Bo Ouyang – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: bouy93@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Zheng-Hong Luo – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-6020; Email: luozh@sjtu.edu.cn
  • Authors
    • Bin-Jie Lai – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-8133-5381
    • Li-Tao Zhu – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6514-8864
  • NotesThe authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22238005) and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. GZC20231576).

Vocabulary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


Microfluidicsthe field of technological and scientific study that investigates fluid flow in channels with dimensions between 1 and 1000 ฮผm
Lab-on-a-Chip Technologythe field of research and technological development aimed at integrating the micro/nanofluidic characteristics to conduct laboratory processes on handheld devices
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)the method utilizing computational abilities to predict physical fluid flow behaviors mathematically through solving the governing equations of corresponding fluid flows
Shear Ratethe rate of change in velocity where one layer of fluid moves past the adjacent layer
Viscoelasticitythe property holding both elasticity and viscosity characteristics relying on the magnitude of applied shear stress and time-dependent strain
Electro-osmosisthe flow of fluid under an applied electric field when charged solid surface is in contact with the bulk fluid
Vortexthe rotating motion of a fluid revolving an axis line

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This article references 108 other publications.

  1. 1Neethirajan, S.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M.; Wu, D.; Nandagopal, S.; Lin, F. Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip 201111 (9), 1574โ€“ 1586,  DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00230eViewGoogle Scholar
  2. 2Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006442 (7101), 368โ€“ 373,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05058ViewGoogle Scholar
  3. 3Burklund, A.; Tadimety, A.; Nie, Y.; Hao, N.; Zhang, J. X. J. Chapter One – Advances in diagnostic microfluidics; Elsevier, 2020; DOI:  DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2019.08.001 .ViewGoogle Scholar
  4. 4Abdulbari, H. A. Chapter 12 – Lab-on-a-chip for analysis of blood. In Nanotechnology for Hematology, Blood Transfusion, and Artificial Blood; Denizli, A., Nguyen, T. A., Rajan, M., Alam, M. F., Rahman, K., Eds.; Elsevier, 2022; pp 265โ€“ 283.ViewGoogle Scholar
  5. 5Vladisavljeviฤ‡, G. T.; Khalid, N.; Neves, M. A.; Kuroiwa, T.; Nakajima, M.; Uemura, K.; Ichikawa, S.; Kobayashi, I. Industrial lab-on-a-chip: Design, applications and scale-up for drug discovery and delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 201365 (11), 1626โ€“ 1663,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  6. 6Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M.; Dhariwal, R.; Desmulliez, M. P. Y.; Jouvet, L. Hydrodynamic blood plasma separation in microfluidic channels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20108 (1), 105โ€“ 114,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-009-0450-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  7. 7Popel, A. S.; Johnson, P. C. Microcirculation and Hemorheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 43โ€“ 69,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.133933ViewGoogle Scholar
  8. 8Fedosov, D. A.; Peltomรคki, M.; Gompper, G. Deformation and dynamics of red blood cells in flow through cylindrical microchannels. Soft Matter 201410 (24), 4258โ€“ 4267,  DOI: 10.1039/C4SM00248BViewGoogle Scholar
  9. 9Chakraborty, S. Dynamics of capillary flow of blood into a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 20055 (4), 421โ€“ 430,  DOI: 10.1039/b414566fViewGoogle Scholar
  10. 10Tomaiuolo, G.; Guido, S. Start-up shape dynamics of red blood cells in microcapillary flow. Microvascular Research 201182 (1), 35โ€“ 41,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.03.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  11. 11Sherwood, J. M.; Dusting, J.; Kaliviotis, E.; Balabani, S. The effect of red blood cell aggregation on velocity and cell-depleted layer characteristics of blood in a bifurcating microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 20126 (2), 24119,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4717755ViewGoogle Scholar
  12. 12Nader, E.; Skinner, S.; Romana, M.; Fort, R.; Lemonne, N.; Guillot, N.; Gauthier, A.; Antoine-Jonville, S.; Renoux, C.; Hardy-Dessources, M.-D. Blood Rheology: Key Parameters, Impact on Blood Flow, Role in Sickle Cell Disease and Effects of Exercise. Frontiers in Physiology 201910, 01329,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01329ViewGoogle Scholar
  13. 13Trejo-Soto, C.; Lรกzaro, G. R.; Pagonabarraga, I.; Hernรกndez-Machado, A. Microfluidics Approach to the Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cell Membrane and Their Effect on Blood Rheology. Membranes 202212 (2), 217,  DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020217ViewGoogle Scholar
  14. 14Wagner, C.; Steffen, P.; Svetina, S. Aggregation of red blood cells: From rouleaux to clot formation. Comptes Rendus Physique 201314 (6), 459โ€“ 469,  DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  15. 15Kim, H.; Zhbanov, A.; Yang, S. Microfluidic Systems for Blood and Blood Cell Characterization. Biosensors 202313 (1), 13,  DOI: 10.3390/bios13010013ViewGoogle Scholar
  16. 16Fรฅhrรฆus, R.; Lindqvist, T. THE VISCOSITY OF THE BLOOD IN NARROW CAPILLARY TUBES. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 193196 (3), 562โ€“ 568,  DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1931.96.3.562ViewGoogle Scholar
  17. 17Ascolese, M.; Farina, A.; Fasano, A. The Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist effect in small blood vessels: how does it help the heart?. J. Biol. Phys. 201945 (4), 379โ€“ 394,  DOI: 10.1007/s10867-019-09534-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  18. 18Bento, D.; Fernandes, C. S.; Miranda, J. M.; Lima, R. In vitro blood flow visualizations and cell-free layer (CFL) measurements in a microchannel network. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2019109, 109847,  DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109847ViewGoogle Scholar
  19. 19Namgung, B.; Ong, P. K.; Wong, Y. H.; Lim, D.; Chun, K. J.; Kim, S. A comparative study of histogram-based thresholding methods for the determination of cell-free layer width in small blood vessels. Physiological Measurement 201031 (9), N61,  DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/N01ViewGoogle Scholar
  20. 20Hymel, S. J.; Lan, H.; Fujioka, H.; Khismatullin, D. B. Cell trapping in Y-junction microchannels: A numerical study of the bifurcation angle effect in inertial microfluidics. Phys. Fluids (1994) 201931 (8), 082003,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5113516ViewGoogle Scholar
  21. 21Li, X.; Popel, A. S.; Karniadakis, G. E. Blood-plasma separation in Y-shaped bifurcating microfluidic channels: a dissipative particle dynamics simulation study. Phys. Biol. 20129 (2), 026010,  DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/2/026010ViewGoogle Scholar
  22. 22Yin, X.; Thomas, T.; Zhang, J. Multiple red blood cell flows through microvascular bifurcations: Cell free layer, cell trajectory, and hematocrit separation. Microvascular Research 201389, 47โ€“ 56,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.05.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  23. 23Shibeshi, S. S.; Collins, W. E. The Rheology of Blood Flow in a Branched Arterial System. Appl. Rheol 200515 (6), 398โ€“ 405,  DOI: 10.1515/arh-2005-0020ViewGoogle Scholar
  24. 24Sequeira, A.; Janela, J. An Overview of Some Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology. In A Portrait of State-of-the-Art Research at the Technical University of Lisbon; Pereira, M. S., Ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2007; pp 65โ€“ 87.ViewGoogle Scholar
  25. 25Walburn, F. J.; Schneck, D. J. A constitutive equation for whole human blood. Biorheology 197613, 201โ€“ 210,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1976-13307ViewGoogle Scholar
  26. 26Quemada, D. A rheological model for studying the hematocrit dependence of red cell-red cell and red cell-protein interactions in blood. Biorheology 198118, 501โ€“ 516,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1981-183-615ViewGoogle Scholar
  27. 27Varchanis, S.; Dimakopoulos, Y.; Wagner, C.; Tsamopoulos, J. How viscoelastic is human blood plasma?. Soft Matter 201814 (21), 4238โ€“ 4251,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SM00061AViewGoogle Scholar
  28. 28Apostolidis, A. J.; Moyer, A. P.; Beris, A. N. Non-Newtonian effects in simulations of coronary arterial blood flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2016233, 155โ€“ 165,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.03.008ViewGoogle Scholar
  29. 29Luo, X. Y.; Kuang, Z. B. A study on the constitutive equation of blood. J. Biomech. 199225 (8), 929โ€“ 934,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90233-QViewGoogle Scholar
  30. 30Oldroyd, J. G.; Wilson, A. H. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1950200 (1063), 523โ€“ 541,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1950.0035ViewGoogle Scholar
  31. 31Prado, G.; Farutin, A.; Misbah, C.; Bureau, L. Viscoelastic transient of confined red blood cells. Biophys J. 2015108 (9), 2126โ€“ 2136,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.046ViewGoogle Scholar
  32. 32Huang, C. R.; Pan, W. D.; Chen, H. Q.; Copley, A. L. Thixotropic properties of whole blood from healthy human subjects. Biorheology 198724 (6), 795โ€“ 801,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1987-24630ViewGoogle Scholar
  33. 33Anand, M.; Kwack, J.; Masud, A. A new generalized Oldroyd-B model for blood flow in complex geometries. International Journal of Engineering Science 201372, 78โ€“ 88,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.06.009ViewGoogle Scholar
  34. 34Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Investigation of blood rheology under steady and unidirectional large amplitude oscillatory shear. J. Rheol. 201862 (2), 577โ€“ 591,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5017623ViewGoogle Scholar
  35. 35Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Measurements of human blood viscoelasticity and thixotropy under steady and transient shear and constitutive modeling thereof. J. Rheol. 201963 (5), 799โ€“ 813,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5108737ViewGoogle Scholar
  36. 36Armstrong, M.; Tussing, J. A methodology for adding thixotropy to Oldroyd-8 family of viscoelastic models for characterization of human blood. Phys. Fluids 202032 (9), 094111,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0022501ViewGoogle Scholar
  37. 37Crank, J.; Nicolson, P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 194743 (1), 50โ€“ 67,  DOI: 10.1017/S0305004100023197ViewGoogle Scholar
  38. 38Clough, R. W. Original formulation of the finite element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 19907 (2), 89โ€“ 101,  DOI: 10.1016/0168-874X(90)90001-UViewGoogle Scholar
  39. 39Liu, W. K.; Liu, Y.; Farrell, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X. S.; Fukui, Y.; Patankar, N.; Zhang, Y.; Bajaj, C.; Lee, J.Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006195 (13), 1722โ€“ 1749,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.049ViewGoogle Scholar
  40. 40Lopes, D.; Agujetas, R.; Puga, H.; Teixeira, J.; Lima, R.; Alejo, J. P.; Ferrera, C. Analysis of finite element and finite volume methods for fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow in a real stenosed artery. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2021207, 106650,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106650ViewGoogle Scholar
  41. 41Favero, J. L.; Secchi, A. R.; Cardozo, N. S. M.; Jasak, H. Viscoelastic flow analysis using the software OpenFOAM and differential constitutive equations. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2010165 (23), 1625โ€“ 1636,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.08.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  42. 42Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Stabilization of an open-source finite-volume solver for viscoelastic fluid flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2017239, 85โ€“ 104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.12.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  43. 43Chee, C. Y.; Lee, H. P.; Lu, C. Using 3D fluid-structure interaction model to analyse the biomechanical properties of erythrocyte. Phys. Lett. A 2008372 (9), 1357โ€“ 1362,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.067ViewGoogle Scholar
  44. 44Xu, D.; Kaliviotis, E.; Munjiza, A.; Avital, E.; Ji, C.; Williams, J. Large scale simulation of red blood cell aggregation in shear flows. J. Biomech. 201346 (11), 1810โ€“ 1817,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  45. 45Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of the royal society of London. A. mathematical and physical sciences 1971324 (1558), 301โ€“ 313,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1971.0141ViewGoogle Scholar
  46. 46Shi, L.; Pan, T.-W.; Glowinski, R. Deformation of a single red blood cell in bounded Poiseuille flows. Phys. Rev. E 201285 (1), 016307,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.016307ViewGoogle Scholar
  47. 47Yoon, D.; You, D. Continuum modeling of deformation and aggregation of red blood cells. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2267โ€“ 2279,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  48. 48Mainardi, F.; Spada, G. Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. European Physical Journal Special Topics 2011193 (1), 133โ€“ 160,  DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01387-1ViewGoogle Scholar
  49. 49Gracka, M.; Lima, R.; Miranda, J. M.; Student, S.; Melka, B.; Ostrowski, Z. Red blood cells tracking and cell-free layer formation in a microchannel with hyperbolic contraction: A CFD model validation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022226, 107117,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107117ViewGoogle Scholar
  50. 50Aryan, H.; Beigzadeh, B.; Siavashi, M. Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation of improved magnetic drug delivery in a three-dimensional CT-based carotid artery bifurcation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022219, 106778,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106778ViewGoogle Scholar
  51. 51Czaja, B.; Zรกvodszky, G.; Azizi Tarksalooyeh, V.; Hoekstra, A. G. Cell-resolved blood flow simulations of saccular aneurysms: effects of pulsatility and aspect ratio. J. R Soc. Interface 201815 (146), 20180485,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0485ViewGoogle Scholar
  52. 52Rydquist, G.; Esmaily, M. A cell-resolved, Lagrangian solver for modeling red blood cell dynamics in macroscale flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2022461, 111204,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111204ViewGoogle Scholar
  53. 53Dadvand, A.; Baghalnezhad, M.; Mirzaee, I.; Khoo, B. C.; Ghoreishi, S. An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann approach to study the dynamics of elastic membranes in viscous shear flows. Journal of Computational Science 20145 (5), 709โ€“ 718,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2014.06.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  54. 54Krรผger, T.; Holmes, D.; Coveney, P. V. Deformability-based red blood cell separation in deterministic lateral displacement devicesโ”€A simulation study. Biomicrofluidics 20148 (5), 054114,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4897913ViewGoogle Scholar
  55. 55Takeishi, N.; Ito, H.; Kaneko, M.; Wada, S. Deformation of a Red Blood Cell in a Narrow Rectangular Microchannel. Micromachines 201910 (3), 199,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10030199ViewGoogle Scholar
  56. 56Krรผger, T.; Varnik, F.; Raabe, D. Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 201161 (12), 3485โ€“ 3505,  DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.057ViewGoogle Scholar
  57. 57Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Umundum, T.; Saeedipour, M. A reduced-order model for deformable particles with application in bio-microfluidics. Computational Particle Mechanics 20207 (3), 593โ€“ 601,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-019-00283-8ViewGoogle Scholar
  58. 58Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Saeedipour, M. Resolved CFD-DEM simulation of blood flow with a reduced-order RBC model. Computational Particle Mechanics 20229 (4), 759โ€“ 774,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-021-00441-xViewGoogle Scholar
  59. 59Mittal, R.; Iaccarino, G. IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 239โ€“ 261,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175743ViewGoogle Scholar
  60. 60Piquet, A.; Roussel, O.; Hadjadj, A. A comparative study of Brinkman penalization and direct-forcing immersed boundary methods for compressible viscous flows. Computers & Fluids 2016136, 272โ€“ 284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  61. 61Akerkouch, L.; Le, T. B. A Hybrid Continuum-Particle Approach for Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Red Blood Cells in Fluid Flows. Fluids 20216 (4), 139,  DOI: 10.3390/fluids6040139ViewGoogle Scholar
  62. 62Barker, A. T.; Cai, X.-C. Scalable parallel methods for monolithic coupling in fluid-structure interaction with application to blood flow modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 2010229 (3), 642โ€“ 659,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  63. 63Cetin, A.; Sahin, M. A monolithic fluid-structure interaction framework applied to red blood cells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 201935 (2), e3171  DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3171ViewGoogle Scholar
  64. 64Freund, J. B. Numerical Simulation of Flowing Blood Cells. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 201446 (1), 67โ€“ 95,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141349ViewGoogle Scholar
  65. 65Ye, T.; Phan-Thien, N.; Lim, C. T. Particle-based simulations of red blood cellsโ”€A review. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2255โ€“ 2266,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.050ViewGoogle Scholar
  66. 66Arabghahestani, M.; Poozesh, S.; Akafuah, N. K. Advances in Computational Fluid Mechanics in Cellular Flow Manipulation: A Review. Applied Sciences 20199 (19), 4041,  DOI: 10.3390/app9194041ViewGoogle Scholar
  67. 67Rathnayaka, C. M.; From, C. S.; Geekiyanage, N. M.; Gu, Y. T.; Nguyen, N. T.; Sauret, E. Particle-Based Numerical Modelling of Liquid Marbles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 202229 (5), 3021โ€“ 3039,  DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09683-7ViewGoogle Scholar
  68. 68Li, X.; Vlahovska, P. M.; Karniadakis, G. E. Continuum- and particle-based modeling of shapes and dynamics of red blood cells in health and disease. Soft Matter 20139 (1), 28โ€“ 37,  DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26891DViewGoogle Scholar
  69. 69Beris, A. N.; Horner, J. S.; Jariwala, S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J. Recent advances in blood rheology: a review. Soft Matter 202117 (47), 10591โ€“ 10613,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SM01212FViewGoogle Scholar
  70. 70Arciero, J.; Causin, P.; Malgaroli, F. Mathematical methods for modeling the microcirculation. AIMS Biophysics 20174 (3), 362โ€“ 399,  DOI: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.362ViewGoogle Scholar
  71. 71Maria, M. S.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow-driven blood plasma separation and on-chip analyte detection in microfluidic devices. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201721 (4), 72,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-1907-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  72. 72Huhtamรคki, T.; Tian, X.; Korhonen, J. T.; Ras, R. H. A. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat. Protoc. 201813 (7), 1521โ€“ 1538,  DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-zViewGoogle Scholar
  73. 73Young, T., III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 180595, 65โ€“ 87,  DOI: 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005ViewGoogle Scholar
  74. 74Kim, Y. C.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, D.; Park, S.-J.; Park, J.-K. Plasma extraction in a capillary-driven microfluidic device using surfactant-added poly(dimethylsiloxane). Sens. Actuators, B 2010145 (2), 861โ€“ 868,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  75. 75Washburn, E. W. The Dynamics of Capillary Flow. Physical Review 192117 (3), 273โ€“ 283,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.17.273ViewGoogle Scholar
  76. 76Cito, S.; Ahn, Y. C.; Pallares, J.; Duarte, R. M.; Chen, Z.; Madou, M.; Katakis, I. Visualization and measurement of capillary-driven blood flow using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Microfluid Nanofluidics 201213 (2), 227โ€“ 237,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-0950-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  77. 77Berthier, E.; Dostie, A. M.; Lee, U. N.; Berthier, J.; Theberge, A. B. Open Microfluidic Capillary Systems. Anal Chem. 201991 (14), 8739โ€“ 8750,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01429ViewGoogle Scholar
  78. 78Berthier, J.; Brakke, K. A.; Furlani, E. P.; Karampelas, I. H.; Poher, V.; Gosselin, D.; Cubizolles, M.; Pouteau, P. Whole blood spontaneous capillary flow in narrow V-groove microchannels. Sens. Actuators, B 2015206, 258โ€“ 267,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.040ViewGoogle Scholar
  79. 79Hirt, C. W.; Nichols, B. D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 198139 (1), 201โ€“ 225,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  80. 80Chen, J.-L.; Shih, W.-H.; Hsieh, W.-H. AC electro-osmotic micromixer using a face-to-face, asymmetric pair of planar electrodes. Sens. Actuators, B 2013188, 11โ€“ 21,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.012ViewGoogle Scholar
  81. 81Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electrokinetics of non-Newtonian fluids: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2013201-202, 94โ€“ 108,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  82. 82Oh, K. W. 6 – Lab-on-chip (LOC) devices and microfluidics for biomedical applications. In MEMS for Biomedical Applications; Bhansali, S., Vasudev, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing, 2012; pp 150โ€“ 171.ViewGoogle Scholar
  83. 83Bello, M. S.; De Besi, P.; Rezzonico, R.; Righetti, P. G.; Casiraghi, E. Electroosmosis of polymer solutions in fused silica capillaries. ELECTROPHORESIS 199415 (1), 623โ€“ 626,  DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150150186ViewGoogle Scholar
  84. 84Park, H. M.; Lee, W. M. Effect of viscoelasticity on the flow pattern and the volumetric flow rate in electroosmotic flows through a microchannel. Lab Chip 20088 (7), 1163โ€“ 1170,  DOI: 10.1039/b800185eViewGoogle Scholar
  85. 85Afonso, A. M.; Alves, M. A.; Pinho, F. T. Analytical solution of mixed electro-osmotic/pressure driven flows of viscoelastic fluids in microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2009159 (1), 50โ€“ 63,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.01.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  86. 86Sousa, J. J.; Afonso, A. M.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Effect of the skimming layer on electro-osmoticโ”€Poiseuille flows of viscoelastic fluids. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201110 (1), 107โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-010-0651-yViewGoogle Scholar
  87. 87Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electro-osmotic mobility of non-Newtonian fluids. Biomicrofluidics 20115 (1), 014110,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3571278ViewGoogle Scholar
  88. 88Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic instabilities in cross-shaped microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2018259, 61โ€“ 77,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  89. 89Bezerra, W. S.; Castelo, A.; Afonso, A. M. Numerical Study of Electro-Osmotic Fluid Flow and Vortex Formation. Micromachines (Basel) 201910 (12), 796,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10120796ViewGoogle Scholar
  90. 90Ji, J.; Qian, S.; Liu, Z. Electroosmotic Flow of Viscoelastic Fluid through a Constriction Microchannel. Micromachines (Basel) 202112 (4), 417,  DOI: 10.3390/mi12040417ViewGoogle Scholar
  91. 91Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Exact solutions for electro-osmotic flow of viscoelastic fluids in rectangular micro-channels. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2009211 (2), 502โ€“ 509,  DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.068ViewGoogle Scholar
  92. 92Gerum, R.; Mirzahossein, E.; Eroles, M.; Elsterer, J.; Mainka, A.; Bauer, A.; Sonntag, S.; Winterl, A.; Bartl, J.; Fischer, L. Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry. Elife 202211, e78823,  DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78823ViewGoogle Scholar
  93. 93Sadek, S. H.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic flow instabilities of viscoelastic fluids in contraction/expansion micro-geometries. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2020283, 104293,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104293ViewGoogle Scholar
  94. 94Spanjaards, M.; Peters, G.; Hulsen, M.; Anderson, P. Numerical Study of the Effect of Thixotropy on Extrudate Swell. Polymers 202113 (24), 4383,  DOI: 10.3390/polym13244383ViewGoogle Scholar
  95. 95Rashidi, S.; Bafekr, H.; Valipour, M. S.; Esfahani, J. A. A review on the application, simulation, and experiment of the electrokinetic mixers. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification 2018126, 108โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2018.02.021ViewGoogle Scholar
  96. 96Matsubara, K.; Narumi, T. Microfluidic mixing using unsteady electroosmotic vortices produced by a staggered array of electrodes. Chemical Engineering Journal 2016288, 638โ€“ 647,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.013ViewGoogle Scholar
  97. 97Qaderi, A.; Jamaati, J.; Bahiraei, M. CFD simulation of combined electroosmotic-pressure driven micro-mixing in a microchannel equipped with triangular hurdle and zeta-potential heterogeneity. Chemical Engineering Science 2019199, 463โ€“ 477,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.034ViewGoogle Scholar
  98. 98Cho, C.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Chen, C. o.-K. Mixing enhancement in crisscross micromixer using aperiodic electrokinetic perturbing flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 201255 (11), 2926โ€“ 2933,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  99. 99Zhao, W.; Yang, F.; Wang, K.; Bai, J.; Wang, G. Rapid mixing by turbulent-like electrokinetic microflow. Chemical Engineering Science 2017165, 113โ€“ 121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  100. 100Tran, T.; Chakraborty, P.; Guttenberg, N.; Prescott, A.; Kellay, H.; Goldburg, W.; Goldenfeld, N.; Gioia, G. Macroscopic effects of the spectral structure in turbulent flows. Nat. Phys. 20106 (6), 438โ€“ 441,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1674ViewGoogle Scholar
  101. 101Toner, M.; Irimia, D. Blood-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 20057, 77โ€“ 103,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108ViewGoogle Scholar
  102. 102Maria, M. S.; Rakesh, P. E.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow of blood in a microchannel with differential wetting for blood plasma separation and on-chip glucose detection. Biomicrofluidics 201610 (5), 054108,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4962874ViewGoogle Scholar
  103. 103Tripathi, S.; Varun Kumar, Y. V. B.; Prabhakar, A.; Joshi, S. S.; Agrawal, A. Passive blood plasma separation at the microscale: a review of design principles and microdevices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 201525 (8), 083001,  DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/25/8/083001ViewGoogle Scholar
  104. 104Mohammadi, M.; Madadi, H.; Casals-Terrรฉ, J. Microfluidic point-of-care blood panel based on a novel technique: Reversible electroosmotic flow. Biomicrofluidics 20159 (5), 054106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4930865ViewGoogle Scholar
  105. 105Kang, D. H.; Kim, K.; Kim, Y. J. An anti-clogging method for improving the performance and lifespan of blood plasma separation devices in real-time and continuous microfluidic systems. Sci. Rep 20188 (1), 17015,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35235-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  106. 106Li, Z.; Pollack, G. H. Surface-induced flow: A natural microscopic engine using infrared energy as fuel. Science Advances 20206 (19), eaba0941  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0941ViewGoogle Scholar
  107. 107Mercado-Uribe, H.; Guevara-Pantoja, F. J.; Garcรญa-Muรฑoz, W.; Garcรญa-Maldonado, J. S.; Mรฉndez-Alcaraz, J. M.; Ruiz-Suรกrez, J. C. On the evolution of the exclusion zone produced by hydrophilic surfaces: A contracted description. J. Chem. Phys. 2021154 (19), 194902,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0043084ViewGoogle Scholar
  108. 108Yalcin, O.; Jani, V. P.; Johnson, P. C.; Cabrales, P. Implications Enzymatic Degradation of the Endothelial Glycocalyx on the Microvascular Hemodynamics and the Arteriolar Red Cell Free Layer of the Rat Cremaster Muscle. Front Physiol 20189, 168,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00168ViewGoogle Scholar
Figure 2-15: Systรจme expรฉrimental du plan inclinรฉ

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Sous la direction de :
Marc Jolin, directeur de recherche
Benoit Bissonnette, codirecteur de recherche

Modรฉlisation de lโ€™รฉcoulement du bรฉton frais

Abstract

ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋น„์ƒ ์‚ฌํƒœ์™€ ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณผํ•™์  ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ๋•Œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŒ๋“  ์˜ค์—ผ์„ ๋Œ€ํญ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ์‹ฌ์ง€์–ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์‹  IPCC(๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ •๋ถ€ ๊ฐ„ ํŒจ๋„) ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ(2022)๋Š” 2030๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•จ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ, ์ง€๊ตฌ ๋ณด์กด์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฆ‰๊ฐ์ ์ธ ์กฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํžˆ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜๋ฏธ์—์„œ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์‚ฐ์—…์€ ์ „์ฒด ์ธ๊ฐ„ ์ด์‚ฐํ™”ํƒ„์†Œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์˜ 4~8%๋ฅผ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ง„ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์‹œ๊ธ‰ํžˆ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  ํ™œ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ์ „ํ™˜์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ค์ œ๋กœ, ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ํŠธ๋Ÿญ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ์‹ ์„ ํ•œ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋ฉด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋”์šฑ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ ค๋ฉด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆ, ํŠน์„ฑํ™” ๋ฐ ๋ณด์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์‹  ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌํ˜„์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ์œ ๋™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ๋…ผ์˜๋˜๊ณ  ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹ ์„ ํ•œ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์œ ๋™์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฐ•์ ๊ณผ ์•ฝ์ ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹ ์„ ํ•œ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์œ ๋ณ€ํ•™๊ณผ ์œ ๋™ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ž‘์—… ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์˜ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ง„์ •ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

In view of the current climate emergency and the various scientific reports on climate change, it is essential and even vital to drastically reduce man-made pollution. The latest IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report (2022) indicates that emissions must be halved by 2030 and strongly emphasizes the need to act immediately to preserve the planet. In this sense, the concrete production industry is responsible for 4-8% of total human carbon dioxide emissions and therefore urgently needs to evolve to reduce its environmental impact. The main objective of this study is to participate in this industrial transition by developing a reliable and exploitable numerical model to optimize the production, reduce mixing time and also reduce concrete waste by using technological quality control tools already available. Indeed, developing a numerical simulation allowing to better understand the behavior and flow profiles of fresh concrete inside a mixing-truck is extremely promising as it allows for further optimization of mixing times and costs. In order to be able to exploit such a complex numerical tool, the implementation of elementary fresh concrete flow models is essential to validate, characterize and calibrate the numerical simulations. In this thesis, the development of three simple flow models is discussed and the results obtained are used to validate the numerical behavior of fresh concrete flow. Each of these models has strengths and weaknesses and contributes to the creation of a numerical working environment that provides a much better understanding of the rheology and flow behavior of fresh concrete. This research project is therefore a real gateway to a full modelling of fresh concrete production.


Key words

fresh concrete, rheology, numerical simulation, mixer-truck, rheological probe.

Figure 2-15: Systรจme expรฉrimental du plan inclinรฉ
Figure 2-15: Systรจme expรฉrimental du plan inclinรฉ
Figure 2-19: Essai d'affaissement au cรดne d'Abrams
Figure 2-19: Essai d’affaissement au cรดne d’Abrams

Reference

Amziane, S., Ferraris, C. F., & Koehler, E. (2006). Feasibility of Using a Concrete
Mixing Truck as a Rheometer.
Anderson, J. D. (1991). Fundamentals of aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill.
Balmforth, N. J., Craster, R. V., & Sassi, R. (2002). Shallow viscoplastic flow on an
inclined plane. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 470, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002001660
Banfill, P., Beauprรฉ, D., Chapdelaine, F., de Larrard, F., Domone, P., Nachbaur, L.,
Sedran, T., Wallevik, O., & Wallevik, J. E. (2000). Comparison of concrete
rheometers International tests at LCPC (Nantes, France) in October 2000. In
NIST.
Baracu T. (2012). Computational analysis of the flow around a cylinder and of the
drag force.
Barreto, D., & Leak, J. (2020). A guide to modeling the geotechnical behavior of soils
using the discrete element method. In Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering (p.
79-100). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821205-9.00016-2
Baudez, J. C., Chabot, F., & Coussot, P. (2002). Rheological interpretation of the
slump test. Applied Rheology, 12(3), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2002-
0008
Beaupre, D. (2012). Mixer-mounted probe measures concrete workability.
Berger, X. (2023). Proposition de recherche et prรฉparation orale de doctorat (GCI8084).
Bergeron, P. (1953). Considรฉrations sur les facteurs influenรงant lโ€™usure due au
transport hydraulique de matรฉriaux solides. Application plus particuliรจre aux
machines. https://www.persee.fr/doc/jhydr_0000-0001_1953_act_2_1_3256
Bingham, E. (1922). Fluidity and Plasticity (Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007).
http://www.archive.org/details/fluidityplasticiOObinguoft
Bruschi, G., Nishioka, T., Tsang, K., & Wang, R. (2003). A comparison of analytical
methods drag coefficient of a cylinder.

Caceres, E. C. (2019). Impact de la rhรฉologie des matรฉriaux cimentaires sur lโ€™aspect
des parements et les procรฉdรฉs de mise en place. https://tel.archivesouvertes.fr/tel-01982159
Chanson, H., Jarny, ; S, & Coussot, P. (2006). Dam Break Wave of Thixotropic Fluid.
https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0733-94292006132:3280
Chi, Z. P., Yang, H., Li, R., & Sun, Q. C. (2021). Measurements of unconfined fresh
concrete flow on a slope using spatial filtering velocimetry. Powder Technology,
393, 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.07.088
Cochard, S., & Ancey, C. (2009). Experimental investigation of the spreading of
viscoplastic fluids on inclined planes. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid
Mechanics, 158(1-3), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.007
Coussot, Philippe., & Ancey, C. (Christophe). (1999). Rhรฉophysique des pรขtes et
des suspensions. EDP Sciences.
CSA Group. (2019). CSA A23.1:19 / CSA A23.2:19โ€ฏ: Concrete materials and
methods of concret construction / Test methods and standard practices for
concrete.
Daczko, J. A. (2000). A proposal for measuring rheology of production concrete.
De Larrard, F. (1999). Structures granulaires et formulation des bรฉtons.
http://www.lcpc.fr/betonlabpro
De Larrard, F., Ferraris, C. F., & Sedran, T. (1998). Fresh concrete: A HerscheIBulkley material (Vol. 31).
Domone P.L.J., J. J. (1999). Properties of mortar for self-compacting concrete.
RILEM, 109-120.
El-Reedy, M. (2009). Advanced Materials and Techniques for Reinforced Concrete
Structures.
Emborg M. (1999). Rheology tests for self-compacting concrete – how useful are
they for the design of concrete mix for full-scale production.
Fall A. (2008). Rhรฉophysique des fluides complexesโ€ฏ: Ecoulement et Blocage de
suspensions concentrรฉes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30515545
Ferraris, C. F., Brower, L. E., Beauprรฉ, D., Chapdelaine, F., Domone, P., Koehler,
E., Shen, L., Sonebi, M., Struble, L., Tepke, D., Wallevik, O., & Wallevik, J. E.

(2003). Comparison of concrete rheometers: International tests at MB.
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.7154
Ferraris, C. F., & de Larrard, F. (1998a). Rhรฉologie du bรฉton frais remaniรฉ III – Lโ€™essai
au cรดne dโ€™Abrams modifiรฉ.
Ferraris, C. F., & de Larrard, F. (1998b, fรฉvrier). NISTIR 6094 Testing and modelling
of fresh concrete rheology. NISTIR 6094.
https://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/~garbocz/rheologyNISTIR/FR97html.htm
Fischedick, M., Roy, J., Abdel-Aziz, A., Acquaye Ghana, A., Allwood, J., Baiocchi,
G., Clift, R., Nenov, V., Yetano Roche Spain, M., Roy, J., Abdel-Aziz, A.,
Acquaye, A., Allwood, J. M., Ceron, J., Geng, Y., Kheshgi, H., Lanza, A.,
Perczyk, D., Price, L., โ€ฆ Minx, J. (2014). Climate Change 2014.
Fox R., & McDonald A. (2004). Introduction to fluid mechanics.
Franco Correa I.-D. (2019). ร‰tude tribologique ร  hautes tempรฉratures de matรฉriaux
cรฉramiques structurรฉs ร  diffรฉrentes รฉchelles.
GIEC. (2022). Climate Change 2022โ€ฏ: Mitigation of Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch
Gouvernement du Canada. (2021, mai 31). Dรฉclaration communeโ€ฏ: Lโ€™industrie
canadienne du ciment et le gouvernement du Canada annoncent un partenariat.
https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/icgc.nsf/fra/07730.html
Grenier, M. (1998). Microstructure et rรฉsistance ร  lโ€™usure de revรชtements crรฉes par
fusion laser avec gaz rรฉactifs sur du titane.
Herschel, W. H., & Bulkley, R. (1926). Konsistenzmessungen von GummiBenzollรถsungen. Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 39(4), 291-300.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432034
Hirt, C. W., & Nichols, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics
of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1), 201-225.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
Hoornahad, H., & Koenders, E. A. B. (2012). Simulation of the slump test based on
the discrete element method (DEM). Advanced Materials Research, 446-449,
3766-3773. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.446-449.3766

Hu, C., de Larrard, F., Sedran, T., Boulay, C., Bosd, F., & Deflorenne, F. (1996).
Validation of BTRHEOM, the new rheometer for soft-to-fluid concrete. In
Materials and Structures/Mat~riaux et Constructions (Vol. 29).
Jeong, S. W., Locat, J., Leroueil, S., & Malet, J. P. (2007). Rheological properties of
fine-grained sediments in modeling submarine mass movements: The role of
texture. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, 3rd
International Symposium, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6512-
5_20
Kabagire, K. D. (2018). Modรฉlisation expรฉrimentale et analytique des propriรฉtรฉs
rhรฉologiques des bรฉtons autoplaรงants.
Katopodes, N. D. (2019). Volume of Fluid Method. In Free-Surface Flow (p.
766-802). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815485-4.00018-8
Khayat. (2008). Personnal Communication.
Kosmatka, S. (2011). Dosage et contrรดle des mรฉlanges de bรฉton (8รจme รฉdition).
Li, H., Wu, A., & Cheng, H. (2022). Generalized models of slump and spread in
combination for higher precision in yield stress determination. Cement and
Concrete Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106863
Massey, B., & Smith, J. (2012). Mechanics of fluids 9รจme รฉdition.
Mokรฉddem, S. (2014). Contrรดle de la rhรฉologie dโ€™un bรฉton et de son รฉvolution lors
du malaxage par des mesures en ligne ร  lโ€™aide de la sonde Viscoprobe.
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00993153
Munson, B. R., & Young, D. R. (2006). Fundamental of Fluid Mechanics (5th รฉd.).
Munson, M., Young, M. , & Okiishi, M. (2020). Mรฉcanique des fluides (8รจme รฉdition).
Murata, J., & Kikukawa, H. (1992). Viscosity Equation for Fresh Concrete.
Nakayama, Y., & Boucher, R. F. (2000). Introduction to fluid mechanics. ButterworthHeinemann.
Nฤ›meฤek, J. (2021). Numerical simulation of slump flow test of cement paste
composites. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 30, 58-62.
https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2021.30.0058
Nikitin, K. D., Olshanskii, M. A., Terekhov, K. M., & Vassilevski, Y. V. (2011). A
numerical method for the simulation of free surface flows of viscoplastic fluid in

3D. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 29(6), 605-622.
https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1109-m11si01
Noh, W. F., & Woodward, P. (1976). SLIC (Simple Line Interface Calculation).
Odabas, D. (2018). Effects of Load and Speed on Wear Rate of Abrasive Wear for
2014 Al Alloy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
295(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/295/1/012008
Pintaude, G. (s. d.). Characteristics of Abrasive Particles and Their Implications on
Wear. www.intechopen.com
Poullain, P. (2003). ร‰tude comparative de lโ€™รฉcoulement dโ€™un fluide viscoplastique
dans une maquette de malaxeur pour bรฉton.
R. J. Cattolica. (2003). Experiment F2: Water Tunnel. In MAE171A/175A Mechanical
Engineering Laboratory Manual (Winter Quarter).
Raper, R. M. (1966). Drag force and pressure distribution on cylindrical
protuberances immersed in a turbulent channel flow.
RMCAO. (2013). CSA A23.2-5C: Concrete Basics Slump Test.
Roques, A., & School, H. (2006). High resolution seismic imaging applied to the
geometrical characterization of very high voltage electric pylons.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281566156
Roussel, N. (2006). Correlation between yield stress and slump: Comparison
between numerical simulations and concrete rheometers results. Materials and
Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 39(4), 501-509.
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-005-9035-2
Roussel, N., & Coussot, P. (2005). โ€œFifty-cent rheometerโ€ for yield stress
measurements: From slump to spreading flow. Journal of Rheology, 49(3),
705-718. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.1879041
Roussel, N., Geiker, M. R., Dufour, F., Thrane, L. N., & Szabo, P. (2007).
Computational modeling of concrete flow: General overview. Cement and
Concrete Research, 37(9), 1298-1307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.007
Schaer, N. (2019). Modรฉlisation des รฉcoulements ร  surface libre de fluides nonnewtoniens. https://theses.hal.science/tel-02166968

Schowalter, W. R., & Christensen, G. (1998). Toward a rationalization of the slump
test for fresh concrete: Comparisons of calculations and experiments. Journal
of Rheology, 42(4), 865-870. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550905
Sofiane Amziane, Chiara F. Ferraris, & Eric P. Koehler. (2005). Measurement of
Workability of Fresh Concrete Using a Mixing Truck. Journal of Research of the
National Institute of Standards Technology, 55-56.
Sooraj, P., Agrawal, A., & Sharma, A. (2018). Measurement of Drag Coefficient for
an Elliptical Cylinder. Journal of Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 5,
1-7. https://doi.org/10.47469/jees.2018.v05.100050
Stachowiak G. (2006). Wear – Materials, Mechanisms and Pratice.
Stachowiak G.W. (1993). Tribology Series (Vol. 24, p. 557-612). Elsevier.
Tattersall, G., & Banfill, P. F. G. (1983). The rheology of fresh concrete.
The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production
and Use ยซ The European Guidelines for Self Compacting Concrete ยป. (2005).
www.efnarc.org
University College London. (2010). Pressure around a cylinder and cylinder drag.
Van Oudheusden, B. W., Scarano, F., Roosenboom, E. W. M., Casimiri, E. W. F., &
Souverein, L. J. (2007). Evaluation of integral forces and pressure fields from
planar velocimetry data for incompressible and compressible flows.
Experiments in Fluids, 43(2-3), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-007-
0261-y
Vasilic, K., Gram, A., & Wallevik, J. E. (2019). Numerical simulation of fresh concrete
flow: Insight and challenges. RILEM Technical Letters, 4, 57-66.
https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.92
Viccione, G., Ferlisi, S., & Marra, E. (2010). A numerical investigation of the
interaction between debris flows and defense barriers.
http://www.unisa.it/docenti/giacomoviccione/en/index
Wallevik J. (2006). Relation between the Bingham parameters and slump.
Wallevik, J. E. (2006). Relationship between the Bingham parameters and slump.
Cement and Concrete Research, 36(7), 1214-1221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.001

Wallevik, J. E., & Wallevik, O. H. (2020). Concrete mixing truck as a rheometer.
Cement and Concrete Research, 127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105930

Validity evaluation of popular liquid-vapor phase change models for cryogenic self-pressurization process

๊ทน์ €์˜จ ์ž์ฒด ๊ฐ€์•• ๊ณต์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธ๊ธฐ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€

์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ฐ€ํ๋œ ์šฉ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ž์ฒด ๊ฐ€์•• ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋งค์šฐ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Hertz-Knudsen ๊ด€๊ณ„, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ ํ”„ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ํŒŒ์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹ค์˜จ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ „์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ทน์ €์˜จ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๊ทน์ €์˜จ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ช…์‹œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 171๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋‹ค์ƒ ์†”๋ฒ„๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ง์ ‘ ๋น„๊ตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ ์‘์ถ• ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด <>๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž์ฒด ๊ฐ€์•• ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์••๋ ฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ย ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ „๋žต์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ ํ”„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ทน์ €์˜จ ์ž์ฒด ๊ฐ€์•• ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  ํŽธ์ฐจ์™€ CPU ์†Œ๋น„๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด Lee ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ Tanasawa ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Elsevier

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Volume 181, December 2021, 121879

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Validity evaluation of popular liquid-vapor phase change models for cryogenic self-pressurization process

Author links open overlay panelZhongqi Zuo, Jingyi Wu, Yonghua HuangShow moreAdd to MendeleyShareCite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121879Get rights and content

Abstract

Liquid-vapor phase change models vitally influence the simulation of self-pressurization processes in closed containers. Popular liquid-vapor phase change models, such as the Hertz-Knudsen relation, energy jump model, and their derivations were developed based on room-temperature fluids. Although they had widely been applied in cryogenic simulations with liquid-vapor transitions, the performance of each model was not explicitly investigated and compared yet under cryogenic conditions. A unified multi-phase solver incorporating four typical liquid-vapor phase change models has been proposed in the present study, which enables direct comparison among those models against experimental data. A total number of 171 self-pressurization simulations were conducted to evaluate the evaporation and condensation modelsโ€™ prediction accuracy and calculation speed. It was found that the pressure prediction highly depended on the model coefficients, whose optimization strategies differed from each other. The energy jump model was found inadequate for cryogenic self-pressurization simulations. According to the average deviation and CPU consumption, the Lee model and the Tanasawa model were proven to be more stable and more efficient than the others.

Introduction

The liquid-vapor phase change of cryogenic fluids is widely involved in industrial applications, such as the hydrogen transport vehicles [1], shipborne liquid natural gas (LNG) containers [2] and on-orbit cryogenic propellant tanks [3]. These applications require cryogenic fluids to be stored for weeks to months. Although high-performance insulation measures are adopted, heat inevitably enters the tank via radiation and conduction. The self-pressurization in the tank induced by the heat leakage eventually causes the venting loss of the cryogenic fluids and threatens the safety of the craft in long-term missions. To reduce the boil-off loss and extend the cryogenic storage duration, a more comprehensive understanding of the self-pressurization mechanism is needed.

Due to the difficulties and limitations in implementing cryogenic experiments, numerical modeling is a convenient and powerful way to study the self-pressurization process of cryogenic fluids. However, how the phase change models influence the mass and heat transfer under cryogenic conditions is still unsettled [4]. As concluded by Persad and Ward [5], a seemingly slight variation in the liquid-vapor phase change models can lead to erroneous predictions.

Among the liquid-vapor phase change models, the kinetic theory gas (KTG) based models and the energy jump model are the most popular ones used in recent self-pressurization simulations [6]. The KTG based models, also known as the Hertz-Knudsen relation models, were developed on the concept of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of the gas molecular [7]. The Hertz-Knudsen relation has evolved to several models, including the Schrage model [8], the Tanasawa model [9], the Lee model [10] and the statistical rate theory (SRT) [11], which will be described in Section 2.2. Since the Schrage model and the Lee model are embedded and configured as the default ones in the commercial CFD solvers Flow-3Dยฎ and Ansys Fluentยฎ respectively, they have been widely used in self-pressurization simulations for liquid nitrogen [12], [13] and liquid hydrogen [14], [15]. The major drawback of the KTG models lies in the difficulty of selecting model coefficients, which were reported in a considerably wide range spanning three magnitudes even for the same working fluid [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Studies showed that the liquid level, pressure and mass transfer rate are directly influenced by the model coefficients [16], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Wrong coefficients will lead to deviation or even divergence of the results. The energy jump model is also known as the thermal limitation model. It assumes that the evaporation and condensation at the liquid-vapor interface are induced only by heat conduction. The model is widely adopted in lumped node simulations due to its simplicity [6], [26], [27]. To improve the accuracy of mass flux prediction, the energy jump model was modified by including the convection heat transfer [28], [29]. However, the convection correlations are empirical and developed mainly for room-temperature fluids. Whether the correlation itself can be precisely applied in cryogenic simulations still needs further investigation.

Fig. 1 summarizes the cryogenic simulations involving the modeling of evaporation and condensation processes in recent years. The publication has been increasing rapidly. However, the characteristics of each evaporation and condensation model are not explicitly revealed when simulating self-pressurization. A comparative study of the phase change models is highly needed for cryogenic fluids for a better simulation of the self-pressurization processes.

In the present paper, a unified multi-phase solver incorporating four typical liquid-vapor phase change models, namely the Tanasawa model, the Lee model, the energy jump model, and the modified energy jump model has been proposed, which enables direct comparison among different models. The models are used to simulate the pressure and temperature evolutions in an experimental liquid nitrogen tank in normal gravity, which helps to evaluate themselves in the aspects of accuracy, calculation speed and robustness.

Section snippets

Governing equations for the self-pressurization tank

In the present study, both the fluid domain and the solid wall of the tank are modeled and discretized. The heat transportation at the solid boundaries is considered to be irrelevant with the nearby fluid velocity. Consequently, two sets of the solid and the fluid governing equations can be decoupled and solved separately. The pressures in the cryogenic container are usually from 100 kPa to 300 kPa. Under these conditions, the Knudsen number is far smaller than 0.01, and the fluids are

Self-pressurization results and phase change model comparison

This section compares the simulation results by different phase change models. Section 3.1 compares the pressure and temperature outputs from two KTG based models, namely the Lee model and the Tanasawa model. Section 3.2 presents the pressure predictions from the energy transport models, namely the energy jump model and the modified energy jump model, and compares pressure prediction performances between the KTG based models and the energy transport models. Section 3.3 evaluates the four models 

Conclusion

A unified vapor-liquid-solid multi-phase numerical solver has been accomplished for the self pressurization simulation in cryogenic containers. Compared to the early fluid-only solver, the temperature prediction in the vicinity of the tank wall improves significantly. Four liquid-vapor phase change models were integrated into the solver, which enables fair and effective comparison for performances between each other. The pressure and temperature prediction accuracies, and the calculation speed

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhongqi Zuo: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing โ€“ original draft, Validation. Jingyi Wu: Conceptualization, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Validation. Yonghua Huang: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Validation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors declare that they have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, โ€œValidity evaluation of popular liquid-vapor phase change models for cryogenic self-pressurization processโ€.

Acknowledgement

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51936006).

References (40)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

Design optimization of perforation on deflector for improved performance of vortex settling basin

์™€๋ฅ˜ ์นจ์ „ ์ˆ˜์กฐ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์˜ ์ฒœ๊ณต ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”*

Abstract

Zhuoyun MuYiyi MaLin Li

First published: 18 August 2021

https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2640

*Optimisation de la conception de la perforation sur le dรฉflecteur pour une meilleure performance du bassin de dรฉcantation par vortex.

โ€กFunding information:ย Graduate Research and Innovation Project of Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Grant/Award Number: XJ2020G171; Xinjiang Agricultural University, Grant/Award Number: SLXK-YJS-2019-04; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 52069028; Tianshan Youth Project, Grant/Award Number: 2018Q017; Department of Education, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Grant/Award Number: XJEDU2018I010

ENTHIS LINK GOES TO A ENGLISH SECTIONFRTHIS LINK GOES TO A FRENCH SECTION

For vortex settling basins (VSBs) installed with a deflector, perforation is an effective retrofit to reduce the self-weight of the deflector and sediment deposition on it. The current study investigated experimentally the performance of VSBs the deflector of which was perforated at different locations with various opening ratios. The results showed that perforating the outside overflow area of the deflector was the optimum for reducing sediment deposition. With an opening ratio of 8.67โ€“13% in the outside overflow area of the deflector, the VSB exhibited similar sediment removal efficiency to the original design without any openings on the deflector. The current study provided the design optimization for deflector perforation in VSBs.

๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์„ค์น˜๋œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์นจ์ „ ๋ถ„์ง€(VSB)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฒœ๊ณต์€ ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ ์ฆ์ฐฉ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฐœ์กฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฒœ๊ณต๋œ VSB์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์˜ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ”Œ๋กœ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ฒœ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ ํ‡ด์ ์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ์ž„์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์˜ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ”Œ๋กœ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ 8.67-13%์˜ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๋กœ VSB๋Š” ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์— ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ์›๋ž˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์นจ์ „๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” VSB์˜ ๋””ํ”Œ๋ ‰ํ„ฐ ์ฒœ๊ณต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration

์กฐํŒŒ์‹ 3๋™์„ ์˜ ์„ ์ฒด์ธก๋ฉด๋Œ€์นญ์ด ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Abolfath Askarian KhoobAtabak FeiziAlireza MohamadiKarim Akbari VakilabadiAbbas Fazeliniai & Shahryar Moghaddampour

Abstract

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์ธ๋ณด๋“œ, ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์•„์›ƒ๋ณด๋“œ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์Šคํƒœ๊ฑฐ/๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ์˜ ๋Œ€์นญ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ ์ธ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์›จ์ด๋ธŒ ํ”ผ์–ด์‹ฑ 3๋™์„ ์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” 0.225์—์„œ 0.60๊นŒ์ง€์˜ Froude ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ์‚ผ๋™์„  ์ถ•์†Œ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ National Iranian Marine Laboratory(NIMALA) ์˜ˆ์ธ ํƒฑํฌ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ ์„ ์ฒด ํŠธ๋žœ์„ฌ์˜ ์•ž์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‚ผ๋™์„ ์˜ ์ด ์ €ํ•ญ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋˜ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด์˜ ๋Œ€์นญ ํ˜•ํƒœ๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ค‘ ์ „์ฒด ์ €ํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

  • Resistance performance
  • Wave-piercing trimaran
  • Seakeeping characteristics
  • Side hull symmetry
  • Model test
  • Experimental study
Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration
Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration

References

  • Ackers BB, Thad JM, Tredennick OW, Landen CH, Miller EJ, Sodowsky JP, Hadler JB (1997) An investigation of the resistance characteristics of powered trimaran side-hull configurations. SNAME Transactions 105:349โ€“373Google Scholar 
  • ASME (2005) Test uncertainty, The American society of mechanical engineers performance test code, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, No. PTC 19. 1โ€“2005, New York
  • Chen Y, Yang L, Xie Y, Yu S (2016) The research on characteristic parameters and resistance chart of operation and maintenance trimaran in the sea. Polish Maritime Research 23(s1):20โ€“24. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0041Article Google Scholar 
  • Claire M, Andrea M (2014) Resistance analysis for a trimaran. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 8(1):7โ€“15Google Scholar 
  • Deng R, Li C, Huang D, Zhou G (2015) The effect of trimming and sinkage on the trimaran resistance calculation. Procedia Engineering 126:327โ€“331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.199Article Google Scholar 
  • Doctors L, Scrace R (2003) The optimization of trimaran side hull position for minimum resistance. Seventh International Conference on Fast Transportation (FAST 2003), Ischia, Italy, 1โ€“12
  • Du L, Hefazi H, Sahoo P (2019) Rapid resistance estimation method of non-Wigley trimarans. Ships and Offshore Structures 14(8):910โ€“920. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1588499Article Google Scholar 
  • Ghadimi P, Nazemian A, Ghadimi A (2019) Numerical scrutiny of the influence of side hulls arrangement on the motion of a Trimaran vessel in regular waves through CFD analysis. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41(1):1โ€“10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1505-xArticle Google Scholar 
  • Hafez K, El-Kot A-R (2011) Comparative analysis of the separation variation influence on the hydrodynamic performance of a high speed trimaran. Journal of Marine Science and Application 10(4):377โ€“393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-011-1083-0Article Google Scholar 
  • Hafez KA, El-Kot AA (2012) Comparative investigation of the stagger variation influence on the hydrodynamic interference of high speed trimaran. Alexandria Engineering Journal 51(3):153โ€“169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.02.002Article Google Scholar 
  • Hashimoto H, Amano S, Umeda N, Matsuda A (2011) Influence of side-hull positions on dynamic behaviors of a trimaran running in following and stern quartering seas. Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, 573โ€“580
  • Insel M, Molland AF (1991) An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 134:1โ€“20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-013-1193-yArticle Google Scholar 
  • ITTC (2014) Testing and extrapolation methods in resistance towing tank tests, Recommended Procedures, 7.5โ€“02โ€“02โ€“01
  • Iqbal M, Utama IKAP (2014) An investigation into the effect of water depth on the resistance components of trimaran configuration. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Marine Technology, Surabaya
  • Lewis EV (1988) Principles of Naval Architecture. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers III: 323โ€“324
  • Luhulima RB, Utama I, Sulisetyono A (2016) Experimental investigation into the resistance components of displacement trimaran at various lateral spacing. International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) 2:21โ€“29Google Scholar 
  • Luhulima RB (2017) An Investigation into the resistance of displacement trimaran: a comparative analysis between experimental and CFD approaches. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering (IJME) 6:9โ€“18Google Scholar 
  • Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA (2011) Ship resistance and propulsion: practical estimation of ship propulsive power. Cambridge University Press, 544.
  • Verna S, Khan K, Praveen PC (2012) Trimaran hull form optimization, using ship flow. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 1(10):5โ€“15
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Talahatu MA, Indrawati RT, Jamaluddin A (2013) Resistance analysis of unsymmetrical trimaran model with outboard side hulls configuration. Journal of Marine Science and Application 12(3):293โ€“297Article Google Scholar 
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Talahatu MA, Indrawati RT, Jamaluddin A (2015a) Resistance reduction on trimaran ship model by biopolymer of eel slime. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering 12(2):95โ€“102. https://doi.org/10.3329/jname.v12i2.19549Article Google Scholar 
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Waskito KT, Jamaluddin A (2015b) Experimental study resistances of asymmetrical Pentamaran model with separation and staggered hull variation of inner side-hulls. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research 42(1):82โ€“94. https://doi.org/10.1615/interjfluidmechres.v42.i1.60Article Google Scholar 
  • Zhang WP, Zong Z, Wang WH (2012) Special problems and solutions for numerical prediction on longitudinal motion of trimaran. Applied Mechanics and Materials 152-154: 1262โ€“75. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.152-154.1262
  • Zhang L, Zhang JN, Shang YC (2019) A potential flow theory and boundary layer theory based hybrid method for waterjet propulsion. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7(4):113โ€“132. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7040113Article Google Scholar 
Thermo-fluid modeling of influence of attenuated laser beam intensity profile on melt pool behavior in laser-assisted powder-based direct energy deposition

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ณด์กฐ ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ง์ ‘ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ์‡  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ๊ฐ•๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ด์œ ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Thermo-fluid modeling of influence of attenuated laser beam intensity profile on melt pool behavior in laser-assisted powder-based direct energy deposition

Mohammad Sattari, Amin Ebrahimi, Martin Luckabauer, Gert-willem R.B.E. Rรถmer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume โ€บ Conference contribution โ€บ Professional

5Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A numerical framework based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), using the finite volume method (FVM) and volume of fluid (VOF) technique is presented to investigate the effect of the laser beam intensity profile on melt pool behavior in laser-assisted powder-based directed energy deposition (L-DED). L-DED is an additive manufacturing (AM) process that utilizes a laser beam to fuse metal powder particles. To assure high-fidelity modeling, it was found that it is crucial to accurately model the interaction between the powder stream and the laser beam in the gas region above the substrate. The proposed model considers various phenomena including laser energy attenuation and absorption, multiple reflections of the laser rays, powder particle stream, particle-fluid interaction, temperature-dependent properties, buoyancy effects, thermal expansion, solidification shrinkage and drag, and Marangoni flow. The latter is induced by temperature and element-dependent surface tension. The model is validated using experimental results and highlights the importance of considering laser energy attenuation. Furthermore, the study investigates how the laser beam intensity profile affects melt pool size and shape, influencing the solidification microstructure and mechanical properties of the deposited material. The proposed model has the potential to optimize the L-DED process for a variety of materials and provides insights into the capability of numerical modeling for additive manufacturing optimization.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFlow-3D World Users Conference
Publication statusPublished – 2023
EventFlow-3D World User Conference – Strasbourg, France
Duration: 5 Jun 2023 โ†’ 7 Jun 2023

Conference

ConferenceFlow-3D World User Conference
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityStrasbourg
Period5/06/23 โ†’ 7/06/23
Figure 2 Modeling the plant with cylindrical tubes at the bottom of the canal.

