Schematic view of the experimental set-up

Short-time numerical simulation of ultrasonically assisted electrochemical removal of strontium from water

  • September 2023

DOI:10.30955/gnc2023.00436

  • Conference: 18th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology CEST2023, 30 August to 2 September 2023, Athens, Greece
  • At: Athens, Greece

Authors:

Katarina Licht

  • University of Zagreb Faculty of Civil Engineering
Ivan Halkijevic at University of Zagreb

Ivan Halkijevic

Hana Posavcic at University of Zagreb

Hana Posavcic

Goran Loncar at University of Zagreb

Goran Loncar

Abstract and Figures

3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์—์„œ์˜ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ๋Š” ์ž‘๋™ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜ 25kHz์˜ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ํŠธ๋žœ์Šค๋“€์„œ 4๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ธ”๋ก์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์—ด๋œ 8๊ฐœ์˜ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ์ „๊ทน์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ค‘์˜ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ด์˜จ์€ ์ „ํ•˜๋Ÿ‰ 3.2โ€ข10โปยนโน C, ์ง๊ฒฝ 1.2โ€ข10โปโธ m์˜ ์ž…์ž๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ Flow-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ, ์ •์ „๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์ด๋™ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์ ์— ์ „๊ทน์— ์˜๊ตฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ™์žกํžŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฌผ์† ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋œ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์‹œ์ž‘ ๋ฐ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์ ์˜ ๋ฌผ์† ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ๊ท ์ผ ๋†๋„์˜ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด 180์ดˆ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํ›„ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ 10.3%์—์„œ 11.2%๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Keywords:

numerical model, electrochemical reactor, strontium

1. Introduction

์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ(Sr)์€ ์ž์—ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์›์†Œ๋กœ, ๋งŽ์€ ํ‡ด์ ์•”๊ณผ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋ฐฉํ•ด์„ ๊ด‘๋ฌผ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ์ธ์œ„์  ๋ฐœ์ƒ์›์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—… ํ™œ๋™, ๋น„๋ฃŒ, ํ•ต ๋‚™์ง„ ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค(Scott et al., 2020). ์ˆ˜์ค‘ Sr ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ 1.5 mg Lโปยน๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ์–ด๋ฆฐ์ด์—๊ฒŒ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ๊ตฌ๋ฃจ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค(Epa et al., n.d.; Peng et al., 2021; Scott et al., 2020). ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹์ˆ˜์—์„œ ๋†’์€ Sr ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋ถ๋ถ€์˜ ์ง€ํ•˜์ˆ˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ 52 mg Lโปยน์˜ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋‹ค(Luczaj and Masarik, 2015; Peng et al., 2021; Scott et al., 2020). Sr ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ •ํ™” ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์  ๊ณต์ •์ด๋‹ค(Kamaraj and Vasudevan, 2015). ์ด ๊ณต์ •์€ ๊ธˆ์† ์ „๊ทน์— ์ „๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‘์ง‘์ œ๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘๋™ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ •์€ ํฌ์ƒ ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ์šฉํ•ด, ์Œ๊ทน์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์‚ฐํ™”์ด์˜จ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์†Œ ์ƒ์„ฑ, ์ „๊ทน ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ์ „ํ•ด์งˆ ๋ฐ˜์‘, ์ฝœ๋กœ์ด๋“œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ๊ณผ ์ „๊ทน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘์ง‘์ œ์˜ ํก์ฐฉ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ํ”Œ๋ก์˜ ์นจ์ „ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ€์ƒ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค(Mollah et al., 2001). ์ด ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹จ์  ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ „๊ทน์˜ ๋ถ„๊ทน๊ณผ ํ”ผ๋ง‰ ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค(Dong et al., 2016; Ince, 2018; Moradi et al., 2021). ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜์€ ์šฉ์งˆ์˜ ์—ด๋ถ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์‚ฐ๊ธฐ ๋ผ๋””์นผ, ๊ณผ์‚ฐํ™”์ˆ˜์†Œ ๋“ฑ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ฑ ์ข…์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค(Mohapatra and Kirpalani, 2019). ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์งˆ์˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ž…์ž์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค(Fu et al., 2016; Ziylan et al., 2013). ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ Sr ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์˜ค์—ผ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์ (EC) ์ผ๊ด„ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์˜ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ(US) ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํšจ์œจ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค EC ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์—์„œ์˜ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ๋‹ค.

References

Dong, B., Fishgold, A., Lee, P., Runge, K., Deymier, P. and Keswani, M. (2016), Sono-electrochemical recovery of metal ions from their aqueous solutions, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 318, 379โ€“387.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2016.07.007

EPA. (2014), Announcement of Final Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on the Third Drinking

Water Contaminant Candidate List. Retrieved from http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action

Fu, F., Lu, J., Cheng, Z. and Tang, B. (2016), Removal of selenite by zero-valent iron combined with ultrasound:

Se(IV) concentration changes, Se(VI) generation, and reaction mechanism, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 29,

328โ€“336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.007 Ince, N.H. (2018), Ultrasound-assisted advanced oxidation processes for water decontamination, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 40, 97โ€“103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.009

Kamaraj, R. and Vasudevan, S. (2015), Evaluation of electrocoagulation processfor the removal of strontium and cesium from aqueous solution, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 93, 522โ€“530.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.021

Luczaj, J. and Masarik, K. (2015), Groundwater Quantity and Quality Issues in a Water-Rich Region: Examples from Wisconsin, USA, Resources, 4(2), 323โ€“357.

https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4020323

Mohapatra, D.P. and Kirpalani, D.M. (2019), Selenium in wastewater: fast analysis method development and advanced oxidation treatment applications, Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 79(5), 842โ€“849. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.010

Mollah, M.Y.A., Schennach, R., Parga, J.R. and Cocke, D.L. (2001), Electrocoagulation (EC)- Science and

applications, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 84(1), 29โ€“41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00176-5 Moradi, M., Vasseghian, Y., Arabzade, H. and Khaneghah, A.M. (2021), Various wastewaters treatment by sono-electrocoagulation process: A comprehensive review of operational parameters and future outlook, Chemosphere, 263, 128314.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2020.128314

Peng, H., Yao, F., Xiong, S., Wu, Z., Niu, G. and Lu, T. (2021), Strontium in public drinking water and associated public health risks in Chinese cities, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(18), 23048.

https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-12378-Y

Scott, V., Juran, L., Ling, E.J., Benham, B. and Spiller, A. (2020), Assessing strontium and vulnerability to

strontium in private drinking water systems in Virginia, Water, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041053

Ziylan, A., Koltypin, Y., Gedanken, A. and Ince, N.H. (2013), More on sonolytic and sonocatalytic decomposition of Diclofenac using zero-valent iron, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20(1), 580โ€“586.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.05.005

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Perforated Monopiles

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Perforated Monopiles

Mary Kathryn Walker
Florida Institute of Technology, mwalker2022@my.fit.edu

Robert J. Weaver, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences
Major Advisor


Chungkuk Jin, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences


Kelli Z. Hunsucker, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences


Richard B. Aronson, Ph.D.
Professor and Department Head
Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences

Abstract

๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์€ ํ•ด์ƒ ํ’๋ ฅ ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ๊ฑด์„ค์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์€ 25~50๋…„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ช… ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋™์•ˆ ๋ถ€์‹์„ฑ ์—ผ์ˆ˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜์–ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์„ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„ํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์  ์‚ฐํ™” ๊ณต์ •์„ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณต์ •์€ ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ฝ”ํŒ…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์Œ๊ทน ๋ณดํ˜ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ญ์‚ฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋ฐ€๋ด‰๋˜๊ณ  ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์  ๋ถ€์‹ ๊ณต์ •์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‚ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๋ชจํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์ค‘๋‹จ์‹œํ‚ฌ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋„๊ด€์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒฝ์— ๋งŒ๋“  ๊ด€ํ†ต๋ถ€๋Š” ์ข…์ข… ๋ˆ„์ถœ๋˜์–ด ์‹ ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฐ์†Œํ™”๋œ ๋ฌผ์ด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‘œ์ค€ ๋ถ€์‹ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฐ์†Œํ™”๋œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์žฌ๊ณ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์€ ๊ฐ„์กฐ๋Œ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์กฐ๊ฐ„๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋ฒฝ์— ์ฒœ๊ณต์ด ์žˆ์–ด ์‹ ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฐ์†Œํ™”๋œ ๋ฌผ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฒœ๊ณต์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ํŒŒ๋„ ํ•˜์ค‘์„ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์  ํ•˜์ค‘ ๊ฐ์†Œ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ฒœ๊ณต์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฒœ๊ณต์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํž˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™(CFD)์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ํŒŒ๋„์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํž˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด๋ก ์  3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ FLOW-3Dยฎ HYDRO๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒœ๊ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ํ›„, ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ฒœ๊ณต์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํŒŒ๋„ ํƒฑํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ 10% ์ด๋‚ด, ์ด์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ 5% ์ด๋‚ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ ํ›„, ์ฒœ๊ณต์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ๋„ ํ•˜์ค‘ ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ํŒŒ๋„์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ‘๊ทผ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์„ 15ยฐ์”ฉ ํšŒ์ „ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ฒœ๊ณต ๋ชจ๋…ธํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ๋˜์–ด์„œ๋Š” ์•ˆ ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ํŒŒ๋„ ํ•˜์ค‘ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฒœ๊ณต์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์†ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Monopiles are used in the construction of offshore wind turbines and typically have a design life of 25 to 50 years. Over their lifecycle, monopiles are exposed to a corrosive saltwater environment, facilitating a galvanic oxidation process that quickly degrades the structure. This process can be mitigated by coating the monopile in a protective barrier and implementing cathodic protection techniques. Historically, monopile designers assumed the interior of the pile would be completely sealed and the galvanic corrosion process would eventually consume all the available oxygen, halting the reaction. However, penetrations made in the pile wall for conduit often leaked and allowed fresh, oxygenated water to enter the interior space. New monopile designs are being researched that reconsider the interior space as an oxygenated environment where standard corrosion protection techniques can be more effectively applied. These new monopiles have perforations through the wall at intertidal or subtidal levels to allow fresh, oxygenated water to flow through the structure. These perforations can also reduce wave loads on the structure. The magnitude of the hydrodynamic load reduction depends on the size and orientation of the perforations. This research studied the applicability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in analysis of force reduction on monopiles in relation to size of a perforation and to analyze the effect of variation in approach angle of a given wave. To determine the force reduction on the monopile, theoretical 3D models were produced and tested using FLOW-3Dยฎ HYDRO with an unperforated monopile used as the control. After the theoretical data was collected, physical scale models with the same variety of perforations were tested using a wave tank to determine the validity of the theoretical models. The CFD simulations were found to be within 10% of the physical models and within 5% of previous research. After the physical and simulated models were validated, it was found that the size of the perforations has a distinct impact on the wave load reduction and testing for differing approach angles of a given wave could be conducted. The variation in approach angle was simulated by rotating the monopile in 15ยฐ increments. The data presented in this paper suggests that the orientation of the monopile is not statistically significant and should not be a design consideration for perforated monopiles. It is also suggested to continue the study on the size and shape of the perforations to find the balance between wave load reduction and structural stability.

Figure 1: Overview sketch of typical monopile (MP) foundation and transition piece (TP) design with an internal j-tube (Hilbert et al., 2011)
Figure 1: Overview sketch of typical monopile (MP) foundation and transition
piece (TP) design with an internal j-tube (Hilbert et al., 2011)

References
Andersen, J., Abrahamsen, R., Andersen, T., Andersen, M., Baun, T., & Neubauer,
J. (2020). Wave Load Mitigation by Perforation of Monopiles. Journal of
Marine Science and Engineering, 8(5), 352.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8050352
Bakker A. (2008) Lectures on Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics.
www.bakker.org.
Bustamante, A., Vera-Tudela, L., & Kรผhn, M. (2015). Evaluation of wind farm
effects on fatigue loads of an individual wind turbine at the EnBW baltic 1
offshore wind farm. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 625, 012020.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012020
Chakrabarti SK. Hydrodynamics of offshore structures. Springer Verlag;1987.
Christiansen, R. (2020). Living Docks: Structural Implications and Determination
of Force Coefficients of Oyster Mats on Dock Pilings in the Indian River
Lagoon [Masterโ€™s Thesis, Florida Institute of Technology].
Clauss, G. (1992). Offshore Structures, Volume 1, Conceptual Design and
Hydromechanics. Springer, London, UK.
COMSOL Multiphysicsยฎ v. 6.1. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm,
Sweden.
Delwiche, A. & Tavares, I. (2017). Retrofit Strategy using Aluminum Anodes for
the Internal section of Windturbine Monopiles. NACE Internation
Corrosion Conference & Expo, Paper no. 8955.
Det Norske Veritas (2014) Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. Norway.
70
Det Norske Veritas (1989). Rules for the Classification of Fixed Offshore
Installations. Technical report, DNV, Hovik, Norway.
DNV. (2011). DNV-RP-C203 Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures (tech.
rep.). http://www.dnv.com
Elger, D. F., LeBret, B. A., Crowe, C. T., & Roberson, J. A. (2022). Engineering
fluid mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 Users Manual (2018). FLOW-3D [Computer software].
Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science, Inc. https://www.flow3d.com
Gaertner, Evan, Jennifer Rinker, Latha Sethuraman, Frederik Zahle, Benjamin
Andersen, Garrett Barter, Nikhar Abbas, Fanzhong Meng, Pietro Bortolotti,
Witold Skrzypinski, George Scott, Roland Feil, Henrik Bredmose,
Katherine Dykes, Matt Shields, Christopher Allen, and Anthony Viselli.
(2020). Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind.
Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-

  1. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf
    Goodisman, Jerry (2001). “Observations on Lemon Cells”. Journal of Chemical
    Education. 78 (4): 516โ€“518. Bibcode:2001JChEd..78..516G.
    doi:10.1021/ed078p516. Goodisman notes that many chemistry textbooks
    use an incorrect model for a cell with zinc and copper electrodes in an
    acidic electrolyte
    Hilbert, L.R. & Black, Anders & Andersen, F. & Mathiesen, Troels. (2011).
    Inspection and monitoring of corrosion inside monopile foundations for
    offshore wind turbines. European Corrosion Congress 2011, EUROCORR
  2. 3. 2187-2201.
    H. J. Landau, “Sampling, data transmission, and the Nyquist rate,” in Proceedings
    of the IEEE, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1701-1706, Oct. 1967, doi:
    10.1109/PROC.1967.5962.
    71
    Journee, J. M., and W. W. Massie. Offshore Hydrodynamics, First Edition.
    Delft University of Technology, 2001.
    Keulegan, G. H., and L. H. Carpenter. โ€œForces on Cylinders and Plates in an
    Oscillating Fluid.โ€ Journal of Research of the National Bureau of
    Standards, vol. 60, no. 5, 1958, pp. 423โ€“40.
    Lahlou, O. (2019). Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Drag Force on
    Surfboards with Different Shapes (thesis).
    L. H. Holthuijsen. Waves in Oceanic and Coastal Waters. Cam-bridge University
    Press, 2007. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618536.
    MacCamy, R.C., Fuchs, R.A.: Wave Forces on Piles: a Diffraction Theory. Corps
    of Engineers Washington DC Beach Erosion Board (1954)
    M. M. Maher and G. Swain, “The Corrosion and Biofouling Characteristics of
    Sealed vs. Perforated Offshore Monopile Interiors Experiment Design
    Comparing Corrosion and Environment Inside Steel Pipe,” OCEANS 2018
    MTS/IEEE Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA, 2018, pp. 1-4, doi:
    10.1109/OCEANS.2018.8604522.
    Morison, J. R.; O’Brien, M. P.; Johnson, J. W.; Schaaf, S. A. (1950), “The force
    exerted by surface waves on piles”, Petroleum Transactions, American
    Institute of Mining Engineers, 189 (5): 149โ€“154, doi:10.2118/950149-G
    Paluzzi, Alexander John, “Effects of Perforations on Internal Cathodic Protection
    and Recruitment of Marine Organisms to Steel Pipes” (2023). Theses and
    Dissertations. 1403. https://repository.fit.edu/etd/1403
    Ploeg, J.V.D. (2021). Perforation of monopiles to reduce hydrodynamic loads and
    enable use in deep waters [Masterโ€™s Thesis, Delft University of
    Technology] Institutional Repository at Delft University of Technology.
    http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:91eada6f-4f2b-4ae6-be59-2b5ff0590c6f.
    72
    Shi, W., Zhang, S., Michailides, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, P., & Li, X. (2023).
    Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamic effects of breaking waves
    on monopiles in model scale. Journal of Marine Science and Technology,
    28(1), 314โ€“325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00926-9
    Santamaria Gonzalez, G.A. (2023) Advantages and Challenges of Perforated
    Monopiles in Deep Water Sites [Masterโ€™s Thesis, Delft University of
    Technology] Institutional Repository at Delft University of Technology.
    http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:490791b6-a912-4bac-a007-f77012c01107
    Sarpkaya, T. and Isaacson, M. (1981). Mechanics of Wave Forces on Offshore
    Structures. Number ISBN 0-442-25402-4. Van Nostrand Reinhold
    Company Inc., New York.
    Tang, Y., Shi, W., Ning, D., You, J., & Michailides, C. (2020). Effects of spilling
    and plunging type breaking waves acting on large monopile offshore wind
    turbines. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00427
    Teja, R. (2021, June 25). Wheatstone bridge: Working, examples, applications.
    ElectronicsHub. https://www.electronicshub.org/wheatstone-bridge/
    The MathWorks Inc. (2022). MATLAB version: 9.13.0 (R2022b), Natick,
    Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc. https://www.mathworks.com
    Wave gauges. Edinburgh Designs. (2016).
    http://www4.edesign.co.uk/product/wavegauges/
    Wilberts, F. (2017). MEASUREMENT DRIVEN FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF
    OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE FOUNDATIONS (Masterโ€™s Thesis,
    Uppsala University).
Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

ํ•ด์ € ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ์“ฐ๋‚˜๋ฏธ์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ง„ํญ ์ถ”์ •: 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•

Ramtin Sabeti a, Mohammad Heidarzadeh ab

aDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA27AY, UK
bHydroCoast Consulting Engineers Ltd, Bath, UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102360

Highlights

  • โ€ขLandslide travel distance is considered for the first time in a predictive equation.
  • โ€ขPredictive equation derived from databases using 3D physical and numerical modeling.
  • โ€ขThe equation was successfully tested on the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami event.
  • โ€ขThe developed equation using three-dimensional data exhibits a 91โ€ฏ% fitting quality.

Abstract

Landslide tsunamis, responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage in recent years, necessitate the allocation of sufficient time and resources for studying these extreme natural hazards. This study offers a step change in the field by conducting a large number of three-dimensional numerical experiments, validated by physical tests, to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides. We first conducted a few 3D physical experiments in a wave basin which were then applied for the validation of a 3D numerical model based on the Flow3D-HYDRO package. Consequently, we delivered 100 simulations using the validated model by varying parameters such as landslide volume, water depth, slope angle and travel distance. This large database was subsequently employed to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial tsunami amplitude. For the first time, we considered travel distance as an independent parameter for developing the predictive equation, which can significantly improve the predication accuracy. The predictive equation was tested for the case of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami and produced satisfactory results.

Keywords

Tsunami, Subaerial landslide, Physical modelling, Numerical simulation, FLOW-3D HYDRO

1. Introduction and literature review

The Anak Krakatau landslide tsunami on 22nd December 2018 was a stark reminder of the dangers posed by subaerial landslide tsunamis (Ren et al., 2020Mulia et al. 2020a; Borrero et al., 2020Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 2021). The collapse of the volcano’s southwest side into the ocean triggered a tsunami that struck the Sunda Strait, leading to approximately 450 fatalities (Syamsidik et al., 2020Mulia et al., 2020b) (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1, landslide tsunamis (both submarine and subaerial) have been responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage to coastal communities worldwide. These incidents underscored the critical need for advanced research into landslide-generated waves to aid in hazard prediction and mitigation. This is further emphasized by recent events such as the 28th of November 2020 landslide tsunami in the southern coast mountains of British Columbia (Canada), where an 18 million m3 rockslide generated a massive tsunami, with over 100โ€ฏm wave run-up, causing significant environmental and infrastructural damage (Geertsema et al., 2022).

Fig 1

Physical modelling and numerical simulation are crucial tools in the study of landslide-induced waves due to their ability to replicate and analyse the complex dynamics of landslide events (Kim et al., 2020). In two-dimensional (2D) modelling, the discrepancy between dimensions can lead to an artificial overestimation of wave amplification (e.g., Heller and Spinneken, 2015). This limitation is overcome with 3D modelling, which enables the scaled-down representation of landslide-generated waves while avoiding the simplifications inherent in 2D approaches (Erosi et al., 2019). Another advantage of 3D modelling in studying landslide-generated waves is its ability to accurately depict the complex dynamics of wave propagation, including lateral and radial spreading from the slide impact zone, a feature unattainable with 2D models (Heller and Spinneken, 2015).

Physical experiments in tsunami research, as presented by authors such as Romano et al. (2020), McFall and Fritz (2016), and Heller and Spinneken (2015), have supported 3D modelling works through validation and calibration of the numerical models to capture the complexities of wave generation and propagation. Numerical modelling has increasingly complemented experimental approach in tsunami research due to the latter’s time and resource-intensive nature, particularly for 3D models (Li et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021). Various numerical approaches have been employed, from Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks to depth-averaged and Navierโ€“Stokes models, enhancing our understanding of tsunami dynamics (Si et al., 2018Grilli et al., 2019Heidarzadeh et al., 20172020Iorio et al., 2021Zhang et al., 2021Kirby et al., 2022Wang et al., 20212022Hu et al., 2022). The sophisticated numerical techniques, including the Particle Finite Element Method and the Immersed Boundary Method, have also shown promising results in modelling highly dynamic landslide scenarios (Mulligan et al., 2020Chen et al., 2020). Among these methods and techniques, FLOW-3D HYDRO stands out in simulating landslide-generated tsunami waves due to its sophisticated technical features such as offering Tru Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for precise free surface tracking (e.g., Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). TruVOF distinguishes itself through a split Lagrangian approach, adeptly reducing cumulative volume errors in wave simulations by dynamically updating cell volume fractions and areas with each time step. Its intelligent adaptation of time step size ensures precise capture of evolving free surfaces, offering unparalleled accuracy in modelling complex fluid interfaces and behaviour (Flow Science, 2023).

Predictive equations play a crucial role in assessing the potential hazards associated with landslide-generated tsunami waves due to their ability to provide risk assessment and warnings. These equations can offer swift and reasonable evaluations of potential tsunami impacts in the absence of detailed numerical simulations, which can be time-consuming and expensive to produce. Among multiple factors and parameters within a landslide tsunami generation, the initial maximum wave amplitude (Fig. 1) stands out due to its critical role. While it is most likely that the initial wave generated by a landslide will have the highest amplitude, it is crucial to clarify that the term “initial maximum wave amplitude” refers to the highest amplitude within the first set of impulse waves. This parameter is essential in determining the tsunami’s impact severity, with higher amplitudes signalling a greater destructive potential (Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). Additionally, it plays a significant role in tsunami modelling, aiding in the prediction of wave propagation and the assessment of potential impacts.

In this study, we initially validate the FLOW-3D HYDRO model through a series of physical experiments conducted in a 3D wave tank at University of Bath (UK). Upon confirmation of the model’s accuracy, we use it to systematically vary parameters namely landslide volume, water depth, slope angle, and travel distance, creating an extensive database. Alongside this, we perform a sensitivity analysis on these variables to discern their impacts on the initial maximum wave amplitude. The generated database was consequently applied to derive a non-dimensional predictive equation aimed at estimating the initial maximum wave amplitude in real-world landslide tsunami events.

Two innovations of this study are: (i) The predictive equation of this study is based on a large number of 3D experiments whereas most of the previous equations were based on 2D results, and (ii) For the first time, the travel distance is included in the predictive equation as an independent parameter. To evaluate the performance of our predictive equation, we applied it to a previous real-world subaerial landslide tsunami, i.e., the Anak Krakatau 2018 event. Furthermore, we compare the performance of our predictive equation with other existing equations.

2. Data and methods

The methodology applied in this research is a combination of physical and numerical modelling. Limited physical modelling was performed in a 3D wave basin at the University of Bath (UK) to provide data for calibration and validation of the numerical model. After calibration and validation, the numerical model was employed to model a large number of landslide tsunami scenarios which allowed us to develop a database for deriving a predictive equation.

2.1. Physical experiments

To validate our numerical model, we conducted a series of physical experiments including two sets in a 3D wave basin at University of Bath, measuring 2.50โ€ฏm in length (WL), 2.60โ€ฏm in width (WW), and 0.60โ€ฏm in height (WH) (Fig. 2a). Conducting two distinct sets of experiments (Table 1), each with different setups (travel distance, location, and water depth), provided a robust framework for validation of the numerical model. For wave measurement, we employed a twin wire wave gauge from HR Wallingford (https://equipit.hrwallingford.com). In these experiments, we used a concrete prism solid block, the dimensions of which are outlined in Table 2. In our experiments, we employed a concrete prism solid block with a density of 2600โ€ฏkg/m3, chosen for its similarity to the natural density of landslides, akin to those observed with the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami, where the landslide composition is predominantly solid rather than granular. The block’s form has also been endorsed in prior studies (Watts, 1998Najafi-Jilani and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2008) as a suitable surrogate for modelling landslide-induced waves. A key aspect of our methodology was addressing scale effects, following the guidelines proposed by Heller et al. (2008) as it is described in Table 1. To enhance the reliability and accuracy of our experimental data, we conducted each physical experiment three times which revealed all three experimental waveforms were identical. This repetition was aimed at minimizing potential errors and inconsistencies in laboratory measurements.

Fig 2

Table 1. The locations and other information of the laboratory setups for making landslide-generated waves in the physical wave basin. This table details the specific parameters for each setup, including slope range (ฮฑ), slide volume (V), kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ), water depth (h), travel distance (D), surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ), Reynolds number (R), Weber number (W), and the precise coordinates of the wave gauges (WG).

Labฮฑ(ยฐ)V (mยณ)h (m)D (m)WG’s Location(ฮฝ) (mยฒ/s)(ฯƒ) (N/m)Acceptable range for avoiding scale effects*Observed values of W and R โŽโŽ
Lab 1452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2470.070X1=1.090 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R > 3.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105R1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.80โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y1=1.210 m
W1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.19โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z1=0.050mW >5.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ103
Lab 2452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2460.045X2=1.030 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.78โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y2=1.210โ€ฏmW2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.13โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z2=0.050 m

โŽ

The acceptable ranges for avoiding scale effects are based on the study by Heller et al. (2008).โŽโŽ

The Reynolds number (R) is given by g0.5h1.5/ฮฝ, with ฮฝ denoting the kinematic viscosity. The Weber number (W) is Wโ€ฏ=โ€ฏฯgh2/ฯƒ, where ฯƒ represents surface tension coefficient and ฯโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ1000kg/m3โ€…is the density of water. In our experiments, conducted at a water temperature of approximately 20โ€ฏยฐC, the kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ) and the surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ) are 1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’6 mยฒ/s and 0.073โ€ฏN/m, respectively (Kestin et al., 1978).

Table 2. Specifications of the solid block used in physical experiments for generating subaerial landslides in the laboratory.

Solid-block attributesProperty metricsGeometric shape
Slide width (bs)0.26 mImage, table 2
Slide length (ls)0.20 m
Slide thickness (s)0.10 m
Slide volume (V)2.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3
Specific gravity, (ฮณs)2.60
Slide weight (ms)6.86 kg

2.2. Numerical simulations applying FLOW-3D hydro

The detailed theoretical framework encompassing the governing equations, the computational methodologies employed, and the specific techniques used for tracking the water surface in these simulations are thoroughly detailed in the study by Sabeti et al. (2024). Here, we briefly explain some of the numerical details. We defined a uniform mesh for our flow domain, carefully crafted with a fine spatial resolution of 0.005โ€ฏm (i.e., grid size). The dimensions of the numerical model directly matched those of our wave basin used in the physical experiment, being 2.60โ€ฏm wide, 0.60โ€ฏm deep, and 2.50โ€ฏm long (Fig. 2). This design ensures comprehensive coverage of the study area. The output intervals of the numerical model are set at 0.02โ€ฏs. This timing is consistent with the sampling rates of wave gauges used in laboratory settings. The friction coefficient in the FLOW-3D HYDRO is designated as 0.45. This value corresponds to the Coulombic friction measurements obtained in the laboratory, ensuring that the simulation accurately reflects real-world physical interactions.

In order to simulate the landslide motion, we applied coupled motion objects in FLOW-3D-HYDRO where the dynamics are predominantly driven by gravity and surface friction. This methodology stands in contrast to other models that necessitate explicit inputs of force and torque. This approach ensures that the simulation more accurately reflects the natural movement of landslides, which is heavily reliant on gravitational force and the interaction between sliding surfaces. The stability of the numerical simulations is governed by the Courant Number criterion (Courant et al., 1928), which dictates the maximum time step (ฮ”t) for a given mesh size (ฮ”x) and flow speed (U). According to Courant et al. (1928), this number is required to stay below one to ensure stability of numerical simulations. In our simulations, the Courant number is always maintained below one.

In alignment with the parameters of physical experiments, we set the fluid within the mesh to water, characterized by a density of 1000โ€ฏkg/mยณ at a temperature of 20 ยฐC. Furthermore, we defined the top, front, and back surfaces of the mesh as symmetry planes. The remaining surfaces are designated as wall types, incorporating no-slip conditions to accurately simulate the interaction between the fluid and the boundaries. In terms of selection of an appropriate turbulence model, we selected the kโ€“ฯ‰ model that showed a better performance than other turbulence methods (e.g., Renormalization-Group) in a previous study (Sabeti et al., 2024). The simulations are conducted using a PC Intelยฎ Coreโ„ข i7-10510U CPU with a frequency of 1.80โ€ฏGHz, and a 16 GB RAM. On this PC, completion of a 3-s simulation required approximately 12.5โ€ฏh.

2.3. Validation

The FLOW-3D HYDRO numerical model was validated using the two physical experiments (Fig. 3) outlined in Table 1. The level of agreement between observations (Oi) and simulations (Si) is examined using the following equation:(1)๏ฟฝ=|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ|ร—100where ฮต represents the mismatch error, Oi denotes the observed laboratory values, and Si represents the simulated values from the FLOW-3D HYDRO model. The results of this validation process revealed that our model could replicate the waves generated in the physical experiments with a reasonable degree of mismatch (ฮต): 14โ€ฏ% for Lab 1 and 8โ€ฏ% for Lab 2 experiments, respectively (Fig. 3). These values indicate that while the model is not perfect, it provides a sufficiently close approximation of the real-world phenomena.

Fig 3

In terms of mesh efficiency, we varied the mesh size to study sensitivity of the numerical results to mesh size. First, by halving the mesh size and then by doubling it, we repeated the modelling by keeping other parameters unchanged. This analysis guided that a mesh size of โˆ†xโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ0.005โ€ฏm is the most effective for the setup of this study. The total number of computational cells applying mesh size of 0.005โ€ฏm is 9.269โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ106.

2.4. The dataset

The validated numerical model was employed to conduct 100 simulations, incorporating variations in four key landslide parameters namely water depth, slope angle, slide volume, and travel distance. This methodical approach was essential for a thorough sensitivity analysis of these variables, and for the creation of a detailed database to develop a predictive equation for maximum initial tsunami amplitude. Within the model, 15 distinct slide volumes were established, ranging from 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 to 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 (Table 3). The slope angle varied between 35ยฐ and 55ยฐ, and water depth ranged from 0.24โ€ฏm to 0.27โ€ฏm. The travel distance of the landslides was varied, spanning from 0.04โ€ฏm to 0.07โ€ฏm. Detailed configurations of each simulation, along with the maximum initial wave amplitudes and dominant wave periods are provided in Table 4.

Table 3. Geometrical information of the 15 solid blocks used in numerical modelling for generating landslide tsunamis. Parameters are: ls, slide length; bs, slide width; s, slide thickness; ฮณs, specific gravity; and V, slide volume.

Solid blockls (m)bsโ€…(m)sโ€…(m)V (m3)ฮณs
Block-10.3100.2600.1556.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-20.3000.2600.1505.85โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-30.2800.2600.1405.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-40.2600.2600.1304.39โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-50.2400.2600.1203.74โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-60.2200.2600.1103.15โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-70.2000.2600.1002.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-80.1800.2600.0902.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-90.1600.2600.0801.66โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-100.1400.2600.0701.27โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-110.1200.2600.0600.93โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-120.1000.2600.0500.65โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-130.0800.2600.0400.41โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-140.0600.2600.0300.23โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-150.0400.2600.0200.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60

Table 4. The numerical simulation for the 100 tests performed in this study for subaerial solid-block landslide-generated waves. Parameters are aM, maximum wave amplitude; ฮฑ, slope angle; h, water depth; D, travel distance; and T, dominant wave period. The location of the wave gauge is X=1.030โ€ฏm, Y=1.210โ€ฏm, and Z=0.050โ€ฏm. The properties of various solid blocks are presented in Table 3.

Test-Block Noฮฑ (ยฐ)h (m)D (m)T(s)aM (m)
1Block-7450.2460.0290.5100.0153
2Block-7450.2460.0300.5050.0154
3Block-7450.2460.0310.5050.0156
4Block-7450.2460.0320.5050.0158
5Block-7450.2460.0330.5050.0159
6Block-7450.2460.0340.5050.0160
7Block-7450.2460.0350.5050.0162
8Block-7450.2460.0360.5050.0166
9Block-7450.2460.0370.5050.0167
10Block-7450.2460.0380.5050.0172
11Block-7450.2460.0390.5050.0178
12Block-7450.2460.0400.5050.0179
13Block-7450.2460.0410.5050.0181
14Block-7450.2460.0420.5050.0183
15Block-7450.2460.0430.5050.0190
16Block-7450.2460.0440.5050.0197
17Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0199
18Block-7450.2460.0460.5050.0201
19Block-7450.2460.0470.5050.0191
20Block-7450.2460.0480.5050.0217
21Block-7450.2460.0490.5050.0220
22Block-7450.2460.0500.5050.0226
23Block-7450.2460.0510.5050.0236
24Block-7450.2460.0520.5050.0239
25Block-7450.2460.0530.5100.0240
26Block-7450.2460.0540.5050.0241
27Block-7450.2460.0550.5050.0246
28Block-7450.2460.0560.5050.0247
29Block-7450.2460.0570.5050.0248
30Block-7450.2460.0580.5050.0249
31Block-7450.2460.0590.5050.0251
32Block-7450.2460.0600.5050.0257
33Block-1450.2460.0450.5050.0319
34Block-2450.2460.0450.5050.0294
35Block-3450.2460.0450.5050.0282
36Block-4450.2460.0450.5050.0262
37Block-5450.2460.0450.5050.0243
38Block-6450.2460.0450.5050.0223
39Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0196
40Block-8450.2460.0450.5050.0197
41Block-9450.2460.0450.5050.0198
42Block-10450.2460.0450.5050.0184
43Block-11450.2460.0450.5050.0173
44Block-12450.2460.0450.5050.0165
45Block-13450.2460.0450.4040.0153
46Block-14450.2460.0450.4040.0124
47Block-15450.2460.0450.5050.0066
48Block-7450.2020.0450.4040.0220
49Block-7450.2040.0450.4040.0219
50Block-7450.2060.0450.4040.0218
51Block-7450.2080.0450.4040.0217
52Block-7450.2100.0450.4040.0216
53Block-7450.2120.0450.4040.0215
54Block-7450.2140.0450.5050.0214
55Block-7450.2160.0450.5050.0214
56Block-7450.2180.0450.5050.0213
57Block-7450.2200.0450.5050.0212
58Block-7450.2220.0450.5050.0211
59Block-7450.2240.0450.5050.0208
60Block-7450.2260.0450.5050.0203
61Block-7450.2280.0450.5050.0202
62Block-7450.2300.0450.5050.0201
63Block-7450.2320.0450.5050.0201
64Block-7450.2340.0450.5050.0200
65Block-7450.2360.0450.5050.0199
66Block-7450.2380.0450.4040.0196
67Block-7450.2400.0450.4040.0194
68Block-7450.2420.0450.4040.0193
69Block-7450.2440.0450.4040.0192
70Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0190
71Block-7450.2480.0450.5050.0189
72Block-7450.2500.0450.5050.0187
73Block-7450.2520.0450.5050.0187
74Block-7450.2540.0450.5050.0186
75Block-7450.2560.0450.5050.0184
76Block-7450.2580.0450.5050.0182
77Block-7450.2590.0450.5050.0183
78Block-7450.2600.0450.5050.0191
79Block-7450.2610.0450.5050.0192
80Block-7450.2620.0450.5050.0194
81Block-7450.2630.0450.5050.0195
82Block-7450.2640.0450.5050.0195
83Block-7450.2650.0450.5050.0197
84Block-7450.2660.0450.5050.0197
85Block-7450.2670.0450.5050.0198
86Block-7450.2700.0450.5050.0199
87Block-7300.2460.0450.5050.0101
88Block-7350.2460.0450.5050.0107
89Block-7360.2460.0450.5050.0111
90Block-7370.2460.0450.5050.0116
91Block-7380.2460.0450.5050.0117
92Block-7390.2460.0450.5050.0119
93Block-7400.2460.0450.5050.0121
94Block-7410.2460.0450.5050.0127
95Block-7420.2460.0450.4040.0154
96Block-7430.2460.0450.4040.0157
97Block-7440.2460.0450.4040.0162
98Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0197
99Block-7500.2460.0450.5050.0221
100Block-7550.2460.0450.5050.0233

In all these 100 simulations, the wave gauge was consistently positioned at coordinates X=1.09โ€ฏm, Y=1.21โ€ฏm, and Z=0.05โ€ฏm. The dominant wave period for each simulation was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function in MATLAB (MathWorks, 2023). Furthermore, the classification of wave types was carried out using a wave categorization graph according to Sorensen (2010), as shown in Fig. 4a. The results indicate that the majority of the simulated waves are on the border between intermediate and deep-water waves, and they are categorized as Stokes waves (Fig. 4a). Four sample waveforms from our 100 numerical experiments are provided in Fig. 4b.

Fig 4

The dataset in Table 4 was used to derive a new predictive equation that incorporates travel distance for the first time to estimate the initial maximum tsunami amplitude. In developing this equation, a genetic algorithm optimization technique was implemented using MATLAB (MathWorks 2023). This advanced approach entailed the use of genetic algorithms (GAs), an evolutionary algorithm type inspired by natural selection processes (MathWorks, 2023). This technique is iterative, involving selection, crossover, and mutation processes to evolve solutions over several generations. The goal was to identify the optimal coefficients and powers for each landslide parameter in the predictive equation, ensuring a robust and reliable model for estimating maximum wave amplitudes. Genetic Algorithms excel at optimizing complex models by navigating through extensive combinations of coefficients and exponents. GAs effectively identify highly suitable solutions for the non-linear and complex relationships between inputs (e.g., slide volume, slope angle, travel distance, water depth) and the output (i.e., maximum initial wave amplitude, aM). MATLAB’s computational environment enhances this process, providing robust tools for GA to adapt and evolve solutions iteratively, ensuring the precision of the predictive model (Onnen et al., 1997). This approach leverages MATLAB’s capabilities to fine-tune parameters dynamically, achieving an optimal equation that accurately estimates aM. It is important to highlight that the nondimensionalized version of this dataset is employed to develop a predictive equation which enables the equation to reproduce the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM) for various subaerial landslide cases, independent of their dimensional differences (e.g., Heler and Hager 2014Heller and Spinneken 2015Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022b). For this nondimensionalization, we employed the water depth (h) to nondimensionalize the slide volume (V/h3) and travel distance (D/h). The slide thickness (s) was applied to nondimensionalize the water depth (h/s).

2.5. Landslide velocity

In discussing the critical role of landslide velocity for simulating landslide-generated waves, we focus on the mechanisms of landslide motion and the techniques used to record landslide velocity in our simulations (Fig. 5). Also, we examine how these methods were applied in two distinct scenarios: Lab 1 and Lab 2 (see Table 1 for their details). Regarding the process of landslide movement, a slide starts from a stationary state, gaining momentum under the influence of gravity and this acceleration continues until the landslide collides with water, leading to a significant reduction in its speed before eventually coming to a stop (Fig. 5) (e.g., Panizzo et al. 2005).

Fig 5

To measure the landslide’s velocity in our simulations, we attached a probe at the centre of the slide, which supplied a time series of the velocity data. The slide’s velocity (vs) peaks at the moment it enters the water (Fig. 5), a point referred to as the impact time (tImp). Following this initial impact, the slides continue their underwater movement, eventually coming to a complete halt (tStop). Given the results in Fig. 5, it can be seen that Lab 1, with its longer travel distance (0.070โ€ฏm), exhibits a higher peak velocity of 1.89โ€ฏm/s. This increase in velocity is attributed to the extended travel distance allowing more time for the slide to accelerate under gravity. Whereas Lab 2, featuring a shorter travel distance (0.045โ€ฏm), records a lower peak velocity of 1.78โ€ฏm/s. This difference underscores how travel distance significantly influences the dynamics of landslide motion. After reaching the peak, both profiles show a sharp decrease in velocity, marking the transition to submarine motion until the slides come to a complete stop (tStop). There are noticeable differences observable in Fig. 5 between the Lab-1 and Lab-2 simulations, including the peaks at 0.3โ€ฏs . These variations might stem from the placement of the wave gauge, which differs slightly in each scenario, as well as the water depth’s minor discrepancies and, the travel distance.

2.6. Effect of air entrainment

In this section we examine whether it is required to consider air entrainment for our modelling or not as the FLOW-3D HYDRO package is capable of modelling air entrainment. The process of air entrainment in water during a landslide tsunami and its subsequent transport involve two key components: the quantification of air entrainment at the water surface, and the simulation of the air’s transport within the fluid (Hirt, 2003). FLOW-3D HYDRO employs the air entrainment model to compute the volume of air entrained at the water’s surface utilizing three approaches: a constant density model, a variable density model accounting for bulking, and a buoyancy model that adds the Drift-FLUX mechanism to variable density conditions (Flow Science, 2023). The calculation of the entrainment rate is based on the following equation:(2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’2๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)]1/2where parameters are: Vair, volume of air; Cair, entrainment rate coefficient; As, surface area of fluid; ฯ, fluid density; k, turbulent kinetic energy; gn, gravity normal to surface; Lt, turbulent length scale; and ฯƒ, surface tension coefficient. The value of k is directly computed from the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) (kw) calculations in our model.

In this study, we selected the variable densityโ€ฏ+โ€ฏDrift-FLUX model, which effectively captures the dynamics of phase separation and automatically activates the constant density and variable density models. This method simplifies the air-water mixture, treating it as a single, homogeneous fluid within each computational cell. For the phase volume fractions f1and f2โ€‹, the velocities are expressed in terms of the mixture and relative velocities, denoted as u and ur, respectively, as follows:(3)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0(4)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

The outcomes from this simulation are displayed in Fig. 6, which indicates that the influence of air entrainment on the generated wave amplitude is approximately 2โ€ฏ%. A value of 0.02 for the entrained air volume fraction means that, in the simulated fluid, approximately 2โ€ฏ% of the volume is composed of entrained air. In other words, for every unit volume of the fluid-air mixture at that location, 2โ€ฏ% is air and the remaining 98โ€ฏ% is water. The configuration of Test-17 (Table 4) was employed for this simulation. While the effect of air entrainment is anticipated to be more significant in models of granular landslide-generated waves (Fritz, 2002), in our simulations we opted not to incorporate this module due to its negligible impact on the results.

Fig 6

3. Results

In this section, we begin by presenting a sequence of our 3D simulations capturing different time steps to illustrate the generation process of landslide-generated waves. Subsequently, we derive a new predictive equation to estimate the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide-generated waves and assess its performance.

3.1. Wave generation and propagation

To demonstrate the wave generation process in our simulation, we reference Test-17 from Table 4, where we employed Block-7 (Tables 34). In this configuration, the slope angle was set to 45ยฐ, with a water depth of 0.246โ€ฏm and a travel distance at 0.045โ€ฏm (Fig. 7). At 0.220โ€ฏs, the initial impact of the moving slide on the water is depicted, marking the onset of the wave generation process (Fig. 7a). Disturbances are localized to the immediate area of impact, with the rest of the water surface remaining undisturbed. At this time, a maximum water particle velocity of 1.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.2โ€ฏm/s is seen around the impact zone (Fig. 7d). Moving to 0.320โ€ฏs, the development of the wave becomes apparent as energy transfer from the landslide to the water creates outwardly radiating waves with maximum water particle velocity of up to around 1.6โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.8โ€ฏm/s (Fig. 7b, e). By the time 0.670โ€ฏs, the wave has fully developed and is propagating away from the impact point exhibiting maximum water particle velocity of up to 2.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 2.1โ€ฏm/s. Concentric wave fronts are visible, moving outwards in all directions, with a colour gradient signifying the highest wave amplitude near the point of landslide entry, diminishing with distance (Fig. 7c, f).

Fig 7

3.2. Influence of landslide parameters on tsunami amplitude

In this section, we investigate the effects of various landslide parameters namely slide volume (V), water depth (h), slipe angle (ฮฑ) and travel distance (D) on the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM). Fig. 8 presents the outcome of these analyses. According to Fig. 8, the slide volume, slope angle, and travel distance exhibit a direct relationship with the wave amplitude, meaning that as these parameters increase, so does the amplitude. Conversely, water depth is inversely related to the maximum initial wave amplitude, suggesting that the deeper the water depth, the smaller the maximum wave amplitude will be (Fig. 8b).

Fig 8

Fig. 8a highlights the pronounced impact of slide volume on the aM, demonstrating a direct correlation between the two variables. For instance, in the range of slide volumes we modelled (Fig. 8a), The smallest slide volume tested, measuring 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, generated a low initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0066โ€ฏm) (Table 4). In contrast, the largest volume tested, 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, resulted in a significantly higher initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0319โ€ฏm) (Table 4). The extremities of these results emphasize the slide volume’s paramount impact on wave amplitude, further elucidated by their positions as the smallest and largest aM values across all conducted tests (Table 4). This is corroborated by findings from the literature (e.g., Murty, 2003), which align with the observed trend in our simulations.

The slope angle’s influence on aM was smooth. A steady increase of wave amplitude was observed as the slope angle increased (Fig. 8c). In examining travel distance, an anomaly was identified. At a travel distance of 0.047โ€ฏm, there was an unexpected dip in aM, which deviates from the general increasing trend associated with longer travel distances. This singular instance could potentially be attributed to a numerical error. Beyond this point, the expected pattern of increasing aM with longer travel distances resumes, suggesting that the anomaly at 0.047โ€ฏm is an outlier in an otherwise consistent trend, and thus this single data point was overlooked while deriving the predictive equation. Regarding the inverse relationship between water depth and wave amplitude, our result (Fig. 8b) is consistent with previous reports by Fritz et al. (2003), (2004), and Watts et al. (2005).

The insights from Fig. 8 informed the architecture of the predictive equation in the next Section, with slide volume, travel distance, and slope angle being multiplicatively linked to wave amplitude underscoring their direct correlations with wave amplitude. Conversely, water depth is incorporated as a divisor, representing its inverse relationship with wave amplitude. This structure encapsulates the dynamics between the landslide parameters and their influence on the maximum initial wave amplitude as discussed in more detail in the next Section.

3.3. Predictive equation

Building on our sensitivity analysis of landslide parameters, as detailed in Section 3.2, and utilizing our nondimensional dataset, we have derived a new predictive equation as follows:(5)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.90(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11where, V is sliding volume, h is water depth, ฮฑ is slope angle, and s is landslide thickness. It is important to note that this equation is valid only for subaerial solid-block landslide tsunamis as all our experiments were for this type of waves. The performance of this equation in predicting simulation data is demonstrated by the satisfactory alignment of data points around a 45ยฐ line, indicating its accuracy and reliability with regard to the experimental dataset (Fig. 9). The quality of fit between the dataset and Eq. (5) is 91โ€ฏ% indicating that Eq. (5) represents the dataset very well. Table 5 presents Eq. (5) alongside four other similar equations previously published. Two significant distinctions between our Eq. (5) and these others are: (i) Eq. (5) is derived from 3D experiments, whereas the other four equations are based on 2D experiments. (ii) Unlike the other equations, our Eq. (5) incorporates travel distance as an independent parameter.

Fig 9

Table 5. Performance comparison among our newly-developed equation and existing equations for estimating the maximum initial amplitude (aM) of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Parameters: aM, initial maximum wave amplitude; h, water depth; vs, landslide velocity; V, slide volume; bs, slide width; ls, slide length; s, slide thickness; ฮฑ, slope angle; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ, volume of the final immersed landslide. We considered ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ= V as the slide volume.

EventPredictive equationsAuthor (year)Observed aM (m) โŽโŽCalculated aM (m)Error, ฮต (%) โŽโŽโŽโŽ
2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami (Subaerial landslide) *๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=1.32๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„ŽNoda (1970)1341340
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.667(0.5(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž)2)0.334(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.754(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.506(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)1.631Bolin et al. (2014) โŽโŽโŽ13459424334
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.25(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž2)0.8Robbe-Saule et al. (2021)1343177
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.4545(tan๏ฟฝ)0.062(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.296(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.235Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022b)1341266
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.911(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11This study1341302.9

โŽ

Geometrical and kinematic parameters of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide based on Heidarzadeh et al. (2020)Grilli et al. (2019) and Grilli et al. (2021)V=2.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ107 m3h= 50โ€ฏm; s= 114โ€ฏm; ฮฑ= 45ยฐ; ls=1250โ€ฏm; bs= 2700โ€ฏm; vs=44.9โ€ฏm/s; D= 2500โ€ฏm; aM= 100โ€ฏm โˆ’150โ€ฏm.โŽโŽ

aM= An average value of aMโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ134โ€ฏm is considered in this study.โŽโŽโŽ

The equation of Bolin et al. (2014) is based on the reformatted one reported by Lindstrรธm (2016).โŽโŽโŽโŽ

Error is calculated using Eq. (1), where the calculated aM is assumed as the simulated value.

Additionally, we evaluated the performance of this equation using the real-world data from the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Based on previous studies (Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 20192021), we were able to provide a list of parameters for the subaerial landslide and associated tsunami for the 2018 Anak Krakatau event (see footnote of Table 5). We note that the data of the 2018 Anak Krakatau event was not used while deriving Eq. (5). The results indicate that Eq. (5) predicts the initial amplitude of the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami as being 130โ€ฏm indicating an error of 2.9โ€ฏ% compared to the reported average amplitude of 134โ€ฏm for this event. This performance indicates an improvement compared to the previous equation reported by Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022a) (Table 5). In contrast, the equations from Robbe-Saule et al. (2021) and Bolin et al. (2014) demonstrate higher discrepancies of 4200โ€ฏ% and 77โ€ฏ%, respectively (Table 5). Although Noda’s (1970) equation reproduces the tsunami amplitude of 134โ€ฏm accurately (Table 5), it is crucial to consider its limitations, notably not accounting for parameters such as slope angle and travel distance.

It is essential to recognize that both travel distance and slope angle significantly affect wave amplitude. In our model, captured in Eq. (5), we integrate the slope angle (ฮฑ) through the tangent function, i.e., tanโ€…ฮฑ. This choice diverges from traditional physical interpretations that often employ the cosine or sine function (e.g., Heller and Hager, 2014Watts et al., 2003). We opted for the tangent function because it more effectively reflects the direct impact of slope steepness on wave generation, yielding superior estimations compared to conventional methods.

The significance of this study lies in its application of both physical and numerical 3D experiments and the derivation of a predictive equation based on 3D results. Prior research, e.g. Heller et al. (2016), has reported notable discrepancies between 2D and 3D wave amplitudes, highlighting the important role of 3D experiments. It is worth noting that the suitability of applying an equation derived from either 2D or 3D data depends on the specific geometry and characteristics inherent in the problem being addressed. For instance, in the case of a long, narrow dam reservoir, an equation derived from 2D data would likely be more suitable. In such contexts, the primary dynamics of interest such as flow patterns and potential wave propagation are predominantly two-dimensional, occurring along the length and depth of the reservoir. This simplification to 2D for narrow dam reservoirs allows for more accurate modelling of these dynamics.

This study specifically investigates waves initiated by landslides, focusing on those characterized as solid blocks instead of granular flows, with slope angles confined to a range of 25ยฐ to 60ยฐ. We acknowledge the additional complexities encountered in real-world scenarios, such as dynamic density and velocity of landslides, which could affect the estimations. The developed equation in this study is specifically designed to predict the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis for the aforementioned specified ranges and types of landslides.

4. Conclusions

Both physical and numerical experiments were undertaken in a 3D wave basin to study solid-block landslide-generated waves and to formulate a predictive equation for their maximum initial wave amplitude. At the beginning, two physical experiments were performed to validate and calibrate a 3D numerical model, which was subsequently utilized to generate 100 experiments by varying different landslide parameters. The generated database was then used to derive a predictive equation for the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide tsunamis. The main features and outcomes are:

  • โ€ขThe predictive equation of this study is exclusively derived from 3D data and exhibits a fitting quality of 91โ€ฏ% when applied to the database.
  • โ€ขFor the first time, landslide travel distance was considered in the predictive equation. This inclusion provides more accuracy and flexibility for applying the equation.
  • โ€ขTo further evaluate the performance of the predictive equation, it was applied to a real-world subaerial landslide tsunami (i.e., the 2018 Anak Krakatau event) and delivered satisfactory performance.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ramtin Sabeti: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Software, Visualization, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Mohammad Heidarzadeh: Methodology, Data curation, Software, Writing โ€“ review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

RS is supported by the Leverhulme Trust Grant No. RPG-2022-306. MH is funded by open funding of State Key Lab of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, grant number SKHL2101. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund. MH is also funded by the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation grant no. 6217 (awarded in 2023).

Acknowledgements

Authors are sincerely grateful to the laboratory technician team, particularly Mr William Bazeley, at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Bath for their support during the laboratory physical modelling of this research. We appreciate the valuable insights provided by Mr. Brian Fox (Senior CFD Engineer at Flow Science, Inc.) regarding air entrainment modelling in FLOW-3D HYDRO. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund.

Data availability

  • All data used in this study are given in the body of the article.

References

Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.

Numerical study of the flow at a vertical pile with net-like scourprotection matt

๊ทธ๋ฌผํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ง๋ง๋š์˜ ์œ ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Minxi Zhanga,b, Hanyan Zhaoc, Dongliang Zhao d, Shaolin Yuee, Huan Zhoue,Xudong Zhaoa
, Carlo Gualtierif, Guoliang Yua,b,โˆ—
a SKLOE, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
b KLMIES, MOE, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
c Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou 510610, China
d CCCC Second Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China
e CCCC Road & Bridge Special Engineering Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430071, China
f Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Abstract

Local scour at a pile or pier in current or wave environments threats the safety of the upper structure all over the world. The application of a net-like matt as a scour protection cover at the pile or pier was proposed. The matt weakens and diffuses the flow in the local scour pit and thus reduces local scour while enhances sediment deposition. Numerical simulations were carried out to investigate the flow at the pile covered by the matt. The simulation results were used to optimize the thickness dt (2.6d95 โˆผ 17.9d95) and opening size dn (7.7d95 โˆผ 28.2d95) of the matt. It was found that the matt significantly reduced the local velocity and dissipated the vortex at the pile, substantially reduced the extent of local scour. The smaller the opening size of the matt, the more effective was the flow diffusion at the bed, and smaller bed shear stress was observed at the pile. For the flow conditions considered in this study, a matt with a relative thickness of T = 7.7 and relative opening size of S = 7.7 could be effective in scour protection.

์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ถ€๋‘์˜ ๊ตญ์ง€์ ์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ˜‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๋ฎ๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฌผ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งคํŠธ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์ด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์•ฝํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ํ™•์‚ฐ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ํ‡ด์ ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ๋กœ ๋ฎ์ธ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋งคํŠธ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜ dt(2.6d95 โˆผ 17.9d95)์™€ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ dn(7.7d95 โˆผ 28.2d95)์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๋ง๋š์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์†Œ๋ฉธ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งคํŠธ์˜ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ธต์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ™•์‚ฐ์ด ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ๋” ์ž‘์€ ์ธต ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์œ ๋™ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒ๋Œ€ ๋‘๊ป˜ T = 7.7, ์ƒ๋Œ€ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ S = 7.7์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋งคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐฉ์ง€์— ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

Numerical simulation, Pile foundation, Local scour, Protective measure, Net-like matt

Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.
Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.
Fig. 2. Local scour pit of pile below the protection matt.
Fig. 2. Local scour pit of pile below the protection matt.

References

[1] C. He, Mod. Transp. Technol. 17 (3) (2020) 46โ€“59 in Chinese.
[2] X. Wen, D. Zhang, J. Tianjin Univ. 54 (10) (2021) 998โ€“1007 (Science and Technology)in Chinese.
[3] M. Zhang, H. Sun, W. Yao, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 265 (2020) 112652, doi:10.1016/j.
oceaneng.2022.112652.
[4] K. Wardhana, F.C. Hadipriono, J. Perform. Constr. Fac. 17 (3) (2003) 144โ€“150,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
[5] R. Ettema, G. Constantinescu, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (9) (2017)
03117006, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001330.
[6] C. Valela, C.D. Rennie, I. Nistor, Int. J. Sediment Res. 37 (1) (2021) 37โ€“46,
doi:10.1016/j.ijsrc.2021.04.004.
[7] B.W. Melville, A.J. Sutherland, J. Hydraul. Eng. 114 (10) (1988) 1210โ€“1226,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:10(1210).
[8] E.V. Richardson, S.R. Davis, Evaluating Scour At Bridges, 4th ed., United States
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington,
DC., 2001.
[9] D.M. Sheppard, B. Melville, H. Demir, J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (1) (2014) 14โ€“23,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000800.
[10] A.O. Aksoy, G. Bombar, T. Arkis, M.S. Guney, J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 65 (1)
(2017) 26โ€“34.
[11] D.T. Bui, A. Shirzadi, A. Amini, et al., Sustainability 12 (3) (2020) 1063, doi:10.
3390/su12031063.
[12] B.M. Sumer, J. Fredsoe, The Mechanics of Scour in Marine Environments. World
Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, 17, World Scientific, Singapore, 2002.
[13] J. Unger, W.H. Hager, Exp. Fluids 42 (1) (2007) 1โ€“19.
[14] G. Kirkil, S.G. Constantinescu, R. Ettema, J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (5) (2008) 82โ€“84,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(572).
[15] B. Dargahi, J. Hydraul. Eng. 116 (10) (1990) 1197โ€“1214.
[16] A. Bestawy, T. Eltahawy, A. Alsaluli, M. Alqurashi, Water Supply 20 (3) (2020)
1006โ€“1015, doi:10.2166/ws.2020.022.
[17] Y.M. Chiew, J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (9) (1992) 1260โ€“1269.
[18] D. Bertoldi, R. Kilgore, in: Hydraulic Engineering โ€™93, ASCE, San Francisco, California, United States, 1993, pp. 1385โ€“1390.
[19] Y.M. Chiew, J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (9) (1997) 635โ€“642.
[20] C.S. Lauchlan, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (5) (2001) 412โ€“418, doi:10.
1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:5(412).
[21] P.F. Lagasse, P.E. Clopper, L.W. Zevenbergen, L.G. Girard, National Cooperative
Highway Research Program (NCHRPReport 593), Countermeasures to protect
bridge piers from scour, Washington, DC, NCHRP, 2007.
[22] S. Jiang, Z. Zhou, J. Ou, J. Sediment Res. (4) (2013) 63โ€“67 in Chinese.
[23] A. Galan, G. Simarro, G. Sanchez-Serrano, J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (6) (2015)
06015004, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001003.
[24] Z. Zhang, H. Ding, J. Liu, Ocean Eng. 33 (2) (2015) 77โ€“83 in Chinese.
[25] C. Valela, C.N. Whittaker, C.D. Rennie, I. Nistor, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng.
148 (3) (2022) 04022002 10.1061/%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001967.
[26] B.W. Melville, A.C. Hadfield, J. Hydraul. Eng. 6 (2) (1999) 1221โ€“1224, doi:10.
1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:11(1221).
[27] V. Kumar, K.G. Rangaraju, N. Vittal, J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (12) (1999) 1302โ€“1305.
[28] A.M. Yasser, K.S. Yasser, M.A. Abdel-Azim, Alex. Eng. J. 54 (2) (2015) 197โ€“203,
doi:10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.004.
[29] S. Khaple, P.R. Hanmaiahgari, R. Gaudio, S. Dey, Acta Geophys. 65 (2017) 957โ€“
975, doi:10.1007/s11600-017-0084-z.
[30] C. Valela, I. Nistor, C.D. Rennie, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Disaster Mitigation Specialty Conference, Fredericton, Canada, Canadian Society for
Civil Engineering, 2018, pp. 235โ€“244.
[31] A. Tafarojnoruz, R. Gaudio, F. Calomino, J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (3) (2012) 297โ€“
305, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000512.
[32] H. Tang, S. Fang, Y. Zhou, K. Cai, Y.M. Chiew, S.Y. Lim, N.S. Cheng, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Scour and Erosion (ICSE-2), Singapore.
Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, 2004.
[33] W. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Sichuan Univ. 06 (2005) 34โ€“40 (Engineering
Science Edition)in Chinese.
[34] S. Yang, B. Shi, Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 5 (2017) 43โ€“47 in Chinese.
[35] H. Wang, F. Si, G. Lou, W. Yang, G. Yu, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 141
(1) (2015) 04014030, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000270.
[36] L.D. Meyer, S.M. Dabney, W.C. Harmon, Trans. ASAE 38 (3) (1995) 809โ€“815.
[37] G. Spyreas, B.W. Wilm, A.E. Plocher, D.M. Ketzner, J.W. Matthews, J.L. Ellis, E.J. Heske, Biol. Invasions 12 (5) (2010) 1253โ€“1267, doi:10.1007/
s10530-009-9544-y.
[38] T. Lambrechts, S. Franรงois, S. Lutts, R. Muรฑoz-Carpena, C.L. Bielders, J. Hydrol.
511 (2014) 800โ€“810, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.030.
[39] G. Yu, Dynamic Embedded Anchor with High Frequency Micro Amplitude Vibrations. CN patent No: ZL200810038546.0, 2008.
[40] X. Chen, M. Zhang, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 236 (2021) 109315, doi:10.1016/j.
oceaneng.2021.109315.
[41] F. Gumgum, M.S. Guney, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference
Engineering and Natural Sciences (ICENS), Serbia, Belgrade, 2020.
[42] H. Zhao, S. Yue, H. Zhou, M. Zhang, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 40 (5) (2022) 111โ€“120
in Chinese.
[43] B. Blocken, C. Gualtieri, Environ. Modell. Softw. 33 (2012) 1โ€“22, doi:10.1016/j.
envsoft.2012.02.001.
[44] N.D. Bennett, B.F. Croke, G. Guariso, et al., Modell. Softw. 40 (2013) 1โ€“20,
doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011.
[45] X. Zhao, Effectiveness and Mechanism of Lattice On Sedimentation and Anti-Erosion of Local Scour Hole At Piers, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2023.
[46] M. Zhang, G. Yu, Water Resour. Res. 53 (9) (2017) 7798โ€“7815, doi:10.1002/
2017WR021066.

Discharge Coefficient of a Two-Rectangle Compound Weir combined with a Semicircular Gate beneath it under Various Hydraulic and Geometric Conditions

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์•„๋ž˜์— ๋ฐ˜์›ํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์›จ์–ด์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜

ABSTRACT

Two-component composite hydraulic structures are commonly employed in irrigation systems. The first component, responsible for managing the overflow, is represented by a weir consisting of two rectangles. The second component, responsible for regulating the underflow, is represented by a semicircular gate. Both components are essential for measuring, directing, and controlling the flow. In this study, we experimentally investigated the flow through a combined two-rectangle sharp-crested weir with a semicircular gate placed across the channel as a control structure. The upper rectangle of the weir has a width of 20 cm, while the lower rectangle has varying widths (W2 ) of 5, 7, and 9 cm and depths (z) of 6, 9, and 11 cm. Additionally, three different values were considered for the gate diameter (d), namely 8, 12, and 15 cm. These dimensions were tested interchangeably, including a weir without a gate (d = 0), under different water head conditions. The results indicate that the discharge passing through the combined structure of the two rectangles and the gate is significantly affected by the weir and gate dimensions. After analyzing the data, empirical formulas were developed to predict the discharge coefficient (Cd ) of the combined structure. It is important to note that the analysis and results presented in this study are limited to the range of data that were tested.

2์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๊ฐœ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ”Œ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์›จ์–ด๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์–ธ๋”ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์›ํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ธก์ •, ์ง€์‹œ ๋ฐ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ œ์–ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋กœ์งˆ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ ๋ฐ˜์›ํ˜• ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋พฐ์กฑํ•œ ๋‘‘์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›จ์–ด์˜ ์œ„์ชฝ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•์€ ํญ์ด 20cm์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์•„๋ž˜์ชฝ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•์€ 5, 7, 9cm์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํญ(W2)๊ณผ 6, 9, 11cm์˜ ๊นŠ์ด(z)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ์ง๊ฒฝ(d)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด 8, 12, 15cm์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฐ’์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๋‘‘(d = 0)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ƒํ˜ธ ๊ตํ™˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•๊ณผ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์ „์ด ์œ„์–ด์™€ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ํ›„, ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์œ ์ถœ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Cd)๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

combound weir; semicircular gates; discharge coefficient; combined structure; open channels;
discharge measurement

Fig. 2. The flume and hydraulic bench layout
Fig. 2. The flume and hydraulic bench layout

REFERENCES

[1] S. S. Ibrahim, R. A. Jafer, and B. M. A. S. Ali, “An Experimental Study
of a Combined Oblique Cylindrical Weir and Gate Structure,”
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 10483โ€“10488, Apr. 2023, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5646.
[2] F. Rooniyan, “The Effect of Confluence Angle on the Flow Pattern at a
Rectangular Open Channel,” Engineering, Technology & Applied
Science Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 576โ€“580, Feb. 2014,
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.395.
[3] A. S. Kote and P. B. Nangare, “Hydraulic Model Investigation on
Stepped Spillwayโ€™s Plain and Slotted Roller Bucket,” Engineering,
Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4419โ€“4422,
Aug. 2019, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2837.
[4] S. M. Kori, A. A. Mahessar, M. Channa, A. A. Memon, and A. R. Kori,
“Study of Flow Characteristics Over a Rounded Edge Drop Structure in
Open Channel,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research,
vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4136โ€“4139, Jun. 2019, https://doi.org/
10.48084/etasr.2584.
[5] F. Granata, F. Di Nunno, R. Gargano, G. de Marinis, “Equivalent
Discharge Coefficient of Side Weirs in Circular Channelโ€”A Lazy
Machine Learning Approach,” Water, vol. 11, no.11, 2019, Art. no.
2406, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112406.
[6] S. Salehi and A. H. Azimi, “Discharge Characteristics of Weir-Orifice
and Weir-Gate Structures,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering, vol. 145, no. 11, Nov. 2019, Art. no. 04019025,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001421.
[7] M. G. Bos, Ed., Discharge Measurement Structures. Wageningen, The
Netherlands: International Institute for Land Reclamation and
Improvement, 1989.
[8] S. Emami, J. Parsa, H. Emami, A. Abbaspour, “An ISaDE algorithm
combined with support vector regression for estimating discharge
coefficient of W-planform weirs,” Water Supply, vol. 21, no.7, pp.
3459โ€“3476, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.112.
[9] A. B. Altan-Sakarya, M. A. Kokpinar, and A. Duru, “Numerical
modelling of contracted sharp-crested weirs and combined weir and gate
systems,” Irrigation and Drainage, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 854โ€“864, 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2468.
[10] P. Ackers, W. R. White, J. A. Perkins, A. J. M. Harrison, Weirs and
Flumes for Flow Measurement, New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1978.
[11] A. Alhamid, D. Husain, and A. Negm, “Discharge equation for
simultaneous flow over rectangular weirs and below inverted triangular
weirs,” Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 595โ€“
607, Dec. 1996.
[12] N. Rajaratnam and K. Subramanya, “Flow Equation for the Sluice Gate,”
Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 167โ€“
186, Sep. 1967, https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000503.
[13] A. Zahiri, H. Md. Azamathulla, and S. Bagheri, “Discharge coefficient
for compound sharp crested side weirs in subcritical flow conditions,”
Journal of Hydrology, vol. 480, pp. 162โ€“166, Feb. 2013,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.022.
[14] S. A. Sarhan and S. A. Jalil, “Analysis of Simulation Outputs for the
Mutual Effect of Flow in Weir and Gate System,” Journal of University
of Babylon for Engineering Sciences, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 48โ€“59, Apr.
2018, https://doi.org/10.29196/jubes.v26i6.1050.
[15] M. Muhammad and S. Abdullahi, “Experimental Study of Flow over
Sharp Crested Rectangular-Triangular Weir Models,” in Nigeria
Engineering Conference Proceedings, Zaria – Nigeria, Jan. 2014, pp.
34โ€“45.
[16] M. Piratheepan, N. E. F. Winston, and K. P. P. Pathirana, “Discharge
Measurements in Open Channels using Compound Sharp-Crested
Weirs,” vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 31-38, Jul. 2007,
https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v40i3.7144.
[17] H. A. Hayawi, A. A. Yahia, G. A. Hayawi, “Free combined flow over a
triangular weir and under rectangular gate,” Damascus University
Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 9โ€“22, 2008.
[18] A.-A. M. Negm, A. M. Al-Brahim, and A. A. Alhamid, “Combined-free
flow over weirs and below gates,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol.
40, no. 3, pp. 359โ€“365, May 2002, https://doi.org/10.1080/
00221680209499950.
[19] A. A. Alhamid, A.-A. M. Negm, and A. M. Al-Brahim, “Discharge
Equation for Proposed Self-cleaning Device,” Journal of King Saud
University – Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13โ€“23, Jan. 1997,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30664-0.
[20] S. I. Khassaf and M. Habeeb, “Experimental Investigation for Flow
Through Combined Trapezoidal Weir and Rectangular Gate,”
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 5, no.
4, pp. 809โ€“814, 2014.
[21] A. A. G. Alniami, D. G. A. M. Hayawi, and H. A. M. Hayawi,
“Coefficient Of Discharge For A Combined Hydraulic Measuring
Device,” Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 92โ€“100,
Dec. 2009, https://doi.org/10.33899/rengj.2009.43616.
[22] J. M. Samani and M. Mazaheri, “Combined Flow over Weir and under
Gate,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 224โ€“227,
Mar. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:3(224).
[23] B. Balouchi and G. Rakhshandehroo, “Using Physical and Soft
Computing Models to Evaluate Discharge Coefficient for Combined
Weirโ€“Gate Structures Under Free Flow Conditions,” Iranian Journal of
Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 42, no.
4, pp. 427โ€“438, Dec. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0117-0.
[24] M. A. R. Eltoukhy, F. S. Abdelhaleem, T. H. Nasralla, S. Shaban,
“Effect of Compound Weir and below Circular Gate Geometric
Characteristics on its Discharge Coefficient,” International Journal of
Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1115โ€“1130,
Oct. 2020.
[25] C. E. Kindsvater and R. W. Carter, “Discharge Characteristics of
Rectangular Thin-Plate Weirs,” Transactions of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 772โ€“801, Jan. 1959,
https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0007696.
[26] H. R. Henry, “Discussion of Diffusion of Submerged Jets,” Transactions
of ASCE, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 687โ€“694, Jan. 1950.

Fig. 3. (aโ€“c) Snapshots of the CtFD simulation of laser-beam irradiation: (a) Top, (b) longitudinal vertical cross-sectional, and (c) transversal vertical cross-sectional views. (d) z-position of the solid/liquid interface during melting and solidification.

Solute segregation in a rapidly solidified Hastelloy-X Ni-based superalloy during laser powder bed fusion investigated by phase-field simulations and computational thermal-fluid dynamics

Masayuki Okugawa ab, Kenji Saito a, Haruki Yoshima a, Katsuhiko Sawaizumi a, Sukeharu Nomoto c, Makoto Watanabe c, Takayoshi Nakano ab, Yuichiro Koizumi abShow moreAdd to MendeleyShareCite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104079

Get rights and content Under a Creative Commonsย license open access

Abstract

Solute segregation significantly affects material properties and is a critical issue in the laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) of Ni-based superalloys. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a computational thermal-fluid dynamics (CtFD) simulation coupled multi-phase-field (MPF) simulation with a multicomponent-composition model of Ni-based superalloy to predict solute segregation under solidification conditions in LPBF. The MPF simulation of the Hastelloy-X superalloy reproduced the experimentally observed submicron-sized cell structure. Significant solute segregations were formed within interdendritic regions during solidification at high cooling rates of up to 10K s-1, a characteristic feature of LPBF. Solute segregation caused a decrease in the solidus temperature (TS), with a reduction of up to 30.4 K, which increases the risk of liquation cracks during LPBF. In addition, the segregation triggers the formation of carbide phases, which increases the susceptibility to ductility dip cracking. Conversely, we found that the decrease in TS is suppressed at the melt-pool boundary regions, where re-remelting occurs during the stacking of the layer above. Controlling the re-remelting behavior is deemed to be crucial for designing crack-free alloys. Thus, we demonstrated that solute segregation at the various interfacial regions of Ni-based multicomponent alloys can be predicted by the conventional MPF simulation. The design of crack-free Ni-based superalloys can be expedited by MPF simulations of a broad range of element combinations and their concentrations in multicomponent Ni-based superalloys.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Laser powder-bed fusion, Hastelloy-X Nickel-based superalloy, solute element segregation, computational thermal-fluid dynamics simulation, phase-field method

1. Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have attracted considerable attention as they allow us to easily build three-dimensional (3D) parts with complex geometries. Among the wide range of available AM techniques, laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) has emerged as a preferred technique for metal AM [1][2][3][4][5]. In LPBF, metal products are built layer-by-layer by scanning laser, which fuse metal powder particles into bulk solids.

Significant attempts have been made to integrate LPBF techniques within the aerospace industry, with a particular focus on weldable Ni-based superalloys, such as IN718 [6][7][8], IN625 [9][10], and Hastelloy-X (HX) [11][12][13][14]. Non-weldable alloys, such as IN738LC [15][16] and CMSX-4 [1][17] are also suitable for their sufficient creep resistance under higher temperature conditions. However, non-weldable alloys are difficult to build using LPBF because of their susceptibility to cracking during the process. In general, a macro solute-segregation during solidification is suppressed by the rapid cooling conditions (up to 108 K s-1) unique to the LPBF process [18]. However, the solute segregation still occurs in the interdendritic regions that are smaller than the micrometer scale [5][19][20][21]; these regions are suggested to be related to the hot cracks in LPBF-fabricated parts. Therefore, an understanding of solute segregation is essential for the fabrication of reliable LPBF-fabricated parts while avoiding cracks.

The multiphase-field (MPF) method has gained popularity for modeling the microstructure evolution and solute segregation under rapid cooling conditions [5][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Moreover, quantifiable predictions have been achieved by combining the MPF method with temperature distribution analysis methods such as the finite-element method (FEM) [20] and computational thermal-fluid dynamics (CtFD) simulations [28]. These aforementioned studies have used binary-approximated multicomponent systems, such as Niโ€“Nb binary alloys, to simulate IN718 alloys. While MPF simulations using binary alloy systems can effectively reproduce microstructure formations and segregation behaviors, the binary approximation might be affected by the chemical interactions between the removed solute elements in the target multicomponent alloy. The limit of absolute stability predicted by the Mullins-Sekerka theory [29] is also crucial because the limit velocity is close to the solidification rate in the LPBF process and is different in multicomponent and binary-approximated systems. The difference between the solidus and liquidus temperatures, ฮ”T0, directly determines the absolute stability according to the Mullins-Sekerka theory. For example, the ฮ”T0 values of IN718 and its binary-approximated Niโ€“5 wt.%Nb alloy are 134 K [28] and 71 K [30], respectively. The solidification rate compared to the limit of absolute stability, i.e., the relative non-equilibrium of solidification, changes by simplification of the system. It is therefore important to use the composition of the actual multicomponent system in such simulations. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no MPF simulation using a multicomponent model coupled with a temperature analysis simulation to predict solute segregation in a Ni-based superalloy.

In this study, we demonstrate that the conventional MPF model can reproduce experimentally observed dendritic structures by performing a phase-field simulation using the temperature distribution obtained by a CtFD simulation of a multicomponent Ni-based alloy (conventional solid-solution hardening-type HX). The MPF simulation revealed that the segregation behavior of solute elements largely depends on the regions of the melt pool, such as the cell boundary, the interior of the melt-pool boundary, and heat-affected regions. The sensitivities of the various interfaces to liquation and solidification cracks are compared based on the predicted concentration distributions. Moreover, the feasibility of using the conventional MPF model for LPBF is discussed in terms of the absolute stability limit.

2. Methods

2.1. Laser-beam irradiation experiments

Rolled and recrystallized HX ingots with dimensions of 20 ร— 50 ร— 10 mm were used as the specimens for laser-irradiation experiments. The specimens were irradiated with a laser beam scanned along straight lines of 10 mm in length using a laser AM machine (EOS 290 M, EOS) equipped with a 400 W Yb-fiber laser. Irradiation was performed with a beam power of P = 300 W and a scanning speed of V = 600 mm s-1, which are the conditions generally used in the LPBF fabrication of Ni-based superalloy [8]. The corresponding line energy was 0.5 J mm-1. The samples were cut perpendicular to the beam-scanning direction for cross-sectional observation using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL JSM 6500). Crystal orientation analysis was performed by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The sizes of each crystal grain and their aspect ratios were evaluated by analyzing the EBSD data.

2.2. CtFD simulation

CtFD simulations of the laser-beam irradiation of HX were performed using a 3D thermo-fluid analysis software (Flow Science FLOW-3Dยฎ with Flow-3D Weld module). A Gaussian heat source model was used, in which the irradiation intensity distribution of the beam is regarded as a symmetrical Gaussian distribution over the entire beam. The distribution of the beam irradiation intensity is expressed by the following equation.(1)qฬ‡=2ฮทPฯ€R2expโˆ’2r2R2.

Here, P is the power, R is the effective beam radius, r is the actual beam radius, and ฮท is the beam absorption rate of the substrate. To improve the accuracy of the model, ฮท was calculated by assuming multiple reflections using the Fresnel equation:(2)๏ฟฝ=1โˆ’121+1โˆ’๏ฟฝcos๏ฟฝ21+1+๏ฟฝcos๏ฟฝ2+๏ฟฝ2โˆ’2๏ฟฝcos๏ฟฝ+2cos2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2+2๏ฟฝcos๏ฟฝ+2cos2๏ฟฝ.

ฮต is the Fresnel coefficient and ฮธ is the incident angle of the laser. A local laser melt causes the vaporization of the material and results in a high vapor pressure. This vapor pressure acts as a recoil pressure on the surface, pushing the weld pool down. The recoil pressure is reproduced using the following equation.(3)precoil=Ap0expโˆ†HLVRTV1โˆ’TVT.

Here, p0 is the atmospheric pressure, โˆ†HLV is the latent heat of vaporization, R is the gas constant, and TV is the boiling point at the saturated vapor pressure. A is a ratio coefficient that is generally assumed to be 0.54, indicating that the recoil pressure due to evaporation is 54% of the vapor pressure at equilibrium on the liquid surface.

Table 1 shows the parameters used in the simulations. Most parameters were evaluated using an alloy physical property calculation software (Sente software JMatPro v11). The values in a previously published study [31] were used for the emissivity and the Stefanโ€“Boltzmann constant, and the values for pure Ni [32] were used for the heat of vaporization and vaporization temperatures. The Fresnel coefficient, which determines the beam absorption efficiency, was used as a fitting parameter to reproduce the morphology of the experimentally observed melt region, and a Fresnel coefficient of 0.12 was used in this study.

Table 1. Parameters used in the CtFD simulations.

ParameterSymbolValueReference
Density at 298.15 Kฯ8.24 g cm-3[โŽ]
Liquidus temperatureTL1628.15 K[โŽ]
Solidus temperatureTS1533.15 K[โŽ]
Viscosity at TLฮท6.8 g m-1 s-1[โŽ]
Specific heat at 298.15 KCP0.439 J g-1 K-1[โŽ]
Thermal conductivity at 298.15 Kฮป10.3 W m-1 K-1[โŽ]
Surface tension at TLฮณL1.85 J m-2[โŽ]
Temperature coefficient of surface tensiondฮณL/dTโ€“2.5 ร— 10โˆ’4 J m-2 K-1[โŽ]
Emissivityฮ•0.27[31]
Stefanโ€“Boltzmann constantฯƒ5.67 ร— 10-8 W m-2 K-4[31]
Heat of fusionฮ”HSL2.76 ร— 102 J g-1[32]
Heat of vaporizationฮ”HLV4.29 ร— 10J g-1[32]
Vaporization temperatureTV3110 K[32]

โŽ

Calculated using JMatPro v11.

The dimensions of the computational domain of the numerical model were 4.0 mm in the beam-scanning direction, 0.4 mm in width, and 0.3 mm in height. A uniform mesh size of 10 ฮผm was applied throughout the computational domain. The boundary condition of continuity was applied to all boundaries except for the top surface. The temperature was initially set to 300 K. P and V were set to their experimental values, i.e., 300 W and 600 mm s-1, respectively. Solidification conditions based on the temperature gradient, G, the solidification rate, R, and the cooling rate were evaluated, and the obtained temperature distribution was used in the MPF simulations.

2.3. MPF simulation

Two-dimensional MPF simulations weakly coupled with the CtFD simulation were performed using the Microstructure Evolution Simulation Software (MICRESS) [33][34][35][36][37] with the TQ-Interface for Thermo-Calc [38]. A simplified HX alloy composition of Ni-21.4Cr-17.6Fe-0.46Mn-8.80Mo-0.39Si-0.50W-1.10Co-0.08 C (mass %) was used in this study. The Gibbs free energy and diffusion coefficient of the system were calculated using the TCNI9 thermodynamic database [39] and the MOBNi5 mobility database [40]. ฮคhe equilibrium phase diagram calculated using Thermo-Calc indicates that the face-centered cubic (FCC) and ฯƒ phases appear as the equilibrium solid phases [19]. However, according to the time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagram [41], the phases are formed after the sample is maintained for tens of hours in a temperature range of 1073 to 1173 K. Therefore, only the liquid and FCC phases were assumed to appear in the MPF simulations. The simulation domain was 5 ร— 100 ฮผm, and the grid size ฮ”x and interface width were set to 0.025 and 0.1 ยตm, respectively. The interfacial mobility between the solid and liquid phases was set to 1.0 ร— 10-8 m4 J-1 s-1. Initially, one crystalline nucleus with a [100] crystal orientation was placed at the left bottom of the simulation domain, with the liquid phase occupying the remainder of the domain. The model was solidified under the temperature field distribution obtained by the CtFD simulation. The concentration distribution and crystal orientation of the solidified model were examined. The primary dendrite arm space (PDAS) was compared to the experimental PDAS measured by the cross-sectional SEM observation.

In an actual LPBF process, solidified layers are remelted and resolidified during the stacking of the one layer above, thereby greatly affecting solute element distributions in those regions. Therefore, remelting and resolidification simulations were performed to examine the effect of remelting on solute segregation. The solidified model was remelted and resolidified by applying a time-dependent temperature field shifted by 60 ฮผm in the height direction, assuming reheating during the stacking of the upper layer (i.e., the upper 40 ฮผm region of the simulation box was remelted and resolidified). The changes in the composition distribution and formed microstructure were investigated.

3. Results

3.1. Experimental observation of melt pool

Fig. 1 shows a cross-sectional optical microscopy image and corresponding inverse pole figure (IPF) orientation maps obtained from the laser-melted region of HX. The dashed line indicates the fusion line. A deep melted region was formed by keyhole-mode melting due to the vaporization of the metal and resultant recoil pressure. Epitaxial growth from the unmelted region was observed. Columnar crystal grains with an average diameter of 5.46 ยฑ 0.32 ฮผm and an aspect ratio of 3.61 ยฑ 0.13 appeared at the melt regions (Figs. 1bโ€“1d). In addition, crystal grains growing in the z direction could be observed in the lower center.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2a shows a cross-sectional backscattering electron image (BEI) obtained from the laser-melted region indicated by the black square in Fig. 1a. The bright particles with a diameter of approximately 2 ฮผm observed outside the melt pool. It is well known that M6C, M23C6, ฯƒ, and ฮผ precipitate phases are formed in Hastelloy-X [41]. These precipitates mainly consisted of Mo, Cr, Fe, and Ni; The ฮผ and M6C phases are rich in Mo, while the ฯƒ and M23C6 phases are rich in Cr. The SEM energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis suggested that the bright particles are the stable precipitates as shown in Fig. S2 and Table S1. Conversely, there are no carbides in the melt pool. This suggests that the cooling rate is extremely high during LPBF, which prevents the formation of a stable carbide during solidification. Figs. 2bโ€“2f show magnified BEI images at different height positions indicated in Fig. 2a. Bright regions are observed between the cells, which become fragmentary at the center of the melt pool, as indicated by the yellow arrow heads in Figs. 2e and 2f.

Fig. 2

3.2. CtFD simulation

Figs. 3aโ€“3c show snapshots of the CtFD simulation of HX at 2.72 ms, with the temperature indicated in color. A melt pool with an elongated teardrop shape formed and keyhole-mode melting was observed at the front of the melt region. The cooling rate, temperature gradient (G), and solidification rate (R) were evaluated from the temporal change in the temperature distribution of the CtFD simulation results. The z-position of the solid/liquid interface during the melting and solidification processes is shown in Fig. 3d. The interface goes down rapidly during melting and then rises during solidification. The MPF simulation of the microstructure formation during solidification was performed using the temperature distribution. Moreover, the microstructure formation process during the fabrication of the upper layer was investigated by remelting and resolidifying the solidified layer using the same temperature distribution with a 60 ฮผm upward shift, corresponding to the layer thickness commonly used in the LPBF of Ni-based superalloys.

Fig. 3

Figs. 4aโ€“4c show the changes in the cooling rate, temperature gradient, and solidification rate in the center line of the melt pool parallel to the z direction. To output the solidification conditions at the solid/liquid interface in the melt pool, only the data of the mesh where the solid phase ratio was close to 0.5 were plotted. Solidification occurred where the cooling rate was in the range of 2.1 ร— 105โ€“1.6 ร— 10K s-1G was in the range of 3.6 ร— 105โ€“1.9 ร— 10K m-1, and R was in the range of 8.2 ร— 10โˆ’2โ€“6.3 ร— 10โˆ’1 m s-1. The cooling rate was the highest near the fusion line and decreased as the interface approached the center of the melt region (Fig. 4a). G also exhibited the highest value in the regions near the fusion line and decreased throughout the solid/liquid interface toward the center of the melt pool (Fig. 4b). R had the lowest value near the fusion line and increased as the interface approached the center of the melt region (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4

3.3. MPF simulations coupled with CtFD simulation

MPF simulations of solidification, remelting, and resolidification were performed using the temperature-time distribution obtained by the CtFD simulation. Fig. 5 shows the MPF solidified models colored by phase and Mo concentration. All the computational domains show the FCC phase after the solidification (Fig. 5a). Dendrites grew parallel to the heat flow direction, and solute segregations were observed in the interdendritic regions. At the bottom of the melt pool (Fig. 5d), planar interface growth occurred before the formation of primary dendrites. The bottom of the melt pool is the turning point of the solid/liquid interface from the downward motion in melting to the upward motion in solidification. Thus, the solidification rate at the boundary is zero, and is extremely low immediately above the molt-pool boundary. Here, the lower limit of the solidification rate (R) for dendritic growth can be represented by the constitutional supercooling criterion [29]Vcs = (G ร— DL) / ฮ”T, and planar interface growth occurs at R < VcsDL and ฮ”T denote the diffusion coefficient in the liquid and the equilibrium freezing range, respectively. The results suggest that planar interface growth occurs at the bottom of the melt pool, resulting in a dark region with a different solute element distribution. Some of the primary dendrites were diminished by competition with other dendrites. In addition, secondary dendrite arms could be seen in the upper regions (Fig. 5c), where solidification occurred at a lower cooling rate. The fragmentation of the solute segregation near the secondary dendrite arms is similar to that observed in the experimental melt pool shown in Figs. 2e and 2f, and the secondary dendrite arms are suggested to have appeared at the center of the melt region. Fig. 6 shows the PDASs measured from the MPF simulation models, compared to the experimental PDASs measured by the cross-sectional SEM observation of the laser-melted regions (Fig. 2). The PDAS obtained by the MPF simulation become larger as the solidification progress. Ghosh et al. [21] evident by the phase-field method that the PDAS decreases as the cooling rate increases under the rapid cooling conditions obtained by the finite element analysis. In this study, the cooling rate was decreased as the interface approached the center of the melt region (Fig. 4a), and the trends in PDAS changes with respect to cooling rate is same as the reported trend [21]. The simulated trends of the PDAS with the position in the melt pool agreed well with the experimental trends. However, all PDASs in the simulation were larger than those observed in the experiment at the same positions. Ode et al. [42] reported that PDAS differences between 2D and 3D MPF simulations can be represented by PDAS2D = 1.12 ร— PDAS3D owing to differences in the effects of the interfacial energy and diffusivity. We also performed 2D and 3D MPF simulations under the solidification conditions of G = 1.94 ร— 10K m-1 and R = 0.82 m s-1 (Fig. S1), and found that the PDAS from the 2D MPF simulation was 1.26 times larger than that from the 3D simulation. Therefore, the cell structure obtained by the CtFD simulation coupled with the 2D MPF simulation agreed well with the experimental results over the entire melt pool region considering the dimensional effects.

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Fig. 7b1 and 7c1 show the concentration profiles of the solidified model along the growth direction indicated by dashed lines in Fig. 7a. The differences in concentrations from the alloy composition are also shown in Fig. 7b2 and 7c2. Cr, Mo, C, Mn, and W were segregated to the interdendritic regions, while Si, Fe, and Co were depressed. The solute segregation behavior agrees with the experimentally observation [43] and the prediction by the Scheil-Gulliver simulation [19]. Segregation occurred to the highest degree in Mo, while the ratio of segregation to the alloy composition was remarkable in C. The concentration fluctuations correlated with the position in the melt pool and decreased at the center of the melt pool, which was suggested to correspond to the lower cooling rate in this region. Conversely, droplets that appeared between secondary dendrite arms in the upper regions of the simulation domain exhibited a locally high segregation of solute elements, with the same amount of segregation as that at the bottom of the melt pool.

Fig. 7

3.4. Remelting and resolidification simulation

The solidified model was subjected to remelting and resolidification conditions by shifting the temperature profile upward by 60 ยตm to reveal the effect of reheating on the solute segregation behavior. Figs. 8a and 8b shows the simulation domains of the HX model after resolidification, colored by phase and Mo concentration. The magnified MPF models during the resolidification of the regions indicated by rectangles in Figs. 8a and 8b are also shown as Figs. 8c and 8d. Dendrites grew from the bottom of the remelted region, with the segregation of solute elements occurring in the interdendritic regions. The entire domain become the FCC phase after the resolidification, as shown in Fig. 8a. The bottom of the remelted regions exhibited a different microstructure, and Mo was depressed at the remelted regions, rather than the interdendritic regions. The different solute segregation behavior [44] and the microstructure formation [45] at the melt pool boundary is also observed in LPBF manufactured 316 L stainless steel. We found that this microstructure was formed by further remelting during the resolidification process, which is shown in Fig. 9. Here, the solidified HX model was heated, and the interdendritic regions were preferentially melted while concentration fluctuations were maintained (Fig. 9a1 and 9a2). Subsequently, planer interface growth occurs near the melt pool boundary where the solidification rate is almost zero, and the dendrites outside of the boundary are grown epitaxially (Fig. 9b1 and 9b2). However, these remelted again because of the temperature rise (Fig. 9c1 and 9c2, and the temperature-time profile shown in Fig. 9e). The remelted regions then cooled and solidified with the abnormal solute segregations (Fig. 9d1 and 9d2). Then, dendrite grows from amplified fluctuations under the solidification rate larger than the criterion of constitutional supercooling (Fig. 9d1, 9d2, and Fig. 8d). It has been reported [46][47] that temperature rising owning to latent heat affects microstructure formation: phase-field simulations of a Niโ€“Al binary alloy suggest that the release of latent heat during solidification increases the average temperature of the system [46] and strongly influences the solidification conditions [47]. In this study, the release of latent heat during solidification is considered in CtFD simulations for calculating the temperature distribution, and the temperature increase is suggested to have also occurred due to the release of latent heat.

Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Fig. 10b1 and 10c1 show the solute element concentration line profiles of the resolidified model along the growth direction indicated by dashed lines in Fig. 10a. Fig. 10b2 and 10c2 show the corresponding differences in concentration from the alloy composition. The segregation behavior of solute elements at the interdendritic regions (Fig. 10b1 and 10b2) was the same as that in the solidified model (Figs. 7b1 and 7b2). Here, Cr, Mo, C, Mn, and W were segregated to the interdendritic regions, while Si, Fe, and Co were depressed. However, the concentration fluctuations at the interdendritic regions were larger than those in the solidified model. Moreover, the segregation of the outside of the melt pool, i.e., the heat-affected zone, was remarkable throughout remelting and resolidification. Different segregation behaviors were observed in the re-remelted region: Mo, Si, Mn, and W were segregated, while Ni, Fe, and Co were depressed. These solute segregations caused by remelting are expected to heavily influence the crack behavior.

Fig. 10

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of segregation of solute elements on liquation cracking susceptibility

Strong solute segregation was observed between the interdendritic regions of the solidified alloy (Fig. 7). In addition, the solute segregation behavior was significantly affected by remelting and resolidification and varied across the alloy. Solute segregation can be categorized by the regions shown in Fig. 11a1โ€“11a4, namely the cell boundary (Fig. 11a1), interior of the melt-pool boundary (Fig. 11a2), re-remelted regions (Fig. 11a3), and heat-affected regions (Fig. 11a4). The concentration profiles of these regions are shown in Fig. 11b1โ€“11b4. Solute segregation was the highest in the cell boundary region. The solute segregation in the heat-affected region was almost the same as that in the cell boundary region, but seemed to have been attenuated by reheating during remelting and resolidification. The interior of the melt-pool boundary region also had the same tendency for solute segregation. However, the amount of Cr segregation was smaller than that of Mo. A decrease in the Cr concentration was also mitigated, and the concentration remained the same as that in the alloy composition. Fig. 11c1โ€“11c4 show the chemical potentials of the solute elements for the FCC phase at 1073 K calculated using the compositions of those interfacial regions. All the interfacial regions showed non-constant chemical potentials for each element along the perpendicular direction, but the fluctuations of the chemical potentials differed by the type of interfaces. In particular, the fluctuation of the chemical potential of C at the cell boundary region was the largest, suggesting it can be relaxed easily by heat treatment. On the other hand, the fluctuations of the other elements in all the regions were small. The solute segregations are most likely to remain after the heat treatment and are supposed to affect the cracking susceptibilities.

Fig. 11

The solidus temperatures TS, the difference between the liquidus and solidus temperatures (i.e., the brittle temperature range (BTR)), and the fractions of the equilibrium precipitate phases at 1073 K of the interfacial regions were calculated as the liquation, solidification, and ductility dip cracking susceptibilities, respectively. At the cell boundary (Fig. 12a1), interior of the melt-pool boundary (Fig. 12a1), and heat-affected regions (Fig. 12a1), the internal and interfacial regions exhibited higher and lower TS compared to that of the alloy composition, respectively. The lowest Ts was obtained with the composition at the cell boundary region, which is the largest solute-segregated region. It has been suggested that strong segregations of solute elements in LPBF lead to liquation cracks [16]. This study also supports this suggestion, and liquation cracks are more likely to occur at the interfacial regions indicated by predicting the solute segregation behavior using the MPF model. Additionally, the BTRs of the cell boundary, interior of the melt-pool boundary, and heat-affected regions were wider at the interdendritic regions, and solidification cracks were also likely to occur in these regions. Moreover, within the solute segregation regions, the fraction of the precipitate phases in these interfacial regions was larger than that calculated using the alloy composition (Fig. 12c1, 12c2, and 12c4). This indicates that ductility dip cracking is also likely to occur at the cell boundary, interior of the melt-pool boundary, and in heat-affected regions. Contrarily, we found that the re-remelted region exhibited a higher TS and smaller BTR even in the interfacial region (Fig. 12a3 and 12b3), where the solute segregation behavior was different from that of the other regions. In addition, the re-remelting region exhibited less precipitation compared with the other segregated regions (Fig. 12c3). The re-remelting caused by the latent heat can attenuate solute segregation, prevent Ts from decreasing, decrease the BTR, and decrease the amount of precipitate phases. Alloys with a large amount of latent heat are expected to increase the re-remelting region, thereby decreasing the susceptibility to liquation and ductility dip cracks due to solute element segregation. This can be a guide for designing alloys for the LPBF process. As mentioned in Section 3.4, the microstructure [45] and the solute segregation behavior [44] at the melt pool boundary of LPBF-manufactured 316 L stainless steel are observed, and they are different from that of the interdendritic regions. Experimental observations of the solute segregation behavior in the LPBF-fabricated Ni-based alloys are currently underway.

Fig. 12

4.2. Applicability of the conventional MPF simulation to microstructure formation under LPBF

As the solidification growth rate increases, segregation coefficients approach 1, and the fluctuation of the solid/liquid interface is suppressed by the interfacial tension. The interface growth occurs in a flat fashion instead of having a cellular morphology at a velocity above the absolute stability limit, Ras, predicted by the Mullins-Sekerka theory [29]Ras = (ฮ”T0 DL) / (k ฮ“) where ฮ”T0DLk, and ฮ“ are the difference between the liquidus and solidus temperatures, equilibrium segregation coefficient, the diffusivity of liquid, and the Gibbs-Thomson coefficient, respectively.

The Ras of HX was calculated using the equation and the thermodynamic parameters obtained by the TCNI9 thermodynamic database [39]. The calculated Ras of HX was 3.9 m s-1 and is ten times larger than that of the Niโ€“Nb alloy (approximately 0.4 m s-1[20]. The HX alloy was solidified under R values in the range of 8.2 ร— 10โˆ’2โ€“6.3 ร— 10โˆ’1 m s-1. The theoretically calculated criterion is larger than the evaluated R, and is in agreement with the experiment in which dendritic growth is observed in the melt pool (Fig. 5). In contrast, Karayagiz et al. [20] reported that the R of the Niโ€“Nb binary alloy under LPBF was as high as approximately 2 m s-1, and planar interface growth was observed to be predominant under the high-growth-rate conditions. These experimentally observed microstructures agree well with the prediction by the Mullins-Sekerka theory about the relationship between the morphology and solidification rates.

In this study, the solidification microstructure formed by the laser-beam irradiation of an HX multicomponent Ni-based superalloy was reproduced by a conventional MPF simulation, in which the system was assumed to be in a quasi-equilibrium condition. Boussinot et al. [24] also suggested that the conventional phase-field model can be applied to simulate the microstructure of an IN718 multicomponent Ni-based superalloy in LPBF. In contrast, Kagayaski et al. [20] suggested that the conventional MPF simulation cannot be applied to the solidification of the Ni-Nb binary alloy system and that the finite interface dissipation model proposed by Steinbach et al. [48][49] is necessary to simulate the high solidification rates observed in LPBF. The difference in the applicability of the conventional MPF method to HX and Niโ€“Nb binary alloys is presumed to arise from the differences in the non-equilibrium degree of these systems under the high solidification rates of LPBF. The results suggest that Ras can be used as a simple index to apply the conventional MPF model for solidification in LPBF. Solidification becomes a non-equilibrium process as the solidification rate approaches the limit of absolute stability, Ras. In this study, the solidification of the HX multicomponent system occurred under a relatively low solidification rate compared to Ras, and the microstructure of the conventional MPF model was successfully reproduced in the physical experiment. However, note that the limit of absolute stability predicted by the Mullins-Sekerka theory was originally proposed for solidification in a binary alloy system, and further investigation is required to consider its applicability to multicomponent alloy systems. Moreover, the fast solidification, such as in the LPBF process, causes segregation coefficient approaching a value of 1 [20][21][25] corresponds to a diffusion length that is on the order of the atomic interface thickness. When the segregation coefficient approaches 1, solute undercooling disappears; hence, there is no driving force to amplify fluctuations regardless of whether interfacial tension is present. This phenomenon should be further investigated in future studies.

5. Conclusions

We simulated solute segregation in a multicomponent HX alloy under the LPBF process by an MPF simulation using the temperature distributions obtained by a CtFD simulation. We set the parameters of the CtFD simulation to match the melt pool shape formed in the laser-irradiation experiment and found that solidification occurred under high cooling rates of up to 1.6 ร— 10K s-1.

MPF simulations using the temperature distributions from CtFD simulation could reproduce the experimentally observed PDAS and revealed that significant solute segregation occurred at the interdendritic regions. Equilibrium thermodynamic calculations using the alloy compositions of the segregated regions when considering crack sensitivities suggested a decrease in the solidus temperature and an increase in the amount of carbide precipitation, thereby increasing the susceptibility to liquation and ductility dip cracks in these regions. Notably, these changes were suppressed at the melt-pool boundary region, where re-remelting occurred during the stacking of the layer above. This effect can be used to achieve a novel in-process segregation attenuation.

Our study revealed that a conventional MPF simulation weakly coupled with a CtFD simulation can be used to study the solidification of multicomponent alloys in LPBF, contrary to the cases of binary alloys investigated in previous studies. We discussed the applicability of the conventional MPF model to the LPBF process in terms of the limit of absolute stability, Ras, and suggested that alloys with a high limit velocity, i.e., multicomponent alloys, can be simulated using the conventional MPF model even under the high solidification velocity conditions of LPBF.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Masayuki Okugawa: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Writing โ€“ original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Takayoshi Nakano: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Yuichiro Koizumi: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Sukeharu Nomoto: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Validation, Investigation. Makoto Watanabe: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Katsuhiko Sawaizumi: Validation, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Kenji Saito: Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Haruki Yoshima: Visualization, Validation, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), โ€œMaterials Integration for Revolutionary Design System of Structural Materials,โ€ (funding agency: The Japan Science and Technology Agency), by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 21H05018 and 21H05193, and by CREST Nanomechanics: Elucidation of macroscale mechanical properties based on understanding nanoscale dynamics for innovative mechanical materials (Grant Number: JPMJCR2194) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). The authors would like to thank Mr. H. Kawabata and Mr. K. Kimura for their technical support with the sample preparations and laser beam irradiation experiments.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Download : Download Word document (654KB)

Supplementary material.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

Modeling and numerical studies of high-precision laser powder bed fusion

Yi Weiย ;Genyu Chen;Nengru Tao;Wei Zhou
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191504

In order to comprehensively reveal the evolutionary dynamics of the molten pool and the state of motion of the fluid during the high-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) process, this study aims to deeply investigate the specific manifestations of the multiphase flow, solidification phenomena, and heat transfer during the process by means of numerical simulation methods. Numerical simulation models of SS316L single-layer HP-LPBF formation with single and double tracks were constructed using the discrete element method and the computational fluid dynamics method. The effects of various factors such as Marangoni convection, surface tension, vapor recoil, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool have been paid attention to during the model construction process. The results show that the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ shape, in which the temperature gradient at the front end of the pool is significantly larger than that at the tail end, with the highest temperature gradient up to 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. It is also found that the depth of the second track is larger than that of the first one, and the process parameter window has been determined preliminarily. In addition, the application of HP-LPBF technology helps to reduce the surface roughness and minimize the forming size.

Topics

Heat transfer,ย Nonequilibrium thermodynamics,ย Solidification process,ย Computer simulation,ย Discrete element method,ย Lasers,ย Mass transfer,ย Fluid mechanics,ย Computational fluid dynamics,ย Multiphase flows

I. INTRODUCTION

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has become a research hotspot in the field of additive manufacturing of metals due to its advantages of high-dimensional accuracy, good surface quality, high density, and high material utilization.1,2 With the rapid development of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics, the demand for microfabrication technology is increasing day by day.3 High-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) is one of the key manufacturing technologies for tiny parts in the fields of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics because of its process characteristics such as small focal spot diameter, small powder particle size, and thin powder layup layer thickness.4โ€“13 Compared with LPBF, HP-LPBF has the significant advantages of smaller focal spot diameter, smaller powder particle size, and thinner layer thickness. These advantages make HP-LPBF perform better in producing micro-fine parts, high surface quality, and parts with excellent mechanical properties.

HP-LPBF is in the exploratory stage, and researchers have already done some exploratory studies on the focal spot diameter, the amount of defocusing, and the powder particle size. In order to explore the influence of changing the laser focal spot diameter on the LPBF process characteristics of the law, Wildman et al.14 studied five groups of different focal spot diameter LPBF forming 316L stainless steel (SS316L) processing effect, the smallest focal spot diameter of 26โ€‰ฮผm, and the results confirm that changing the focal spot diameter can be achieved to achieve the energy control, so as to control the quality of forming. Subsequently, Mclouth et al.15 proposed the laser out-of-focus amount (focal spot diameter) parameter, which characterizes the distance between the forming plane and the laser focal plane. The laser energy density was controlled by varying the defocusing amount while keeping the laser parameters constant. Sample preparation at different focal positions was investigated, and their microstructures were characterized. The results show that the samples at the focal plane have finer microstructure than those away from the focal plane, which is the effect of higher power density and smaller focal spot diameter. In order to explore the influence of changing the powder particle size on the characteristics of the LPBF process, Qian et al.16 carried out single-track scanning simulations on powder beds with average powder particle sizes of 70 and 40โ€‰ฮผm, respectively, and the results showed that the melt tracks sizes were close to each other under the same process parameters for the two particle-size distributions and that the molten pool of powder beds with small particles was more elongated and the edges of the melt tracks were relatively flat. In order to explore the superiority of HP-LPBF technology, Xu et al.17 conducted a comparative analysis of HP-LPBF and conventional LPBF of SS316L. The results showed that the average surface roughness of the top surface after forming by HP-LPBF could reach 3.40โ€‰ฮผm. Once again, it was verified that HP-LPBF had higher forming quality than conventional LPBF. On this basis, Wei et al.6 comparatively analyzed the effects of different laser focal spot diameters on different powder particle sizes formed by LPBF. The results showed that the smaller the laser focal spot diameter, the fewer the defects on the top and side surfaces. The above research results confirm that reducing the laser focal spot diameter can obtain higher energy density and thus better forming quality.

LPBF involves a variety of complex systems and mechanisms, and the final quality of the part is influenced by a large number of process parameters.18โ€“24 Some research results have shown that there are more than 50 factors affecting the quality of the specimen. The influencing factors are mainly categorized into three main groups: (1) laser parameters, (2) powder parameters, and (3) equipment parameters, which interact with each other to determine the final specimen quality. With the continuous development of technologies such as computational materials science and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the method of studying the influence of different factors on the forming quality of LPBF forming process has been shifted from time-consuming and laborious experimental characterization to the use of numerical simulation methods. As a result, more and more researchers are adopting this approach for their studies. Currently, numerical simulation studies on LPBF are mainly focused on the exploration of molten pool, temperature distribution, and residual stresses.

  1. Finite element simulation based on continuum mechanics and free surface fluid flow modeling based on fluid dynamics are two common approaches to study the behavior of LPBF molten pool.25โ€“28 Finite element simulation focuses on the temperature and thermal stress fields, treats the powder bed as a continuum, and determines the molten pool size by plotting the elemental temperature above the melting point. In contrast, fluid dynamics modeling can simulate the 2D or 3D morphology of the metal powder pile and obtain the powder size and distribution by certain algorithms.29 The flow in the molten pool is mainly affected by recoil pressure and the Marangoni effect. By simulating the molten pool formation, it is possible to predict defects, molten pool shape, and flow characteristics, as well as the effect of process parameters on the molten pool geometry.30โ€“34 In addition, other researchers have been conducted to optimize the laser processing parameters through different simulation methods and experimental data.35โ€“46 Crystal growth during solidification is studied to further understand the effect of laser parameters on dendritic morphology and solute segregation.47โ€“54 A multi-scale system has been developed to describe the fused deposition process during 3D printing, which is combined with the conductive heat transfer model and the dendritic solidification model.55,56
  2. Relevant scholars have adopted various different methods for simulation, such as sequential coupling theory,57 Lagrangian and Eulerian thermal models,58 birthโ€“death element method,25 and finite element method,59 in order to reveal the physical phenomena of the laser melting process and optimize the process parameters. Luo et al.60 compared the LPBF temperature field and molten pool under double ellipsoidal and Gaussian heat sources by ANSYS APDL and found that the diffusion of the laser energy in the powder significantly affects the molten pool size and the temperature field.
  3. The thermal stresses obtained from the simulation correlate with the actual cracks,61 and local preheating can effectively reduce the residual stresses.62 A three-dimensional thermodynamic finite element model investigated the temperature and stress variations during laser-assisted fabrication and found that powder-to-solid conversion increases the temperature gradient, stresses, and warpage.63 Other scholars have predicted residual stresses and part deflection for LPBF specimens and investigated the effects of deposition pattern, heat, laser power, and scanning strategy on residual stresses, noting that high-temperature gradients lead to higher residual stresses.64โ€“67 

In short, the process of LPBF forming SS316L is extremely complex and usually involves drastic multi-scale physicochemical changes that will only take place on a very small scale. Existing literature employs DEM-based mesoscopic-scale numerical simulations to investigate the effects of process parameters on the molten pool dynamics of LPBF-formed SS316L. However, a few studies have been reported on the key mechanisms of heating and solidification, spatter, and convective behavior of the molten pool of HP-LPBF-formed SS316L with small laser focal spot diameters. In this paper, the geometrical properties of coarse and fine powder particles under three-dimensional conditions were first calculated using DEM. Then, numerical simulation models for single-track and double-track cases in the single-layer HP-LPBF forming SS316L process were developed at mesoscopic scale using the CFD method. The flow genesis of the melt in the single-track and double-track molten pools is discussed, and their 3D morphology and dimensional characteristics are discussed. In addition, the effects of laser process parameters, powder particle size, and laser focal spot diameter on the temperature field, characterization information, and defects in the molten pool are discussed.

