FIG. 3. (a) Defect configurations involving two (X โˆ’ W)W mixedโ€“interstitials in which X corresponds to V, Ti and Re atoms. The figure shows a slice parallel to a {110} plane of the structure. Small (blue) spheres indicate tungsten atoms whereas large (gray) spheres indicate X atoms. Thicker (yellow) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.3 ยฐA whereas thinner (gray) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.5 ยฐA. (b) An illustration of parallel h111i strings in BCC tungsten. (c) Binding energy of a pair of titanium bridge mixedโ€“interstitial with respect to string number.

W-Re ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„์—์„œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์˜ ์—ญํ• 

W-Re ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„์—์„œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์˜ ์—ญํ• 

The role of interstitial binding in radiation induced segregation in W-Re alloys

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ”Œ๋ผ์ฆˆ๋งˆ ๋Œ€๋ฉด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ํ……์Šคํ…(W) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ ์ค‘์„ฑ์ž ์กฐ์‚ฌ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ ˆ๋Š„(Re)์˜ ๋น„์ •์ƒ์  ์„์ถœ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์›์ž๋ก ์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ดํ•˜์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์„์ถœ์˜ ์›์ธ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ(interstitial binding)์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์ €ํ•ญ์„ฑ ์ดํ•ด์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.

Paper Metadata

  • Industry: ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€
  • Material: ํ……์Šคํ…(W), ๋ ˆ๋Š„(Re), ๋ฐ”๋‚˜๋“(V), ํ‹ฐํƒ€๋Š„(Ti)
  • Process: ์ค‘์„ฑ์ž ์กฐ์‚ฌ ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„(RIS) ๋ฐ ์„์ถœ(RIP), ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฒ”ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ด๋ก (DFT) ๊ณ„์‚ฐ

Keywords

  • ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ
  • ๋ ˆ๋Š„ ์„์ถœ
  • ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ
  • ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„
  • ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฒ”ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ด๋ก (DFT)
  • ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ

Executive Summary

Research Architecture

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ……์Šคํ… ๊ธฐํŒ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž(V, Ti, Re)์™€ ํ……์Šคํ… ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž(mixed interstitials)์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฒ”ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ด๋ก (DFT) ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 128๊ฐœ ์›์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” 4x4x4 ์Šˆํผ์…€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, VASP(Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์›์ž ์œ„์น˜์™€ ์…€ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ด์™„์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 100๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ์ด์ค‘ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž(double-interstitial) ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

FIG. 1. Bridge (a) and h111i dumbbell (b) interstitial defects in
tungsten. The h111i crowdion configuration closely resembles the
h111i dumbbell configuration with a slightly larger spacing of the
defect atoms along the h111i axis. The figure shows a slice parallel
to {110}. Small (blue) spheres indicate tungsten atoms whereas large
(gray) spheres indicate extrinsic atoms (V, Ti, Re). Thicker (yellow)
cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.3 ยฐA whereas thinner
(gray) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.5 ยฐA. The bond
angle  is indicated in (a).
FIG. 1. Bridge (a) and h111i dumbbell (b) interstitial defects in tungsten. The h111i crowdion configuration closely resembles the h111i dumbbell configuration with a slightly larger spacing of the defect atoms along the h111i axis. The figure shows a slice parallel to {110}. Small (blue) spheres indicate tungsten atoms whereas large (gray) spheres indicate extrinsic atoms (V, Ti, Re). Thicker (yellow) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.3 ยฐA whereas thinner (gray) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.5 ยฐA. The bond angle  is indicated in (a).

Key Findings

๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, W-V, W-Ti, W-Re ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ์Œ ์‚ฌ์ด์— -2.4 eV์—์„œ -3.2 eV์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•จ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ๋“ค์€ ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•œ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ทผ์ ‘ <111> ์›์ž์—ด(strings)์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ •๋ ฌ๋  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ์ด๋™ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์€ Re์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 0.12 eV๋กœ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์•„, ๋น„๊ต์  ๋‚ฎ์€ ์˜จ๋„์—์„œ๋„ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ์‘์ง‘๊ณผ ์ •๋ ฌ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Industrial Applications

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ๋กœ์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋ฒ„ํ„ฐ(divertor) ๋ฐ ์ œ1๋ฒฝ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์ธ ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ช… ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ”๋Š˜ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ intermetallic ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ($\sigma$ ๋ฐ $\chi$ ์ƒ)์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์›์†Œ์˜ ๋†๋„ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฐ ์—ด์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ ์ €ํ•˜(๊ฒฝํ™” ๋ฐ ์ทจํ™”) ๋ฐฉ์ง€ ์ „๋žต ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, BCC ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์†์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.


Theoretical Background

ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž(Mixed Interstitials)

์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ํ……์Šคํ…์—์„œ ์ž๊ธฐ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž(SIA)๋Š” <111> ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตญ๋ถ€ํ™”๋œ ํฌ๋ผ์šฐ๋””์˜จ(crowdion) ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ V, Ti, Re์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฉด SIA์™€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ๋ธŒ๋ฆฟ์ง€(bridge) ๋˜๋Š” ๋ค๋ฒจ(dumbbell) ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ํฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ(์ด์ƒ์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์›์ž๋‹น ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์˜ 1.2~1.6๋ฐฐ)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฉฐ, <111> ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ด๋ฐฉ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์žฅ(strain field)์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์ฃผ๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„ ๋ฐ ์„์ถœ(RIS/RIP)

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ๋Š” ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ดํ•˜์—์„œ ์„์ถœ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋‚˜, ์ค‘์„ฑ์ž ์กฐ์‚ฌ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ ๊ฒฐํ•จ(๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ณต)์˜ ๊ณผํฌํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋น„ํ‰ํ˜• ์„์ถœ์ด ์œ ๋„๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ณต๊ณต ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์„ค๋ช…๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋˜ W-Re ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ €๋†๋„ ์„์ถœ ํ˜„์ƒ์€, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ค๋ช…๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํšํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‘์ง‘๋จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „๊ตฌ์ฒด ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค.

Results and Analysis

Experimental Setup

๋ชจ๋“  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์€ VASP๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ DFT ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. Projector Augmented Wave(PAW) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ˜์‹ฌ๋ถ€ ์ „์ž(semi-core electron) ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” “hard” PAW ์„ค์ •์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๋ฉดํŒŒ ์ ˆ๋‹จ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” V(343 eV), Ti(290 eV), Re(295 eV)๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ตํ™˜-์ƒ๊ด€ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” Generalized Gradient Approximation(GGA)์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์‹œ ์›์ž๋ ฅ์€ 15 meV/ร… ์ดํ•˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ ด์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋™ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์€ Climbing Image-Nudged Elastic Band(CI-NEB) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Visual Data Summary

๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(Fig. 2) ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 2.8 ร…์ผ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ธ๋ ฅ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ€์–ด์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์‡ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์™€ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ๋ณ€ํ™”($\Delta V^f$) ์‚ฌ์ด์—๋Š” ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ํƒ„์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์žฅ(elastic strain field)์˜ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ขŒ์šฐ๋จ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, <111> ์›์ž์—ด ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™”(Fig. 3)๋Š” ๊ฒฐํ•จ์ด ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•œ ์ธ์ ‘ ์—ด์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•ˆ์ •ํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.

Variable Correlation Analysis

์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž์˜ ๋†๋„์™€ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€($E_{mix}$) ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 15%์ผ ๋•Œ ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, 30% ์ด์ƒ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ์ „์ด๋  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ์‘์ง‘์ด ์ผ์ • ์ž„๊ณ„ ๋†๋„์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•ด์ง€๋ฉฐ ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๋ชจํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋™๋ ฅ์ด ๋จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์€ ์ฒ™๋ ฅ(repulsive)์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์–ด, ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ์—†์ด๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‘์ง‘์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•œ๋‹ค.