Optimized Vegetation Density to Dissipate Energy of Flood Flow in Open Canals

์—ด๋ฆฐ ์šดํ•˜์—์„œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์‹์ƒ ๋ฐ€๋„

Mahdi Feizbahr,1Navid Tonekaboni,2Guang-Jun Jiang,3,4andย Hong-Xia Chen3,4
Academic Editor:ย Mohammad Yazdi

Abstract

๊ฐ•์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹์ƒ์€ ์กฐ๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ํ‰๊ท  ์œ ์†์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ, ์œ ๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ• ํšก๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ์œ ์† ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ž์—ฐ์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์šดํ•˜์™€ ๊ฐ•์€ ํ™์ˆ˜ ๋™์•ˆ ์ดˆ๋ชฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฎ์—ฌ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์šดํ•˜์˜ ์กฐ๋„๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ™์ˆ˜์‹œ ์œ ๋™์ €ํ•ญ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค.ย ์‹๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์€ ํ๋ฆ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์‹๋ฌผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์œ ์†, ์œ ์† ๊นŠ์ด ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹์ƒ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์†์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด 48๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ๊ด€์˜ ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ž„์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ๋ฌด์‹œํ• ๋งŒํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Abstract

Vegetation along the river increases the roughness and reduces the average flow velocity, reduces flow energy, and changes the flow velocity profile in the cross section of the river. Many canals and rivers in nature are covered with vegetation during the floods. Canalโ€™s roughness is strongly affected by plants and therefore it has a great effect on flow resistance during flood. Roughness resistance against the flow due to the plants depends on the flow conditions and plant, so the model should simulate the current velocity by considering the effects of velocity, depth of flow, and type of vegetation along the canal. Total of 48 models have been simulated to investigate the effect of roughness in the canal. The results indicated that, by enhancing the velocity, the effect of vegetation in decreasing the bed velocity is negligible, while when the current has lower speed, the effect of vegetation on decreasing the bed velocity is obviously considerable.

1. Introduction

Considering the impact of each variable is a very popular field within the analytical and statistical methods and intelligent systems [1โ€“14]. This can help research for better modeling considering the relation of variables or interaction of them toward reaching a better condition for the objective function in control and engineering [15โ€“27]. Consequently, it is necessary to study the effects of the passive factors on the active domain [28โ€“36]. Because of the effect of vegetation on reducing the discharge capacity of rivers [37], pruning plants was necessary to improve the condition of rivers. One of the important effects of vegetation in river protection is the action of roots, which cause soil consolidation and soil structure improvement and, by enhancing the shear strength of soil, increase the resistance of canal walls against the erosive force of water. The outer limbs of the plant increase the roughness of the canal walls and reduce the flow velocity and deplete the flow energy in vicinity of the walls. Vegetation by reducing the shear stress of the canal bed reduces flood discharge and sedimentation in the intervals between vegetation and increases the stability of the walls [38โ€“41].

One of the main factors influencing the speed, depth, and extent of flood in this method is Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient. On the other hand, soil cover [42], especially vegetation, is one of the most determining factors in Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient. Therefore, it is expected that those seasonal changes in the vegetation of the region will play an important role in the calculated value of Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient and ultimately in predicting the flood wave behavior [43โ€“45]. The roughness caused by plantsโ€™ resistance to flood current depends on the flow and plant conditions. Flow conditions include depth and velocity of the plant, and plant conditions include plant type, hardness or flexibility, dimensions, density, and shape of the plant [46]. In general, the issue discussed in this research is the optimization of flood-induced flow in canals by considering the effect of vegetation-induced roughness. Therefore, the effect of plants on the roughness coefficient and canal transmission coefficient and in consequence the flow depth should be evaluated [4748].

Current resistance is generally known by its roughness coefficient. The equation that is mainly used in this field is Manning equation. The ratio of shear velocity to average current velocity  is another form of current resistance. The reason for using the  ratio is that it is dimensionless and has a strong theoretical basis. The reason for using Manning roughness coefficient is its pervasiveness. According to Freeman et al. [49], the Manning roughness coefficient for plants was calculated according to the Kouwen and Unny [50] method for incremental resistance. This method involves increasing the roughness for various surface and plant irregularities. Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient has all the factors affecting the resistance of the canal. Therefore, the appropriate way to more accurately estimate this coefficient is to know the factors affecting this coefficient [51].

To calculate the flow rate, velocity, and depth of flow in canals as well as flood and sediment estimation, it is important to evaluate the flow resistance. To determine the flow resistance in open ducts, Manning, Chรฉzy, and Darcyโ€“Weisbach relations are used [52]. In these relations, there are parameters such as Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient (n), Chรฉzy roughness coefficient (C), and Darcyโ€“Weisbach coefficient (f). All three of these coefficients are a kind of flow resistance coefficient that is widely used in the equations governing flow in rivers [53].

The three relations that express the relationship between the average flow velocity (V) and the resistance and geometric and hydraulic coefficients of the canal are as follows:where nf, and c are Manning, Darcyโ€“Weisbach, and Chรฉzy coefficients, respectively. Vโ€‰=โ€‰average flow velocity, Rโ€‰=โ€‰hydraulic radius, Sfโ€‰=โ€‰slope of energy line, which in uniform flow is equal to the slope of the canal bed, โ€‰=โ€‰gravitational acceleration, and Kn is a coefficient whose value is equal to 1 in the SI system and 1.486 in the English system. The coefficients of resistance in equations (1) to (3) are related as follows:

Based on the boundary layer theory, the flow resistance for rough substrates is determined from the following general relation:where fโ€‰=โ€‰Darcyโ€“Weisbach coefficient of friction, yโ€‰=โ€‰flow depth, Ksโ€‰=โ€‰bed roughness size, and Aโ€‰=โ€‰constant coefficient.

On the other hand, the relationship between the Darcyโ€“Weisbach coefficient of friction and the shear velocity of the flow is as follows:

By using equation (6), equation (5) is converted as follows:

Investigation on the effect of vegetation arrangement on shear velocity of flow in laboratory conditions showed that, with increasing the shear Reynolds number (), the numerical value of the  ratio also increases; in other words the amount of roughness coefficient increases with a slight difference in the cases without vegetation, checkered arrangement, and cross arrangement, respectively [54].

Roughness in river vegetation is simulated in mathematical models with a variable floor slope flume by different densities and discharges. The vegetation considered submerged in the bed of the flume. Results showed that, with increasing vegetation density, canal roughness and flow shear speed increase and with increasing flow rate and depth, Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient decreases. Factors affecting the roughness caused by vegetation include the effect of plant density and arrangement on flow resistance, the effect of flow velocity on flow resistance, and the effect of depth [4555].

One of the works that has been done on the effect of vegetation on the roughness coefficient is Darby [56] study, which investigates a flood wave model that considers all the effects of vegetation on the roughness coefficient. There are currently two methods for estimating vegetation roughness. One method is to add the thrust force effect to Manningโ€™s equation [475758] and the other method is to increase the canal bed roughness (Manning-Strickler coefficient) [4559โ€“61]. These two methods provide acceptable results in models designed to simulate floodplain flow. Wang et al. [62] simulate the floodplain with submerged vegetation using these two methods and to increase the accuracy of the results, they suggested using the effective height of the plant under running water instead of using the actual height of the plant. Freeman et al. [49] provided equations for determining the coefficient of vegetation roughness under different conditions. Lee et al. [63] proposed a method for calculating the Manning coefficient using the flow velocity ratio at different depths. Much research has been done on the Manning roughness coefficient in rivers, and researchers [4963โ€“66] sought to obtain a specific number for n to use in river engineering. However, since the depth and geometric conditions of rivers are completely variable in different places, the values of Manning roughness coefficient have changed subsequently, and it has not been possible to choose a fixed number. In river engineering software, the Manning roughness coefficient is determined only for specific and constant conditions or normal flow. Lee et al. [63] stated that seasonal conditions, density, and type of vegetation should also be considered. Hydraulic roughness and Manning roughness coefficient n of the plant were obtained by estimating the total Manning roughness coefficient from the matching of the measured water surface curve and water surface height. The following equation is used for the flow surface curve:where  is the depth of water change, S0 is the slope of the canal floor, Sf is the slope of the energy line, and Fr is the Froude number which is obtained from the following equation:where D is the characteristic length of the canal. Flood flow velocity is one of the important parameters of flood waves, which is very important in calculating the water level profile and energy consumption. In the cases where there are many limitations for researchers due to the wide range of experimental dimensions and the variety of design parameters, the use of numerical methods that are able to estimate the rest of the unknown results with acceptable accuracy is economically justified.

FLOW-3D software uses Finite Difference Method (FDM) for numerical solution of two-dimensional and three-dimensional flow. This software is dedicated to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and is provided by Flow Science [67]. The flow is divided into networks with tubular cells. For each cell there are values of dependent variables and all variables are calculated in the center of the cell, except for the velocity, which is calculated at the center of the cell. In this software, two numerical techniques have been used for geometric simulation, FAVORโ„ข (Fractional-Area-Volume-Obstacle-Representation) and the VOF (Volume-of-Fluid) method. The equations used at this model for this research include the principle of mass survival and the magnitude of motion as follows. The fluid motion equations in three dimensions, including the Navierโ€“Stokes equations with some additional terms, are as follows:where  are mass accelerations in the directions xyz and  are viscosity accelerations in the directions xyz and are obtained from the following equations:

Shear stresses  in equation (11) are obtained from the following equations:

The standard model is used for high Reynolds currents, but in this model, RNG theory allows the analytical differential formula to be used for the effective viscosity that occurs at low Reynolds numbers. Therefore, the RNG model can be used for low and high Reynolds currents.

Weather changes are high and this affects many factors continuously. The presence of vegetation in any area reduces the velocity of surface flows and prevents soil erosion, so vegetation will have a significant impact on reducing destructive floods. One of the methods of erosion protection in floodplain watersheds is the use of biological methods. The presence of vegetation in watersheds reduces the flow rate during floods and prevents soil erosion. The external organs of plants increase the roughness and decrease the velocity of water flow and thus reduce its shear stress energy. One of the important factors with which the hydraulic resistance of plants is expressed is the roughness coefficient. Measuring the roughness coefficient of plants and investigating their effect on reducing velocity and shear stress of flow is of special importance.

Roughness coefficients in canals are affected by two main factors, namely, flow conditions and vegetation characteristics [68]. So far, much research has been done on the effect of the roughness factor created by vegetation, but the issue of plant density has received less attention. For this purpose, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of vegetation density on flow velocity changes.

In a study conducted using a software model on three density modes in the submerged state effect on flow velocity changes in 48 different modes was investigated (Table 1).

Table 1 

The studied models.

The number of cells used in this simulation is equal to 1955888โ€‰cells. The boundary conditions were introduced to the model as a constant speed and depth (Figure 1). At the output boundary, due to the presence of supercritical current, no parameter for the current is considered. Absolute roughness for floors and walls was introduced to the model (Figure 1). In this case, the flow was assumed to be nonviscous and air entry into the flow was not considered. After  seconds, this model reached a convergence accuracy of .

Figure 1 

The simulated model and its boundary conditions.

Due to the fact that it is not possible to model the vegetation in FLOW-3D software, in this research, the vegetation of small soft plants was studied so that Manningโ€™s coefficients can be entered into the canal bed in the form of roughness coefficients obtained from the studies of Chow [69] in similar conditions. In practice, in such modeling, the effect of plant height is eliminated due to the small height of herbaceous plants, and modeling can provide relatively acceptable results in these conditions.

48 models with input velocities proportional to the height of the regular semihexagonal canal were considered to create supercritical conditions. Manning coefficients were applied based on Chow [69] studies in order to control the canal bed. Speed profiles were drawn and discussed.

Any control and simulation system has some inputs that we should determine to test any technology [70โ€“77]. Determination and true implementation of such parameters is one of the key steps of any simulation [2378โ€“81] and computing procedure [82โ€“86]. The input current is created by applying the flow rate through the VFR (Volume Flow Rate) option and the output flow is considered Output and for other borders the Symmetry option is considered.

Simulation of the models and checking their action and responses and observing how a process behaves is one of the accepted methods in engineering and science [8788]. For verification of FLOW-3D software, the results of computer simulations are compared with laboratory measurements and according to the values of computational error, convergence error, and the time required for convergence, the most appropriate option for real-time simulation is selected (Figures 2 and 3 ).

Figure 2 

Modeling the plant with cylindrical tubes at the bottom of the canal.

Figure 3 

Velocity profiles in positions 2 and 5.

The canal is 7 meters long, 0.5 meters wide, and 0.8 meters deep. This test was used to validate the application of the software to predict the flow rate parameters. In this experiment, instead of using the plant, cylindrical pipes were used in the bottom of the canal.

The conditions of this modeling are similar to the laboratory conditions and the boundary conditions used in the laboratory were used for numerical modeling. The critical flow enters the simulation model from the upstream boundary, so in the upstream boundary conditions, critical velocity and depth are considered. The flow at the downstream boundary is supercritical, so no parameters are applied to the downstream boundary.

The software well predicts the process of changing the speed profile in the open canal along with the considered obstacles. The error in the calculated speed values can be due to the complexity of the flow and the interaction of the turbulence caused by the roughness of the floor with the turbulence caused by the three-dimensional cycles in the hydraulic jump. As a result, the software is able to predict the speed distribution in open canals.

2. Modeling Results

After analyzing the models, the results were shown in graphs (Figures 4โ€“14 ). The total number of experiments in this study was 48 due to the limitations of modeling.


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)
  • (d)
    (d)

Figure 4 

Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 1โ€‰m and flow velocities of 3โ€“3.3โ€‰m/s. Canal with a depth of 1 meter and a flow velocity of (a) 3 meters per second, (b) 3.1 meters per second, (c) 3.2 meters per second, and (d) 3.3 meters per second.

Figure 5 

Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3 meters per second.

Figure 6 

Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.1 meters per second.

Figure 7 

Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.2 meters per second.

Figure 8 

Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.3 meters per second.


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)
  • (d)
    (d)

Figure 9 

Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 2โ€‰m and flow velocities of 4โ€“4.3โ€‰m/s. Canal with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of (a) 4 meters per second, (b) 4.1 meters per second, (c) 4.2 meters per second, and (d) 4.3 meters per second.

Figure 10 

Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4 meters per second.

Figure 11 

Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.1 meters per second.

Figure 12 

Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.2 meters per second.

Figure 13 

Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.3 meters per second.


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(d)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)
  • (d)
    (d)

Figure 14 

Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 3โ€‰m and flow velocities of 5โ€“5.3โ€‰m/s. Canal with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of (a) 4 meters per second, (b) 4.1 meters per second, (c) 4.2 meters per second, and (d) 4.3 meters per second.

To investigate the effects of roughness with flow velocity, the trend of flow velocity changes at different depths and with supercritical flow to a Froude number proportional to the depth of the section has been obtained.

According to the velocity profiles of Figure 5, it can be seen that, with the increasing of Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

According to Figures 5 to 8, it can be found that, with increasing the Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the models 1 to 12, which can be justified by increasing the speed and of course increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 10, we see that, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

According to Figure 11, we see that, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of Figures 5โ€“10, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

With increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases (Figure 12). But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models (Figures 5โ€“8 and 1011), which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 13, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of Figures 5 to 12, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 15, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

Figure 15 

Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5 meters per second.

According to Figure 16, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher model, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 16 

Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.1 meters per second.

According to Figure 17, it is clear that, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 17 

Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.2 meters per second.

According to Figure 18, with increasing Manningโ€™s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 18 

Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.3 meters per second.

According to Figure 19, it can be seen that the vegetation placed in front of the flow input velocity has negligible effect on the reduction of velocity, which of course can be justified due to the flexibility of the vegetation. The only unusual thing is the unexpected decrease in floor speed of 3โ€‰m/s compared to higher speeds.


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)

Figure 19 

Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 1โ€‰m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 1โ€‰m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 1โ€‰m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 1โ€‰m.

According to Figure 20, by increasing the speed of vegetation, the effect of vegetation on reducing the flow rate becomes more noticeable. And the role of input current does not have much effect in reducing speed.


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)

Figure 20 

Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 2โ€‰m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 2โ€‰m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 2โ€‰m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 2โ€‰m.

According to Figure 21, it can be seen that, with increasing speed, the effect of vegetation on reducing the bed flow rate becomes more noticeable and the role of the input current does not have much effect. In general, it can be seen that, by increasing the speed of the input current, the slope of the profiles increases from the bed to the water surface and due to the fact that, in software, the roughness coefficient applies to the channel floor only in the boundary conditions, this can be perfectly justified. Of course, it can be noted that, due to the flexible conditions of the vegetation of the bed, this modeling can show acceptable results for such grasses in the canal floor. In the next directions, we may try application of swarm-based optimization methods for modeling and finding the most effective factors in this research [278151889โ€“94]. In future, we can also apply the simulation logic and software of this research for other domains such as power engineering [95โ€“99].


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)


(a)


(b)


(c)

  • (a)
    (a)
  • (b)
    (b)
  • (c)
    (c)

Figure 21 

Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 3โ€‰m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 3โ€‰m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 3โ€‰m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 3โ€‰m.

3. Conclusion

The effects of vegetation on the flood canal were investigated by numerical modeling with FLOW-3D software. After analyzing the results, the following conclusions were reached:(i)Increasing the density of vegetation reduces the velocity of the canal floor but has no effect on the velocity of the canal surface.(ii)Increasing the Froude number is directly related to increasing the speed of the canal floor.(iii)In the canal with a depth of one meter, a sudden increase in speed can be observed from the lowest speed and higher speed, which is justified by the sudden increase in Froude number.(iv)As the inlet flow rate increases, the slope of the profiles from the bed to the water surface increases.(v)By reducing the Froude number, the effect of vegetation on reducing the flow bed rate becomes more noticeable. And the input velocity in reducing the velocity of the canal floor does not have much effect.(vi)At a flow rate between 3 and 3.3โ€‰meters per second due to the shallow depth of the canal and the higher landing number a more critical area is observed in which the flow bed velocity in this area is between 2.86 and 3.1โ€‰m/s.(vii)Due to the critical flow velocity and the slight effect of the roughness of the horseshoe vortex floor, it is not visible and is only partially observed in models 1-2-3 and 21.(viii)As the flow rate increases, the effect of vegetation on the rate of bed reduction decreases.(ix)In conditions where less current intensity is passing, vegetation has a greater effect on reducing current intensity and energy consumption increases.(x)In the case of using the flow rate of 0.8 cubic meters per second, the velocity distribution and flow regime show about 20% more energy consumption than in the case of using the flow rate of 1.3 cubic meters per second.

Nomenclature

n:Manningโ€™s roughness coefficient
C:Chรฉzy roughness coefficient
f:Darcyโ€“Weisbach coefficient
V:Flow velocity
R:Hydraulic radius
g:Gravitational acceleration
y:Flow depth
Ks:Bed roughness
A:Constant coefficient
:Reynolds number
โˆ‚y/โˆ‚x:Depth of water change
S0:Slope of the canal floor
Sf:Slope of energy line
Fr:Froude number
D:Characteristic length of the canal
G:Mass acceleration
:Shear stresses.

Data Availability

All data are included within the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Contract no. 71761030 and Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia under Contract no. 2019LH07003.

References

  1. H. Yu, L. Jie, W. Gui et al., โ€œDynamic Gaussian bare-bones fruit fly optimizers with abandonment mechanism: method and analysis,โ€ Engineering with Computers, vol. 20, pp. 1โ€“29, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. Zhao, D. Li, B. Yang, C. Ma, Y. Zhu, and H. Chen, โ€œFeature selection based on improved ant colony optimization for online detection of foreign fiber in cotton,โ€ Applied Soft Computing, vol. 24, pp. 585โ€“596, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Hu, H. Chen, A. A. Heidari et al., โ€œOrthogonal learning covariance matrix for defects of grey wolf optimizer: insights, balance, diversity, and feature selection,โ€ Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 213, Article ID 106684, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Yu, M. Chen, K. Chen et al., โ€œSGOA: annealing-behaved grasshopper optimizer for global tasks,โ€ Engineering with Computers, vol. 4, pp. 1โ€“28, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Shan, Z. Qiao, A. A. Heidari, H. Chen, H. Turabieh, and Y. Teng, โ€œDouble adaptive weights for stabilization of moth flame optimizer: balance analysis, engineering cases, and medical diagnosis,โ€ Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 8, Article ID 106728, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Tu, H. Chen, J. Liu et al., โ€œEvolutionary biogeography-based whale optimization methods with communication structure: towards measuring the balance,โ€ Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 212, Article ID 106642, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, X. Wang et al., โ€œTowards augmented kernel extreme learning models for bankruptcy prediction: algorithmic behavior and comprehensive analysis,โ€ Neurocomputing, vol. 430, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  8. H.-L. Chen, G. Wang, C. Ma, Z.-N. Cai, W.-B. Liu, and S.-J. Wang, โ€œAn efficient hybrid kernel extreme learning machine approach for early diagnosis of Parkinsonืณs disease,โ€ Neurocomputing, vol. 184, pp. 131โ€“144, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Xia, H. Chen, Q. Li et al., โ€œUltrasound-based differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid Nodules: an extreme learning machine approach,โ€ Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 147, pp. 37โ€“49, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Li, L. Hou, B. Y. Sharma et al., โ€œDeveloping a new intelligent system for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion,โ€ Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 153, pp. 211โ€“225, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Xu and H.-L. Chen, โ€œAdaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization,โ€ Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 797โ€“807, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Wang, H. Chen, B. Yang et al., โ€œToward an optimal kernel extreme learning machine using a chaotic moth-flame optimization strategy with applications in medical diagnoses,โ€ Neurocomputing, vol. 267, pp. 69โ€“84, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Chao, K. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Zhu, J. Wang, and Z. Yu, โ€œGeographically weighted regression based methods for merging satellite and gauge precipitation,โ€ Journal of Hydrology, vol. 558, pp. 275โ€“289, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. J. Golrokh, G. Azeem, and A. Hasan, โ€œEco-efficiency evaluation in cement industries: DEA malmquist productivity index using optimization models,โ€ ENG Transactions, vol. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. Zhao, L. Lei, F. Yu et al., โ€œChaotic random spare ant colony optimization for multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Kapur entropy,โ€ Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 8, Article ID 106510, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, X. Wang, H. Chen, and C. Li, โ€œBoosted binary Harris hawks optimizer and feature selection,โ€ Engineering with Computers, vol. 517, pp. 1โ€“30, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Hu, G. Hong, J. Ma, X. Wang, and H. Chen, โ€œAn efficient machine learning approach for diagnosis of paraquat-poisoned patients,โ€ Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 116โ€“124, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Shen, H. Chen, Z. Yu et al., โ€œEvolving support vector machines using fruit fly optimization for medical data classification,โ€ Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, pp. 61โ€“75, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Cai et al., โ€œChaos enhanced grey wolf optimization wrapped ELM for diagnosis of paraquat-poisoned patients,โ€ Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 78, pp. 481โ€“490, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Xu, H. Chen, J. Luo, Q. Zhang, S. Jiao, and X. Zhang, โ€œEnhanced Moth-flame optimizer with mutation strategy for global optimization,โ€ Information Sciences, vol. 492, pp. 181โ€“203, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Wang and H. Chen, โ€œChaotic multi-swarm whale optimizer boosted support vector machine for medical diagnosis,โ€ Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 88, Article ID 105946, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Chen, J. Li, H. Lu, and P. Yan, โ€œCoupling system dynamics analysis and risk aversion programming for optimizing the mixed noise-driven shale gas-water supply chains,โ€ Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 278, Article ID 123209, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. Tang, Y. Xu, A. Lin et al., โ€œPredicting green consumption behaviors of students using efficient firefly grey wolf-assisted K-nearest neighbor classifiers,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 35546โ€“35562, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H.-J. Ma and G.-H. Yang, โ€œAdaptive fault tolerant control of cooperative heterogeneous systems with actuator faults and unreliable interconnections,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3240โ€“3255, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
  25. H.-J. Ma and L.-X. Xu, โ€œDecentralized adaptive fault-tolerant control for a class of strong interconnected nonlinear systems via graph theory,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  26. H. J. Ma, L. X. Xu, and G. H. Yang, โ€œMultiple environment integral reinforcement learning-based fault-tolerant control for affine nonlinear systems,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, pp. 1โ€“16, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Hu, M. Wang, C. Zhao, Q. Pan, and C. Du, โ€œFormation control and collision avoidance for multi-UAV systems based on Voronoi partition,โ€ Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 65โ€“72, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Qian, C. Chen, and X. Zhou, โ€œLocality-constrained discriminative matrix regression for robust face identification,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 99, pp. 1โ€“15, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Zhou, and Y. Ma, โ€œRobust low-rank tensor recovery with rectification and alignment,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 238โ€“255, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
  30. X. Zhang, J. Wang, T. Wang, R. Jiang, J. Xu, and L. Zhao, โ€œRobust feature learning for adversarial defense via hierarchical feature alignment,โ€ Information Sciences, vol. 560, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  31. X. Zhang, R. Jiang, T. Wang, and J. Wang, โ€œRecursive neural network for video deblurring,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 03, p. 1, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Wang, G. Tang, and L. Zhao, โ€œPyramid channel-based feature attention network for image dehazing,โ€ Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 197-198, Article ID 103003, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Zhang, T. Wang, W. Luo, and P. Huang, โ€œMulti-level fusion and attention-guided CNN for image dehazing,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, p. 1, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. He, J. Shen, and Y. Zhang, โ€œEcological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management,โ€ Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 206, pp. 1115โ€“1125, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Chen, W. Zheng, W. Li, and Y. Huang, โ€œLarge group Activity security risk assessment and risk early warning based on random forest algorithm,โ€ Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 144, pp. 1โ€“5, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Hu, H. Zhang, Z. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Xu, and Q. Pan, โ€œObject traversing by monocular UAV in outdoor environment,โ€ Asian Journal of Control, vol. 25, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  37. P. Tian, H. Lu, W. Feng, Y. Guan, and Y. Xue, โ€œLarge decrease in streamflow and sediment load of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau driven by future climate change: a case study in Lhasa River Basin,โ€ Catena, vol. 187, Article ID 104340, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Stokes, C. Atger, A. G. Bengough, T. Fourcaud, and R. C. Sidle, โ€œDesirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides,โ€ Plant and Soil, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 1โ€“30, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. B. Devi, A. Sharma, and B. Kumar, โ€œStudies on emergent flow over vegetative channel bed with downward seepage,โ€ Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 408โ€“420, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  40. G. Ireland, M. Volpi, and G. Petropoulos, โ€œExamining the capability of supervised machine learning classifiers in extracting flooded areas from Landsat TM imagery: a case study from a Mediterranean flood,โ€ Remote Sensing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3372โ€“3399, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Goodarzi and S. Javadi, โ€œAssessment of aquifer vulnerability using the DRASTIC model; a case study of the Dezful-Andimeshk Aquifer,โ€ Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17โ€“22, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
  42. K. Zhang, Q. Wang, L. Chao et al., โ€œGround observation-based analysis of soil moisture spatiotemporal variability across a humid to semi-humid transitional zone in China,โ€ Journal of Hydrology, vol. 574, pp. 903โ€“914, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. De Doncker, P. Troch, R. Verhoeven, K. Bal, P. Meire, and J. Quintelier, โ€œDetermination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river,โ€ Environmental Fluid Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 549โ€“567, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Fathi-Moghadam and K. Drikvandi, โ€œManning roughness coefficient for rivers and flood plains with non-submerged vegetation,โ€ International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1โ€“4, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
  45. F.-C. Wu, H. W. Shen, and Y.-J. Chou, โ€œVariation of roughness coefficients for unsubmerged and submerged vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 934โ€“942, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. K. Wood, โ€œRangeland vegetation-hydrologic interactions,โ€ in Vegetation Science Applications for Rangeland Analysis and Management, vol. 3, pp. 469โ€“491, Springer, 1988.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Wilson, O. Yagci, H.-P. Rauch, and N. Olsen, โ€œ3D numerical modelling of a willow vegetated river/floodplain system,โ€ Journal of Hydrology, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. 13โ€“21, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Yazarloo, M. Khamehchian, and M. R. Nikoodel, โ€œObservational-computational 3d engineering geological model and geotechnical characteristics of young sediments of golestan province,โ€ Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 03, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  49. G. E. Freeman, W. H. Rahmeyer, and R. R. Copeland, โ€œDetermination of resistance due to shrubs and woody vegetation,โ€ International Journal of River Basin Management, vol. 19, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
  50. N. Kouwen and T. E. Unny, โ€œFlexible roughness in open channels,โ€ Journal of the Hydraulics Division, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 713โ€“728, 1973.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Hosseini and J. Abrishami, Open Channel Hydraulics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007.
  52. C. S. James, A. L. Birkhead, A. A. Jordanova, and J. J. Oโ€™Sullivan, โ€œFlow resistance of emergent vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 390โ€“398, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Huthoff and D. Augustijn, โ€œChannel roughness in 1D steady uniform flow: Manning or Chรฉzy?,,โ€ NCR-days, vol. 102, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
  54. M. S. Sabegh, M. Saneie, M. Habibi, A. A. Abbasi, and M. Ghadimkhani, โ€œExperimental investigation on the effect of river bank tree planting array, on shear velocity,โ€ Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, vol. 2, no. 4, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
  55. A. Errico, V. Pasquino, M. Maxwald, G. B. Chirico, L. Solari, and F. Preti, โ€œThe effect of flexible vegetation on flow in drainage channels: estimation of roughness coefficients at the real scale,โ€ Ecological Engineering, vol. 120, pp. 411โ€“421, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. E. Darby, โ€œEffect of riparian vegetation on flow resistance and flood potential,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 443โ€“454, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. V. Kutija and H. Thi Minh Hong, โ€œA numerical model for assessing the additional resistance to flow introduced by flexible vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 99โ€“114, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Fischer-Antze, T. Stoesser, P. Bates, and N. R. B. Olsen, โ€œ3D numerical modelling of open-channel flow with submerged vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 303โ€“310, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. U. Stephan and D. Gutknecht, โ€œHydraulic resistance of submerged flexible vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydrology, vol. 269, no. 1-2, pp. 27โ€“43, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. G. Carollo, V. Ferro, and D. Termini, โ€œFlow resistance law in channels with flexible submerged vegetation,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 554โ€“564, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. W. Fu-sheng, โ€œFlow resistance of flexible vegetation in open channel,โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. S1, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
  62. P.-f. Wang, C. Wang, and D. Z. Zhu, โ€œHydraulic resistance of submerged vegetation related to effective height,โ€ Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 265โ€“273, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. K. Lee, L. C. Roig, H. L. Jenter, and H. M. Visser, โ€œDrag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades,โ€ Ecological Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4-5, pp. 237โ€“248, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. J. Arcement and V. R. Schneider, Guide for Selecting Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  65. Y. Ding and S. S. Y. Wang, โ€œIdentification of Manning’s roughness coefficients in channel network using adjoint analysis,โ€ International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3โ€“13, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. T. Engman, โ€œRoughness coefficients for routing surface runoff,โ€ Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 39โ€“53, 1986.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Feizbahr, C. Kok Keong, F. Rostami, and M. Shahrokhi, โ€œWave energy dissipation using perforated and non perforated piles,โ€ International Journal of Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 212โ€“219, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Farzadkhoo, A. Keshavarzi, H. Hamidifar, and M. Javan, โ€œSudden pollutant discharge in vegetated compound meandering rivers,โ€ Catena, vol. 182, Article ID 104155, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. V. T. Chow, Open-channel Hydraulics, Mcgraw-Hill Civil Engineering Series, Chennai, TN, India, 1959.
  70. X. Zhang, R. Jing, Z. Li, Z. Li, X. Chen, and C.-Y. Su, โ€œAdaptive pseudo inverse control for a class of nonlinear asymmetric and saturated nonlinear hysteretic systems,โ€ IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 916โ€“928, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  71. C. Zuo, Q. Chen, L. Tian, L. Waller, and A. Asundi, โ€œTransport of intensity phase retrieval and computational imaging for partially coherent fields: the phase space perspective,โ€ Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 20โ€“32, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. Zuo, J. Sun, J. Li, J. Zhang, A. Asundi, and Q. Chen, โ€œHigh-resolution transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy with annular illumination,โ€ Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7654โ€“7722, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. B.-H. Li, Y. Liu, A.-M. Zhang, W.-H. Wang, and S. Wan, โ€œA survey on blocking technology of entity resolution,โ€ Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 769โ€“793, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Y. Liu, B. Zhang, Y. Feng et al., โ€œDevelopment of 340-GHz transceiver front end based on GaAs monolithic integration technology for THz active imaging array,โ€ Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 21, p. 7924, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Hu, H. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Zhu, C. Zhao, and Q. Pan, โ€œConvergent multiagent formation control with collision avoidance,โ€ IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1805โ€“1818, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. B. Movahhed, J. Ayoubinejad, F. N. Asl, and M. Feizbahr, โ€œThe effect of rain on pedestrians crossing speed,โ€ Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 6, no. 3, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  77. A. Li, D. Spano, J. Krivochiza et al., โ€œA tutorial on interference exploitation via symbol-level precoding: overview, state-of-the-art and future directions,โ€ IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 796โ€“839, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. W. Zhu, C. Ma, X. Zhao et al., โ€œEvaluation of sino foreign cooperative education project using orthogonal sine cosine optimized kernel extreme learning machine,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 61107โ€“61123, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. G. Liu, W. Jia, M. Wang et al., โ€œPredicting cervical hyperextension injury: a covariance guided sine cosine support vector machine,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 46895โ€“46908, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. Y. Wei, H. Lv, M. Chen et al., โ€œPredicting entrepreneurial intention of students: an extreme learning machine with Gaussian barebone harris hawks optimizer,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 76841โ€“76855, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Lin, Q. Wu, A. A. Heidari et al., โ€œPredicting intentions of students for master programs using a chaos-induced sine cosine-based fuzzy K-Nearest neighbor classifier,โ€ Ieee Access, vol. 7, pp. 67235โ€“67248, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. Fan, P. Wang, A. A. Heidari et al., โ€œRationalized fruit fly optimization with sine cosine algorithm: a comprehensive analysis,โ€ Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 157, Article ID 113486, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. E. Rodrรญguez-Esparza, L. A. Zanella-Calzada, D. Oliva et al., โ€œAn efficient Harris hawks-inspired image segmentation method,โ€ Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 155, Article ID 113428, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Jiao, G. Chong, C. Huang et al., โ€œOrthogonally adapted Harris hawks optimization for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models,โ€ Energy, vol. 203, Article ID 117804, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Z. Xu, Z. Hu, A. A. Heidari et al., โ€œOrthogonally-designed adapted grasshopper optimization: a comprehensive analysis,โ€ Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 150, Article ID 113282, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. Abbassi, R. Abbassi, A. A. Heidari et al., โ€œParameters identification of photovoltaic cell models using enhanced exploratory salp chains-based approach,โ€ Energy, vol. 198, Article ID 117333, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. Mahmoodi and K. K. Aminjan, โ€œNumerical simulation of flow through sukhoi 24 air inlet,โ€ Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 03, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  88. F. J. Golrokh and A. Hasan, โ€œA comparison of machine learning clustering algorithms based on the DEA optimization approach for pharmaceutical companies in developing countries,โ€ ENG Transactions, vol. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  89. H. Chen, A. A. Heidari, H. Chen, M. Wang, Z. Pan, and A. H. Gandomi, โ€œMulti-population differential evolution-assisted Harris hawks optimization: framework and case studies,โ€ Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 111, pp. 175โ€“198, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. J. Guo, H. Zheng, B. Li, and G.-Z. Fu, โ€œBayesian hierarchical model-based information fusion for degradation analysis considering non-competing relationship,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 175222โ€“175227, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. Guo, H. Zheng, B. Li, and G.-Z. Fu, โ€œA Bayesian approach for degradation analysis with individual differences,โ€ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 175033โ€“175040, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. M. A. Malakoutian, Y. Malakoutian, P. Mostafapour, and S. Z. D. Abed, โ€œPrediction for monthly rainfall of six meteorological regions and TRNC (case study: north Cyprus),โ€ ENG Transactions, vol. 2, no. 2, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
  93. H. Arslan, M. Ranjbar, and Z. Mutlum, โ€œMaximum sound transmission loss in multi-chamber reactive silencers: are two chambers enough?,,โ€ ENG Transactions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
  94. N. Tonekaboni, M. Feizbahr, N. Tonekaboni, G.-J. Jiang, and H.-X. Chen, โ€œOptimization of solar CCHP systems with collector enhanced by porous media and nanofluid,โ€ Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 9984840, 12 pages, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Z. Niu, B. Zhang, J. Wang et al., โ€œThe research on 220GHz multicarrier high-speed communication system,โ€ China Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 131โ€“139, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. B. Zhang, Z. Niu, J. Wang et al., โ€œFourโ€hundred gigahertz broadband multiโ€branch waveguide coupler,โ€ IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1175โ€“1179, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. Z.-Q. Niu, L. Yang, B. Zhang et al., โ€œA mechanical reliability study of 3dB waveguide hybrid couplers in the submillimeter and terahertz band,โ€ Journal of Zhejiang University Science, vol. 1, no. 1, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
  98. B. Zhang, D. Ji, D. Fang, S. Liang, Y. Fan, and X. Chen, โ€œA novel 220-GHz GaN diode on-chip tripler with high driven power,โ€ IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 780โ€“783, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. Taleghani and A. Taleghani, โ€œIdentification and ranking of factors affecting the implementation of knowledge management engineering based on TOPSIS technique,โ€ ENG Transactions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
Strain rate magnitude at the free surface, illustrating Kelvin-Helmoltz (KH) shear instabilities.

On the reef scale hydrodynamics at Sodwana Bay, South Africa

Environmental Fluid Mechanics (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The hydrodynamics of coral reefs strongly influences their biological functioning, impacting processes such as nutrient availability and uptake, recruitment success and bleaching. For example, coral reefs located in oligotrophic regions depend on upwelling for nutrient supply. Coral reefs at Sodwana Bay, located on the east coast of South Africa, are an example of high latitude marginal reefs. These reefs are subjected to complex hydrodynamic forcings due to the interaction between the strong Agulhas current and the highly variable topography of the region. In this study, we explore the reef scale hydrodynamics resulting from the bathymetry for two steady current scenarios at Two-Mile Reef (TMR) using a combination of field data and numerical simulations. The influence of tides or waves was not considered for this study as well as reef-scale roughness. Tilt current meters with onboard temperature sensors were deployed at selected locations within TMR. We used field observations to identify the dominant flow conditions on the reef for numerical simulations that focused on the hydrodynamics driven by mean currents. During the field campaign, southerly currents were the predominant flow feature with occasional flow reversals to the north. Northerly currents were associated with greater variability towards the southern end of TMR. Numerical simulations showed that Jesser Point was central to the development of flow features for both the northerly and southerly current scenarios. High current variability in the south of TMR during reverse currents is related to the formation of Kelvin-Helmholtz type shear instabilities along the outer edge of an eddy formed north of Jesser Point. Furthermore, downward vertical velocities were computed along the offshore shelf at TMR during southerly currents. Current reversals caused a change in vertical velocities to an upward direction due to the orientation of the bathymetry relative to flow directions.

Highlights

  • A predominant southerly current was measured at Two-Mile Reef with occasional reversals towards the north.
  • Field observations indicated that northerly currents are spatially varied along Two-Mile Reef.
  • Simulation of reverse currents show the formation of a separated flow due to interaction with Jesser Point with Kelvinโ€“Helmholtz type shear instabilities along the seaward edge.

์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ Sodwana Bay์—์„œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์•”์ดˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทœ๋ชจ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์— ์–ด๋–ค ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Sodwana Bay์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” LES ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ณ„ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํŒŒ๋„์™€ ์กฐ์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐฐ์ œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ Agulhas ํ•ด๋ฅ˜์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถฅ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ LES๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  Sodwana Bay์˜ ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anarde K, Myres H, Figlus J (2016) Tilt current meter field validation in the surf zone. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts, vol 2016, pp EP23Aโ€”-0950
  2. Blocken B (2018) LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor applications: A foregone conclusion? Build Simul 11(5):821โ€“870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3Article Google Scholar 
  3. Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res Ocean 104(C4):7649โ€“7666. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622Article Google Scholar 
  4. Bouffanais R (2010) Advances and challenges of applied large-eddy simulation. Comput Fluids 39:735โ€“738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.12.003Article Google Scholar 
  5. Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2002) Coral bleaching on high-latitude marginal reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Mar Pollut Bull 44:1380โ€“1387Article Google Scholar 
  6. Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2008) Coral community structure and risk assessment of high-latitude reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 17(13):3097โ€“3117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9271-6Article Google Scholar 
  7. Chen SC (2018) Performance assessment of FLOW-3D and XFlow in the numerical modelling of fish-bone type fishway hydraulics https://doi.org/10.15142/T3HH1J
  8. Corbella S, Pringle J, Stretch DD (2015) Assimilation of ocean wave spectra and atmospheric circulation patterns to improve wave modelling. Coast Eng 100:1โ€“10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.03.003Article Google Scholar 
  9. Davis KA, Pawlak G, Monismith SG (2021) Turbulence and coral reefs. Ann Rev Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-042120-071823Article Google Scholar 
  10. Flow Science Inc (2018) FLOW-3D, Version 12.0 Users Manual. Santa Fe, NM, https://www.flow3d.com/
  11. Flow Science Inc (2019) FLOW-3D, Version 12.0 [Computer Software]. Santa Fe, NM, https://www.flow3d.com/
  12. Franco A, Moernaut J, Schneider-Muntau B, Strasser M, Gems B (2020) The 1958 Lituya Bay tsunami – pre-event bathymetry reconstruction and 3D numerical modelling utilising the computational fluid dynamics software Flow-3D. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20(8):2255โ€“2279Article Google Scholar 
  13. Fringer OB, Gerritsen M, Street RL (2006) An unstructured-grid, finite-volume, nonhydrostatic, parallel coastal ocean simulator. Ocean Model 14(3):139โ€“173Article Google Scholar 
  14. Fringer OB, Dawson CN, He R, Ralston DK, Zhang YJ (2019) The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: findings from a workshop. Ocean Model 143(September):101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101458Article Google Scholar 
  15. Glassom D, Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2006) Coral recruitment patterns at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Coral Reefs 25(3):485โ€“492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0117-6Article Google Scholar 
  16. Gomes A, Pinho JLS, Valente T, do Carmo JS, Hegde VA (2020) Performance assessment of a semi-circular breakwater through CFD modelling. J Mar Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030226Article Google Scholar 
  17. Green RH, Lowe RJ, Buckley ML (2018) Hydrodynamics of a tidally forced coral reef atoll. J Geophys Res Oceans 123(10):7084โ€“7101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013946Article Google Scholar 
  18. Hansen AB, Carstensen S, Christensen DF, Aagaard T (2017) Performance of a tilt current meter in the surf zone. Coastal dynamics
  19. Hench JL, Rosman JH (2013) Observations of spatial flow patterns at the coral colony scale on a shallow reef flat. J Geophys Res Ocean 118(3):1142โ€“1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20105Article Google Scholar 
  20. Hirt CW (1993) Volume-fraction techniques: powerful tools for wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46โ€“47:327โ€“338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90298-3Article Google Scholar 
  21. Hirt CW, Sicilian JM (1985) A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Ship Hydrodynamics https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10009570543/en/
  22. Hocker LO, Hruska MA (2004) Interleaving synchronous data and asynchronous data in a single data storage file
  23. Hossain MM, Staples AE (2020) Effects of coral colony morphology on turbulent flow dynamics. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0225676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225676Article Google Scholar 
  24. Jacob B, Stanev EV (2021) Understanding the impact of bathymetric changes in the german bight on coastal hydrodynamics: one step toward realistic morphodynamic modeling. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.640214Article Google Scholar 
  25. Koehl MAR, Hadfield MG (2010) Hydrodynamics of larval settlement from a larvaโ€™s point of view. Integr Comp Biol 50(4):539โ€“551. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icq101Article Google Scholar 
  26. Lim A, Wheeler AJ, Price DM, Oโ€™Reilly L, Harris K, Conti L (2020) Influence of benthic currents on cold-water coral habitats: a combined benthic monitoring and 3D photogrammetric investigation. Sci Rep 10(1):19433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76446-yArticle Google Scholar 
  27. Limer BD, Bloomberg J, Holstein DM (2020) The influence of eddies on coral larval retention in the flower garden banks. Front Mar Sci 7:372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00372Article Google Scholar 
  28. Monismith SG (2007) Hydrodynamics of coral reefs. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39(1):37โ€“55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092125Article Google Scholar 
  29. Morris T (2009) Physical oceanography of Sodwana Bay and its effect on larval transport and coral bleaching. PhD thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
  30. Morris T, Lamont T, Roberts MJ (2013) Effects of deep-sea eddies on the northern KwaZulu-Natal shelf, South Africa. Afr J Mar Sci 35(3):343โ€“350. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2013.827991Article Google Scholar 
  31. Perry C, Larcombe P (2003) Marginal and non-reef-building coral environments. Coral Reefs 22:427โ€“432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0330-5Article Google Scholar 
  32. Pope SB (2001) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar 
  33. Porter SN (2009) Biogeography and potential factors regulating shallow subtidal reef communities in the Western Indian Ocean. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town
  34. Porter SN, Schleyer MH (2017) Long-term dynamics of a high-latitude coral reef community at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Coral Reefs 36(2):369โ€“382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-016-1531-zArticle Google Scholar 
  35. Porter SN, Schleyer MH (2019) Environmental variation and how its spatial structure influences the cross-shelf distribution of high-latitude coral communities in South Africa. Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040057Article Google Scholar 
  36. Ramsay PJ (1994) Marine geology of the Sodwana Bay shelf, southeast Africa. Mar Geol 120(3โ€“4):225โ€“247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(94)90060-4Article Google Scholar 
  37. Ramsay PJ, Mason TR (1990) Development of a type zoning model for Zululand coral reefs, Sodwana Bay, South Africa. J Coastal Res 6(4):829โ€“852Google Scholar 
  38. Reguero BG, Beck MW, Agostini VN, Kramer P, Hancock B (2018) Coral reefs for coastal protection: a new methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada. J Environ Manag 210:146โ€“161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.024Article Google Scholar 
  39. Reidenbach M, Stocking J, Szczyrba L, Wendelken C (2021) Hydrodynamic interactions with coral topography and its impact on larval settlement. Coral Reefs 40:1โ€“15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02069-yArticle Google Scholar 
  40. Reidenbach MA, Koseff JR, Koehl MAR (2009) Hydrodynamic forces on larvae affect their settlement on coral reefs in turbulent, wave-driven flow. Limnol Oceanogr 54(1):318โ€“330. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0318Article Google Scholar 
  41. Roberts H, Richardson J, Lagumbay R, Meselhe E, Ma Y (2013) Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling using FLOW-3D for siting and optimization of the LCA medium diversion at white ditch hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling using FLOW-3D for siting and optimization of the LCA medium diversion at white D (December)
  42. Roberts MJ, Ribbink AJ, Morris T, Berg MAVD, Engelbrecht DC, Harding RT (2006) Oceanographic environment of the Sodwana Bay coelacanths (Latimeria chalumnae), South Africa: coelacanth research. South Afr J Sci 102(9):435โ€“443Google Scholar 
  43. Rogers JS, Monismith SG, Feddersen F, Storlazzi CD (2013) Hydrodynamics of spur and groove formations on a coral reef. J Geophys Res Ocean 118(6):3059โ€“3073. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20225Article Google Scholar 
  44. Rogers JS, Monismith SG, Koweek DA, Torres WI, Dunbar RB (2016) Thermodynamics and hydrodynamics in an atoll reef system and their influence on coral cover. Limnol Oceanogr 61(6):2191โ€“2206. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10365Article Google Scholar 
  45. Schleyer MH, Celliers L (2003) Coral dominance at the reef-sediment interface in marginal coral communities at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Mar Freshw Res 54(8):967โ€“972. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF02049Article Google Scholar 
  46. Schleyer MH, Porter SN (2018) Chapter One – drivers of soft and stony coral community distribution on the high-latitude coral reefs of South Africa. advances in marine biology, vol 80, Academic Press, pp 1โ€“55, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.09.001
  47. Scott F, Antolinez JAA, McCall R, Storlazzi C, Reniers A, Pearson S (2020) Hydro-morphological characterization of coral reefs for wave runup prediction. Front Mar Sci 7:361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00361Article Google Scholar 
  48. Sebens KP, Grace SP, Helmuth B, Maney EJ Jr, Miles JS (1998) Water flow and prey capture by three scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis, Montastrea cavernosa and Porites porites, in a field enclosure. Mar Biol 131(2):347โ€“360Article Google Scholar 
  49. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99โ€“164Article Google Scholar 
  50. Stocking J, Laforsch C, Sigl R, Reidenbach M (2018) The role of turbulent hydrodynamics and surface morphology on heat and mass transfer in corals. J R Soc Interface 15:20180448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0448Article Google Scholar 
  51. Van Leer B (1977) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J Comput Phys 23(3):263โ€“275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(77)90094-8Article Google Scholar 
  52. Wells C, Pringle J, Stretch D (2021) Cold water temperature anomalies on the Sodwana reefs and their driving mechanisms. South Afr J Sci. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/9304Article Google Scholar 
  53. Wyatt ASJ, Lowe RJ, Humphries S, Waite AM (2010) Particulate nutrient fluxes over a fringing coral reef: relevant scales of phytoplankton production and mechanisms of supply. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 405:113โ€“130Article Google Scholar 
  54. Yao Y, He T, Deng Z, Chen L, Guo H (2019) Large eddy simulation modeling of tsunami-like solitary wave processes over fringing reefs. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19(6):1281โ€“1295. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1281-2019Article Google Scholar 
  55. Zhao Q, Tanimoto K (1998) Numerical simulation of breaking waves by large eddy simulation and vof method. Coastal Engineering Proceedings 1(26), 10.9753/icce.v26.%p, https://journals.tdl.org/icce/index.php/icce/article/view/5656

Text and image taken from Deoraj, et al. (2022), On the reef scale hydrodynamics at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Preprint courtesy the authors.

Figure 2: 3D (left) and 2D (right) views of wave elevation using case C

CFD ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๋„์—์„œ ํ•˜์ด๋“œ๋กœํฌ์ผ์˜ SEAKEEPING ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

SYAFIQ ZIKRYAND FITRIADHY*
Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala
Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
*
Corresponding author: naoe.afit@gmail.com http://doi.org/10.46754/umtjur.2021.07.017

Abstract

์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„ ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ด์•…ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์Šน๊ฐ์˜ ํŽธ์•ˆํ•จ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ €ํ•ญ๊ณผ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ง ์šด๋™(ํžˆ๋ธŒ ๋ฐ ํ”ผ์น˜)์„ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํŒŒ๋ž‘์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„ ์˜ ๋‚ดํ•ญ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„  ์šด๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamic) ํ•ด์„์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. Froude Number ๋ฐ ํฌ์ผ ๋ฐ›์Œ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Froude Number์˜ ํ›„์† ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” ํžˆ๋ธŒ ๋ฐ ํ”ผ์น˜ ์šด๋™์— ๋ฐ˜๋น„๋ก€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋†’์€ ์‘๋‹ต ์ง„ํญ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์ž(RAO)์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„  ํ•ญํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ์—…๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ํฌ์ผ ์„ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ํžˆ๋ธŒ ์šด๋™์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ํฌ์ผ ์„ ๋ฏธ๋Š” 7.5o์—์„œ ๋‚ฎ์€ ํžˆ๋ธŒ ์šด๋™์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ 5o, 10o ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ์น˜๋ชจ์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํฌ์ผ ๋ณด์šฐ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” 5o์—์„œ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ์ด 10o, 7.5o ์ˆœ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌ์ผ ์„ ๋ฏธ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„ ์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ”ผ์น˜ ๋ชจ์…˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณตํ•ด ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ค‘์ต์„  ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ์šด์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

CFD, hydrofoil, foil angle of attack, heave, pitch.