II. MODELING

A. 3D powder bed modeling

HP-LPBF is an advanced processing technique for preparing target parts layer by layer stacking, the process of which involves repetitive spreading and melting of powders. In this process, both the powder spreading and the morphology of the powder bed are closely related to the results of the subsequent melting process, while the melted surface also affects the uniform distribution of the next layer of powder. For this reason, this chapter focuses on the modeling of the physical action during the powder spreading process and the theory of DEM to establish the numerical model of the powder bed, so as to lay a solid foundation for the accuracy of volume of fluid (VOF) and CFD.

1. DEM

DEM is a numerical technique for calculating the interaction of a large number of particles, which calculates the forces and motions of the spheres by considering each powder sphere as an independent unit. The motion of the powder particles follows the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, including translational and rotational,38,68โ€“70 which are expressed as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝij,

(1)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝijร—๏ฟฝij),

(2)

where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the mass of unit particle i in kg, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the advective acceleration in m/s2, And g is the gravitational acceleration in m/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the force in contact with the neighboring particle ๏ฟฝ in N. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the rotational inertia of the unit particle ๏ฟฝ in kg ยท m2. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the unit particle ๏ฟฝ angular acceleration in rad/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the vector pointing from unit particle ๏ฟฝ to the contact point of neighboring particle ๏ฟฝโ .

Equations (1) and (2) can be used to calculate the velocity and angular velocity variations of powder particles to determine their positions and velocities. A three-dimensional powder bed model of SS316L was developed using DEM. The powder particles are assumed to be perfect spheres, and the substrate and walls are assumed to be rigid. To describe the contact between the powder particles and between the particles and the substrate, a non-slip Hertzโ€“Mindlin nonlinear spring-damping model71 was used with the following expression:๏ฟฝhz=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝijโˆ’๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ’(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)],

(3)

where ๏ฟฝhz is the force calculated using the Hertzian in M. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the radius of unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ in m, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the overlap size of the two powder particles in m. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the elastic constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝij is the unit vector connecting the centerlines of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝeff is the effective mass of the two powder particles in kg. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the viscoelastic damping constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the components of the relative velocities of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the displacement vector between two spherical particles. The schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles is shown in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles.

Because the particle size of the powder used for HP-LPBF is much smaller than 100โ€‰ฮผm, the effect of van der Waals forces must be considered. Therefore, the cohesive force ๏ฟฝjkr of the Hertzโ€“Mindlin model was used instead of van der Waals forces,72 with the following expression:๏ฟฝjkr=โˆ’4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ1.5+4๏ฟฝ*3๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ3,

(4)1๏ฟฝ*=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(5)1๏ฟฝ*=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(6)

where ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent Young’s modulus in GPa; ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent particle radius in m; ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface energy of the powder particles in J/m2; ฮฑ is the contact radius in m; ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Young’s modulus of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, in GPa; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Poisson’s ratio of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively.

2. Model building

Figure 2 shows a 3D powder bed model generated using DEM with a coarse powder geometry of 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰30โ€‰ฮผm3. The powder layer thickness is 30โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity is 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 31.7โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 15โ€“53โ€‰ฮผm. The geometry of the fine powder was 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰20โ€‰ฮผm3, with a layer thickness of 20โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity of 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 11.5โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 5โ€“25โ€‰ฮผm. After the 3D powder bed model is generated, it needs to be imported into the CFD simulation software for calculation, and the imported geometric model is shown in Fig. 3. This geometric model is mainly composed of three parts: protective gas, powder bed, and substrate. Under the premise of ensuring the accuracy of the calculation, the mesh size is set to 3โ€‰ฮผm, and the total number of coarse powder meshes is 1โ€‰704โ€‰940. The total number of fine powder meshes is 3โ€‰982โ€‰250.

FIG. 2.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Three-dimensional powder bed model: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

FIG. 3.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Geometric modeling of the powder bed computational domain: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

B. Modeling of fluid mechanics simulation

In order to solve the flow, melting, and solidification problems involved in HP-LPBF molten pool, the study must follow the three governing equations of conservation of mass, conservation of energy, and conservation of momentum.73 The VOF method, which is the most widely used in fluid dynamics, is used to solve the molten pool dynamics model.

1. VOF

VOF is a method for tracking the free interface between the gas and liquid phases on the molten pool surface. The core idea of the method is to define a volume fraction function F within each grid, indicating the proportion of the grid space occupied by the material, 0โ€‰โ‰คโ€‰Fโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰1 in Fig. 4. Specifically, when Fโ€‰=โ€‰0, the grid is empty and belongs to the gas-phase region; when Fโ€‰=โ€‰1, the grid is completely filled with material and belongs to the liquid-phase region; and when 0โ€‰<โ€‰Fโ€‰<โ€‰1, the grid contains free surfaces and belongs to the mixed region. The direction normal to the free surface is the direction of the fastest change in the volume fraction F (the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction), and the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction can be calculated from the values of the volume fractions in the neighboring grids.74 The equations controlling the VOF are expressed as follows:๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโ‹…(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0,

(7)

where t is the time in s and ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the liquid velocity in m/s.

FIG. 4.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of VOF.

The material parameters of the mixing zone are altered due to the inclusion of both the gas and liquid phases. Therefore, in order to represent the density of the mixing zone, the average density ๏ฟฝยฏ is used, which is expressed as follows:72๏ฟฝยฏ=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ1)๏ฟฝgas+๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝmetal,

(8)

where ๏ฟฝ1 is the proportion of liquid phase, ๏ฟฝgas is the density of protective gas in kg/m3, and ๏ฟฝmetal is the density of metal in kg/m3.

2. Control equations and boundary conditions

Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the HP-LPBF melting process. First, the laser light strikes a localized area of the material and rapidly heats up the area. Next, the energy absorbed in the region is diffused through a variety of pathways (heat conduction, heat convection, and surface radiation), and this process triggers complex phase transition phenomena (melting, evaporation, and solidification). In metals undergoing melting, the driving forces include surface tension and the Marangoni effect, recoil due to evaporation, and buoyancy due to gravity and uneven density. The above physical phenomena interact with each other and do not occur independently.

FIG. 5.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

  1. Laser heat sourceThe Gaussian surface heat source model is used as the laser heat source model with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=2๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2exp(โˆ’2๏ฟฝ12๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2),(9)where ๏ฟฝ is the heat flow density in W/m2, ๏ฟฝ0 is the absorption rate of SS316L, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the radius of the laser focal spot in m, and ๏ฟฝ1 is the radial distance from the center of the laser focal spot in m. The laser focal spot can be used for a wide range of applications.
  2. Energy absorptionThe formula for calculating the laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 of SS316L is as follows:๏ฟฝ0=0.365(๏ฟฝ0[1+๏ฟฝ0(๏ฟฝโˆ’20)]/๏ฟฝ)0.5,(10)where ๏ฟฝ0 is the direct current resistivity of SS316L at 20โ€‰ยฐC in ฮฉ m, ๏ฟฝ0 is the resistance temperature coefficient in ppm/ยฐC, ๏ฟฝ is the temperature in ยฐC, and ๏ฟฝ is the laser wavelength in m.
  3. Heat transferThe basic principle of heat transfer is conservation of energy, which is expressed as follows:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(11)where ๏ฟฝ is the density of liquid phase SS316L in kg/m3, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the specific heat capacity of SS316L in J/(kg K), ๐›ป๏ฟฝ is the gradient operator, t is the time in s, T is the temperature in K, ๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the temperature gradient, ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the velocity vector, ๏ฟฝ0 is the coefficient of thermal conduction of SS316L in W/(m K), and โ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the thermal energy dissipation term in the molten pool.
  4. Molten pool flowThe following three conditions need to be satisfied for the molten pool to flow:
    • Conservation of mass with the following expression:๐›ป๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0.(12)
    • Conservation of momentum (Navierโ€“Stokes equation) with the following expression:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝโ†’=๏ฟฝยท[โˆ’pI+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’+(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)๏ฟฝ)]+๏ฟฝ,(13)where ๏ฟฝ is the pressure in Pa exerted on the liquid phase SS316L microelement, ๏ฟฝ is the unit matrix, ๏ฟฝ is the fluid viscosity in N s/m2, and ๏ฟฝ is the volumetric force (gravity, atmospheric pressure, surface tension, vapor recoil, and the Marangoni effect).
    • Conservation of energy, see Eq. (11)
  5. Surface tension and the Marangoni effectThe effect of temperature on the surface tension coefficient is considered and set as a linear relationship with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝdT(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),(14)where ๏ฟฝ is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature T in N/m, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the melting temperature of SS316L in K, ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ in Pa, and ฯƒdฯƒ/ dT is the surface tension temperature coefficient in N/(m K).In general, surface tension decreases with increasing temperature. A temperature gradient causes a gradient in surface tension that drives the liquid to flow, known as the Marangoni effect.
  6. Metal vapor recoilAt higher input energy densities, the maximum temperature of the molten pool surface reaches the evaporation temperature of the material, and a gasification recoil pressure occurs vertically downward toward the molten pool surface, which will be the dominant driving force for the molten pool flow.75 The expression is as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=0.54๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ€‰expโ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(15)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the gasification recoil pressure in Pa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the ambient pressure in kPa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of evaporation in J/kg, ๏ฟฝ0 is the gas constant in J/(mol K), T is the surface temperature of the molten pool in K, and Te is the evaporation temperature in K.
  7. Solidโ€“liquidโ€“gas phase transitionWhen the laser hits the powder layer, the powder goes through three stages: heating, melting, and solidification. During the solidification phase, mutual transformations between solid, liquid, and gaseous states occur. At this point, the latent heat of phase transition absorbed or released during the phase transition needs to be considered.68 The phase transition is represented based on the relationship between energy and temperature with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ),,(16)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are solid and liquid phase density, respectively, of SS316L in kg/m3. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ unit volume of solid and liquid phase-specific heat capacity, respectively, of SS316L in J/(kg K). ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, are the solidification temperature and melting temperature of SS316L in K. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of the phase transition of SS316L melting in J/kg.

3. Assumptions

The CFD model was computed using the commercial software package FLOW-3D.76 In order to simplify the calculation and solution process while ensuring the accuracy of the results, the model makes the following assumptions:

  1. It is assumed that the effects of thermal stress and material solid-phase thermal expansion on the calculation results are negligible.
  2. The molten pool flow is assumed to be a Newtonian incompressible laminar flow, while the effects of liquid thermal expansion and density on the results are neglected.
  3. It is assumed that the surface tension can be simplified to an equivalent pressure acting on the free surface of the molten pool, and the effect of chemical composition on the results is negligible.
  4. Neglecting the effect of the gas flow field on the molten pool.
  5. The mass loss due to evaporation of the liquid metal is not considered.
  6. The influence of the plasma effect of the molten metal on the calculation results is neglected.

It is worth noting that the formulation of assumptions requires a trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. In the above models, some physical phenomena that have a small effect or high difficulty on the calculation results are simplified or ignored. Such simplifications make numerical simulations more efficient and computationally tractable, while still yielding accurate results.

4. Initial conditions

The preheating temperature of the substrate was set to 393โ€‰K, at which time all materials were in the solid state and the flow rate was zero.

5. Material parameters

The material used is SS316L and the relevant parameters required for numerical simulations are shown in Table I.46,77,78

TABLE I.

SS316L-related parameters.

PropertySymbolValue
Density of solid metal (kg/m3๏ฟฝmetal 7980 
Solid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1658 
Liquid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1723 
Vaporization temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 3090 
Latent heat of melting (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 2.60ร—105 
Latent heat of evaporation (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 7.45ร—106 
Surface tension of liquid phase (N /mโ ) ๏ฟฝ 1.60 
Liquid metal viscosity (kg/m s) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 6ร—10โˆ’3 
Gaseous metal viscosity (kg/mโ€‰s) ๏ฟฝgas 1.85ร—10โˆ’5 
Temperature coefficient of surface tension (N/m K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝT 0.80ร—10โˆ’3 
Molar mass (โ  kg/molโ ) 0.05โ€‰593 
Emissivity ๏ฟฝ 0.26 
Laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 0.35 
Ambient pressure (kPa) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 101โ€‰325 
Ambient temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ0 300 
Stefanโ€“Boltzmann constant (W/m2 K4๏ฟฝ 5.67ร—10โˆ’8 
Thermal conductivity of metals (โ  W/mโ€‰Kโ ) ๏ฟฝ 24.55 
Density of protective gas (kg/m3๏ฟฝgas 1.25 
Coefficient of thermal expansion (/K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 16ร—10โˆ’6 
Generalized gas constant (โ  J/molโ€‰Kโ ) 8.314 

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

With the objective of studying in depth the evolutionary patterns of single-track and double-track molten pool development, detailed observations were made for certain specific locations in the model, as shown in Fig. 6. In this figure, P1 and P2 represent the longitudinal tangents to the centers of the two melt tracks in the XZ plane, while L1 is the transverse profile in the YZ plane. The scanning direction is positive and negative along the X axis. Points A and B are the locations of the centers of the molten pool of the first and second melt tracks, respectively (xโ€‰=โ€‰1.995โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’4, yโ€‰=โ€‰5โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’7, and zโ€‰=โ€‰โˆ’4.85โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’5).

FIG. 6.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of observation position.

A. Single-track simulation

A series of single-track molten pool simulation experiments were carried out in order to investigate the influence law of laser power as well as scanning speed on the HP-LPBF process. Figure 7 demonstrates the evolution of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the single-track molten pool in the time period of 50โ€“500โ€‰ฮผs under a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The powder bed is in the natural cooling state. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the powder is heated by the laser heat and rapidly melts and settles to form the initial molten pool. This process is accompanied by partial melting of the substrate and solidification together with the melted powder. The molten pool rapidly expands with increasing width, depth, length, and temperature, as shown in Fig. 7(a). When tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands more obviously, and the temperature starts to transfer to the surrounding area, forming a heat-affected zone. At this point, the width of the molten pool tends to stabilize, and the temperature in the center of the molten pool has reached its peak and remains largely stable. However, the phenomenon of molten pool spatter was also observed in this process, as shown in Fig. 7(b). As time advances, when tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, solidification begins to occur at the tail of the molten pool, and tiny ripples are produced on the solidified surface. This is due to the fact that the melt flows toward the region with large temperature gradient under the influence of Marangoni convection and solidifies together with the melt at the end of the bath. At this point, the temperature gradient at the front of the bath is significantly larger than at the end. While the width of the molten pool was gradually reduced, the shape of the molten pool was gradually changed to a โ€œcometโ€ shape. In addition, a slight depression was observed at the top of the bath because the peak temperature at the surface of the bath reached the evaporation temperature, which resulted in a recoil pressure perpendicular to the surface of the bath downward, creating a depressed region. As the laser focal spot moves and is paired with the Marangoni convection of the melt, these recessed areas will be filled in as shown in Fig. 7(c). It has been shown that the depressed regions are the result of the coupled effect of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension.79 By tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the width and height of the molten pool stabilize and show a โ€œcometโ€ shape in Fig. 7(d).

FIG. 7.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Single-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

Figure 8 depicts the velocity vector diagram of the P1 profile in a single-track molten pool, the length of the arrows represents the magnitude of the velocity, and the maximum velocity is about 2.36โ€‰m/s. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool takes shape, and the velocities at the two ends of the pool are the largest. The variation of the velocities at the front end is especially more significant in Fig. 8(a). As the time advances to tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands rapidly, in which the velocity at the tail increases and changes more significantly, while the velocity at the front is relatively small. At this stage, the melt moves backward from the center of the molten pool, which in turn expands the molten pool area. The melt at the back end of the molten pool center flows backward along the edge of the molten pool surface and then converges along the edge of the molten pool to the bottom center, rising to form a closed loop. Similarly, a similar closed loop is formed at the front end of the center of the bath, but with a shorter path. However, a large portion of the melt in the center of the closed loop formed at the front end of the bath is in a nearly stationary state. The main cause of this melt flow phenomenon is the effect of temperature gradient and surface tension (the Marangoni effect), as shown in Figs. 8(b) and 8(e). This dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ pool. At tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the tendency of the above two melt flows to close the loop is more prominent and faster in Fig. 8(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the velocity vector of the molten pool shows a stable trend, and the closed loop of melt flow also remains stable. With the gradual laser focal spot movement, the melt is gradually solidified at its tail, and finally, a continuous and stable single track is formed in Fig. 8(d).

FIG. 8.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of single-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) molten pool flow.

In order to explore in depth the transient evolution of the molten pool, the evolution of the single-track temperature field and the melt flow was monitored in the YZ cross section. Figure 9(a) shows the state of the powder bed at the initial moment. When tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ฮผs, the laser focal spot acts on the powder bed and the powder starts to melt and gradually collects in the molten pool. At this time, the substrate will also start to melt, and the melt flow mainly moves in the downward and outward directions and the velocity is maximum at the edges in Fig. 9(b). When tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool increase due to the recoil pressure. At this time, the melt flows more slowly at the center, but the direction of motion is still downward in Fig. 9(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool further increase, at which time the intensity of the melt flow reaches its peak and the direction of motion remains the same in Fig. 9(d). When tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ฮผs, the melt starts to move upward, and the surrounding powder or molten material gradually fills up, causing the surface of the molten pool to begin to flatten. At this time, the maximum velocity of the melt is at the center of the bath, while the velocity at the edge is close to zero, and the edge of the melt starts to solidify in Fig. 9(e). When tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ฮผs, the melt continues to move upward, forming a convex surface of the melt track. However, the melt movement slows down, as shown in Fig. 9(f). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the melt further moves upward and its speed gradually becomes smaller. At the same time, the melt solidifies further, as shown in Fig. 9(g). When tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ฮผs, the melt track is basically formed into a single track with a similar โ€œmountainโ€ shape. At this stage, the velocity is close to zero only at the center of the molten pool, and the flow behavior of the melt is poor in Fig. 9(h). At tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ฮผs, the melt stops moving and solidification is rapidly completed. Up to this point, a single track is formed in Fig. 9(i). During the laser action on the powder bed, the substrate melts and combines with the molten state powder. The powder-to-powder fusion is like the convergence of water droplets, which are rapidly fused by surface tension. However, the fusion between the molten state powder and the substrate occurs driven by surface tension, and the molten powder around the molten pool is pulled toward the substrate (a wetting effect occurs), which ultimately results in the formation of a monolithic whole.38,80,81

FIG. 9.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of single-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰0โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

The wetting ability between the liquid metal and the solid substrate in the molten pool directly affects the degree of balling of the melt,82,83 and the wetting ability can be measured by the contact angle of a single track in Fig. 10. A smaller value of contact angle represents better wettability. The contact angle ฮฑ can be calculated by๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ1โˆ’๏ฟฝ22,

(17)

where ๏ฟฝ1 and ๏ฟฝ2 are the contact angles of the left and right regions, respectively.

FIG. 10.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic of contact angle.

Relevant studies have confirmed that the wettability is better at a contact angle ฮฑ around or below 40ยฐ.84 After measurement, a single-track contact angle ฮฑ of about 33ยฐ was obtained under this process parameter, which further confirms the good wettability.

B. Double-track simulation

In order to deeply investigate the influence of hatch spacing on the characteristics of the HP-LPBF process, a series of double-track molten pool simulation experiments were systematically carried out. Figure 11 shows in detail the dynamic changes of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool in the time period of 2050โ€“2500โ€‰ฮผs under the conditions of laser power of 100โ€‰W, scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. By comparing the study with Fig. 7, it is observed that the basic characteristics of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track. However, there are subtle differences between them. The first track exhibits a basically symmetric shape, but the second track morphology shows a slight deviation influenced by the difference in thermal diffusion rate between the solidified metal and the powder. Otherwise, the other characteristic information is almost the same as that of the first track. Figure 12 shows the velocity vector plot of the P2 profile in the double-track molten pool, with a maximum velocity of about 2.63โ€‰m/s. The melt dynamics at both ends of the pool are more stable at tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ฮผs, where the maximum rate of the second track is only 1/3 of that of the first one. Other than that, the rest of the information is almost no significant difference from the characteristic information of the first track. Figure 13 demonstrates a detailed observation of the double-track temperature field and melts flow in the YZ cross section, and a comparative study with Fig. 9 reveals that the width of the second track is slightly wider. In addition, after the melt direction shifts from bottom to top, the first track undergoes four time periods (50โ€‰ฮผs) to reach full solidification, while the second track takes five time periods. This is due to the presence of significant heat buildup in the powder bed after the forming of the first track, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt and an increased molten pool lifetime. In conclusion, the level of specimen forming can be significantly optimized by adjusting the laser power and hatch spacing.

FIG. 11.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 12.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of double-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 13.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of double-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰2450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰2550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰2600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰2650โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

In order to quantitatively detect the molten pool dimensions as well as the remolten region dimensions, the molten pool characterization information in Fig. 14 is constructed by drawing the boundary on the YZ cross section based on the isothermal surface of the liquid phase line. It can be observed that the heights of the first track and second track are basically the same, but the depth of the second track increases relative to the first track. The molten pool width is mainly positively correlated with the laser power as well as the scanning speed (the laser line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ). However, the remelted zone width is negatively correlated with the hatch spacing (the overlapping ratio). Overall, the forming quality of the specimens can be directly influenced by adjusting the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing.

FIG. 14.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool characterization information on YZ cross section.

In order to study the variation rule of the temperature in the center of the molten pool with time, Fig. 15 demonstrates the temperature variation curves with time for two reference points, A and B. Among them, the red dotted line indicates the liquid phase line temperature of SS316L. From the figure, it can be seen that the maximum temperature at the center of the molten pool in the first track is lower than that in the second track, which is mainly due to the heat accumulation generated after passing through the first track. The maximum temperature gradient was calculated to be 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. When the laser scanned the first track, the temperature in the center of the molten pool of the second track increased slightly. Similarly, when the laser scanned the second track, a similar situation existed in the first track. Since the temperature gradient in the second track is larger than that in the first track, the residence time of the liquid phase in the molten pool of the first track is longer than that of the second track.

FIG. 15.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Temperature profiles as a function of time for two reference points A and B.

C. Simulation analysis of molten pool under different process parameters

In order to deeply investigate the effects of various process parameters on the mesoscopic-scale temperature field, molten pool characteristic information and defects of HP-LPBF, numerical simulation experiments on mesoscopic-scale laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing of double-track molten pools were carried out.

1. Laser power

Figure 16 shows the effects of different laser power on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. When Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, a smaller molten pool is formed due to the lower heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time. This leads to a smaller track width, which results in adjacent track not lapping properly and the presence of a large number of unmelted powder particles, resulting in an increase in the number of defects, such as pores in the specimen. The surface of the track is relatively flat, and the depth is small. In addition, the temperature gradient before and after the molten pool was large, and the depression location appeared at the biased front end in Fig. 16(a). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, the surface of the track is flat and smooth with excellent lap. Due to the Marangoni effect, the velocity field of the molten pool is in the form of โ€œvortex,โ€ and the melt has good fluidity, and the maximum velocity reaches 2.15โ€‰m/s in Fig. 16(b). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W, the heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time is too large, resulting in the melt rapidly reaching the evaporation temperature, generating a huge recoil pressure, forming a large molten pool, and the surface of the track is obviously raised. The melt movement is intense, especially the closed loop at the center end of the molten pool. At this time, the depth and width of the molten pool are large, leading to the expansion of the remolten region and the increased chance of the appearance of porosity defects in Fig. 16(c). The results show that at low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool is dominant. At high laser power, recoil pressure is its main role.

FIG. 16.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different laser powers: (a) Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, (b) Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, (c) Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W.

Table II shows the effect of different laser powers on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. The negative overlapping ratio in the table indicates that the melt tracks are not lapped, and 26/29 indicates the melt depth of the first track/second track. It can be seen that with the increase in laser power, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, and remelted zone show a gradual increase. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also increases. Especially in the process of laser power from 50 to 200โ€‰W, the melting depth and melting width increased the most, which increased nearly 2 and 1.5 times, respectively. Meanwhile, the overlapping ratio also increases with the increase in laser power, which indicates that the melting and fusion of materials are better at high laser power. On the other hand, the dimensions of the molten pool did not change uniformly with the change of laser power. Specifically, the depth-to-width ratio of the molten pool increased from about 0.30 to 0.39 during the increase from 50 to 120โ€‰W, which further indicates that the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is greater than that in the horizontal direction with the increase in laser power. This dimensional response to laser power is mainly affected by the recoil pressure and also by the difference in the densification degree between the powder layer and the metal substrate. In addition, according to the experimental results, the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then decrease during the process of laser power increase, and always stays within the range of less than 33ยฐ. Therefore, in practical applications, it is necessary to select the appropriate laser power according to the specific needs in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE II.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different laser powers.

Laser power (W)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
50 16 54 11 โˆ’10 23 
100 26/29 74 14 18 23.33 33 
200 37/45 116 21 52 93.33 28 

2. Scanning speed

Figure 17 demonstrates the effect of different scanning speeds on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. With the gradual increase in scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. When ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, the slow scanning speed causes the material to absorb too much heat, which is very easy to trigger the overburning phenomenon. At this point, the molten pool is larger and the surface morphology is uneven. This situation is consistent with the previously discussed scenario with high laser power in Fig. 17(a). However, when ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s, the scanning speed is too fast, resulting in the material not being able to absorb sufficient heat, which triggers the powder particles that fail to melt completely to have a direct effect on the bonding of the melt to the substrate. At this time, the molten pool volume is relatively small and the neighboring melt track cannot lap properly. This result is consistent with the previously discussed case of low laser power in Fig. 17(b). Overall, the ratio of the laser power to the scanning speed (the line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ) has a direct effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 17.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different scanning speed: (a) โ€‰๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, (b) โ€‰๏ฟฝ =โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s.

Table III shows the effects of different scanning speed on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. It can be seen that the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. With the increase in scanning speed, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remelted zone, and overlapping ratio show a gradual decreasing trend. Among them, the melt depth and melt width decreased faster, while the melt height and remolten region decreased relatively slowly. In addition, when the scanning speed was increased from 200 to 800โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were significantly accelerated, while the decreasing speeds of overlapping ratio were relatively slow. When the scanning speed was further increased to 1600โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were further accelerated, and the un-lapped condition of the melt channel also appeared. In addition, the contact angle increases and then decreases with the scanning speed, and both are lower than 33ยฐ. Therefore, when selecting the scanning speed, it is necessary to make reasonable trade-offs according to the specific situation, and take into account the factors of melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio, in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE III.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different scanning speeds.

Scanning speed (mm/s)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
200 55/68 182 19/32 124 203.33 22 
1600 13 50 11 โˆ’16.67 31 

3. Hatch spacing

Figure 18 shows the effect of different hatch spacing on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The surface morphology and temperature field of the first track and second track are basically the same, but slightly different. The first track shows a basically symmetric morphology along the scanning direction, while the second track shows a slight offset due to the difference in the heat transfer rate between the solidified material and the powder particles. When the hatch spacing is too small, the overlapping ratio increases and the probability of defects caused by remelting phenomenon grows. When the hatch spacing is too large, the neighboring melt track cannot overlap properly, and the powder particles are not completely melted, leading to an increase in the number of holes. In conclusion, the ratio of the line energy density ๏ฟฝ to the hatch spacing (the volume energy density E) has a significant effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 18.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different hatch spacings: (a) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.03โ€‰mm, (b) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.12โ€‰mm.

Table IV shows the effects of different hatch spacing on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. It can be seen that the hatch spacing has little effect on the melt depth, melt width, and melt height, but has some effect on the remolten region. With the gradual expansion of hatch spacing, the remolten region shows a gradual decrease. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also decreased with the increase in hatch spacing. In addition, it is observed that the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then remain stable when the hatch spacing increases, which has a more limited effect on it. Therefore, trade-offs and decisions need to be made on a case-by-case basis when selecting the hatch spacing.

TABLE IV.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different hatch spacings.

Hatch spacing (mm)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
0.03 25/27 82 14 59 173.33 30 
0.12 26 78 14 โˆ’35 33 

In summary, the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing have a significant effect on the formation of the molten pool, and the correct selection of these three process parameters is crucial to ensure the forming quality. In addition, the melt depth of the second track is slightly larger than that of the first track at higher line energy density ๏ฟฝ and volume energy density E. This is mainly due to the fact that a large amount of heat accumulation is generated after the first track, forming a larger molten pool volume, which leads to an increase in the melt depth.

D. Simulation analysis of molten pool with powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter

Figure 19 demonstrates the effect of different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under a laser power of 100โ€‰W, a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. In the process of melting coarse powder with small laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy cannot completely melt the larger powder particles, resulting in their partial melting and further generating excessive pore defects. The larger powder particles tend to generate zigzag molten pool edges, which cause an increase in the roughness of the melt track surface. In addition, the molten pool is also prone to generate the present spatter phenomenon, which can directly affect the quality of forming. The volume of the formed molten pool is relatively small, while the melt depth, melt width, and melt height are all smaller relative to the fine powder in Fig. 19(a). In the process of melting fine powders with a large laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy is able to melt the fine powder particles sufficiently, even to the point of overmelting. This results in a large number of fine spatters being generated at the edge of the molten pool, which causes porosity defects in the melt track in Fig. 19(b). In addition, the maximum velocity of the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes compared to small powder particle sizes, which indicates that the temperature gradient in the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes and the melt motion is more intense. However, the size of the laser focal spot diameter has a relatively small effect on the melt motion. However, a larger focal spot diameter induces a larger melt volume with greater depth, width, and height. In conclusion, a small powder size helps to reduce the surface roughness of the specimen, and a small laser spot diameter reduces the minimum forming size of a single track.

FIG. 19.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool with different powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter: (a) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰25โ€‰ฮผm, coarse powder, (b) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰80โ€‰ฮผm, fine powder.

Table V shows the maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder sizes and laser focal spot diameters. As can be seen from the table, the maximum temperature gradient is lower than that of HP-LPBF for both coarse powders with a small laser spot diameter and fine powders with a large spot diameter, a phenomenon that leads to an increase in the heat transfer rate of HP-LPBF, which in turn leads to a corresponding increase in the cooling rate and, ultimately, to the formation of finer microstructures.

TABLE V.

Maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters.

Laser power (W)Scanning speed (mm/s)Hatch spacing (mm)Average powder size (ฮผm)Laser focal spot diameter (ฮผm)Maximum temperature gradient (ร—107โ€‰K/s)
100 800 0.06 31.7 25 7.89 
11.5 80 7.11 

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the geometrical characteristics of 3D coarse and fine powder particles were first calculated using DEM and then numerical simulations of single track and double track in the process of forming SS316L from monolayer HP-LPBF at mesoscopic scale were developed using CFD method. The effects of Marangoni convection, surface tension, recoil pressure, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool were considered in this model. The effects of laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing on the dynamics of the single-track and double-track molten pools, as well as on other characteristic information, were investigated. The effects of the powder particle size on the molten pool were investigated comparatively with the laser focal spot diameter. The main conclusions are as follows:

  1. The results show that the temperature gradient at the front of the molten pool is significantly larger than that at the tail, and the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ morphology. At the top of the molten pool, there is a slightly concave region, which is the result of the coupling of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension. The melt flow forms two closed loops, which are mainly influenced by temperature gradients and surface tension. This special dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ molten pool and an almost โ€œmountainโ€ shape in single-track forming.
  2. The basic characteristics of the three-dimensional morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track, but there are subtle differences. The first track exhibits a basically symmetrical shape; however, due to the difference in thermal diffusion rates between the solidified metal and the powder, a slight asymmetry in the molten pool morphology of the second track occurs. After forming through the first track, there is a significant heat buildup in the powder bed, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt, which increases the life of the molten pool. The heights of the first track and second track remained essentially the same, but the depth of the second track was greater relative to the first track. In addition, the maximum temperature gradient was 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s during HP-LPBF forming.
  3. At low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool plays a dominant role. At high laser power, recoil pressure becomes the main influencing factor. With the increase of laser power, the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is superior to that in the horizontal direction. With the gradual increase of scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. In addition, the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. Too large or too small hatch spacing will lead to remelting or non-lap phenomenon, which in turn causes the formation of defects.
  4. When using a small laser focal spot diameter, it is difficult to completely melt large powder particle sizes, resulting in partial melting and excessive porosity generation. At the same time, large powder particles produce curved edges of the molten pool, resulting in increased surface roughness of the melt track. In addition, spatter occurs, which directly affects the forming quality. At small focal spot diameters, the molten pool volume is relatively small, and the melt depth, the melt width, and the melt height are correspondingly small. Taken together, the small powder particle size helps to reduce surface roughness, while the small spot diameter reduces the forming size.

REFERENCES

  1. S. L. Sing and W. Y. Yeong , โ€œ Laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing: Perspectives on recent developments,โ€ Virtual Phys. Prototyping. 15, 359โ€“370 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1779999
    Google ScholarCrossref
  2. A. M. Khorasani , I. G. Jithin , J. K. Veetil , and A. H. Ghasemi , โ€œ A review of technological improvements in laser-based powder bed fusion of metal printers,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108, 191โ€“209 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05361-3
    Google ScholarCrossref
  3. Y. Qin , A. Brockett , Y. Ma , A. Razali , J. Zhao , C. Harrison , W. Pan , X. Dai , and D. Loziak , โ€œ Micro-manufacturing: Research, technology outcomes and development issues,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47, 821โ€“837 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2411-2
    Google ScholarCrossref
  4. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Development of micro selective laser melting: The state of the art and future perspectives,โ€ Engineering. 5, 702โ€“720 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  5. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , J. Xu , and W. Zhou , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of SS316L: Single tracks, defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 145, 107469 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107469
    Google ScholarCrossref
  6. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , M. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , and J. Xu , โ€œ Process optimization of micro selective laser melting and comparison of different laser diameter for forming different powder,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 150, 107953 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107953
    Google ScholarCrossref
  7. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Formation of SS316L single tracks in micro selective laser melting: Surface, geometry, and defects,โ€ Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 9451406.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9451406
    Crossref
  8. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , S. Gao , X. Song , R. Huang , M. Seita , and J. Wei , โ€œ Effect of in-situ laser remelting on the microstructure of SS316L fabricated by micro selective laser melting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 330โ€“336.
    Google ScholarCrossref
  9. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Tailoring surface roughness of micro selective laser melted SS316L by in-situ laser remelting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 337โ€“343.
    Google Scholar
  10. J. Fu , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , Y. Long , H. Li , and M. Fu , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of NiTi shape memory alloy: Defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 131, 106374 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106374
    Google ScholarCrossref
  11. E. Abele and M. Kniepkamp , โ€œ Analysis and optimisation of vertical surface roughness in micro selective laser melting,โ€ Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 3, 034007 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/3/3/034007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  12. S. Qu , J. Ding , J. Fu , M. Fu , B. Zhang , and X. Song , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion processing of pure copper,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 48, 102417 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102417
    Google ScholarCrossref
  13. Y. Wei , G. Chen , M. Li , W. Li , Y. Zhou , J. Xu , and Z. wei , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion of 18Ni300 maraging steel and its SiC reinforcement composite materials,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 84, 750โ€“763 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.049
    Google ScholarCrossref
  14. B. Liu , R. Wildman , T. Christopher , I. Ashcroft , and H. Richard , โ€œ Investigation the effect of particle size distribution on processing parameters optimisation in selective laser melting process,โ€ in 2011 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium ( University of Texas at Austin, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  15. T. D. McLouth , G. E. Bean , D. B. Witkin , S. D. Sitzman , P. M. Adams , D. N. Patel , W. Park , J.-M. Yang , and R. J. Zaldivar , โ€œ The effect of laser focus shift on microstructural variation of Inconel 718 produced by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 149, 205โ€“213 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.019
    Google ScholarCrossref
  16. Y. Qian , Y. Wentao , and L. Feng , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulations of powder bed fusion: Research progresses and conditions,โ€ Electromachining Mould 06, 46โ€“52 (2017).https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-279X.2017.06.012
    Google Scholar
  17. J. Fu , S. Qu , J. Ding , X. Song , and M. W. Fu , โ€œ Comparison of the microstructure, mechanical properties and distortion of stainless Steel 316L fabricated by micro and conventional laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 44, 102067 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  18. N. T. Aboulkhair , I. Maskery , C. Tuck , I. Ashcroft , and N. M. Everitt , โ€œ The microstructure and mechanical properties of selectively laser Melted AlSi10Mg: The effect of a conventional T6-like heat treatment,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 667, 139โ€“146 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.092
    Google ScholarCrossref
  19. S. Y. Chen , J. C. Huang , C. T. Pan , C. H. Lin , T. L. Yang , Y. S. Huang , C. H. Ou , L. Y. Chen , D. Y. Lin , H. K. Lin , T. H. Li , J. S. C. Jang , and C. C. Yang , โ€œ Microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cell porous Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by selective laser melting,โ€ J. Alloys Compd. 713, 248โ€“254 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.190
    Google ScholarCrossref
  20. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , D. Wang , and M. Zhang , โ€œ Influence mechanism of parameters process and mechanical properties evolution mechanism of Maraging steel 300 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 703, 116โ€“123 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.033
    Google ScholarCrossref
  21. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , Z. Xiao , M. Zhang , and D. Wang , โ€œ Process optimization and mechanical property evolution of AlSiMg0.75 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 140, 257โ€“266 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.045
    Google ScholarCrossref
  22. Y. Liu , M. Zhang , W. Shi , Y. Ma , and J. Yang , โ€œ Study on performance optimization of 316L stainless steel parts by high-efficiency selective laser melting,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 138, 106872 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106872
    Google ScholarCrossref
  23. D. Gu , Y.-C. Hagedorn , W. Meiners , G. Meng , R. J. S. Batista , K. Wissenbach , and R. Poprawe , โ€œ Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and wear performance of selective laser melting processed commercially pure titanium,โ€ Acta Mater. 60, 3849โ€“3860 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.006
    Google ScholarCrossref
  24. N. Read , W. Wang , K. Essa , and M. M. Attallah , โ€œ Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: Process optimisation and mechanical properties development,โ€ Mater. Des. 65, 417โ€“424 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  25. I. A. Roberts , C. J. Wang , R. Esterlein , M. Stanford , and D. J. Mynors , โ€œ A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49(12โ€“13), 916โ€“923 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.07.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  26. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Finite element analysis of the effect of volume shrinkage during laser densification,โ€ Acta Mater. 53(18), 4743โ€“4754 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.014
    Google ScholarCrossref
  27. K. Carolin , E. Attar , and P. Heinl , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(6), 978โ€“987 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016
    Google ScholarCrossref
  28. F.-J. Gรผrtler , M. Karg , K.-H. Leitz , and M. Schmidt , โ€œ Simulation of laser beam melting of steel powders using the three-dimensional volume of fluid method,โ€ Phys. Procedia 41, 881โ€“886 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.162
    Google ScholarCrossref
  29. P. Meakin and R. Jullien , โ€œ Restructuring effects in the rain model for random deposition,โ€ J. Phys. France 48(10), 1651โ€“1662 (1987).https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198700480100165100
    Google ScholarCrossref
  30. J-m Wang , G-h Liu , Y-l Fang , and W-k Li , โ€œ Marangoni effect in nonequilibrium multiphase system of material processing,โ€ Rev. Chem. Eng. 32(5), 551โ€“585 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2015-0067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  31. W. Ye , S. Zhang , L. L. Mendez , M. Farias , J. Li , B. Xu , P. Li , and Y. Zhang , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the melting and alloying processes of elemental titanium and boron powders using selective laser alloying,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 64, 1235โ€“1247 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  32. U. S. Bertoli , A. J. Wolfer , M. J. Matthews , J.-P. R. Delplanque , and J. M. Schoenung , โ€œ On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 113, 331โ€“340 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037
    Google ScholarCrossref
  33. W. E. King , H. D. Barth , V. M. Castillo , G. F. Gallegos , J. W. Gibbs , D. E. Hahn , C. Kamath , and A. M. Rubenchik , โ€œ Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(12), 2915โ€“2925 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  34. L. Cao , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the impact of laying powder on selective laser melting single-pass formation,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 141, 1036โ€“1048 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  35. L. Huang , X. Hua , D. Wu , and F. Li , โ€œ Numerical study of keyhole instability and porosity formation mechanism in laser welding of aluminum alloy and steel,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 252, 421โ€“431 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.011
    Google ScholarCrossref
  36. K. Q. Le , C. Tang , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ On the study of keyhole-mode melting in selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Therm. Sci. 145, 105992 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.105992
    Google ScholarCrossref
  37. J.-H. Cho and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Theoretical analysis of keyhole dynamics in polarized laser drilling,โ€ J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40(24), 7638 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/24/007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  38. W. Ye , โ€œ Mechanism analysis of selective laser melting and metallurgy process based on base element powder of titanium and boron,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Nanchang University, 2021).
    Google Scholar
  39. R. Ammer , M. Markl , U. Ljungblad , C. Kรถrner , and U. Rรผde , โ€œ Simulating fast electron beam melting with a parallel thermal free surface lattice Boltzmann method,โ€ Comput. Math. Appl. 67(2), 318โ€“330 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.10.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  40. H. Chen , Q. Wei , S. Wen , Z. Li , and Y. Shi , โ€œ Flow behavior of powder particles in layering process of selective laser melting: Numerical modeling and experimental verification based on discrete element method,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 123, 146โ€“159 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  41. F. Verhaeghe , T. Craeghs , J. Heulens , and L. Pandelaers , โ€œ A pragmatic model for selective laser melting with evaporation,โ€ Acta Mater. 57(20), 6006โ€“6012 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.027
    Google ScholarCrossref
  42. C. H. Fu and Y. B. Guo , โ€œ Three-dimensional temperature gradient mechanism in selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V,โ€ J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136(6), 061004 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028539
    Google ScholarCrossref
  43. Y. Xiang , Z. Shuzhe , L. Junfeng , W. Zhengying , Y. Lixiang , and J. Lihao , โ€œ Numerical simulation and experimental verification for selective laser single track melting forming of Ti6Al4V,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 53(11), 2102โ€“2109โ€‰+โ€‰2117 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.11.007
    Google Scholar
  44. Q. He , H. Xia , J. Liu , X. Ao , and S. Lin , โ€œ Modeling and numerical studies of selective laser melting: Multiphase flow, solidification and heat transfer,โ€ Mater. Des. 196, 109115 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109115
    Google ScholarCrossref
  45. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical simulation including the influence of process parameters on SLM single-layer multi-pass formation,โ€ Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 4130โ€“4145 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05831-z
    Google ScholarCrossref
  46. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical investigation including the influence of process parameters on LPBF multi-layer multi-path formation,โ€ Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 126(1), 5โ€“23 (2021).https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.014693
    Google ScholarCrossref
  47. H. Yin and S. D. Felicelli , โ€œ Dendrite growth simulation during solidification in the LENS process,โ€ Acta Mater. 58(4), 1455โ€“1465 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  48. P. Nie , O. A. Ojo , and Z. Li , โ€œ Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 77, 85โ€“95 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.039
    Google ScholarCrossref
  49. Z. Liu and H. Qi , โ€œ Effects of substrate crystallographic orientations on crystal growth and microstructure formation in laser powder deposition of nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 87, 248โ€“258 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.046
    Google ScholarCrossref
  50. L. Wei , L. Xin , W. Meng , and H. Weidong , โ€œ Cellular automaton simulation of the molten pool of laser solid forming process,โ€ Acta Phys. Sin. 64(01), 018103โ€“018363 (2015).https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.64.018103
    Google ScholarCrossref
  51. R. Acharya , J. A. Sharon , and A. Staroselsky , โ€œ Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Acta Mater. 124, 360โ€“371 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018
    Google ScholarCrossref
  52. M. R. Rolchigo and R. LeSar , โ€œ Modeling of binary alloy solidification under conditions representative of additive manufacturing,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 535โ€“545 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  53. S. Geng , P. Jiang , L. Guo , X. Gao , and G. Mi , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of grain/sub-grain structure evolution during solidification in laser welding of aluminum alloys,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119252 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119252
    Google ScholarCrossref
  54. W. L. Wang , W. Q. Liu , X. Yang , R. R. Xu , and Q. Y. Dai , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of columnar-to-equiaxed transition during laser selective melting of rare earth magnesium alloy,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 119, 11โ€“24 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.029
    Google ScholarCrossref
  55. Q. Xia , J. Yang , and Y. Li , โ€œ On the conservative phase-field method with the N-component incompressible flows,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 012120 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135490
    Google ScholarCrossref
  56. Q. Xia , G. Sun , J. Kim , and Y. Li , โ€œ Multi-scale modeling and simulation of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition technique,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 034116 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141316
    Google ScholarCrossref
  57. A. Hussein , L. Hao , C. Yan , and R. Everson , โ€œ Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 52, 638โ€“647 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070
    Google ScholarCrossref
  58. J. Ding , P. Colegrove , J. Mehnen , S. Ganguly , P. M. Sequeira Almeida , F. Wang , and S. Williams , โ€œ Thermo-mechanical analysis of wire and arc additive layer manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(12), 3315โ€“3322 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.023
    Google ScholarCrossref
  59. Y. Du , X. You , F. Qiao , L. Guo , and Z. Liu , โ€œ A model for predicting the temperature field during selective laser melting,โ€ Results Phys. 12, 52โ€“60 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.031
    Google ScholarCrossref
  60. X. Luo , M. Liu , L. Zhenhua , H. Li , and J. Shen , โ€œ Effect of different heat-source models on calculated temperature field of selective laser melted 18Ni300,โ€ Chin. J. Lasers 48(14), 1402005โ€“1402062 (2021).https://doi.org/10.3788/CJL202148.1402005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  61. J. F. Li , L. Li , and F. H. Stott , โ€œ Thermal stresses and their implication on cracking during laser melting of ceramic materials,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(14), 4385โ€“4398 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  62. P. Aggarangsi and J. L. Beuth , โ€œ Localized preheating approaches for reducing residual stress in additive manufacturing,โ€ paper presented at the 2006 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, The University of Texas in Austin on August 14โ€“16, 2006.
  63. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Thermal and mechanical finite element modeling of laser forming from metal and ceramic powders,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(1), 69โ€“80 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.028
    Google ScholarCrossref
  64. A. H. Nickel , D. M. Barnett , and F. B. Prinz , โ€œ Thermal stresses and deposition patterns in layered manufacturing,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 317(1โ€“2), 59โ€“64 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01179-0
    Google ScholarCrossref
  65. M. F. Zaeh and G. Branner , โ€œ Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting,โ€ Prod. Eng. 4(1), 35โ€“45 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y
    Google ScholarCrossref
  66. P. Bian , J. Shi , Y. Liu , and Y. Xie , โ€œ Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 132, 106477 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106477
    Google ScholarCrossref
  67. B. M. Marques , C. M. Andrade , D. M. Neto , M. C. Oliveira , J. L. Alves , and L. F. Menezes , โ€œ Numerical analysis of residual stresses in parts produced by selective laser melting process,โ€ Procedia Manuf. 47, 1170โ€“1177 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.167
    Google ScholarCrossref
  68. W. Mu , โ€œ Numerical simulation of SLM forming process and research and prediction of forming properties,โ€ MA thesis ( Anhui Jianzhu University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  69. Y. Zhang , โ€œ Multi-scale multi-physics modeling of laser powder bed fusion process of metallic materials with experiment validation,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Purdue University, 2018).
    Google Scholar
  70. Y. Qian , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation studies of key processing issues for powder bed fusion technology,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Tsinghua University, 2019).
    Google Scholar
  71. N. V. Brilliantov , S. Frank , J.-M. Hertzsch , and T. Pรถschel , โ€œ Model for collisions in granular gases,โ€ Phys. Rev. E 53(5), 5382โ€“5392 (1996).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5382
    Google ScholarCrossref
  72. Z. Xiao , โ€œ Research on microscale selective laser melting process of high strength pure copper specimens,โ€ MA thesis ( Hunan University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  73. Z. Li , K. Mukai , M. Zeze , and K. C. Mills , โ€œ Determination of the surface tension of liquid stainless steel,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. 40(9โ€“10), 2191โ€“2195 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1931-x
    Google ScholarCrossref
  74. R. Scardovelli and S. Zaleski , โ€œ Analytical relations connecting linear interfaces and volume fractions in rectangular grids,โ€ J. Comput. Phys. 164(1), 228โ€“237 (2000).https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6567
    Google ScholarCrossref
  75. D.-W. Cho , W.-I. Cho , and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Modeling and simulation of arc: Laser and hybrid welding process,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 16(1), 26โ€“55 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.06.012
    Google ScholarCrossref
    76.Flow3D. Version 11.1.0: User Manual ( FlowScience, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2015).
  76. Y. Tian , L. Yang , D. Zhao , Y. Huang , and J. Pan , โ€œ Numerical analysis of powder bed generation and single track forming for selective laser melting of ss316l stainless steel,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 58, 964โ€“974 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  77. C. Tang , K. Q. Le , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ Physics of humping formation in laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119172 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172
    Google ScholarCrossref
  78. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale simulation of pore evolution during laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 179, 109686 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109686
    Google ScholarCrossref
  79. R. Li , J. Liu , Y. Shi , W. Li , and W. Jiang , โ€œ Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 59(9โ€“12), 1025โ€“1035 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3566-1
    Google ScholarCrossref
  80. S. A. Khairallah and A. Anderson , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(11), 2627โ€“2636 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  81. J. Liu , D. Gu , H. Chen , D. Dai , and H. Zhang , โ€œ Influence of substrate surface morphology on wetting behavior of tracks during selective laser melting of aluminum-based alloys,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19(2), 111โ€“121 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700599
    Google ScholarCrossref
  82. L. Li , J. Li , and T. Fan , โ€œ Phase-field modeling of wetting and balling dynamics in powder bed fusion process,โ€ Phys. Fluids 33, 042116 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046771
    Google ScholarCrossref
  83. X. Nie , Z. Hu , H. Zhu , Z. Hu , L. Ke , and X. Zeng , โ€œ Analysis of processing parameters and characteristics of selective laser melted high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloys: from single tracks to cubic samples,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 256, 69โ€“77 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.030
    Google ScholarCrossref

Lab-on-a-Chip ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† : ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ๊ด€์ 

Review on Blood Flow Dynamics in Lab-on-a-Chip Systems: An Engineering Perspective

  • Bin-Jie Lai
  • ,ย 
  • Li-Tao Zhu
  • ,ย 
  • Zhe Chen*
  • ,ย 
  • Bo Ouyang*
  • ,ย andย 
  • Zheng-Hong Luo*

Abstract

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ํ•˜์—์„œ, “LOC(lab-on-a-chip)” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ์ „๋‹จ ์†๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ ํ˜ˆ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋™์  ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ ๋„ ๋ฐ ํƒ„์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ , ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ ์‚ผํˆฌ์•• ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ต๋ž€์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜ˆ์•ก ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ํ•˜๋Š” LOC ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋…ผ์˜๋˜๊ณ  ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํšจ๊ณผ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ•˜์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์ œํƒ€ ์ „์œ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€์ •๋„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ตฌ๋™๋˜๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ•™์ œ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

KEYWORDS:ย 

1. Introduction

1.1. Microfluidic Flow in Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) Systems

Over the past several decades, the ability to control and utilize fluid flow patterns at microscales has gained considerable interest across a myriad of scientific and engineering disciplines, leading to growing interest in scientific research of microfluidics. 

(1) Microfluidics, an interdisciplinary field that straddles physics, engineering, and biotechnology, is dedicated to the behavior, precise control, and manipulation of fluids geometrically constrained to a small, typically submillimeter, scale. 

(2) The engineering community has increasingly focused on microfluidics, exploring different driving forces to enhance working fluid transport, with the aim of accurately and efficiently describing, controlling, designing, and applying microfluidic flow principles and transport phenomena, particularly for miniaturized applications. 

(3) This attention has chiefly been fueled by the potential to revolutionize diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in the biomedical and pharmaceutical sectorsUnder various driving forces in microfluidic flows, intriguing transport phenomena have bolstered confidence in sustainable and efficient applications in fields such as pharmaceutical, biochemical, and environmental science. The โ€œlab-on-a-chipโ€ (LOC) system harnesses microfluidic flow to enable fluid processing and the execution of laboratory tasks on a chip-sized scale. LOC systems have played a vital role in the miniaturization of laboratory operations such as mixing, chemical reaction, separation, flow control, and detection on small devices, where a wide variety of fluids is adapted. Biological fluid flow like blood and other viscoelastic fluids are notably studied among the many working fluids commonly utilized by LOC systems, owing to the optimization in small fluid sample volumed, rapid response times, precise control, and easy manipulation of flow patterns offered by the system under various driving forces. 

(4)The driving forces in blood flow can be categorized as passive or active transport mechanisms and, in some cases, both. Under various transport mechanisms, the unique design of microchannels enables different functionalities in driving, mixing, separating, and diagnosing blood and drug delivery in the blood. 

(5) Understanding and manipulating these driving forces are crucial for optimizing the performance of a LOC system. Such knowledge presents the opportunity to achieve higher efficiency and reliability in addressing cellular level challenges in medical diagnostics, forensic studies, cancer detection, and other fundamental research areas, for applications of point-of-care (POC) devices. 

(6)

1.2. Engineering Approach of Microfluidic Transport Phenomena in LOC Systems

Different transport mechanisms exhibit unique properties at submillimeter length scales in microfluidic devices, leading to significant transport phenomena that differ from those of macroscale flows. An in-depth understanding of these unique transport phenomena under microfluidic systems is often required in fluidic mechanics to fully harness the potential functionality of a LOC system to obtain systematically designed and precisely controlled transport of microfluids under their respective driving force. Fluid mechanics is considered a vital component in chemical engineering, enabling the analysis of fluid behaviors in various unit designs, ranging from large-scale reactors to separation units. Transport phenomena in fluid mechanics provide a conceptual framework for analytically and descriptively explaining why and how experimental results and physiological phenomena occur. The Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, along with other governing equations, is often adapted to accurately describe fluid dynamics by accounting for pressure, surface properties, velocity, and temperature variations over space and time. In addition, limiting factors and nonidealities for these governing equations should be considered to impose corrections for empirical consistency before physical models are assembled for more accurate controls and efficiency. Microfluidic flow systems often deviate from ideal conditions, requiring adjustments to the standard governing equations. These deviations could arise from factors such as viscous effects, surface interactions, and non-Newtonian fluid properties from different microfluid types and geometrical layouts of microchannels. Addressing these nonidealities supports the refining of theoretical models and prediction accuracy for microfluidic flow behaviors.

The analytical calculation of coupled nonlinear governing equations, which describes the material and energy balances of systems under ideal conditions, often requires considerable computational efforts. However, advancements in computation capabilities, cost reduction, and improved accuracy have made numerical simulations using different numerical and modeling methods a powerful tool for effectively solving these complex coupled equations and modeling various transport phenomena. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical technique used to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of various flow parameters. It serves as a critical approach to provide insights and reasoning for decision-making regarding the optimal designs involving fluid dynamics, even prior to complex physical model prototyping and experimental procedures. The integration of experimental data, theoretical analysis, and reliable numerical simulations from CFD enables systematic variation of analytical parameters through quantitative analysis, where adjustment to delivery of blood flow and other working fluids in LOC systems can be achieved.

Numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element-Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) are heavily employed in CFD and offer diverse approaches to achieve discretization of Eulerian flow equations through filling a mesh of the flow domain. A more in-depth review of numerical methods in CFD and its application for blood flow simulation is provided in Section 2.2.2.

1.3. Scope of the Review

In this Review, we explore and characterize the blood flow phenomena within the LOC systems, utilizing both physiological and engineering modeling approaches. Similar approaches will be taken to discuss capillary-driven flow and electric-osmotic flow (EOF) under electrokinetic phenomena as a passive and active transport scheme, respectively, for blood transport in LOC systems. Such an analysis aims to bridge the gap between physical (experimental) and engineering (analytical) perspectives in studying and manipulating blood flow delivery by different driving forces in LOC systems. Moreover, the Review hopes to benefit the interests of not only blood flow control in LOC devices but also the transport of viscoelastic fluids, which are less studied in the literature compared to that of Newtonian fluids, in LOC systems.

Section 2 examines the complex interplay between viscoelastic properties of blood and blood flow patterns under shear flow in LOC systems, while engineering numerical modeling approaches for blood flow are presented for assistance. Sections 3 and 4 look into the theoretical principles, numerical governing equations, and modeling methodologies for capillary driven flow and EOF in LOC systems as well as their impact on blood flow dynamics through the quantification of key parameters of the two driving forces. Section 5 concludes the characterized blood flow transport processes in LOC systems under these two forces. Additionally, prospective areas of research in improving the functionality of LOC devices employing blood and other viscoelastic fluids and potentially justifying mechanisms underlying microfluidic flow patterns outside of LOC systems are presented. Finally, the challenges encountered in the numerical studies of blood flow under LOC systems are acknowledged, paving the way for further research.

2. Blood Flow Phenomena

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


2.1. Physiological Blood Flow Behavior

Blood, an essential physiological fluid in the human body, serves the vital role of transporting oxygen and nutrients throughout the body. Additionally, blood is responsible for suspending various blood cells including erythrocytes (red blood cells or RBCs), leukocytes (white blood cells), and thrombocytes (blood platelets) in a plasma medium.Among the cells mentioned above, red blood cells (RBCs) comprise approximately 40โ€“45% of the volume of healthy blood. 

(7) An RBC possesses an inherent elastic property with a biconcave shape of an average diameter of 8 ฮผm and a thickness of 2 ฮผm. This biconcave shape maximizes the surface-to-volume ratio, allowing RBCs to endure significant distortion while maintaining their functionality. 

(8,9) Additionally, the biconcave shape optimizes gas exchange, facilitating efficient uptake of oxygen due to the increased surface area. The inherent elasticity of RBCs allows them to undergo substantial distortion from their original biconcave shape and exhibits high flexibility, particularly in narrow channels.RBC deformability enables the cell to deform from a biconcave shape to a parachute-like configuration, despite minor differences in RBC shape dynamics under shear flow between initial cell locations. As shown in Figure 1(a), RBCs initiating with different resting shapes and orientations displaying display a similar deformation pattern 

(10) in terms of its shape. Shear flow induces an inward bending of the cell at the rear position of the rim to the final bending position, 

(11) resulting in an alignment toward the same position of the flow direction.

Figure 1. Images of varying deformation of RBCs and different dynamic blood flow behaviors. (a) The deforming shape behavior of RBCs at four different initiating positions under the same experimental conditions of a flow from left to right, (10) (b) RBC aggregation, (13) (c) CFL region. (18) Reproduced with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2011 Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2022 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.

The flexible property of RBCs enables them to navigate through narrow capillaries and traverse a complex network of blood vessels. The deformability of RBCs depends on various factors, including the channel geometry, RBC concentration, and the elastic properties of the RBC membrane. 

(12) Both flexibility and deformability are vital in the process of oxygen exchange among blood and tissues throughout the body, allowing cells to flow in vessels even smaller than the original cell size prior to deforming.As RBCs serve as major components in blood, their collective dynamics also hugely affect blood rheology. RBCs exhibit an aggregation phenomenon due to cell to cell interactions, such as adhesion forces, among populated cells, inducing unique blood flow patterns and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems. For blood flow in large vessels between a diameter of 1 and 3 cm, where shear rates are not high, a constant viscosity and Newtonian behavior for blood can be assumed. However, under low shear rate conditions (0.1 s

โ€“1) in smaller vessels such as the arteries and venules, which are within a diameter of 0.2 mm to 1 cm, blood exhibits non-Newtonian properties, such as shear-thinning viscosity and viscoelasticity due to RBC aggregation and deformability. The nonlinear viscoelastic property of blood gives rise to a complex relationship between viscosity and shear rate, primarily influenced by the highly elastic behavior of RBCs. A wide range of research on the transient behavior of the RBC shape and aggregation characteristics under varied flow circumstances has been conducted, aiming to obtain a better understanding of the interaction between blood flow shear forces from confined flows.

For a better understanding of the unique blood flow structures and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems, some blood flow patterns are introduced in the following section.

2.1.1. RBC Aggregation

RBC aggregation is a vital phenomenon to be considered when designing LOC devices due to its impact on the viscosity of the bulk flow. Under conditions of low shear rate, such as in stagnant or low flow rate regions, RBCs tend to aggregate, forming structures known as rouleaux, resembling stacks of coins as shown in Figure 1(b). 

(13) The aggregation of RBCs increases the viscosity at the aggregated region, 

(14) hence slowing down the overall blood flow. However, when exposed to high shear rates, RBC aggregates disaggregate. As shear rates continue to increase, RBCs tend to deform, elongating and aligning themselves with the direction of the flow. 

(15) Such a dynamic shift in behavior from the cells in response to the shear rate forms the basis of the viscoelastic properties observed in whole blood. In essence, the viscosity of the blood varies according to the shear rate conditions, which are related to the velocity gradient of the system. It is significant to take the intricate relationship between shear rate conditions and the change of blood viscosity due to RBC aggregation into account since various flow driving conditions may induce varied effects on the degree of aggregation.

2.1.2. Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist Effect

The Fรฅhrรฆusโ€“Lindqvist (FL) effect describes the gradual decrease in the apparent viscosity of blood as the channel diameter decreases. 

(16) This effect is attributed to the migration of RBCs toward the central region in the microchannel, where the flow rate is higher, due to the presence of higher pressure and asymmetric distribution of shear forces. This migration of RBCs, typically observed at blood vessels less than 0.3 mm, toward the higher flow rate region contributes to the change in blood viscosity, which becomes dependent on the channel size. Simultaneously, the increase of the RBC concentration in the central region of the microchannel results in the formation of a less viscous region close to the microchannel wall. This region called the Cell-Free Layer (CFL), is primarily composed of plasma. 

(17) The combination of the FL effect and the following CFL formation provides a unique phenomenon that is often utilized in passive and active plasma separation mechanisms, involving branched and constriction channels for various applications in plasma separation using microfluidic systems.

2.1.3. Cell-Free Layer Formation

In microfluidic blood flow, RBCs form aggregates at the microchannel core and result in a region that is mostly devoid of RBCs near the microchannel walls, as shown in Figure 1(c). 

(18) The region is known as the cell-free layer (CFL). The CFL region is often known to possess a lower viscosity compared to other regions within the blood flow due to the lower viscosity value of plasma when compared to that of the aggregated RBCs. Therefore, a thicker CFL region composed of plasma correlates to a reduced apparent whole blood viscosity. 

(19) A thicker CFL region is often established following the RBC aggregation at the microchannel core under conditions of decreasing the tube diameter. Apart from the dependence on the RBC concentration in the microchannel core, the CFL thickness is also affected by the volume concentration of RBCs, or hematocrit, in whole blood, as well as the deformability of RBCs. Given the influence CFL thickness has on blood flow rheological parameters such as blood flow rate, which is strongly dependent on whole blood viscosity, investigating CFL thickness under shear flow is crucial for LOC systems accounting for blood flow.

2.1.4. Plasma Skimming in Bifurcation Networks

The uneven arrangement of RBCs in bifurcating microchannels, commonly termed skimming bifurcation, arises from the axial migration of RBCs within flowing streams. This uneven distribution contributes to variations in viscosity across differing sizes of bifurcating channels but offers a stabilizing effect. Notably, higher flow rates in microchannels are associated with increased hematocrit levels, resulting in higher viscosity compared with those with lower flow rates. Parametric investigations on bifurcation angle, 

(20) thickness of the CFL, 

(21) and RBC dynamics, including aggregation and deformation, 

(22) may alter the varying viscosity of blood and its flow behavior within microchannels.

2.2. Modeling on Blood Flow Dynamics

2.2.1. Blood Properties and Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology

Under different shear rate conditions in blood flow, the elastic characteristics and dynamic changes of the RBC induce a complex velocity and stress relationship, resulting in the incompatibility of blood flow characterization through standard presumptions of constant viscosity used for Newtonian fluid flow. Blood flow is categorized as a viscoelastic non-Newtonian fluid flow where constitutive equations governing this type of flow take into consideration the nonlinear viscometric properties of blood. To mathematically characterize the evolving blood viscosity and the relationship between the elasticity of RBC and the shear blood flow, respectively, across space and time of the system, a stress tensor (ฯ„) defined by constitutive models is often coupled in the Navierโ€“Stokes equation to account for the collective impact of the constant dynamic viscosity (ฮท) and the elasticity from RBCs on blood flow.The dynamic viscosity of blood is heavily dependent on the shear stress applied to the cell and various parameters from the blood such as hematocrit value, plasma viscosity, mechanical properties of the RBC membrane, and red blood cell aggregation rate. The apparent blood viscosity is considered convenient for the characterization of the relationship between the evolving blood viscosity and shear rate, which can be defined by Cassonโ€™s law, as shown in eq 1.

๐œ‡=๐œ0๐›พห™+2๐œ‚๐œ0๐›พห™โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš+๐œ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+๏ฟฝ

(1)where ฯ„

0 is the yield stressโ€“stress required to initiate blood flow motion, ฮท is the Casson rheological constant, and ฮณฬ‡ is the shear rate. The value of Cassonโ€™s law parameters under blood with normal hematocrit level can be defined as ฯ„

0 = 0.0056 Pa and ฮท = 0.0035 Paยทs. 

(23) With the known property of blood and Cassonโ€™s law parameters, an approximation can be made to the dynamic viscosity under various flow condition domains. The Power Law model is often employed to characterize the dynamic viscosity in relation to the shear rate, since precise solutions exist for specific geometries and flow circumstances, acting as a fundamental standard for definition. The Carreau and Carreauโ€“Yasuda models can be advantageous over the Power Law model due to their ability to evaluate the dynamic viscosity at low to zero shear rate conditions. However, none of the above-mentioned models consider the memory or other elastic behavior of blood and its RBCs. Some other commonly used mathematical models and their constants for the non-Newtonian viscosity property characterization of blood are listed in Table 1 below. 

(24โˆ’26)Table 1. Comparison of Various Non-Newtonian Models for Blood Viscosity 

(24โˆ’26)

ModelNon-Newtonian ViscosityParameters
Power Law(2)n = 0.61, k = 0.42
Carreau(3)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 3.1736 s, m = 2.406, a = 0.254
Walburnโ€“Schneck(4)C1 = 0.000797 Paยทs, C2 = 0.0608 Paยทs, C3 = 0.00499, C4 = 14.585 gโ€“1, TPMA = 25 g/L
Carreauโ€“Yasuda(5)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 1.902 s, n = 0.22, a = 1.25
Quemada(6)ฮผp = 0.0012 Paยทs, kโˆž = 2.07, k0 = 4.33, ฮณฬ‡c = 1.88 sโ€“1

The blood rheology is commonly known to be influenced by two key physiological factors, namely, the hematocrit value (H

t) and the fibrinogen concentration (c

f), with an average value of 42% and 0.252 gdยทL

โ€“1, respectively. Particularly in low shear conditions, the presence of varying fibrinogen concentrations affects the tendency for aggregation and rouleaux formation, while the occurrence of aggregation is contingent upon specific levels of hematocrit. 

(27) The study from Apostolidis et al. 

(28) modifies the Casson model through emphasizing its reliance on hematocrit and fibrinogen concentration parameter values, owing to the extensive knowledge of the two physiological blood parameters.The viscoelastic response of blood is heavily dependent on the elasticity of the RBC, which is defined by the relationship between the deformation and stress relaxation from RBCs under a specific location of shear flow as a function of the velocity field. The stress tensor is usually characterized by constitutive equations such as the Upper-Convected Maxwell Model 

(29) and the Oldroyd-B model 

(30) to track the molecule effects under shear from different driving forces. The prominent non-Newtonian features, such as shear thinning and yield stress, have played a vital role in the characterization of blood rheology, particularly with respect to the evaluation of yield stress under low shear conditions. The nature of stress measurement in blood, typically on the order of 1 mPa, is challenging due to its low magnitude. The occurrence of the CFL complicates the measurement further due to the significant decrease in apparent viscosity near the wall over time and a consequential disparity in viscosity compared to the bulk region.In addition to shear thinning viscosity and yield stress, the formation of aggregation (rouleaux) from RBCs under low shear rates also contributes to the viscoelasticity under transient flow 

(31) and thixotropy 

(32) of whole blood. Given the difficulty in evaluating viscoelastic behavior of blood under low strain magnitudes and limitations in generalized Newtonian models, the utilization of viscoelastic models is advocated to encompass elasticity and delineate non-shear components within the stress tensor. Extending from the Oldroyd-B model, Anand et al. 

(33) developed a viscoelastic model framework for adapting elasticity within blood samples and predicting non-shear stress components. However, to also address the thixotropic effects, the model developed by Horner et al. 

(34) serves as a more comprehensive approach than the viscoelastic model from Anand et al. Thixotropy 

(32) typically occurs from the structural change of the rouleaux, where low shear rate conditions induce rouleaux formation. Correspondingly, elasticity increases, while elasticity is more representative of the isolated RBCs, under high shear rate conditions. The model of Horner et al. 

(34) considers the contribution of rouleaux to shear stress, taking into account factors such as the characteristic time for Brownian aggregation, shear-induced aggregation, and shear-induced breakage. Subsequent advancements in the model from Horner et al. often revolve around refining the three aforementioned key terms for a more substantial characterization of rouleaux dynamics. Notably, this has led to the recently developed mHAWB model 

(35) and other model iterations to enhance the accuracy of elastic and viscoelastic contributions to blood rheology, including the recently improved model suggested by Armstrong et al. 

(36)

2.2.2. Numerical Methods (FDM, FEM, FVM)

Numerical simulation has become increasingly more significant in analyzing the geometry, boundary layers of flow, and nonlinearity of hyperbolic viscoelastic flow constitutive equations. CFD is a powerful and efficient tool utilizing numerical methods to solve the governing hydrodynamic equations, such as the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, continuity equation, and energy conservation equation, for qualitative evaluation of fluid motion dynamics under different parameters. CFD overcomes the challenge of analytically solving nonlinear forms of differential equations by employing numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) to discretize and solve the partial differential equations (PDEs), allowing for qualitative reproduction of transport phenomena and experimental observations. Different numerical methods are chosen to cope with various transport systems for optimization of the accuracy of the result and control of error during the discretization process.FDM is a straightforward approach to discretizing PDEs, replacing the continuum representation of equations with a set of finite-difference equations, which is typically applied to structured grids for efficient implementation in CFD programs. 

(37) However, FDM is often limited to simple geometries such as rectangular or block-shaped geometries and struggles with curved boundaries. In contrast, FEM divides the fluid domain into small finite grids or elements, approximating PDEs through a local description of physics. 

(38) All elements contribute to a large, sparse matrix solver. However, FEM may not always provide accurate results for systems involving significant deformation and aggregation of particles like RBCs due to large distortion of grids. 

(39) FVM evaluates PDEs following the conservation laws and discretizes the selected flow domain into small but finite size control volumes, with each grid at the center of a finite volume. 

(40) The divergence theorem allows the conversion of volume integrals of PDEs with divergence terms into surface integrals of surface fluxes across cell boundaries. Due to its conservation property, FVM offers efficient outcomes when dealing with PDEs that embody mass, momentum, and energy conservation principles. Furthermore, widely accessible software packages like the OpenFOAM toolbox 

(41) include a viscoelastic solver, making it an attractive option for viscoelastic fluid flow modeling. 

(42)

2.2.3. Modeling Methods of Blood Flow Dynamics

The complexity in the blood flow simulation arises from deformability and aggregation that RBCs exhibit during their interaction with neighboring cells under different shear rate conditions induced by blood flow. Numerical models coupled with simulation programs have been applied as a groundbreaking method to predict such unique rheological behavior exhibited by RBCs and whole blood. The conventional approach of a single-phase flow simulation is often applied to blood flow simulations within large vessels possessing a moderate shear rate. However, such a method assumes the properties of plasma, RBCs and other cellular components to be evenly distributed as average density and viscosity in blood, resulting in the inability to simulate the mechanical dynamics, such as RBC aggregation under high-shear flow field, inherent in RBCs. To accurately describe the asymmetric distribution of RBC and blood flow, multiphase flow simulation, where numerical simulations of blood flows are often modeled as two immiscible phases, RBCs and blood plasma, is proposed. A common assumption is that RBCs exhibit non-Newtonian behavior while the plasma is treated as a continuous Newtonian phase.Numerous multiphase numerical models have been proposed to simulate the influence of RBCs on blood flow dynamics by different assumptions. In large-scale simulations (above the millimeter range), continuum-based methods are wildly used due to their lower computational demands. 

(43) Eulerian multiphase flow simulations offer the solution of a set of conservation equations for each separate phase and couple the phases through common pressure and interphase exchange coefficients. Xu et al. 

(44) utilized the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM) to replicate the dynamic behavior and distortion of RBCs subjected to fluidic forces, utilizing the Johnsonโ€“Kendallโ€“Roberts model 

(45) to define the adhesive forces of cell-to-cell interactions. The iterative direct-forcing immersed boundary method (IBM) is commonly employed in simulations of the fluidโ€“cell interface of blood. This method effectively captures the intricacies of the thin and flexible RBC membranes within various external flow fields. 

(46) The study by Xu et al. 

(44) also adopts this approach to bridge the fluid dynamics and RBC deformation through IBM. Yoon and You utilized the Maxwell model to define the viscosity of the RBC membrane. 

(47) It was discovered that the Maxwell model could represent the stress relaxation and unloading processes of the cell. Furthermore, the reduced flexibility of an RBC under particular situations such as infection is specified, which was unattainable by the Kelvinโ€“Voigt model 

(48) when compared to the Maxwell model in the literature. The Yeoh hyperplastic material model was also adapted to predict the nonlinear elasticity property of RBCs with FEM employed to discretize the RBC membrane using shell-type elements. Gracka et al. 

(49) developed a numerical CFD model with a finite-volume parallel solver for multiphase blood flow simulation, where an updated Maxwell viscoelasticity model and a Discrete Phase Model are adopted. In the study, the adapted IBM, based on unstructured grids, simulates the flow behavior and shape change of the RBCs through fluid-structure coupling. It was found that the hybrid Eulerโ€“Lagrange (Eโ€“L) approach 

(50) for the development of the multiphase model offered better results in the simulated CFL region in the microchannels.To study the dynamics of individual behaviors of RBCs and the consequent non-Newtonian blood flow, cell-shape-resolved computational models are often adapted. The use of the boundary integral method has become prevalent in minimizing computational expenses, particularly in the exclusive determination of fluid velocity on the surfaces of RBCs, incorporating the option of employing IBM or particle-based techniques. The cell-shaped-resolved method has enabled an examination of cell to cell interactions within complex ambient or pulsatile flow conditions 

(51) surrounding RBC membranes. Recently, Rydquist et al. 

(52) have looked to integrate statistical information from macroscale simulations to obtain a comprehensive overview of RBC behavior within the immediate proximity of the flow through introduction of respective models characterizing membrane shape definition, tension, bending stresses of RBC membranes.At a macroscopic scale, continuum models have conventionally been adapted for assessing blood flow dynamics through the application of elasticity theory and fluid dynamics. However, particle-based methods are known for their simplicity and adaptability in modeling complex multiscale fluid structures. Meshless methods, such as the boundary element method (BEM), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), and dissipative particle dynamics (DPD), are often used in particle-based characterization of RBCs and the surrounding fluid. By representing the fluid as discrete particles, meshless methods provide insights into the status and movement of the multiphase fluid. These methods allow for the investigation of cellular structures and microscopic interactions that affect blood rheology. Non-confronting mesh methods like IBM can also be used to couple a fluid solver such as FEM, FVM, or the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) through membrane representation of RBCs. In comparison to conventional CFD methods, LBM has been viewed as a favorable numerical approach for solving the Nโ€“S equations and the simulation of multiphase flows. LBM exhibits the notable advantage of being amenable to high-performance parallel computing environments due to its inherently local dynamics. In contrast to DPD and SPH where RBC membranes are modeled as physically interconnected particles, LBM employs the IBM to account for the deformation dynamics of RBCs 

(53,54) under shear flows in complex channel geometries. 

(54,55) However, it is essential to acknowledge that the utilization of LBM in simulating RBC flows often entails a significant computational overhead, being a primary challenge in this context. Krรผger et al. 

(56) proposed utilizing LBM as a fluid solver, IBM to couple the fluid and FEM to compute the response of membranes to deformation under immersed fluids. This approach decouples the fluid and membranes but necessitates significant computational effort due to the requirements of both meshes and particles.Despite the accuracy of current blood flow models, simulating complex conditions remains challenging because of the high computational load and cost. Balachandran Nair et al. 

(57) suggested a reduced order model of RBC under the framework of DEM, where the RBC is represented by overlapping constituent rigid spheres. The Morse potential force is adapted to account for the RBC aggregation exhibited by cell to cell interactions among RBCs at different distances. Based upon the IBM, the reduced-order RBC model is adapted to simulate blood flow transport for validation under both single and multiple RBCs with a resolved CFD-DEM solver. 

(58) In the resolved CFD-DEM model, particle sizes are larger than the grid size for a more accurate computation of the surrounding flow field. A continuous forcing approach is taken to describe the momentum source of the governing equation prior to discretization, which is different from a Direct Forcing Method (DFM). 

(59) As no body-conforming moving mesh is required, the continuous forcing approach offers lower complexity and reduced cost when compared to the DFM. Piquet et al. 

(60) highlighted the high complexity of the DFM due to its reliance on calculating an additional immersed boundary flux for the velocity field to ensure its divergence-free condition.The fluidโ€“structure interaction (FSI) method has been advocated to connect the dynamic interplay of RBC membranes and fluid plasma within blood flow such as the coupling of continuumโ€“particle interactions. However, such methodology is generally adapted for anatomical configurations such as arteries 

(61,62) and capillaries, 

(63) where both the structural components and the fluid domain undergo substantial deformation due to the moving boundaries. Due to the scope of the Review being blood flow simulation within microchannels of LOC devices without deformable boundaries, the Review of the FSI method will not be further carried out.In general, three numerical methods are broadly used: mesh-based, particle-based, and hybrid meshโ€“particle techniques, based on the spatial scale and the fundamental numerical approach, mesh-based methods tend to neglect the effects of individual particles, assuming a continuum and being efficient in terms of time and cost. However, the particle-based approach highlights more of the microscopic and mesoscopic level, where the influence of individual RBCs is considered. A review from Freund et al. 

(64) addressed the three numerical methodologies and their respective modeling approaches of RBC dynamics. Given the complex mechanics and the diverse levels of study concerning numerical simulations of blood and cellular flow, a broad spectrum of numerical methods for blood has been subjected to extensive review. 

(64โˆ’70) Ye at al. 

(65) offered an extensive review of the application of the DPD, SPH, and LBM for numerical simulations of RBC, while Rathnayaka et al. 

(67) conducted a review of the particle-based numerical modeling for liquid marbles through drawing parallels to the transport of RBCs in microchannels. A comparative analysis between conventional CFD methods and particle-based approaches for cellular and blood flow dynamic simulation can be found under the review by Arabghahestani et al. 

(66) Literature by Li et al. 

(68) and Beris et al. 

(69) offer an overview of both continuum-based models at micro/macroscales and multiscale particle-based models encompassing various length and temporal dimensions. Furthermore, these reviews deliberate upon the potential of coupling continuum-particle methods for blood plasma and RBC modeling. Arciero et al. 

(70) investigated various modeling approaches encompassing cellular interactions, such as cell to cell or plasma interactions and the individual cellular phases. A concise overview of the reviews is provided in Table 2 for reference.

Table 2. List of Reviews for Numerical Approaches Employed in Blood Flow Simulation

ReferenceNumerical methods
Li et al. (2013) (68)Continuum-based modeling (BIM), particle-based modeling (LBM, LB-FE, SPH, DPD)
Freund (2014) (64)RBC dynamic modeling (continuum-based modeling, complementary discrete microstructure modeling), blood flow dynamic modeling (FDM, IBM, LBM, particle-mesh methods, coupled boundary integral and mesh-based methods, DPD)
Ye et al. (2016) (65)DPD, SPH, LBM, coupled IBM-Smoothed DPD
Arciero et al. (2017) (70)LBM, IBM, DPD, conventional CFD Methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Arabghahestani et al. (2019) (66)Particle-based methods (LBM, DPD, direct simulation Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics), SPH, conventional CFD methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Beris et al. (2021) (69)DPD, smoothed DPD, IBM, LBM, BIM
Rathnayaka (2022) (67)SPH, CG, LBM

3. Capillary Driven Blood Flow in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


3.1. Capillary Driven Flow Phenomena

Capillary driven (CD) flow is a pivotal mechanism in passive microfluidic flow systems 

(9) such as the blood circulation system and LOC systems. 

(71) CD flow is essentially the movement of a liquid to flow against drag forces, where the capillary effect exerts a force on the liquid at the borders, causing a liquidโ€“air meniscus to flow despite gravity or other drag forces. A capillary pressure drops across the liquidโ€“air interface with surface tension in the capillary radius and contact angle. The capillary effect depends heavily on the interaction between the different properties of surface materials. Different values of contact angles can be manipulated and obtained under varying levels of surface wettability treatments to manipulate the surface properties, resulting in different CD blood delivery rates for medical diagnostic device microchannels. CD flow techniques are appealing for many LOC devices, because they require no external energy. However, due to the passive property of liquid propulsion by capillary forces and the long-term instability of surface treatments on channel walls, the adaptability of CD flow in geometrically complex LOC devices may be limited.

3.2. Theoretical and Numerical Modeling of Capillary Driven Blood Flow

3.2.1. Theoretical Basis and Assumptions of Microfluidic Flow

The study of transport phenomena regarding either blood flow driven by capillary forces or externally applied forces under microfluid systems all demands a comprehensive recognition of the significant differences in flow dynamics between microscale and macroscale. The fundamental assumptions and principles behind fluid transport at the microscale are discussed in this section. Such a comprehension will lay the groundwork for the following analysis of the theoretical basis of capillary forces and their role in blood transport in LOC systems.

At the macroscale, fluid dynamics are often strongly influenced by gravity due to considerable fluid mass. However, the high surface to volume ratio at the microscale shifts the balance toward surface forces (e.g., surface tension and viscous forces), much larger than the inertial force. This difference gives rise to transport phenomena unique to microscale fluid transport, such as the prevalence of laminar flow due to a very low Reynolds number (generally lower than 1). Moreover, the fluid in a microfluidic system is often assumed to be incompressible due to the small flow velocity, indicating constant fluid density in both space and time.Microfluidic flow behaviors are governed by the fundamental principles of mass and momentum conservation, which are encapsulated in the continuity equation and the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation. The continuity equation describes the conservation of mass, while the Nโ€“S equation captures the spatial and temporal variations in velocity, pressure, and other physical parameters. Under the assumption of the negligible influence of gravity in microfluidic systems, the continuity equation and the Eulerian representation of the incompressible Nโ€“S equation can be expressed as follows:

โˆ‡ยท๐ฎโ‡€=0โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(7)

โˆ’โˆ‡๐‘+๐œ‡โˆ‡2๐ฎโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๐‰โ‡€โˆ’๐…โ‡€=0โˆ’โˆ‡๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโˆ‡2๏ฟฝโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(8)Here, p is the pressure, u is the fluid viscosity, 

๐‰โ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ represents the stress tensor, and F is the body force exerted by external forces if present.

3.2.2. Theoretical Basis and Modeling of Capillary Force in LOC Systems

The capillary force is often the major driving force to manipulate and transport blood without an externally applied force in LOC systems. Forces induced by the capillary effect impact the free surface of fluids and are represented not directly in the Navierโ€“Stokes equations but through the pressure boundary conditions of the pressure term p. For hydrophilic surfaces, the liquid generally induces a contact angle between 0ยฐ and 30ยฐ, encouraging the spread and attraction of fluid under a positive cosโ€ฏฮธ condition. For this condition, the pressure drop becomes positive and generates a spontaneous flow forward. A hydrophobic solid surface repels the fluid, inducing minimal contact. Generally, hydrophobic solids exhibit a contact angle larger than 90ยฐ, inducing a negative value of cosโ€ฏฮธ. Such a value will result in a negative pressure drop and a flow in the opposite direction. The induced contact angle is often utilized to measure the wall exposure of various surface treatments on channel walls where different wettability gradients and surface tension effects for CD flows are established. Contact angles between different interfaces are obtainable through standard values or experimental methods for reference. 

(72)For the characterization of the induced force by the capillary effect, the Youngโ€“Laplace (Yโ€“L) equation 

(73) is widely employed. In the equation, the capillary is considered a pressure boundary condition between the two interphases. Through the Yโ€“L equation, the capillary pressure force can be determined, and subsequently, the continuity and momentum balance equations can be solved to obtain the blood filling rate. Kim et al. 

(74) studied the effects of concentration and exposure time of a nonionic surfactant, Silwet L-77, on the performance of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannel in terms of plasma and blood self-separation. The study characterized the capillary pressure force by incorporating the Yโ€“L equation and further evaluated the effects of the changing contact angle due to different levels of applied channel wall surface treatments. The expression of the Yโ€“L equation utilized by Kim et al. 

(74) is as follows:

๐‘ƒ=โˆ’๐œŽ(cos๐œƒb+cos๐œƒtโ„Ž+cos๐œƒl+cos๐œƒr๐‘ค)๏ฟฝ=โˆ’๏ฟฝ(cosโก๏ฟฝb+cosโก๏ฟฝtโ„Ž+cosโก๏ฟฝl+cosโก๏ฟฝr๏ฟฝ)

(9)where ฯƒ is the surface tension of the liquid and ฮธ

bฮธ

tฮธ

l, and ฮธ

r are the contact angle values between the liquid and the bottom, top, left, and right walls, respectively. A numerical simulation through Coventor software is performed to evaluate the dynamic changes in the filling rate within the microchannel. The simulation results for the blood filling rate in the microchannel are expressed at a specific time stamp, shown in Figure 2. The results portray an increasing instantaneous filling rate of blood in the microchannel following the decrease in contact angle induced by a higher concentration of the nonionic surfactant treated to the microchannel wall.

Figure 2. Numerical simulation of filling rate of capillary driven blood flow under various contact angle conditions at a specific timestamp. (74) Reproduced with permission from ref (74). Copyright 2010 Elsevier.

When in contact with hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces, blood forms a meniscus with a contact angle due to surface tension. The Lucasโ€“Washburn (Lโ€“W) equation 

(75) is one of the pioneering theoretical definitions for the position of the meniscus over time. In addition, the Lโ€“W equation provides the possibility for research to obtain the velocity of the blood formed meniscus through the derivation of the meniscus position. The Lโ€“W equation 

(75) can be shown below:

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘ก2๐œ‡โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ

(10)Here L(t) represents the distance of the liquid driven by the capillary forces. However, the generalized Lโ€“W equation solely assumes the constant physical properties from a Newtonian fluid rather than considering the non-Newtonian fluid behavior of blood. Cito et al. 

(76) constructed an enhanced version of the Lโ€“W equation incorporating the power law to consider the RBC aggregation and the FL effect. The non-Newtonian fluid apparent viscosity under the Power Law model is defined as

๐œ‡=๐‘˜ยท(๐›พห™)๐‘›โˆ’1๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝห™)๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(11)where ฮณฬ‡ is the strain rate tensor defined as 

๐›พห™=12๐›พห™๐‘–๐‘—๐›พห™๐‘—๐‘–โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝห™=12๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ. The stress tensor term ฯ„ is computed as ฯ„ = ฮผฮณฬ‡

ij. The updated Lโ€“W equation by Cito 

(76) is expressed as

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…[(๐‘›+13๐‘›+1)(๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘…๐‘˜)1/๐‘›๐‘ก]๐‘›/๐‘›+1๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ+13๏ฟฝ+1)(๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)1/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ+1

(12)where k is the flow consistency index and n is the power law index, respectively. The power law index, from the Power Law model, characterizes the extent of the non-Newtonian behavior of blood. Both the consistency and power law index rely on blood properties such as hematocrit, the appearance of the FL effect, the formation of RBC aggregates, etc. The updated Lโ€“W equation computes the location and velocity of blood flow caused by capillary forces at specified time points within the LOC devices, taking into account the effects of blood flow characteristics such as RBC aggregation and the FL effect on dynamic blood viscosity.Apart from the blood flow behaviors triggered by inherent blood properties, unique flow conditions driven by capillary forces that are portrayed under different microchannel geometries also hold crucial implications for CD blood delivery. Berthier et al. 

(77) studied the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn condition, the condition to initiate the spontaneous capillary flow within a V-groove microchannel, as shown in Figure 3(a) both experimentally and numerically. Through experimental studies, the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn filament development of capillary driven blood flow is observed, as shown in Figure 3(b), while the dynamic development of blood flow is numerically simulated through CFD simulation.

Figure 3. (a) Sketch of the cross-section of Berthierโ€™s V-groove microchannel, (b) experimental view of blood in the V-groove microchannel, (78) (c) illustration of the dynamic change of the extension of filament from FLOW 3D under capillary flow at three increasing time intervals. (78) Reproduced with permission from ref (78). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.

Berthier et al. 

(77) characterized the contact angle needed for the initiation of the capillary driving force at a zero-inlet pressure, through the half-angle (ฮฑ) of the V-groove geometry layout, and its relation to the Concusโ€“Finn filament as shown below:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๎€๎€๐œƒ<๐œ‹2โˆ’๐›ผsin๐›ผ1+2(โ„Ž2/๐‘ค)sin๐›ผ<cos๐œƒ{๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝsinโก๏ฟฝ1+2(โ„Ž2/๏ฟฝ)โกsinโก๏ฟฝ<cosโก๏ฟฝ

(13)Three possible regimes were concluded based on the contact angle value for the initiation of flow and development of Concusโ€“Finn filament:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๐œƒ>๐œƒ1๐œƒ1>๐œƒ>๐œƒ0๐œƒ0no SCFSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filamentSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament{๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ1no SCF๏ฟฝ1>๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament

(14)Under Newtonโ€™s Law, the force balance with low Reynolds and Capillary numbers results in the neglect of inertial terms. The force balance between the capillary forces and the viscous force induced by the channel wall is proposed to derive the analytical fluid velocity. This relation between the two forces offers insights into the average flow velocity and the penetration distance function dependent on time. The apparent blood viscosity is defined by Berthier et al. 

(78) through Cassonโ€™s law, 

(23) given in eq 1. The research used the FLOW-3D program from Flow Science Inc. software, which solves transient, free-surface problems using the FDM in multiple dimensions. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method 

(79) is utilized to locate and track the dynamic extension of filament throughout the advancing interface within the channel ahead of the main flow at three progressing time stamps, as depicted in Figure 3(c).

4. Electro-osmotic Flow (EOF) in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


The utilization of external forces, such as electric fields, has significantly broadened the possibility of manipulating microfluidic flow in LOC systems. 

(80) Externally applied electric field forces induce a fluid flow from the movement of ions in fluid terms as the โ€œelectro-osmotic flowโ€ (EOF).Unique transport phenomena, such as enhanced flow velocity and flow instability, induced by non-Newtonian fluids, particularly viscoelastic fluids, under EOF, have sparked considerable interest in microfluidic devices with simple or complicated geometries within channels. 

(81) However, compared to the study of Newtonian fluids and even other electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flows, the literature focusing on the theoretical and numerical modeling of electro-osmotic blood flow is limited due to the complexity of blood properties. Consequently, to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex blood flow behavior under EOF, theoretical and numerical studies of the transport phenomena in the EOF section will be based on the studies of different viscoelastic fluids under EOF rather than that of blood specifically. Despite this limitation, we believe these studies offer valuable insights that can help understand the complex behavior of blood flow under EOF.

4.1. EOF Phenomena

Electro-osmotic flow occurs at the interface between the microchannel wall and bulk phase solution. When in contact with the bulk phase, solution ions are absorbed or dissociated at the solidโ€“liquid interface, resulting in the formation of a charge layer, as shown in Figure 4. This charged channel surface wall interacts with both negative and positive ions in the bulk sample, causing repulsion and attraction forces to create a thin layer of immobilized counterions, known as the Stern layer. The induced electric potential from the wall gradually decreases with an increase in the distance from the wall. The Stern layer potential, commonly termed the zeta potential, controls the intensity of the electrostatic interactions between mobile counterions and, consequently, the drag force from the applied electric field. Next to the Stern layer is the diffuse mobile layer, mainly composed of a mobile counterion. These two layers constitute the โ€œelectrical double layerโ€ (EDL), the thickness of which is directly proportional to the ionic strength (concentration) of the bulk fluid. The relationship between the two parameters is characterized by a Debye length (ฮป

D), expressed as

๐œ†๐ท=๐œ–๐‘˜B๐‘‡2(๐‘๐‘’)2๐‘0โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝB๏ฟฝ2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)2๏ฟฝ0

(15)where ฯต is the permittivity of the electrolyte solution, k

B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the electron temperature, Z is the integer valence number, e is the elementary charge, and c

0 is the ionic density.

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of an electro-osmotic flow in a microchannel with negative surface charge. (82) Reproduced with permission from ref (82). Copyright 2012 Woodhead Publishing.

When an electric field is applied perpendicular to the EDL, viscous drag is generated due to the movement of excess ions in the EDL. Electro-osmotic forces can be attributed to the externally applied electric potential (ฯ•) and the zeta potential, the system wall induced potential by charged walls (ฯˆ). As illustrated in Figure 4, the majority of ions in the bulk phase have a uniform velocity profile, except for a shear rate condition confined within an extremely thin Stern layer. Therefore, EOF displays a unique characteristic of a โ€œnear flatโ€ or plug flow velocity profile, different from the parabolic flow typically induced by pressure-driven microfluidic flow (Hagenโ€“Poiseuille flow). The plug-shaped velocity profile of the EOF possesses a high shear rate above the Stern layer.Overall, the EOF velocity magnitude is typically proportional to the Debye Length (ฮป

D), zeta potential, and magnitude of the externally applied electric field, while a more viscous liquid reduces the EOF velocity.

4.2. Modeling on Electro-osmotic Viscoelastic Fluid Flow

4.2.1. Theoretical Basis of EOF Mechanisms

The EOF of an incompressible viscoelastic fluid is commonly governed by the continuity and incompressible Nโ€“S equations, as shown in eqs 7 and 8, where the stress tensor and the electrostatic force term are coupled. The electro-osmotic body force term F, representing the body force exerted by the externally applied electric force, is defined as 

๐นโ‡€=๐‘๐ธ๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€, where ฯ

E and 

๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ are the net electric charge density and the applied external electric field, respectively.Numerous models are established to theoretically study the externally applied electric potential and the system wall induced potential by charged walls. The following Laplace equation, expressed as eq 16, is generally adapted and solved to calculate the externally applied potential (ฯ•).

โˆ‡2๐œ™=0โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=0

(16)Ion diffusion under applied electric fields, together with mass transport resulting from convection and diffusion, transports ionic solutions in bulk flow under electrokinetic processes. The Nernstโ€“Planck equation can describe these transport methods, including convection, diffusion, and electro-diffusion. Therefore, the Nernstโ€“Planck equation is used to determine the distribution of the ions within the electrolyte. The electric potential induced by the charged channel walls follows the Poissonโ€“Nernstโ€“Plank (PNP) equation, which can be written as eq 17.

โˆ‡ยท[๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡๐‘›๐‘–โˆ’๐‘ขโ‡€๐‘›๐‘–+๐‘›๐‘–๐ท๐‘–๐‘ง๐‘–๐‘’๐‘˜๐‘๐‘‡โˆ‡(๐œ™+๐œ“)]=0โˆ‡ยท[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡(๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ)]=0

(17)where D

in

i, and z

i are the diffusion coefficient, ionic concentration, and ionic valence of the ionic species I, respectively. However, due to the high nonlinearity and numerical stiffness introduced by different lengths and time scales from the PNP equations, the Poissonโ€“Boltzmann (PB) model is often considered the major simplified method of the PNP equation to characterize the potential distribution of the EDL region in microchannels. In the PB model, it is assumed that the ionic species in the fluid follow the Boltzmann distribution. This model is typically valid for steady-state problems where charge transport can be considered negligible, the EDLs do not overlap with each other, and the intrinsic potentials are low. It provides a simplified representation of the potential distribution in the EDL region. The PB equation governing the EDL electric potential distribution is described as

โˆ‡2๐œ“=(2๐‘’๐‘ง๐‘›0๐œ€๐œ€0)sinh(๐‘ง๐‘’๐œ“๐‘˜b๐‘‡)โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=(2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0)โกsinh(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝb๏ฟฝ)

(18)where n

0 is the ion bulk concentration, z is the ionic valence, and ฮต

0 is the electric permittivity in the vacuum. Under low electric potential conditions, an even further simplified model to illustrate the EOF phenomena is the Debyeโ€“Hรผckel (DH) model. The DH model is derived by obtaining a charge density term by expanding the exponential term of the Boltzmann equation in a Taylor series.

4.2.2. EOF Modeling for Viscoelastic Fluids

Many studies through numerical modeling were performed to obtain a deeper understanding of the effect exhibited by externally applied electric fields on viscoelastic flow in microchannels under various geometrical designs. Bello et al. 

(83) found that methylcellulose solution, a non-Newtonian polymer solution, resulted in stronger electro-osmotic mobility in experiments when compared to the predictions by the Helmholtzโ€“Smoluchowski equation, which is commonly used to define the velocity of EOF of a Newtonian fluid. Being one of the pioneers to identify the discrepancies between the EOF of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, Bello et al. attributed such discrepancies to the presence of a very high shear rate in the EDL, resulting in a change in the orientation of the polymer molecules. Park and Lee 

(84) utilized the FVM to solve the PB equation for the characterization of the electric field induced force. In the study, the concept of fractional calculus for the Oldroyd-B model was adapted to illustrate the elastic and memory effects of viscoelastic fluids in a straight microchannel They observed that fluid elasticity and increased ratio of viscoelastic fluid contribution to overall fluid viscosity had a significant impact on the volumetric flow rate and sensitivity of velocity to electric field strength compared to Newtonian fluids. Afonso et al. 

(85) derived an analytical expression for EOF of viscoelastic fluid between parallel plates using the DH model to account for a zeta potential condition below 25 mV. The study established the understanding of the electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow under low zeta potential conditions. Apart from the electrokinetic forces, pressure forces can also be coupled with EOF to generate a unique fluid flow behavior within the microchannel. Sousa et al. 

(86) analytically studied the flow of a standard viscoelastic solution by combining the pressure gradient force with an externally applied electric force. It was found that, at a near wall skimming layer and the outer layer away from the wall, macromolecules migrating away from surface walls in viscoelastic fluids are observed. In the study, the Phan-Thien Tanner (PTT) constitutive model is utilized to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the solution. The approach is found to be valid when the EDL is much thinner than the skimming layer under an enhanced flow rate. Zhao and Yang 

(87) solved the PB equation and Carreau model for the characterization of the EOF mechanism and non-Newtonian fluid respectively through the FEM. The numerical results depict that, different from the EOF of Newtonian fluids, non-Newtonian fluids led to an increase of electro-osmotic mobility for shear thinning fluids but the opposite for shear thickening fluids.Like other fluid transport driving forces, EOF within unique geometrical layouts also portrays unique transport phenomena. Pimenta and Alves 

(88) utilized the FVM to perform numerical simulations of the EOF of viscoelastic fluids considering the PB equation and the Oldroyd-B model, in a cross-slot and flow-focusing microdevices. It was found that electroelastic instabilities are formed due to the development of large stresses inside the EDL with streamlined curvature at geometry corners. Bezerra et al. 

(89) used the FDM to numerically analyze the vortex formation and flow instability from an electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow in a microchannel with a nozzle geometry and parallel wall geometry setting. The PNP equation is utilized to characterize the charge motion in the EOF and the PTT model for non-Newtonian flow characterization. A constriction geometry is commonly utilized in blood flow adapted in LOC systems due to the change in blood flow behavior under narrow dimensions in a microchannel. Ji et al. 

(90) recently studied the EOF of viscoelastic fluid in a constriction microchannel connected by two relatively big reservoirs on both ends (as seen in Figure 5) filled with the polyacrylamide polymer solution, a viscoelastic fluid, and an incompressible monovalent binary electrolyte solution KCl.

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of a negatively charged constriction microchannel connected to two reservoirs at both ends. An electro-osmotic flow is induced in the system by the induced potential difference between the anode and cathode. (90) Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

In studying the EOF of viscoelastic fluids, the Oldroyd-B model is often utilized to characterize the polymeric stress tensor and the deformation rate of the fluid. The Oldroyd-B model is expressed as follows:

๐œ=๐œ‚p๐œ†(๐œโˆ’๐ˆ)๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝp๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(19)where ฮท

p, ฮป, c, and I represent the polymer dynamic viscosity, polymer relaxation time, symmetric conformation tensor of the polymer molecules, and the identity matrix, respectively.A log-conformation tensor approach is taken to prevent convergence difficulty induced by the viscoelastic properties. The conformation tensor (c) in the polymeric stress tensor term is redefined by a new tensor (ฮ˜) based on the natural logarithm of the c. The new tensor is defined as

ฮ˜=ln(๐œ)=๐‘ln(๐šฒ)๐‘ฮ˜=ln(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝโกln(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ

(20)in which ฮ› is the diagonal matrix and R is the orthogonal matrix.Under the new conformation tensor, the induced EOF of a viscoelastic fluid is governed by the continuity and Nโ€“S equations adapting the Oldroyd-B model, which is expressed as

โˆ‚๐šฏโˆ‚๐‘ก+๐ฎยทโˆ‡๐šฏ=๐›€ฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๐+1๐œ†(eฮ˜โˆ’๐ˆ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยทโˆ‡๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ(eฮ˜โˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(21)where ฮฉ and B represent the anti-symmetric matrix and the symmetric traceless matrix of the decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor โˆ‡u, respectively. The conformation tensor can be recovered by c = exp(ฮ˜). The PB model and Laplace equation are utilized to characterize the charged channel wall induced potential and the externally applied potential.The governing equations are numerically solved through the FVM by RheoTool, 

(42) an open-source viscoelastic EOF solver on the OpenFOAM platform. A SIMPLEC (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations-Consistent) algorithm was applied to solve the velocity-pressure coupling. The pressure field and velocity field were computed by the PCG (Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient) solver and the PBiCG (Preconditioned Biconjugate Gradient) solver, respectively.Ranging magnitudes of an applied electric field or fluid concentration induce both different streamlines and velocity magnitudes at various locations and times of the microchannel. In the study performed by Ji et al., 

(90) notable fluctuation of streamlines and vortex formation is formed at the upper stream entrance of the constriction as shown in Figure 6(a) and (b), respectively, due to the increase of electrokinetic effect, which is seen as a result of the increase in polymeric stress (ฯ„

xx). 

(90) The contraction geometry enhances the EOF velocity within the constriction channel under high E

app condition (600 V/cm). Such phenomena can be attributed to the dependence of electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow on the system wall surface and bulk fluid properties. 

(91)

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of vortex formation and streamlines of EOF depicting flow instability at (a) 1.71 s and (b) 1.75 s. Spatial distribution of the elastic normal stress at (c) high Eapp condition. Streamline of an electro-osmotic flow under Eapp of 600 V/cm (90) for (d) non-Newtonian and (e) Newtonian fluid through a constriction geometry. Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

As elastic normal stress exceeds the local shear stress, flow instability and vortex formation occur. The induced elastic stress under EOF not only enhances the instability of the flow but often generates an irregular secondary flow leading to strong disturbance. 

(92) It is also vital to consider the effect of the constriction layout of microchannels on the alteration of the field strength within the system. The contraction geometry enhances a larger electric field strength compared with other locations of the channel outside the constriction region, resulting in a higher velocity gradient and stronger extension on the polymer within the viscoelastic solution. Following the high shear flow condition, a higher magnitude of stretch for polymer molecules in viscoelastic fluids exhibits larger elastic stresses and enhancement of vortex formation at the region. 

(93)As shown in Figure 6(c), significant elastic normal stress occurs at the inlet of the constriction microchannel. Such occurrence of a polymeric flow can be attributed to the dominating elongational flow, giving rise to high deformation of the polymers within the viscoelastic fluid flow, resulting in higher elastic stress from the polymers. Such phenomena at the entrance result in the difference in velocity streamline as circled in Figure 6(d) compared to that of the Newtonian fluid at the constriction entrance in Figure 6(e). 

(90) The difference between the Newtonian and polymer solution at the exit, as circled in Figure 6(d) and (e), can be attributed to the extrudate swell effect of polymers 

(94) within the viscoelastic fluid flow. The extrudate swell effect illustrates that, as polymers emerge from the constriction exit, they tend to contract in the flow direction and grow in the normal direction, resulting in an extrudate diameter greater than the channel size. The deformation of polymers within the polymeric flow at both the entrance and exit of the contraction channel facilitates the change in shear stress conditions of the flow, leading to the alteration in streamlines of flows for each region.

4.3. EOF Applications in LOC Systems

4.3.1. Mixing in LOC Systems

Rather than relying on the micromixing controlled by molecular diffusion under low Reynolds number conditions, active mixers actively leverage convective instability and vortex formation induced by electro-osmotic flows from alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) electric fields. Such adaptation is recognized as significant breakthroughs for promotion of fluid mixing in chemical and biological applications such as drug delivery, medical diagnostics, chemical synthesis, and so on. 

(95)Many researchers proposed novel designs of electro-osmosis micromixers coupled with numerical simulations in conjunction with experimental findings to increase their understanding of the role of flow instability and vortex formation in the mixing process under electrokinetic phenomena. Matsubara and Narumi 

(96) numerically modeled the mixing process in a microchannel with four electrodes on each side of the microchannel wall, which generated a disruption through unstable electro-osmotic vortices. It was found that particle mixing was sensitive to both the convection effect induced by the main and secondary vortex within the micromixer and the change in oscillation frequency caused by the supplied AC voltage when the Reynolds number was varied. Qaderi et al. 

(97) adapted the PNP equation to numerically study the effect of the geometry and zeta potential configuration of the microchannel on the mixing process with a combined electro-osmotic pressure driven flow. It was reported that the application of heterogeneous zeta potential configuration enhances the mixing efficiency by around 23% while the height of the hurdles increases the mixing efficiency at most 48.1%. Cho et al. 

(98) utilized the PB model and Laplace equation to numerically simulate the electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid mixing process within a wavy and block layout of microchannel walls. The Power Law model is adapted to describe the fluid rheological characteristic. It was found that shear-thinning fluids possess a higher volumetric flow rate, which could result in poorer mixing efficiency compared to that of Newtonian fluids. Numerous studies have revealed that flow instability and vortex generation, in particular secondary vortices produced by barriers or greater magnitudes of heterogeneous zeta potential distribution, enhance mixing by increasing bulk flow velocity and reducing flow distance.To better understand the mechanism of disturbance formed in the system due to externally applied forces, known as electrokinetic instability, literature often utilize the Rayleigh (Ra) number, 

(1) as described below:

๐‘…๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ=๐‘ขev๐‘ขeo=(๐›พโˆ’1๐›พ+1)2๐‘Š๐›ฟ2๐ธel2๐ป2๐œ๐›ฟRa๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝev๏ฟฝeo=(๏ฟฝโˆ’1๏ฟฝ+1)2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝel2๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(22)where ฮณ is the conductivity ratio of the two streams and can be written as 

๐›พ=๐œŽel,H๐œŽel,L๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝel,H๏ฟฝel,L. The Ra number characterizes the ratio between electroviscous and electro-osmotic flow. A high Ra

v value often results in good mixing. It is evident that fluid properties such as the conductivity (ฯƒ) of the two streams play a key role in the formation of disturbances to enhance mixing in microsystems. At the same time, electrokinetic parameters like the zeta potential (ฮถ) in the Ra number is critical in the characterization of electro-osmotic velocity and a slip boundary condition at the microchannel wall.To understand the mixing result along the channel, the concentration field can be defined and simulated under the assumption of steady state conditions and constant diffusion coefficient for each of the working fluid within the system through the convectionโ€“diffusion equation as below:

โˆ‚๐‘๐’Šโˆ‚๐‘ก+โˆ‡โ‡€(๐‘๐‘–๐‘ขโ‡€โˆ’๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡โ‡€๐‘๐’Š)=0โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‡โ‡€(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡โ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

(23)where c

i is the species concentration of species i and D

i is the diffusion coefficient of the corresponding species.The standard deviation of concentration (ฯƒ

sd) can be adapted to evaluate the mixing quality of the system. 