Paper Details

The role of interstitial binding in radiation induced segregation in W-Re alloys

1. Overview

  • Title: The role of interstitial binding in radiation induced segregation in W-Re alloys
  • Author: Leili Gharaee, Jaime Marian, Paul Erhart
  • Year: 2018 (Dated)
  • Journal: arXiv:1607.00230v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

2. Abstract

ํ……์Šคํ… ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ณ ์˜จ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ”Œ๋ผ์ฆˆ๋งˆ ๋Œ€๋ฉด ํ›„๋ณด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์„ฑ์ž ์กฐ์‚ฌ ํ•˜์—์„œ ํ•ต ๋ณ€ํ™˜์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ ˆ๋Š„์€ ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋†๋„์—์„œ๋„ ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋ ˆ๋Š„ ์„์ถœ์€ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ์ธ์„ฑ์— ํ•ด๋กœ์šด ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ์ดํ•˜ ์„์ถœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜๊ป˜๋ผ๋Š” ์กฐ์‚ฌ ์œ ๋ฐœ ๊ฒฐํ•จ, ํŠนํžˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์šฉ์งˆ-ํ……์Šคํ… ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ๊ฐ€๋ฆฌํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฒ”ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ด๋ก ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ W-Re, W-V, W-Ti ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ํ•™๊ณผ ๊ฐ ์น˜ํ™˜ ์šฉ์งˆ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์—ด์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ -2.4 ~ -3.2 eV์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ ์„œ๋กœ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋Œ์–ด๋‹น๊ธฐ๋ฉฐ, ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•œ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ทผ์ ‘ 111 ์›์ž์—ด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ •๋ ฌ๋œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ์Œ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•จ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์ด๋™ ๋ฐ ํšŒ์ „ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์˜จ๋„์—์„œ๋„ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ์‘์ง‘๊ณผ ์ •๋ ฌ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ€๋Š˜๊ณ  ๊ธด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ์‘์ง‘์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ”๋Š˜ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ์ „๊ตฌ์ฒด ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ W-Re ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ํŽธ์„ ๋ฐ ์„์ถœ์— ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฒด์‹ฌ ์ž…๋ฐฉ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.

3. Methodology

3.1. ์Šˆํผ์…€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ: 128๊ฐœ ์›์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” 4x4x4 BCC ํ……์Šคํ… ์Šˆํผ์…€์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์™€ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ด์ค‘ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ 100๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•จ.
3.2. DFT ๊ณ„์‚ฐ: VASP ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ PAW ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ GGA ๊ตํ™˜-์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•จ. ์›์ž ์œ„์น˜์™€ ์…€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋ฅผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ด์™„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•จ.
3.3. ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„: ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „์ฒด ๋†๋„ ๋ฒ”์œ„์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•จ.
3.4. ์ด๋™ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ ์‚ฐ์ถœ: CI-NEB ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ํšŒ์ „ ๋ฐ ๋ณ‘์ง„ ์ด๋™์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•จ.

4. Key Results

๋ชจ๋“  ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(W-Re, W-V, W-Ti)์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ฐ„์— ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์ธ๋ ฅ(-2.4 ~ -3.2 eV)์ด ์กด์žฌํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ธ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ๋“ค์ด ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•œ <111> ์›์ž์—ด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ •๋ ฌ๋˜๋„๋ก ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ๋ฐ”๋Š˜ ๋ชจ์–‘(acicular) ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, Re ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ์ด๋™ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์•„(0.12 eV) ์กฐ์‚ฌ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์‹ ์†ํ•œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ „๋‹ฌ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ณต๊ณต ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์šฉ์งˆ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.

5. Mathematical Models

์ด์ค‘ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€($E^b_{2[X]}$)๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ •์˜๋œ๋‹ค: $$E^b_{2[X]} = E^f(2[X-W]_W) – 2E^f([X-W]_W)$$ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ $E^f$๋Š” ํ˜•์„ฑ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์Œ์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ธ๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”($\Delta V^f_{2[X]}$)๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ๋‹ค: $$\Delta V^f_{2[X]} = V^f(2[X-W]_W) – 2V^f([X-W]_W)$$ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€($E_{mix}$)๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค: $$E_{mix}(X_xW_{1-x}) = E(X_xW_{1-x}) – [xE(X) + (1-x)E(W)]$$

FIG. 3. (a) Defect configurations involving two (X โˆ’ W)W mixedโ€“interstitials in which X corresponds to V, Ti and Re atoms. The figure
shows a slice parallel to a {110} plane of the structure. Small (blue) spheres indicate tungsten atoms whereas large (gray) spheres indicate
X atoms. Thicker (yellow) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.3 ยฐA whereas thinner (gray) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter
than 2.5 ยฐA. (b) An illustration of parallel h111i strings in BCC tungsten. (c) Binding energy of a pair of titanium bridge mixedโ€“interstitial with
respect to string number.
FIG. 3. (a) Defect configurations involving two (X โˆ’ W)W mixedโ€“interstitials in which X corresponds to V, Ti and Re atoms. The figure shows a slice parallel to a {110} plane of the structure. Small (blue) spheres indicate tungsten atoms whereas large (gray) spheres indicate X atoms. Thicker (yellow) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.3 ยฐA whereas thinner (gray) cylinders indicate bond lengths shorter than 2.5 ยฐA. (b) An illustration of parallel h111i strings in BCC tungsten. (c) Binding energy of a pair of titanium bridge mixedโ€“interstitial with respect to string number.

Figure List

  1. Fig 1: ํ……์Šคํ… ๋‚ด ๋ธŒ๋ฆฟ์ง€(bridge) ๋ฐ <111> ๋ค๋ฒจ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋„
  2. Fig 2: V, Ti, Re ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„
  3. Fig 3: ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ(I~IV) ๋ฐ ์›์ž์—ด ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€
  4. Fig 4: ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• V, Ti, Re ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์Œ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€(์ฒ™๋ ฅ ํ™•์ธ)
  5. Fig 5: ๋†๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„
  6. Fig 6: ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ๋น„ํ•ด๋ฆฌ์„ฑ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ
  7. Fig 7: ๊ฐ€๋Š˜๊ณ  ๊ธด ์šฉ์งˆ ๋†์ถ• ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜ ๋ชจ์‹๋„

References

  1. S. J. Zinkle and N. M. Ghoniem, Fusion Eng. Des. 51โ€“52, 55 (2000).
  2. M. Rieth et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 432, 482 (2013).
  3. T. Tanno et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 386โ€“388, 218 (2009).
  4. P. Erhart, B. Sadigh, and A. Caro, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 141904 (2008).

Technical Q&A

Q: ๋ ˆ๋Š„(Re) ์„์ถœ์ด ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ์งˆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€?

๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ค‘์„ฑ์ž ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๋‚˜๋…ธ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ ˆ๋Š„ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์ทจํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ์ธ์„ฑ์— ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๊ฑด์ „์„ฑ์„ ์ €ํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ์š”์ธ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.

Q: ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ <111> ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋ ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€?

ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ํฌ๊ณ  ์ด๋ฐฉ์„ฑ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์žฅ(strain field)์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. DFT ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ๋“ค์ด ํ‰ํ–‰ํ•œ <111> ์›์ž์—ด์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์˜ ์ค‘์ฒฉ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „์ž ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•ˆ์ •ํ™”๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํƒ„์„ฑ์ , ์ „์ž์  ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ์ •๋ ฌ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ตฌ๋™๋ ฅ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.