Figure 1: Overall mesh block being used in simulation
Figure 1: Overall mesh block being used in simulation
Figure 2: 3D (left) and 2D (right) views of wave elevation using case C
Figure 2: 3D (left) and 2D (right) views of wave elevation using case C

References

Djavareshkian, M. H., & Esmaeili, A. (2014). Heuristic optimization of submerged hydrofoil
using ANFISโ€“PSO. Ocean Engineering, 92, 55-63.
Fitriadhy, A., & Adam, N. A. (2017). Heave and pitch motions performance of a monotricat ship in
head-seas. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 14, 4243-4258.
Islam, M., Jahra, F., & Hiscock, S. (2016). Data analysis methodologies for hydrodynamic
experiments in waves. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 13(1),
1-15.
Koutsourakis, N., Bartzis, J. G., & Markatos, N. C. (2012). Evaluation of Reynolds stress, k-ฮต and
RNG k-ฮต turbulence models in street canyon flows using various experimental datasets.
Environmental fluid mechanics, 1-25.
Manual, F. D. U. (2011). Flow3D User Manual, v9. 4.2, Flow Science. Inc., Santa Fe, NM. Matveev, K., & Duncan, R. (2005). Development
of the tool for predicting hydrofoil system performance and simulating motion of hydrofoil-assisted boats. Paper presented at the High Speed and High Performance Ship and Craft Symposium, Everett/WA: ASNE, USA.
Seif, M., Mehdigholi, H., & Najafi, A. (2014). Experimental and numerical modeling of the
high speed planing vessel motion. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 13(2), 62-
72.
Sun, X., Yao, C., Xiong, Y., & Ye, Q. (2017). Numerical and experimental study on
seakeeping performance of a swath vehicle in head waves. Applied Ocean Research, 68, 262-
275.
Vakilabadi, K. A., Khedmati, M. R., & Seif, M.S. (2014). Experimental study on heave and
pitch motion characteristics of a wave-piercing trimaran. Transactions of FAMENA, 38(3), 13-
26.
Yakhot, A., Rakib, S., & Flannery, W. (1994). LowReynolds number approximation for turbulent
eddy viscosity. Journal of scientific computing, 9(3), 283-292.
Yakhot, V., & Orszag, S. A. (1986). Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory.
Journal of scientific computing, 1(1), 3-51.

Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)

Three-dimensional Numerical Evaluation of Hydraulic Efficiency and Discharge Coefficient in Grate Inlets

์‡ ์ฐฝ์‚ด ๊ฒฉ์ž ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํšจ์œจ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ํ‰๊ฐ€

Melquisedec Cortรฉs Zambrano*, Helmer Edgardo Monroy Gonzรกlez,
Wilson Enrique Amaya Tequia
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Santo Tomas Tunja University. Address Av. Universitaria No. 45-202.
Tunja โ€“ Boyacรก – Colombia

Abstract

ํ™์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ง€๋ฐ˜์ด๋™ ๋ฐ ์ด๋™์˜ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ธ‰์†ํ•œ ๋„์‹œํ™” ๋ฐ ๋„์‹œํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ด์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋„์‹œ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์ง‘์ˆ˜ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฒ”๋žŒ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์„œ๋Š” 7๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ™”๊ฒฉ์ž ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ์œ ์ž… ํšจ์œจ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3Dยฎ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” Q = 24, 34.1, 44, 100, 200 ๋ฐ 300 L/s์˜ ์œ ์†์—์„œ ํ’€ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋กœ ๊ฒฉ์ž๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ข…๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ 1.0์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. %, 1.5% ๋ฐ 2.0% ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์ • ํšก๋‹จ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, ์ด 126๊ฐœ ๋ชจ๋ธ. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ข…๋‹จ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ ํšจ์œจ๊ณก์„ ๊ณผ ํ† ์ถœ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ๊ณต์‹์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ •๋˜์–ด ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Floods are one of the causes of ground movement and displacement, and due to rapid urbanization and urban growth may occur more frequently than before. The characteristics of an urban drainage system can define the occurrence and extent of flooding, where catchment elements have a determining role. This document presents the numerical investigation of the hydraulic inlet efficiency and the discharge coefficient of seven types of grate inlets. The FLOW-3Dยฎ simulator is used to test the gratings at a full scale, under flow rates of Q = 24, 34.1, 44, 100, 200 and 300 L/s, preserving the configuration of the experimental prototype with longitudinal slopes of 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% and a fixed cross slope, for a total of 126 models. Based on the results, hydraulic inlet efficiency curves and discharge coefficients are constructed for each type and a longitudinal slope condition. The results are adjusted with empirical formulations proposed in other investigations, serving to verify the results of physical testing of prototypes.

Keywords

grate inlet, inlet efficiency, discharge coefficient, computational fluid dynamic, 3D modelling.

Fig. 1. Physical model of the experimental campaign (source: Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 1. Physical model of the experimental campaign (source: Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade
and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 4. Comparison between the results obtained during physical experimentation in prototype 7 and simulation results with FLOW-3Dยฎ (source:
made with FlowSightยฎ and photographic record by Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 4. Comparison between the results obtained during physical experimentation in prototype 7 and simulation results with FLOW-3Dยฎ (source: made with FlowSightยฎ and photographic record by Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 6. Example of the results of flow depth and velocity vectors in the xy plane, for a stable flow condition in a grate inlet type and free surface
configuration and flow regime, of some grating types (source: produced with FlowSightยฎ)
Fig. 6. Example of the results of flow depth and velocity vectors in the xy plane, for a stable flow condition in a grate inlet type and free surface configuration and flow regime, of some grating types (source: produced with FlowSightยฎ)

References

Alia Md., S., and Sabtu, N. (2020). Comparison of Different Methodologies for Determining the Efficiency of Gully Inlets. In F. M.
Nazri (Ed.), Proceedings of AICCEโ€˜19: Transforming the Nation
for a Sustainable Tomorrow (Vol. 53, pp. 1275-1284). Springer
Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
32816-0_99
Antunes do Carmo, J. S. (2020). Physical Modelling vs. Numerical Modelling: Complementarity and Learning. July. https://doi.
org/10.20944/preprints202007.0753.v1
Aragรณn-Hernรกndez, J. L. (2013). Modelaciรณn numรฉrica integrada de los procesos hidrรกulicos en el drenaje urbano [Universidad Politรฉcnica de Cataluรฑa]. In Doctoral Tesis. https://
upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/95059?locale-attribute=es
Argue, J. R., and Pezzaniti, D. (1996). How reliable are inlet
(hydraulic) models at representing stormwater flow? Science
of the Total Environment, 189-190, 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(96)05231-X
Banco Mundial, O. (2019). Agua: Panorama general. https://
www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/water/overview
Cรกrdenas-Quintero, M., Carvajal-Serna, L. F., and Marbello-Pรฉrez, R. (2018). Evaluaciรณn numรฉrica tridimensional de un
sumidero de reja de fondo (Three-Dimensional Numerical Assessment of Grate Inlet). SSRN Electronic Journal, November.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3112980
Carvalho, R. F., Lopes, P., Leandro, J., and David, L. M. (2019).
Numerical Research of Flows into Gullies with Different Outlet Locations. Water, 11(2), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/
w11040794
Chaparro Andrade, F. G., and Abaunza Tabares, K. V. (2021). Importancia de los sumideros, su funcionamiento y diseรฑo en redes de alcantarillado caso de estudio sector nororiental Tunja.
Universidad Santo Tomรกs.
Cortรฉs Zambrano, M., Amaya Tequia, W. E., and Gamba Fernรกndez, D. S. (2020). Implementation of the hydraulic modelling of
urban drainage in the northeast sector, Tunja, Boyacรก. Revista
Facultad de Ingenierรญa Universidad de Antioquia. https://doi.
org/10.17533/udea.redin.20200578
Cosco, C., Gรณmez, M., Russo, B., Tellez-Alvarez, J., Macchione, F., Costabile, P., and Costanzo, C. (2020). Discharge coefficients for specific grated inlets. Influence of the Froude
number. Urban Water Journal, 17(7), 656-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1811881
Despotovic, J., Plavsic, J., Stefanovic, N., and Pavlovic, D. (2005).
Inefficiency of storm water inlets as a source of urban floods.
Water Science and Technology, 51(2), 139-145. https://doi.
org/10.2166/wst.2005.0041
Ellis, J. B., and Marsalek, J. (1996). Overview of urban drainage:
Environmental impacts and concerns, means of mitigation and
implementation policies. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 34(6),
723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689609498446
Fang, X., Jiang, S., and Alam, S. R. (2010). Numerical simulations of efficiency of curb-opening inlets. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, 136(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
HY.1943-7900.0000131
Faram, M. G., and Harwood, R. (2000). CFD for the Water Industry; The Role of CFD as a Tool for the Development of Wastewater Treatment Systems. Hydro International, 21-22.
Faram, M. G., and Harwood, R. (2002). Assessment of the
effectiveness of stormwater treatment chambers using
computational fluid dynamics. Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, 40644(September 2002), 1-14. https://doi.
org/10.1061/40644(2002)7
Flow Science, I. (2018). FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 Users Manual.
In FLOW-3D [Computer software]. https://www.flow3d.com
Flow Science, I. (2019). FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 [Computer software] (No. 12). https://www.flow3d.com
Ghanbari, R., and Heidarnejad, M. (2020). Experimental and numerical analysis of flow hydraulics in triangular and rectangular
piano key weirs. Water Science, 00(00), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.
1080/11104929.2020.1724649

Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2005a). Comparative study of methodologies to determine inlet efficiency from test data. HEC-12
methodology vs UPC method. Water Resources Management,
Algarve, Portugal., 80(October 2014), 623-632. https://doi.
org/10.2495/WRM050621
Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2005b). Comparative study among
different methodologies to determine storm sewer inlet efficiency from test data. 10th International Conference on Urban
Drainage, August, 21-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255602448_Comparative_study_among_different_methodologies_to_determine_storm_sewer_inlet_efficiency_
from_test_data
Gรณmez, M., Recasens, J., Russo, B., and Martรญnez-Gomariz, E.
(2016). Assessment of inlet efficiency through a 3D simulation: Numerical and experimental comparison. Water Science
and Technology, 74(8), 1926-1935. https://doi.org/10.2166/
wst.2016.326
Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2011). Methodology to estimate hydraulic efficiency of drain inlets. Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers: Water Management, 164(2), 81-90. https://doi.
org/10.1680/wama.900070
Gรณmez Valentin, M. (2007). Hidrologรญa urbana. In Hidrologรญa Urbana (pp. 135-147). Instituto Flumen.
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., and Norton, J. P. (2006). Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental
models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 602-614.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004
Jang, J. H., Hsieh, C. T., and Chang, T. H. (2019). The importance of gully flow modelling to urban flood simulation. Urban Water Journal, 16(5), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1669198
Kaushal, D. R., Thinglas, T., Tomita, Y., Kuchii, S., and Tsukamoto, H. (2012). Experimental investigation on optimization of
invert trap configuration for sewer solid management. Powder Technology, 215-216, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.08.029
Khazaee, I., and Mohammadiun, M. (2010). Effects of flow field
on open channel flow properties using numerical investigation
and experimental comparison. International Journal of Energy
and Environment, 1(6), 1083-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0031-9384(10)00122-8
Kleidorfer, M., Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Vonach, T., and Rauch, W.
(2018). What can we learn from a 500-year event? Experiences
from urban drainage in Austria. Water Science and Technology,
77(8), 2146-2154. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.138
Leitรฃo, J. P., Simรตes, N. E., Pina, R. D., Ochoa-Rodriguez, S.,
Onof, C., and Sรก Marques, A. (2017). Stochastic evaluation of
the impact of sewer inletsโ€˜ hydraulic capacity on urban pluvial
flooding. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31(8), 1907-1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-
1283-x
Lopes, P., Leandro, J., Carvalho, R. F., Russo, B., and Gรณmez, M.
(2016). Assessment of the ability of a volume of fluid model to
reproduce the efficiency of a continuous transverse gully with
grate. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 142(10),
1-9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001058
Mohsin, M., and Kaushal, D. R. (2016). 3D CFD validation of invert trap efficiency for sewer solid management using VOF model. Water Science and Engineering, 9(2), 106-114. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.06.006
Palla, A., Colli, M., Candela, A., Aronica, G. T., and Lanza, L.
G. (2018). Pluvial flooding in urban areas: the role of surface
drainage efficiency. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11,
S663-S676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12246
Russo, B. (2010). Design of surface drainage systems according
to hazard criteria related to flooding of urban areas [Universitat
Politรจcnica de Catalunya]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/
tesis?codigo=258828
Sedano-Cruz, K., Carvajal-Escoar, Y., and รvila Dรญaz, A. J. (2013).
ANรLISIS DE ASPECTOS QUE INCREMENTAN EL RIESGO
DE INUNDACIONES EN COLOMBIA. Luna Azul, 37, 219-218.
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321729206014
Spaliviero, F., May, R. W. P., Escarameia, M. (2000). Spacing of road gullies. Hydraulic performance of BS EN 124 gully gratings. HR Walingford, 44(0). https://doi.org/10.13140/
RG.2.1.1344.0889
Tรฉllez-รlvarez, J., Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2020). Quantification of energy loss in two grated inlets under pressure. Water
(Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061601
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez, V., Russo, B., and Redondo, J. M.
(2003). Performance assessment of numerical modelling
for hydraulic efficiency of a grated inlet. 1, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez Valentin, M., Paindelli, A., and Russo,
B. (2017). ACTIVIDAD EXPERIMENTAL DE I+D+i EN INGENIERรA
HIDRรULICA EN ESPAร‘A. In L. J. Balairรณn Pรฉrez and D. Lรณpez
Gรณmez (Eds.), Seminario 2017, Comunicaciones de las lรญneas prioritarias (pp. 41-43). Universitat Politรจcnica de Valรจncia.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez Valentin, M., and Russo, B. (2019).
Modelling of Surcharge Flow Through Grated Inlet. In P. Gourbesville and G. Caignaert (Eds.), Advances in Hydroinformati-

cs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
4451-42-0
UNDRR, I., and CRED, I. (2018). Pรฉrdidas econรณmicas, pobreza y
Desastres 1998 – 2017 (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.12962/
j23373520.v6i1.22451
Vyzikas, T., and Greaves, D. (2018). Numerial Modelling.
In D. Greaves and G. Iglesias (Eds.), Wave and Tidal Energy (pp. 289-363). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.
org/10.1002/9781119014492
Yakhot, V., and Orszag, S. A. (1986). Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence. I . Basic Theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1(1), 3-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452
Yakhot, V., and Smith, L. M. (1992). The renormalization group,
the ษ›-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. Journal
of Scientific Computing, 7(l), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/
BF01060210
Yazdanfar, Z., and Sharma, A. (2015). Urban drainage system
planning and design – Challenges with climate change and urbanization: A review. Water Science and Technology, 72(2), 165-https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.207

Figure 3. Different parts of a Searaser; 1) Buoy 2) Chamber 3) Valves 4) Generator 5) Anchor system

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์žฌ์ƒ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์ „๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Fatemehsadat Mirshafiee1, Emad Shahbazi 2, Mohadeseh Safi 3, Rituraj Rituraj 4,*
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 1999143344 , Iran
2Department of Mechatronic, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 158754413, Iran
3Department of Mechatronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 1416634793, Iran
4 Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, 1023, Budapest, Hungary

  • Correspondence: rituraj88@stud.uni-obuda.hu

ABSTRACT

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์ „๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์†Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ๊ณ ์™€ ํ’์†์„ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๊ณ ์™€ ์ˆ˜์†Œ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํŒŒ๋„์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žฅ๋ คํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ํ•ด์–‘ ํŠน์ˆ˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•™์Šต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์˜ ์–‘์€ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์ „๋ ฅ์˜ ์–‘์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์€ ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๋…ผ์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

This study proposes a data-driven methodology for modeling power and hydrogen generation of a sustainable energy converter. The wave and hydrogen production at different wave heights and wind speeds are predicted. Furthermore, this research emphasizes and encourages the possibility of extracting hydrogen from ocean waves. By using the extracted data from FLOW-3D software simulation and the experimental data from the special test in the ocean, the comparison analysis of two data-driven learning methods is conducted. The results show that the amount of hydrogen production is proportional to the amount of generated electrical power. The reliability of the proposed renewable energy converter is further discussed as a sustainable smart grid application.

Key words

Cavity, Combustion efficiency, hydrogen fuel, Computational Fluent and Gambit.

Figure 1. The process of power and hydrogen production with Searaser.
Figure 1. The process of power and hydrogen production with Searaser.
Figure 2. The cross-section A-A of the two essential parts of a Searaser
Figure 2. The cross-section A-A of the two essential parts of a Searaser
Figure 3. Different parts of a Searaser; 1) Buoy 2) Chamber 3) Valves 4) Generator 5) Anchor system
Figure 3. Different parts of a Searaser; 1) Buoy 2) Chamber 3) Valves 4) Generator 5) Anchor system
Figure 4. The boundary conditions of the control volume
Figure 4. The boundary conditions of the control volume
Figure 5. The wind velocity during the period of the experimental test
Figure 5. The wind velocity during the period of the experimental test

REFERENCES

  1. Kalbasi, R., Jahangiri, M., Dehshiri, S.J.H., Dehshiri, S.S.H., Ebrahimi, S., Etezadi, Z.A.S. and Karimipour, A., 2021. Finding the
    best station in Belgium to use residential-scale solar heating, one-year dynamic simulation with considering all system losses:
    economic analysis of using ETSW. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 45, p.101097.
  2. Megura M, Gunderson R. Better poison is the cure? Critically examining fossil fuel companies, climate change framing, and
    corporate sustainability reports. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022 Mar 1;85:102388.
  3. Holechek JL, Geli HM, Sawalhah MN, Valdez R. A global assessment: can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050?.
    Sustainability. 2022 Jan;14(8):4792.
  4. Ahmad M, Kumar A, Ranjan R. Recent Developments of Tidal Energy as Renewable Energy: An Overview. River and Coastal
    Engineering. 2022:329-43.
  5. Amini E, Mehdipour H, Faraggiana E, Golbaz D, Mozaffari S, Bracco G, Neshat M. Optimization of hydraulic power take-off
    system settings for point absorber wave energy converter. Renewable Energy. 2022 Jun 4.
  6. Claywell, R., Nadai, L., Felde, I., Ardabili, S. 2020. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and a multilayer perceptron model
    trained with grey wolf optimizer for predicting solar diffuse fraction. Entropy, 22(11), p.1192.
  7. McLeod I, Ringwood JV. Powering data buoys using wave energy: a review of possibilities. Journal of Ocean Engineering and
    Marine Energy. 2022 Jun 20:1-6.
  8. Olsson G. Water interactions: A systemic view: Why we need to comprehend the water-climate-energy-food-economics-lifestyle connections.
  9. Malkowska A, Malkowski A. Green Energy in the Political Debate. InGreen Energy 2023 (pp. 17-39). Springer, Cham.
  10. Mayon R, Ning D, Ding B, Sergiienko NY. Wave energy converter systemsโ€“status and perspectives. InModelling and Optimisation of Wave Energy Converters (pp. 3-58). CRC Press.
  11. Available online at: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/uk-ecotricity-introduces-wave-power-device-searaser/ (9/27/2022)
  12. Mousavi SM, et al.,. Deep learning for wave energy converter modeling using long short-term memory. Mathematics. 2021 Apr
    15;9(8):871.
  13. Mega V. The Energy Race to Decarbonisation. InHuman Sustainable Cities 2022 (pp. 105-141). Springer, Cham.
  14. Li R, Tang BJ, Yu B, Liao H, Zhang C, Wei YM. Cost-optimal operation strategy for integrating large scale of renewable energy
    in Chinaโ€™s power system: From a multi-regional perspective. Applied Energy. 2022 Nov 1;325:119780.
  15. Ardabili S., Abdolalizadeh L., Mako C., Torok B., Systematic Review of Deep Learning and Machine Learning for Building
    Energy, Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 2022.
  16. Penalba M, Aizpurua JI, Martinez-Perurena A, Iglesias G. A data-driven long-term metocean data forecasting approach for the
    design of marine renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022 Oct 1;167:112751.
  17. Torabi, M., Hashemi, S., Saybani, M.R., 2019. A Hybrid clustering and classification technique for forecasting shortโ€term energy
    consumption. Environmental progress & sustainable energy, 38(1), pp.66-76.
  18. Rivera FP, Zalamea J, Espinoza JL, Gonzalez LG. Sustainable use of spilled turbinable energy in Ecuador: Three different energy
    storage systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022 Mar 1;156:112005.
  19. Raza SA, Jiang J. Mathematical foundations for balancing single-phase residential microgrids connected to a three-phase distribution system. IEEE Access. 2022 Jan 6;10:5292-303.
  20. Takach M, Sarajliฤ‡ M, Peters D, Kroener M, Schuldt F, von Maydell K. Review of Hydrogen Production Techniques from Water
    Using Renewable Energy Sources and Its Storage in Salt Caverns. Energies. 2022 Feb 15;15(4):1415.
  21. Lv Z, Li W, Wei J, Ho F, Cao J, Chen X. Autonomous Chemistry Enabling Environment-Adaptive Electrochemical Energy
    Storage Devices. CCS Chemistry. 2022 Jul 7:1-9.
  22. Dehghan Manshadi, Mahsa, Milad Mousavi, M. Soltani, Amir Mosavi, and Levente Kovacs. 2022. “Deep Learning for Modeling
    an Offshore Hybrid Windโ€“Wave Energy System” Energies 15, no. 24: 9484. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249484
  23. Ishaq H, Dincer I, Crawford C. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: Challenges and opportunities. International
    Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022 Jul 22;47(62):26238-64.
  24. Maguire JF, Woodcock LV. On the Thermodynamics of Aluminum Cladding Oxidation: Water as the Catalyst for Spontaneous
    Combustion. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 2022 Sep 10:1-5.
  25. Mohammadi, M. R., Hadavimoghaddam, F., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Munir, M. T., Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A., โ€ฆ & Mohaddespour, A. (2021). Modeling hydrogen solubility in hydrocarbons using extreme gradient boosting and equations of state.
    Scientific reports, 11(1).
  26. Ma S, Qin J, Xiu X, Wang S. Design and performance evaluation of an underwater hybrid system of fuel cell and battery. Energy
    Conversion and Management. 2022 Jun 15;262:115672.
  27. Ahamed R, McKee K, Howard I. A Review of the Linear Generator Type of Wave Energy Convertersโ€™ Power Take-Off Systems.
    Sustainability. 2022 Jan;14(16):9936.
  28. Nejad, H.D., Nazari, M., Nazari, M., Mardan, M.M.S., 2022. Fuzzy State-Dependent Riccati Equation (FSDRE) Control of the
    Reverse Osmosis Desalination System With Photovoltaic Power Supply. IEEE Access, 10, pp.95585-95603.
  29. Zou S, Zhou X, Khan I, Weaver WW, Rahman S. Optimization of the electricity generation of a wave energy converter using
    deep reinforcement learning. Ocean Engineering. 2022 Jan 15;244:110363.
  30. Wu J, Qin L, Chen N, Qian C, Zheng S. Investigation on a spring-integrated mechanical power take-off system for wave energy
    conversion purpose. Energy. 2022 Apr 15;245:123318.
  31. Papini G, Dores Piuma FJ, Faedo N, Ringwood JV, Mattiazzo G. Nonlinear Model Reduction by Moment-Matching for a Point
    Absorber Wave Energy Conversion System. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022 May;10(5):656.
  32. Forbush DD, Bacelli G, Spencer SJ, Coe RG, Bosma B, Lomonaco P. Design and testing of a free floating dual flap wave energy
    converter. Energy. 2022 Feb 1;240:122485.
  33. Rezaei, M.A., 2022. A New Hybrid Cascaded Switched-Capacitor Reduced Switch Multilevel Inverter for Renewable Sources
    and Domestic Loads. IEEE Access, 10, pp.14157-14183.
  34. Lin Z, Cheng L, Huang G. Electricity consumption prediction based on LSTM with attention mechanism. IEEJ Transactions on
    Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2020;15(4):556-562.
  35. Tavoosi, J., Mohammadzadeh, A., Pahlevanzadeh, B., Kasmani, M.B., 2022. A machine learning approach for active/reactive
    power control of grid-connected doubly-fed induction generators. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(2), p.101564.
  36. Ghalandari, M., 2019. Flutter speed estimation using presented differential quadrature method formulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), pp.804-810.
  37. Li Z, Bouscasse B, Ducrozet G, Gentaz L, Le Touzรฉ D, Ferrant P. Spectral wave explicit navier-stokes equations for wavestructure interactions using two-phase computational fluid dynamics solvers. Ocean Engineering. 2021 Feb 1;221:108513.
  38. Zhou Y. Ocean energy applications for coastal communities with artificial intelligencea state-of-the-art review. Energy and AI.
    2022 Jul 29:100189.
  39. Miskati S, Farin FM. Performance evaluation of wave-carpet in wave energy extraction at different coastal regions: an analytical
    approach (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering).
  40. Gu C, Li H. Review on Deep Learning Research and Applications in Wind and Wave Energy. Energies. 2022 Feb 17;15(4):1510.
  41. Aazami, R., 2022. Optimal Control of an Energy-Storage System in a Microgrid for Reducing Wind-Power Fluctuations. Sustainability, 14(10), p.6183.
  42. Kabir M, Chowdhury MS, Sultana N, Jamal MS, Techato K. Ocean renewable energy and its prospect for developing economies.
    InRenewable Energy and Sustainability 2022 Jan 1 (pp. 263-298). Elsevier.
  43. Babajani A, Jafari M, Hafezisefat P, Mirhosseini M, Rezania A, Rosendahl L. Parametric study of a wave energy converter
    (Searaser) for Caspian Sea. Energy Procedia. 2018 Aug 1;147:334-42.
  44. He J. Coherence and cross-spectral density matrix analysis of random wind and wave in deep water. Ocean Engineering.
    2020;197:106930
  45. Ijadi Maghsoodi, A., 2018. Renewable energy technology selection problem using integrated h-swara-multimoora approach.
    Sustainability, 10(12), p.4481.
  46. Band, S.S., Ardabili, S., Sookhak, M., Theodore, A., Elnaffar, S., Moslehpour, M., Csaba, M., Torok, B., Pai, H.T., 2022. When
    Smart Cities Get Smarter via Machine Learning: An In-depth Literature Review. IEEE Access.
  47. Shamshirband, S., Rabczuk, T., Nabipour, N. and Chau, K.W., 2020. Prediction of significant wave height; comparison between
    nested grid numerical model, and machine learning models of artificial neural networks, extreme learning and support vector
    machines. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1), pp.805-817.
  48. Liu, Z., Mohammadzadeh, A., Turabieh, H., Mafarja, M., 2021. A new online learned interval type-3 fuzzy control system for
    solar energy management systems. IEEE Access, 9, pp.10498-10508.
  49. Bavili, R.E., Mohammadzadeh, A., Tavoosi, J., Mobayen, S., Assawinchaichote, W., Asad, J.H. 2021. A New Active Fault Tolerant Control System: Predictive Online Fault Estimation. IEEE Access, 9, pp.118461-118471.
  50. Akbari, E., Teimouri, A.R., Saki, M., Rezaei, M.A., Hu, J., Band, S.S., Pai, H.T., 2022. A Fault-Tolerant Cascaded SwitchedCapacitor Multilevel Inverter for Domestic Applications in Smart Grids. IEEE Access.
  51. Band, S.S., Ardabili, S., 2022. Feasibility of soft computing techniques for estimating the long-term mean monthly wind speed.
    Energy Reports, 8, pp.638-648.
  52. Tavoosi, J., Mohammadzadeh, A., Pahlevanzadeh, B., Kasmani, M.B., 2022. A machine learning approach for active/reactive
    power control of grid-connected doubly-fed induction generators. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(2), p.101564.
  53. Ponnusamy, V. K., Kasinathan, P., Madurai Elavarasan, R., Ramanathan, V., Anandan, R. K., Subramaniam, U., โ€ฆ & Hossain,
    E. A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Aspects of Big Data Analytics for the Smart Grid. Sustainability, 2021; 13(23),
    13322.
  54. Ahmad, T., Zhang, D., Huang, C., Zhang, H., Dai, N., Song, Y., & Chen, H. Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry:
    Status Quo, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021; 289, 125834.
  55. Wang, G., Chao, Y., Cao, Y., Jiang, T., Han, W., & Chen, Z. A comprehensive review of research works based on evolutionary
    game theory for sustainable energy development. Energy Reports, 2022; 8, 114-136.
  56. Iranmehr H., Modeling the Price of Emergency Power Transmission Lines in the Reserve Market Due to the Influence of Renewable Energies, Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 2022
  57. Farmanbar, M., Parham, K., Arild, ร˜., & Rong, C. A widespread review of smart grids towards smart cities. Energies, 2019;
    12(23), 4484.
  58. Quartier, N., Crespo, A. J., Domรญnguez, J. M., Stratigaki, V., & Troch, P. Efficient response of an onshore Oscillating Water
    Column Wave Energy Converter using a one-phase SPH model coupled with a multiphysics library. Applied Ocean Research,
    2021; 115, 102856.
  59. Mahmoodi, K., Nepomuceno, E., & Razminia, A. Wave excitation force forecasting using neural networks. Energy, 2022; 247,
    123322.
  60. Wang, H., Alattas, K.A., 2022. Comprehensive review of load forecasting with emphasis on intelligent computing approaches.
    Energy Reports, 8, pp.13189-13198.
  61. Clemente, D., Rosa-Santos, P., & Taveira-Pinto, F. On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A
    review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021; 135, 110162.
  62. Felix, A., V. Hernรกndez-Fontes, J., Lithgow, D., Mendoza, E., Posada, G., Ring, M., & Silva, R. Wave energy in tropical regions:
    deployment challenges, environmental and social perspectives. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2019; 7(7), 219.
  63. Farrok, O., Ahmed, K., Tahlil, A. D., Farah, M. M., Kiran, M. R., & Islam, M. R. Electrical power generation from the oceanic
    wave for sustainable advancement in renewable energy technologies. Sustainability, 2020; 12(6), 2178.
  64. Guo, B., & Ringwood, J. V. A review of wave energy technology from a research and commercial perspective. IET Renewable
    Power Generation, 2021; 15(14), 3065-3090.
  65. Lรณpez-Ruiz, A., Bergillos, R. J., Lira-Loarca, A., & Ortega-Sรกnchez, M. A methodology for the long-term simulation and uncertainty analysis of the operational lifetime performance of wave energy converter arrays. Energy, 2018; 153, 126-135.
  66. Safarian, S., Saryazdi, S. M. E., Unnthorsson, R., & Richter, C. Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant. Energy, 2020; 213, 118800.
  67. Kushwah, S. An oscillating water column (OWC): the wave energy converter. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India):
    Series C, 2021; 102(5), 1311-1317.
  68. Pap, J., Mako, C., Illessy, M., Kis, N., 2022. Modeling Organizational Performance with Machine Learning. Journal of Open
    Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), p.177.
  69. Pap, J., Mako, C., Illessy, M., Dedaj, Z., Ardabili, S., Torok, B., 2022. Correlation Analysis of Factors Affecting Firm Performance
    and Employees Wellbeing: Application of Advanced Machine Learning Analysis. Algorithms, 15(9), p.300.
  70. Alanazi, A., 2022. Determining Optimal Power Flow Solutions Using New Adaptive Gaussian TLBO Method. Applied Sciences, 12(16), p.7959.
  71. Shakibjoo, A.D., Moradzadeh, M., Din, S.U., 2021. Optimized Type-2 Fuzzy Frequency Control for Multi-Area Power Systems.
    IEEE access, 10, pp.6989-7002.
  72. Zhang, G., 2021. Solar radiation estimation in different climates with meteorological variables using Bayesian model averaging
    and new soft computing models. Energy Reports, 7, pp.8973-8996.
  73. Cao, Y., Raise, A., Mohammadzadeh, A., Rathinasamy, S., 2021. Deep learned recurrent type-3 fuzzy system: Application for
    renewable energy modeling/prediction. Energy Reports, 7, pp.8115-8127.
  74. Tavoosi, J., Suratgar, A.A., Menhaj, M.B., 2021. Modeling renewable energy systems by a self-evolving nonlinear consequent
    part recurrent type-2 fuzzy system for power prediction. Sustainability, 13(6), p.3301.
  75. Bourouis, S., Band, S.S., 2022. Meta-Heuristic Algorithm-Tuned Neural Network for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Ultrasound
    Images. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, p.834028.
  76. Mosavi, A.H., Mohammadzadeh, A., Rathinasamy, S., Zhang, C., Reuter, U., Levente, K. and Adeli, H., 2022. Deep learning
    fuzzy immersion and invariance control for type-I diabetes. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 149, p.105975.
  77. Almutairi, K., Algarni, S., Alqahtani, T., Moayedi, H., 2022. A TLBO-Tuned Neural Processor for Predicting Heating Load in
    Residential Buildings. Sustainability, 14(10), p.5924.
  78. Ahmad, Z., Zhong, H., 2020. Machine learning modeling of aerobic biodegradation for azo dyes and hexavalent chromium.
    Mathematics, 8(6), p.913.
  79. Mosavi, A., Shokri, M., Mansor, Z., Qasem, S.N., Band, S.S. and Mohammadzadeh, A., 2020. Machine learning for modeling
    the singular multi-pantograph equations. Entropy, 22(9), p.1041.
  80. Ardabili, S., 2019, September. Deep learning and machine learning in hydrological processes climate change and earth systems
    a systematic review. In International conference on global research and education (pp. 52-62). Springer, Cham.
  81. Moayedi, H., (2021). Suggesting a stochastic fractal search paradigm in combination with artificial neural network for early
    prediction of cooling load in residential buildings. Energies, 14(6), 1649.
  82. Rezakazemi, M., et al., 2019. ANFIS pattern for molecular membranes separation optimization. Journal of Molecular Liquids,
    274, pp.470-476.
  83. Mosavi, A., Faghan, Y., Ghamisi, P., Duan, P., Ardabili, S.F., Salwana, E. and Band, S.S., 2020. Comprehensive review of deep
    reinforcement learning methods and applications in economics. Mathematics, 8(10), p.1640.
  84. Samadianfard, S., Jarhan, S., Salwana, E., 2019. Support vector regression integrated with fruit fly optimization algorithm for
    river flow forecasting in Lake Urmia Basin. Water, 11(9), p.1934.
  85. Moayedi, H., (2021). Double-target based neural networks in predicting energy consumption in residential buildings. Energies,
    14(5), 1331.
  86. Choubin, B., 2019. Earth fissure hazard prediction using machine learning models. Environmental research, 179, p.108770.
  87. Mohammadzadeh S, D., Kazemi, S.F., 2019. Prediction of compression index of fine-grained soils using a gene expression programming model. Infrastructures, 4(2), p.26.
  88. Karballaeezadeh, N., Mohammadzadeh S, D., Shamshirband, S., Hajikhodaverdikhan, P., 2019. Prediction of remaining service
    life of pavement using an optimized support vector machine (case study of Semnanโ€“Firuzkuh road). Engineering Applications
    of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), pp.188-198.
  89. Rezaei, M. Et al., (2022). Adaptation of A Real-Time Deep Learning Approach with An Analog Fault Detection Technique for
    Reliability Forecasting of Capacitor Banks Used in Mobile Vehicles. IEEE Access v. 21 pp. 89-99.
  90. Khakian, R., et al., (2020). Modeling nearly zero energy buildings for sustainable development in rural areas. Energies, 13(10),
    2593.
Figure 5. Schematic view of flap and support structure [32]

Design Optimization of Ocean Renewable Energy Converter Using a Combined Bi-level Metaheuristic Approach

๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ Bi-level ๋ฉ”ํƒ€ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ํ•ด์–‘ ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”

Erfan Amini a1, Mahdieh Nasiri b1, Navid Salami Pargoo a, Zahra Mozhgani c, Danial Golbaz d, Mehrdad Baniesmaeil e, Meysam Majidi Nezhad f, Mehdi Neshat gj, Davide Astiaso Garcia h, Georgios Sylaios i

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in renewable energies in view of the fact that fossil fuels are the leading cause of catastrophic environmental consequences. Ocean wave energy is a renewable energy source that is particularly prevalent in coastal areas. Since many countries have tremendous potential to extract this type of energy, a number of researchers have sought to determine certain effective factors on wave convertersโ€™ performance, with a primary emphasis on ambient factors. In this study, we used metaheuristic optimization methods to investigate the effects of geometric factors on the performance of an Oscillating Surge Wave Energy Converter (OSWEC), in addition to the effects of hydrodynamic parameters. To do so, we used CATIA software to model different geometries which were then inserted into a numerical model developed in Flow3D software. A Ribed-surface design of the converterโ€™s flap is also introduced in this study to maximize wave-converter interaction. Besides, a Bi-level Hill Climbing Multi-Verse Optimization (HCMVO) method was also developed for this application. The results showed that the converter performs better with greater wave heights, flap freeboard heights, and shorter wave periods. Additionally, the added ribs led to more wave-converter interaction and better performance, while the distance between the flap and flume bed negatively impacted the performance. Finally, tracking the changes in the five-dimensional objective function revealed the optimum value for each parameter in all scenarios. This is achieved by the newly developed optimization algorithm, which is much faster than other existing cutting-edge metaheuristic approaches.

Keywords

Wave Energy Converter

OSWEC

Hydrodynamic Effects

Geometric Design

Metaheuristic Optimization

Multi-Verse Optimizer

1Introduction

The increase in energy demand, the limitations of fossil fuels, as well as environmental crises, such as air pollution and global warming, are the leading causes of calling more attention to harvesting renewable energy recently [1][2][3]. While still in its infancy, ocean wave energy has neither reached commercial maturity nor technological convergence. In recent decades, remarkable progress has been made in the marine energy domain, which is still in the early stage of development, to improve the technology performance level (TPL) [4][5]and technology readiness level (TRL) of wave energy converters (WECs). This has been achieved using novel modeling techniques [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] to gain the following advantages [15]: (i) As a source of sustainable energy, it contributes to the mix of energy resources that leads to greater diversity and attractiveness for coastal cities and suppliers. [16] (ii) Since wave energy can be exploited offshore and does not require any land, in-land site selection would be less expensive and undesirable visual effects would be reduced. [17] (iii) When the best layout and location of offshore site are taken into account, permanent generation of energy will be feasible (as opposed to using solar energy, for example, which is time-dependent) [18].

In general, the energy conversion process can be divided into three stages in a WEC device, including primary, secondary, and tertiary stages [19][20]. In the first stage of energy conversion, which is the subject of this study, the wave power is converted to mechanical power by wave-structure interaction (WSI) between ocean waves and structures. Moreover, the mechanical power is transferred into electricity in the second stage, in which mechanical structures are coupled with power take-off systems (PTO). At this stage, optimal control strategies are useful to tune the system dynamics to maximize power output [10][13][12]. Furthermore, the tertiary energy conversion stage revolves around transferring the non-standard AC power into direct current (DC) power for energy storage or standard AC power for grid integration [21][22]. We discuss only the first stage regardless of the secondary and tertiary stages. While Page 1 of 16 WECs include several categories and technologies such as terminators, point absorbers, and attenuators [15][23], we focus on oscillating surge wave energy converters (OSWECs) in this paper due to its high capacity for industrialization [24].

Over the past two decades, a number of studies have been conducted to understand how OSWECsโ€™ structures and interactions between ocean waves and flaps affect converters performance. Henry et al.โ€™s experiment on oscillating surge wave energy converters is considered as one of the most influential pieces of research [25], which demonstrated how the performance of oscillating surge wave energy converters (OSWECs) is affected by seven different factors, including wave period, wave power, flapโ€™s relative density, water depth, free-board of the flap, the gap between the tubes, gap underneath the flap, and flap width. These parameters were assessed in their two models in order to estimate the absorbed energy from incoming waves [26][27]. In addition, Folly et al. investigated the impact of water depth on the OSWECs performance analytically, numerically, and experimentally. According to this and further similar studies, the average annual incident wave power is significantly reduced by water depth. Based on the experimental results, both the surge wave force and the power capture of OSWECs increase in shallow water [28][29]. Following this, Sarkar et al. found that under such circumstances, the device that is located near the coast performs much better than those in the open ocean [30]. On the other hand, other studies are showing that the size of the converter, including height and width, is relatively independent of the location (within similar depth) [31]. Subsequently, Schmitt et al. studied OSWECs numerically and experimentally. In fact, for the simulation of OSWEC, OpenFOAM was used to test the applicability of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solvers. Then, the experimental model reproduced the numerical results with satisfying accuracy [32]. In another influential study, Wang et al. numerically assessed the effect of OSWECโ€™s width on their performance. According to their findings, as converter width increases, its efficiency decreases in short wave periods while increases in long wave periods [33]. One of the main challenges in the analysis of the OSWEC is the coupled effect of hydrodynamic and geometric variables. As a result, numerous cutting-edge geometry studies have been performed in recent years in order to find the optimal structure that maximizes power output and minimizes costs. Garcia et al. reviewed hull geometry optimization studies in the literature in [19]. In addition, Guo and Ringwood surveyed geometric optimization methods to improve the hydrodynamic performance of OSWECs at the primary stage [14]. Besides, they classified the hull geometry of OSWECs based on Figure 1. Subsequently, Whittaker et al. proposed a different design of OSWEC called Oyster2. There have been three examples of different geometries of oysters with different water depths. Based on its water depth, they determined the width and height of the converter. They also found that in the constant wave period the less the converterโ€™s width, the less power captures the converter has [34]. Afterward, Oโ€™Boyle et al. investigated a type of OSWEC called Oyster 800. They compared the experimental and numerical models with the prototype model. In order to precisely reproduce the shape, mass distribution, and buoyancy properties of the prototype, a 40th-scale experimental model has been designed. Overall, all the models were fairly accurate according to the results [35].

Inclusive analysis of recent research avenues in the area of flap geometry has revealed that the interaction-based designs of such converters are emerging as a novel approach. An initiative workflow is designed in the current study to maximizing the wave energy extrication by such systems. To begin with, a sensitivity analysis plays its role of determining the best hydrodynamic values for installing the converterโ€™s flap. Then, all flap dimensions and characteristics come into play to finalize the primary model. Following, interactive designs is proposed to increase the influence of incident waves on the body by adding ribs on both sides of the flap as a novel design. Finally, a new bi-level metaheuristic method is proposed to consider the effects of simultaneous changes in ribs properties and other design parameters. We hope this novel approach will be utilized to make big-scale projects less costly and justifiable. The efficiency of the method is also compared with four well known metaheuristic algorithms and out weight them for this application.

This paper is organized as follows. First, the research methodology is introduced by providing details about the numerical model implementation. To that end, we first introduced the primary modelโ€™s geometry and software details. That primary model is later verified with a benchmark study with regard to the flap angle of rotation and water surface elevation. Then, governing equations and performance criteria are presented. In the third part of the paper, we discuss the modelโ€™s sensitivity to lower and upper parts width (we proposed a two cross-sectional design for the flap), bottom elevation, and freeboard. Finally, the novel optimization approach is introduced in the final part and compared with four recent metaheuristic algorithms.

2. Numerical Methods

In this section, after a brief introduction of the numerical software, Flow3D, boundary conditions are defined. Afterwards, the numerical model implementation, along with primary model properties are described. Finally, governing equations, as part of numerical process, are discussed.

2.1Model Setup

FLOW-3D is a powerful and comprehensive CFD simulation platform for studying fluid dynamics. This software has several modules to solve many complex engineering problems. In addition, modeling complex flows is simple and effective using FLOW-3Dโ€™s robust meshing capabilities [36]. Interaction between fluid and moving objects might alter the computational range. Dynamic meshes are used in our modeling to take these changes into account. At each time step, the computational node positions change in order to adapt the meshing area to the moving object. In addition, to choose mesh dimensions, some factors are taken into account such as computational accuracy, computational time, and stability. The final grid size is selected based on the detailed procedure provided in [37]. To that end, we performed grid-independence testing on a CFD model using three different mesh grid sizes of 0.01, 0.015, and 0.02 meters. The problem geometry and boundary conditions were defined the same, and simulations were run on all three grids under the same conditions. The predicted values of the relevant variable, such as velocity, was compared between the grids. The convergence behavior of the numerical solution was analyzed by calculating the relative L2 norm error between two consecutive grids. Based on the results obtained, it was found that the grid size of 0.02 meters showed the least error, indicating that it provided the most accurate and reliable solution among the three grids. Therefore, the grid size of 0.02 meters was selected as the optimal spatial resolution for the mesh grid.

In this work, the flume dimensions are 10 meters long, 0.1 meters wide, and 2.2 meters high, which are shown in figure2. In addition, input waves with linear characteristics have a height of 0.1 meters and a period of 1.4 seconds. Among the linear wave methods included in this software, RNGk-ฮต and k- ฮต are appropriate for turbulence model. The research of Lopez et al. shows that RNGk- ฮต provides the most accurate simulation of turbulence in OSWECs [21]. We use CATIA software to create the flap primary model and other innovative designs for this project. The flap measures 0.1 m x 0.65 m x 0.360 m in x, y and z directions, respectively. In Figure 3, the primary model of flap and its dimensions are shown. In this simulation, five boundaries have been defined, including 1. Inlet, 2. Outlet, 3. Converter flap, 4. Bed flume, and 5. Water surface, which are shown in figure 2. Besides, to avoid wave reflection in inlet and outlet zones, Flow3D is capable of defining some areas as damping zones, the length of which has to be one to one and a half times the wavelength. Therefore, in the model, this length is considered equal to 2 meters. Furthermore, there is no slip in all the boundaries. In other words, at every single time step, the fluid velocity is zero on the bed flume, while it is equal to the flap velocity on the converter flap. According to the wave theory defined in the software, at the inlet boundary, the water velocity is called from the wave speed to be fed into the model.

2.2Verification

In the current study, we utilize the Schmitt experimental model as a benchmark for verification, which was developed at the Queenโ€™s University of Belfast. The experiments were conducted on the flap of the converter, its rotation, and its interaction with the water surface. Thus, the details of the experiments are presented below based up on the experimental setupโ€™s description [38]. In the experiment, the laboratory flume has a length of 20m and a width of 4.58m. Besides, in order to avoid incident wave reflection, a wave absorption source is devised at the end of the left flume. The flume bed, also, includes two parts with different slops. The flap position and dimensions of the flume can be seen in Figure4. In addition, a wave-maker with 6 paddles is installed at one end. At the opposite end, there is a beach with wire meshes. Additionally, there are 6 indicators to extract the water level elevation. In the flap model, there are three components: the fixed support structure, the hinge, and the flap. The flap measures 0.1m x 0.65m x 0.341m in x, y and z directions, respectively. In Figure5, the details are given [32]. The support structure consists of a 15 mm thick stainless steel base plate measuring 1m by 1.4m, which is screwed onto the bottom of the tank. The hinge is supported by three bearing blocks. There is a foam centerpiece on the front and back of the flap which is sandwiched between two PVC plates. Enabling changes of the flap, three metal fittings link the flap to the hinge. Moreover, in this experiment, the selected wave is generated based on sea wave data at scale 1:40. The wave height and the wave period are equal to 0.038 (m) and 2.0625 (s), respectively, which are tantamount to a wave with a period of 13 (s) and a height of 1.5 (m).

Two distinct graphs illustrate the numerical and experi-mental study results. Figure6 and Figure7 are denoting the angle of rotation of flap and surface elevation in computational and experimental models, respectively. The two figures roughly represent that the numerical and experimental models are a good match. However, for the purpose of verifying the match, we calculated the correlation coefficient (C) and root mean square error (RMSE). According to Figure6, correlation coefficient and RMSE are 0.998 and 0.003, respectively, and in Figure7 correlation coefficient and RMSE are respectively 0.999 and 0.001. Accordingly, there is a good match between the numerical and empirical models. It is worth mentioning that the small differences between the numerical and experimental outputs may be due to the error of the measuring devices and the calibration of the data collection devices.

Including continuity equation and momentum conserva- tion for incompressible fluid are given as [32][39]:(1)

where P represents the pressure, g denotes gravitational acceleration, u represents fluid velocity, and Di is damping coefficient. Likewise, the model uses the same equation. to calculate the fluid velocity in other directions as well. Considering the turbulence, we use the two-equation model of RNGK- ฮต. These equations are:

(3)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝt(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝand(4)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝโˆ—๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝWhere ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ are constants. In addition, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represent the turbulent Prandtl number of ๏ฟฝ and k, respectively.

๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ also denote the production of turbulent kinetic energy of k under the effect of velocity gradient, which is calculated as follows:(5)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝeff[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(6)๏ฟฝeff=๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(7)๏ฟฝeff=๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwhere ๏ฟฝ is molecular viscosity,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represents turbulence viscosity, k denotes kinetic energy, and โˆŠโˆŠ is energy dissipation rate. The values of constant coefficients in the two-equation RNGK โˆŠ-โˆŠ model is as shown in the Table 1 [40].Table 2.

Table 1. Constant coefficients in RNGK-โˆŠ model

Factors๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
Quantity0.0124.381.421.681.391.390.084

Table 2. Flap properties

Joint height (m)0.476
Height of the center of mass (m)0.53
Weight (Kg)10.77

It is worth mentioning that the volume of fluid method is used to separate water and air phases in this software [41]. Below is the equation of this method [40].(8)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0where ฮฑ and 1 โˆ’ ฮฑ are portion of water phase and air phase, respectively. As a weighting factor, each fluid phase portion is used to determine the mixture properties. Finally, using the following equations, we calculate the efficiency of converters [42][34][43]:(9)๏ฟฝ=14|๏ฟฝ|2๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ2+(๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝa)2(๏ฟฝn2-๏ฟฝ2)2where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represents natural frequency, I denotes the inertia of OSWEC, Ia is the added inertia, F is the complex wave force, and B denotes the hydrodynamic damping coefficient. Afterward, the capture factor of the converter is calculated by [44]:(10)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ1/2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝgw where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represents the capture factor, which is the total efficiency of device per unit length of the wave crest at each time step [15], ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represent the dimensional amplitude of the incident wave, w is the flapโ€™s width, and Cg is the group velocity of the incident wave, as below:(11)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0ยท121+2๏ฟฝ0โ„Žsinh2๏ฟฝ0โ„Žwhere ๏ฟฝ0 denotes the wave number, h is water depth, and H is the height of incident waves.

According to previous sections โˆŠ,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-โˆŠ modeling is used for all models simulated in this section. For this purpose, the empty boundary condition is used for flume walls. In order to preventing wave reflection at the inlet and outlet of the flume, the length of wave absorption is set to be at least one incident wavelength. In addition, the structured mesh is chosen, and the mesh dimensions are selected in two distinct directions. In each model, all grids have a length of 2 (cm) and a height of 1 (cm). Afterwards, as an input of the software for all of the models, we define the time step as 0.001 (s). Moreover, the run time of every simulation is 30 (s). As mentioned before, our primary model is Schmitt model, and the flap properties is given in table2. For all simulations, the flume measures 15 meters in length and 0.65 meters in width, and water depth is equal to 0.335 (m). The flap is also located 7 meters from the flumeโ€™s inlet.

Finally, in order to compare the results, the capture factor is calculated for each simulation and compared to the primary model. It is worth mentioning that capture factor refers to the ratio of absorbed wave energy to the input wave energy.

According to primary model simulation and due to the decreasing horizontal velocity with depth, the wave crest has the highest velocity. Considering the fact that the waveโ€™s orbital velocity causes the flap to move, the contact between the upper edge of the flap and the incident wave can enhance its performance. Additionally, the numerical model shows that the dynamic pressure decreases as depth increases, and the hydrostatic pressure increases as depth increases.

To determine the OSWEC design, it is imperative to understand the correlation between the capture factor, wave period, and wave height. Therefore, as it is shown in Figure8, we plot the change in capture factor over the variations in wave period and wave height in 3D and 2D. In this diagram, the first axis features changes in wave period, the second axis displays changes in wave height, and the third axis depicts changes in capture factor. According to our wave properties in the numerical model, the wave period and wave height range from 2 to 14 seconds and 2 to 8 meters, respectively. This is due to the fact that the flap does not oscillate if the wave height is less than 2 (m), and it does not reverse if the wave height is more than 8 (m). In addition, with wave periods more than 14 (s), the wavelength would be so long that it would violate the deep-water conditions, and with wave periods less than 2 (s), the flap would not oscillate properly due to the shortness of wavelength. The results of simulation are shown in Figure 8. As it can be perceived from Figure 8, in a constant wave period, the capture factor is in direct proportion to the wave height. It is because of the fact that waves with more height have more energy to rotate the flap. Besides, in a constant wave height, the capture factor increases when the wave period increases, until a given wave period value. However, the capture factor falls after this point. These results are expected since the flapโ€™s angular displacement is not high in lower wave periods, while the oscillating motion of that is not fast enough to activate the power take-off system in very high wave periods.

As is shown in Figure 9, we plot the change in capture factor over the variations in wave period (s) and water depth (m) in 3D. As it can be seen in this diagram, the first axis features changes in water depth (m), the second axis depicts the wave period (s), and the third axis displays OSWECโ€™s capture factor. The wave period ranges from 0 to 10 seconds based on our wave properties, which have been adopted from Schmittโ€™s model, while water depth ranges from 0 to 0.5 meters according to the flume and flap dimensions and laboratory limitations. According to Figure9, for any specific water depth, the capture factor increases in a varying rate when the wave period increases, until a given wave period value. However, the capture factor falls steadily after this point. In fact, the maximum capture factor occurs when the wave period is around 6 seconds. This trend is expected since, in a specific water depth, the flap cannot oscillate properly when the wavelength is too short. As the wave period increases, the flap can oscillate more easily, and consequently its capture factor increases. However, the capture factor drops in higher wave periods because the wavelength is too large to move the flap. Furthermore, in a constant wave period, by changing the water depth, the capture factor does not alter. In other words, the capture factor does not depend on the water depth when it is around its maximum value.

3Sensitivity Analysis

Based on previous studies, in addition to the flap design, the location of the flap relative to the water surface (freeboard) and its elevation relative to the flume bed (flap bottom elevation) play a significant role in extracting energy from the wave energy converter. This study measures the sensitivity of the model to various parameters related to the flap design including upper part width of the flap, lower part width of the flap, the freeboard, and the flap bottom elevation. Moreover, as a novel idea, we propose that the flap widths differ in the lower and upper parts. In Figure10, as an example, a flap with an upper thickness of 100 (mm) and a lower thickness of 50 (mm) and a flap with an upper thickness of 50 (mm) and a lower thickness of 100 (mm) are shown. The influence of such discrepancy between the widths of the upper and lower parts on the interaction between the wave and the flap, or in other words on the capture factor, is evaluated. To do so, other parameters are remained constant, such as the freeboard, the distance between the flap and the flume bed, and the wave properties.