(97) The standard deviation for concentration at a specific portion of the channel may be calculated using the equation below:

๐œŽsd=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)โˆ’๐ถm)2d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ๎€ค๎€ข๎€ฃ๎€ฃ๏ฟฝsd=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)โˆ’๏ฟฝm)2d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*

(24)where C*(y*) and C

m are the non-dimensional concentration profile and the mean concentration at the portion, respectively. C* is the non-dimensional concentration and can be calculated as 

๐ถโˆ—=๐ถ๐ถref๏ฟฝ*=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝref, where C

ref is the reference concentration defined as the bulk solution concentration. The mean concentration profile can be calculated as 

๐ถm=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—๏ฟฝm=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*. With the standard deviation of concentration, the mixing efficiency 

(97) can then be calculated as below:

๐œ€๐‘ฅ=1โˆ’๐œŽsd๐œŽsd,0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=1โˆ’๏ฟฝsd๏ฟฝsd,0

(25)where ฯƒ

sd,0 is the standard derivation of the case of no mixing. The value of the mixing efficiency is typically utilized in conjunction with the simulated flow field and concentration field to explore the effect of geometrical and electrokinetic parameters on the optimization of the mixing results.

5. Summary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


5.1. Conclusion

Viscoelastic fluids such as blood flow in LOC systems are an essential topic to proceed with diagnostic analysis and research through microdevices in the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries. The complex blood flow behavior is tightly controlled by the viscoelastic characteristics of blood such as the dynamic viscosity and the elastic property of RBCs under various shear rate conditions. Furthermore, the flow behaviors under varied driving forces promote an array of microfluidic transport phenomena that are critical to the management of blood flow and other adapted viscoelastic fluids in LOC systems. This review addressed the blood flow phenomena, the complicated interplay between shear rate and blood flow behaviors, and their numerical modeling under LOC systems through the lens of the viscoelasticity characteristic. Furthermore, a theoretical understanding of capillary forces and externally applied electric forces leads to an in-depth investigation of the relationship between blood flow patterns and the key parameters of the two driving forces, the latter of which is introduced through the lens of viscoelastic fluids, coupling numerical modeling to improve the knowledge of blood flow manipulation in LOC systems. The flow disturbances triggered by the EOF of viscoelastic fluids and their impact on blood flow patterns have been deeply investigated due to their important role and applications in LOC devices. Continuous advancements of various numerical modeling methods with experimental findings through more efficient and less computationally heavy methods have served as an encouraging sign of establishing more accurate illustrations of the mechanisms for multiphase blood and other viscoelastic fluid flow transport phenomena driven by various forces. Such progress is fundamental for the manipulation of unique transport phenomena, such as the generated disturbances, to optimize functionalities offered by microdevices in LOC systems.

The following section will provide further insights into the employment of studied blood transport phenomena to improve the functionality of micro devices adapting LOC technology. A discussion of the novel roles that external driving forces play in microfluidic flow behaviors is also provided. Limitations in the computational modeling of blood flow and electrokinetic phenomena in LOC systems will also be emphasized, which may provide valuable insights for future research endeavors. These discussions aim to provide guidance and opportunities for new paths in the ongoing development of LOC devices that adapt blood flow.

5.2. Future Directions

5.2.1. Electro-osmosis Mixing in LOC Systems

Despite substantial research, mixing results through flow instability and vortex formation phenomena induced by electro-osmotic mixing still deviate from the effective mixing results offered by chaotic mixing results such as those seen in turbulent flows. However, recent discoveries of a mixing phenomenon that is generally observed under turbulent flows are found within electro-osmosis micromixers under low Reynolds number conditions. Zhao 

(99) experimentally discovered a rapid mixing process in an AC applied micromixer, where the power spectrum of concentration under an applied voltage of 20 V

p-p induces a โˆ’5/3 slope within a frequency range. This value of the slope is considered as the Oโ€“C spectrum in macroflows, which is often visible under relatively high Re conditions, such as the Taylor microscale Reynolds number Re > 500 in turbulent flows. 

(100) However, the Re value in the studied system is less than 1 at the specific location and applied voltage. A secondary flow is also suggested to occur close to microchannel walls, being attributed to the increase of convective instability within the system.Despite the experimental phenomenon proposed by Zhao et al., 

(99) the range of effects induced by vital parameters of an EOF mixing system on the enhanced mixing results and mechanisms of disturbance generated by the turbulent-like flow instability is not further characterized. Such a gap in knowledge may hinder the adaptability and commercialization of the discovery of micromixers. One of the parameters for further evaluation is the conductivity gradient of the fluid flow. A relatively strong conductivity gradient (5000:1) was adopted in the system due to the conductive properties of the two fluids. The high conductivity gradients may contribute to the relatively large Rayleigh number and differences in EDL layer thickness, resulting in an unusual disturbance in laminar flow conditions and enhanced mixing results. However, high conductivity gradients are not always achievable by the working fluids due to diverse fluid properties. The reliance on turbulent-like phenomena and rapid mixing results in a large conductivity gradient should be established to prevent the limited application of fluids for the mixing system. In addition, the proposed system utilizes distinct zeta potential distributions at the top and bottom walls due to their difference in material choices, which may be attributed to the flow instability phenomena. Further studies should be made on varying zeta potential magnitude and distribution to evaluate their effect on the slip boundary conditions of the flow and the large shear rate condition close to the channel wall of EOF. Such a study can potentially offer an optimized condition in zeta potential magnitude through material choices and geometrical layout of the zeta potential for better mixing results and manipulation of mixing fluid dynamics. The two vital parameters mentioned above can be varied with the aid of numerical simulation to understand the effect of parameters on the interaction between electro-osmotic forces and electroviscous forces. At the same time, the relationship of developed streamlines of the simulated velocity and concentration field, following their relationship with the mixing results, under the impact of these key parameters can foster more insight into the range of impact that the two parameters have on the proposed phenomena and the microfluidic dynamic principles of disturbances.

In addition, many of the current investigations of electrokinetic mixers commonly emphasize the fluid dynamics of mixing for Newtonian fluids, while the utilization of biofluids, primarily viscoelastic fluids such as blood, and their distinctive response under shear forces in these novel mixing processes of LOC systems are significantly less studied. To develop more compatible microdevice designs and efficient mixing outcomes for the biomedical industry, it is necessary to fill the knowledge gaps in the literature on electro-osmotic mixing for biofluids, where properties of elasticity, dynamic viscosity, and intricate relationship with shear flow from the fluid are further considered.

5.2.2. Electro-osmosis Separation in LOC Systems

Particle separation in LOC devices, particularly in biological research and diagnostics, is another area where disturbances may play a significant role in optimization. 

(101) Plasma analysis in LOC systems under precise control of blood flow phenomena and blood/plasma separation procedures can detect vital information about infectious diseases from particular antibodies and foreign nucleic acids for medical treatments, diagnostics, and research, 

(102) offering more efficient results and simple operating procedures compared to that of the traditional centrifugation method for blood and plasma separation. However, the adaptability of LOC devices for blood and plasma separation is often hindered by microchannel clogging, where flow velocity and plasma yield from LOC devices is reduced due to occasional RBC migration and aggregation at the filtration entrance of microdevices. 

(103)It is important to note that the EOF induces flow instability close to microchannel walls, which may provide further solutions to clogging for the separation process of the LOC systems. Mohammadi et al. 

(104) offered an anti-clogging effect of RBCs at the blood and plasma separating device filtration entry, adjacent to the surface wall, through RBC disaggregation under high shear rate conditions generated by a forward and reverse EOF direction.

Further theoretical and numerical research can be conducted to characterize the effect of high shear rate conditions near microchannel walls toward the detachment of binding blood cells on surfaces and the reversibility of aggregation. Through numerical modeling with varying electrokinetic parameters to induce different degrees of disturbances or shear conditions at channel walls, it may be possible to optimize and better understand the process of disrupting the forces that bind cells to surface walls and aggregated cells at filtration pores. RBCs that migrate close to microchannel walls are often attracted by the adhesion force between the RBC and the solid surface originating from the van der Waals forces. Following RBC migration and attachment by adhesive forces adjacent to the microchannel walls as shown in Figure 7, the increase in viscosity at the region causes a lower shear condition and encourages RBC aggregation (cellโ€“cell interaction), which clogs filtering pores or microchannels and reduces flow velocity at filtration region. Both the impact that shear forces and disturbances may induce on cell binding forces with surface walls and other cells leading to aggregation may suggest further characterization. Kinetic parameters such as activation energy and the rate-determining step for cell binding composition attachment and detachment should be considered for modeling the dynamics of RBCs and blood flows under external forces in LOC separation devices.

Figure 7. Schematic representations of clogging at a microchannel pore following the sequence of RBC migration, cell attachment to channel walls, and aggregation. (105) Reproduced with permission from ref (105). Copyright 2018 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

5.2.3. Relationship between External Forces and Microfluidic Systems

In blood flow, a thicker CFL suggests a lower blood viscosity, suggesting a complex relationship between shear stress and shear rate, affecting the blood viscosity and blood flow. Despite some experimental and numerical studies on electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow, limited literature has performed an in-depth investigation of the role that applied electric forces and other external forces could play in the process of CFL formation. Additional studies on how shear rates from external forces affect CFL formation and microfluidic flow dynamics can shed light on the mechanism of the contribution induced by external driving forces to the development of a separate phase of layer, similar to CFL, close to the microchannel walls and distinct from the surrounding fluid within the system, then influencing microfluidic flow dynamics.One of the mechanisms of phenomena to be explored is the formation of the Exclusion Zone (EZ) region following a โ€œSelf-Induced Flowโ€ (SIF) phenomenon discovered by Li and Pollack, 

(106) as shown in Figure 8(a) and (b), respectively. A spontaneous sustained axial flow is observed when hydrophilic materials are immersed in water, resulting in the buildup of a negative layer of charges, defined as the EZ, after water molecules absorb infrared radiation (IR) energy and break down into H and OH

+โ€“.

Figure 8. Schematic representations of (a) the Exclusion Zone region and (b) the Self Induced Flow through visualization of microsphere movement within a microchannel. (106) Reproduced with permission from ref (106). Copyright 2020 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Despite the finding of such a phenomenon, the specific mechanism and role of IR energy have yet to be defined for the process of EZ development. To further develop an understanding of the role of IR energy in such phenomena, a feasible study may be seen through the lens of the relationships between external forces and microfluidic flow. In the phenomena, the increase of SIF velocity under a rise of IR radiation resonant characteristics is shown in the participation of the external electric field near the microchannel walls under electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow systems. The buildup of negative charges at the hydrophilic surfaces in EZ is analogous to the mechanism of electrical double layer formation. Indeed, research has initiated the exploration of the core mechanisms for EZ formation through the lens of the electrokinetic phenomena. 

(107) Such a similarity of the role of IR energy and the transport phenomena of SIF with electrokinetic phenomena paves the way for the definition of the unknown SIF phenomena and EZ formation. Furthermore, Li and Pollack 

(106) suggest whether CFL formation might contribute to a SIF of blood using solely IR radiation, a commonly available source of energy in nature, as an external driving force. The proposition may be proven feasible with the presence of the CFL region next to the negatively charged hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer, coating the luminal side of blood vessels. 

(108) Further research can dive into the resonating characteristics between the formation of the CFL region next to the hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer and that of the EZ formation close to hydrophilic microchannel walls. Indeed, an increase in IR energy is known to rapidly accelerate EZ formation and SIF velocity, depicting similarity to the increase in the magnitude of electric field forces and greater shear rates at microchannel walls affecting CFL formation and EOF velocity. Such correlation depicts a future direction in whether SIF blood flow can be observed and characterized theoretically further through the lens of the relationship between blood flow and shear forces exhibited by external energy.

The intricate link between the CFL and external forces, more specifically the externally applied electric field, can receive further attention to provide a more complete framework for the mechanisms between IR radiation and EZ formation. Such characterization may also contribute to a greater comprehension of the role IR can play in CFL formation next to the endothelial glycocalyx layer as well as its role as a driving force to propel blood flow, similar to the SIF, but without the commonly assumed pressure force from heart contraction as a source of driving force.

5.3. Challenges

Although there have been significant improvements in blood flow modeling under LOC systems over the past decade, there are still notable constraints that may require special attention for numerical simulation applications to benefit the adaptability of the designs and functionalities of LOC devices. Several points that require special attention are mentioned below:

1.The majority of CFD models operate under the relationship between the viscoelasticity of blood and the shear rate conditions of flow. The relative effect exhibited by the presence of highly populated RBCs in whole blood and their forces amongst the cells themselves under complex flows often remains unclearly defined. Furthermore, the full range of cell populations in whole blood requires a much more computational load for numerical modeling. Therefore, a vital goal for future research is to evaluate a reduced modeling method where the impact of cellโ€“cell interaction on the viscoelastic property of blood is considered.
2.Current computational methods on hemodynamics rely on continuum models based upon non-Newtonian rheology at the macroscale rather than at molecular and cellular levels. Careful considerations should be made for the development of a constructive framework for the physical and temporal scales of micro/nanoscale systems to evaluate the intricate relationship between fluid driving forces, dynamic viscosity, and elasticity.
3.Viscoelastic fluids under the impact of externally applied electric forces often deviate from the assumptions of no-slip boundary conditions due to the unique flow conditions induced by externally applied forces. Furthermore, the mechanism of vortex formation and viscoelastic flow instability at laminar flow conditions should be better defined through the lens of the microfluidic flow phenomenon to optimize the prediction of viscoelastic flow across different geometrical layouts. Mathematical models and numerical methods are needed to better predict such disturbance caused by external forces and the viscoelasticity of fluids at such a small scale.
4.Under practical situations, zeta potential distribution at channel walls frequently deviates from the common assumption of a constant distribution because of manufacturing faults or inherent surface charges prior to the introduction of electrokinetic influence. These discrepancies frequently lead to inconsistent surface potential distribution, such as excess positive ions at relatively more negatively charged walls. Accordingly, unpredicted vortex formation and flow instability may occur. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to these discrepancies and how they could trigger the transport process and unexpected results of a microdevice.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


  • Corresponding Authors
    • Zhe Chen – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: zaccooky@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Bo Ouyang – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: bouy93@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Zheng-Hong Luo – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-6020; Email: luozh@sjtu.edu.cn
  • Authors
    • Bin-Jie Lai – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-8133-5381
    • Li-Tao Zhu – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6514-8864
  • NotesThe authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22238005) and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. GZC20231576).

Vocabulary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


Microfluidicsthe field of technological and scientific study that investigates fluid flow in channels with dimensions between 1 and 1000 ฮผm
Lab-on-a-Chip Technologythe field of research and technological development aimed at integrating the micro/nanofluidic characteristics to conduct laboratory processes on handheld devices
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)the method utilizing computational abilities to predict physical fluid flow behaviors mathematically through solving the governing equations of corresponding fluid flows
Shear Ratethe rate of change in velocity where one layer of fluid moves past the adjacent layer
Viscoelasticitythe property holding both elasticity and viscosity characteristics relying on the magnitude of applied shear stress and time-dependent strain
Electro-osmosisthe flow of fluid under an applied electric field when charged solid surface is in contact with the bulk fluid
Vortexthe rotating motion of a fluid revolving an axis line

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This article references 108 other publications.

  1. 1Neethirajan, S.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M.; Wu, D.; Nandagopal, S.; Lin, F. Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip 201111 (9), 1574โ€“ 1586,  DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00230eViewGoogle Scholar
  2. 2Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006442 (7101), 368โ€“ 373,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05058ViewGoogle Scholar
  3. 3Burklund, A.; Tadimety, A.; Nie, Y.; Hao, N.; Zhang, J. X. J. Chapter One – Advances in diagnostic microfluidics; Elsevier, 2020; DOI:  DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2019.08.001 .ViewGoogle Scholar
  4. 4Abdulbari, H. A. Chapter 12 – Lab-on-a-chip for analysis of blood. In Nanotechnology for Hematology, Blood Transfusion, and Artificial Blood; Denizli, A., Nguyen, T. A., Rajan, M., Alam, M. F., Rahman, K., Eds.; Elsevier, 2022; pp 265โ€“ 283.ViewGoogle Scholar
  5. 5Vladisavljeviฤ‡, G. T.; Khalid, N.; Neves, M. A.; Kuroiwa, T.; Nakajima, M.; Uemura, K.; Ichikawa, S.; Kobayashi, I. Industrial lab-on-a-chip: Design, applications and scale-up for drug discovery and delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 201365 (11), 1626โ€“ 1663,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  6. 6Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M.; Dhariwal, R.; Desmulliez, M. P. Y.; Jouvet, L. Hydrodynamic blood plasma separation in microfluidic channels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20108 (1), 105โ€“ 114,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-009-0450-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  7. 7Popel, A. S.; Johnson, P. C. Microcirculation and Hemorheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 43โ€“ 69,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.133933ViewGoogle Scholar
  8. 8Fedosov, D. A.; Peltomรคki, M.; Gompper, G. Deformation and dynamics of red blood cells in flow through cylindrical microchannels. Soft Matter 201410 (24), 4258โ€“ 4267,  DOI: 10.1039/C4SM00248BViewGoogle Scholar
  9. 9Chakraborty, S. Dynamics of capillary flow of blood into a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 20055 (4), 421โ€“ 430,  DOI: 10.1039/b414566fViewGoogle Scholar
  10. 10Tomaiuolo, G.; Guido, S. Start-up shape dynamics of red blood cells in microcapillary flow. Microvascular Research 201182 (1), 35โ€“ 41,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.03.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  11. 11Sherwood, J. M.; Dusting, J.; Kaliviotis, E.; Balabani, S. The effect of red blood cell aggregation on velocity and cell-depleted layer characteristics of blood in a bifurcating microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 20126 (2), 24119,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4717755ViewGoogle Scholar
  12. 12Nader, E.; Skinner, S.; Romana, M.; Fort, R.; Lemonne, N.; Guillot, N.; Gauthier, A.; Antoine-Jonville, S.; Renoux, C.; Hardy-Dessources, M.-D. Blood Rheology: Key Parameters, Impact on Blood Flow, Role in Sickle Cell Disease and Effects of Exercise. Frontiers in Physiology 201910, 01329,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01329ViewGoogle Scholar
  13. 13Trejo-Soto, C.; Lรกzaro, G. R.; Pagonabarraga, I.; Hernรกndez-Machado, A. Microfluidics Approach to the Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cell Membrane and Their Effect on Blood Rheology. Membranes 202212 (2), 217,  DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020217ViewGoogle Scholar
  14. 14Wagner, C.; Steffen, P.; Svetina, S. Aggregation of red blood cells: From rouleaux to clot formation. Comptes Rendus Physique 201314 (6), 459โ€“ 469,  DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  15. 15Kim, H.; Zhbanov, A.; Yang, S. Microfluidic Systems for Blood and Blood Cell Characterization. Biosensors 202313 (1), 13,  DOI: 10.3390/bios13010013ViewGoogle Scholar
  16. 16Fรฅhrรฆus, R.; Lindqvist, T. THE VISCOSITY OF THE BLOOD IN NARROW CAPILLARY TUBES. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 193196 (3), 562โ€“ 568,  DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1931.96.3.562ViewGoogle Scholar
  17. 17Ascolese, M.; Farina, A.; Fasano, A. The Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist effect in small blood vessels: how does it help the heart?. J. Biol. Phys. 201945 (4), 379โ€“ 394,  DOI: 10.1007/s10867-019-09534-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  18. 18Bento, D.; Fernandes, C. S.; Miranda, J. M.; Lima, R. In vitro blood flow visualizations and cell-free layer (CFL) measurements in a microchannel network. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2019109, 109847,  DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109847ViewGoogle Scholar
  19. 19Namgung, B.; Ong, P. K.; Wong, Y. H.; Lim, D.; Chun, K. J.; Kim, S. A comparative study of histogram-based thresholding methods for the determination of cell-free layer width in small blood vessels. Physiological Measurement 201031 (9), N61,  DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/N01ViewGoogle Scholar
  20. 20Hymel, S. J.; Lan, H.; Fujioka, H.; Khismatullin, D. B. Cell trapping in Y-junction microchannels: A numerical study of the bifurcation angle effect in inertial microfluidics. Phys. Fluids (1994) 201931 (8), 082003,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5113516ViewGoogle Scholar
  21. 21Li, X.; Popel, A. S.; Karniadakis, G. E. Blood-plasma separation in Y-shaped bifurcating microfluidic channels: a dissipative particle dynamics simulation study. Phys. Biol. 20129 (2), 026010,  DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/2/026010ViewGoogle Scholar
  22. 22Yin, X.; Thomas, T.; Zhang, J. Multiple red blood cell flows through microvascular bifurcations: Cell free layer, cell trajectory, and hematocrit separation. Microvascular Research 201389, 47โ€“ 56,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.05.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  23. 23Shibeshi, S. S.; Collins, W. E. The Rheology of Blood Flow in a Branched Arterial System. Appl. Rheol 200515 (6), 398โ€“ 405,  DOI: 10.1515/arh-2005-0020ViewGoogle Scholar
  24. 24Sequeira, A.; Janela, J. An Overview of Some Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology. In A Portrait of State-of-the-Art Research at the Technical University of Lisbon; Pereira, M. S., Ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2007; pp 65โ€“ 87.ViewGoogle Scholar
  25. 25Walburn, F. J.; Schneck, D. J. A constitutive equation for whole human blood. Biorheology 197613, 201โ€“ 210,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1976-13307ViewGoogle Scholar
  26. 26Quemada, D. A rheological model for studying the hematocrit dependence of red cell-red cell and red cell-protein interactions in blood. Biorheology 198118, 501โ€“ 516,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1981-183-615ViewGoogle Scholar
  27. 27Varchanis, S.; Dimakopoulos, Y.; Wagner, C.; Tsamopoulos, J. How viscoelastic is human blood plasma?. Soft Matter 201814 (21), 4238โ€“ 4251,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SM00061AViewGoogle Scholar
  28. 28Apostolidis, A. J.; Moyer, A. P.; Beris, A. N. Non-Newtonian effects in simulations of coronary arterial blood flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2016233, 155โ€“ 165,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.03.008ViewGoogle Scholar
  29. 29Luo, X. Y.; Kuang, Z. B. A study on the constitutive equation of blood. J. Biomech. 199225 (8), 929โ€“ 934,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90233-QViewGoogle Scholar
  30. 30Oldroyd, J. G.; Wilson, A. H. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1950200 (1063), 523โ€“ 541,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1950.0035ViewGoogle Scholar
  31. 31Prado, G.; Farutin, A.; Misbah, C.; Bureau, L. Viscoelastic transient of confined red blood cells. Biophys J. 2015108 (9), 2126โ€“ 2136,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.046ViewGoogle Scholar
  32. 32Huang, C. R.; Pan, W. D.; Chen, H. Q.; Copley, A. L. Thixotropic properties of whole blood from healthy human subjects. Biorheology 198724 (6), 795โ€“ 801,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1987-24630ViewGoogle Scholar
  33. 33Anand, M.; Kwack, J.; Masud, A. A new generalized Oldroyd-B model for blood flow in complex geometries. International Journal of Engineering Science 201372, 78โ€“ 88,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.06.009ViewGoogle Scholar
  34. 34Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Investigation of blood rheology under steady and unidirectional large amplitude oscillatory shear. J. Rheol. 201862 (2), 577โ€“ 591,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5017623ViewGoogle Scholar
  35. 35Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Measurements of human blood viscoelasticity and thixotropy under steady and transient shear and constitutive modeling thereof. J. Rheol. 201963 (5), 799โ€“ 813,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5108737ViewGoogle Scholar
  36. 36Armstrong, M.; Tussing, J. A methodology for adding thixotropy to Oldroyd-8 family of viscoelastic models for characterization of human blood. Phys. Fluids 202032 (9), 094111,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0022501ViewGoogle Scholar
  37. 37Crank, J.; Nicolson, P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 194743 (1), 50โ€“ 67,  DOI: 10.1017/S0305004100023197ViewGoogle Scholar
  38. 38Clough, R. W. Original formulation of the finite element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 19907 (2), 89โ€“ 101,  DOI: 10.1016/0168-874X(90)90001-UViewGoogle Scholar
  39. 39Liu, W. K.; Liu, Y.; Farrell, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X. S.; Fukui, Y.; Patankar, N.; Zhang, Y.; Bajaj, C.; Lee, J.Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006195 (13), 1722โ€“ 1749,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.049ViewGoogle Scholar
  40. 40Lopes, D.; Agujetas, R.; Puga, H.; Teixeira, J.; Lima, R.; Alejo, J. P.; Ferrera, C. Analysis of finite element and finite volume methods for fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow in a real stenosed artery. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2021207, 106650,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106650ViewGoogle Scholar
  41. 41Favero, J. L.; Secchi, A. R.; Cardozo, N. S. M.; Jasak, H. Viscoelastic flow analysis using the software OpenFOAM and differential constitutive equations. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2010165 (23), 1625โ€“ 1636,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.08.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  42. 42Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Stabilization of an open-source finite-volume solver for viscoelastic fluid flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2017239, 85โ€“ 104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.12.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  43. 43Chee, C. Y.; Lee, H. P.; Lu, C. Using 3D fluid-structure interaction model to analyse the biomechanical properties of erythrocyte. Phys. Lett. A 2008372 (9), 1357โ€“ 1362,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.067ViewGoogle Scholar
  44. 44Xu, D.; Kaliviotis, E.; Munjiza, A.; Avital, E.; Ji, C.; Williams, J. Large scale simulation of red blood cell aggregation in shear flows. J. Biomech. 201346 (11), 1810โ€“ 1817,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  45. 45Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of the royal society of London. A. mathematical and physical sciences 1971324 (1558), 301โ€“ 313,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1971.0141ViewGoogle Scholar
  46. 46Shi, L.; Pan, T.-W.; Glowinski, R. Deformation of a single red blood cell in bounded Poiseuille flows. Phys. Rev. E 201285 (1), 016307,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.016307ViewGoogle Scholar
  47. 47Yoon, D.; You, D. Continuum modeling of deformation and aggregation of red blood cells. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2267โ€“ 2279,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  48. 48Mainardi, F.; Spada, G. Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. European Physical Journal Special Topics 2011193 (1), 133โ€“ 160,  DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01387-1ViewGoogle Scholar
  49. 49Gracka, M.; Lima, R.; Miranda, J. M.; Student, S.; Melka, B.; Ostrowski, Z. Red blood cells tracking and cell-free layer formation in a microchannel with hyperbolic contraction: A CFD model validation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022226, 107117,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107117ViewGoogle Scholar
  50. 50Aryan, H.; Beigzadeh, B.; Siavashi, M. Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation of improved magnetic drug delivery in a three-dimensional CT-based carotid artery bifurcation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022219, 106778,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106778ViewGoogle Scholar
  51. 51Czaja, B.; Zรกvodszky, G.; Azizi Tarksalooyeh, V.; Hoekstra, A. G. Cell-resolved blood flow simulations of saccular aneurysms: effects of pulsatility and aspect ratio. J. R Soc. Interface 201815 (146), 20180485,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0485ViewGoogle Scholar
  52. 52Rydquist, G.; Esmaily, M. A cell-resolved, Lagrangian solver for modeling red blood cell dynamics in macroscale flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2022461, 111204,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111204ViewGoogle Scholar
  53. 53Dadvand, A.; Baghalnezhad, M.; Mirzaee, I.; Khoo, B. C.; Ghoreishi, S. An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann approach to study the dynamics of elastic membranes in viscous shear flows. Journal of Computational Science 20145 (5), 709โ€“ 718,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2014.06.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  54. 54Krรผger, T.; Holmes, D.; Coveney, P. V. Deformability-based red blood cell separation in deterministic lateral displacement devicesโ”€A simulation study. Biomicrofluidics 20148 (5), 054114,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4897913ViewGoogle Scholar
  55. 55Takeishi, N.; Ito, H.; Kaneko, M.; Wada, S. Deformation of a Red Blood Cell in a Narrow Rectangular Microchannel. Micromachines 201910 (3), 199,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10030199ViewGoogle Scholar
  56. 56Krรผger, T.; Varnik, F.; Raabe, D. Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 201161 (12), 3485โ€“ 3505,  DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.057ViewGoogle Scholar
  57. 57Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Umundum, T.; Saeedipour, M. A reduced-order model for deformable particles with application in bio-microfluidics. Computational Particle Mechanics 20207 (3), 593โ€“ 601,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-019-00283-8ViewGoogle Scholar
  58. 58Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Saeedipour, M. Resolved CFD-DEM simulation of blood flow with a reduced-order RBC model. Computational Particle Mechanics 20229 (4), 759โ€“ 774,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-021-00441-xViewGoogle Scholar
  59. 59Mittal, R.; Iaccarino, G. IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 239โ€“ 261,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175743ViewGoogle Scholar
  60. 60Piquet, A.; Roussel, O.; Hadjadj, A. A comparative study of Brinkman penalization and direct-forcing immersed boundary methods for compressible viscous flows. Computers & Fluids 2016136, 272โ€“ 284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  61. 61Akerkouch, L.; Le, T. B. A Hybrid Continuum-Particle Approach for Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Red Blood Cells in Fluid Flows. Fluids 20216 (4), 139,  DOI: 10.3390/fluids6040139ViewGoogle Scholar
  62. 62Barker, A. T.; Cai, X.-C. Scalable parallel methods for monolithic coupling in fluid-structure interaction with application to blood flow modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 2010229 (3), 642โ€“ 659,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  63. 63Cetin, A.; Sahin, M. A monolithic fluid-structure interaction framework applied to red blood cells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 201935 (2), e3171  DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3171ViewGoogle Scholar
  64. 64Freund, J. B. Numerical Simulation of Flowing Blood Cells. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 201446 (1), 67โ€“ 95,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141349ViewGoogle Scholar
  65. 65Ye, T.; Phan-Thien, N.; Lim, C. T. Particle-based simulations of red blood cellsโ”€A review. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2255โ€“ 2266,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.050ViewGoogle Scholar
  66. 66Arabghahestani, M.; Poozesh, S.; Akafuah, N. K. Advances in Computational Fluid Mechanics in Cellular Flow Manipulation: A Review. Applied Sciences 20199 (19), 4041,  DOI: 10.3390/app9194041ViewGoogle Scholar
  67. 67Rathnayaka, C. M.; From, C. S.; Geekiyanage, N. M.; Gu, Y. T.; Nguyen, N. T.; Sauret, E. Particle-Based Numerical Modelling of Liquid Marbles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 202229 (5), 3021โ€“ 3039,  DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09683-7ViewGoogle Scholar
  68. 68Li, X.; Vlahovska, P. M.; Karniadakis, G. E. Continuum- and particle-based modeling of shapes and dynamics of red blood cells in health and disease. Soft Matter 20139 (1), 28โ€“ 37,  DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26891DViewGoogle Scholar
  69. 69Beris, A. N.; Horner, J. S.; Jariwala, S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J. Recent advances in blood rheology: a review. Soft Matter 202117 (47), 10591โ€“ 10613,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SM01212FViewGoogle Scholar
  70. 70Arciero, J.; Causin, P.; Malgaroli, F. Mathematical methods for modeling the microcirculation. AIMS Biophysics 20174 (3), 362โ€“ 399,  DOI: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.362ViewGoogle Scholar
  71. 71Maria, M. S.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow-driven blood plasma separation and on-chip analyte detection in microfluidic devices. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201721 (4), 72,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-1907-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  72. 72Huhtamรคki, T.; Tian, X.; Korhonen, J. T.; Ras, R. H. A. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat. Protoc. 201813 (7), 1521โ€“ 1538,  DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-zViewGoogle Scholar
  73. 73Young, T., III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 180595, 65โ€“ 87,  DOI: 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005ViewGoogle Scholar
  74. 74Kim, Y. C.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, D.; Park, S.-J.; Park, J.-K. Plasma extraction in a capillary-driven microfluidic device using surfactant-added poly(dimethylsiloxane). Sens. Actuators, B 2010145 (2), 861โ€“ 868,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  75. 75Washburn, E. W. The Dynamics of Capillary Flow. Physical Review 192117 (3), 273โ€“ 283,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.17.273ViewGoogle Scholar
  76. 76Cito, S.; Ahn, Y. C.; Pallares, J.; Duarte, R. M.; Chen, Z.; Madou, M.; Katakis, I. Visualization and measurement of capillary-driven blood flow using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Microfluid Nanofluidics 201213 (2), 227โ€“ 237,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-0950-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  77. 77Berthier, E.; Dostie, A. M.; Lee, U. N.; Berthier, J.; Theberge, A. B. Open Microfluidic Capillary Systems. Anal Chem. 201991 (14), 8739โ€“ 8750,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01429ViewGoogle Scholar
  78. 78Berthier, J.; Brakke, K. A.; Furlani, E. P.; Karampelas, I. H.; Poher, V.; Gosselin, D.; Cubizolles, M.; Pouteau, P. Whole blood spontaneous capillary flow in narrow V-groove microchannels. Sens. Actuators, B 2015206, 258โ€“ 267,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.040ViewGoogle Scholar
  79. 79Hirt, C. W.; Nichols, B. D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 198139 (1), 201โ€“ 225,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  80. 80Chen, J.-L.; Shih, W.-H.; Hsieh, W.-H. AC electro-osmotic micromixer using a face-to-face, asymmetric pair of planar electrodes. Sens. Actuators, B 2013188, 11โ€“ 21,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.012ViewGoogle Scholar
  81. 81Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electrokinetics of non-Newtonian fluids: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2013201-202, 94โ€“ 108,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  82. 82Oh, K. W. 6 – Lab-on-chip (LOC) devices and microfluidics for biomedical applications. In MEMS for Biomedical Applications; Bhansali, S., Vasudev, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing, 2012; pp 150โ€“ 171.ViewGoogle Scholar
  83. 83Bello, M. S.; De Besi, P.; Rezzonico, R.; Righetti, P. G.; Casiraghi, E. Electroosmosis of polymer solutions in fused silica capillaries. ELECTROPHORESIS 199415 (1), 623โ€“ 626,  DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150150186ViewGoogle Scholar
  84. 84Park, H. M.; Lee, W. M. Effect of viscoelasticity on the flow pattern and the volumetric flow rate in electroosmotic flows through a microchannel. Lab Chip 20088 (7), 1163โ€“ 1170,  DOI: 10.1039/b800185eViewGoogle Scholar
  85. 85Afonso, A. M.; Alves, M. A.; Pinho, F. T. Analytical solution of mixed electro-osmotic/pressure driven flows of viscoelastic fluids in microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2009159 (1), 50โ€“ 63,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.01.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  86. 86Sousa, J. J.; Afonso, A. M.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Effect of the skimming layer on electro-osmoticโ”€Poiseuille flows of viscoelastic fluids. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201110 (1), 107โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-010-0651-yViewGoogle Scholar
  87. 87Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electro-osmotic mobility of non-Newtonian fluids. Biomicrofluidics 20115 (1), 014110,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3571278ViewGoogle Scholar
  88. 88Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic instabilities in cross-shaped microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2018259, 61โ€“ 77,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  89. 89Bezerra, W. S.; Castelo, A.; Afonso, A. M. Numerical Study of Electro-Osmotic Fluid Flow and Vortex Formation. Micromachines (Basel) 201910 (12), 796,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10120796ViewGoogle Scholar
  90. 90Ji, J.; Qian, S.; Liu, Z. Electroosmotic Flow of Viscoelastic Fluid through a Constriction Microchannel. Micromachines (Basel) 202112 (4), 417,  DOI: 10.3390/mi12040417ViewGoogle Scholar
  91. 91Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Exact solutions for electro-osmotic flow of viscoelastic fluids in rectangular micro-channels. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2009211 (2), 502โ€“ 509,  DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.068ViewGoogle Scholar
  92. 92Gerum, R.; Mirzahossein, E.; Eroles, M.; Elsterer, J.; Mainka, A.; Bauer, A.; Sonntag, S.; Winterl, A.; Bartl, J.; Fischer, L. Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry. Elife 202211, e78823,  DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78823ViewGoogle Scholar
  93. 93Sadek, S. H.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic flow instabilities of viscoelastic fluids in contraction/expansion micro-geometries. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2020283, 104293,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104293ViewGoogle Scholar
  94. 94Spanjaards, M.; Peters, G.; Hulsen, M.; Anderson, P. Numerical Study of the Effect of Thixotropy on Extrudate Swell. Polymers 202113 (24), 4383,  DOI: 10.3390/polym13244383ViewGoogle Scholar
  95. 95Rashidi, S.; Bafekr, H.; Valipour, M. S.; Esfahani, J. A. A review on the application, simulation, and experiment of the electrokinetic mixers. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification 2018126, 108โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2018.02.021ViewGoogle Scholar
  96. 96Matsubara, K.; Narumi, T. Microfluidic mixing using unsteady electroosmotic vortices produced by a staggered array of electrodes. Chemical Engineering Journal 2016288, 638โ€“ 647,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.013ViewGoogle Scholar
  97. 97Qaderi, A.; Jamaati, J.; Bahiraei, M. CFD simulation of combined electroosmotic-pressure driven micro-mixing in a microchannel equipped with triangular hurdle and zeta-potential heterogeneity. Chemical Engineering Science 2019199, 463โ€“ 477,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.034ViewGoogle Scholar
  98. 98Cho, C.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Chen, C. o.-K. Mixing enhancement in crisscross micromixer using aperiodic electrokinetic perturbing flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 201255 (11), 2926โ€“ 2933,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  99. 99Zhao, W.; Yang, F.; Wang, K.; Bai, J.; Wang, G. Rapid mixing by turbulent-like electrokinetic microflow. Chemical Engineering Science 2017165, 113โ€“ 121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  100. 100Tran, T.; Chakraborty, P.; Guttenberg, N.; Prescott, A.; Kellay, H.; Goldburg, W.; Goldenfeld, N.; Gioia, G. Macroscopic effects of the spectral structure in turbulent flows. Nat. Phys. 20106 (6), 438โ€“ 441,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1674ViewGoogle Scholar
  101. 101Toner, M.; Irimia, D. Blood-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 20057, 77โ€“ 103,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108ViewGoogle Scholar
  102. 102Maria, M. S.; Rakesh, P. E.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow of blood in a microchannel with differential wetting for blood plasma separation and on-chip glucose detection. Biomicrofluidics 201610 (5), 054108,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4962874ViewGoogle Scholar
  103. 103Tripathi, S.; Varun Kumar, Y. V. B.; Prabhakar, A.; Joshi, S. S.; Agrawal, A. Passive blood plasma separation at the microscale: a review of design principles and microdevices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 201525 (8), 083001,  DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/25/8/083001ViewGoogle Scholar
  104. 104Mohammadi, M.; Madadi, H.; Casals-Terrรฉ, J. Microfluidic point-of-care blood panel based on a novel technique: Reversible electroosmotic flow. Biomicrofluidics 20159 (5), 054106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4930865ViewGoogle Scholar
  105. 105Kang, D. H.; Kim, K.; Kim, Y. J. An anti-clogging method for improving the performance and lifespan of blood plasma separation devices in real-time and continuous microfluidic systems. Sci. Rep 20188 (1), 17015,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35235-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  106. 106Li, Z.; Pollack, G. H. Surface-induced flow: A natural microscopic engine using infrared energy as fuel. Science Advances 20206 (19), eaba0941  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0941ViewGoogle Scholar
  107. 107Mercado-Uribe, H.; Guevara-Pantoja, F. J.; Garcรญa-Muรฑoz, W.; Garcรญa-Maldonado, J. S.; Mรฉndez-Alcaraz, J. M.; Ruiz-Suรกrez, J. C. On the evolution of the exclusion zone produced by hydrophilic surfaces: A contracted description. J. Chem. Phys. 2021154 (19), 194902,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0043084ViewGoogle Scholar
  108. 108Yalcin, O.; Jani, V. P.; Johnson, P. C.; Cabrales, P. Implications Enzymatic Degradation of the Endothelial Glycocalyx on the Microvascular Hemodynamics and the Arteriolar Red Cell Free Layer of the Rat Cremaster Muscle. Front Physiol 20189, 168,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00168ViewGoogle Scholar
Fig. 9 From: An Investigation on Hydraulic Aspects of Rectangular Labyrinth Pool and Weir Fishway Using FLOW-3D

An Investigation on Hydraulic Aspects of Rectangular Labyrinth Pool and Weir Fishway Using FLOW-3D

Abstract

์›จ์–ด์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฐ์—ด(์ฆ‰, ์ง์„ ํ˜• ์›จ์–ด์™€ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์›จ์–ด ๋ชจ์–‘, ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ, ์›จ์–ด์˜ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ์กด์žฌ, ํ๋ฆ„ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ํ‰๊ท  ์†๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๋ถ„ํฌ, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ, ์–ด๋„์—์„œ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ. ํ๋ฆ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3Dยฎ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๊ณผ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋œ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ธ‰๋ฝ์œ ๋™์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๊ณผ ํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๋œ ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‰๊ท  ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ ์˜ค์ฐจ์™€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.014m์™€ 3.11%๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ๊ณผ ๋‘‘์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83(L: ์›จ์–ด ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ, B: ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํญ) ๊ฐ’์—์„œ ๊ธ‰๋ฝ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61์—์„œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ๋ณด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ฌด์ฐจ์› ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰(Q+)์ด ๋” ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ณด์™€ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ๋ณด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Q๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 1.56๊ณผ 1.47h์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(h: ๋ณด ์œ„ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ). ๊ธฐ์กด ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํ’€ ๋‚ด ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„๋Š” ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰, ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€(TKE) ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„(TI) ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์›จ์–ด์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด๋ณด๋‹ค ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ด ๋” ๋‚ฎ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ TKE ๋ฐ TI ๊ฐ’์€ ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด ์ƒ๋‹จ, ์›จ์–ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ๋ฒฝ ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ, ์›จ์–ด ์ธก๋ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ฒฝ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด์™€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’ ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ์˜ ์ฒด์  ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‘‘์— ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉด ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„์™€ TI ๊ฐ’์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ’€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ TKE ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๊ณ ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํœด์‹ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ด ๋” ๋„“์–ด์ง€๊ณ (TKE๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง) ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์œจ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Two different arrangements of the weir (i.e., straight weir and rectangular labyrinth weir) were used to evaluate the effects of geometric parameters such as weir shape, weir spacing, presence of an orifice at the weir, and bed slope on the flow regime and the relationship between discharge and depth, variation and distribution of depth-averaged velocity, turbulence characteristics, and energy dissipation at the fishway. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed using FLOW-3Dยฎ software to examine the effects on flow conditions. The numerical model was validated by comparing the calculated surface profiles and velocities with experimentally measured values from the literature. The results of the numerical model and experimental data showed that the root-mean-square error and mean absolute percentage error for the surface profiles and normalized velocity profiles of plunging flows were 0.014 m and 3.11%, respectively, confirming the ability of the numerical model to predict the flow characteristics of the pool and weir. A plunging flow can occur at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83 (L: distance of the weir, B: width of the channel) and streaming flow at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 for each model. The rectangular labyrinth weir model has larger dimensionless discharge values (Q+) than the conventional model. For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir at submerged flow, Q is proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively (h: the water depth above the weir). The average depth velocity in the pool of a conventional weir is higher than that of a rectangular labyrinth weir. However, for a given discharge, bed slope, and weir spacing, the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and turbulence intensity (TI) values are higher for a rectangular labyrinth weir compared to conventional weir. The conventional weir has lower energy dissipation than the rectangular labyrinth weir. Lower TKE and TI values were observed at the top of the labyrinth weir, at the corner of the wall downstream of the weir, and between the side walls of the weir and the channel wall. As the distance between the weirs and the bottom slope increased, the average depth velocity, the average value of turbulent kinetic energy and the turbulence intensity increased, and the volumetric energy dissipation in the pool decreased. The presence of an opening in the weir increased the average depth velocity and TI values and decreased the range of highest TKE within the pool, resulted in larger resting areas for fish (lower TKE), and decreased the energy dissipation rates in both models.

1 Introduction

Artificial barriers such as detour dams, weirs, and culverts in lakes and rivers prevent fish from migrating and completing the upstream and downstream movement cycle. This chain is related to the life stage of the fish, its location, and the type of migration. Several riverine fish species instinctively migrate upstream for spawning and other needs. Conversely, downstream migration is a characteristic of early life stages [1]. A fish ladder is a waterway that allows one or more fish species to cross a specific obstacle. These structures are constructed near detour dams and other transverse structures that have prevented such migration by allowing fish to overcome obstacles [2]. The flow pattern in fish ladders influences safe and comfortable passage for ascending fish. The flowโ€™s strong turbulence can reduce the fishโ€™s speed, injure them, and delay or prevent them from exiting the fish ladder. In adult fish, spawning migrations are usually complex, and delays are critical to reproductive success [3].

Various fish ladders/fishways include vertical slots, denil, rock ramps, and pool weirs [1]. The choice of fish ladder usually depends on many factors, including water elevation, space available for construction, and fish species. Pool and weir structures are among the most important fish ladders that help fish overcome obstacles in streams or rivers and swim upstream [1]. Because they are easy to construct and maintain, this type of fish ladder has received considerable attention from researchers and practitioners. Such a fish ladder consists of a sloping-floor channel with series of pools directly separated by a series of weirs [4]. These fish ladders, with or without underwater openings, are generally well-suited for slopes of 10% or less [12]. Within these pools, flow velocities are low and provide resting areas for fish after they enter the fish ladder. After resting in the pools, fish overcome these weirs by blasting or jumping over them [2]. There may also be an opening in the flooded portion of the weir through which the fish can swim instead of jumping over the weir. Design parameters such as the length of the pool, the height of the weir, the slope of the bottom, and the water discharge are the most important factors in determining the hydraulic structure of this type of fish ladder [3]. The flow over the weir depends on the flow depth at a given slope S0 and the pool length, either โ€œplungingโ€ or โ€œstreaming.โ€ In plunging flow, the water column h over each weir creates a water jet that releases energy through turbulent mixing and diffusion mechanisms [5]. The dimensionless discharges for plunging (Q+) and streaming (Q*) flows are shown in Fig. 1, where Q is the total discharge, B is the width of the channel, w is the weir height, S0 is the slope of the bottom, h is the water depth above the weir, d is the flow depth, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The maximum velocity occurs near the top of the weir for plunging flow. At the waterโ€™s surface, it drops to about half [6].

figure 1
Fig. 1

Extensive experimental studies have been conducted to investigate flow patterns for various physical geometries (i.e., bed slope, pool length, and weir height) [2]. Guiny et al. [7] modified the standard design by adding vertical slots, orifices, and weirs in fishways. The efficiency of the orifices and vertical slots was related to the velocities at their entrances. In the laboratory experiments of Yagci [8], the three-dimensional (3D) mean flow and turbulence structure of a pool weir fishway combined with an orifice and a slot is investigated. It is shown that the energy dissipation per unit volume and the discharge have a linear relationship.

Considering the beneficial characteristics reported in the limited studies of researchers on the labyrinth weir in the pool-weir-type fishway, and knowing that the characteristics of flow in pool-weir-type fishways are highly dependent on the geometry of the weir, an alternative design of the rectangular labyrinth weir instead of the straight weirs in the pool-weir-type fishway is investigated in this study [79]. Kim [10] conducted experiments to compare the hydraulic characteristics of three different weir types in a pool-weir-type fishway. The results show that a straight, rectangular weir with a notch is preferable to a zigzag or trapezoidal weir. Studies on natural fish passes show that pass ability can be improved by lengthening the weirโ€™s crest [7]. Zhong et al. [11] investigated the semi-rigid weirโ€™s hydraulic performance in the fishwayโ€™s flow field with a pool weir. The results showed that this type of fishway performed better with a lower invert slope and a smaller radius ratio but with a larger pool spacing.

Considering that an alternative method to study the flow characteristics in a fishway with a pool weir is based on numerical methods and modeling from computational fluid dynamics (CFD), which can easily change the geometry of the fishway for different flow fields, this study uses the powerful package CFD and the software FLOW-3D to evaluate the proposed weir design and compare it with the conventional one to extend the application of the fishway. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic performance of the rectangular labyrinth pool and the weir with submerged openings in different hydraulic configurations. The primary objective of creating a new weir configuration for suitable flow patterns is evaluated based on the swimming capabilities of different fish species. Specifically, the following questions will be answered: (a) How do the various hydraulic and geometric parameters relate to the effects of water velocity and turbulence, expressed as turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and turbulence intensity (TI) within the fishway, i.e., are conventional weirs more affected by hydraulics than rectangular labyrinth weirs? (b) Which weir configurations have the greatest effect on fish performance in the fishway? (c) In the presence of an orifice plate, does the performance of each weir configuration differ with different weir spacing, bed gradients, and flow regimes from that without an orifice plate?

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Physical Model Configuration

This paper focuses on Ead et al. [6]โ€™s laboratory experiments as a reference, testing ten pool weirs (Fig. 2). The experimental flume was 6 m long, 0.56 m wide, and 0.6 m high, with a bottom slope of 10%. Field measurements were made at steady flow with a maximum flow rate of 0.165 m3/s. Discharge was measured with magnetic flow meters in the inlets and water level with point meters (see Ead et al. [6]. for more details). Table 1 summarizes the experimental conditions considered for model calibration in this study.

figure 2
Fig. 2

Table 1 Experimental conditions considered for calibration

Full size table

2.2 Numerical Models

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using FLOW-3Dยฎ v11.2 to validate a series of experimental liner pool weirs by Ead et al. [6] and to investigate the effects of the rectangular labyrinth pool weir with an orifice. The dimensions of the channel and data collection areas in the numerical models are the same as those of the laboratory model. Two types of pool weirs were considered: conventional and labyrinth. The proposed rectangular labyrinth pool weirs have a symmetrical cross section and are sized to fit within the experimental channel. The conventional pool weir model had a pool length of lโ€‰=โ€‰0.685 and 0.342 m, a weir height of wโ€‰=โ€‰0.141 m, a weir width of Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.56 m, and a channel slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰5 and 10%. The rectangular labyrinth weirs have the same front width as the offset, i.e., aโ€‰=โ€‰bโ€‰=โ€‰cโ€‰=โ€‰0.186 m. A square underwater opening with a width of 0.05 m and a depth of 0.05 m was created in the middle of the weir. The weir configuration considered in the present study is shown in Fig. 3.

figure 3
Fig. 3

2.3 Governing Equations

FLOW-3Dยฎ software solves the Navierโ€“Stokesโ€“Reynolds equations for three-dimensional analysis of incompressible flows using the fluid-volume method on a gridded domain. FLOW -3Dยฎ uses an advanced free surface flow tracking algorithm (TruVOF) developed by Hirt and Nichols [12], where fluid configurations are defined in terms of a VOF function F (xyzt). In this case, F (fluid fraction) represents the volume fraction occupied by the fluid: Fโ€‰=โ€‰1 in cells filled with fluid and Fโ€‰=โ€‰0 in cells without fluid (empty areas) [413]. The free surface area is at an intermediate value of F. (Typically, Fโ€‰=โ€‰0.5, but the user can specify a different intermediate value.) The equations in Cartesian coordinates (xyz) applicable to the model are as follows:

๏ฟฝfโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝx)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝy)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝz)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝSOR

(1)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝx+๏ฟฝx

(2)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝy+๏ฟฝy

(3)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝz+๏ฟฝz

(4)

where (uvw) are the velocity components, (AxAyAz) are the flow area components, (Gx, Gy, Gz) are the mass accelerations, and (fxfyfz) are the viscous accelerations in the directions (xyz), ฯ is the fluid density, RSOR is the spring term, Vf is the volume fraction associated with the flow, and P is the pressure. The kโ€“ฮต turbulence model (RNG) was used in this study to solve the turbulence of the flow field. This model is a modified version of the standard kโ€“ฮต model that improves performance. The model is a two-equation model; the first equation (Eq. 5) expresses the turbulenceโ€™s energy, called turbulent kinetic energy (k) [14]. The second equation (Eq. 6) is the turbulent dissipation rate (ฮต), which determines the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy [15]. These equations are expressed as follows Dasineh et al. [4]:

โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=โˆ‚โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝฮต

(5)

โˆ‚(๏ฟฝฮต)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝฮต๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=โˆ‚โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝฮต๏ฟฝeffโˆ‚ฮตโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ1ฮตฮต๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝkโˆ’๏ฟฝ2ฮต๏ฟฝฮต2๏ฟฝ

(6)

In these equations, k is the turbulent kinetic energy, ฮต is the turbulent energy consumption rate, Gk is the generation of turbulent kinetic energy by the average velocity gradient, with empirical constants ฮฑฮตโ€‰=โ€‰ฮฑkโ€‰=โ€‰1.39, C1ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰1.42, and C2ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰1.68, eff is the effective viscosity, ฮผeffโ€‰=โ€‰ฮผโ€‰+โ€‰ฮผt [15]. Here, ฮผ is the hydrodynamic density coefficient, and ฮผt is the turbulent density of the fluid.

2.4 Meshing and the Boundary Conditions in the Model Setup

The numerical area is divided into three mesh blocks in the X-direction. The meshes are divided into different sizes, a containing mesh block for the entire spatial domain and a nested block with refined cells for the domain of interest. Three different sizes were selected for each of the grid blocks. By comparing the accuracy of their results based on the experimental data, the reasonable mesh for the solution domain was finally selected. The convergence index method (GCI) evaluated the mesh sensitivity analysis. Based on this method, many researchers, such as Ahmadi et al. [16] and Ahmadi et al. [15], have studied the independence of numerical results from mesh size. Three different mesh sizes with a refinement ratio (r) of 1.33 were used to perform the convergence index method. The refinement ratio is the ratio between the larger and smaller mesh sizes (rโ€‰=โ€‰Gcoarse/Gfine). According to the recommendation of Celik et al. [17], the recommended number for the refinement ratio is 1.3, which gives acceptable results. Table 2 shows the characteristics of the three mesh sizes selected for mesh sensitivity analysis.Table 2 Characteristics of the meshes tested in the convergence analysis

Full size table

The results of u1โ€‰=โ€‰umax (u1โ€‰=โ€‰velocity component along the x1 axis and umaxโ€‰=โ€‰maximum velocity of u1 in a section perpendicular to the invert of the fishway) at Qโ€‰=โ€‰0.035 m3/s,โ€‰ร—โ€‰1/lโ€‰=โ€‰0.66, and Y1/bโ€‰=โ€‰0 in the pool of conventional weir No. 4, obtained from the output results of the software, were used to evaluate the accuracy of the calculation range. As shown in Fig. 4x1โ€‰=โ€‰the distance from a given weir in the x-direction, Y1โ€‰=โ€‰the water depth measured in the y-direction, Y0โ€‰=โ€‰the vertical distance in the Cartesian coordinate system, hโ€‰=โ€‰the water column at the crest, bโ€‰=โ€‰the distance between the two points of maximum velocity umax and zero velocity, and lโ€‰=โ€‰the pool length.

figure 4
Fig. 4

The apparent index of convergence (p) in the GCI method is calculated as follows:

๏ฟฝ=lnโก(๏ฟฝ3โˆ’๏ฟฝ2)(๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝ1)/lnโก(๏ฟฝ)

(7)

f1f2, and f3 are the hydraulic parameters obtained from the numerical simulation (f1 corresponds to the small mesh), and r is the refinement ratio. The following equation defines the convergence index of the fine mesh:

GCIfine=1.25|ฮต|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(8)

Here, ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰(f2โ€‰โˆ’โ€‰f1)/f1 is the relative error, and f2 and f3 are the values of hydraulic parameters considered for medium and small grids, respectively. GCI12 and GCI23 dimensionless indices can be calculated as:

GCI12=1.25|๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ1|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(9)

Then, the independence of the network is preserved. The convergence index of the network parameters obtained by Eqs. (7)โ€“(9) for all three network variables is shown in Table 3. Since the GCI values for the smaller grid (GCI12) are lower compared to coarse grid (GCI23), it can be concluded that the independence of the grid is almost achieved. No further change in the grid size of the solution domain is required. The calculated values (GCI23/rpGCI12) are close to 1, which shows that the numerical results obtained are within the convergence range. As a result, the meshing of the solution domain consisting of a block mesh with a mesh size of 0.012 m and a block mesh within a larger block mesh with a mesh size of 0.009 m was selected as the optimal mesh (Fig. 5).Table 3 GCI calculation

Full size table

figure 5
Fig. 5

The boundary conditions applied to the area are shown in Fig. 6. The boundary condition of specific flow rate (volume flow rate-Q) was used for the inlet of the flow. For the downstream boundary, the flow output (outflow-O) condition did not affect the flow in the solution area. For the Zmax boundary, the specified pressure boundary condition was used along with the fluid fractionโ€‰=โ€‰0 (P). This type of boundary condition considers free surface or atmospheric pressure conditions (Ghaderi et al. [19]). The wall boundary condition is defined for the bottom of the channel, which acts like a virtual wall without friction (W). The boundary between mesh blocks and walls were considered a symmetrical condition (S).

figure 6
Fig. 6

The convergence of the steady-state solutions was controlled during the simulations by monitoring the changes in discharge at the inlet boundary conditions. Figure 7 shows the time series plots of the discharge obtained from the Model A for the three main discharges from the numerical results. The 8 s to reach the flow equilibrium is suitable for the case of the fish ladder with pool and weir. Almost all discharge fluctuations in the models are insignificant in time, and the flow has reached relative stability. The computation time for the simulations was between 6 and 8 h using a personal computer with eight cores of a CPU (Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20 GHz and 16 GB RAM).

figure 7
Fig. 7

3 Results

3.1 Verification of Numerical Results

Quantitative outcomes, including free surface and normalized velocity profiles obtained using FLOW-3D software, were reviewed and compared with the results of Ead et al. [6]. The fourth pool was selected to present the results and compare the experiment and simulation. For each quantity, the percentage of mean absolute error (MAPE (%)) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) are calculated. Equations (10) and (11) show the method used to calculate the errors.

MAPE(%)100ร—1๏ฟฝโˆ‘1๏ฟฝ|๏ฟฝexpโˆ’๏ฟฝnum๏ฟฝexp|

(10)

RMSE(โˆ’)1๏ฟฝโˆ‘1๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝexpโˆ’๏ฟฝnum)2

(11)

Here, Xexp is the value of the laboratory data, Xnum is the numerical data value, and n is the amount of data. As shown in Fig. 8, let x1โ€‰=โ€‰distance from a given weir in the x-direction and Y1โ€‰=โ€‰water depth in the y-direction from the bottom. The trend of the surface profiles for each of the numerical results is the same as that of the laboratory results. The surface profiles of the plunging flows drop after the flow enters and then rises to approach the next weir. The RMSE and MAPE error values for Model A are 0.014 m and 3.11%, respectively, indicating acceptable agreement between numerical and laboratory results. Figure 9 shows the velocity vectors and plunging flow from the numerical results, where x and y are horizontal and vertical to the flow direction, respectively. It can be seen that the jet in the fish ladder pool has a relatively high velocity. The two vortices, i.e., the enclosed vortex rotating clockwise behind the weir and the surface vortex rotating counterclockwise above the jet, are observed for the regime of incident flow. The point where the jet meets the fish passage bed is shown in the figure. The normalized velocity profiles upstream and downstream of the impact points are shown in Fig. 10. The figure shows that the numerical results agree well with the experimental data of Ead et al. [6].

figure 8
Fig. 8
figure 9
Fig. 9
figure 10
Fig. 10

3.2 Flow Regime and Discharge-Depth Relationship

Depending on the geometric shape of the fishway, including the distance of the weir, the slope of the bottom, the height of the weir, and the flow conditions, the flow regime in the fishway is divided into three categories: dipping, transitional, and flow regimes [4]. In the plunging flow regime, the flow enters the pool through the weir, impacts the bottom of the fishway, and forms a hydraulic jump causing two eddies [220]. In the streamwise flow regime, the surface of the flow passing over the weir is almost parallel to the bottom of the channel. The transitional regime has intermediate flow characteristics between the submerged and flow regimes. To predict the flow regime created in the fishway, Ead et al. [6] proposed two dimensionless parameters, Qt* and L/w, where Qt* is the dimensionless discharge, L is the distance between weirs, and w is the height of the weir:

๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ—=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(12)

Q is the total discharge, B is the width of the channel, S0 is the slope of the bed, and g is the gravity acceleration. Figure 11 shows different ranges for each flow regime based on the slope of the bed and the distance between the pools in this study. The results of Baki et al. [21], Ead et al. [6] and Dizabadi et al. [22] were used for this comparison. The distance between the pools affects the changes in the regime of the fish ladder. So, if you decrease the distance between weirs, the flow regime more likely becomes. This study determined all three flow regimes in a fish ladder. When the corresponding range of Qt* is less than 0.6, the flow regime can dip at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83. If the corresponding range of Qt* is greater than 0.5, transitional flow may occur at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22. On the other hand, when Qt* is greater than 1, streamwise flow can occur at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61. These observations agree well with the results of Baki et al. [21], Ead et al. [6] and Dizabadi et al. [22].

figure 11
Fig. 11

For plunging flows, another dimensionless discharge (Q+) versus h/w given by Ead et al. [6] was used for further evaluation:

๏ฟฝ+=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝโ„Ž=23๏ฟฝd๏ฟฝ

(13)

where h is the water depth above the weir, and Cd is the discharge coefficient. Figure 12a compares the numerical and experimental results of Ead et al. [6]. In this figure, Rehbockโ€™s empirical equation is used to estimate the discharge coefficient of Ead et al. [6].

๏ฟฝd=0.57+0.075โ„Ž๏ฟฝ

(14)

figure 12
Fig. 12

The numerical results for the conventional weir (Model A) and the rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B) of this study agree well with the laboratory results of Ead et al. [6]. When comparing models A and B, it is also found that a rectangular labyrinth weir has larger Qโ€‰+โ€‰values than the conventional weir as the length of the weir crest increases for a given channel width and fixed headwater elevation. In Fig. 12b, Models A and Bโ€™s flow depth plot shows the plunging flow regime. The power trend lines drawn through the data are the best-fit lines. The data shown in Fig. 12b are for different bed slopes and weir geometries. For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir at submerged flow, Q can be assumed to be proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively. In the results of Ead et al. [6], Q is proportional to 1.5h. If we assume that the flow through the orifice is Qo and the total outflow is Q, the change in the ratio of Qo/Q to total outflow for models A and B can be shown in Fig. 13. For both models, the flow through the orifice decreases as the total flow increases. A logarithmic trend line was also found between the total outflow and the dimensionless ratio Qo/Q.

figure 13
Fig. 13

3.3 Depth-Averaged Velocity Distributions

To ensure that the target fish species can pass the fish ladder with maximum efficiency, the average velocity in the fish ladder should be low enough [4]. Therefore, the average velocity in depth should be as much as possible below the critical swimming velocities of the target fishes at a constant flow depth in the pool [20]. The contour plot of depth-averaged velocity was used instead of another direction, such as longitudinal velocity because fish are more sensitive to depth-averaged flow velocity than to its direction under different hydraulic conditions. Figure 14 shows the distribution of depth-averaged velocity in the pool for Models A and B in two cases with and without orifice plates. Model Aโ€™s velocity within the pool differs slightly in the spanwise direction. However, no significant variation in velocity was observed. The flow is gradually directed to the sides as it passes through the rectangular labyrinth weir. This increases the velocity at the sides of the channel. Therefore, the high-velocity zone is located at the sides. The low velocity is in the downstream apex of the weir. This area may be suitable for swimming target fish. The presence of an opening in the weir increases the flow velocity at the opening and in the poolโ€™s center, especially in Model A. The flow velocity increase caused by the modelsโ€™ opening varied from 7.7 to 12.48%. Figure 15 illustrates the effect of the inverted slope on the averaged depth velocity distribution in the pool at low and high discharge. At constant discharge, flow velocity increases with increasing bed slope. In general, high flow velocity was found in the weir toe sidewall and the weir and channel sidewalls.

figure 14
Fig. 14
figure 15
Fig. 15

On the other hand, for a constant bed slope, the high-velocity area of the pool increases due to the increase in runoff. For both bed slopes and different discharges, the most appropriate path for fish to travel from upstream to downstream is through the middle of the cross section and along the top of the rectangular labyrinth weirs. The maximum dominant velocities for Model B at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% were 0.83 and 1.01 m/s; at S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, they were 1.12 and 1.61 m/s at low and high flows, respectively. The low mean velocities for the same distance and S0โ€‰=โ€‰5 and 10% were 0.17 and 0.26 m/s, respectively.

Figure 16 shows the contour of the averaged depth velocity for various distances from the weir at low and high discharge. The contour plot shows a large variation in velocity within short distances from the weir. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, velocities are low upstream and downstream of the top of the weir. The high velocities occur in the side walls of the weir and the channel. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22, the low-velocity zone displaces the higher velocity in most of the pool. Higher velocities were found only on the sides of the channel. As the discharge increases, the velocity zone in the pool becomes wider. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, there is an area of higher velocities only upstream of the crest and on the sides of the weir. At high discharge, the prevailing maximum velocities for L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 were 1.46, 1.65, and 1.84 m/s, respectively. As the distance between weirs increases, the range of maximum velocity increases.

figure 16
Fig. 16

On the other hand, the low mean velocity for these distances was 0.27, 0.44, and 0.72 m/s, respectively. Thus, the low-velocity zone decreases with increasing distance between weirs. Figure 17 shows the pattern distribution of streamlines along with the velocity contour at various distances from the weir for Qโ€‰=โ€‰0.05 m3/s. A stream-like flow is generally formed in the pool at a small distance between weirs (L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61). The rotation cell under the jet forms clockwise between the two weirs. At the distances between the spillways (L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22), the transition regime of the flow is formed. The transition regime occurs when or shortly after the weir is flooded. The rotation cell under the jet is clockwise smaller than the flow regime and larger than the submergence regime. At a distance L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, a plunging flow is formed so that the plunging jet dips into the pool and extends downstream to the center of the pool. The clockwise rotation of the cell is bounded by the dipping jet of the weir and is located between the bottom and the side walls of the weir and the channel.

figure 17
Fig. 17

Figure 18 shows the average depth velocity bar graph for each weir at different bed slopes and with and without orifice plates. As the distance between weirs increases, all modelsโ€™ average depth velocity increases. As the slope of the bottom increases and an orifice plate is present, the average depth velocity in the pool increases. In addition, the average pool depth velocity increases as the discharge increases. Among the models, Model Aโ€™s average depth velocity is higher than Model Bโ€™s. The variation in velocity ranged from 8.11 to 12.24% for the models without an orifice plate and from 10.26 to 16.87% for the models with an orifice plate.

figure 18
Fig. 18

3.4 Turbulence Characteristics

The turbulent kinetic energy is one of the important parameters reflecting the turbulent properties of the flow field [23]. When the k value is high, more energy and a longer transit time are required to migrate the target species. The turbulent kinetic energy is defined as follows:

๏ฟฝ=12(๏ฟฝxโ€ฒ2+๏ฟฝyโ€ฒ2+๏ฟฝzโ€ฒ2)

(15)

where uxuy, and uz are fluctuating velocities in the xy, and z directions, respectively. An illustration of the TKE and the effects of the geometric arrangement of the weir and the presence of an opening in the weir is shown in Fig. 19. For a given bed slope, in Model A, the highest TKE values are uniformly distributed in the weirโ€™s upstream portion in the channelโ€™s cross section. In contrast, for the rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B), the highest TKE values are concentrated on the sides of the pool between the crest of the weir and the channel wall. The highest TKE value in Models A and B is 0.224 and 0.278 J/kg, respectively, at the highest bottom slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%). In the downstream portion of the conventional weir and within the crest of the weir and the walls of the rectangular labyrinth, there was a much lower TKE value that provided the best conditions for fish to recover in the pool between the weirs. The average of the lowest TKE for bottom slopes of 5 and 10% in Model A is 0.041 and 0.056 J/kg, and for Model B, is 0.047 and 0.064 J/kg. The presence of an opening in the weirs reduces the area of the highest TKE within the pool. It also increases the resting areas for fish (lower TKE). The highest TKE at the highest bottom slope in Models A and B with an orifice is 0.208 and 0.191 J/kg, respectively.

figure 19
Fig. 19

Figure 20 shows the effect of slope on the longitudinal distribution of TKE in the pools. TKE values significantly increase for a given discharge with an increasing bottom slope. Thus, for a low bed slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%), a large pool area has expanded with average values of 0.131 and 0.168 J/kg for low and high discharge, respectively. For a bed slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, the average TKE values are 0.176 and 0.234 J/kg. Furthermore, as the discharge increases, the area with high TKE values within the pool increases. Lower TKE values are observed at the apex of the labyrinth weir, at the corner of the wall downstream of the weir, and between the side walls of the weir and the channel wall for both bottom slopes. The effect of distance between weirs on TKE is shown in Fig. 21. Low TKE values were observed at low discharge and short distances between weirs. Low TKE values are located at the top of the rectangular labyrinth weir and the downstream corner of the weir wall. There is a maximum value of TKE at the large distances between weirs, L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, along the center line of the pool, where the dip jet meets the bottom of the bed. At high discharge, the maximum TKE value for the distance L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 was 0.246, 0.322, and 0.417 J/kg, respectively. In addition, the maximum TKE range increases with the distance between weirs.

figure 20
Fig. 20
figure 21
Fig. 21

For TKE size, the average value (TKEave) is plotted against q in Fig. 22. For all models, the TKE values increase with increasing q. For example, in models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and a slope of 10%, the TKE value increases by 41.66 and 86.95%, respectively, as q increases from 0.1 to 0.27 m2/s. The TKE values in Model B are higher than Model A for a given discharge, bed slope, and weir distance. The TKEave in Model B is higher compared to Model A, ranging from 31.46 to 57.94%. The presence of an orifice in the weir reduces the TKE values in both weirs. The intensity of the reduction is greater in Model B. For example, in Models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.1 m2/s, an orifice reduces TKEave values by 60.35 and 19.04%, respectively. For each model, increasing the bed slope increases the TKEave values in the pool. For example, for Model B with qโ€‰=โ€‰0.18 m2/s, increasing the bed slope from 5 to 10% increases the TKEave value by 14.34%. Increasing the distance between weirs increases the TKEave values in the pool. For example, in Model B with S0โ€‰=โ€‰10% and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.3 m2/s, the TKEave in the pool increases by 34.22% if you increase the distance between weirs from L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 to L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.183.

figure 22
Fig. 22

Cotel et al. [24] suggested that turbulence intensity (TI) is a suitable parameter for studying fish swimming performance. Figure 23 shows the plot of TI and the effects of the geometric arrangement of the weir and the presence of an orifice. In Model A, the highest TI values are found upstream of the weirs and are evenly distributed across the cross section of the channel. The TI values increase as you move upstream to downstream in the pool. For the rectangular labyrinth weir, the highest TI values were concentrated on the sides of the pool, between the top of the weir and the side wall of the channel, and along the top of the weir. Downstream of the conventional weir, within the apex of the weir, and at the corners of the walls of the rectangular labyrinth weir, the percentage of TI was low. At the highest discharge, the average range of TI in Models A and B was 24โ€“45% and 15โ€“62%, respectively. The diversity of TI is greater in the rectangular labyrinth weir than the conventional weir. Fish swimming performance is reduced due to higher turbulence intensity. However, fish species may prefer different disturbance intensities depending on their swimming abilities; for example, Salmo trutta prefers a disturbance intensity of 18โ€“53% [25]. Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26] found a higher range of TI for fishways, such as natural rock weirs, of 40โ€“60%. The presence of an orifice in the weir increases TI values within the pool, especially along the middle portion of the cross section of the fishway. With an orifice in the weir, the average range of TI in Models A and B was 28โ€“59% and 22โ€“73%, respectively.

figure 23
Fig. 23

The effect of bed slope on TI variation is shown in Fig. 24. TI increases in different pool areas as the bed slope increases for a given discharge. For a low bed slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%), a large pool area has increased from 38 to 63% and from 56 to 71% for low and high discharge, respectively. For a bed slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, the average values of TI are 45โ€“67% and 61โ€“73% for low and high discharge, respectively. Therefore, as runoff increases, the area with high TI values within the pool increases. A lower TI is observed for both bottom slopes in the corner of the wall, downstream of the crest walls, and between the side walls in the weir and channel. Figure 25 compares weir spacing with the distribution of TI values within the pool. The TI values are low at low flows and short distances between weirs. A maximum value of TI occurs at long spacing and where the plunging stream impinges on the bed and the area around the bed. TI ranges from 36 to 57%, 58โ€“72%, and 47โ€“76% for the highest flow in a wide pool area for L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83, respectively.

figure 24
Fig. 24
figure 25
Fig. 25

The average value of turbulence intensity (TIave) is plotted against q in Fig. 26. The increase in TI values with the increase in q values is seen in all models. For example, the average values of TI for Models A and B at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and slope of 10% increased from 23.9 to 33.5% and from 42 to 51.8%, respectively, with the increase in q from 0.1 to 0.27 m2/s. For a given discharge, a given gradient, and a given spacing of weirs, the TIave is higher in Model B than Model A. The presence of an orifice in the weirs increases the TI values in both types. For example, in Models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.1 m2/s, the presence of an orifice increases TIave from 23.9 to 37.1% and from 42 to 48.8%, respectively. For each model, TIave in the pool increases with increasing bed slope. For Model B with qโ€‰=โ€‰0.18 m2/s, TIave increases from 37.5 to 45.8% when you increase the invert slope from 5 to 10%. Increasing the distance between weirs increases the TIave in the pool. In Model B with S0โ€‰=โ€‰10% and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.3 m2/s, the TIave in the pool increases from 51.8 to 63.7% as the distance between weirs increases from L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 to L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.183.

figure 26
Fig. 26

3.5 Energy Dissipation

To facilitate the passage of various target species through the pool of fishways, it is necessary to pay attention to the energy dissipation of the flow and to keep the flow velocity in the pool slow. The average volumetric energy dissipation (k) in the pool is calculated using the following basic formula:

๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(16)

where ฯ is the water density, and H is the average water depth of the pool. The change in k versus Q for all models at two bottom slopes, S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%, and S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, is shown in Fig. 27. Like the results of Yagci [8] and Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26], at a constant bottom slope, the energy dissipation in the pool increases with increasing discharge. The trend of change in k as a function of Q from the present study at a bottom gradient of S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% is also consistent with the results of Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26] for the fishway with rock weir. The only difference between the results is the geometry of the fishway and the combination of boulders instead of a solid wall. Comparison of the models shows that the conventional model has lower energy dissipation than the rectangular labyrinth for a given discharge. Also, increasing the distance between weirs decreases the volumetric energy dissipation for each model with the same bed slope. Increasing the slope of the bottom leads to an increase in volumetric energy dissipation, and an opening in the weir leads to a decrease in volumetric energy dissipation for both models. Therefore, as a guideline for volumetric energy dissipation, if the value within the pool is too high, the increased distance of the weir, the decreased slope of the bed, or the creation of an opening in the weir would decrease the volumetric dissipation rate.

figure 27
Fig. 27

To evaluate the energy dissipation inside the pool, the general method of energy difference in two sections can use:

ฮต=๏ฟฝ1โˆ’๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ1

(17)

where ฮต is the energy dissipation rate, and E1 and E2 are the specific energies in Sects. 1 and 2, respectively. The distance between Sects. 1 and 2 is the same. (L is the distance between two upstream and downstream weirs.) Figure 28 shows the changes in ฮต relative to q (flow per unit width). The rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B) has a higher energy dissipation rate than the conventional weir (Model A) at a constant bottom gradient. For example, at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%, L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.08 m3/s.m, the energy dissipation rate in Model A (conventional weir) was 0.261. In Model B (rectangular labyrinth weir), however, it was 0.338 (22.75% increase). For each model, the energy dissipation rate within the pool increases as the slope of the bottom increases. For Model B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.178 m3/s.m, the energy dissipation rate at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% and 10% is 0.305 and 0.358, respectively (14.8% increase). Figure 29 shows an orificeโ€™s effect on the poolsโ€™ energy dissipation rate. With an orifice in the weir, both modelsโ€™ energy dissipation rates decreased. Thus, the reduction in energy dissipation rate varied from 7.32 to 9.48% for Model A and from 8.46 to 10.57 for Model B.

figure 28
Fig. 28
figure 29
Fig. 29

4 Discussion

This study consisted of entirely of numerical analysis. Although this study was limited to two weirs, the hydraulic performance and flow characteristics in a pooled fishway are highlighted by the rectangular labyrinth weir and its comparison with the conventional straight weir. The study compared the numerical simulations with laboratory experiments in terms of surface profiles, velocity vectors, and flow characteristics in a fish ladder pool. The results indicate agreement between the numerical and laboratory data, supporting the reliability of the numerical model in capturing the observed phenomena.

When the configuration of the weir changes to a rectangular labyrinth weir, the flow characteristics, the maximum and minimum area, and even the location of each hydraulic parameter change compared to a conventional weir. In the rectangular labyrinth weir, the flow is gradually directed to the sides as it passes the weir. This increases the velocity at the sides of the channel [21]. Therefore, the high-velocity area is located on the sides. In the downstream apex of the weir, the flow velocity is low, and this area may be suitable for swimming target fish. However, no significant change in velocity was observed at the conventional weir within the fish ladder. This resulted in an average increase in TKE of 32% and an average increase in TI of about 17% compared to conventional weirs.

In addition, there is a slight difference in the flow regime for both weir configurations. In addition, the rectangular labyrinth weir has a higher energy dissipation rate for a given discharge and constant bottom slope than the conventional weir. By reducing the distance between the weirs, this becomes even more intense. Finally, the presence of an orifice in both configurations of the weir increased the flow velocity at the orifice and in the middle of the pool, reducing the highest TKE value and increasing the values of TI within the pool of the fish ladder. This resulted in a reduction in volumetric energy dissipation for both weir configurations.

The results of this study will help the reader understand the direct effects of the governing geometric parameters on the hydraulic characteristics of a fishway with a pool and weir. However, due to the limited configurations of the study, further investigation is needed to evaluate the position of the weirโ€™s crest on the flow direction and the difference in flow characteristics when combining boulders instead of a solid wall for this type of labyrinth weir [26]. In addition, hydraulic engineers and biologists must work together to design an effective fishway with rectangular labyrinth configurations. The migration habits of the target species should be considered when designing the most appropriate design [27]. Parametric studies and field observations are recommended to determine the perfect design criteria.

The current study focused on comparing a rectangular labyrinth weir with a conventional straight weir. Further research can explore other weir configurations, such as variations in crest position, different shapes of labyrinth weirs, or the use of boulders instead of solid walls. This would help understand the influence of different geometric parameters on hydraulic characteristics.

5 Conclusions

A new layout of the weir was evaluated, namely a rectangular labyrinth weir compared to a straight weir in a pool and weir system. The differences between the weirs were highlighted, particularly how variations in the geometry of the structures, such as the shape of the weir, the spacing of the weir, the presence of an opening at the weir, and the slope of the bottom, affect the hydraulics within the structures. The main findings of this study are as follows:

  • The calculated dimensionless discharge (Qt*) confirmed three different flow regimes: when the corresponding range of Qt* is smaller than 0.6, the regime of plunging flow occurs for values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83. (L: distance of the weir; B: channel width). When the corresponding range of Qt* is greater than 0.5, transitional flow occurs at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22. On the other hand, if Qt* is greater than 1, the streaming flow is at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61.
  • For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir with the plunging flow, it can be assumed that the discharge (Q) is proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively (h: water depth above the weir). This information is useful for estimating the discharge based on water depth in practical applications.
  • In the rectangular labyrinth weir, the high-velocity zone is located on the side walls between the top of the weir and the channel wall. A high-velocity variation within short distances of the weir. Low velocity occurs within the downstream apex of the weir. This area may be suitable for swimming target fish.
  • As the distance between weirs increased, the zone of maximum velocity increased. However, the zone of low speed decreased. The prevailing maximum velocity for a rectangular labyrinth weir at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 was 1.46, 1.65, and 1.84 m/s, respectively. The low mean velocities for these distances were 0.27, 0.44, and 0.72 m/s, respectively. This finding highlights the importance of weir spacing in determining the flow characteristics within the fishway.
  • The presence of an orifice in the weir increased the flow velocity at the orifice and in the middle of the pool, especially in a conventional weir. The increase ranged from 7.7 to 12.48%.
  • For a given bottom slope, in a conventional weir, the highest values of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are uniformly distributed in the upstream part of the weir in the cross section of the channel. In contrast, for the rectangular labyrinth weir, the highest TKE values were concentrated on the sides of the pool between the crest of the weir and the channel wall. The highest TKE value for the conventional and the rectangular labyrinth weir was 0.224 and 0.278 J/kg, respectively, at the highest bottom slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%).
  • For a given discharge, bottom slope, and weir spacing, the average values of TI are higher for the rectangular labyrinth weir than for the conventional weir. At the highest discharge, the average range of turbulence intensity (TI) for the conventional and rectangular labyrinth weirs was between 24 and 45% and 15% and 62%, respectively. This reveals that the rectangular labyrinth weir may generate more turbulent flow conditions within the fishway.
  • For a given discharge and constant bottom slope, the rectangular labyrinth weir has a higher energy dissipation rate than the conventional weir (22.75 and 34.86%).
  • Increasing the distance between weirs decreased volumetric energy dissipation. However, increasing the gradient increased volumetric energy dissipation. The presence of an opening in the weir resulted in a decrease in volumetric energy dissipation for both model types.

Availability of data and materials

Data is contained within the article.

References

  1. Katopodis C (1992) Introduction to fishway design, working document. Freshwater Institute, Central Arctic Region
  2. Marriner, B.A.; Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Thiem, J.D.; Cooke, S.J.; Katopodis, C.: Field and numerical assessment of turning pool hydraulics in a vertical slot fishway. Ecol. Eng. 63, 88โ€“101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.010Article Google Scholar 
  3. Dasineh, M.; Ghaderi, A.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Ahmadi, M.; Kuriqi, A.: Prediction of hydraulic jumps on a triangular bed roughness using numerical modeling and soft computing methods. Mathematics 9, 3135 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  4. Silva, A.T.; Bermรบdez, M.; Santos, J.M.; Rabuรฑal, J.R.; Puertas, J.: Pool-type fishway design for a potamodromous cyprinid in the Iberian Peninsula: the Iberian barbelโ€”synthesis and future directions. Sustainability 12, 3387 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083387Article Google Scholar 
  5. Santos, J.M.; Branco, P.; Katopodis, C.; Ferreira, T.; Pinheiro, A.: Retrofitting pool-and-weir fishways to improve passage performance of benthic fishes: effect of boulder density and fishway discharge. Ecol. Eng. 73, 335โ€“344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.065Article Google Scholar 
  6. Ead, S.; Katopodis, C.; Sikora, G.; Rajaratnam, N.J.J.: Flow regimes and structure in pool and weir fishways. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 3, 379โ€“390 (2004)Article Google Scholar 
  7. Guiny, E.; Ervine, D.A.; Armstrong, J.D.: Hydraulic and biological aspects of fish passes for Atlantic salmon. J. Hydraul. Eng. 131, 542โ€“553 (2005)Article Google Scholar 
  8. Yagci, O.: Hydraulic aspects of pool-weir fishways as ecologically friendly water structure. Ecol. Eng. 36, 36โ€“46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.007Article Google Scholar 
  9. Dizabadi, S.; Hakim, S.S.; Azimi, A.H.: Discharge characteristics and structure of flow in labyrinth weirs with a downstream pool. Flow Meas. Instrum. 71, 101683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101683Article Google Scholar 
  10. Kim, J.H.: Hydraulic characteristics by weir type in a pool-weir fishway. Ecol. Eng. 16, 425โ€“433 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00125-7Article Google Scholar 
  11. Zhong, Z.; Ruan, T.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Xu, W.: Experimental and numerical assessment of hydraulic characteristic of a new semi-frustum weir in the pool-weir fishway. Ecol. Eng. 170, 106362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106362Article Google Scholar 
  12. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201โ€“225 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5Article Google Scholar 
  13. Roache, P.J.: Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J. Fluids Eng. 1994(116), 405โ€“413 (1994)Article Google Scholar 
  14. Guo, S.; Chen, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, S.: CFD and experimental investigations of drag force on spherical leak detector in pipe flows at high Reynolds number. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 101(1), 59โ€“80 (2014)Google Scholar 
  15. Ahmadi, M.; Kuriqi, A.; Nezhad, H.M.; Ghaderi, A.; Mohammadi, M.: Innovative configuration of vertical slot fishway to enhance fish swimming conditions. J. Hydrodyn. 34, 917โ€“933 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0071-yArticle Google Scholar 
  16. Ahmadi, M.; Ghaderi, A.; MohammadNezhad, H.; Kuriqi, A.; Di Francesco, S.J.W.: Numerical investigation of hydraulics in a vertical slot fishway with upgraded configurations. Water 13, 2711 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  17. Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.; Freitas, C.J.J.: Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953Article Google Scholar 
  18. Li, S.; Yang, J.; Ansell, A.: Evaluation of pool-type fish passage with labyrinth weirs. Sustainability (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031098Article Google Scholar 
  19. Ghaderi, A.; Dasineh, M.; Aristodemo, F.; Aricรฒ, C.: Numerical simulations of the flow field of a submerged hydraulic jump over triangular macroroughnesses. Water 13(5), 674 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  20. Branco, P.; Santos, J.M.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.; Ferreira, M.T.: Pool-type fishways: two different morpho-ecological cyprinid species facing plunging and streaming flows. PLoS ONE 8, e65089 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065089Article Google Scholar 
  21. Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Harwood, A.; Lewis, A.; Healey, K.: Rock-weir fishway I: flow regimes and hydraulic characteristics. J. Ecohydraulics 2, 122โ€“141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2017.1369182Article Google Scholar 
  22. Dizabadi, S.; Azimi, A.H.: Hydraulic and turbulence structure of triangular labyrinth weir-pool fishways. River Res. Appl. 36, 280โ€“295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3581Article Google Scholar 
  23. Faizal, W.M.; Ghazali, N.N.N.; Khor, C.Y.; Zainon, M.Z.; Ibrahim, N.B.; Razif, R.M.: Turbulent kinetic energy of flow during inhale and exhale to characterize the severity of obstructive sleep apnea patient. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 136(1), 43โ€“61 (2023)Google Scholar 
  24. Cotel, A.J.; Webb, P.W.; Tritico, H.: Do brown trout choose locations with reduced turbulence? Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 610โ€“619 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1577/T04-196.1Article Google Scholar 
  25. Hargreaves, D.M.; Wright, N.G.: On the use of the kโ€“ฮต model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 95, 355โ€“369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.08.002Article Google Scholar 
  26. Kupferschmidt, C.; Zhu, D.Z.: Physical modelling of pool and weir fishways with rock weirs. River Res. Appl. 33, 1130โ€“1142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3157Article Google Scholar 
  27. Romรฃo, F.; Quaresma, A.L.; Santos, J.M.; Amaral, S.D.; Branco, P.; Pinheiro, A.N.: Multislot fishway improves entrance performance and fish transit time over vertical slots. Water (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030275Article Google Scholar 

Download references

FLOW-3Dย 2024R1ย ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3Dย 2024R1ย ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D 2024R1์€ ๋ฒ„๋ธ” ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ • ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์† ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํŠนํžˆ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์„ค์ • ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋” ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ก์ฒด-์ฆ๊ธฐ ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ต์…˜์„ ๊ณ ์ฒด-์•ก์ฒด ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ต์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฃนํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์—ด ๋ฒ„๋ธ” ๋ฐ ์—ด ๋ฒ„๋ธ” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉ๋œ ์ด์ƒ ๊ธฐ์ฒด ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ ์ž…๋ ฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ค„์ด๊ณ , ์ž…๋ ฅ์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ƒ์ „์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž์—ฐ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๊ทธ๋ฃนํ™”๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด EXODUS II ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด-๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ฐ ์—ด ์‘๋ ฅ ์ง„ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D 2023R2 ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹

FLOW-3D POST 2023R2 ๋Š” EXODUS II ํ˜•์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅธ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์€ ํฌ๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์ž‘์—…์— ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์—(ํ‰๊ท  ์ตœ๋Œ€ 5๋ฐฐ!) ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋„๊ตฌ์™€์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D POST 2023R2 ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ด์ œ selected data๋ฅผ flsgrf , EXODUS II ๋‘˜์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜ ๋˜๋Š” flsgrf ์™€ EXODUS II ๋‘˜๋‹ค ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ์“ธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด EXODUS II ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์€ ๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ˜ธํ™˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํฌ์ŠคํŠธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ๋ฐ FEA ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FLOW-3D ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์—ด ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํฌ๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์‹ ์†ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž„์˜ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ์˜ ์Šฌ๋ผ์ด์‹ฑ, ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ๋ฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

๋ ˆ์ด ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด์‹ฑ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™”์žฅํ’ˆ ํฌ๋ฆผ ์ถฉ์ „
FLOW-3D POST ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด EXODUS II ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ฑ„์›Œ์ง„ ํ™”์žฅํ’ˆ ํฌ๋ฆผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ด‘์„  ์ถ”์  ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์˜ˆ

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์€ ์†”๋ฒ„ ์—”์ง„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด์„œ flsgrf ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ์ž‘์—… ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ๋†€๋ผ์šด ์†๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์ž๋ž‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์†๋„์™€ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์–ด ์›ํ™œํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

FLOW-3D POST ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์„ธ์š” .

๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ์„ 

FLOW-3D 2023R2๋Š” two-equation(RANS) ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ dynamic mixing length ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ธต๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŠน์ • ์ œํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์ „ ๋ฒ„์ „์˜ ์ฝ”๋“œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋˜์–ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • mixing length๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด dynamic mixing length ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ธธ์ด์™€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฒ™๋„๋ฅผ ๋” ์ž˜ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๊ณ ์ •๋œ(๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜) mixing length๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹  ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ‘์ด‰์‹ ํƒฑํฌ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜
์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ณ ์ • mixing length์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ‘์ด‰ ํƒฑํฌ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋™์  mixing length ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋™์  mixing length ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต

์ •์ˆ˜์•• ์ดˆ๊ธฐํ™”

์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์ •์˜๋œ ์œ ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ •์ˆ˜์••์„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ „์—๋Š” ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ •์ˆ˜์•• ์†”๋ฒ„์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ด ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D 2023R2๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜์•• ์†”๋ฒ„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผœ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 6๋ฐฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•ด์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„ ์†”๋ฒ„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D 2023R2๋Š” ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์••๋ ฅ ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์ œํŠธ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์˜ˆ์—์„œ 2023R2 ์†”๋ฒ„๋Š” 2023R1 ๋ฒ„์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ์ตœ๋Œ€ 4๋ฐฐ ๋น ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์ œํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜
FLOW-3D ์˜ ์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์ œํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ์˜ˆ

FLOW-3D 2023R2 ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ œํ’ˆ์€ 2023R2์—์„œ IT ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ฐœ์„  ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  FLOW-3D 2023R2์€ ์ด์ œ Windows 11 ๋ฐ RHEL 8์„ ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Linux ์„ค์น˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋ˆ„๋ฝ๋œ ์ข…์†์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋” ์ด์ƒ ๋ฃจํŠธ ์ˆ˜์ค€ ๊ถŒํ•œ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์„ค์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋” ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ์•ˆ์ „ํ•ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์ž๋™ํ™”ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž…๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ์— ๋ช…๋ น์ค„ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋„ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋œ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ™•์žฅ๋œ PQ 2 ๋ถ„์„

์ œ์กฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์œ ์•• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ PQ 2 ๊ณก์„ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ๊ฑด๋„ˆ๋›ฐ๊ณ  ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ์†Œ์Šค ๋˜๋Š” ์†๋„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์•• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด PQ 2 ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋กœ์จ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D 2022R2 ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D 2022R2 ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ ์ถœ์‹œ๋กœ Flow Science๋Š” FLOW-3D ์˜ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜๊ณผ HPC ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ธ๋“œ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋‹จ์ผ ๋…ธ๋“œ CPU ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋…ธ๋“œ์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์†”๋ฒ„ ์—”์ง„์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์—๋Š” ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋กœ๊ทธ ํ˜•ํƒœ ํ…์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์†”๋ฒ„ ์†๋„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐœ์„ , ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ฐ ํŒฌํ…€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์š”์†Œ ์ œ์–ด, entrained air ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์†”๋ฒ„

FLOW-3D ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๋‹จ์ผ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์†”๋ฒ„๋กœ ๋งˆ์ด๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋กœ์ปฌ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜์ด๋‚˜ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งŽ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด๋‚˜ ๋กœ์ปฌ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ์—์„œ ๋” ํฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 2022R2 ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค์—์„œ๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ HPC ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์˜ Open MP/MPI ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™”์™€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ด์ ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ™•์žฅ์˜ ์˜ˆ
CPU ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ™•์žฅ์˜ ์˜ˆ
๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๋ถ„ํ•ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
Open MP/MPI ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฉ”์‹œ ๋ถ„ํ•ด์˜ ์˜ˆ

์†”๋ฒ„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐœ์„ 

๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์†Œ์ผ“ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜

๋‹ค์ค‘ ์†Œ์ผ“ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜์€ ์ด์ œ ๋งค์šฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ HPC ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋˜ OpenMP/MPI ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™”๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฃจํ‹ด์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๋ฒกํ„ฐํ™” ๋ฐ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค

๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ 10~20% ์ •๋„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ๋Š” 20%๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋Ÿฐํƒ€์ž„ ์ด์ ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ •์ œ๋œ ์ฒด์  ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ•œ๊ณ„

Time step ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋Ÿฐํƒ€์ž„์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์š”์ธ์ด๋ฉฐ, 2022R2์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด time step ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ธ 3D ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ Numerics ํƒญ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ–‰ ์ค‘์ด๊ณ  ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์ œํ•œ๋œ(cx, cy ๋˜๋Š” cz ์ œํ•œ) ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒˆ ์˜ต์…˜์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์†๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ 30% ์ •๋„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์••๋ ฅ ์†”๋ฒ„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ปจ๋””์…”๋„ˆ

๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กœ์šด ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์••๋ ฅ ์†”๋ฒ„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์‹คํ–‰ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 2022R2์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋˜๋ฉด FLOW-3D๊ฐ€ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ปจ๋””์…”๋„ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ์••๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜๋ ด์„ ๋•์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Ÿฐํƒ€์ž„์ด 1.9~335๋ฐฐ ๋” ๋นจ๋ผ์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค!

์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋กœ๊ทธ ํ˜•ํƒœ ํ…์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์†”๋ฒ„ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ๋†’์€ Weissenberg ์ˆ˜์— ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜
๋กœ๊ทธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํ…์„œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋†’์€ Weissenberg ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์˜ ์˜ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ๊ณต: MF Tome ์™ธ, J. Non-Newton. Fluid. Mech. 175-176 (2012) 44โ€“54

ํ™œ์„ฑ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ œ์–ด ํ™•์žฅ

Active simulation ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์–ด ์—ฐ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ํŒฌํ…€ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์—ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„์—๋„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์†๋„ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
์—ฐ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์†๋„ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
๋™์  ์—ด ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
์œตํ•ฉ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋™์  ์—ด ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
๋™์  ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ
์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ํƒฑํฌ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋™์  ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์˜ˆ

ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

๋””ํ“จ์ € ๋ฐ ์ด์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ๊ธฐํฌ ํ๋ฆ„ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด์ œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์›์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ์— ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋™๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์šฉ์กด ์‚ฐ์†Œ์˜ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ฐ’์ด ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋””ํ“จ์ € ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜ˆ
๋””ํ“จ์ € ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜ˆ: ์ด์ œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ์— ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ์•„์นด์ด๋ธŒ ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D 2022R1 ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

FLOW-3D v12.0 ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

Predicting solid-state phase transformations during metal additive manufacturing: A case study on electron-beam powder bed fusion of Inconel-738

Predicting solid-state phase transformations during metal additive manufacturing: A case study on electron-beam powder bed fusion of Inconel-738

๊ธˆ์† ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ์ค‘ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ์˜ˆ์ธก: Inconel-738์˜ ์ „์ž๋น” ๋ถ„๋ง์ธต ์œตํ•ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Nana Kwabenaย Adomakoย a,ย Nimaย Haghdadiย a,ย James F.L.ย Dingleย bc,ย Ernstย Kozeschnikย d,ย Xiaozhouย Liaoย bc,ย Simon P.ย Ringerย bc,ย Sophieย Primigย a

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) has now become the perhaps most desirable technique for producing complex shaped engineering parts. However, to truly take advantage of its capabilities, advanced control of AM microstructures and properties is required, and this is often enabled via modeling. The current work presents a computational modeling approach to studying the solid-state phase transformation kinetics and the microstructural evolution during AM. Our approach combines thermal and thermo-kinetic modelling. A semi-analytical heat transfer model is employed to simulate the thermal history throughout AM builds. Thermal profiles of individual layers are then used as input for the MatCalc thermo-kinetic software. The microstructural evolution (e.g., fractions, morphology, and composition of individual phases) for any region of interest throughout the build is predicted by MatCalc. The simulation is applied to an IN738 part produced by electron beam powder bed fusion to provide insights into how ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates evolve during thermal cycling. Our simulations show qualitative agreement with our experimental results in predicting the size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ along the build height, its multimodal size character, as well as the volume fraction of MC carbides. Our findings indicate that our method is suitable for a range of AM processes and alloys, to predict and engineer their microstructures and properties.

Graphical Abstract

ga1

Keywords

Additive manufacturing, Simulation, Thermal cycles, ฮณโ€ฒ phase, IN738

1. Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an advanced manufacturing method that enables engineering parts with intricate shapes to be fabricated with high efficiency and minimal materials waste. AM involves building up 3D components layer-by-layer from feedstocks such as powder [1]. Various alloys, including steel, Ti, Al, and Ni-based superalloys, have been produced using different AM techniques. These techniques include directed energy deposition (DED), electron- and laser powder bed fusion (E-PBF and L-PBF), and have found applications in a variety of industries such as aerospace and power generation [2][3][4]. Despite the growing interest, certain challenges limit broader applications of AM fabricated components in these industries and others. One of such limitations is obtaining a suitable and reproducible microstructure that offers the desired mechanical properties consistently. In fact, the AM as-built microstructure is highly complex and considerably distinctive from its conventionally processed counterparts owing to the complicated thermal cycles arising from the deposition of several layers upon each other [5][6].

Several studies have reported that the solid-state phases and solidification microstructure of AM processed alloys such as CMSX-4, CoCr [7][8], Ti-6Al-4V [9][10][11]IN738 [6]304L stainless steel [12], and IN718 [13][14] exhibit considerable variations along the build direction. For instance, references [9][10] have reported that there is a variation in the distribution of ฮฑ and ฮฒ phases along the build direction in Ti-alloys. Similarly, the microstructure of an L-PBF fabricated martensitic steel exhibits variations in the fraction of martensite [15]. Furthermore, some of the present authors and others [6][16][17][18][19][20] have recently reviewed and reported that there is a difference in the morphology and fraction of nanoscale precipitates as a function of build height in Ni-based superalloys. These non-uniformities in the as-built microstructure result in an undesired heterogeneity in mechanical and other important properties such as corrosion and oxidation [19][21][22][23]. To obtain the desired microstructure and properties, additional processing treatments are utilized, but this incurs extra costs and may lead to precipitation of detrimental phases and grain coarsening. Therefore, a through-process understanding of the microstructure evolution under repeated heating and cooling is now needed to further advance 3D printed microstructure and property control.

It is now commonly understood that the microstructure evolution during printing is complex, and most AM studies concentrate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the final build only. Post-printing studies of microstructure characteristics at room temperature miss crucial information on how they evolve. In-situ measurements and modelling approaches are required to better understand the complex microstructural evolution under repeated heating and cooling. Most in-situ measurements in AM focus on monitoring the microstructural changes, such as phase transformations and melt pool dynamics during fabrication using X-ray scattering and high-speed X-ray imaging [24][25][26][27]. For example, Zhao et al. [25] measured the rate of solidification and described the ฮฑ/ฮฒ phase transformation during L-PBF of Ti-6Al-4V in-situ. Also, Wahlmann et al. [21] recently used an L-PBF machine coupled with X-ray scattering to investigate the changes in CMSX-4 phase during successive melting processes. Although these techniques provide significant understanding of the basic principles of AM, they are not widely accessible. This is due to the great cost of the instrument, competitive application process, and complexities in terms of the experimental set-up, data collection, and analysis [26][28].

Computational modeling techniques are promising and more widely accessible tools that enable advanced understanding, prediction, and engineering of microstructures and properties during AM. So far, the majority of computational studies have concentrated on physics based process models for metal AM, with the goal of predicting the temperature profile, heat transfer, powder dynamics, and defect formation (e.g., porosity) [29][30]. In recent times, there have been efforts in modeling of the AM microstructure evolution using approaches such as phase-field [31], Monte Carlo (MC) [32], and cellular automata (CA) [33], coupled with finite element simulations for temperature profiles. However, these techniques are often restricted to simulating the evolution of solidification microstructures (e.g., grain and dendrite structure) and defects (e.g., porosity). For example, Zinovieva et al. [33] predicted the grain structure of L-PBF Ti-6Al-4V using finite difference and cellular automata methods. However, studies on the computational modelling of the solid-state phase transformations, which largely determine the resulting properties, remain limited. This can be attributed to the multi-component and multi-phase nature of most engineering alloys in AM, along with the complex transformation kinetics during thermal cycling. This kind of research involves predictions of the thermal cycle in AM builds, and connecting it to essential thermodynamic and kinetic data as inputs for the model. Based on the information provided, the thermokinetic model predicts the history of solid-state phase microstructure evolution during deposition as output. For example, a multi-phase, multi-component mean-field model has been developed to simulate the intermetallic precipitation kinetics in IN718 [34] and IN625 [35] during AM. Also, Basoalto et al. [36] employed a computational framework to examine the contrasting distributions of process-induced microvoids and precipitates in two Ni-based superalloys, namely IN718 and CM247LC. Furthermore, McNamara et al. [37] established a computational model based on the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami model for non-isothermal conditions to predict solid-state phase transformation kinetics in L-PBF IN718 and DED Ti-6Al-4V. These models successfully predicted the size and volume fraction of individual phases and captured the repeated nucleation and dissolution of precipitates that occur during AM.

In the current study, we propose a modeling approach with appreciably short computational time to investigate the detailed microstructural evolution during metal AM. This may include obtaining more detailed information on the morphologies of phases, such as size distribution, phase fraction, dissolution and nucleation kinetics, as well as chemistry during thermal cycling and final cooling to room temperature. We utilize the combination of the MatCalc thermo-kinetic simulator and a semi-analytical heat conduction model. MatCalc is a software suite for simulation of phase transformations, microstructure evolution and certain mechanical properties in engineering alloys. It has successfully been employed to simulate solid-state phase transformations in Ni-based superalloys [38][39], steels [40], and Al alloys [41] during complex thermo-mechanical processes. MatCalc uses the classical nucleation theory as well as the so-called Svoboda-Fischer-Fratzl-Kozeschnik (SFFK) growth model as the basis for simulating precipitation kinetics [42]. Although MatCalc was originally developed for conventional thermo-mechanical processes, we will show that it is also applicable for AM if the detailed time-temperature profile of the AM build is known. The semi-analytical heat transfer code developed by Stump and Plotkowski [43] is used to simulate these profile throughout the AM build.

1.1. Application to IN738

Inconel-738 (IN738) is a precipitation hardening Ni-based superalloy mainly employed in high-temperature components, e.g. in gas turbines and aero-engines owing to its exceptional mechanical properties at temperatures up to 980 ยฐC, coupled with high resistance to oxidation and corrosion [44]. Its superior high-temperature strength (โˆผ1090 MPa tensile strength) is provided by the L12 ordered Ni3(Al,Ti) ฮณโ€ฒ phase that precipitates in a face-centered cubic (FCC) ฮณ matrix [45][46]. Despite offering great properties, IN738, like most superalloys with high ฮณโ€ฒ fractions, is challenging to process owing to its propensity to hot cracking [47][48]. Further, machining of such alloys is challenging because of their high strength and work-hardening rates. It is therefore difficult to fabricate complex INC738 parts using traditional manufacturing techniques like casting, welding, and forging.

The emergence of AM has now made it possible to fabricate such parts from IN738 and other superalloys. Some of the current authorsโ€™ recent research successfully applied E-PBF to fabricate defect-free IN738 containing ฮณโ€ฒ throughout the build [16][17]. The precipitated ฮณโ€ฒ were heterogeneously distributed. In particular, Haghdadi et al. [16] studied the origin of the multimodal size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ, while Lim et al. [17] investigated the gradient in ฮณโ€ฒ character with build height and its correlation to mechanical properties. Based on these results, the present study aims to extend the understanding of the complex and site-specific microstructural evolution in E-PBF IN738 by using a computational modelling approach. New experimental evidence (e.g., micrographs not published previously) is presented here to support the computational results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials preparation

IN738 Ni-based superalloy (59.61Ni-8.48Co-7.00Al-17.47Cr-3.96Ti-1.01Mo-0.81W-0.56Ta-0.49Nb-0.47C-0.09Zr-0.05B, at%) gas-atomized powder was used as feedstock. The powders, with average size of 60 ยฑ 7 ยตm, were manufactured by Praxair and distributed by Astro Alloys Inc. An Arcam Q10 machine by GE Additive with an acceleration voltage of 60 kV was used to fabricate a 15 ร— 15 ร— 25 mm3 block (XYZ, Z: build direction) on a 316 stainless steel substrate. The block was 3D-printed using a ‘random’ spot melt pattern. The random spot melt pattern involves randomly selecting points in any given layer, with an equal chance of each point being melted. Each spot melt experienced a dwell time of 0.3 ms, and the layer thickness was 50 ยตm. Some of the current authors have previously characterized the microstructure of the very same and similar builds in more detail [16][17]. A preheat temperature of โˆผ1000 ยฐC was set and kept during printing to reduce temperature gradients and, in turn, thermal stresses [49][50][51]. Following printing, the build was separated from the substrate through electrical discharge machining. It should be noted that this sample was simultaneously printed with the one used in [17] during the same build process and on the same build plate, under identical conditions.

2.2. Microstructural characterization

The printed sample was longitudinally cut in the direction of the build using a Struers Accutom-50, ground, and then polished to 0.25 ยตm suspension via standard techniques. The polished x-z surface was electropolished and etched using Struers A2 solution (perchloric acid in ethanol). Specimens for image analysis were polished using a 0.06 ยตm colloidal silica. Microstructure analyses were carried out across the height of the build using optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with focus on the microstructure evolution (ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates) in individual layers. The position of each layer being analyzed was determined by multiplying the layer number by the layer thickness (50 ยตm). It should be noted that the position of the first layer starts where the thermal profile is tracked (in this case, 2 mm from the bottom). SEM images were acquired using a JEOL 7001 field emission microscope. The brightness and contrast settings, acceleration voltage of 15 kV, working distance of 10 mm, and other SEM imaging parameters were all held constant for analysis of the entire build. The ImageJ software was used for automated image analysis to determine the phase fraction and size of ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates and carbides. A 2-pixel radius Gaussian blur, following a greyscale thresholding and watershed segmentation was used [52]. Primary ฮณโ€ฒ sizes (>50 nm), were measured using equivalent spherical diameters. The phase fractions were considered equal to the measured area fraction. Secondary ฮณโ€ฒ particles (<50 nm) were not considered here. The ฮณโ€ฒ size in the following refers to the diameter of a precipitate.

2.3. Hardness testing

A Struers DuraScan tester was utilized for Vickers hardness mapping on a polished x-z surface, from top to bottom under a maximum load of 100 mN and 10 s dwell time. 30 micro-indentations were performed per row. According to the ASTM standard [53], the indentations were sufficiently distant (โˆผ500 ยตm) to assure that strain-hardened areas did not interfere with one another.

2.4. Computational simulation of E-PBF IN738 build

2.4.1. Thermal profile modeling

The thermal history was generated using the semi-analytical heat transfer code (also known as the 3DThesis code) developed by Stump and Plotkowski [43]. This code is an open-source C++ program which provides a way to quickly simulate the conductive heat transfer found in welding and AM. The key use case for the code is the simulation of larger domains than is practicable with Computational Fluid Dynamics/Finite Element Analysis programs like FLOW-3D AM. Although simulating conductive heat transfer will not be an appropriate simplification for some investigations (for example the modelling of keyholding or pore formation), the 3DThesis code does provide fast estimates of temperature, thermal gradient, and solidification rate which can be useful for elucidating microstructure formation across entire layers of an AM build. The mathematics involved in the code is as follows:

In transient thermal conduction during welding and AM, with uniform and constant thermophysical properties and without considering fluid convection and latent heat effects, energy conservation can be expressed as:(1)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝโˆ‡2๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝฬ‡where ๏ฟฝ is density, ๏ฟฝ specific heat, ๏ฟฝ temperature, ๏ฟฝ time, ๏ฟฝ thermal conductivity, and ๏ฟฝฬ‡ a volumetric heat source. By assuming a semi-infinite domain, Eq. 1 can be analytically solved. The solution for temperature at a given time (t) using a volumetric Gaussian heat source is presented as:(2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ0=33๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ32โˆซ0๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝexpโˆ’3๏ฟฝโ€ฒ๏ฟฝโ€ฒ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโ€ฒ๏ฟฝโ€ฒ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโ€ฒ๏ฟฝโ€ฒ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ€ฒ(3)and๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=12๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝโ€ฒ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2for๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ(4)and๏ฟฝโ€ฒ๏ฟฝโ€ฒ=๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ€ฒWhere ๏ฟฝ is the vector ๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the location of the heat source.