Q: Re์˜ ์ด๋™ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์ด 0.12 eV๋กœ ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์–ด๋–ค ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š”๊ฐ€?

์ด๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ํ•ด๋ฆฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๋‚ด๋ฅผ ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์›์ž๋กœ์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์˜จ๋„ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋„ ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž๊ฐ€ ์‹ ์†ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‘์ง‘๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ์˜ˆ์ธก๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.

Q: ์™œ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž๋ผ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋ฐ€์–ด๋‚ด๋Š”๊ฐ€?

DFT ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(Fig. 4), ํ……์Šคํ… ๊ฒฉ์ž ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” V, Ti, Re ์›์ž ์Œ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ์–‘(+)์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ์„œ๋กœ ์ฒ™๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž์˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ ์—†์ด๋Š” ์šฉ์งˆ ์›์ž๋“ค์ด ์Šค์Šค๋กœ ์‘์ง‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•œ๋‹ค.

Q: ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์„์ถœ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์˜ 4๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๊ณผ์ •์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€?

์ฒซ์งธ, ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ SIA๊ฐ€ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ˜• Re ์›์ž์— ํฌํš๋˜์–ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ด๋“ค์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์„œ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ค‘ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ํก์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ <111> ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋„ท์งธ, ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ž„๊ณ„์น˜(์•ฝ 30%)์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฉด ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ธˆ์† ๊ฐ„ ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋ฌผ ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ด๋œ๋‹ค.

Conclusion

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ œ์ผ์›๋ฆฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ……์Šคํ… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์œ ๋ฐœ ์„์ถœ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. W-Re, W-V, W-Ti ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๊ฐ„ ์›์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๊ณผ <111> ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ •๋ ฌ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ ๋น„ํ‰ํ˜• ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ํ˜•์„ฑ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ํ•ต์œตํ•ฉ๋กœ์šฉ ๊ณ ๋‚ด๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์†์ƒ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ณ ๋„ํ™”์— ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.


Source Information

Citation: Leili Gharaee, Jaime Marian, and Paul Erhart (2018). The role of interstitial binding in radiation induced segregation in W-Re alloys. arXiv:1607.00230v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].

DOI/Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00230

Technical Review Resources for Engineers:

โ–ถ Access the original research paper (PDF)
โ–ถ FLOW-3D ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜ ํŒ€๊ณผ ํ˜‘์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์‹œ๋ ค๋ฉด..

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited.
Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Figure 1 XRD pattern showing peaks corresponding to different phases present in the microstructure of the as-cast CrCuFeMnNi HEA fabricated using alloy mixing method.

์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ๋ณด๋ฌผ๋กœ: ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ์ €๋น„์šฉ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ 

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Karthikeyan Hariharan๊ณผ K Sivaprasad๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ “Sustainable low-cost method for production of High entropy alloys from alloy scraps” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword:ย ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ (High Entropy Alloy)
  • Secondary Keywords:ย ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ, ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ƒ์‚ฐ, ์ €๋น„์šฉ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ(Alloy mixing)

Executive Summary

  • The Challenge:ย ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ(HEA)์€ ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์ด ํฌ์ง€๋งŒ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›๋ฃŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ํ•œ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Method:ย ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ(304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•, ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80, ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ)์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์šฉํ•ดํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋“ฑ์›์ž ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ CrCuFeMnNi ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ(Alloy mixing)” ๊ณต์ •์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Key Breakthrough:ย ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์งˆ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ๋•๋ถ„์— ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ 50% ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Bottom Line:ย “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Challenge: Why This Research Matters for R&D Professionals

๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ(HEA)์€ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“  ์‹ ์†Œ์žฌ๋กœ, ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํŒŒ๊ดด ์ธ์„ฑ, ๋‚ด์‹์„ฑ ๋“ฑ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ์ˆœ๋„์˜ ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ง„๊ณต ์šฉํ•ดํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์•„ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฐ์—… ์ ์šฉ์— ํฐ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ์ด ๋˜์–ด ์™”์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋™์‹œ์—, ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๊ธˆ์† ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์€ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ  ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋กœ ๋‚จ์•„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ์ž์› ๋‚ญ๋น„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ฒ„๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ถ€๊ฐ€๊ฐ€์น˜์˜ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Approach: Unpacking the Methodology

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ(Alloy mixing)”์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์—์„œ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์ธ 304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•(“ํŒŒ์†๋œ” ์ธ์žฅ ์‹œํŽธ), ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80(“์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ” ๋กœ ์ฝ”์ผ), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ „๊ธฐ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ(๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ์„ ) ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ฃผ์›๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ์›์ž(equiatomic) ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋งž์ถ”๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์ˆœ๋„ ๋ง๊ฐ„(Mn)๊ณผ ํฌ๋กฌ(Cr)์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ค€๋น„๋œ ์›๋ฃŒ 30g์„ ํ……์Šคํ… ์ „๊ทน์ด ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋œ ์ง„๊ณต ์•„ํฌ ์šฉํ•ด๋กœ์—์„œ ์•„๋ฅด๊ณค(Ar) ๋ถ„์œ„๊ธฐ ํ•˜์— ์šฉํ•ดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™”ํ•™์  ๊ท ์งˆ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ์„ ์ตœ์†Œ 5ํšŒ ์ด์ƒ ์žฌ์šฉํ•ดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – X์„  ํšŒ์ ˆ ๋ถ„์„(XRD): ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ƒ(phase)์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด Cu-Kฮฑ ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – ์ฃผ์‚ฌ์ „์žํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(SEM): ์ „๊ณ„๋ฐฉ์ถœํ˜• ๊ฑด(FEG)์ด ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋œ SEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ˜• ๋ถ„๊ด‘๋ฒ•(EDS): ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋‚ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ƒ๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์›์†Œ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – ์—ด์—ญํ•™ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ(ThermoCalc): ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ(์ฃผ๋กœ Si, C)์ด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ThermoCalc ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์˜ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1 XRD pattern showing peaks corresponding to different phases present in the microstructure of the as-cast CrCuFeMnNi HEA fabricated using alloy mixing method.
Figure 1 XRD pattern showing peaks corresponding to different phases present in the microstructure of the as-cast CrCuFeMnNi HEA fabricated using alloy mixing method.

The Breakthrough: Key Findings & Data

Finding 1: ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ณด์กด ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ๊ฐ•๋„ 50% ํ–ฅ์ƒ

์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ณ ์ˆœ๋„ ์›๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. XRD ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(Figure 1), 2๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฉด์‹ฌ์ž…๋ฐฉ(FCC) ์ƒ๊ณผ 1๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฒด์‹ฌ์ž…๋ฐฉ(BCC) ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ 3์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SEM ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€(Figure 2)์—์„œ๋„ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ “ํ™”๋ถ„(flower-pot)” ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ 2์ฐจ์ƒ๊ณผ ์ƒ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์ด ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ThermoCalc ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” 135.55 MPa์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ(ํ‰๊ท  Si 0.5 wt%, C 0.02 wt%)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” 190.21 MPa๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ์›์†Œ, ํŠนํžˆ ๊ทœ์†Œ(Si)๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์šฉ ๊ฐ•ํ™”(solid solution strengthening) ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผ์ผœ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ 50%๋‚˜ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 4 (a) Frequency distribution plot for the yield strength for alloys with varying impurity contents, (b) plot showing the variation of yield strength as a function of Si content
Figure 4 (a) Frequency distribution plot for the yield strength for alloys with varying impurity contents, (b) plot showing the variation of yield strength as a function of Si content

Finding 2: ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์  ์—ญํ•  ๋ฐ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ

๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ํ•ญ์ƒ ํ•ด๋กœ์šด ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์ด ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์˜ ์กฐ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”, ํŠนํžˆ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ข… ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Figure 4b์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๊ทœ์†Œ(Si) ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์˜ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์ด์ ์€ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Table 2์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋ถ„์„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์€ ๊ณ ์ˆœ๋„ ์›์†Œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด 100๋ฐฐ ์ด์ƒ ์ €๋ ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„, ์ด ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋ฅผ ์•ž๋‹น๊ธธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Practical Implications for R&D and Operations

  • For Process Engineers:ย ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๊ณต์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋น„๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ, ์ผ๊ด€๋œ ์ตœ์ข… ์ œํ’ˆ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํˆฌ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์˜ ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Quality Control Teams:ย ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Figure 4 ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰, ํŠนํžˆ Si๊ฐ€ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ž…๊ณ ๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์›๋ฃŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ข… ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Design Engineers:ย ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ•ด์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด์„œ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ 50% ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ €๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ํŠน์ • ์šฉ๋„์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ด์งˆ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Paper Details


Sustainable low-cost method for production of High entropy alloys from alloy scraps

1. Overview:

  • Title:ย Sustainable low-cost method for production of High entropy alloys from alloy scraps
  • Author:ย Karthikeyan Hariharan, K Sivaprasad
  • Year of publication:
  • Journal/academic society of publication:
  • Keywords:ย Scraps, recycling, Sustainability, High entropy alloys

2. Abstract:

์ด ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ(Alloy mixing)”์ด๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ(HEA)์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋“ฑ์›์ž ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ CrCuFeMnNi HEA๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์—ฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ถœ์ฒ˜์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ(304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•(SS), ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80, ์ „๊ธฐ์„  ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ)์„ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ Mn๊ณผ Cr์„ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„๊ณต ์•„ํฌ ์šฉํ•ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋…น์—ฌ ๋“ฑ์›์ž ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ X์„  ํšŒ์ ˆ(XRD)๊ณผ ์ฃผ์‚ฌ์ „์žํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(SEM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ”์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์ด ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›์†Œ์˜ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์šฉํ•ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ๋™์ผ ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ThermoCalc์˜ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ 50% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 1000๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์กฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ถ„์„์€ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์— ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•จ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ”์ด ์ œ์กฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค.

3. Introduction:

๋ฏธ๊ตญ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ณดํ˜ธ๊ตญ(EPA)์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด 2018๋…„ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋งŒ 3,469๋งŒ ํ†ค์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด ์ค‘ 34.9%๋งŒ์ด ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์†์˜ 1์ฐจ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณต์ •์€ ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ์†Œ๋ชจ๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ์€ ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์ด ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋กœ ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ์–ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ(HEA)์€ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์›์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹ ์†Œ์žฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ทœ๋ฒ”์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋…น์—ฌ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋†’์•„ ์‹ค์ œ ์ ์šฉ์ด ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์œผ๋กœ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค.

4. Summary of the study:

Background of the research topic:

๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์ , ํ™”ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์‹ ์†Œ์žฌ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ ๊ฐ€์˜ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒ์šฉํ™”์— ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฒช๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋™์‹œ์—, ์‚ฐ์—… ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์€ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

Status of previous research:

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

Purpose of the study:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์›๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ”์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ €๋น„์šฉ์˜ ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ด์ ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

Core study:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ 304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•, ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80, ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ง„๊ณต ์•„ํฌ ์šฉํ•ดํ•˜์—ฌ CrCuFeMnNi ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ์ œ์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ(ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„)์„ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

5. Research Methodology

Research Design:

์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋กœ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •(“ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ”)์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ณต์ •๊ณผ์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง(ThermoCalc)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods:

  • ์žฌ๋ฃŒ:ย 304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•, ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80, ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ์„  ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ 99.9% ์ˆœ๋„ Mn, Cr.
  • ์ œ์กฐ:ย ์ง„๊ณต ์•„ํฌ ์šฉํ•ด.
  • ๋ถ„์„:
    • X์„  ํšŒ์ ˆ ๋ถ„์„(XRD)์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ ์‹๋ณ„.
    • ์ฃผ์‚ฌ์ „์žํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ(SEM)์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ด€์ฐฐ.
    • ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ˜• ๋ถ„๊ด‘๋ฒ•(EDS)์œผ๋กœ ์›์†Œ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ถ„์„.
    • ThermoCalc ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋กœ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ถ„์„.

Research Topics and Scope:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” CrCuFeMnNi ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ œ์กฐ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ, ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ๋‚ด ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฒ”์œ„๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค.

6. Key Results:

Key Results:

  • “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์€ XRD ๋ฐ SEM ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›๋ฃŒ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ThermoCalc ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์—์„œ ์œ ๋ž˜ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ(ํŠนํžˆ Si)๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋Œ€๋น„ 50% ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค (135.55 MPa vs 190.21 MPa).
  • ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ๋†๋„, ํŠนํžˆ Si ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€๋™ํ•˜๋ฉฐ(์•ฝ 100 MPa ๋ฒ”์œ„), ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์กฐ์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์€ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ์›์†Œ๋ณด๋‹ค 100๋ฐฐ ์ด์ƒ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜์—ฌ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ œ์กฐ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค.

Figure List:

  • Figure 1 XRD pattern showing peaks corresponding to different phases present in the microstructure of the as-cast CrCuFeMnNi HEA fabricated using alloy mixing method.
  • Figure 2 SEM secondary electron image showing the microstructure of the as-cast CrCuFeMnNi HEA fabricated through alloy mixing; the green arrow shows the ฮฒ phase with flower-pot morphology, and the red arrow shows the ฮฑ’ phase on the phase boundary.
  • Figure 3 EDS maps showing different phases present and the distribution of different elements in the microstructure for the CrCuFeMnNi alloy produced using alloy mixing
  • Figure 4 (a) Frequency distribution plot for the yield strength for alloys with varying impurity contents, (b) plot showing the variation of yield strength as a function of Si content

7. Conclusion:

  • ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ XRD์™€ SEM์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กดํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๋ณด๋‹ค 50% ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ์›์†Œ, ํŠนํžˆ Si์˜ ๊ณ ์šฉ ๊ฐ•ํ™” ํšจ๊ณผ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ๋†๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํฐ ํŽธ์ฐจ(์•ฝ 100MPa)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์ด ์ €ํ•˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.
  • ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์€ ์ œ์กฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์€ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์žฌํ™œ์šฉ์˜ ๊ธธ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ฃผ๋Š” ์œ ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋น„์šฉ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค.