In Figure11, models are simulated with distinct upper and lower widths. As it is clear in this figure, the first axis depicts the lower part width of the flap, the second axis indicates the upper part width of the flap, and the colors represent the capture factor values. Additionally, in order to consider a sufficient range of change, the flap thickness varies from half to double the value of the primary model for each part.

According to this study, the greater the discrepancy in these two parts, the lower the capture factor. It is on account of the fact that when the lower part of the flap is thicker than the upper part, and this thickness difference in these two parts is extremely conspicuous, the inertia against the motion is significant at zero degrees of rotation. Consequently, it is difficult to move the flap, which results in a low capture factor. Similarly, when the upper part of the flap is thicker than the lower part, and this thickness difference in these two parts is exceedingly noticeable, the inertia is so great that the flap can not reverse at the maximum degree of rotation. As the results indicate, the discrepancy can enhance the performance of the converter if the difference between these two parts is around 20%. As it is depicted in the Figure11, the capture factor reaches its own maximum amount, when the lower part thickness is from 5 to 6 (cm), and the upper part thickness is between 6 and 7 (cm). Consequently, as a result of this discrepancy, less material will be used, and therefore there will be less cost.

As illustrated in Figure12, this study examines the effects of freeboard (level difference between the flap top and water surface) and the flap bottom elevation (the distance between the flume bed and flap bottom) on the converter performance. In this diagram, the first axis demonstrates the freeboard and the second axis on the left side displays the flap bottom elevation, while the colors indicate the capture factor. In addition, the feasible range of freeboard is between -15 to 15 (cm) due to the limitation of the numerical model, so that we can take the wave slamming and the overtopping into consideration. Additionally, based on the Schmitt model and its scaled model of 1:40 of the base height, the flap bottom should be at least 9 (cm) high. Since the effect of surface waves is distributed over the depth of the flume, it is imperative to maintain a reasonable flap height exposed to incoming waves. Thus, the maximum flap bottom elevation is limited to 19 (cm). As the Figure12 pictures, at constant negative values of the freeboard, the capture factor is in inverse proportion with the flap bottom elevation, although slightly.

Furthermore, at constant positive values of the freeboard, the capture factor fluctuates as the flap bottom elevation decreases while it maintains an overall increasing trend. This is on account of the fact that increasing the flap bottom elevation creates turbulence flow behind the flap, which encumbers its rotation, as well as the fact that the flap surface has less interaction with the incoming waves. Furthermore, while keeping the flap bottom elevation constant, the capture factor increases by raising the freeboard. This is due to the fact that there is overtopping with adverse impacts on the converter performance when the freeboard is negative and the flap is under the water surface. Besides, increasing the freeboard makes the wave slam more vigorously, which improves the converter performance.

Adding ribs to the flap surface, as shown in Figure13, is a novel idea that is investigated in the next section. To achieve an optimized design for the proposed geometry of the flap, we determine the optimal number and dimensions of ribs based on the flap properties as our decision variables in the optimization process. As an example, Figure13 illustrates a flap with 3 ribs on each side with specific dimensions.

Figure14 shows the flow velocity field around the flap jointed to the flume bed. During the oscillation of the flap, the pressure on the upper and lower surfaces of the flap changes dynamically due to the changing angle of attack and the resulting change in the direction of fluid flow. As the flap moves upwards, the pressure on the upper surface decreases, and the pressure on the lower surface increases. Conversely, as the flap moves downwards, the pressure on the upper surface increases, and the pressure on the lower surface decreases. This results in a cyclic pressure variation around the flap. Under certain conditions, the pressure field around the flap can exhibit significant variations in magnitude and direction, forming vortices and other flow structures. These flow structures can affect the performance of the OSWEC by altering the lift and drag forces acting on the flap.

4Design Optimization

We consider optimizing the design parameters of the flap of converter using a nature-based swarm optimization method, that fall in the category of metaheuristic algorithms [45]. Accordingly, we choose four state-of-the-art algorithms to perform an optimization study. Then, based on their performances to achieve the highest capture factor, one of them will be chosen to be combined with the Hill Climb algorithm to carry out a local search. Therefore, in the remainder of this section, we discuss the search process of each algorithm and visualize their performance and convergence curve as they try to find the best values for decision variables.

4.1. Metaheuristic Approaches

As the first considered algorithm, the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm simulates the natural leadership and hunting performance of gray wolves which tend to live in colonies. Hunters must obey the alpha wolf, the leader, who is responsible for hunting. Then, the beta wolf is at the second level of the gray wolf hierarchy. A subordinate of alpha wolf, beta stands under the command of the alpha. At the next level in this hierarchy, there are the delta wolves. They are subordinate to the alpha and beta wolves. This category of wolves includes scouts, sentinels, elders, hunters, and caretakers. In this ranking, omega wolves are at the bottom, having the lowest level and obeying all other wolves. They are also allowed to eat the prey just after others have eaten. Despite the fact that they seem less important than others, they are really central to the pack survival. Since, it has been shown that without omega wolves, the entire pack would experience some problems like fighting, violence, and frustration. In this simulation, there are three primary steps of hunting including searching, surrounding, and finally attacking the prey. Mathematically model of gray wolvesโ€™ hunting technique and their social hierarchy are applied in determined by optimization. this study. As mentioned before, gray wolves can locate their prey and surround them. The alpha wolf also leads the hunt. Assuming that the alpha, beta, and delta have more knowledge about prey locations, we can mathematically simulate gray wolf hunting behavior. Hence, in addition to saving the top three best solutions obtained so far, we compel the rest of the search agents (also the omegas) to adjust their positions based on the best search agent. Encircling behavior can be mathematically modeled by the following equations: [46].(12)๏ฟฝโ†’=|๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ)-๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ)|(13)๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ+1)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ)-๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝโ†’(14)๏ฟฝโ†’=2.๏ฟฝ2โ†’(15)๏ฟฝโ†’=2๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝ1โ†’-๏ฟฝโ†’Where ๏ฟฝโ†’indicates the position vector of gray wolf, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’ defines the vector of prey, t indicates the current iteration, and ๏ฟฝโ†’and ๏ฟฝโ†’are coefficient vectors. To force the search agent to diverge from the prey, we use ๏ฟฝโ†’ with random values greater than 1 or less than -1. In addition, Cโ†’ contains random values in the range [0,2], and ๏ฟฝโ†’ 1 and ๏ฟฝ2โ†’ are random vectors in [0,1]. The second considered technique is the Moth Flame Optimizer (MFO) algorithm. This method revolves around the mothsโ€™ navigation mechanism, which is realized by positioning themselves and maintaining a fixed angle relative to the moon while flying. This effective mechanism helps moths to fly in a straight path. However, when the source of light is artificial, maintaining an angle with the light leads to a spiral flying path towards the source that causes the mothโ€™s death [47]. In MFO algorithm, moths and flames are both solutions. The moths are actual search agents that fly in hyper-dimensional space by changing their position vectors, and the flames are considered pins that moths drop when searching the search space [48]. The problemโ€™s variables are the position of moths in the space. Each moth searches around a flame and updates it in case of finding a better solution. The fitness value is the return value of each mothโ€™s fitness (objective) function. The position vector of each moth is passed to the fitness function, and the output of the fitness function is assigned to the corresponding moth. With this mechanism, a moth never loses its best solution [49]. Some attributes of this algorithm are as follows:

  • โ€ขIt takes different values to converge moth in any point around the flame.
  • โ€ขDistance to the flame is lowered to be eventually minimized.
  • โ€ขWhen the position gets closer to the flame, the updated positions around the flame become more frequent.

As another method, the Multi-Verse Optimizer is based on a multiverse theory which proposes there are other universes besides the one in which we all live. According to this theory, there are more than one big bang in the universe, and each big bang leads to the birth of a new universe [50]. Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO) is mainly inspired by three phenomena in cosmology: white holes, black holes, and wormholes. A white hole has never been observed in our universe, but physicists believe the big bang could be considered a white hole [51]. Black holes, which behave completely in contrast to white holes, attract everything including light beams with their extremely high gravitational force [52]. In the multiverse theory, wormholes are time and space tunnels that allow objects to move instantly between any two corners of a universe (or even simultaneously from one universe to another) [53]. Based on these three concepts, mathematical models are designed to perform exploration, exploitation, and local search, respectively. The concept of white and black holes is implied as an exploration phase, while the concept of wormholes is considered as an exploitation phase by MVO. Additionally, each solution is analogous to a universe, and each variable in the solution represents an object in that universe. Furthermore, each solution is assigned an inflation rate, and the time is used instead of iterations. Following are the universe rules in MVO:

  • โ€ขThe possibility of having white hole increases with the inflation rate.
  • โ€ขThe possibility of having black hole decreases with the inflation rate.
  • โ€ขObjects tend to pass through black holes more frequently in universes with lower inflation rates.
  • โ€ขRegardless of inflation rate, wormholes may cause objects in universes to move randomly towards the best universe. [54]

Modeling the white/black hole tunnels and exchanging objects of universes mathematically was accomplished by using the roulette wheel mechanism. With every iteration, the universes are sorted according to their inflation rates, then, based on the roulette wheel, the one with the white hole is selected as the local extremum solution. This is accomplished through the following steps:

Assume that

(16)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1โ‰ฅ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)

Where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ represents the jth parameter of the ith universe, Ui indicates the ith universe, NI(Ui) is normalized inflation rate of the ith universe, r1 is a random number in [0,1], and j xk shows the jth parameter of the kth universe selected by a roulette wheel selection mechanism [54]. It is assumed that wormhole tunnels always exist between a universe and the best universe formed so far. This mechanism is as follows:(17)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=if๏ฟฝ2<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝร—((๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)ร—๏ฟฝ4+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ3<0.5๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝร—((๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)ร—๏ฟฝ4+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ3โ‰ฅ0.5๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwhere Xj indicates the jth parameter of the best universe formed so far, TDR and WEP are coefficients, where Xj indicates the jth parameter of the best universelbjshows the lower bound of the jth variable, ubj is the upper bound of the jth variable, and r2, r3, and r4 are random numbers in [1][54].

Finally, one of the newest optimization algorithms is WOA. The WOA algorithm simulates the movement of prey and the whaleโ€™s discipline when looking for their prey. Among several species, Humpback whales have a specific method of hunting [55]. Humpback whales can recognize the location of prey and encircle it before hunting. The optimal design position in the search space is not known a priori, and the WOA algorithm assumes that the best candidate solution is either the target prey or close to the optimum. This foraging behavior is called the bubble-net feeding method. Two maneuvers are associated with bubbles: upward spirals and double loops. A unique behavior exhibited only by humpback whales is bubble-net feeding. In fact, The WOA algorithm starts with a set of random solutions. At each iteration, search agents update their positions for either a randomly chosen search agent or the best solution obtained so far [56][55]. When the best search agent is determined, the other search agents will attempt to update their positions toward that agent. It is important to note that humpback whales swim around their prey simultaneously in a circular, shrinking circle and along a spiral-shaped path. By using a mathematical model, the spiral bubble-net feeding maneuver is optimized. The following equation represents this behavior:(18)๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ+1)=๏ฟฝโ€ฒโ†’ยท๏ฟฝblยทcos(2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝโˆ—โ†’(๏ฟฝ)

Where:(19)๏ฟฝโ€ฒโ†’=|๏ฟฝโˆ—โ†’(๏ฟฝ)-๏ฟฝโ†’(๏ฟฝ)|

Xโ†’(t+ 1) indicates the distance of the it h whale to the prey (best solution obtained so far),๏ฟฝ is a constant for defining the shape of the logarithmic spiral, l is a random number in [โˆ’1, 1], and dot (.) is an element-by-element multiplication [55].

Comparing the four above-mentioned methods, simulations are run with 10 search agents for 400 iterations. In Figure 15, there are 20 plots the optimal values of different parameters in optimization algorithms. The five parameters of this study are freeboard, bottom elevations, number of ribs on the converter, rib thickness, and rib Height. The optimal value for each was found by optimization algorithms, naming WOA, MVO, MFO, and GWO. By looking through the first row, the freeboard parameter converges to its maximum possible value in the optimization process of GWO after 300 iterations. Similarly, MFO finds the same result as GWO. In contrast, the freeboard converges to its minimum possible value in MVO optimizing process, which indicates positioning the converter under the water. Furthermore, WOA found the optimal value of freeboard as around 0.02 after almost 200 iterations. In the second row, the bottom elevation is found at almost 0.11 (m) in all algorithms; however, the curves follow different trends in each algorithm. The third row shows the number of ribs, where results immediately reveal that it should be over 4. All algorithms coincide at 5 ribs as the optimal number in this process. The fourth row displays the trends of algorithms to find optimal rib thickness. MFO finds the optimal value early and sets it to around 0.022, while others find the same value in higher iterations. Finally, regarding the rib height, MVO, MFO, and GWO state that the optimal value is 0.06 meters, but WOA did not find a higher value than 0.039.

4.2. HCMVO Bi-level Approach

Despite several strong search characteristics of MVO and its high performance in various optimization problems, it suffers from a few deficiencies in local and global search mechanisms. For instance, it is trapped in the local optimum when wormholes stochastically generate many solutions near the best universe achieved throughout iterations, especially in solving complex multimodal problems with high dimensions [57]. Furthermore, MVO needs to be modified by an escaping strategy from the local optima to enhance the global search abilities. To address these shortages, we propose a fast and effective meta-algorithm (HCMVO) to combine MVO with a Random-restart hill-climbing local search. This meta-algorithm uses MVO on the upper level to develop global tracking and provide a range of feasible and proper solutions. The hill-climbing algorithm is designed to develop a comprehensive neighborhood search around the best-found solution proposed by the upper-level (MVO) when MVO is faced with a stagnation issue or falling into a local optimum. The performance threshold is formulated as follows.(20)ฮ”๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝTHD=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝTH๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝTH๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-1๏ฟฝwhere BestTHDis the best-found solution per generation, andM is related to the domain of iterations to compute the average performance of MVO. If the proposed best solution by the local search is better than the initial one, the global best of MVO will be updated. HCMVO iteratively runs hill climbing when the performance of MVO goes down, each time with an initial condition to prepare for escaping such undesirable situations. In order to get a better balance between exploration and exploitation, the search step size linearly decreases as follows:(21)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝMa๏ฟฝiter๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+1where iter and Maxiter are the current iteration and maximum number of evaluation, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ stands for the step size of the neighborhood search. Meanwhile, this strategy can improve the convergence rate of MVO compared with other algorithms.

Algorithm 1 shows the technical details of the proposed optimization method (HCMVO). The initial solution includes freeboard (๏ฟฝ), bottom elevation (๏ฟฝ), number of ribs (Nr), rib thickness (๏ฟฝ), and rib height(๏ฟฝ).

5. Conclusion

The high trend of diminishing worldwide energy resources has entailed a great crisis upon vulnerable societies. To withstand this effect, developing renewable energy technologies can open doors to a more reliable means, among which the wave energy converters will help the coastal residents and infrastructure. This paper set out to determine the optimized design for such devices that leads to the highest possible power output. The main goal of this research was to demonstrate the best design for an oscillating surge wave energy converter using a novel metaheuristic optimization algorithm. In this regard, the methodology was devised such that it argued the effects of influential parameters, including wave characteristics, WEC design, and interaction criteria.

To begin with, a numerical model was developed in Flow 3D software to simulate the response of the flap of a wave energy converter to incoming waves, followed by a validation study based upon a well-reputed experimental study to verify the accuracy of the model. Secondly, the hydrodynamics of the flap was investigated by incorporating the turbulence. The effect of depth, wave height, and wave period are also investigated in this part. The influence of two novel ideas on increasing the wave-converter interaction was then assessed: i) designing a flap with different widths in the upper and lower part, and ii) adding ribs on the surface of the flap. Finally, four trending single-objective metaheuristic optimization methods

Empty CellAlgorithm 1: Hill Climb Multiverse Optimization
01:procedure HCMVO
02:๏ฟฝ=30,๏ฟฝ=5โ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
03:๏ฟฝ=ใ€ˆF1,B1,N,R,H1ใ€‰,โ€ฆใ€ˆFN,B2,N,R,HNใ€‰โ‡’lb1Nโฉฝ๏ฟฝโฉฝubN
04:Initialize parameters๏ฟฝER,๏ฟฝDR,๏ฟฝEP,Best๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝite๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ–นWormhole existence probability (WEP)
05:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)
06:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=Normalize the inflation rate๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
07:for iter in[1,โ‹ฏ,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝiter]do
08:for๏ฟฝin[1,โ‹ฏ,๏ฟฝ]do
09:Update๏ฟฝEP,๏ฟฝDR,Black๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝIndex=๏ฟฝ
10:for๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[1,โ‹ฏ,๏ฟฝ]๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
11:๏ฟฝ1=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ()
12:if๏ฟฝ1โ‰ค๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)then
13:White HoleIndex=Roulette๏ฟฝheelSelection(-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)
14:๏ฟฝ(Black HoleIndex,๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(White HoleIndex,๏ฟฝ)
15:end if
16:๏ฟฝ2=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ([0,๏ฟฝ])
17:if๏ฟฝ2โ‰ค๏ฟฝEPthen
18:๏ฟฝ3=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(),๏ฟฝ4=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ()
19:if๏ฟฝ3<0.5then
20:๏ฟฝ1=((๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ))ร—๏ฟฝ4+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ))
21:๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ)=Best๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝDRร—๏ฟฝ
22:else
23:๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ)=Best๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)-๏ฟฝDRร—๏ฟฝ
24:end if
25:end if
26:end for
27:end for
28:๏ฟฝHD=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ([๏ฟฝ1,๏ฟฝ2,โ‹ฏ,๏ฟฝNp])
29:Bes๏ฟฝTH๏ฟฝitr=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝHD
30:ฮ”BestTHD=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝBestTII๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-BestTII๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-1๏ฟฝ
31:ifฮ”BestTHD<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝthenโ–นPerform hill climbing local search
32:BestTHD=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝlim๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝTHD
33:end if
34:end for
35:return๏ฟฝ,BestTHDโ–นFinal configuration
36:end procedure

The implementation details of the hill-climbing algorithm applied in HCMPA can be seen in Algorithm 2. One of the critical parameters isg, which denotes the resolution of the neighborhood search around the proposed global best by MVO. If we set a small step size for hill-climbing, the convergence speed will be decreased. On the other hand, a large step size reinforces the exploration ability. Still, it may reduce the exploitation ability and in return increase the act of jumping from a global optimum or surfaces with high-potential solutions. Per each decision variable, the neighborhood search evaluates two different direct searches, incremental or decremental. After assessing the generated solutions, the best candidate will be selected to iterate the search algorithm. It is noted that the hill-climbing algorithm should not be applied in the initial iteration of the optimization process due to the immense tendency for converging to local optima. Meanwhile, for optimizing largescale problems, hill-climbing is not an appropriate selection. In order to improve understanding of the proposed hybrid optimization algorithmโ€™s steps, the flowchart of HCMVO is designed and can be seen in Figure 16.

Figure 17 shows the observed capture factor (which is the absorbed energy with respect to the available energy) by each optimization algorithm from iterations 1 to 400. The algorithms use ten search agents in their modified codes to find the optimal solutions. While GWO and MFO remain roughly constant after iterations 54 and 40, the other three algorithms keep improving the capture factor. In this case, HCMVO and MVO worked very well in the optimizing process with a capture factor obtained by the former as 0.594 and by the latter as 0.593. MFO almost found its highest value before the iteration 50, which means the exploration part of the algorithm works out well. Similarly, HCMVO does the same. However, it keeps finding the better solution during the optimization process until the last iteration, indicating the strong exploitation part of the algorithm. GWO reveals a weakness in exploration and exploitation because not only does it evoke the least capture factor value, but also the curve remains almost unchanged throughout 350 iterations.

Figure 18 illustrates complex interactions between the five optimization parameters and the capture factor for HCMVO (a), MPA (b), and MFO (c) algorithms. The first interesting observation is that there is a high level of nonlinear relationships among the setting parameters that can make a multi-modal search space. The dark blue lines represent the best-found configuration throughout the optimisation process. Based on both HCMVO (a) and MVO (b), we can infer that the dark blue lines concentrate in a specific range, showing the high convergence ability of both HCMVO and MVO. However, MFO (c) could not find the exact optimal range of the decision variables, and the best-found solutions per generation distribute mostly all around the search space.

Empty CellAlgorithm 1: Hill Climb Multiverse Optimization
01:procedure HCMVO
02:Initialization
03:Initialize the constraints๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ
04:๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ=Mi๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝโ–นCompute the step size,๏ฟฝis search resolution
05:So๏ฟฝ1=ใ€ˆ๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝใ€‰โ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
06:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝSo๏ฟฝ1โ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
07:Main loop
08:for iterโ‰ค๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝita=do
09:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยฑ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
10:while๏ฟฝโ‰ค๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(Sol1)do
11:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ,โ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž
12:fitness๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝiter=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
13:t = t+1
14:end while
15:ใ€ˆ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝmaxใ€‰=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
16:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝitev=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝInde๏ฟฝmaxโ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
17:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ-๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝMax๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+1โ–น๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
18:end for
19:return๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝiter,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ
20:end procedure

were utilized to illuminate the optimum values of the design parameters, and the best method was chosen to develop a new algorithm that performs both local and global search methods.

The correlation between hydrodynamic parameters and the capture factor of the converter was supported by the results. For any given water depth, the capture factor increases as the wave period increases, until a certain wave period value (6 seconds) is reached, after which the capture factor gradually decreases. It is expected since the flap cannot oscillate effectively when the wavelength is too short for a certain water depth. Conversely, when the wavelength is too long, the capture factor decreases. Furthermore, under a constant wave period, increasing the water depth does not affect the capture factor. Regarding the sensitivity analysis, the study found that increasing the flap bottom elevation causes turbulence flow behind the flap and limitation of rotation, which leads to less interaction with the incoming waves. Furthermore, while keeping the flap bottom elevation constant, increasing the freeboard improves the capture factor. Overtopping happens when the freeboard is negative and the flap is below the water surface, which has a detrimental influence on converter performance. Furthermore, raising the freeboard causes the wave impact to become more violent, which increases converter performance.

In the last part, we discussed the search process of each algorithm and visualized their performance and convergence curves as they try to find the best values for decision variables. Among the four selected metaheuristic algorithms, the Multi-verse Optimizer proved to be the most effective in achieving the best answer in terms of the WEC capture factor. However, the MVO needed modifications regarding its escape approach from the local optima in order to improve its global search capabilities. To overcome these constraints, we presented a fast and efficient meta-algorithm (HCMVO) that combines MVO with a Random-restart hill-climbing local search. On a higher level, this meta-algorithm employed MVO to generate global tracking and present a range of possible and appropriate solutions. Taken together, the results demonstrated that there is a significant degree of nonlinearity among the setup parameters that might result in a multimodal search space. Since MVO was faced with a stagnation issue or fell into a local optimum, we constructed a complete neighborhood search around the best-found solution offered by the upper level. In sum, the newly-developed algorithm proved to be highly effective for the problem compared to other similar optimization methods. The strength of the current findings may encourage future investigation on design optimization of wave energy converters using developed geometry as well as the novel approach.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Erfan Amini: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization. Mahdieh Nasiri: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization. Navid Salami Pargoo: Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Zahra Mozhgani: Conceptualization, Methodology. Danial Golbaz: Writing โ€“ original draft. Mehrdad Baniesmaeil: Writing โ€“ original draft. Meysam Majidi Nezhad: . Mehdi Neshat: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization. Davide Astiaso Garcia: Supervision. Georgios Sylaios: Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This research has been carried out within ILIAD (Inte-grated Digital Framework for Comprehensive Maritime Data and Information Services) project that received funding from the European Unionโ€™s H2020 programme.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

Figure 14. Defects: (a) Unmelt defects(Scheme NO.4);(b) Pores defects(Scheme NO.1); (c); Spattering defect (Scheme NO.3); (d) Low overlapping rate defects(Scheme NO.5).

Molten pool structure, temperature and velocity
flow in selective laser melting AlCu5MnCdVA alloy

์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์„ ํƒ์  ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต AlCu5MnCdVA ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ

Pan Lu1 , Zhang Cheng-Lin2,6,Wang Liang3, Liu Tong4 and Liu Jiang-lin5
1 Aviation and Materials College, Anhui Technical College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Wuhu Anhui 241000, Peopleโ€™s
Republic of China 2 School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei Anhui 230026, Peopleโ€™s Republic of China 3 Anhui Top Additive Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhu Anhui 241300, Peopleโ€™s Republic of China 4 Anhui Chungu 3D Printing Institute of Intelligent Equipment and Industrial Technology, Anhui 241300, Peopleโ€™s Republic of China 5 School of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, Peopleโ€™s Republic of
China 6 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
E-mail: ahjdpanlu@126.com, jiao__zg@126.com, ahjdjxx001@126.com,tongliu1988@126.com and liujianglin@tyut.edu.cn

Keywords

SLM, molten pool, AlCu5MnCdVA alloy, heat flow, velocity flow, numerical simulation

Abstract

์„ ํƒ์  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต(SLM)์€ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ, ์šฉ์œต, ์ƒ์ „์ด, ๊ธฐํ™” ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋™์  ๋น„ํ‰ํ˜• ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์ธ ๊ธˆ์† ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ(MAM)์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์œ ๋งํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ(๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์˜จ๋„ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ํ๋ฆ„)์€ SLM์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ์„ฑํ˜• ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ ํƒ์  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต AlCu5MnCdVA ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์˜จ๋„ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ์†๋„์žฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์šฉ์œตํ’€์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ(๊นŠ์€ ์˜ค๋ชฉ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์ด์ค‘ ์˜ค๋ชฉ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ํ‰๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ๋Œ์ถœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ํ‰๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์กฐ)๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์•ฝ 132 ฮผm ร— 107 ฮผm ร— 50 ฮผm์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. : ์šฉ์œตํ’€์€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ตฌ๋™๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊นŠ์ด 15ฮผm์˜ ๊นŠ์€ ์˜ค๋ชฉํ˜•์ƒ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์„ฑํ˜• ํ›„๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์žฅ๋ ฅ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋†’์ด 10ฮผm์˜ ๋Œ์ถœํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ํ๋ฆ„์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ๋ ฅ, ๊ธˆ์† ์•ก์ฒด ์ค‘๋ ฅ, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ตฌ๋™๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AlCu5MnCdVA ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ธˆ์† ์•ก์ฒด ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉฐ(3.5 ร— 10-4 S), ๊ฐ€์—ด ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 6.5 ร— 107 K S-1 ๋ฐ 1.6 ร— 106 K S-1 ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๊ฐ์  ํ‘œ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ AlCu5MnCdVA ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ฐฝ์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค: ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ 250W, ๋ถ€ํ™” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ 0.11mm, ์ธต ๋‘๊ป˜ 0.03mm, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„ 1.5m s-1 .

๋˜ํ•œ, ์‹คํ—˜ ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ…๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•  ๋•Œ, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํญ์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์•ฝ 205um ๋ฐ ์•ฝ 210um์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ๋‘ ์šฉ์œต ํŠธ๋ž™ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์•ฝ 65um์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ธ์‡„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์น˜ํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) has become one of the most promising technologies in Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM), which is a complex dynamic non-equilibrium process involving heat transfer, melting, phase transition, vaporization and mass transfer. The characteristics of the molten pool (structure, temperature flow and velocity flow) have a decisive influence on the final forming quality of SLM. In this study, both numerical simulation and experiments were employed to study molten pool structure, temperature flow and velocity field in Selective Laser Melting AlCu5MnCdVA alloy. The results showed the structure of molten pool showed different forms(deep-concave structure, double-concave structure, plane structure, protruding structure and ideal planar structure), and the size of the molten pool was approximately 132 ฮผm ร— 107 ฮผm ร— 50 ฮผm: in the early stage, molten pool was in a state of deep-concave shape with a depth of 15 ฮผm due to multiple driving forces, while a protruding shape with a height of 10 ฮผm duo to tension gradient in the later stages of forming. The metal flow inside the molten pool was mainly driven by laser impact force, metal liquid gravity, surface tension and recoil pressure. For AlCu5MnCdVA alloy, metal liquid solidification speed was extremely fast(3.5 ร— 10โˆ’4 S), the heating rate and cooling rate reached 6.5 ร— 107 K Sโˆ’1 and 1.6 ร— 106 K Sโˆ’1 , respectively. Choosing surface roughness as a visual standard, low-laser energy AlCu5MnCdVA alloy optimum process parameters window was obtained by numerical simulation: laser power 250 W, hatching space 0.11 mm, layer thickness 0.03 mm, laser scanning velocity 1.5 m sโˆ’1 . In addition, compared with experimental printing and numerical simulation, the width of the molten pool was about 205 um and about 210 um, respectively, and overlapping between two adjacent molten tracks was all about 65 um. The results showed that the numerical simulation results were basically consistent with the experimental print results, which proved the correctness of the numerical simulation model.

Figure 1. AlCu5MnCdVA powder particle size distribution.
Figure 1. AlCu5MnCdVA powder particle size distribution.
Figure 2. AlCu5MnCdVA powder
Figure 2. AlCu5MnCdVA powder
Figure 3. Finite element model and calculation domains of SLM.
Figure 3. Finite element model and calculation domains of SLM.
Figure 4. SLM heat transfer process.
Figure 4. SLM heat transfer process.
Figure 14. Defects: (a) Unmelt defects(Scheme NO.4);(b) Pores defects(Scheme NO.1); (c); Spattering defect (Scheme NO.3); (d) Low
overlapping rate defects(Scheme NO.5).
Figure 17. Two-pass molten tracks overlapping for Scheme NO.2.
Figure 17. Two-pass molten tracks overlapping for Scheme NO.2.

References

[1] Cuiyun H 2008 Phase diagram determination and thermodynamic study of Alโ€“Cuโ€“Mn, Alโ€“Cuโ€“Si, Alโ€“Mgโ€“Ni and Niโ€“Tiโ€“Si systems Central South University
[2] Zhanfei Z 2017 Study on theta phase segregation and room temperature properties of high strength cast Alโ€“Cuโ€“Mn alloy Lanzhou University of Technology
[3] Nie X et al 2018 Analysis of processing parameters and characteristics of selective laser melted high strength Alโ€“Cuโ€“Mg alloys: from single tracks to cubic samplesJ. Mater. Process. Technol. 256 69โ€“77
[4] Shenping Y et al 2017 Laser absorptance measurement of commonly used metal materials in laser additive manufacturing technology Aviation Manufacturing Technology 12 23โ€“9
[5] Wenqing W 2007 Relationship between cooling rate and grain size of AlCu5MnCdVA alloy Harbin University of Technology
[6] Majeed M, Vural M, Raja S and Bilal Naim Shaikh M 2019 Finite element analysis of thermal behavior in maraging steel during SLM process Optik 208 113โ€“24
[7] Khairallah S A, Anderson A T, Rubenchik A and King W E 2016 Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones Acta Mater. 108 36โ€“45
[8] Bo C, Zhiyu X, Quanquan Z, Yuanbiao W, Liping W and Jin C 2020 Process optimization and microstructure and properties of SLM forming Cu6AlNiSnInCe imitation gold alloy Chin. J. Nonferr. Met. 30 372โ€“82
[9] Li W 2012 Research on performance of metal parts formed by selective laser melting Huazhong University of Science and Technology
[10] Yu Q 2013 The influence of different laser heat sources on the surface shape of the molten pool in laser cladding Surf. Technol. 42 40โ€“3

[11] Xianfeng J, Xiangchen M, Rongwei S, Xigen Y and Ming Y 2015 Research on the influence of material state change on temperature field
in SLM processing Applied Laser 35 155โ€“9
[12] Kรถrner C, Attar E and Heinl P 2011 Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processesJ. Mater. Process. Technol. 211 978โ€“87
[13] Yadroitsev I, Gusarov A, Yadroitsava I and Smurov I 2010 Single track formation in selective laser melting of metal powdersJ. Mater.
Process. Technol. 210 1624โ€“31
[14] King W, Anderson A T, Ferencz R M, Hodge N E, Kamath C and Khairallah S A 2014 Overview of modelling and simulation of metal
powder bed fusion process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Mater. Sci. Technol. 31 957โ€“68
[15] Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C and Everson R 2013 Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built
without-support in selective laser melting Materials & Design (1980โ€“2015) 52 638โ€“47
[16] Qiu C, Panwisawas C, Ward M, Basoalto H C, Brooks J W and Attallah M M 2015 On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and
porosity development during selective laser melting Acta Mater. 96 72โ€“9
[17] Weihao Y, Hui C and Qingsong W 2020 Thermodynamic behavior of laser selective melting molten pool under the action of recoil
pressure Journal of Mechanical Engineering 56 213โ€“9
[18] Weijuan Y 2019 Numerical simulation of melt pool temperature field and morphology evolution during laser selective melting process
Xiโ€™an University of Technology
[19] Genwang W 2017 Research on the establishment of laser heat source model based on energy distribution and its simulation application
Harbin Institute of Technology
[20] FLOW-3D 2017 User Manual (USA: FLOW SCIENCE)
[21] Hirt C and Nichols B 1981 Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundariesJ. Comput. Phys. 39 201โ€“25
[22] Hu Z, Zhang H, Zhu H, Xiao Z, Nie X and Zeng X 2019 Microstructure, mechanical properties and strengthening mechanisms of
AlCu5MnCdVA aluminum alloy fabricated by selective laser melting Materials Science and Engineering: A 759 154โ€“66
[23] Ketai H, Liu Z and Lechang Y 2020 Simulation of temperature field, microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel in
selected laser melting Progress in Laser and Optoelectronics 9 1โ€“18
[24] Cao L 2020 Workpiece-scale numerical simulations of SLM molten pool dynamic behavior of 316L stainless steel Comput. Math. Appl.
4 22โ€“34
[25] Dening Z, Yongping L, Tinglu H and Junyi S 2000 Numerical study of fluid flow and heat transfer in molten pool under the condition of
moving heat source J. Met. 4 387โ€“90
[26] Chengyun C, Cui F and Wenlong Z 2018 The effect of Marangoni flow on the thermal behavior and melt flow behavior of laser cladding
Applied Laser 38 409โ€“16
[27] Peiying B and Enhuai Y 2020 The effect of laser power on the morphology and residual stress of the molten pool of metal laser selective
melting Progress in Laser and Optoelectronics 7 1โ€“12 http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1690.TN.20190717.0933.032.html
[28] Zhen L, Dongyun Z, Zhe F and Chengjie W 2017 Numerical simulation of the influence of overlap rate on the forming quality of
Inconel 718 alloy by selective laser melting processing Applied Laser 37 187โ€“93
[29] Wei W, Qi L, Guang Y, Lanyun Q and Xiong X 2015 Numerical simulation of electromagnetic field, temperature field and flowfield of
laser melting pool under the action of electromagnetic stirring China Laser 42 48โ€“55
[30] Hu Y, He X, Yu G and Zhao S 2016 Capillary convection in pulsedโ€”butt welding of miscible dissimilar couple Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 231 2429โ€“40
[31] Li R 2010 Research on the key basic problems of selective laser melting forming of metal powder Huazhong University of Science and
Technology
[32] Zijue T, Weiwei L, Zhaorui Y, Hao W and Hongchao Z 2019 Study on the shape evolution behavior of metal laser melting deposition
based on molten pool dynamic characteristicsJournal of Mechanical Engineering 55 39โ€“47
[33] Pan L, Cheng-Lin Z, Hai-Yi L, Liang W and Tong L 2020 A new two-step selective laser remelting of 316L stainless steel: process,
density, surface roughness, mechanical properties, microstructure Mater. Res. Express 7 056503
[34] Pan L, Cheng-Lin Z, Hai-Yi L, Jiang H, Tong L and Liang W 2019 The influence and optimization of forming process parameters of
316L stainless steel prepared by laser melting on the density Forging Technology 44 103โ€“9

Figure 15. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on a wall under different Reynolds numbers.

Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment

byย Hongbo Miย 1,2, Chuan Wangย 1,3, Xuanwen Jiaย 3,*, Bo Huย 2, Hongliang Wangย 4, Hui Wangย 3ย and Yong Zhuย 5

1College of Mechatronics Engineering, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China

2Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

3College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

4School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering/Flight College, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China

5National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.Sustainability2023,ย 15(6), 5159;ย https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

Received: 30 January 2023ย /ย Revised: 4 March 2023ย /ย Accepted: 10 March 2023ย /ย Published: 14 March 2023(This article belongs to the Special Issueย Advanced Technologies of Renewable Energy and Water Management for Sustainable Environment

Abstract

Due to their high efficiency, low heat loss and associated sustainability advantages, impinging jets have been used extensively in marine engineering, geotechnical engineering and other engineering practices. In this paper, the flow structure and impact characteristics of impinging jets with different Reynolds numbers and impact distances are systematically studied by Flow-3D based on PIV experiments. In the study, the relevant state parameters of the jets are dimensionlessly treated, obtaining not only the linear relationship between the length of the potential nucleation zone and the impinging distance, but also the linear relationship between the axial velocity and the axial distance in the impinging zone. In addition, after the jet impinges on the flat plate, the vortex action range caused by the wall-attached flow of the jet gradually decreases inward with the increase of the impinging distance. By examining the effect of Reynolds number Re on the hydraulic characteristics of the submerged impact jet, it can be found that the structure of the continuous submerged impact jet is relatively independent of the Reynolds number. At the same time, the final simulation results demonstrate the applicability of the linear relationship between the length of the potential core region and the impact distance. This study provides methodological guidance and theoretical support for relevant engineering practice and subsequent research on impinging jets, which has strong theoretical and practical significance.

Keywords: 

PIV;ย Flow-3D;ย impinging jet;ย hydraulic characteristics;ย impinging distance

Sustainability 15 05159 g001 550

Figure 1. Geometric model.

Sustainability 15 05159 g002 550

Figure 2.ย Model grid schematic.

Sustainability 15 05159 g003 550

Figure 3.ย (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup; (b) PIV images of vertical impinging jets with velocity fields.

Sustainability 15 05159 g004 550

Figure 4. (a) Velocity distribution verification at the outlet of the jet pipe; (b) Distribution of flow angle in the mid-axis of the jet [39].

Sustainability 15 05159 g005 550

Figure 5. Along-range distribution of the dimensionless axial velocity of the jet at different impact distances.Figure 6 shows the variation of H

Sustainability 15 05159 g006 550

Figure 6.ย Relationship between the distribution of potential core region and the impact heightย H/D.

Sustainability 15 05159 g007 550

Figure 7. The relationship between the potential core length 

Sustainability 15 05159 g008 550

Figure 8.ย Along-range distribution of the flow angleย ฯ†ย of the jet at different impact distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g009 550

Figure 9.ย Velocity distribution along the axis of the jet at different impinging regions.

Sustainability 15 05159 g010 550

Figure 10. The absolute value distribution of slope under different impact distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g011a 550
Sustainability 15 05159 g011b 550

Figure 11. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on wall under different impinging distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g012 550

Figure 12.ย Along-range distribution of the dimensionless axial velocity of the jet at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g013 550

Figure 13. Along-range distribution of the flow angle ฯ† of the jet at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g014 550

Figure 14. Velocity distribution along the jet axis at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g015 550

Figure 15. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on a wall under different Reynolds numbers.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F.; Liang, C.; Tan, S. Using a high-pressure water jet-assisted tunnel boring machine to break rock. Adv. Mech. Eng. 202012, 1687814020962290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shi, X.; Zhang, G.; Xu, G.; Ma, Y.; Wu, X. Inactivating Microorganism on Medical Instrument Using Plasma Jet. High Volt. Eng. 200935, 632โ€“635. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gao, Y.; Han, P.; Wang, F.; Cao, J.; Zhang, S. Study on the Characteristics of Water Jet Breaking Coal Rock in a Drilling Hole. Sustainability 202214, 8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Ge, J.; Zhang, D.; Gao, Z. Numerical study of continuous jet impinging on a rotating wall based on Wrayโ€”Agarwal turbulence model. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 202244, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, B.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ge, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y. Numerical Simulation Study of the Horizontal Submerged Jet Based on the Wrayโ€”Agarwal Turbulence Model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 202210, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dahiya, A.K.; Bhuyan, B.K.; Kumar, S. Perspective study of abrasive water jet machining of compositesโ€”A review. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 202236, 213โ€“224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abushanab, W.S.; Moustafa, E.B.; Harish, M.; Shanmugan, S.; Elsheikh, A.H. Experimental investigation on surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy during abrasive water jet machining process. Alex. Eng. J. 202261, 7529โ€“7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, C.; Ge, J.; Zhang, Y. A numerical study of a submerged water jet impinging on a stationary wall. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 202210, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, J.; Shen, H.; Xie, W.; Zhai, S.; Xi, G. Influence of flow fluctuation characteristics on flow and heat transfer in different regions. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 826โ€“833. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhai, S.; Xie, F.; Yin, G.; Xi, G. Effect of gap ratio on vortex-induced vibration characteristics of different blunt bodies near-wall. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 1132โ€“1138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Tao, L. PIV experiment and numerical simulation of trailing vortex structure of improved INTER-MIG impeller. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 158โ€“164. [Google Scholar]
  12. Han, B.; Yao, Z.; Tang, R.; Xu, H. On the supersonic impinging jet by laser Doppler velocimetry. Exp. Meas. Fluid Mech. 200216, 99โ€“103. [Google Scholar]
  13. Darisse, A.; Lemay, J.; Benaissa, A. LDV measurements of well converged third order moments in the far field of a free turbulent round jet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 201344, 825โ€“833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Kumar, A. Effect of initial conditions on mean flow characteristics of a three dimensional turbulent wall jet. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2021235, 6177โ€“6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tao, D.; Zhang, R.; Ying, C. Development and application of the pollutant diffusion testing apparatus based on the image analysis. J. Saf. Environ. 201616, 247โ€“251. [Google Scholar]
  16. Seo, H.; Kim, K.C. Experimental study on flow and turbulence characteristics of bubbly jet with low void fraction. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2021142, 103738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wen, Q.; Sha, J.; Liu, Y. TR-PIV measurement of the turbulent submerged jet and POB analysis of the dynamic structure. J. Exp. Fluid Mech. 20144, 16โ€“24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Shi, W.; He, Z.; Han, Y.; Xiao, Y. Interstage difference of pressure pulsation in a three-stage electrical submersible pump. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2021196, 107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, S. An improved convolutional neural network with an adaptable learning rate towards multi-signal fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump. Adv. Eng. Inform. 202150, 101406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, Y.; Song, X.; Li, K.; Yan, X. Hybrid modeling for submergence depth of the pumping well using stochastic configuration networks with random sampling. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2022208, 109423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, S. A novel adaptive convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump with acoustic images. Adv. Eng. Inform. 202252, 101554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Long, J.; Song, X.; Shi, J.; Chen, J. Optimization and CFD Analysis on Nozzle Exit Position of Two-phase Ejector. J. Refrig. 202243, 39โ€“45. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ni, Q.; Ruan, W. Optimization design of desilting jet pump parameters based on response surface model. J. Ship Mech. 202226, 365โ€“374. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, K.; Zhu, X.; Ren, X.; Qiu, Q.; Shen, S. Numerical investigation on the effect of nozzle position for design of high performance ejector. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017126, 594โ€“601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Tang, Y. Numerical study for the influences of primary steam nozzle distance and mixing chamber throat diameter on steam ejector performance. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2018132, 509โ€“516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lucas, C.; Rusche, H.; Schroeder, A.; Koehler, J. Numerical investigation of a two-phase CO2 ejector. Int. J. Refrigeration 201443, 154โ€“166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, X.; Zhu, T.; Fu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Chen, W. Numerical simulation of rock breaking by abrasive water jet. J. Coast. Res. 201993, 274โ€“283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, L.; Liu, Y.; Shen, K.; Yang, X.; Ba, Q.; Xiong, W. Numerical research on the dynamic rock-breaking process of impact drilling with multi-nozzle water jets. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021207, 109145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lei, C.; Zhou, Y.; Qiu, X. Numerical Simulation on Internal Flow Field of a Self-excited Oscillation Pulsed Jet Nozzle with Back-flow. Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerosp. Eng. 202241, 998โ€“1002. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, J.; Ni, F.; Gu, L. Numerical method of FLOW-3D for sediment erosion simulation. China Harb. Eng. 201939, 6โ€“11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Al Shaikhli, H.I.; Khassaf, S.I. Using of flow 3d as CFD materials approach in waves generation. Mater. Today Proc. 202249, 2907โ€“2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kosaj, R.; Alboresha, R.S.; Sulaiman, S.O. Comparison Between Numerical Flow3d Software and Laboratory Data, For Sediment Incipient Motion. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022961, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Du, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, X.; Yu, X. Long-distance water hammer protection of pipeline after pump being first lowered and then rasied. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 1248โ€“1253, 1267. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao, F.; Li, X.; Gao, Q. Experiment and numerical simulation on hydraulic characteristics of novel trapezoidal measuring weir. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 1104โ€“1111. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tu, A.; Nie, X.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Experimental and simulation study on water infiltration characteristics of layered red soil. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 1243โ€“1249. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen, J.; Zeng, B.; Liu, L.; Tao, K.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, D. Investigating the anchorage performance of full-grouted anchor bolts with a modified numerical simulation method. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022141, 106640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, B.; Yao, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y. Flow and Performance of the Disk Cavity of a Marine Gas Turbine at Varying Nozzle Pressure and Low Rotation Speeds: A Numerical Investigation. Machines 202311, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Jin, B.; Ding, S. Orthogonal test of important parameters affecting hydraulic performance of negative pressure feedback jet sprinkler. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 966โ€“972. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Lu, W.; Tan, S.K.; Zhou, L. Experimental investigation on impingement of a submerged circular water jet at varying impinging angles and Reynolds numbers. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 201789, 189โ€“198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Speziale, C.G.; Thangam, S. Analysis of an RNG based turbulence model for separated flows. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 199230, 1379โ€“1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Hassan, M.; Assoum, H.H.; Sobolik, V.; Vรฉtel, J.; Abed-Meraim, K.; Garon, A.; Sakout, A. Experimental investigation of the wall shear stress and the vortex dynamics in a circular impinging jet. Exp. Fluids 201252, 1475โ€“1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fairweather, M.; Hargrave, G. Experimental investigation of an axisymmetric, impinging turbulent jet. 1. Velocity field. Exp. Fluids 200233, 464โ€“471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ashforth-Frost, S.; Jambunathan, K. Effect of nozzle geometry and semi-confinement on the potential core of a turbulent axisymmetric free jet. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 199623, 155โ€“162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, M.; Huang, H.; Wang, D.; Lv, S.; Chen, Y. PIV tests for flow characteristics of impinging jet in a semi-closed circular pipe. J. Vib. Shock 202140, 90โ€“97, 113. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisherโ€™s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

ยฉ 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

      

MDPI and ACS Style

Mi, H.; Wang, C.; Jia, X.; Hu, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y. Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment. Sustainability 202315, 5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

AMA Style

Mi H, Wang C, Jia X, Hu B, Wang H, Wang H, Zhu Y. Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6):5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159Chicago/Turabian Style

Mi, Hongbo, Chuan Wang, Xuanwen Jia, Bo Hu, Hongliang Wang, Hui Wang, and Yong Zhu. 2023. “Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment” Sustainability 15, no. 6: 5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

Figure 5 A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

Physical and Numerical Modeling of the Impeller Construction Impact on the Aluminum Degassing Process

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํƒˆ๊ธฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ž„ํŽ ๋Ÿฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Kamil Kuglin,1 Michaล‚ Szucki,2 Jacek Pieprzyca,3 Simon Genthe,2 Tomasz Merder,3 and Dorota Kalisz1,*

Mikael Ersson, Academic Editor

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Go to:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of tests on the suitability of designed heads (impellers) for aluminum refining. The research was carried out on a physical model of the URO-200, followed by numerical simulations in the FLOW 3D program. Four design variants of impellers were used in the study. The degree of dispersion of the gas phase in the model liquid was used as a criterion for evaluating the performance of each solution using different process parameters, i.e., gas flow rate and impeller speed. Afterward, numerical simulations in Flow 3D software were conducted for the best solution. These simulations confirmed the results obtained with the water model and verified them.

Keywords: aluminum, impeller construction, degassing process, numerical modeling, physical modeling

Go to:

1. Introduction

Constantly increasing requirements concerning metallurgical purity in terms of hydrogen content and nonmetallic inclusions make casting manufacturers use effective refining techniques. The answer to this demand is the implementation of the aluminum refining technique making use of a rotor with an original design guaranteeing efficient refining [1,2,3,4]. The main task of the impeller (rotor) is to reduce the contamination of liquid metal (primary and recycled aluminum) with hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions. An inert gas, mainly argon or a mixture of gases, is introduced through the rotor into the liquid metal to bring both hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions to the metal surface through the flotation process. Appropriately and uniformly distributed gas bubbles in the liquid metal guarantee achieving the assumed level of contaminant removal economically. A very important factor in deciding about the obtained degassing effect is the optimal rotor design [5,6,7,8]. Thanks to the appropriate geometry of the rotor, gas bubbles introduced into the liquid metal are split into smaller ones, and the spinning movement of the rotor distributes them throughout the volume of the liquid metal bath. In this solution impurities in the liquid metal are removed both in the volume and from the upper surface of the metal. With a well-designed impeller, the costs of refining aluminum and its alloys can be lowered thanks to the reduced inert gas and energy consumption (optimal selection of rotor rotational speed). Shorter processing time and a high degree of dehydrogenation decrease the formation of dross on the metal surface (waste). A bigger produced dross leads to bigger process losses. Consequently, this means that the choice of rotor geometry has an indirect impact on the degree to which the generated waste is reduced [9,10].

Another equally important factor is the selection of process parameters such as gas flow rate and rotor speed [11,12]. A well-designed gas injection system for liquid metal meets two key requirements; it causes rapid mixing of the liquid metal to maintain a uniform temperature throughout the volume and during the entire process, to produce a chemically homogeneous metal composition. This solution ensures effective degassing of the metal bath. Therefore, the shape of the rotor, the arrangement of the nozzles, and their number are significant design parameters that guarantee the optimum course of the refining process. It is equally important to complete the mixing of the metal bath in a relatively short time, as this considerably shortens the refining process and, consequently, reduces the process costs. Another important criterion conditioning the implementation of the developed rotor is the generation of fine diffused gas bubbles which are distributed throughout the metal volume, and whose residence time will be sufficient for the bubbles to collide and adsorb the contaminants. The process of bubble formation by the spinning rotors differs from that in the nozzles or porous molders. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion splits the bubbles into smaller ones. Here, the rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and fluid density have a key effect on the bubble size. The velocity of the bubbles, which depends mainly on their size and shape, determines their residence time in the reactor and is, therefore, very important for the refining process, especially since gas bubbles in liquid aluminum may remain steady only below a certain size [13,14,15].

The impeller designs presented in the article were developed to improve the efficiency of the process and reduce its costs. The impellers used so far have a complicated structure and are very pricey. The success of the conducted research will allow small companies to become independent of external supplies through the possibility of making simple and effective impellers on their own. The developed structures were tested on the water model. The results of this study can be considered as pilot.

Go to:

2. Materials and Methods

Rotors were realized with the SolidWorks computer design technique and a 3D printer. The developed designs were tested on a water model. Afterward, the solution with the most advantageous refining parameters was selected and subjected to calculations with the Flow3D package. As a result, an impeller was designed for aluminum refining. Its principal lies in an even distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of liquid metal, with the largest possible participation of the bubble surface, without disturbing the metal surface. This procedure guarantees the removal of gaseous, as well as metallic and nonmetallic, impurities.

2.1. Rotor Designs

The developed impeller constructions, shown in Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 and Figure 4, were printed on a 3D printer using the PLA (polylactide) material. The impeller design models differ in their shape and the number of holes through which the inert gas flows. Figure 1Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the same impeller model but with a different number of gas outlets. The arrangement of four, eight, and 12 outlet holes was adopted in the developed design. A triangle-shaped structure equipped with three gas outlet holes is presented in Figure 4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g001.jpg

Figure 1

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with four holesโ€”variant B4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g002.jpg

Figure 2

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with eight holesโ€”variant B8.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g003.jpg

Figure 3

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with twelve holesโ€”variant B12.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g004.jpg

Figure 4

A 3D modelโ€”โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller with three holesโ€”variant RT3.

2.2. Physical Models

Investigations were carried out on a water model of the URO 200 reactor of the barbotage refining process (see Figure 5).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g005.jpg

Figure 5

A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

The URO 200 reactor can be classified as a cyclic reactor. The main element of the device is a rotor, which ends the impeller. The whole system is attached to a shaft via which the refining gas is supplied. Then, the shaft with the rotor is immersed in the liquid metal in the melting pot or the furnace chamber. In URO 200 reactors, the refining process lasts 600 s (10 min), the gas flow rate that can be obtained ranges from 5 to 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, and the speed at which the rotor can move is 0 to 400 rpm. The permissible quantity of liquid metal for barbotage refining is 300 kg or 700 kg [8,16,17]. The URO 200 has several design solutions which improve operation and can be adapted to the existing equipment in the foundry. These solutions include the following [8,16]:

  • URO-200XRโ€”used for small crucible furnaces, the capacity of which does not exceed 250 kg, with no control system and no control of the refining process.
  • URO-200SAโ€”used to service several crucible furnaces of capacity from 250 kg to 700 kg, fully automated and equipped with a mechanical rotor lift.
  • URO-200KAโ€”used for refining processes in crucible furnaces and allows refining in a ladle. The process is fully automated, with a hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200KXโ€”a combination of the XR and KA models, designed for the ladle refining process. Additionally, refining in heated crucibles is possible. The unit is equipped with a manual hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200PAโ€”designed to cooperate with induction or crucible furnaces or intermediate chambers, the capacity of which does not exceed one ton. This unit is an integral part of the furnace. The rotor lift is equipped with a screw drive.

Studies making use of a physical model can be associated with the observation of the flow and circulation of gas bubbles. They require meeting several criteria regarding the similarity of the process and the object characteristics. The similarity conditions mainly include geometric, mechanical, chemical, thermal, and kinetic parameters. During simulation of aluminum refining with inert gas, it is necessary to maintain the geometric similarity between the model and the real object, as well as the similarity related to the flow of liquid metal and gas (hydrodynamic similarity). These quantities are characterized by the Reynolds, Weber, and Froude numbers. The Froude number is the most important parameter characterizing the process, its magnitude is the same for the physical model and the real object. Water was used as the medium in the physical modeling. The factors influencing the choice of water are its availability, relatively low cost, and kinematic viscosity at room temperature, which is very close to that of liquid aluminum.

The physical model studies focused on the flow of inert gas in the form of gas bubbles with varying degrees of dispersion, particularly with respect to some flow patterns such as flow in columns and geysers, as well as disturbance of the metal surface. The most important refining parameters are gas flow rate and rotor speed. The barbotage refining studies for the developed impeller (variants B4, B8, B12, and RT3) designs were conducted for the following process parameters:

  • Rotor speed: 200, 300, 400, and 500 rpm,
  • Ideal gas flow: 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1,
  • Temperature: 293 K (20 ยฐC).