The numerical integration scheme used is an adaptive Gaussian quadrature method based on the following nondimensionalization:(5)๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy2๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝโ€ฒ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy2๏ฟฝโ€ฒ,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxy

A more detailed explanation of the mathematics can be found in reference [43].

The main source of the thermal cycling present within a powder-bed fusion process is the fusion of subsequent layers. Therefore, regions near the top of a build are expected to undergo fewer thermal cycles than those closer to the bottom. For this purpose, data from the single scan’s thermal influence on multiple layers was spliced to represent the thermal cycles experienced at a single location caused by multiple subsequent layers being fused.

The cross-sectional area simulated by this model was kept constant at 1โ€‰ร—โ€‰1โ€‰mm2, and the depth was dependent on the build location modelled with MatCalc. For a build location 2โ€‰mm from the bottom, the maximum number of layers to simulate is 460. Fig. 1a shows a stitched overview OM image of the entire build indicating the region where this thermal cycle is simulated and tracked. To increase similarity with the conditions of the physical build, each thermal history was constructed from the results of two simulations generated with different versions of a random scan path. The parameters used for these thermal simulations can be found in Table 1. It should be noted that the main purpose of the thermal profile modelling was to demonstrate how the conditions at different locations of the build change relative to each other. Accurately predicting the absolute temperature during the build would require validation via a temperature sensor measurement during the build process which is beyond the scope of the study. Nonetheless, to establish the viability of the heat source as a suitable approximation for this study, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted. This analysis focused on the influence of energy input on ฮณโ€ฒ precipitation behavior, the central aim of this paper. This was achieved by employing varying beam absorption energies (0.76, 0.82 – the values utilized in the simulation, and 0.9). The direct impact of beam absorption efficiency on energy input into the material was investigated. Specifically, the initial 20 layers of the build were simulated and subsequently compared to experimental data derived from SEM. While phase fractions were found to be consistent across all conditions, disparities emerged in the mean size of ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates. An absorption efficiency of 0.76 yielded a mean size of approximately 70โ€‰nm. Conversely, absorption efficiencies of 0.82 and 0.9 exhibited remarkably similar mean sizes of around 130โ€‰nm, aligning closely with the outcomes of the experiments.

Fig. 1

Table 1. A list of parameters used in thermal simulation of E-PBF.

ParameterValue
Spatial resolution5โ€‰ยตm
Time step0.5โ€‰s
Beam diameter200โ€‰ยตm
Beam penetration depth1โ€‰ยตm
Beam power1200โ€‰W
Beam absorption efficiency0.82
Thermal conductivity25.37โ€‰W/(mโ‹…K)
Chamber temperature1000โ€‰ยฐC
Specific heat711.756โ€‰J/(kgโ‹…K)
Density8110โ€‰kg/m3

2.4.2. Thermo-kinetic simulation

The numerical analyses of the evolution of precipitates was performed using MatCalc version 6.04 (rel 0.011). The thermodynamic (โ€˜mc_ni.tdbโ€™, version 2.034) and diffusion (โ€˜mc_ni.ddbโ€™, version 2.007) databases were used. MatCalc’s basic principles are elaborated as follows:

The nucleation kinetics of precipitates are computed using a computational technique based on a classical nucleation theory [54] that has been modified for systems with multiple components [42][55]. Accordingly, the transient nucleation rate (๏ฟฝ), which expresses the rate at which nuclei are formed per unit volume and time, is calculated as:(6)๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ*โˆ™๏ฟฝxpโˆ’๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝโˆ™๏ฟฝโˆ™expโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwhere ๏ฟฝ0 denotes the number of active nucleation sites, ๏ฟฝ* the rate of atomic attachment, ๏ฟฝ the Boltzmann constant, ๏ฟฝ the temperature, ๏ฟฝ* the critical energy for nucleus formation, ฯ„ the incubation time, and t the time. ๏ฟฝ (Zeldovich factor) takes into consideration that thermal excitation destabilizes the nucleus as opposed to its inactive state [54]. Z is defined as follows:(7)๏ฟฝ=โˆ’12๏ฟฝkTโˆ‚2โˆ†๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ*12where โˆ†๏ฟฝ is the overall change in free energy due to the formation of a nucleus and n is the nucleus’ number of atoms. โˆ†๏ฟฝโ€™s derivative is evaluated at n* (critical nucleus size). ๏ฟฝ* accounts for the long-range diffusion of atoms required for nucleation, provided that the matrixโ€™ and precipitatesโ€™ composition differ. Svoboda et al. [42] developed an appropriate multi-component equation for ๏ฟฝ*, which is given by:(8)๏ฟฝ*=4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ*2๏ฟฝ4๏ฟฝโˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝkiโˆ’๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝโˆ’1where ๏ฟฝ* denotes the critical radius for nucleation, ๏ฟฝ represents atomic distance, and ๏ฟฝ is the molar volume. ๏ฟฝki and ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ represent the concentration of elements in the precipitate and matrix, respectively. The parameter ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ denotes the rate of diffusion of the ith element within the matrix. The expression for the incubation time ๏ฟฝ is expressed as [54]:(9)๏ฟฝ=12๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ2

and ๏ฟฝ*, which represents the critical energy for nucleation:(10)๏ฟฝ*=16๏ฟฝ3๏ฟฝ3โˆ†๏ฟฝvol2where ๏ฟฝ is the interfacial energy, and โˆ†Gvol the change in the volume free energy. The critical nucleus’ composition is similar to the ฮณโ€ฒ phase’s equilibrium composition at the same temperature. ๏ฟฝ is computed based on the precipitate and matrix compositions, using a generalized nearest neighbor broken bond model, with the assumption of interfaces being planar, sharp, and coherent [56][57][58].

In Eq. 7, it is worth noting that ๏ฟฝ* represents the fundamental variable in the nucleation theory. It contains ๏ฟฝ3/โˆ†๏ฟฝvol2 and is in the exponent of the nucleation rate. Therefore, even small variations in ฮณ and/or โˆ†๏ฟฝvol can result in notable changes in ๏ฟฝ, especially if ๏ฟฝ* is in the order of ๏ฟฝโˆ™๏ฟฝ. This is demonstrated in [38] for UDIMET 720 Li during continuous cooling, where these quantities change steadily during precipitation due to their dependence on matrixโ€™ and precipitateโ€™s temperature and composition. In the current work, these changes will be even more significant as the system is exposed to multiple cycles of rapid cooling and heating.

Once nucleated, the growth of a precipitate is assessed using the radius and composition evolution equations developed by Svoboda et al. [42] with a mean-field method that employs the thermodynamic extremal principle. The expression for the total Gibbs free energy of a thermodynamic system G, which consists of n components and m precipitates, is given as follows:(11)๏ฟฝ=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ33๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝki๏ฟฝki+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ.

The chemical potential of component ๏ฟฝ in the matrix is denoted as ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ=1,โ€ฆ,๏ฟฝ), while the chemical potential of component ๏ฟฝ in the precipitate is represented by ๏ฟฝki(๏ฟฝ=1,โ€ฆ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ=1,โ€ฆ,๏ฟฝ). These chemical potentials are defined as functions of the concentrations ๏ฟฝki(๏ฟฝ=1,โ€ฆ,๏ฟฝ,๏ฟฝ=1,โ€ฆ,๏ฟฝ). The interface energy density is denoted as ๏ฟฝ, and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ incorporates the effects of elastic energy and plastic work resulting from the volume change of each precipitate.

Eq. (12) establishes that the total free energy of the system in its current state relies on the independent state variables: the sizes (radii) of the precipitates ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and the concentrations of each component ๏ฟฝki. The remaining variables can be determined by applying the law of mass conservation to each component ๏ฟฝ. This can be represented by the equation:(12)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ33๏ฟฝki,

Furthermore, the global mass conservation can be expressed by equation:(13)๏ฟฝ=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝWhen a thermodynamic system transitions to a more stable state, the energy difference between the initial and final stages is dissipated. This model considers three distinct forms of dissipation effects [42]. These include dissipations caused by the movement of interfaces, diffusion within the precipitate and diffusion within the matrix.

Consequently, ๏ฟฝฬ‡๏ฟฝ (growth rate) and ๏ฟฝฬ‡ki (chemical compositionโ€™s rate of change) of the precipitate with index ๏ฟฝ are derived from the linear system of equation system:(14)๏ฟฝij๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwhere ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ symbolizes the rates ๏ฟฝฬ‡๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝฬ‡ki [42]. Index i contains variables for precipitate radius, chemical composition, and stoichiometric boundary conditions suggested by the precipitate’s crystal structure. Eq. (10) is computed separately for every precipitate ๏ฟฝ. For a more detailed description of the formulae for the coefficients ๏ฟฝij and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ employed in this work please refer to [59].

The MatCalc software was used to perform the numerical time integration of ๏ฟฝฬ‡๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝฬ‡ki of precipitates based on the classical numerical method by Kampmann and Wagner [60]. Detailed information on this method can be found in [61]. Using this computational method, calculations for E-PBF thermal cycles (cyclic heating and cooling) were computed and compared to experimental data. The simulation took approximately 2โ€“4 hrs to complete on a standard laptop.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure

Fig. 1 displays a stitched overview image and selected SEM micrographs of various ฮณโ€ฒ morphologies and carbides after observations of the X-Z surface of the build from the top to 2โ€‰mm above the bottom. Fig. 2 depicts a graph that charts the average size and phase fraction of the primary ฮณโ€ฒ, as it changes with distance from the top to the bottom of the build. The SEM micrographs show widespread primary ฮณโ€ฒ precipitation throughout the entire build, with the size increasing in the top to bottom direction. Particularly, at the topmost height, representing the 460th layer (Zโ€‰=โ€‰22.95โ€‰mm), as seen in Fig. 1b, the average size of ฮณโ€ฒ is 110โ€‰ยฑโ€‰4โ€‰nm, exhibiting spherical shapes. This is representative of the microstructure after it solidifies and cools to room temperature, without experiencing additional thermal cycles. The ฮณโ€ฒ size slightly increases to 147โ€‰ยฑโ€‰6โ€‰nm below this layer and remains constant until 0.4โ€‰mm (โˆผ453rd layer) from the top. At this position, the microstructure still closely resembles that of the 460th layer. After the 453rd layer, the ฮณโ€ฒ size grows rapidly to โˆผ503โ€‰ยฑโ€‰19โ€‰nm until reaching the 437th layer (1.2โ€‰mm from top). The ฮณโ€ฒ particles here have a cuboidal shape, and a small fraction is coarser than 600โ€‰nm. ฮณโ€ฒ continue to grow steadily from this position to the bottom (23โ€‰mm from the top). A small fraction of ฮณโ€ฒ is >โ€‰800โ€‰nm.

Fig. 2

Besides primary ฮณโ€ฒ, secondary ฮณโ€ฒ with sizes ranging from 5 to 50โ€‰nm were also found. These secondary ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates, as seen in Fig. 1f, were present only in the bottom and middle regions. A detailed analysis of the multimodal size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ can be found in [16]. There is no significant variation in the phase fraction of the ฮณโ€ฒ along the build. The phase fraction is โˆผ 52%, as displayed in Fig. 2. It is worth mentioning that the total phase fraction of ฮณโ€ฒ was estimated based on the primary ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction because of the small size of secondary ฮณโ€ฒ. Spherical MC carbides with sizes ranging from 50 to 400โ€‰nm and a phase fraction of 0.8% were also observed throughout the build. The carbides are the light grey precipitates in Fig. 1g. The light grey shade of carbides in the SEM images is due to their composition and crystal structure [52]. These carbides are not visible in Fig. 1b-e because they were dissolved during electro-etching carried out after electropolishing. In Fig. 1g, however, the sample was examined directly after electropolishing, without electro-etching.

Table 2 shows the nominal and measured composition of ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates throughout the build by atom probe microscopy as determined in our previous study [17]. No build height-dependent composition difference was observed in either of the ฮณโ€ฒ precipitate populations. However, there was a slight disparity between the composition of primary and secondary ฮณโ€ฒ. Among the main ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements, the primary ฮณโ€ฒ has a high Ti concentration while secondary ฮณโ€ฒ has a high Al concentration. A detailed description of the atom distribution maps and the proxigrams of the constituent elements of ฮณโ€ฒ throughout the build can be found in [17].

Table 2. Bulk IN738 composition determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Compositions of ฮณ, primary ฮณโ€ฒ, and secondary ฮณโ€ฒ at various locations in the build measured by APT. This information is reproduced from data in Ref. [17] with permission.

at%NiCrCoAlMoWTiNbCBZrTaOthers
Bulk59.1217.478.487.001.010.813.960.490.470.050.090.560.46
ฮณ matrix
Top50.4832.9111.591.941.390.820.440.80.030.030.020.24
Mid50.3732.6111.931.791.540.890.440.10.030.020.020.010.23
Bot48.1034.5712.082.141.430.880.480.080.040.030.010.12
Primary ฮณโ€ฒ
Top72.172.513.4412.710.250.397.780.560.030.020.050.08
Mid71.602.573.2813.550.420.687.040.730.010.030.040.04
Bot72.342.473.8612.500.260.447.460.500.050.020.020.030.04
Secondary ฮณโ€ฒ
Mid70.424.203.2314.190.631.035.340.790.030.040.040.05
Bot69.914.063.6814.320.811.045.220.650.050.100.020.11

3.2. Hardness

Fig. 3a shows the Vickers hardness mapping performed along the entire X-Z surface, while Fig. 3b shows the plot of average hardness at different build heights. This hardness distribution is consistent with the ฮณโ€ฒ precipitate size gradient across the build direction in Fig. 1Fig. 2. The maximum hardness of โˆผ530 HV1 is found at โˆผ0.5โ€‰mm away from the top surface (Zโ€‰=โ€‰22.5), where ฮณโ€ฒ particles exhibit the smallest observed size in Fig. 2b. Further down the build (โˆผ 2โ€‰mm from the top), the hardness drops to the 440โ€“490 HV1 range. This represents the region where ฮณโ€ฒ begins to coarsen. The hardness drops further to 380โ€“430 HV1 at the bottom of the build.

Fig. 3

3.3. Modeling of the microstructural evolution during E-PBF

3.3.1. Thermal profile modeling

Fig. 4 shows the simulated thermal profile of the E-PBF build at a location of 23โ€‰mm from the top of the build, using a semi-analytical heat conduction model. This profile consists of the time taken to deposit 460 layers until final cooling, as shown in Fig. 4a. Fig. 4b-d show the magnified regions of Fig. 4a and reveal the first 20 layers from the top, a single layer (first layer from the top), and the time taken for the build to cool after the last layer deposition, respectively.

Fig. 4

The peak temperatures experienced by previous layers decrease progressively as the number of layers increases but never fall below the build preheat temperature (1000โ€‰ยฐC). Our simulated thermal cycle may not completely capture the complexity of the actual thermal cycle utilized in the E-PBF build. For instance, the top layer (Fig. 4c), also representing the first deposit’s thermal profile without additional cycles (from powder heating, melting, to solidification), recorded the highest peak temperature of 1390โ€‰ยฐC. Although this temperature is above the melting range of the alloy (1230โ€“1360โ€‰ยฐC) [62], we believe a much higher temperature was produced by the electron beam to melt the powder. Nevertheless, the solidification temperature and dynamics are outside the scope of this study as our focus is on the solid-state phase transformations during deposition. It takes โˆผ25โ€‰s for each layer to be deposited and cooled to the build temperature. The interlayer dwell time is 125โ€‰s. The time taken for the build to cool to room temperature (RT) after final layer deposition is โˆผ4.7 hrs (17,000โ€‰s).

3.3.2. MatCalc simulation

During the MatCalc simulation, the matrix phase is defined as ฮณ. ฮณโ€ฒ, and MC carbide are included as possible precipitates. The domain of these precipitates is set to be the matrix (ฮณ), and nucleation is assumed to be homogenous. In homogeneous nucleation, all atoms of the unit volume are assumed to be potential nucleation sitesTable 3 shows the computational parameters used in the simulation. All other parameters were set at default values as recommended in the version 6.04.0011 of MatCalc. The values for the interfacial energies are automatically calculated according to the generalized nearest neighbor broken bond model and is one of the most outstanding features in MatCalc [56][57][58]. It should be noted that the elastic misfit strain was not included in the calculation. The output of MatCalc includes phase fraction, size, nucleation rate, and composition of the precipitates. The phase fraction in MatCalc is the volume fraction. Although the experimental phase fraction is the measured area fraction, it is relatively similar to the volume fraction. This is because of the generally larger precipitate size and similar morphology at the various locations along the build [63]. A reliable phase fraction comparison between experiment and simulation can therefore be made.

Table 3. Computational parameters used in the simulation.

Precipitation domainฮณ
Nucleation site ฮณโ€ฒBulk (homogenous)
Nucleation site MC carbideBulk (Homogenous)
Precipitates class size250
Regular solution critical temperature ฮณโ€ฒ2500โ€‰K[64]
Calculated interfacial energyฮณโ€ฒ =โ€‰0.080โ€“0.140โ€‰J/m2 and MC carbide =โ€‰0.410โ€“0.430โ€‰J/m2
3.3.2.1. Precipitate phase fraction

Fig. 5a shows the simulated phase fraction of ฮณโ€ฒ and MC carbide during thermal cycling. Fig. 5b is a magnified view of 5a showing the simulated phase fraction at the center points of the top 70 layers, whereas Fig. 5c corresponds to the first two layers from the top. As mentioned earlier, the top layer (460th layer) represents the microstructure after solidification. The microstructure of the layers below is determined by the number of thermal cycles, which increases with distance to the top. For example, layers 459, 458, 457, up to layer 1 (region of interest) experience 1, 2, 3 and 459 thermal cycles, respectively. In the top layer in Fig. 5c, the volume fraction of ฮณโ€ฒ and carbides increases with temperature. For ฮณโ€ฒ, it decreases to zero when the temperature is above the solvus temperature after a few seconds. Carbides, however, remain constant in their volume fraction reaching equilibrium (phase fraction โˆผ 0.9%) in a short time. The topmost layer can be compared to the first deposit, and the peak in temperature symbolizes the stage where the electron beam heats the powder until melting. This means ฮณโ€ฒ and carbide precipitation might have started in the powder particles during heating from the build temperature and electron beam until the onset of melting, where ฮณโ€ฒ dissolves, but carbides remain stable [28].

Fig. 5

During cooling after deposition, ฮณโ€ฒ reprecipitates at a temperature of 1085โ€‰ยฐC, which is below its solvus temperature. As cooling progresses, the phase fraction increases steadily to โˆผ27% and remains constant at 1000โ€‰ยฐC (elevated build temperature). The calculated equilibrium fraction of phases by MatCalc is used to show the complex precipitation characteristics in this alloy. Fig. 6 shows that MC carbides form during solidification at 1320โ€‰ยฐC, followed by ฮณโ€ฒ, which precipitate when the solidified layer cools to 1140โ€‰ยฐC. This indicates that all deposited layers might contain a negligible amount of these precipitates before subsequent layer deposition, while being at the 1000โ€‰ยฐC build temperature or during cooling to RT. The phase diagram also shows that the equilibrium fraction of the ฮณโ€ฒ increases as temperature decreases. For instance, at 1000, 900, and 800โ€‰ยฐC, the phase fractions are โˆผ30%, 38%, and 42%, respectively.

Fig. 6

Deposition of subsequent layers causes previous layers to undergo phase transformations as they are exposed to several thermal cycles with different peak temperatures. In Fig. 5c, as the subsequent layer is being deposited, ฮณโ€ฒ in the previous layer (459th layer) begins to dissolve as the temperature crosses the solvus temperature. This is witnessed by the reduction of the ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction. This graph also shows how this phase dissolves during heating. However, the phase fraction of MC carbide remains stable at high temperatures and no dissolution is seen during thermal cycling. Upon cooling, the ฮณโ€ฒ that was dissolved during heating reprecipitates with a surge in the phase fraction until 1000โ€‰ยฐC, after which it remains constant. This microstructure is similar to the solidification microstructure (layer 460), with a similar ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction (โˆผ27%).

The complete dissolution and reprecipitation of ฮณโ€ฒ continue for several cycles until the 50th layer from the top (layer 411), where the phase fraction does not reach zero during heating to the peak temperature (see Fig. 5d). This indicates the โ€˜partialโ€™ dissolution of ฮณโ€ฒ, which continues progressively with additional layers. It should be noted that the peak temperatures for layers that underwent complete dissolution were much higher (1170โ€“1300โ€‰ยฐC) than the ฮณโ€ฒ solvus.

The dissolution and reprecipitation of ฮณโ€ฒ during thermal cycling are further confirmed in Fig. 7, which summarizes the nucleation rate, phase fraction, and concentration of major elements that form ฮณโ€ฒ in the matrix. Fig. 7b magnifies a single layer (3rd layer from top) within the full dissolution region in Fig. 7a to help identify the nucleation and growth mechanisms. From Fig. 7b, ฮณโ€ฒ nucleation begins during cooling whereby the nucleation rate increases to reach a maximum value of approximately 1โ€‰ร—โ€‰1020 mโˆ’3sโˆ’1. This fast kinetics implies that some rearrangement of atoms is required for ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates to form in the matrix [65][66]. The matrix at this stage is in a non-equilibrium condition. Its composition is similar to the nominal composition and remains unchanged. The phase fraction remains insignificant at this stage although nucleation has started. The nucleation rate starts declining upon reaching the peak value. Simultaneously, diffusion-controlled growth of existing nuclei occurs, depleting the matrix of ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements (Al and Ti). Thus, from (7)(11), โˆ†๏ฟฝvol continuously decreases until nucleation ceases. The growth of nuclei is witnessed by the increase in phase fraction until a constant level is reached at 27% upon cooling to and holding at build temperature. This nucleation event is repeated several times.

Fig. 7

At the onset of partial dissolution, the nucleation rate jumps to 1โ€‰ร—โ€‰1021 mโˆ’3sโˆ’1, and then reduces sharply at the middle stage of partial dissolution. The nucleation rate reaches 0 at a later stage. Supplementary Fig. S1 shows a magnified view of the nucleation rate, phase fraction, and thermal profile, underpinning this trend. The jump in nucleation rate at the onset is followed by a progressive reduction in the solute content of the matrix. The peak temperatures (โˆผ1130โ€“1160โ€‰ยฐC) are lower than those in complete dissolution regions but still above or close to the ฮณโ€ฒ solvus. The maximum phase fraction (โˆผ27%) is similar to that of the complete dissolution regions. At the middle stage, the reduction in nucleation rate is accompanied by a sharp drop in the matrix composition. The ฮณโ€ฒ fraction drops to โˆผ24%, where the peak temperatures of the layers are just below or at ฮณโ€ฒ solvus. The phase fraction then increases progressively through the later stage of partial dissolution to โˆผ30% towards the end of thermal cycling. The matrix solute content continues to drop although no nucleation event is seen. The peak temperatures are then far below the ฮณโ€ฒ solvus. It should be noted that the matrix concentration after complete dissolution remains constant. Upon cooling to RT after final layer deposition, the nucleation rate increases again, indicating new nucleation events. The phase fraction reaches โˆผ40%, with a further depletion of the matrix in major ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements.

3.3.2.2. ฮณโ€ฒ size distribution

Fig. 8 shows histograms of the ฮณโ€ฒ precipitate size distributions (PSD) along the build height during deposition. These PSDs are predicted at the end of each layer of interest just before final cooling to room temperature, to separate the role of thermal cycles from final cooling on the evolution of ฮณโ€ฒ. The PSD for the top layer (layer 460) is shown in Fig. 8a (last solidified region with solidification microstructure). The ฮณโ€ฒ size ranges from 120 to 230โ€‰nm and is similar to the 44 layers below (2.2โ€‰mm from the top).

Fig. 8

Further down the build, ฮณโ€ฒ begins to coarsen after layer 417 (44th layer from top). Fig. 8c shows the PSD after the 44th layer, where the ฮณโ€ฒ size exhibits two peaks at โˆผ120โ€“230 and โˆผ300โ€‰nm, with most of the population being in the former range. This is the onset of partial dissolution where simultaneously with the reprecipitation and growth of fresh ฮณโ€ฒ, the undissolved ฮณโ€ฒ grows rapidly through diffusive transport of atoms to the precipitates. This is shown in Fig. 8c, where the precipitate class sizes between 250 and 350 represent the growth of undissolved ฮณโ€ฒ. Although this continues in the 416th layer, the phase fractions plot indicates that the onset of partial dissolution begins after the 411th layer. This implies that partial dissolution started early, but the fraction of undissolved ฮณโ€ฒ was too low to impact the phase fraction. The reprecipitated ฮณโ€ฒ are mostly in the 100โ€“220โ€‰nm class range and similar to those observed during full dissolution.

As the number of layers increases, coarsening intensifies with continued growth of more undissolved ฮณโ€ฒ, and reprecipitation and growth of partially dissolved ones. Fig. 8d, e, and f show this sequence. Further down the build, coarsening progresses rapidly, as shown in Figs. 8d, 8e, and 8f. The ฮณโ€ฒ size ranges from 120 to 1100โ€‰nm, with the peaks at 160, 180, and 220โ€‰nm in Figs. 8d, 8e, and 8f, respectively. Coarsening continues until nucleation ends during dissolution, where only the already formed ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates continue to grow during further thermal cycling. The ฮณโ€ฒ size at this point is much larger, as observed in layers 361 and 261, and continues to increase steadily towards the bottom (layer 1). Two populations in the ranges of โˆผ380โ€“700 and โˆผ750โ€“1100โ€‰nm, respectively, can be seen. The steady growth of ฮณโ€ฒ towards the bottom is confirmed by the gradual decrease in the concentration of solute elements in the matrix (Fig. 7a). It should be noted that for each layer, the ฮณโ€ฒ class with the largest size originates from continuous growth of the earliest set of the undissolved precipitates.

Fig. 9Fig. 10 and supplementary Figs. S2 and S3 show the ฮณโ€ฒ size evolution during heating and cooling of a single layer in the full dissolution region, and early, middle stages, and later stages of partial dissolution, respectively. In all, the size of ฮณโ€ฒ reduces during layer heating. Depending on the peak temperature of the layer which varies with build height, ฮณโ€ฒ are either fully or partially dissolved as mentioned earlier. Upon cooling, the dissolved ฮณโ€ฒ reprecipitate.

Fig. 9
Fig. 10

In Fig. 9, those layers that underwent complete dissolution (top layers) were held above ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature for longer. In Fig. 10, layers at the early stage of partial dissolution spend less time in the ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature region during heating, leading to incomplete dissolution. In such conditions, smaller precipitates are fully dissolved while larger ones shrink [67]. Layers in the middle stages of partial dissolution have peak temperatures just below or at ฮณโ€ฒ solvus, not sufficient to achieve significant ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution. As seen in supplementary Fig. S2, only a few smaller ฮณโ€ฒ are dissolved back into the matrix during heating, i.e., growth of precipitates is more significant than dissolution. This explains the sharp decrease in concentration of Al and Ti in the matrix in this layer.

The previous sections indicate various phenomena such as an increase in phase fraction, further depletion of matrix composition, and new nucleation bursts during cooling. Analysis of the PSD after the final cooling of the build to room temperature allows a direct comparison to post-printing microstructural characterization. Fig. 11 shows the ฮณโ€ฒ size distribution of layer 1 (460th layer from the top) after final cooling to room temperature. Precipitation of secondary ฮณโ€ฒ is observed, leading to the multimodal size distribution of secondary and primary ฮณโ€ฒ. The secondary ฮณโ€ฒ size falls within the 10โ€“80โ€‰nm range. As expected, a further growth of the existing primary ฮณโ€ฒ is also observed during cooling.

Fig. 11
3.3.2.3. ฮณโ€ฒ chemistry after deposition

Fig. 12 shows the concentration of the major elements that form ฮณโ€ฒ (Al, Ti, and Ni) in the primary and secondary ฮณโ€ฒ at the bottom of the build, as calculated by MatCalc. The secondary ฮณโ€ฒ has a higher Al content (13.5โ€“14.5โ€‰at% Al), compared to 13โ€‰at% Al in the primary ฮณโ€ฒ. Additionally, within the secondary ฮณโ€ฒ, the smallest particles (โˆผ10โ€‰nm) have higher Al contents than larger ones (โˆผ70โ€‰nm). In contrast, for the primary ฮณโ€ฒ, there is no significant variation in the Al content as a function of their size. The Ni concentration in secondary ฮณโ€ฒ (71.1โ€“72โ€‰at%) is also higher in comparison to the primary ฮณโ€ฒ (70โ€‰at%). The smallest secondary ฮณโ€ฒ (โˆผ10โ€‰nm) have higher Ni contents than larger ones (โˆผ70โ€‰nm), whereas there is no substantial change in the Ni content of primary ฮณโ€ฒ, based on their size. As expected, Ti shows an opposite size-dependent variation. It ranges from โˆผ 7.7โ€“8.7โ€‰at% Ti in secondary ฮณโ€ฒ to โˆผ9.2โ€‰at% in primary ฮณโ€ฒ. Similarly, within the secondary ฮณโ€ฒ, the smallest (โˆผ10โ€‰nm) have lower Al contents than the larger ones (โˆผ70โ€‰nm). No significant variation is observed for Ti content in primary ฮณโ€ฒ.

Fig. 12

4. Discussion

A combined modelling method is utilized to study the microstructural evolution during E-PBF of IN738. The presented results are discussed by examining the precipitation and dissolution mechanism of ฮณโ€ฒ during thermal cycling. This is followed by a discussion on the phase fraction and size evolution of ฮณโ€ฒ during thermal cycling and after final cooling. A brief discussion on carbide morphology is also made. Finally, a comparison is made between the simulation and experimental results to assess their agreement.

4.1. ฮณโ€ฒ morphology as a function of build height

4.1.1. Nucleation of ฮณโ€ฒ

The fast precipitation kinetics of the ฮณโ€ฒ phase enables formation of ฮณโ€ฒ upon quenching from higher temperatures (above solvus) during thermal cycling [66]. In Fig. 7b, for a single layer in the full dissolution region, during cooling, the initial increase in nucleation rate signifies the first formation of nuclei. The slight increase in nucleation rate during partial dissolution, despite a decrease in the concentration of ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements, may be explained by the nucleation kinetics. During partial dissolution and as the precipitates shrink, it is assumed that the regions at the vicinity of partially dissolved precipitates are enriched in ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements [68][69]. This differs from the full dissolution region, in which case the chemical composition is evenly distributed in the matrix. Several authors have attributed the solute supersaturation of the matrix around primary ฮณโ€ฒ to partial dissolution during isothermal ageing [69][70][71][72]. The enhanced supersaturation in the regions close to the precipitates results in a much higher driving force for nucleation, leading to a higher nucleation rate upon cooling. This phenomenon can be closely related to the several nucleation bursts upon continuous cooling of Ni-based superalloys, where second nucleation bursts exhibit higher nucleation rates [38][68][73][74].

At middle stages of partial dissolution, the reduction in the nucleation rate indicates that the existing composition and low supersaturation did not trigger nucleation as the matrix was closer to the equilibrium state. The end of a nucleation burst means that the supersaturation of Al and Ti has reached a low level, incapable of providing sufficient driving force during cooling to or holding at 1000โ€‰ยฐC for further nucleation [73]. Earlier studies on Ni-based superalloys have reported the same phenomenon during ageing or continuous cooling from the solvus temperature to RT [38][73][74].

4.1.2. Dissolution of ฮณโ€ฒ during thermal cycling

ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution kinetics during heating are fast when compared to nucleation due to exponential increase in phase transformation and diffusion activities with temperature [65]. As shown in Fig. 9Fig. 10, and supplementary Figs. S2 and S3, the reduction in ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction and size during heating indicates ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution. This is also revealed in Fig. 5 where phase fraction decreases upon heating. The extent of ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution mostly depends on the temperature, time spent above ฮณโ€ฒ solvus, and precipitate size [75][76][77]. Smaller ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates are first to be dissolved [67][77][78]. This is mainly because more solute elements need to be transported away from large ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates than from smaller ones [79]. Also, a high temperature above ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature leads to a faster dissolution rate [80]. The equilibrium solvus temperature of ฮณโ€ฒ in IN738 in our MatCalc simulation (Fig. 6) and as reported by Ojo et al. [47] is 1140โ€‰ยฐC and 1130โ€“1180โ€‰ยฐC, respectively. This means the peak temperature experienced by previous layers decreases progressively from ฮณโ€ฒ supersolvus to subsolvus, near-solvus, and far from solvus as the number of subsequent layers increases. Based on the above, it can be inferred that the degree of dissolution of ฮณโ€ฒ contributes to the gradient in precipitate distribution.

Although the peak temperatures during later stages of partial dissolution are much lower than the equilibrium ฮณโ€ฒ solvus, ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution still occurs but at a significantly lower rate (supplementary Fig. S3). Wahlmann et al. [28] also reported a similar case where they observed the rapid dissolution of ฮณโ€ฒ in CMSX-4 during fast heating and cooling cycles at temperatures below the ฮณโ€ฒ solvus. They attributed this to the ฮณโ€ฒ phase transformation process taking place in conditions far from the equilibrium. While the same reasoning may be valid for our study, we further believe that the greater surface area to volume ratio of the small ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates contributed to this. This ratio means a larger area is available for solute atoms to diffuse into the matrix even at temperatures much below the solvus [81].

4.2. ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction and size evolution

4.2.1. During thermal cycling

In the first layer, the steep increase in ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction during heating (Fig. 5), which also represents ฮณโ€ฒ precipitation in the powder before melting, has qualitatively been validated in [28]. The maximum phase fraction of 27% during the first few layers of thermal cycling indicates that IN738 theoretically could reach the equilibrium state (โˆผ30%), but the short interlayer time at the build temperature counteracts this. The drop in phase fraction at middle stages of partial dissolution is due to the low number of ฮณโ€ฒ nucleation sites [73]. It has been reported that a reduction of ฮณโ€ฒ nucleation sites leads to a delay in obtaining the final volume fraction as more time is required for ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates to grow and reach equilibrium [82]. This explains why even upon holding for 150โ€‰s before subsequent layer deposition, the phase fraction does not increase to those values that were observed in the previous full ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution regions. Towards the end of deposition, the increase in phase fraction to the equilibrium value of 30% is as a result of the longer holding at build temperature or close to it [83].

During thermal cycling, ฮณโ€ฒ particles begin to grow immediately after they first precipitate upon cooling. This is reflected in the rapid increase in phase fraction and size during cooling in Fig. 5 and supplementary Fig. S2, respectively. The rapid growth is due to the fast diffusion of solute elements at high temperatures [84]. The similar size of ฮณโ€ฒ for the first 44 layers from the top can be attributed to the fact that all layers underwent complete dissolution and hence, experienced the same nucleation event and growth during deposition. This corresponds with the findings by Balikci et al. [85], who reported that the degree of ฮณโ€ฒ precipitation in IN738LC does not change when a solution heat treatment is conducted above a certain critical temperature.

The increase in coarsening rate (Fig. 8) during thermal cycling can first be ascribed to the high peak temperature of the layers [86]. The coarsening rate of ฮณโ€ฒ is known to increase rapidly with temperature due to the exponential growth of diffusion activity. Also, the simultaneous dissolution with coarsening could be another reason for the high coarsening rate, as ฮณโ€ฒ coarsening is a diffusion-driven process where large particles grow by consuming smaller ones [78][84][86][87]. The steady growth of ฮณโ€ฒ towards the bottom of the build is due to the much lower layer peak temperature, which is almost close to the build temperature, and reduced dissolution activity, as is seen in the much lower solute concentration in ฮณโ€ฒ compared to those in the full and partial dissolution regions.

4.2.2. During cooling

The much higher phase fraction of โˆผ40% upon cooling signifies the tendency of ฮณโ€ฒ to reach equilibrium at lower temperatures (Fig. 4). This is due to the precipitation of secondary ฮณโ€ฒ and a further increase in the size of existing primary ฮณโ€ฒ, which leads to a multimodal size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ after cooling [38][73][88][89][90]. The reason for secondary ฮณโ€ฒ formation during cooling is as follows: As cooling progresses, it becomes increasingly challenging to redistribute solute elements in the matrix owing to their lower mobility [38][73]. A higher supersaturation level in regions away from or free of the existing ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates is achieved, making them suitable sites for additional nucleation bursts. More cooling leads to the growth of these secondary ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates, but as the temperature and in turn, the solute diffusivity is low, growth remains slow.

4.3. Carbides

MC carbides in IN738 are known to have a significant impact on the high-temperature strength. They can also act as effective hardening particles and improve the creep resistance [91]. Precipitation of MC carbides in IN738 and several other superalloys is known to occur during solidification or thermal treatments (e.g., hot isostatic pressing) [92]. In our case, this means that the MC carbides within the E-PBF build formed because of the thermal exposure from the E-PBF thermal cycle in addition to initial solidification. Our simulation confirms this as MC carbides appear during layer heating (Fig. 5). The constant and stable phase fraction of MC carbides during thermal cycling can be attributed to their high melting point (โˆผ1360โ€‰ยฐC) and the short holding time at peak temperatures [75][93][94]. The solvus temperature for most MC carbides exceeds most of the peak temperatures observed in our simulation, and carbide dissolution kinetics at temperatures above the solvus are known to be comparably slow [95]. The stable phase fraction and random distribution of MC carbides signifies the slight influence on the gradient in hardness.

4.4. Comparison of simulations and experiments

4.4.1. Precipitate phase fraction and morphology as a function of build height

A qualitative agreement is observed for the phase fraction of carbides, i.e. โˆผ0.8% in the experiment and โˆผ0.9% in the simulation. The phase fraction of ฮณโ€ฒ differs, with the experiment reporting a value of โˆผ51% and the simulation, 40%. Despite this, the size distribution of primary ฮณโ€ฒ along the build shows remarkable consistency between experimental and computational analyses. It is worth noting that the primary ฮณโ€ฒ morphology in the experimental analysis is observed in the as-fabricated state, whereas the simulation (Fig. 8) captures it during deposition process. The primary ฮณโ€ฒ size in the experiment is expected to experience additional growth during the cooling phase. Regardless, both show similar trends in primary ฮณโ€ฒ size increments from the top to the bottom of the build. The larger primary ฮณ’ size in the simulation versus the experiment can be attributed to the fact that experimental and simulation results are based on 2D and 3D data, respectively. The absence of stereological considerations [96] in our analysis could have led to an underestimation of the precipitate sizes from SEM measurements. The early starts of coarsening (8th layer) in the experiment compared to the simulation (45th layer) can be attributed to a higher actual ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature than considered in our simulation [47]. The solvus temperature of ฮณโ€ฒ in a Ni-based superalloy is mainly determined by the detailed composition. A high amount of Cr and Co are known to reduce the solvus temperature, whereas Ta and Mo will increase it [97][98][99]. The elemental composition from our experimental work was used for the simulation except for Ta. It should be noted that Ta is not included in the thermodynamic database in MatCalc used, and this may have reduced the solvus temperature. This could also explain the relatively higher ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction in the experiment than in simulation, as a higher ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature will cause more ฮณโ€ฒ to precipitate and grow early during cooling [99][100].

Another possible cause of this deviation can be attributed to the extent of ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution, which is mainly determined by the peak temperature. It can be speculated that individual peak temperatures at different layers in the simulation may have been over-predicted. However, one needs to consider that the true thermal profile is likely more complicated in the actual E-PBF process [101]. For example, the current model assumes that the thermophysical properties of the material are temperature-independent, which is not realistic. Many materials, including IN738, exhibit temperature-dependent properties such as thermal conductivityspecific heat capacity, and density [102]. This means that heat transfer simulations may underestimate or overestimate the temperature gradients and cooling rates within the powder bed and the solidified part. Additionally, the model does not account for the reduced thermal diffusivity through unmelted powder, where gas separating the powder acts as insulation, impeding the heat flow [1]. In E-PBF, the unmelted powder regions with trapped gas have lower thermal diffusivity compared to the fully melted regions, leading to localized temperature variations, and altered solidification behavior. These limitations can impact the predictions, particularly in relation to the carbide dissolution, as the peak temperatures may be underestimated.

While acknowledging these limitations, it is worth emphasizing that achieving a detailed and accurate representation of each layer’s heat source would impose tough computational challenges. Given the substantial layer count in E-PBF, our decision to employ a semi-analytical approximation strikes a balance between computational feasibility and the capture of essential trends in thermal profiles across diverse build layers. In future work, a dual-calibration strategy is proposed to further reduce simulation-experiment disparities. By refining temperature-independent thermophysical property approximations and absorptivity in the heat source model, and by optimizing interfacial energy descriptions in the kinetic model, the predictive precision could be enhanced. Further refining the simulation controls, such as adjusting the precipitate class size may enhance quantitative comparisons between modeling outcomes and experimental data in future work.

4.4.2. Multimodal size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ and concentration

Another interesting feature that sees qualitative agreement between the simulation and the experiment is the multimodal size distribution of ฮณโ€ฒ. The formation of secondary ฮณโ€ฒ particles in the experiment and most E-PBF Ni-based superalloys is suggested to occur at low temperatures, during final cooling to RT [16][73][90]. However, so far, this conclusion has been based on findings from various continuous cooling experiments, as the study of the evolution during AM would require an in-situ approach. Our simulation unambiguously confirms this in an AM context by providing evidence for secondary ฮณโ€ฒ precipitation during slow cooling to RT. Additionally, it is possible to speculate that the chemical segregation occurring during solidification, due to the preferential partitioning of certain elements between the solid and liquid phases, can contribute to the multimodal size distribution during deposition [51]. This is because chemical segregation can result in variations in the local composition of superalloys, which subsequently affects the nucleation and growth of ฮณโ€ฒ. Regions with higher concentrations of alloying elements will encourage the formation of larger ฮณโ€ฒ particles, while regions with lower concentrations may favor the nucleation of smaller precipitates. However, it is important to acknowledge that the elevated temperature during the E-PBF process will largely homogenize these compositional differences [103][104].

A good correlation is also shown in the composition of major ฮณโ€ฒ forming elements (Al and Ti) in primary and secondary ฮณโ€ฒ. Both experiment and simulation show an increasing trend for Al content and a decreasing trend for Ti content from primary to secondary ฮณโ€ฒ. The slight composition differences between primary and secondary ฮณโ€ฒ particles are due to the different diffusivity of ฮณโ€ฒ stabilizers at different thermal conditions [105][106]. As the formation of multimodal ฮณโ€ฒ particles with different sizes occurs over a broad temperature range, the phase chemistry of ฮณโ€ฒ will be highly size dependent. The changes in the chemistry of various ฮณโ€ฒ (primary, secondary, and tertiary) have received significant attention since they have a direct influence on the performance [68][105][107][108][109]. Chen et al. [108][109], reported a high Al content in the smallest ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates compared to the largest, while Ti showed an opposite trend during continuous cooling in a RR1000 Ni-based superalloy. This was attributed to the temperature and cooling rate at which the ฮณโ€ฒ precipitates were formed. The smallest precipitates formed last, at the lowest temperature and cooling rate. A comparable observation is evident in the present investigation, where the secondary ฮณโ€ฒ forms at a low temperature and cooling rate in comparison to the primary. The temperature dependence of ฮณโ€ฒ chemical composition is further evidenced in supplementary Fig. S4, which shows the equilibrium chemical composition of ฮณโ€ฒ as a function of temperature.

5. Conclusions

A correlative modelling approach capable of predicting solid-state phase transformations kinetics in metal AM was developed. This approach involves computational simulations with a semi-analytical heat transfer model and the MatCalc thermo-kinetic software. The method was used to predict the phase transformation kinetics and detailed morphology and chemistry of ฮณโ€ฒ and MC during E-PBF of IN738 Ni-based superalloy. The main conclusions are:

  • 1.The computational simulations are in qualitative agreement with the experimental observations. This is particularly true for the ฮณโ€ฒ size distribution along the build height, the multimodal size distribution of particles, and the phase fraction of MC carbides.
  • 2.The deviations between simulation and experiment in terms of ฮณโ€ฒ phase fraction and location in the build are most likely attributed to a higher ฮณโ€ฒ solvus temperature during the experiment than in the simulation, which is argued to be related to the absence of Ta in the MatCalc database.
  • 3.The dissolution and precipitation of ฮณโ€ฒ occur fast and under non-equilibrium conditions. The level of ฮณโ€ฒ dissolution determines the gradient in ฮณโ€ฒ size distribution along the build. After thermal cycling, the final cooling to room temperature has further significant impacts on the final ฮณโ€ฒ size, morphology, and distribution.
  • 4.A negligible amount of ฮณโ€ฒ forms in the first deposited layer before subsequent layer deposition, and a small amount of ฮณโ€ฒ may also form in the powder induced by the 1000โ€‰ยฐC elevated build temperature before melting.

Our findings confirm the suitability of MatCalc to predict the microstructural evolution at various positions throughout a build in a Ni-based superalloy during E-PBF. It also showcases the suitability of a tool which was originally developed for traditional thermo-mechanical processing of alloys to the new additive manufacturing context. Our simulation capabilities are likely extendable to other alloy systems that undergo solid-state phase transformations implemented in MatCalc (various steels, Ni-based superalloys, and Al-alloys amongst others) as well as other AM processes such as L-DED and L-PBF which have different thermal cycle characteristics. New tools to predict the microstructural evolution and properties during metal AM are important as they provide new insights into the complexities of AM. This will enable control and design of AM microstructures towards advanced materials properties and performances.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Primig Sophie: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Adomako Nana Kwabena: Writing โ€“ original draft, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Haghdadi Nima: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Dingle James F.L.: Methodology, Conceptualization, Software, Writing โ€“ review & editing, Visualization. Kozeschnik Ernst: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Software, Methodology. Liao Xiaozhou: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Ringer Simon P: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by the Department of Industry, Innovation, and Science under the auspices of the AUSMURI program โ€“ which is a part of the Commonwealthโ€™s Next Generation Technologies Fund. The authors acknowledge the facilities and the scientific and technical assistance at the Electron Microscope Unit (EMU) within the Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre (MWAC) at UNSW Sydney and Microscopy Australia. Nana Adomako is supported by a UNSW Scientia PhD scholarship. Michael Hainesโ€™ (UNSW Sydney) contribution to the revised version of the original manuscript is thankfully acknowledged.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Download : Download Word document (462KB)

Supplementary material.

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

Figure 1. US bath modified as an EC reactor

๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ธก์ •์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋™์‹œ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์œ ๋ฌด์— ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†์ด ๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ๋Š” ์ž‘๋™ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 25kHz์ธ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ๋Š” 2๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ธ”๋ก์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์—ด๋œ 8๊ฐœ์˜ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ์ „๊ทน์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

LICHT K.1*, LONฤŒAR G.1, POSAVฤŒIฤ† H.1, HALKIJEVIฤ† I.1
1 Department of Hydroscience and Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb, Andrije Kaฤiฤ‡a-Mioลกiฤ‡a 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*corresponding author:
e-mail:katarina.licht@grad.unizg.hr

๋ฌผ ์†์˜ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ด์˜จ์€ 3.2โˆ™10-19C์˜ ์ „ํ•˜์™€ 1.2โˆ™10-8m์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ์„ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž…์ž๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ, ์ •์ „๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ ๋ฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์ด๋™ ๊ฐ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Flow-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋œ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๋๋‚  ๋•Œ ์ „๊ทน์— ์˜๊ตฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋ฌผ ์†์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์™€ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์‹œ ๋ฌผ ๋‚ด ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ๋†๋„์˜ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์ˆ˜์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ 180์ดˆ ํ›„์— ์ŠคํŠธ๋ก ํŠฌ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ 10.3%์—์„œ 11.2%๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์›์ž๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

3D numerical simulations and measurements on an electrochemical reactor were used to analyze the efficiency of strontium removal from water, with and without simultaneous ultrasound treatment. Ultrasound was generated using 4 ultrasonic transducers with an operating frequency of 25 kHz. The reactor used 8 aluminum electrodes arranged in two blocks. Strontium ions in water are modeled as particles characterized by a charge of 3.2โˆ™10-19 C and a diameter of 1.2โˆ™10-8 m. The numerical model was created in Flow-3D software using the basic hydrodynamic module, electrostatic module, and general moving objects module. The performance of the studied reactor variants by numerical simulations is defined by the ratio of the number of model strontium particles permanently retained on the electrodes at the end of the simulation period to the initial number of particles in the water. For the laboratory reactor, the effect of strontium removal is defined by the ratio of the homogeneous strontium concentration in the water at the end and at the beginning of the experiments. The results show that the use of ultrasound increases the effect of strontium removal from 10.3% to 11.2% after 180 seconds of water treatment. The results of numerical simulations agree with the results of measurements on a reactor with the same geometrical characteristics.

Keywords

numerical model, electrochemical reactor, strontium

Figure 1. US bath modified as an EC reactor
Figure 1. US bath modified as an EC reactor
Figure 2. Schematic view of the experimental set-up
Figure 2. Schematic view of the experimental set-up

References

Dong, B., Fishgold, A., Lee, P., Runge, K., Deymier, P. and Keswani, M. (2016), Sono-electrochemical recovery of metal ions from their aqueous solutions, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 318, 379โ€“387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2016.07.007
EPA. (2014), Announcement of Final Regulatory Determinations for Contaminants on the Third Drinking
Water Contaminant Candidate List. Retrieved from http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action
Fu, F., Lu, J., Cheng, Z. and Tang, B. (2016), Removal of selenite by zero-valent iron combined with ultrasound: Se(IV) concentration changes, Se(VI) generation, and reaction mechanism, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 29, 328โ€“336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.007
Ince, N.H. (2018), Ultrasound-assisted advanced oxidation processes for water decontamination, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 40, 97โ€“103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.009
Kamaraj, R. and Vasudevan, S. (2015), Evaluation of electrocoagulation process for the removal of strontium and cesium from aqueous solution, Chemical
Engineering Research and Design, 93, 522โ€“530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.021
Luczaj, J. and Masarik, K. (2015), Groundwater Quantity and Quality Issues in a Water-Rich Region: Examples from Wisconsin, USA, Resources, 4(2), 323โ€“357.
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4020323
Mohapatra, D.P. and Kirpalani, D.M. (2019), Selenium in wastewater: fast analysis method development and advanced oxidation treatment applications, Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 79(5), 842โ€“849. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.010

Mollah, M.Y.A., Schennach, R., Parga, J.R. and Cocke, D.L.(2001), Electrocoagulation (EC)- Science and
applications, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 84(1), 29โ€“41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00176-5

Moradi, M., Vasseghian, Y., Arabzade, H. and Khaneghah, A.M. (2021), Various wastewaters treatment by sonoelectrocoagulation process: A comprehensive review of operational parameters and future outlook, Chemosphere, 263, 128314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2020.12831 4
Peng, H., Yao, F., Xiong, S., Wu, Z., Niu, G. and Lu, T. (2021), Strontium in public drinking water and associated public health risks in Chinese cities, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(18), 23048. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-12378-Y
Scott, V., Juran, L., Ling, E.J., Benham, B. and Spiller, A. (2020), Assessing strontium and vulnerability to strontium in private drinking water systems in Virginia, Water, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041053
Ziylan, A., Koltypin, Y., Gedanken, A. and Ince, N.H. (2013), More on sonolytic and sonocatalytic decomposition of Diclofenac using zero-valent iron, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20(1), 580โ€“586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.05.00

Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.

๊ทธ๋ฌผํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋งคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ง๋ง๋š์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Numerical study of the flow at a vertical pile with net-like scour protection matt
Minxi Zhanga,b
, Hanyan Zhaoc
, Dongliang Zhao d, Shaolin Yuee
, Huan Zhoue
,
Xudong Zhaoa
, Carlo Gualtierif
, Guoliang Yua,b,โˆ—
a SKLOE, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China b KLMIES, MOE, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China c Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou 510610, China d CCCC Second Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China e CCCC Road & Bridge Special Engineering Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430071, China f Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Abstract

ํ˜„์žฌ ๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ง๋š ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋‘์˜ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ˜‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ง๋š์ด๋‚˜ ๋ถ€๋‘์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๋ฎ๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฌผ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์ด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์•ฝํ™” ๋ฐ ํ™•์‚ฐ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ํ‡ด์ ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ๋กœ ๋ฎํžŒ ๋ง๋š์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋งคํŠธ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜ dt(2.6d95 ~ 17.9d95)์™€ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ dn(7.7d95 ~ 28.2d95)์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๋ง๋š์—์„œ ์™€๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์†Œ๋ฉธ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งคํŠธ์˜ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฒ ๋“œ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ ๋™ํ™•์‚ฐ์ด ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ง๋š์—์„œ ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๋ฒ ๋“œ์ „๋‹จ์‘๋ ฅ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์œ ๋™ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒ๋Œ€ ๋‘๊ป˜ T = 7.7 ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋Œ€ ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ S = 7.7์ธ ๋งคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐฉ์ง€์— ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.
Fig. 26. Distribution of the turbulent kinetic energy on the y-z plane (X = 0.5) for various S
Fig. 26. Distribution of the turbulent kinetic energy on the y-z plane (X = 0.5) for various S

References

[1] C. He, Mod. Transp. Technol. 17 (3) (2020) 46โ€“59 in Chinese.
[2] X. Wen, D. Zhang, J. Tianjin Univ. 54 (10) (2021) 998โ€“1007 (Science and Technology)in Chinese.
[3] M. Zhang, H. Sun, W. Yao, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 265 (2020) 112652, doi:10.1016/j.
oceaneng.2022.112652.
[4] K. Wardhana, F.C. Hadipriono, J. Perform. Constr. Fac. 17 (3) (2003) 144โ€“150,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
[5] R. Ettema, G. Constantinescu, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (9) (2017)
03117006, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001330.
[6] C. Valela, C.D. Rennie, I. Nistor, Int. J. Sediment Res. 37 (1) (2021) 37โ€“46,
doi:10.1016/j.ijsrc.2021.04.004.
[7] B.W. Melville, A.J. Sutherland, J. Hydraul. Eng. 114 (10) (1988) 1210โ€“1226,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:10(1210).
[8] E.V. Richardson, S.R. Davis, Evaluating Scour At Bridges, 4th ed., United States
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington,
DC., 2001.
[9] D.M. Sheppard, B. Melville, H. Demir, J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (1) (2014) 14โ€“23,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000800.
[10] A.O. Aksoy, G. Bombar, T. Arkis, M.S. Guney, J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 65 (1)
(2017) 26โ€“34.
[11] D.T. Bui, A. Shirzadi, A. Amini, et al., Sustainability 12 (3) (2020) 1063, doi:10.
3390/su12031063.
[12] B.M. Sumer, J. Fredsoe, The Mechanics of Scour in Marine Environments. World
Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, 17, World Scientific, Singapore, 2002.
[13] J. Unger, W.H. Hager, Exp. Fluids 42 (1) (2007) 1โ€“19.
[14] G. Kirkil, S.G. Constantinescu, R. Ettema, J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (5) (2008) 82โ€“84,
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(572).
[15] B. Dargahi, J. Hydraul. Eng. 116 (10) (1990) 1197โ€“1214.
[16] A. Bestawy, T. Eltahawy, A. Alsaluli, M. Alqurashi, Water Supply 20 (3) (2020)
1006โ€“1015, doi:10.2166/ws.2020.022.
[17] Y.M. Chiew, J. Hydraul. Eng. 118 (9) (1992) 1260โ€“1269.
[18] D. Bertoldi, R. Kilgore, in: Hydraulic Engineering โ€™93, ASCE, San Francisco, California, United States, 1993, pp. 1385โ€“1390.
[19] Y.M. Chiew, J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (9) (1997) 635โ€“642.
[20] C.S. Lauchlan, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (5) (2001) 412โ€“418, doi:10.
1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:5(412).
[21] P.F. Lagasse, P.E. Clopper, L.W. Zevenbergen, L.G. Girard, National Cooperative
Highway Research Program (NCHRPReport 593), Countermeasures to protect
bridge piers from scour, Washington, DC, NCHRP, 2007.
[22] S. Jiang, Z. Zhou, J. Ou, J. Sediment Res. (4) (2013) 63โ€“67 in Chinese.
[23] A. Galan, G. Simarro, G. Sanchez-Serrano, J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (6) (2015)
06015004, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001003.
[24] Z. Zhang, H. Ding, J. Liu, Ocean Eng. 33 (2) (2015) 77โ€“83 in Chinese.
[25] C. Valela, C.N. Whittaker, C.D. Rennie, I. Nistor, B.W. Melville, J. Hydraul. Eng.
148 (3) (2022) 04022002 10.1061/%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001967.
[26] B.W. Melville, A.C. Hadfield, J. Hydraul. Eng. 6 (2) (1999) 1221โ€“1224, doi:10.
1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:11(1221).
[27] V. Kumar, K.G. Rangaraju, N. Vittal, J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (12) (1999) 1302โ€“1305.
[28] A.M. Yasser, K.S. Yasser, M.A. Abdel-Azim, Alex. Eng. J. 54 (2) (2015) 197โ€“203,
doi:10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.004.
[29] S. Khaple, P.R. Hanmaiahgari, R. Gaudio, S. Dey, Acta Geophys. 65 (2017) 957โ€“
975, doi:10.1007/s11600-017-0084-z.
[30] C. Valela, I. Nistor, C.D. Rennie, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Disaster Mitigation Specialty Conference, Fredericton, Canada, Canadian Society for
Civil Engineering, 2018, pp. 235โ€“244.
[31] A. Tafarojnoruz, R. Gaudio, F. Calomino, J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (3) (2012) 297โ€“
305, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000512.
[32] H. Tang, S. Fang, Y. Zhou, K. Cai, Y.M. Chiew, S.Y. Lim, N.S. Cheng, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Scour and Erosion (ICSE-2), Singapore.
Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, 2004.
[33] W. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Sichuan Univ. 06 (2005) 34โ€“40 (Engineering
Science Edition)in Chinese.
[34] S. Yang, B. Shi, Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 5 (2017) 43โ€“47 in Chinese.
[35] H. Wang, F. Si, G. Lou, W. Yang, G. Yu, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 141
(1) (2015) 04014030, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000270.
[36] L.D. Meyer, S.M. Dabney, W.C. Harmon, Trans. ASAE 38 (3) (1995) 809โ€“815.
[37] G. Spyreas, B.W. Wilm, A.E. Plocher, D.M. Ketzner, J.W. Matthews, J.L. Ellis, E.J. Heske, Biol. Invasions 12 (5) (2010) 1253โ€“1267, doi:10.1007/
s10530-009-9544-y.
[38] T. Lambrechts, S. Franรงois, S. Lutts, R. Muรฑoz-Carpena, C.L. Bielders, J. Hydrol.
511 (2014) 800โ€“810, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.030.
[39] G. Yu, Dynamic Embedded Anchor with High Frequency Micro Amplitude Vibrations. CN patent No: ZL200810038546.0, 2008.
[40] X. Chen, M. Zhang, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 236 (2021) 109315, doi:10.1016/j.
oceaneng.2021.109315.
[41] F. Gumgum, M.S. Guney, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference
Engineering and Natural Sciences (ICENS), Serbia, Belgrade, 2020.
[42] H. Zhao, S. Yue, H. Zhou, M. Zhang, G. Yu, Ocean Eng. 40 (5) (2022) 111โ€“120
in Chinese.
[43] B. Blocken, C. Gualtieri, Environ. Modell. Softw. 33 (2012) 1โ€“22, doi:10.1016/j.
envsoft.2012.02.001.
[44] N.D. Bennett, B.F. Croke, G. Guariso, et al., Modell. Softw. 40 (2013) 1โ€“20,
doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011.
[45] X. Zhao, Effectiveness and Mechanism of Lattice On Sedimentation and Anti-Erosion of Local Scour Hole At Piers, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2023.
[46] M. Zhang, G. Yu, Water Resour. Res. 53 (9) (2017) 7798โ€“7815, doi:10.1002/
2017WR021066.

Effects of pile-cap elevation on scour and turbulence around a complex bridge pier

๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๊ธฐ๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ง๋š ๋šœ๊ป‘ ๋†’์ด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

ABSTRACT

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ง๋š ๋šœ๊ป‘ ๋†’์ด์—์„œ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ง๋š ์บก์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ถ€๋‘ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์ง€์—ญ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ํ๋ฆ„ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ง๋š ์บก ๋†’์ด๊ฐ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์ธต์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ง๋š ์บก์ด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ (์‚ฌ๋ก€ I), ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๊ณ (์‚ฌ๋ก€ II) ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋…ธ์ถœ(์‚ฌ๋ก€ III)๋˜๋„๋ก ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์€ ๋ง‘์€ ๋ฌผ ์„ธ๊ตด ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ ์žฌ์ˆœํ™˜ ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์œ ์†๊ณ„ (PIV) ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ง๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„ ์œ ์†์„ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ ์บก ์ผ€์ด์Šค๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์„ธ๋ฏธ ๊นŠ์ด(MSD)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ๋ก€ II์—์„œ MSD๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์œ ๋™์žฅ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ง๋š ์บก์ด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๋ง๋š ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ๋™์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ์ผ ์บก์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ํ‰๊ท  ์†๋„, ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด, ๋ ˆ์ด๋†€์ฆˆ ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์œค๊ณฝ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ๋ก€ III์—์„œ ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์ง€๋งŒ ํŒŒ์ผ ์บก์ด ๋ฒ ๋“œ์—์„œ ๋–จ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํŒŒ์ผ ์บก ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์„ธ๋ฏธ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

In this study, the local scour and the associated flow hydrodynamics around a complex pier with rectangular pile-cap at three different pile-cap elevations are investigated. The pile-cap elevations were selected with respect to the initial sand bed, such that the pile-cap was unexposed (case I), partially exposed (case II), and fully exposed (case III) to the flow. The experiments were performed in a recirculating flume under clear-water scour conditions, and the instantaneous flow velocity was obtained at different vertical planes using the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. The partially exposed pile-cap case showed the maximum obtained scour-depth (MSD). The reason behind the MSD occurrence in case II was enunciated through the analysis of turbulent flow field which showed that as the pile-cap got exposed to the flow, it dominantly affected the generation of vortices from the pile-cap corners responsible for the higher scour depth. The effect of the pile-cap on the flow field was prominently seen in case III through the mean velocities, vorticity, Reynolds shear stresses and turbulent kinetic energy contours, but since the pile-cap was away from the bed, the pile-cap corners did not show any direct effect on the scour.

KEYWORDS: 

References

  • Adrian, R. J. (2013). Structure of turbulent boundary layers. In Jeremy G. Venditti, James L. Best, Michael Church, & Richard J. Hardy (Eds.), Coherent flow structures at earth’s surface (pp. 17โ€“24). John Wiley and Sons. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Adrian, R. J., & Westerweel, J. (2011). Particle image velocimetry, No. 30. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Alemi, M., & Maia, R. (2018). Numerical simulation of the flow and local scour process around single and complex bridge piers. International Journal of Civil Engineering16(5), 475โ€“487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0137-8 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Alemi, M., Pรชgo, J. P., & Maia, R. (2019). Numerical simulation of the turbulent flow around a complex bridge pier on the scoured bed. European Journal of Mechanics โ€“ B/Fluids76, 316โ€“331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.03.011 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Amini, A., Hamidi, S., Shirzadi, A., Behmanesh, J., & Akib, S. (2021). Efficiency of artificial neural networks in determining scour depth at composite bridge piers. International Journal of River Basin Management19(3), 327โ€“333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2020.1742138 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Arneson, L. A., Zevenbergen, L. W., Lagasse, P. F., & Clopper, P. E. (2015). Evaluating scour at bridges, 5th ed. hydraulic engineering circular No. 18 (HEC-18). Federal Highway Administration. [Google Scholar]
  • Ataie-Ashtiani, B., & Aslani-Kordkandi, A. (2012). Flow field around side-by-side piers with and without a scour hole. European Journal of Mechanics โ€“ B/Fluids36, 152โ€“166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2012.03.007 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Baratian-Ghorghi, Z., & Beheshti, A. A. (2010). Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour of compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering136(6), 343โ€“351. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2010)136:6(343) [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Avallone, F., Discetti, S., Astarita, T., & Cardone, G. (2015). Convergence enhancement of single-pixel PIV with symmetric double correlation. Experiments in Fluids56(4), 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1938-2 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Beheshti, A. A., & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. (2010). Experimental study of three-dimensional flow field around a complex bridge pier. Journal of Engineering Mechanics136(2), 143โ€“154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000073 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Beheshti, A. A., & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. (2016). Scour hole influence on turbulent flow field around complex bridge piers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion97(2), 451โ€“474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-016-9707-8 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Cameron, S. M., Nikora, V. I., & Marusic, I. (2019). Drag forces on a bed particle in open-channel flow: Effects of pressure spatial fluctuations and very-large-scale motions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics863, 494โ€“512. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.1003 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Cheng, N., & Emadzadeh, A. (2017). Laboratory measurements of vortex-induced sediment pickup rates. International Journal of Sediment Research32(1), 98โ€“104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.04.005 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Coleman, S. E. (2005). Clearwater local scour at complex piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering131(4), 330โ€“334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:4(330) [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Das, S., & Mazumdar, A. (2015). Turbulence flow field around two eccentric circular piers in scour hole. International Journal of River Basin Management13(3), 343โ€“361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2015.1012515 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Esmaeili Varaki, M., Radice, A., Samira Hossini, S., & Fazl Ola, R. (2019). Local scour at a complex pier with inclined columns footed on capped piles: Effect of the pile arrangement and of the cap thickness and elevation. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1โ€“10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2019.1702109 [Taylor & Francis Online][Google Scholar]
  • Ferraro, D., Tafarojnoruz, A., Gaudio, R., & Cardoso, A. H. (2013). Effects of pile cap thickness on the maximum scour depth at a complex pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering139(5), 482โ€“491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000704 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Gaudio, R., Tafarojnoruz, A., & Calomino, F. (2012). Combined flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour. Journal of Hydraulic Research50(1), 35โ€“43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.649548 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Gautam, P., Eldho, T., & Behera, M. (2016). Experimental study of scour around a complex pier with elliptical pile-cap. In J. Harris, R. Whitehouse, & S. Moxon (Eds.), Scour and Erosion: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scour and Erosion (Oxford, UK, 12-15 September 2016) (pp. 759โ€“765). CRC Press. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Gautam, P., Eldho, T. I., Mazumder, B. S., & Behera, M. R. (2019). Experimental study of flow and turbulence characteristics around simple and complex piers using PIV. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science100, 193โ€“206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.09.010 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Graf, W. H., & Istiarto, I. (2002). Flow pattern in the scour hole around a cylinder. Journal of Hydraulic Research40(1), 13โ€“20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680209499869 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Hjulstrom, F. (1935). Study of the morphological activity of Rivers as illustrated by the River fyris bulletin, vol. 25. Geological Institute of Upsala. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar, A., & Kothyari, U. C. (2012). Three-dimensional flow characteristics within the scour hole around circular uniform and compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering138(5), 420โ€“429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000527 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Mashahir, M. B., Zarrati, A. R., & Rezayi, M. J. (2004). Time development of scouring around a bridge pier protected by collar. In Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-2). November 14โ€“17, 2004, Singapore[Google Scholar]
  • Melville, B. W. (2008). The physics of local scour at bridge piers. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-4). November 5-7, 2008, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 28โ€“40). [Google Scholar]
  • Melville, B. W., & Chiew, Y. M. (1999). Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering125(1), 59โ€“65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:1(59) [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Melville, B. W., & Raudkivi, A. J. (1977). Flow characteristics in local scour at bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research15(4), 373โ€“380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687709499641 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Moreno, M., Maia, R., & Couto, L. (2016a). Effects of relative column width and pile-cap elevation on local scour depth around complex piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering142(2), 04015051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001080 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Moreno, M., Maia, R., & Couto, L. (2016b). Prediction of equilibrium local scour depth at complex bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering142(11), 04016045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001153 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Nezu, I., & Rodi, W. (1986). Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering112(5), 335โ€“355. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:5(335) [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Radice, A., & Tran, C. K. (2012). Study of sediment motion in scour hole of a circular pier. Journal of Hydraulic Research50(1), 44โ€“51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.641764 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Richardson, J. R., & York, K. (1999). Hydrodynamic countermeasures for local pier scour. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1690(1), 186โ€“192. https://doi.org/10.3141/1690-21 [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Saw, E., Debue, P., Kuzzay, D., Daviaud, F., & Dubrulle, B. (2018). On the universality of anomalous scaling exponents of structure functions in turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics837, 657โ€“669. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.848 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Schlichting, H. (1968). Boundary layer theory (Vol. 960). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheppard, D. M., Demir, H., & Melville, B. W. (2011). Scour at wide piers and long skewed piers (Vol. 682). Transportation Research Board. [Google Scholar]
  • Tafarojnoruz, A., Gaudio, R., & Calomino, F. (2012). Bridge pier scour mitigation under steady and unsteady flow conditions. Acta Geophysica60(4), 1076โ€“1097. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0040-x [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Tafarojnoruz, A., Gaudio, R., & Dey, S. (2010). Flow-altering countermeasures against scour at bridge piers: A review. Journal of Hydraulic Research48(4), 441โ€“452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.491645 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Tennekes, H., & Lumley, J. L. (1972). A first course in turbulence. MIT press. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Veerappadevaru, G., Gangadharaiah, T., & Jagadeesh, T. R. (2011). Vortex scouring process around bridge pier with a caisson. Journal of Hydraulic Research49(3), 378โ€“383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.568195 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Veerappadevaru, G., Gangadharaiah, T., & Jagadeesh, T. R. (2012). Temporal variation of vortex scour process around caisson piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research50(2), 200โ€“207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.666832 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Vijayasree, B. A., Eldho, T. I., Mazumder, B. S., & Ahmad, N. (2019). Influence of bridge pier shape on flow field and scour geometry. International Journal of River Basin Management17(1), 109โ€“129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1394315 [Taylor & Francis Online][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Yang, Y., Melville, B. W., Sheppard, D. M., & Shamseldin, A. Y. (2018). Clear-water local scour at skewed complex bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering144(6), 04018019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001458 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
  • Yang, Y., Melville, B. W., Macky, G. H., & Shamseldin, A. Y. (2020). Temporal evolution of clear-water local scour at aligned and skewed complex bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering146(4), 04020026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001732 [Crossref][Web of Science ยฎ][Google Scholar]
Effects of surface roughness on overflow discharge of embankment weirs

ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ๋‘‘์˜ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ”Œ๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

Effects of surface roughness on overflow discharge of embankment weirs

Abstract

A numerical study was performed on the embankment weir overflows with various surface roughness and tailwater submergence, to better understand the effects of weir roughness on discharge performances under the free and submerged conditions. The variation of flow regime is captured, from the free overflow, submerged hydraulic jump, to surface flow with increasing tailwater depth. A roughness factor is introduced to reflect the reduction in discharge caused by weir roughness. The roughness factor decreases with the roughness height, and it also depends on the tailwater depth, highlighting various relations of the roughness factor with the roughness height between different flow regimes, which is linear for the free overflow and submerged hydraulic jump while exponential for the surface flow. Accordingly, the effects of weir roughness on overflow discharge appear nonnegligible for the significant roughness height and the surface flow regime occurring under considerable tailwater submergence. The established empirical expressions of discharge coefficient and submergence and roughness factors make it possible to predict the discharge over embankment weirs considering both tailwater submergence and surface roughness.

์ž์œ  ๋ฐ ์นจ์ˆ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‘‘ ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์™€ ํ…Œ์ผ์›Œํ„ฐ ์นจ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ œ๋ฐฉ ๋‘‘ ๋ฒ”๋žŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž์œ  ๋ฒ”๋žŒ, ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์ˆ˜์•• ์ ํ”„, ํ…Œ์ผ์›Œํ„ฐ ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์œ ๋™์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ์œ ๋™ ์ฒด์ œ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์บก์ฒ˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์–ด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ์กฐ๋„ ๋†’์ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ , ๋˜ํ•œ ํ…Œ์ผ์›Œํ„ฐ ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋ฉฐ, ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ ์˜์—ญ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์กฐ๋„ ๋†’์ด์™€ ์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Š” ์ž์œ  ๋ฒ”๋žŒ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์ˆ˜์•• ์ ํ”„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ ํ˜•์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ง€์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ๋ฆ„. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์›จ์–ด ์กฐ๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์กฐ๋„ ๋†’์ด์™€ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜ ์นจ์ˆ˜ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„ ์ฒด์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๊ณ„์ˆ˜์™€ ์นจ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฆฝ๋œ ์‹ค์ฆ์‹์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์ˆ˜ ์นจ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ง€ํ‘œ์กฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ๋ณด ์œ„์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

  1. Kindsvater C. E. Discharge characteristics of embankment -shaped weirs (No. 1617) [R]. Washington DC, USA: US Government Printing Office, 1964.Google Scholar 
  2. Fritz H. M., Hager W. H. Hydraulics of embankment weirs [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124(9): 963โ€“971.Article Google Scholar 
  3. Azimi A. H., Rajaratnam N., Zhu D. Z. Water surface characteristics of submerged rectangular sharp-crested weirs [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2016, 142(5): 06016001.Article Google Scholar 
  4. Felder S., Islam N. Hydraulic performance of an embankment weir with rough crest [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2017, 143(3): 04016086.Article Google Scholar 
  5. Hakim S. S., Azimi A. H. Hydraulics of submerged traingular weirs and weirs of finite-crest length with upstream and downstream ramps [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2017, 143(8): 06017008.Article Google Scholar 
  6. Safarzadeh A., Mohajeri S. H. Hydrodynamics of rectangular broad-crested porous weirs [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2018, 144(10): 04018028.Google Scholar 
  7. Sargison J. E., Percy A. Hydraulics of broad-crested weirs with varying side slopes [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2009, 35(1): 115โ€“118.Article Google Scholar 
  8. Yang Z., Bai F., Huai W. et al. Lattice Boltzmann method for simulating flows in the open-channel with partial emergent rigid vegetation cover [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(4): 717โ€“724.Article Google Scholar 
  9. Fathi-moghaddam M., Sadrabadi M. T., Rahmanshahi M. Numerical simulation of the hydraulic performance of triangular and trapezoidal gabion weirs in free flow condtion [J]. Flow Measurement on Instrumentation, 2018, 62: 93โ€“104.Article Google Scholar 
  10. Zerihun Y. T. A one-dimensional Boussinesq-type momentum model for steady rapidly varied open channel flows [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne, 2004.Google Scholar 
  11. Paล™รญlkovรก J., ล˜รญha J., Zachoval Z. The influence of roughness on the discharge coefficient of a broad-crested weir [J]. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 2012, 60(2): 101โ€“114.Article Google Scholar 
  12. ล˜รญha J., Duchan D., Zachoval Z. et al. Performance of a shallow-water model for simulating flow over trapezoidal broad-crested weirs [J]. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 2019, 67(4): 322โ€“328.Article Google Scholar 
  13. Yan X., Ghodoosipour B., Mohammadian A. Three-dimensional numerical study of multiple vertical buoyant jets in stationary ambient water [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2020, 146(7): 04020049.Article Google Scholar 
  14. Qian S., Xu H., Feng J. Flume experiments on baffle-posts for retarding open channel flow: By C. UBING, R. ETTEMA and CI THORNTON, J. Hydraulic Res. 55 (3), 2017, 430โ€“437 [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2019, 57(2): 280โ€“282.Article Google Scholar 
  15. Sun J., Qian S., Xu H. et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stepped dropshaft with different step shape [J]. Water Science and Technology Water Supply, 2020, 21(1): 581โ€“592.Google Scholar 
  16. Qian S., Wu J., Zhou Y. et al. Discussion of โ€œHydraulic performance of an embankment weir with rough crestโ€ by Stefan Felder and Nushan Islam [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2018, 144(4): 07018003.Article Google Scholar 
  17. Mohammadpour R., Ghani A. A., Azamathulla H. M. Numerical modeling of 3-D flow on porous broad crested weirs [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(22): 9324โ€“9337.Article Google Scholar 
  18. Savage B. M., Brian M. C., Greg S. P. Physical and numerical modeling of large headwater ratios for a 15ยฐ labyrinth spillway [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2016, 142(11): 04016046.Article Google Scholar 
  19. Al-Husseini T. R., Al-Madhhachi A. S. T., Naser Z. A. Laboratory experiments and numerical model of local scour around submerged sharp crested weirs [J]. Journal of King Saud University Science, 2020, 32(3): 167โ€“176.Article Google Scholar 
  20. Zerihun Y. T., Fenton J. D. A Boussinesq-type model for flow over trapezoidal profile weirs [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2007, 45(4): 519โ€“528.Article Google Scholar 
  21. Flow Science, Inc. FLOW-3D ยฎ Version 12.0 Users Manual (2018) [EB/OL]. Santa Fe, NM, USA: Flow Science, Inc., 2019.Google Scholar 
  22. Bazin H. Expรฉriences nouvelles sur lโ€™ecoulement par dรฉversoir [R]. Paris, France: Annales des Ponts et Chaussรฉes, 1898.MATH Google Scholar 
  23. Hager W. H., Schwalt M. Broad-crested weir [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1994, 120(1): 13โ€“26.Article Google Scholar 
Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration

์กฐํŒŒ์‹ 3๋™์„ ์˜ ์„ ์ฒด์ธก๋ฉด๋Œ€์นญ์ด ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Abolfath Askarian KhoobAtabak FeiziAlireza MohamadiKarim Akbari VakilabadiAbbas Fazeliniai & Shahryar Moghaddampour

Abstract

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์ธ๋ณด๋“œ, ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์•„์›ƒ๋ณด๋“œ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์Šคํƒœ๊ฑฐ/๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ์˜ ๋Œ€์นญ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ ์ธ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์›จ์ด๋ธŒ ํ”ผ์–ด์‹ฑ 3๋™์„ ์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” 0.225์—์„œ 0.60๊นŒ์ง€์˜ Froude ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ์‚ผ๋™์„  ์ถ•์†Œ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ National Iranian Marine Laboratory(NIMALA) ์˜ˆ์ธ ํƒฑํฌ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ ์„ ์ฒด ํŠธ๋žœ์„ฌ์˜ ์•ž์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‚ผ๋™์„ ์˜ ์ด ์ €ํ•ญ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋˜ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด์˜ ๋Œ€์นญ ํ˜•ํƒœ๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ค‘ ์ „์ฒด ์ €ํ•ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฉด ์„ ์ฒด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

  • Resistance performance
  • Wave-piercing trimaran
  • Seakeeping characteristics
  • Side hull symmetry
  • Model test
  • Experimental study
Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration
Figure 4 Snapshots of the trimaran model during the tests. a Inboard side hulls in the Tri-1confguration, b Outboard side hulls in the Tri-4 confguration, c Symmetric side hulls in the Tri-4confguration

References

  • Ackers BB, Thad JM, Tredennick OW, Landen CH, Miller EJ, Sodowsky JP, Hadler JB (1997) An investigation of the resistance characteristics of powered trimaran side-hull configurations. SNAME Transactions 105:349โ€“373Google Scholar 
  • ASME (2005) Test uncertainty, The American society of mechanical engineers performance test code, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, No. PTC 19. 1โ€“2005, New York
  • Chen Y, Yang L, Xie Y, Yu S (2016) The research on characteristic parameters and resistance chart of operation and maintenance trimaran in the sea. Polish Maritime Research 23(s1):20โ€“24. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2016-0041Article Google Scholar 
  • Claire M, Andrea M (2014) Resistance analysis for a trimaran. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 8(1):7โ€“15Google Scholar 
  • Deng R, Li C, Huang D, Zhou G (2015) The effect of trimming and sinkage on the trimaran resistance calculation. Procedia Engineering 126:327โ€“331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.199Article Google Scholar 
  • Doctors L, Scrace R (2003) The optimization of trimaran side hull position for minimum resistance. Seventh International Conference on Fast Transportation (FAST 2003), Ischia, Italy, 1โ€“12
  • Du L, Hefazi H, Sahoo P (2019) Rapid resistance estimation method of non-Wigley trimarans. Ships and Offshore Structures 14(8):910โ€“920. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1588499Article Google Scholar 
  • Ghadimi P, Nazemian A, Ghadimi A (2019) Numerical scrutiny of the influence of side hulls arrangement on the motion of a Trimaran vessel in regular waves through CFD analysis. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41(1):1โ€“10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1505-xArticle Google Scholar 
  • Hafez K, El-Kot A-R (2011) Comparative analysis of the separation variation influence on the hydrodynamic performance of a high speed trimaran. Journal of Marine Science and Application 10(4):377โ€“393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-011-1083-0Article Google Scholar 
  • Hafez KA, El-Kot AA (2012) Comparative investigation of the stagger variation influence on the hydrodynamic interference of high speed trimaran. Alexandria Engineering Journal 51(3):153โ€“169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.02.002Article Google Scholar 
  • Hashimoto H, Amano S, Umeda N, Matsuda A (2011) Influence of side-hull positions on dynamic behaviors of a trimaran running in following and stern quartering seas. Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Offshore and Polar Engineering, 573โ€“580
  • Insel M, Molland AF (1991) An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 134:1โ€“20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-013-1193-yArticle Google Scholar 
  • ITTC (2014) Testing and extrapolation methods in resistance towing tank tests, Recommended Procedures, 7.5โ€“02โ€“02โ€“01
  • Iqbal M, Utama IKAP (2014) An investigation into the effect of water depth on the resistance components of trimaran configuration. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Marine Technology, Surabaya
  • Lewis EV (1988) Principles of Naval Architecture. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers III: 323โ€“324
  • Luhulima RB, Utama I, Sulisetyono A (2016) Experimental investigation into the resistance components of displacement trimaran at various lateral spacing. International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) 2:21โ€“29Google Scholar 
  • Luhulima RB (2017) An Investigation into the resistance of displacement trimaran: a comparative analysis between experimental and CFD approaches. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering (IJME) 6:9โ€“18Google Scholar 
  • Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA (2011) Ship resistance and propulsion: practical estimation of ship propulsive power. Cambridge University Press, 544.
  • Verna S, Khan K, Praveen PC (2012) Trimaran hull form optimization, using ship flow. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 1(10):5โ€“15
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Talahatu MA, Indrawati RT, Jamaluddin A (2013) Resistance analysis of unsymmetrical trimaran model with outboard side hulls configuration. Journal of Marine Science and Application 12(3):293โ€“297Article Google Scholar 
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Talahatu MA, Indrawati RT, Jamaluddin A (2015a) Resistance reduction on trimaran ship model by biopolymer of eel slime. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering 12(2):95โ€“102. https://doi.org/10.3329/jname.v12i2.19549Article Google Scholar 
  • Yanuar Y, Gunawan G, Waskito KT, Jamaluddin A (2015b) Experimental study resistances of asymmetrical Pentamaran model with separation and staggered hull variation of inner side-hulls. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research 42(1):82โ€“94. https://doi.org/10.1615/interjfluidmechres.v42.i1.60Article Google Scholar 
  • Zhang WP, Zong Z, Wang WH (2012) Special problems and solutions for numerical prediction on longitudinal motion of trimaran. Applied Mechanics and Materials 152-154: 1262โ€“75. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.152-154.1262
  • Zhang L, Zhang JN, Shang YC (2019) A potential flow theory and boundary layer theory based hybrid method for waterjet propulsion. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7(4):113โ€“132. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7040113Article Google Scholar 
Numerical simulation on molten pool behavior of narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding

์ข์€ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

Numerical simulation on molten pool behavior of narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

As a highly efficient thick plate welding resolution, narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding (NG-GTAW) is in the face of a series of problems like inter-layer defects like pores, lack of fusion, inclusion of impurity, and the sensitivity to poor sidewall fusion, which is hard to be repaired after the welding process. This study employs numerical simulation to investigate the molten pool behavior in NG-GTAW root welding. A 3D numerical model was established, where a body-fitted coordinate system was applied to simulate the electromagnetic force, and a bridge transition model was developed to investigate the wireโ€“feed root welding. The simulated results were validated experimentally. Results show that the molten pool behavior is dominated by electromagnetic force when the welding current is relatively high, and the dynamic change of the vortex actually determines the molten pool morphology. For self-fusion welding, there are two symmetric inward vortices in the cross-section and one clockwise vortex in the longitudinal section. With the increasing welding current, the vortices in the cross-section gradually move to the arc center with a decreasing range, while the vortex in the longitudinal section moves backward. With the increasing traveling speed, the vortices in the cross-section move toward the surface of the molten pool with a decreasing range, and the horizontal component of liquid metal velocity changes in the longitudinal section. For wireโ€“feed welding, the filling metal strengthens the downward velocity component; as a result, the vortex formation is blocked in the cross-section and is strengthened in the longitudinal section.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

The raw/processed data required cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. Wang X, Nan Y, Xie Z, Tsai Y, Yang J, Shang C (2017) Influence of welding pass on microstructure and toughness in the reheated zone of multi-pass weld metal of 550 MPa offshore engineering steel. Mater Sci Eng : A 702:196โ€“205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.081Article Google Scholar 
  2. Bunaziv I, Akselsen OM, Frostevarg J, Kaplan AFH (2018) Deep penetration fiber laser-arc hybrid welding of thick HSLA steel. J Mater Process Technol 256:216โ€“228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.026Article Google Scholar 
  3. Josefson BL, Karlsson CT (1989) FE-calculated stresses in a multi-pass butt-welded pipe-a simplified approach. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip 38:227โ€“243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(89)90017-3Article Google Scholar 
  4. Mitra A, Rajan Babu V, Puthiyavinayagam P, Varier NV, Ghosh M, Desai H, Chellapandi P, Chetal SC (2012) Design and development of thick plate concept for rotatable plugs and technology development for future Indian FBR. Nucl Eng Des 246:245โ€“255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.01.008Article Google Scholar 
  5. Alemdar ASA, Jalal SR, Mulapeer MMS (2022) Influence of friction stir welding process on the mechanical characteristics of the hybrid joints aa2198-t8 to aa2024-t3. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2022:1โ€“11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7055446Article Google Scholar 
  6. Anant R, Ghosh PK (2017) Advancement in narrow gap GMA weld joint of thick section of austenitic stainless steel to HSLA steel. Mater Today: Proc 4:10169โ€“10173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.342Article Google Scholar 
  7. Wang J, Zhu J, Fu P, Su R, Han W, Yang F (2012) A swing arc system for narrow gap GMA welding. ISIJ Int 52:110โ€“114. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.110Article Google Scholar 
  8. Jiang L, Shi L, Lu Y, Xiang Y, Zhang C, Gao M (2022) Effects of sidewall grain growth on pore formation in narrow gap oscillating laser welding. Optics Laser Technol 156:108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108483Article Google Scholar 
  9. Ohnishi T, Kawahito Y, Mizutani M, Katayama S (2013) Butt welding of thick, high strength steel plate with a high power laser and hot wire to improve tolerance to gap variance and control weld metal oxygen content. Sci Technol Welding Join 18:314โ€“322. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171813Y.0000000108Article Google Scholar 
  10. Cai C, Li L, Tai L (2017) Narrow-gap laser-MIG hybrid welding of thick-section steel with different shielding gas nozzles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:909โ€“916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0179-3Article Google Scholar 
  11. Yang T, Liu J, Zhuang Y, Sun K, Chen W (2020) Studies on the formation mechanism of incomplete fusion defects in ultra-narrow gap laser wire filling welding. Optics Laser Technol 129:106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106275Article Google Scholar 
  12. Miao R, Shan Z, Zhou Q, Wu Y, Ge L, Zhang J, Hu H (2022) Real-time defect identification of narrow overlap welds and application based on convolutional neural networks. J Manuf Syst 62:800โ€“810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.012Article Google Scholar 
  13. Nรคsstrรถm J, Brueckner F, Kaplan AFH (2020) Imperfections in narrow gap multi-layer welding – potential causes and countermeasures. Optics Lasers Eng 129:106011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106011Article Google Scholar 
  14. Li W, Yu R, Huang D, Wu J, Wang Y, Hu T, Wang J (2019) Numerical simulation of multi-layer rotating arc narrow gap MAG welding for medium steel plate. J Manuf Proc 45:460โ€“471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.035Article Google Scholar 
  15. Han S, Liu G, Tang X, Xu L, Cui H, Shao C (2022) Effect of molten pool behaviors on welding defects in tandem NG-GMAW based on CFD simulation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 195:123165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123165Article Google Scholar 
  16. Mikihito H, Yoshito I (2016) A simplified Fe simulation method with shell element for welding deformation and residual stress generated by multi-pass butt welding. Int J Steel Struct 16:51โ€“58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-3005-0Article Google Scholar 
  17. Cai W, Saez M, Spicer P, Chakraborty D, Skurkis R, Carlson B, Okigami F, Robertson J (2023) Distortion simulation of gas metal arc welding (gmaw) processes for automotive body assembly. Weld World 67:109โ€“139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-022-01369-3Article Google Scholar 
  18. Pazilova UA, Il In AV, Kruglova AA, Motovilina GD, Khlusova EI (2015) Influence of the temperature and strain rate on the structure and fracture mode of high-strength steels upon the simulation of the thermal cycle of welding and post-welding tempering. Phys Metals Metallogr 116:606โ€“614. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X1506006XArticle Google Scholar 
  19. Zhang Z, Wu Q, Grujicic M et al (2016) Monte Carlo simulation of grain growth and welding zones in friction stir welding of aa6082-t6. J Mater Sci 51:1882โ€“1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9495-xArticle Google Scholar 
  20. Ikram A, Chung H (2021) Numerical simulation of arc, metal transfer and its impingement on weld pool in variable polarity gas metal arc welding. J Manuf Process 64:1529โ€“1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.001Article Google Scholar 
  21. Zhao B, Chen J, Wu C, Shi L (2020) Numerical simulation of bubble and arc dynamics during underwater wet flux-cored arc welding. J Manuf Process 59:167โ€“185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.054Article Google Scholar 
  22. Zeng Z, Wang Z, Hu S, Wu S (2022) Dynamic molten pool behavior of pulsed gas tungsten arc welding with filler wire in horizontal position and its characterization based on arc voltage. J Manuf Proc 75:1โ€“12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.051Article Google Scholar 
  23. Zhu C, Cheon J, Tang X, Na S, Cui H (2018) Molten pool behaviors and their influences on welding defects in narrow gap GMAW of 5083 Al-alloy. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126:1206โ€“1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.132Article Google Scholar 
  24. Gu H, Vรคistรถ T, Li L (2020) Numerical and experimental study on the molten pool dynamics and fusion zone formation in multi-pass narrow gap laser welding. Optics Laser Technol 126:106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106081Article Google Scholar 
  25. Ma C, Chen B, Meng Z, Tan C, Song X, Li Y (2023) Characteristic of keyhole, molten pool and microstructure of oscillating laser TIG hybrid welding. Optics Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109142.161:109142
  26. Ai Y, Liu X, Huang Y, Yu L (2020) Numerical analysis of the influence of molten pool instability on the weld formation during the high speed fiber laser welding. Int J Heat Mass Trans 160:120103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120103Article Google Scholar 
  27. Meng X, Artinov A, Bachmann M, รœstรผndaฤŸ ร–, Gumenyuk A, Rethmeier M (2022) The detrimental molten pool narrowing phenomenon in wire feed laser beam welding and its suppression by magnetohydrodynamic technique. Int J Heat Mass Transf 193:122913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122913Article Google Scholar 
  28. Li X, Wei X, Zhang L, Lv Q (2023) Numerical simulation for the effect of scanning speed and in situ laser shock peening on molten pool and solidification characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125:5031โ€“5046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10897-1Article Google Scholar 
  29. Ye W, Bao J, Lei J Huang Y, Li Z, Li P, Zhang Y (2022) Multiphysics modeling of thermal behavior of commercial pure titanium powder during selective laser melting. Met Mater Int 28:282-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01019-1.
  30. Cheng H, Kang L, Wang C, Li Q, Chang B, Chang B (2022) Dynamic behavior of molten pool backside during full-penetration laser welding of Ni-based superalloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:4587โ€“4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08187-9Article Google Scholar 
  31. Jeong H, Park K, Cho J (2016) Numerical analysis of variable polarity arc weld pool. J Mech Sci Technol 30:4307โ€“4313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0845-7Article Google Scholar
Strain rate magnitude at the free surface, illustrating Kelvin-Helmoltz (KH) shear instabilities.

On the reef scale hydrodynamics at Sodwana Bay, South Africa

Environmental Fluid Mechanics (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The hydrodynamics of coral reefs strongly influences their biological functioning, impacting processes such as nutrient availability and uptake, recruitment success and bleaching. For example, coral reefs located in oligotrophic regions depend on upwelling for nutrient supply. Coral reefs at Sodwana Bay, located on the east coast of South Africa, are an example of high latitude marginal reefs. These reefs are subjected to complex hydrodynamic forcings due to the interaction between the strong Agulhas current and the highly variable topography of the region. In this study, we explore the reef scale hydrodynamics resulting from the bathymetry for two steady current scenarios at Two-Mile Reef (TMR) using a combination of field data and numerical simulations. The influence of tides or waves was not considered for this study as well as reef-scale roughness. Tilt current meters with onboard temperature sensors were deployed at selected locations within TMR. We used field observations to identify the dominant flow conditions on the reef for numerical simulations that focused on the hydrodynamics driven by mean currents. During the field campaign, southerly currents were the predominant flow feature with occasional flow reversals to the north. Northerly currents were associated with greater variability towards the southern end of TMR. Numerical simulations showed that Jesser Point was central to the development of flow features for both the northerly and southerly current scenarios. High current variability in the south of TMR during reverse currents is related to the formation of Kelvin-Helmholtz type shear instabilities along the outer edge of an eddy formed north of Jesser Point. Furthermore, downward vertical velocities were computed along the offshore shelf at TMR during southerly currents. Current reversals caused a change in vertical velocities to an upward direction due to the orientation of the bathymetry relative to flow directions.

Highlights

  • A predominant southerly current was measured at Two-Mile Reef with occasional reversals towards the north.
  • Field observations indicated that northerly currents are spatially varied along Two-Mile Reef.
  • Simulation of reverse currents show the formation of a separated flow due to interaction with Jesser Point with Kelvinโ€“Helmholtz type shear instabilities along the seaward edge.

์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ Sodwana Bay์—์„œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์•”์ดˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทœ๋ชจ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์— ์–ด๋–ค ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Sodwana Bay์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” LES ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ณ„ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํŒŒ๋„์™€ ์กฐ์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐฐ์ œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ Agulhas ํ•ด๋ฅ˜์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถฅ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ LES๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  Sodwana Bay์˜ ์‚ฐํ˜ธ์ดˆ์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anarde K, Myres H, Figlus J (2016) Tilt current meter field validation in the surf zone. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts, vol 2016, pp EP23Aโ€”-0950
  2. Blocken B (2018) LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor applications: A foregone conclusion? Build Simul 11(5):821โ€“870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3Article Google Scholar 
  3. Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res Ocean 104(C4):7649โ€“7666. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622Article Google Scholar 
  4. Bouffanais R (2010) Advances and challenges of applied large-eddy simulation. Comput Fluids 39:735โ€“738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.12.003Article Google Scholar 
  5. Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2002) Coral bleaching on high-latitude marginal reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Mar Pollut Bull 44:1380โ€“1387Article Google Scholar 
  6. Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2008) Coral community structure and risk assessment of high-latitude reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 17(13):3097โ€“3117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9271-6Article Google Scholar 
  7. Chen SC (2018) Performance assessment of FLOW-3D and XFlow in the numerical modelling of fish-bone type fishway hydraulics https://doi.org/10.15142/T3HH1J
  8. Corbella S, Pringle J, Stretch DD (2015) Assimilation of ocean wave spectra and atmospheric circulation patterns to improve wave modelling. Coast Eng 100:1โ€“10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.03.003Article Google Scholar 
  9. Davis KA, Pawlak G, Monismith SG (2021) Turbulence and coral reefs. Ann Rev Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-042120-071823Article Google Scholar 
  10. Flow Science Inc (2018) FLOW-3D, Version 12.0 Users Manual. Santa Fe, NM, https://www.flow3d.com/
  11. Flow Science Inc (2019) FLOW-3D, Version 12.0 [Computer Software]. Santa Fe, NM, https://www.flow3d.com/
  12. Franco A, Moernaut J, Schneider-Muntau B, Strasser M, Gems B (2020) The 1958 Lituya Bay tsunami – pre-event bathymetry reconstruction and 3D numerical modelling utilising the computational fluid dynamics software Flow-3D. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20(8):2255โ€“2279Article Google Scholar 
  13. Fringer OB, Gerritsen M, Street RL (2006) An unstructured-grid, finite-volume, nonhydrostatic, parallel coastal ocean simulator. Ocean Model 14(3):139โ€“173Article Google Scholar 
  14. Fringer OB, Dawson CN, He R, Ralston DK, Zhang YJ (2019) The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: findings from a workshop. Ocean Model 143(September):101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101458Article Google Scholar 
  15. Glassom D, Celliers L, Schleyer MH (2006) Coral recruitment patterns at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Coral Reefs 25(3):485โ€“492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0117-6Article Google Scholar 
  16. Gomes A, Pinho JLS, Valente T, do Carmo JS, Hegde VA (2020) Performance assessment of a semi-circular breakwater through CFD modelling. J Mar Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030226Article Google Scholar 
  17. Green RH, Lowe RJ, Buckley ML (2018) Hydrodynamics of a tidally forced coral reef atoll. J Geophys Res Oceans 123(10):7084โ€“7101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013946Article Google Scholar 
  18. Hansen AB, Carstensen S, Christensen DF, Aagaard T (2017) Performance of a tilt current meter in the surf zone. Coastal dynamics
  19. Hench JL, Rosman JH (2013) Observations of spatial flow patterns at the coral colony scale on a shallow reef flat. J Geophys Res Ocean 118(3):1142โ€“1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20105Article Google Scholar 
  20. Hirt CW (1993) Volume-fraction techniques: powerful tools for wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46โ€“47:327โ€“338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90298-3Article Google Scholar 
  21. Hirt CW, Sicilian JM (1985) A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Ship Hydrodynamics https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10009570543/en/
  22. Hocker LO, Hruska MA (2004) Interleaving synchronous data and asynchronous data in a single data storage file
  23. Hossain MM, Staples AE (2020) Effects of coral colony morphology on turbulent flow dynamics. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0225676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225676Article Google Scholar 
  24. Jacob B, Stanev EV (2021) Understanding the impact of bathymetric changes in the german bight on coastal hydrodynamics: one step toward realistic morphodynamic modeling. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.640214Article Google Scholar 
  25. Koehl MAR, Hadfield MG (2010) Hydrodynamics of larval settlement from a larvaโ€™s point of view. Integr Comp Biol 50(4):539โ€“551. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icq101Article Google Scholar 
  26. Lim A, Wheeler AJ, Price DM, Oโ€™Reilly L, Harris K, Conti L (2020) Influence of benthic currents on cold-water coral habitats: a combined benthic monitoring and 3D photogrammetric investigation. Sci Rep 10(1):19433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76446-yArticle Google Scholar 
  27. Limer BD, Bloomberg J, Holstein DM (2020) The influence of eddies on coral larval retention in the flower garden banks. Front Mar Sci 7:372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00372Article Google Scholar 
  28. Monismith SG (2007) Hydrodynamics of coral reefs. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39(1):37โ€“55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092125Article Google Scholar 
  29. Morris T (2009) Physical oceanography of Sodwana Bay and its effect on larval transport and coral bleaching. PhD thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
  30. Morris T, Lamont T, Roberts MJ (2013) Effects of deep-sea eddies on the northern KwaZulu-Natal shelf, South Africa. Afr J Mar Sci 35(3):343โ€“350. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2013.827991Article Google Scholar 
  31. Perry C, Larcombe P (2003) Marginal and non-reef-building coral environments. Coral Reefs 22:427โ€“432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0330-5Article Google Scholar 
  32. Pope SB (2001) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar 
  33. Porter SN (2009) Biogeography and potential factors regulating shallow subtidal reef communities in the Western Indian Ocean. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town
  34. Porter SN, Schleyer MH (2017) Long-term dynamics of a high-latitude coral reef community at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Coral Reefs 36(2):369โ€“382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-016-1531-zArticle Google Scholar 
  35. Porter SN, Schleyer MH (2019) Environmental variation and how its spatial structure influences the cross-shelf distribution of high-latitude coral communities in South Africa. Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040057Article Google Scholar 
  36. Ramsay PJ (1994) Marine geology of the Sodwana Bay shelf, southeast Africa. Mar Geol 120(3โ€“4):225โ€“247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(94)90060-4Article Google Scholar 
  37. Ramsay PJ, Mason TR (1990) Development of a type zoning model for Zululand coral reefs, Sodwana Bay, South Africa. J Coastal Res 6(4):829โ€“852Google Scholar 
  38. Reguero BG, Beck MW, Agostini VN, Kramer P, Hancock B (2018) Coral reefs for coastal protection: a new methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada. J Environ Manag 210:146โ€“161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.024Article Google Scholar 
  39. Reidenbach M, Stocking J, Szczyrba L, Wendelken C (2021) Hydrodynamic interactions with coral topography and its impact on larval settlement. Coral Reefs 40:1โ€“15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02069-yArticle Google Scholar 
  40. Reidenbach MA, Koseff JR, Koehl MAR (2009) Hydrodynamic forces on larvae affect their settlement on coral reefs in turbulent, wave-driven flow. Limnol Oceanogr 54(1):318โ€“330. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0318Article Google Scholar 
  41. Roberts H, Richardson J, Lagumbay R, Meselhe E, Ma Y (2013) Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling using FLOW-3D for siting and optimization of the LCA medium diversion at white ditch hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling using FLOW-3D for siting and optimization of the LCA medium diversion at white D (December)
  42. Roberts MJ, Ribbink AJ, Morris T, Berg MAVD, Engelbrecht DC, Harding RT (2006) Oceanographic environment of the Sodwana Bay coelacanths (Latimeria chalumnae), South Africa: coelacanth research. South Afr J Sci 102(9):435โ€“443Google Scholar 
  43. Rogers JS, Monismith SG, Feddersen F, Storlazzi CD (2013) Hydrodynamics of spur and groove formations on a coral reef. J Geophys Res Ocean 118(6):3059โ€“3073. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20225Article Google Scholar 
  44. Rogers JS, Monismith SG, Koweek DA, Torres WI, Dunbar RB (2016) Thermodynamics and hydrodynamics in an atoll reef system and their influence on coral cover. Limnol Oceanogr 61(6):2191โ€“2206. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10365Article Google Scholar 
  45. Schleyer MH, Celliers L (2003) Coral dominance at the reef-sediment interface in marginal coral communities at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Mar Freshw Res 54(8):967โ€“972. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF02049Article Google Scholar 
  46. Schleyer MH, Porter SN (2018) Chapter One – drivers of soft and stony coral community distribution on the high-latitude coral reefs of South Africa. advances in marine biology, vol 80, Academic Press, pp 1โ€“55, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.09.001
  47. Scott F, Antolinez JAA, McCall R, Storlazzi C, Reniers A, Pearson S (2020) Hydro-morphological characterization of coral reefs for wave runup prediction. Front Mar Sci 7:361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00361Article Google Scholar 
  48. Sebens KP, Grace SP, Helmuth B, Maney EJ Jr, Miles JS (1998) Water flow and prey capture by three scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis, Montastrea cavernosa and Porites porites, in a field enclosure. Mar Biol 131(2):347โ€“360Article Google Scholar 
  49. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99โ€“164Article Google Scholar 
  50. Stocking J, Laforsch C, Sigl R, Reidenbach M (2018) The role of turbulent hydrodynamics and surface morphology on heat and mass transfer in corals. J R Soc Interface 15:20180448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0448Article Google Scholar 
  51. Van Leer B (1977) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J Comput Phys 23(3):263โ€“275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(77)90094-8Article Google Scholar 
  52. Wells C, Pringle J, Stretch D (2021) Cold water temperature anomalies on the Sodwana reefs and their driving mechanisms. South Afr J Sci. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/9304Article Google Scholar 
  53. Wyatt ASJ, Lowe RJ, Humphries S, Waite AM (2010) Particulate nutrient fluxes over a fringing coral reef: relevant scales of phytoplankton production and mechanisms of supply. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 405:113โ€“130Article Google Scholar 
  54. Yao Y, He T, Deng Z, Chen L, Guo H (2019) Large eddy simulation modeling of tsunami-like solitary wave processes over fringing reefs. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19(6):1281โ€“1295. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1281-2019Article Google Scholar 
  55. Zhao Q, Tanimoto K (1998) Numerical simulation of breaking waves by large eddy simulation and vof method. Coastal Engineering Proceedings 1(26), 10.9753/icce.v26.%p, https://journals.tdl.org/icce/index.php/icce/article/view/5656

Text and image taken from Deoraj, et al. (2022), On the reef scale hydrodynamics at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Preprint courtesy the authors.

Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)

Three-dimensional Numerical Evaluation of Hydraulic Efficiency and Discharge Coefficient in Grate Inlets

์‡ ์ฐฝ์‚ด ๊ฒฉ์ž ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํšจ์œจ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ํ‰๊ฐ€

Melquisedec Cortรฉs Zambrano*, Helmer Edgardo Monroy Gonzรกlez,
Wilson Enrique Amaya Tequia
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Santo Tomas Tunja University. Address Av. Universitaria No. 45-202.
Tunja โ€“ Boyacรก – Colombia

Abstract

ํ™์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ง€๋ฐ˜์ด๋™ ๋ฐ ์ด๋™์˜ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ธ‰์†ํ•œ ๋„์‹œํ™” ๋ฐ ๋„์‹œํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ด์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋„์‹œ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์ง‘์ˆ˜ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฒ”๋žŒ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์„œ๋Š” 7๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ™”๊ฒฉ์ž ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ์œ ์ž… ํšจ์œจ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3Dยฎ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” Q = 24, 34.1, 44, 100, 200 ๋ฐ 300 L/s์˜ ์œ ์†์—์„œ ํ’€ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋กœ ๊ฒฉ์ž๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ข…๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ 1.0์ธ ์‹คํ—˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. %, 1.5% ๋ฐ 2.0% ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์ • ํšก๋‹จ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, ์ด 126๊ฐœ ๋ชจ๋ธ. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ข…๋‹จ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ ํšจ์œจ๊ณก์„ ๊ณผ ํ† ์ถœ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ๊ณต์‹์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ •๋˜์–ด ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Floods are one of the causes of ground movement and displacement, and due to rapid urbanization and urban growth may occur more frequently than before. The characteristics of an urban drainage system can define the occurrence and extent of flooding, where catchment elements have a determining role. This document presents the numerical investigation of the hydraulic inlet efficiency and the discharge coefficient of seven types of grate inlets. The FLOW-3Dยฎ simulator is used to test the gratings at a full scale, under flow rates of Q = 24, 34.1, 44, 100, 200 and 300 L/s, preserving the configuration of the experimental prototype with longitudinal slopes of 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% and a fixed cross slope, for a total of 126 models. Based on the results, hydraulic inlet efficiency curves and discharge coefficients are constructed for each type and a longitudinal slope condition. The results are adjusted with empirical formulations proposed in other investigations, serving to verify the results of physical testing of prototypes.

Keywords

grate inlet, inlet efficiency, discharge coefficient, computational fluid dynamic, 3D modelling.