8. References:

    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2021) Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2018 Tables and Figures Assessing Trends in Material Generation and Management in the US;2021 ASI 9214-6.
    1. Broadbent C (2016) Steel’s recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1658-1665. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1.
    1. Manabe T, Miyata M, Ohnuki K (2019) Introduction of Steelmaking Process with Resource Recycling. J Sustain Metall 5(3):319-330. doi: 10.1007/s40831-019-00221-1.
    1. Yeh J-, Chen S-, Lin S-, Gan J-, Chin T-, Shun T-, Tsau C-, Chang S- (2004) Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Advanced engineering materials 6(5):299-303. doi: 10.1002/adem.200300567.
    1. Cantor B, Chang ITH, Knight P, Vincent AJB (2004) Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials: properties,microstructure,processing 375-377:213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257.
    1. Li Z, Raabe D (2017) Strong and Ductile Non-equiatomic High-Entropy Alloys: Design, Processing, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties. JOM 69:2099-2106. doi: 10.1007/s11837-017-2540-2.
    1. Sahu S, Swanson OJ, Li T, Gerard AY, Scully JR, Frankel GS (2020) Localized Corrosion Behavior of Non-Equiatomic NiFeCrMnCo Multi-Principal Element Alloys. Electrochimica acta 354(C):136749. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136749.
    1. Tomboc GM, Kwon T, Joo J, Lee K (2020) High entropy alloy electrocatalysts: a critical assessment of fabrication and performance. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability 8(3):14844-14862. doi: 10.1039/d0ta05176d
    1. Li C, Li JC, Zhao M, Jiang Q (2009) Effect of alloying elements on microstructure and properties of multiprincipal elements high-entropy alloys. J Alloys Compounds 475:752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.124.
    1. Troparevsky MC, Morris JR, Kent PRC et al (2015) Criteria for Predicting the Formation of Single-Phase High-Entropy Alloys. Physical review. X 5(1):011-041. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.01104.
    1. Blinov VM, Bannykh IO, Lukin EI, Bannykh OA, Blinov EV, Chernogorova OP, Samoilova MA (2021) Effect of Substitutional Alloying Elements on the Stacking Fault Energy in Austenitic Steels. Russian metallurgy Metally 2021:1325. doi: 10.1134/S0036029521100086.
    1. Xiong R, Liu Y, Si H, Peng H, Wang S, Sun B, Chen H, Kim HS, Wen Y (2020) Effects of Si on the Microstructure and Work Hardening Behavior of Feโ€“17Mnโ€“ 1.1C-xSi High Manganese Steels. Metals and Materials International 3891-3904. doi: 10.1007/s12540-020-00846-y.
    1. D. T. Llewellyn (1997) Work hardening effects in austenitic stainless steels. Materials Science and Technology 13:5, 389-400. doi: 10.1179/mst.1997.13.5.389.
    1. Alfa-Aeser (2021) Price list for pure elements. https://www.alfa.com/en/pure-elements/. Accessed Oct 23, 2021.
    1. iScrap (2021) Price list for metallic scarp. https://iscrapapp.com/prices/. Accessed Oct 16, 2021.

Expert Q&A: Your Top Questions Answered

Q1: ์™œ ํŠน์ • ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ(304L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•, ๋‹ˆํฌ๋กฌ 80, ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ)์ด ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ด ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ๋“ค์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์ธ CrCuFeMnNi HEA๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์›์†Œ๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ํŠน์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์‹ผ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์ด ์•„๋‹Œ, ์‚ฐ์—… ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ 50% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ ThermoCalc ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ธ๋ฐ, ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์—†์ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A2: ThermoCalc๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์กฐ์„ฑ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ด์—ญํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ž์ฒด๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ํฐ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: Figure 4b๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด Si ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์ด ๋งŽ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ํ•ญ์ƒ ์ข‹๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

A3: ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Si๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์šฉ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•ญ๋ณต ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋„ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์กฐ์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋‚˜ ์–‘์ด ๊ณผ๋„ํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด ์—ฐ์„ฑ, ๋‚ด์‹์„ฑ, ํ”ผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ช… ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ชฉํ‘œํ•˜๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋งž์ถฐ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“  ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ “์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๋‹ค”๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A4: ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, Figure 1์˜ XRD ํŒจํ„ด ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์‹๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•œ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ(2๊ฐœ์˜ FCC, 1๊ฐœ์˜ BCC)์ด ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, Figure 2์˜ SEM ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด CrCuFeMnNi ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ “ํ™”๋ถ„(flower-pot)” ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ 2์ฐจ์ƒ๊ณผ ์ƒ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์„์ถœ๋ฌผ์ด ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋‘ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌํ˜„ํ–ˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: Table 2์˜ ๋น„์šฉ ๋ถ„์„์€ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ํ‘œ์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ช…์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์›์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์›Œ๋‚™ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ด์ ์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ƒ๋‹นํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋‚ด๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Conclusion: Paving the Way for Higher Quality and Productivity

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ถ€๊ฐ€๊ฐ€์น˜์˜ ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌํƒ„์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” “ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ”์ด๋ผ๋Š” ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ถˆ์ˆœ๋ฌผ์„ ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๊ฐ•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ณ ์—”ํŠธ๋กœํ”ผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋ฅผ ์•ž๋‹น๊ธฐ๊ณ  ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ž์› ์ˆœํ™˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ด์‡ ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

STI C&D์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0450
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

Copyright Information

  • This content is a summary and analysis based on the paper “Sustainable low-cost method for production of High entropy alloys from alloy scraps” by “Karthikeyan Hariharan, K Sivaprasad”.
  • Source: The provided technical document.

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Figure1.Matbridgeanditslocation

๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋ถ„์„: Mat ๋Œ€๊ต ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Erion PERIKU์™€ Yavuz YARDIM์ด ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ International Students’ Conference of Civil Engineering, ISCCE 2012์— ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ “[Effect of Scour on Load Carry Capacity of Piles on Mat Bridge]” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

  • Primary Keyword: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด (Bridge Scour)
  • Secondary Keywords: ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ (Pile Foundation), ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ (Load Carrying Capacity), ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ (Pile Bent), ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ (Structural Stability)

Executive Summary

  • The Challenge: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ์ธ ์„ธ๊ตด(scour) ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Method: ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ์ด๋ก ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ(pile bent)์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Key Breakthrough: ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์ด ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 17.64%, ์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 32.11%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Bottom Line: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ €ํ•˜์‹œ์ผœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ˜‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์š”์ธ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ •๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง๊ณผ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์„ ์ œ์  ๋Œ€์‘์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Challenge: Why This Research Matters for CFD Professionals

๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋Š” ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ธ๋ช… ๋ฐ ์žฌ์‚ฐ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ 60% ์ด์ƒ์ด ์„ธ๊ตด ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ† ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์นจ์‹์‹œ์ผœ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฅผ ๋…ธ์ถœ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฐ•๋ฌผ์˜ ์œ ์†์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์— ๋”์šฑ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ ์„œ๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ์ค‘๋ถ€ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ณ ์†๋„๋กœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์–•์€ ๊ฐ•์ด๋‚˜ ์Šต์ง€ ์œ„์— ๊ฑด์„ค๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ํŒŒ์ผ(friction pile) ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž ์žฌ์  ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure1. Mat bridge and its location
Figure1. Mat bridge and its location
Figure 3. Soil profile and scoring view of pile group
Figure 3. Soil profile and scoring view of pile group

The Approach: Unpacking the Methodology

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์š”์•ฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ถ„์„์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ(Qu)์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์„ ๋‹จ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ(Qt)๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ(Qs)์˜ ํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

(Eq. 1). – Qu = Qt + Qs = qtAt + fAs

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – qt: ๋‹จ์œ„ ์„ ๋‹จ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ – At: ํŒŒ์ผ ์„ ๋‹จ ๋ฉด์  – f: ๋‹จ์œ„ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ – As: ํŒŒ์ผ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋ฉด์ 

์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ Coyle and Costello์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(Eq. 3)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„์ ์ฐฉ์„ฑ ํ† ์–‘์—์„œ์˜ ์„ ๋‹จ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธก๋ฉด ํ† ์•• ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Ks)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ฮฒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(Eq. 2)์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„์€ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ(0m)๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 4.5m์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm์™€ 100cm์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํŒŒ์ผ ์œ ํ˜•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Breakthrough: Key Findings & Data

๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Finding 1: ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์ตœ๋Œ€ 17.64% ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค

์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(28๊ฐœ ํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ 6101 kN์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 4.5m์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ 5025 kN์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” Table 2์—์„œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋“ฏ์ด, ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์•ฝ 17.64%์˜ ์†์‹ค์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Finding 2: ์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์ตœ๋Œ€ 32.11%์˜ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค

์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(8๊ฐœ ํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ)์€ ๋” ํฐ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ 18322 kN์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์กŒ์œผ๋‚˜, ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ด ํŒŒ์ผ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์ธ 3.0m์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์ด 12438 kN์œผ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” Table 2์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋ถ€์— ๋ช…์‹œ๋œ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ์•ฝ 32.11%์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” 4.5m ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹œ 48.08%๊นŒ์ง€ ์†์‹ค์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋Œ€๊ตฌ๊ฒฝ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ๋” ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Practical Implications for R&D and Operations

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„, ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜, ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ์ข…์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • For Process/Civil Engineers: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๊ฐ€ 2.5์—์„œ 3.0์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ์งˆ ์—ญํ•™์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์œจ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์ž„์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ •๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์žฌํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Quality Control/Safety Teams: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(์˜ˆ: Table 2)๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค๋ฅ ์„ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋กœ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์„ ์žฌ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„ ๋ณด๊ฐ• ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Design Engineers: ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์˜ˆ์ƒ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๊ธธ์ด์™€ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Paper Details


Effect of Scour on Load Carry Capacity of Piles on Mat Bridge

1. Overview:

  • Title: Effect of Scour on Load Carry Capacity of Piles on Mat Bridge
  • Author: Erion PERIKU, Yavuz YARDIM
  • Year of publication: 2012
  • Journal/academic society of publication: International Students’ Conference of Civil Engineering, ISCCE 2012, 10-11 May 2012, EpokaUniversity, Tirana, Albania
  • Keywords: Mat Bridge, Scour, Pile Bent, Pile Load Carry Capacity.

2. Abstract:

๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์†์‹ค์„ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ƒํƒœ, ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฌผ, ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ํ†ตํ•ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ ์„œ๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ์ค‘๋ถ€์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ณ ์†๋„๋กœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ž‘์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ, ์Šต์ง€, ๋Šช์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์–•์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์œ„์— ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ณต ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ์— ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„์˜ ๊ฐ•๋“ค์€ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ์œ ๋™ ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ, ํ™์ˆ˜์˜ ์–‘๊ณผ ์†๋„๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ ๋ฒคํŠธ ๋†’์ด์— ๋ฐ˜๋น„๋ก€ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ํŠน์ • ๋†’์ด์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ฌ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์š”์•ฝํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์™”์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด 32๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ ์ค‘ 19๊ฐœ๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฒช๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ธ๊ตด ๋†’์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์˜ 17.64%์—์„œ 32.11%์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์†์‹ค์„ ์ž…์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

3. Introduction:

์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์›์ธ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” 60% ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค[1]. ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์™€ ์ „์ฒด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค[2]. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณ„๋„๋กœ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ „์ฒด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋ถ„์„๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค[2]. ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ขŒ๊ตด ์œ„ํ—˜, ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค[3-5]. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ ์„œ๋ถ€์— ๊ฑด์„ค๋œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํŒŒ์ผ๋“ค์ด ๊ฑด์„ค๋œ ํ† ์–‘ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ• ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ, ์Šต์ง€, ๋Šช์ง€์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํ† ์–‘ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์ด ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

4. Summary of the study:

Background of the research topic:

์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์€ ๊ฐ• ์œ„์— ๊ฑด์„ค๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด ์œ„ํ˜‘๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ํŒŒ์ผ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ์†์‹ค์€ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋กœ ์ง๊ฒฐ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Status of previous research:

๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ(substructure)์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ, ํŠนํžˆ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ, ์ขŒ๊ตด ์œ„ํ—˜, ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํŠธ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด ์™”์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์ „์ฒด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Purpose of the study:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์•Œ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ์•„ Mat ๋Œ€๊ต ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์†์‹ค ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์ „ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Core study:

Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ œ์›์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 4.5m์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ณ„๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์™€ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค๋ฅ  ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

5. Research Methodology

Research Design:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰(Mat ๋Œ€๊ต)์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(case study)์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•(analytical method)์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods:

  • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘: Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์™€ ํ˜„์žฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ(ํ† ์ธต ๊ตฌ์„ฑ, ๋‹จ์œ„ ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰, ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๊ฐ ๋“ฑ)๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ ์ œ์›(์ง๊ฒฝ, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜) ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ(Qu)์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌธํ—Œ์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๊ณต์‹๋“ค์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ๋‹จ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ(Qt)์€ Coyle and Costello์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„, ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ(Qs)์€ ฮฒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ 0m์—์„œ 4.5m๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Research Topics and Scope:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน(์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm, 100cm)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ œํ•œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€์œ„๋‚˜ ์ „์ฒด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋™์  ๊ฑฐ๋™์€ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

6. Key Results:

Key Results:

  • ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 0m์—์„œ 4.5m๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ 6101 kN์—์„œ 5025 kN์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 17.64% ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 0m์—์„œ 4.5m๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ 18322 kN์—์„œ 9513 kN์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ 48.08% ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ์€ 4.5m ์„ธ๊ตด์—์„œ 17.64%์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์„, ์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ์€ 3.0m ์„ธ๊ตด์—์„œ 32.11%์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์„ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure List:

  • Figure 1. Mat bridge and its location
  • Figure 2. Pile cap view
  • Figure 3. Soil profile and scoring view of pile group
  • Figure 4. Effective soil pressure distribution, (a) 30cm diameter piles, (b) 100 cm diameter piles.
  • Figure 5. Bearing capacity of piles groups (a) 30cm diameter piles, (b) 100 cm diameter piles.

7. Conclusion:

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ํŒŒ์ผ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋„์›€์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Mat ๋Œ€๊ต์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 0.5m์—์„œ 4.5m๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง๊ฒฝ 30cm ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 4.5m์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•ฝ 17.64%์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง๊ฒฝ 100cm ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 3.0m์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•ฝ 32.11%์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ† ์งˆ ์—ญํ•™์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์œจ์ด 2.5์—์„œ 3๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ ์ „์ฒด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ์ˆ˜์••์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ต๊ฐ ์นจํ•˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์ „๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

8. References:

  • [1] Liang F. Y.,Bennett C., Parsons R. L.,Han J., Lin C.(2009).A literature review on behavior of scoured piles under bridges, International Foundation Congress & Equipment Expo. Orlando.
  • [2] Lin C., Bennett C., Han J., Parsons R. L.(2011). Integrated analysis of the performance of pile supported bridges under scoured conditions. J Engineering Structures; 36:27-38.
  • [3] Avent R. R.,AlawadyM. (2005) Bridge scour and substructure deterioration: Case study. J Bridge Engineering ;10:247โ€“54.
  • [4] Lin C., Bennett C., Han J., Parsons R. L., (2010). Scour effects on the response of laterally loaded piles considering stress history of sand. J Computer & Geotechnics; 37:1008โ€“1014.
  • [5] Bennett C., Lin C., Han J., Parsons R. L., (2009) Bridge pile groupunder scour conditions. Proceedings of SEI 2009 Structures Congress. Austin, Texas.
  • [6] Periku E., Yardim Y., (2011). Deficiencies of Some Important Bridges in Albania, Proceedings of the Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, Albania.
  • [7] The Technical Construction Central Archive of Albania (2012), Hekurudha Lac โ€“ Shkoder Hani Hotit, Ure Hekurudhore Automobilistike mbi Lumin Mat. Nr.333.prot.
  • [8] Togrol E., Tan O., (2003) Kazikli Temeller, Birsen Publishing, Istanbul, p. 42-69, 93-112.
  • [9] Tomilson M. J., (1994) Pile Design and Construction Practice, 4th edn. E&FN Spon, London.
  • [10] Kulhawy F. H., (1984) Limiting tip and side resistance: fact or fallacy, Symposium on Analysis and Design of Pile Foundation, ASCE, p. 80-89.
  • [11] Prakash S. and Sharma, H. D. (1990). Pile foundations in engineering practice. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 218-264.
  • [12] Prakash S. and D. Saran (1967), “Behaviour of Laterally Loaded Piles in a Cohesive Soil,” Proc., Third Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Haifa, Israel Vol. 1, p. 235-238.
  • [13] Sonmez, D., U. Ergun (1994) Kazik Gruplarinin Kohezyonsuz Zeminde Negatif Surtunmesi Uzerinde Bir Model Calismasi, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 5. International Congress, p. 250-259.