These studies were aimed at determining the most favorable variants of impellers, which were then verified using the numerical modeling methods in the Flow-3D program.

2.3. Numerical Simulations with Flow-3D Program

Testing different rotor impellers using a physical model allows for observing the phenomena taking place while refining. This is a very important step when testing new design solutions without using expensive industrial trials. Another solution is modeling by means of commercial simulation programs such as ANSYS Fluent or Flow-3D [18,19]. Unlike studies on a physical model, in a computer program, the parameters of the refining process and the object itself, including the impeller design, can be easily modified. The simulations were performed with the Flow-3D program version 12.03.02. A three-dimensional system with the same dimensions as in the physical modeling was used in the calculations. The isothermal flow of liquidโ€“gas bubbles was analyzed. As in the physical model, three speeds were adopted in the numerical tests: 200, 300, and 500 rpm. During the initial phase of the simulations, the velocity field around the rotor generated an appropriate direction of motion for the newly produced bubbles. When the required speed was reached, the generation of randomly distributed bubbles around the rotor was started at a rate of 2000 per second. Table 1 lists the most important simulation parameters.

Table 1

Values of parameters used in the calculations.

ParameterValueUnit
Maximum number of gas particles1,000,000
Rate of particle generation20001ยทsโˆ’1
Specific gas constant287.058Jยทkgโˆ’1ยทKโˆ’1
Atmospheric pressure1.013 ร— 105Pa
Water density1000kgยทmโˆ’3
Water viscosity0.001kgยทmโˆ’1ยทsโˆ’1
Boundary condition on the wallsNo-slip
Size of computational cell0.0034m

Open in a separate window

In the case of the CFD analysis, the numerical solutions require great care when generating the computational mesh. Therefore, computational mesh tests were performed prior to the CFD calculations. The effect of mesh density was evaluated by taking into account the velocity of water in the tested object on the measurement line A (height of 0.065 m from the bottom) in a characteristic cross-section passing through the object axis (see Figure 6). The mesh contained 3,207,600, 6,311,981, 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 cells.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g006.jpg

Figure 6

The velocity of the water depending on the size of the computational grid.

The quality of the generated computational meshes was checked using the criterion skewness angle QEAS [18]. This criterion is described by the following relationship:

QEAS=max{ฮฒmaxโˆ’ฮฒeq180โˆ’ฮฒeq,ฮฒeqโˆ’ฮฒminฮฒeq},

(1)

where ฮฒmaxฮฒmin are the maximal and minimal angles (in degrees) between the edges of the cell, and ฮฒeq is the angle corresponding to an ideal cell, which for cubic cells is 90ยฐ.

Normalized in the interval [0;1], the value of QEAS should not exceed 0.75, which identifies the permissible skewness angle of the generated mesh. For the computed meshes, this value was equal to 0.55โ€“0.65.

Moreover, when generating the computational grids in the studied facility, they were compacted in the areas of the highest gradients of the calculated values, where higher turbulence is to be expected (near the impeller). The obtained results of water velocity in the studied object at constant gas flow rate are shown in Figure 6.

The analysis of the obtained water velocity distributions (see Figure 6) along the line inside the object revealed that, with the density of the grid of nodal points, the velocity changed and its changes for the test cases of 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 were insignificant. Therefore, it was assumed that a grid containing not less than 7,900,000 (7,889,512) cells would not affect the result of CFD calculations.

A single-block mesh of regular cells with a size of 0.0034 m was used in the numerical calculations. The total number of cells was approximately 7,900,000 (7,889,512). This grid resolution (see Figure 7) allowed the geometry of the system to be properly represented, maintaining acceptable computation time (about 3 days on a workstation with 2ร— CPU and 12 computing cores).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g007.jpg

Figure 7

Structured equidistant mesh used in numerical calculations: (a) mesh with smoothed, surface cells (the so-called FAVOR method) used in Flow-3D; (b) visualization of the applied mesh resolution.

The calculations were conducted with an explicit scheme. The timestep was selected by the program automatically and controlled by stability and convergence. From the moment of the initial velocity field generation (start of particle generation), it was 0.0001 s.

When modeling the degassing process, three fluids are present in the system: water, gas supplied through the rotor head (impeller), and the surrounding air. Modeling such a multiphase flow is a numerically very complex issue. The necessity to overcome the liquid backpressure by the gas flowing out from the impeller leads to the formation of numerical instabilities in the volume of fluid (VOF)-based approach used by Flow-3D software. Therefore, a mixed description of the analyzed flow was used here. In this case, water was treated as a continuous medium, while, in the case of gas bubbles, the discrete phase model (DPM) model was applied. The way in which the air surrounding the system was taken into account is later described in detail.

The following additional assumptions were made in the modeling:

  • โ€”The liquid phase was considered as an incompressible Newtonian fluid.
  • โ€”The effect of chemical reactions during the refining process was neglected.
  • โ€”The composition of each phase (gas and liquid) was considered homogeneous; therefore, the viscosity and surface tension were set as constants.
  • โ€”Only full turbulence existed in the liquid, and the effect of molecular viscosity was neglected.
  • โ€”The gas bubbles were shaped as perfect spheres.
  • โ€”The mutual interaction between gas bubbles (particles) was neglected.

2.3.1. Modeling of Liquid Flow 

The motion of the real fluid (continuous medium) is described by the Navierโ€“Stokes Equation [20].

dudt=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+13ฮฝโˆ‡(โˆ‡โ‹… u)+F,

(2)

where du/dt is the time derivative, u is the velocity vector, t is the time, and F is the term accounting for external forces including gravity (unit components denoted by XYZ).

In the simulations, the fluid flow was assumed to be incompressible, in which case the following equation is applicable:

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+(uโ‹…โˆ‡)u=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+F.

(3)

Due to the large range of liquid velocities during flows, the turbulence formation process was included in the modeling. For this purpose, the kโ€“ฮต model turbulence kinetic energy k and turbulence dissipation ฮต were the target parameters, as expressed by the following equations [21]:

โˆ‚(ฯk)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯkvi)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒk)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+Gk+Gbโˆ’ฯฮตโˆ’Ym+Sk,

(4)

โˆ‚(ฯฮต)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯฮตui)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒฮต)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+C1ฮตฮตk(Gk+G3ฮตGb)+C2ฮตฯฮต2k+Sฮต,

(5)

where ฯ is the gas density, ฯƒฮบ and ฯƒฮต are the Prandtl turbulence numbers, k and ฮต are constants of 1.0 and 1.3, and Gk and Gb are the kinetic energy of turbulence generated by the average velocity and buoyancy, respectively.

As mentioned earlier, there are two gas phases in the considered problem. In addition to the gas bubbles, which are treated here as particles, there is also air, which surrounds the system. The boundary of phase separation is in this case the free surface of the water. The shape of the free surface can change as a result of the forming velocity field in the liquid. Therefore, it is necessary to use an appropriate approach to free surface tracking. The most commonly used concept in liquidโ€“gas flow modeling is the volume of fluid (VOF) method [22,23], and Flow-3D uses a modified version of this method called TrueVOF. It introduces the concept of the volume fraction of the liquid phase fl. This parameter can be used for classifying the cells of a discrete grid into areas filled with liquid phase (fl = 1), gaseous phase, or empty cells (fl = 0) and those through which the phase separation boundary (fl โˆˆ (0, 1)) passes (free surface). To determine the local variations of the liquid phase fraction, it is necessary to solve the following continuity equation:

dfldt=0.

(6)

Then, the fluid parameters in the region of coexistence of the two phases (the so-called interface) depend on the volume fraction of each phase.

ฯ=flฯl+(1โˆ’fl)ฯg,

(7)

ฮฝ=flฮฝl+(1โˆ’fl)ฮฝg,

(8)

where indices l and g refer to the liquid and gaseous phases, respectively.

The parameter of fluid velocity in cells containing both phases is also determined in the same way.

u=flul+(1โˆ’fl)ug.

(9)

Since the processes taking place in the surrounding air can be omitted, to speed up the calculations, a single-phase, free-surface model was used. This means that no calculations were performed in the gas cells (they were treated as empty cells). The liquid could fill them freely, and the air surrounding the system was considered by the atmospheric pressure exerted on the free surface. This approach is often used in modeling foundry and metallurgical processes [24].

2.3.2. Modeling of Gas Bubble Flow 

As stated, a particle model was used to model bubble flow. Spherical particles (gas bubbles) of a given size were randomly generated in the area marked with green in Figure 7b. In the simulations, the gas bubbles were assumed to have diameters of 0.016 and 0.02 m corresponding to the gas flow rates of 10 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, respectively.

Experimental studies have shown that, as a result of turbulent fluid motion, some of the bubbles may burst, leading to the formation of smaller bubbles, although merging of bubbles into larger groupings may also occur. Therefore, to be able to observe the behavior of bubbles of different sizes (diameter), the calculations generated two additional particle types with diameters twice smaller and twice larger, respectively. The proportion of each species in the system was set to 33.33% (Table 2).

Table 2

Data assumed for calculations.

NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
A2000.01610D2000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
B3000.01610E3000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
C5000.01610F5000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04

Open in a separate window

The velocity of the particle results from the generated velocity field (calculated from Equation (3) in the liquid ul around it and its velocity resulting from the buoyancy force ub. The effect of particle radius r on the terminal velocity associated with buoyancy force can be determined according to Stokesโ€™ law.

ub=29 (ฯgโˆ’ฯl)ฮผlgr2,

(10)

where g is the acceleration (9.81).

The DPM model was used for modeling the two-phase (waterโ€“air) flow. In this model, the fluid (water) is treated as a continuous phase and described by the Navierโ€“Stokes equation, while gas bubbles are particles flowing in the model fluid (discrete phase). The trajectories of each bubble in the DPM system are calculated at each timestep taking into account the mass forces acting on it. Table 3 characterizes the DPM model used in our own research [18].

Table 3

Characteristic of the DPM model.

MethodEquations
Eulerโ€“LagrangeBalance equation:
dugdt=FD(uโˆ’ug)+g(ฯฑgโˆ’ฯฑ)ฯฑg+F.
FD (u โˆ’ up) denotes the drag forces per mass unit of a bubble, and the expression for the drag coefficient FD is of the form
FD=18ฮผCDReฯฑโ‹…gd2g24.
The relative Reynolds number has the form
Reโ‰กฯdg|ugโˆ’u|ฮผ.
On the other hand, the force resulting from the additional acceleration of the model fluid has the form
F=12dฯdtฯg(uโˆ’ug),
where ug is the gas bubble velocity, u is the liquid velocity, dg is the bubble diameter, and CD is the drag coefficient.

Open in a separate window

Go to:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Calculations of Power and Mixing Time by the Flowing Gas Bubbles

One of the most important parameters of refining with a rotor is the mixing power induced by the spinning rotor and the outflowing gas bubbles (via impeller). The mixing power of liquid metal in a ladle of height (h) by gas injection can be determined from the following relation [15]:

pgVm=ฯโ‹…gโ‹…uB,

(11)

where pg is the mixing power, Vm is the volume of liquid metal in the reactor, ฯ is the density of liquid aluminum, and uB is the average speed of bubbles, given below.

uB=nโ‹…Rโ‹…TAcโ‹…Pmโ‹…t,

(12)

where n is the number of gas moles, R is the gas constant (8.314), Ac is the cross-sectional area of the reactor vessel, T is the temperature of liquid aluminum in the reactor, and Pm is the pressure at the middle tank level. The pressure at the middle level of the tank is calculated by a function of the mean logarithmic difference.

Pm=(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)โˆ’Paln(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)Pa,

(13)

where Pa is the atmospheric pressure, and h is the the height of metal in the reactor.

Themelis and Goyal [25] developed a model for calculating mixing power delivered by gas injection.

pg=2Qโ‹…Rโ‹…Tโ‹…ln(1+mโ‹…ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hP),

(14)

where Q is the gas flow, and m is the mass of liquid metal.

Zhang [26] proposed a model taking into account the temperature difference between gas and alloy (metal).

pg=QRTgVm[ln(1+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hPa)+(1โˆ’TTg)],

(15)

where Tg is the gas temperature at the entry point.

Data for calculating the mixing power resulting from inert gas injection into liquid aluminum are given below in Table 4. The design parameters were adopted for the model, the parameters of which are shown in Figure 5.

Table 4

Data for calculating mixing power introduced by an inert gas.

ParameterValueUnit
Height of metal column0.7m
Density of aluminum2375kgยทmโˆ’3
Process duration20s
Gas temperature at the injection site940K
Cross-sectional area of ladle0.448m2
Mass of liquid aluminum546.25kg
Volume of ladle0.23M3
Temperature of liquid aluminum941.15K

Open in a separate window

Table 5 presents the results of mixing power calculations according to the models of Themelis and Goyal and of Zhang for inert gas flows of 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The obtained calculation results significantly differed from each other. The difference was an order of magnitude, which indicates that the model is highly inaccurate without considering the temperature of the injected gas. Moreover, the calculations apply to the case when the mixing was performed only by the flowing gas bubbles, without using a rotor, which is a great simplification of the phenomenon.

Table 5

Mixing power calculated from mathematical models.

Mathematical ModelMixing Power (Wยทtโˆ’1)
for a Given Inert Gas Flow (dm3ยทminโˆ’1)
102030
Themelis and Goyal11.4923.3335.03
Zhang0.821.662.49

Open in a separate window

The mixing time is defined as the time required to achieve 95% complete mixing of liquid metal in the ladle [27,28,29,30]. Table 6 groups together equations for the mixing time according to the models.

Table 6

Models for calculating mixing time.

AuthorsModelRemarks
Szekely [31]ฯ„=800ฮตโˆ’0.4ฮตโ€”Wยทtโˆ’1
Chiti and Paglianti [27]ฯ„=CVQlVโ€”volume of reactor, m3
Qlโ€”flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1
Iguchi and Nakamura [32]ฯ„=1200โ‹…Qโˆ’0.4D1.97hโˆ’1.0ฯ…0.47ฯ…โ€”kinematic viscosity, m2ยทsโˆ’1
Dโ€”diameter of ladle, m
hโ€”height of metal column, m
Qโ€”liquid flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1

Open in a separate window

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the liquid column in the ladle and mixing power values.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g008.jpg

Figure 8

Mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the metal column (Iguchi and Nakamura model).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g009.jpg

Figure 9

Mixing time as a function of mixing power (Szekly model).

3.2. Determining the Bubble Size

The mechanisms controlling bubble size and mass transfer in an alloy undergoing refining are complex. Strong mixing conditions in the reactor promote impurity mass transfer. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion separates the bubbles into smaller bubbles. Rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and liquid density have a strong influence on the bubble size. To characterize the kinetic state of the refining process, parameters k and A were introduced. Parameters kA, and uB can be calculated using the below equations [33].

k=2Dโ‹…uBdBโ‹…ฯ€โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš,

(16)

A=6Qโ‹…hdBโ‹…uB,

(17)

uB=1.02gโ‹…dB,โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš

(18)

where D is the diffusion coefficient, and dB is the bubble diameter.

After substituting appropriate values, we get

dB=3.03ร—104(ฯ€D)โˆ’2/5gโˆ’1/5h4/5Q0.344Nโˆ’1.48.

(19)

According to the last equation, the size of the gas bubble decreases with the increasing rotational speed (see Figure 10).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g010.jpg

Figure 10

Effect of rotational speed on the bubble diameter.

In a flow of given turbulence intensity, the diameter of the bubble does not exceed the maximum size dmax, which is inversely proportional to the rate of kinetic energy dissipation in a viscous flow ฮต. The size of the gas bubble diameter as a function of the mixing energy, also considering the Weber number and the mixing energy in the negative power, can be determined from the following equations [31,34]:

  • โ€”Sevik and Park:

dBmax=We0.6krโ‹…(ฯƒโ‹…103ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)0.6โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’0.4โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(20)

  • โ€”Evans:

dBmax=โŽกโŽฃWekrโ‹…ฯƒโ‹…1032โ‹…(ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)13โŽคโŽฆ35 โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’25โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(21)

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble dBmax determined from Equation (21) are given in Table 7.

Table 7

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble using Equation (21).

ModelMixing Energy
ฤบ (m2ยทsโˆ’3)
Weber Number (Wekr)
0.591.01.2
Zhang and Taniguchi
dmax
0.10.01670.02300.026
0.50.00880.01210.013
1.00.00670.00910.010
1.50.00570.00780.009
Sevik and Park
dBmax
0.10.2650.360.41
0.50.1390.190.21
1.00.1060.140.16
1.50.0900.120.14
Evans
dBmax
0.10.2470.3400.38
0.50.1300.1780.20
1.00.0980.1350.15
1.50.0840.1150.13

Open in a separate window

3.3. Physical Modeling

The first stage of experiments (using the URO-200 water model) included conducting experiments with impellers equipped with four, eight, and 12 gas outlets (variants B4, B8, B12). The tests were carried out for different process parameters. Selected results for these experiments are presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g011.jpg

Figure 11

Impeller variant B4โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g012.jpg

Figure 12

Impeller variant B8โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g013.jpg

Figure 13

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant B12).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g014.jpg

Figure 14

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant RT3).

The analysis of the refining variants presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14 reveals that the proposed impellers design model is not useful for the aluminum refining process. The number of gas outlet orifices, rotational speed, and flow did not affect the refining efficiency. In all the variants shown in the figures, very poor dispersion of gas bubbles was observed in the object. The gas bubble flow had a columnar character, and so-called dead zones, i.e., areas where no inert gas bubbles are present, were visible in the analyzed object. Such dead zones were located in the bottom and side zones of the ladle, while the flow of bubbles occurred near the turning rotor. Another negative phenomenon observed was a significant agitation of the water surface due to excessive (rotational) rotor speed and gas flow (see Figure 13, cases 20; 400, 30; 300, 30; 400, and 30; 500).

Research results for a โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller equipped with three gas supply orifices (variant RT3) are presented in Figure 14.

In this impeller design, a uniform degree of bubble dispersion in the entire volume of the modeling fluid was achieved for most cases presented (see Figure 14). In all tested variants, single bubbles were observed in the area of the water surface in the vessel. For variants 20; 200, 30; 200, and 20; 300 shown in Figure 14, the bubble dispersion results were the worst as the so-called dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further applications. Interestingly, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model. This means that the presented model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Its design with sharp edges also differed from previously analyzed models, which is beneficial for gas bubble dispersion, but may interfere with its suitability in industrial conditions due to possible premature wear.

3.4. Qualitative Comparison of Research Results (CFD and Physical Model)

The analysis (physical modeling) revealed that the best mixing efficiency results were obtained with the RT3 impeller variant. Therefore, numerical calculations were carried out for the impeller model with three outlet orifices (variant RT3). The CFD results are presented in Figure 15 and Figure 16.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g015.jpg

Figure 15

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 1 s: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g016.jpg

Figure 16

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 5.4 s.: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

CFD results are presented for all analyzed variants (impeller RT3) at two selected calculation timesteps of 1 and 5.40 s. They show the velocity field of the medium (water) and the dispersion of gas bubbles.

Figure 15 shows the initial refining phase after 1 s of the process. In this case, the gas bubble formation and flow were observed in an area close to contact with the rotor. Figure 16 shows the phase when the dispersion and flow of gas bubbles were advanced in the reactor area of the URO-200 model.

The quantitative evaluation of the obtained results of physical and numerical model tests was based on the comparison of the degree of gas dispersion in the model liquid. The degree of gas bubble dispersion in the volume of the model liquid and the areas of strong turbulent zones formation were evaluated during the analysis of the results of visualization and numerical simulations. These two effects sufficiently characterize the required course of the process from the physical point of view. The known scheme of the below description was adopted as a basic criterion for the evaluation of the degree of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid.

  • Minimal dispersionโ€”single bubbles ascending in the region of their formation along the ladle axis; lack of mixing in the whole bath volume.
  • Accurate dispersionโ€”single and well-mixed bubbles ascending toward the bath mirror in the region of the ladle axis; no dispersion near the walls and in the lower part of the ladle.
  • Uniform dispersionโ€”most desirable; very good mixing of fine bubbles with model liquid.
  • Excessive dispersionโ€”bubbles join together to form chains; large turbulence zones; uneven flow of gas.

The numerical simulation results give a good agreement with the experiments performed with the physical model. For all studied variants (used process parameters), the single bubbles were observed in the area of water surface in the vessel. For variants presented in Figure 13 (200 rpm, gas flow 20 and dm3ยทminโˆ’1) and relevant examples in numerical simulation Figure 16, the worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use. The areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model (physical model). This means that the presented impeller model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. The worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and side walls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use.

Figure 17 presents exemplary results of model tests (CFD and physical model) with marked gas bubble dispersion zones. All variants of tests were analogously compared, and this comparison allowed validating the numerical model.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g017.jpg

Figure 17

Compilations of model research results (CFD and physical): Aโ€”single gas bubbles formed on the surface of the modeling liquid, Bโ€”excessive formation of gas chains and swirls, Cโ€”uniform distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of the tank, and Dโ€”dead zones without gas bubbles, no dispersion. (a) Variant B; (b) variant F.

It should be mentioned here that, in numerical simulations, it is necessary to make certain assumptions and simplifications. The calculations assumed three particle size classes (Table 2), which represent the different gas bubbles that form due to different gas flow rates. The maximum number of particles/bubbles (Table 1) generated was assumed in advance and related to the computational capabilities of the computer. Too many particles can also make it difficult to visualize and analyze the results. The size of the particles, of course, affects their behavior during simulation, while, in the figures provided in the article, the bubbles are represented by spheres (visualization of the results) of the same size. Please note that, due to the adopted Lagrangianโ€“Eulerian approach, the simulation did not take into account phenomena such as bubble collapse or fusion. However, the obtained results allow a comprehensive analysis of the behavior of gas bubbles in the system under consideration.

The comparative analysis of the visualization (quantitative) results obtained with the water model and CFD simulations (see Figure 17) generated a sufficient agreement from the point of view of the trends. A precise quantitative evaluation is difficult to perform because of the lack of a refraction compensating system in the water model. Furthermore, in numerical simulations, it is not possible to determine the geometry of the forming gas bubbles and their interaction with each other as opposed to the visualization in the water model. The use of both research methods is complementary. Thus, a direct comparison of images obtained by the two methods requires appropriate interpretation. However, such an assessment gives the possibility to qualitatively determine the types of the present gas bubble dispersion, thus ultimately validating the CFD results with the water model.

A summary of the visualization results for impellers RT3, i.e., analysis of the occurring gas bubble dispersion types, is presented in Table 8.

Table 8

Summary of visualization results (impeller RT3)โ€”different types of gas bubble dispersion.

No Exp.ABCDEF
Gas flow rate, dm3ยทminโˆ’11030
Impeller speed, rpm200300500200300500
Type of dispersionAccurateUniformUniform/excessiveMinimalExcessiveExcessive

Open in a separate window

Tests carried out for impeller RT3 confirmed the high efficiency of gas bubble distribution in the volume of the tested object at a low inert gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The most optimal variant was variant B (300 rpm, 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1). However, the other variants A and C (gas flow rate 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1) seemed to be favorable for this type of impeller and are recommended for further testing. The above process parameters will be analyzed in detail in a quantitative analysis to be performed on the basis of the obtained efficiency curves of the degassing process (oxygen removal). This analysis will give an unambiguous answer as to which process parameters are the most optimal for this type of impeller; the results are planned for publication in the next article.

It should also be noted here that the high agreement between the results of numerical calculations and physical modelling prompts a conclusion that the proposed approach to the simulation of a degassing process which consists of a single-phase flow model with a free surface and a particle flow model is appropriate. The simulation results enable us to understand how the velocity field in the fluid is formed and to analyze the distribution of gas bubbles in the system. The simulations in Flow-3D software can, therefore, be useful for both the design of the impeller geometry and the selection of process parameters.

Go to:

4. Conclusions

The results of experiments carried out on the physical model of the device for the simulation of barbotage refining of aluminum revealed that the worst results in terms of distribution and dispersion of gas bubbles in the studied object were obtained for the black impellers variants B4, B8, and B12 (multi-orifice impellersโ€”four, eight, and 12 outlet holes, respectively).

In this case, the control of flow, speed, and number of gas exit orifices did not improve the process efficiency, and the developed design did not meet the criteria for industrial tests. In the case of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller (variant RT3), uniform gas bubble dispersion was achieved throughout the volume of the modeling fluid for most of the tested variants. The worst bubble dispersion results due to the occurrence of the so-called dead zones in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel were obtained for the flow variants of 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. For the analyzed model, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains were formed were found only for the inert gas flow of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. The model impeller (variant RT3) had the best performance compared to the previously presented impellers in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Moreover, its design differed from previously presented models because of its sharp edges. This can be advantageous for gas bubble dispersion, but may negatively affect its suitability in industrial conditions due to premature wearing.

The CFD simulation results confirmed the results obtained from the experiments performed on the physical model. The numerical simulation of the operation of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller model (using Flow-3D software) gave good agreement with the experiments performed on the physical model. This means that the presented model impeller, as compared to other (analyzed) designs, had the best performance in terms of gas bubble dispersion in the model liquid.

In further work, the developed numerical model is planned to be used for CFD simulations of the gas bubble distribution process taking into account physicochemical parameters of liquid aluminum based on industrial tests. Consequently, the obtained results may be implemented in production practice.

Go to:

Funding Statement

This paper was created with the financial support grants from the AGH-UST, Faculty of Foundry Engineering, Poland (16.16.170.654 and 11/990/BK_22/0083) for the Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Poland.

Go to:

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and D.K.; methodology, J.P. and T.M.; validation, M.S. and S.G.; formal analysis, D.K. and T.M.; investigation, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; resources, M.S., J.P. and K.K.; writingโ€”original draft preparation, D.K. and T.M.; writingโ€”review and editing, D.K. and T.M.; visualization, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; supervision, D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Go to:

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Go to:

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Go to:

Footnotes

Publisherโ€™s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Go to:

References

1. Zhang L., Xuewei L., Torgerson A.T., Long M. Removal of Impurity Elements from Molten Aluminium: A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2011;32:150โ€“228. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2010.483396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Saternus M. Impurities of liquid aluminium-methods on their estimation and removal. Met. Form. 2015;23:115โ€“132. [Google Scholar]

3. ลปak P.L., Kalisz D., Lelito J., Gracz B., Szucki M., Suchy J.S. Modelling of non-metallic particle motion process in foundry alloys. Metalurgija. 2015;54:357โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

4. Kalisz D., Kuglin K. Efficiency of aluminum oxide inclusions rmoval from liquid steel as a result of collisions and agglomeration on ceramic filters. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2020;20:43โ€“48. [Google Scholar]

5. Kuglin K., Kalisz D. Evaluation of the usefulness of rotors for aluminium refining. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021;1178:012036. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1178/1/012036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modeling of the impeller construction impact o the aluminium refining process. Materials. 2022;15:575. doi: 10.3390/ma15020575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modelling of aluminum refining process conducted in batch reactor with rotary impeller. Metals. 2018;8:726. doi: 10.3390/met8090726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Saternus M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J. The influence of impeller geometry on the gas bubbles dispersion in uro-200 reactorโ€”RTD curves. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015;60:2887โ€“2893. doi: 10.1515/amm-2015-0461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Hernรกndez-Hernรกndez M., Camacho-Martรญnez J., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A. Impeller design assisted by physical modeling and pilot plant trials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016;236:1โ€“8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Mancilla E., Cruz-Mรฉndez W., Garduรฑo I.E., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A., Ascanio G. Comparison of the hydrodynamic performance of rotor-injector devices in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017;118:158โ€“169. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.11.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Michalek K., Socha L., Gryc K., Tkadleckova M., Saternus M., Pieprzyca J., Merder T. Modelling of technological parameters of aluminium melt refining in the ladle by blowing of inert gas through the rotating impeller. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2018;63:987โ€“992. [Google Scholar]

12. Walek J., Michalek K., Tkadleckovรก M., Saternus M. Modelling of Technological Parameters of Aluminium Melt Refining in the Ladle by Blowing of Inert Gas through the Rotating Impeller. Metals. 2021;11:284. doi: 10.3390/met11020284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Michalek K., Gryc K., Moravka J. Physical modelling of bath homogenization in argon stirred ladle. Metalurgija. 2009;48:215โ€“218. [Google Scholar]

14. Michalek K. The Use of Physical Modeling and Numerical Optimization for Metallurgical Processes. VSB; Ostrawa, Czech Republic: 2001. [Google Scholar]

15. Chen J., Zhao J. Light Metals. TMS; Warrendale, PA, USA: 1995. Bubble distribution in a melt treatment water model; pp. 1227โ€“1231. [Google Scholar]

16. Saternus M. Model Matematyczny do Sterowania Procesem Rafinacji Ciekล‚ych Stopรณw Aluminium Przy Zastosowaniu URO-200. Katowice, Poland: 2004. Research Project Nr 7 T08B 019 21. [Google Scholar]

17. Pietrewicz L., Wฤ™ลผyk W. Urzฤ…dzenia do rafinacji gazowej typu URO-200 szeล›ฤ‡ lat produkcji i doล›wiadczeล„; Proceedings of the Aluminum Conference; Zakopane, Poland. 12โ€“16 October 1998. [Google Scholar]

18. Flow3d Userโ€™s Guide. Flow Science, Inc.; Santa Fe, NM, USA: 2020. [Google Scholar]

19. Sinelnikov V., Szucki M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J., Kalisz D. Physical and numerical modeling of the slag splashing process. Materials. 2021;14:2289. doi: 10.3390/ma14092289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. White F. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 2010. (McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering). [Google Scholar]

21. Yang Z., Yang L., Cheng T., Chen F., Zheng F., Wang S., Guo Y. Fluid Flow Characteristic of EAF Molten Steel with Different Bottom-Blowing Gas Flow Rate Distributions. ISIJ. 2020;60:1957โ€“1967. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Nichols B.D., Hirt C.W. Methods for calculating multi-dimensional, transient free surface flows past bodies; Proceedings of the First International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics; Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 20โ€“22 October 1975. [Google Scholar]

23. Hirt C.W., Nichols B.D. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981;39:201โ€“255. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Szucki M., Suchy J.S., Lelito J., Malinowski P., Sobczyk J. Application of the lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of the mold filling process in the casting industry. Heat Mass Transf. 2017;53:3421โ€“3431. doi: 10.1007/s00231-017-2069-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Themelis N.J., Goyal P. Gas injection in steelmaking. Candian Metall. Trans. 1983;22:313โ€“320. [Google Scholar]

26. Zhang L., Jing X., Li Y., Xu Z., Cai K. Mathematical model of decarburization of ultralow carbon steel during RH treatment. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing. 1997;4:19โ€“23. [Google Scholar]

27. Chiti F., Paglianti A., Bujalshi W. A mechanistic model to estimate powder consumption and mixing time in aluminium industries. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2004;82:1105โ€“1111. doi: 10.1205/cerd.82.9.1105.44156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Bouaifi M., Roustan M. Power consumption, mixing time and homogenization energy in dual-impeller agitated gas-liquid reactors. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011;40:87โ€“95. doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(00)00128-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Kang J., Lee C.H., Haam S., Koo K.K., Kim W.S. Studies on the overall oxygen transfer rate and mixing time in pilot-scale surface aeration vessel. Environ. Technol. 2001;22:1055โ€“1068. doi: 10.1080/09593332208618215. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Moucha T., Linek V., Prokopov E. Gas hold-up, mixing time and gas-liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient of various multiple-impeller configurations: Rushton turbine, pitched blade and techmix impeller and their combinations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003;58:1839โ€“1846. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00682-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Szekely J. Flow phenomena, mixing and mass transfer in argon-stirred ladles. Ironmak. Steelmak. 1979;6:285โ€“293. [Google Scholar]

32. Iguchi M., Nakamura K., Tsujino R. Mixing time and fluid flow phenomena in liquids of varying kinematic viscosities agitated by bottom gas injection. Metall. Mat. Trans. 1998;29:569โ€“575. doi: 10.1007/s11663-998-0091-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Hjelle O., Engh T.A., Rasch B. Removal of Sodium from Aluminiummagnesium Alloys by Purging with Cl2. Aluminium-Verlag GmbH; Dusseldorf, Germany: 1985. pp. 343โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

34. Zhang L., Taniguchi S. Fundamentals of inclusion removal from liquid steel by bubble flotation. Int. Mat. Rev. 2000;45:59โ€“82. doi: 10.1179/095066000101528313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Figure 4.24 - Model with virtual valves in the extremities of the geometries to simulate the permeability of the mold promoting a more uniformed filling

Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by Flow-3D

Dissertaรงรฃo de Mestrado
Ciclo de Estudos Integrados Conducentes ao
Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Mecรขnica
Trabalho efectuado sob a orientaรงรฃo do
Doutor Hรฉlder de Jesus Fernades Puga
Professor Doutor Josรฉ Joaquim Carneiro Barbosa

ABSTRACT

๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋กœ ํŠœํ„ฐ ์„ ํƒ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ฃผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์„ค์ •๋˜๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์—ผ๋‘์— ๋‘๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ฃผ์ œ ‘Flow- 3D ยฎ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ €์•• ์ถฉ์ „ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ตœ์ ํ™”’๊ฐ€ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถฉ์ „ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  Flow-3Dยฎ๋Š” ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๋„๊ตฌ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์ „์ฒด ์ถฉ์ „ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋ฐ ํ–‰๋™ ํ‘œํ˜„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒ์›”ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ด€๋ จ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ถฉ์ง„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํƒ์ƒ‰์  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ฐ ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ญ๋น„์— ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ์ ์ธ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ถฉ์ „ ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๋น„์šฉ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ญ๋น„. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ €์•• ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ถฉ์ง„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์Œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด Flow 3Dยฎ ํƒ์ƒ‰;
์ถฉ์ „ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง;
๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜, ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ค‘์ธ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณก์„ ๊ณผ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์€ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ๋งˆ์ด๋‹์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณก์„ ์€ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณผ ์ด์ „์— ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์‹ค์ œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด 3๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณก์„ ์ด ์ธต๋ฅ˜ ์ถฉ์ง„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์˜ ์˜๋„๋œ ๋ชฉ์ ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ 0.5 ๐‘š/๐‘ ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถฉ์ „ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด 2์ธ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณก์„ ์€ 0.5 ๐‘š/๐‘  ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์†๋„๋กœ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ฑ„์šฐ๋Š” ๋” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ด์ „๋‹ฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ด์ „์— ์–ป์€ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ฃผ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†Œ์‚ฐ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ํ™•์ฆํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋” ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ NovaFlow & Solidยฎ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ต๋˜์–ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์„ค์ •๋œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Flow 3Dยฎ๋Š” ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

As part of the dissertation and bearing in mind the parameters in which the possibility of a choice of tutor and the subject to be addressed is established, the subject for development โ€™Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by Flow 3D ยฎโ€™ was chosen. For this it was necessary to define the objectives to achieve and the methods to attain them. Despite the wide range of software able to simulate and validate filling systems, Flow 3Dยฎ has been shown as one of the best tools in the market, demonstrating its ability to simulate with distinctive accuracy with respect to the entire process of filling and the behavioral representation of the fluid obtained. To this end, it is important to explore this tool for a better understanding of the processes involved and to serve as an exploratory basis for the simulation of filling systems, simulation being one of the great strengths of the current industry due to the need to reduce costs and time waste, in practical terms, that lead to the perfecting of the dimensioning of filling devices, which are reflected in delays and wasted material. In this way it is intended to validate the methodology to design a filling system in lowpressure casting process, exploring their physical models and thus allowing for its characterization. For this, consider the following main phases: The exploration of the simulation software Flow 3Dยฎ; modeling of filling systems; simulation, validation and optimization of systems modeled by exploring the parameters of the models. Therefore, it is intended to validate the pressure curves under study and the eventual mining of the most relevant information in a casting analysis. The pressure curves that were used were obtained through the gathered literature and the practical work previously performed. Through the results it was possible to conclude that the pressure curve with 3 levels meets the intended purpose of a laminar filling regime and associated speeds never exceeding 0.5 ๐‘š/๐‘ . The pressure curve with 2 filling levels has a more turbulent system, having filling areas with velocities above 0.5 ๐‘š/๐‘ . The heat transfer parameter was studied due to the values previously obtained didnโ€™t corroborate the behavior of dissipation regarding to the casting. In this way, new values, more in tune with the casting process, were obtained. The achieved results were compared with those generated by NovaFlow & Solidยฎ, which were shown to be similar, validating the parameters established in the simulations. Flow 3Dยฎ was proven a powerful tool for the simulation of casting parts.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

์ €์••, Flow 3Dยฎ, ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜, ํŒŒ์šด๋“œ๋ฆฌ, ์••๋ ฅ-์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ด€๊ณ„,Low Pressure, Flow 3Dยฎ, Simulation, Foundry, Pressure-time relation

Figure 4.24 - Model with virtual valves in the extremities of the geometries to simulate the permeability of the mold promoting a more uniformed filling
Figure 4.24 – Model with virtual valves in the extremities of the geometries to simulate the permeability of the mold promoting a more uniformed filling
Figure 4.39 - Values of temperature contours using full energy heat transfer parameter for simula
Figure 4.39 – Values of temperature contours using full energy heat transfer parameter for simula
Figure 4.40 โ€“ Comparison between software simulations (a) Flow 3Dยฎ simulation,
(b) NovaFlow & Solidยฎ simulation
Figure 4.40 โ€“ Comparison between software simulations (a) Flow 3Dยฎ simulation, (b) NovaFlow & Solidยฎ simulation

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] E. Stanley and D. B. Sc, โ€œFluid Flow Aspects of Solidification Modellingโ€ฏ: Simulation
of Low Pressure Die Casting .โ€
[2] Y. Sahin, โ€œComputer aided foundry die-design,โ€ Metallography, vol. 24, no. 8, pp.
671โ€“679, 2003.
[3] F. Bonollo, J. Urban, B. Bonatto, and M. Botter, โ€œGravity and low pressure die casting
of aluminium alloysโ€ฏ: a technical and economical benchmark,โ€ La Metall. Ital., vol. 97,
no. 6, pp. 23โ€“32, 2005.
[4] P. a and R. R, โ€œStudy of the effect of process parameters on the production of a nonsimmetric low pressure die casting part,โ€ La Metall. Ital., pp. 57โ€“63, 2009.
[5] โ€œFundiรงรฃo em baixa pressรฃo | Aluinfo.โ€ [Online]. Available:
http://www.aluinfo.com.br/novo/materiais/fundicao-em-baixa-pressao. [Accessed: 18-
Sep-2015].
[6] โ€œLow Pressure Sand Casting by Wolverine Bronze.โ€ [Online]. Available:
http://www.wolverinebronze.com/low-pressure-sand-casting.php. [Accessed: 18-Sep2015].
[7] A. Reikher, โ€œNumerical Analysis of Die-Casting Process in Thin Cavities Using
Lubrication Approximation,โ€ no. December, 2012.
[8] P. Fu, A. a. Luo, H. Jiang, L. Peng, Y. Yu, C. Zhai, and A. K. Sachdev, โ€œLow-pressure
die casting of magnesium alloy AM50: Response to process parameters,โ€ J. Mater.
Process. Technol., vol. 205, no. 1โ€“3, pp. 224โ€“234, 2008.
[9] X. Li, Q. Hao, W. Jie, and Y. Zhou, โ€œDevelopment of pressure control system in
counter gravity casting for large thin-walled A357 aluminum alloy components,โ€
Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 847โ€“851, 2008.
[10] J. a. Hines, โ€œDetermination of interfacial heat-transfer boundary conditions in an
aluminum low-pressure permanent mold test casting,โ€ Metall. Mater. Trans. B, vol. 35,
no. 2, pp. 299โ€“311, 2004.
[11] A. Lima, A. Freitas, and P. Magalhรฃes, โ€œProcessos de vazamento em moldaรงรตes
permanentes,โ€ pp. 40โ€“49, 2003.
[12] Y. B. Choi, K. Matsugi, G. Sasaki, K. Arita, and O. Yanagisawa, โ€œAnalysis of
Manufacturing Processes for Metal Fiber Reinforced Aluminum Alloy Composite
Fabricated by Low-Pressure Casting,โ€ Mater. Trans., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1227โ€“1231,
68
2006.
[13] G. Mi, X. Liu, K. Wang, and H. Fu, โ€œNumerical simulation of low pressure die-casting
aluminum wheel,โ€ China Foundry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 48โ€“52, 2009.
[14] J. Kuo, F. Hsu, and W. Hwang, โ€œADVANCED Development of an interactive
simulation system for the determination of the pressure ยฑ time relationship during the
ยฎ lling in a low pressure casting process,โ€ vol. 2, pp. 131โ€“145, 2001.
[15] S.-G. Liu, F.-Y. Cao, X.-Y. Zhao, Y.-D. Jia, Z.-L. Ning, and J.-F. Sun, โ€œCharacteristics
of mold filling and entrainment of oxide film in low pressure casting of A356 alloy,โ€
Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 626, pp. 159โ€“164, 2015.
[16] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 10 – Solidification and Shrinkage-Casting.โ€ FLOW3Dยฎ.
[17] โ€œUAB Casting Engineering Laboratory.โ€ [Online]. Available:
file:///C:/Users/Jos%C3%A9 Belo/Desktop/Artigo_Software/UAB Casting
Engineering Laboratory.htm. [Accessed: 09-Nov-2015].
[18] A. Louvo, โ€œCasting Simulation as a Tool in Concurrent Engineering,โ€ pp. 1โ€“12, 1997.
[19] T. R. Vijayaram and P. Piccardo, โ€œComputers in Foundries,โ€ vol. 30, 2012.
[20] M. Sadaiah, D. R. Yadav, P. V. Mohanram, and P. Radhakrishnan, โ€œA generative
computer-aided process planning system for prismatic components,โ€ Int. J. Adv.
Manuf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 709โ€“719, 2002.
[21] Ministry_of_Planning, โ€œDigital Data,โ€ vol. 67, pp. 1โ€“6, 2004.
[22] S. Shamasundar, D. Ramachandran, and N. S. Shrinivasan, โ€œCOMPUTER
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENTCASTING PROCESS.โ€
[23] J. M. Siqueira and G. Motors, โ€œSimulation applied to Aluminum High Pressure Die
Casting,โ€ pp. 1โ€“5, 1998.
[24] C. Fluid, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS. Abdulnaser Sayma & Ventus
Publishing ApS, 2009.
[25] C. a. Felippa, โ€œ1 – Overview,โ€ Adv. Finite Elem. Methods, pp. 1โ€“9.
[26] a. Meena and M. El Mansori, โ€œCorrelative thermal methodology for castability
simulation of ductile iron in ADI production,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 212,
no. 11, pp. 2484โ€“2495, 2012.
[27] T. R. Vijayaram, S. Sulaiman, a. M. S. Hamouda, and M. H. M. Ahmad, โ€œNumerical
simulation of casting solidification in permanent metallic molds,โ€ J. Mater. Process.
69
Technol., vol. 178, pp. 29โ€“33, 2006.
[28] โ€œGeneral CFD FAQ — CFD-Wiki, the free CFD reference.โ€ [Online]. Available:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/General_CFD_FAQ. [Accessed: 10-Nov-2015].
[29] โ€œFEM | FEA | CFD.โ€ [Online]. Available: http://fem4analyze.blogspot.pt/. [Accessed:
09-Nov-2015].
[30] โ€œFundiรงรฃo; revista da Associaรงรฃo portuguesa de fundiรงรฃo,โ€ Fundiรงรฃo, vol. N
o
227.
[31] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 1 – Introduction_to_FLOW-3D – Casting.โ€ FLOW3Dยฎ.
[32] F. Science, โ€œFLOW-3D Cast Documentation,โ€ no. 3.5, p. 80, 2012.
[33] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 4 – Geometry Building – General.โ€ FLOW-3Dยฎ.
[34] F. Science, โ€œFLOW-3D v11.0.3 User Manual,โ€ pp. 1โ€“132, 2015.
[35] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 5 Meshing Concept – General.โ€ FLOW-3Dยฎ.
[36] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 6 – Boundary_Conditions – Casting.โ€ FLOW-3Dยฎ.
[37] โ€œCasting Training Class – Lecture 9 – Physical Models-castings.โ€ FLOW-3Dยฎ.
[38] P. A. D. Jรกcome, M. C. Landim, A. Garcia, A. F. Furtado, and I. L. Ferreira, โ€œThe
application of computational thermodynamics and a numerical model for the
determination of surface tension and Gibbsโ€“Thomson coefficient of aluminum based
alloys,โ€ Thermochim. Acta, vol. 523, no. 1โ€“2, pp. 142โ€“149, 2011.
[39] J. P. Anson, R. A. L. Drew, and J. E. Gruzleski, โ€œThe surface tension of molten
aluminum and Al-Si-Mg alloy under vacuum and hydrogen atmospheres,โ€ Metall.
Mater. Trans. B Process Metall. Mater. Process. Sci., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. XVIโ€“1032,
1999.

Figure 1.| Physical models of the vertical drop, backdrop and stepped drop developed in the Technical University of Lisbon.

Numerical modelling of air-water flows in sewer drops

ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ๊ณต๊ธฐ-๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Paula Beceiro (corresponding author)
Maria do Cรฉu Almeida
Hydraulic and Environment Department (DHA), National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Avenida do Brasil 101, 1700-066 Lisbon, Portugal
E-mail: pbeceiro@lnec.pt
Jorge Matos
Department of Civil Engineering, Arquitecture and Geosources,
Technical University of Lisbon (IST), Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

ABSTRACT

๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์šฉ์กด ์‚ฐ์†Œ(DO)์˜ ์กด์žฌ๋Š” ํ•ด๋กœ์šด ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์ตํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋˜๋Š” ํ˜ธ๊ธฐ์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ˆ˜๋„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ํ์ˆ˜์— DO๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ-์•ก์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฉด ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด๋‚˜ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŠน์ด์ ์˜ ์กด์žฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ˜ผ์ž…๋œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์—ฐ์† ์žฌ๋ฐฉ์ถœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ˜ผ์ž… ๋ฐ ํ›„์† ํ™˜๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ตฌ ๋“œ๋กญ์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ˆ˜๊ตฌ์˜ ํ˜ธ๊ธฐ์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง ๋‚™ํ•˜, ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋‚™ํ•˜๋ฅผ CFD(์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™) ์ฝ”๋“œ FLOW-3Dยฎ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์กด์žฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ-๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ˜ผ์ž…์˜ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” Soares(2003), Afonso(2004) ๋ฐ Azevedo(2006)๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜, ์••๋ ฅ ํ—ค๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ์˜ ์ธก์ •์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ์•• ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ž˜ ๋งž์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ ํ›„ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์—ฐํ–‰ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The presence of dissolved oxygen (DO) in water flows is an important factor to ensure the aerobic conditions recognised as beneficial to prevent the occurrence of detrimental effects. The incorporation of DO in wastewater flowing in sewer systems is a process widely investigated in order to quantify the effect of continuous reaeration through the air-liquid interface or air entrained due the presence of singularities such as drops or junctions. The location of sewer drops to enhance air entrainment and subsequently reaeration is an effective practice to promote aerobic conditions in sewers. In the present paper, vertical drops, backdrops and stepped drop was modelled using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLOW-3Dยฎ to evaluate the air-water flows due to the turbulence induced by the presence of this type of structures. The assessment of the hydraulic variables and an analysis of the air entrainment based in the available experimental studies were carried out. The results of the CFD models for these structures were validated using measurements of discharge, pressure head and water depth obtained in the corresponding physical models developed by Soares (2003), Afonso (2004) and Azevedo (2006). A very good fit was obtained for the hydraulic behaviour. After validation of numerical models, analysis of the air entrainment was carried out.

Key words | air entrainment, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), sewer drops

Figure 1.| Physical models of the vertical drop, backdrop and stepped drop developed in the Technical University of Lisbon.
Figure 1.| Physical models of the vertical drop, backdrop and stepped drop developed in the Technical University of Lisbon.
Figure 3. Comparison between the experimental and numerical pressure head along of the invert of the outlet pipe.
Figure 3. Comparison between the experimental and numerical pressure head along of the invert of the outlet pipe.
Figure 4. Average void fraction along the longitudinal axis of the outlet pipe for the lower discharges in the vertical drop and backdrop.
Figure 4. Average void fraction along the longitudinal axis of the outlet pipe for the lower discharges in the vertical drop and backdrop.

REFERENCES

Afonso, J. Dissipaรงรฃo de energia e rearejamento em quedas em colectores. M.Sc. Thesis, UTL/IST, Lisboa, Portugal.
Almeida, M. C., Butler, D. & Matos, J. S. Reaeration by sewer drops. In: 8th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, Sydney, Australia.
Azevedo, R. I. Transferรชncia de oxigรฉnio em quedas guiadas em colectores. M.Sc. Thesis, IST, Lisboa, Portugal.
Beceiro, P., Almeida, M. C. & Matos, J. Numerical Modelling of air-water flows in a vertical drop and a backdrop. In: 3rd IAHR Europe Congress, Porto, Portugal.
Bombardelli, F. A., Meireles, I. & Matos, J. S. Laboratory measurements and multi-block numerical simulations of the mean flow and turbulence in the non-aerated skimming flow region of step stepped spillways. Environ. Fluid Mech. 11 (3), 263โ€“288.
Brethour, J. M. & Hirt, C. W. Drift Model for TwoComponent Flows. Flow Science, Inc., Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Chamani, M. R. Jet Flow on Stepped Spillways and Drops. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Chanson, H. Air Bubble Entrainment in Free-Surface Turbulent Shear Flow. Academic Press Inc., California, USA.
Chanson, H. Air bubble entrainment in open channels: flow structure and bubble size distribution. Int. J. Multiphase 23 (1), 193โ€“203.
Chanson, H. Hydraulics of aerated flows: qui pro quo? Journal of Hydraulic Research 51 (3), 223โ€“243.
Dufresne, M., Vazques, J., Terfous, A., Ghenaim, A. & Poulet, J. Experimental investigation and CFD modelling of flow, sedimentation, and solids separation in a combined sewer detention tank. Computer and Fluids 38, 1042โ€“1049.
Durve, A. P. & Patwardhan, A. W. Numerical and experimental investigation of onset of gas entrainment phenomenon. Chemical Engineering Science 73, 140โ€“150.
Felder, S. & Chanson, H. Airโ€“water flows and free-surface profiles on a non-uniform stepped chute. Journal of Hydraulic Research 52 (2), 253โ€“263.
Flow Science FLOW-3D Userโ€™s Manuals Version 10.0. Vol.1/2. Flow Science Inc., Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Granata, F., Marinis, G., Gargano, R. & Hager, W. H. Energy loss in circular drop manholes. In: 33rd IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for Sustainable Environment, British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Hirt, C. W. Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of air at A Free Surface. Flow Science Inc., Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Hirt, C. W. & Nichols, B. D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 39, 201โ€“225.
Hirt, C. W. & Sicilian, J. M. A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In: Proc. 4th Int, Conf. Ship Hydro., National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA.
Isfahani, A. H. G. & Brethour, J. On the Implementation of Two-Equation Turbulence Models in FLOW-3D. Flow Science Inc., Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Kouyi, G. L., Bret, P., Didier, J. M., Chocat, B. & Billat, C. The use of CFD modelling to optimise measurement of overflow rates in a downstream-controlled dual-overflow structure. Water Science and Technology 64 (2), 521โ€“527.
Lopes, P., Leandro, J., Carvalho, R. F., Pรกscoa, P. & Martins, R. Numerical and experimental investigation of a gully under surcharge conditions. Urban Water Journal 12 (6), 468โ€“476.
Martins, R., Leandro, J. & Carvalho, R. F. Characterization of the hydraulic performance of a gully under drainage conditions. Water Science and Technology 69 (12), 2423โ€“2430.
Matias, N., Nielsel, A. H., Vollertsen, J., Ferreira, F. & Matos, J. S. Reaeration and hydrogen sulfide release at drop structures. In: 8th International Conference on Sewer Processes and Networks (SPN8), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Matos, J. S. & Sousa, E. R. Prediction of dissolved oxygen concentration along sanitary sewers. Water Science and Technology 34 (5โ€“6), 525โ€“532.
Mignot, E., Bonakdari, H., Knothe, P., Lipeme Kouyi, G., Bessette, A., Riviรจre, N. & Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L. Experiments and 3D simulations of flow structures in junctions and of their influence on location of flowmeters. In: 12th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ozmen-Cagatay, H. & Kocaman, S. Dam-break flow in the presence of obstacle: experiment and CFD Simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 5 (4), 541โ€“552.
Shojaee Fard, M. H. & Boyaghchi, F. A. Studies of the influence of various blade outlet angles in a centrifugal pump when handling viscous fluids. American Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (9), 718โ€“724.
Soares, A. Rearejamento em Quedas em Colectores de รguas Residuais. M.Sc. Thesis, FCTUC, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sousa, C. M. & Lopes, R. R. Hidrรกulica e rearejamento em quedas verticais em colectores. Estudo Experimental. Research Report, UTL/IST, Lisboa, Portugal.
Sousa, V., Meireles, I., Matos, J. & Almeida, M. C. Numerical modelling of air-water flow in a vertical drop manhole. In: 7th International Conference on Sewer Processes and Networks (SPN7), Shefield, UK.
Stovin, V., Guymer, I. & Lau, S. D. Approaches to validating a 3D CFD manhole model. In: 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Tota, P. V. Turbulent Flow Over A Backward-Facing Step Using the RNG Model. Flow Science Inc., Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Valero, D. & Garcรญa-Bartual, R. Calibration of an air entrainment model for CFD spillway applications. In: Advances in Hydroinformatics. Springer, Singapore, pp. 571โ€“582.
Versteeg, H. K. & Malalasekera, W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. The Finite Volume Method. Longman Group limited, England.
Yang, Y., Yang, J., Zuo, J., Li, Y., He, S., Yang, X. & Zhang, K. Study on two operating conditions of a full-scale oxidation ditch for optimization of energy consumption and effluent quality by using CFD model. Water Research 45 (11), 3439โ€“3452.
Zhai, A. J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W. & Chen, Q. Y. Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: part 1โ€” summary of prevalent Turbulence models. HVAC&R Research 13 (6), 853โ€“870.
Zhao, C., Zhu, D. Z. & Rajaratnam, N. Computational and experimental study of surcharged flow at a 90W combining sewer junction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 134 (6), 688โ€“700.