Fig. 1. Physical model of the experimental campaign (source: Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 1. Physical model of the experimental campaign (source: Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade
and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 2. Design of the grate inlet types studied: (a) R1, (b) R2, (c) R3, (d) R4, (e) R5, (f) R6, (g) R7 (source: based on geometries of Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 4. Comparison between the results obtained during physical experimentation in prototype 7 and simulation results with FLOW-3Dยฎ (source:
made with FlowSightยฎ and photographic record by Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 4. Comparison between the results obtained during physical experimentation in prototype 7 and simulation results with FLOW-3Dยฎ (source: made with FlowSightยฎ and photographic record by Chaparro Andrade and Abaunza Tabares, 2021)
Fig. 6. Example of the results of flow depth and velocity vectors in the xy plane, for a stable flow condition in a grate inlet type and free surface
configuration and flow regime, of some grating types (source: produced with FlowSightยฎ)
Fig. 6. Example of the results of flow depth and velocity vectors in the xy plane, for a stable flow condition in a grate inlet type and free surface configuration and flow regime, of some grating types (source: produced with FlowSightยฎ)

References

Alia Md., S., and Sabtu, N. (2020). Comparison of Different Methodologies for Determining the Efficiency of Gully Inlets. In F. M.
Nazri (Ed.), Proceedings of AICCEโ€˜19: Transforming the Nation
for a Sustainable Tomorrow (Vol. 53, pp. 1275-1284). Springer
Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
32816-0_99
Antunes do Carmo, J. S. (2020). Physical Modelling vs. Numerical Modelling: Complementarity and Learning. July. https://doi.
org/10.20944/preprints202007.0753.v1
Aragรณn-Hernรกndez, J. L. (2013). Modelaciรณn numรฉrica integrada de los procesos hidrรกulicos en el drenaje urbano [Universidad Politรฉcnica de Cataluรฑa]. In Doctoral Tesis. https://
upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/95059?locale-attribute=es
Argue, J. R., and Pezzaniti, D. (1996). How reliable are inlet
(hydraulic) models at representing stormwater flow? Science
of the Total Environment, 189-190, 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(96)05231-X
Banco Mundial, O. (2019). Agua: Panorama general. https://
www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/water/overview
Cรกrdenas-Quintero, M., Carvajal-Serna, L. F., and Marbello-Pรฉrez, R. (2018). Evaluaciรณn numรฉrica tridimensional de un
sumidero de reja de fondo (Three-Dimensional Numerical Assessment of Grate Inlet). SSRN Electronic Journal, November.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3112980
Carvalho, R. F., Lopes, P., Leandro, J., and David, L. M. (2019).
Numerical Research of Flows into Gullies with Different Outlet Locations. Water, 11(2), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/
w11040794
Chaparro Andrade, F. G., and Abaunza Tabares, K. V. (2021). Importancia de los sumideros, su funcionamiento y diseรฑo en redes de alcantarillado caso de estudio sector nororiental Tunja.
Universidad Santo Tomรกs.
Cortรฉs Zambrano, M., Amaya Tequia, W. E., and Gamba Fernรกndez, D. S. (2020). Implementation of the hydraulic modelling of
urban drainage in the northeast sector, Tunja, Boyacรก. Revista
Facultad de Ingenierรญa Universidad de Antioquia. https://doi.
org/10.17533/udea.redin.20200578
Cosco, C., Gรณmez, M., Russo, B., Tellez-Alvarez, J., Macchione, F., Costabile, P., and Costanzo, C. (2020). Discharge coefficients for specific grated inlets. Influence of the Froude
number. Urban Water Journal, 17(7), 656-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1811881
Despotovic, J., Plavsic, J., Stefanovic, N., and Pavlovic, D. (2005).
Inefficiency of storm water inlets as a source of urban floods.
Water Science and Technology, 51(2), 139-145. https://doi.
org/10.2166/wst.2005.0041
Ellis, J. B., and Marsalek, J. (1996). Overview of urban drainage:
Environmental impacts and concerns, means of mitigation and
implementation policies. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 34(6),
723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689609498446
Fang, X., Jiang, S., and Alam, S. R. (2010). Numerical simulations of efficiency of curb-opening inlets. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, 136(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
HY.1943-7900.0000131
Faram, M. G., and Harwood, R. (2000). CFD for the Water Industry; The Role of CFD as a Tool for the Development of Wastewater Treatment Systems. Hydro International, 21-22.
Faram, M. G., and Harwood, R. (2002). Assessment of the
effectiveness of stormwater treatment chambers using
computational fluid dynamics. Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, 40644(September 2002), 1-14. https://doi.
org/10.1061/40644(2002)7
Flow Science, I. (2018). FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 Users Manual.
In FLOW-3D [Computer software]. https://www.flow3d.com
Flow Science, I. (2019). FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 [Computer software] (No. 12). https://www.flow3d.com
Ghanbari, R., and Heidarnejad, M. (2020). Experimental and numerical analysis of flow hydraulics in triangular and rectangular
piano key weirs. Water Science, 00(00), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.
1080/11104929.2020.1724649

Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2005a). Comparative study of methodologies to determine inlet efficiency from test data. HEC-12
methodology vs UPC method. Water Resources Management,
Algarve, Portugal., 80(October 2014), 623-632. https://doi.
org/10.2495/WRM050621
Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2005b). Comparative study among
different methodologies to determine storm sewer inlet efficiency from test data. 10th International Conference on Urban
Drainage, August, 21-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255602448_Comparative_study_among_different_methodologies_to_determine_storm_sewer_inlet_efficiency_
from_test_data
Gรณmez, M., Recasens, J., Russo, B., and Martรญnez-Gomariz, E.
(2016). Assessment of inlet efficiency through a 3D simulation: Numerical and experimental comparison. Water Science
and Technology, 74(8), 1926-1935. https://doi.org/10.2166/
wst.2016.326
Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2011). Methodology to estimate hydraulic efficiency of drain inlets. Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers: Water Management, 164(2), 81-90. https://doi.
org/10.1680/wama.900070
Gรณmez Valentin, M. (2007). Hidrologรญa urbana. In Hidrologรญa Urbana (pp. 135-147). Instituto Flumen.
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., and Norton, J. P. (2006). Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental
models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 602-614.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004
Jang, J. H., Hsieh, C. T., and Chang, T. H. (2019). The importance of gully flow modelling to urban flood simulation. Urban Water Journal, 16(5), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1669198
Kaushal, D. R., Thinglas, T., Tomita, Y., Kuchii, S., and Tsukamoto, H. (2012). Experimental investigation on optimization of
invert trap configuration for sewer solid management. Powder Technology, 215-216, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.08.029
Khazaee, I., and Mohammadiun, M. (2010). Effects of flow field
on open channel flow properties using numerical investigation
and experimental comparison. International Journal of Energy
and Environment, 1(6), 1083-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0031-9384(10)00122-8
Kleidorfer, M., Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Vonach, T., and Rauch, W.
(2018). What can we learn from a 500-year event? Experiences
from urban drainage in Austria. Water Science and Technology,
77(8), 2146-2154. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.138
Leitรฃo, J. P., Simรตes, N. E., Pina, R. D., Ochoa-Rodriguez, S.,
Onof, C., and Sรก Marques, A. (2017). Stochastic evaluation of
the impact of sewer inletsโ€˜ hydraulic capacity on urban pluvial
flooding. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 31(8), 1907-1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-
1283-x
Lopes, P., Leandro, J., Carvalho, R. F., Russo, B., and Gรณmez, M.
(2016). Assessment of the ability of a volume of fluid model to
reproduce the efficiency of a continuous transverse gully with
grate. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 142(10),
1-9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001058
Mohsin, M., and Kaushal, D. R. (2016). 3D CFD validation of invert trap efficiency for sewer solid management using VOF model. Water Science and Engineering, 9(2), 106-114. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.06.006
Palla, A., Colli, M., Candela, A., Aronica, G. T., and Lanza, L.
G. (2018). Pluvial flooding in urban areas: the role of surface
drainage efficiency. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11,
S663-S676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12246
Russo, B. (2010). Design of surface drainage systems according
to hazard criteria related to flooding of urban areas [Universitat
Politรจcnica de Catalunya]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/
tesis?codigo=258828
Sedano-Cruz, K., Carvajal-Escoar, Y., and รvila Dรญaz, A. J. (2013).
ANรLISIS DE ASPECTOS QUE INCREMENTAN EL RIESGO
DE INUNDACIONES EN COLOMBIA. Luna Azul, 37, 219-218.
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=321729206014
Spaliviero, F., May, R. W. P., Escarameia, M. (2000). Spacing of road gullies. Hydraulic performance of BS EN 124 gully gratings. HR Walingford, 44(0). https://doi.org/10.13140/
RG.2.1.1344.0889
Tรฉllez-รlvarez, J., Gรณmez, M., and Russo, B. (2020). Quantification of energy loss in two grated inlets under pressure. Water
(Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061601
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez, V., Russo, B., and Redondo, J. M.
(2003). Performance assessment of numerical modelling
for hydraulic efficiency of a grated inlet. 1, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.16309/j.cnki.issn.1007-1776.2003.03.004
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez Valentin, M., Paindelli, A., and Russo,
B. (2017). ACTIVIDAD EXPERIMENTAL DE I+D+i EN INGENIERรA
HIDRรULICA EN ESPAร‘A. In L. J. Balairรณn Pรฉrez and D. Lรณpez
Gรณmez (Eds.), Seminario 2017, Comunicaciones de las lรญneas prioritarias (pp. 41-43). Universitat Politรจcnica de Valรจncia.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Tรฉllez รlvarez, J., Gรณmez Valentin, M., and Russo, B. (2019).
Modelling of Surcharge Flow Through Grated Inlet. In P. Gourbesville and G. Caignaert (Eds.), Advances in Hydroinformati-

cs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
4451-42-0
UNDRR, I., and CRED, I. (2018). Pรฉrdidas econรณmicas, pobreza y
Desastres 1998 – 2017 (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.12962/
j23373520.v6i1.22451
Vyzikas, T., and Greaves, D. (2018). Numerial Modelling.
In D. Greaves and G. Iglesias (Eds.), Wave and Tidal Energy (pp. 289-363). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.
org/10.1002/9781119014492
Yakhot, V., and Orszag, S. A. (1986). Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence. I . Basic Theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1(1), 3-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452
Yakhot, V., and Smith, L. M. (1992). The renormalization group,
the ษ›-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. Journal
of Scientific Computing, 7(l), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/
BF01060210
Yazdanfar, Z., and Sharma, A. (2015). Urban drainage system
planning and design – Challenges with climate change and urbanization: A review. Water Science and Technology, 72(2), 165-https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.207

์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋„˜์ด ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ณ„ ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœํ˜• ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „์›”๋ฅ˜ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ํ•ด์„ ( 3์ฐจ์› ์ „์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ )

๋ถˆ์™„์ „ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœํ˜• ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ์ „์‚ฐ ์ถ”์น˜ํ•ด์„

ํ˜„์žฌ ๋†์–ด์ดŒ๊ณต์‚ฌ์™€ ๋†์–ด์ดŒ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›, ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ, ํ•™๊ณ„ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์˜ค๋žœ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ํ•™๊ณ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ™œ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๊ณผ ํ˜„์žฅ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•œ๊ตญ๋†์–ด์ดŒ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์žฌ๋‚œ์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ๋ณธ๋ถ€ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ต์œก ์žฅ๋ฉด
2024๋…„ ํ•œ๊ตญ๋†์–ด์ดŒ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ๋ณธ๋ถ€ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „์›”๋ฅ˜ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ•ด์„๊ต์œก ์žฅ๋ฉด

๋†์–ด์ดŒ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ์—…๋ฌด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์‹œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์‹ญ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ? ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ถ๊ธˆํ•˜์‹  ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด๋‚˜ ์šฉ์—ญ ์˜๋ขฐ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์‹œ๋ฉด ์–ธ์ œ๋“ ์ง€ ์•„๋ž˜ ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜๋กœ ์—ฐ๋ฝ ์ฃผ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ณผ์—… ์˜ˆ์‹œ

๊ณผ์—…์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„

  • 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ OO์ €์ˆ˜์ง€์˜ ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ๊ฒ€ํ† 
  • ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์—ฌ๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์—ฌ์œ ๊ณ  ๊ฒ€ํ† 

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ณผ์—… ์„ธ๋ถ€๋‚ด์šฉ

๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ 200๋…„, 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„

๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด

๊ฐ€. ์ˆ˜์œ„

  • ๋งŒ์ˆ˜์œ„
  • ํ™์ˆ˜์œ„
    – 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„
    – 200๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„
    – ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(PMF)

๋‚˜. ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰

  • 100๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰
  • 200๋…„ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰
  • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(PMF)

์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์—ฌ์œ ๊ณ  ๊ฒ€ํ† 

  • ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ๋ฌผ๋„˜์ด ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ˜•์ƒ ๊ฒ€ํ† 
  • ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ’์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† 
  • ์ˆ˜์œ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ฌผ๋„˜์ด ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์—ฌ์œ ๊ณ  ๊ฒ€ํ† 

โ€ป ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ฐ’์€ ๋ฐœ์ฃผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ์ œ๊ณต

์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฌผ

  • 100๋…„๋นˆ๋„, 200๋…„๋นˆ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(PMF) ์œ ์ž…์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธก์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ ์—ฌ์œ ๊ณ  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† 
  • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(PMF)์„ ๊ณ ๋ ค ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ Data ๊ตฌ์ถ•
  • ๊ณผ์—…๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ, ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์›๋ณธ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฐ PDF ํŒŒ์ผ, ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ์›๋ณธ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ
  • ๊ธฐํƒ€
    โ€ป ๋ชจ๋“  ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ CD ๋ฐ ์ด๋™์ €์žฅ์žฅ์น˜์— ๋ณ„๋„ ์ €์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ฉํ’ˆ

<์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ์šฉ์—ญ ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜>

  • ์ „ํ™” :   02-2026-0455
  • Email : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr
Figure 3: Wave pattern at sea surface at 20 knots (10.29 m/s) for mesh 1

Flow-3D์—์„œ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ถ„์„

Ship resistance analysis using CFD simulations in Flow-3D

Author

Deshpande, SujaySundsbรธ, Per-ArneDas, Subhashis

Abstract

์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ๋™๋ ฅ ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ ๋˜๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ•์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋™๋ ฅ์ด ์ถ”์ง„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ‘์†์‹ค’์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ถ”์ง„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค:

Holtrop-Mennen(HM) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋˜๋Š” CFD(์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ, ์ฆ‰ ์˜ˆ์ธ ํƒฑํฌ์—์„œ ์ถ•์†Œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ. ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์„ ๋ฐ• ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ HM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ•ด์„/CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ์™„์ „ํ•œ 3D ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์™„๋ฃŒ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋งŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ Flow-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž”์ž”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ƒ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋กค์˜จ/๋กค์˜คํ”„ ์Šน๊ฐ(RoPax) ํŽ˜๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์†๋„์—์„œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ HM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ถ”์ •์น˜์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์„ ๋ฐ• ์†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ HM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ๋†’์€ ์„ ์†์„ ์œ„ํ•œ HM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์ปธ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” Flow-3D์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ์‹œ์—ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

While designing the power requirements of a ship, the most important factor to be considered is the ship resistance, or the sea drag forces acting on the ship. It is important to have an estimate of the ship resistance while designing the propulsion system since the power required to overcome the sea drag forces contribute to โ€˜lossesโ€™ in the propulsion system. There are three main methods to calculate ship resistance: Statistical methods like the Holtrop-Mennen (HM) method, numerical analysis or CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations, and model testing, i.e. scaled model tests in towing tanks. At the start of the design stage, when only basic ship parameters are available, only statistical models like the HM method can be used. Numerical analysis/ CFD simulations and model tests can be performed only when the complete 3D design of the ship is completed. The present paper aims at predicting the calm water ship resistance using CFD simulations, using the Flow-3D software package. A case study of a roll-on/roll-off passenger (RoPax) ferry was investigated. Ship resistance was calculated at various ship speeds. Since the mesh affects the results in any CFD simulation, multiple meshes were used to check the mesh sensitivity. The results from the simulations were compared with the estimate from the HM method. The results from simulations agreed well with the HM method for low ship speeds. The difference in the results was considerably high compared to the HM method for higher ship speeds. The capability of Flow-3D to perform ship resistance analysis was demonstrated.

Figure 1: Simplified ship geometry
Figure 1: Simplified ship geometry
Figure 3: Wave pattern at sea surface at 20 knots (10.29 m/s) for mesh 1
Figure 3: Wave pattern at sea surface at 20 knots (10.29 m/s) for mesh 1
Figure 4: Ship Resistance (kN) vs Ship Speed (knots)
Figure 4: Ship Resistance (kN) vs Ship Speed (knots)

Publisher

International Society of Multiphysics

Citation

Deshpande SR, Sundsbรธ P, Das S. Ship resistance analysis using CFD simulations in Flow-3D. The International Journal of Multiphysics. 2020;14(3):227-236

REFERENCES

[1] K. Min and S. Kang, โ€œStudy on the form factor and full-scale ship resistance prediction
method,โ€ Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 108-118, June 2010.
[2] A. Molland, S. Turnock and D. Hudson, “Ship Resistance and Propulsion” Second
Edition. In Ship Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive
Power (pp. 12-69), August 2017, Cambridge University Press.
[3] K. Niklas and H. Pruszko, โ€œFull-scale CFD simulations for the determination of ship
resistance as a rational, alternative method to towing tank experiments,โ€ Ocean
Engineering, vol. 190, October 2019.
[4] A. Elkafas, M. Elgohary and A. Zeid, โ€œNumerical study on the hydrodynamic drag force
of a container ship model,โ€ Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 849-859,
September 2019.
[5] J. Holtrop and G. Mennen, โ€œAn approximate power prediction method,โ€ International
Shipbuilding Progress, vol. 29, no. 335, pp. 166-170, July 1982.
[6] E. Bรธckmann and S. Steen, โ€œModel test and simulation of a ship with wavefoils,โ€ Applied
Ocean research, vol. 57, pp. 8-18, April 2016.
[7] K. Atreyapurapu, B. Tallapragada and K. Voonna, โ€œSimulation of a Free Surface Flow
over a Container Vessel Using CFD,โ€ International Journal of Engineering Trends and
Technology (IJETT), vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 334-339, December 2014.
[8] J. Petersen, D. Jacobsen and O. Winther, โ€œStatistical modelling for ship propulsion
efficiency,โ€ Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 17, pp. 30-39, December
2011.
[9] H. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the
finite volume method (second edition), Harlow, England: Pearson Education Ltd, 2007.
[10]C. Hirth and B. Nichols, โ€œVolume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free
boundaries,โ€ Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 201-225, January 1981.
[11] A. Nordli and H. Khawaja, โ€œComparison of Explicit Method of Solution for CFD Euler
Problems using MATLABยฎ and FORTRAN 77,โ€ International Journal of Multiphysics,
vol. 13, no. 2, 2019.
[12] FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 12.0 Userโ€™s Manual (2018). FLOW-3D [Computer software]. Santa
Fe, NM: Flow Science, Inc. https://www.flow3d.com.
[13] D. McCluskey and A. Holdรธ, โ€œOptimizing the hydrocyclone for ballast water treatment
using computational fluid dynamics,โ€ International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 3, no. 3,
2009.
[14]M. Breuer, D. Lakehal and W. Rodi, โ€œFlow around a Surface Mounted Cubical Obstacle:
Comparison of Les and Rans-Results,โ€ Computation of Three-Dimensional Complex
Flows. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 49, p. 1996.
[15] G. Wei, โ€œA Fixed-Mesh Method for General Moving Objects in Fluid Flowโ€, Modern
Physics Letters B, vol. 19, no. 28, pp. 1719-1722, 2005.
[16]J. Michell, โ€œThe wave-resistance of a ship,โ€ The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin
Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Vols. 45, 1898, no. 272, pp. 106-123,
May 2009.

Figure 5 A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

Physical and Numerical Modeling of the Impeller Construction Impact on the Aluminum Degassing Process

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํƒˆ๊ธฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ž„ํŽ ๋Ÿฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Kamil Kuglin,1 Michaล‚ Szucki,2 Jacek Pieprzyca,3 Simon Genthe,2 Tomasz Merder,3 and Dorota Kalisz1,*

Mikael Ersson, Academic Editor

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Go to:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of tests on the suitability of designed heads (impellers) for aluminum refining. The research was carried out on a physical model of the URO-200, followed by numerical simulations in the FLOW 3D program. Four design variants of impellers were used in the study. The degree of dispersion of the gas phase in the model liquid was used as a criterion for evaluating the performance of each solution using different process parameters, i.e., gas flow rate and impeller speed. Afterward, numerical simulations in Flow 3D software were conducted for the best solution. These simulations confirmed the results obtained with the water model and verified them.

Keywords: aluminum, impeller construction, degassing process, numerical modeling, physical modeling

Go to:

1. Introduction

Constantly increasing requirements concerning metallurgical purity in terms of hydrogen content and nonmetallic inclusions make casting manufacturers use effective refining techniques. The answer to this demand is the implementation of the aluminum refining technique making use of a rotor with an original design guaranteeing efficient refining [1,2,3,4]. The main task of the impeller (rotor) is to reduce the contamination of liquid metal (primary and recycled aluminum) with hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions. An inert gas, mainly argon or a mixture of gases, is introduced through the rotor into the liquid metal to bring both hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions to the metal surface through the flotation process. Appropriately and uniformly distributed gas bubbles in the liquid metal guarantee achieving the assumed level of contaminant removal economically. A very important factor in deciding about the obtained degassing effect is the optimal rotor design [5,6,7,8]. Thanks to the appropriate geometry of the rotor, gas bubbles introduced into the liquid metal are split into smaller ones, and the spinning movement of the rotor distributes them throughout the volume of the liquid metal bath. In this solution impurities in the liquid metal are removed both in the volume and from the upper surface of the metal. With a well-designed impeller, the costs of refining aluminum and its alloys can be lowered thanks to the reduced inert gas and energy consumption (optimal selection of rotor rotational speed). Shorter processing time and a high degree of dehydrogenation decrease the formation of dross on the metal surface (waste). A bigger produced dross leads to bigger process losses. Consequently, this means that the choice of rotor geometry has an indirect impact on the degree to which the generated waste is reduced [9,10].

Another equally important factor is the selection of process parameters such as gas flow rate and rotor speed [11,12]. A well-designed gas injection system for liquid metal meets two key requirements; it causes rapid mixing of the liquid metal to maintain a uniform temperature throughout the volume and during the entire process, to produce a chemically homogeneous metal composition. This solution ensures effective degassing of the metal bath. Therefore, the shape of the rotor, the arrangement of the nozzles, and their number are significant design parameters that guarantee the optimum course of the refining process. It is equally important to complete the mixing of the metal bath in a relatively short time, as this considerably shortens the refining process and, consequently, reduces the process costs. Another important criterion conditioning the implementation of the developed rotor is the generation of fine diffused gas bubbles which are distributed throughout the metal volume, and whose residence time will be sufficient for the bubbles to collide and adsorb the contaminants. The process of bubble formation by the spinning rotors differs from that in the nozzles or porous molders. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion splits the bubbles into smaller ones. Here, the rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and fluid density have a key effect on the bubble size. The velocity of the bubbles, which depends mainly on their size and shape, determines their residence time in the reactor and is, therefore, very important for the refining process, especially since gas bubbles in liquid aluminum may remain steady only below a certain size [13,14,15].

The impeller designs presented in the article were developed to improve the efficiency of the process and reduce its costs. The impellers used so far have a complicated structure and are very pricey. The success of the conducted research will allow small companies to become independent of external supplies through the possibility of making simple and effective impellers on their own. The developed structures were tested on the water model. The results of this study can be considered as pilot.

Go to:

2. Materials and Methods

Rotors were realized with the SolidWorks computer design technique and a 3D printer. The developed designs were tested on a water model. Afterward, the solution with the most advantageous refining parameters was selected and subjected to calculations with the Flow3D package. As a result, an impeller was designed for aluminum refining. Its principal lies in an even distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of liquid metal, with the largest possible participation of the bubble surface, without disturbing the metal surface. This procedure guarantees the removal of gaseous, as well as metallic and nonmetallic, impurities.

2.1. Rotor Designs

The developed impeller constructions, shown in Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 and Figure 4, were printed on a 3D printer using the PLA (polylactide) material. The impeller design models differ in their shape and the number of holes through which the inert gas flows. Figure 1Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the same impeller model but with a different number of gas outlets. The arrangement of four, eight, and 12 outlet holes was adopted in the developed design. A triangle-shaped structure equipped with three gas outlet holes is presented in Figure 4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g001.jpg

Figure 1

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with four holesโ€”variant B4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g002.jpg

Figure 2

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with eight holesโ€”variant B8.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g003.jpg

Figure 3

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with twelve holesโ€”variant B12.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g004.jpg

Figure 4

A 3D modelโ€”โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller with three holesโ€”variant RT3.

2.2. Physical Models

Investigations were carried out on a water model of the URO 200 reactor of the barbotage refining process (see Figure 5).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g005.jpg

Figure 5

A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

The URO 200 reactor can be classified as a cyclic reactor. The main element of the device is a rotor, which ends the impeller. The whole system is attached to a shaft via which the refining gas is supplied. Then, the shaft with the rotor is immersed in the liquid metal in the melting pot or the furnace chamber. In URO 200 reactors, the refining process lasts 600 s (10 min), the gas flow rate that can be obtained ranges from 5 to 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, and the speed at which the rotor can move is 0 to 400 rpm. The permissible quantity of liquid metal for barbotage refining is 300 kg or 700 kg [8,16,17]. The URO 200 has several design solutions which improve operation and can be adapted to the existing equipment in the foundry. These solutions include the following [8,16]:

  • URO-200XRโ€”used for small crucible furnaces, the capacity of which does not exceed 250 kg, with no control system and no control of the refining process.
  • URO-200SAโ€”used to service several crucible furnaces of capacity from 250 kg to 700 kg, fully automated and equipped with a mechanical rotor lift.
  • URO-200KAโ€”used for refining processes in crucible furnaces and allows refining in a ladle. The process is fully automated, with a hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200KXโ€”a combination of the XR and KA models, designed for the ladle refining process. Additionally, refining in heated crucibles is possible. The unit is equipped with a manual hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200PAโ€”designed to cooperate with induction or crucible furnaces or intermediate chambers, the capacity of which does not exceed one ton. This unit is an integral part of the furnace. The rotor lift is equipped with a screw drive.

Studies making use of a physical model can be associated with the observation of the flow and circulation of gas bubbles. They require meeting several criteria regarding the similarity of the process and the object characteristics. The similarity conditions mainly include geometric, mechanical, chemical, thermal, and kinetic parameters. During simulation of aluminum refining with inert gas, it is necessary to maintain the geometric similarity between the model and the real object, as well as the similarity related to the flow of liquid metal and gas (hydrodynamic similarity). These quantities are characterized by the Reynolds, Weber, and Froude numbers. The Froude number is the most important parameter characterizing the process, its magnitude is the same for the physical model and the real object. Water was used as the medium in the physical modeling. The factors influencing the choice of water are its availability, relatively low cost, and kinematic viscosity at room temperature, which is very close to that of liquid aluminum.

The physical model studies focused on the flow of inert gas in the form of gas bubbles with varying degrees of dispersion, particularly with respect to some flow patterns such as flow in columns and geysers, as well as disturbance of the metal surface. The most important refining parameters are gas flow rate and rotor speed. The barbotage refining studies for the developed impeller (variants B4, B8, B12, and RT3) designs were conducted for the following process parameters:

  • Rotor speed: 200, 300, 400, and 500 rpm,
  • Ideal gas flow: 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1,
  • Temperature: 293 K (20 ยฐC).

These studies were aimed at determining the most favorable variants of impellers, which were then verified using the numerical modeling methods in the Flow-3D program.

2.3. Numerical Simulations with Flow-3D Program

Testing different rotor impellers using a physical model allows for observing the phenomena taking place while refining. This is a very important step when testing new design solutions without using expensive industrial trials. Another solution is modeling by means of commercial simulation programs such as ANSYS Fluent or Flow-3D [18,19]. Unlike studies on a physical model, in a computer program, the parameters of the refining process and the object itself, including the impeller design, can be easily modified. The simulations were performed with the Flow-3D program version 12.03.02. A three-dimensional system with the same dimensions as in the physical modeling was used in the calculations. The isothermal flow of liquidโ€“gas bubbles was analyzed. As in the physical model, three speeds were adopted in the numerical tests: 200, 300, and 500 rpm. During the initial phase of the simulations, the velocity field around the rotor generated an appropriate direction of motion for the newly produced bubbles. When the required speed was reached, the generation of randomly distributed bubbles around the rotor was started at a rate of 2000 per second. Table 1 lists the most important simulation parameters.

Table 1

Values of parameters used in the calculations.

ParameterValueUnit
Maximum number of gas particles1,000,000
Rate of particle generation20001ยทsโˆ’1
Specific gas constant287.058Jยทkgโˆ’1ยทKโˆ’1
Atmospheric pressure1.013 ร— 105Pa
Water density1000kgยทmโˆ’3
Water viscosity0.001kgยทmโˆ’1ยทsโˆ’1
Boundary condition on the wallsNo-slip
Size of computational cell0.0034m

Open in a separate window

In the case of the CFD analysis, the numerical solutions require great care when generating the computational mesh. Therefore, computational mesh tests were performed prior to the CFD calculations. The effect of mesh density was evaluated by taking into account the velocity of water in the tested object on the measurement line A (height of 0.065 m from the bottom) in a characteristic cross-section passing through the object axis (see Figure 6). The mesh contained 3,207,600, 6,311,981, 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 cells.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g006.jpg

Figure 6

The velocity of the water depending on the size of the computational grid.

The quality of the generated computational meshes was checked using the criterion skewness angle QEAS [18]. This criterion is described by the following relationship:

QEAS=max{ฮฒmaxโˆ’ฮฒeq180โˆ’ฮฒeq,ฮฒeqโˆ’ฮฒminฮฒeq},

(1)

where ฮฒmaxฮฒmin are the maximal and minimal angles (in degrees) between the edges of the cell, and ฮฒeq is the angle corresponding to an ideal cell, which for cubic cells is 90ยฐ.

Normalized in the interval [0;1], the value of QEAS should not exceed 0.75, which identifies the permissible skewness angle of the generated mesh. For the computed meshes, this value was equal to 0.55โ€“0.65.

Moreover, when generating the computational grids in the studied facility, they were compacted in the areas of the highest gradients of the calculated values, where higher turbulence is to be expected (near the impeller). The obtained results of water velocity in the studied object at constant gas flow rate are shown in Figure 6.

The analysis of the obtained water velocity distributions (see Figure 6) along the line inside the object revealed that, with the density of the grid of nodal points, the velocity changed and its changes for the test cases of 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 were insignificant. Therefore, it was assumed that a grid containing not less than 7,900,000 (7,889,512) cells would not affect the result of CFD calculations.

A single-block mesh of regular cells with a size of 0.0034 m was used in the numerical calculations. The total number of cells was approximately 7,900,000 (7,889,512). This grid resolution (see Figure 7) allowed the geometry of the system to be properly represented, maintaining acceptable computation time (about 3 days on a workstation with 2ร— CPU and 12 computing cores).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g007.jpg

Figure 7

Structured equidistant mesh used in numerical calculations: (a) mesh with smoothed, surface cells (the so-called FAVOR method) used in Flow-3D; (b) visualization of the applied mesh resolution.

The calculations were conducted with an explicit scheme. The timestep was selected by the program automatically and controlled by stability and convergence. From the moment of the initial velocity field generation (start of particle generation), it was 0.0001 s.

When modeling the degassing process, three fluids are present in the system: water, gas supplied through the rotor head (impeller), and the surrounding air. Modeling such a multiphase flow is a numerically very complex issue. The necessity to overcome the liquid backpressure by the gas flowing out from the impeller leads to the formation of numerical instabilities in the volume of fluid (VOF)-based approach used by Flow-3D software. Therefore, a mixed description of the analyzed flow was used here. In this case, water was treated as a continuous medium, while, in the case of gas bubbles, the discrete phase model (DPM) model was applied. The way in which the air surrounding the system was taken into account is later described in detail.

The following additional assumptions were made in the modeling:

  • โ€”The liquid phase was considered as an incompressible Newtonian fluid.
  • โ€”The effect of chemical reactions during the refining process was neglected.
  • โ€”The composition of each phase (gas and liquid) was considered homogeneous; therefore, the viscosity and surface tension were set as constants.
  • โ€”Only full turbulence existed in the liquid, and the effect of molecular viscosity was neglected.
  • โ€”The gas bubbles were shaped as perfect spheres.
  • โ€”The mutual interaction between gas bubbles (particles) was neglected.

2.3.1. Modeling of Liquid Flow 

The motion of the real fluid (continuous medium) is described by the Navierโ€“Stokes Equation [20].

dudt=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+13ฮฝโˆ‡(โˆ‡โ‹… u)+F,

(2)

where du/dt is the time derivative, u is the velocity vector, t is the time, and F is the term accounting for external forces including gravity (unit components denoted by XYZ).

In the simulations, the fluid flow was assumed to be incompressible, in which case the following equation is applicable:

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+(uโ‹…โˆ‡)u=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+F.

(3)

Due to the large range of liquid velocities during flows, the turbulence formation process was included in the modeling. For this purpose, the kโ€“ฮต model turbulence kinetic energy k and turbulence dissipation ฮต were the target parameters, as expressed by the following equations [21]:

โˆ‚(ฯk)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯkvi)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒk)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+Gk+Gbโˆ’ฯฮตโˆ’Ym+Sk,

(4)

โˆ‚(ฯฮต)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯฮตui)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒฮต)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+C1ฮตฮตk(Gk+G3ฮตGb)+C2ฮตฯฮต2k+Sฮต,

(5)

where ฯ is the gas density, ฯƒฮบ and ฯƒฮต are the Prandtl turbulence numbers, k and ฮต are constants of 1.0 and 1.3, and Gk and Gb are the kinetic energy of turbulence generated by the average velocity and buoyancy, respectively.

As mentioned earlier, there are two gas phases in the considered problem. In addition to the gas bubbles, which are treated here as particles, there is also air, which surrounds the system. The boundary of phase separation is in this case the free surface of the water. The shape of the free surface can change as a result of the forming velocity field in the liquid. Therefore, it is necessary to use an appropriate approach to free surface tracking. The most commonly used concept in liquidโ€“gas flow modeling is the volume of fluid (VOF) method [22,23], and Flow-3D uses a modified version of this method called TrueVOF. It introduces the concept of the volume fraction of the liquid phase fl. This parameter can be used for classifying the cells of a discrete grid into areas filled with liquid phase (fl = 1), gaseous phase, or empty cells (fl = 0) and those through which the phase separation boundary (fl โˆˆ (0, 1)) passes (free surface). To determine the local variations of the liquid phase fraction, it is necessary to solve the following continuity equation:

dfldt=0.

(6)

Then, the fluid parameters in the region of coexistence of the two phases (the so-called interface) depend on the volume fraction of each phase.

ฯ=flฯl+(1โˆ’fl)ฯg,

(7)

ฮฝ=flฮฝl+(1โˆ’fl)ฮฝg,

(8)

where indices l and g refer to the liquid and gaseous phases, respectively.

The parameter of fluid velocity in cells containing both phases is also determined in the same way.

u=flul+(1โˆ’fl)ug.

(9)

Since the processes taking place in the surrounding air can be omitted, to speed up the calculations, a single-phase, free-surface model was used. This means that no calculations were performed in the gas cells (they were treated as empty cells). The liquid could fill them freely, and the air surrounding the system was considered by the atmospheric pressure exerted on the free surface. This approach is often used in modeling foundry and metallurgical processes [24].

2.3.2. Modeling of Gas Bubble Flow 

As stated, a particle model was used to model bubble flow. Spherical particles (gas bubbles) of a given size were randomly generated in the area marked with green in Figure 7b. In the simulations, the gas bubbles were assumed to have diameters of 0.016 and 0.02 m corresponding to the gas flow rates of 10 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, respectively.

Experimental studies have shown that, as a result of turbulent fluid motion, some of the bubbles may burst, leading to the formation of smaller bubbles, although merging of bubbles into larger groupings may also occur. Therefore, to be able to observe the behavior of bubbles of different sizes (diameter), the calculations generated two additional particle types with diameters twice smaller and twice larger, respectively. The proportion of each species in the system was set to 33.33% (Table 2).

Table 2

Data assumed for calculations.

NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
A2000.01610D2000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
B3000.01610E3000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
C5000.01610F5000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04

Open in a separate window

The velocity of the particle results from the generated velocity field (calculated from Equation (3) in the liquid ul around it and its velocity resulting from the buoyancy force ub. The effect of particle radius r on the terminal velocity associated with buoyancy force can be determined according to Stokesโ€™ law.

ub=29 (ฯgโˆ’ฯl)ฮผlgr2,

(10)

where g is the acceleration (9.81).

The DPM model was used for modeling the two-phase (waterโ€“air) flow. In this model, the fluid (water) is treated as a continuous phase and described by the Navierโ€“Stokes equation, while gas bubbles are particles flowing in the model fluid (discrete phase). The trajectories of each bubble in the DPM system are calculated at each timestep taking into account the mass forces acting on it. Table 3 characterizes the DPM model used in our own research [18].

Table 3

Characteristic of the DPM model.

MethodEquations
Eulerโ€“LagrangeBalance equation:
dugdt=FD(uโˆ’ug)+g(ฯฑgโˆ’ฯฑ)ฯฑg+F.
FD (u โˆ’ up) denotes the drag forces per mass unit of a bubble, and the expression for the drag coefficient FD is of the form
FD=18ฮผCDReฯฑโ‹…gd2g24.
The relative Reynolds number has the form
Reโ‰กฯdg|ugโˆ’u|ฮผ.
On the other hand, the force resulting from the additional acceleration of the model fluid has the form
F=12dฯdtฯg(uโˆ’ug),
where ug is the gas bubble velocity, u is the liquid velocity, dg is the bubble diameter, and CD is the drag coefficient.

Open in a separate window

Go to:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Calculations of Power and Mixing Time by the Flowing Gas Bubbles

One of the most important parameters of refining with a rotor is the mixing power induced by the spinning rotor and the outflowing gas bubbles (via impeller). The mixing power of liquid metal in a ladle of height (h) by gas injection can be determined from the following relation [15]:

pgVm=ฯโ‹…gโ‹…uB,

(11)

where pg is the mixing power, Vm is the volume of liquid metal in the reactor, ฯ is the density of liquid aluminum, and uB is the average speed of bubbles, given below.

uB=nโ‹…Rโ‹…TAcโ‹…Pmโ‹…t,

(12)

where n is the number of gas moles, R is the gas constant (8.314), Ac is the cross-sectional area of the reactor vessel, T is the temperature of liquid aluminum in the reactor, and Pm is the pressure at the middle tank level. The pressure at the middle level of the tank is calculated by a function of the mean logarithmic difference.

Pm=(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)โˆ’Paln(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)Pa,

(13)

where Pa is the atmospheric pressure, and h is the the height of metal in the reactor.

Themelis and Goyal [25] developed a model for calculating mixing power delivered by gas injection.

pg=2Qโ‹…Rโ‹…Tโ‹…ln(1+mโ‹…ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hP),

(14)

where Q is the gas flow, and m is the mass of liquid metal.

Zhang [26] proposed a model taking into account the temperature difference between gas and alloy (metal).

pg=QRTgVm[ln(1+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hPa)+(1โˆ’TTg)],

(15)

where Tg is the gas temperature at the entry point.

Data for calculating the mixing power resulting from inert gas injection into liquid aluminum are given below in Table 4. The design parameters were adopted for the model, the parameters of which are shown in Figure 5.

Table 4

Data for calculating mixing power introduced by an inert gas.

ParameterValueUnit
Height of metal column0.7m
Density of aluminum2375kgยทmโˆ’3
Process duration20s
Gas temperature at the injection site940K
Cross-sectional area of ladle0.448m2
Mass of liquid aluminum546.25kg
Volume of ladle0.23M3
Temperature of liquid aluminum941.15K

Open in a separate window

Table 5 presents the results of mixing power calculations according to the models of Themelis and Goyal and of Zhang for inert gas flows of 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The obtained calculation results significantly differed from each other. The difference was an order of magnitude, which indicates that the model is highly inaccurate without considering the temperature of the injected gas. Moreover, the calculations apply to the case when the mixing was performed only by the flowing gas bubbles, without using a rotor, which is a great simplification of the phenomenon.

Table 5

Mixing power calculated from mathematical models.

Mathematical ModelMixing Power (Wยทtโˆ’1)
for a Given Inert Gas Flow (dm3ยทminโˆ’1)
102030
Themelis and Goyal11.4923.3335.03
Zhang0.821.662.49

Open in a separate window

The mixing time is defined as the time required to achieve 95% complete mixing of liquid metal in the ladle [27,28,29,30]. Table 6 groups together equations for the mixing time according to the models.

Table 6

Models for calculating mixing time.

AuthorsModelRemarks
Szekely [31]ฯ„=800ฮตโˆ’0.4ฮตโ€”Wยทtโˆ’1
Chiti and Paglianti [27]ฯ„=CVQlVโ€”volume of reactor, m3
Qlโ€”flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1
Iguchi and Nakamura [32]ฯ„=1200โ‹…Qโˆ’0.4D1.97hโˆ’1.0ฯ…0.47ฯ…โ€”kinematic viscosity, m2ยทsโˆ’1
Dโ€”diameter of ladle, m
hโ€”height of metal column, m
Qโ€”liquid flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1

Open in a separate window

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the liquid column in the ladle and mixing power values.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g008.jpg

Figure 8

Mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the metal column (Iguchi and Nakamura model).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g009.jpg

Figure 9

Mixing time as a function of mixing power (Szekly model).

3.2. Determining the Bubble Size

The mechanisms controlling bubble size and mass transfer in an alloy undergoing refining are complex. Strong mixing conditions in the reactor promote impurity mass transfer. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion separates the bubbles into smaller bubbles. Rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and liquid density have a strong influence on the bubble size. To characterize the kinetic state of the refining process, parameters k and A were introduced. Parameters kA, and uB can be calculated using the below equations [33].

k=2Dโ‹…uBdBโ‹…ฯ€โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš,

(16)

A=6Qโ‹…hdBโ‹…uB,

(17)

uB=1.02gโ‹…dB,โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš

(18)

where D is the diffusion coefficient, and dB is the bubble diameter.

After substituting appropriate values, we get

dB=3.03ร—104(ฯ€D)โˆ’2/5gโˆ’1/5h4/5Q0.344Nโˆ’1.48.

(19)

According to the last equation, the size of the gas bubble decreases with the increasing rotational speed (see Figure 10).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g010.jpg

Figure 10

Effect of rotational speed on the bubble diameter.

In a flow of given turbulence intensity, the diameter of the bubble does not exceed the maximum size dmax, which is inversely proportional to the rate of kinetic energy dissipation in a viscous flow ฮต. The size of the gas bubble diameter as a function of the mixing energy, also considering the Weber number and the mixing energy in the negative power, can be determined from the following equations [31,34]:

  • โ€”Sevik and Park:

dBmax=We0.6krโ‹…(ฯƒโ‹…103ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)0.6โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’0.4โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(20)

  • โ€”Evans:

dBmax=โŽกโŽฃWekrโ‹…ฯƒโ‹…1032โ‹…(ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)13โŽคโŽฆ35 โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’25โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(21)

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble dBmax determined from Equation (21) are given in Table 7.

Table 7

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble using Equation (21).

ModelMixing Energy
ฤบ (m2ยทsโˆ’3)
Weber Number (Wekr)
0.591.01.2
Zhang and Taniguchi
dmax
0.10.01670.02300.026
0.50.00880.01210.013
1.00.00670.00910.010
1.50.00570.00780.009
Sevik and Park
dBmax
0.10.2650.360.41
0.50.1390.190.21
1.00.1060.140.16
1.50.0900.120.14
Evans
dBmax
0.10.2470.3400.38
0.50.1300.1780.20
1.00.0980.1350.15
1.50.0840.1150.13

Open in a separate window

3.3. Physical Modeling

The first stage of experiments (using the URO-200 water model) included conducting experiments with impellers equipped with four, eight, and 12 gas outlets (variants B4, B8, B12). The tests were carried out for different process parameters. Selected results for these experiments are presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g011.jpg

Figure 11

Impeller variant B4โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g012.jpg

Figure 12

Impeller variant B8โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g013.jpg

Figure 13

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant B12).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g014.jpg

Figure 14

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant RT3).

The analysis of the refining variants presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14 reveals that the proposed impellers design model is not useful for the aluminum refining process. The number of gas outlet orifices, rotational speed, and flow did not affect the refining efficiency. In all the variants shown in the figures, very poor dispersion of gas bubbles was observed in the object. The gas bubble flow had a columnar character, and so-called dead zones, i.e., areas where no inert gas bubbles are present, were visible in the analyzed object. Such dead zones were located in the bottom and side zones of the ladle, while the flow of bubbles occurred near the turning rotor. Another negative phenomenon observed was a significant agitation of the water surface due to excessive (rotational) rotor speed and gas flow (see Figure 13, cases 20; 400, 30; 300, 30; 400, and 30; 500).

Research results for a โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller equipped with three gas supply orifices (variant RT3) are presented in Figure 14.

In this impeller design, a uniform degree of bubble dispersion in the entire volume of the modeling fluid was achieved for most cases presented (see Figure 14). In all tested variants, single bubbles were observed in the area of the water surface in the vessel. For variants 20; 200, 30; 200, and 20; 300 shown in Figure 14, the bubble dispersion results were the worst as the so-called dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further applications. Interestingly, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model. This means that the presented model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Its design with sharp edges also differed from previously analyzed models, which is beneficial for gas bubble dispersion, but may interfere with its suitability in industrial conditions due to possible premature wear.

3.4. Qualitative Comparison of Research Results (CFD and Physical Model)

The analysis (physical modeling) revealed that the best mixing efficiency results were obtained with the RT3 impeller variant. Therefore, numerical calculations were carried out for the impeller model with three outlet orifices (variant RT3). The CFD results are presented in Figure 15 and Figure 16.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g015.jpg

Figure 15

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 1 s: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g016.jpg

Figure 16

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 5.4 s.: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

CFD results are presented for all analyzed variants (impeller RT3) at two selected calculation timesteps of 1 and 5.40 s. They show the velocity field of the medium (water) and the dispersion of gas bubbles.

Figure 15 shows the initial refining phase after 1 s of the process. In this case, the gas bubble formation and flow were observed in an area close to contact with the rotor. Figure 16 shows the phase when the dispersion and flow of gas bubbles were advanced in the reactor area of the URO-200 model.

The quantitative evaluation of the obtained results of physical and numerical model tests was based on the comparison of the degree of gas dispersion in the model liquid. The degree of gas bubble dispersion in the volume of the model liquid and the areas of strong turbulent zones formation were evaluated during the analysis of the results of visualization and numerical simulations. These two effects sufficiently characterize the required course of the process from the physical point of view. The known scheme of the below description was adopted as a basic criterion for the evaluation of the degree of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid.

  • Minimal dispersionโ€”single bubbles ascending in the region of their formation along the ladle axis; lack of mixing in the whole bath volume.
  • Accurate dispersionโ€”single and well-mixed bubbles ascending toward the bath mirror in the region of the ladle axis; no dispersion near the walls and in the lower part of the ladle.
  • Uniform dispersionโ€”most desirable; very good mixing of fine bubbles with model liquid.
  • Excessive dispersionโ€”bubbles join together to form chains; large turbulence zones; uneven flow of gas.

The numerical simulation results give a good agreement with the experiments performed with the physical model. For all studied variants (used process parameters), the single bubbles were observed in the area of water surface in the vessel. For variants presented in Figure 13 (200 rpm, gas flow 20 and dm3ยทminโˆ’1) and relevant examples in numerical simulation Figure 16, the worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use. The areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model (physical model). This means that the presented impeller model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. The worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and side walls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use.

Figure 17 presents exemplary results of model tests (CFD and physical model) with marked gas bubble dispersion zones. All variants of tests were analogously compared, and this comparison allowed validating the numerical model.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g017.jpg

Figure 17

Compilations of model research results (CFD and physical): Aโ€”single gas bubbles formed on the surface of the modeling liquid, Bโ€”excessive formation of gas chains and swirls, Cโ€”uniform distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of the tank, and Dโ€”dead zones without gas bubbles, no dispersion. (a) Variant B; (b) variant F.

It should be mentioned here that, in numerical simulations, it is necessary to make certain assumptions and simplifications. The calculations assumed three particle size classes (Table 2), which represent the different gas bubbles that form due to different gas flow rates. The maximum number of particles/bubbles (Table 1) generated was assumed in advance and related to the computational capabilities of the computer. Too many particles can also make it difficult to visualize and analyze the results. The size of the particles, of course, affects their behavior during simulation, while, in the figures provided in the article, the bubbles are represented by spheres (visualization of the results) of the same size. Please note that, due to the adopted Lagrangianโ€“Eulerian approach, the simulation did not take into account phenomena such as bubble collapse or fusion. However, the obtained results allow a comprehensive analysis of the behavior of gas bubbles in the system under consideration.

The comparative analysis of the visualization (quantitative) results obtained with the water model and CFD simulations (see Figure 17) generated a sufficient agreement from the point of view of the trends. A precise quantitative evaluation is difficult to perform because of the lack of a refraction compensating system in the water model. Furthermore, in numerical simulations, it is not possible to determine the geometry of the forming gas bubbles and their interaction with each other as opposed to the visualization in the water model. The use of both research methods is complementary. Thus, a direct comparison of images obtained by the two methods requires appropriate interpretation. However, such an assessment gives the possibility to qualitatively determine the types of the present gas bubble dispersion, thus ultimately validating the CFD results with the water model.

A summary of the visualization results for impellers RT3, i.e., analysis of the occurring gas bubble dispersion types, is presented in Table 8.

Table 8

Summary of visualization results (impeller RT3)โ€”different types of gas bubble dispersion.

No Exp.ABCDEF
Gas flow rate, dm3ยทminโˆ’11030
Impeller speed, rpm200300500200300500
Type of dispersionAccurateUniformUniform/excessiveMinimalExcessiveExcessive

Open in a separate window

Tests carried out for impeller RT3 confirmed the high efficiency of gas bubble distribution in the volume of the tested object at a low inert gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The most optimal variant was variant B (300 rpm, 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1). However, the other variants A and C (gas flow rate 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1) seemed to be favorable for this type of impeller and are recommended for further testing. The above process parameters will be analyzed in detail in a quantitative analysis to be performed on the basis of the obtained efficiency curves of the degassing process (oxygen removal). This analysis will give an unambiguous answer as to which process parameters are the most optimal for this type of impeller; the results are planned for publication in the next article.

It should also be noted here that the high agreement between the results of numerical calculations and physical modelling prompts a conclusion that the proposed approach to the simulation of a degassing process which consists of a single-phase flow model with a free surface and a particle flow model is appropriate. The simulation results enable us to understand how the velocity field in the fluid is formed and to analyze the distribution of gas bubbles in the system. The simulations in Flow-3D software can, therefore, be useful for both the design of the impeller geometry and the selection of process parameters.

Go to:

4. Conclusions

The results of experiments carried out on the physical model of the device for the simulation of barbotage refining of aluminum revealed that the worst results in terms of distribution and dispersion of gas bubbles in the studied object were obtained for the black impellers variants B4, B8, and B12 (multi-orifice impellersโ€”four, eight, and 12 outlet holes, respectively).

In this case, the control of flow, speed, and number of gas exit orifices did not improve the process efficiency, and the developed design did not meet the criteria for industrial tests. In the case of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller (variant RT3), uniform gas bubble dispersion was achieved throughout the volume of the modeling fluid for most of the tested variants. The worst bubble dispersion results due to the occurrence of the so-called dead zones in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel were obtained for the flow variants of 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. For the analyzed model, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains were formed were found only for the inert gas flow of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. The model impeller (variant RT3) had the best performance compared to the previously presented impellers in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Moreover, its design differed from previously presented models because of its sharp edges. This can be advantageous for gas bubble dispersion, but may negatively affect its suitability in industrial conditions due to premature wearing.

The CFD simulation results confirmed the results obtained from the experiments performed on the physical model. The numerical simulation of the operation of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller model (using Flow-3D software) gave good agreement with the experiments performed on the physical model. This means that the presented model impeller, as compared to other (analyzed) designs, had the best performance in terms of gas bubble dispersion in the model liquid.

In further work, the developed numerical model is planned to be used for CFD simulations of the gas bubble distribution process taking into account physicochemical parameters of liquid aluminum based on industrial tests. Consequently, the obtained results may be implemented in production practice.

Go to:

Funding Statement

This paper was created with the financial support grants from the AGH-UST, Faculty of Foundry Engineering, Poland (16.16.170.654 and 11/990/BK_22/0083) for the Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Poland.

Go to:

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and D.K.; methodology, J.P. and T.M.; validation, M.S. and S.G.; formal analysis, D.K. and T.M.; investigation, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; resources, M.S., J.P. and K.K.; writingโ€”original draft preparation, D.K. and T.M.; writingโ€”review and editing, D.K. and T.M.; visualization, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; supervision, D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Go to:

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Go to:

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Go to:

Footnotes

Publisherโ€™s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Go to:

References

1. Zhang L., Xuewei L., Torgerson A.T., Long M. Removal of Impurity Elements from Molten Aluminium: A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2011;32:150โ€“228. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2010.483396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Saternus M. Impurities of liquid aluminium-methods on their estimation and removal. Met. Form. 2015;23:115โ€“132. [Google Scholar]

3. ลปak P.L., Kalisz D., Lelito J., Gracz B., Szucki M., Suchy J.S. Modelling of non-metallic particle motion process in foundry alloys. Metalurgija. 2015;54:357โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

4. Kalisz D., Kuglin K. Efficiency of aluminum oxide inclusions rmoval from liquid steel as a result of collisions and agglomeration on ceramic filters. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2020;20:43โ€“48. [Google Scholar]

5. Kuglin K., Kalisz D. Evaluation of the usefulness of rotors for aluminium refining. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021;1178:012036. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1178/1/012036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modeling of the impeller construction impact o the aluminium refining process. Materials. 2022;15:575. doi: 10.3390/ma15020575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modelling of aluminum refining process conducted in batch reactor with rotary impeller. Metals. 2018;8:726. doi: 10.3390/met8090726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Saternus M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J. The influence of impeller geometry on the gas bubbles dispersion in uro-200 reactorโ€”RTD curves. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015;60:2887โ€“2893. doi: 10.1515/amm-2015-0461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Hernรกndez-Hernรกndez M., Camacho-Martรญnez J., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A. Impeller design assisted by physical modeling and pilot plant trials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016;236:1โ€“8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Mancilla E., Cruz-Mรฉndez W., Garduรฑo I.E., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A., Ascanio G. Comparison of the hydrodynamic performance of rotor-injector devices in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017;118:158โ€“169. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.11.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Michalek K., Socha L., Gryc K., Tkadleckova M., Saternus M., Pieprzyca J., Merder T. Modelling of technological parameters of aluminium melt refining in the ladle by blowing of inert gas through the rotating impeller. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2018;63:987โ€“992. [Google Scholar]

12. Walek J., Michalek K., Tkadleckovรก M., Saternus M. Modelling of Technological Parameters of Aluminium Melt Refining in the Ladle by Blowing of Inert Gas through the Rotating Impeller. Metals. 2021;11:284. doi: 10.3390/met11020284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Michalek K., Gryc K., Moravka J. Physical modelling of bath homogenization in argon stirred ladle. Metalurgija. 2009;48:215โ€“218. [Google Scholar]

14. Michalek K. The Use of Physical Modeling and Numerical Optimization for Metallurgical Processes. VSB; Ostrawa, Czech Republic: 2001. [Google Scholar]

15. Chen J., Zhao J. Light Metals. TMS; Warrendale, PA, USA: 1995. Bubble distribution in a melt treatment water model; pp. 1227โ€“1231. [Google Scholar]

16. Saternus M. Model Matematyczny do Sterowania Procesem Rafinacji Ciekล‚ych Stopรณw Aluminium Przy Zastosowaniu URO-200. Katowice, Poland: 2004. Research Project Nr 7 T08B 019 21. [Google Scholar]

17. Pietrewicz L., Wฤ™ลผyk W. Urzฤ…dzenia do rafinacji gazowej typu URO-200 szeล›ฤ‡ lat produkcji i doล›wiadczeล„; Proceedings of the Aluminum Conference; Zakopane, Poland. 12โ€“16 October 1998. [Google Scholar]

18. Flow3d Userโ€™s Guide. Flow Science, Inc.; Santa Fe, NM, USA: 2020. [Google Scholar]

19. Sinelnikov V., Szucki M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J., Kalisz D. Physical and numerical modeling of the slag splashing process. Materials. 2021;14:2289. doi: 10.3390/ma14092289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. White F. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 2010. (McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering). [Google Scholar]

21. Yang Z., Yang L., Cheng T., Chen F., Zheng F., Wang S., Guo Y. Fluid Flow Characteristic of EAF Molten Steel with Different Bottom-Blowing Gas Flow Rate Distributions. ISIJ. 2020;60:1957โ€“1967. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Nichols B.D., Hirt C.W. Methods for calculating multi-dimensional, transient free surface flows past bodies; Proceedings of the First International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics; Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 20โ€“22 October 1975. [Google Scholar]

23. Hirt C.W., Nichols B.D. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981;39:201โ€“255. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Szucki M., Suchy J.S., Lelito J., Malinowski P., Sobczyk J. Application of the lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of the mold filling process in the casting industry. Heat Mass Transf. 2017;53:3421โ€“3431. doi: 10.1007/s00231-017-2069-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Themelis N.J., Goyal P. Gas injection in steelmaking. Candian Metall. Trans. 1983;22:313โ€“320. [Google Scholar]

26. Zhang L., Jing X., Li Y., Xu Z., Cai K. Mathematical model of decarburization of ultralow carbon steel during RH treatment. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing. 1997;4:19โ€“23. [Google Scholar]

27. Chiti F., Paglianti A., Bujalshi W. A mechanistic model to estimate powder consumption and mixing time in aluminium industries. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2004;82:1105โ€“1111. doi: 10.1205/cerd.82.9.1105.44156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Bouaifi M., Roustan M. Power consumption, mixing time and homogenization energy in dual-impeller agitated gas-liquid reactors. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011;40:87โ€“95. doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(00)00128-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Kang J., Lee C.H., Haam S., Koo K.K., Kim W.S. Studies on the overall oxygen transfer rate and mixing time in pilot-scale surface aeration vessel. Environ. Technol. 2001;22:1055โ€“1068. doi: 10.1080/09593332208618215. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Moucha T., Linek V., Prokopov E. Gas hold-up, mixing time and gas-liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient of various multiple-impeller configurations: Rushton turbine, pitched blade and techmix impeller and their combinations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003;58:1839โ€“1846. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00682-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Szekely J. Flow phenomena, mixing and mass transfer in argon-stirred ladles. Ironmak. Steelmak. 1979;6:285โ€“293. [Google Scholar]

32. Iguchi M., Nakamura K., Tsujino R. Mixing time and fluid flow phenomena in liquids of varying kinematic viscosities agitated by bottom gas injection. Metall. Mat. Trans. 1998;29:569โ€“575. doi: 10.1007/s11663-998-0091-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Hjelle O., Engh T.A., Rasch B. Removal of Sodium from Aluminiummagnesium Alloys by Purging with Cl2. Aluminium-Verlag GmbH; Dusseldorf, Germany: 1985. pp. 343โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

34. Zhang L., Taniguchi S. Fundamentals of inclusion removal from liquid steel by bubble flotation. Int. Mat. Rev. 2000;45:59โ€“82. doi: 10.1179/095066000101528313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.

Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process using FLOW-3D

Aneesh Kumar J1, a, K. Krishnakumar1, b and S. Savithri2, c 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 2 Computational Modelling& Simulation Division, Process Engineering & Environmental Technology Division CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science & Technology
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
a aneesh82kj@gmail.com, b kkk@cet.ac.in, c sivakumarsavi@gmail.com, ssavithri@niist.res.in Key words: Mold filling, centrifugal casting process, computer simulation, FLOW- 3Dโ„ข

Abstract

์›์‹ฌ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์ด ์ง€์ •๋œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ, ์ฆ‰ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ ๊ฐ„์— ๋ฐ€๋„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํฐ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์—†๋Š” ์ฃผ๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธˆํ˜•์ด ๊ณ ์†์œผ๋กœ ํšŒ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธˆํ˜• ๋ฒฝ์ด ๋ถˆํˆฌ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ˜„์žฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์šฉ CFD ์ฝ”๋“œ FLOW-3Dโ„ข๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ง ์›์‹ฌ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ์ค‘๊ณต ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ์ฃผ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธˆํ˜• ์ถฉ์ „ ์‹œํ€€์Šค๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง ์›์‹ฌ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ์ „ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Centrifugal casting process is one of the potential manufacturing techniques used for producing functionally graded materials viz., composite materials or metallic materials which have high differences of density among constituents. In this process, the fluid flow plays a major role and understanding the complex flow process is a must for the production of defect-free castings. Since the mold spins at a high velocity and the mold wall being opaque, it is impossible to visualise the flow patterns in real time. Hence, in the present work, the commercial CFD code FLOW-3Dโ„ข, has been used to simulate the mold filling sequence for a simple hollow cylindrical casting during vertical centrifugal casting process. Effect of various spinning velocities on the fill pattern during vertical centrifugal casting process is being investigated.

Figure 1: (a) Mold geometry and (b) Computational mesh
Figure 1: (a) Mold geometry and (b) Computational mesh
Figure 2: Experimental data on height of
vertex formed [8]  / Figure 3: Vertex height as a function of time
Figure 2: Experimental data on height of vertex formed [8]/Figure 3: Vertex height as a function of time
Figure 4: Free surface contours for water model at 10 s, 15 s and 20 s.
Figure 4: Free surface contours for water model at 10 s, 15 s and 20 s.
Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.
Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.

References

[1] W. Shi-Ping, L. Chang-yun, G. Jing-jie, S. Yan-qing, L. Xiu-qiao, F. Heng-zhi, Numerical simulation and
experimental investigation of two filling methods in vertical centrifugal casting, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc.
China 16 (2006) 1035-1040.
10.1016/s1003-6326(06)60373-7
[2] G. Chirita, D. Soares, F.S. Silva, Advantages of the centrifugal casting technique for the production of
structural components with Al-Si alloys, Mater. Des. 29 (2008) 20-27.
10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.011
[3] A. Kermanpur, Sh. Mahmoudi, A. Hajipour, Numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification in the
multi-cavity casting moulds of automotive components, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 206 (208) 62-68.
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.004
[4] D. McBride et. al. Complex free surface flows in centrifugal casting: Computational modelling and
validation experiments, Computers & Fluids 82 (2013) 63-72.
10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.04.021

Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.

Numerical study of the dam-break waves and Favre waves down sloped wet rigid-bed at laboratory scale

WenjunLiuaBoWangaYakunGuobaState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinabFaculty of Engineering & Informatics, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK

Highlights

๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์ง„ ์Šต์œค์ธต์—์„œ ๋ŒํŒŒ๊ดด์œ ๋™๊ณผ FFavreย ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.
์ˆ˜์ง ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์†๋„์˜ ๋น„์œจ์ด ๋จผ์ € ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์œ ๋™ ์ƒํƒœ๋Š” ์œ ์ƒ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํฐ ํ›„๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Favre ํŒŒ๋„๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง ์†๋„์™€ ์ˆ˜์ง ๊ฐ€์†๋„์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋ฒ ๋“œ ์ „๋‹จ์‘๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Abstract

The bed slope and the tailwater depth are two important ones among the factors that affect the propagation of the dam-break flood and Favre waves. Most previous studies have only focused on the macroscopic characteristics of the dam-break flows or Favre waves under the condition of horizontal bed, rather than the internal movement characteristics in sloped channel. The present study applies two numerical models, namely, large eddy simulation (LES) and shallow water equations (SWEs) models embedded in the CFD software package FLOW-3D to analyze the internal movement characteristics of the dam-break flows and Favre waves, such as water level, the velocity distribution, the fluid particles acceleration and the bed shear stress, under the different bed slopes and water depth ratios. The results under the conditions considered in this study show that there is a flow state transition in the flow evolution for the steep bed slope even in water depth ratio ฮฑ = 0.1 (ฮฑ is the ratio of the tailwater depth to the reservoir water depth). The flow state transition shows that the wavefront changes from a breaking state to undular. Such flow transition is not observed for the horizontal slope and mild bed slope. The existence of the Favre waves leads to a significant increase of the vertical velocity and the vertical acceleration. In this situation, the SWEs model has poor prediction. Analysis reveals that the variation of the maximum bed shear stress is affected by both the bed slope and tailwater depth. Under the same bed slope (e.g., S0 = 0.02), the maximum bed shear stress position develops downstream of the dam when ฮฑ = 0.1, while it develops towards the end of the reservoir when ฮฑ = 0.7. For the same water depth ratio (e.g., ฮฑ = 0.7), the maximum bed shear stress position always locates within the reservoir at S0 = 0.02, while it appears in the downstream of the dam for S0 = 0 and 0.003 after the flow evolves for a while. The comparison between the numerical simulation and experimental measurements shows that the LES model can predict the internal movement characteristics with satisfactory accuracy. This study improves the understanding of the effect of both the bed slope and the tailwater depth on the internal movement characteristics of the dam-break flows and Favre waves, which also provides a valuable reference for determining the flood embankment height and designing the channel bed anti-scouring facility.

Fig. 1. Sketch of related variables involved in shallow water model.
Fig. 1. Sketch of related variables involved in shallow water model.
Fig. 2. Flume model in numerical simulation.
Fig. 2. Flume model in numerical simulation.
Fig. 3. Grid sensitivity analysis (a) water surface profile; (b) velocity profile.
Fig. 3. Grid sensitivity analysis (a) water surface profile; (b) velocity profile.
Fig. 4. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the velocity profile.
Fig. 4. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the velocity profile.
Fig. 5. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the bed shear stress.
Fig. 5. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the bed shear stress.
Fig. 6. Model validation results (a) variation of the velocity profile; (b) error value of the velocity profile; (c) variation of the bed shear stress; (d) error value of the bed shear stress.
Fig. 6. Model validation results (a) variation of the velocity profile; (b) error value of the velocity profile; (c) variation of the bed shear stress; (d) error value of the bed shear stress.
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of regional division.
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of regional division.
Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 8. (continued).
Fig. 9. Froude number for ฮฑ = 0.1 (a) variation with time; (b) variation with wavefront position.
Fig. 9. Froude number for ฮฑ = 0.1 (a) variation with time; (b) variation with wavefront position.
Fig. 10. Characteristics of velocity distribution (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 10. Characteristics of velocity distribution (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 11. Average proportion of the vertical velocity (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 11. Average proportion of the vertical velocity (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 12. Bed shear stress distribution (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 12. Bed shear stress distribution (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 12. (continued).
Fig. 12. (continued).
Fig. 13. Variation of the maximum bed shear stress position with time (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 13. Variation of the maximum bed shear stress position with time (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 14. Time when the maximum bed shear stress appears at different positions (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 14. Time when the maximum bed shear stress appears at different positions (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 15. Movement characteristics of the fluid particles (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 15. Movement characteristics of the fluid particles (a) ฮฑ = 0.1; (b) ฮฑ = 0.3; (c) ฮฑ = 0.5; (d) ฮฑ = 0.7.
Fig. 15. (continued).
Fig. 15. (continued).

Keywords

Dam-break flow, Bed slope, Wet bed, Velocity profile, Bed shear stress, Large eddy simulation

References

Barnes, M.P., Baldock, T.E. 2006. Bed shear stress measurements in dam break and swash
flows. Proceedings of International Conference on Civil and Environmental
Engineering. Hiroshima University, Japan, 28โ€“29 September.
Biscarini, C., Francesco, S.D., Manciola, P., 2010. CFD modelling approach for dam break
flow studies. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 14, 705โ€“718. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-
705-2010.
Fig. 15. (continued).
W. Liu et al.
Journal of Hydrology 602 (2021) 126752
19
Bristeau, M.-O., Goutal, N., Sainte-Marie, J., 2011. Numerical simulations of a nonhydrostatic shallow water model. Comput. Fluids. 47 (1), 51โ€“64. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.013.
Bung, D.B., Hildebrandt, A., Oertel, M., Schlenkhoff, A., Schlurmann, T. 2008. Bore
propagation over a submerged horizontal plate by physical and numerical
simulation. Proc. 31st Intl.Conf. Coastal Eng., Hamburg, Germany, 3542โ€“3553.
Cantero-Chinchilla, F.N., Castro-Orgaz, O., Dey, S., Ayuso, J.L., 2016. Nonhydrostatic
dam break flows. I: physical equations and numerical schemes. J. Hydraul. Eng. 142
(12), 04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001205.
Castro-Orgaz, O., Chanson, H., 2020. Undular and broken surges in dam-break flows: A
review of wave breaking strategies in a boussinesq-type framework. Environ. Fluid
Mech. 154 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09749-3.
Chang, T.-J., Kao, H.-M., Chang, K.-H., Hsu, M.-H., 2011. Numerical simulation of
shallow-water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle
hydrodynamics. J. Hydrol. 408 (1-2), 78โ€“90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jhydrol.2011.07.023.
Chen, H., Xu, W., Deng, J., Xue, Y., Li, J., 2009. Experimental investigation of pressure
load exerted on a downstream dam by dam-break flow. J. Hydraul. Eng. 140,
199โ€“207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000743.
Favre H. 1935. Etude thยดeorique et expยดerimentale des ondes de translation dans les
canaux dยดecouverts. Dunod, Paris. (in French).
Flow Science Inc. 2016. Flow-3D Userโ€™s Manuals. Santa Fe NM.
Fraccarollo, L., Toro, E.F., 1995. Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow
water model for two-dimensional dam-break type problems. J. Hydraul. Res. 33 (6),
843โ€“864. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689509498555.
Guo, Y., Wu, X., Pan, C., Zhang, J., 2012. Numerical simulation of the tidal flow and
suspended sediment transport in the qiantang estuary. J Waterw. Port Coastal. 138
(3), 192โ€“202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000118.
Guo, Y., Zhang, Z., Shi, B., 2014. Numerical simulation of gravity current descending a
slope into a linearly stratified environment. J. Hydraulic Eng. 140 (12), 04014061.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000936.
Khosronejad, A., Kang, S., Flora, K., 2019. Fully coupled free-surface flow and sediment
transport modelling of flash floods in a desert stream in the mojave desert, california.
Hydrol. Process 33 (21), 2772โ€“2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.v33.2110.1002/
hyp.13527.
Khosronejad, A., Arabi, M.G., Angelidis, D., Bagherizadeh, E., Flora, K., Farhadzadeh, A.,
2020a. A comparative study of rigid-lid and level-set methods for LES of openchannel flows: morphodynamics. Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 145โ€“164. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10652-019-09703-y.
Khosronejad, A., Flora, K., Zhang, Z.X., Kang, S., 2020b. Large-eddy simulation of flash
flood propagation and sediment transport in a dry-bed desert stream. Int. J.
Sediment Res. 35 (6), 576โ€“586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.02.002.
Khoshkonesh, A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., 2019. A comprehensive study of dam
break over the dry and wet beds. Ocean Eng. 188, 106279.1โ€“106279.18. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106279.
Kocaman, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., 2012. The effect of lateral channel contraction on dam
break flows: laboratory experiment. J. Hydrol. 432โ€“433, 145โ€“153. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.035.
Kocaman, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., 2015. Investigation of dam-break induced shock waves
impact on a vertical wall. J. Hydrol. 525, 1โ€“12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jhydrol.2015.03.040.
LaRocque, L.A., Imran, J., Chaudhry, M.H., 2013a. Experimental and numerical
investigations of two-dimensional dam-break flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (6),
569โ€“579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000705.
Larocque, L.A., Imran, J., Chaudhry, M.H., 2013b. 3D numerical simulation of partial
breach dam-break flow using the LES and k-ฮต turbulence models. J. Hydraul. Res. 51,
145โ€“157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.734862.
Lauber, G., Hager, W.H., 1998a. Experiments to dam break wave: Horizontal channel.
J. Hydraul. Res. 36 (3), 291โ€“307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498620.
Lauber, G., Hager, W.H., 1998b. Experiments to dam break wave: Sloping channel.
J. Hydraul. Res. 36 (5), 761โ€“773. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498601.
Leal, J.G., Ferreira, R.M., Cardoso, A.H., 2006. Dam-break wave-front celerity.
J. Hydraul. Eng. 132 (1), 69โ€“76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)
132:1(69).
Liu, W., Wang, B., Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., 2020. Experimental investigation on the
effects of bed slope and tailwater on dam-break flows. J. Hydrol. 590, 125256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125256.
Marche, C., Beauchemin P. EL Kayloubi, A. 1995. Etude numยดerique et expยดerimentale des
ondes secondaires de Favre consยดecutives a la rupture dโ€™un harrage. Can. J. Civil Eng.
22, 793โ€“801, (in French). https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-089.
Marra, D., Earl, T., Ancey, C. 2011. Experimental investigations of dam break flows down
an inclined channel. Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International
Association for Hydro-Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and
Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water
Engineering, Brisbane, Australia.
Marsooli, R., Wu, W., 2014. 3-D finite-volume model of dam-break flow over uneven
beds based on vof method. Adv. Water Resour. 70, 104โ€“117. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.020.
Miller, S., Chaudhry, M.H., 1989. Dam-break flows in curved channel. J. Hydraul. Eng.
115 (11), 1465โ€“1478. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:11
(1465).
Mohapatra, P.K., Chaudhry, M.H., 2004. Numerical solution of Boussinesq equations to
simulate dam-break flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (2), 156โ€“159. https://doi.org/
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:2(156).
Oertel, M., Bung, D.B., 2012. Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves:
laboratory versus VOF. J. Hydraul. Res. 50 (1), 89โ€“97. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00221686.2011.639981.
Ozmen-Cagatay, H., Kocaman, S., 2012. Investigation of dam-break flow over abruptly
contracting channel with trapezoidal-shaped lateral obstacles. J. Fluids Eng. 134,
081204 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007154.
Ozmen-Cagatay, H., Kocaman, S., Guzel, H., 2014. Investigation of dam-break flood
waves in a dry channel with a hump. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 8 (3), 304โ€“315. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.01.005.
Park, I.R., Kim, K.S., Kim, J., Van, S.H., 2012. Numerical investigation of the effects of
turbulence intensity on dam-break flows. Ocean Eng. 42, 176โ€“187. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.005.
Peregrine, D.H., 1966. Calculations of the development of an undular bore. J. Fluid
Mech. 25 (2), 321โ€“330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066001678.
Savic, L.j., Holly, F.M., 1993. Dam break flood waves computed by modified Godunov
method. J. Hydraul. Res. 31 (2), 187โ€“204. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00221689309498844.
Shigematsu, T., Liu, P., Oda, K., 2004. Numerical modeling of the initial stages of dambreak waves. J. Hydraul. Res. 42 (2), 183โ€“195. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00221686.2004.9628303.
Smagorinsky, J., 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations.
Part I: the basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99โ€“164. https://doi.org/
10.1126/science.27.693.594.
Soares-Frazao, S., Zech, Y., 2002. Undular bores and secondary waves – Experiments and
hybrid finite-volume modeling. J. Hydraul. Res. 40, 33โ€“43. https://doi.org/
10.1080/00221680209499871.
Stansby, P.K., Chegini, A., Barnes, T.C.D., 1998. The initial stages of dam-break flow.
J. Fluid Mech. 370, 203โ€“220. https://doi.org/10.1017/022112098001918.
Treske, A., 1994. Undular bores (favre-waves) in open channels – experimental studies.
J. Hydraul. Res. 32 (3), 355โ€“370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689409498738.
Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Dong, J., Ma, X., Song, J., 2016. A semi-analytical approach
for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by embankment dam failures. Hydrol.
Process 30 (20), 3682โ€“3691. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.v30.2010.1002/
hyp.10896.
Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Ma, X., Song, J., 2017. Analytical solution of dambreak flood wave propagation in a dry sloped channel with an irregular-shaped
cross-section. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 14, 93โ€“104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jher.2016.11.003.
Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Song, J., Liu, W., Liu, X., 2018. Empirical and semianalytical models for predicting peak outflows caused by embankment dam failures.
J. Hydrol. 562, 692โ€“702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.049.
Wang, B., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, X., Liu, W., 2019. Comparison of measured
dam-break flood waves in triangular and rectangular channels. J. Hydrol. 575,
690โ€“703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.081.
Wang, B., Liu, W., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Wu, Z., Liu, X., Yang, S., 2020a.
Enhancement of semi-theoretical models for predicting peak discharges in breached
embankment dams. Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (4), 885โ€“904. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10652-019-09730-9.
Wang, B., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., 2020b. Analytical solution of shallow
water equations for ideal dam-break flood along a wet bed slope. J. Hydraul. Eng.
146 (2), 06019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001683.
Wang, B., Liu, W., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, X., Yang, S., 2020c.
Experimental and numerical investigations of similarity for dam-break flows on wet
bed. J. Hydrol. 583, 124598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124598.
Wang, B., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, W., Yang, S., Zhang, F.,
2020d. Analytical and experimental investigations of dam-break flows in triangular
channels with wet-bed conditions. J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (10), 04020070. https://doi.
org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001808.
Wu, W., Wang, S., 2007. One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable
beds. J. Hydraul. Eng. 133 (1), 48โ€“58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
(2007)133:1(48).
Xia, J., Lin, B., Falconer, R.A., Wang, G., 2010. Modelling dam-break flows over mobile
beds using a 2d coupled approach. Adv. Water Resour. 33 (2), 171โ€“183. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.11.004.
Yang, S., Yang, W., Qin, S., Li, Q., Yang, B., 2018a. Numerical study on characteristics of
dam-break wave. Ocean Eng. 159, 358โ€“371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
oceaneng.2018.04.011.
Yang, S., Yang, W., Qin, S., Li, Q., 2018b. Comparative study on calculation methods of
dam-break wave. J. Hydraul. Res. 57 (5), 702โ€“714. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00221686.2018.1494057.

Fig. 6. Experiment of waves passing through a single block of porous medium.

Generalization of a three-layer model for wave attenuation in n-block submerged porous breakwater

NadhiraKarimaaIkhaMagdalenaabIndrianaMarcelaaMohammadFaridbaFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bandung Institute of Technology, 40132, IndonesiabCenter for Coastal and Marine Development, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia

Highlights

โ€ขA new three-layer model for n-block submerged porous breakwaters is developed.

โ€ขNew analytical approach in finding the wave transmission coefficient is presented.

โ€ขA finite volume method successfully simulates the wave attenuation process.

โ€ขPorous media blocks characteristics and configuration can optimize wave reduction.

Abstract

๋†’์€ ํŒŒ๋„ ์ง„ํญ์€ ํ•ด์•ˆ์„ ์— ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ํ•ด์•ˆ ๋ณต์›๋ ฅ์„ ์•ฝํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์ฒด๋Š” ํ•ด์–‘ ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์นœํ™”์ ์ธ ํ•ด์•ˆ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” n๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž ๊ธด ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ๋ธ”๋ก์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ง„ํญ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 3์ธต ๊นŠ์ด ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ „๋‹ฌ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ–‰๋ ฌ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ง„ํญ ๊ฐ์†Œ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ’€๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง€๊ทธ์žฌ๊ทธ ์œ ํ•œ ์ฒด์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์งˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํˆฌ๊ณผํŒŒ ์ง„ํญ์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ ธ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

High wave amplitudes may cause dangerous effects on the shoreline and weaken coastal resilience. However, multiple porous media can act as environmental friendly coastal protectors of the marine ecosystem. In this paper, we use three-layer depth-integrated equations to calculate wave amplitude reduction in a domain withย nย submerged porous media blocks. The mathematical model is solved analytically using the separation of variables method involving several matrix equations to obtain the wave transmission coefficient. This coefficient provides information about the magnitude of amplitude reduction. Additionally, a staggered finite volume method is applied to solve the model numerically. By conducting numerical simulations, we conclude that porous media blocksโ€™ configuration and characteristics are crucial in reducing transmitted wave amplitude.

Keywords

Three-layer equations, Submerged porous media, Wave transmission coefficient, Finite volume method

Fig. 1. Sketch of the problem configuration.
Fig. 1. Sketch of the problem configuration.
Fig. 6. Experiment of waves passing through a single block of porous medium.
Fig. 6. Experiment of waves passing through a single block of porous medium.

References

[1]M. Beck, G. Lange, Managing Coasts with Natural Solutions: Guidelines for Measuring and Valuing the Coastal Protection Services of Mangroves and Coral Reefs.

Google Scholar[2]

Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, H. Li, A. Chang

Oblique wave motion over multiple submerged porous bars near a vertical wall

J. Ocean Univ. China, 16 (2017), pp. 568-574, 10.1007/s11802-017-3333-5 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[3]C. K. Sollitt, R. H. Cross, Wave transmission through permeable breakwaters, Coast. Eng..

Google Scholar[4]J.-F. Lee, L.-F. Tu, C.-C. Liu, Nonlinear wave evolution above rectangular submerged structures, J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 22. doi:10.6119/JMST-013-0503-3.

Google Scholar[5]

Y.T. Wu, C.L. Yeh, S.-C. Hsiao

Three-dimensional numerical simulation on the interaction of solitary waves and porous breakwaters

Coast. Eng., 85 (2014), pp. 12-29

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[6]

Y. feng Xu, X. he Xia, J. hua Wang, J. jian Chen

Numerical analysis on cnoidal wave induced response of porous seabed with definite thickness

J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. (Sci.), 18 (2013), pp. 650-654, 10.1007/s12204-013-1446-6 View PDF

Google Scholar[7]

D.M. Pรฉrez-Romero, M. Ortega-Sรกnchez, A. Moรฑino, M.A. Losada

Characteristic friction coefficient and scale effects in oscillatory porous flow

Coast. Eng., 56 (9) (2009), pp. 931-939, 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.05.002

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[8]

A. Torres-Freyermuth, M. Brocchini, S. Corvaro, J.C. Pintado-Patiรฑo

Wave attenuation over porous seabeds: a numerical study

Ocean Model., 117 (2017), pp. 28-40, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.07.004

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]F. Hajivalie, S. M. Mahmoudof, Experimental study of energy dissipation at rectangular submerged breakwater, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fluid Mechanics.

Google Scholar[10]G. T. Klonaris, A. S. Metallinos, C. D. Memos, K. A. Galani, Experimental and numerical investigation of bed morphology in the lee of porous submerged breakwaters, Coast. Eng. 155.

Google Scholar[11]

A. Kubowicz-Grajewska

Experimental investigation into wave interaction with a rubble-mound submerged breakwater (case study)

J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 22 (2) (2017), pp. 313-326 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[12]

S.M. Mahmoudof, F. Hajivalie

Experimental study of hydraulic response of smooth submerged breakwaters to irregular waves

Oceanologia, 63 (4) (2021), pp. 448-462

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]

C. Tsai, H. Chen, F. Lee

Wave transformation over submerged permeable breakwater on porous bottom

Ocean Eng., 33 (2006), pp. 1623-1643, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.09.006

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[14]

S. Rojanakamthorn, M. Isobe, A. Watanabe

A mathematical model of wave transformation over a submerged breakwater

Coastal Engineering in Japan, 31 (1989), pp. 209-234, 10.1080/05785634.1989.11924515 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]

Q. Lin, Q.r. Meng, D.q. Lu

Waves propagating over a two-layer porous barrier on a seabed

J. Hydrodyn., 30 (3) (2018), pp. 453-462 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]X. Yu, A. T. Chwang, Wave motion through porous structures, J. Eng. Mech. 120. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:5(989).

Google Scholar[17]

K.G. Vijay, V. Venkateswarlu, D. Karmakar

Scattering of gravity waves by multiple submerged rubble-mound breakwaters

Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 45 (10) (2020), pp. 8529-8550 View PDF

CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[18]

I. Magdalena, G. Jonathan

Water waves resonance and its interaction with submerged breakwater

Results in Engineering, 13 (2022), Article 100343, 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100343

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]

I. Magdalena, K. Firdaus, D. Jayadi

Analytical and numerical studies for wave generated by submarine landslide

Alex. Eng. J., 61 (9) (2022), pp. 7303-7313, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.069

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]

L. Arpaia, M. Ricchiuto, A.G. Filippini, R. Pedreros

An efficient covariant frame for the spherical shallow water equations: well balanced dg approximation and application to tsunami and storm surge

Ocean Model., 169 (2022), Article 101915, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101915

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[21]

M. Briani, G. Puppo, M. Ribot

Angle dependence in coupling conditions for shallow water equations at channel junctions

Comput. Math. Appl., 108 (2022), pp. 49-65, 10.1016/j.camwa.2021.12.021

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]

I. Magdalena, G.R. Andadari, D.E. Reeve

An integrated study of wave attenuation by vegetation

Wave Motion, 110 (2022), Article 102878, 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2021.102878

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]

I. Magdalena, R. Laโ€™lang, R. Mendoza

Quantification of wave attenuation in mangroves in manila bay using nonlinear shallow water equations

Results in Applied Mathematics, 12 (2021), Article 100191, 10.1016/j.rinam.2021.100191

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[24]

K.T. Mandli

A numerical method for the two layer shallow water equations with dry states

Ocean Model., 72 (2013), pp. 80-91, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.08.001

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[25]

M. Farhan, Z. Omar, F. Mebarek-Oudina, J. Raza, Z. Shah, R.V. Choudhari, O.D. Makinde

Implementation of the one-step one-hybrid block method on the nonlinear equation of a circular sector oscillator

Comput. Math. Model., 31 (2020), pp. 116-132, 10.1007/s10598-020-09480-0 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]

R. Djebali, F. Mebarek-Oudina, C. Rajashekhar

Similarity solution analysis of dynamic and thermal boundary layers: further formulation along a vertical flat plate

Phys. Scripta, 96 (8) (2021), Article 085206, 10.1088/1402-4896/abfe31 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[27]

M. Alkasassbeh, O. Zurni, F. Mebarek-Oudina, J. Raza

Heat transfer study of convective fin with temperature,ร„รชdependent internal heat generation by hybrid block method

Heat Tran. Asian Res., 48 (2019), pp. 1225-1244, 10.1002/htj.21428 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[28]

I. Magdalena, M.F. Eka Pebriansyah

Numerical treatment of finite difference method for solving dam break model on a wet-dry bed with an obstacle

Results in Engineering, 14 (2022), Article 100382, 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100382

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[29]

M. Uddin, S. Rasel, J.K. Adewole, K.S. Al Kalbani

Finite element simulation on the convective double diffusive water-based copper oxide nanofluid flow in a square cavity having vertical wavy surfaces in presence of hydro-magnetic field

Results in Engineering, 13 (2022), Article 100364, 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100364

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[30]

E.H.H. Al-Qadami, A.S. Abdurrasheed, Z. Mustaffa, K.W. Yusof, M. Malek, A.A. Ghani

Numerical modelling of flow characteristics over sharp crested triangular hump

Results in Engineering, 4 (2019), Article 100052, 10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100052

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[31]

I. Magdalena, V. Kusnowo, M.I. Azis

Widowati, 1d-2d numerical model for wave attenuation by mangroves as a porous structure

Computation, 9 (6) (2021), pp. 1-21

Google Scholar[32]

I. Magdalena, M.F. Atras, L. Sembiring, M.A. Nugroho, R.S.B. Labay, M.P. Roque

Wave transmission by rectangular submerged breakwaters

Computation, 8 (2) (2020), pp. 1-18 View PDF

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[33]

I. Magdalena, S.R. Pudjaprasetya

Numerical modeling for gravity waves over submerged porous media

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9 (28) (2015), pp. 124-130

View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[34]

I. Magdalena, A. Hariz, M. Farid, M.S.B. Kusuma

Numerical studies using staggered finite volume for dam break flow with an obstacle through different geometries

Results in Applied Mathematics, 12 (2021), Article 100193, 10.1016/j.rinam.2021.100193

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[35]

R. Walters, E. Hanert, J. Pietrzak, D. Le Roux

Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations

Ocean Model., 28 (1) (2009), pp. 106-117, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004

the Sixth International Workshop on Unstructured Mesh Numerical Modelling of Coastal, Shelf and Ocean Flows

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[36]

F. Mebarek-Oudina

Numerical modeling of the hydrodynamic stability in vertical annulus with heat source of different lengths, Engineering Science and Technology

Int. J., 20 (4) (2017), pp. 1324-1333, 10.1016/j.jestch.2017.08.003

ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[37]

S. Pudjaprasetya, I. Magdalena

Numerical modeling for gravity waves over submerged porous media

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9 (2015), pp. 124-130

Google Scholar

Fig. 1. Schematic figure showing the PREP with additional gas flowing on the end face of electrode.

ํ”Œ๋ผ์ฆˆ๋งˆ ํšŒ์ „ ์ „๊ทน ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

Effects of process parameters and cooling gas on powder formation during the plasma rotating electrode process

Yujie Cuia Yufan Zhaoa1 Haruko Numatab Kenta Yamanakaa Huakang Biana Kenta Aoyagia AkihikoChibaa
aInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, JapanbDepartment of Materials Processing, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan

Highlights

โ€ขThe limitation of increasing the rotational speed in decreasing powder size was clarified.

โ€ขCooling and disturbance effects varied with the gas flowing rate.

โ€ขInclined angle of the residual electrode end face affected powder formation.

โ€ขAdditional cooling gas flowing could be applied to control powder size.

Abstract

The plasma rotating electrode process (PREP) is rapidly becoming an important powder fabrication method in additive manufacturing. However, the low production rate of fine PREP powder limits the development of PREP. Herein, we investigated different factors affecting powder formation during PREP by combining experimental methods and numerical simulations. The limitation of increasing the rotation electrode speed in decreasing powder size is attributed to the increased probability of adjacent droplets recombining and the decreased tendency of granulation. The effects of additional Ar/He gas flowing on the rotational electrode on powder formation is determined through the cooling effect, the disturbance effect, and the inclined effect of the residual electrode end face simultaneously. A smaller-sized powder was obtained in the He atmosphere owing to the larger inclined angle of the residual electrode end face compared to the Ar atmosphere. Our research highlights the route for the fabrication of smaller-sized powders using PREP.

ํ”Œ๋ผ์ฆˆ๋งˆ ํšŒ์ „ ์ „๊ทน ๊ณต์ •(PREP)์€ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ œ์กฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ž๋ฆฌ์žก๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ PREP ๋ถ„๋ง์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์œจ์€ PREP์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์„ ์ œํ•œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ PREP ๋™์•ˆ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ง ํฌ๊ธฐ ๊ฐ์†Œ์—์„œ ํšŒ์ „ ์ „๊ทน ์†๋„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋Š” ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ ์•ก์  ์žฌ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ํ™•๋ฅ  ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ๋ฆฝํ™” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.. ํšŒ์ „ ์ „๊ทน์— ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€ Ar/He ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ, ์™ธ๋ž€ ํšจ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์ „๊ทน ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. He ๋ถ„์œ„๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” Ar ๋ถ„์œ„๊ธฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์ „๊ทน ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ์ด ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋” ์ž‘์€ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ถ„๋ง์ด ์–ป์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” PREP๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ์ž‘์€ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ์ œ์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

Plasma rotating electrode process

Ti-6Al-4 V alloy, Rotating speed, Numerical simulation, Gas flowing, Powder size

Introduction

With the development of additive manufacturing, there has been a significant increase in high-quality powder production demand [1,2]. The initial powder characteristics are closely related to the uniform powder spreading [3,4], packing density [5], and layer thickness observed during additive manufacturing [6], thus determining the mechanical properties of the additive manufactured parts [7,8]. Gas atomization (GA) [9โ€“11], centrifugal atomization (CA) [12โ€“15], and the plasma rotating electrode process (PREP) are three important powder fabrication methods.

Currently, GA is the dominant powder fabrication method used in additive manufacturing [16] for the fabrication of a wide range of alloys [11]. GA produces powders by impinging a liquid metal stream to droplets through a high-speed gas flow of nitrogen, argon, or helium. With relatively low energy consumption and a high fraction of fine powders, GA has become the most popular powder manufacturing technology for AM.

The entrapped gas pores are generally formed in the powder after solidification during GA, in which the molten metal is impacted by a high-speed atomization gas jet. In addition, satellites are formed in GA powder when fine particles adhere to partially molten particles.

The gas pores of GA powder result in porosity generation in the additive manufactured parts, which in turn deteriorates its mechanical properties because pores can become crack initiation sites [17]. In CA, a molten metal stream is poured directly onto an atomizer disc spinning at a high rotational speed. A thin film is formed on the surface of the disc, which breaks into small droplets due to the centrifugal force. Metal powder is obtained when these droplets solidify.

Compared with GA powder, CA powder exhibits higher sphericity, lower impurity content, fewer satellites, and narrower particle size distribution [12]. However, very high speed is required to obtain fine powder by CA. In PREP, the molten metal, melted using the plasma arc, is ejected from the rotating rod through centrifugal force. Compared with GA powder, PREP-produced powders also have higher sphericity and fewer pores and satellites [18].

For instance, PREP-fabricated Ti6Al-4 V alloy powder with a powder size below 150 ฮผm exhibits lower porosity than gas-atomized powder [19], which decreases the porosity of additive manufactured parts. Furthermore, the process window during electron beam melting was broadened using PREP powder compared to GA powder in Inconel 718 alloy [20] owing to the higher sphericity of the PREP powder.

In summary, PREP powder exhibits many advantages and is highly recommended for powder-based additive manufacturing and direct energy deposition-type additive manufacturing. However, the low production rate of fine PREP powder limits the widespread application of PREP powder in additive manufacturing.

Although increasing the rotating speed is an effective method to decrease the powder size [21,22], the reduction in powder size becomes smaller with the increased rotating speed [23]. The occurrence of limiting effects has not been fully clarified yet.

Moreover, the powder size can be decreased by increasing the rotating electrode diameter [24]. However, these methods are quite demanding for the PREP equipment. For instance, it is costly to revise the PREP equipment to meet the demand of further increasing the rotating speed or electrode diameter.

Accordingly, more feasible methods should be developed to further decrease the PREP powder size. Another factor that influences powder formation is the melting rate [25]. It has been reported that increasing the melting rate decreases the powder size of Inconel 718 alloy [26].

In contrast, the powder size of SUS316 alloy was decreased by decreasing the plasma current within certain ranges. This was ascribed to the formation of larger-sized droplets from fluid strips with increased thickness and spatial density at higher plasma currents [27]. The powder size of NiTi alloy also decreases at lower melting rates [28]. Consequently, altering the melting rate, varied with the plasma current, is expected to regulate the PREP powder size.

Furthermore, gas flowing has a significant influence on powder formation [27,29โ€“31]. On one hand, the disturbance effect of gas flowing promotes fluid granulation, which in turn contributes to the formation of smaller-sized powder [27]. On the other hand, the cooling effect of gas flowing facilitates the formation of large-sized powder due to increased viscosity and surface tension. However, there is a lack of systematic research on the effect of different gas flowing on powder formation during PREP.

Herein, the authors systematically studied the effects of rotating speed, electrode diameter, plasma current, and gas flowing on the formation of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy powder during PREP as additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V alloy exhibits great application potential [32]. Numerical simulations were conducted to explain why increasing the rotating speed is not effective in decreasing powder size when the rotation speed reaches a certain level. In addition, the different factors incited by the Ar/He gas flowing on powder formation were clarified.

Fig. 1. Schematic figure showing the PREP with additional gas flowing on the end face of electrode.
Fig. 1. Schematic figure showing the PREP with additional gas flowing on the end face of electrode.

References

[1] W. Ding, G. Chen, M. Qin, Y. He, X. Qu, Low-cost Ti powders for additive manufacturing treated by fluidized bed, Powder Technol. 350 (2019) 117โ€“122, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.042.
[2] W.S.W. Harun, M.S.I.N. Kamariah, N. Muhamad, S.A.C. Ghani, F. Ahmad, Z. Mohamed,
A review of powder additive manufacturing processes for metallic biomaterials,
Powder Technol. 327 (2018) 128โ€“151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.
058.
[3] M. Ahmed, M. Pasha, W. Nan, M. Ghadiri, A simple method for assessing powder
spreadability for additive manufacturing, Powder Technol. 367 (2020) 671โ€“679,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.033.
[4] W. Nan, M. Pasha, M. Ghadiri, Numerical simulation of particle flow and segregation
during roller spreading process in additive manufacturing, Powder Technol. 364
(2020) 811โ€“821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.023.
[5] A. Averardi, C. Cola, S.E. Zeltmann, N. Gupta, Effect of particle size distribution on the
packing of powder beds : a critical discussion relevant to additive manufacturing,
Mater. Today Commun. 24 (2020) 100964, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.
2020.100964.
[6] K. Riener, N. Albrecht, S. Ziegelmeier, R. Ramakrishnan, L. Haferkamp, A.B. Spierings,
G.J. Leichtfried, Influence of particle size distribution and morphology on the properties of the powder feedstock as well as of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), Addit. Manuf. 34 (2020) 101286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
addma.2020.101286.
[7] W.S.W. Harun, N.S. Manam, M.S.I.N. Kamariah, S. Sharif, A.H. Zulkifly, I. Ahmad, H.
Miura, A review of powdered additive manufacturing techniques for Ti-6Al-4V biomedical applications, Powder Technol. 331 (2018) 74โ€“97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
powtec.2018.03.010.
[8] A.T. Sutton, C.S. Kriewall, M.C. Leu, J.W. Newkirk, Powder characterisation techniques and effects of powder characteristics on part properties in powder-bed fusion processes, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 12 (2017) (2017) 3โ€“29, https://doi.org/10.
1080/17452759.2016.1250605.
[9] G. Chen, Q. Zhou, S.Y. Zhao, J.O. Yin, P. Tan, Z.F. Li, Y. Ge, J. Wang, H.P. Tang, A pore
morphological study of gas-atomized Ti-6Al-4V powders by scanning electron microscopy and synchrotron X-ray computed tomography, Powder Technol. 330
(2018) 425โ€“430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.053.
[10] Y. Feng, T. Qiu, Preparation, characterization and microwave absorbing properties of
FeNi alloy prepared by gas atomization method, J. Alloys Compd. 513 (2012)
455โ€“459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.079.

[11] I.E. Anderson, R.L. Terpstra, Progress toward gas atomization processing with increased uniformity and control, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 326 (2002) 101โ€“109, https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01427-7.
[12] P. Phairote, T. Plookphol, S. Wisutmethangoon, Design and development of a centrifugal atomizer for producing zinc metal powder, Int. J. Appl. Phys. Math. 2 (2012)
77โ€“82, https://doi.org/10.7763/IJAPM.2012.V2.58.
[13] L. Tian, I. Anderson, T. Riedemann, A. Russell, Production of fine calcium powders by
centrifugal atomization with rotating quench bath, Powder Technol. 308 (2017)
84โ€“93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.011.
[14] M. Eslamian, J. Rak, N. Ashgriz, Preparation of aluminum/silicon carbide metal matrix composites using centrifugal atomization, Powder Technol. 184 (2008) 11โ€“20,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.07.045.
[15] T. Plookphol, S. Wisutmethangoon, S. Gonsrang, Influence of process parameters on
SAC305 lead-free solder powder produced by centrifugal atomization, Powder
Technol. 214 (2011) 506โ€“512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.09.015.
[16] M.Z. Gao, B. Ludwig, T.A. Palmer, Impact of atomization gas on characteristics of austenitic stainless steel powder feedstocks for additive manufacturing, Powder
Technol. 383 (2021) 30โ€“42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.005.
[17] X. Shui, K. Yamanaka, M. Mori, Y. Nagata, A. Chiba, Effects of post-processing on cyclic fatigue response of a titanium alloy additively manufactured by electron beam
melting, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 680 (2017) 239โ€“248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.
2016.10.059.
[18] C. Wang, X.H. Zhao, Y.C. Ma, Q.X. Wang, Y.J. Lai, S.J. Liang, Study of the spherical
HoCu powders prepared by supreme-speed plasma rotating electrode process,
Powder Metallurgy Technology 38 (3) (2020) 227โ€“233, https://doi.org/10.19591/
j.cnki.cn11-1974/tf.2020.03.011 (in Chinese).
[19] G. Chen, S.Y. Zhao, P. Tan, J. Wang, C.S. Xiang, H.P. Tang, A comparative study of Ti6Al-4V powders for additive manufacturing by gas atomization, plasma rotating
electrode process and plasma atomization, Powder Technol. 333 (2018) 38โ€“46,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.04.013.
[20] Y. Zhao, K. Aoyagi, Y. Daino, K. Yamanaka, A. Chiba, Significance of powder feedstock
characteristics in defect suppression of additively manufactured Inconel 718, Addit.
Manuf. 34 (2020) 101277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101277.
[21] Y. Nie, J. Tang, B. Yang, Q. Lei, S. Yu, Y. Li, Comparison in characteristic and atomization behavior of metallic powders produced by plasma rotating electrode process,
Adv. Powder Technol. 31 (2020) 2152โ€“2160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.03.
006.
[22] Y. Cui, Y. Zhao, H. Numata, H. Bian, K. Wako, K. Yamanaka, K. Aoyagi, C. Zhang, A.
Chiba, Effects of plasma rotating electrode process parameters on the particle size
distribution and microstructure of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy powder, Powder Technol 376
(2020) 363โ€“372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.08.027.
[23] J. Tang, Y. Nie, Q. Lei, Y. Li, Characteristics and atomization behavior of Ti-6Al-4V
powder produced by plasma rotating electrode process Adv, Powder Technol. 10
(2019) 2330โ€“2337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2019.07.015.
[24] M. Zdujiฤ‡, D. Uskokoviฤ‡, Production of atomized metal and alloy powders by the rotating electrode process, Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 29 (1990) 673โ€“683,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00795571.
[25] L. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Particle size distribution of tin powder produced by centrifugal
atomisation using rotating cups, Powder Technol. 318 (2017) 62โ€“67, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.05.038.
[26] Y. Liu, S. Liang, Z. Han, J. Song, Q. Wang, A novel model of calculating particle sizes in
plasma rotating electrode process for superalloys, Powder Technol. 336 (2018)
406โ€“414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.002.
[27] Y. Zhao, Y. Cui, H. Numata, H. Bian, K. Wako, K. Yamanaka, Centrifugal granulation
behavior in metallic powder fabrication by plasma rotating electrode process, Sci.
Rep. (2020) 1โ€“15, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75503-w.
[28] T. Hsu, C. Wei, L. Wu, Y. Li, A. Chiba, M. Tsai, Nitinol powders generate from plasma
rotation electrode process provide clean powder for biomedical devices used with
suitable size, spheroid surface and pure composition, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 1โ€“8,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32101-1.
[29] M. Wei, S. Chen, M. Sun, J. Liang, C. Liu, M. Wang, Atomization simulation and preparation of 24CrNiMoY alloy steel powder using VIGA technology at high gas pressure, Powder Technol. 367 (2020) 724โ€“739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.
2020.04.030.
[30] Y. Tan, X. Zhu, X.Y. He, B. Ding, H. Wang, Q. Liao, H. Li, Granulation characteristics of
molten blast furnace slag by hybrid centrifugal-air blast technique, Powder Technol.
323 (2018) 176โ€“185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.040.
[31] P. Xu, D.H. Liu, J. Hu, G.Y. Lin, Synthesis of Ni-Ti composite powder by radio frequency plasma spheroidization process, Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering
39 (1) (2020) 67โ€“71 , (in Chinese) 10.13264/j.cnki.ysjskx.2020.01.011.
[32] H. Mehboob, F. Tarlochan, A. Mehboob, S.H. Chang, S. Ramesh, W.S.W. Harun, K.
Kadirgama, A novel design, analysis and 3D printing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy bioinspired porous femoral stem, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 31 (2020) 78, https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10856-020-06420-7.
[33] FLOW-3Dยฎ Version 11.2 [Computer software]. , Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, NM,
2017https://www.flow3d.com.
[34] M. Boivineau, C. Cagran, D. Doytier, V. Eyraud, M.H. Nadal, B. Wilthan, G. Pottlacher,
Thermophysical properties of solid and liquid Ti-6Al-4V (TA6V) alloy, Int. J.
Thermophys. 27 (2006) 507โ€“529, https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00021868.
[35] J. Liu, Q. Qin, Q. Yu, The effect of size distribution of slag particles obtained in dry
granulation on blast furnace slag cement strength, Powder Technol. 362 (2020)
32โ€“36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.115.
[36] M. Tanaka, S. Tashiro, A study of thermal pinch effect of welding arcs, J. Japan Weld.
Soc. 25 (2007) 336โ€“342, https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws.25.336 (in Japanese).
[37] T. Kamiya, A. Kayano, Disintegration of viscous fluid in the ligament state purged
from a rotating disk, J. Chem. Eng. JAPAN. 4 (1971) 364โ€“369, https://doi.org/10.
1252/jcej.4.364.
[38] T. Kamiya, An analysis of the ligament-type disintegration of thin liquid film at the
edge of a rotating disk, J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 5 (1972) 391โ€“396, https://doi.org/10.
1252/jcej.5.391.
[39] J. Burns, C. Ramshaw, R. Jachuck, Measurement of liquid film thickness and the determination of spin-up radius on a rotating disc using an electrical resistance technique, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 2245โ€“2253, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509
(03)00091-5.
[40] J. Rauscher, R. Kelly, J. Cole, An asymptotic solution for the laminar flow of a thin film
on a rotating disk, J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 40 (1973) 43โ€“47, https://doi.org/10.
1115/1.3422970

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

Hyung Ju Yoo1, Sung Sik Joo2, Beom Jae Kwon3, Seung Oh Lee4*

์œ  ํ˜•์ฃผ1, ์ฃผ ์„ฑ์‹2, ๊ถŒ ๋ฒ”์žฌ3, ์ด ์Šน์˜ค4*

1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA
3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN
4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University

1ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๊ณผ์ •
2ใˆœํ—ฅ์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„ ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
3ใˆœ์ด์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ž์›๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
4ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜

ABSTRACT

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐ•์šฐ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋ฟ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋„์ถœ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77% ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ๋œ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ : ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ, FLOW-3D, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ

1. ์„œ ๋ก 

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ 24๊ฐœ ๋Œ์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด์œ„ํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ทน์‹ฌํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์‹ ์„ค ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ ๋“ฑ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทนํ•œํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋กœ์จ ๋น„์ƒ์ƒํ™ฉ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ (K-water, 2021), ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ ์ฐจ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(Jeon et al., 2006Kim, 2007Kim et al., 2008). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Jeon et al.(2006)์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ ๋ฐ”์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์„ค๊ณ„์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Kim et al.(2008)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Kim and Kim(2013)์€ ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒยทํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Zeng et al.(2017)์€ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Li et al.(2011)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ์‹ ๊ทœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Lee et al.(2019)๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜(FLOW-3D)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด 7.6%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ . ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋ถ„์„์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

2. ๋ณธ ๋ก 

2.1 ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

2.1.1 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ก 

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ Flow Science, Inc์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)์œผ๋กœ ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„๋ชจ์˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ•ด์„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ , ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ•ด์„์—๋„ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค(Flow Science, 2011). ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D(version 12.0)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

2.1.2 ์œ ๋™ํ•ด์„์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹

1) ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ƒ์ˆ˜ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (1)(2)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(1)

โˆ‡ยทv=0

(2)

โˆ‚โˆ‚x(uAx)+โˆ‚โˆ‚y(vAy)+โˆ‚โˆ‚z(wAz)=RSORฯ

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ€๋„(kg/m3), u, v, w๋Š” x, y, z๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์œ ์†(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az๋Š” ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฉด์ (m2), RSOR๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์„ฑ/์†Œ๋ฉธ(mass source/sink)ํ•ญ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Momentum Equation)

๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„์„ฑ๋ถ„ u, v, w์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ Eqs. (3)(4)(5)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(3)

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORฯVFu

(4)

โˆ‚vโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚y+Gy+fy-by-RSORฯVFv

(5)

โˆ‚wโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORฯVFw

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, Gx, Gy, Gz๋Š” ์ฒด์ ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, fx, fy, fz๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, bx, by, bz๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์†์‹ค์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2.1.3 ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์— ์ €ํ•ญํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ• ์„ ํƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ํ•˜ ์‹œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (6)(7)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

1) Schoklitsch ๊ณต์‹

Schoklitsch(1934)๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

(6)

ฯ„=ฮณRI=ฮณC2V2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), I๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, C๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) Manning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ณต์‹

Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‹ ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

(7)

ฯ„=ฮณn2V2R1/3

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ์œ ์†์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Maning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กค ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค.

2.2 ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€

ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์€ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์œ ์ˆ˜์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด ํ™•๋ณด๋˜๋„๋ก ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ™•๋ณด์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์‹œ๊ณต์ƒ์˜ ์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ตด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตด์š”์„ฑ(flexibility) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ์‹œ๊ณต๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„ํƒˆ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ASTM(๋ฏธ๊ตญ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์‹œํ—˜ํ•™ํšŒ)์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ๋งคํŠธ ์‹œํ—˜๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ๋ณ„๋กœ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ•์†Œ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ตญ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์€ Table 1์— ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)๊ณผ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (ฯ„p, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)
Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment5.0

2.3. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„

2.3.1 ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3D ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋นˆ๋„(100๋…„) ๋ฐ 200๋…„๋นˆ๋„ ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์ด์ƒ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ์€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ํ•œ 2011๋…„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์˜ ํ‘œ์ธต ์œ ์‹ค ๋ฐ ์˜น๋ฒฝ ๋ฐ€๋ฆผํ˜„์ƒ ๋“ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์–ด ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ˆ˜ยท๋ณด๊ฐ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์„ 0.99 ~ 8.16 m์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ฒฉ์ž์ˆ˜๋Š” 49,102,500๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์œ ์ž…์œ ๋Ÿ‰(inflow), ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์€ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด(wall), ํ•˜๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์œ„(water surface elevation)์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Table 2Fig. 1 ์ฐธ์กฐ). FLOW-3D ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์—๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๊ธธ์ด ๋ชจํ˜•, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ชจํ˜•, k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, LES ๋ชจํ˜• ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์˜(Flow Science, 2011)ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” RNG k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” Table 3์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์ด ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 1 ๋ฐ Case 2๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 3 ~ Case 6). ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 7 ~ Case 10) ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’(Chow, 1959)์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹(Vanoni, 2006)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ๊ณ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹์€ Eq. (8)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์œผ๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๊ณ ๋Š” Table 4์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, kS๋Š” ์กฐ๊ณ  (m), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, g๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ฐ€์†๋„(m/s2)๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ(Time Step)์€ 0.0001์ดˆ๋กœ ์„ค์ •(CFL number < 1.0) ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”, ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’ ์—ญ์‹œ 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1.0%์˜ ์œ ์†๋ณ€๋™์€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์œ ์†์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case์—์„œ 2400์ดˆ ์ด๋‚ด์— ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
โˆ†X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
โˆ†Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
โˆ†Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case ๋ณ„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 2 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด(L)๋Š” ์ด 1.3 km๋กœ 10 m ๋“ฑ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Case 1 – Case 6๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†(Vmax)์€ ์•ฝ 3% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณด๋‹ค 7ยฐ์ž‘์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์ž…ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์†์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ์ถ•์†Œ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰(Qa)์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์†(Vp)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Qp)์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜(Case 5 & 6)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(ฯ„p)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2) ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 4 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” Table 5์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทmax)๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 2% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ถ€๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜(Case 1)์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทref)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 58%๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(Fig. 5 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์–ด ์ง„๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ฮทmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation
in terms of Vp
Evaluation
in terms of ฯ„p
1
(Qa = 0)
9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)
8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)
6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)
6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)
4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)
4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด(ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ)์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์กฐํ•ฉ(Case 7 ~ Case 10)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 7์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ท ๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ด๊ณ , Case 8์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Case 9๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ ๊ทœ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) ์œ ์†์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 6 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 7 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Qa>Qe)์—์„œ Section 2์— ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 10)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์€ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ (Fig. 8 ์ฐธ์กฐ), ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 9 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 6์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp
8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp
8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp
6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp
6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ณ ์ •์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 10Fig. 11 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 7์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 12 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp
3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp
5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp
6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp
6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ง€ํ˜•์€ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์•„์ง€๊ณ , ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)๊ณผ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์— ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ท ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 7) ๋ฐ ํŽธ์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 8 & Case 9)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†, ์ตœ๋Œ€์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 42%, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 58%๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 1)์—์„œ 3.63 m/s, ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 2)์—์„œ 4.53 m/s๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๋„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.09 kN/m2 ๋ฐ 0.26 kN/m2๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ์น˜์ˆ˜์ฆ๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ ์™„๊ณต๋œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋„์ถœ์— ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ , ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Acknowledgements

๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ K-water์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ทœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํšจ์œจ์  ์—ฐ๊ณ„์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋งˆ๋ จ(2021-WR-GP-76-149)์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.