Expert Q&A: Your Top Questions Answered

Q1: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ถ„์„์  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” “๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์š”์•ฝํ•œ๋‹ค(analytically summarizes)”๊ณ  ๋ช…์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜„์žฅ ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ์ง€๋ฐ˜ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ€์šฉํ•œ ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ํ™•๋ฆฝ๋œ ๊ณตํ•™ ์ด๋ก ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์—†์ด๋„ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: Table 2์—์„œ๋Š” 100cm ์ง๊ฒฝ ํŒŒ์ผ์ด 4.5m ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹œ 48.08%์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์—์„œ๋Š” 3.0m ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹œ 32.11% ์†์‹ค์„ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A2: ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋ถ€์—์„œ “100cm ์ง๊ฒฝ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๋Š” 3.0m”๋ผ๊ณ  ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” 4.5m๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‹ค์ œ Mat ๋Œ€๊ต ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ํ•ด๋‹น ํŒŒ์ผ ์œ ํ˜•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ 3.0m์˜€์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ 32.11%์˜ ์†์‹ค์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž˜ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์ด์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ‘๊ทธ๋ฃน ํšจ๊ณผ(group effect)’๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A3: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ Sonmez์™€ Ergun(1994)์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ธ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด ํŒŒ์ผ ์ง๊ฒฝ(D)์˜ 4๋ฐฐ(4D)๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ๊ทธ๋ฃน ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํŒŒ์ผ๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด 3D์—์„œ 5D ์‚ฌ์ด์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ „์ฒด ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ํ•ฉ์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰๋œ ‘์ž„๊ณ„ ๊นŠ์ด(critical depth)’์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A4: ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊นŠ์ด(๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 15D๋กœ ์–ธ๊ธ‰)๋Š” ํŒŒ์ผ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ํšจ ํ† ์••์ด ์„ ํ˜•์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์—์„œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ๊ฐœ๋…์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๊นŽ์•„๋‚ด๋ ค ์ด ์œ ํšจ ํ† ์•• ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ถ„์„(Figure 4)์€ ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์œ ํšจ ํ† ์••์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ฉด ๋งˆ์ฐฐ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ตœ์ข… ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ์–ด๋–ค ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ž…๋‹ˆ๊นŒ?

A5: ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์—์„œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฒคํŠธ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•(deflection) ๋ฐ ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ ์†์‹ค๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์นจํ•˜(settlement)๋‚˜ ์ „๋„(overturning) ์œ„ํ—˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์ธ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์•”์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Conclusion: Paving the Way for Higher Quality and Productivity

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ๋ฏธ๊ด€์ƒ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 32% ์ด์ƒ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ถ•๊ดด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์œ„ํ˜‘์ž„์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Mat ๋Œ€๊ต ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์œ„ํ—˜๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„, ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0450
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

Copyright Information

  • This content is a summary and analysis based on the paper “Effect of Scour on Load Carry Capacity of Piles on Mat Bridge” by “Erion PERIKU, Yavuz YARDIM”.
  • Source: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234057885.pdf

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Figure 4. a) Definition of time to equilibrium and end-scour depth according to Cardoso and Bettess (1999)

๊ต๊ฐ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜: 7์ผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ์ตœ์ข… ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์š”์•ฝ์€ Rui Lanรงa, Cristina Fael, Antรณnio Cardoso๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ “[Assessing equilibrium clear water scour around single cylindrical piers]” ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” STI C&D์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

  • Primary Keyword: ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„
  • Secondary Keywords: ๊ต๊ฐ ์„ธ๊ตด, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜, CFD, ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด, ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”, ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ

Executive Summary

  • The Challenge: ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ต๊ฐ ์„ธ๊ตด ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€์€ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ณผ์†Œํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์•ˆ์ „์— ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Method: ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ 46์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜ 5๊ฑด์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ , 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์˜ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Key Breakthrough: ๋‹จ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ก์— 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ๋งค์šฐ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • The Bottom Line: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ , ๋” ์งง์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋„ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Challenge: Why This Research Matters for CFD Professionals

๊ต๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด(local scour) ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์˜ ์ง€์ง€๋ ฅ์„ ์•ฝํ™”์‹œ์ผœ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ•๊ดด์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์›์ธ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋” ์ด์ƒ “์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ” ๋˜๋Š” “์ธ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ์ •๋„๋กœ” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ‘ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ’์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์ ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋งˆ๋‹ค ํ•ด์„์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ ๋งค์šฐ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฃผ๊ด€์„ฑ์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ์งง์€ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰ํ˜•์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ž˜๋ชป ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๋ฉด, ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ณผ์†Œํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์•ˆ์ „์œจ์„ ์ž˜๋ชป ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ด๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‹œ์ž‘๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Approach: Unpacking the Methodology

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 5๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์€ ๊ธธ์ด 12.7m, ํญ 0.83m, ๊นŠ์ด 1.0m์˜ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ฐ ์œ ๋ฆฌ๋ฒฝ ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

– ์œ ์‚ฌ(Sediment): ๋‘ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์„์˜์‚ฌ(D50 = 0.86mm ๋ฐ 1.28mm)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
– ๊ต๊ฐ(Pier): ์ง๊ฒฝ 63mm, 75mm, 80mm์˜ PVC ํŒŒ์ดํ”„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์„ ๋ชจ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
– ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„: ๊ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ์ตœ์†Œ 24.9์ผ์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 45.6์ผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ธด ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์–ด, ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌํŒ€์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” Melville & Chiew (1999), Cardoso & Bettess (1999) ๋“ฑ ๊ธฐ์กด์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, Bertoldi and Jones (1998)๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„(t=โˆž)์—์„œ์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์™ธ์‚ฝ(extrapolate)ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

The Breakthrough: Key Findings & Data

Finding 1: ๊ธฐ์กด ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€์˜ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์˜ค์ฐจ

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€๋“ค์€ ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๊ณผ์†Œํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ด ์•„์ง ํ‰ํ˜•์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์„ธ๊ตด ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ผ์‹œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋А๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์„ ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์˜ค์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Table 2์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, Melville & Chiew (1999)์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ ์šฉํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋œ ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋Š” 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•œ ๊ฐ’์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ -23%(์‹คํ—˜ #2)๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ ์—ˆ๋˜ Cardoso & Bettess (1999)์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์กฐ์ฐจ๋„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ -13%์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 4. a) Definition of time to equilibrium and end-scour depth according to Cardoso and Bettess (1999)
Figure 4. a) Definition of time to equilibrium and end-scour depth according to Cardoso and Bettess (1999)