Development of macro-defect-free PBF-EB-processed Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys with superior plasticity using PREP-synthesized powder and machine learning-assisted process optimization

Development of macro-defect-free PBF-EB-processed Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys with superior plasticity using PREP-synthesized powder and machine learning-assisted process optimization

Yunwei GuiabKenta Aoyagib Akihiko Chibab
aDepartment of Materials Processing, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6 Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan
bInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan

Received 14 October 2022, Revised 23 December 2022, Accepted 3 January 2023, Available online 5 January 2023.Show lessAdd to MendeleyShareCite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.144595Get rights and content

Abstract

The elimination of internal macro-defects is a key issue in Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys fabricated via powder bed fusion using electron beams (PBF-EB), wherein internal macro-defects mainly originate from the virgin powder and inappropriate printing parameters. This study compares different types powders by combining support vector machine techniques to determine the most suitable powder for PBF-EB and to predict the processing window for the printing parameters without internal macro-defects. The results show that powders fabricated via plasma rotating electrode process have the best sphericity, flowability, and minimal porosity and are most suitable for printing. Surface roughness criterion was also applied to determine the quality of the even surfaces, and support vector machine was used to construct processing maps capable of predicting a wide range of four-dimensional printing parameters to obtain macro-defect-free samples, offering the possibility of subsequent development of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys with excellent properties. The macro-defect-free samples exhibited good elongation, with the best overall mechanical properties being the ultimate tensile strength and elongation of 934.7โ€ฏMPa and 24.3%, respectively. The elongation of the three macro-defect-free samples was much higher than that previously reported for additively manufactured Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys. The high elongation of the samples in this work is mainly attributed to the elimination of internal macro-defects.

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can rapidly manufacture complex or custom parts, reducing process steps and saving manufacturing time [[1], [2], [3], [4]], and are widely used in the aerospace, automotive, and other precision industries [5,6]. Powder bed fusion using an electron beam (PBF-EB) is an additive manufacturing method that uses a high-energy electron beam to melt metal powders layer by layer to produce parts. In contrast to selective laser melting, PBF-EB involves the preparation of samples in a high vacuum environment, which effectively prevents the introduction of impurities such as O and N. It also involves a preheating process for the print substrate and powder, which reduces residual thermal stress on the sample and subsequent heat treatment processes [[2], [3], [4],7]. Due to these features and advantages, PBF-EB technology is a very important AM technology with great potential in metallic materials. Moreover, PBF-EB is the ideal AM technology for the manufacture of complex components made of many alloys, such as titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, aluminum alloys and stainless steels [[2], [3], [4],8].

Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloy is one of the prevalent commercial titanium alloys possessing high specific strength, excellent mechanical properties, excellent corrosion resistance, and good biocompatibility [9,10]. It is widely used in applications requiring low density and excellent corrosion resistance, such as the aerospace industry and biomechanical applications [11,12]. The mechanical properties of PBF-EB-processed Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys are superior to those fabricated by casting or forging, because the rapid cooling rate in PBF-EB results in finer grains [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. However, the PBF-EB-fabricated parts often include internal macro-defects, which compromises their mechanical properties [[19], [20], [21], [22]]. This study focused on the elimination of macro-defects, such as porosity, lack of fusion, incomplete penetration and unmelted powders, which distinguishes them from micro-defects such as vacancies, dislocations, grain boundaries and secondary phases, etc. Large-sized fusion defects cause a severe reduction in mechanical strength. Smaller defects, such as pores and cracks, lead to the initiation of fatigue cracking and rapidly accelerate the cracking process [23]. The issue of internal macro-defects must be addressed to expand the application of the PBF-EB technology. The main studies for controlling internal macro-defects are online monitoring of defects, remelting and hot isostatic pressing (HIP). The literatures [24,25] report the use of infrared imaging or other imaging techniques to identify defects, but the monitoring of smaller sized defects is still not adequate. And in some cases remelting does not reduce the internal macro-defects of the part, but instead causes coarsening of the macrostructure and volatilization of some metal elements [23]. The HIP treatment does not completely eliminate the internal macro-defects, the original defect location may still act as a point of origin of the crack, and the subsequent treatment will consume more time and economic costs [23]. Therefore, optimizing suitable printing parameters to avoid internal macro-defects in printed parts at source is of great industrial value and research significance, and is an urgent issue in PBF-EB related technology.

There are two causes of internal macro-defects in the AM process: gas pores trapped in the virgin powder and the inappropriate printing parameters [7,23]. Gui et al. [26] classify internal macro-defects during PBF-EB process according to their shape, such as spherical defects, elongated shape defects, flat shape defects and other irregular shape defects. Of these, spherical defects mainly originate from raw material powders. Other shape defects mainly originate from lack of fusion or unmelted powders caused by unsuitable printing parameters, etc. The PBF-EB process requires powders with good flowability, and spherical powders are typically chosen as raw materials. The prevalent techniques for the fabrication of pre-alloyed powders are gas atomization (GA), plasma atomization (PA), and the plasma rotating electrode process (PREP) [27,28]. These methods yield powders with different characteristics that affect the subsequent fabrication. The selection of a suitable powder for PBF-EB is particularly important to produce Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys without internal macro-defects. The need to optimize several printing parameters such as beam current, scan speed, line offset, and focus offset make it difficult to eliminate internal macro-defects that occur during printing [23]. Most of the studies [11,12,22,[29], [30], [31], [32], [33]] on the optimization of AM processes for Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys have focused on samples with a limited set of parameters (e.g., powerโ€“scan speed) and do not allow for the guidance and development of unknown process windows for macro-defect-free samples. In addition, process optimization remains a time-consuming problem, with the traditional โ€˜trial and errorโ€™ method demanding considerable time and economic costs. The development of a simple and efficient method to predict the processing window for alloys without internal macro-defects is a key issue. In recent years, machine learning techniques have increasingly been used in the field of additive manufacturing and materials development [[34], [35], [36], [37]]. Aoyagi et al. [38] recently proposed a novel and efficient method based on a support vector machine (SVM) to optimize the two-dimensional process parameters (current and scan speed) and obtain PBF-EB-processed CoCr alloys without internal macro-defects. The method is one of the potential approaches toward effective optimization of more than two process parameters and makes it possible for the machine learning techniques to accelerate the development of alloys without internal macro-defects.

Herein, we focus on the elimination of internal macro-defects, such as pores, lack of fusion, etc., caused by raw powders and printing parameters. The Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V powders produced by three different methods were compared, and the powder with the best sphericity, flowability, and minimal porosity was selected as the feedstock for subsequent printing. The relationship between the surface roughness and internal macro-defects in the Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V components was also investigated. The combination of SVM and surface roughness indices (Sdr) predicted a wider four-dimensional processing window for obtaining Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys without internal macro-defects. Finally, we investigated the tensile properties of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys at room temperature with different printing parameters, as well as the corresponding microstructures and fracture types.

Section snippets

Starting materials

Three types of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloy powders, produced by GA, PA, and PREP, were compared. The particle size distribution of the powders was determined using a laser particle size analyzer (LS230, Beckman Coulter, USA), and the flowability was measured using a Hall flowmeter (JIS-Z2502, Tsutsui Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Japan), according to the ASTM B213 standard. The powder morphology and internal macro-defects were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JCM-6000) and X-ray 

Comparison of the characteristics of GA, PA, and PREP Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V powders

The particle size distributions (PSDs) and flowability of the three types of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloy powders produced by GA, PA, and PREP are shown in Fig. 2. Although the average particle sizes are similar (89.4โ€ฏฮผm for GA, 82.5โ€ฏฮผm for PA, and 86.1ฮผm for PREP), the particle size range is different for the three types of powder (6.2โ€“174.8 ฮผm for GA, 27.3โ€“139.2 ฮผm for PA, and 39.4โ€“133.9 ฮผm for PREP). The flowability of the GA, PA, and PREP powders was 30.25โ€ฏยฑโ€ฏ0.98, 26.54โ€ฏยฑโ€ฏ0.37, and 25.03โ€ฏยฑโ€ฏ0.22 (s/50

Conclusions

The characteristics of the three types of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloy powders produced via GA, PA, and PREP were compared. The PREP powder with the best sphericity, flowability, and low porosity was found to be the most favorable powder for subsequent printing of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys without internal macro-defects. The quantitative criterion of Sdr <0.015 for even surfaces was also found to be applicable to Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys. The process maps of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V alloys include two regions, high beam current/scan speed 

Uncited references

[55]; [56]; [57]; [58]; [59]; [60]; [61]; [62]; [63]; [64]; [65].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yunwei Gui: Writing โ€“ original draft, Visualization, Validation, Investigation. Kenta Aoyagi: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Akihiko Chiba: Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was based on the results obtained from project JPNP19007, commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). This work was also supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Proposal No. 21K03801) and the Inter-University Cooperative Research Program (Proposal nos. 18G0418, 19G0411, and 20G0418) of the Cooperative Research and Development Center for Advanced Materials, Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University. It was also supported by the Council for

References (65)

View more references

Cited by (0)

Recommended articles (6)

Figure 2. Different PKW Types.

A review of Piano Key Weir as a superior alternative for dam rehabilitation

๋Œ ๋ณต๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ Piano Key Weir์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

Amiya Abhash &

K. K. Pandey

Pages 541-551 | Received 03 Mar 2020, Accepted 07 May 2020, Published online: 21 May 2020

ABSTRACT

Dams fall in โ€˜installations containing dangerous forcesโ€™ because of their massive impact on the environment and civilian life and property as per International humanitarian law. As such, it becomes vital for hydraulic engineers to refurbish various solutions for dam rehabilitation. This paper presents a review of a new type of weir installation called Piano Key Weir (PKW), which is becoming popular around the world for its higher spillway capacity both for existing and new dam spillway installations. This paper reviews the geometry along with structural integrity, discharging capacity, economic aspects, aeration requirements, sediment transport and erosion aspects of Piano Key Weir (PKW) as compared with other traditional spillway structures and alternatives from literature. The comparison with other alternatives shows PKW to be an excellent alternative for dam risk mitigation owing to its high spillway capabilities and economy, along with its use in both existing and new hydraulic structures.

๋Œ์€ ๊ตญ์ œ ์ธ๋„๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ„์ธ ์ƒํ™œ ๋ฐ ์žฌ์‚ฐ์— ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ‘์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ํž˜์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์„ค๋ฌผ’์— ์†ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์œ ์•• ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ๋Œ ๋ณต๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์žฌ์ •๋น„ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋ฐฑ์„œ์—์„œ๋Š” PKW(Piano Key Weir)๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๋‘‘ ์„ค์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. PKW๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ทœ ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค์น˜ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋ฐฑ์„œ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ฌด๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰, ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ธก๋ฉด, ํญ๊ธฐ ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ, ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์šด๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ PKW(Piano Key Weir)์˜ ์นจ์‹ ์ธก๋ฉด๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋Š” PKW๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋Œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์™„ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํƒ์›”ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋‘์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

KEYWORDS: 

Figure 2. Different PKW Types.
Figure 2. Different PKW Types.

References

  • Anderson, R., and Tullis, B. (2011). Influence of Piano Key Weir geometry on discharge. Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs Liรจge B. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, R., and Tullis, B. (2012a). โ€œPiano key weir hydraulics and labyrinth weir comparisonโ€. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 139(3), 246โ€“253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000530 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, R., and Tullis, B. (2012b). โ€œPiano key weir: Reservoir versus channel applicationโ€. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 138(8), 773โ€“776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000464 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, R.M. 2011. Piano key weir head discharge relationships, M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. [Google Scholar]
  • Bashiri, H., Dewals, B., Pirotton, M., Archambeau, P., and Erpicum, S. (2016). โ€œTowards a new design equation for piano key weirs discharge capacity.โ€ Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures. Portland, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Bianucci, S.P., Sordo Ward, ร.F., Pรฉrez Dรญaz, J.I., Garcรญa-Palacios, J.H., Mediero Orduรฑa, L.J., and Garrote de Marcos, L. (2013). โ€œRisk-based methodology for parameter calibration of a reservoir flood control modelโ€. Natl. Hazard Earth Syst. Sci., 13(4), 965โ€“981. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-965-2013 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Blancher, B., Montarros, F., and Laugier, F. (2011). Hydraulic comparison between Piano Key Weirs and labyrinth spillways. Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs Liรจge B. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Botha, A., Fitz, I., Moore, A., Mulder, F., and Van Deventer, N. 2013. โ€œApplication of the Piano Key Weir spillway in the Republic of South Africaโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 185. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Chahartaghi, M.K., Nazari, S., and Shooshtari, M.M. 2019. โ€œExperimental and numerical simulation of arced trapezoidal Piano Key Weirsโ€. Flow Meas. Instrum., 68, 101576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101576 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Chi Hien, T., Thanh Son, H., and Ho Ta Khanh, M. (2006). Results of some โ€˜piano keysโ€™ weir hydraulic model tests in Vietnam. Proc., 22nd Int. Congress of Large Dams, Question 87, Response 39, International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD). Barcelona, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  • Cicero, G., Barcouda, M., Luck, M., and Vettori, E. (2011). Study of a piano key morning glory to increase the spillway capacity of the Bage dam. Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth Piano Key Weirs-PKW2011, Taylor & Francis, London. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Cicero, G., De Miranda, D., and Luck, M. (2012). โ€œAssessment of the code Wolf 1D PKW for predicting the hydraulic behaviour of PK-Weirs.โ€ Congrรจs SHF-33รจmes journรฉes de lโ€™hydraulique โ€œGrands amรฉnagements hydrauliques 2012โ€, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Cicero, G., and Delisle, J. (2013). โ€œDischarge characteristics of Piano Key weirs under submerged flowโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs IIโ€“PKW 2013, 101โ€“109. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Cicero, G., Delisle, J., Lefebvre, V., and Vermeulen, J. (2013). โ€œExperimental and numerical study of the hydraulic performance of a trapezoidal Piano Key weir.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 265. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Cicรฉro, G., Guene, C., Luck, M., Pinchard, T., Lochu, A., and Brousse, P. (2010). โ€œExperimental optimization of a Piano Key Weir to increase the spillway capacity of the Malarce dam.โ€ 1st IAHR European Congress, Edinbourgh, Mai 4โ€“6, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Crookston, B., Anderson, R., and Tullis, B. (2018). โ€œFree-flow discharge estimation method for Piano Key weir geometries.โ€ J. Hydro. Environ. Res., 19, 160โ€“167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.003 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Das Singhal, G., and Sharma, N. 2011. โ€œRehabilitation of Sawara Kuddu Hydroelectric Projectโ€“Model studies of Piano Key Weir in Indiaโ€. Proc. Int. Workshop on Labyrinths and Piano Key Weirs PKW 2011. Taylor & Francis, London. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Denys, F., Basson, G., and Strasheim, J. (2017). Fluid Structure Interaction of Piano Key Weirs. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Eichenberger, P. (2013). โ€œThe first commercial piano key weir in Switzerland.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 227. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Erpicum, S., Laugier, F., Pfister, M., Pirotton, M., Cicero, G.-M., and Schleiss, A.J. 2013. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, CRC Press. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Erpicum, S., Machiels, O., Dewals, B., Pirotton, M., and Archambeau, P. (2012). โ€œNumerical and physical hydraulic modelling of Piano Key Weirs.โ€ Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Water Resources and Renewable Energy Development in Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailande. [Google Scholar]
  • Erpicum, S., Nagel, V., and Laugier, F. (2011). โ€œPiano Key Weir design study at Raviege damโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirsโ€“PKW 2011, 43โ€“50. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Ervine, D., and Elsawy, E. (1975). โ€œThe effect of a falling nappe on river aeration.โ€ Proc. 16th IAHR Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Falvey, H.T. 1980. โ€œAir-water flow in hydraulic structuresโ€. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 81. [Google Scholar]
  • Gabriel-Martin, I., Sordo-Ward, A., Garrote, L., and Castillo, L.G. (2017). โ€œInfluence of initial reservoir level and gate failure in dam safety analysis. Stochastic approach.โ€ J. Hydrol., 550, 669โ€“684. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.032 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Gebhardt, M., Herbst, J., Merkel, J., and Belzner, F. (2019). โ€œSedimentation at labyrinth weirsโ€“an experimental study of the self-cleaning processโ€. J. Hydraulic Res., 57(4), 579โ€“590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1494053 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Hu, H., Qian, Z., Yang, W., Hou, D., and Du, L. (2018). โ€œNumerical study of characteristics and discharge capacity of piano key weirs.โ€ Flow Meas. Instrum., 62, 27โ€“32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.05.004 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Javaheri, A., and Kabiri-Samani, A. (2012). โ€œThreshold submergence of flow over PK weirsโ€. Int. J. Civil Geol. Eng., 6, 46โ€“49. [Google Scholar]
  • Jayatillake, H., and Perera, K. (2013). โ€œDesign of a Piano-Key Weir for Giritale Dam spillway in Sri Lanka.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 151. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Jayatillake, H., and Perera, K. (2017). โ€œAdoption of a type D Piano Key Weir spillway with tapered noses at Rambawa Tank, Sri Lanka.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Jรผstrich, S., Pfister, M., and Schleiss, A.J. (2016). โ€œMobile riverbed scour downstream of a Piano Key weirโ€. J. Hydraulic Eng., 142(11), 04016043. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001189 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Kabiri-Samani, A., and Javaheri, A. (2012). โ€œDischarge coefficients for free and submerged flow over Piano Key weirsโ€. J. Hydraulic Res., 50(1), 114โ€“120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.647888 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Karimi, M., Attari, J., Saneie, M., and Jalili Ghazizadeh, M.R. (2018). โ€œSide weir flow characteristics: comparison of piano key, labyrinth, and linear typesโ€. J. Hydraulic Eng., 144(12), 04018075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001539 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Karimi, M., Attari, J., Saneie, M., and Jalili-Ghazizadeh, M. (2017). โ€œExperimental study of discharge coefficient of a piano key side weir.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017). Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2017, Qui Nhon, Vietnam, 22โ€“24. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Khanh, M.H.T. (2013). โ€œThe Piano Key Weirs: 15 years of Research & Developmentโ€“Prospect.โ€ Labyrinth and piano key weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 3. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Khanh, M.H.T. (2017). โ€œHistory and development of Piano Key Weirs in Vietnam from 2004 to 2016.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam. [Google Scholar]
  • Khanh, M.H.T., Hien, T.C., and Hai, N.T. (2011). โ€œMain results of the PK weir model tests in Vietnam (2004 to 2010).โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs, 191. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Khassaf, S.I., Aziz, L.J., and Elkatib, Z.A. (2016). โ€œHydraulic behavior of piano key weir type B under free flow conditionsโ€. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 5(3), 158โ€“163. [Google Scholar]
  • Khassaf, S.I., and Al-Baghdadi, M.B. (2015). โ€œExperimental study of non-rectangular piano key weir discharge coefficientโ€. J. Homepage, 6(5), 425โ€“436. [Google Scholar]
  • Khassaf, S.I., and Al-Baghdadi, M.B.N. (2018). โ€œExperimental investigation of submerged flow over piano key weirโ€. Int. J. Energy Environ., 9(3), 249โ€“260. [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon, -H.-H., and Moon, Y.-I. (2006). โ€œImprovement of overtopping risk evaluations using probabilistic concepts for existing damsโ€. Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 20(4), 223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0017-2 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Laugier, F. (2007). โ€œDesign and construction of the first Piano Key Weir spillway at Goulours damโ€. Int. J. Hydropower Dams, 14(5), 94. [Google Scholar]
  • Laugier, F., Lochu, A., Gille, C., Leite Ribeiro, M., and Boillat, J.-L. (2009). โ€œDesign and construction of a labyrinth PKW spillway at Saint-Marc dam, Franceโ€. Hydropower Dams, 16(LCHโ€“ARTICLEโ€“2009โ€“023), 100โ€“107. [Google Scholar]
  • Laugier, F., Pralong, J., and Blancher, B. (2011). โ€œInfluence of structural thickness of sidewalls on PKW spillway discharge capacity.โ€ Proc. Intl Workshop on Labyrinths and Piano Key Weirs PKW 2011. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Le Blanc, M., Spinazzola, U., and Kocahan, H. (2011). โ€œLabyrinth fusegate applications on free overflow spillwaysโ€“Overview of recent projects.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs, 261, Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Leite Ribeiro, M., Bieri, M., Boillat, J.-L., Schleiss, A., Delorme, F., and Laugier, F. (2009). โ€œHydraulic capacity improvement of existing spillwaysโ€“design of a piano key weirs.โ€ Proc. (on CD) of the 23rd Congress of the Int. Commission on Large Dams CIGB-ICOLD. Brasilia, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Leite Ribeiro, M., Bieri, M., Boillat, J.-L., Schleiss, A., Singhal, G., and Sharma, N. (2011). โ€œDischarge capacity of piano key weirsโ€. J. Hydraulic Eng., 138(2), 199โ€“203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000490 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Lempรฉriรจre, F., and Ouamane, A. (2003). โ€œThe Piano Keys weir: a new cost-effective solution for spillwaysโ€. Int. J. Hydropower Dams, 10(5), 144โ€“149. [Google Scholar]
  • Lempรฉriรจre, F., and Vigny, J. (2011). โ€œGeneral comments on labyrinth and Piano Keys Weirsโ€“The futureโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key weirsโ€“PKW 2011, 289โ€“294. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Lempรฉriรจre, F., Vigny, J., and Ouamane, A. (2011). General comments on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs: The past and present. Proc. Intl. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs, Liรจge B. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Lewin, J., Ballard, G., and Bowles, D.S. (2003). โ€œSpillway gate reliability in the context of overall dam failure risk.โ€ USSD Annual Lecture, Charleston, South Carolina. [Google Scholar]
  • Lodomez, M., Pirotton, M., Dewals, B., Archambeau, P., and Erpicum, S. (2017). โ€œCould piano key weirs be subject to nappe oscillations?โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Machiels, O., Erpicum, S., Archambeau, P., Dewals, B., and Pirotton, M. (2009). โ€œLarge scale experimental study of piano key weirs.โ€ Proc. 33rd IAHR Congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment, IAHR. Vancouver, Canada [Google Scholar]
  • Machiels, O., Erpicum, S., Archambeau, P., Dewals, B., and Pirotton, M. (2011a). โ€œPiano Key Weir preliminary design methodโ€“Application to a new dam project.โ€ Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs Liรจge B. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Machiels, O., Erpicum, S., Dewals, B., Archambeau, P., and Pirotton, M. (2010). โ€œPiano Key Weirs: The experimental study of an efficient solution for rehabilitationโ€. WIT Trans. Ecol., 133, 95โ€“106. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Machiels, O., Erpicum, S., Dewals, B.J., Archambeau, P., and Pirotton, M. (2011b). โ€œExperimental observation of flow characteristics over a Piano Key Weirโ€. J Hydraulic Res, 49(3), 359โ€“366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.567761 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Machiels, O., Pirotton, M., Pierre, A., Dewals, B., and Erpicum, S. (2014). โ€œExperimental parametric study and design of Piano Key Weirsโ€. J. Hydraulic Res., 52(3), 326โ€“335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.875070 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Mehboudi, A., Attari, J., and Hosseini, S. (2016). โ€œExperimental study of discharge coefficient for trapezoidal piano key weirs.โ€ Flow Meas. Instrum., 50, 65โ€“72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.06.005 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Micovic, Z., Hartford, D.N., Schaefer, M.G., and Barker, B.L. (2016). โ€œA non-traditional approach to the analysis of flood hazard for damsโ€. Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 30(2), 559โ€“581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1052-2 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Monjezi, R., Heidarnejad, M., Masjedi, A., Purmohammadi, M.H., and Kamanbedast, A. (2018). โ€œLaboratory investigation of the discharge coefficient of flow in arced labyrinth weirs with triangular plans.โ€ Flow Meas. Instrum., 64, 64โ€“70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.10.011 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Noseda, M., Stojnic, I., Pfister, M., and Schleiss, A.J. (2019). โ€œUpstream Erosion and sediment passage at piano key weirsโ€. J. Hydraulic Eng., 145(8), 04019029. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001616 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Oertel, M. (2015). โ€œDischarge coefficients of piano key weirs from experimental and numerical modelS.โ€ E= proceedings of the 36th IAHR world congress. 28 June โ€“ 3 July, The Hague, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Ouamane, A. (2011). Nine years of study of the Piano Key Weir in the university laboratory of Biskra โ€œlessons and reflectionsโ€. Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth Piano Key Weirs-PKW2011, Taylor & Francis, London. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Ouamane, A., Debabeche, M., Lempรฉriรจre, F., and Vigny, J. (2017). Twenty years of research in Biskra University for Labyrinths and Piano Key Weirs and associated fuse plugs. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Ouamane, A., and Lempรฉriรจre, F. (2006). Design of a new economic shape of weir. Proc. Int. Symp. on Dams in the Societies of the 21st Century. Barcelona, Spain. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Patev, R., and Putcha, C. (2005). โ€œDevelopment of fault trees for risk assessment of dam gates and associated operating equipmentโ€. Int. J. Modell. Simul., 25(3), 190โ€“201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2005.11442336 [Taylor & Francis Online][Google Scholar]
  • Paxson, G., Tullis, B., and Hertel, D. 2013. โ€œComparison of Piano Key Weirs with labyrinth and gated spillways: Hydraulics, cost, constructability and operationsโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 123โ€“130. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Pfister, M., Capobianco, D., Tullis, B., and Schleiss, A.J. (2013). โ€œDebris-blocking sensitivity of piano key weirs under reservoir-type approach flowโ€. J. Hydraulic Eng., 139(11), 1134โ€“1141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000780 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Phillips, M., and Lesleighter, E. 2013. โ€œPiano Key Weir spillway: Upgrade option for a major damโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 159โ€“168. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Pinchard, T., Boutet, J., and Cicero, G. (2011). โ€œSpillway capacity upgrade at Malarce dam: design of an additional Piano Key Weir spillway.โ€ Proc. Int. Workshop on Labyrinths and Piano Key Weirs PKW. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Pralong, J., J. Vermeulen, B. Blancher, F. Laugier, S. Erpicum, O. Machiels, M. Pirotton, J.-L. Boillat, M. Leite Ribeiro and A. Schleiss (2011). โ€œA naming convention for the piano key weirs geometrical parameters.โ€ Labyrinth and piano key weirs, 271โ€“278. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro, M.L., Boillat, J.-L., Schleiss, A., Laugier, F., and Albalat, C. (2007). โ€œRehabilitation of St-Marc dam.โ€ Experimental optimization of a piano key weir. Proc. of 32nd Congress of IAHR, Vince, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro, M.L., Pfister, M., and Schleiss, A.J. (2013). โ€œOverview of Piano Key weir prototypes and scientific model investigationsโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 273. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro, M.L., Pfister, M., Schleiss, A.J., and Boillat, J.-L. (2012). โ€œHydraulic design of A-type piano key weirsโ€. J. Hydraulic Res., 50(4), 400โ€“408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.695041 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Ribi, J., Spahni, B., Dorthe, D., and Pfister, M. (2017). Piano Key Weir as overflow on sedimentation basin of wastewater treatment plant. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Schleiss, A. (2011). โ€œFrom labyrinth to piano key weirs: a historical review.โ€ Proc. Int. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs Liรจge B. Liรจge, Belgium. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Sharma, N., and Tiwari, H. (2013). โ€œExperimental study on vertical velocity and submergence depth near Piano Key Weir.โ€ Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II-PKW, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano key weirs 2013, Chatou, Paris, France, 20โ€“22, 93โ€“100. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Tiwari, H. (2016). Experimental Study of Turbulence Characteristics Near Piano Key Weir. PhD, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. [Google Scholar]
  • Tiwari, H., and Sharma, N. 2017. โ€œEmpirical and Mathematical Modeling of Head and Discharge Over Piano Key Weirโ€. Development of Water Resources in India. Springer, Cham. 341โ€“354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55125-8_29 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Valley, P., and Blancher, B. (2017). Construction and testing of two Piano Key Weirs at Charmines dam. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), Feb 22โ€“24, 2017, CRC Press, Qui Nhon, Vietnam. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Vermeulen, J., Lassus, C., and Pinchard, T. (2017). Design of a Piano Key Weir aeration network. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW 2017), February 22- 24,2017, Qui Nhon, Vietnam, CRC Press. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Vermeulen, J., Laugier, F., Faramond, L., and Gille, C. (2011). โ€œLessons learnt from design and construction of EDF first Piano Key Weirsโ€. Labyrinth and Piano Key weirs-PKW 2011, 215โ€“224. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
Serife Yurdagul Kumcuโˆ’2โˆ’KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssรงTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory

Investigation of flow over spillway modeling and comparison between experimental data and CFD analysis

์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ CFD ํ•ด์„์˜ ๋น„๊ต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

DOI:10.1007/s12205-016-1257-z

Authors:

Serife Yurdagul Kumcu at Necmettin Erbakan รœniversitesi

Serife Yurdagul Kumcu

Abstract and Figures

As a part of design process for hydro-electric generating stations, hydraulic engineers typically conduct some form of model testing. The desired outcome from the testing can vary considerably depending on the specific situation, but often characteristics such as velocity patterns, discharge rating curves, water surface profiles, and pressures at various locations are measured. Due to recent advances in computational power and numerical techniques, it is now also possible to obtain much of this information through numerical modeling. In this paper, hydraulic characteristics of Kavsak Dam and Hydroelectric Power Plant (HEPP), which are under construction and built for producing energy in Turkey, were investigated experimentally by physical model studies. The 1/50-scaled physical model was used in conducting experiments. Flow depth, discharge and pressure data were recorded for different flow conditions. Serious modification was made on the original project with the experimental study. In order to evaluate the capability of the computational fluid dynamics on modeling spillway flow a comparative study was made by using results obtained from physical modeling and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. A commercially available CFD program, which solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, was used to model the numerical model setup by defining cells where the flow is partially or completely restricted in the computational space. Discharge rating curves, velocity patterns and pressures were used to compare the results of the physical model and the numerical model. It was shown that there is reasonably good agreement between the physical and numerical models in flow characteristics.

์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ด๋–ค ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์†๋„ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋ฐฉ์ „ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ , ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ์˜ ์••๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ธก์ •๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ด์ œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ„ฐํ‚ค์—์„œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฑด์„ค ์ค‘์ธ Kavsak ๋Œ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ(HEPP)์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 1/50 ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์‹คํ—˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„ ๊นŠ์ด, ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๋ฐ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ๋ก๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์›๋ž˜ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ์— ๋Œ€๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ •์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๊ณผ ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. RANS(Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ํ‘ธ๋Š” ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ CFD ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋˜๋Š” ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ œํ•œ๋˜๋Š” ์…€์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค์ •์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ , ์†๋„ ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ๋™ ํŠน์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐ„์— ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์ข‹์€ ์ผ์น˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Serife Yurdagul Kumcuโˆ’2โˆ’KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssรงTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory
Serife Yurdagul Kumcuโˆ’2โˆ’KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssรงTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory

References

Bureau of Reclamation (1977). Design of small dams, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., U.S.

Bureau of Reclamation (1990). Cavitation in chute and spillways, Engineering Monograph, No.42, U.S. Chanel, P. G. (2008). An evaluation of computational fluid dynamics for

spillway modeling, MSc Thesis, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Chanson, H. (2002). The hydraulics of stepped chutes and spillways,Balkema, Lisse, The Netherlands.

Chanson, H. and Gonzalez, C. A. (2005). โ€œPhysical modeling and scale effects of air-water flows on stepped spillways.โ€ Journal of Zhejiang University Science, Vol. 6A, No. 3, pp. 243-250.

Demiroz, E. (1986). โ€œSpecifications of aeration structures which are added to the spillways.โ€ DSI Report, HI-754, DSI-TAKK Publications, Ankara, Turkey.

Erfanain-Azmoudeh, M. H. and Kamanbedast, A. A. (2013). โ€œDetermine the appropriate location of aerator system on gotvandoliadam’s spillway using Flow 3D.โ€ American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 378-383, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2013. 13.03. 458.

Falvey, H. T. (1990). Cavitation in chutes and spillways, Engineering Monograph 42 Water Resources Technical Publication US Printing Office, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.

Flow-3D User โ€™s Manual (2012). Flow science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

Hirt, C. W. (1992). โ€œVolume-fraction techniques: Powerful tools for flow

modeling.โ€ Flow Science Report, No. FSI-92-00-02, Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

Hirt C. W. and Nichols B. D. (1981). โ€œVolume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.โ€Jornal of Computational Physics, Vol. 39, pp. 201-225, DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.

Hirt, C. W. and Sicilian, J. M. (1985). โ€œA Porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes.โ€ Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Hydro-dynamics, 24-27 September 1985, National Academic of Sciences, Washington DC.

Ho, D., Boyes, K., Donohoo, S., and Cooper, B. (2003). โ€œNumerical flow analysis for spillways.โ€ 43rd ANCOLD Conference, Hobart, Tas m a nia .

Johnson, M. C. and Savage, B. M. (2006). โ€œPhysical and numerical comparison of flow over ogee spillway in the presence of tailwater.โ€

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 12, pp. 1353-135, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.

Kim, S. D., Lee, H. J., and An, S. D. (2010). โ€œImprovement of hydraulic stability for spillway using CFD model.โ€ Int. Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 774-780.

Kokpinar, M. A. and Gogus, M. (2002). โ€œHigh speed jet flows over spillway aerators.โ€ Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 885-898, DOI: 10.1139/l02-088.

Kumcu, S. Y. (2010). Hydraulic model studies of Kavsak Dam and HEPP, DSI Report, HI-1005, DSI-TAKK Publications, Ankara, Turkey.

Margeirsson, B. (2007). Computational modeling of flow over a spillway, MSc Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Nichols, B. D. and Hirt, C. W. (1975). โ€œMethods for calculating multi-dimensional, transient free surface flows past bodies.โ€ Proc. First Intern. Conf. Num., Ship Hydrodynamics, Gaithersburg, ML.

Savage, B. M. and Johnson, M. C. (2001). โ€œFlow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study.โ€ Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 8, pp. 640-649, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.

Souders, D. T. and Hirt, C. W. (2004). โ€œModeling entrainment of air at turbulent free surfaces.โ€ Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental resources Management, pp. 1-10.

entรผrk, F. (1994). Hydraulics of dams and reservoirs, Water Resources Publication Colorado, USA.

Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B, Groeneveld, J., Sydor, K., and Fuchs, D. (2001). Optimization of hydraulic design using computational fluid dynamics, Waterpower XII, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Teklemariam, E., Shumilak, B., Sydor, K., Murray, D., Fuchs, D., and Holder, G. (2008). โ€œAn integral approach using both physical and computational modeling can be beneficial in addressing the full range of hydraulic design issues.โ€ CDA Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Canada.

Usta, E. (2014). Numerical investigation of hydraulic characteristics of Laleli Dam spillway and comparison with physical model study, Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Versteeg, H. K. and Malalasekera, W. (1996). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics, Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group Limited, Harlow, England.

Vischer, D. L. and Hager, W. H. (1997). Dam hydraulics, J. Wiley & Sons Ltd., England.

Wagner, W. E. (1967). โ€œGlen Canyon diversion tunnel outlets.โ€ J. Hydraulic Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, No. HY6, pp. 113-134.

Willey, J., Ewing, T., Wark, B., and Lesleighter, E. (2012). Comple-mentary use of physical and numerical modeling techniques in spillway design refinement, Commission Internationale Des Grands Barrages, Kyoto, June 2012.

Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.

Assessment of spillway modeling using computational fluid dynamics

์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ‰๊ฐ€

Authors: Paul G. Chanel and John C. Doering AUTHORS INFO & AFFILIATIONS

Publication: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

3 December 2008

Abstract

Throughout the design and planning period for future hydroelectric generating stations, hydraulic engineers are increasingly integrating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) into the process. As a result, hydraulic engineers are interested in the reliability of CFD software to provide accurate flow data for a wide range of structures, including a variety of different spillways. In the literature, CFD results have generally been in agreement with physical model experimental data. Despite past success, there has not been a comprehensive assessment that looks at the ability of CFD to model a range of different spillway configurations, including flows with various gate openings. In this article, Flow-3D is used to model the discharge over ogee-crested spillways. The numerical model results are compared with physical model studies for three case study evaluations. The comparison indicates that the accuracy of Flow-3D is related to the parameterย P/Hd.

๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๊ณ„ํš ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์œ ์•• ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD)์„ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ ์  ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์•• ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” CFD ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ CFD ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” CFD์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋Š” ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ธ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Flow-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ogee-crested ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต๋Š” Flow-3D์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ P/Hd์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Rรฉsumรฉ

Les ingรฉnieurs en hydraulique intรจgrent de plus en plus la dynamique des fluides numรฉrique (ยซ CFD ยป) dans le processus de conception et de planification des futures centrales. Ainsi, les ingรฉnieurs en hydraulique sโ€™intรฉressent ร  la fiabilitรฉ du logiciel de ยซ CFD ยป afin de fournir des donnรฉes prรฉcises sur le dรฉbit pour une large gamme de structures, incluant diffรฉrents types dโ€™รฉvacuateurs. Les rรฉsultats de ยซ CFD ยป dans la littรฉrature ont รฉtรฉ globalement sont gรฉnรฉralement en accord avec les donnรฉes expรฉrimentales des essais physiques. Malgrรฉ les succรจs antรฉrieurs, il nโ€™y avait aucune รฉvaluation complรจte de la capacitรฉ des ยซ CFD ยป ร  modรฉliser une plage de configuration des รฉvacuateurs, incluant les dรฉbits ร  diverses ouvertures de vannes. Dans le prรฉsent article, le logiciel Flow-3D est utilisรฉ pour modรฉliser le dรฉbit par des รฉvacuateurs en doucine. Les rรฉsultats du modรจle de calcul sont comparรฉs ร  ceux des essais physiques pour trois รฉtudes de cas. La comparaison montre que la prรฉcision du logiciel Flow-3D est associรฉe au paramรจtre P/Hd.

Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.
Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

GET ACCESSALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? SIGN IN AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR VIA YOUR INSTITUTION

References

Chanel, P.G., and Doering, J.C. 2007. An evaluation of computational fluid dynamics for spillway modelling. In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC), Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 3โ€“7 December 2007. pp. 1201โ€“1206.

Google Scholar

Flow Science, Inc. 2007. Flow-3D userโ€™s manuals. Version 9.2. Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

Google Scholar

Gessler, D. 2005. CFD modeling of spillway performance, EWRI 2005: Impacts of global climate change. In Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Anchorage, Alaska, 15โ€“19 May 2005. Edited by R. Walton. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.

Google Scholar

Hirt, C.W., and Nichols, B.D. 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1): 201โ€“225.

Crossref

ISI

Google Scholar

Hirt, C.W., and Sicilian, J.M. 1985. A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Hydro-dynamics, Washington, D.C., 24โ€“27 September 1985. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

Google Scholar

Ho, D., Cooper, B., Riddette, K., and Donohoo, S. 2006. Application of numerical modelling to spillways in Australia. In Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century. Edited by Berga et al. Taylor and Francis Group, London.

Google Scholar

LaSalle Consulting Group Inc. 1992. Conawapa generating station. Sectional model study of the spillway. LaSalle Consulting Group Inc., Montrรฉal, Que.

Google Scholar

Lemke, D.E. 1989. A comparison of the hydraulic performance of an orifice and an overflow spillway in a northern application using physical modeling. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.

Google Scholar

Savage, B.M., and Johnson, M.C. 2001. Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(8): 640โ€“649.

Crossref

ISI

Google Scholar

Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B., Groeneveld, J., Sydor, K., and Fuchs, D. 2001. Optimization of hydraulic design using computational fluid dynamics. In Proceedings of Waterpower XII, Salt Lake City, Utah, 9โ€“11 July 2001.

Google Scholar

Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B., Groeneveld, J., and Fuchs, D. 2002. Computational fluid dynamics: Diverse applications in hydropower project’s design and analysis. In Proceedings of the CWRA 55th Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Man., 11โ€“14 June 2002. Canadian Water Resources Association, Cambridge, Ontario.

Google Scholar

Western Canadian Hydraulic Laboratories Inc. 1980. Hydraulics model studies limestone generating station spillway/diversion structure flume study. Final report. Western Canadian Hydraulic Laboratories Inc., Port Coquitlam, B.C.

Google Scholar

Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.

BC Hydro Assesses Spillway Hydraulics with FLOW-3D

by Faizal Yusuf, M.A.Sc., P.Eng.
Specialist Engineer in the Hydrotechnical Department at BC Hydro

BC Hydro, a public electric utility in British Columbia, uses FLOW-3D to investigate complex hydraulics issues at several existing dams and to assist in the design and optimization of proposed facilities.

Faizal Yusuf, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Specialist Engineer in the Hydrotechnical department at BC Hydro, presents three case studies that highlight the application of FLOW-3D to different types of spillways and the importance of reliable prototype or physical hydraulic model data for numerical model calibration.

W.A.C. Bennett Dam
At W.A.C. Bennett Dam, differences in the spillway geometry between the physical hydraulic model from the 1960s and the prototype make it difficult to draw reliable conclusions on shock wave formation and chute capacity from physical model test results. The magnitude of shock waves in the concrete-lined spillway chute are strongly influenced by a 44% reduction in the chute width downstream of the three radial gates at the headworks, as well as the relative openings of the radial gates. The shock waves lead to locally higher water levels that have caused overtopping of the chute walls under certain historical operations.Prototype spill tests for discharges up to 2,865 m3/s were performed in 2012 to provide surveyed water surface profiles along chute walls, 3D laser scans of the water surface in the chute and video of flow patterns for FLOW-3D model calibration. Excellent agreement was obtained between the numerical model and field observations, particularly for the location and height of the first shock wave at the chute walls (Figure 1).

W.A.C์—์„œ Bennett Dam, 1960๋…„๋Œ€์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž… ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉํŒŒ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ŠˆํŠธ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ผ์ด๋‹ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚™ํ•˜์‚ฐ์˜ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉํŒŒ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํ—ค๋“œ์›Œํฌ์— ์žˆ๋Š” 3๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ŠˆํŠธ ํญ์ด 44% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ๊ฒฉํŒŒ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์ŠˆํŠธ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ๋ฒ”๋žŒ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๋Œ€ 2,865m3/s์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž… ์œ ์ถœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ 2012๋…„์— ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์ŠˆํŠธ ๋ฒฝ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํ•„, 3D ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ”์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ณด์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ŠˆํŠธ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด ๋น„๋””์˜ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ŠˆํŠธ ๋ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉํŒŒ์˜ ์œ„์น˜์™€ ๋†’์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ๊ฐ„์— ํƒ์›”ํ•œ ์ผ์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1).
Figure 1. Comparison between prototype observations and FLOW-3D for a spill discharge of 2,865 m^3/s at Bennett Dam spillway.
Figure 1. Comparison between prototype observations and FLOW-3D for a spill discharge of 2,865 m^3/s at Bennett Dam spillway.

The calibrated FLOW-3D model confirmed that the design flood could be safely passed without overtopping the spillway chute walls as long as all three radial gates are opened as prescribed in existing operating orders with the outer gates open more than the inner gate.

The CFD model also provided insight into the concrete damage in the spillway chute. Cavitation indices computed from FLOW-3D simulation results were compared with empirical data from the USBR and found to be consistent with the historical performance of the spillway. The numerical analysis supported field inspections, which concluded that deterioration of the concrete conditions in the chute is likely not due to cavitation.

Strathcona Dam
FLOW-3D was used to investigate poor approach conditions and uncertainties with the rating curves for Strathcona Dam spillway, which includes three vertical lift gates on the right abutment of the dam. The rating curves for Strathcona spillway were developed from a combination of empirical adjustments and limited physical hydraulic model testing in a flume that did not include geometry of the piers and abutments.

Numerical model testing and calibration was based on comparisons with prototype spill observations from 1982 when all three gates were fully open, resulting in a large depression in the water surface upstream of the leftmost bay (Figure 2). The approach flow to the leftmost bay is distorted by water flowing parallel to the dam axis and plunging over the concrete retaining wall adjacent to the upstream slope of the earthfill dam. The flow enters the other two bays much more smoothly. In addition to very similar flow patterns produced in the numerical model compared to the prototype, simulated water levels at the gate section matched 1982 field measurements to within 0.1 m.

๋ณด์ •๋œ FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ์—ด๋ ค ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์šด์˜ ๋ช…๋ น์— ๊ทœ์ •๋œ ๋Œ€๋กœ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์—ด๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚™ํ•˜์‚ฐ ๋ฒฝ์„ ๋„˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ™์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚™ํ•˜์‚ฐ์˜ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์†์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ๋„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” USBR์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ต๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ถ„์„์€ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ŠˆํŠธ์˜ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์ƒํƒœ ์•…ํ™”๋Š” ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด ์•„๋‹ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ง€์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Strathcona ๋Œ
FLOW-3D๋Š” Strathcona Dam ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ด์•…ํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋Œ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์— 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Strathcona ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ ์€ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์กฐ์ •๊ณผ ๊ต๊ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ต๋Œ€์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์ •์€ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ๋œ 1982๋…„์˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž… ์œ ์ถœ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์™ผ์ชฝ ๋งŒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์— ํฐ ํ•จ๋ชฐ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2). ์ตœ์ขŒ๋‹จ ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ๋Œ ์ถ•๊ณผ ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ํ™์ฑ„์›€๋Œ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์— ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์˜น๋ฒฝ ์œ„๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๋ฌผ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์™œ๊ณก๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ๋ฆ„์€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‘ ๋ฒ ์ด๋กœ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด ์™ธ์—๋„ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋Š” 1982๋…„ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ 0.1m ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ์ผ์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 2. Prototype observations and FLOW-3D results for a Strathcona Dam spill in 1982 with all three gates fully open.
Figure 2. Prototype observations and FLOW-3D results for a Strathcona Dam spill in 1982 with all three gates fully open.

The calibrated CFD model produces discharges within 5% of the spillway rating curve for the reservoirโ€™s normal operating range with all gates fully open. However, at higher reservoir levels, which may occur during passage of large floods (as shown in Figure 3), the difference between simulated discharges and the rating curves are greater than 10% as the physical model testing with simplified geometry and empirical corrections did not adequately represent the complex approach flow patterns. The FLOW-3D model provided further insight into the accuracy of rating curves for individual bays, gated conditions and the transition between orifice and free surface flow.

๋ณด์ •๋œ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์—ด๋ฆฐ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ €์ˆ˜์ง€์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ž‘๋™ ๋ฒ”์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ 5% ์ด๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ํ™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ˆ˜์œ„์—์„œ๋Š”(๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ) ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™๊ณผ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์ˆ˜์ •์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ณผ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„  ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” 10% ์ด์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋ฒ ์ด, ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค์™€ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ „ํ™˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.
Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.

John Hart Dam
The John Hart concrete dam will be modified to include a new free crest spillway to be situated between an existing gated spillway and a low level outlet structure that is currently under construction. Significant improvements in the design of the proposed spillway were made through a systematic optimization process using FLOW-3D.

The preliminary design of the free crest spillway was based on engineering hydraulic design guides. Concrete apron blocks are intended to protect the rock at the toe of the dam. A new right training wall will guide the flow from the new spillway towards the tailrace pool and protect the low level outlet structure from spillway discharges.

FLOW-3D model results for the initial and optimized design of the new spillway are shown in Figure 4. CFD analysis led to a 10% increase in discharge capacity, significant decrease in roadway impingement above the spillway crest and improved flow patterns including up to a 5 m reduction in water levels along the proposed right wall. Physical hydraulic model testing will be used to confirm the proposed design.

์กด ํ•˜ํŠธ ๋Œ
John Hart ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋Œ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฑด์„ค ์ค‘์ธ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ์ €์ธต ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•  ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž์œ  ๋งˆ๋ฃจ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ˆ˜์ •๋  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„ ์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž์œ  ๋งˆ๋ฃจ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์•ž์น˜๋งˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์€ ๋Œ ์„ ๋‹จ๋ถ€์˜ ์•”์„์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ๋ฒฝ์€ ์ƒˆ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ผ๋ ˆ์ด์Šค ํ’€๋กœ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ตฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒˆ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด 10% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋งˆ๋ฃจ ์œ„์˜ ๋„๋กœ ์ถฉ๋Œ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ๋ฒฝ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ 5m ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ˆ˜์•• ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 4. FLOW-3D model results for the preliminary and optimized layout of the proposed spillway at John Hart Dam.
Figure 4. FLOW-3D model results for the preliminary and optimized layout of the proposed spillway at John Hart Dam.

Conclusion

BC Hydro has been using FLOW-3D to investigate a wide range of challenging hydraulics problems for different types of spillways and water conveyance structures leading to a greatly improved understanding of flow patterns and performance. Prototype data and reliable physical hydraulic model testing are used whenever possible to improve confidence in the numerical model results.

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž… ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์œ ์•• ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๋•Œ๋งˆ๋‹ค ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

About Flow Science, Inc.
Based in Santa Fe, New Mexico USA, Flow Science was founded in 1980 by Dr. C. W. (Tony) Hirt, who was one of the principals in pioneering the โ€œVolume-of-Fluidโ€ or VOF method while working at the Los Alamos National Lab. FLOW-3D is a direct descendant of this work, and in the subsequent years, we have increased its sophistication with TruVOF, boasting pioneering improvements in the speed and accuracy of tracking distinct liquid/gas interfaces. Today, Flow Science products offer complete multiphysics simulation with diverse modeling capabilities including fluid-structure interaction, 6-DoF moving objects, and multiphase flows. From inception, our vision has been to provide our customers with excellence in flow modeling software and services.

Numerical analysis of energy dissipator options using computational fluid dynamics modeling โ€” a case study of Mirani Dam

์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ž ์˜ต์…˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ํ•ด์„ โ€” Mirani ๋Œ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Arabian Journal of Geosciences volume 15, Article number: 1614 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ FLOW 3D ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™(CFD) ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒํ‚ค์Šคํƒ„ Mirani ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ ์˜ต์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋งค๋ฆฝ์ง€(USBR) ์œ ํ˜• II ๋ฐ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์œ ์—ญ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 3D Reynolds ํ‰๊ท  Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์ด ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ„์˜ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์บก์ฒ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์œ ์ž…, ๋ฐ€๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ-ํ”Œ๋Ÿญ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•˜์œ„ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.ย ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 39.5m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 44.2m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 3๋ฒˆ์งธ์™€ 4ย ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 48.8m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜์กฐ์™€ 39.5m์˜ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์ •์ˆ˜์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋„ค ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ๋ฐ ์ŠˆํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋†’์ด๊ฐ€ 0.3m ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ FLOW 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ 0.9m์—์„œ ์ตœ์†Œ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ์†Œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒ€์ฆ์€ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II( Lย = 48.8m), USBR ์œ ํ˜• III(ย Lย = 35.5m) ๋ฐ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์„ย 0.3m ๋ธ”๋ก ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(ย L= 35.5m).ย ํ†ต๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ท  ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” 2.5%, RMSE(์ œ๊ณฑ ํ‰๊ท  ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ ์˜ค์ฐจ) ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” 3% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ 4ย ๋ฒˆ์งธย ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ๊ธฐ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

In this study, the FLOW 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software was used to estimate the performance of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) type II and USBR type III stilling basins as energy dissipation options for the Mirani Dam spillway, Pakistan. The 3D Reynolds-averaged Navierโ€“Stokes equations were solved, which included sub-grid models for air entrainment, density evaluation, and driftโ€“flux, to capture free-surface flow over the spillway. Five models were considered in this research. The first model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 39.5 m. The second model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 44.2 m. The 3rd and 4thย models have a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 48.8 m and a 39.5 m USBR type III stilling basin, respectively. The fifth model is identical to the fourth, but the friction and chute block heights have been increased by 0.3 m. To set up the best FLOW 3D model conditions, mesh sensitivity analysis was performed, which yielded a minimum error at a mesh size of 0.9 m. Three sets of boundary conditions were tested and the set that gave the minimum error was employed. Numerical validation was done by comparing the physical model energy dissipation of USBR type II (Lย = 48.8 m), USBR type III (Lย =35.5 m), and USBR type III with 0.3-m increments in blocks (Lย = 35.5 m). The statistical analysis gave an average error of 2.5% and a RMSE (root mean square error) index of less than 3%. Based on hydraulics and economic analysis, the 4thย model was found to be an optimized energy dissipator. The maximum difference between the physical and numerical models in terms of percentage energy absorbed was found to be less than 5%.