2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.

3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.

4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.

5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.

6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548.ย 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.

9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.

10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593

11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279

12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.

15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.

16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE.ย 10.1061/9780784408230

17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and Gonzรกlez-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 ๊ฑด์„ค๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ยทํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2004). ๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ฆ๋Œ€๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

2 ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ…๋‹จ (2003). ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ… ๋ฐฑ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค.

3 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2016). ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

4 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2019). ํ•˜์ฒœ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€ํ•ด์„ค. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

5 ๊น€๋Œ€๊ทผ, ๋ฐ•์„ ์ค‘, ์ด์˜์‹, ํ™ฉ์ข…ํ›ˆ (2008). ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ – ์•ˆ๋™๋‹ค๋ชฉ์ ๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1604-1608.

6 ๊น€์ƒํ˜ธ, ๊น€์ง€์„ฑ (2013). ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ ์ƒํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„. ๋Œ€ํ•œํ† ๋ชฉํ•™ํšŒ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ง‘. 33(2): 537-548.ย 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

7 ๊น€์ฃผ์„ฑ (2007). ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜ ๋น„๊ต ๊ณ ์ฐฐ. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

8 ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ (2009). ๋‚™๋™๊ฐ•์ˆ˜๊ณ„ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(๋ณ€๊ฒฝ). ๋ถ€์‚ฐ: ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ.

9 ์ „ํƒœ๋ช…, ๊น€ํ˜•์ผ, ๋ฐ•ํ˜•์„ญ, ๋ฐฑ์šด์ผ (2006). ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„-์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1726-1731.

10 ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2021). ๋Œ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ทœ์ •. ๋Œ€์ „: ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ.

Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators

2์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ŠˆํŠธ ํญ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํšจ์œจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

Investigation of the Effect of Ramp Angle on Chute Aeration System Efficiency by Two-Phase Flow Analysis

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran

2 Instructor in Civil Engineering Department Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful,Iran.

 10.22055/JISE.2021.37743.1980

Abstract

Flow aeration in chute spillway is one of the most effective and economic ways to prevent cavitation damage. Surface damage is significantly reduced when very small values of air are scattered in a water prism. A structure known as an aerator may be used for this purpose. Besides, ramp angle is one of the factors influencing aerator efficiency. In this research, the value of air entraining the flow through the Jarreh Damโ€™s spillway at the ramp angles of 6, 8 and 10 degrees, as three different scenarios, was simulated using the Flow-3D software. In order to validate the results of the inlet air into the flowing fluid at a ramp angle of 6 degrees, the observational results of the dam spillway physical model from the laboratory of TAMAB Company in Iran were used. According to the results, raising the ramp angle increases the inlet air to the water jet nappe, and a ten-degree ramp angle provides the best aeration efficiency. The Flow-3D model can also simulate the two-phase water-air flow on spillways, according to the results.

์ŠˆํŠธ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํญ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ์•„์ฃผ ์ž‘์€ ์–‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํฉ์–ด์ง€๋ฉด ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์†์ƒ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์–ด๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํญ๊ธฐ ์žฅ์น˜๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ํญ๊ธฐ ํšจ์œจ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์ธ 6, 8 ๋ฐ 10๋„์˜ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„์—์„œ Jarreh ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 6๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์ด๋ž€ TAMAB Company์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์—์„œ ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋ฉด ์›Œํ„ฐ์ œํŠธ ๊ธฐ์ €๊ท€๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  10๋„ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ํญ๊ธฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Flow-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฌผ-๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
(a) The full-scale map of the Jarreh spillwayโ€™s plan and profile.
(a) The full-scale map of the Jarreh spillwayโ€™s plan and profile.
Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)

References

1- Baharvand, S., & Lashkar-Ara, B. (2021). Hydraulic design criteria of the modified meander C-type
fishway using the combined experimental and CFD models. Ecological Engineering, 164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106207
2- Bayon, A., Toro, J. P., Bombardelli, F. A., Matos, J., & Lรณpez-Jimรฉnez, P. A. (2018). Influence of VOF
technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated,
skimming flow in stepped spillways. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 19, 137โ€“149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.002
3- Brethour, J. M., & Hirt, C. W. (2009). Drift Model for Two-Component Flows. Flow Science, Inc., FSI09-TN83Rev, 1โ€“7.
4- Chanson, H. (1989). Study of air entrainment and aeration devices. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 27(3),
301โ€“319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499166
5- Dong, Z., Wang, J., Vetsch, D. F., Boes, R. M., & Tan, G. (2019). Numerical simulation of air-water twophase flow on stepped spillways behind X-shaped flaring gate piers under very high unit discharge. Water
(Switzerland), 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101956
6- Flow-3D, V. 11. 2. (2017). User Manual. Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA;
7- Hirt, C. W. (2003). Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of Air at a Free Surface. Flow Science, Inc., FSI-03-
TN6, 1โ€“9.
8- Hirt, C. W. (2016). Dynamic Droplet Sizes for Drift Fluxes. Flow Science, Inc., 1โ€“10.
9- Hirt, C. W., & Nichols, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.
Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1), 201โ€“225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
10- Kherbache, K., Chesneau, X., Zeghmati, B., Abide, S., & Benmamar, S. (2017). The effects of step
inclination and air injection on the water flow in a stepped spillway: A numerical study. Journal of
Hydrodynamics, 29(2), 322โ€“331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60742-4
11- Kramer, M., & Chanson, H. (2019). Optical flow estimations in aerated spillway flows: Filtering and
discussion on sampling parameters. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 103, 318โ€“328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.002
12- Mahmoudian, Z., Baharvand, S., & Lashkarara, B. (2019). Investigating the Flow Pattern in Baffle
Fishway Denil Type. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE), 42(3), 179โ€“196.
13- Meireles, I. C., Bombardelli, F. A., & Matos, J. (2014). Air entrainment onset in skimming flows on
steep stepped spillways: An analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(3).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.878401
14- Parsaie, A., & Haghiabi, A. H. (2019). Inception point of flow aeration on quarter-circular crested stepped
spillway. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101618
15- Richardson, J. F., & Zaki W N. (1979). Sedimentation and Fluidisation. Part 1. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng,
32, 35โ€“53.
16- Shamloo, H., Hoseini Ghafari, S., & Kavianpour, M. (2012). Experimental study on the effects of inlet
flows on aeration in chute spillway (Case study: Jare Dam, Iran). 10th International Congress on
Advances in Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
17- Wang, S. Y., Hou, D. M., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Aerator of stepped chute in Murum Hydropower
Station. Procedia Engineering, 28, 803โ€“807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.813.
18- Wei, W., Deng, J., & Zhang, F. (2016). Development of self-aeration process for supercritical chute
flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 79, 172โ€“180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.003
19- Wu, J., QIAN, S., & MA, F. (2016). A new design of ski-jump-step spillway. Journal of Hydrodynamics,
05, 914โ€“917.
20- Xu, Y., Wang, W., Yong, H., & Zhao, W. (2012). Investigation on the cavity backwater of the jet flow from the chute aerators. Procedia Engineering, 31, 51โ€“56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.989
21- Yakhot, V., & Orszag, S. A. (1986). Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory.
Journal of Scientific Computing, 1(1), 3โ€“51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452
22- Yang, J., Teng, P., & Lin, C. (2019). Air-vent layouts and water-air flow behaviors of a wide spillway
aerator. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 9(2), 130โ€“143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2019.02.009
23- Zhang, G., & Chanson, H. (2016). Interaction between free-surface aeration and total pressure on a
stepped chute. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 74, 368โ€“381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.011

Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)

2์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ŠˆํŠธ ํญ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํšจ์œจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

1 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran

2 Instructor in Civil Engineering Department Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful,Iran.

 10.22055/JISE.2021.37743.1980

Abstract

์ŠˆํŠธ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํญ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ์•„์ฃผ ์ž‘์€ ์–‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํฉ์–ด์ง€๋ฉด ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์†์ƒ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์–ด๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํญ๊ธฐ ์žฅ์น˜๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ํญ๊ธฐ ํšจ์œจ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Flow-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์ธ 6, 8 ๋ฐ 10๋„์˜ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„์—์„œ Jarreh ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 6๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์ด๋ž€ TAMAB Company์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์—์„œ ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋ฉด ์›Œํ„ฐ์ œํŠธ ๊ธฐ์ €๊ท€๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  10๋„ ๋žจํ”„ ๊ฐ๋„๋Š” ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ํญ๊ธฐ ํšจ์œจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Flow-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฌผ-๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Flow aeration in chute spillway is one of the most effective and economic ways to prevent cavitation damage. Surface damage is significantly reduced when very small values of air are scattered in a water prism. A structure known as an aerator may be used for this purpose. Besides, ramp angle is one of the factors influencing aerator efficiency. In this research, the value of air entraining the flow through the Jarreh Damโ€™s spillway at the ramp angles of 6, 8 and 10 degrees, as three different scenarios, was simulated using the Flow-3D software. In order to validate the results of the inlet air into the flowing fluid at a ramp angle of 6 degrees, the observational results of the dam spillway physical model from the laboratory of TAMAB Company in Iran were used. According to the results, raising the ramp angle increases the inlet air to the water jet nappe, and a ten-degree ramp angle provides the best aeration efficiency. The Flow-3D model can also simulate the two-phase water-air flow on spillways, according to the results.

Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
Fig. 3- Results of numerical model validation in determining a) mean flow depth, b) mean velocity, and c) static pressure in various discharges vs (Shamloo et al., 2012) research under a 6 degree ramp angle
Fig. 3- Results of numerical model validation in determining a) mean flow depth, b) mean velocity, and c) static pressure in various discharges vs (Shamloo et al., 2012) research under a 6 degree ramp angle
Fig. 4- Location of data extraction stations after aeration on a scale model of 1:50
Fig. 4- Location of data extraction stations after aeration on a scale model of 1:50
Fig.7- Changes in cavitation index in different discharges with changes in ramp angle: a) 6 degrees, b) 8 degrees and c) 10 degrees
Fig.7- Changes in cavitation index in different discharges with changes in ramp angle: a) 6 degrees, b) 8 degrees and c) 10 degrees

Keywords

Aeration system Ramp angle Aeration coefficient Two-phase flow Flow-3D model

์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ

  • Baharvand, S., & Lashkar-Ara, B. (2021). ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ • ์‚ฌํ–‰ Cํ˜• ์–ด๋กœ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€. ์ƒํƒœ ๊ณตํ•™ , 164 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106207

2- Bayon, A., Toro, JP, Bombardelli, FA, Matos, J., & Lรณpez-Jimรฉnez, PA(2018). VOF ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์ด์‚ฐํ™” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ํญ๊ธฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์Šคํ‚ค๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ. ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ €๋„ , 19 , 137โ€“149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.002

3- Brethour, JM, & Hirt, CW (2009). 2์„ฑ๋ถ„ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ. Flow Science, Inc. , FSI – 09 – TN83Rev , 1โ€“7.

4- Chanson, H. (1989). ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์œ ์ž… ๋ฐ ํญ๊ธฐ ์žฅ์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ. ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ €๋„ , 27 (3), 301โ€“319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499166

5- Dong, Z., Wang, J., Vetsch, DF, Boes, RM, & Tan, G. (2019). ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์€ ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์—์„œ X์žํ˜• ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์–ด๋ง ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๊ต๊ฐ ๋’ค์˜ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ-๋ฌผ 2์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜. ๋ฌผ(์Šค์œ„์Šค) , 11 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101956

6- Flow-3D, V. 11. 2. (2017). ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๋งค๋‰ด์–ผ. Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA;

7- Hirt, CW (2003). ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง. Flow Science, Inc. , FSI – 03 – TN6 , 1โ€“9.

8- Hirt, CW (2016). ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ํ”Œ๋Ÿญ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋™์  ์•ก์  ํฌ๊ธฐ. Flow Science, Inc. , 1โ€“10.

9- Hirt, CW, & Nichols, BD (1981). ์ž์œ  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ VOF(์œ ์ฒด ์ฒด์ ) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•. ์ „์‚ฐ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ €๋„ , 39 (1), 201โ€“225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5

10- Kherbache, K., Chesneau, X., Zeghmati, B., Abide, S., & Benmamar, S. (2017). ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ฃผ์ž…์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ: ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ. ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์ €๋„ , 29 (2), 322โ€“331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60742-4

11- Kramer, M., & Chanson, H. (2019). ํญ๊ธฐ๋œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ถ”์ •: ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง ๋ฐ ๋…ผ์˜. ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ด ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ๊ณผํ•™ , 103 , 318โ€“328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.002

12- Mahmoudian, Z., Baharvand, S., & Lashkarara, B. (2019). Baffle Fishway Denil Type์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ. ๊ด€๊ฐœ ๊ณผํ•™ ๋ฐ ๊ณตํ•™(JISE) , 42 (3), 179โ€“196.

13- Meireles, IC, Bombardelli, FA ๋ฐ Matos, J. (2014). ๊ฐ€ํŒŒ๋ฅธ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์Šคํ‚ค๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ์ž‘: ๋ถ„์„. ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ €๋„ , 52 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.878401

14- Parsaie, A., & Haghiabi, AH (2019). 1/4 ์›ํ˜• ๋ณ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ํ๋ฆ„ ํญ๊ธฐ์˜ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์ง€์ . ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ • ๋ฐ ๊ณ„์ธก , 69 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101618

15- Richardson, JF, & Zaki W N. (1979). ์นจ์ „ ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™ํ™”. ํŒŒํŠธ 1. ํŠธ๋žœ์Šค. Inst. ํ™”ํ•™ ์˜์–ด , 32 , 35โ€“53.

16- Shamloo, H., Hoseini Ghafari, S., & Kavianpour, M. (2012). ์ŠˆํŠธ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํญ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ž…๊ตฌ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ: ์ด๋ž€ Jare Dam). ์ œ10์ฐจ ํ† ๋ชฉ ๊ณตํ•™ ๋ฐœ์ „์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ ํšŒ์˜, ์ค‘๋™ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋Œ€ํ•™, ์•™์นด๋ผ, ํ„ฐํ‚ค .

17- Wang, SY, Hou, DM, & Wang, CH (2012). Murum ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ์˜ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ์ŠˆํŠธ์˜ ํญ๊ธฐ ์žฅ์น˜. ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ๋””์•„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง , 28 , 803โ€“807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.813.

18- Wei, W., Deng, J., & Zhang, F. (2016). ์ดˆ์ž„๊ณ„ ์ŠˆํŠธ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์ฒด ํญ๊ธฐ ๊ณต์ • ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ. ๋‹ค์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ตญ์ œ ์ €๋„ , 79 , 172โ€“180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.003

19- Wu, J., QIAN, S., & MA, F. (2016). ์Šคํ‚ค์ ํ”„ ์Šคํ… ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋””์ž์ธ. ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์ €๋„ , 05 , 914โ€“917.

20- Xu, Y., Wang, W., Yong, H., & Zhao, W. (2012). ์ŠˆํŠธ ํญ๊ธฐ ์žฅ์น˜์—์„œ ์ œํŠธ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ณต๋™ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ. ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ๋””์•„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง , 31 , 51โ€“56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.989

21- Yakhot, V., & Orszag, SA (1986). ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์žฌ์ •๊ทœํ™” ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ถ„์„. I. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ด๋ก . ๊ณผํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์ €๋„ , 1 (1), 3โ€“51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452

22- Yang, J., Teng, P., & Lin, C. (2019). ๋„“์€ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํญ๊ธฐ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ†ตํ’๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ-๊ธฐ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters , 9 (2), 130โ€“143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2019.02.009

23- Zhang, G., & Chanson, H. (2016). ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํญ๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์‹ ์ŠˆํŠธ์˜ ์ด ์••๋ ฅ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ. ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ด ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ๊ณผํ•™ , 74 , 368โ€“381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.011

Computational Fluid Dynamics, ์˜จ์‹ค

CFD ์‚ฌ์šฉ: ์œ ์•• ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๋†์—…์—์„œ์˜ ์‘์šฉ

USO DE CFD COMO HERRAMIENTA PARA LA MODELACIร“N Yย  PREDICCIร“N NUMร‰RICA DE LOS FLUIDOS: APLICACIONES ENย  ESTRUCTURAS HIDRรULICAS Y AGRICULTURA

Cruz Ernesto Aguilar-Rodriguez1*; Candido Ramirez-Ruiz2; Erick Dante Mattos Villarroel3 

1Tecnolรณgico Nacional de Mรฉxico/ITS de Los Reyes. Carretera Los Reyes-Jacona, Col. Libertad. 60300.  Los Reyes de Salgado, Michoacรกn. Mรฉxico. 

ernesto.ar@losreyes.tecnm.mx – 3541013901 (*Autor de correspondencia) 

2Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnologรญa, UNAM. Cto. Exterior S/N, C.U., Coyoacรกn, 04510, Ciudad  de Mรฉxico. Mรฉxico.  3Riego y Drenaje. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnologรญa del Agua. Paseo Cuauhnรกhuac 8532, Progreso,  Jiutepec, Morelos, C.P. 62550. Mรฉxico.

Abstract

๊ณตํ•™์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์€ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋ฉฐ, ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์€ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์ง€๋ฐฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณผํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์—๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์ด ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. . ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(Computational Fluid Dynamics, ์ดํ•˜ CFD)์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์˜ ํ•ด์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ, ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์„ ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ๋กœํ˜• ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ์‹œํŠธ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ํญ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์นจ๊ฐ•๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‚ฌ์ฒด์ , ํ”ผ์Šคํ†ค ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์˜ ๋ถ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†์—…์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜จ์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋””์ž์ธ, ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ์œ ํ˜• ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ค‘ ์˜จ์‹ค์˜ ๊ธธ์ด์™€ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํ™˜๊ธฐ์œจ์— ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์˜จ์‹ค์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๋Š” ๋†’์ด์˜ 6๋ฐฐ ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ: Computational Fluid Dynamics, ์˜จ์‹ค,

Spillway, Settler ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ: COMEII-21048 ์†Œ๊ฐœ 

CFD๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ์šด๋™ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์–ป์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๊ณตํ•™์—์„œ ๋ฒค์ธ„๋ฆฌ(Xu, Gao, Zhao, & Wang, 2014) ์›Œํ„ฐ ํŽŒํ•‘(ศ˜CHEAUA, 2016) ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ ์šฉ( Wu et ์•Œ., 2000). 

๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ CFD ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋Š” ๋‘‘์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ CFD์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Crookston et al. (2012)๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด Flow 3D๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” 3%์—์„œ 7%๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ธก๋ฉด์— ์ €์•• ์˜์—ญ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ต์‚ฌ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์—…ํ•  ๋•Œ ์œ„์–ด์˜ ๋ฒฝ. Zuhair(2013)๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ Mandali weir ์›ํ˜•์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  

์ตœ๊ทผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ CFD๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ผ๋ถ€๋งŒ์ด ์Œ์šฉ์ˆ˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์นจ์ ์ž์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ, ์ˆ˜์˜จ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋“ฑ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์œ ์ฒด ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ CFD ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ ์  ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

๋ณดํ˜ธ ๋†์—…์—์„œ CFD๋Š” ์˜จ์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด์กฐ ๋ƒ‰๋ฐฉ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฐฉ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜จ์‹ค์˜ ๋ฏธ๊ธฐํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(Aguilar Rodrรญguez et al., 2020).  

2D ๋ฐ 3D CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ์˜จ์‹ค ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ํƒœ์–‘ ๋ณต์‚ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํ˜„์—ด ๋ฐ ์ž ์—ด ๊ตํ™˜ ํ•˜์œ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํ†ตํ•ฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜จ์‹ค์˜ ๋ฏธ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(Majdoubi, Boulard, Fatnassi, & Bouirden, 2009). ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜จ์‹ค ์„ค๊ณ„(Sethi, 2009), ๋ฎ๊ฐœ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ(Baxevanou, Fidaros, Bartzanas, & Kittas, 2018), ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์—ฐ์ค‘ ๊ณ„์ ˆ( Tong, Christopher, Li, & Wang, 2013), ํ™˜๊ธฐ ์œ ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ(Bartzanas, Boulard, & Kittas, 2004). 

CFD ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์นœํ™”์ ์ธ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์–ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  

Figura 1. Distribuciรณn de presiones y velocidades en un vertedor de pared delgada.
Figura 2. Perfiles de velocidad y presiรณn en la cresta vertedora.
Figura 3. Condiciones de aireaciรณn en vertedor tipo laberinto. (A)lรกmina adherida a la pared del
vertedor, (B) aireado, (C) parcialmente aireado, (D) ahogado.
Figura 4. Realizaciรณn de prueba de riego.
Figura 5. Efecto de la posiciรณn y direcciรณn de los calefactores en un invernadero a 2 m del suelo.
Figura 5. Efecto de la posiciรณn y direcciรณn de los calefactores en un invernadero a 2 m del suelo.
Figura 6. Indicadores ambientales para medir el confort ambiental de los cultivos.
Figura 6. Indicadores ambientales para medir el confort ambiental de los cultivos.
Figura 7. Lรญneas de corriente dentro del sedimentador experimental en estado estacionario  (Ramirez-Ruiz, 2019).
Figura 7. Lรญneas de corriente dentro del sedimentador experimental en estado estacionario (Ramirez-Ruiz, 2019).

Referencias Bibliogrรกficas

Aguilar-Rodriguez, C.; Flores-Velazquez, J.; Ojeda-Bustamante, W.; Rojano, F.; Iรฑiguez-
Covarrubias, M. 2020. Valuation of the energyperformance of a greenhouse with

an electric heater using numerical simulations. Processes, 8, 600.

Aguilar-Rodriguez, C.; Flores-Velazquez, J.; Rojano, F.; Ojeda-Bustamante, W.; Iรฑiguez-
Covarrubias, M. 2020. Estimaciรณn del ciclo de cultivo de tomate (Solanum

lycopersicum L.) en invernadero, con base en grados dรญas calor (GDC) simulados
con CFD. Tecnologรญa y ciencias del agua, ISSN 2007-2422, 11(4), 27-57.
Al-Sammarraee, M., y Chan, A. (2009). Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation
in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part 2: The effects
of baffles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 152(2-3), 315-321.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.052.
Bartzanas, T.; Boulard, T.; Kittas, C. 2004. Effect of vent arrangement on windward
ventilation of a tunnel greenhouse. Biosystems Engineering, 88(4).
Baxevanou, C.; Fidaros, D.; Bartzanas, T.; Kittas, C. 2018. Yearly numerical evaluation of
greenhouse cover materials. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 149, 54โ€“

  1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.006.
    Crookston, B. M., & Tullis, B. P. 2012. Labyrinth weirs: Nappe interference and local
    submergence. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138(8), 757-765.
    Fernรกndez, J. M. 2012. Tรฉcnicas numรฉricas en Ingenierรญa de Fluidos: Introducciรณn a la
    Dinรกmica de Fluidos Computacional (CFD) por el Mรฉtodo de Volumen Finito;
    Revertรฉ, Barcelona, pp. 98-294.
    Goula, A., Kostoglou, M., Karapantsios, T., y Zouboulis, A. (2008). The effect of influent
    temperature variations in a sedimentation tank for potable water treatmentโ€” A
    computational fluid dynamics study. Water Research, 42(13), 3405-3414.
    doi://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.002.
    Majdoubi, H.; Boulard, T.; Fatnassi, H.; Bouirden, L. 2009. Airflow and microclimate
    patterns in a one-hectare Canary type greenhouse: an experimental and CFD
    assisted study. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(6-7), 1050-1062.
    Ramirez-Ruiz Candido (2019). Estudio hidrodinรกmico de sedimentadores de alta tasa en
    plantas potabilizadoras utilizando dinรกmica de fluidos computacional (CFD).
    Universidad Nacional Autรณnoma de Mรฉxico. Tesis de maestrรญa.
    Sรกnchez, J. M. C., & Elsitdiรฉ, L. G. C. 2011. Consideraciones del mallado aplicadas al
    cรกlculo de flujos bifรกsicos con las tรฉcnicas de dinรกmica de fluidos computacional.
    J. Introd. Inv. UPCT., 4, 33-35.
    Sethi, V.P. 2009. On the selection of shape and orientation of a greenhouse: Thermal
    modeling and experimental validation, Sol. Energy, 83, 21โ€“38.
    ศ˜CHEAUA, F. 2016. AGRICULTURAL FIELD IRRIGATION SOLUTION BASED ON
    VENTURI NOZZLE ฮณ 2 g ฮณ 2 g. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN AND
    ENGINEERING GRAPHICS, 2(1), 31โ€“35.

Tong, G.; Christopher, D.; Li, T.; Wang, T. 2013. Passive solar energy utilization: a review
of cross-section building parameter selection for Chinese solar greenhouses.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 540-548.

Xu, Y., Gao, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, H. 2014. Wet gas overreading characteristics of a long-
throat Venturi at high pressure based on CFD. Flow Measurement and

Instrumentation, 40, 247โ€“255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.09.004
Wu, W., Rodi, W y Wenka, T. 2000. 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport
in open channels. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. Vol 126 Num 1.
Zuhair al zubaidy, Riyadh. 2013. Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flow.
En:International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research. Vol 2, No 3;
13p

Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation

Understanding dry-out mechanism in rod bundles of boiling water reactor

๋“๋Š” ๋ฌผ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋ด‰ ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์˜ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ์ดํ•ด

Liril D.SilviaDinesh K.ChandrakercSumanaGhoshaArup KDasb
aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
cReactor Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

Abstract

Present work reports numerical understanding of interfacial dynamics during co-flow of vapor and liquid phases of water inside a typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), consisting of a nuclear fuel rod bundle assembly of 7 pins in a circular array. Two representative spacings between rods in a circular array are used to carry out the simulation. In literature, flow boiling in a nuclear reactor is dealt with mechanistic models or averaged equations. Hence, in the present study using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) based multiphase model, a detailed numerical understanding of breaking and making in interfaces during flow boiling in BWR is targeted. Our work will portray near realistic vapor bubble and liquid flow dynamics in rod bundle scenario. Constant wall heat flux for fuel rod and uniform velocity of the liquid at the inlet patch is applied as a boundary condition. The saturation properties of water are taken at 30 bar pressure. Flow boiling stages involving bubble nucleation, growth, merging, local dry-out, rewetting with liquid patches, and complete dry-out are illustrated. The dry-out phenomenon with no liquid presence is numerically observed with phase fraction contours at various axial cut-sections. The quantification of the liquid phase fraction at different axial planes is plotted over time, emphasizing the progressive dry-out mechanism. A comparison of liquid-vapor distribution for inner and outer rods reveals that the inner rod’s dry-out occurs sooner than that of the outer rod. The heat transfer coefficient to identify the heat dissipation capacity of each case is also reported.

ํ˜„์žฌ ์ž‘์—…์€ ์›ํ˜• ๋ฐฐ์—ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” 7๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•€์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ํ•ต์—ฐ๋ฃŒ๋ด‰ ๋‹ค๋ฐœ ์–ด์…ˆ๋ธ”๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋“๋Š” ๋ฌผ ์›์ž๋กœ(BWR) ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด์ƒ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›ํ˜• ๋ฐฐ์—ด์˜ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ ์›์ž๋กœ์˜ ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ก ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋˜๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ VOF(Volume of Fluid) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” BWR์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ณ„๋ฉด์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ๋ฐ ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ž‘์—…์€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ ๋ฒˆ๋“ค ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐํฌ ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ์—ญํ•™์„ ๋ฌ˜์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ๋ด‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋ฒฝ ์—ด์œ ์†๊ณผ ์ž…๊ตฌ ํŒจ์น˜์—์„œ ์•ก์ฒด์˜ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์˜ ํฌํ™” ํŠน์„ฑ์€ 30bar ์••๋ ฅ์—์„œ ์ทจํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐํฌ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ, ์„ฑ์žฅ, ๋ณ‘ํ•ฉ, ๊ตญ์†Œ ๊ฑด์กฐ, ์•ก์ฒด ํŒจ์น˜๋กœ ์žฌ์Šต์œค ๋ฐ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์„ค๋ช…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฑด์กฐ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ถ• ๋‹จ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์œ„์ƒ ๋ถ„์œจ ์œค๊ณฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ถ• ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ ์•ก์ƒ ๋ถ„์œจ์˜ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋Š” ์ ์ง„์ ์ธ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์™€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์˜ ์•ก-์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์˜ ๊ฑด์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์—ด ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋„ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 ร— (for a and b), 1.5 ร— (for c and d)
Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 ร— (for a and b), 1.5 ร— (for c and d)
Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (uยฏz); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.
Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (uยฏz); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.

References

[1] J. Wรผrtz, An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Annular Steam-Water Flow in Tubes and Annuli at 30 to 90 Bar, Risรธ National Laboratory,
Roskilde, 1978.
[2] W. Tian, A. Myint, Z. Li, S. Qiu, G.H. Su, D. Jia, Experimental study on dryout point in vertical narrow annulus under low flow conditions, in: International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 4689, 2004, pp. 643โ€“648. Jan
1Vol.
[3] K.M. Becker, C.H. Ling, S. Hedberg, G. Strand, An experimental investigation of
post dryout heat transfer, R. Inst. Technol. (1983).
[4] K.M. Becker, A Burnout Correlation for Flow of Boiling Water in Vertical Rod
Bundles, AB Atomenergi, 1967.
[5] Jr J.R. Barbosa, G.F. Hewitt, S.M. Richardson, High-speed visualisation of nucleate boiling in vertical annular flow, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46 (26) (2003)
5153โ€“5160 1, doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00255-2.
[6] Y. Mizutani, A. Tomiyama, S. Hosokawa, A. Sou, Y. Kudo, K. Mishima, Twophase flow patterns in a four by four rod bundle, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 (6)
(2007) 894โ€“901 1, doi:10.1080/18811248.2007.9711327.
[7] S.S. Paranjape, Two-Phase Flow Interfacial Structures in a Rod Bundle Geometry, Purdue University, 2009.
[8] D. Lavicka, J. Polansky, Model of the cooling of a nuclear reactor fuel rod, Multiph. Sci. Technol. 25 (2-4) (2013), doi:10.1615/MultScienTechn.v25.i2-4.90.
[9] M. Thurgood, J. Kelly, T. Guidotti, R. Kohrt, K. Crowell, Tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1983.
[10] S. Sugawara, Droplet deposition and entrainment modeling based on the
three-fluid model, Nucl. Eng. Des. 122 (1-3) (1990) 67โ€“84, doi:10.1016/
0029-5493(90)90197-6.
[11] C. Adamsson, J.M. Le Corre, Modeling and validation of a mechanistic tool
(MEFISTO) for the prediction of critical power in BWR fuel assemblies, Nucl.
Eng. Des. 241 (8) (2011) 2843โ€“2858, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.033.
[12] S. Talebi, H. Kazeminejad, A mathematical approach to predict dryout in a rod
bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 249 (2012) 348โ€“356, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.04.
016.
[13] H. Anglart, O. Nylund, N. Kurul, M.Z. Podowski, CFD prediction of flow and
phase distribution in fuel assemblies with spacers, Nucl. Eng. Des. 177 (1-3)
(1997) 215โ€“228, doi:10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00195-7.
[14] H. Li, H. Anglart, CFD model of diabatic annular two-phase flow using the
Eulerianโ€“Lagrangian approach, Ann. Nucl. Energy 77 (2015) 415โ€“424, doi:10.
1016/j.anucene.2014.12.002.
[15] G. Sorokin, A. Sorokin, Experimental and numerical investigation of liquid metal boiling in fuel subassemblies under natural circulation conditions, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47 (1-4) (2005) 656โ€“663, doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.
05.069.
[16] W.D. Pointer, A. Tentner, T. Sofu, D. Weber, S. Lo, A. Splawski, Eulerian
two-phase computational fluid dynamics for boiling water reactor core analysis, Joint International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computation and
Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M and Cยฑ SNA), 2007.
[17] K. Podila, Y. Rao, CFD modelling of supercritical water flow and heat transfer
in a 2 ร— 2 fuel rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 301 (2016) 279โ€“289, doi:10.1016/j.
nucengdes.2016.03.019.
[18] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, Numerical investigation of subcooled flow boiling in an annulus under the influence of eccentricity, Appl. Therm. Eng. 129 (2018) 1604โ€“1617, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.
2017.10.105.
[19] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, CFD modeling of
critical heat flux in flow boiling: validation and assessment of closure models,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 150 (2019) 651โ€“665, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.
030.
[20] W. Fan, H. Li, H. Anglart, A study of rewetting and conjugate heat transfer
influence on dryout and post-dryout phenomena with a multi-domain coupled CFD approach, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 163 (2020) 120503, doi:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120503.
[21] R. Zhang, T. Cong, G. Su, J. Wang, S. Qiu, Investigation on the critical heat
flux in typical 5 by 5 rod bundle at conditions prototypical of PWR based
on CFD methodology, Appl. Therm. Eng. 179 (2020) 115582, doi:10.1016/j.
applthermaleng.2020.115582.

[22] L.D. Silvi, A. Saha, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, Numerical analysis of
pre-dryout sequences through the route of interfacial evolution in annular gasliquid two-phase flow with phase change, Chem. Eng. Sci. 212 (2020) 115356,
doi:10.1016/j.ces.2019.115356.
[23] L.D. Silvi, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, On-route to dryout through sequential interfacial dynamics in annular flow boiling around temperature and
heat flux controlled heater rod, Chem. Eng. Sci. 229 (2021) 116014, doi:10.1016/
j.ces.2020.116014.
[24] J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface
tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100 (2) (1992) 335โ€“354, doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)
90240-Y.
[25] B. Lafaurie, C. Nardone, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modelling merging
and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER, J. Comput. Phys. 113 (1)
(1994) 134โ€“147, doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1123.
[26] I. Tanasawa, Advances in condensation heat transfer, Ad. Heat Transf. 21 (1991)
55โ€“139 Vol, doi:10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70334-4.
[27] V.H. Del Valle, D.B. Kenning, Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transf. 28 (10) (1985) 1907โ€“1920, doi:10.1016/0017-9310(85)
90213-3.
[28] B. Matzner, G.M. Latter, Reduced pressure drop space for boiling water reactor
fuel bundles, US Patent US5375154A, (1993)
[29] C. Unal, O. Badr, K. Tuzla, J.C. Chen, S. Neti, Pressure drop at rod-bundle spacers
in the post-CHF dispersed flow regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20 (3) (1994)
515โ€“522, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(94)90025-6.
[30] D.K. Chandraker, A.K. Nayak, V.P. Krishnan, Effect of spacer on the dryout of
BWR fuel rod assemblies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 294 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.
2015.09.004.
[31] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, A comprehensive review of the spacer
effect on performance of nuclear fuel bundle using computational fluid dynamics methodology, Mater. Today: Proc. 4 (2017) 100030โ€“110034, doi:10.
1016/j.matpr.2017.06.315.
[32] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, Experimental investigation on the effect
of space on the turbulent mixing in vertical pressure tube-type boiling water
reactor, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 190 (2) (2018), doi:10.1080/00295639.2017.1413874.
[33] T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer characteristics of subcooled boiling in a single rod channel with/without spacer grid,
Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 20 (2020) 100644, doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100644.
[34] K.M. Becker, G. Hernborg, M. Bode, O. Eriksson, Burnout data for flow of boiling water in vertical round ducts, annuli and rod clusters, AB Atomenergi
(1965).
[35] A. Saha, A.K. Das, Numerical study of boiling around wires and influence of
active or passive neighbours on vapour film dynamics, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
130 (2019) 440โ€“454, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.117.
[36] M. Reimann, U. Grigull, Heat transfer with free convection and film boiling in
the critical area of water and carbon dioxide, Heat Mass Transf. 8 (1975) 229โ€“
239, doi:10.1007/BF01002151.
[37] M.S. Plesset, S.A. Zwick, The growth of vapor bubbles in superheated liquids, J.
Appl. Phys. 25 (4) (1954) 493โ€“500, doi:10.1063/1.1721668.
[38] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, Numerical simulation of superheated vapor bubble rising in stagnant liquid, Heat Mass Transf. 53 (9) (2017) 2885โ€“2899,
doi:10.1007/S00231-017-2031-6.
[39] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, The evaluation of the diffuse interface method
for phase change simulations using OpenFOAM, Heat Transf. Asian Res. 46 (8)
(2017) 1173โ€“1203, doi:10.1002/htj.21268.
[40] P. Goel, A.K. Nayak, M.K. Das, J.B. Joshi, Bubble departure characteristics in a
horizontal tube bundle under cross flow conditions, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 100
(2018) 143โ€“154, doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.12.013.
[41] K.M. Becker, J. Engstorm, B.Scholin Nylund, B. Sodequist, Analysis of the dryout
incident in the Oskarshamn 2 boiling water reactor, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 16 (6)
(1990) 959โ€“974, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(90)90101-N.
[42] H.G. Weller, A New Approach to VOF-Based Interface Capturing Methods
for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, A New Approach to VOF-Based
Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, 4,
OpenCFD Ltd., 2008 Report TR/HGW.
[43] G. Boeing, Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, fractals, selfsimilarity and the limits of prediction, Systems 4 (4) (2016) 37, doi:10.3390/
systems4040037.

Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.

Benchmark study on slamming response of flat-stiffened plates considering fluid-structure interaction

์œ ์ฒด-๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ‰ํŒ ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํŒ์˜ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์‘๋‹ต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Dac DungTruongabBeom-SeonJangaCarl-ErikJansoncJonas W.RingsbergcYasuhiraYamadadKotaTakamotofYasumiKawamuraeHan-BaekJua
aResearch Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
bDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Nha Trang University, Nha Trang, Viet Nam
cDivision of Marine Technology, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
dNational Maritime Research Institute, National Institute of Maritime, Port and Aviation Technology, Tokyo, Japan
eDepartment of Systems Design for Ocean-Space, Yokohama National University, Kanagawa, Japan
fDepartment of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

ABSTRACT

์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํ•ด์–‘๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ํ‰๋ณด๊ฐ•ํŒ์˜ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜์‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด-๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ(FSI) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก , ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์••๋ ฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ FSI ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ƒ์šฉ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(์˜ˆ: LS-Dyna ALE, LS-Dyna ICFD, ANSYS CFX ๋ฐ Star-CCM+/ABAQUS)์ด ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณต๊ฐœ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ ์ž…์ˆ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋Ÿ‰ ์„ ๋ฐ•๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํ‰ํ‰ํ•œ ๊ฐ•ํ™” ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์Šต์‹ ๋‚™ํ•˜ ์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” FSI ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์— ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์†์„ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ ์š”์•ฝ์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ „์— ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฐํฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถฉ๋Œ ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ•ํŒ์˜ ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์ด ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์‘๋‹ต์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•ด์–‘ ์„ค๋น„์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ‰ํŒ ๋ณด๊ฐ• ๊ฐ•ํŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํŒ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ์ˆ˜์ง๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ FE ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํž˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ํš๋“ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ์ƒ์šฉ FSI ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FSI ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์˜๊ตฌ ์ฒ˜์ง์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ๊ฐ€ ์ •์  ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ DNV์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๋ฐ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋“ฑ๊ฐ€ ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋ฌผ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์†๋„์™€ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์— ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋“ฑ๊ฐ€์ •์••๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ถฉ๋Œ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ถฉ๋Œ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.

This paper presents a benchmark study on the slamming responses of offshore structuresโ€™ flat-stiffened plates. The objective was to compare the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation methodologies, modeling techniques, and established researchers’ experiences in predicting slamming pressure. Three research groups employing the most commonย commercial software packagesย for numerical FSI simulations (i.e. LS-Dyna ALE, LS-Dynaย ICFD, ANSYS CFX, and Star-CCM+/ABAQUS) participated in this study. Wet drop test data on flat-stiffened aluminum plates of light-ship-like bottom structures available in the open literature was utilized for validation of the FSI modeling. A summary of the experimental conditions including the geometry model and material properties, was distributed to the participants prior to their simulations. Aย parametric studyย on flat-stiffened steel plates having actual scantlings used in marine installations was performed to investigate the effect of impact velocity and plate rigidity on slamming response. Theย FE simulationย results for the total vertical forces acting on the stiffened plates and their structural responses to those forces, as obtained from the participants, were analyzed and compared. The reliable and accurate predictions of slamming loads using the aforementioned commercial FSI software packages were evaluated. Additionally, equivalent static slamming pressures resulting in the same permanent deflections, as observed from the FSI simulations, were reported and compared with analytical models proposed by the Classification Standards DNV and existing experimental data for calculation of the slamming pressure. The study results showed that the equivalent load model depends on the water impact velocity and plate rigidity; that is, the equivalent staticย pressure coefficientย decreases with an increase in impact velocity, and increases when impacting structures become stiffer.

Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.
Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.
Fig. 6. (a) Boundary conditions of water hitting case and (b) water jets at end of the simulation.
Fig. 6. (a) Boundary conditions of water hitting case and (b) water jets at end of the simulation.
Fig. 7. Comparison of prediction and test results for deflection time history of (a) D1 and (b) D2 for Vi = 2.3 m/s.
Fig. 7. Comparison of prediction and test results for deflection time history of (a) D1 and (b) D2 for Vi = 2.3 m/s.
Fig. 8. Comparison of prediction and test results for maximum deflection with different impact velocities.
Fig. 8. Comparison of prediction and test results for maximum deflection with different impact velocities.
Fig. 16. Boundary conditions applied to present FSI simulations (Sym. denotes symmetric, and Cons. denotes constrained)
Fig. 16. Boundary conditions applied to present FSI simulations (Sym. denotes symmetric, and Cons. denotes constrained)
Fig. 24. Distribution of deflections at moment of maximum deflection in: (a) LS-Dyna ALE, (b) Star-CCM+/ABAQUS, (c) ANSYS CFD, and (d) LSDyna ICFD (unit: m).

Keywords

Benchmark studyEquivalent static pressureFlat-stiffened plateFluid-structure interactionPermanent deflectionSlamming pressure coefficient

References

[1] Von Karman TH. The impact on seaplane floats during landing. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics; 1929. Technical note No.: 321.
[2] Wagner VH. รœber StoรŸ- und Gleitvorgange ยจ an der Oberflache ยจ von Flรผssigkeiten. Z Angew Math Mech 1932;12(4):193โ€“215.
[3] Chuang SL. Experiments on flat-bottom slamming. J Ship Res 1966;10:10โ€“7.
[4] Chuang SL. Investigation of impact of rigid and elastic bodies with water. Report for Department of the Navy. Washington, DC: United States Department of the
Navy; 1970. Report No.: 3248.
[5] Mori K. Response of the bottom plate of high-speed crafts under impulsive water pressure. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 1977;142:297โ€“305 [Japanese].
[6] Cheon JS, Jang BS, Yim KH, Lee HSD, Koo BY, Ju HB. A study on slamming pressure on a flat stiffened plate considering fluidโ€“structure interaction. J Mar Sci
Technol 2016;21:309โ€“24.
[7] Truong DD, Jang BS, Ju HB, Han SW. Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid-structure interaction. Part I: Numerical simulations. Ships Offshore
Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1816732.
[8] Truong DD, Jang BS, Ju HB, Han SW. Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid-structure interaction. Part II: Derivation of empirical formulations. Mar
Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102700.
[9] Greenhow M, Lin W. Numerical simulation of nonlinear free surface flows generated by wedge entry and wave maker motions. In: Proceedings of the 4th
international conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, Washington, DC; 1985.
[10] Sun H, Faltinsen OM. Water impact of horizontal circular cylinders and cylindrical shells. Appl Ocean Res 2006;28(5):299โ€“311.
[11] Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Royal Astronomical Society 1977;181:375โ€“89.
[12] Shao S. Incompressible SPH simulation of water entry of a free-falling object. Int J Numer Methods Fluid 2009;59(1):91โ€“115.
[13] Souli M, Ouahsine A, Lewin L. ALE formulation for fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000;190(5):659โ€“75.
[14] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). ICFD theory manual incompressible fluid solver in LS-DYNA. Livermore Software Technology Corporation;

[15] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2006.
[16] FLOW-3D userโ€™s manual. 2018., version 12.0.
[17] Cd-adapco. STAR-CCM+ Userโ€™s manual. 2012., version 7.06.
[18] ANSYS fluent userโ€™s guide. 2015.
[19] ANSYS CFX userโ€™s guide. 2014.
[20] Abaqus userโ€™s manual, version 6.13. SIMULIA; 2013.
[21] Luo HB, Hu J, Guedes Soares C. Numerical simulation of hydroelastic responses of flat stiffened panels under slamming loads. In: Proceedings of the 29th
international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE2010); 2010 [Shanghai, China].[22] Yamada Y, Takami T, Oka M. Numerical study on the slamming impact of wedge shaped obstacles considering fluid-structure interaction (FSI). In: Proceedings
of the 22nd international offshore and polar engineering conference (ISOPE2012); 2012 [Rhodes, Greece].
[23] Luo HB, Wang H, Guedes Soares C. Numerical and experimental study of hydrodynamic impact and elastic response of one free-drop wedge with stiffened
panels. Ocean Eng 2012;40:1โ€“14.
[24] Sun H, Wang DY. Experimental and numerical analysis of hydrodynamic impact on stiffened side of three dimensional elastic stiffened plates. Adv Mech Eng
2018;10(4):1โ€“23.
[25] Ma S, Mahfuz H. Finite element simulation of composite ship structures with fluid structure interaction. Ocean Eng 2012;52:52โ€“9.
[26] LSTC. Turek & hronโ€™s FSI benchmark problem. 2012.
[27] Califano A, Brinchmann K. Evaluation of loads during a free-fall lifeboat drop. In: Proceedings of the ASME 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore
and arctic engineering (OMAE2013); 2013 [Nantes, France].
[28] LSTC. 3D fluid elastic body interaction problem. 2014.
[29] Yamada Y, Takamoto K, Nakanishi T, Ma C, Komoriyama Y. Numerical study on the slamming impact of stiffened flat panel using ICFD method – effect of
structural rigidity on the slamming impact. In: Proceedings of the ASME 39th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE2020);
2020 [Florida, USA].
[30] Nicolici S, Bilegan RM. Fluid structure interaction modeling of liquid sloshing phenomena in flexible tanks in flexible tanks. Nucl Eng Des 2013;258:51โ€“6.
[31] DNV. DNV-RP-C205 environmental conditions and environmental loads. Det Norske Veritas; October 2010.
[32] Ahmed YM. Numerical simulation for the free surface flow around a complex ship hull form at different froude numbers. Alex Eng J 2011;50(3):229โ€“35.
[33] Ghadimi P, Feizi Chekab MA, Dashtimanesh A. Numerical simulation of water entry of different arbitrary bow sections. J Nav Architect Mar Eng 2014;11:
117โ€“29.
[34] Park BW, Cho S-R. Simple design formulae for predicting the residual damage of unstiffened and stiffened plates under explosive loadings. Int J Impact Eng
2006;32:1721โ€“36.
[35] Truong DD, Shin HK, Cho S-R. Permanent set evolution of aluminium-alloy plates due to repeated impulsive pressure loadings induced by slamming. J Mar Sci
Technol 2018;23:580โ€“95.
[36] Jones N. Structural impact. first ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
[37] Zha Y, Moan T. Ultimate strength of stiffened aluminium panels with predominantly torsional failure modes. Thin-Walled Struct 2001;39:631โ€“48.
[38] Sensharma P, Collette M, Harrington J. Effect of welded properties on aluminum structures. Ship Structure Committee SSC-4 2010.
[39] ABS. Guide for slamming loads and strength assessment for vessels. 2011.
[40] Villavicencio R, Sutherland L, Guedes Soares C. Numerical simulation of transversely impacted, clamped circular aluminium plates. Ships Offshore Struct 2012;7(1):31โ€“45.
[41] Material properties database. https://www.varmintal.com/aengr.htm, Assessed date: 16 May 2020.
[42] Ringsberg JW, Andriยดc J, Heggelund SE, Homma N, Huang YT, Jang BS, et al. Report of the ISSC technical committee II.1 on quasi-static response. In:
Kaminski ML, Rigo P, editors. Proceedings of the 20th international ship and offshore structures congress (ISSC 2018), vol. 1. IOS Press BV; 2018. p. 226โ€“31.
[43] Shin HK, Kim S-C, Cho S-R. Experimental investigations on slamming impacts by drop tests. J Soc Nav Archit Korea 2010;47(3):410โ€“20 [Korean].
[44] Huera-Huarte FJ, Jeon D, Gharib M. Experimental investigation of water slamming loads on panels. Ocean Eng 2011;38:1347โ€“55.

Energy and exergy analysis of an enhanced solar CCHP system with a collector embedded by porous media and nano fluid

Energy and exergy analysis of an enhanced solar CCHP system with a collector embedded by porous media and nano fluid

Year 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, 1489 – 1505, 02.09.2021

N. TONEKABONI  H. SALARIAN  M. Eshagh NIMVARI  J. KHALEGHINIA https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.990897

Abstract

The low efficiency of Collectors that absorb energy can be mentioned as one of the drawbacks in solar cogeneration cycles. In the present study, solar systems have been improved by adding porous media and Nanofluid to collectors. One advantage of using porous media and nanomaterials is to absorb more energy while the surface area is reduced. In this study, first, solar collectors are enhanced using 90% porosity copper in solar combined cooling, heating and power systems (SCCHP). Second, different percentages of CuO and Al2O3 nano-fluids are added to a flat plate and parabolic collectors to enhance thermal properties. Simulations are performed in different modes (simple parabolic collectors, simple flat plate collectors, improved flat plate collectors, parabolic collectors with porous media, and flat plate and parabolic collectors with different density of CuO and Al2O3 nanofluids). A case study is investigated for warm and dry regions with mean solar radiation Ib = 820 w / m2 in Iran. The maximum energy and exergy efficiencies are 60.12% and 18.84%, respectively, that is related to enhanced parabolic solar collectors with porous media and nanofluids. Adding porous media and nano-fluids increases an average 14.4% collector energy efficiency and 8.08% collector exergy efficiency.

Keywords

Exergy analysisSolar cogeneration systemPorous mediaNanofluid

References

  • [1] Center TU. Annual report on China building energy efficiency. China Construction Industry Press (In Chinese). 2016.
  • [2] Tonekaboni N, Salarian H, Fatahian E, Fatahian H. Energy and exergy economic analysis of cogeneration cycle of homemade CCHP with PVT collector. Canadian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2015;3:224-233.
  • [3] Hassan JM, Abdul-Ghafour QJ, Mohammed MF. CFD simulation of enhancement techniques in flat plate solar water collectors. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences 2017;20:751-761.
  • [4] Sopian K, Daud WR, Othman MY, Yatim B. Thermal performance of the double-pass solar collector with and without porous media. Renewable Energy 1999;18:557-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00007-5
  • [5] Feizbahr M, Kok Keong C, Rostami F, Shahrokhi M. Wave energy dissipation using perforated and non perforated piles. International Journal of Engineering 2018;31:212-219. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2018.31.02b.04
  • [6] Tian Y, Zhao CY. A review of solar collectors and thermal energy storage in solar thermal applications. Applied Energy 2013;104:538-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.051
  • [7] Wang F, Tan J, Wang Z. Heat transfer analysis of porous media receiver with different transport and thermophysical models using mixture as feeding gas. Energy Conversion and Management 2014;83:159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.068
  • [8] Korti AI. Numerical 3-D heat flow simulations on double-pass solar collector with and without porous media. Journal of Thermal Engineering 2015;1:10-23. https://doi.org/10.18186/jte.86295
  • [9] Sharma N, Diaz G. Performance model of a novel evacuated-tube solar collector based on minichannels. Solar Energy 2011;85:881-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.001
  • [10] Tyagi VV, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK. Advancement in solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) hybrid collector technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012;16:1383-1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.013
  • [11] Zhai H, Dai YJ, Wu JY, Wang RZ. Energy and exergy analyses on a novel hybrid solar heating, cooling and power generation system for remote areas. Applied Energy 2009;86:1395-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.11.020
  • [12] Wang J, Dai Y, Gao L, Ma S. A new combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Renewable Energy 2009;34:2780-2788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.010
  • [13] Jing YY, Bai H, Wang JJ, Liu L. Life cycle assessment of a solar combined cooling heating and power system in different operation strategies. Applied Energy 2012;92:843-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.046
  • [14] Temir G, Bilge D. Thermoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system. applied thermal engineering. Applied Thermal Engineering 2004;24:2689-2699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.014
  • [15] Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF. Optimization of capacity and operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm. Applied Energy 2010;87:1325-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.005
  • [16] Kleinstreuer C, Chiang H. Analysis of a porous-medium solar collector. Heat Transfer Engineering 1990;11:45-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457639008939728
  • [17] Mbaye M, Bilgen E. Natural convection and conduction in porous wall, solar collector systems without vents. Jornal of Solar Energy Engineering 1992;114:40-46. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929980
  • [18] Hirasawa S, Tsubota R, Kawanami T, Shirai K. Reduction of heat loss from solar thermal collector by diminishing natural convection with high-porosity porous medium. Solar Energy 2013;97:305-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.035
  • [19] Jouybari HJ, Saedodin S, Zamzamian A, Nimvari ME, Wongwises S. Effects of porous material and nanoparticles on the thermal performance of a flat plate solar collector: an experimental study. Renewable Energy 2017;114:1407-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.008
  • [20] Subramani J, Nagarajan PK, Wongwises S, Elโ€Agouz SA, Sathyamurthy R. Experimental study on the thermal performance and heat transfer characteristics of solar parabolic trough collector using Al2O3 nanofluids. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 2018;37:1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12767
  • [21] Yousefi T, Veysi F, Shojaeizadeh E, Zinadini S. An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3โ€“H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renewable Energy 2012;39:293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.056
  • [22] Tyagi H, Phelan P, Prasher R. Predicted efficiency of a low-temperature nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2009;131:041004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3197562
  • [23] Shojaeizadeh E, Veysi F, Kamandi A. Exergy efficiency investigation and optimization of an Al2O3โ€“water nanofluid based Flat-plate solar collector. Energy and Buildings 2015;101:12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.048
  • [24] Tiwari AK, Ghosh P, Sarkar J. Solar water heating using nanofluidsโ€“a comprehensive overview and environmental impact analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 2013;3:221-224. [25] Akram N, Sadri R, Kazi SN, Zubir MN, Ridha M, Ahmed W, et al. A comprehensive review on nanofluid operated solar flat plate collectors. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2020;139:1309-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08514-z
  • [26] Lemington N. Study of solar driven adsorption cooling potential in Indonesia. Journal of Thermal Engineering 2017;3:1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.290257
  • [27] Tong Y, Lee H, Kang W, Cho H. Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid. Applied Thermal Engineering 2019;159:113959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113959
  • [28] Khanafer K, Vafai K. A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of nanofluids. International Journal of Heat And Mass Transfer 2011;54:4410-4428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.04.048
  • [29] Farhana K, Kadirgama K, Rahman MM, Ramasamy D, Noor MM, Najafi G, et al. Improvement in the performance of solar collectors with nanofluidsโ€”A state-of-the-art review. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects 2019;18:100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100276
  • [30] Turkyilmazoglu M. Condensation of laminar film over curved vertical walls using single and two-phase nanofluid models. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids 2017;65:184-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.04.007
  • [31] Chen CC, Huang PC. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement for a novel flat-plate solar water collector using metal-foam blocks. International Journal of Heat And Mass Transfer 2012;55:6734-6756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.082
  • [32] Huang PC, Chen CC, Hwang HY. Thermal enhancement in a flat-plate solar water collector by flow pulsation and metal-foam blocks. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2013;61:696-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.02.037
  • [33] Hajipour M, Dehkordi AM. Mixed-convection flow of Al2O3โ€“H O nanofluid in a channel partially filled with porous metal foam: experimental and numerical study. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2014;53:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.11.002
  • [34] Rashidi S, Bovand M, Esfahani JA. Heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop penalty in porous solar heat exchangers: a sensitivity analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 2015;103:726-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.019
  • [35] Manikandan GK, Iniyan S, Goic R. Enhancing the optical and thermal efficiency of a parabolic trough collectorโ€“A review. Applied Energy 2019;235:1524-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.048

Details

Primary LanguageEnglish
SubjectsEngineering
Journal SectionArticles
AuthorsN. TONEKABONI  This is me
Islamic Azad University Nour Branch
0000-0002-1563-4407
IranH. SALARIAN  This is me (Primary Author)
Islamic Azad University Nour Branch
0000-0002-2161-0276
IranM. Eshagh NIMVARI  This is me
Amol University of Special Modern Technologies
0000-0002-7401-315X
IranJ. KHALEGHINIA  This is me
Islamic Azad University Nour Branch
0000-0001-5357-193X
Iran
Publication DateSeptember 2, 2021
Application DateDecember 28, 2020
Acceptance DateMay 9, 2020
Published in IssueYear 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6
Figure 1- The experimental model [17]

์™€๋ฅ˜ํ˜• ์šฐ์ˆ˜ ์ €๋ฅ˜์ง€์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์Šˆ๋ฏธํŠธ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

Investigation of the Turbulent Schmidt Number Effects On Numerical Modelling Of Vortex-Type Stormwater Retention Ponds

S. M. Yamini1; H. Shamloo2; S. H. Ghafari3
1M.Eng., Dep. of Civil Engineering K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Valiasr St., Tehran, Iran.
smyamini@alumni.kntu.ac.ir
2Associate Professor, Dep. of Civil Engineering K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Valiasr St., Tehran, Iran.
hshamloo@kntu.ac.ir
3Ph.D., Dep. of Civil Engineering Univ. of Tehran, Enqelab St., Tehran, Iran. sarvenazghafari@ut.ac.ir

Abstract

์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ž…๋ ฅ์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ข…์ข… ์ •๋ฐ€ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด RANS(Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes) ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์Šค์นผ๋ผ ์ „์†ก์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ 1์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ํ™•์‚ฐ์˜ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋˜๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์Šˆ๋ฏธํŠธ ์ˆ˜(Sct)์˜ ์ •์˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์†์„ฑ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ณดํŽธ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ’์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ์ˆ˜ ์ €๋ฅ˜์ง€์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ Sct๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์—ญํ• ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ถ”์ ์ž ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์™€๋ฅ˜ํ˜• ์šฐ์ˆ˜ ์ €๋ฅ˜์ง€์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์Šˆ๋ฏธํŠธ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๊ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์…€์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์ž๋™ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ธธ์ด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ์ผ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” Sct= 0.625์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์ง๊ฒฝ์˜ 7%์™€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ธธ์ด์˜ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ™•๋ฆฝ๋œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ฌด์ฐจ์› RDT ๊ณก์„ ์˜ ํ”ผํฌ ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ FLOW-3D๊ฐ€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์œ ๋™์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜ํ˜• ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์—์„œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™•์‚ฐ๋„๋ฅผ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€“ Achieving accurate and reliable CFD modelling results often is the subject of scrutiny because of the importance of the inputs in those simulations. If turbulence modelling is based on Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, estimating the turbulent scalar transport requires the definition of the turbulent Schmidt number (Sct), defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity to mass one in a turbulent flow. However, no universal value has been accepted for this parameter as it is a property of turbulent flows.

The practical role of establishing a suitable Sct in numerical studies of stormwater retention ponds is of the utmost importance because the assessment of the hydraulic efficiency of them is based on output mass concentration of tracer tests. In this study, several numerical simulations of a vortex-type stormwater retention pond were systematically carried out using FLOW-3D. A range of various turbulent Schmidt numbers were introduced in numerical simulations performed by different number of computational cells to investigate mesh sensitivity.

Moreover, the effects of maximum turbulent mixing length as a user-defined or automatically computed value were assessed. The outcome of this study is an established numerical model with a constant value of maximum turbulent mixing length equal to 7% of the hydraulic diameter along with Sct= 0.625 which provides a close agreement with experimental results.

Noticeably, the peak values of numerical dimensionless RDT curves are dramatically decreased, resulted in a close match with experimental results. This concludes that FLOW-3D has a considerable ability to appropriately predict mass diffusivity in vortex-type physics of turbulent flows.

Keywords:

turbulent Schmidt number โ€“ maximum turbulent mixing length โ€“ CFD โ€“ mesh sensitivity โ€“ vortex-type
stormwater retention pond โ€“ environmental fluid mechanics

Figure 1- The experimental model [17]
Figure 1- The experimental model [17]
Figure 2- Schematic of boundary conditions in the numerical model
Figure 2- Schematic of boundary conditions in the numerical model
Figure 3- Positioning of mesh blocks
Figure 3- Positioning of mesh blocks

References

[1] C. Gualtieri, A. Angeloudis, F. Bombardelli, S. Jha, and T. Stoesser, “On the Values for the Turbulent Schmidt Number
in Environmental Flows,” Fluids, vol. 2, p. 17, 2017.
[2] ร…. Adamsson, L. Bergdahl, and S. Lyngfelt, “Measurement and three-dimensional simulation of flow in a rectangular
detention tank,” Urban Water Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 277-287, 2005/12/01 2005, doi: 10.1080/15730620500386545.
[3] C. Gualtieri, “Numerical simulation of flow and tracer transport in a disinfection contact tank,” 2006.
[4] S. Khan, B. Melville, and A. Shamseldin, Modeling the Layouts of Stormwater Retention Ponds using Residence Time.
2009, pp. 77-83.
[5] F. Martรญnez-Solano, P. L. I. Rey, C. Gualtieri, and P. Lรณpez-Jimรฉnez, “Modelling flow and concentration field in
rectangular water tanks,” 2010.
[6] W. B. Rauen, A. Angeloudis, and R. A. Falconer, “Appraisal of chlorine contact tank modelling practices,” Water
Research, vol. 46, no. 18, pp. 5834-5847, 2012/11/15/ 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.013.

[7] J. Zhang, A. Tejada-Martรญnez, and Q. Zhang, “Evaluation of LES and RANS for Determining Hydraulic Performance
of Disinfection Systems for Water Treatment,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 136, 05/15 2014, doi:
10.1115/1.4027652.
[8] J. Zhang, A. E. Tejada-Martรญnez, and Q. Zhang, “Developments in computational fluid dynamics-based modeling for
disinfection technologies over the last two decades: A review,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 58, pp. 71-
85, 2014/08/01/ 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.003.
[9] C. Gualtieri and F. Salzano, “DIscussion on “The effect of baffle spacing on hydrodynamics and solute transport in
serpentine contact tanks”,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 52, pp. 152-154, 02/28 2014, doi:
10.1080/00221686.2013.877528.
[10] A. Angeloudis, T. Stoesser, R. A. Falconer, and D. Kim, “Flow, transport and disinfection performance in small- and
full-scale contact tanks,” Journal of Hydro-environment Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2015/03/01/ 2015, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.07.001.
[11] A. Angeloudis, T. Stoesser, C. Gualtieri, and R. A. Falconer, “Contact Tank Design Impact on Process Performance,”
Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 563-576, 2016/10/01 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10666-016-9502-
x.
[12] D. Valero and D. B. Bung, “Sensitivity of turbulent Schmidt number and turbulence model to simulations of jets in
crossflow,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 82, pp. 218-228, 2016/08/01/ 2016, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.030.
[13] F. Sonnenwald, I. Guymer, and V. Stovin, “Computational fluid dynamics modelling of residence times in vegetated
stormwater ponds,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Management, vol. 171, pp. 1-11, 11/07
2017, doi: 10.1680/jwama.16.00117.
[14] F. Sonnenwald, I. Guymer, and V. Stovin, “A CFD-Based Mixing Model for Vegetated Flows,” Water Resources
Research, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2322-2347, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023628.
[15] S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[16] R. Rossi and G. Iaccarino, “Numerical simulation of scalar dispersion downstream of a square obstacle using gradienttransport type models,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 2518-2531, 2009/05/01/ 2009, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.044.
[17] R. Chowdhury, M. Ahadi, K. A. Mazurek, G. Putz, D. Bergstrom, and C. Albers, “Physical Scale and Computational
Modeling in the Development of a Vortex-Type Stormwater Retention Pond,” in World Environmental and Water
Resources Congress 2016, 2016, pp. 388-397.
[18] V. Yakhot and L. M. Smith, “The renormalization group, the ษ›-expansion and derivation of turbulence models,” Journal
of Scientific Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35-61, 1992/03/01 1992, doi: 10.1007/BF01060210.
[19] Flow Science, Inc., FLOW-3D User manual. Santa Fe, NM, USA. (2015).
[20] M. M. Bishop, J. M. Morgan, B. Cornwell, and D. K. Jamison, “Improving the Disinfection Detention Time of a Water
Plant Clearwell,” Journal AWWA, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 68-75, 1993, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-
8833.1993.tb05958.x.
[21] F. L. Hart, “Improved Hydraulic Performance of Chlorine Contact Chambers.,” Jounal of Water Pollution Control
Federation, vol. 51(12), pp. 2868โ€“2875, 1979.

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

Hyung Ju Yoo1ย Sung Sik Joo2ย Beom Jae Kwon3ย Seung Oh Lee4*
์œ  ํ˜•์ฃผ1ย ์ฃผ ์„ฑ์‹2ย ๊ถŒ ๋ฒ”์žฌ3ย ์ด ์Šน์˜ค4*
1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
1ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๊ณผ์ •
2ใˆœํ—ฅ์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„ ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
3ใˆœ์ด์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ž์›๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
4ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜*Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐ•์šฐ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋ฟ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค.

์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋„์ถœ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77% ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ๋œ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ,ย FLOW-3D,ย ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜,ย ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ,ย ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ

Recently, as the occurrence frequency of sudden floods due to climate change increased and the aging of the existing spillway, it is necessary to establish a plan to utilize an auxiliary spillway to minimize the flood damage of downstream rivers. Most studies have been conducted on the review of flow characteristics according to the operation of auxiliary spillway through the hydraulic experiments and numerical modeling. However, the studies on examination of flood damage in the downstream rivers and the stability of the revetment according to the operation of the auxiliary spillway were relatively insufficient in the literature. In this study, the stability of the revetment on the downstream river according to the outflow conditions of the existing and auxiliary spillway was examined by using 3D numerical model, FLOW-3D. The velocity, water surface elevation and shear stress results of FLOW-3D were compared with the permissible velocity and shear stress of design criteria. It was assumed the sluice gate was fully opened. As a result of numerical simulations of various auxiliary spillway operations during flood season, the single operation of the auxiliary spillway showed the reduction effect of maximum velocity and the water surface elevation compared with the single operation of the existing spillway. The stability of the revetment on downstream was satisfied under the condition of outflow less than 45% of the design flood discharge. However, the potential overtopping damage was confirmed in the case of exceeding the 45% of the design flood discharge. Therefore, the simultaneous operation with the existing spillway was important to ensure the stability on design flood discharge condition. As a result of examining the allocation ratio and the total allowable outflow, the reduction effect of maximum velocity was confirmed on the condition, where the amount of outflow on auxiliary spillway was more than that on existing spillway. It is because the flow of downstream rivers was concentrated in the center due to the outflow of existing spillway. The permissible velocity and shear stress were satisfied under the condition of less than 77% of the design flood discharge with simultaneous operation. It was found that the flood damage of downstream rivers can be minimized by setting the amount allocated to the auxiliary spillway to be larger than the amount allocated to the existing spillway for the total outflow with simultaneous operation condition. However, this study only reviewed the flow characteristics around the revetment according to the outflow of spillway under the full opening of the sluice gate condition. Therefore, the various sluice opening conditions and outflow scenarios will be asked to derive more efficient utilization of the auxiliary spillway in th future.KeywordsAuxiliary spillway FLOW-3D Numerical simulation Revetment stability Shear stress

1. ์„œ ๋ก 

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ 24๊ฐœ ๋Œ์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด์œ„ํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ทน์‹ฌํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์‹ ์„ค ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ ๋“ฑ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทนํ•œํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋กœ์จ ๋น„์ƒ์ƒํ™ฉ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ (K-water, 2021), ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ ์ฐจ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(Jeon et al., 2006Kim, 2007Kim et al., 2008). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Jeon et al.(2006)์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ ๋ฐ”์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์„ค๊ณ„์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Kim et al.(2008)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Kim and Kim(2013)์€ ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒยทํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Zeng et al.(2017)์€ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Li et al.(2011)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ์‹ ๊ทœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Lee et al.(2019)๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜(FLOW-3D)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด 7.6%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ . ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋ถ„์„์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

2. ๋ณธ ๋ก 

2.1 ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

2.1.1 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ก 

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ Flow Science, Inc์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)์œผ๋กœ ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„๋ชจ์˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ•ด์„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ , ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ•ด์„์—๋„ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค(Flow Science, 2011). ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D(version 12.0)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

2.1.2 ์œ ๋™ํ•ด์„์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹

1) ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ƒ์ˆ˜ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (1)(2)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(1)

โˆ‡ยทv=0

(2)

โˆ‚โˆ‚x(uAx)+โˆ‚โˆ‚y(vAy)+โˆ‚โˆ‚z(wAz)=RSORฯ

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ€๋„(kg/m3), u, v, w๋Š” x, y, z๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์œ ์†(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az๋Š” ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฉด์ (m2), RSOR๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์„ฑ/์†Œ๋ฉธ(mass source/sink)ํ•ญ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Momentum Equation)

๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„์„ฑ๋ถ„ u, v, w์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ Eqs. (3)(4)(5)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(3)

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORฯVFu

(4)

โˆ‚vโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚y+Gy+fy-by-RSORฯVFv

(5)

โˆ‚wโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORฯVFw

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, Gx, Gy, Gz๋Š” ์ฒด์ ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, fx, fy, fz๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, bx, by, bz๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์†์‹ค์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2.1.3 ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์— ์ €ํ•ญํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ• ์„ ํƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ํ•˜ ์‹œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (6)(7)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

1) Schoklitsch ๊ณต์‹

Schoklitsch(1934)๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

(6)

ฯ„=ฮณRI=ฮณC2V2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), I๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, C๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) Manning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ณต์‹

Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‹ ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

(7)

ฯ„=ฮณn2V2R1/3

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ์œ ์†์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Maning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กค ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค.

2.2 ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€

ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์€ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์œ ์ˆ˜์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด ํ™•๋ณด๋˜๋„๋ก ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ™•๋ณด์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์‹œ๊ณต์ƒ์˜ ์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ตด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตด์š”์„ฑ(flexibility) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ์‹œ๊ณต๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„ํƒˆ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ASTM(๋ฏธ๊ตญ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์‹œํ—˜ํ•™ํšŒ)์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ๋งคํŠธ ์‹œํ—˜๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ๋ณ„๋กœ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ•์†Œ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ตญ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์€ Table 1์— ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)๊ณผ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (ฯ„p, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)
Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment5.0

2.3. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„

2.3.1 ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3D ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋นˆ๋„(100๋…„) ๋ฐ 200๋…„๋นˆ๋„ ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์ด์ƒ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ์€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ํ•œ 2011๋…„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์˜ ํ‘œ์ธต ์œ ์‹ค ๋ฐ ์˜น๋ฒฝ ๋ฐ€๋ฆผํ˜„์ƒ ๋“ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์–ด ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ˆ˜ยท๋ณด๊ฐ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์„ 0.99 ~ 8.16 m์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ฒฉ์ž์ˆ˜๋Š” 49,102,500๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์œ ์ž…์œ ๋Ÿ‰(inflow), ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์€ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด(wall), ํ•˜๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์œ„(water surface elevation)์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Table 2Fig. 1 ์ฐธ์กฐ). FLOW-3D ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์—๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๊ธธ์ด ๋ชจํ˜•, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ชจํ˜•, k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, LES ๋ชจํ˜• ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์˜(Flow Science, 2011)ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” RNG k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” Table 3์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์ด ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 1 ๋ฐ Case 2๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 3 ~ Case 6). ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 7 ~ Case 10) ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’(Chow, 1959)์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹(Vanoni, 2006)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ๊ณ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹์€ Eq. (8)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์œผ๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๊ณ ๋Š” Table 4์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, kS๋Š” ์กฐ๊ณ  (m), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, g๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ฐ€์†๋„(m/s2)๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ(Time Step)์€ 0.0001์ดˆ๋กœ ์„ค์ •(CFL number < 1.0) ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”, ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’ ์—ญ์‹œ 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1.0%์˜ ์œ ์†๋ณ€๋™์€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์œ ์†์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case์—์„œ 2400์ดˆ ์ด๋‚ด์— ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
โˆ†X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
โˆ†Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
โˆ†Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case ๋ณ„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 2 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด(L)๋Š” ์ด 1.3 km๋กœ 10 m ๋“ฑ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Case 1 – Case 6๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†(Vmax)์€ ์•ฝ 3% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณด๋‹ค 7ยฐ์ž‘์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์ž…ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์†์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ์ถ•์†Œ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰(Qa)์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์†(Vp)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Qp)์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜(Case 5 & 6)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(ฯ„p)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2) ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 4 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” Table 5์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทmax)๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 2% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ถ€๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜(Case 1)์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทref)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 58%๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(Fig. 5 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์–ด ์ง„๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ฮทmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation
in terms of Vp
Evaluation
in terms of ฯ„p
1
(Qa = 0)
9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)
8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)
6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)
6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)
4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)
4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด(ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ)์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์กฐํ•ฉ(Case 7 ~ Case 10)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 7์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ท ๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ด๊ณ , Case 8์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Case 9๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ ๊ทœ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) ์œ ์†์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 6 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 7 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Qa>Qe)์—์„œ Section 2์— ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 10)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์€ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ (Fig. 8 ์ฐธ์กฐ), ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 9 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 6์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp
8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp
8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp
6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp
6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ณ ์ •์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 10Fig. 11 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 7์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 12 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp
3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp
5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp
6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp
6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ง€ํ˜•์€ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์•„์ง€๊ณ , ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)๊ณผ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์— ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ท ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 7) ๋ฐ ํŽธ์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 8 & Case 9)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†, ์ตœ๋Œ€์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 42%, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 58%๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 1)์—์„œ 3.63 m/s, ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 2)์—์„œ 4.53 m/s๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๋„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.09 kN/m2 ๋ฐ 0.26 kN/m2๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ์น˜์ˆ˜์ฆ๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ ์™„๊ณต๋œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋„์ถœ์— ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ , ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Acknowledgements

๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ K-water์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ทœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํšจ์œจ์  ์—ฐ๊ณ„์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋งˆ๋ จ(2021-WR-GP-76-149)์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.
2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.
3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.
4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.
5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.
6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.
9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.
10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593
11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279
12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.
15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.
16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE. 10.1061/9780784408230
17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and Gonzรกlez-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 ๊ฑด์„ค๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ยทํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2004). ๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ฆ๋Œ€๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
2 ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ…๋‹จ (2003). ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ… ๋ฐฑ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค.
3 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2016). ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
4 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2019). ํ•˜์ฒœ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€ํ•ด์„ค. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
5 ๊น€๋Œ€๊ทผ, ๋ฐ•์„ ์ค‘, ์ด์˜์‹, ํ™ฉ์ข…ํ›ˆ (2008). ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ – ์•ˆ๋™๋‹ค๋ชฉ์ ๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1604-1608.
6 ๊น€์ƒํ˜ธ, ๊น€์ง€์„ฑ (2013). ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ ์ƒํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„. ๋Œ€ํ•œํ† ๋ชฉํ•™ํšŒ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ง‘. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
7 ๊น€์ฃผ์„ฑ (2007). ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜ ๋น„๊ต ๊ณ ์ฐฐ. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
8 ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ (2009). ๋‚™๋™๊ฐ•์ˆ˜๊ณ„ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(๋ณ€๊ฒฝ). ๋ถ€์‚ฐ: ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ.
9 ์ „ํƒœ๋ช…, ๊น€ํ˜•์ผ, ๋ฐ•ํ˜•์„ญ, ๋ฐฑ์šด์ผ (2006). ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„-์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1726-1731.
10 ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2021). ๋Œ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ทœ์ •. ๋Œ€์ „: ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ.

electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1

A survey of electromagnetic metal casting computation designs, present approaches, future possibilities, and practical issues

The European Physical Journal Plus volume 136, Article number: 704 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Electromagnetic metal casting (EMC) is a casting technique that uses electromagnetic energy to heat metal powders. It is a faster, cleaner, and less time-consuming operation. Solid metals create issues in electromagnetics since they reflect the electromagnetic radiation rather than consume itโ€”electromagnetic energy processing results in sounded pieces with higher-ranking material properties and a more excellent microstructure solution. For the physical production of the electromagnetic casting process, knowledge of electromagnetic material interaction is critical. Even where the heated material is an excellent electromagnetic absorber, the total heating quality is sometimes insufficient. Numerical modelling works on finding the proper coupled effects between properties to bring out the most effective operation. The main parameters influencing the quality of output of the EMC process are: power dissipated per unit volume into the material, penetration depth of electromagnetics, complex magnetic permeability and complex dielectric permittivity. The contact mechanism and interference pattern also, in turn, determines the quality of the process. Only a few parameters, such as the environment’s temperature, the interference pattern, and the rate of metal solidification, can be controlled by AI models. Neural networks are used to achieve exact outcomes by stimulating the neurons in the human brain. Additive manufacturing (AM) is used to design mold and cores for metal casting. The models outperformed the traditional DFA optimization approach, which is susceptible to local minima. The system works only offline, so real-time analysis and corrections are not yet possible.

Korea Abstract

์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ (EMC)๋Š” ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ๊ฐ€์—ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๊นจ๋—ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋œ ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธˆ์†์€ ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „์ž๊ธฐํ•™์—์„œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์‚ฌ์šด๋“œ ์กฐ๊ฐ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์—ด๋œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ํก์ˆ˜์žฌ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ ์ „์ฒด ๊ฐ€์—ด ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ๋ถˆ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ด๋Œ์–ด ๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์†์„ฑ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

EMC ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋‹น ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ, ์ „์ž๊ธฐ์˜ ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด, ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์ž๊ธฐ ํˆฌ๊ณผ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์œ ์ „์œจ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ‘์ด‰ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํŒจํ„ด ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์˜จ๋„, ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ๊ธˆ์† ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋งŒ AI ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ œ์–ด ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์€ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋‰ด๋Ÿฐ์„ ์ž๊ทนํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ (AM)๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ์šฉ ๋ชฐ๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋กœ์ปฌ ์ตœ์†Œ๊ฐ’์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๊ธฐ์กด DFA ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋Šฅ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ •์€ ์•„์ง ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig2
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig2
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig3
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig3
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig4
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig4
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig5
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig5
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig6
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig6
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig7
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig7
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig8
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig8
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig9
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig9

References

  1. 1.J. Sun, W. Wang, Q. Yue, Review on electromagnetic-matter interaction fundamentals and efficient electromagnetic-associated heating strategies. Materials 9(4), 231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040231ADS Article Google Scholar 
  2. 2.E. Ghasali, A. Fazili, M. Alizadeh, K. Shirvanimoghaddam, T. Ebadzadeh, Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-TiC metal matrix composite prepared by conventional, electromagnetic and spark plasma sintering methods. Materials 10(11), 1255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111255ADS Article Google Scholar 
  3. 3.D. Agrawal, Latest global developments in electromagnetic materials processing. Mater. Res. Innov. 14(1), 3โ€“8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1179/143307510×12599329342926Article Google Scholar 
  4. 4.S. Singh, P. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, R. Kumar, S. Kaushal, Development and characterization of electromagnetic processed cast iron joint. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.10.012Article Google Scholar 
  5. 5.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Electromagnetic melting and processing of metalโ€“ceramic composite castings. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 232(7), 1235โ€“1243 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416666900Article Google Scholar 
  6. 6.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Novel electromagnetic composite casting process: theory, feasibility and characterization. Mater. Des. 111, 51โ€“59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.071Article Google Scholar 
  7. 7.J. Lucas, J, What are electromagnetics? LiveScience. (2018). https://www.livescience.com/50259-Electromagnetics.html
  8. 8.R. Samyal, A.K. Bagha, R. Bedi, the casting of materials using electromagnetic energy: a review. Mater. Today Proc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.255Article Google Scholar 
  9. 9.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Processing of Ni-WC-8Co MMC casting through electromagnetic melting. Mater. Manuf. Process. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1291954Article Google Scholar 
  10. 10.R. Singh, S. Singh, V. Mahajan, Investigations for dimensional accuracy of investment casting process after cycle time reduction by advancements in shell moulding. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6, 859โ€“865 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.103Article Google Scholar 
  11. 11.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, On melting characteristics of bulk Al-7039 alloy during in-situ electromagnetic casting. Appl. Therm. Eng. 111, 660โ€“675 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.122Article Google Scholar 
  12. 12.S. Zhang, 10 Different types of casting process. (2021). MachineMfg.com, https://www.machinemfg.com/types-of-casting/
  13. 13.Envirocare, Foundry health risks. (2013). https://envirocare.org/foundry-health-risks/
  14. 14.S.S. Gajmal, D.N. Raut, A review of opportunities and challenges in electromagnetic assisted casting. Recent Trends Product. Eng. 2(1) (2019)
  15. 15.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Electromagnetic-material interaction phenomena: heating mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in material processing. Compos. Part A (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.035Article Google Scholar 
  16. 16.S. Chandrasekaran, T. Basak, S. Ramanathan, Experimental and theoretical investigation on electromagnetic melting of metals. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(3), 482โ€“487 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.001Article Google Scholar 
  17. 17.C.R. Bird, J.M. Mertz, U.S. Patent No. 4655276. (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 1987)
  18. 18.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Experimental investigation on in-situ electromagnetic casting of copper. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 346, 012052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/346/1/012052Article Google Scholar 
  19. 19.V. Gangwar, S. Kumar, V. Singh, H. Singh, Effect of process parameters on hardness of AA-6063 in-situ electromagnetic casting by using taguchi method, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 804(1) (IOP Publishing, 2020), p. 012019
  20. 20.X. Ye, S. Guo, L. Yang, J. Gao, J. Peng, T. Hu, L. Wang, M. Hou, Q. Luo, New utilization approach of electromagnetic thermal energy: preparation of metallic matrix diamond tool bit by electromagnetic hot-press sintering. J. Alloy. Compd. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.183Article Google Scholar 
  21. 21.S. Das, A.K. Mukhopadhyay, S. Datta, D. Basu, Prospects of Electromagnetic processing: an overview. Bull. Mater. Sci. 32(1), 1โ€“13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0001-4Article Google Scholar 
  22. 22.K.L. Glass, D.M. Ashby, U.S. Patent No. 9050656. (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2015)
  23. 23.S. Verma, P. Gupta, S. Srivastava, S. Kumar, A. Anand, An overview: casting/melting of non ferrous metallic materials using domestic electromagnetic oven. J. Mater. Sci. Mech. Eng. 4(4), (2017). p-ISSN: 2393-9095; e-ISSN: 2393-9109
  24. 24.S.S. Panda, V. Singh, A. Upadhyaya, D. Agrawal, Sintering response of austenitic (316L) and ferritic (434L) stainless steel consolidated in conventional and electromagnetic furnaces. Scripta Mater. 54(12), 2179โ€“2183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.034Article Google Scholar 
  25. 25.Y. Zhang, S. Yang, S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, Microwave/freeze casting assisted fabrication of carbon frameworks derived from embedded upholder in tremella for superior performance supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.006Article Google Scholar 
  26. 26.D. Thomas, P. Abhilash, M.T. Sebastian, Casting and characterization of LiMgPO4 glass free LTCC tape for electromagnetic applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33(1), 87โ€“93 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.002Article Google Scholar 
  27. 27.M.H. Awida, N. Shah, B. Warren, E. Ripley, A.E. Fathy, Modeling of an industrial Electromagnetic furnace for metal casting applications. 2008 IEEE MTT-S Int. Electromagn. Symp. Digest. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/mwsym.2008.4633143Article Google Scholar 
  28. 28.P.K. Loharkar, A. Ingle, S. Jhavar, Parametric review of electromagnetic-based materials processing and its applications. J. Market. Res. 8(3), 3306โ€“3326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.004Article Google Scholar 
  29. 29.E.B. Ripley, J.A. Oberhaus, WWWeb search power page-melting and heat treating metals using electromagnetic heating-the potential of electromagnetic metal processing techniques for a wide variety of metals and alloys is. Ind. Heat. 72(5), 65โ€“70 (2005)Google Scholar 
  30. 30.J. Campbell, Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Metallurgy, Techniques and Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015)Google Scholar 
  31. 31.B. Ravi, Metal Casting: Computer-Aided Design and Analysis, 1st edn. (PHI Learning Ltd, 2005)Google Scholar 
  32. 32.D.E. Clark, W.H. Sutton, Electromagnetic processing of materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26(1), 299โ€“331 (1996)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  33. 33.A.D. Abdullin, New capabilities of software package ProCAST 2011 for modeling foundry operations. Metallurgist 56(5โ€“6), 323โ€“328 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-012-9578-8Article Google Scholar 
  34. 34.J. Ha, P. Cleary, V. Alguine, T. Nguyen, Simulation of die filling in gravity die casting using SPH and MAGMAsoft, in Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on CFD in Minerals & Process Industries (1999) pp. 423โ€“428
  35. 35.M. Sirviรถ, M. Woล›, Casting directly from a computer model by using advanced simulation software FLOW-3D Cast ลฝ. Arch. Foundry Eng. 9(1), 79โ€“82 (2009)Google Scholar 
  36. 36.NOVACAST Systems, Nova-Solid/Flow Brochure, NOVACAST, Ronneby (2015)
  37. 37.AutoCAST-X1 Brochure, 3D Foundry Tech, Mumbai
  38. 38.EKK, Inc. Metal Casting Simulation Software and Consulting Services, CAPCAST Brochure
  39. 39.P. Muenprasertdee, Solidification modeling of iron castings using SOLIDCast (2007)
  40. 40.CasCAE, CT-CasTest Inc. Oy, Kerava
  41. 41.E. Dominguez-Tortajada, J. Monzo-Cabrera, A. Diaz-Morcillo, Uniform electric field distribution in electromagnetic heating applicators by means of genetic algorithms optimization of dielectric multilayer structures. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Theory Tech. 55(1), 85โ€“91 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmtt.2006.886913ADS Article Google Scholar 
  42. 42.B. Warren, M.H. Awida, A.E. Fathy, Electromagnetic heating of metals. IET Electromagn. Antennas Propag. 6(2), 196โ€“205 (2012)Article Google Scholar 
  43. 43.S. Ashouri, M. Nili-Ahmadabadi, M. Moradi, M. Iranpour, Semi-solid microstructure evolution during reheating of aluminum A356 alloy deformed severely by ECAP. J. Alloy. Compd. 466(1โ€“2), 67โ€“72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.010Article Google Scholar 
  44. 44.Penn State, Metal Parts Made In The Electromagnetic Oven. ScienceDaily. (1999) Retrieved May 8, 2021, from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/06/990622055733.htm
  45. 45.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, A review of research trends in electromagnetic processing of metal-based materials and opportunities in electromagnetic metal casting. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 41(3), 217โ€“255 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2016.1142421ADS Article Google Scholar 
  46. 46.D.K. Ghodgaonkar, V.V. Varadan, V.K. Varadan, Free-space measurement of complex permittivity and complex permeability of magnetic materials at Electromagnetic frequencies. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 39(2), 387โ€“394 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/19.52520Article Google Scholar 
  47. 47.J. Baker-Jarvis, E.J. Vanzura, W.A. Kissick, Improved technique for determining complex permittivity with the transmission/reflection method. Microw. Theory Tech. IEEE Trans. 38, 1096โ€“1103 (1990)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  48. 48.M. Bologna, A. Petri, B. Tellini, C. Zappacosta, Effective magnetic permeability measurementin composite resonator structures. Instrum. Meas. IEEE Trans. 59, 1200โ€“1206 (2010)Article Google Scholar 
  49. 49.B. Ravi, G.L. Datta, Metal castingโ€“back to future, in 52nd Indian Foundry Congress, (2004)
  50. 50.D. El Khaled, N. Novas, J.A. Gazquez, F. Manzano-Agugliaro. Microwave dielectric heating: applications on metals processing. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 2880โ€“2892 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.043Article Google Scholar 
  51. 51.H. Sekiguchi, Y. Mori, Steam plasma reforming using Electromagnetic discharge. Thin Solid Films 435, 44โ€“48 (2003)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  52. 52.J. Sun, W. Wang, C. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, Q. Yue, Study on the coupled effect of wave absorption and metal discharge generation under electromagnetic irradiation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 2042โ€“2051 (2014)Article Google Scholar 
  53. 53.K.I. Rybakov, E.A. Olevsky, E.V. Krikun, Electromagnetic sintering: fundamentals and modeling. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96(4), 1003โ€“1020 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12278Article Google Scholar 
  54. 54.A.K. Shukla, A. Mondal, A. Upadhyaya, Numerical modeling of electromagnetic heating. Sci. Sinter. 42(1), 99โ€“124 (2010)Article Google Scholar 
  55. 55.M. Chiumenti, C. Agelet de Saracibar, M. Cervera, On the numerical modeling of the thermomechanical contact for metal casting analysis. J. Heat Transf. 130(6), (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897923Article MATH Google Scholar 
  56. 56.B. Ravi, Metal Casting: Computer-Aided Design and Analysis. (PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2005)
  57. 57.J.H. Lee, S.D. Noh, H.-J. Kim, Y.-S. Kang, Implementation of cyber-physical production systems for quality prediction and operation control in metal casting. Sensors 18, 1428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051428ADS Article Google Scholar 
  58. 58.B. Aksoy, M. Koru, Estimation of casting mold interfacial heat transfer coefficient in pressure die casting process by artificial intelligence methods. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45, 8969โ€“8980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04648-7Article Google Scholar 
  59. 59.S.S. Miriyala, V.R. Subramanian, K. Mitra, TRANSFORM-ANN for online optimization of complex industrial processes: casting process as case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(1), 294โ€“309 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.026MathSciNet Article MATH Google Scholar 
  60. 60.J.K. Kittu, G.C.M. Patel, M. Parappagoudar, Modeling of pressure die casting process: an artificial intelligence approach. Int. J. Metalcast. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-015-0001-7Article Google Scholar 
  61. 61.W. Chen, B. Gutmann, C.O. Kappe, Characterization of electromagnetic-induced electric discharge phenomena in metal-solvent mixtures. ChemistryOpen 1, 39โ€“48 (2012)Article Google Scholar 
  62. 62.J. Walker, A. Prokop, C. Lynagh, B. Vuksanovich, B. Conner, K. Rogers, J. Thiel, E. MacDonald, Real-time process monitoring of core shifts during metal casting with wireless sensing and 3D sand printing. Addit. Manuf. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.018Article Google Scholar 
  63. 63.G.C. Manjunath Patel, A.K. Shettigar, M.B. Parappagoudar, A systematic approach to model and optimize wear behaviour of castings produced by squeeze casting process. J. Manuf. Process. 32, 199โ€“212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.02.004Article Google Scholar 
  64. 64.G.C. Manjunath Patel, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, An intelligent system for squeeze casting processโ€”soft computing based approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86, 3051โ€“3065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8416-8Article Google Scholar 
  65. 65.M. Ferguson, R. Ak, Y.T. Lee, K.H. Law, Automatic localization of casting defects with convolutional neural networks, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (Boston, MA, USA, 2017), pp. 1726โ€“1735. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258115.
  66. 66.P.K.D.V. Yarlagadda, Prediction of die casting process parameters by using an artificial neural network model for zinc alloys. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(1), 119โ€“139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400189617Article MATH Google Scholar 
  67. 67.G.C. ManjunathPatel, A.K. Shettigar, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, Back propagation genetic and recurrent neural network applications in modelling and analysis of squeeze casting process. Appl. Soft Comput. 59, 418โ€“437 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.018Article Google Scholar 
  68. 68.J. Zheng, Q. Wang, P. Zhao et al., Optimization of high-pressure die-casting process parameters using artificial neural network. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44, 667โ€“674 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1886-6Article Google Scholar 
  69. 69.E. Mares, J. Sokolowski, Artificial intelligence-based control system for the analysis of metal casting properties. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 40, 149โ€“154 (2010)Google Scholar 
  70. 70.K.S. Senthil, S. Muthukumaran, C. Chandrasekhar Reddy, Suitability of friction welding of tube to tube plate using an external tool process for different tube diametersโ€”a study. Exp. Tech. 37(6), 8โ€“14 (2013)Article Google Scholar 
  71. 71.N.K. Bhoi, H. Singh, S. Pratap, P.K. Jain, Electromagnetic material processing: a clean, green, and sustainable approach. Sustain. Eng. Prod. Manuf. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816564-5.00001-3Article Google Scholar 
  72. 72.K.S. Senthil, D.A. Daniel, An investigation of boiler grade tube and tube plate without block by using friction welding process. Mater. Today Proc. 5(2), 8567โ€“8576 (2018)Article Google Scholar 
  73. 73.E. Hetmaniok, D. Sล‚ota, A. Zielonka, Restoration of the cooling conditions in a three-dimensional continuous casting process using artificial intelligence algorithms. Appl. Math. Modell. 39(16), 4797โ€“4807 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.056Article MATH Google Scholar 
  74. 74.C.V. Kumar, S. Muthukumaran, A. Pradeep, S.S. Kumaran, Optimizational study of friction welding of steel tube to aluminum tube plate using an external tool process. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 6(2), 300โ€“306 (2011)Google Scholar 
  75. 75.T. Adithiyaa, D. Chandramohan, T. Sathish, Optimal prediction of process parameters by GWO-KNN in stirring-squeeze casting of AA2219 reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater. Today Proc. 150, 1598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.051Article Google Scholar 
  76. 76.B.P. Pehrson, A.F. Moore (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8708031 (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2014)
  77. 77.Liu, J., & Rynerson, M. L. (2008). U.S. Patent No. 7,461,684. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  78. 78.K. Salonitis, B. Zeng, H.A. Mehrabi, M. Jolly, The challenges for energy efficient casting processes. Procedia CIRP 40, 24โ€“29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.043Article Google Scholar 
  79. 79.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Effect of solidification environment on microstructure and indentation hardness of Alโ€“Znโ€“Mg alloy casts developed using electromagnetic heating. Int. J. Metal Cast. 10, 1โ€“13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0176-1Article Google Scholar 
  80. 80.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Effect of susceptor and Mold material on microstructure of in-situ electromagnetic casts of Alโ€“Znโ€“Mg alloy. Mater. Des. 131, 428โ€“440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.038Article Google Scholar 
  81. 81.S. Kaushal, S. Bohra, D. Gupta, V. Jain, On processing and characterization of Cuโ€“Mo-based castings through electromagnetic heating. Int. J. Metalcast. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00481-8Article Google Scholar 
  82. 82.S. Nandwani, S. Vardhan, A.K. Bagha, A literature review on the exposure time of electromagnetic based welding of different materials. Mater. Today Proc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.056Article Google Scholar 
  83. 83.F.J.B. Brum, S.C. Amico, I. Vedana, J.A. Spim, Electromagnetic dewaxing applied to the investment casting process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(7), 3166โ€“3171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.024Article Google Scholar 
  84. 84.M.P. Reddy, R.A. Shakoor, G. Parande, V. Manakari, F. Ubaid, A.M.A. Mohamed, M. Gupta, Enhanced performance of nano-sized SiC reinforced Al metal matrix nanocomposites synthesized through electromagnetic sintering and hot extrusion techniques. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 27(5), 606โ€“614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.08.015Article Google Scholar 
  85. 85.V.R. Kalamkar, K. Monkova, (Eds.), Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7
  86. 86.V. Bist, A.K. Sharma, P. Kumar, Development and microstructural characterisations of the lead casting using electromagnetic technology. Managerโ€™s J. Mech. Eng. 4(4), 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.26634/jme.4.4.2840Article Google Scholar 
  87. 87.A. Sharma, A. Chouhan, L. Pavithran, U. Chadha, S.K. Selvaraj, Implementation of LSS framework in automotive component manufacturing: a review, current scenario and future directions. Mater Today: Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.374Article Google Scholar 
Figure 6. Evolution of melt pool in the overhang region (ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W, vโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s, the streamlines are shown by arrows).

Experimental and numerical investigation of the origin of surface roughness in laser powder bed fused overhang regions

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์˜ ์›์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

Shaochuan Feng,Amar M. Kamat,Soheil Sabooni &Yutao PeiPages S66-S84 | Received 18 Jan 2021, Accepted 25 Feb 2021, Published online: 10 Mar 2021

ABSTRACT

Surface roughness of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) printed overhang regions is a major contributor to deteriorated shape accuracy/surface quality. This study investigates the mechanisms behind the evolution of surface roughness (Ra) in overhang regions. The evolution of surface morphology is the result of a combination of border track contour, powder adhesion, warp deformation, and dross formation, which is strongly related to the overhang angle (ฮธ). When 0ยฐโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰ฮธโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰15ยฐ, the overhang angle does not affect Ra significantly since only a small area of the melt pool boundaries contacts the powder bed resulting in slight powder adhesion. When 15ยฐโ€‰<โ€‰ฮธโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰50ยฐ, powder adhesion is enhanced by the melt pool sinking and the increased contact area between the melt pool boundary and powder bed. When ฮธโ€‰>โ€‰50ยฐ, large waviness of the overhang contour, adhesion of powder clusters, severe warp deformation and dross formation increase Ra sharply.

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ํ“จ์ „ (L-PBF) ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ… ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ˜•์ƒ ์ •ํ™•๋„ / ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ €ํ•˜์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ (Ra ) ์˜ ์ง„ํ™” ๋’ค์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ง„ํ™”๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„ ( ฮธ ) ์™€ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ํŠธ๋ž™ ์œค๊ณฝ, ๋ถ„๋ง ์ ‘์ฐฉ, ๋’คํ‹€๋ฆผ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๋“œ๋กœ์Šค ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . 0ยฐ โ‰คโ€‰ ฮธ โ€‰โ‰ค 15ยฐ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ , ์šฉ์œตํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์˜ ์ž‘์€ ์˜์—ญ ๋งŒ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ์™€ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ R a์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . 15ยฐ < ฮธ ์ผ ๋•Œโ€‰โ€‰โ‰ค 50ยฐ, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์‹ฑํ‚น ๋ฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์™€ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰ ๋ฉด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ ‘์ฐฉ๋ ฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฮธ โ€‰> 50ยฐ ์ผ ๋•Œ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์œค๊ณฝ์˜ ํฐ ํŒŒํ˜•, ๋ถ„๋ง ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ์˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ, ์‹ฌํ•œ ํœจ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๋“œ ๋กœ์Šค ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด Ra ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

KEYWORDS: Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), melt pool dynamics, overhang region, shape deviation, surface roughness

1. Introduction

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ (L-PBF)์€ ์ฒจ๋‹จ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ (AM) ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ, ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šฌ๋ผ์ด์Šค ๋œ 3D ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์ง€์›์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธต๋ณ„๋กœ 3 ์ฐจ์› (3D) ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ (CAD) ๋ชจ๋ธ (Chatham, Long ๋ฐ Williams 2019 ; Tan, Zhu ๋ฐ Zhou 2020 ). ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์‡„ ์ธต ์•„๋ž˜์— โ€‹โ€‹์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์‡„ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์˜์—ญ ๋˜๋Š” ๋Œ์ถœ ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธฐํŒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์œ„์— ๊ฑด์„ค๋˜๋Š” ํŠน์ˆ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Patterson, Messimer ๋ฐ Farrington 2017). ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์€์ง€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์ถ• ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ง€์ง€๋Œ€๊ฐ€์žˆ๋Š” ๋Œ์ถœ ์˜์—ญ์˜ L-PBF๋Š” ์ง€์ง€์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ฐ€๋„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ œ์™ธ ํ•˜๊ณ  (Wang and Chou 2018 ) ๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธฐํŒ์˜ ๊ณต์ •๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— L-PBF ๊ณต์ • ํ›„ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ์ง€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ธ์‡„ ๋œ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์€ L-PBF ๊ณต์ • ํ›„ ์ง€์ง€๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ, ์—ฐ์‚ญ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๋งˆ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ›„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ์ œ์ž‘๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ํŠน์ • ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ํ›„ ์ง€์ง€๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์šฐ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ƒ๋‹จ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋Œ์ถœ๋ถ€ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ง€์ง€๋Œ€์—†์ด ๊ฑด์„คํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Hopkinson and Dickens 2000 ). ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์ฑ„๋„์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜์—†๋Š”์ง€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด, ํŠนํžˆ ๋“ฑ๊ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„ (Feng, Kamat ๋ฐ Pei 2021 ) ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ 3D ์ฑ„๋„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋งˆ๊ฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์€ (i) ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•, (ii) ๊ณ„๋‹จ ํšจ๊ณผ (Kuo et al. 2020 ; Li et al. 2020 )๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ๋ชจ์–‘์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .) ๋ฐ (iii) ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ์†Œ๊ฒฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ; ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ์•ž์˜ ๋‘ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ mm ๊ธธ์ด ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ‘๋งคํฌ๋กœ’ํŽธ์ฐจ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜๊ณ  ํ›„์ž๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ยตm ๊ธธ์ด ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ‘๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ’ํŽธ์ฐจ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ด ์‘๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์€ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Patterson, Messimer ๋ฐ Farrington 2017 ). ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ์ธ ์šฉ์œต / ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์—์„œ ํฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‘๊ณ  ๋œ ์ธต์— ์ง‘์ค‘์  ์ธ ์—ด ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ด ์‘๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋’คํ‹€๋ฆผ์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ์„ ํ˜„์ €ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์€ ์•„๋ž˜์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œํ•œ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ตฌ์†๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘ ์‘๋ ฅ ์™„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Kamat ๋ฐ Pei 2019 ). ๋”์šฑ์ด ์šฉ์œต ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด ๋‘๊ป˜๋ณด๋‹ค ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์ด์ „ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด๋„ ์žฌ์šฉ ํ•ด๋˜์–ด ๋นŒ๋“œ ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด๊ฐ„์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [Yadroitsev et al. 2013 ; Kamath et al.2014 ]),์‘๊ณ  ๋œ ๋‘๊ป˜๊ฐ€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ๋‘๊ป˜๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—ํ˜•ํƒœ ํŽธ์ฐจ (์˜ˆ : ๋“œ ๋กœ์Šค [Charles et al. 2020 ; Feng et al. 2020 ])๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ์ธ์‡„ ๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด (R a ๋ฐ S a โˆผ 10 ฮผm)์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฑฐ์น ๋‹ค (Duval-Chaneac et al. 2018 ; Wen et al. 2018 ). ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š”๊ณ ํ˜•ํ™” ๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ์— ๋ถ€์ฐฉ ๋œ ์šฉ์œต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ถ„๋ง์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ (R a )๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 20 ฮผm์ธ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํŠนํžˆ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Mazur et al. 2016 ; Pakkanen et al. 2016 ).

์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„ ( ฮธ , ๋นŒ๋“œ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธก์ •)๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋’คํ‹€๋ฆผ ํŽธํ–ฅ๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Kamat and Pei 2019 ; Mingear et al. 2019 ). ฮธ โˆผ 45 ยฐ ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„ ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ์ง€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—†์ด ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ธ์‡„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Pakkanen et al. 2016 ; Kadirgama et al. 2018 ). ฮธ ์ผ ๋•Œ์ด ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ฐ’๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ’ˆ์งˆ๋กœ ์ธ์‡„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„ ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ (๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ)๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๋ชจ์–‘ / ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„์คŒ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Wang et al. 2013 ; Mingear et al . 2019 ).

์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด (Shrestha ๋ฐ Chou 2018 ) ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ (Le et al. 2020 ) ์˜์—ญ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” L-PBF ๊ณต์ •์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ€๊ณต์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ˜„์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋ชจ์–‘, ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„๋Š” ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๊ณผ โ€‹โ€‹ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์— ๋ชจ๋‘ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ˜•ํƒœ / ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ ์—ญํ• ์„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ. ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ์˜ L-PBF ๋™์•ˆ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (FEM)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  (Roberts et al. 2009 ; Du et al.2019 ), ์œ ํ•œ ์ฐจ๋ถ„ ๋ฒ• (FDM) (Wu et al. 2018 ), ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ (CFD) (Lee and Zhang 2016 ), ์ž„์˜์˜ Lagrangian-Eulerian ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (ALE) (Khairallah and Anderson 2014 )์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ (Hu et al. 2018 ) ๋ฐ Marangoni ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜ (Zhang et al. 2018 ) ํ˜„์ƒ์„ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ (์˜จ๋„ ์žฅ) ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ (์šฉ์œต ํ๋ฆ„) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด์‚ฐ ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ• (DEM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Lee and Zhang 2016 ; Wu et al. 2018 ). ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ L-PBF ๊ณต์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Khairallah et al. 2016) ๋ฉ”์กฐ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ (Khairallah ๋ฐ Anderson 2014 ), ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ (Leitz et al. 2017 )์—์„œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ํŠธ๋ž™ (Foroozmehr et al. 2016 ) ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด (Huang, Khamesee ๋ฐ Toyserkani 2019 )๋กœ.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„๋ฐ›์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์˜์—ญ์˜ L-PBF์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„ ์ฐธ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์˜์—ญ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์—๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ๊ธˆ์†์€ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ‹ˆ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์•„๋ž˜๋กœ ํ˜๋Ÿฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์•ฝํ•œ ์ง€์ง€์ฒด ์•„๋ž˜๋กœ ๊ฐ€๋ผ ์•‰์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ์–‘ / ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ง„ํ™”์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ณต๊ทน, ์—ด ์กฐ๊ฑด (์˜ˆ : ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํก์ˆ˜,2019 ; Karimi et al. 2020 ; ๋…ธ๋ž˜์™€ ์˜ 2020 ). ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋Š” (๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ) ํ˜•์ƒ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ฌ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์  ํ•˜์ค‘ ๋™์•ˆ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ท ์—ด์˜ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์ง€์  ์—ญํ• ์„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Gรผnther et al. 2018 ). ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋†’์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ๋Š” (๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ) ์ •ํ™•๋„ / ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—„๊ฒฉํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด์žˆ๋Š” ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์ œ์กฐ์—์„œ L-PBF์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์ œํ•œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ (์ง€์ง€๋ฌผ์—†์ด ์ œ์ž‘)์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ํ˜•์ƒ ํŽธ์ฐจ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ์›์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํฌ๊ด„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๋œ DEM-CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ํŠธ๋ž™ ์œค๊ณฝ, ๋ถ„๋ง ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๋ฐ ๋’คํ‹€๋ฆผ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€ ๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ R์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋‹จ์ผ ์š”์ธ L-PBF ์ธ์‡„ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์นจ๋ชฐ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ ‘์ฐฉ์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ด ์‹๋ณ„๋˜๊ณ  ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ธ์‡„ ๋œ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ–‰ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์™„ํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ์  ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ„๋žตํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The shape and size of the L-PBF printed samples are illustrated in Figure 1
The shape and size of the L-PBF printed samples are illustrated in Figure 1
Figure 2. Borders in the overhang region depending on the overhang angle ฮธ
Figure 2. Borders in the overhang region depending on the overhang angle ฮธ
Figure 3. (a) Profile of the volumetric heat source, (b) the model geometry of single-track printing on a solid substrate (unit: ยตm), and (c) the comparison of melt pool dimensions obtained from the experiment (right half) and simulation (left half) for a calibrated optical penetration depth of 110โ€…ยตm (laser power 200โ€…W and scan speed 800โ€…mm/s, solidified layer thickness 30โ€…ยตm, powder size 10โ€“45โ€…ยตm).
Figure 3. (a) Profile of the volumetric heat source, (b) the model geometry of single-track printing on a solid substrate (unit: ยตm), and (c) the comparison of melt pool dimensions obtained from the experiment (right half) and simulation (left half) for a calibrated optical penetration depth of 110โ€…ยตm (laser power 200โ€…W and scan speed 800โ€…mm/s, solidified layer thickness 30โ€…ยตm, powder size 10โ€“45โ€…ยตm).
Figure 4. The model geometry of an overhang being L-PBF processed: (a) 3D view and (b) right view.
Figure 4. The model geometry of an overhang being L-PBF processed: (a) 3D view and (b) right view.
Figure 5. The cross-sectional contour of border tracks in a 45ยฐ overhang region.
Figure 5. The cross-sectional contour of border tracks in a 45ยฐ overhang region.
Figure 6. Evolution of melt pool in the overhang region (ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W, vโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s, the streamlines are shown by arrows).
Figure 6. Evolution of melt pool in the overhang region (ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W, vโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s, the streamlines are shown by arrows).
Figure 7. The overhang contour is contributed by (a) only outer borders when ฮธโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰60ยฐ (b) both inner borders and outer borders when ฮธโ€‰>โ€‰60ยฐ.
Figure 7. The overhang contour is contributed by (a) only outer borders when ฮธโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰60ยฐ (b) both inner borders and outer borders when ฮธโ€‰>โ€‰60ยฐ.
Figure 8. Schematic of powder adhesion on a 45ยฐ overhang region.
Figure 8. Schematic of powder adhesion on a 45ยฐ overhang region.
Figure 9. The L-PBF printed samples with various overhang angle (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰0ยฐ (cube), (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰55ยฐ and (e) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ.
Figure 9. The L-PBF printed samples with various overhang angle (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰0ยฐ (cube), (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰55ยฐ and (e) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ.
Figure 10. Two mechanisms of powder adhesion related to the overhang angle: (a) simulation-predicted, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ; (b) simulation-predicted, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ; (c, e) optical micrographs, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ; (d, f) optical micrographs, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ. (e) and (f) are partial enlargement of (c) and (d), respectively.
Figure 10. Two mechanisms of powder adhesion related to the overhang angle: (a) simulation-predicted, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ; (b) simulation-predicted, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ; (c, e) optical micrographs, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ; (d, f) optical micrographs, ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ. (e) and (f) are partial enlargement of (c) and (d), respectively.
Figure 11. Simulation-predicted surface morphology in the overhang region at different overhang angle: (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰15ยฐ, (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ and (e) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰80ยฐ (Blue solid lines: simulation-predicted contour; red dashed lines: the planar profile of designed overhang region specified by the overhang angles).
Figure 11. Simulation-predicted surface morphology in the overhang region at different overhang angle: (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰15ยฐ, (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ and (e) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰80ยฐ (Blue solid lines: simulation-predicted contour; red dashed lines: the planar profile of designed overhang region specified by the overhang angles).
Figure 12. Effect of overhang angle on surface roughness Ra in overhang regions
Figure 12. Effect of overhang angle on surface roughness Ra in overhang regions
Figure 13. Surface morphology of L-PBF printed overhang regions with different overhang angle: (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰15ยฐ, (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ and (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ (overhang border parameters: Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W, vโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s).
Figure 13. Surface morphology of L-PBF printed overhang regions with different overhang angle: (a) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰15ยฐ, (b) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰30ยฐ, (c) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ and (d) ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰60ยฐ (overhang border parameters: Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W, vโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s).
Figure 14. Effect of (a) laser power (scan speedโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s) and (b) scan speed (lase powerโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W) on surface roughness Ra in overhang regions (ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, laser power and scan speed referred to overhang border parameters, and the other process parameters are listed in Table 2).
Figure 14. Effect of (a) laser power (scan speedโ€‰=โ€‰1000โ€…mm/s) and (b) scan speed (lase powerโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€…W) on surface roughness Ra in overhang regions (ฮธโ€‰=โ€‰45ยฐ, laser power and scan speed referred to overhang border parameters, and the other process parameters are listed in Table 2).

References

  • Cai, Chao, Chrupcala Radoslaw, Jinliang Zhang, Qian Yan, Shifeng Wen, Bo Song, and Yusheng Shi. 2019. โ€œIn-Situ Preparation and Formation of TiB/Ti-6Al-4V Nanocomposite via Laser Additive Manufacturing: Microstructure Evolution and Tribological Behavior.โ€ Powder Technology 342: 73โ€“84. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.088. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Cai, Chao, Wei Shian Tey, Jiayao Chen, Wei Zhu, Xingjian Liu, Tong Liu, Lihua Zhao, and Kun Zhou. 2021. โ€œComparative Study on 3D Printing of Polyamide 12 by Selective Laser Sintering and Multi Jet Fusion.โ€ Journal of Materials Processing Technology 288 (August 2020): 116882. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116882. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Cai, Chao, Xu Wu, Wan Liu, Wei Zhu, Hui Chen, Jasper Dong Qiu Chua, Chen Nan Sun, Jie Liu, Qingsong Wei, and Yusheng Shi. 2020. โ€œSelective Laser Melting of Near-ฮฑ Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V: Parameter Optimization, Heat Treatment and Mechanical Performance.โ€ Journal of Materials Science and Technology 57: 51โ€“64. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.004. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Charles, Amal, Ahmed Elkaseer, Lore Thijs, and Steffen G. Scholz. 2020. โ€œDimensional Errors Due to Overhanging Features in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Parts Made of Ti-6Al-4V.โ€ Applied Sciences 10 (7): 2416. doi:10.3390/app10072416. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Chatham, Camden A., Timothy E. Long, and Christopher B. Williams. 2019. โ€œA Review of the Process Physics and Material Screening Methods for Polymer Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing.โ€ Progress in Polymer Science 93: 68โ€“95. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.003. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Du, Yang, Xinyu You, Fengbin Qiao, Lijie Guo, and Zhengwu Liu. 2019. โ€œA Model for Predicting the Temperature Field during Selective Laser Melting.โ€ Results in Physics 12 (November 2018): 52โ€“60. doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.031. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Duval-Chaneac, M. S., S. Han, C. Claudin, F. Salvatore, J. Bajolet, and J. Rech. 2018. โ€œExperimental Study on Finishing of Internal Laser Melting (SLM) Surface with Abrasive Flow Machining (AFM).โ€ Precision Engineering 54 (July 2017): 1โ€“6. doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.03.006. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Feng, Shaochuan, Shijie Chen, Amar M. Kamat, Ru Zhang, Mingji Huang, and Liangcai Hu. 2020. โ€œInvestigation on Shape Deviation of Horizontal Interior Circular Channels Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 36 (December): 101585. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101585. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Feng, Shaochuan, Chuanzhen Huang, Jun Wang, Hongtao Zhu, Peng Yao, and Zhanqiang Liu. 2017. โ€œAn Analytical Model for the Prediction of Temperature Distribution and Evolution in Hybrid Laser-Waterjet Micro-Machining.โ€ Precision Engineering 47: 33โ€“45. doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.07.002. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Feng, Shaochuan, Amar M. Kamat, and Yutao Pei. 2021. โ€œDesign and Fabrication of Conformal Cooling Channels in Molds: Review and Progress Updates.โ€ International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121082. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Flow-3D V11.2 Documentation. 2016. Flow Science, Inc. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Foroozmehr, Ali, Mohsen Badrossamay, Ehsan Foroozmehr, and Saโ€™id Golabi. 2016. โ€œFinite Element Simulation of Selective Laser Melting Process Considering Optical Penetration Depth of Laser in Powder Bed.โ€ Materials and Design 89: 255โ€“263. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.002. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • โ€œGeometrical Product Specifications (GPS) โ€” Surface Texture: Profile Method โ€” Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture (ISO 4288).โ€ 1996. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/2096.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Gรผnther, Johannes, Stefan Leuders, Peter Koppa, Thomas Trรถster, Sebastian Henkel, Horst Biermann, and Thomas Niendorf. 2018. โ€œOn the Effect of Internal Channels and Surface Roughness on the High-Cycle Fatigue Performance of Ti-6Al-4V Processed by SLM.โ€ Materials & Design 143: 1โ€“11. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.042. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Hopkinson, Neil, and Phill Dickens. 2000. โ€œConformal Cooling and Heating Channels Using Laser Sintered Tools.โ€ In Solid Freeform Fabrication Conference, 490โ€“497. Texas. doi:10.26153/tsw/3075. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Hu, Zhiheng, Haihong Zhu, Changchun Zhang, Hu Zhang, Ting Qi, and Xiaoyan Zeng. 2018. โ€œContact Angle Evolution during Selective Laser Melting.โ€ Materials and Design 139: 304โ€“313. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.002. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Hu, Cheng, Kejia Zhuang, Jian Weng, and Donglin Pu. 2019. โ€œThree-Dimensional Analytical Modeling of Cutting Temperature for Round Insert Considering Semi-Infinite Boundary and Non-Uniform Heat Partition.โ€ International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 155 (October 2018): 536โ€“553. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.019. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Huang, Yuze, Mir Behrad Khamesee, and Ehsan Toyserkani. 2019. โ€œA New Physics-Based Model for Laser Directed Energy Deposition (Powder-Fed Additive Manufacturing): From Single-Track to Multi-Track and Multi-Layer.โ€ Optics & Laser Technology 109 (August 2018): 584โ€“599. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.015. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Kadirgama, K., W. S. W. Harun, F. Tarlochan, M. Samykano, D. Ramasamy, Mohd Zaidi Azir, and H. Mehboob. 2018. โ€œStatistical and Optimize of Lattice Structures with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Ti6AL4V Material.โ€ International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97 (1โ€“4): 495โ€“510. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-1913-1. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Kamat, Amar M, and Yutao Pei. 2019. โ€œAn Analytical Method to Predict and Compensate for Residual Stress-Induced Deformation in Overhanging Regions of Internal Channels Fabricated Using Powder Bed Fusion.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 29 (March): 100796. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100796. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Kamath, Chandrika, Bassem El-Dasher, Gilbert F. Gallegos, Wayne E. King, and Aaron Sisto. 2014. โ€œDensity of Additively-Manufactured, 316L SS Parts Using Laser Powder-Bed Fusion at Powers up to 400 W.โ€ International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 74 (1โ€“4): 65โ€“78. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-5954-9. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Karimi, J., C. Suryanarayana, I. Okulov, and K. G. Prashanth. 2020. โ€œSelective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V: Effect of Laser Re-Melting.โ€ Materials Science and Engineering A (July): 140558. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140558. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Khairallah, Saad A., and Andy Anderson. 2014. โ€œMesoscopic Simulation Model of Selective Laser Melting of Stainless Steel Powder.โ€ Journal of Materials Processing Technology 214 (11): 2627โ€“2636. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Khairallah, Saad A., Andrew T. Anderson, Alexander Rubenchik, and Wayne E. King. 2016. โ€œLaser Powder-Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Physics of Complex Melt Flow and Formation Mechanisms of Pores, Spatter, and Denudation Zones.โ€ Edited by Adedeji B. Badiru, Vhance V. Valencia, and David Liu. Acta Materialia 108 (April): 36โ€“45. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Kuo, C. N., C. K. Chua, P. C. Peng, Y. W. Chen, S. L. Sing, S. Huang, and Y. L. Su. 2020. โ€œMicrostructure Evolution and Mechanical Property Response via 3D Printing Parameter Development of Alโ€“Sc Alloy.โ€ Virtual and Physical Prototyping 15 (1): 120โ€“129. doi:10.1080/17452759.2019.1698967. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Le, K. Q., C. H. Wong, K. H. G. Chua, C. Tang, and H. Du. 2020. โ€œDiscontinuity of Overhanging Melt Track in Selective Laser Melting Process.โ€ International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 162 (December): 120284. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120284. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Lee, Y. S., and W. Zhang. 2016. โ€œModeling of Heat Transfer, Fluid Flow and Solidification Microstructure of Nickel-Base Superalloy Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 12: 178โ€“188. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Leitz, K. H., P. Singer, A. Plankensteiner, B. Tabernig, H. Kestler, and L. S. Sigl. 2017. โ€œMulti-Physical Simulation of Selective Laser Melting.โ€ Metal Powder Report 72 (5): 331โ€“338. doi:10.1016/j.mprp.2016.04.004. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Li, Jian, Jing Hu, Yi Zhu, Xiaowen Yu, Mengfei Yu, and Huayong Yang. 2020. โ€œSurface Roughness Control of Root Analogue Dental Implants Fabricated Using Selective Laser Melting.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 34 (September 2019): 101283. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101283. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Li, Yingli, Kun Zhou, Pengfei Tan, Shu Beng Tor, Chee Kai Chua, and Kah Fai Leong. 2018. โ€œModeling Temperature and Residual Stress Fields in Selective Laser Melting.โ€ International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 136 (February): 24โ€“35. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.001. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Mazur, MacIej, Martin Leary, Matthew McMillan, Joe Elambasseril, and Milan Brandt. 2016. โ€œSLM Additive Manufacture of H13 Tool Steel with Conformal Cooling and Structural Lattices.โ€ Rapid Prototyping Journal 22 (3): 504โ€“518. doi:10.1108/RPJ-06-2014-0075. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Mingear, Jacob, Bing Zhang, Darren Hartl, and Alaa Elwany. 2019. โ€œEffect of Process Parameters and Electropolishing on the Surface Roughness of Interior Channels in Additively Manufactured Nickel-Titanium Shape Memory Alloy Actuators.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 27 (October 2018): 565โ€“575. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.027. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Pakkanen, Jukka, Flaviana Calignano, Francesco Trevisan, Massimo Lorusso, Elisa Paola Ambrosio, Diego Manfredi, and Paolo Fino. 2016. โ€œStudy of Internal Channel Surface Roughnesses Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting in Aluminum and Titanium Alloys.โ€ Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 47 (8): 3837โ€“3844. doi:10.1007/s11661-016-3478-7. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson, Albert E., Sherri L. Messimer, and Phillip A. Farrington. 2017. โ€œOverhanging Features and the SLM/DMLS Residual Stresses Problem: Review and Future Research Need.โ€ Technologies 5 (4): 15. doi:10.3390/technologies5020015. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts, I. A., C. J. Wang, R. Esterlein, M. Stanford, and D. J. Mynors. 2009. โ€œA Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Temperature Field during Laser Melting of Metal Powders in Additive Layer Manufacturing.โ€ International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 49 (12โ€“13): 916โ€“923. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.07.004. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Shrestha, Subin, and Kevin Chou. 2018. โ€œComputational Analysis of Thermo-Fluid Dynamics with Metallic Powder in SLM.โ€ In CFD Modeling and Simulation in Materials Processing 2018, edited by Laurentiu Nastac, Koulis Pericleous, Adrian S. Sabau, Lifeng Zhang, and Brian G. Thomas, 85โ€“95. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72059-3_9. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Sing, S. L., and W. Y. Yeong. 2020. โ€œLaser Powder Bed Fusion for Metal Additive Manufacturing: Perspectives on Recent Developments.โ€ Virtual and Physical Prototyping 15 (3): 359โ€“370. doi:10.1080/17452759.2020.1779999. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • ล milauer, Vรกclav, Emanuele Catalano, Bruno Chareyre, Sergei Dorofeenko, Jรฉrรดme Duriez, Nolan Dyck, Jan Eliรกลก, et al. 2015. Yade Documentation. 2nd ed. The Yade Project. doi:10.5281/zenodo.34073. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Tan, Pengfei, Fei Shen, Biao Li, and Kun Zhou. 2019. โ€œA Thermo-Metallurgical-Mechanical Model for Selective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V.โ€ Materials & Design 168 (April): 107642. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107642. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Tan, Lisa Jiaying, Wei Zhu, and Kun Zhou. 2020. โ€œRecent Progress on Polymer Materials for Additive Manufacturing.โ€ Advanced Functional Materials 30 (43): 1โ€“54. doi:10.1002/adfm.202003062. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Wang, Xiaoqing, and Kevin Chou. 2018. โ€œEffect of Support Structures on Ti-6Al-4V Overhang Parts Fabricated by Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing.โ€ Journal of Materials Processing Technology 257 (February): 65โ€“78. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.038. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Wang, Di, Yongqiang Yang, Ziheng Yi, and Xubin Su. 2013. โ€œResearch on the Fabricating Quality Optimization of the Overhanging Surface in SLM Process.โ€ International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 65 (9โ€“12): 1471โ€“1484. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4271-4. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Wen, Peng, Maximilian Voshage, Lucas Jauer, Yanzhe Chen, Yu Qin, Reinhart Poprawe, and Johannes Henrich Schleifenbaum. 2018. โ€œLaser Additive Manufacturing of Zn Metal Parts for Biodegradable Applications: Processing, Formation Quality and Mechanical Properties.โ€ Materials and Design 155: 36โ€“45. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Wu, Yu-che, Cheng-hung San, Chih-hsiang Chang, Huey-jiuan Lin, Raed Marwan, Shuhei Baba, and Weng-Sing Hwang. 2018. โ€œNumerical Modeling of Melt-Pool Behavior in Selective Laser Melting with Random Powder Distribution and Experimental Validation.โ€ Journal of Materials Processing Technology 254 (November 2017): 72โ€“78. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.032. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Yadroitsev, I., P. Krakhmalev, I. Yadroitsava, S. Johansson, and I. Smurov. 2013. โ€œEnergy Input Effect on Morphology and Microstructure of Selective Laser Melting Single Track from Metallic Powder.โ€ Journal of Materials Processing Technology 213 (4): 606โ€“613. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.014. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Yu, Wenhui, Swee Leong Sing, Chee Kai Chua, and Xuelei Tian. 2019. โ€œInfluence of Re-Melting on Surface Roughness and Porosity of AlSi10Mg Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting.โ€ Journal of Alloys and Compounds 792: 574โ€“581. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.017. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, Dongyun, Pudan Zhang, Zhen Liu, Zhe Feng, Chengjie Wang, and Yanwu Guo. 2018. โ€œThermofluid Field of Molten Pool and Its Effects during Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Inconel 718 Alloy.โ€ Additive Manufacturing 21 (100): 567โ€“578. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.031. [Crossref], [Web of Science ยฎ], [Google Scholar]
A new dynamic masking technique for time resolved PIV analysis

A new dynamic masking technique for time resolved PIV analysis

์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„ํ•ด PIV ๋ถ„์„์„์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ 

๋ฌผ์ฒด ๊ฐ€์‹œ์„ฑ์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๋œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋ฆฌ์›จ์–ด ๋ ˆ์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๋„๊ตฌ

Journal of Visualization ( 2021 ) ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์ธ์šฉ

Abstract

Time resolved PIV encompassing moving and/or deformable objects interfering with the light source requires the employment of dynamic masking (DM). A few DM techniques have been recently developed, mainly in microfluidics and multiphase flows fields. Most of them require ad-hoc design of the experimental setup, and may spoil the accuracy of the resulting PIV analysis. A new DM technique is here presented which envisages, along with a dedicated masking algorithm, the employment of fluorescent coating to allow for accurate tracking of the object. We show results from measurements obtained through a validated PIV setup demonstrating the need to include a DM step even for objects featuring limited displacements. We compare the proposed algorithm with both a no-masking and a static masking solution. In the framework of developing low cost, flexible and accurate PIV setups, the proposed algorithm is made available through a freeware application able to generate masks to be used by an existing, freeware PIV analysis package.

๊ด‘์›์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ด๋™ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ PIV๋Š” ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น (DM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •์˜ ์ž„์‹œ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ PIV ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋–จ์–ด ๋œจ๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์ „์šฉ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œํ•œ๋œ ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ DM ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒ€์ฆ ๋œ PIV ์„ค์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ no-masking ๋ฐ static masking ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ €๋น„์šฉ, ์œ ์—ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ PIV ์„ค์ • ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ”„๋ฆฌ์›จ์–ด PIV ๋ถ„์„ ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ”„๋ฆฌ์›จ์–ด ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

  • Time resolved PIV, Dynamics masking, Image processing, Vibration inducers, Fluorescent coating

๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ๊ฐœ์š”

์†Œ๊ฐœ

PIV (์ž…์ž ์˜์ƒ ์†๋„๊ณ„)์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ 70 ๋…„๋Œ€ ํ›„๋ฐ˜ (Archbold ๋ฐ Ennosย 1972ย )์ด ๋ฐ˜์  ๊ณ„์ธก์˜ ํ™•์žฅ (Barker and Fourneyย 1977ย )ย ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ž…๋œ ์ด๋ž˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์—์„œ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹คย .ย PIV ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด์— ์ฃผ์ž…๋œ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…์ž์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ํ™•์‹คํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒ๋˜๊ณ  ์œ ๋™์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ๋ฆ„์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € / LED ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์กฐ๋ช…๋˜๊ณ  ์ž…์ž์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‚ฐ๋ž€ ๋œ ๋น›์€ ์ถ”์ ์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋…์ž๋Š” ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ์ž‘ํ’ˆ Grant (ย 1997ย ), Westerweel et al.ย (ย 2013 ๋…„)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…์„ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.ย ๊ธฐ๋ณธ 2D ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ์„ค์ •์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ง„๋ณด ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋‹จ์ผ / ๋‹ค์ค‘ ํ‰๋ฉด ์ž…์ฒด PIV (Prasadย 2000ย ) ๋ฐ ์ฒด์  / ๋‹จ์ธต PIV (Scaranoย 2013ย )์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์˜ ๋น„ ์นจ์Šต์  ์ธก์ •์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์กฐ์‚ฌ๋œ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์ด ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•œ ์„œ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ •์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น (SM) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ PIV ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๊ฐ์ฒด์™€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋นผ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์šธ์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒŒ์ข… ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์œ ์† ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ์ด ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ถˆํ–‰ํžˆ๋„ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž ์˜์—ญ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์˜ ๊ทผ์ ‘์„ฑ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

PIV ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ํš๋“ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฒ™๋„๋กœ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํ๋ฆ„์— ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€์„ฑ์ด ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์œ„์น˜ / ๋ชจ์–‘๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚นํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์œ ์ฒด ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋„ ๊ฐ€๋ ค์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์œ ์˜ํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Foeth et al.ย 2006).ย 

์ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์ด ์„ ํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋น„๊ต์  ์‰ฌ์šฐ๋ฏ€๋กœ SM ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์— ๋ถ€ํ•ฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ / ๋˜๋Š” ๋ชจ์–‘์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย PIV ๋ถ„์„์„์œ„ํ•œ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น (DM) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Sanchis and Jensenย 2011ย , Masullo ๋ฐ Theunissenย 2017ย , Anders et al.ย 2019ย )ย .ย ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„ํ•ด PIV ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋•๋ถ„์— ๊ณ ์† ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ์˜ ๊ฐ€์šฉ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์•„์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ์ „์€ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ PIV ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋น„๋กฏ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Lindken et al.ย 2009) ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋‚˜๋…ธ ์Šค์œ„ ๋จธ (Ergin et al.ย 2015ย ) ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„ (Brรผckerย 2000ย , Khalitov ๋ฐ Longmireย 2002ย )ย ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌย ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ PIV ๋ถ„์„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€ (TSI Instrumentsย 2014ย , DantecDynamicsย 2018ย )์— ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ (Vennemann ๋ฐ Rรถsgenย 2020ย )์€ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ์ž๋™ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ํ›ˆ๋ จํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งŽ์€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํš๋“ ํ•œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์—์„œ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ๊ฐœ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ํ‘œ์‹œ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ž„์‹œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์„ ๊ตฌ์ƒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ 2D PIV ์„ค์ •์„ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ์€ ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์„ค์ •์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. PIV ์„ค์ •์—์„œ ๊ฐ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋ Œ๋”๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ PIV ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‹œํŠธ์— ๋Œ€๋žต ์ˆ˜์ง ์ธ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋ฅผ ํ–ฅํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€๋ฆฌํ‚ค๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ด‘์›์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ˆœ์ง„ํ•œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” PIV์˜ ROI (๊ด€์‹ฌ ์˜์—ญ)๋ฅผ ๋น„์ถ” ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋Š” ๊ด‘์›์„ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ฒด์—๋งŒ ๊ฒจ๋ƒฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋”ฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‚ฐ๋ž€ ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ด‘ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ช…์•”๋น„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…์ž์™€ ์–ด๋‘์šด ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ.

์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์„ผ์„œ์— ๋‹ฟ๋Š” ๋น›์˜ ์–‘์ด ์ ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด ๊ฐ€ํ˜น ํ•ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„๊ณผ ์œ ๋™ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋œ ์„ค์ •์˜ ํš๋“ ์†๋„์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋А๋ฆฌ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŽ„์Šค ์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋‹จ์ผ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ด‘ ์ƒท์„ ์‚ฝ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ๋Œ€์นญ ์‚ฝ์ž…์€ ์•„๋‹˜). ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ์ƒท์„ ๋‘˜ ๋ชจ๋‘์— ๋™๊ธฐํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ปคํ”Œ์—์„œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ด‘์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋œ ์ด์ „ ์ƒท๊ณผ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ƒท์˜ ๋‘ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ฐ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ €, ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ๋ฐ ๋น›์„ ์ œ์–ด ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋™๊ธฐํ™” ์žฅ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค (Foeth et al. 2006 ; Dussol et al. 2016 ) ์˜ ๋ฐ์€ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์—์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ์‚ฐ๋ž€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ด‘์„ ํš๋“ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ์ฒด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์ด ์ œ๊ณต ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋Š” ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํฐ ์ž…์ž๋กœ ์‹๋ณ„๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‚ฐ๋ž€ ๋œ ๋น›์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‹œํŠธ์— ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋งŽ์€ ์‹œ๋”ฉ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ๋น„์ถ”์–ด PIV ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ์ ์ง„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ €ํ•˜ ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ„์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์žฅ ์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋™์ผ ํ‰๋ฉด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‹œํŠธ (Driscoll et al. 2003 )๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์žฅ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์ข์€ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋Œ€์—ญ. ์ „์ฒด ์„ค์ •์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์Œ€ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์žฅ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค์ •์„ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์žฅ์ฐฉ ๋œ ๋‘ ๋Œ€์˜ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์™€ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์‹œ๋“œ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Pedocchi et al. 2008 ).

๊ฐ์ฒด์˜ ๋ณ€์œ„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„ ๋•Œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•œ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ •์  ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ๋ฒ•์น™์€ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋˜๋Š” ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ทธ๋ ค ๋ถ„์„์— ํฌํ•จ ๋œ ์กฐ๋ช… ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์–‘์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” PIV ๋ถ„์„์„์œ„ํ•œ DM ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹คํ—˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ํŽ˜์ธํŒ…์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ณ€ ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์˜คํ”ˆ ์†Œ์Šค ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ด‘์— ๋ถˆํˆฌ๋ช… ํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ํฐ ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ NM (no-masking)๊ณผ SM (static masking) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ์—๋„ ์ด ๋ฐฑ์„œ๋Š” ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ๋ณ€์œ„๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ DM์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฆฌ์กฐํŠธ๋Š” ํ•„์ˆ˜์ด๋ฉฐ SM ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์Œ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋œ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ PIV ์„ค์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ค๋ช… ํ›„ ๋‘ ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „์ฒด PIV ์ฒด์ธ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ DM ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ NM ๋ฐ SM ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ด ๋„์ถœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ–‰๋™ ์–‘์‹

์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ PIV ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์บก์ฒ˜ ํ•œ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์—์„œ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถ”์  ์„ฑ์„ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ฒด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์„ ๊ตฌ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”๋˜๋ฉด ํŠน์ • ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์ถ”์ ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€๋ฉด (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 ์ฐธ์กฐ  ) ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…

์ฝ”ํŒ…์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆญ์Šค ์— ์‹œํŒ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•๊ด‘ ๋ถ„๋ง (fluorescein (Taniguchi and Lindsey 2018 ; Taniguchi et al. 2018 )) ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ์•ก์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆญ์Šค๋Š” ํด๋ฆฌ ์—์Šคํ„ฐ / ์—ํญ์‹œ (๋Œ€์ƒ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์™€์˜ ํ™”ํ•™์  ํ˜ธํ™˜์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ) ํˆฌ๋ช… ์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆญ์Šค๋Š” ํˆฌ๋ช…ํ•œ ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์ฝ˜ ๊ณ ๋ฌด๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ… ๋œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋Š” ์‹คํ–‰ ์ค‘์— ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋น›์„ ๋ฐฉ์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜ ์ „์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ์กฐ๋ช…์„ ๋น„์ถฐ ์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 4W LED ์†Œ์Šค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ)์— 20 ์ดˆ ๊ธด ๋…ธ์ถœ์ด  ์‹คํ—˜ ์‹คํ–‰ (๋ช‡ ์ดˆ)์˜ ์งง์€ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ผ๊ด€๋œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์™€ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•  ๋•Œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  3 ์€ ์”จ ๋ฟŒ๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ ์ž…์ž์™€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๋ชจ์–‘์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์— ๊ฒน์ณ์ง„ ๋ชจ์Šต์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์ƒ‰์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„).

๋Œ€์‹ , ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ž…์ž์™€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ํŒŒ์žฅ์„ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๋“œ ์ž…์ž์— ์˜ํ•ด ์‚ฐ๋ž€ ๋œ ๋น›๊ณผ ํ˜„์ €ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์—์„œ ๋ฉ€๋ฆฌ ๋–จ์–ด์ง„ ๋Œ€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ (Pedocchi et al. 2008 ). ๋‘ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ปฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ํš๋“์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ์„ค์ •์˜ ์• ๋“œํ˜น ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง์€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์‹๋ณ„์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ด‰์ง„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŒŒ์žฅ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ์˜ ํ”ผํฌ๋Š” 540nm์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Taniguchi and Lindsey 2018 ; Taniguchi et al. 2018), ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ 532 nm์— ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฐ€๊น์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด

DM ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ์€ ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ PIV ๋ถ„์„ ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€ PIVlab (Thielicke 2020 , Thielicke ๋ฐ Stamhuis 2014 ) ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋œ ์˜คํ”ˆ ์†Œ์Šค ํ”„๋ฆฌ์›จ์–ด GUI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋„๊ตฌ (Prestininzi ๋ฐ Lombardi 2021 )์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์„ธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์ˆœ์ฐจ์  ์‹คํ–‰์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 ์—์„œ aโ€“bโ€“c๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•จ ). ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ (a)๋Š” ์žฅ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์ฆ‰, ์†Œ์Šค์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์— ๋ถ€๋”ชํžˆ๋Š” ๋น›); ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ (b)์€ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ (c)์€ ์ถ”์  ๋œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์Œ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ์„ PIV ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋กœ ๋ณ‘ํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  1. (ใ…)๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ (์ฆ‰, ํš๋“ ํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์‹œ์•ผ (FOV)) ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์‹œ์  ์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์•„๋‹ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” GUI์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ๋งŒํ•˜๋ฉด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์— ์†ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ธ๊ทธ๋จผํŠธ (๋‘ ์Œ์˜ ์ )๋ฅผ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋„๋ก ์š”์ฒญ๋ฐ›์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฉด FOV ์™ธ๋ถ€์—์žˆ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋‘ ์„ ์˜ ๊ต์ฐจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ทธ๋จผํŠธ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž๋Š” ROI ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ƒ์ž์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. (๋น„)๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€๋ฉด ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์ถ”์ ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ (์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ RGB ์ƒ‰์ƒ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋…น์ƒ‰ ์ฑ„๋„์ด์ง€๋งŒ GUI๋Š” ์„ ํ˜ธํ•˜๋Š” ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ)์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋กœ์ปฌ ์ ์‘ ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ฐ’์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ง„ํ™” ๋จ (Bradley and Roth 2007), ํ›„์ž๋Š” ์ด์›ƒ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๋กœ์ปฌ ํ‰๊ท  ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ํ”ฝ์…€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ž…์ž์™€ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ด์ง„ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ผํ•œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ž…์ž์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ํฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์‹๋ณ„๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ „๋žต์€ ์ด์ „์— ๋…ผ์˜๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋‹ค๊ฐํ˜•์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ ํฌ์ธํŠธ ๋ฐ€๋„๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ด‘์„  ํˆฌ์‚ฌ (RC) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. RC๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœํ•˜๋Š” “๊ฒฝ ์šด์†ก ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง”์˜ ํ‹€์— ์†ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์„ ํƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ๋–จ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ๋งŒ ์ฃผ๋กœ RC์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.2015 ), ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๊ฐ„๋žตํžˆ ํšŒ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ (๋ช…ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ์ƒ‰์ธํ™”๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์Œ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ด‘์„ ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•๋‚˜๋Š” j์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜ L ์—์„œ i ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ •์  ์œผ๋กœ ์บ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š” jํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด์˜ J ์˜ค๋ธŒ์ ํŠธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋‹ค๊ฐํ˜• ์ผ; ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š”ํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š” jํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด ํ•˜์œ„ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์— ์† ใ…์ œ์ดใ…์ œ์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ ์กฐ๋ช…๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์ •์ ์˜ ํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š” jํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ใ…์ œ์ดใ…์ œ์ด ๋งŒ์•ฝ ์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•๋‚˜๋Š” j์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด ์ ์–ด๋„ ํ•œ์ชฝ์„ ๊ต์ฐจ ์—์Šคk j์—์Šค์ผ€์ด์ œ์ด( j ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋‹ค๊ฐํ˜• ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“ ๋ฉด์— ๊ฑธ์ณ์žˆ๋Š” k )ํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š” jํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด (๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ ํ๋‚˜๋Š” j kํ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด์ผ€์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์œ„์น˜์™€ ์ •์  ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š” jํ”ผ๋‚˜๋Š”์ œ์ด). ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ด‘์„ , ์ฆ‰ฯ1ฯ1 ๊ณผ ฯ2ฯ2์ถ”๊ฐ€๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ง€๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋Š” ์ €์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. (์”จ)์ผ๋‹จ ์ •์  ์„ธํŠธ, ์ฆ‰ ใ…์ œ์ดใ…์ œ์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ง์ ‘ ๋น„์ถฐ์ง€๊ณ  ์‹๋ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ROI ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ƒ์ž์˜ ์Œ์˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ํ›„์ž์™€ ๊ต์ฐจํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ฯ1ฯ1 ๊ณผ ฯ2ฯ2. ๋‘ ๊ต์ฐจ์ ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ใ…์ œ์ดใ…์ œ์ด. ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‘˜๋Ÿฌ์‹ธ์ธ ์˜์—ญใ…์ œ์ดใ…์ œ์ด ๋งˆ์นจ๋‚ด ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†Œ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์— RC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ์ ˆ์ฐจ์˜ ์˜์‚ฌ ์ฝ”๋“œ๋Š” Alg์—๋ณด๊ณ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1

DM ๊ฒ€์ฆ

์ด ์„น์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ DM์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋œ PIV ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹, ์ฆ‰ no-masking (NM)๊ณผ static masking (SM) ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3

์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •

์ง„๋™ ์œ ๋„๊ธฐ (VI)์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด PIV ์„ค์ •์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์žฌ DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Curatolo et al. 2019 , 2020 ). ํ›„์ž๋Š” ๋น„ ๋งฅ๋™ โ€‹โ€‹์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ์—ญ๋ฅ˜์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋œ ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ๊ทœ์น™์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋„“์€ ์ง„๋™์„ ์œ ๋„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์œ™๋ ›์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ VI๋Š” ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ๋์— ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋˜๋ฉฐ (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 ์ฐธ์กฐ   ) ์ง„๋™ ์šด๋™์˜ ์–ด๋А ์ง€์ ์—์„œ๋“  ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅํ•ด ์–‘๋ ฅ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์˜ค๋ชฉํ•œ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

VI๋Š” ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์žฅ์ฐฉ ๋œ ์••์ „ ํŒจ์น˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์ • ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ถ”์ถœ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 ์—์„œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋œ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ „์ฒด ์ธก๋ฉด ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋Š”  Sect์— ์„ค๋ช… ๋œ ์‚ฌ์–‘์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ํŽ˜์ธํŠธ๋กœ ์ฝ”ํŒ…๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 2.1 . ์‹คํ—˜์€ Roma Tre University ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ํ•™ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์˜ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 10.8cm ๊ธธ์ด์˜ ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„๋Š” ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋˜๊ณ  ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ํ–ฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ˆ˜์ง-์„ธ๋กœ ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ง„๋™ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ผ๋ฏน ํŽ˜ ๋กœ๋ธŒ ์Šค์นด์ด ํŠธ (PZT) ์••์ „ ํŒจ์น˜ (7ร—ร—์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ์œ—๋ฉด์—๋Š” Physik Instrumente (PI)์—์„œ ๋งŒ๋“  3cm)๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ๋ฆ„ ์œ ๋„ ์ง„๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด AC ์ „์•• ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. VI ์™ผ์ชฝ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ์ค‘์•™๋ฉด์—์žˆ๋Š” 2D ์†๋„ ํ•„๋“œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ œ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ PIV ์žฅ๋น„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.๊ฐ์ฃผ1 ์—ฐ์†ํŒŒ, ์ €๋น„์šฉ, ์ €์ „๋ ฅ (150mW), ๋…น์ƒ‰ (532nm) ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์ด 2mm ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ๋ถ€์ฑ„๊ผด ์‹œํŠธ์— ํผ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.120โˆ˜120โˆ˜๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด VI์˜ ํ•œ์ชฝ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ต์ฐจ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด 100 ์ธ ํด๋ฆฌ ์•„๋ฏธ๋“œ ์ž…์ž๋กœ ์‹œ๋“œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮผฮผm ๋ฐ 1016 Kg / m์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„์‚ผ์‚ผ. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†Œ์Šค๋Š” VI์˜ 15cm ์œ„์ชฝ (์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์•„๋ž˜ ์•ฝ 4cm)๊ณผ VI์˜ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ 5cm์— ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.5โˆ˜5โˆ˜์ƒ๋ฅ˜. ์œ„์˜ ์„ค์ •์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ›„๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋ฉด๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‹œํŠธ์— ์ง์ ‘ ๋งž์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‹œํŠธ์— ์ˆ˜์ง์œผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์† ์ƒ์šฉ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ (Sony RX100 M5)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋™์˜์ƒ์„ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์ž๋Š” 1920์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ 500fps์˜ ๋†’์€ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋ก๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ร—ร— 1080px, ๋‚˜์ค‘์— ๋” ์ž‘์€ 655๋กœ ์ž˜๋ฆผ ร—ร—์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„ ์ค‘์— ๋ถ„์„ ํ•  850px ROI. ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ, ํ”„๋ฆฌ์›จ์–ด, ์˜คํ”ˆ ์†Œ์Šค, MatLab ์šฉ PIV ๋ถ„์„ ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Thielicke and Stamhuis 2014 ). ์ด ๋„๊ตฌ๋Š” ์งˆ์˜ ์˜์—ญ (IA) ๋ณ€ํ˜• (์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 64ร—ร— 64, 32 ร—ร— 32 ๋ฐ 26 ร—ร—26). ๊ฐ ํŒจ์Šค์—์„œ ๊ฐ IA์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์™€ ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€์œ„ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธ์ ‘ํ•œ IA ์‚ฌ์ด์— 50 %์˜ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ†ต๊ณผ ํ›„, ์ž…์ž ๋ณ€์œ„ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ฐ„๋˜์–ด IA์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ํ”ฝ์…€์˜ ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๋”ฉ ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํŒจ์Šค์—์„œ IA ๋‹น ์•ฝ 5์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Keane๊ณผ Adrian ( 1992 )์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ฐ’์€ 95 % ์œ ํšจํ•œ ํƒ์ง€ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. IA๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ปคํ”Œ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์˜๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๋œ ์œ ๋™ ์—ญํ•™์€ 0.4 ~ 0.7m / s ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ์œ ๋™ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ž…์ž๋Š” ๊ถŒ์žฅ ์ตœ์†Œ๊ฐ’ ์ธ 2 ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ (Keane and Adrian 1992 ) ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ์•ฝ 3-4 ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํŒจ์Šค IA์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

PIV ์ฒด์ธ ๋ถ„์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€

์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋œ PIV ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์€ ์ด์ „์— ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์˜ˆ : Guรฉrin et al. ( 2020 ), Vennemann and Rรถsgen ( 2020 ), Mohammadshahi et al. ( 2020 ), Narayan et al. ( 2020 )). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ PIV ์ธก์ •์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ผ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” Sect์— ์„ค๋ช… ๋œ ๋™์ผํ•œ PIV ์„ค์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธก์ • ๋œ ์„ธ๋กœ ์œ ์†์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3.1 ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ์šฉ์•ก์ด์žˆ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ. ํ›„์ž๋Š” ํ”Œ๋กœํŒ… ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด์„œ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” PTV (์ž…์ž ์ถ”์  ์†๋„๊ณ„) ์ธก์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณด์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์€ Eq. 1 (Keulegan 1938 ).u ( z) =์œ โˆ—[5.75 ๋กœ๊ทธ(์ง€ฮด) +8.5];์œ (์ง€)=์œ โˆ—[5.75๋กœ๊ทธโก(์ง€ฮด)+8.5];(1)

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ u ๋Š” ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์œ ์† ์„ฑ๋ถ„, z ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง ์ขŒํ‘œ,ฮดฮด ์นจ๋Œ€ ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ Vโˆ—Vโˆ— ๊ท ์ผ ํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ณต์‹์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •๋˜๋Š” ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ์†๋„, ์ฆ‰ ์œ โˆ—= U/ C์œ โˆ—=์œ /์”จ; U ๋Š” ๊นŠ์ด ํ‰๊ท  ์œ ์†์ด๊ณ  C ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.์”จ= 5.75๋กœ๊ทธ( 13.3์—ํ”„R / ฮด)์”จ=5.75๋กœ๊ทธโก(13.3์—ํ”„์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•/ฮด), R = 0.2์•„๋ฅด ์žํ˜•=0.2 m์€ ์œ ์•• ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ์ด๊ณ  ์—ํ”„= 0.92์—ํ”„=0.92์œ ํ•œ ํญ ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ  4 ๋Š” 4 ์ดˆ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฐฝ์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„ ๊ฐ’์„ ํ‰๊ท ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์€ ๋ถ„์„ ํ”„๋กœํ•„๊ณผ PIV ์ธก์ • ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ์ธ ๋ณ€๋™์€ ๋Œ€๋žต 0.5 ์ดˆ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ฒ™๋„์—์„œ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. PTV ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐ’์ด ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ฮด= 1ฮด=1cm, ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Eq. 1 , ์‹คํ—˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ์นจ๋Œ€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. VI์˜ ํœด์ง€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€์€ ์ƒ‰ ์‹ญ์ž๊ฐ€๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต๋Š” ๋†€๋ผ์šด ์ผ์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฃผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •๊ณผ PIV ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋œ ์„ค์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ๋Š” VI ๋’ท๋ฉด์— ์žฌ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ ๋œ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์–‘์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ๋†’์€ ์บ ๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ๋•Œ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜์–ด ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ๋‹ค์‹œ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒจ๋ถ€ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์–‘ (Curatolo ์™ธ. ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ 2020 ) ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์••์ „ ํŒจ์น˜ (์ฆ‰, ํšจ์œจ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ง„๋™์ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค)์—์„œ VI์˜ ํšจ์œจ๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” PIV ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธก์ • ๋œ ์ง„๋™์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฌ ์ ์—์„œ ์žฌ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ ๋œ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๋ฅผ CFD (์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™) ์ƒ์šฉ ์ฝ”๋“œ FLOW-3Dยฎ (Flow Science 2019 )๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก ํ•œ ๊ธธ์ด์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ RANS๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์‹ (๋น„์–ด ์Šคํ†ก์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด๋†€์ฆˆ ํ‰๊ท ) ์ผ€์ด -ฯตฯต๊ตฌ์กฐํ™” ๋œ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ์˜ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ์‡„ (์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 1mm ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด ์„ ํƒ๋จ). ๋‹ค์šด ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ ์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋†’์€ ์บ ๋ฒ„ VI๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์žฌ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ์—์„œ ๋น„๊ต ๋œ ์–‘์€ VI์˜ ์•ž์ชฝ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ์™€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ํ๋ฆ„ ์žฌ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ ์œ„์น˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ˜ธ ๊ธธ์ด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐ  ํ•˜๋ฉด CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋œ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๋Š” ์ธก์ • ๋œ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๋ณด๋‹ค 10 % ๋” ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž‘์—…์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” PIV ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฑด์ „ํ•œ ์ธก์ •์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„๋ฅ˜์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ VI์˜ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ค‘์ด๋ฉฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ž‘์—…์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6์„ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ  ์ˆœ๊ฐ„ ์œ ์† ์žฅ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ํƒํ•œ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„์€ ์ง„๋™์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฌ ์ ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ DM (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6 ์˜ ํŒจ๋„ a  )์€ ๋ถ€๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์šด ์œ ๋™์žฅ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ›„๋ฅ˜์—์„œ ์ผ๊ด€๋œ ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

NM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ• (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6 ์˜ ํŒจ๋„ b1  )๋„ ํ›„๋ฅ˜์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™• ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋น„๊ต์—์„œ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ถ”๋ก  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํš๋“ ํ•œ ์œ ๋™์žฅ ์˜ ์‚ฌํ›„ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง์ด ์‹คํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์œ ์†์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6 ์˜ ํŒจ๋„ c1์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ๋„ “ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ”ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. , DM ๋ฐ NM ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์€ ์†๋„ ํ•„๋“œ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด ํ›„๋ฅ˜์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด ์šด๋™์ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„์น˜์— ๊ฐ€๊น๊ฒŒ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ทธ๋Ÿด๋“ฏํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๊ณต์‹ํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹คํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ NM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ “ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ”์ด์ง€๋งŒ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํ˜„๊ณผ ๊ทธ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์•„๋ž˜์—์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ๋™์žฅ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๋ถ€์ •ํ™•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ–‰๋™์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์˜คํ•ด์˜ ์†Œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6 ์˜ ํŒจ๋„ b2๋Š”  SM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์€ ์œ ์† ์žฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ํŒจ๋„ c2๋Š” SM๊ณผ DM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์€ NM ๋Œ€์‘ ๋ฌผ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฃผ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์†Œ์Šค์˜ ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ง„๋™ ์ค‘์— ์Œ์˜ ์˜์—ญ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์›€์ง์ด์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์˜ ์ง„๋™ ๋™์•ˆ VI๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ํ•œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ์œก์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ถ„์„ ๋œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ •์  ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋ฉด NM ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ์€ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ํฐ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค์ •์€ NM์ด ์ผ๊ด€๋˜๊ฒŒ ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— NM๋ณด๋‹ค SM์˜ ์šฐ์›”์„ฑ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™” ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Œ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ  6 ์€ ๋ถ„์„ ๋œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ฒ ์ €ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฃผ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ์ธ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7 ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ  ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด SM ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด NM๋ณด๋‹ค ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  SM ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ •์ ์— ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  SM์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ โ€‹โ€‹๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ์ŠคํŒŒ์ดํฌ๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„ํฌ์˜ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ •์  ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ๊ณผ๋Œ€ ํ‰๊ฐ€ (์™ผ์ชฝ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ) ๋ฐ ๊ณผ์†Œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ (์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ)์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— SM๊ณผ NM์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐฐ์ œํ•˜์—ฌ DM์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฆฌ์กฐํŠธ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฌด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋Š” PIV ๋ถ„์„ ๋„๊ตฌ์— DM (Dynamic Masking) ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น์€ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์— ์ž ๊ธด ๋ถˆํˆฌ๋ช… ์ด๋™ / ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ PIV ์„ค์ •์—์„œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ ๋œ DM๊ณผ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹, ์ฆ‰ no-masking (NM)๊ณผ static masking (SM)์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ์ €๋น„์šฉ PIV ์„ค์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋œ ์ธก์ •์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๋œ ์œ ๋™ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์ œํ•œ๋œ ๋ณ€์œ„๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๋น„๊ต๋Š” DM ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ํ•„์ˆ˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์ด ์ž…์ฆ ๋œ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€

๋ฉ”๋ชจ

  1. 1.์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๋Š” PIV ๋ถ„์„์˜ ๋ณต์ œ๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์š”์ฒญ์‹œ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ

  1. Anders S, Noto D, Seilmayer M, Eckert S (2019) ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ๋žœ๋ค ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น : ๋‹ค์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ piv๋ฅผ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ . Experim ์œ ์ฒด 60 (4) : 1โ€“6์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  2. Archbold E, Ennos A (1972) ์ด์ค‘ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ๋ณ€์œ„ ์ธก์ •. Optica Acta Int J Opt 19 (4) : 253โ€“271์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  3. Barker D, Fourney M (1977) ์–ผ๋ฃฉ ํŒจํ„ด์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„ ์ธก์ •. Opt Lett 1 (4) : 135โ€“137์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  4. Bradley D, Roth G (2007) ์ ๋ถ„ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ ์‘ ํ˜• ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ฐ’. J ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๋„๊ตฌ 12 (2) : 13โ€“21์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  5. Brรผcker C (2000) Piv์˜ ๋‹ค์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„. ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์œ ์†๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ๊ฐ•์˜ ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ, p 1
  6. Case N (2015) ์‹œ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๋ช…. GitHub ์ €์žฅ์†Œ. https://github.com/ncase/sight-and-light
  7. Curatolo M, La Rosa M, Prestininzi P (2019) ๋ฐ”์ด ๋ชจ๋ฅด ํ”„ ์••์ „ ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ๊ตฝํž˜์—์„œ ํ‰๋ฉด ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ€์ •์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 30 (10) : 1508โ€“1517์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  8. Curatolo M, Lombardi V, Prestininzi P (2020) ์–‡์€ ์••์ „ ์บ”ํ‹ธ๋ ˆ๋ฒ„์˜ ์œ ๋™ ์œ ๋„ ์ง„๋™ ํ–ฅ์ƒ : ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ถ„์„. In : River Flow 2020โ€” ์œ ์ฒด ์œ ์••์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ ํšŒ์˜ ์ ˆ์ฐจ
  9. DantecDynamics : DynamicStudio 6.4 (2018) https://www.dantecdynamics.com/dynamicstudio-6-4-release-with-new-dynamic-masking-add-on/
  10. Driscoll K, Sick V, Gray C (2003) ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ โ€‹โ€‹์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด์—์„œ ๋™์‹œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ / ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ ์œ„์ƒ piv ์ธก์ •. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 35 (1) : 112โ€“115์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  11. Dussol D, Druault P, Mallat B, Delacroix S, Germain G (2016) ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค, ๊ฑฐํ’ˆ ๋ฐ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” piv ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ ์ถ”์ถœ. Comptes Rendus Mรฉcanique 344 (7) : 464โ€“478์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  12. Ergin F, Watz B, Wadhwa N (2015) ์žฅ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ micropiv๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž‘์€ ํ‰์˜ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ”ฝ์…€ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ธก์ •. ์—์„œ : ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์œ ์†๊ณ„ -PIV15์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ œ 11 ํšŒ ๊ตญ์ œ ์‹ฌํฌ์ง€์—„. ์บ˜๋ฆฌํฌ๋‹ˆ์•„ ์ฃผ ์‚ฐํƒ€ ๋ฐ”๋ฐ”๋ผ, 9 ์›”, 14 ~ 16 ์ชฝ
  13. Flow Science I (2019) FLOW-3D, ๋ฒ„์ „ 12.0. ์‚ฐํƒ€ํŽ˜, NM https://www.flow3d.com/
  14. Foeth EJ, Van Doorne C, Van Terwisga T, Wieneke B (2006) ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ 3d ์‹œํŠธ ์บ๋น„ํ…Œ์ด์…˜์˜ piv ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 40 (4) : 503โ€“513์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  15. Grant I (1997) ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์†๋„ ์ธก์ • : ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ. Proc Inst Mech Eng CJ Mech Eng Sci 211 (1) : 55โ€“76์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  16. Guรฉrin A, Derr J, Du Pont SC, Berhanu M (2020) ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ง‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋œ Streamwise ์šฉํ•ด ํŒจํ„ด. Phys Rev Lett 125 (19) : 194502์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  17. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1992) piv ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๋ถ„์„ ์ด๋ก . Appl Sci Res 49 (3) : 191โ€“215์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  18. Keulegan GH (1938) ์—ด๋ฆฐ ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฒ•์น™, vol. 21. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ํ‘œ์ค€ ๊ตญ (National Bureau of Standards)
  19. Khalitov D, Longmire EK (2002) 2 ๊ฐœ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์œ„์ƒ ์ฐจ๋ณ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋™์‹œ 2 ์ƒ piv. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 32 (2) : 252โ€“268์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  20. Lindken R, Rossi M, GroรŸe S, Westerweel J (2009) ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์ž…์ž ์˜์ƒ ์†๋„๊ณ„ (piv) : ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, ์‘์šฉ ๋ฐ ์ง€์นจ. ๋žฉ ์นฉ 9 (17) : 2551โ€“2567์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  21. Masullo A, Theunissen R (2017) ํ”ฝ์…€ ๊ฐ•๋„ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ piv ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„์„์œ„ํ•œ ์ž๋™ํ™” ๋œ ๋งˆ์Šคํฌ ์ƒ์„ฑ. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 58 (6) : 70์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  22. Mohammadshahi S, Samsam-Khayani H, Cai T, Kim KC (2020) ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ์ง„๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œํŠธ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ. Int J ์—ด ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ 86 : 108701์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  23. Narayan S, Moravec DB, Dallas AJ, Dutcher CS (2020) 4 ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ํŠธ๋žฉ์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ ๋ชจ์–‘ ์ด์™„. Phys Rev Fluids 5 (11) : 113603์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  24. Pedocchi F, Martin JE, Garcรญa MH (2008) ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์†๋„๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ์‹คํ—˜์„์œ„ํ•œ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ž…์ž. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 45 (1) : 183โ€“186์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  25. Prasad AK (2000) ์ž…์ฒด ์ž…์ž ์˜์ƒ ์œ ์†๊ณ„. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 29 (2) : 103โ€“116์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  26. Prestininzi P, Lombardi V (2021) DM @ PIV. https://it.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/75398-dm-piv . MATLAB Central ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตํ™˜. 2021 ๋…„ 5 ์›” 6 ์ผ ํ™•์ธ
  27. Sanchis A, Jensen A (2011) ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ๋ผ๋ˆ ๋ณ€ํ™˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ piv ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น. Experim ์œ ์ฒด 51 (4) : 871โ€“880์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  28. Scarano F (2013) Tomographic piv : ์›๋ฆฌ์™€ ์‹คํ–‰. Meas Sci Technol 24 (1)
  29. Taniguchi M, Lindsey JS (2018) photochemcad์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ> 300 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ํก์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค. Photochem Photobiol 94 (2) : 290โ€“327์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  30. Taniguchi M, Du H, Lindsey JS (2018) Photochemcad 3 : ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๊ด‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ. Photochem Photobiol 94 (2) : 277โ€“289์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  31. Thielicke W (2020) PIVlab (2020). https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/27659-pivlab-particle-image-velocimetry-piv-tool . MATLAB Central ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตํ™˜. 5 ์›” 8 ์ผ ํ™•์ธ
  32. Thielicke W, Stamhuis E (2014) PIVlab-matlab์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์นœํ™”์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์†๋„๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. J Open Res Softw 2 (1)
  33. TSI Instruments (2014) PIV ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น. TSI Incorporated ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ๋…ธํŠธ PIV-018
  34. Vennemann B, Rรถsgen T (2020) ์ปจ๋ณผ ๋ฃจ์…˜ ์˜คํ†  ์ธ์ฝ”๋”๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์†๋„ ์ธก์ •์„์œ„ํ•œ ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ . Experim ์œ ์ฒด 61 (7) : 1โ€“11์กฐ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 
  35. Westerweel J, Elsinga GE, Adrian RJ (2013) ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž…์ž ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์œ ์†๊ณ„. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 45 (1) : 409โ€“436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101204MathSciNet ์กฐ ์ˆ˜ํ•™ Google ํ•™์ˆ  ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ 

์ฐธ์กฐ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ

์ž๊ธˆ

CRUI-CARE ๊ณ„์•ฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ Universitร  degli Studi Roma Tre๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์˜คํ”ˆ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ์ž๊ธˆ.

์ž‘๊ฐ€ ์ •๋ณด

์ œํœด

  1. ์ดํƒˆ๋ฆฌ์•„ Roma, Universitร  Roma Tre ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผValentina Lombardi, Michele La Rocca, Pietro Prestininzi

๊ต์‹  ์ €์ž

Valentina Lombardi์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„œ์‹  .

์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ •๋ณด

๋ฐœํ–‰์ธ์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ

Springer Nature๋Š” ์ถœํŒ ๋œ์ง€๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ด€ ์†Œ์†์˜ ๊ด€ํ• ๊ถŒ ์ฃผ์žฅ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘๋ฆฝ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜คํ”ˆ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์ปค๋จผ์ฆˆ ์ €์ž‘์ž ํ‘œ์‹œ 4.0 ๊ตญ์ œ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ํ—ˆ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.์ด ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค๋Š” ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ์›์ €์ž์™€ ์ถœ์ฒ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ํฌ๋ ˆ๋”ง์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋งค์ฒด ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ๊ณต์œ , ๊ฐœ์ž‘, ๋ฐฐํฌ ๋ฐ ๋ณต์ œ๋ฅผ ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์ปค๋จผ์ฆˆ ๋ผ์ด์„ผ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์ œ 3 ์ž ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ž๋ฃŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌ๋ ˆ๋”ง ๋ผ์ธ์— ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ๋ช…์‹œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์ปค๋จผ์ฆˆ ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค์— ํฌํ•จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์ปค๋จผ์ฆˆ ๋ผ์ด์„ผ์Šค์— ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์˜๋„ ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ๋ฒ•์  ๊ทœ์ •์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ €์ž‘๊ถŒ ๋ณด์œ ์ž๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ง์ ‘ ํ—ˆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•„์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ผ์ด์„ผ์Šค์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ณธ์„ ๋ณด๋ ค๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

์žฌํŒ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ๊ฐ€

์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด

์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์ธ์šฉ

Lombardi, V., Rocca, ML & Prestininzi, P. ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„ํ•ด PIV ๋ถ„์„์„์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋™์  ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น ๊ธฐ์ˆ . J Vis (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-021-00756-0

์ธ์šฉ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ

  • ๋ฐ›์€2020 ๋…„ 7 ์›” 20 ์ผ
  • ๊ฐœ์ •2021 ๋…„ 3 ์›” 22 ์ผ
  • ์ˆ˜๋ฝ ๋จ2021 ๋…„ 4 ์›” 20 ์ผ
  • ๊ฒŒ์‹œ ๋จ2021 ๋…„ 5 ์›” 11 ์ผ
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-021-00756-0

์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ๊ณต์œ 

๋‹ค์Œ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์€ ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋‚˜์ด ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ ๋ฅผ ์ฝ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.๊ณต์œ  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋งํฌ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ

Springer Nature SharedIt ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ๊ณต์œ  ์ด๋‹ˆ์…”ํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์ œ๊ณต

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ PIV
  • ์—ญํ•™ ๋งˆ์Šคํ‚น
  • ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ
  • ์ง„๋™ ์œ ๋„์ œ
  • ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ฝ”ํŒ…
Modeling of contactless bubbleโ€“bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps

Modeling of contactless bubbleโ€“bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps

ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๊ด€์„ฑ ํŽŒํ”„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰์‹ ๊ธฐํฌ-๊ธฐํฌ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Physics of Fluids 33, 042002 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041924 B. Hayesa) G. L. Whitingb), and  R. MacCurdyc)

ABSTRACT

In this study, the nonlinear effect of contactless bubbleโ€“bubble interactions in inertial micropumps is characterized via reduced parameter one-dimensional and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (3D CFD) modeling. A one-dimensional pump model is developed to account for contactless bubble-bubble interactions, and the accuracy of the developed one-dimensional model is assessed via the commercial volume of fluid CFD software, FLOW-3D. The FLOW-3D CFD model is validated against experimental bubble dynamics images as well as experimental pump data. Precollapse and postcollapse bubble and flow dynamics for two resistors in a channel have been successfully explained by the modified one-dimensional model. The net pumping effect design space is characterized as a function of resistor placement and firing time delay. The one-dimensional model accurately predicts cumulative flow for simultaneous resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements (0.2L < xโ€‰<โ€‰0.8L where L is the channel length) as well as delayed resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements when the time delay is greater than the time required for the vapor bubble to fill the channel cross section. In general, one-dimensional model accuracy suffers at near-reservoir resistor placements and short time delays which we propose is a result of 3D bubble-reservoir interactions and transverse bubble growth interactions, respectively, that are not captured by the one-dimensional model. We find that the one-dimensional model accuracy improves for smaller channel heights. We envision the developed one-dimensional model as a first-order rapid design tool for inertial pump-based microfluidic systems operating in the contactless bubbleโ€“bubble interaction nonlinear regime

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ด€์„ฑ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ํŽŒํ”„์—์„œ ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰ ๊ธฐํฌ-๊ธฐํฌ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋œ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ฐ 3 ์ฐจ์› ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ (3D CFD) ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰์‹ ๊ธฐํฌ-๋ฒ„๋ธ” ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 1 ์ฐจ์› ํŽŒํ”„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋œ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด CFD ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ธ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ƒ์šฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์ธ ๊ฑฐํ’ˆ ์—ญํ•™ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์™€ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์ธ ํŽŒํ”„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฑ„๋„์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‘ ์ €ํ•ญ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ถ•๊ดด ์ „ ๋ฐ ๋ถ•๊ดด ํ›„ ๊ธฐํฌ ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™ ์—ญํ•™์€ ์ˆ˜์ • ๋œ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆœ ํŽŒํ•‘ ํšจ๊ณผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ง€์—ฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ ํŠน์ง• ์ง€์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ (0.2L <x <0.8L, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ L์€ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ธธ์ด)๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ˆ„์  ํ๋ฆ„๊ณผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ง€์—ฐ์‹œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์ฑ„๋„ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋กœ ์ง€์—ฐ๋œ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด ์ฑ„๋„ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ์ฑ„์šฐ๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ณด๋‹ค ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐฐ์น˜์™€ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํฌ์ฐฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” 3D ๊ธฐํฌ-์ €์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ธฐํฌ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ธ ์งง์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ง€์—ฐ์—์„œ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฒช์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฑ„๋„ ๋†’์ด๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„์ˆ˜๋ก 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋œ 1 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋น„์ ‘์ด‰ ๊ธฐํฌ-๊ธฐํฌ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ด€์„ฑ ํŽŒํ”„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ 1 ์ฐจ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

REFERENCES

1.S. Hassan and X. Zhang, โ€œ Design and fabrication of capillary-driven flow device for point-of-care diagnostics,โ€ Biosensors 10, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10040039, Google ScholarCrossref
2.Q. Shizhi and H. Bau, โ€œ Magneto-hydrodynamics based microfluidics,โ€ Mech. Res. Commun. 36, 10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.06.013, Google ScholarCrossref
3.N. Mishchuk, T. Heldal, T. Volden, J. Auerswald, and H. Knapp, โ€œ Micropump based on electroosmosis of the second kind,โ€ Electrophoresis 30, 3499 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900271, Google ScholarCrossref
4.J. Snyder, J. Getpreecharsawas, D. Fang, T. Gaborski, C. Striemer, P. Fauchet, D. Borkholder, and J. McGrath, โ€œ High-performance, low-voltage electroosmotic pumps with molecularly thin silicon nanomembranes,โ€ Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 18425โ€“18430 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308109110, Google ScholarCrossref
5.K. Vinayakumar, G. Nadiger, V. Shetty, S. Dinesh, M. Nayak, and K. Rajanna, โ€œ Packaged peristaltic micropump for controlled drug delivery application,โ€ Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 015102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973513, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
6.D. Duffy, H. Gillis, J. Lin, N. Sheppard, and G. Kellogg, โ€œ Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays,โ€ Anal. Chem. 71, 4669 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990682c, Google ScholarCrossref
7.V. Gnyawali, M. Saremi, M. Kolios, and S. Tsai, โ€œ Stable microfluidic flow focusing using hydrostatics,โ€ Biomicrofluidics 11, 034104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983147, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
8.J. Lake, K. Heyde, and W. Ruder, โ€œ Low-cost feedback-controlled syringe pressure pumps for microfluidics applications,โ€ PLoS One 12, e0175089 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175089, Google ScholarCrossref
9.M. I. Mohammed, S. Haswell, and I. Gibson, โ€œ Lab-on-a-chip or chip-in-a-lab: Challenges of commercialization lost in translation,โ€ Procedia Technology 20, 54โ€“59 (2015), proceedings of The 1st International Design Technology Conference, DESTECH2015, Geelong. Google ScholarCrossref
10.E. Torniainen, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and P. Kornilovitch, โ€œ Bubble-driven inertial micropump,โ€ Phys. Fluids 24, 122003 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769755, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
11.H. Hoefemann, S. Wadle, N. Bakhtina, V. Kondrashov, N. Wangler, and R. Zengerle, โ€œ Sorting and lysis of single cells by bubblejet technology,โ€ Sens. Actuators, B 168, 442โ€“445 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.04.005, Google ScholarCrossref
12.B. Hayes, A. Hayes, M. Rolleston, A. Ferreira, and J. Kirsher, โ€œ Pulsatory mixing of laminar flow using bubble-driven micro-pumps,โ€ in Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2018), Vol. 7. Google ScholarCrossref
13.E. Ory, H. Yuan, A. Prosperetti, S. Popinet, and S. Zaleski, โ€œ Growth and collapse of a vapor bubble in a narrow tube,โ€ Phys. Fluids 12, 1268 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870381, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
14.Z. Yin and A. Prosperetti, โ€œโ€˜ Blinking bubbleโ€™ micropump with microfabricated heaters,โ€ J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 1683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/9/010, Google ScholarCrossref
15.M. Einat and M. Grajower, โ€œ Microboiling measurements of thermal-inkjet heaters,โ€ J. Microelectromech. Syst. 19, 391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2040946, Google ScholarCrossref
16.A. Govyadinov, P. Kornilovitch, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, โ€œ Single-pulse dynamics and flow rates of inertial micropumps,โ€ Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 73 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-016-1738-x, Google ScholarCrossref
17.E. Sourtiji and Y. Peles, โ€œ A micro-synthetic jet in a microchannel using bubble growth and collapse,โ€ Appl. Therm. Eng. 160, 114084 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114084, Google ScholarCrossref
18.B. Hayes, A. Govyadinov, and P. Kornilovitch, โ€œ Microfluidic switchboards with integrated inertial pumps,โ€ Microfluid. Nanofluid. 22, 15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2032-2, Google ScholarCrossref
19.P. Kornilovitch, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, โ€œ One-dimensional model of inertial pumping,โ€ Phys. Rev. E 87, 023012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.023012, Google ScholarCrossref
20.H. Yuan and A. Prosperetti, โ€œ The pumping effect of growing and collapsing bubbles in a tube,โ€ J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 402โ€“413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/9/4/318, Google ScholarCrossref
21.J. Zou, B. Li, and C. Ji, โ€œ Interactions between two oscillating bubbles in a rigid tube,โ€ Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 61, 105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.10.021, Google ScholarCrossref
22.C. Hirt and B. Nichols, โ€œ Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,โ€ J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201โ€“225 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5, Google ScholarCrossref
23.C. Borgnakke and R. E. Sonntag, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 8th ed. ( Wiley, 1999). Google Scholar
24.O. E. Ruiz, โ€œ CFD model of the thermal inkjet droplet ejection process,โ€ in Proceeding of Heat Transfer Summer Conference (2007), Vol. 3. Google ScholarCrossref
25.T. Theofanous, L. Biasi, H. Isbin, and H. Fauske, โ€œ A theoretical study on bubble growth in constant and time-dependent pressure fields,โ€ Chem. Eng. Sci. 24, 885โ€“897 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(69)85008-6, Google ScholarCrossref
26.S. Timoshenko and J. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. ( McGaw-Hill, Inc., 1970). Google Scholar

Figure 2. Experimental setups for the (a) Al/Cu overlap joint and (b) laser welding process.

Investigation on Laser Welding of Al Ribbon to Cu Sheet: Weldability, Microstructure, and Mechanical and Electrical Properties

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ๋ฆฌ๋ณธ๊ณผ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ์‹œํŠธ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ : ์šฉ์ ‘์„ฑ, ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ

Wonโ€Sang Shin 1,โ€ , Daeโ€Won Cho 2,โ€ , Donghyuck Jung 1, Heeshin Kang 3, Jeng O Kim 3, Yoonโ€Jun Kim 1,*
and Changkyoo Park 3,*

Al ๋ฆฌ๋ณธ๊ณผ Cu ์‹œํŠธ์˜ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „์ž ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์—†๋Š” Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ, ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ์—ด ์ž…๋ ฅ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Al / Cu ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘ ์ค‘์— ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ์˜์—ญ์— ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ž ํƒ์นจ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๊ธฐ์™€ ํˆฌ๊ณผ ์ „์ž ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ Al4Cu9, Al2Cu, AlCu ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ Marangoni ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ์ˆœํ™˜์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Al๊ณผ Cu์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๊ณผ Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์—์„œ ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ. Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์˜ ์ธ์žฅ ์ „๋‹จ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฉด์ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ๋ฉด์ ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ธก์ • ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฌด๊ฒฐ์  Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์ฐฝ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  Al / Cu ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ด์ฆˆ ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Introduction

์ „๊ธฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „์ž ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํŒจํ‚ค์ง•ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „์ž ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ๊ณ ์žฅ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ €ํ•ญ ์Šคํฟ ์šฉ์ ‘, ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ด์ง•, ๋‚ฉ๋•œ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ์ŒํŒŒ ์šฉ์ ‘ (USW)์ด ์ „๊ธฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‚ฉ๋•œ๊ณผ ๋‚ฉ๋•œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ €์˜จ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๊ณผ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [1]. ํ•„๋Ÿฌ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ๋‘ ๊ณต์ • ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋Š” ๋ถ€์‹ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๊ฐˆ๋ฐ”๋‹‰ ๋ถ€์‹์— ์ทจ์•ฝ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [2,3]. ๋”์šฑ์ด, ๋น„๊ธˆ์†๊ณผ ์ถฉ์ „์žฌ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์นœํ™”๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์ถฉ์ „์žฌ ๋งŒ ํŠน์ • ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [1]. USW๋Š” ์šฉ์ ‘ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ๊ณ  ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์งง๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ ‘ํ•ฉ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์ด ๋น„๊ต์  ์ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ์งˆ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ (์˜ˆ : Al, Cu, Ag, Au ๋ฐ Ni)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ ‘ํ•ฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [4โ€“6]. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ Cu๋ฅผ์œ„ํ•œ USW ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฌผ์ด ๊ฐ•ํ•ด ์šฉ์ ‘์„ฑ์ด ์ €ํ•˜๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Cu ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— Sn ๋˜๋Š” Ni ์ฝ”ํŒ…์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋Šฆ์ถ”๊ณ  ์‚ฐ์—…์  ์‘์šฉ์„์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ์•…ํ™”์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค [7 , 8].

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์‰ฌ์šด ์ œ์–ด, ๊ณ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์›๊ฒฉ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „์ž ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ๋งํ•œ ํ›„๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์ž‘์€ ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ ์˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [9-11]. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ค€๋น„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด์ข… ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ์‚ฐ์—… ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 [12,13]์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ์ „๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„์œ„ํ•œ ์™€์ด์–ด ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฆฌ๋ณธ ๋ณธ๋”ฉ์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „๋ ฅ ์ „์ž ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์—์„œ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ค‘์—์„œ Al๊ณผ Cu๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ „๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ข…์ข… ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [14]. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ Al๊ณผ Cu์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์šฉ์ ‘์€ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ (IMC)์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋™์‹œ์— Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— IMC๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉด ์—ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์— ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ผ์น˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ท ์—ด์ด ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [15,16].

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ์–ป์œผ๋ ค๋ฉด IMC์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ํ”ผํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ Al ๋ฐ Cu ์‹œํŠธ์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์†ํŒŒ (CW) ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๊ฐ€ Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [17-23]. ํฐ ์—ด ์ž…๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ IMC ํ˜•์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์šฉ์ ‘ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ท ์—ด์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [18,19].

CW ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ง„๋™์€ Al / Cu ์กฐ์ธํŠธ์˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง์„  CW ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” [18-20]๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ IMC ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณต๊ณผ ๊ท ์—ด์ด ๋” ์ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Al๊ณผ Cu ์‹œํŠธ์˜ ๊ฒน์นจ ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์—๋Š” CW ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ชจ๋“œ ํŒŒ์ด๋ฒ„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, IMC ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜์—ฌ ๋†’์€ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์†๋„ (์ฆ‰, 50m / min)์—์„œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [22]. Mai et al. [23]์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ Al / Cu ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋“ค์€ Al / Cu ์šฉ์ ‘์„ฑ์ด ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”์œผ๋ฉฐ 100mm / min ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์˜ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„์—์„œ ๊ท ์—ด์—†๋Š” Al / Cu ์ ‘ํ•ฉ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ๋ฌธ ๋‚ด์šฉ ์ƒ๋žต : ๋ฌธ์„œ ํ•˜๋‹จ๋ถ€์˜ ์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) power module. Redโ€dotted box indicated the electrical connections
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) power module. Redโ€dotted box indicated the electrical connections
Figure 2. Experimental setups for the (a) Al/Cu overlap joint and (b) laser welding process.
Figure 2. Experimental setups for the (a) Al/Cu overlap joint and (b) laser welding process.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the numerical simulation domain and boundary conditions.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the numerical simulation domain and boundary conditions.
Figure 4. Experimental setup for the fourโ€point electrical resistance measurement.
Figure 4. Experimental setup for the fourโ€point electrical resistance measurement.
Figure 5. Crossโ€sectional OM image of the Al/Cu joints in parallel to the laser welding direction. The laser power and scan speed were set at 2300 W and 20 mm/s, respectively.
Figure 5. Crossโ€sectional OM image of the Al/Cu joints in parallel to the laser welding direction. The laser power and scan speed were set at 2300 W and 20 mm/s, respectively.
Figure 6 shows the crossโ€sectional SEM images of the Al/Cu joints, and corresponding EPMA element mapping of Al and Cu for the (a) 23/20, (b) 25/28.6, (c) 25/15.4, and (d) 27/20.
Figure 6 shows the crossโ€sectional SEM images of the Al/Cu joints, and corresponding EPMA element mapping of Al and Cu for the (a) 23/20,
Figure 6. Crossโ€sectional SEM image and elemental distribution mapping of Al and Cu elements for the (a) 23/20, (b) 25/28.6, (c) 25/15.4, and (d) 27/20.
Figure 6. Crossโ€sectional SEM image and elemental distribution mapping of Al and Cu elements for the (d) 27/20.
Figure 7. EPMA line scan analysis and identification of the IMCs for the (a) 23/20 and (b) 25/15.4.
Figure 7. EPMA line scan analysis and identification of the IMCs for the (a) 23/20 and (b) 25/15.4.
Figure 8. TEM analysis for the 25/28.6. (a) Indicating the location of TEM analysis in SEM image of the welding zone. (b) TEM brightโ€field image and SAED pattern insets, examined at the location (1) in figure (a), confirmed Alโ€rich phase (white globular shape) and Al2Cu eutectic phase (gray region), and (c) TEM brightโ€field image and SAED pattern inset of Al4Cu9, examined at the location (2) in figure (a).
Figure 8. TEM analysis for the 25/28.6. (a) Indicating the location of TEM analysis in SEM image of the welding zone. (b) TEM brightโ€field image and SAED pattern insets, examined at the location (1) in figure (a), confirmed Alโ€rich phase (white globular shape) and Al2Cu eutectic phase (gray region), and (c) TEM brightโ€field image and SAED pattern inset of Al4Cu9, examined at the location (2) in figure (a).
Figure 9. Temperature profiles and molten pool flow on transverse crossโ€section (yโ€“z plane at x = 1.23 cm): (a) Negative surface tension gradient for the 23/20 (Case 1), (b) negative surface tension gradient for the 25/15.4 (Case 2), (c) positive surface tension gradient for the 25/15.4 (Case 3), and (d) without surface tension for the 25/15.4 (Case 4).
Figure 9. Temperature profiles and molten pool flow on transverse crossโ€section (yโ€“z plane at x = 1.23 cm): (a) Negative surface tension gradient for the 23/20 (Case 1), (b) negative surface tension gradient for the 25/15.4 (Case 2), (c) positive surface tension gradient for the 25/15.4 (Case 3), and (d) without surface tension for the 25/15.4 (Case 4).
Figure 12. Results of the tensile shear tests for the (a) 23/20: fracture at the Al ribbon and (b) 25/15.4: fracture at the weld
Figure 12. Results of the tensile shear tests for the (a) 23/20: fracture at the Al ribbon and (b) 25/15.4: fracture at the weld
Figure 13. Stressโ€“strain curves obtained by the tensile shear tests.
Figure 13. Stressโ€“strain curves obtained by the tensile shear tests.

References

  1. Schwartz, M.M.; Aircraft, S. Introduction to Brazing and Soldering. ASM Int. 2018, 6, doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001344.
  2. Vianco, P.T. Corrosion issues in solder joint design and service. Weld. J. 1999, 78, 39โ€“46.
  3. Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Huang, J.; Gu, Y. Corrosion Behavior of Aluminumโ€Steel Weldโ€Brazing Joint. J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
    2016, 25, 1916โ€“1923, doi:10.1007/s11665โ€016โ€2020โ€9.
  4. Harman, G.G. Wire Bonding in Microelectronics: Materials, Processes, Reliability and Yield, 3rd ed; McGrawโ€Hill Education: New
    York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780071642651.
  5. Aonuma, M.; Nakata, K. Dissimilar metal joining of ZK60 magnesium alloy and titanium by friction stir welding. Mater. Sci.
    Eng. B Solid State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2012, 177, 543โ€“548, doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2011.12.031.
  6. Sasaki, T.; Watanabe, T.; Hosokawa, Y.; Yanagisawa, A. Analysis for relative motion in ultrasonic welding of aluminium sheet.
    Sci. Technol. Weld. Jt. 2012, 18, 19โ€“24, doi:10.1179/1362171812Y.0000000066.
  7. Maeda, M.; Sato, T.; Inoue, N.; Yagi, D.; Takahashi, Y. Anomalous microstructure formed at the interface between copper ribbon
    and tinโ€deposited copper plate by ultrasonic bonding. Microelectron. Reliab. 2011, 51, 130โ€“136, doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2010.05.009.
  8. Maeda, M.; Yagi, D.; Takahashi, Y. Interfacial microstructure between copper ribbon and nickelโ€coated copper plate formed by
    ultrasonic bonding. Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc. 2013, 31, 188โ€“191, doi:10.2207/qjjws.31.188s.
  9. Sun, Z.; Ion, J.C. Laser welding of dissimilar metal combinations. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 4205โ€“4214, doi:10.1007/BF00361499.
  10. Yan, S.; Hong, Z.; Watanabe, T.; Jingguo, T. CW/PW dualโ€beam YAG laser welding of steel/aluminum alloy sheets. Opt. Lasers
    Eng. 2010, 48, 732โ€“736, doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.03.015.
  11. Mehlmann, B.; Gehlen, E.; Olowinsky, A.; Gillner, A. Laser micro welding for ribbon bonding. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 776โ€“781,
    doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.085.
  12. Nwanoro, K.C.; Lu, H.; Yin, C.; Bailey, C. An analysis of the reliability and design optimization of aluminium ribbon bonds in
    power electronics modules using computer simulation method. Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 87, 1โ€“14,
    doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2018.05.013.
  13. Li, H.; Cao, B.; Yang, J.W.; Liu, J. Modeling of resistance heat assisted ultrasonic welding of Cuโ€Al joint. J. Mater. Process. Technol.
    2018, 256, 121โ€“130, doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.008.
  14. Davis, J.R. Copper and Copper Alloys. In ASM Speciality Handbook; ASM International: Almere, The Netherlands, 2001; ISBN
    2001022956
  1. Rabkin, D.M.; Ryabov, V.R.; Lozovskaya, A.V.; Dovzhenko, V.A. Preparation and properties of copperโ€aluminum intermetallic
    compounds. Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 1970, 9, 695โ€“700, doi:10.1007/BF00803820.
  2. Chen, C.Y.; Chen, H.L.; Hwang, W.S. Influence of interfacial structure development on the fracture mechanism and bond
    strength of aluminum/copper bimetal plate. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 1232โ€“1239, doi:10.2320/matertrans.47.1232.
  3. Schmidt, P.A.; Schweier, M.; Zaeh, M.F. Joining of lithiumโ€ion batteries using laser beam welding: Electrical losses of welded
    aluminum and copper joints. J. Laser Appl. 2012, 915, doi:10.2351/1.5062563.
  4. Smith, S.; Blackburn, J.; Gittos, M.; De Bono, P.; Hilton, P. Welding of dissimilar metallic materials using a scanned laser beam.
    J. Laser Appl. 2013, 493, doi:10.2351/1.5062921.
  5. Solchenbach, T.; Plapper, P. Mechanical characteristics of laser brazeโ€welded aluminiumโ€copper connections. Opt. Laser Technol.
    2013, 54, 249โ€“256, doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.003.
  6. Kraetzsch, M.; Standfuss, J.; Klotzbach, A.; Kaspar, J.; Brenner, B.; Beyer, E. Laser Beam Welding with Highโ€Frequency Beam
    Oscillation: Welding of Dissimilar Materials with Brilliant Fiber Lasers. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 142โ€“149,
    doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.018.
  7. Solchenbach, T.; Plapper, P.; Cai, W. Electrical performance of laser brazeโ€welded aluminumโ€copper interconnects. J. Manuf.
    Process. 2014, 16, 183โ€“189, doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.12.002.
  8. Lee, S.J.; Nakamura, H.; Kawahito, Y.; Katayama, S. Effect of welding speed on microstructural and mechanical properties of
    laser lap weld joints in dissimilar Al and Cu sheets. Sci. Technol. Weld. Jt. 2014, 19, 111โ€“118, doi:10.1179/1362171813Y.0000000168.
  9. Mai, T.A.; Spowage, A.C. Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steelโ€kovar, copperโ€steel and copperโ€
    aluminium. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 374, 224โ€“233, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.025.
  10. Zhang, G.; Takahashi, Y.; Heng, Z.; Takashima, K.; Misawa, K. Ultrasonic weldability of al ribbon to cu sheet and the dissimilar
    joint formation mode. Mater. Trans. 2015, 56, 1842โ€“1851, doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2015251.
  11. Zhu, B.; Zhen, L.; Xia, H.; Su, J.; Niu, S.; Wu, L.; Tan, C.; Chen, B. Effect of the scanning path on the nanosecond pulse laser
    welded Al/Cu lapped joint. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 139, 106945, doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.106945.
  12. Kumar, A.; Gupta, M.P.; Banerjee, J.; Neogy, S.; Keskar, N.; Bhatt, R.B.; Behere, P.G.; Biswas, D.J. Microโ€Welding of Stainless
    Steel and Copper Foils Using a Nanoโ€Second Pulsed Fiber Laser. Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process. 2019, 6, 158โ€“172,
    doi.org/10.1007/s40516โ€019โ€00088โ€w.
  13. Trinh, L.N.; Lee, D. The Characteristics of Laser Welding of a Thin Aluminum Tab and Steel Battery Case for Lithiumโ€Ion
    Battery. Metals 2020, 10, 842, doi.org/10.3390/met10060842.
  14. Cho, D.W.; Park, J.H.; Moon, H.S. A study on molten pool behavior in the one pulse one drop GMAW process using
    computational fluid dynamics. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 139, 848โ€“859, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.038.
  15. Cho, W.I.; Na, S.J.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J.S. Numerical study of alloying element distribution in CO2 laserโ€GMA hybrid welding.
    Comput. Mater. Sci. 2010, 49, 792โ€“800, doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.025.
  16. Cho, D.W.; Kiran, D.V.; Na, S.J. Analysis of molten pool behavior by fluxโ€wall guided metal transfer in lowโ€current submerged
    arc welding process. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2017, 110, 104โ€“112, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.02.060.
  17. Cho, W.โ€I.; Na, S.โ€J. Impact of Wavelengths of CO2, Disk, and Green Lasers on Fusion Zone Shape in Laser Welding of Steel. J.
    Weld. Jt. 2020, 38, 235โ€“240, doi:10.5781/jwj.2020.38.3.1.
  18. Sim, A.; Chun, E.J.; Cho, D.W. Numerical Simulation of Surface Softening Behavior for Laser Heat Treated Cuโ€Bearing Medium
    Carbon Steel. Met. Mater. Int. 2020, 26, 1207โ€“1217, doi:10.1007/s12540โ€019โ€00577โ€9.
  19. Jarwitz, M.; Fetzer, F.; Weber, R.; Graf, T. Weld seam geometry and electrical resistance of laserโ€welded, aluminumโ€copper
    dissimilar joints produced with spatial beam oscillation. Metals 2018, 8, 510, doi:10.3390/met8070510.
  20. Weigl, M.; Albert, F.; Schmidt, M. Enhancing the ductility of laserโ€welde copperโ€aluminum connections by using adapted filler
    materia. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 335โ€“341, doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.141.
  21. Chen, J.; Lai, Y.S.; Wang, Y.W.; Kao, C.R. Investigation of growth behavior of Alโ€Cu intermetallic compounds in Cu wire
    bonding. Microelectron. Reliab. 2011, 51, 125โ€“129, doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2010.09.034.
  22. Chen, H.; Yang, L.; Long, J. Firstโ€principles investigation of the elastic, Vickers hardness and thermodynamic properties of Alโ€
    Cu intermetallic compounds. Superlattices Microstruct. 2015, 79, 156โ€“165, doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2014.11.005.
  23. Liu, H.J.; Shen, J.J.; Zhou, L.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Liu, C.; Kuang, L.Y. Microstructural characterisation and mechanical properties of
    friction stir welded joints of aluminium alloy to copper. Sci. Technol. Weld. Jt. 2011, 16, 92โ€“99,
    doi:10.1179/1362171810Y.0000000007.
  24. Hug, E.; Bellido, N. Brittleness study of intermetallic (Cu, Al) layers in copperโ€clad aluminium thin wires. Mater. Sci. Eng. A
    2011, 528, 7103โ€“7106, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.077.
  25. Braunoviฤ‡, M.; Alexandrov, N. Intermetallic Compounds At Aluminumโ€Toโ€Copper Electrical Interfaces: Effect of Temperature
    And Electric Current. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. Part A 1994, 17, 78โ€“85, doi:10.1109/95.296372.
  26. Lee, W.B.; Bang, K.S.; Jung, S.B. Effects of intermetallic compound on the electrical and mechanical properties of friction welded
    Cu/Al bimetallic joints during annealing. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 390, 212โ€“219, doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.057.
Figure 7. Formation of incident and reflected waves.

Investigate Impact Force of Dam-Break Flow against Structures by Both 2D and 3D Numerical Simulations

2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋Œ ๋ถ•๊ดด์œ ๋™์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ๋ ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

1 Faculty of Water Resources Engineering, Thuyloi University, 175 Tay Son, Dong Da, Ha Noi 116705, Vietnam
2 Hydraulic Construction Institute, 3/95 Chua Boc, Dong Da, Ha Noi 116705, Vietnam
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Costanza Aricรฒ
Water 2021, 13(3), 344;

Abstract

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ผ๋ถ€ 2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์นจ์ˆ˜ ์ง€์—ญ์— ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ๋œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณณ์—์„œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํŒŒ๋™์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋จผ์ €, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์—์„œ 2D ์ฒœ์ˆ˜(shallow water) ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(2D-SWEs)์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ํ•œ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(FVM)์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FDS (flux-difference splitting)์€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  Roe ์ฒด๊ณ„๋Š” Riemann ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜ธ์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‘˜์งธ, ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ 3D CFD ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๊ฐ€ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ Flow 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

RNG(Renormalized Group) ๋ฐ LES(Large-eddy Simulation)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด๋†€์ฆˆ ํ‰๊ท  Navier-Stokes(RAN)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” 3D ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์ด 2D ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋‚ซ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ๋ ฅ์˜ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํž˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์†๋„ ์œ ๋„๋ ฅ์ด ๋™์  ํž˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ Froude ์ˆซ์ž์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์™€ ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํž˜์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ํ”ผํฌ ๊ฐ’์˜ 3D ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฌผ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ํญ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The aim of this paper was to investigate the ability of some 2D and 3D numerical models to simulate flood waves in the presence of an isolated building or building array in an inundated area. Firstly, the proposed 2D numerical model was based on the finite-volume method (FVM) to solve 2D shallow-water equations (2D-SWEs) on structured mesh. The flux-difference splitting method (FDS) was utilized to obtain an exact mass balance while the Roe scheme was invoked to approximate Riemann problems. Secondly, the 3D commercially available CFD software package was selected, which contained a Flow 3D model with two turbulent models: Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANs) with a renormalized group (RNG) and a large-eddy simulation (LES). The numerical results of an impact force on an obstruction due to a dam-break flow showed that a 3D solution was much better than a 2D one. By comparing the 3D numerical force results of an impact force acting on building arrays with the existence experimental data, the influence of velocity-induced force on a dynamic force was quantified by a function of the Froude number and the water depth of the incident wave. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of the initial water stage and dam-break width on the 3D-computed results of the peak value of force intensity.

Keywords:ย dam-break wave;ย 2D numerical model;ย Flow 3D model;ย structures;ย impact force

Introduction

ํ™์ˆ˜ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋„์‹œ ๊ณ„ํš์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ํฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ณผ์ œ์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์ง€์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ  ๋˜๋Š” ์•ˆ์ „ ์˜์‹ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์ธก์ •์ด๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถ”์ • ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [1,2,3,4,5,6].

์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ถˆ์—ฐ์† ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋น„์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ 10 ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฒœ์ˆ˜(shallow water) ์†”๋ฒ„๋Š” ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ๋ฉด์—์„œ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์นจ์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์  ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋งŽ์€์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์šธ์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].

Migot et al. [9]๋Š” ๋„์‹œ ํ™์ˆ˜์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ์–ธ๊ธ‰ ๋œ 45 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž‘ํ’ˆ ์ค‘ ๋‹จ 4 ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ๋งŒ์ด ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์— ๊ฐ€ํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ํž˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์••๋ ฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์— ๋Œ๋ฐœ ํ™์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒœ์ˆ˜(shallow water) ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ [10,11]์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ๋œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ์˜ ํž˜์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•œํŽธ Shige-eda [12]๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด์™€ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋ฐฐ์—ด ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Aureli์™€ Shige-eda๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ€์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ํž˜์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ 2D ์ฒœ์ˆ˜(shallow water) ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ (SWE)์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [10,12].

Migot [9]์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 2D SWE์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ถœํŒ๋ฌผ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ์ฃผ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ง€์ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ (CFD) 3D ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋Œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํŒŒ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ [13,14,15,16]์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  Issakhov [17]๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์ด ์••๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด CFD ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ 3 ๋ฐฐ ๋” ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค.

Aureli [10]๋Š” ๋Œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํŒŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ ์ •์  ํž˜์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์™€ 2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Mokarani [18]๋Š” ๋Œ ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ํ๋ฆ„ ์˜ํ–ฅ์˜ VOF ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ํ”ผํฌ ์••๋ ฅ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ์ž‘ํ’ˆ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๊ตฐ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํž˜์€ ์••๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ • ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ๋˜๋Š” ์ •๋ ฅ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ๊ธ‰๋ฅ˜์—์„œ ์†๋„๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํž˜์€ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ ฅ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ™์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค [19]. Armanini [20]๋Š” ์ •์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์ด ํ•ญ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์  ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋งŒ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋Š” ํ•œ, ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋น„์ •์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๋™์  ํž˜์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์€ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ 3D ์ˆ˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ชจ๋‘์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ ๋œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ๋น„์ •์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์žฌํ˜„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์œ ์† ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ถ”์ •๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ธก์ • ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ ๋Œ ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์— ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์ ์ธ ํž˜๋„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†๋„ ์œ ๋„ ํž˜์ด ๋™์  ํž˜์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” Froude ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ž…์‚ฌ ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋œ ๋Œ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ ํญ (b)๊ณผ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„ (h0)๋Š” ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฐ’์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1. (a) Configuration of experiment test (dimension in meters); (b) Gauges on the vertical front face of building.
Figure 1. (a) Configuration of experiment test (dimension in meters); (b) Gauges on the vertical front face of building.
Figure 2. (a) Distributed pressure profiles at centerline of front face of column; (b) Comparison of load-time histories simulated by different numerical models
Figure 2. (a) Distributed pressure profiles at centerline of front face of column; (b) Comparison of load-time histories simulated by different numerical models
Figure 3. Group of buildings in flooded area.
Figure 3. Group of buildings in flooded area.
Figure 4. Water depth and u-velocity profiles at gauge b.
Figure 4. Water depth and u-velocity profiles at gauge b.
Figure 5. Water hydrographs at gauges a and c.
Figure 5. Water hydrographs at gauges a and c.
Figure 6. Velocity component profiles at gauges a and c.
Figure 6. Velocity component profiles at gauges a and c.
Figure 7. Formation of incident and reflected waves.
Figure 7. Formation of incident and reflected waves.
Figure 8. Snapshots of streamlines of Froude number at different times: 1.0 s, 2.0 s, 5.0 s and 10 s.
Figure 8. Snapshots of streamlines of Froude number at different times: 1.0 s, 2.0 s, 5.0 s and 10 s.
Figure 9. Force in the flow direction exerted on 6 buildings.
Figure 9. Force in the flow direction exerted on 6 buildings.
Figure 10. The linear regression between forces per unit width (F) and q2b/h0.
Figure 10. The linear regression between forces per unit width (F) and q2b/h0.

Conclusions

๋Œ ๋ถ•๊ดด ํ๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํŒŒ๋„๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์†๋„ ๋˜๋Š” ํฐ ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์•• ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒœ์ˆ˜(shallow water) ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ 2D ์ˆ˜ํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ FDS ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, FDS ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ตœ์‹  ๋ฒ„์ „์˜ Flow 3D ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
(1) ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ๋˜๋Š” ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ณต์‹ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 2D ๋ฐ 3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ •์  ํž˜์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฐ’ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์•• ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ ํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ LES ๋ฐ RAN ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ 3D ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ 2D ์–•์€ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด 1๊ฐœ๋งŒ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์ถฉ๊ฒฉ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ž˜ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 3D ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋” ๊ฐ€๊น์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
(2) ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •์  ๋ฐ ๋™์  ํž˜์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ LES ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Flow 3D์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์†๋„์— ์˜ํ•œ ํž˜๊ณผ ์••๋ ฅ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์€ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ, ์†๋„ ์œ ๋„ ํž˜์€ ๋Œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ์ฃผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์—์„œ ๋ฉ€๋ฆฌ ๋–จ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์—์„œ ์••๋ ฅ ํž˜์ด ๋” ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†๋„ ์œ ๋„ ํž˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ฮฑ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์‚ฌ๊ณ ํŒŒ์˜ Froude ์ˆซ์ž์™€ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. q2b/h0๊ณผ ์ •์  ํž˜๊ณผ ๋™์  ํž˜์˜ ํ”ผํฌ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์„ ํ˜• ํšŒ๊ท€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ R-์ œ๊ณฑ ์–‘์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ, ์ œ์‹œ๋œ 2D ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋„๋ฉ”์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™์ˆ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ฮฑ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(21)์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์šด์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†๋„ ์œ ๋„ ํž˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋งค์šฐ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋†’์ด๋ ค๋ฉด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํž˜ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ๊ตฌํ˜„๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

  1. Testa, G.; Zuccala, D.; Alcrudo, F.; Mulet, J.; Frazao, S.S. Flash flood flow experiment in a simplifed urban district. J. Hydraul. Res. 200745, 37โ€“44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soares-Frazao, S.; Zech, Y. Dam-break flow through an idealized city. J. Hydraul. Res. 200846, 648โ€“665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soares-Frazรฃo, S.; Zech, Y. Experimental study of dam-break flow against an isolated obstacle. J. Hydraul. Res. 200745, 27โ€“36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soares-Frazรฃo, S. Experiments of dam-break wave over a triangular bottom sill. J. Hydraul. Res. 200745, 19โ€“26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. di Cristo, C.; Evangelista, S.; Greco, M.; Iervolino, M.; Leopardi, A.; Vacca, A. Dam-break waves over an erodible embankment: Experiments and simulations. J. Hydraul. Res. 201856, 196โ€“210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Evangelista, S. Experiments and numerical simulations of dike erosion due to a wave impact. Water 20157, 5831โ€“5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y.L.; Yu, C.H. Research on dam break flow induced front wave impacting a vertical wall based on the CLSVOF and level set methods. Ocean Eng. 2019178, 442โ€“462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. ร–zgen, I.; Zhao, J.; Liang, D.; Hinkelmann, R. Urban flood modeling using shallow water equations with depth-dependent anisotropic porosity. J. Hydrol. 2016541, 1165โ€“1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mignot, E.; Li, X.; Dewals, B. Experimental modelling of urban flooding: A review. J. Hydrol. 2019568, 334โ€“342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aureli, F.; Dazzi, A.; Maranzoni, A.; Mignosa, P.; Vacondio, R. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the force due to the impact of a dam break wave on a structure. Adv. Water Resour. 201576, 29โ€“42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Milanesi, L.; Pilotti, M.; Belleri, A.; Marini, A.; Fuchs, S. Vulnerability to flash floods: A simplified structural model for masonry buldings. Water Resour. Res. 201854, 7177โ€“7197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shige-eda, M.; Akiyama, J. Numerical and experimental study on two dimensional flood flows with and without structures. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2003129, 817โ€“821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cagatay, H.O.; Kocaman, S. Dam break flows during initial stage using SWE and RANs approaches. J. Hydraul. Res. 201048, 603โ€“611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, S.; Yang, W.; Qin, S.; Li, Q.; Yang, B. Numerical study on characteristics of dam break wave. Ocean Eng. 2018159, 358โ€“371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Robb., D.M.; Vasquez., J.A. Numerical simulation of dam break flows using depth averaged hydrodynamic and three dimensional CFD models. In Proceedings of the 22nd Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 28โ€“30 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kocaman, S.; Evangelista, S.; Viccione, G.; Guzel, H. Experimental and Numerical analysis of 3D dam break waves in an enclosed domain with a single oriented obstacles. Environ. Sci. Proc. 20202, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Issakhov, A.; Zhandaulet, Y.; Nogaeva, A. Numerical simulation of dambreak flow for various forms of the obstacle by VOF method. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2018109, 191โ€“206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mokarani, C.; Abadie, S. Conditions for peak pressure stability in VOF simulations of dam break flow impact. J. Fluids Struct. 201662, 86โ€“103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, L.; Sun, J.; Lin, B.; Lu, L. Building performance in dam break flowโ€”an experimental sudy. Urban Water J. 201815, 251โ€“258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Armanini, A.; Larcher, M.; Odorizzi, M. Dynamic impact of a debris flow front against a vertical wall. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on debris-flow hazards mitigation: Mechanics, prediction and assessment, Padua, Italy, 14โ€“17 June 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hubbard, M.E.; Garcia Navarro, P. Flux difference splitting and the balancing of source terms and flux gradients. J. Comput. Phys. 2000165, 89โ€“125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roe, P.L. A basis for upwind differencing of the two-dimensional unsteady Euler equations. In Numerical Methods in Fluids Dynamics II; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bradford, S.F.; Sander, B. Finite volume model for shallow water flooding of arbitrary topography. J. Hydraul. Eng. (ASCE) 2002128, 289โ€“298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brufau, P.; Garica-Navarro, P. Two dimensional dam break flow simulation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 200033, 35โ€“57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hien, L.T.T. 2D Numerical Modeling of Dam-Break Flows with Application to Case Studies in Vietnam. Ph.D. Thesis, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hien, L.T.T.; Tomirotti, M. Numerical modeling of dam break flows over complex topography. Case studies in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 19th IAHR-APD Congress 2014, Hanoi, Vietnam, 21โ€“24 September 2014; ISBN 978-604-82-1383-1. [Google Scholar]
  27. Flow-3D, Version 12.0; User Mannual; Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2020.
  28. Guney, M.S.; Tayfur, G.; Bombar, G.; Elci, S. Distorted physical model to study sudden partial dam break flow in an urban area. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2014140, 05014006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shige-eda, M.; Akiyama, J. Discussion and Closure to โ€œNumerical and experimental study on two dimensional flood flows with and without structuresโ€ by Mirei Shige-eda and Juichiro Akiyama. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2005131, 336โ€“337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ritter, A. Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwelle (Generation of the water wave). Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 189236, 947โ€“954. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1 (A) A schematic of ovarian cancer metastases involving tumor cells or clusters (yellow) shedding from a primary site and disseminating along ascitic currents of peritoneal fluid (green arrows) in the abdominal cavity. Ovarian cancer typically disseminates in four common abdomino-pelvic sites: (1) cul-de-sac (an extension of the peritoneal cavity between the rectum and back wall of the uterus); (2) right infracolic space (the apex formed by the termination of the small intestine of the small bowel mesentery at the ileocecal junction); (3) left infracolic space (superior site of the sigmoid colon); (4) Right paracolic gutter (communication between the upper and lower abdomen defined by the ascending colon and peritoneal wall). (B) The schematic of a perfusion model used to study the impact of sustained fluid flow on treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules (Top left). A side view of the perfusion model and growth of ovarian cancer nodules to a stromal bed (Top right). The photograph of a perfusion model used in the experiments (Bottom left) and depth-informed confocal imaging of ovarian cancer nodules in channels with and without carboplatin treatment (Bottom right). The perfusion model is 24 ร— 40 mm, with three channels that are 4 ร— 30 mm each and a height of 254 ฮผm. The inlet and outlet ports of channels are 2.2 mm in diameter and positioned 5 mm from the edge of the chip. (C) A schematic of a 24-well plate model used to study the treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules under static conditions (without flow) (Top left). A side view of the static models and growth of ovarian cancer nodules on a stromal bed (Top right). Confocal imaging of 3D ovarian cancer nodules in a 24-well plate without and with carboplatin treatment (Bottom). Scale bars: 1 mm.

Flow-induced Shear Stress Confers Resistance to Carboplatin in an Adherent Three-Dimensional Model for Ovarian Cancer: A Role for EGFR-Targeted Photoimmunotherapy Informed by Physical Stress

๋‚œ์†Œ์•”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๊ด€๋œ 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์นด๋ณดํ”Œ๋ผํ‹ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ๋™์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ „๋‹จ์‘๋ ฅ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Abstract

A key reason for the persistently grim statistics associated with metastatic ovarian cancer is resistance to conventional agents, including platinum-based chemotherapies. A major source of treatment failure is the high degree of genetic and molecular heterogeneity, which results from significant underlying genomic instability, as well as stromal and physical cues in the microenvironment. Ovarian cancer commonly disseminates via transcoelomic routes to distant sites, which is associated with the frequent production of malignant ascites, as well as the poorest prognosis. In addition to providing a cell and protein-rich environment for cancer growth and progression, ascitic fluid also confers physical stress on tumors. An understudied area in ovarian cancer research is the impact of fluid shear stress on treatment failure. Here, we investigate the effect of fluid shear stress on response to platinum-based chemotherapy and the modulation of molecular pathways associated with aggressive disease in a perfusion model for adherent 3D ovarian cancer nodules. Resistance to carboplatin is observed under flow with a concomitant increase in the expression and activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as well as downstream signaling members mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). The uptake of platinum by the 3D ovarian cancer nodules was significantly higher in flow cultures compared to static cultures. A downregulation of phospho-focal adhesion kinase (p-FAK), vinculin, and phospho-paxillin was observed following carboplatin treatment in both flow and static cultures. Interestingly, low-dose anti-EGFR photoimmunotherapy (PIT), a targeted photochemical modality, was found to be equally effective in ovarian tumors grown under flow and static conditions. These findings highlight the need to further develop PIT-based combinations that target the EGFR, and sensitize ovarian cancers to chemotherapy in the context of flow-induced shear stress.

์ „์ด์„ฑ ๋‚œ์†Œ ์•”๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์•”์šธํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฐฑ๊ธˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ™”ํ•™ ์š”๋ฒ•์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์•ฝ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‹คํŒจ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ์€ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ ์ „์  ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์ž์  ์ด์งˆ์„ฑ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ฒŒ๋†ˆ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๊ธฐ์งˆ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋‹จ์„œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‚œ์†Œ ์•”์€ ํ”ํžˆ transcoelomic ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋จผ ๋ถ€์œ„๋กœ ์ „ํŒŒ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์•…์„ฑ ๋ณต์ˆ˜์˜ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•œ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚˜์œ ์˜ˆํ›„์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•” ์„ฑ์žฅ ๋ฐ ์ง„ํ–‰์„์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธํฌ ๋ฐ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์ด ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋ณต์ˆ˜ ์•ก์€ ์ข…์–‘์— ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚œ์†Œ ์•” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ž˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ถ„์•ผ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ์ด ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‹คํŒจ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ฐฑ๊ธˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ™”ํ•™ ์š”๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ณผ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ 3D ๋‚œ์†Œ ์•” ๊ฒฐ์ ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ์งˆ๋ณ‘๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ถ„์ž ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜ ๋ณ€์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์นด๋ฅด๋ณดํ”Œ๋ผํ‹ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์„ฑ์€ ์ƒํ”ผ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์ธ์ž ์ˆ˜์šฉ์ฒด (EGFR)์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๋ฐ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๋˜๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋‹ค์šด ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์›์ธ ๋ฏธํ† ๊ฒ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ํ‚ค๋‚˜์ œ/์„ธํฌ ์™ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์กฐ์ ˆ ํ‚ค๋‚˜์ œ (MEK) ๋ฐ ์„ธํฌ ์™ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์กฐ์ ˆ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‚ค๋‚˜์•„์ œ (ERK). 3D ๋‚œ์†Œ ์•” ๊ฒฐ์ ˆ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ฐฑ๊ธˆ ํก์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ •์  ๋ฐฐ์–‘์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ ๋™ ๋ฐฐ์–‘์—์„œ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋†’์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํฌ์Šค ํฌ-ํฌ์ปฌ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ํ‚ค๋‚˜์ œ (p-FAK), ๋นˆ ์ฟจ๋ฆฐ ๋ฐ ํฌ์Šค ํฌ-ํŒ ์‹ค๋ฆฐ์˜ ํ•˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ์€ ์œ ๋™ ๋ฐ ์ •์  ๋ฐฐ์–‘ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์นด๋ณด ํ”Œ ๋ผํ‹ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํ›„ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กญ๊ฒŒ๋„, ํ‘œ์  ๊ด‘ ํ™”ํ•™์  ์–‘์‹ ์ธ ์ €์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ํ•ญ EGFR ๊ด‘ ๋ฉด์—ญ ์š”๋ฒ• (PIT)์€ ์œ ๋™ ๋ฐ ์ •์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•œ ๋‚œ์†Œ ์ข…์–‘์—์„œ ๋˜‘๊ฐ™์ด ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ EGFR์„ ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœํ•˜๋Š” PIT ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ํ๋ฆ„ ์œ ๋„ ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ์˜ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ํ™”ํ•™ ์š”๋ฒ•์— ๋‚œ์†Œ ์•”์„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•  ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords: ovarian cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), chemoresistance, fluid shear stress, ascites, perfusion model, photoimmunotherapy (PIT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), carboplatin

Figure 1 (A) A schematic of ovarian cancer metastases involving tumor cells or clusters (yellow) shedding from a primary site and disseminating along ascitic currents of peritoneal fluid (green arrows) in the abdominal cavity. Ovarian cancer typically disseminates in four common abdomino-pelvic sites: (1) cul-de-sac (an extension of the peritoneal cavity between the rectum and back wall of the uterus); (2) right infracolic space (the apex formed by the termination of the small intestine of the small bowel mesentery at the ileocecal junction); (3) left infracolic space (superior site of the sigmoid colon); (4) Right paracolic gutter (communication between the upper and lower abdomen defined by the ascending colon and peritoneal wall). (B) The schematic of a perfusion model used to study the impact of sustained fluid flow on treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules (Top left). A side view of the perfusion model and growth of ovarian cancer nodules to a stromal bed (Top right). The photograph of a perfusion model used in the experiments (Bottom left) and depth-informed confocal imaging of ovarian cancer nodules in channels with and without carboplatin treatment (Bottom right). The perfusion model is 24 ร— 40 mm, with three channels that are 4 ร— 30 mm each and a height of 254 ฮผm. The inlet and outlet ports of channels are 2.2 mm in diameter and positioned 5 mm from the edge of the chip. (C) A schematic of a 24-well plate model used to study the treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules under static conditions (without flow) (Top left). A side view of the static models and growth of ovarian cancer nodules on a stromal bed (Top right). Confocal imaging of 3D ovarian cancer nodules in a 24-well plate without and with carboplatin treatment (Bottom). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 1 (A) A schematic of ovarian cancer metastases involving tumor cells or clusters (yellow) shedding from a primary site and disseminating along ascitic currents of peritoneal fluid (green arrows) in the abdominal cavity. Ovarian cancer typically disseminates in four common abdomino-pelvic sites: (1) cul-de-sac (an extension of the peritoneal cavity between the rectum and back wall of the uterus); (2) right infracolic space (the apex formed by the termination of the small intestine of the small bowel mesentery at the ileocecal junction); (3) left infracolic space (superior site of the sigmoid colon); (4) Right paracolic gutter (communication between the upper and lower abdomen defined by the ascending colon and peritoneal wall). (B) The schematic of a perfusion model used to study the impact of sustained fluid flow on treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules (Top left). A side view of the perfusion model and growth of ovarian cancer nodules to a stromal bed (Top right). The photograph of a perfusion model used in the experiments (Bottom left) and depth-informed confocal imaging of ovarian cancer nodules in channels with and without carboplatin treatment (Bottom right). The perfusion model is 24 ร— 40 mm, with three channels that are 4 ร— 30 mm each and a height of 254 ฮผm. The inlet and outlet ports of channels are 2.2 mm in diameter and positioned 5 mm from the edge of the chip. (C) A schematic of a 24-well plate model used to study the treatment resistance and molecular features of 3D ovarian cancer nodules under static conditions (without flow) (Top left). A side view of the static models and growth of ovarian cancer nodules on a stromal bed (Top right). Confocal imaging of 3D ovarian cancer nodules in a 24-well plate without and with carboplatin treatment (Bottom). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 2 (A) Geometry of the micronodule located at the center of the microchannel. The flow velocity is in the X-direction. The nodule is modeled as an ellipse with a semi-minor axis of 40 ฮผm in the Z-direction. The semi-major axis varies from 40-100 ฮผm in the X-direction. The section over which the fluid dynamics are studied is the middle part of the channel with dimensions 4 mm along the Y-axis and 250 ฮผm along the Z-axis. The nodule is located at (0, 20 ฮผm). The black dotted line shows the centerline of the largest nodule. (B) Shear stress distribution over the surface of the solid micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. (C) Shear stress distribution over the surface of the porous micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. (D) Flow flux distribution over the centerline of the porous micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. The flux enters the surface at the left and leaves at the right.
Figure 2 (A) Geometry of the micronodule located at the center of the microchannel. The flow velocity is in the X-direction. The nodule is modeled as an ellipse with a semi-minor axis of 40 ฮผm in the Z-direction. The semi-major axis varies from 40-100 ฮผm in the X-direction. The section over which the fluid dynamics are studied is the middle part of the channel with dimensions 4 mm along the Y-axis and 250 ฮผm along the Z-axis. The nodule is located at (0, 20 ฮผm). The black dotted line shows the centerline of the largest nodule. (B) Shear stress distribution over the surface of the solid micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. (C) Shear stress distribution over the surface of the porous micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. (D) Flow flux distribution over the centerline of the porous micro-nodule on the XZ-plane. The flux enters the surface at the left and leaves at the right.
Figure 3 Cytotoxic response in carboplatin-treated 3D OVCAR-5 cultures under static conditions. (A) Representative confocal images of 3D tumors treated with carboplatin (0-500 ฮผM) for 96 h showing a dose-dependent reduction in viable tumor (calcein signal). (B) Image-based quantification of normalized viable tumor area in 3D OVCAR-5 cultures following treatment with increasing doses of carboplatin. A minimum nodule size cut-off of 2000 ยตm2 (clusters of ~15โ€“20 cells) was applied to the fluorescence images for quantitative analysis of the normalized viable tumor area. (One-way ANOVA with Dunnettโ€™s post hoc test; n.s., not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; N = 9) (C) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)-based quantification of carboplatin uptake in static 3D OVCAR-5 tumors shows a dose-dependent increase in platinum levels, up to 9774 ยฑ 3,052 ng/mg protein at an incubation concentration of 500 ฮผM carboplatin. (One-way ANOVA with Dunnโ€™s multiple comparisons test; n.s., not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3). Results are expressed as mean ยฑ standard error of mean (SEM). Scale bars: 500 ฮผm.
Figure 3 Cytotoxic response in carboplatin-treated 3D OVCAR-5 cultures under static conditions. (A) Representative confocal images of 3D tumors treated with carboplatin (0-500 ฮผM) for 96 h showing a dose-dependent reduction in viable tumor (calcein signal). (B) Image-based quantification of normalized viable tumor area in 3D OVCAR-5 cultures following treatment with increasing doses of carboplatin. A minimum nodule size cut-off of 2000 ยตm2 (clusters of ~15โ€“20 cells) was applied to the fluorescence images for quantitative analysis of the normalized viable tumor area. (One-way ANOVA with Dunnettโ€™s post hoc test; n.s., not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; N = 9) (C) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)-based quantification of carboplatin uptake in static 3D OVCAR-5 tumors shows a dose-dependent increase in platinum levels, up to 9774 ยฑ 3,052 ng/mg protein at an incubation concentration of 500 ฮผM carboplatin. (One-way ANOVA with Dunnโ€™s multiple comparisons test; n.s., not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3). Results are expressed as mean ยฑ standard error of mean (SEM). Scale bars: 500 ฮผm.
Figure 4 flow-induced chemo-resistance
Figure 4 flow-induced chemo-resistance
Figure 5 The effects of flow-induced shear stress on 3D ovarian cancer biology. (A) Western blot analysis of OVCAR-5 tumors was performed 7 days after culture under static or flow conditions. A flow-induced increase in EGFR and p-ERK, compared to static cultures, was observed. Conversely, a reduction in p-FAK, p-Paxillin, and Vinculin was observed under flow, relative to static conditions. (B) Western blot analysis of 3D OVCAR-5 tumors was performed 11 days after culture under static or flow conditions, including 4 days of treatment with 500 ยตM carboplatin, and respective controls. In both static and flow 3D cultures, carboplatin treatment resulted in downregulation of EGFR, FAK, p-Paxillin, Paxillin, and Vinculin. Upregulation of p-ERK was observed after carboplatin treatment in both static and flow 3D cultures. (C) Baseline levels of EGFR activity and expression are maintained by a complex array of factors, including recycling and degradation of the activated receptor complex. Flow-induced shear stress has been shown to cause a posttranslational up-regulation of EGFR expression and activation, likely resulting from increased receptor recycling and decreased EGFR degradation. Activation of EGFR results in ERK phosphorylation to induce gene expression, ultimately leading to cell proliferation, survival, and chemoresistance. FAK and other tyrosine kinases are activated by the engagement of integrins with the ECM. Subsequent phosphorylation of paxillin by FAK not only influences the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, but also modulates vinculin activation to regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, thereby stimulating pro-survival gene expression.
Figure 5 The effects of flow-induced shear stress on 3D ovarian cancer biology. (A) Western blot analysis of OVCAR-5 tumors was performed 7 days after culture under static or flow conditions. A flow-induced increase in EGFR and p-ERK, compared to static cultures, was observed. Conversely, a reduction in p-FAK, p-Paxillin, and Vinculin was observed under flow, relative to static conditions. (B) Western blot analysis of 3D OVCAR-5 tumors was performed 11 days after culture under static or flow conditions, including 4 days of treatment with 500 ยตM carboplatin, and respective controls. In both static and flow 3D cultures, carboplatin treatment resulted in downregulation of EGFR, FAK, p-Paxillin, Paxillin, and Vinculin. Upregulation of p-ERK was observed after carboplatin treatment in both static and flow 3D cultures. (C) Baseline levels of EGFR activity and expression are maintained by a complex array of factors, including recycling and degradation of the activated receptor complex. Flow-induced shear stress has been shown to cause a posttranslational up-regulation of EGFR expression and activation, likely resulting from increased receptor recycling and decreased EGFR degradation. Activation of EGFR results in ERK phosphorylation to induce gene expression, ultimately leading to cell proliferation, survival, and chemoresistance. FAK and other tyrosine kinases are activated by the engagement of integrins with the ECM. Subsequent phosphorylation of paxillin by FAK not only influences the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, but also modulates vinculin activation to regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, thereby stimulating pro-survival gene expression.