Keywords

  • Numerical modeling
  • Spillway
  • Hydraulic jump
  • Energy dissipation
  • FLOW 3D

References

  • Abbasi S, Fatemi S, Ghaderi A, Di Francesco S (2021) The effect of geometric parameters of the antivortex on a triangular labyrinth side weir. Water (Switzerland) 13(1).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010014
  • Amorim JCC, Amante RCR, Barbosa VD (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow in a stilling basin. Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress 28 Juneโ€“3 July, the Hague, the Netherlands, 1, 1โ€“6
  • Asaram D, Deepamkar G, Singh G, Vishal K, Akshay K (2016) Energy dissipation by using different slopes of ogee spillway. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 4(3):18โ€“22Google Scholarย 
  • Boes RM, Hager WH (2003) Hydraulic design of stepped spillways. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):671โ€“679.ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:9(671)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130(7):0780011โ€“0780014.ย https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Chen Q, Dai G, Liu H (2002) Volume of fluid model for turbulence numerical simulation of stepped spillway overflow. J Hydraul Eng 128(7):683โ€“688. 10.1061/ๅ…ฑASCEๅ…ฒ0733-9429ๅ…ฑ2002ๅ…ฒ128:7ๅ…ฑ683ๅ…ฒ CE
  • Damiron R (2015) CFD modelling of dam spillway aerator. Lund University Sweden
  • Dunlop SL, Willig IA, Paul GE (2016) Cabinet Gorge Dam spillway modifications for TDG abatement โ€“ design evolution and field performance. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3650628160, 460โ€“470. 10.15142/T3650628160853
  • Fleit G, Baranya S, Bihs H (2018) CFD modeling of varied flow conditions over an ogee-weir. Period Polytech Civ Eng 62(1):26โ€“32.ย https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10821Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Frizell KW, Frizell KH (2015) Guidelines for hydraulic design of stepped spillways. Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2015-06, May
  • Ghaderi A, Abbasi S (2021) Experimental and numerical study of the effects of geometric appendance elements on energy dissipation over stepped spillway. Water (Switzerland) 13(7).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070957
  • Ghaderi A, Dasineh M, Aristodemo F, Ghahramanzadeh A (2020) Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. J Hydroinform 22(6):1554โ€“1572.ย https://doi.org/10.2166/HYDRO.2020.298Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Gรผven A, Mahmood AH (2021) Numerical investigation of flow characteristics over stepped spillways. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 21(3):1344โ€“1355.ย https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.283Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Herrera-Granados O, Kostecki SW (2016) Numerical and physical modeling of water flow over the ogee weir of the new Niedรณw barrage. J Hydrol Hydromech 64(1):67โ€“74.ย https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0013Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Ho DKH, Riddette KM (2010) Application of computational fluid dynamics to evaluate hydraulic performance of spillways in australia. Aust J Civ Eng 6(1):81โ€“104.ย https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2010.11463946Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Kocaer ร–, Yarar A (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow over ogee spillway. Water Resour Manag 34(13):3949โ€“3965.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02558-9Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Kumcu SY (2017) Investigation of flow over spillway modeling and comparison between experimental data and CFD analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(3):994โ€“1003.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1257-zArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Li S, Li Q, Yang J (2019) CFD modelling of a stepped spillway with various step layouts. Math Prob Eng 2019:1โ€“12.ย https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Muthukumaran N, Prince Arulraj G (2020) Experimental investigation on augmenting the discharge over ogee spillways with nanocement. Civ Eng Archit 8(5):838โ€“845.ย https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080511Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Naderi V, Farsadizadeh D, Lin C, Gaskin S (2019) A 3D study of an air-core vortex using HSPIV and flow visualization. Arab J Sci Eng 44(10):8573โ€“8584.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03764-3Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Nangare PB, Kote AS (2017) Experimental investigation of an ogee stepped spillway with plain and slotted roller bucket for energy dissipation. Int J Civ Eng Technol 8(8):1549โ€“1555Google Scholarย 
  • Parsaie A, Moradinejad A, Haghiabi AH (2018) Numerical modeling of flow pattern in spillway approach channel. Jordan J Civ Eng 12(1):1โ€“9Google Scholarย 
  • Pasbani Khiavi M, Ali Ghorbani M, Yusefi M (2021) Numerical investigation of the energy dissipation process in stepped spillways using finite volume method. J Irrig Water Eng 11(4):22โ€“37Google Scholarย 
  • Peng Y, Zhang X, Yuan H, Li X, Xie C, Yang S, Bai Z (2019) Energy dissipation in stepped spillways with different horizontal face angles. Energies 12(23).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234469
  • Raza A, Wan W, Mehmood K (2021) Stepped spillway slope effect on air entrainment and inception point location. Water (Switzerland) 13(10).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101428
  • Reeve DE, Zuhaira AA, Karunarathna H (2019) Computational investigation of hydraulic performance variation with geometry in gabion stepped spillways. Water Sci Eng 12(1):62โ€“72.ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.04.002Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Rice CE, Kadavy KC (1996) Model study of a roller compacted concrete stepped spillway. J Hydraul Eng 122(6):292โ€“297.ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:6(292)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Rong Y, Zhang T, Peng L, Feng P (2019) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam discharge and flood routing in Wudu reservoir. Water (Switzerland) 11(10).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102157
  • Saqib N, Akbar M, Pan H, Ou G, Mohsin M, Ali A, Amin A (2022) Numerical analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved risers. Appl Sci 12(448):1โ€“18Google Scholarย 
  • Saqib N, Ansari K, Babar M (2021) Analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved treads using computational fluid dynamics. Intl Conf Adv Mech Eng :1โ€“10
  • Saqib Nu, Akbar M, Huali P, Guoqiang O (2022) Numerical investigation of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across the stepped spillway having curved treads using FLOW 3D. Arab J Geosci 15(1):1363โ€“1400.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10505-8Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sarkardeh H, Marosi M, Roshan R (2015) Stepped spillway optimization through numerical and physical modeling. Int J Energy Environ 6(6):597โ€“606Google Scholarย 
  • Serafeim A, Avgeris V, Hrissanthou V (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow over a spillway. Eur Water Publ 14(2015):55โ€“59.ย https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-63248-042-2-11Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sorensen RM (1986) Stepped spillway model investigation. J Hydraul Eng I(12):1461โ€“1472.ย https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-
  • Tabbara M, Chatila J, Awwad R (2005) Computational simulation of flow over stepped spillways. Comput Struct 83(27):2215โ€“2224.ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.04.005Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Valero D, Bung DB, Crookston BM, Matos J (2016) Numerical investigation of USBR type III stilling basin performance downstream of smooth and stepped spillways. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3406281608, 635โ€“646.ย https://doi.org/10.15142/T340628160853
  • Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (1979) An introduction to computational fluid mechanics. (Vol. 2).ย https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(80)90010-7
  • WAPDA model studies cell, IRI Lahore (2003) Mirani Dam Project hydraulic model studies for the spillway. November 2003
  • Yakhot V, Orszag S (1986) Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J Sci Comput 1(1):3โ€“51Articleย Google Scholarย 

์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์† ์ธํ„ฐ์ปค๋„ฅํŠธ์˜ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”

Optimization of processing parameters for pulsed laser welding of dissimilar metal interconnects

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋…์ž์˜ ํŽธ์˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ฒˆ์—ญ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด์–ด์„œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์›๋ฌธ์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

NguyenThi TienaYu-LungLoabM.Mohsin RazaaCheng-YenChencChi-PinChiuc

aNational Cheng Kung University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tainan, Taiwan

bNational Cheng Kung University, Academy of Innovative Semiconductor and Sustainable Manufacturing, Tainan, Taiwan

cJum-bo Co., Ltd, Xinshi District, Tainan, Taiwan

Abstract

์›Œ๋ธ” ์ „๋žต์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘(PLW) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ์ด์ข… ๋žฉ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์˜ ์ œ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”ผํฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ ‘์„  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์กฐํ•ฉ 43๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์›ํ˜• ํŒจํ‚น ์„ค๊ณ„ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ๋จผ์ € ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์„ ํƒํ•œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” PLW ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD) ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์–ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•์ƒ(์ฆ‰, ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ํญ ๋ฐ ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด) ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ PLW ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 3๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ต์œกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋Œ€์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งต์€ ์šฉ์œต ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ท ์—ด์ด๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณต์ด ์—†๊ณ  ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด์ข… ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” PLW ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์€ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ๊ฐ•๋„, ๊ธˆ์†๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ(IMC) ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ด‰ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž…์ฆ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 1209N์˜ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ 86ยตฮฉ์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ด‰ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ์˜์—ญ์—๋Š” ๊ท ์—ด ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณต๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์ด ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

An experimental and numerical investigation is performed into the optimal processing parameters for the fabrication of aluminum and copper dissimilar lap joints using a pulsed laser welding (PLW) method with a wobble strategy. A circle packing design algorithm is first employed to select 43 representative combinations of the peak laser power and tangential welding speed. The selected parameters are then supplied to a computational fluidic dynamics (CFD) model of the PLW process to predict the melt pool geometry (i.e., interface width and penetration depth) and copper concentration. The simulation results are used to train three surrogate models to predict the melt pool geometry and copper concentration for any combination of the PLW parameters within the design space. Finally, the processing maps constructed using the surrogate models are filtered in accordance with three quality criteria to determine the PLW parameters that produce dissimilar joints with no cracks or pores in the fusion zone and enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. The validity of the proposed optimization approach is demonstrated by evaluating the shear strength, intermetallic compound (IMC) formation, and electrical contact resistance of experimental samples produced using the optimal welding parameters. The results confirm that the optimal parameters yield a high shear strength of 1209ย N and a low electrical contact resistance of 86 ยตฮฉ. Moreover, the fusion zone is free of defects, such as cracks and pores.

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of Al-Cu lap-joint arrangement
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of Al-Cu lap-joint arrangement
Fig. 2. Machine setup (MFQS-150W_1500W
Fig. 2. Machine setup (MFQS-150W_1500W
Fig. 5. Lap-shear mechanical tests: (a) experimental setup and specimen dimensions, and (b) two different failures of lap-joint welding.
N. Thi Tien et al.
Fig. 5. Lap-shear mechanical tests: (a) experimental setup and specimen dimensions, and (b) two different failures of lap-joint welding. N. Thi Tien et al.
Fig. 9. Simulation and experimental results for melt pool profile. (a) Simulation results for melt pool cross-section, and (b) OM image of melt pool cross-section.
(Note that laser processing parameter of 830 W and 565 mm/s is chosen.).
Fig. 9. Simulation and experimental results for melt pool profile. (a) Simulation results for melt pool cross-section, and (b) OM image of melt pool cross-section. (Note that laser processing parameter of 830 W and 565 mm/s is chosen.).

References

[1]

G. Santos

Road transport and CO2 emissions: What are the challenges?

Transport Policy, 59 (2017), pp. 71-74

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[2]

A. Das, D. Li, D. Williams, D. Greenwood

Joining technologies for automotive battery systems manufacturing

World Electric Veh. J., 9 (2) (2018), p. 22 View PDF

CrossRefGoogle Scholar[3]

M. Zwicker, M. Moghadam, W. Zhang, C. Nielsen

Automotive battery pack manufacturingโ€“a review of battery to tab joining

J. Adv. Joining Process., 1 (2020), Article 100017

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]

T. Mai, A. Spowage

Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steelโ€“kovar, copperโ€“steel and copperโ€“aluminium

Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 374 (1โ€“2) (2004), pp. 224-233

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[5]

S.S. Lee, T.H. Kim, S.J. Hu, W.W. Cai, J. Li, J.A. Abell

Characterization of joint quality in ultrasonic welding of battery tabs

International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, vol. 54990, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2012), pp. 249-261

Google Scholar[6]

Y. Zhou, P. Gorman, W. Tan, K. Ely

Weldability of thin sheet metals during small-scale resistance spot welding using an alternating-current power supply

J. Electron. Mater., 29 (9) (2000), pp. 1090-1099 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]

S. Katayama

Handbook of laser welding technologies

Elsevier (2013)

Google Scholar[8]

A. Sadeghian, N. Iqbal

A review on dissimilar laser welding of steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel for electric vehicle battery manufacturing

Opt. Laser Technol., 146 (2022), Article 107595

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]

M.J. Brand, P.A. Schmidt, M.F. Zaeh, A. Jossen

Welding techniques for battery cells and resulting electrical contact resistances

J. Storage Mater., 1 (2015), pp. 7-14

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]

M. Jarwitz, F. Fetzer, R. Weber, T. Graf

Weld seam geometry and electrical resistance of laser-welded, aluminum-copper dissimilar joints produced with spatial beam oscillation

Metals, 8 (7) (2018), p. 510 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]S. Smith, J. Blackburn, M. Gittos, P. de Bono, and P. Hilton, โ€œWelding of dissimilar metallic materials using a scanned laser beam,โ€ in International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, 2013, vol. 2013, no. 1: Laser Institute of America, pp. 493-502.

Google Scholar[12]

P. Schmitz, J.B. Habedank, M.F. Zaeh

Spike laser welding for the electrical connection of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries

J. Laser Appl., 30 (1) (2018), Article 012004 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]

P. Kah, C. Vimalraj, J. Martikainen, R. Suoranta

Factors influencing Al-Cu weld properties by intermetallic compound formation

Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng., 10 (1) (2015), pp. 1-13

Google Scholar[14]

Z. Lei, X. Zhang, J. Liu, P. Li

Interfacial microstructure and reaction mechanism with various weld fillers on laser welding-brazing of Al/Cu lap joint

J. Manuf. Process., 67 (2021), pp. 226-240

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]

T. Solchenbach, P. Plapper

Mechanical characteristics of laser braze-welded aluminiumโ€“copper connections

Opt. Laser Technol., 54 (2013), pp. 249-256

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]

T. Solchenbach, P. Plapper, W. Cai

Electrical performance of laser braze-welded aluminumโ€“copper interconnects

J. Manuf. Process., 16 (2) (2014), pp. 183-189

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[17]

S.J. Lee, H. Nakamura, Y. Kawahito, S. Katayama

Effect of welding speed on microstructural and mechanical properties of laser lap weld joints in dissimilar Al and Cu sheets

Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 19 (2) (2014), pp. 111-118

Google Scholar[18]

Z. Xue, S. Hu, D. Zuo, W. Cai, D. Lee, K.-A. Elijah Jr

Molten pool characterization of laser lap welded copper and aluminum

J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 46 (49) (2013), Article 495501 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]

S. Zhao, G. Yu, X. He, Y. Zhang, W. Ning

Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of laser overlap welding of Ti6Al4V and 42CrMo

J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211 (3) (2011), pp. 530-537

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]

W. Huang, H. Wang, T. Rinker, W. Tan

Investigation of metal mixing in laser keyhole welding of dissimilar metals

Mater. Des., 195 (2020), Article 109056

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[21]

E. Kaiser, G. Ambrosy, E. Papastathopoulos

Welding strategies for joining copper and aluminum by fast oscillating, high quality laser beam

High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Applications, Diagnostics, and Systems IX, vol. 11273, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2020), p. 112730C

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]

V. Dimatteo, A. Ascari, A. Fortunato

Continuous laser welding with spatial beam oscillation of dissimilar thin sheet materials (Al-Cu and Cu-Al): Process optimization and characterization

J. Manuf. Process., 44 (2019), pp. 158-165

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]

V. Dimatteo, A. Ascari, E. Liverani, A. Fortunato

Experimental investigation on the effect of spot diameter on continuous-wave laser welding of copper and aluminum thin sheets for battery manufacturing

Opt. Laser Technol., 145 (2022), Article 107495

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[24]

D. Wu, X. Hua, F. Li, L. Huang

Understanding of spatter formation in fiber laser welding of 5083 aluminum alloy

Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 113 (2017), pp. 730-740

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[25]

R. Ducharme, K. Williams, P. Kapadia, J. Dowden, B. Steen, M. Glowacki

The laser welding of thin metal sheets: an integrated keyhole and weld pool model with supporting experiments

J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 27 (8) (1994), p. 1619 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]

C.W. Hirt, B.D. Nichols

Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries

J. Comput. Phys., 39 (1) (1981), pp. 201-225

ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[27]

W. Piekarska, M. Kubiak

Three-dimensional model for numerical analysis of thermal phenomena in laserโ€“arc hybrid welding process

Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 54 (23โ€“24) (2011), pp. 4966-4974

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[28]J. Zhou, H.-L. Tsai, and P.-C. Wang, โ€œTransport phenomena and keyhole dynamics during pulsed laser welding,โ€ 2006.

Google Scholar[29]

D. Harrison, D. Yan, S. Blairs

The surface tension of liquid copper

J. Chem. Thermodyn., 9 (12) (1977), pp. 1111-1119

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[30]

M. Leitner, T. Leitner, A. Schmon, K. Aziz, G. Pottlacher

Thermophysical properties of liquid aluminum

Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 48 (6) (2017), pp. 3036-3045 View PDF

This article is free to access.

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[31]

H.-C. Tran, Y.-L. Lo

Systematic approach for determining optimal processing parameters to produce parts with high density in selective laser melting process

Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 105 (10) (2019), pp. 4443-4460 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[32]A. Ascari, A. Fortunato, E. Liverani, and A. Lutey, โ€œApplication of different pulsed laser sources to dissimilar welding of Cu and Al alloys,โ€ in Proceedings of Lasers in Manufacturing Conference (LIM), 2019.

Google Scholar[33]

A. Fortunato, A. Ascari

Laser welding of thin copper and aluminum sheets: feasibility and challenges in continuous-wave welding of dissimilar metals

Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 6 (2) (2019), pp. 136-157 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[34]

A. Boucherit, M.-N. Avettand-Fรจnoรซl, R. Taillard

Effect of a Zn interlayer on dissimilar FSSW of Al and Cu

Mater. Des., 124 (2017), pp. 87-99

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[35]

N. Kumar, I. Masters, A. Das

In-depth evaluation of laser-welded similar and dissimilar material tab-to-busbar electrical interconnects for electric vehicle battery pack

J. Manuf. Process., 70 (2021), pp. 78-96

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[36]

M. Abbasi, A.K. Taheri, M. Salehi

Growth rate of intermetallic compounds in Al/Cu bimetal produced by cold roll welding process

J. Alloy. Compd., 319 (1โ€“2) (2001), pp. 233-241

ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[37]

D. Zuo, S. Hu, J. Shen, Z. Xue

Intermediate layer characterization and fracture behavior of laser-welded copper/aluminum metal joints

Mater. Des., 58 (2014), pp. 357-362

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[38]

S. Yan, Y. Shi

Influence of Ni interlayer on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welded joint of Al/Cu bimetal

J. Manuf. Process., 59 (2020), pp. 343-354

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[39]

S. Yan, Y. Shi

Influence of laser power on microstructure and mechanical property of laser-welded Al/Cu dissimilar lap joints

J. Manuf. Process., 45 (2019), pp. 312-321

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

Fig. 8 Distribution of solidification properties on the yz cross section at the maximum width of the melt pool.(a) thermal gradient G, (b) solidification velocity vT, (c) cooling rate Gร—vT, and (d) morphology factor G/vT. These profiles are calculated with a laser power 300 W and velocity 400 mm/s using (a1 through d1) analytical Rosenthal simulation and (a2 through d2) high-fidelity CFD simulation. The laser is moving out of the page from the upper left corner of each color map (Color figure online)

Quantifying Equiaxedย vsย Epitaxial Solidification in Laser Melting of CMSX-4 Single Crystal Superalloy

CMSX -4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต์—์„œ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์‘๊ณ ์™€ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์‘๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋…์ž์˜ ํŽธ์˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ฒˆ์—ญ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด์–ด์„œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์›๋ฌธ์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Abstract

์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ๊ณผ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์‘๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์€ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ๋™์•ˆ CMSX-4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ”์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์กฐํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ CMSX-4 ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ถ„๋ง ์—†๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. EBSD(Electron Backscattered Diffraction) ๋งคํ•‘์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์‹๋ณ„์„ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜์—ญ ๋ถ„์œจ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„ํฌ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์œตํ•ฉ ์˜์—ญ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ํ•ต์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•œ “์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ”์€ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„ ํ•„๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ถ”์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์† ์ ์ธต ๊ฐ€๊ณต์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์ž…์ž ์„ฑ์žฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์™€ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ,๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธธ์ญ‰ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The competition between epitaxial vs. equiaxed solidification has been investigated in CMSX-4 single crystal superalloy during laser melting as practiced in additive manufacturing. Single-track laser scans were performed on a powder-free surface of directionally solidified CMSX-4 alloy with several combinations of laser power and scanning velocity. Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) mapping facilitated identification of new orientations, i.e., โ€œstray grainsโ€ that nucleated within the fusion zone along with their area fraction and spatial distribution. Using high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics simulations, both the temperature and fluid velocity fields within the melt pool were estimated. This information was combined with a nucleation model to determine locations where nucleation has the highest probability to occur in melt pools. In conformance with general experience in metals additive manufacturing, the as-solidified microstructure of the laser-melted tracks is dominated by epitaxial grain growth; nevertheless, stray grains were evident in elongated melt pools. It was found that, though a higher laser scanning velocity and lower power are generally helpful in the reduction of stray grains, the combination of a stable keyhole and minimal fluid velocity further mitigates stray grains in laser single tracks.

Introduction

๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ๊ณ ์˜จ์—์„œ ๊ธด ๋…ธ์ถœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๋†’์€ ์ธ์žฅ ๊ฐ•๋„, ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‚ฐํ™” ๋ฐ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํฌ๋ฆฌํ”„ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ์กฐํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์—”์ง„ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CMSX-4๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ํฌ๋ฆฌํ”„ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ดˆ๊ณ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ ˆ๋Š„ ํ•จ์œ  ๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1 , 2 ]์ž…๊ณ„์˜ ์กด์žฌ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋ฆฌํ”„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ธ์‹์€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ์—”์ง„์˜ ๊ณ ์˜จ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘ ๋งˆ๋ชจ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณต์›ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3 , 4 , 5 ]

์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ(AM)๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท ์—ด [ 6 , 7 ] ๋ฐ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž 8 , 9 ] ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์ด ์ด ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์ค‘์— ์ž์ฃผ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ “์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ”์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•˜๋Š” ์‘๊ณ  ์ค‘ ๋ชจ์žฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•™์  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์€ ๋‹ˆ์ผˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ดˆํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์ค‘ ์œ ํ•ดํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3 , 10 ]๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์†์‹ค๋˜๊ณ  ์›๋ž˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์†์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์‘๊ณ ์˜ ์‹œ์ž‘์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋– ๋Œ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด์ „ ์ž‘์—…์€ ์šฉ์œต ์˜์—ญ(FZ) ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋– ๋Œ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง€์ƒ ์‘๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋™ ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์ ์„ ๋‘์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›๋“ค์€ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘์— ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋‹จ์— ์•ž์„œ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์€ ์ด์งˆ์ ์ธ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ, ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์€ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์œ„์น˜์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ฐจ์ด์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐ์ด ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์œ„์น˜๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ, ์˜ˆ ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฌผ ์ž…์ž์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ๋งŽ์€ ์ฃผ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ TiB์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ต์ œ์˜ ๋„์ž…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์‘๊ณ ๋ฅผ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.22์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ.

ํ—Œ๋ฒ•์  ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์—์„œ Hunt 11 ] ๋Š” ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ์—์„œ ๋“ฑ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ „์ด(CET)๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Gaumann๊ณผ Kurz๋Š” Hunt์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋– ๋Œ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ํ•ต์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ฑ์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 12 , 14 ] ์ดํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ Vitek์€ Gaumann์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํฌํ•จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Vitek์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐํŒ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3 , 10 ]์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„์™€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์€ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์–‘์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3,10 ] ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ Vitek์€ ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ถˆ๊ท ์งˆ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘๋œ CMSX -4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์ด๋„๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ž„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ Vitek์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜๊ณ  ๊ธˆ์† AM์˜ ๊ธ‰์†ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์†๋„์™€ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AM์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์ œ์กฐ ๋Š” ์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ธฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ชฉ๊ฒฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 16 ] EBM(Electron Beam Melting)์— ์˜ํ•œ CMSX-4์˜ ์ œ์ž‘ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์€ ์ž์ฃผ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] CMSX์˜ ์ œ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. – 4๊ฐœ์˜ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ(LPBF)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, AM์˜ ์ธ๊ธฐ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•˜์œ„ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ, ํŠนํžˆ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 22 ]์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ถ€์กฑ์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 2 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜( ์˜ˆ: ์—ด์› ์ „๋ ฅ, ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„, ์Šคํฟ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์˜ˆ์—ด ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต)์˜ ์—„๊ฒฉํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๋Š” ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์กฐ๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ณ  ์œ ์ง€ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ. 25 ] EBM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ท ์—ด ์—†๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ 19 , 24 ] ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.23 , 26 ]

์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ LPBF๋ฅผ ๋Œ€ํ‘œํ•˜๋Š” ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • CMSX-4์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ์™„ํ™”๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. LPBF๋Š” ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ„๋ง์˜ ์–‡์€ ์ธต์„ ๊ธฐํŒ์— ๋…น์ด๊ณ  ์œตํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธต๋ณ„ ์ฆ์ฐฉ์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ, ๋น ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ€์—ด/๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฉ๋ ฌํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์— ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋™์ ์ธ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 28 , 29 , 30 ] ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ ๋„ ํ‚คํ™€์˜ ๋™์—ญํ•™( ์˜ˆ:, ๊ธฐํ™” ์œ ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์œ„์ƒ ํ•จ๋ชฐ) ๋ฐ ์—ด์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์€ AM ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ  ๊ฒฐํ•จ๊ณผ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜๊ณ  ๊ด€๋ จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] ๊ธฐํ•˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ํ‚คํ™€์€ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ, ๋ณผ๋ง, ์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ํ•ดํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ‚คํ™€ ์ง„ํ™”์™€ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์€ ์ž์—ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํฌ์ฐฉ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์‚ฌํ›„ ํŠน์„ฑํ™” ๊ธฐ์ˆ . ๊ณ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD)์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์•„๋ž˜์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €-๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 36 ] ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์šฉ์œต๋ฌผ ํ’€์˜ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ํ™•๋ฆฝ๋œ ์‚ฌํ›„ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ฐ ์šฉ์œต๋ฌผ ํ’€ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CMSX-4 ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ AM ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ œ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์ฐฝ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‘๊ณ  ์ค‘ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ค‘ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ์ฆ์ฐฉ์€ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ธต์ด ์žˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์—†๋Š” AM ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 37 , 38 , 39 ]๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” CMSX-4์˜ ์‘๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ” ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” CMSX-4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ •์˜ LPBF ์ œ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ LPBF์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ธ‰์† ์šฉ์ ‘์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์–ด ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์šฉ์œต๋ฌผ ํ’€์˜ ๋งค์šฐ ๋™์ ์ธ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ์‹คํ—˜

๋ฐฉ์ „ ๊ฐ€๊ณต(EDM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ CMSX-4 ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์‘๊ณ  ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ž‰๊ณณ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์€ ์น˜์ˆ˜ 20์˜ ์ง์œก๋ฉด์ฒด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ร—ร—20ร—ร—6mm. 6๊ฐœ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜โŸจ 001 โŸฉโŸจ001โŸฉ์ž‰๊ณณ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•™์  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์ด ์ด ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ์„ฑ์žฅ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์Šค์บ”๋˜๋„๋ก ์ ˆ๋‹จ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์ˆ˜์ง์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ํŠธ๋ž™์€ EOS M290 ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„๋ง์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ 400W, ๊ฐ€์šฐ์‹œ์•ˆ ๋น” ์ง๊ฒฝ 100์˜ ์ดํ„ฐ๋ธ€ ํŒŒ์ด๋ฒ„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๊ฐ€ ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋œ LPBF ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮผฮผ์ดˆ์ ์—์„œ m. ์‹คํ—˜ ์ค‘์— ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ LPBF ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์šฉ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํ™€๋”์˜ ํฌ์ผ“์— ๋ผ์›Œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋†’์ด๋กœ ์œ ์ง€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ํ™€๋”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณณ์—์„œ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ์€ ์•„๋ฅด๊ณค ํผ์ง€ ๋ถ„์œ„๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์˜ˆ์—ด์€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ์‹คํ—˜์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ(200~370W)๊ณผ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„(0.4~1.4m/s)์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์„ฑ๊ฒฉ ๋ฌ˜์‚ฌ

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ํ›„, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ์ˆ˜์ง์ธ ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ FZ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์ด์•„๋ชฌ๋“œ ํ†ฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ ˆ๋‹จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ํ›„, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์žฅ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ณ  220 ๊ทธ๋ฆฟ SiC ํŽ˜์ดํผ๋กœ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฝœ๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์นด ํ˜„ํƒ์•ก ๊ด‘ํƒ์ œ๋กœ ๋งˆ๋ฌด๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž๋™ ์—ฐ๋งˆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋Š” 20kV์˜ ๊ฐ€์† ์ „์••์—์„œ TESCAN MIRA 3XMH ์ „๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ ์ „์ž ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(SEM)์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. EBSD ์ง€๋„๋Š”0.4ฮผm _0.4ฮผ๋ฏธ๋””์—„๋‹จ๊ณ„ ํฌ๊ธฐ. Bruker ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ EBSD ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. EBSD ํด๋ฆฐ์—…์€ ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ์ ‘์ด‰์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ ํ™•์žฅ ๋ฃจํ‹ด์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ธ๋ฑ์Šค๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํšŒ์ ˆ ํŒจํ„ด๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฒ€์€์ƒ‰ ํ”ฝ์…€์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด์›ƒ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํด๋ฆฐ์—… ๋ฃจํ‹ด์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”์˜ ๋Œ€๋น„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 10g CuSO๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ Marbles ์‹œ์•ฝ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์—์นญํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.44, 50mL HCl ๋ฐ 70mL H22์˜ํ˜•.

์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž์˜ ์„ฑํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์ด์ „ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3 , 10 ] ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 3 ์— ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด , ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•™์  ๋ฐฐํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ์ด ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์ตœ์†Œ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฐํ–ฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ LPBF ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด์ „ ์ž‘์—…๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Vitek์˜ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ์ˆ˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ Rosenthal ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ 3 ]๋˜ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋ชจ์–‘๊ณผ FZ์˜ ์—ด ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Rosenthal ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์€ ์—ด์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ฐ˜๋ฌดํ•œ ํŒ์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ์ ์›์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „๋‹ฌ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค 40 , 41 ] .

ํ‹ฐ=ํ‹ฐ0+ฮทํ”ผ2 ํŒŒ์ด์ผ€์ด์—‘์Šค2+์™€์ด2+์ง€2———-โˆš๊ฒฝํ—˜์น˜[- ๋ธŒ์ด(์—‘์Šค2+์™€์ด2+์ง€2———-โˆšโˆ’ ์—‘์Šค )2ฮฑ _] ,ํ‹ฐ=ํ‹ฐ0+ฮทํ”ผ2ํŒŒ์ด์ผ€์ด์—‘์Šค2+์™€์ด2+์ง€2๊ฒฝํ—˜์น˜โก[-V(์—‘์Šค2+์™€์ด2+์ง€2-์—‘์Šค)2ฮฑ],(1)

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ T ๋Š” ์˜จ๋„,ํ‹ฐ0ํ‹ฐ0๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ 313K( ์ฆ‰ , EOS ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ์ฑ”๋ฒ„ ์˜จ๋„)๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์˜จ๋„, P ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ํŒŒ์›Œ, V ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„,ฮทฮท๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ, k ๋Š” ์—ด์ „๋„์œจ,ฮฑฮฑ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์—ดํ™•์‚ฐ์œจ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. x , y , z ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ, ๊ฐ€๋กœ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ์„ธ๋กœ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์ •๋ ฌ๋œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์ด ์ง๊ต ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” ์ฐธ์กฐ 3 ์˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ž์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . CMSX-4์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ์ƒ์„  ์˜จ๋„(1603K)์™€ ์•ก์ƒ์„  ์˜จ๋„(1669K)์˜ ๋“ฑ์˜จ์„  ํ‰๊ท ์œผ๋กœ ์‘๊ณ  ํ”„๋ŸฐํŠธ( ์ฆ‰ , ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ๊ณ„๋ฉด)๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 42 , 43 , 44 ] ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ์—ด๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ํ‘œ I ์— ๋‚˜์—ด๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ํ‘œ I CMSX-4์˜ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ์—ด๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์„ฑ

ํ’€ ์‚ฌ์ด์ฆˆ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”

์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋Š” ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์—ด ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โˆ‡ ํ‹ฐโˆ‡ํ‹ฐ45 ] ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด :

์ง€ = | โˆ‡ ํ‹ฐ| =โˆฃโˆฃโˆฃโˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค๋‚˜^^+โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด์ œ์ด^^+โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€์ผ€์ด^^โˆฃโˆฃโˆฃ=(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€)2————————โˆš,G=|โˆ‡ํ‹ฐ|=|โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค๋‚˜^^+โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด์ œ์ด^^+โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€์ผ€์ด^^|=(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€)2,(2)

์–ด๋””๋‚˜^^๋‚˜^^,์ œ์ด^^์ œ์ด^^, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ์ผ€์ด^^์ผ€์ด^^๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ x , y ๋ฐ z ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‘๊ณ  ๋“ฑ์˜จ์„  ์†๋„,Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„ V ์™€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Vํ‹ฐ= V์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธฮธ =Vโˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€)2——————-โˆš,Vํ‹ฐ=V์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธโกฮธ=Vโˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์—‘์Šค)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์™€์ด)2+(โˆ‚ํ‹ฐโˆ‚์ง€)2,(์‚ผ)

์–ด๋””ฮธฮธ๋Š” ์Šค์บ” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ( ์ฆ‰ , ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์—ด ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ) ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฐ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ง€์ƒ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ๋“ฑ์˜จ์„ ์˜ ์†๋„๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋„๋ก ๊ฐ•์ œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ. 46 ]

์‘๊ณ  ์ „์„ ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ตญ์ง€์  ๋น„์œจฮฆฮฆ, ์•ก์ฒด ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ G ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ • , ์‘๊ณ  ์„ ๋‹จ ์†๋„Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ๋ฐ ํ•ต ๋ฐ€๋„N0N0. ๊ณ ์ •๋œ ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จโ–ณํ‹ฐNโ–ณํ‹ฐN, ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ์€ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฃผ์ƒ ์ „์„ ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ฒด ์‹œ๊ฐ„d (ฮ”T_) / dt = – _Vํ‹ฐG๋””(โ–ณํ‹ฐ)/๋””ํ‹ฐ=-Vํ‹ฐG, ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ G ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ด€๊ณ„ , ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ๋ถ„์œจฮฆฮฆ, ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ํŒ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐฮ”T _โ–ณํ‹ฐ, ํ•ต ๋ฐ€๋„N0N0, ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ n ๋ฐ ํ•ต์ƒ์„ฑ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐโ–ณํ‹ฐNโ–ณํ‹ฐN, Gรคumann ์™ธ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ถ„ ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํŒŒ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . 12 , 14 ] Hunt์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ 11 ] ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•จ :

์ง€ =1์—” + 1- 4ฯ€ _N03 ์ธ์น˜( 1 โˆ’ ฮฆ )———โˆš์‚ผฮ”T _( 1 -โ–ณํ‹ฐ์—” + 1Nโ–ณํ‹ฐ์—” + 1) .G=1N+1-4ํŒŒ์ดN0์‚ผ์ธโก(1-ฮฆ)์‚ผโ–ณํ‹ฐ(1-โ–ณํ‹ฐNN+1โ–ณํ‹ฐN+1).(4)

๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ํŒ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์„ ์ „์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์˜ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ–ณํ‹ฐ์”จโ–ณํ‹ฐ์”จ, ๋ฉฑ๋ฒ•์น™ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ–ณํ‹ฐ์”จ= ( _Vํ‹ฐ)1 / ์—”โ–ณํ‹ฐ์”จ=(ใ…Vํ‹ฐ)1/N, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ a ์™€ n ์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ข…์† ์ƒ์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CMSX-4์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด ๊ฐ’์€a = 1.25 ร—106ใ…=1.25ร—106 s K 3.4mโˆ’ 1-1,์—” = 3.4N=3.4, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ N0= 2 ร—1015N0=2ร—1015๋ฏธ๋””์—„โˆ’ 3,-์‚ผ,์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 3 ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด .โ–ณํ‹ฐNโ–ณํ‹ฐN2.5K์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.106106 K/s. ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‘œํ˜„ฮฆฮฆ์œ„์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์žฌ๋ฐฐ์—ดํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ฮฆ= 1 -์ด์žํ˜•์—์Šค\ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ\  S=- 4ฯ€ _N0์‚ผ(1( ์—” + 1 ) (GN/ ์•„Vํ‹ฐ)1 / ์—”)์‚ผ=โˆ’2.356ร—1019(vTG3.4)33.4.ฮฆ=1โˆ’eS\ where\ S=โˆ’4ฯ€N03(1(n+1)(Gn/avT)1/n)3=โˆ’2.356ร—1019(vTG3.4)33.4.

(5)

As proposed by Hunt,[11] a value of ฮฆโ‰ค0.66ฮฆโ‰ค0.66 pct represents fully columnar epitaxial growth condition, and, conversely, a value of ฮฆโ‰ฅ49ฮฆโ‰ฅ49 pct indicates that the initial single crystal microstructure is fully replaced by an equiaxed microstructure. To calculate the overall stray grain area fraction, we followed Vitekโ€™s method by dividing the FZ into roughly 19 to 28 discrete parts (depending on the length of the melt pool) of equal length from the point of maximum width to the end of melt pool along the x direction. The values of G and vTvT were determined at the center on the melt pool boundary of each section and these values were used to represent the entire section. The area-weighted average of ฮฆฮฆ over these discrete sections along the length of melt pool is designated as ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ, and is given by:

ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏ=โˆ‘kAkฮฆkโˆ‘kAk,ฮฆยฏ=โˆ‘kAkฮฆkโˆ‘kAk,

(6)

where k is the index for each subsection, and AkAk and ฮฆkฮฆk are the areas and ฮฆฮฆ values for each subsection. The summation is taken over all the sections along the melt pool. Vitekโ€™s improved model allows the calculation of stray grain area fraction by considering the melt pool geometry and variations of G and vTvT around the tail end of the pool.

์ˆ˜๋…„์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜„์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” FLOW-3D์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ CFD๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ์šฉ FVM(Finite Volume Method)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 47 , 48 ] CFD๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ์šด๋™๊ณผ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด์‹ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์™€ ํ”„๋ ˆ๋„ฌ ํก์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 36 ]๋จผ์ €, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์— ์˜ํ•ด ์กฐ๋ช…๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์…€์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ด‘์„ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์‚ฐํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ฐ ์ž…์‚ฌ ๊ด‘์„ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž…์‚ฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž…์‚ฌ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฒกํ„ฐ์™€ ์ •๋ ฌ๋  ๋•Œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ๊ธˆ์†์— ์˜ํ•ด ํก์ˆ˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์€ Fresnel ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๊ด‘์„  ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋ฉฐ , ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๊ด‘์„ ์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋ถ€๋”ชํžˆ๋ฉด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž…์‚ฌ๊ด‘์„ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ํž˜์ด ์•ก์ฒด ๊ธˆ์† ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ์ฆ๋ฐœ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์€ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ์–ต์ œ๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ํž˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ํ”ผ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•= ํŠน๊ธ‰ _{ B ( 1- _ํ‹ฐV/ ํ‹ฐ) }ํ”ผ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•=ใ…๊ฒฝํ—˜์น˜โก{๋น„(1-ํ‹ฐV/ํ‹ฐ)}, ์–ด๋””ํ”ผ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•ํ”ผ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋™์••๋ ฅ, A ์™€ B ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 75์™€ 15์ด๋‹ค.ํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐV๋Š” ํฌํ™” ์˜จ๋„์ด๊ณ  T ๋Š” ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ์˜จ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ํ‚คํ™€ ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์›๋™๋ ฅ์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” Marangoni ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜จ๋„์˜ ์„ ํ˜• ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋˜๋ฉฐ,ฯƒ =1.79-9.90โ‹…10โˆ’ 4( ํ‹ฐโˆ’ 1654์ผ€์ด )ฯƒ=1.79-9.90โ‹…10-4(ํ‹ฐ-1654๋…„์ผ€์ด)์—”์— โˆ’ 1-1. 49 ] ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๋ฒ ์–ด ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ์˜ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(2300 ฮผฮผ๋ฏธ๋””์—„ร—ร—250 ฮผฮผ๋ฏธ๋””์—„ร—ร—500 ฮผฮผm) xz ํ‰๋ฉด ์— ์ ์šฉ๋œ ๋Œ€์นญ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด . ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” 8์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮผฮผm์ด๊ณ  ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” 0.15์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮผฮผs๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ๋…ผ์˜

์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•ํƒœ

์ด ์ž‘์—…์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ 5๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์›Œ( P )์™€ 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„( V )๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ 29๊ฐœ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ํ”ผ- ๋ธŒ์ดํ”ผ-V์กฐํ•ฉ. P ์™€ V ๊ฐ’์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๋ณผ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค  .

๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  1 ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค 39 ] : (1) ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ(ํŒŒ๋ž€์ƒ‰ ์ƒ์ž), (2) ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ๋“œ(๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰), (3) ์ „ํ™˜ ๋ชจ๋“œ(๋งˆ์  ํƒ€), (4) ๋ณผ๋ง ๋ชจ๋“œ(๋…น์ƒ‰). ๋†’์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ธ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต๋ฌผ ํ’€์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„ˆ๋น„/๊นŠ์ด( W / D ) ๋น„์œจ์ด 0.5๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ํฐ ๊นŠ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋А๋‹ค๋ž€ ๋ชจ์–‘์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด ์–•์•„์ ธ W / D ๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 0.5์ธ ๋ฐ˜์›ํ˜• ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. W / D _์ „ํ™˜ ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 1์—์„œ 0.5 ์‚ฌ์ด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๋ฅผ 1200 ๋ฐ 1400mm/s๋กœ ๋” ๋†’์ด๋ฉด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ํฐ ์บก ๋†’์ด์™€ ๋ณผ๋ง ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ธ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์–ธ๋”์ปท์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํž˜๊ณผ ์†๋„์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ์„œ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ๋„ˆ๋น„๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  2 (a)์™€ (b)์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํญ์€ ๊ธฐํŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  2 (a)๋Š” ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋งค์šฐ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊นŠ์ด ๋Œ€ ํŒŒ์›Œ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊พธ์ค€ํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์†๋„ ๊ณก์„ ์—๋Š” ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒน์นจ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ƒ์น˜ ๋ชปํ•œ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์€ ์ข…์ข… ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ”๋‹น ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋งŒ ์ถ”์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๋™์ž‘์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 (b) ์˜ ๋„ˆ๋น„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค  . ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  2(c)๋Š” ์„ ํ˜• ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„ P / V ์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ์„œ ์šฉ์œต ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ํญ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์„ ํ˜• ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„ ๊ธธ์ด๋‹น ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํˆฌ์ž…๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 50 ] ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋ฉฐ ๋„ˆ๋น„๋Š” ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋™์ผํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์ค€๊ณต ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€, ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋˜๋Š” ์†์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 50 ]

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ ํ‰๊ฐ€

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์€ LPBF ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 31 , 51 , 52 ] ์ ๋ถ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์˜ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฌํ˜„์˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ ‘๊ทผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 51 ] ๊ทธ ์™ธ . 39 ] ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ Rosenthal ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 40 ] ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐ„์™ธ . 53 ] Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 30๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ณ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋ง ๋ฒ•์น™์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ค‘์ธ ํŠน์ • ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ตœ์†Œ ํก์ˆ˜(ํ‰ํ‰ํ•œ ์šฉ์œต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ํก์ˆ˜์œจ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Š” CMSX-4์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถ”์ •์น˜๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒํ•œ ๋ฐ ํ•˜ํ•œ ํก์ˆ˜์œจ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊นŠ์€ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋น›์„ ๊ฐ€๋‘๋Š” ํ‚คํ™€ ๋‚ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์ด 0.8๋งŒํผ ๋†’์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํ˜„์ƒ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 5152 , 54 ] ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์˜ ์ƒํ•œ์„ 0.8๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ 51 ์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด , ์ „๋„ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์€ ์•ฝ 0.3์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ํ•˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์ด ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํก์ˆ˜์œจ ๊ฐ’์„ 0.55 ยฑ 0.25๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Vitek์˜ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋Š” 1.0์˜ ๊ณ ์ • ํก์ˆ˜์œจ ๊ฐ’์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3 ]

ํ“จ์ „ ์กด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 ์€ 200~300W ๋ฐ 600~300W ๋ฐ 600~300W ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์†๋„๋กœ 9๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ CMSX-4 ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ yz ๋‹จ๋ฉด ์—์„œ ์ทจํ•œ EBSD ์—ญ๊ทน์ ๋„์™€ ํ•ด๋‹น ์—ญ๊ทน์ ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ๊ฐ 1400mm/s. EBSD ๋งต์—์„œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์€ EBSD ๋งต์—์„œ ๊ทธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ RGB ์ƒ‰์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฌ˜์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 5๋„์˜ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 ์—์„œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘๋œ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • CMSX-4์˜ ์ด์ „ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 10 ]์—ญ ๊ทน์ ๋„์—์„œ, ์  ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐโŸจ 001 โŸฉโŸจ001โŸฉ์œตํ•ฉ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ๋กœ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ๊ณก๋ฌผ์€ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์งˆ๊ฐ์ด ์—†๋Š” ํฉ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•™์  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ์ฃผ๋กœโŸจ 001 โŸฉโŸจ001โŸฉ๋น„๋ก ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ ˆ๋‹จํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ ๊ฐ๋„๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์„ฑ์žฅ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ํŽธ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆโŸจ 001 โŸฉโŸจ001โŸฉ์ฃผ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ํ•˜๋‹จ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์—์„œ ์ƒ๋‹จ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค  . ์ด ์ „์ด๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ „ํ™˜์€ CET์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FZ์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„  ์ฃผ๋ณ€์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์•ˆ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์„œ๋กœ ์ถฉ๋Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๋Š” ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋” ๊นŠ์€ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์„ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ์นจ์ „๋œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž…์ž๋Š” ๋‚˜์ค‘์— ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ๋…ผ์˜๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ž ์žฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ์—์„œ ํ•ต์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ฑ์žฅํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์—์„œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ธฐ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์žฅ์ถ•์ด ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์ •๋ ฌ๋œ ๊ธธ์ญ‰ํ•œ ๋ชจ์–‘์„ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ์˜ ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜๋Š” ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋†’์€ ์†๋„์˜ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋” ์–•์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ช…๋ฐฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ํฐ ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์€ ๊ณ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ €์†์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๊นŠ์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ๋” ์ž์ฃผ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์‘๊ณ  ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋™๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์†๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ํ›„์† ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3

์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

์„œ๋ก ์—์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘์— ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 55 ]๋…ผ์˜๋œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ธ๊ธฐ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ (1) ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋‹จ์— ์•ž์„œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์  ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์ด์ข… ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ (2) ์šฉ์œต๋ฌผ ํ’€์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์› ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ์˜ˆ๋กœ ๋“ค๋ฉด, ๊ณ ์ฒด๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด๋งŒํผ ๋งŽ์€ ์šฉ์งˆ์„ ์ˆ˜์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‘๊ณ  ์ค‘์— ์šฉ์งˆ์„ ์•ก์ฒด๋กœ ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์„ฑ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์•ž์—์„œ ์šฉ์งˆ ๋ถ„ํ• ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ํ‰ํ˜• ์•ก์ƒ์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์•ก์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ฒด์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ๋œ ๊ตฌ์—ญ์˜ ์กด์žฌ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์˜ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 56 ]์ „์ฒด ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์€ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ, ๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฅ  ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์˜ ํ•ฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€์ •์€ ๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฅ  ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šฉ์งˆ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์˜ ๋” ํฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌด์‹œ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 57 ]

์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉดํ”ผ- ๋ธŒ์ดํ”ผ-V์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์˜ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ) ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด (ฮฆฮฆ) ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ธˆ์† AM์˜ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๊ณ  ๋™์•ˆ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  4 ๋Š” ํ•ด์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ ๊ฐ’์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ ๋ฉด์  ๋น„์œจ์ด ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํก์ˆ˜์œจ์„ 0.30์—์„œ 0.80์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉดฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์•ฝ 3๋ฐฐ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ €์† ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋”์šฑ ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋“  ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ๊ฐ™๋‹ค๋ฉด, ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ์ „๋ ฅ์˜ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ํ‰๊ท  ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด ํ‰๊ท  ์‘๊ณ ์œจ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‰๊ท  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ ๋น„์œจ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์€ Vitek์˜ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์ฑ„ํƒ๋œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5 ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ž€์ƒ‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค  . 3 ] ๋” ํฐ ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ๊ตฌ์—ญ( ์ฆ‰, ์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ์˜์—ญ)์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’€์˜ ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž์˜ ๋ฉด์  ๋น„์œจ์ด ๋ถ„ํ™์ƒ‰ ์˜์—ญ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” LPBF ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๋ฉด์  ๋น„์œจ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ํฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‘ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ , ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๋น„์œจ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  5 ์—์„œ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ LPBF ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ถ”๋ก ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  6 (a)๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ์˜ EBSD ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ๋‚˜์˜จ ์‹คํ—˜์  ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ  ๊ณผ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4 ์˜ ํ•ด์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ  ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.. ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ FZ์—์„œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด์ง€๋งŒ ์ถ”์„ธ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์ผ๊ด€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€, ํŠนํžˆ ์ „๋ ฅ์ด 300W์ธ 2๊ฐœ๋Š” ๋ถ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Rosenthal ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ์ด ์ˆœ์ „ํžˆ ์ „๋„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ขŒ์šฐ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ ์ฒด์ œ์˜ ์—ด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 39 , 40 ] ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  4 ์˜ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ , ์ฆ‰ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋™์•ˆ ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ์ „๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋” ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  6 (b)๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์„ ๋น„๊ตฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์ˆ˜์น˜ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ. CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์ง€๋งŒฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœํ”ผ- ๋ธŒ์ดํ”ผ-V์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฐ’์ด ๋ถ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๋” ๊ฐ€๊น๊ฒŒ ์ •๋ ฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5

๋ชจ์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ G ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์‘๊ณ ์œจ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌVํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ์Œ์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (a)์˜ CMSX-4 ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋งต์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ๊ณต์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ( ์ฆ‰ , ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ธ์ž)๋Š” ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ง€ ร—Vํ‹ฐGร—Vํ‹ฐ( ์ฆ‰ , ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„)๋Š” ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๊ณ  , 58 , 59 ]์ง€ -Vํ‹ฐG-Vํ‹ฐํ”Œ๋กฏ์€ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •๊ณผ AM ๊ณต์ • ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”Œ๋กฏ์˜ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•œ ํŠน์ง•์€ ๋“ฑ์ถ•, ์ฃผ์ƒ, ํ‰๋ฉด ์ „๋ฉด ๋ฐ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ์ „์ด ์˜์—ญ์„ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (a)๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๋ถ„์„ ์—ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋งต์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (b)๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋งต์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์€ ๋‚ฎ์€ G ์ด์ƒ ์—์„œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ์ •ํ™ฉ. ์ด ํ”Œ๋กฏ์—์„œ ๊ฐ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ ํ‰๋ฉด ์ „๋ฉด์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ์ง€์ ์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋„ˆ๋น„ ์œ„์น˜์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ์ง€์ ์˜ ๋์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํ›„๋ฉด ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (a)์—์„œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜์ง€ -Vํ‹ฐG-Vํ‹ฐ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์˜ ์Œ์€ ์›์ฃผํ˜• ์˜์—ญ์— ์†ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ ์ฐจ CET ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์˜์—ญ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ํ”ผ- ๋ธŒ์ดํ”ผ-V์กฐํ•ฉ. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7 (a) ์˜ ๊ณก์„  ์ค‘ ์–ด๋А ๊ฒƒ๋„  ํ‰๋ฉด ์ „๋ฉด ์˜์—ญ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์ง€๋งŒ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ „๋ ฅ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›Œ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ €์† ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ๊ณต์ •์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ด์ „ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณก์„ ์ด ํ‰๋ฉด ์˜์—ญ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ CET ์˜์—ญ์— ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฉ€์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CET ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์„น์…˜์˜ ์ˆ˜๋„ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์—์„œ.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6

๊ทธ๋งŒํผ์ง€ -Vํ‹ฐG-Vํ‹ฐCFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์˜ ์Œ์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (b)์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ ์  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์ •์˜๋œ ์ขŒํ‘œ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ํ•ด์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ, ๊ณ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์€ ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์ฒด ์ขŒํ‘œ๊ณ„์— ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ  G ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์ผ๋ฐ˜ 3D ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ์— ์„ ํ˜• ๋ณด๊ฐ„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋งต์— ํ”Œ๋กฏ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  7 (a)์˜ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋œ ๋งค์šฐ ๋™์ ์ธ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋งŒํผ์ง€ -Vํ‹ฐG-Vํ‹ฐ๋ถ„์„ ์—ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์Œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋Š” ๋” ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋‚ ์นด๋กœ์šด ๊ตด๊ณก์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(์ด๋Š” G ๋ฐVํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ) ๋‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8

์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

์ˆ˜์น˜ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋™ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ ์ •๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ Rosenthal ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  8 ์€ ์‘๊ณ  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ G ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ,์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ์ง€ ร—Vํ‹ฐGร—Vํ‹ฐyz ๋‹จ๋ฉด์—์„œ x ๋Š” FLOW-3D์—์„œ (a1โ€“d1) ๋ถ„์„ ์—ด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ (a2โ€“d2) FVM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํญ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  8 ์˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „์„ ์ด ํŠน์ • ์œ„์น˜์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•  ๋•Œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์•„๋‹ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ถ”์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์˜ ์ž„์‹œ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๊ฐ’์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ 300W ๋ฐ ์†๋„ 400mm/s์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋Š” ํฐ์ƒ‰ ๊ณก์„ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (a2โ€“d2)์˜ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 342์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮผฮผm, ์ธก์ • ๊นŠ์ด 352์™€ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ ฮผฮผ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธธ์ญ‰ํ•œ ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ ๋ชจ์–‘๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 ์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜ FZ์˜ m  . ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ฐ˜์› ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 264์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮผฮผ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜„์‹ค๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ€๋‹ค. CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ฆ๊ธฐ ํ•จ๋ชฐ์˜ ๋™์  ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— FZ ํ•˜๋‹จ์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ท ์ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8 (a1) ๋ฐ (a2) ์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์„ ํ–ฅํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ€ ์ ์ฐจ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค  . ์‘๊ณ ์œจ์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8 ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ๊ฑฐ์˜ 0์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (b1) ๋ฐ (b2). ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์˜์—ญ์ด ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ์ˆ˜์ง์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒฮธ โ†’ ฯ€/ 2ฮธโ†’ํŒŒ์ด/2๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ Vํ‹ฐโ†’ 0Vํ‹ฐโ†’0์‹์—์„œ [ 3 ]. ๋Œ€์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„  ๊ทผ์ฒ˜ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์ž˜ ์ •๋ ฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮธ โ†’ 0ฮธโ†’0๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ Vํ‹ฐโ†’ ๋ธŒ์ดVํ‹ฐโ†’V, ๋น” ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„. G ์™€ _Vํ‹ฐVํ‹ฐ๊ฐ’์ด ์–ป์–ด์ง€๋ฉด ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„์ง€ ร—Vํ‹ฐGร—Vํ‹ฐ๋ฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ธ์ž์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8 (c2)๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’๊ณ  ์ƒ๋‹จ์—์„œ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅธ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์†๋„๋กœ  ์ธํ•ด ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„  ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ถ”์„ธ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  8 (c1)์— ์บก์ฒ˜๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 8 ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ์š”์ธ (d1) ๋ฐ (d2)๋Š” ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํฐ ๊ฐ’์€ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ 0์ธ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์†๋„๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋†’์€ ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ธ์ž๋Š” ์ฃผ์ƒ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ค‘์•™ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฐ’์ด ๋‚ฎ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋” ํฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Tanet al. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’€ 59 ] ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฅผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์— ์žˆ๋Š” ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  8 (d1) ๋ฐ (d2)์˜ ๊ฐ’. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ผ์น˜๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์— ์ถ•์ ๋œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž์˜ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์žฅ์ด ๋“ฑ์˜จ์„  ์†๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ด‰์ง„๋จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ ์„ฑํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮฆฮฆ300W์˜ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ๊ณผ 400, 800 ๋ฐ 1200mm/s์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†๋„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ 3D ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์ „์ฒด์— ๊ฑธ์ณ. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 (d)~(f)๋Š” ๋กœ์ปฌฮฆฮฆํ•ด๋‹น 3D ๋ณด๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์€ ํšŒ์ƒ‰ ํ‰๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋œ ํŠน์ • yz ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ. ์ด yz ์„น์…˜์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 23.40, 11.85 ๋ฐ 2.45pct์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ ์ ˆํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ณผ๋„ ๊ฐ’์ด๋ฉฐฮฆยฏยฏยฏยฏฮฆยฏ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  6 ์˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ด ๊ฐ’์ด ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ๊ณ„๋ฉด์— ๊ฐ€๊น์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์ทจํ•ด์กŒ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋‚ฎ์•„์„œ ํ•ต์ด ์ƒ์กดํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ฑ์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ•ต ํ˜•์„ฑ์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ๊ณ„๋ฉด์— ๋” ๊ฐ€๊น๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 (a), (d), (g), (h)์—์„œ ์œ„์ชฝ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์—์„œ ๋ฉ€๋ฆฌ ๋–จ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ์™€ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„ ํ•„๋“œ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ด๋ก ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ์„ค๋ช…์ด ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋– ๋Œ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜, ์ฆ‰ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ์˜ ํŒ์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ์ง€๋ฅด๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์—ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์†๋„ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์†๋„๋ณด๋‹ค ํด ๋•Œ, ์ฃผ์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ตญ์ง€์  ์žฌ์šฉ์œต์€ ์šฉ์งˆ์ด ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ํ๋ฌผํ๋ฌผํ•œ ๊ตฌ์—ญ์˜ ๊นŠ์€ ๊ณณ์—์„œ ์•ก์ƒ์„  ๋“ฑ์˜จ์„ ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ด๋™ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. . 55] ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ์—ด๋ฆฐ ์•ก์ฒด๋กœ ์šด๋ฐ˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ’€์ด ๊ณผ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŒŒํŽธ์€ ๊ณ ์˜จ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์˜ค๋ž˜ ์ƒ์กดํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธธ ์žƒ์€ ์ž…์ž์˜ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์€ ํ™œ์„ฑ ํ•ต์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.N0N0) ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ 15 , 60 , 61 ] ์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 (a) ๋ฐ (b)์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์€ ์šฉ์œต ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์•„๋ž˜์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ํ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ง€๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„์˜ ์—ญ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” V = 400 ๋ฐ 800mm/s์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ’ 1.0 ๋ฐ 1.6m/s๋กœ ๋” ๋А๋ ค์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 (c)์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ์นจํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๋” ์–•๊ณ  ๋„“์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์ด ๋” ๊ณ ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋˜์–ด ์ฆ๊ธฐ ์นจ๊ฐ•์—์„œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ€์–ด๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ญ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ’ 3.5m/s๋กœ ๋” ๋นจ๋ผ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋„ˆ๋น„์—์„œ yz ๋‹จ๋ฉด  ์˜ ํ‚คํ™€ ์•„๋ž˜ ํ‰๊ท  ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด 0.46, 0.45 ๋ฐ 1.44m/s์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.9 (a), (b) ๋ฐ (c). ํ‚คํ™€ ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์€ ๊ฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ์ตœ์†Œ ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ •์˜๋˜๋Š” ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 240 ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋‚ด๋ฆผ ๋ณ€๋™ ฮผฮผm์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 9 (a)์˜ V = 400mm/s ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ  ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ๋ณ€๋™์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 (c)์—์„œ 16์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋กœ  ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮผฮผ๋ฏธ๋””์—„. V = 400mm/s์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์žฅ๊ณผ ๋†’์€ ๋ณ€๋™ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” ์ด์ „ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋™์—ญํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 34 ]