References

  1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:7โ€“34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foley O.W., Rauh-Hain J.A., Del Carmen M.G. Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: An update on treatment. Oncology. 2013;27:288โ€“294, 298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kipps E., Tan D.S., Kaye S.B. Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: New avenues for therapy and research. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2013;13:273โ€“282. doi: 10.1038/nrc3432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tan D.S., Agarwal R., Kaye S.B. Mechanisms of transcoelomic metastasis in ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:925โ€“934. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70939-1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed N., Stenvers K.L. Getting to know ovarian cancer ascites: Opportunities for targeted therapy-based translational research. Front. Oncol. 2013;3:256. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shield K., Ackland M.L., Ahmed N., Rice G.E. Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: Biology and pathology. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009;113:143โ€“148. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.032. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Naora H., Montell D.J. Ovarian cancer metastasis: Integrating insights from disparate model organisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:355โ€“366. doi: 10.1038/nrc1611. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lengyel E. Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;177:1053โ€“1064. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Javellana M., Hoppenot C., Lengyel E. The road to long-term survival: Surgical approach and longitudinal treatments of long-term survivors of advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019;152:228โ€“234. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Al Habyan S., Kalos C., Szymborski J., McCaffrey L. Multicellular detachment generates metastatic spheroids during intra-abdominal dissemination in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37:5127โ€“5135. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0317-x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim S., Kim B., Song Y.S. Ascites modulates cancer cell behavior, contributing to tumor heterogeneity in ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1173โ€“1178. doi: 10.1111/cas.12987. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowtell D.D., Bohm S., Ahmed A.A., Aspuria P.J., Bast R.C., Beral V., Berek J.S., Birrer M.J., Blagden S., Bookman M.A., et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: Reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:668โ€“679. doi: 10.1038/nrc4019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoppenot C., Eckert M.A., Tienda S.M., Lengyel E. Who are the long-term survivors of high grade serous ovarian cancer? Gynecol. Oncol. 2018;148:204โ€“212. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.032. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao Y., Cao J., Melamed A., Worley M., Gockley A., Jones D., Nia H.T., Zhang Y., Stylianopoulos T., Kumar A.S., et al. Losartan treatment enhances chemotherapy efficacy and reduces ascites in ovarian cancer models by normalizing the tumor stroma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:2210โ€“2219. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818357116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ayantunde A.A., Parsons S.L. Pattern and prognostic factors in patients with malignant ascites: A retrospective study. Ann. Oncol. 2007;18:945โ€“949. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl499. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Latifi A., Luwor R.B., Bilandzic M., Nazaretian S., Stenvers K., Pyman J., Zhu H., Thompson E.W., Quinn M.A., Findlay J.K., et al. Isolation and characterization of tumor cells from the ascites of ovarian cancer patients: Molecular phenotype of chemoresistant ovarian tumors. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046858. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ahmed N., Greening D., Samardzija C., Escalona R.M., Chen M., Findlay J.K., Kannourakis G. Unique proteome signature of post-chemotherapy ovarian cancer ascites-derived tumor cells. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30061. doi: 10.1038/srep30061. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gjorevski N., Boghaert E., Nelson C.M. Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Transmission of Mechanical Stress through Epithelial Tissues. Cancer Microenviron. 2012;5:29โ€“38. doi: 10.1007/s12307-011-0076-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Polacheck W.J., Charest J.L., Kamm R.D. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11115โ€“11120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103581108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Polacheck W.J., German A.E., Mammoto A., Ingber D.E., Kamm R.D. Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3D cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:2447โ€“2452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316848111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Polacheck W.J., Zervantonakis I.K., Kamm R.D. Tumor cell migration in complex microenvironments. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70:1335โ€“1356. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1115-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Swartz M.A., Lund A.W. Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: Linking mechanobiology with immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:210โ€“219. doi: 10.1038/nrc3186. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pisano M., Triacca V., Barbee K.A., Swartz M.A. An in vitro model of the tumor-lymphatic microenvironment with simultaneous transendothelial and luminal flows reveals mechanisms of flow enhanced invasion. Integr. Biol. 2015;7:525โ€“533. doi: 10.1039/C5IB00085H. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Follain G., Herrmann D., Harlepp S., Hyenne V., Osmani N., Warren S.C., Timpson P., Goetz J.G. Fluids and their mechanics in tumour transit: Shaping metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2020;20:107โ€“124. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0221-x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rizvi I., Gurkan U.A., Tasoglu S., Alagic N., Celli J.P., Mensah L.B., Mai Z., Demirci U., Hasan T. Flow induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cellular heterogeneity and biomarker modulation in 3D ovarian cancer nodules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E1974โ€“E1983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216989110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Novak C., Horst E., Mehta G. Mechanotransduction in ovarian cancer: Shearing into the unknown. APL Bioeng. 2018;2 doi: 10.1063/1.5024386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Carmignani C.P., Sugarbaker T.A., Bromley C.M., Sugarbaker P.H. Intraperitoneal cancer dissemination: Mechanisms of the patterns of spread. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:465โ€“472. doi: 10.1023/A:1023791229361. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sugarbaker P.H. Observations concerning cancer spread within the peritoneal cavity and concepts supporting an ordered pathophysiology. Cancer Treatment Res. 1996;82:79โ€“100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Feki A., Berardi P., Bellingan G., Major A., Krause K.H., Petignat P., Zehra R., Pervaiz S., Irminger-Finger I. Dissemination of intraperitoneal ovarian cancer: Discussion of mechanisms and demonstration of lymphatic spreading in ovarian cancer model. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2009;72:1โ€“9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.12.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Holm-Nielsen P. Pathogenesis of ascites in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 1953;33:10โ€“21. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1953.tb04805.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ahmed N., Riley C., Oliva K., Rice G., Quinn M. Ascites induces modulation of alpha6beta1 integrin and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor expression and associated functions in ovarian carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 2005;92:1475โ€“1485. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602495. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Woodburn J.R. The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999;82:241โ€“250. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00045-X. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Servidei T., Riccardi A., Mozzetti S., Ferlini C., Riccardi R. Chemoresistant tumor cell lines display altered epidermal growth factor receptor and HER3 signaling and enhanced sensitivity to gefitinib. Int. J. Cancer J. Int. Cancer. 2008;123:2939โ€“2949. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23902. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen A.P., Zhang J., Liu H., Zhao S.P., Dai S.Z., Sun X.L. Association of EGFR expression with angiogenesis and chemoresistance in ovarian carcinoma. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology] 2009;31:48โ€“52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Alper O., Bergmann-Leitner E.S., Bennett T.A., Hacker N.F., Stromberg K., Stetler-Stevenson W.G. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and the invasive phenotype of ovarian carcinoma cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1375โ€“1384. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.18.1375. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zeineldin R., Muller C.Y., Stack M.S., Hudson L.G. Targeting the EGF receptor for ovarian cancer therapy. J. Oncol. 2010;2010:414676. doi: 10.1155/2010/414676. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Alper O., De Santis M.L., Stromberg K., Hacker N.F., Cho-Chung Y.S., Salomon D.S. Anti-sense suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor expression alters cellular proliferation, cell-adhesion and tumorigenicity in ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2000;88:566โ€“574. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001115)88:4<566::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-D. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Posadas E.M., Liel M.S., Kwitkowski V., Minasian L., Godwin A.K., Hussain M.M., Espina V., Wood B.J., Steinberg S.M., Kohn E.C. A phase II and pharmacodynamic study of gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:1323โ€“1330. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Psyrri A., Kassar M., Yu Z., Bamias A., Weinberger P.M., Markakis S., Kowalski D., Camp R.L., Rimm D.L., Dimopoulos M.A. Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor expression level on survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:8637โ€“8643. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1436. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dimou A., Agarwal S., Anagnostou V., Viray H., Christensen S., Gould Rothberg B., Zolota V., Syrigos K., Rimm D. Standardization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) measurement by quantitative immunofluorescence and impact on antibody-based mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;179:580โ€“589. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.04.031. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Anagnostou V.K., Welsh A.W., Giltnane J.M., Siddiqui S., Liceaga C., Gustavson M., Syrigos K.N., Reiter J.L., Rimm D.L. Analytic variability in immunohistochemistry biomarker studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:982โ€“991. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0097. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Del Carmen M.G., Rizvi I., Chang Y., Moor A.C., Oliva E., Sherwood M., Pogue B., Hasan T. Synergism of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunotherapy with photodynamic treatment of ovarian cancer in vivo. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1516โ€“1524. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji314. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Armstrong D.K., Bundy B., Wenzel L., Huang H.Q., Baergen R., Lele S., Copeland L.J., Walker J.L., Burger R.A., Gynecologic Oncology G. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:34โ€“43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Verwaal V.J., Van Ruth S., De Bree E., Van Sloothen G.W., Van Tinteren H., Boot H., Zoetmulder F.A. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:3737โ€“3743. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Driel W.J., Koole S.N., Sikorska K., Schagen van Leeuwen J.H., Schreuder H.W.R., Hermans R.H.M., De Hingh I., Van der Velden J., Arts H.J., Massuger L., et al. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:230โ€“240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708618. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Verwaal V.J., Bruin S., Boot H., Van Slooten G., Van Tinteren H. 8-year follow-up of randomized trial: Cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:2426โ€“2432. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9966-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. DeLaney T.F., Sindelar W.F., Tochner Z., Smith P.D., Friauf W.S., Thomas G., Dachowski L., Cole J.W., Steinberg S.M., Glatstein E. Phase I study of debulking surgery and photodynamic therapy for disseminated intraperitoneal tumors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1993;25:445โ€“457. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90066-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Celli J.P., Spring B.Q., Rizvi I., Evans C.L., Samkoe K.S., Verma S., Pogue B.W., Hasan T. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: Mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:2795โ€“2838. doi: 10.1021/cr900300p. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Spring B.Q., Rizvi I., Xu N., Hasan T. The role of photodynamic therapy in overcoming cancer drug resistance. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015;14:1476โ€“1491. doi: 10.1039/C4PP00495G. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liang B.J., Pigula M., Baglo Y., Najafali D., Hasan T., Huang H.C. Breaking the Selectivity-Uptake Trade-Off of Photoimmunoconjugates with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan for Synergistic Multi-Tier Cancer Targeting. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18:1. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0560-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang H.C., Rizvi I., Liu J., Anbil S., Kalra A., Lee H., Baglo Y., Paz N., Hayden D., Pereira S., et al. Photodynamic Priming Mitigates Chemotherapeutic Selection Pressures and Improves Drug Delivery. Cancer Res. 2018;78:558โ€“571. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1700. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Huang H.C., Mallidi S., Liu J., Chiang C.T., Mai Z., Goldschmidt R., Ebrahim-Zadeh N., Rizvi I., Hasan T. Photodynamic Therapy Synergizes with Irinotecan to Overcome Compensatory Mechanisms and Improve Treatment Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1066โ€“1077. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Cengel K.A., Glatstein E., Hahn S.M. Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy. Cancer Treat. Res. 2007;134:493โ€“514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Obaid G., Broekgaarden M., Bulin A.-L., Huang H.-C., Kuriakose J., Liu J., Hasan T. Photonanomedicine: A convergence of photodynamic therapy and nanotechnology. Nanoscale. 2016;8:12471โ€“12503. doi: 10.1039/C5NR08691D. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ogata F., Nagaya T., Nakamura Y., Sato K., Okuyama S., Maruoka Y., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy: A comparison of light dosing schedules. Oncotarget. 2017;8:35069โ€“35075. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17047. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mitsunaga M., Ogawa M., Kosaka N., Rosenblum L.T., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. Cancer cell-selective in vivo near infrared photoimmunotherapy targeting specific membrane molecules. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1685โ€“1691. doi: 10.1038/nm.2554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Inglut C.T., Baglo Y., Liang B.J., Cheema Y., Stabile J., Woodworth G.F., Huang H.-C. Systematic Evaluation of Light-Activatable Biohybrids for Anti-Glioma Photodynamic Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1269. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang H.C., Pigula M., Fang Y., Hasan T. Immobilization of Photo-Immunoconjugates on Nanoparticles Leads to Enhanced Light-Activated Biological Effects. Small. 2018:e1800236. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Spring B.Q., Abu-Yousif A.O., Palanisami A., Rizvi I., Zheng X., Mai Z., Anbil S., Sears R.B., Mensah L.B., Goldschmidt R., et al. Selective treatment and monitoring of disseminated cancer micrometastases in vivo using dual-function, activatable immunoconjugates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E933โ€“E942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319493111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Abu-Yousif A.O., Moor A.C., Zheng X., Savellano M.D., Yu W., Selbo P.K., Hasan T. Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted photosensitizer selectively inhibits EGFR signaling and induces targeted phototoxicity in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2012;321:120โ€“127. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rizvi I., Dinh T.A., Yu W., Chang Y., Sherwood M.E., Hasan T. Photoimmunotherapy and irradiance modulation reduce chemotherapy cycles and toxicity in a murine model for ovarian carcinomatosis: Perspective and results. Israel J. Chem. 2012;52:776โ€“787. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201200016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Quirk B.J., Brandal G., Donlon S., Vera J.C., Mang T.S., Foy A.B., Lew S.M., Girotti A.W., Jogal S., LaViolette P.S., et al. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for malignant brain tumors–where do we stand? Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2015;12:530โ€“544. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.04.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Eljamel M.S., Goodman C., Moseley H. ALA and Photofrin fluorescence-guided resection and repetitive PDT in glioblastoma multiforme: A single centre Phase III randomised controlled trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2008;23:361โ€“367. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0494-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Varma A.K., Muller P.J. Cranial neuropathies after intracranial Photofrin-photodynamic therapy for malignant supratentorial gliomas-a report on 3 cases. Surg. Neurol. 2008;70:190โ€“193. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.01.060. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Akimoto J. Photodynamic Therapy for Malignant Brain Tumors. Neurol. Medico-Chirurgica. 2016;56:151โ€“157. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kercher E.M., Nath S., Rizvi I., Spring B.Q. Cancer Cell-targeted and Activatable Photoimmunotherapy Spares T Cells in a 3D Coculture Model. Photochem. Photobiol. 2019 doi: 10.1111/php.13153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Savellano M.D., Hasan T. Targeting cells that overexpress the epidermal growth factor receptor with polyethylene glycolated BPD verteporfin photosensitizer immunoconjugates. Photochem. Photobiol. 2003;77:431โ€“439. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0431:TCTOTE>2.0.CO;2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Molpus K.L., Hamblin M.R., Rizvi I., Hasan T. Intraperitoneal photoimmunotherapy of ovarian carcinoma xenografts in nude mice using charged photoimmunoconjugates. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000;76:397โ€“404. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5705. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Savellano M.D., Hasan T. Photochemical targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor: A mechanistic study. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:1658โ€“1668. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1902. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Nath S., Saad M.A., Pigula M., Swain J.W.R., Hasan T. Photoimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer: A Unique Niche in the Management of Advanced Disease. Cancers. 2019;11:1887. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121887. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Calibasi Kocal G., Guven S., Foygel K., Goldman A., Chen P., Sengupta S., Paulmurugan R., Baskin Y., Demirci U. Dynamic Microenvironment Induces Phenotypic Plasticity of Esophageal Cancer Cells Under Flow. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38221. doi: 10.1038/srep38221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tasoglu S., Gurkan U.A., Wang S., Demirci U. Manipulating biological agents and cells in micro-scale volumes for applications in medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:5788โ€“5808. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60042d. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Moon S., Gurkan U.A., Blander J., Fawzi W.W., Aboud S., Mugusi F., Kuritzkes D.R., Demirci U. Enumeration of CD4+ T-cells using a portable microchip count platform in Tanzanian HIV-infected patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021409. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. White F.M. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill; Boston, MA, USA: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  75. Luo Q., Kuang D., Zhang B., Song G. Cell stiffness determined by atomic force microscopy and its correlation with cell motility. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1860:1953โ€“1960. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.06.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sarntinoranont M., Rooney F., Ferrari M. Interstitial Stress and Fluid Pressure Within a Growing Tumor. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2003;31:327โ€“335. doi: 10.1114/1.1554923. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc. Res. 1989;37:77โ€“104. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(89)90074-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Malik R., Khan A.P., Asangani I.A., Cieล›lik M., Prensner J.R., Wang X., Iyer M.K., Jiang X., Borkin D., Escara-Wilke J., et al. Targeting the MLL complex in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 2015;21:344. doi: 10.1038/nm.3830. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nath S., Christian L., Tan S.Y., Ki S., Ehrlich L.I., Poenie M. Dynein Separately Partners with NDE1 and Dynactin To Orchestrate T Cell Focused Secretion. J. Immunol. 2016;197:2090โ€“2101. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Celli J.P., Rizvi I., Evans C.L., Abu-Yousif A.O., Hasan T. Quantitative imaging reveals heterogeneous growth dynamics and treatment-dependent residual tumor distributions in a three-dimensional ovarian cancer model. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15:051603. doi: 10.1117/1.3483903. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rizvi I., Celli J.P., Evans C.L., Abu-Yousif A.O., Muzikansky A., Pogue B.W., Finkelstein D., Hasan T. Synergistic Enhancement of Carboplatin Efficacy with Photodynamic Therapy in a Three-Dimensional Model for Micrometastatic Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9319โ€“9328. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1783. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. Glidden M.D., Celli J.P., Massodi I., Rizvi I., Pogue B.W., Hasan T. Image-Based Quantification of Benzoporphyrin Derivative Uptake, Localization, and Photobleaching in 3D Tumor Models, for Optimization of PDT Parameters. Theranostics. 2012;2:827โ€“839. doi: 10.7150/thno.4334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Celli J.P., Rizvi I., Blanden A.R., Massodi I., Glidden M.D., Pogue B.W., Hasan T. An imaging-based platform for high-content, quantitative evaluation of therapeutic response in 3D tumour models. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:3751. doi: 10.1038/srep03751. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  84. Bulin A.L., Broekgaarden M., Hasan T. Comprehensive high-throughput image analysis for therapeutic efficacy of architecturally complex heterotypic organoids. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16622-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Rahmanzadeh R., Rai P., Celli J.P., Rizvi I., Baron-Luhr B., Gerdes J., Hasan T. Ki-67 as a molecular target for therapy in an in vitro three-dimensional model for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9234โ€“9242. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1190. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. Anbil S., Rizvi I., Celli J.P., Alagic N., Pogue B.W., Hasan T. Impact of treatment response metrics on photodynamic therapy planning and outcomes in a three-dimensional model of ovarian cancer. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18:098004. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.9.098004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Di Pasqua A.J., Goodisman J., Dabrowiak J.C. Understanding how the platinum anticancer drug carboplatin works: From the bottle to the cell. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2012;389:29โ€“35. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2012.01.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. Rabik C.A., Dolan M.E. Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2007;33:9โ€“23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ozols R.F. Carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. Semin. Oncol. 1995;22:78โ€“83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Neijt J.P., Lund B. Paclitaxel with carboplatin for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Semin. Oncol. 1996;23:2โ€“4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Subauste C.M., Pertz O., Adamson E.D., Turner C.E., Junger S., Hahn K.M. Vinculin modulation of paxillinโ€“FAK interactions regulates ERK to control survival and motility. J. Cell Biol. 2004;165:371โ€“381. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200308011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  92. Eke I., Cordes N. Focal adhesion signaling and therapy resistance in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015;31:65โ€“75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. McCubrey J.A., Steelman L.S., Chappell W.H., Abrams S.L., Wong E.W., Chang F., Lehmann B., Terrian D.M., Milella M., Tafuri A., et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1773:1263โ€“1284. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.10.001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  94. Duska L.R., Hamblin M.R., Miller J.L., Hasan T. Combination photoimmunotherapy and cisplatin: Effects on human ovarian cancer ex vivo. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1557โ€“1563. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.18.1557. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  95. Spring B., Mai Z., Rai P., Chang S., Hasan T. Theranostic nanocells for simultaneous imaging and photodynamic therapy of pancreatic cancer. Proc. SPIE. 2010;7551:755104. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kessel D., Oleinick N.L. Photodynamic therapy and cell death pathways. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;635:35โ€“46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-697-9_3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  97. Van Dongen G.A., Visser G.W., Vrouenraets M.B. Photosensitizer-antibody conjugates for detection and therapy of cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004;56:31โ€“52. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.09.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ayhan A., Gultekin M., Taskiran C., Dursun P., Firat P., Bozdag G., Celik N.Y., Yuce K. Ascites and epithelial ovarian cancers: A reappraisal with respect to different aspects. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2007;17:68โ€“75. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00777.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  99. Shen-Gunther J., Mannel R.S. Ascites as a predictor of ovarian malignancy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2002;87:77โ€“83. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6800. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  100. Pourgholami M.H., Ataie-Kachoie P., Badar S., Morris D.L. Minocycline inhibits malignant ascites of ovarian cancer through targeting multiple signaling pathways. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;129:113โ€“119. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.031. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  101. Shender V., Arapidi G., Butenko I., Anikanov N., Ivanova O., Govorun V. Peptidome profiling dataset of ovarian cancer and non-cancer proximal fluids: Ascites and blood sera. Data Brief. 2019;22:557โ€“562. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.056. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  102. Parsons S.L., Watson S.A., Steele R.J.C. Malignant ascites. Br. J. Surg. 1996;83:6โ€“14. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830104. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  103. Becker G., Galandi D., Blum H.E. Malignant ascites: Systematic review and guideline for treatment. Eur. J. Cancer. 2006;42:589โ€“597. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  104. Huang H., Li Y.J., Lan C.Y., Huang Q.D., Feng Y.L., Huang Y.W., Liu J.H. Clinical significance of ascites in epithelial ovarian cancer. Neoplasma. 2013;60:546โ€“552. doi: 10.4149/neo_2013_071. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  105. Blagden S.P. Harnessing Pandemonium: The Clinical Implications of Tumor Heterogeneity in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2015;5:149. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ahmed N., Latifi A., Riley C.B., Findlay J.K., Quinn M.A. Neuronal transcription factor Brn-3a(l) is over expressed in high-grade ovarian carcinomas and tumor cells from ascites of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2010;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-3-17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  107. Mahmood N., Mihalcioiu C., Rabbani S.A. Multifaceted Role of the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and Its Receptor (uPAR): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications. Front. Oncol. 2018;8:24. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00024. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  108. Jeffrey B., Udaykumar H.S., Schulze K.S. Flow fields generated by peristaltic reflex in isolated guinea pig ileum: Impact of contraction depth and shoulders. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G907โ€“G918. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00062.2003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  109. Nagy J.A., Herzberg K.T., Dvorak J.M., Dvorak H.F. Pathogenesis of malignant ascites formation: Initiating events that lead to fluid accumulation. Cancer Res. 1993;53:2631โ€“2643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Ahmed N., Abubaker K., Findlay J., Quinn M. Epithelial mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like phenotypes facilitate chemoresistance in recurrent ovarian cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2010;10:268โ€“278. doi: 10.2174/156800910791190175. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  111. Latifi A., Abubaker K., Castrechini N., Ward A.C., Liongue C., Dobill F., Kumar J., Thompson E.W., Quinn M.A., Findlay J.K., et al. Cisplatin treatment of primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian carcinomas generates residual cells with mesenchymal stem cell-like profile. J. Cell Biochem. 2011;112:2850โ€“2864. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23199. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  112. Chan D.W., Hui W.W., Cai P.C., Liu M.X., Yung M.M., Mak C.S., Leung T.H., Chan K.K., Ngan H.Y. Targeting GRB7/ERK/FOXM1 signaling pathway impairs aggressiveness of ovarian cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mebratu Y., Tesfaigzi Y. How ERK1/2 activation controls cell proliferation and cell death: Is subcellular localization the answer? Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1168โ€“1175. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.8.8147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zebisch A., Czernilofsky A.P., Keri G., Smigelskaite J., Sill H., Troppmair J. Signaling through RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK: From basics to bedside. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007;14:601โ€“623. doi: 10.2174/092986707780059670. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  115. Jo H., Sipos K., Go Y.M., Law R., Rong J., McDonald J.M. Differential effect of shear stress on extracellular signal-regulated kinase and N-terminal Jun kinase in endothelial cells. Gi2- and Gbeta/gamma-dependent signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:1395โ€“1401. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.2.1395. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  116. Surapisitchat J., Hoefen R.J., Pi X., Yoshizumi M., Yan C., Berk B.C. Fluid shear stress inhibits TNF-alpha activation of JNK but not ERK1/2 or p38 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: Inhibitory crosstalk among MAPK family members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:6476โ€“6481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101134098. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  117. Kim C.H., Jeung E.B., Yoo Y.M. Combined Fluid Shear Stress and Melatonin Enhances the ERK/Akt/mTOR Signal in Cilia-Less MC3T3-E1 Preosteoblast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2929. doi: 10.3390/ijms19102929. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  118. Persons D.L., Yazlovitskaya E.M., Cui W., Pelling J.C. Cisplatin-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in ovarian carcinoma cells: Inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity increases sensitivity to cisplatin. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999;5:1007โ€“1014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Hayakawa J., Ohmichi M., Kurachi H., Ikegami H., Kimura A., Matsuoka T., Jikihara H., Mercola D., Murata Y. Inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase or c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase cascade, differentially activated by cisplatin, sensitizes human ovarian cancer cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:31648โ€“31654. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31648. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  120. Yeh P.Y., Chuang S.E., Yeh K.H., Song Y.C., Ea C.K., Cheng A.L. Increase of the resistance of human cervical carcinoma cells to cisplatin by inhibition of the MEK to ERK signaling pathway partly via enhancement of anticancer drug-induced NF kappa B activation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002;63:1423โ€“1430. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)00908-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang X., Martindale J.L., Holbrook N.J. Requirement for ERK activation in cisplatin-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:39435โ€“39443. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004583200. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  122. Qin X., Liu C., Zhou Y., Wang G. Cisplatin induces programmed death-1-ligand 1(PD-L1) over-expression in hepatoma H22 cells via Erk /MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010;56:OL1366-72. doi: 10.1170/156. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  123. Basu A., Tu H. Activation of ERK during DNA damage-induced apoptosis involves protein kinase Cdelta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;334:1068โ€“1073. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.199. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  124. Nowak G. Protein kinase C-alpha and ERK1/2 mediate mitochondrial dysfunction, decreases in active Na+ transport, and cisplatin-induced apoptosis in renal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:43377โ€“43388. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206373200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  125. Chaudhury A., Tan B.J., Das S., Chiu G.N. Increased ERK activation and cellular drug accumulation in the enhanced cytotoxicity of folate receptor-targeted liposomal carboplatin. Int. J. Oncol. 2012;40:703โ€“710. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1262. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  126. Lok G.T., Chan D.W., Liu V.W., Hui W.W., Leung T.H., Yao K.M., Ngan H.Y. Aberrant activation of ERK/FOXM1 signaling cascade triggers the cell migration/invasion in ovarian cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023790. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  127. Lafky J.M., Wilken J.A., Baron A.T., Maihle N.J. Clinical implications of the ErbB/epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family and its ligands in ovarian cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1785:232โ€“265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.01.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  128. Secord A.A., Blessing J.A., Armstrong D.K., Rodgers W.H., Miner Z., Barnes M.N., Lewandowski G., Mannel R.S., Gynecologic Oncology G. Phase II trial of cetuximab and carboplatin in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor expression: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008;108:493โ€“499. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.029. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  129. Bae G.-Y., Choi S.-J., Lee J.-S., Jo J., Lee J., Kim J., Cha H.-J. Loss of E-cadherin activates EGFR-MEK/ERK signaling, which promotes invasion via the ZEB1/MMP2 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2013;4:2512. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pece S., Gutkind J.S. Signaling from E-cadherins to the MAPK pathway by the recruitment and activation of epidermal growth factor receptors upon cell-cell contact formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:41227โ€“41233. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006578200. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  131. Lifschitz-Mercer B., Czernobilsky B., Feldberg E., Geiger B. Expression of the adherens junction protein vinculin in human basal and squamous cell tumors: Relationship to invasiveness and metastatic potential. Hum. Pathol. 1997;28:1230โ€“1236. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90195-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  132. Raz A., Geiger B. Altered organization of cell-substrate contacts and membrane-associated cytoskeleton in tumor cell variants exhibiting different metastatic capabilities. Cancer Res. 1982;42:5183โ€“5190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Fukada T., Sakajiri H., Kuroda M., Kioka N., Sugimoto K. Fluid shear stress applied by orbital shaking induces MG-63 osteosarcoma cells to activate ERK in two phases through distinct signaling pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2017;9:257โ€“265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.01.004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wu D.W., Wu T.C., Wu J.Y., Cheng Y.W., Chen Y.C., Lee M.C., Chen C.Y., Lee H. Phosphorylation of paxillin confers cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via activating ERK-mediated Bcl-2 expression. Oncogene. 2014;33:4385โ€“4395. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.389. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  135. Kessel D. Apoptosis and associated phenomena as a determinants of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015;14:1397โ€“1402. doi: 10.1039/C4PP00413B. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  136. Agostinis P., Berg K., Cengel K.A., Foster T.H., Girotti A.W., Gollnick S.O., Hahn S.M., Hamblin M.R., Juzeniene A., Kessel D., et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:250โ€“281. doi: 10.3322/caac.20114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sorrin A.J., Ruhi M.K., Ferlic N.A., Karimnia V., Polacheck W.J., Celli J.P., Huang H.C., Rizvi I. Photodynamic Therapy and the Biophysics of the Tumor Microenvironment. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/php.13209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  138. Niu C.J., Fisher C., Scheffler K., Wan R., Maleki H., Liu H., Sun Y., C A.S., Birngruber R., Lilge L. Polyacrylamide gel substrates that simulate the mechanical stiffness of normal and malignant neuronal tissues increase protoporphyin IX synthesis in glioma cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015;20:098002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.9.098002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  139. Perentes J.Y., Wang Y., Wang X., Abdelnour E., Gonzalez M., Decosterd L., Wagnieres G., Van den Bergh H., Peters S., Ris H.B., et al. Low-Dose Vascular Photodynamic Therapy Decreases Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure, which Promotes Liposomal Doxorubicin Distribution in a Murine Sarcoma Metastasis Model. Transl. Oncol. 2014;7 doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.04.010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  140. Leunig M., Goetz A.E., Gamarra F., Zetterer G., Messmer K., Jain R.K. Photodynamic therapy-induced alterations in interstitial fluid pressure, volume and water content of an amelanotic melanoma in the hamster. Br. J. Cancer. 1994;69:101โ€“103. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  141. Foster T.H., Murant R.S., Bryant R.G., Knox R.S., Gibson S.L., Hilf R. Oxygen consumption and diffusion effects in photodynamic therapy. Radiat Res. 1991;126:296โ€“303. doi: 10.2307/3577919. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  142. Foster T.H., Hartley D.F., Nichols M.G., Hilf R. Fluence rate effects in photodynamic therapy of multicell tumor spheroids. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1249โ€“1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Nichols M.G., Foster T.H. Oxygen diffusion and reaction kinetics in the photodynamic therapy of multicell tumour spheroids. Phys. Med. Biol. 1994;39:2161โ€“2181. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/12/003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  144. Cavin S., Wang X., Zellweger M., Gonzalez M., Bensimon M., Wagnieres G., Krueger T., Ris H.B., Gronchi F., Perentes J.Y. Interstitial fluid pressure: A novel biomarker to monitor photo-induced drug uptake in tumor and normal tissues. Lasers Surg. Med. 2017;49:773โ€“780. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22687. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  145. Garcia Calavia P., Chambrier I., Cook M.J., Haines A.H., Field R.A., Russell D.A. Targeted photodynamic therapy of breast cancer cells using lactose-phthalocyanine functionalized gold nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;512:249โ€“259. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.030. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  146. Kato T., Jin C.S., Ujiie H., Lee D., Fujino K., Wada H., Hu H.P., Weersink R.A., Chen J., Kaji M., et al. Nanoparticle targeted folate receptor 1-enhanced photodynamic therapy for lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;113:59โ€“68. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sebak A.A., Gomaa I.E.O., ElMeshad A.N., AbdelKader M.H. Targeted photodynamic-induced singlet oxygen production by peptide-conjugated biodegradable nanoparticles for treatment of skin melanoma. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2018;23:181โ€“189. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.05.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  148. Fernandes S.R.G., Fernandes R., Sarmento B., Pereira P.M.R., Tome J.P.C. Photoimmunoconjugates: Novel synthetic strategies to target and treat cancer by photodynamic therapy. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17:2579โ€“2593. doi: 10.1039/C8OB02902D. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  149. Hamblin M.R., Miller J.L., Hasan T. Effect of charge on the interaction of site-specific photoimmunoconjugates with human ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56:5205โ€“5210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Flont M., Jastrzebska E., Brzozka Z. Synergistic effect of the combination therapy on ovarian cancer cells under microfluidic conditions. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2020;1100:138โ€“148. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.047. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Intel Fortran Compiler 2019

Customer Notification: Intel Fortran Compiler Update

์ด ์•Œ๋ฆผ์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ฒ„์ „์—์„œ ์ปดํŒŒ์ผ ๋นŒ๋“œ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค ๋“œ๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ (์ฆ‰, ์†Œ์Šค ์ฝ”๋“œ ์ˆ˜์ • ๋ฐ ์žฌ ์ปดํŒŒ์ผ)ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์›จ๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„์˜ ์กฐ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜(์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ)ํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ƒˆ ๋ฒ„์ „์ด ์ถœ์‹œ ๋  ๋•Œ ์›ํ™œํ•œ ์ „ํ™˜์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•Œ๋ฆผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ค€๋น„๋ฅผ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D์˜ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค์ธ FLOW-3D v12.1 ๋ฐ FLOW-3D CAST v5.1์€ ์ธํ…” ยฎ FORTRAN ์ปดํŒŒ์ผ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฒ„์ „ 19.0.3.203 ๋นŒ๋“œ 20190206 (Windows) ๋ฐ ๋ฒ„์ „ 19.0.3.199 ๋นŒ๋“œ 20190206 (Linux)๋กœ ๋นŒ๋“œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Intel Fortran Compiler 2019
Intel Fortran Compiler 2019

์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ง€์ •ํ•˜๋Š” Windows ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 Professional๋„ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฒ„์ „์ธ FLOW-3D v12.0 ๋ฐ FLOW-3D CAST v5.0 ๋ฐ ํ›„์† ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋Š” Intelยฎ FORTRAN ๋ฒ„์ „ 16.0.1 ๋ฐ Microsoft Visual Studio 2010/2013 Professional์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์† ๋นŒ๋“œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋‹ค์‹œ ์•Œ๋ ค๋“œ๋ฆฌ์ง€๋งŒ,์ด ์•Œ๋ฆผ์€ FLOW-3D ์†”๋ฒ„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ ์†Œ์Šค ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ ์ปดํŒŒ์ผ(์ฆ‰, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜)ํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ๋งŒ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜(์ปค์Šคํ…€ ์ฝ”๋“œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ)ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์กฐ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ปดํŒŒ์ผ๋Ÿฌ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ support@flow3d.com์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์› ํŒ€์— ๋ฌธ์˜ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

ๅœ–1. 1 ๅ—ๆตทๅญค็ซ‹ๅ…งๆณข็ฉบ้–“ๅˆ†ๅธƒๅœ–๏ผˆHsu et al., 2000๏ผ‰

Numerical Modeling on Internal Solitary Wave propagation over an obstacle using Flow-3D

Keyword: Internal solitary waves, Numerical, Flow-3D, Computational Fluid Dynamics

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž : Yu-Ren Chen
์ง€๋„๊ต์ˆ˜ : Dr John R C Hsu
June 2012

๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•ด์–‘์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ญ๋งŒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ,๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ํšจ์œจ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ ์ƒ์„ฑ, ์ „์†ก, ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ตญ๋‚ด์™ธ ํ•ด์–‘ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” FLOW-3D ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ (Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD) ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์ธต์˜ ๋‹ด์ˆ˜์™€ ํ•˜์ธต์˜ ๋‹ด์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ”๋‹ท๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ณ„์ธตํ™” ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ถ•๊ดด ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธด ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํŒŒํ˜• ์ง„ํ™” ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™์žฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์งง์€ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์‚ฌ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๊ผด ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์™€ ์ด๋“ฑ๋ณ€ ์‚ผ๊ฐํ˜•. ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ž‘๋™ ์„ค์ •๊ณผ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ ์‹คํ—˜์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด์ „ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ ์ „์†ก ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ค‘๋ ฅ ๋ถ•๊ดด ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์˜ ์ „์†ก ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ์ง„ํญ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ; ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์˜ ์ง„ํญ์ด ํฌ๊ณ  ์ „์†ก ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋น ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ; ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŠธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ฆฌ๋ฉด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์˜ ์ง„ํญ์ด ์ž‘๊ณ  ์ „์†ก ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ฆฌ์ง€ ๋งŒ ๋‘˜ ๋‹ค ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๋น„๋ก€ ๊ด€๊ณ„.

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ (๊ธด ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ, ์‚ฌ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๊ผด ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€์žˆ๋Š” ์งง์€ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ, ์ด๋“ฑ๋ณ€ ์‚ผ๊ฐํ˜•)์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ณ ๋… ํŒŒ์˜ ์ „์†ก ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ์ผ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์˜ ํŒŒํ˜• ์ง„ํ™”, ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐ ์œ ๋™์žฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ์—ด์‹ฌํžˆ ๋ถ„์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ณ ๋… ํŒŒ์˜ ์ „์†ก ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์š”์•ฝ

์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋‘ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๊ณ„๋ฉด์—์žˆ๋Š” ํŒŒ๋™์„ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ํŒŒ๋ผ๊ณ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ”๋‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ํ‘œ์ธต์˜ ๊ธฐ์•• ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ ์žฅ์ด ๊ณต๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ค์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ํŒŒ์ธ ํ•ด๋ฉด์— ๋ถˆ์–ด ์˜ฌ ๋•Œ ๋ณ€๋™์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ฒด ๋˜๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„ ์ธตํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ๋•Œ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ํž˜ (์˜ˆ : ๋ฐ”๋žŒ, ์••๋ ฅ, ํŒŒ๋„ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜, ์ค‘๋ ฅ ๋“ฑ)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ต๋ž€๋˜๋ฉด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๋ผ๊ณ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์›จ์ด๋ธŒ๋Š” ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ธตํ™” ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์›จ์ด๋ธŒ ํ˜„์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ผ์ƒ ์ƒํ™œ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ์˜คํ›„ ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ ์ „์— ๊นŠ๊ณ  ์–•์€ altocumulus ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„ ์ธต์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š˜์— ์ž์ฃผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์ค‘์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ƒ์Šน์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ค‘์˜ ์ˆ˜์ฆ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋กœ ์‘์ถ•๋˜์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์ด๋˜๋„๋กํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋ผ ์•‰์œผ๋ฉด ์ˆ˜์ฆ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‘๊ฒฐ์ด ์‰ฝ์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์ด ์žˆ์–ด๋„ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ํŒŒ๋„๊ฐ€ ์‘๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œ์‚ฐ๋˜์–ด ๋ฃจ๋ฒ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ altocumulus ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๋ฐ€๋„์™€ ์ธตํ™” ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ์ž์—ฐ ์ˆ˜์ฒด๋Š” ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ต๋ž€ ๋  ๋•Œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋™ ์šด๋™์„ ๊ฒช๊ฒŒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ •๋˜๊ณ  ์ธตํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•œ ํ˜ธ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๋žŒ ์žฅ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์— ํŒŒ๋„์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ƒ ๋œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋™์„ ์ผ์œผ์ผœ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ „๋‹ฌ๋˜๊ณ  ํ˜ธ์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๋ฌผ์ด ์ถ•์ ๋˜์–ด ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ•์  ์˜์—ญ; ์ˆ˜์—ญ์ด ๊ฐ€๋ผ ์•‰๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉด ์œ„์น˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‚จ๋ฏธ ์ฝœ๋กฌ๋น„์•„์˜ Babine Lake์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋™ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋™ ์šด๋™์„ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Farmer, 1978). ). ์—ผ๋ถ„, ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋˜๋Š” ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๋ฐ”๋‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์กฐ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ง€ํ˜•์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์—ญ์ด ํ–‰์„ฑ์˜ ์ค‘๋ ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์›€์ง์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฉ๋ ฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณต์ด์žˆ๋Š” ์ง€ํ˜•์„ ํ†ต๊ณผ ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋™์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ; ์ค‘๊ตญ ํ•ด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋‚จ์ชฝ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์—์„œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด (Hsu et al., 2000). ํŒŒ๋™์€ ์‹ฌํ•ด์—์„œ ์–•์€ ๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์–•์•„ ์ง, ๊นจ์ง, ํ˜ผํ•ฉ, ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด, ๊ตด์ ˆ, ํšŒ์ ˆ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๊ฐ€์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ ์ „๋‹ฌ์€ ์ผ์ข…์˜ ํŒŒ๋™์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์œ„์—์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ ํ•œ ํŒŒ๋™ ํŠน์„ฑ๋„ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•ด์–‘ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์‹ญ ํ‚ฌ๋กœ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ํŒŒ์žฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ,์ฃผ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๋ถ„ ์ •๋„ ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉฐ ์ˆ˜์‹ญ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋„ ๋А๋ฆฌ๋ฉฐ ์ง„ํญ์€ ๋ช‡ ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ ๋ฏธํ„ฐ. ํ•ด์–‘ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„๊ฐ€ ์›€์ง์ผ ๋•Œ ์ธตํ™” ์œ„์™€ ์•„๋ž˜์˜ ๋ฌผ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด ํ˜„์žฌ ์ „๋‹จ ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ธตํ™” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฉด์—์„œ ํฐ ๋น„ํ‹€๋ฆผ ํž˜์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ”๋‹ค์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ๋ง๋š๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์„์œ  ์‹œ์ถ” ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ๊ณ ์ • ์ผ€์ด๋ธ”์€ ํฐ ๋น„ํ‹€๋ฆผ์„ ๊ฒฌ๋”œ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์–ด ํŒŒ์†๋  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (Bole et al. 1994). ๋นฝ๋นฝํ•œ ํด๋ผ์ธ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ํ•ญํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ž ์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ด ํ•ด์–‘ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„ ํ™œ๋™์„ ๋งŒ๋‚˜๊ฒŒ๋˜๋ฉด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ƒ์Šน ์ „๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ž ์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ด ํ•ด์ €์— ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์— ๋‹ฟ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ถฉ๋Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž ์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ด ์†์ƒ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ค์˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋Š” ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌํ•ด ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ทผํ•ด ๋Œ€๋ฅ™๋ถ•์œผ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋˜๋ฉด ์ƒํ•˜์ˆ˜ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ตํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ด์ €์— ์˜์–‘๋ถ„์„ ์šด๋ฐ˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋ฉฐ (Osborne and Bruch et al., 1980; Sandstorm and Elliot et al., 1984) ์–ด์—… ์ž์›์„ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ„์—์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ ํ•œ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ์™ธ์—๋„ ํ•ด์ €์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ€์ด๋ธ” ๋ฐ ํŒŒ์ดํ”„ ๋ผ์ธ, ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์ŒํŒŒ ํƒ์ง€๊ธฐ, ํ•ด์–‘ ์ƒ๋ฌผ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ, ๊ตฐ์‚ฌ ํ™œ๋™ ๋“ฑ์ด ํ•ด์–‘ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ํฌํ•จ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ•ด์–‘ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ตœ๊ทผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์—๋Š” ๋ถ„์„ ์ด๋ก  ๋„์ถœ, ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ฐฐ, ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ถ„์„์ด ํฌํ•จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณผํ•™ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ธ‰์†ํ•œ ๋ฐœ์ „, ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ๋ฐœ์ „, ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ๋Œ€์ค‘ํ™”, ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ง„ํ™”๋กœ ํ•ด์–‘ ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋งŽ์€ ํŒŒ๋™ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ์‹คํ—˜ ํ•ด์„๋ณด๋‹ค ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ (์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™, ์ฐธ์กฐ)์˜ FLOW-๋ฅผ ์„ ์ • ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ ์ƒ์„ฑ, ์ „์†ก, ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ ํ†ต๊ณผ, ์ ์ฐจ ์†Œ๋ฉธํ•˜๋Š” ์›€์ง์ž„ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŒŒ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด์ „ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ๅœ–1. 1  ๅ—ๆตทๅญค็ซ‹ๅ…งๆณข็ฉบ้–“ๅˆ†ๅธƒๅœ–๏ผˆHsu et al., 2000๏ผ‰
ๅœ–1. 1 ๅ—ๆตทๅญค็ซ‹ๅ…งๆณข็ฉบ้–“ๅˆ†ๅธƒๅœ–๏ผˆHsu et al., 2000๏ผ‰
ๅœ–1. 2  ้šœ็ค™้ซ˜ๅบฆ่ˆ‡ๅˆ†ๅฑคๆต้ซ”ๅŽšๅบฆ้—œไฟ‚ไน‹็คบๆ„ๅœ–
ๅœ–1. 2 ้šœ็ค™้ซ˜ๅบฆ่ˆ‡ๅˆ†ๅฑคๆต้ซ”ๅŽšๅบฆ้—œไฟ‚ไน‹็คบๆ„ๅœ–
ๅœ–3. 1 ไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข้€š้Žๆขฏๅฝข้šœ็ค™็š„ๅฏฆ้ฉ—้…็ฝฎๅœ–(้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011)
ๅœ–3. 1 ไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข้€š้Žๆขฏๅฝข้šœ็ค™็š„ๅฏฆ้ฉ—้…็ฝฎๅœ–(้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011)
ๅœ–3. 3  ๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎคไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข็ถ“้Ž13ยฐๆ–œๅกๆขฏๅฝข้šœ็ค™็‰ฉ็š„้€ฃ็บŒ็ต„ๅœ–๏ผˆ้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011๏ผ‰
ๅœ–3. 3 ๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎคไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข็ถ“้Ž13ยฐๆ–œๅกๆขฏๅฝข้šœ็ค™็‰ฉ็š„้€ฃ็บŒ็ต„ๅœ–๏ผˆ้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011๏ผ‰
ๅœ–3. 3 (a) ๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎคไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข๏ผˆ้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011๏ผ›ฮธ=13ยฐ๏ผŒT = t0 = 42 s๏ผ‰
ๅœ–3. 3 (a) ๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎคไธ‹ๆฒ‰ๅž‹ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข๏ผˆ้„ญๆ˜Žๅฎ๏ผŒ2011๏ผ›ฮธ=13ยฐ๏ผŒT = t0 = 42 s๏ผ‰
ๅœ–3. 5 ๆฏ”่ผƒๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎค๏ผˆไธŠๅœ–๏ผ‰ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข๏ผˆๅœ–3. 3 (a)๏ผ‰่ˆ‡FLOW-3Dๆจกๆ“ฌ๏ผˆไธ‹ๅœ–๏ผ‰็š„ๅ‚ณ้žๆณขๅฝข๏ผˆฮธ=13ยฐ๏ผŒt = 42 s๏ผ‰
ๅœ–3. 5 ๆฏ”่ผƒๅฏฆ้ฉ—ๅฎค๏ผˆไธŠๅœ–๏ผ‰ๅ…งๅญค็ซ‹ๆณข๏ผˆๅœ–3. 3 (a)๏ผ‰่ˆ‡FLOW-3Dๆจกๆ“ฌ๏ผˆไธ‹ๅœ–๏ผ‰็š„ๅ‚ณ้žๆณขๅฝข๏ผˆฮธ=13ยฐ๏ผŒt = 42 s๏ผ‰
ๅœ–4. 6้–˜้–€้–‹ๅ•Ÿ้€Ÿ็އ0.14 m/sไน‹็ญ‰ๅฏ†ๅบฆ็ทšๅŠๆตๅ ด
ๅœ–4. 6้–˜้–€้–‹ๅ•Ÿ้€Ÿ็އ0.14 m/sไน‹็ญ‰ๅฏ†ๅบฆ็ทšๅŠๆตๅ ด

ๅœ–4. 53 ๅ…งๆณขๅœจไธ‰่ง’ๅฝขๅ‰ๅกๅ่ฝ‰็‚บ้ †ๆ™‚้‡ๆธฆๆต๏ผŒๅพŒๅก้ขไธŠๅฝขๆˆ้€†ๆ™‚้‡ๆธฆๆต๏ผˆt = 63 s๏ผ‰
ๅœ–4. 53 ๅ…งๆณขๅœจไธ‰่ง’ๅฝขๅ‰ๅกๅ่ฝ‰็‚บ้ †ๆ™‚้‡ๆธฆๆต๏ผŒๅพŒๅก้ขไธŠๅฝขๆˆ้€†ๆ™‚้‡ๆธฆๆต๏ผˆt = 63 s๏ผ‰

Reference

Apel, J.R., Holbrook, J.R, Tsai, J. and Liu, A.K. (1985). The Sulu Sea internal soliton experiment. J. Phys. Oceanography, 15(12): 1625-1651. Ariyaratnam, J. (1998). Investigation of slope stability under internal wave action. B.Eng. (Hons.) thesis, Dept. of Environmental Eng., University of Western Australia, Australia. Baines, P.G. (1983). Tidal motion in submarine canyons โ€“ a laboratory experiment. J. Physical Oceanography, 13: 310-328. Benjamin, T.B. (1966). Internal waves of finite amplitude and permanent form. J. Fluid Mech., 25: 241-270. Bole, J.B., Ebbesmeyer, J.J. and Romea, R.D. (1994). Soliton currents in South China Sea: measurements and theoretical modelling. Proc. 26th Annual Offshore Tech. Conf., Houston, Texas. 367-375. Burnside, W. (1889). On the small wave-motions of a heterogeneous fluid under gravity. Proc. Lond., Math. Soc., (1) xx, 392-397. Chen C.Y., J.R-C. Hsu, H.H. Chen, C.F. Kuo and Cheng M.H (2007). Laboratory observations on internal solitary wave evolution on steep and inverse uniform slopes. Ocean Engineering, 34: 157-170. Cheng M.H., J.R-C. Hsu, C.Y. Chen (2005). Numerical model for internal solitary wave evolution on impermeable variable seabad, Proc.27th Ocean Eng, pp.355-359. Choi, W. and Camassa, R. (1996). Weakly nonlinear internal waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech., 313: 83-103. Ebbesmeyer, C.C., and Romea, R.D. (1992). Final design parameters for solitons at selected locations in South China Sea. Final and supplementary reports prepared for Amoco Production Company, 209pp. plus appendices. Ekman, V. M., (1904). โ€œOn dead-water, Norwegian North Polar Expeditionโ€, 1893-1896. Scientific Results, 5(15)๏ผš1-150. Farmer, D.M. (1978). Observation of long nonlinear internal waves in a lake. J. Phys. Oceanography, 8(1): 63-73. Garret, C. and Munk, W. (1972). Space-time scales of internal waves. Geophys. Fluid Dyn., 3: 225-264. Gill, A.E. (1982). Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. International Geophysical Series, Vol. 30, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Harleman, D.R.F. (1961). Stratified flow. Ch. 26 in Handbook of Fluid Dynamics (ed., V. Streeter), NY: McGraw-Hill, (26): 1-21. Helfrich, K.R. (1992). Internal solitary wave breaking and run-up on a uniform slope. J. Fluid Mech., 243: 133-154.

Helfrich, K.R. and Melville, W.K. (1986). On long nonlinear internal waves over slope-shelf topography. J. Fluid Mech., 167: 285-308. Honji, H., Matsunaga, N., Sugihara, Y. and Sakai, K. (1995). Experimental observation of interanl symmetric solitary waves in a two-layer fluid. Fluid Dynamics Research, 15 (2): 89-102. Hsu, M.K., Liu, A.K., and Liu, C. (2000). A study of internal waves in the China Sea and Yellow Sea using SAR. Continental Shelf Research, 20: 389-410. Johns, K. (1999). Interaction of an internal wave with a submerged sill in a two-layer fluid. B.Eng. (Hons.) thesis, Dept. of Environmental Eng., University of Western Australia, Australia Kao, T.W., Pan, F.S. and Renouard, D. (1985). Internal solitions on the pycnocline: generation, propagation, shoaling and breaking over a slope. J. Fluid Mech. 159: 19-53. Koop, C.G. and Butler, G. (1981). An investigation of internal solitary waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech., 112: 225-251. Lin, T.W. (2001). A study on internal waves characteristics in north of South China Sea, Master Thesis, Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan Univ., Taiwan. (In Chinese). Lynett, P., Wu, T.-R. and Liu, P. L.-F. (2002), Modeling wave runup with depth-integrated equations, Coastal Engineering, Vol. 46, pp. 89-107. Ming-Hung Cheng,John R.-C. Hsu, Chen-Yuan Chen and Cheng-Wu Chen (2009). Modelling the propagation of an internal solitary wave across double ridges and a shelf-slope.Environ Fluid Mech,9:321โ€“340. Ming-Hung Cheng and John R.C. Hsu (2011). Effect of frontal slope on waveform evolution of a depression interfacial solitary wave across a trapezoidal obstacle. Ocean Engineering. Matsuno, Y. (1993). A unified theory of nonlinear wave propagation in two-layer fluid systems. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 62: 1902-1916. Michallet, H. and Barthelemy, E. (1998). Experimental study of interfacial solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech., 366: 159-177. Muller, P. and X. Liu (2000). Scattering of internal waves at finite topography in two dimensions. Part I: Theory and case studies, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30: 532-549 Nagashima, H. (1971). Reflection and breaking of internal waves on a sloping beach. J. Oceanographical Soc. Japan, 27(1): 1-6. Nansen, F. (1902). The oceanography of the north polar basin. Sci. Results, Norwegian North Polar Expedition 1893-1896, 3: 9. Osborne, A.R. and Burch, T.L. (1980). Internal solitons in the Andaman Sea. Science, 208 (43): 451-460

82 Russell, J.S. (1844). On waves. Report of the 14th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, York, 311-390. Sandstrom, H. and Elliot J. A. (1984). Internal tide and solitons on the Scotian Shelf: a nutrient pump at work. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89 (C4): 6415-6428. Stokes G.G. (1847). On the Theory of Oscillatory Waves. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8: 441โ€“455. Strutt, J. W., Lord Rayleigh. (1883). Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density.Proceedings of the London mathematical society, 8: pp. 170-177. Sveen, J.K., Guo, Y., Davies, P.A. and Grue, J. (2002). On the breaking of internal solitary waves at a ridge. J. Fluid Mech., 469 (25): 161-188. Vlasenko, V., and Hutter, K. (2002). Numerical experiments on the breaking of solitary internal waves over a slope-shelf topography. J. of Physical Oceanography, 32(6), pp.1779-1793. Wessels F. and Hutter K. (1996). Interaction of internal waves with a topographic sill in a two-layered fluid. J. Phys. Oceanogr , 26: 5-20

Cad2Stl

FLOW-3D ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ์•ˆ๋‚ด

์ด ๋ฌธ์„œ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ผ๋ถ€ Utility Program์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ํŠน์ • ์ž‘์—…์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  1. ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ฐ STL ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ

FLOW-3D๋Š” ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ํ˜•์‹์ธ STLํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹๋งŒ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ CAD ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€์—์„œ STLํ˜•์‹์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ STLํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด FLOW-3D ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ STL ํŒŒ์ผ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ ๋‚˜์—ด๋œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ์„น์…˜์—์„œ ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • Cad2Stl : ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ CAD ํ˜•์‹์—์„œ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š”.STLํŒŒ์ผ
  • Topo2STL : ํŒŒ์ผ์„topoํ˜•์‹์—์„œ.STLํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ
  • MiniMagics :.STLํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ
  • qAdmesh :.STLํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์†Œํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ

Cad2Stl

Cad2Stl ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ CAD ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ FLOW-3D์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” STL ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Cad2Stl ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ STL ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • Autodesk 3D Max :.3ds
  • Autodesk ๋ณ„๋ช… :.obj
  • IGES: .igs,.iges
  • BREP :.brep
  • ๋‹จ๊ณ„ : .stp,.step
  • ์•„๋ฐ”์ฟ ์Šค 6.2+ :.inp
  • NASTRAN :.blk
  • Marc Mentat : ๊ณ ์ • ํ˜•์‹๊ณผ ์‰ผํ‘œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„.dat

Cad2Stl ์€ ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ์—ญ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋Š” ์œ ์ง€ ๋ณด์ˆ˜ ๊ณ„์•ฝ์ด ์œ ํšจํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  FLOW-3D ๊ณ ๊ฐ์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋ฉฐ FLOW-3D Usre Site์˜ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์—์„œ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Cad2Stl ์€ Flow Science Japan์—์„œ FLOW-3D ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

Cad2Stl Program
  1. ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์— ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ํŒŒ์ผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€
    • ์ถ”๊ฐ€ -๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์— ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ์ œ๊ฑฐ -๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
    • ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ด๋ฆ„์€ import file ์ด๋ฆ„๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” CADํŒŒ์ผ์„ STLํŒŒ์ผ ์ด๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋”๋ธ” ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋ฉด ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. ๊ตฌ์ฒดํ™” ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ STL ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ์ด ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋  ๋•Œ๋งˆ๋‹ค STL๋กœ ์ž‘์„ฑ๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ์ด ํ‘œ์‹œ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜๋ฉด ํŒŒ์ผ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ๋กœ๋“œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์™„๋ฃŒ๋˜๋ฉด ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋กœ๋“œํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋Œ€ํ™” ์ƒ์ž๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ BREP, IGES๋ฐ STEP ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์—๋งŒ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ๋กœ๋“œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์™„๋ฃŒ๋˜๋ฉด ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋กœ๋“œํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋Œ€ํ™” ์ƒ์ž๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๋ณ€ํ™˜ -ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋กœ๋“œํ•  ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ชฉ๋ก์—์„œ ํ•ด๋‹น ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
    • ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ -๋ชจ๋“  ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ณ€ํ™˜
    • ํ‘œ์‹œ -๋ณ€ํ™˜๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค
    • ๋ฉด ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ˆ˜์ • -์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์ˆ˜์ • ๋ฃจํ‹ด
    • ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก ์ˆจ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ -๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณด๊ธฐ ํ™”๋ฉด์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ์™€์ด์–ด ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์˜ค๋ฒ„๋ ˆ์ด -๊ฐ STL ํŒจ์‹ฏ์˜ ํŒจ์‹ฏ ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์˜ค๋ฒ„๋ ˆ์ด ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ํ•˜๋‹จ์˜ ํ™•์ธ๋ž€์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๋กœ๊ทธ ์ง€์šฐ๊ธฐ – ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋กœ๊ทธ ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ์ƒ์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ์ง€์›๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  4. ์ข…๋ฃŒ -ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋‹ซ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

qAdmesh

qAdmesh๋Š” .STLํŒŒ์ผ์— ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ์ด๋ฉฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๋Š์–ด์ง„ ํŒจ์‹ฏ, ๋ฐ˜์ „๋œ ๋ฒ•์„ , ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๋Š์–ด์ง„ ํŒจ์‹ฏ ๋ฐ ๋ˆ„๋ฝ๋œ ํŒจ์‹ฏ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‚ฌ์†Œํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. qAdmesh๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด:

  • GUI์—์„œ: Model Setup ํƒญ์˜ Tools โ€ฃ qAdmesh๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • Windows: ๋ฐ”ํƒ• ํ™”๋ฉด ์•„์ด์ฝ˜์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‹œ์ž‘ ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ FLOW-3D v12.0 ํด๋”์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋„๊ตฌ ํ•˜์œ„ ๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ์— ์žˆ๋Š” Admesh ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • Linux์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ: $F3D_HOME/utilities/qAdmesh์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

๋ช…๋ น: qAdmesh๋ฅผ ์—ด๊ณ  ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง€์˜ค๋ฉ”ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋กœ๋“œ ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ • ์‚ฌํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒˆ ํ˜•์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋‘๊ณ  ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์œ ํ˜•์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์ƒˆ ํ˜•์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์ด์ง„ STL ์€ ASCII STL ์˜ต์…˜ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์€ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์ด์ง„ ๋ฐ ASCII ํ˜•์‹ ๋งŒ FLOW-3D ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋จ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ ์šฉ์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

qAdmesh program
qAdmesh program

qAdmesh์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์€ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค์˜ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€ ์„น์…˜์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถœ๋ ฅ์—๋Š” ๊ฐ์ง€๋œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์™€ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์˜ต์…˜์ด ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์กฐ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ์˜ต์…˜์€ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ณ ์ •ํ•  ๋•Œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ด ์–ด๋–ค ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ฐจ ํƒญ์—๋Š” .STL ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํšŒ์ „, ๋ฏธ๋Ÿฌ๋ง, ํฌ๊ธฐ ์กฐ์ •, ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋ฐ ๋ณ‘ํ•ฉ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ต์…˜์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

qAdmesh๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค๋งŒ FSI์—์„œ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. qAdmesh๊ฐ€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์‹ฌ๊ฐ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ qAdmesh ๊ฐ€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์ค„์–ด ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ CAD ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ  .STL ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์žฌ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

MiniMagics 

MiniMagics ๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ STLํŒŒ์ผ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋ฐ ๋ณต๊ตฌ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค์น˜๋Š” FLOW-3D ํ™ˆ ๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ ์˜ Utilites ํด๋”์—์„œ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ๋ณต๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ qAdmesh์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์ˆ˜์ • ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ qAdmesh์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

$F3D_HOME/UtilitiesSTL

  • Topo2STL

FLOW-3D๊ฐ€ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ผํ•œ CAD ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์€ .STL์ด์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜•์‹์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ˜•์‹์˜ ์ง€ํ˜• ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋“œ๋ฌธ ์ผ์ด ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Topo2STL์˜ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Topo2STL ์€ Windows ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ๋“œ๋กญ ๋‹ค์šด ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ช…๋ น

  1. ์ง€ํ˜• ํŒŒ์ผ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ ํ˜•์‹์˜ ASCII ํŒŒ์ผ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์„ ์€ ์ ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋‹จ์œ„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ 3 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ (์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ”ผํŠธ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฏธํ„ฐ)๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” ๊ณต๋ฐฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ ์ˆœ์„œ๋Š” XYZ ์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ Z๋Š” ํ‘œ๊ณ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” ๋™์ผํ•œ XY ์ ์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌ์ธํŠธ์˜ ์ˆœ์„œ (ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ค„)๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋จธ๋ฆฌ๊ธ€ ์ค„์ด๋‚˜ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ ์ค„์ด ์—†์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. Topo2stl.exe์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๊ฐ€ ์ถ”์ถœ๋œ ์œ„์น˜์— ์žˆ๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ Topo2STL์— ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋ผ๋Š” topo ํŒŒ์ผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์ฐฝ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์ฐฝ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  4. topoํŒŒ์ผ์ด ์„ ํƒ๋˜๋ฉด, Topo2STL์˜ ์ฐฝ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ , X, Y์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์™€ Z ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  topo๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ต์Šคํ…ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜๋ฉด Topo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ต์Šคํ…ํŠธ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ด ํฌ์ธํŠธ ์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ Information: Topo data extents ์•„๋ž˜์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Topo2STL
Topo2STL
Topo2STL
Topo2STL
  1. ๋ณ€ํ™˜์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ž…๋ ฅ์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋Šฅ ๋ฐ STL ์ตœ์†Œ Z ์ขŒํ‘œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋Š” 0.002 * min (X ๋ฒ”์œ„, Y ๋ฒ”์œ„)์ด๊ณ  STL ์ตœ์†Œ Z ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” ZMIN-(ZMAX-ZMIN)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ZMIN ๋ฐ ZMAX๋Š” Topo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋Š” STL ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ Topo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„์„๋˜๋Š”์ง€ ์ œ์–ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    • STL ์ตœ์†Œ Z ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” Topo ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ZMAX๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์€ ๊ฐ’์ด์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ STLํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ตœ์†Œ โ€‹โ€‹Z ๋‘๊ป˜๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  2. Browse ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์€ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  3. ๋ณ€ํ™˜์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์‹œ์ž‘๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ์ทจ์†Œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณ€ํ™˜์ด ์™„๋ฃŒ๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€ Topo2STL ์ฐฝ์„ ๋‹ซ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Topo2STL
Topo2STL
  1. ๋ณ€ํ™˜์ด ์™„๋ฃŒ (๋˜๋Š” ์ข…๋ฃŒ)๋˜๋ฉด ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ๋‹จ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์–ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ Topo ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Topo2STL
  1. FSAI๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹ ๋ณ€ํ™˜

FSAI์˜ ๋„๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฉ”์‹œ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค Abaqus6.2 ์ดํ›„ ํ˜•์‹๊ณผ NASTRAN ๋ฒŒํฌ ํ˜•์‹์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•์‹์„ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” FSAI๋Š” ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ๋“œ๋กญ ๋‹ค์šด ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FSAI๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. EXODUS II

  • ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๋ฅผ ์—ฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ์˜ Abaqus ํ˜•์‹์ธ์ง€ NASTRAN ํ˜•์‹์ธ์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฆ„ )
  • ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•„๋“œ์—์„œ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ ์œ„์น˜ ํ•„๋“œ์—์„œ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถœ๋ ฅ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์œผ์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ด๋ฆ„ ํ•„๋“œ์—์„œ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ๋ˆ„๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

 ๋…ธํŠธ

์ด FSAI ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด FLOW-3D ์™€ ๋ณ„๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ผ์ด์„ผ์Šค๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ FLOW-3D ์˜์—… ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฌธ์˜ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

  1. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ธฐ

์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ๋“œ๋กญ ๋‹ค์šด ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ (์˜ˆ: ์œ ์ฒด ์†์„ฑ ๋“ฑ)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ์—ด์ „๋‹ฌ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜
  • ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์—ด ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด
  • ์ƒท ์Šฌ๋ฆฌ๋ธŒ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ๋†’์ด
  • ๊ณ ์•• ๋‹ค์ด์บ์ŠคํŒ…์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ”ผ์Šคํ†ค ์†๋„
  • ๋ฐธ๋ธŒ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜
  1. MPDB (Material Properties Database) ํ™•์žฅ

MPDB (Material Properties Database)๋Š” FLOW-3D ์™€ ๋ณ„๋„๋กœ Flow Science, Inc ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํƒ€์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋ฌธํ—Œ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜จ๋„ ์˜์กด์„ฑ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ์šฉ MPDB๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ FLOW-3D์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์™€ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ FLOW-3D ๋กœ ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” MPDB ๋…์  ๋ฒ„์ „์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. MPDB์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ณ ์ฒด์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ FLOW-3D์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ณ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ์œ ์ฒด ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ, ์‘๊ณ  ๋ฐ ์—ด ์‘๋ ฅ ์ง„ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

MPDB๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋…๋ฆฝํ˜• ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. MPDB์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ง€์นจ์€ JAHM Software, Inc.๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ MPDB๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ์™€ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด MPDB ์šฉ ์‹คํ–‰ ํŒŒ์ผ์ด Windows์™€ Linux์— ์žˆ์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ–‰ ํŒŒ์ผ์€ FLOW-3D GUI์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜๋ฉฐ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฉ”๋‰ด ์•„๋ž˜ MPDB์—์„œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๊ธฐ ๋ฉ”๋‰ด ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ์ด ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ผ๋„ ์ถฉ์กฑ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด FLOW-3D GUI๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. MPDB%F3D_HOME%\Utilities$F3D_HOME/UtilitiesMPDB_for_FLOW-3D

FLOW-3D MPDB
FLOW-3D MPDB

material๋ฅผ ํด๋ฆญ MPDB์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค MPDB๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„์˜ ์ฐฝ์—์„œ ์—ด๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Materials ํƒญ, ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”์—์„œ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์œผ๋กœ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜์—ฌ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

(Material Properties Database)
(Material Properties Database)

์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์€ ์ฒ  (Fe)์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(Fe)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Fe)

์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ, ์„ธ๋ผ๋ฏน, ์œ ๋ฆฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํƒญ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์€ Al & Cu ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(Al & Cu)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Al & Cu)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Fe,Ni - 1006 (UNS G10060))
FLOW-3D MPDB(Fe,Ni – 1006 (UNS G10060))

์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ์‹๋ณ„๋˜๋ฉด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๋ฉด ํ•ด๋‹น ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์†์„ฑ ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„์˜ ์ฐฝ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด Fe ๋ฐ Ni ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ 1006 (UNS G10060)์„ ์—ฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ FLOW-3D์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(1006(UNS G10060))
FLOW-3D MPDB(1006(UNS G10060))

๊ฐ ์†์„ฑ์€ ์ด ์ฐฝ์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ์—์„œ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ํ‘œ์‹œ, ํ”Œ๋กœํŒ… ๋˜๋Š” ์ €์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์†์„ฑ ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ FLOW-3D ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

FLOW-3D ์™€ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ฐฝ์„ ๋‹ซ๊ณ  FLOW-3D/SolidWorks/ANSYS ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ FLOW-3D๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ํ˜•์‹(.f3d_dbf ํ™•์žฅ), ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ํ˜•์‹ (.f3d_dbs ํ™•์žฅ), ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‰ผํ‘œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋œ ๊ฐ’(CSVํ˜•์‹)์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ FLOW-3D ํ˜ธํ™˜ ํ˜•์‹์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. MPDB์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ณ ์ฒด์ด์ง€๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๋ ค๋ฉด FLOW-3D์—์„œ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์œ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ Fluids ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ํ˜•์‹์„ ์„ ํƒํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ํŒŒ์ผ ํ˜•์‹๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๋ฌธ์„œ ํด๋”์™€ Windows ๋ฐ Linux์— ์ €์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CSV<My Documents>\FLOW-3D\gui\MaterialsDatabase/home/<user>/FLOW-3D/gui/MaterialsDatabase

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„์น˜๋Š” FLOW-3D์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ณณ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. MPDB์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„์น˜๋กœ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ธ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” FLOW-3D์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์— ์˜ํ•ด ์„ ํƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

1006 (UNS G10060) ์ฒ  ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(UNS G10060)
FLOW-3D MPDB(UNS G10060)

์ด์ „์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ–ˆ๋˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ FLOW-3D ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์—†๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์†์„ฑ์ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋˜์ž ๋งˆ์ž ํ”Œ๋กฏ ๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋˜๋ฉด ์ฐธ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ ์„น์…˜์ด ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฐธ์กฐ ํƒญ ์†์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ฐ์€ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์„น์…˜์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

์˜จ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๋„๋ก ๊ฐ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ”Œ๋กฏ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด ์—ด์ „๋„๋„๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ํ”Œ๋กœํŒ…ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ €์˜จ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋„์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ”Œ๋กฏ์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— .f3d_dbsํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์“ฐ๋ ค๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์Œ ์ฐฝ์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ์“ธ ์†์„ฑ์„ โ€‹โ€‹์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†์„ฑ์ด ์„ ํƒ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋‹ซ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. 

์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ฐฝ์„ ๋‹ซ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D/SolidWorks/ANSYS ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ๋‹ซ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(Low temperature warning)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Low temperature warning)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Temperature Plot)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Temperature Plot)

.f3d_dbsํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์“ฐ๋ ค๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์Œ ์ฐฝ์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ์“ธ ์†์„ฑ์„ โ€‹โ€‹์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†์„ฑ์ด ์„ ํƒ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋‹ซ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์ฐฝ์„ ๋‹ซ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D/SolidWorks/ANSYS ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ๋‹ซ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์ด ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•œ ํ›„ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ๋ˆ„๋ฝ๋œ ์†์„ฑ์€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์†์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ (์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๋ถ€๋‹ด)์—์„œ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋ ค์žˆ๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ FLOW-3D์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์†์„ฑ์„ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์ผ์น˜์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(Select properties to write to file)
FLOW-3D MPDB(Select properties to write to file)

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ๋‹ซ์€ ํ›„ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ๋ฌป๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ฐ’์€ MPDB ๊ฐ€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์— ์ง€์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ๊ฐ€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ •์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์œ„์น˜์™€ ํ™•์žฅ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์„ค์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(File locate position)
FLOW-3D MPDB(File locate position)

CSVํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ๊ธฐ๋ก๋˜๋ฉด ๊ฐ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ” ํ˜•์‹ ์†์„ฑ ์ฐฝ์˜ ๊ฐ’ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๊ธฐ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ด์€ ํ•ญ์ƒ ์˜จ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D MPDB(csv file)
FLOW-3D MPDB(csv file)
  1. grfedit๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ flsgrf ํŒŒ์ผ ํŽธ์ง‘

๋ช…๋ น ์ค„ ์œ ํ‹ธ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ runscript์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ( Runscripts ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ฐธ์กฐ ).


Runscripts ์‚ฌ์šฉ

์‹คํ–‰ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๋Š” ์ž‘์—… ๋ฌธ์ œ ๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰๋˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๋Š” $F3D_HOME/local๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ์— ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • F3D_HOMEFLOW-3D ์„ค์น˜ ๋””๋ ‰ํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ง€์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .
  • F3DTKNUX_LICENSE_FILEFLOW-3D ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค ์„œ๋ฒ„ ์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ โ€‹โ€‹์ง€์ • ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • PATHPATHํฌํ•จํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. $F3D_HOME/local๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ์‹คํ–‰ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • F3D_VERSION: ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์†”๋ฒ„ ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ํšจํ•œ ์˜ต์…˜์€ double๋ฐฐ์ • ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฒ„์ „ ๋ฐ prehyd์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ง€์ • ๋ฐฐ์ • ๋ฐ€๋„ ์†”๋ฒ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ช…๋ น ์ค„์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด :

  1. ๋ช…๋ น ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ ๋˜๋Š” ํ„ฐ๋ฏธ๋„์„ ์—ฝ๋‹ˆ ๋‹ค.
  2. ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
    • Windows : FLOW-3D ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๋ณต์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ FLOW-3D ์•„์ด์ฝ˜ ์„ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์œผ๋กœ ํด๋ฆญ ํ•˜๊ณ  ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์„ ํƒ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .
    • Linux : ์„ค์น˜ ๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ ์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ flow3dvars.sh๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค local.
  3. ์†”๋ฒ„๊ฐ€ ์‹คํ–‰์ค‘์ธ ๋””๋ ‰ํ† ๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  4. ์›ํ•˜๋Š” runscript ๋ช…๋ น์„ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. runhyd <ext2>

  • grfedit๋ฅผ ์—ฐ ํ›„ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์†Œ์Šค ํŒŒ์ผ (flsgrf.*๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋  ํŒŒ์ผ)์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ „์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๋กœ (์˜ˆ c:\users\username\FLOW-3D\simulation\flsgrf.simulation:)๋ฅผ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  <enter>๋ฅผ ๋ˆ„๋ฅด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • ์ด์ œ, ํŒŒ์ผ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํ™•์žฅ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, (๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•  ์œ„์น˜๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ) ํŒŒ์ผ์„ new_output. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ๊ธฐ๋ก๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค c:\users\username\FLOW-3D\simulation\flsgrf.new_output. ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฉด ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ฎ์–ด์“ฐ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ณด๋‹ค ๋Šฆ๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์†Œ์Šค ํŒŒ์ผ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋งŒ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ด ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ์–ด๋–ค ํžˆ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŽธ์ง‘, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŽธ์ง‘ ์žฌ์‹œ์ž‘ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ์“ฐ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ๋ฌป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.
  • ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•œ ํ›„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ด ๋‹ซํžˆ๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ flsgrf.*ํŒŒ์ผ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

 ๋…ธํŠธ

  • grfedit๋Š” FLOW-3D v11.1 ์ด์ƒ์—์„œ ์ž‘์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์†Œ์Šค flsgrf.*ํŒŒ์ผ์€ grfedit์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ •๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค
  • FLOW-3D/MP์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ์ž‘์—…ํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” flsgrf1์˜ ์œ„๋กœ flsgrf ๊ต์ฒด ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค .
  • ์†Œ์Šค ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ชจ๋‘์— ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์œ ์ผํ•œ ์ด๋ฆ„์€ flsgrf๋ฐ flsgrf1์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ๋ฐTruVOF๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์—์„œ ๋“ฑ๋ก ์ƒํ‘œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

education_banner

FLOW-3D ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ต์œก

FLOW-3D Training Modules

FLOW-3D GUI PART 1 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

FLOW-3D GUI

  • Introduction to FLOW-3D graphical user interface
  • Simulation Manager Tab
  • Portfolio
  • Running Simulations and the Queue
  • Runtime Diagnostics: Text Output
  • Runtime Diagnostics: Plots
  • Runtime Controls
  • FLOW-3D File Structure
    Review the important files that are created when running simulations in FLOW-3D. Access the simulation files through a link on the Simulation Manager Tab. Identify the important setup and solver outputs files

๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค์ • ํƒญ

  • Introduction to the Model Setup TabIntroduction to the Model Setup Tab including an orientation to its layout and how to access model inputs though the dock widgets on the process toolbar. Options for customizing the layout of the process toolbar are also reviewed.
  • Navigating the 3D ViewportLearn the basic controls for navigating the 3D viewport. This includes mouse controls, toolbar shortcuts, saving views, and moving the pivot point.
  • Other Menu/Toolbar Navigation Options
  • Working with Dock Widget Inputs
  • Model DependenciesRecognize and understand dock widget input dependencies.
Model Setup Tab PART 2 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
Global Settings PART 3 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

์ „์—ญ ์„ค์ •

  • Global Dock Widget Overview
  • Pressure Type
  • Finish Time
  • Finish Options: Additional Finish Condition
  • Finish Options: Active Simulation ControlDefine a logical condition to stop the simulation using active simulation control.
  • Restart OptionsHow to manually define the Restart options to continue running a previously completed simulation.
  • Version OptionsDefine the Version options to specify the solver version and the number of processors used when starting a new simulation run.

๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ

  • Physics Dock Widget OverviewDescription of the available options in the Physics dock widget
  • Interface Tracking, Number of Fluids and Flow ModeBackground information on interface tracking methods and defining the number of fluids. Description of the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for simulation of complex free surfaces, and how this affects the selection of the number of fluids. Examples are presented for one fluid and two fluid simulations.
  • Activating Physics ModelsDemonstration for how to activate physics models and how to limit the display of inactive physics models using the physics model filter.
Physics Models PART 4 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
Fluid Properties PART 5 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

์œ ์ฒด ์†์„ฑ

  • Fluids Dock Widget OverviewIntroduction to the Fluids dock widget and how to define properties for fluids in the simulation.
  • Defining Fluid Properties ManuallyExample for how to manually define fluid properties.
  • Defining Fluid Properties from the Materials DatabaseExample for how to load fluid properties from the fluids database.
  • Managing the Materials Database
    How to add and edit entries in the materials database.

์ง€์˜ค๋ฉ”ํŠธ๋ฆฌ

  • Introduction
  • Component and Subcomponent Overview
  • Creating Subcomponents: Overview
  • Creating Subcomponents: STL
  • Creating Subcomponents: Primitives Manually
  • Creating Subcomponents: Primitives Interactively
  • Creating Subcomponents: Raster
  • Subcomponent Types
  • Subcomponent Order
  • Component Order
  • Component and Subcomponent Properties
  • Transformations
Geometry PART 6 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
Meshing PART 7 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

Meshing

  • Meshing Introduction
  • Coordinate Systems
  • FAVORโ„ข
  • Meshing Basics: Meshing Overview
  • Meshing Basics: Creating Mesh Blocks
  • Meshing Basics: Domain Extents
  • Meshing Basics: Global Controls
  • Meshing Basics: Local Controls
  • Reviewing Mesh Quality: FAVORize
  • Reviewing Mesh Quality: Preprocessing
  • Multi-block Meshing
  • Conforming Mesh Blocks
  • Meshing Best Practices

Boundary Conditions

  • Introduction
    Introductory comments regarding how boundary conditions are applied and other considerations when defining BCs.
  • Boundaries Dock Widget Overview
  • Velocity
  • Volume Flow Rate
  • Wall
  • Symmetry
  • Grid Overlay
  • Pressure
  • Continuative
  • Outflow
    Description and example setup of the Outflow BC type.
Boundary Conditions PART 8 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
Initial Conditions PART 9 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

Initial Conditions

  • Introduction
    Discussion of how the initial conditions and can affect simulation results and run times.
  • Options for Defining ICs
    Example: Global Settings
    Example: Fluid Regions
  • Example: Function Coefficients
    Description and example for defining spatially varying fluid properties with user defined functions.
  • Example: Pointers
    Description and example for defining an initial condition by filling contiguous cells with the Pointer object.

Output Options

  • Output Dock Widget Overview
  • Spatial Data
  • Spatial Data: Restart Data
  • Spatial Data: Selected Data
  • History Data
  • Diagnostics: Short Print Data
  • Diagnostics: Long Print Data
  • Example Setup
  • Batch Post-processing
  • Batch Mode: Context File
  • Batch Mode: Manual
  • Batch Mode: Generate Reports
Output Options PART 10 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
Baffles PART 11 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES

Baffles

Introduction
An introduction to the available options for creating and defining baffle objects.
Creating Baffle Objects
Limitations
Force Outputs
Porosity
Scalar Reset Options
Summary
A summary of the important options for creating baffles and defining properties.

Measurement Devices

  • History Probes 
    History probes are point measurement devices and are used to record solver output at a specific location. Examples are provided for how to create these objects interactively and by defining a coordinate value.
  • Flux Surfaces 
    Flux surfaces are a special type of baffle object with a fixed porosity of 1, and are used to calculate flux quantities. Examples are provided for how to create flux surfaces and the types of data available from their output.
  • Sampling volumes 
    Sampling volumes are are three-dimensional data collection regions. Examples are provided for how to create sampling volumes and the types of data available from their output.
Measurement Devices PART 12 OF THE FLOW-3D V12.0 TRAINING SERIES
W&E Exercise: Ogee Weir

W&E Exercise: Ogee Weir

  • This exercise demonstrates the steps to setup a basic free surface or open channel flow simulation in FLOW-3D. It is intended to be a simple and fast running simulation that demonstrates the key setup steps that can be applied to a wide range of other common open channel flow applications. In this exercise, we will simulate flow over an ogee weir to predict the discharge capacity. Simulation results can be validated against discharge rating curves obtained from physical model measurements (USBR, 1996).  Special attention is given to the common types of boundary conditions used in open channel flow simulations and how to select them during the model setup. We also provide examples for common post-processing tasks using both FLOW-3D and FlowSight.
collapsed-raised-fluid-column-figure-1-1

Steady-State Accelerator for Free-Surface Flows

์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ€์†๊ธฐ

์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ Tony Hirt ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ฐ€์˜ค๋Š” FLOW-3D  v12.0 ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด Steady-State Accelerator์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค  .

์ผ์‹œ์ ์ธ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ ๊ทผ ์  ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋” ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ž์ฃผ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒํ™ฉ์€ ์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„ ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์••์ถ• ํŒŒ๋Š” ๋ถ•๊ดดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋žœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋‚จ๊ธธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํŒŒ๋™์€ ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋žœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์••์ถ• ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์‡ ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์  ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค (์ฆ‰, ์••๋ ฅ-์†๋„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์€ ์••๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŒŒ๋™์ด ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ์ธ ์˜์—ญ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์งง์€ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ—ˆ์šฉํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์••๋ ฅ ์žฅ์— ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋…ธ์ด์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์žฅ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ „ํŒŒ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ์„๋งŒํผ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์‡ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋…ธํŠธ์—์„œ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์…€์— ์ ์šฉ๋œ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ์••๋ ฅ ์กฐ์ •์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ต๋ž€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ์‡ ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋Œํ•‘์€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Steady-State Accelerator Idea

์œ ์ฒด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ๋˜๋Š” ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์€  VOF (Volume-of-Fluid) ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FLOW-3D ์—์„œ ์ถ”์ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ์œ ์ฒด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ F์˜ ๋น„์œจ์€ ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ฐพ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด์— ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋Š” F ๊ฐ’๋„ ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. F๊ฐ€ ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์ˆ˜์ง ์ธ ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„๊ฐ€ 0์ด์–ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ์ ‘์„  ์œ ์ฒด ์†๋„๋Š” 0 ์ผ ํ•„์š”๋Š” ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์œ„์–ด ์œ„์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์—๋Š” ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์—์„œ ๋‚˜์˜ค๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์œ„์น˜์™€ ๋ชจ์–‘์€ ๋ณ€ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ์†”๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ •์ƒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์†๋„๋ฅผ 0์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฐพ์•„์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ •์ƒ ์†๋„๋ฅผ 0์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์••๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ •์ƒ ์†๋„์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ด ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์••๋ ฅ์— “๋Œํ•‘”์••๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†๋„๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ฐ–์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ์Œ์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ •์ƒ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ 0์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›Œ์ง€๋ฉด ์ˆ˜์ • ์••๋ ฅ๋„ 0์ด๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด ๊ณ ์ • ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๋ณด์ •์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ํฌ๋ฉด ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ์ŠˆํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ๋ณด์ • ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ œํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์–ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ์•ฝ์–ด ssacc ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ, S๋Š” teady- S ํ…Œ์ดํŠธ ์•ก์„ธ์„œ๋ฆฌ elerator์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์˜ต์…˜์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ์ž…๋ ฅ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ssacc ์˜ ๊ฐ’ ์€ ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•œ ์ƒํ•œ ์ธ 1.0๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ™์•„์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋Œํ•‘ ์••๋ ฅ์— ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ œํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ • ํ•ด ์ง€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ผ์‹œ์ ์ธ ํ˜„์ƒ์— ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋Œํ•‘ ๋ฆฌ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด์ „ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋˜์–ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ€์†๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ณผ๋„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋” ์ด์ƒ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œํ•‘ ์••๋ ฅ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ธ ํž˜์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ „ํŒŒ์™€ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œํผ๋Š” ํฐ ๊ณผ๋„ ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋„๋ก ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์•ˆ์ •๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์–ป๋Š” ๋ฐ์—๋งŒ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋ฆฌ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๋Œํ•‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ฃผ์˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์šธ์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋Œํ•‘ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ssacc ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ค„์ž„์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์˜ˆ๋Š” ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ€์†๊ธฐ์˜ ๋Œํ•‘ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Steady-State Accelerator Examples

Collapse of Raised Fluid Column

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์˜ˆ๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด 100cm, ๊นŠ์ด 5cm์˜ 2 ์ฐจ์› ๋ฌผ ์›…๋ฉ์ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์„ ๋‹ด์€ ํƒฑํฌ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋Š” ๋Œ€์นญ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ ์ค‘์•™์—๋Š” ํญ 10cm, ๋†’์ด 3cm์˜ ์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ ์œ„์— ๋ฌผ ๋ธ”๋ก์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ธ”๋ก์€ ์ค‘๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฌผ์— ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์ถฉ๋Œ ์ง€์ ์—์„œ ๋ฉ€๋ฆฌ ์ด๋™ ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ ํƒฑํฌ ๋์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ํŒŒ๋„๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 100 ์ดˆ ํ›„์—๋„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1).

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ€์†๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ssacc = 1.0 ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ชจ๋“  ํŒŒ๋™์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์‡ ๋˜์–ด ๊ฑฐ์˜ ํ‰ํ‰ํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์•„๋ž˜์— ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ ๋„์˜ ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์„œ์„œํžˆ ๊ฐ์‡ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2). ์ด ์˜ˆ์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋œ ๋Œํ•‘์€ ํŠนํžˆ ์ธ์ƒ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1. Column collapse without damping. Times of flow plots are 0.0, 10.0, and 100.0s. Bottom figure is the mean kinetic energy vs. time.
Figure 2. Column collapse with damping coefficient ssacc=1.0 at times of 0.0, 10.0 and 100.0s. Bottom figure is the mean kinetic energy vs. time.

ย 

์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๊ฒฉ์ž์—์„œ 45 ยฐ์˜ ์ •์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ์ƒ์Šน

์ˆ˜์ง ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ์ƒ์Šน์€ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์–‘ํ˜ธํ•œ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒ์Šน ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์–‘์€ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๋ ฅ, ์ฆ‰ ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์˜ ์ฝ”์‚ฌ์ธ์— ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๊ณฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ด‰ ์„  ๊ธธ์ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์˜ˆ์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ด๋ฉฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์€ 70 dynes / cm์ด๊ณ  ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์€ 30 ยฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฑ„๋„์€ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์ด ์ •์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 0.707cm์ด๊ณ  ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๊ฒฉ์ž์—์„œ 45 ยฐ ํšŒ์ „ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ x ๋ฐ y ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€์นญ์„ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ถ„๋ฉด ๋งŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์—๋Š” ์ œ๋กœ ๊ฒŒ์ด์ง€ ์••๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ฌผ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ ๊ธธ์ด๋Š” 0.0125cm (41x41x80 ์…€)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์Šน์‹œ์ผœ์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ์ด๋ก ์  ์œ ์ฒด ๋Ÿ‰์€ 0.04373cc์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3a๋Š” ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ์‡  ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œํ•‘์—†์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์–‘์€ ์ด๋ก  ๊ฐ’๋ณด๋‹ค 1.74 % ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3b์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋Œํ•‘์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” 2.24 %๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์†๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ๋Š” ์•ฝ 0.15 ์ดˆ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํ‘œ์ค€ ์†”๋ฒ„๋Š” 0.8 ์ดˆ ํ›„์— ๋งŒ โ€‹โ€‹์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ 5 ๋ฐฐ ์ด์ƒ ๋” ์˜ค๋ž˜ ๊ฑธ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 3a. Capillary rise in square channel without damping pressures.
Figure 3b. Histories of fluid volume in the two simulations (blue is with damping).

ssacc๊ฐ€ 1.0๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์œผ๋ฉด ๋Œํ•‘์ด ์ ์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ ด์— ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋„๋‹ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1.0์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ssacc ๊ฐ’์€ ๋Œํ•‘๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ssacc = 0.0 ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ก ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ›„๋ฉด ๋ฒฝ์— ์ ์€ ์–‘์˜ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ ด๋œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋’ค์ชฝ ๋ฒฝ์—์žˆ๋Š” ์ž‘์€ ์œ ์ฒด ์กฐ๊ฐ์€ ํ‰ํ˜• ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ์ŠˆํŠธ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ •์ฐฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋žœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋ฒฝ์— ๋‚จ๊ธฐ๊ณ  ๋’ค๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์˜ค๋ฒ„ ์ŠˆํŠธ๋Š” ssacc ๊ฐ€ 0์ด ์•„๋‹ ๋•Œ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

2 Fluid, 1 Temperature

2 Fluid, 2 Temperature ๋ชจ๋ธ

2 Fluid, 2 Temperature ๋ชจ๋ธ

์šฐ์ฃผ์„  ๋ฐ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ ํƒฑํฌ ๋ฐ ํŠน์ • ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ์žฅ์น˜๋Š” ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ž‘๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์•ก์ฒด ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ฒด ์ƒํƒœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์œ ์ฒด ๊ณ„๋ฉด์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ์—๋„, ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™๋„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ!

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3D v12.0์—๋Š” 2 Fluid, 2 Temperature ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

 

๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ : 2 Fluid, 1 Temperature

FLOW-3D ์˜ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ์ถ”์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ TruVOF๋Š” ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์œ„์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ 2 Fluid ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ž‘๋™ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜,์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š”, ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ์…€์˜ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋žต๋„์— ๋„์‹œ ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ์˜จ๋„ (๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ) Tmix๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์งˆ๋Ÿฌ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฌ ์šธ ๋•Œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ด-๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์•ก์ฒด ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ • ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์šฉ์•ก์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด-๊ธฐ์ฒด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ํ•จ์œ ํ•˜๋Š” ์…€์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์••๋„ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ์˜จ๋„ ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์ธ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜๋งŒ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ-2 Fluid, 1 Temperature

์ข…ํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ : 2 Fluid, 2 Temperature

1 Temperature ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 2 Fluid ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 2 Temperature ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋ฒ„์ „ 11.3์— ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์•„๋ž˜ ํšŒ๋กœ๋„์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๊ฐ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ ์ƒ์˜ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์ €์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ด ํฌํ•จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ์…€์€ ์ด์ œ ์•ก์ฒด (T1)์™€ ๊ฐ€์Šค (T2) ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ข…ํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ : 2 ์œ ์ฒด, 2 ์˜จ๋„

ํƒฑํฌ ์Šฌ๋กœ์‹ฑ(Tank sloshing)

ํƒฑํฌ ์Šฌ๋กœ์‹ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ, ์•ก์ฒด๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„ 300K์ด๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์Šค๋Š” 400K์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ์ •๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์•„๋ž˜ ์• ๋‹ˆ๋ฉ”์ด์…˜์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋„ ์œค๊ณฝ์—์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šฉ์•ก์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ์€ 1 Temperature ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ง€๊ณ  ๊ณ„๋ฉด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๊ฐ€๋ฆฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ : 2 Fluid, 1 Temperature

์ข…ํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ : 2 Fluid, 2 Temperature

๊ณต๊ธฐ์ค‘ ๋“œ๋กญ ์šฉ์ ‘(Drop welding in air)

์ด ๋‚™ํ•˜ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์•ก์ฒด ๊ธˆ์†์€ ์ค‘๋ ฅ ํ•˜์—์„œ 2300K์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ ์ฒดํ™” ๋œ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ฒ ๋“œ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„๋Š” 293K์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. simplified model์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์•ก์ฒด ๊ธˆ์† ๋‚™ํ•˜ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ ๋“œ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์—๋„ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— comprehensive model์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹จ์ˆœํ™” ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์˜จ๋„ ํ•„๋“œ ์ง„ํ™”

์ข…ํ•ฉ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ํ•„๋“œ

FLOW-3D์˜ 2 Fluid, 2 Temperature ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์œ ์ฒด ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ์ถ”์ ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ ์Šฌ๋กœ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์—ด์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐ ์œ„์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆ์ด๋‚˜ ์˜๊ฒฌ์€ adwaith@flow3d.com์— ๋ฌธ์˜ํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์˜ ๊ณ ์ •(Contact Line Pinning)

์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์˜ ๊ณ ์ •(Contact Line Pinning)

์ฆ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋น—๋ฐฉ์šธ์—์„œ ๋‚จ์€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฌผ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์”ป์€ ์ž๋™์ฐจ์—์„œ ์ข‹์ง€ ๋ชปํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ๊ณต์ •์€, ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ๋“œ๋กญ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ์ด ์ธ์‡„ ๋œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋˜๋Š” ํ…์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ์ž‰ํฌ์ ฏ ์ธ์‡„์—์„œ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ์–ด๋–ค ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—” ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค๋ฉด, ์ž‰ํฌ ์ฐŒ๊บผ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์‡„ ๋œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋‚˜ ํ…์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ์ž‰ํฌ์ ฏ ์ธ์‡„๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•ก์ฒด ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ์ฆ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ž”๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฌผ์ด ์˜ˆ์ƒ์น˜ ๋ชปํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง ์–ผ๋ฃฉ์ด ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ์˜ˆ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ปคํ”ผ์˜ ์ž”๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฌผ์ด ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ๋ฐ”๊นฅ ์ชฝ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ์— ๋ชจ์—ฌ ์–‡์€ ์›ํ˜• ๋ง ์–ผ๋ฃฉ์ด ๋‚จ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์ ์ธ ๊ณผ์ •์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง ์–ผ๋ฃฉ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ๋œ ๊ณ ์ฒด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์ด ์žˆ์–ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์€ ์•ก์ฒด ๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด ๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธฐํŒ๊ณผ ๊ต์ฐจํ•˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ์™ธ๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์ด ์ฆ๋ฐœํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ •์ง€ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ๋ฐœ์€ ๊ธฐํŒ์˜ ์—ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ์–‡์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ƒ๊น๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๋ฐœํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์†์‹ค ๋œ ์•ก์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ–ฅํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์šฉ์งˆ์„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋กœ ์šด๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ๋“  ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ํ•œ ํ›„, ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง ์–ผ๋ฃฉ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒํ•˜๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋†๋„์˜ ์šฉ์งˆ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•

FLOW-3D v12.0์˜ ์ตœ์‹  ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ‘์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์˜ ๊ณ ์ •’ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ ‘์ด‰์˜ ๊ณ ์ • ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ณ ์ • ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์ž‰ํฌ์ ฏ ์ธ์‡„, ์ฝ”ํŒ… ๋ฐ ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šต์œค ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ณต๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ์žฅ์น˜์—์„œ ์•ก์ฒด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์˜ ์ด๋™์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” โ€‹โ€‹๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ํŠน์ง•์€ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ์ž๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ • ์œ„์น˜์— ๊ณ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜•์ƒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐ ํ•˜์œ„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์ค‘์— ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ‘๊ณ ์ •’ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์€ ์ฒ˜์Œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด๊ณผ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณณ์— ๊ณ ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฐฉ ์†๋„๋ฅผ 0์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ณ ์ •์ด ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ๊ณผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋กค์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ‘์ด‰์ ์„ ์ง€๋‚˜์•ผ๋งŒ ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง ์–ผ๋ฃฉ ๊ฒ€์ฆ

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1์€ ํ‰ํ‰ํ•œ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋†“์ธ ์›ํ˜• ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ๋ฉด์€ 30 โ„ƒ์˜ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์˜จ๋„๋กœ ์œ ์ง€๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์˜จ๋„๋Š” 20 โ„ƒ์ด๊ณ  ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ณต๊ทน์˜ ์˜จ๋„๋Š” ์ผ์ •ํ•œ 20 โ„ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ๋ฐ€๋„ 0.967 g/cm3, ์ ๋„ 0.02022 poise, ๋น„์—ด 1.645e+07 cm2/s/K, ์—ด์ „๋„๋„ 1.2964e+4 g*cm/s3/K, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ 33.15 g/cm2์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ž‰ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1. ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”.

์•ก์  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๊ณก๋ฅ  ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ์€ 7.5e-03 cm์ด๊ณ , ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ 4.5e-03 cm์˜ ์›์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒ‰๋ณด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์€ 37.87 ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1-a๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€์ •๋œ ์ •์  ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์€ 0 ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ •์••์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ทน ๋‚ด์˜ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„์••์€ 0์ด๊ณ  ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ์ˆ˜์šฉ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” Rsize = 0.01 ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž‰ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋  ๋•Œ ๊ธฐํŒ ์ƒ์— ๊ณ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋„ ์ผœ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด์— ์šฉํ•ด ๋œ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋†๋„ 0.01 g/cm3 ์ด๊ณ  ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋†๋„ rmax = 1.1625 g/cm3 ์—์„œ ์šด๋ฐ˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์Šค์นผ๋ผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉํ•ด ๋œ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ํ‰๊ท ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์งˆ๋Ÿ‰๋‹น 0.05 poise์˜ ์†๋„๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์ˆœ ์ ๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๊ณต์ •์€ 3.0 ๋„์˜ ๋ฐฉ์œ„ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์…€์— ๊ฑธ์ณ์žˆ๋Š” ์ถ• ๋Œ€์นญ ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (x ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ = 6e-05 cm, z ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ = 4e-05 cm.)

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1์€ ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๋ฐœํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์ด ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 0 ๋„์˜ ์ •์  ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ์•ก์ ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ ํ–ฅํ•œ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ์ ‘์ด‰์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์œ ๋™์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉํ•ด ๋œ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์ฆ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์„ ํ–ฅํ•ด ๋”์šฑ ์žฌ๋ถ„๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2). ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ณ„์† ์ฆ๋ฐœํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋‚จ์•„์žˆ๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด์˜ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ rmax์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด, ๊ณผ์ž‰๋œ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๊ณ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ2. g / cm3 ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ ๋†๋„ ๋ฐ t = 2.0ms์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด. ํ๋ฆ„์€ ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์„ ํ–ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ‘์ด‰์„  ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋จผ์ € ๊ฑด์กฐ๋˜์–ด ๊ณ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์ด ๋‚จ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์— ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ธ ‘์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง’ ํŒจํ„ด์ด ๊ธฐํŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์ƒ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3 ๋ฐ 4). ์•ˆ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์ด ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰(์šฉํ•ด + ๊ฑด์กฐ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ)์€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰์˜ 0.025 % ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ๋ณด์กด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3. ๋ชจ๋“  ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ๋œ ํ›„ ๊ธฐํŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๊ฑด์กฐ๋œ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ (๋‹จ์œ„ : g / cm3) .
๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๋†๋„๋Š” ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์˜ ์œ„์น˜์— ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ‘์ปคํ”ผ ๋ง’ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4. ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ฆ๋ฐœ ํ•œ ํ›„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์•ก์ ์˜ ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋œ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ƒ ๋ถ„ํฌ.

๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ

๊ทธ๋ฆผ5. ์ˆ˜์ง ๋ฒฝ์— ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• : t = 0 ms (ํŒŒ๋ž€์ƒ‰), t = 4e-02 ms (์—ฐํ•œ ํŒŒ๋ž‘) t = 0.2 ms (๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰).
ํ•ด๋‹น ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” โ€œEffects of microscale topographyโ€, Y.V.Kalinin, V.Berejnov and R. E. Thorne, Langmuir 25, 5391-5397. (2009). ์—์„œ์˜ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ ‘์ด‰์„  ๊ณ ์ • ์‘์šฉ์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์˜ˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง์˜ ๋ฒฝ์— ๊ณ ์ • ๋œ ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์šธ์˜ ์•ก์ฒด ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” 2.7 g / cm3, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ 200 g / cm2 ๋ฐ ์ ๋„ 0.27 poise์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •์  ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์€ 0 ๋„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ดˆ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒ‰๋ณด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ ‘์ด‰๊ฐ์ด 90๋„๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ 0.5cm์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ์„ ์ˆ˜์ง ๋ฒฝ์— ๋†“์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5). 7e+06 cm/s2์˜ ์ค‘๋ ฅ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณต์› ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์—†์• ๊ณ  ์•ก์ ์ด ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๋„๋ก ๋ณ€ํ˜•์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ์œ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฐฉ์šธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€์˜ ์งˆ์  ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5์—์„œ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์š”์•ฝ

FLOW-3D์˜ ์ ‘์ด‰์„  ๊ณ ์ • ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋ฒฝ์˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ™•์žฅํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ณต๋ฒ•์—์„œ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ‘์ด‰์„  ๊ณ ์ •์ด ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์‘์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๊ด€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์˜ˆ์‹œ์™€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ฐธ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์œผ์‹ ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D v12.0 ๊ต์œก

FLOW-3D v12.0 ๊ต์œก

FLOW-3Dย v12.0 ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ต์œก ๊ณผ์ •์€ FLOW-3D ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ธ ๊ต์œก ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ FLOW-3D์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์ฃผ๋ฌธํ˜• ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์„น์…˜์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ž์‹ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์˜ˆ์ œ์™€ ์„ค๋ช…์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹ ๊ทœ FLOW-3D ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ๋ณ„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์ „์ฒด ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์™„๋ฃŒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” FLOW-3D v12.0 ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฐœ์„  ์‚ฌํ•ญ ๋ฐ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค์ • ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ๊ณ ์น˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ต์œก ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ•์˜ ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์ฃผ์ œ์™€ ์„ธ๊ทธ๋จผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฑ…๊ฐˆํ”ผ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜๋ฉฐ ์–ธ์ œ๋“ ์ง€ ์ฐธ์กฐ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ํ›Œ๋ฅญํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ต์œก ๊ณผ์ •์€ User Site์—์„œ ์ง€์›๋˜๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ย 

FLOW-3D ๊ต์œก ๋ชจ๋“ˆ

 

FLOW-3D GUI                                                 Model Setup                                                      Global Settings

 

Physics Models                                                Fluid Properties                                              Geometry

 

Meshing                                                               Boundary Conditions                                  Initial Conditions

 

Output Options