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ V = 400mm/s ํ‚คํ™€ ์ผ€์ด์Šค์˜ ๋ฌด์งˆ์„œํ•œ ๋ณ€๋™ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์ฃผ์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ์กฐ๊ฐ์„ ๊ตฌ๋™ํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. V = 1200mm/s์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜ ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. . ๋ด๋“œ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ์œ ๋™์žฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์„ค๋ช…์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ๋– ๋Œ์ด ์ž…์ž์˜ ์กด์žฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋Ÿด๋“ฏํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ๋•Œ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  9 ์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ์˜์—ญ ๋น„์œจ ์ด ์ˆ˜์ง€์ƒ์ • ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋†’์€ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ, ์ฆ‰ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋œ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ„์˜ ์ด์œ ๋กœ ํ•ต ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์•„์ง ๋ฐฐ์ œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋‹จํŽธํ™” ์ด๋ก ์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฌธํ—Œ [ 62 ] ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋  ๋งŒํผ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜ ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ถ€์ฐจ์ ์ธ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์œ ์˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1200mm/s๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„๋Š” ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ๋ฉด์  ๋ถ„์œจ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•œ ๋ณผ๋ง์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ AM ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‚ฎ์€ P ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ V ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์‘๊ณ  ์ „๋ฉด ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์™„๋งŒํ•ด์ง„ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค., ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์ฐฝ์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ์‘๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์„ฑ์žฅ ๋™์•ˆ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์†Œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ผ์ธ์€ 250W ์ •๋„์˜ ์ „๋ ฅ๊ณผ 600~800mm/s์˜ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„๋กœ ์ตœ์†Œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์ฐฝ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‹ ์ค‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์— ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ธ์‡„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณตํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Š” CMSX-4 AM ๋นŒ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 63 ]์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด AM ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ๋ณด๋‹ค ์—„๊ฒฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ๋„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €, CMSX-4 ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฐ ๋ฒŒํฌ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์ค‘์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ธต์˜ CMSX-4 ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ถ•์ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋„ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ง์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Lopez-Galilea ๋“ฑ ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋ถ„๋ง์ด ์ฃผ๋กœ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋…น์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง๊ณผ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . 22 ]๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ CMSX-4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € AM์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐํŒ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ, ์†๋„, ํ•ด์น˜ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ ์ธต ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ 2๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ๊ณผ ์—ด์žฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” AM ๋นŒ๋“œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋™์•ˆ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋น„๋“œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ง€์‹ ๊ฒฉ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํ•ด์†Œํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

LPBF ์ œ์กฐ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ CMSX-4 ๋‹จ๊ฒฐ์ • ์˜ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ(๊ธฐ๋‘ฅํ˜•) ๋Œ€ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ์‘๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณ ์ „์ ์ธ ์‘๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํŠน์ง•์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‘๊ณ  ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ํ‘œ์œ  ๊ฒฐ์ • ์„ฑํ–ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•ด์„์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ณ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ CFD ์—ด ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

  • ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ฐ€๊ณต ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜•์ƒ, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํก์ˆ˜์œจ, ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ํ‚คํ™€ ์š”๋™, ์ž…์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์„ฑ์— ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์ด๋ก ์ ์ธ ํ‘œ์œ  ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต AM ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ์ „๋„ ๋ฐ ๋ณผ๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๊ด€์ฐฐ๊ณผ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํ‚คํ™€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๊ณผ์†Œํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์„ฑ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์„น์…˜์ด๋‚˜ ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„ ํ•„๋“œ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ์—ด์žฅ์— ๋™์ผํ•œ ํ‘œ์œ  ์ž…์ž ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํŒŒ์ดํ”„๋ผ์ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ ๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ์—ฐ์žฅ๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ‘œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ธ ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ƒ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ถˆ๊ท ์ผ ํ•ตํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.์ง€ /Vํ‹ฐG/Vํ‹ฐ์ •๊ถŒ.
  • ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž๋Š” ๊นŠ์€ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ๋…์ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ๋Œ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฐํ™”์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์†๋„์™€ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ์™ธ์—๋„ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ํ‚คํ™€๊ณผ ์ตœ์†Œ ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ํฉ์–ด์ง„ ์ž…์ž ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™์—์„œ ์—ํ”ผํƒ์…œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ๋ณด์กดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

  1. R.C. Reed: The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, pp.17โ€“20.Book Google Scholar 
  2. A. Basak, R. Acharya, and S. Das: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, vol. 47A, pp. 3845โ€“59.Article Google Scholar 
  3. J. Vitek: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 53โ€“67.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  4. R. Vilar and A. Almeida: J. Laser Appl., 2015, vol. 27, p. S17004.Article Google Scholar 
  5. T. Kalfhaus, M. Schneider, B. Ruttert, D. Sebold, T. Hammerschmidt, J. Frenzel, R. Drautz, W. Theisen, G. Eggeler, O. Guillon, and R. Vassen: Mater. Des., 2019, vol. 168, p. 107656.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  6. S.S. Babu, S.A. David, J.W. Park, and J.M. Vitek: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2004, vol. 9, pp. 1โ€“12.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  7. L. Felberbaum, K. Voisey, M. Gรคumann, B. Viguier, and A. Mortensen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, vol. 299, pp. 152โ€“56.Article Google Scholar 
  8. S. Mokadem, C. Bezenรงon, J.M. Drezet, A. Jacot, J.D. Wagniรจre, and W. Kurz: TMS Annual Meeting, 2004, pp. 67โ€“76.
  9. J.M. Vitek: ASM Proc. Int. Conf. Trends Weld. Res., vol. 2005, pp. 773โ€“79.
  10. J.M. Vitek, S. Babu, and S. David: Process Optimization for Welding Single-Crystal Nickel-Bbased Superalloyshttps://technicalreports.ornl.gov/cppr/y2001/pres/120424.pdf
  11. J.D. Hunt: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1984, vol. 65, pp. 75โ€“83.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  12. M. Gรคumann, R. Trivedi, and W. Kurz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, vol. 226โ€“228, pp. 763โ€“69.Article Google Scholar 
  13. M. Gรคumann, S. Henry, F. Clรฉton, J.D. Wagniรจre, and W. Kurz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. 271, pp. 232โ€“41.Article Google Scholar 
  14. M. Gรคumann, C. Bezenรงon, P. Canalis, and W. Kurz: Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1051โ€“62.Article Google Scholar 
  15. J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, and S.S. Babu: Welding and Weld Repair of Single Crystal Gas Turbine Alloyshttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stan-David/publication/238692931_WELDING_AND_WELD_REPAIR_OF_SINGLE_CRYSTAL_GAS_TURBINE_ALLOYS/links/00b4953204ab35bbad000000/WELDING-AND-WELD-REPAIR-OF-SINGLE-CRYSTAL-GAS-TURBINE-ALLOYS.pdf
  16. B. Kianian: Wohlers Report 2017: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report, Wohlers Associates, Inc., Fort Collins, 2017.Google Scholar 
  17. M. Ramsperger, L. Mรบjica Roncery, I. Lopez-Galilea, R.F. Singer, W. Theisen, and C. Kรถrner: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2015, vol. 17, pp. 1486โ€“93.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  18. A.B. Parsa, M. Ramsperger, A. Kostka, C. Somsen, C. Kรถrner, and G. Eggeler: Metals, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 258-1โ€“17.Article Google Scholar 
  19. C. Kรถrner, M. Ramsperger, C. Meid, D. Bรผrger, P. Wollgramm, M. Bartsch, and G. Eggeler: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2018, vol. 49A, pp. 3781โ€“92.Article Google Scholar 
  20. D. Bรผrger, A. Parsa, M. Ramsperger, C. Kรถrner, and G. Eggeler: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, vol. 762, p. 138098,Article Google Scholar 
  21. J. Pistor and C. Kรถrner: Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, p. 24482.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  22. I. Lopez-Galilea, B. Ruttert, J. He, T. Hammerschmidt, R. Drautz, B. Gault, and W. Theisen: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 30, p. 100874.CAS Google Scholar 
  23. N. Lu, Z. Lei, K. Hu, X. Yu, P. Li, J. Bi, S. Wu, and Y. Chen: Addit. Manuf., 2020, vol. 34, p. 101228.CAS Google Scholar 
  24. K. Chen, R. Huang, Y. Li, S. Lin, W. Zhu, N. Tamura, J. Li, Z.W. Shan, and E. Ma: Adv. Mater., 2020, vol. 32, pp. 1โ€“8.Google Scholar 
  25. W.J. Sames, F.A. List, S. Pannala, R.R. Dehoff, and S.S. Babu: Int. Mater. Rev., 2016, vol. 61, pp. 315โ€“60.Article Google Scholar 
  26. A. Basak, R. Acharya, and S. Das: Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 22, pp. 665โ€“71.CAS Google Scholar 
  27. R. Jiang, A. Mostafaei, J. Pauza, C. Kantzos, and A.D. Rollett: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2019.03.103.Article Google Scholar 
  28. R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, C. Kantzos, J. Pauza, K. Fezzaa, T. Sun, and A.D. Rollett: Science, 2019, vol. 363, pp. 849โ€“52.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  29. B. Fotovvati, S.F. Wayne, G. Lewis, and E. Asadi: Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 2018, p. 4920718.Article Google Scholar 
  30. P.-J. Chiang, R. Jiang, R. Cunningham, N. Parab, C. Zhao, K. Fezzaa, T. Sun, and A.D. Rollett: in Advanced Real Time Imaging II, pp. 77โ€“85.
  31. J. Ye, S.A. Khairallah, A.M. Rubenchik, M.F. Crumb, G. Guss, J. Belak, and M.J. Matthews: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2019, vol. 21, pp. 1โ€“9.Article Google Scholar 
  32. C. Zhao, Q. Guo, X. Li, N. Parab, K. Fezzaa, W. Tan, L. Chen, and T. Sun: Phys. Rev. X, 2019, vol. 9, p. 021052.CAS Google Scholar 
  33. S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, and W.E. King: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 108, pp. 36โ€“45.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  34. N. Kouraytem, X. Li, R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, T. Sun, A.D. Rollett, A.D. Spear, and W. Tan: Appl. Phys. Rev., 2019, vol. 11, p. 064054.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  35. T. DebRoy, H. Wei, J. Zuback, T. Mukherjee, J. Elmer, J. Milewski, A. Beese, A. Wilson-Heid, A. De, and W. Zhang: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2018, vol. 92, pp. 112โ€“224.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  36. J.H. Cho and S.J. Na: J. Phys. D, 2006, vol. 39, pp. 5372โ€“78.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  37. I. Yadroitsev, A. Gusarov, I. Yadroitsava, and I. Smurov: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, vol. 210, pp. 1624โ€“31.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  38. S. Ghosh, L. Ma, L.E. Levine, R.E. Ricker, M.R. Stoudt, J.C. Heigel, and J.E. Guyer: JOM, 2018, vol. 70, pp. 1011โ€“16.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  39. Y. He, C. Montgomery, J. Beuth, and B. Webler: Mater. Des., 2019, vol. 183, p. 108126.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  40. D. Rosenthal: Weld. J., 1941, vol. 20, pp. 220โ€“34.Google Scholar 
  41. M. Tang, P.C. Pistorius, and J.L. Beuth: Addit. Manuf., 2017, vol. 14, pp. 39โ€“48.CAS Google Scholar 
  42. R.E. Aune, L. Battezzati, R. Brooks, I. Egry, H.J. Fecht, J.P. Garandet, M. Hayashi, K.C. Mills, A. Passerone, P.N. Quested, E. Ricci, F. Schmidt-Hohagen, S. Seetharaman, B. Vinet, and R.K. Wunderlich: Proc. Int.Symp. Superalloys Var. Deriv., 2005, pp. 467โ€“76.
  43. B.C. Wilson, J.A. Hickman, and G.E. Fuchs: JOM, 2003, vol. 55, pp. 35โ€“40.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  44. J.J. Valencia and P.N. Quested: ASM Handb., 2008, vol. 15, pp. 468โ€“81.Google Scholar 
  45. H.L. Wei, J. Mazumder, and T. DebRoy: Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, pp. 1โ€“7.Google Scholar 
  46. N. Raghavan, R. Dehoff, S. Pannala, S. Simunovic, M. Kirka, J. Turner, N. Carlson, and S.S. Babu: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 112, pp. 303โ€“14.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  47. R. Lin, H. Wang, F. Lu, J. Solomon, and B.E. Carlson: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, vol. 108, pp. 244โ€“56.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  48. M. Bayat, A. Thanki, S. Mohanty, A. Witvrouw, S. Yang, J. Thorborg, N.S. Tiedje, and J.H. Hattel: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 30, p. 100835.CAS Google Scholar 
  49. K. Higuchi, H.-J. Fecht, and R.K. Wunderlich: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2007, vol. 9, pp. 349โ€“54.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  50. Q. Guo, C. Zhao, M. Qu, L. Xiong, L.I. Escano, S.M.H. Hojjatzadeh, N.D. Parab, K. Fezzaa, W. Everhart, T. Sun, and L. Chen: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 28, pp. 600โ€“09.Google Scholar 
  51. J. Trapp, A.M. Rubenchik, G. Guss, and M.J. Matthews: Appl. Mater. Today, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 341โ€“49.Article Google Scholar 
  52. M. Schneider, L. Berthe, R. Fabbro, and M. Muller: J. Phys. D, 2008, vol. 41, p. 155502.Article Google Scholar 
  53. Z. Gan, O.L. Kafka, N. Parab, C. Zhao, L. Fang, O. Heinonen, T. Sun, and W.K. Liu: Nat. Commun., 2021, vol. 12, p. 2379.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  54. B.J. Simonds, E.J. Garboczi, T.A. Palmer, and P.A. Williams: Appl. Phys. Rev., 2020, vol. 13, p. 024057.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  55. J. Dantzig and M. Rappaz: Solidification, 2nd ed., EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2016, pp. 483โ€“532.Google Scholar 
  56. W. Tiller, K. Jackson, J. Rutter, and B. Chalmers: Acta Metall., 1953, vol. 1, pp. 428โ€“37.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  57. D. Zhang, A. Prasad, M.J. Bermingham, C.J. Todaro, M.J. Benoit, M.N. Patel, D. Qiu, D.H. StJohn, M. Qian, and M.A. Easton: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, vol. 51A, pp. 4341โ€“59.Article Google Scholar 
  58. F. Yan, W. Xiong, and E.J. Faierson: Materials, 2017, vol. 10, p. 1260.Article Google Scholar 
  59. W. Tan and Y.C. Shin: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2015, vol. 98, pp. 446โ€“58.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  60. A. Hellawell, S. Liu, and S.Z. Lu: JOM, 1997, vol. 49, pp. 18โ€“20.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  61. H. Ji: China Foundry, 2019, vol. 16, pp. 262โ€“66.Article Google Scholar 
  62. J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, and L.A. Boatner: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 1997, vol. 2, pp. 109โ€“18.Article CAS Google Scholar 
  63. X. Wang, J.A. Muรฑiz-Lerma, O. Sanchez-Mata, S.E. Atabay, M.A. Shandiz, and M. Brochu: Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2020, vol. 5, pp. 41โ€“49.Article Google Scholar 

Download references

Fig. 1. Schematic of lap welding for 6061/5182 aluminum alloys.

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๊ฒน์นจ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ˜•์„ฑ, ์šฉ์œต ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ์ž…์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ธํŒŒ ๋ฐœ์ง„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

๋ฆฐ ์ฒธ ๊ฐ€์˜ค ์–‘ ๋ฏธ์‹œ ์˜น ์žฅ ์ถ˜๋ฐ ์™•
Lin Chen , Gaoyang Mi , Xiong Zhang , Chunming Wang *
์ค‘๊ตญ ์šฐํ•œ์‹œ ํ™”์ค‘๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 430074

Effects of sinusoidal oscillating laser beam on weld formation, melt flow and grain structure during aluminum alloys lap welding

Abstract

A numerical model of 1.5โ€ฏmm 6061/5182 aluminum alloys thin sheets lap joints under laser sinusoidal oscillation (sine) welding and laser welding (SLW) weld was developed to simulate temperature distribution and melt flow. Unlike the common energy distribution of SLW, the sinusoidal oscillation of laser beam greatly homogenized the energy distribution and reduced the energy peak. The energy peaks were located at both sides of the sine weld, resulting in the tooth-shaped sectional formation. This paper illustrated the effect of the temperature gradient (G) and solidification rate (R) on the solidification microstructure by simulation. Results indicated that the center of the sine weld had a wider area with low G/R, promoting the formation of a wider equiaxed grain zone, and the columnar grains were slenderer because of greater GR. The porosity-free and non-penetration welds were obtained by the laser sinusoidal oscillation. The reasons were that the molten pool volume was enlarged, the volume proportion of keyhole was reduced and the turbulence in the molten pool was gentled, which was observed by the high-speed imaging and simulation results of melt flow. The tensile test of both welds showed a tensile fracture form along the fusion line, and the tensile strength of sine weld was significantly better than that of the SLW weld. This was because that the wider equiaxed grain area reduced the tendency of cracks and the finer grain size close to the fracture location. Defect-free and excellent welds are of great significance to the new energy vehicles industry.

์˜จ๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‚ฌ์ธํŒŒ ์ง„๋™ (์‚ฌ์ธ) ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฐ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘ (SLW) ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ 1.5mm 6061/5182 ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ฐ•ํŒ ๋žฉ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SLW์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ถ„ํฌ์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์˜ ์‚ฌ์ธํŒŒ ์ง„๋™์€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ท ์งˆํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํ”ผํฌ๋ฅผ ์ค„์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํ”ผํฌ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ์–‘์ชฝ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ†ฑ๋‹ˆ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ(G)์™€ ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„ ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.(R) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ G/R๋กœ ๋” ๋„“์€ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋” ํฐ GR๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ฃผ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์ด ๋” ๊ฐ€๋Š˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ด€ํ†ต ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‚ฌ์ธํŒŒ ์ง„๋™์— ์˜ํ•ด ์–ป์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๊ฐ€ ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๊ณ  ์—ด์‡  ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ๋น„์œจ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์™„๋งŒํ•ด์กŒ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ณ ์† ์ด๋ฏธ์ง• ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ์šฉ์ ‘๋ถ€ ์˜ ์ธ์žฅ์‹œํ—˜ ์€ ์œต์ฐฉ์„ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์žฅํŒŒ๊ดดํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ์ธ์žฅ๊ฐ•๋„์‚ฌ์ธ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ SLW ์šฉ์ ‘๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋“ฑ์ถ• ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฆฝ ์˜์—ญ์ด ๋„“์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ท ์—ด ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ํŒŒ๋‹จ ์œ„์น˜์— ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•œ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ•จ์ด ์—†๊ณ  ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์‹ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…์— ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1. Schematic of lap welding for 6061/5182 aluminum alloys.
Fig. 1. Schematic of lap welding for 6061/5182 aluminum alloys.
Fig. 2. Finite element mesh.
Fig. 2. Finite element mesh.
Fig. 3. Weld morphologies of cross-section and upper surface for the two welds: (a) sine pattern weld; (b) SLW weld.
Fig. 3. Weld morphologies of cross-section and upper surface for the two welds: (a) sine pattern weld; (b) SLW weld.
Fig. 4. Calculation of laser energy distribution: (a)-(c) sine pattern weld; (d)-(f) SLW weld.
Fig. 4. Calculation of laser energy distribution: (a)-(c) sine pattern weld; (d)-(f) SLW weld.
Fig. 5. The partially melted region of zone A.
Fig. 5. The partially melted region of zone A.
Fig. 6. The simulated profiles of melted region for the two welds: (a) SLW weld; (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 6. The simulated profiles of melted region for the two welds: (a) SLW weld; (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 7. The temperature field simulation results of cross section for sine pattern weld.
Fig. 7. The temperature field simulation results of cross section for sine pattern weld.
Fig. 8. Dynamic behavior of the molten pool at the same time interval of 0.004 s within one oscillating period: (a) SLW weld; (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 8. Dynamic behavior of the molten pool at the same time interval of 0.004 s within one oscillating period: (a) SLW weld; (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 9. The temperature field and flow field of the molten pool for the SLW weld: (a)~(f) t = 80 ms~100 ms.
Fig. 9. The temperature field and flow field of the molten pool for the SLW weld: (a)~(f) t = 80 ms~100 ms.
Fig. 10. The temperature field and flow field of the molten pool for the sine pattern weld: (a)~(f) t = 151 ms~171 ms.
Fig. 10. The temperature field and flow field of the molten pool for the sine pattern weld: (a)~(f) t = 151 ms~171 ms.
Fig. 11. The evolution of the molten pool volume and keyhole depth within one period.
Fig. 11. The evolution of the molten pool volume and keyhole depth within one period.
Fig. 12. The X-ray inspection results for the two welds: (a) SLW weld, (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 12. The X-ray inspection results for the two welds: (a) SLW weld, (b) sine pattern weld.
Fig. 13. Comparison of the solidification parameters for sine and SLW patterns: (a) the temperature field simulated results of the molten pool upper surfaces; (b) temperature gradient G and solidification rate R along the molten pool boundary isotherm from weld centerline to the fusion boundary; (c) G/R; (d) GR.
Fig. 13. Comparison of the solidification parameters for sine and SLW patterns: (a) the temperature field simulated results of the molten pool upper surfaces; (b) temperature gradient G and solidification rate R along the molten pool boundary isotherm from weld centerline to the fusion boundary; (c) G/R; (d) GR.
Fig. 14. The EBSD results of equiaxed grain zone in the weld center of: (a) sine pattern weld; (b) SLW weld; (c) grain size.
Fig. 14. The EBSD results of equiaxed grain zone in the weld center of: (a) sine pattern weld; (b) SLW weld; (c) grain size.
Fig. 15. (a) EBSD results of horizontal sections of SLW weld and sine pattern weld; (b) The columnar crystal widths of SLW weld and sine pattern weld.
Fig. 15. (a) EBSD results of horizontal sections of SLW weld and sine pattern weld; (b) The columnar crystal widths of SLW weld and sine pattern weld.
Fig. 16. (a) The tensile test results of the two welds; (b) Fracture location of SLW weld; (b) Fracture location of sine pattern weld.
Fig. 16. (a) The tensile test results of the two welds; (b) Fracture location of SLW weld; (b) Fracture location of sine pattern weld.

Keywords

Laser welding, Sinusoidal oscillating, Energy distribution, Numerical simulation, Molten pool flow, Grain structure

References

Chen, X., 2014. Study on laser-MAG Hybrid Weaving Welding Charateristics. Master
thesis. Harbin Institute of Technology, China.
Chen, G., Wang, B., Mao, S., Zhong, P., He, J., 2019. Research on the โ€œโˆžโ€-shaped laser
scanning welding process for aluminum alloy. Opt. Laser Technol. 115, 32โ€“41.
Cho, W.-I., Na, S.-J., Cho, M.-H., Lee, J.-S., 2010. Numerical study of alloying element
distribution in CO2 laserโ€“GMA hybrid welding. Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 792โ€“800.
Cho, W.-I., Na, S.-J., Thomy, C., Vollertsen, F., 2012. Numerical simulation of molten
pool dynamics in high power disk laser welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212,
262โ€“275.
Das, A., Butterworth, I., Masters, I., Williams, D., 2018. Microstructure and mechanical
properties of gap-bridged remote laser welded (RLW) automotive grade AA 5182
joints. Mater. Charact. 145, 697โ€“712.
Fetzer, F., Sommer, M., Weber, R., Weberpals, J.-P., Graf, T., 2018. Reduction of pores by
means of laser beam oscillation during remote welding of AlMgSi. Opt. Lasers Eng.
108, 68โ€“77.
Geng, S., Jiang, P., Shao, X., Guo, L., Gao, X., 2020. Heat transfer and fluid flow and their
effects on the solidification microstructure in full-penetration laser welding of
aluminum sheet. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 46, 50โ€“63.
Hagenlocher, C., Sommer, M., Fetzer, F., Weber, R., Graf, T., 2018a. Optimization of the
solidification conditions by means of beam oscillation during laser beam welding of
aluminum. Mater. Des. 160, 1178โ€“1185.
Hagenlocher, C., Weller, D., Weber, R., Graf, T., 2018b. Reduction of the hot cracking
susceptibility of laser beam welds in AlMgSi alloys by increasing the number of grain
boundaries. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 24, 313โ€“319.
Hagenlocher, C., Fetzer, F., Weller, D., Weber, R., Graf, T., 2019. Explicit analytical
expressions for the influence of welding parameters on the grain structure of laser
beam welds in aluminium alloys. Mater. Des. 174, 107791.
Han, X., Tang, X., Wang, T., Shao, C., Lu, F., Cui, H., 2018. Role of ambient pressure in
keyhole dynamics based on beam transmission path method for laser welding on Al
alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 99, 1639โ€“1651.
Hao, K., Li, G., Gao, M., Zeng, X., 2015. Weld formation mechanism of fiber laser
oscillating welding of austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 225,
77โ€“83.
Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D., 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free
boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201โ€“225.
Jiang, Z., Chen, X., Li, H., Lei, Z., Chen, Y., Wu, S., Wang, Y., 2020. Grain refinement and
laser energy distribution during laser oscillating welding of Invar alloy. Mater. Des.
186, 108195.
Kaplan, A., 1994. A model of deep penetration laser welding based on calculation of the
keyhole profile. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 27, 1805โ€“1814.
Kou, S., 2002. Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey, USA.
Kuryntsev, S.V., Gilmutdinov, A.K., 2015. The effect of laser beam wobbling mode in
welding process for structural steels. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81, 1683โ€“1691.
Li, P., Nie, F., Dong, H., Li, S., Yang, G., Zhang, H., 2018. Pulse MIG welding of 6061-T6/
A356-T6 aluminum alloy dissimilar T-joint. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 27, 4760โ€“4769.
Liu, T., Mu, Z., Hu, R., Pang, S., 2019. Sinusoidal oscillating laser welding of 7075
aluminum alloy: hydrodynamics, porosity formation and optimization. Int. J. Heat
Mass Transf. 140, 346โ€“358.
Seto, N., Katayama, S., Matsunawa, A., 2000. High-speed simultaneous observation of
plasma and keyhole behavior during high power CO2 laser welding: effect of
shielding gas on porosity formation. J. Laser Appl. 12, 245โ€“250.
Tang, Z., Vollertsen, F., 2014. Influence of grain refinement on hot cracking in laser
welding of aluminum. Weld. World 58, 355โ€“366.
Wang, L., Gao, M., Zhang, C., Zeng, X., 2016. Effect of beam oscillating pattern on weld
characterization of laser welding of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 108,
707โ€“717.
Wang, L., Gao, M., Zeng, X., 2018. Experiment and prediction of weld morphology for
laser oscillating welding of AA6061 aluminium alloy. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 24,
334โ€“341.
Yamazaki, Y., Abe, Y., Hioki, Y., Nakatani, M., Kitagawa, A., Nakata, K., 2016.
Fundamental study of narrow-gap welding with oscillation laser beam. Weld. Int. 30,
699โ€“707.
Yuan, Z., Tu, Y., Yuan, T., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., 2021. Size effects on mechanical
properties of pure industrial aluminum sheet for micro/meso scale plastic
deformation: experiment and modeling. J. Alloys. Compd. 859, 157752.
Zou, J., 2016. Characteristics of laser scanning welding process for 5A06 aluminum alloy
thick plate with narrow gap. Materials Processing Engineering. Harbin Welding
Institute, China. Master thesis.

Figure 9. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) contour map on different sections.

Numerical Simulation Research on the Diversion
Characteristics of a Trapezoidal Channel

Yong Cheng, Yude Song, Chunye Liu, Wene Wang * and Xiaotao Hu
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

  • Correspondence: wangwene@nwsuaf.edu.cn

Abstract

๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์ ์€ ๊ด€๊ฐœ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฌผ ์ „ํ™˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ด€๊ฐœ์šฉ์ˆ˜ ์šด๋ฐ˜์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฌผ ์šด๋ฐ˜ ํšจ์œจ๊ณผ ์นจ์ „์ด ์ฃผ์š” ๊ด€์‹ฌ์‚ฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ด€๊ฐœ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๋ฌผ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์ ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ FLOW-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  15 ์„ธํŠธ์˜ ์ž‘์—… ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์ ์—์„œ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์œ ๋™์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์  ๋ถ€๊ทผ์˜ ์žฌ์ˆœํ™˜ ๊ตฌ์—ญ ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์‚ฌ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๊ผด ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์ธต์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ „ํ™˜ ํญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ „ํ™˜ ํญ์€ ์‚ฌ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๊ผด ์ฑ„๋„๊ณผ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์ ์ด ์ฃผ ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์œ ์†์— ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ์ ์˜ ์žฌ์ˆœํ™˜ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ ์†์€ ์ž‘์•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋งฅ๋™ ์†๋„์™€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ์ปธ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ์†Œ์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ปค์„œ ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฌผ ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ด€๊ฐœ๊ตฌ์—ญ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ์šด์˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Open-channel bifurcations are the most common water diversion structures in irrigation districts. In irrigation water conveyance, water transport efficiency and sedimentation are primary concerns. This study accordingly analyzes the influence of open-channel bifurcations on water delivery in irrigation areas. Herein, the three-dimensional flow at an open-channel bifurcation was studied via numerical simulations using FLOW-3D software and including 15 sets of working conditions. The hydraulic characteristics of the recirculation zone and flow structures in the vicinity of the open-channel bifurcation were analyzed. Equations for the flow diversion width of the surface and bottom layers in the trapezoidal channel were then obtained. The flow diversion widths along the water depth were found to differ between trapezoidal and rectangular channels. The results also show that open-channel bifurcations considerably influence the flow velocity in the main channel. The flow velocity in the recirculation zone of open-channel bifurcations was small, but the pulsation velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy were large. The energy dissipated in this area was relatively large, which was not conducive to channel water delivery. This study provides a reference for channel optimization and operation management in irrigation districts.

Keywords

trapezoidal open channel; numerical simulation; the recirculation zone; flow diversion
width; turbulence kinetic energy

Figure 1. Experimental plan and section measurement layout. Note: Red points in the figure represent the measurement point arrangement, and Roman numerals represent measurement section numbers.
Figure 1. Experimental plan and section measurement layout. Note: Red points in the figure represent the measurement point arrangement, and Roman numerals represent measurement section numbers.
Figure 5. Froude number (Fr) contour map at different water depths. Note: Q1 = 40 L/s; b = 30 cm. X* and Y* are obtained by dimensionless processing of X-axis and Y-axis coordinates. (a) depth of water below the sill height; (b) depth of water above the sill height.
Figure 5. Froude number (Fr) contour map at different water depths. Note: Q1 = 40 L/s; b = 30 cm. X* and Y* are obtained by dimensionless processing of X-axis and Y-axis coordinates. (a) depth of water below the sill height; (b) depth of water above the sill height.
Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.

Influence of bridge piers shapes on the flow of the lower Yellow River

๊ต๊ฐ ๋ชจ์–‘์ด ํ™ฉํ•˜ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

Xianqi Zhanga,b,c, Tao Wanga,* and Xiaobin Lua
a Water Conservancy College, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
b Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Protection Engineering, Zhengzhou 450046, China
c Technology Research Center of Water Conservancy and Marine Traffic Engineering, Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*Corresponding author. E-mail: 1124149584@qq.com

Abstract

ํ•˜์ฒœ์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ์ง€๋ฅด๋Š” ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค. ๊ต๊ฐ ํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๊ฐ•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋ฒ”๋žŒ์— ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Mike 21 Flow Model ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋™์  ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๊ต๊ฐ์ด ๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•, ์›ํ˜• โ€‹โ€‹๋ฐ ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฌผ ์ฐจ๋‹จ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์ด ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ์†์—์„œ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ปธ๊ณ  ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์ด ๊ทธ ๋’ค๋ฅผ ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ  ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž‘์•˜๋‹ค. ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ’์€ ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ 1.95๋ฐฐ์˜€๋‹ค. ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ต๊ฐ์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•์˜ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ฒด์ œ์— ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ฒœ ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฐธ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Key words

bridge piers shape, flow regime, Mike21 Flow Model, numerical simulation, Yellow River

Figure 1 | Location of the proposed bridge
Figure 1 | Location of the proposed bridge
Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.
Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.
Figure 3 | (a) Elevation contour map of water surface near the rectangular pier in the working condition 1, (b) Elevation contour map of water surface near the round pier in the working condition 1 and (c) Elevation contour map of water surface near the oval pier in the working condition 1.
Figure 3 | (a) Elevation contour map of water surface near the rectangular pier in the working condition 1, (b) Elevation contour map of water surface near the round pier in the working condition 1 and (c) Elevation contour map of water surface near the oval pier in the working condition 1.
Figure 9 | Monitoring section backwater changes; (a) Once in ten years traffic, (b) Yearly average flow, (c) Lowest water level (p ยผ 95%)
Figure 9 | Monitoring section backwater changes; (a) Once in ten years traffic, (b) Yearly average flow, (c) Lowest water level (p ยผ 95%)

REFERENCES

Ban, M. N. & Wu, Y. G. 2018 Analysis of flood carrying capacity of Nandu River estuary based on MIKE21 FM. South-to-North
Water Diversion and Water Conservancy Science and Technology 16(02), 151โ€“157.
Guo, F. Q., Qu, H. F., Zeng, H., Cong, P. T. & Geng, X. 2013 Numerical simulation of flood evolution in flood storage area based
on MIKE21 FM model. Hydropower Energy Science 31(05), 34โ€“37.

Huang, X., Wang, L. L. & Tang, H. W. 2017 Study on the law of the influence of Bridge Pier Shape of Plain River Course on
River Backwater. In: The 14th National Hydrodynamics Conference and the 28th National Hydrodynamics Conference
Proceedings (Volume 2). Ed. China Ocean Press. pp. 858โ€“866.
Liu, X. C., Geng, P. C., Cao, L. & Sun, X. L. 2020 Mike21 simulates the influence of cross-river bridge on river regime. Peopleโ€™s
Yellow River 42(S1), 24โ€“25 รพ 29.
Luo, W. G., Lu, J. & Lai, H. 2015 Research on the backwater in front of multiple parallel bridge piers at equal distances. Journal
of Sichuan University: Engineering Science Edition 47(4), 6โ€“13.
Luo, M., Huang, E. & Li, G. 2018 Optimization of water intake layout in an irrigation area based on MIKE21FM numerical
simulation. Hydropower Energy Science 36(03), 118โ€“122.
Milad, H., Mohammad, A. Z. & Mohammad, M. A. 2019 Simulation of turbulent flow around tandem piers. Iranian Journal of
Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 43(4).
Ren, M. F., Xu, Z. X. & Su, G. G. 2017 Calculation and comparative analysis of bridge backwater based on two-dimensional
hydrodynamic model and empirical formula. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering 36(05), 78โ€“87.
Selahattin, K. 2014 Prediction of backwater profiles due to bridges in a compound channel using CFD. Advances in Mechanical
Engineering 6.
Sulaiman, D. J., Adnan, A. I. & Manahil, A. T. 2019 Simulation analyses of flow in the wake region of non-uniform bridge pier
by using computational fluid dynamic. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (6).
Wan, L. M. & Li, P. J. 2018 Numerical simulation of navigable flow conditions of bridges across rivers. Water Conservancy
Science and Technology and Economy 24(02), 28โ€“33.
Wang, L. L., Zhang, F. S. & Tang, H. W. 2016 Relationship between water resistance ratio and congestion characteristics of
bridge piers in plains rivers. Journal of River and Sea University (Natural Science Edition) 44(05), 386โ€“392.
Wang, S. T. 2019 On the application of numerical simulation of river and coast hydrodynamics. Engineering and Construction
33(01), 13โ€“16.
Wang, P., He, Y. & Du, Z. S. 2020a Study on urban design flood simulation based on hydrodynamic numerical calculation.
Journal of Xiโ€™an University of Technology 1โ€“6(11โ€“04).
Wang, Q. X., Peng, W. Q., Dong, F., Liu, X. B. & Ou, N. 2020b Simulating flow of an urban river course with complex cross
sections based on the MIKE21 FM model. Water 12(3).
Wei, X. L., Yang, S. F., Hu, P. F. & Ma, X. H. 2016 The influence of tandem cylindrical bridge piers on navigable water flow
based on two-dimensional mathematical model. Water Transport Engineering (08), 75โ€“81.
Wu, P., Balachandar, R. & Ramamurthy, A. 2018 Effects of splitter plate on reducing local scour around bridge pier. River
Research and Applications 34(10).
Xu, D., Yang, H. T., Wang, D., He, C. N., Bai, Y. C. & J, Z. Z. 2018 Numerical simulation study on the congestion characteristics
of river diagonal bridge piers. Journal of Hydropower 37(08), 55โ€“63.
Yang, L. H., Li, J. Z., Kang, A. Q., Li, S. & Feng, P. 2020 The effect of nonstationarity in rainfall on urban flooding based on
coupling SWMM and MIKE21. Water Resources Management. (prepublish).
Yu, P. & Zhu, L. K. 2020 Numerical simulation of local scour around bridge piers using novel inlet turbulent boundary
conditions. Ocean Engineering 218, 108166.

Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process

Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process

๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ ˆ์˜ค ๋‹ค์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘๋œ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ธŒ๋ž˜ํ‚ท์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŒ… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ค๊ณ„

International Journal of Metalcasting volume 16, pages878โ€“893 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

In this study a gating system including sprue, runner and overflows for semi-solid rheocasting of aluminum alloy was designed by means of numerical simulations with a commercial software. The effects of pouring temperature, mold temperature and injection speed on the filling process performance of semi-solid die casting were studied. Based on orthogonal test analysis, the optimal die casting process parameters were selected, which were metal pouring temperature 590 ยฐC, mold temperature 260 ยฐC and injection velocity 0.5 m/s. Semi-solid slurry preparation process of Swirled Enthalpy Equilibration Device (SEED) was used for die casting production experiment. Aluminum alloy semi-solid bracket components were successfully produced with the key die casting process parameters selected, which was consistent with the simulation result. The design of semi-solid gating system was further verified by observing and analyzing the microstructure of different zones of the casting. The characteristic parameters, particle size and shape factor of microstructure of the produced semi-solid casting showed that the semi-solid aluminum alloy components are of good quality.

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ ˆ์˜ค์บ์ŠคํŒ…์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์Šคํ”„๋ฃจ, ๋Ÿฌ๋„ˆ ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ”Œ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ดํŒ… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์ž… ์˜จ๋„, ๊ธˆํ˜• ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์ถœ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๋‹ค์ด์บ์ŠคํŒ…์˜ ์ถฉ์ „ ๊ณต์ • ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง๊ต ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ถ„์„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์ž… ์˜จ๋„ 590ยฐC, ๊ธˆํ˜• ์˜จ๋„ 260ยฐC ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์ถœ ์†๋„ 0.5m/s์ธ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋‹ค์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Swirled Enthalpy Equilibration Device(SEED)์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ๋‹ค์ด์บ์ŠคํŒ… ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ธŒ๋ž˜ํ‚ท ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹ค์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ฒŒ์ดํŒ… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์ฃผ์กฐ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ์ฃผ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜, ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ์–‘ํ˜ธํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process
Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process

References

  1. G. Li, H. Lu, X. Hu et al., Current progress in rheoforming of wrought aluminum alloys: a review. Met. Open Access Metall. J. 10(2), 238 (2020)CAS Google Scholar 
  2. G. Eisaabadi, A. Nouri, Effect of Sr on the microstructure of electromagnetically stirred semi-solid hypoeutectic Alโ€“Si alloys. Int. J. Metalcast. 12, 292โ€“297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0161-8CAS Article Google Scholar 
  3. C. Xghab, D. Qza, E. Spma et al., Blistering in semi-solid die casting of aluminium alloys and its avoidance. Acta Mater. 124, 446โ€“455 (2017)Article Google Scholar 
  4. M. Modigell, J. Koke, Rheological modelling on semi-solid metal alloys and simulation of thixocasting processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 111(1โ€“3), 53โ€“58 (2001)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  5. A. Pola, M. Tocci, P. Kapranos, Microstructure and properties of semi-solid aluminum alloys: a literature review. Met. Open Access Metall. J. 8(3), 181 (2018)Google Scholar 
  6. M.C. Flemings, Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Metall. Trans. B 22, 269โ€“293 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651227Article Google Scholar 
  7. Q. Zhu, Semi-solid moulding: competition to cast and machine from forging in making automotive complex components. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 20, 1042โ€“1047 (2010)Article Google Scholar 
  8. K. Prapasajchavet, Y. Harada, S. Kumai, Microstructure analysis of Alโ€“5.5 at.%Mg alloy semi-solid slurry by Weckโ€™s reagent. Int. J. Metalcast. 11(1), 123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-016-0084-9Article Google Scholar 
  9. P. Das, S.K. Samanta, S. Tiwari, P. Dutta, Die filling behaviour of semi solid A356 Al alloy slurry during rheo pressure die casting. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 68(6), 1215โ€“1220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0706-6CAS Article Google Scholar 
  10. B. Zhou, S. Lu, K. Xu et al., Microstructure and simulation of semisolid aluminum alloy castings in the process of stirring integrated transfer-heat (SIT) with water cooling. Int. J. Metalcast. 14(2), 396โ€“408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00357-6CAS Article Google Scholar 
  11. S. Ji, Z. Fan, Solidification behavior of Snโ€“15 wt Pct Pb alloy under a high shear rate and high intensity of turbulence during semisolid processing. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 33(11), 3511โ€“3520 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0338-4Article Google Scholar 
  12. P. Kapranos, P.J. Ward, H.V. Atkinson, D.H. Kirkwood, Near net shaping by semi-solid metal processing. Mater. Des. 21, 387โ€“394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00077-1Article Google Scholar 
  13. H.V. Atkinson, Alloys for semi-solid processing. Solid State Phenom. 192โ€“193, 16โ€“27 (2013)Google Scholar 
  14. L. Rogal, Critical assessment: opportunities in developing semi-solid processing: aluminium, magnesium, and high-temperature alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. Mst A Publ. Inst. Met. 33, 759โ€“764 (2017)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  15. H. Guo, Rheo-diecasting process for semi-solid aluminum alloys. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 22(004), 590โ€“595 (2007)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  16. T. Chucheep, J. Wannasin, R. Canyook, T. Rattanochaikul, S. Janudom, S. Wisutmethangoon, M.C. Flemings, Characterization of flow behavior of semi-solid slurries with low solid fractions. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44(10), 4754โ€“4763 (2013)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  17. M. Li, Y.D. Li, W.L. Yang et al., Effects of forming processes on microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy prepared by self-inoculation method. Mater. Res. 22(3) (2019)
  18. P. Cรดtรฉ, M.E. Larouche, X.G. Chen et al., New developments with the SEED technology. Solid State Phenom. 192(3), 373โ€“378 (2012)Article Google Scholar 
  19. I. Dumaniฤ‡, S. Joziฤ‡, D. Bajiฤ‡ et al., Optimization of semi-solid high-pressure die casting process by computer simulation, Taguchi method and grey relational analysis. Inter Metalcast. 15, 108โ€“118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00422-5Article Google Scholar 
  20. Y. Bai et al., Numerical simulation on the rheo-diecasting of the semi-solid A356 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 16, 422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-4799(09)60074-1CAS Article Google Scholar 
  21. B.C. Bhunia, Studies on die filling of A356 Al alloy and development of a steering knuckle component using rheo pressure die casting system. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 271, 293โ€“311 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.014CAS Article Google Scholar 
  22. A. Guo, J. Zhao, C. Xu et al., Effects of pouring temperature and electromagnetic stirring on porosity and mechanical properties of A357 aluminum alloy rheo-diecasting. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3310-1Article Google Scholar 
  23. C.G. Kang, S.M. Lee, B.M. Kim, A study of die design of semi-solid die casting according to gate shape and solid fraction. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 204(1โ€“3), 8โ€“21 (2008)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  24. Z. Liu, W. Mao, T. Wan et al., Study on semi-solid A380 aluminum alloy slurry prepared by water-cooling serpentine channel and its rheo-diecasting. Met. Mater. Int. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00672-2Article Google Scholar 
  25. Z.Y. Liu, W.M. Mao, W.P. Wang et al., Investigation of rheo-diecasting mold filling of semi-solid A380 aluminum alloy slurry. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 24(006), 691โ€“700 (2017)CAS Article Google Scholar 
  26. M. Arif, M.Z. Omar, N. Muhamad et al., Microstructural evolution of solid-solution-treated Znโ€“22Al in the semisolid state. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29(008), 765โ€“774 (2013)CAS Article Google Scholar 

Keywords

  • semi-solid rheo-die casting
  • gating system
  • process parameters
  • numerical simulation
  • microstructure
Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) - (c) ฮ”tcycle = 400 ฮผs, (d) โ€“ (f) ฮ”tcycle = 1000 ฮผs and (g) โ€“ (i) ฮ”tcycle = 3000 ฮผs.

MULTIPHYSICS SIMULATION OF THEMRAL AND FLUID DYNAMICS PHENOMENA DURING THE PULSED LASER POWDER BED FUSION PROCESS OF 316-L STEEL

M. Bayat* , V. K. Nadimpalli, J. H. Hattel
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Produktionstorvet
425, Kgs. 2800, Lyngby, Denmark

ABSTRACT

L-PBF(Laser Powder Bed Fusion)๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฃผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ œ์กฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ† ํด๋กœ์ง€ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๋•๋ถ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. . ํŽ„์Šค L-PBF(PL-PBF)์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์€ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์ง€์† ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋“€ํ‹ฐ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‘˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณ€์กฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ œ์–ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธธ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ฃผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด PL-PBF ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ํŠธ๋ž™์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ๋ชจ์–‘ ๋ฐ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€์ธ Flow-3D๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” 316-L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ• PL-PBF ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ด๊ณผ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ ๊ณต์ • ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ๋™ ์กฐ๊ฑด. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ณ ์ •๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋“€ํ‹ฐ ์‚ฌ์ดํด(50%)์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ์ง€์† ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋ชจ์–‘๊ณผ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ข… ํŠธ๋ž™ ํ˜•ํƒœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ๊ธด ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๋” ํฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ณ€์œ„๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํ›„๋ฅ˜์— ๋” ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๋Š” ํ˜น์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๋™์‹œ์— ๋” ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ 50% ๋“€ํ‹ฐ ์‚ฌ์ดํด์—์„œ 1000ฮผs์—์„œ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋Œ€์นญ์ ์ธ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ 400ฮผs ์‚ฌ์ดํด ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋” ๊ธด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ’€ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ์€ 1000ฮผs์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋” ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฐ์† ํŠธ๋ž™๊ณผ ํŒŒ์†๋œ ํŠธ๋ž™ PL-PBF ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์—ฐ์† ํŠธ๋ž™์€ ํ•ญ์ƒ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์šฉ์œต ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์œ ์ง€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

English Abstract

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) has attracted a lot of attention from various industrial sectors and mainly thanks to its well-proven well-known capacity of realizing complex topology-optimized components that have so far been impossible to make using conventional manufacturing techniques. In Pulsed L-PBF (PL-PBF), the laserโ€™s temporal profile can be modulated via modifying either or both the cycle duration and the duty cycle. Thus, the laserโ€™s temporal profile could be considered as a new process parameter that paves the way for a better control of this process for future applications. Therefore, in this work we aim to investigate how changing the laserโ€™s temporal profile can affect the melt pool conditions and the final shape and geometry of a track in the PL-PBF process. In this respect, in this paper a multiphysics numerical model of the PL-PBF process of 316-L stainless steel is developed based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package Flow-3D and the model is used to simulate the heat and fluid flow conditions occurring inside the melt pool during the course of the process at different pulsing modes. Thus, a parametric study is carried out to study the influence of the laserโ€™s cycle duration with a fixed laser duty cycle (50 %) on the shape and size of the melt pool and the final track morphology. It is noticed that at longer cycle periods, more noticeable humps form at the wake of the melt pool as more material is displaced within bigger melt pools, which are at the same time subjected to more significant recoil pressures. It is also observed in the simulations that at 50 % duty cycle, longer melt pools form at 400 ฮผs cycle period compared to the more symmetrical melt pools formed at 1000 ฮผs, primarily because of shorter laser off-times in the former, even though melt pool volume is bigger for the 1000 ฮผs case. The parameteric study illustrates the boundary between a continuous track and a broken track PL-PBF wherein the continuous track is retained by always maintaining a small volume of molten material.

Figure 1: Front and side views of the computational domain. Note that the region along z and from -100 ฮผm to +50 ฮผm is void.
Figure 1: Front and side views of the computational domain. Note that the region along z and from -100 ฮผm to +50 ฮผm is void.
Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) - (c) ฮ”tcycle = 400 ฮผs, (d) โ€“ (f) ฮ”tcycle = 1000 ฮผs and (g) โ€“ (i) ฮ”tcycle = 3000 ฮผs.
Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) – (c) ฮ”tcycle = 400 ฮผs, (d) โ€“ (f) ฮ”tcycle = 1000 ฮผs and (g) โ€“ (i) ฮ”tcycle = 3000 ฮผs.
Figure 3: Plot of melt pool volume versus time for four cases including continuous wave laser as well as 50 % duty cycle at 400 ฮผs, 1000 ฮผs and 3000 ฮผs.
Figure 3: Plot of melt pool volume versus time for four cases including continuous wave laser as well as 50 % duty cycle at 400 ฮผs, 1000 ฮผs and 3000 ฮผs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work a CFD model of the modulated PL-PBF process of stainless steel 316-L is developed in the commercial software package Flow-3D. The model involves physics such as solidification, melting, evaporation, convection, laser-material interaction, capillarity, Marangoni effect and the recoil pressure effect. In the current study, a parametric study is carried out to understand how the change in the cycle period duration affects the melt poolโ€™s thermo-fluid conditions during the modulated PL-PBF process. It is observed that at the pulse mode with 50 % duty cycle and 400 ฮผs cycle period, an overlapped chain of humps form at the wake of the melt pool and at a spatial frequency of occurrence of about 78 ฮผm. Furthermore and as expected, it is noted that the melt pool volume, the size of the hump as well as the crater size at the end of the track, increase with increase in the cycle period duration, as more material is re-deposited at the back of the melt pool and that itself is caused by more pronounced recoil pressures. Moreover, it is noticed that due to the short off-time period of the laser in the 400 ฮผs cycle period case, there is always an amount of liquid metal left from the previous cycle, at the time the new cycle starts. This is found to be the main reason why longer and elongated melt pools form at 400 ฮผs cycle period, compared to the bigger, shorter and more symmetrical-like melt pools forming at the 1000 ฮผs case. In this study PL-PBF single tracks including the broken track and the continuous track examples were studied to illustrate the boundary of this transition at a given laser scan parameter setting. At higher scan speeds, it is expected that the Plateauโ€“Rayleigh instability will compete with the pulsing behavior to change the transition boundary between a broken and continuous track, which is suggested as future work from this study.

REFERENCES

[1] T. Craeghs, L. Thijs, F. Verhaeghe, J.-P. Kruth, J. Van Humbeeck, A study of the microstructural
evolution during selective laser melting of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 3303โ€“3312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004.
[2] J. Liu, A.T. Gaynor, S. Chen, Z. Kang, K. Suresh, A. Takezawa, L. Li, J. Kato, J. Tang, C.C.L. Wang, L.
Cheng, X. Liang, A.C. To, Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing,
(2018) 2457โ€“2483.
[3] M. Bayat, W. Dong, J. Thorborg, A.C. To, J.H. Hattel, A review of multi-scale and multi-physics
simulations of metal additive manufacturing processes with focus on modeling strategies, Addit. Manuf.
47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102278.
[4] A. Foroozmehr, M. Badrossamay, E. Foroozmehr, S. Golabi, Finite Element Simulation of Selective Laser
Melting process considering Optical Penetration Depth of laser in powder bed, Mater. Des. 89 (2016)
255โ€“263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.002.
[5] Y.S. Lee, W. Zhang, Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base
superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion, Addit. Manuf. 12 (2016) 178โ€“188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003.
[6] S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, W.E. King, Laser powder-bed fusion additive
manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation
zones, Acta Mater. 108 (2016) 36โ€“45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014.
[7] M. Bayat, A. Thanki, S. Mohanty, A. Witvrouw, S. Yang, J. Thorborg, N.S. Tiedje, J.H. Hattel, Keyholeinduced porosities in Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Ti6Al4V: High-fidelity modelling and
experimental validation, Addit. Manuf. 30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100835.
[8] A. Charles, M. Bayat, A. Elkaseer, L. Thijs, J.H. Hattel, S. Scholz, Elucidation of dross formation in laser
powder bed fusion at down-facing surfaces: phenomenon-oriented multiphysics simulation and
experimental validation, Addit. Manuf. Under revi (2021).
[9] M. Bayat, V.K. Nadimpalli, D.B. Pedersen, J.H. Hattel, A fundamental investigation of thermo-capillarity
in laser powder bed fusion of metals and alloys, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 166 (2021) 120766.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120766.
[10] J.D. Roehling, S.A. Khairallah, Y. Shen, A. Bayramian, C.D. Boley, A.M. Rubenchik, J. Demuth, N.
Duanmu, M.J. Matthews, Physics of large-area pulsed laser powder bed fusion, Addit. Manuf. 46 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102186.
[11] M. Zheng, L. Wei, J. Chen, Q. Zhang, J. Li, S. Sui, G. Wang, W. Huang, Surface morphology evolution
during pulsed selective laser melting: Numerical and experimental investigations, Appl. Surf. Sci. 496
(2019) 143649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143649.
[12] M. Bayat, V.K. Nadimpalli, D.B. Pedersen, J.H. Hattel, A fundamental investigation of thermo-capillarity
in laser powder bed fusion of metals and alloys, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 166 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120766.