Finding 2: 7์ผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์˜ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€, ๋น„๊ต์  ์งง์€ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜(Equation 2)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Table 4๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„(4์ผ, 7์ผ, 15์ผ)์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ „์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ก(์ตœ๋Œ€ 46์ผ)์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•œ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 4์ผ ๊ธฐ๋ก: ์™ธ์‚ฝ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” -21%์—์„œ +12%๊นŒ์ง€ ํฐ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 7์ผ ๊ธฐ๋ก: ์™ธ์‚ฝ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” -7%์—์„œ +5% ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์ข์€ ์˜ค์ฐจ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋‹จ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. – 15์ผ ๊ธฐ๋ก: 7์ผ ๊ธฐ๋ก์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ ๊ฐœ์„  ํญ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์•ฝ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ์‹คํ—˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Practical Implications for R&D and Operations

  • For Hydraulic/Civil Engineers: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด, ๊ต๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For Infrastructure Project Managers: ๋” ์งง์€ ์‹คํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ €ํ•ดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ์ผ์ •์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹คํ—˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • For CFD Modelers: ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ณผ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ท€์ค‘ํ•œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Paper Details


Assessing equilibrium clear water scour around single cylindrical piers

1. Overview:

  • Title: Assessing equilibrium clear water scour around single cylindrical piers
  • Author: Rui Lanรงa, Cristina Fael, Antรณnio Cardoso
  • Year of publication: 2010 (inferred from source)
  • Journal/academic society of publication: River Flow 2010 Conference (inferred from source)
  • Keywords: Local scour; Single piers; Equilibrium phase.

2. Abstract:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ํ‰ํ˜• ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์‹œ์ž‘์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹คํ—˜์ด ํ‰ํ˜• ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ์ž˜๋ชป๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์ด ๋…ผ์˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ‰ํ˜• ๋„๋‹ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์ด ํ‰ํ˜• ์‹ฌ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ๋„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์—์„œ์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

3. Introduction:

1950๋…„๋Œ€ ์ด๋ž˜๋กœ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ๊ต๋Ÿ‰ ๊ต๊ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ต๋Œ€์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ด ์™”์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ง€๋‚œ 20๋…„ ์ „๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ํ‰ํ˜•์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ธธ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‹คํ—˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ–ˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด๊ฐ€ “์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ” ๋” ์ด์ƒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ์ •์˜๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฃผ๊ด€์„ฑ์€ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์—์„œ ํ‰ํ˜•์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

4. Summary of the study:

Background of the research topic:

๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด์€ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ ์ฐจ ๊นŠ์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๊ตด ๊ณผ์ •์€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„, ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ‰ํ˜• ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋ง‘์€ ๋ฌผ ์„ธ๊ตด(clear-water scour) ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ธธ๋ฉฐ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„์— ์ ๊ทผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ‘๊ทผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Status of previous research:

๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์ด ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, Melville and Chiew (1999)๋Š” 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์„ธ๊ตด ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ง๊ฒฝ์˜ 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•  ๋•Œ๋ฅผ ํ‰ํ˜• ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Cardoso and Bettess (1999)๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๋Œ€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋กœ๊ทธ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ 0์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์›Œ์ง€๋Š” ์‹œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰ํ˜•์„ ํŒ๋‹จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€๋“ค์€ ์ž์˜์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ผ์‹œ์ ์ธ ์ •์ฒด๊ธฐ ์ดํ›„์— ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋‹ค์‹œ ์‹œ์ž‘๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋น„ํŒ๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Purpose of the study:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์‹œ์ž‘์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๋น„๊ต์  ์งง์€ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋Œ€์•ˆ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Core study:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์€ 5๊ฑด์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€(Melville & Chiew, Cardoso & Bettess ๋“ฑ)์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์„ ์ธ์œ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ถ•(์˜ˆ: 4์ผ, 7์ผ, 15์ผ)ํ•˜์—ฌ ์งง์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

5. Research Methodology

Research Design:

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ†ต์ œ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ 5๊ฑด์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ฑ„ํƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ต๊ฐ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์œ ์‚ฌ ์ž…๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ์„ ๋น„๊ต ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods:

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ์„ค์น˜๋œ ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํฌ์ธํŠธ ๊ฒŒ์ด์ง€(point gauge)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ยฑ1mm์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(time-series data)๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํšŒ๊ท€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ์ ํ•ฉ(fitting)์‹œ์ผœ ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Research Topics and Scope:

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋Š” ๋ง‘์€ ๋ฌผ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์ˆ˜์ง ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด๋กœ ์ œํ•œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์€ ์ƒ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ(d/Dp)์ด ์•ฝ 2์ด๊ณ , ์ƒ๋Œ€ ์œ ์‚ฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ(Dp/D50)๊ฐ€ 49.2์—์„œ 93.0 ์‚ฌ์ด์ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

6. Key Results:

Key Results:

  • ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€๋“ค์€ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 23%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณผ์†Œํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ํด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ํ‰ํ˜• ๋„๋‹ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต์‹๋“ค ๋˜ํ•œ ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ณด๋‹ค ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋” ์ž˜ ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์™ธ์‚ฝ์— ๋” ์ ํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์•ฝ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ „์ฒด ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๊ฐ’์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure List:

  • Figure 1. Time evolution of the scour depth
  • Figure 2. Time evolution of scour depth written in the coordinates of Oliveto and Hager (2005)
  • Figure 3. a) Data of Exp. # 2 adjusted by equation (1); b) idem for equation (2)
  • Figure 4. a) Definition of time to equilibrium and end-scour depth according to Cardoso and Bettess (1999)

7. Conclusion:

์ตœ๋Œ€ ์•ฝ 46์ผ ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์—์„œ์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹คํ—˜์€ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ํ‰ํ˜•์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ๋” ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ์œ ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‰ํ˜• ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์‹œ์ž‘์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ‰ํ˜• ๋„๋‹ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜(Equation 2)๋กœ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹จ์ผ ์›ํ˜• ๊ต๊ฐ์—์„œ์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

8. References:

  • Bertoldi, D.A., Jones, J.S. 1998. Time to scour experiments as an indirect measure of stream power around bridge piers. Proceedings of the International Water Resource Engineering Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, August 1998, pp. 264-269.
  • Cardoso, A.H., Bettess, R. 1999. Effects of time and channel geometry on scour at bridge abutments. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 125 nยฐ 4, Abril.
  • Chabert, J., Engeldinger, P. 1956. Etude des affouillements autour des piles des ponts. Laboratoire National d’Hydraulique, Chatou, France.
  • Coleman, S.E., Lauchlan, C.S., Melville, B.W. 2003. Clearwater scour development at bridge abutment. Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, vol. 41, nยบ 5, pp. 521-531.
  • Ettema, R., 1980. Scour at bridge piers. University of Auckland, School of Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Rep. No. 216.
  • Fael, C.M.S., G. Simarro-Grande, Martรญn-Vide J.P., Cardoso, A.H. 2006. Local scour at vertical-wall abutments under-clear water flow conditions. Water Resources Research. vol. nยบ 42, W10408.
  • Franzetti, S., Larcan; E., and Mignosa, P. 1982. Influence of tests duration on the evaluation of ultimate scour around circular piers, International Conference on the Hydraulic Modelling of Civil Engineering Structures, paper G2, Coventry, England.
  • Franzetti, S., Malavasi, S., and Piccinin, C. 1994. Sull’erosione alla base delle pile di ponte in acque chiare. Proc., XXIV Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Vol. II, T4 13โ€“24 (in Italian).
  • Grimaldi, C. 2005. Non-conventional countermeasures against local scouring at bridge piers. Ph.D. thesis, Hydraulic Engineering for Environment and Territory, Univ. of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy.
  • Hoffmans, G.J.C.M., Verheij, H.J. 1997. Scour manual. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 205.
  • Kothyari, U. C., Hager, W. H., Oliveto, G. 2007. Generalized approach for clear-water scour at bridge foundations elements. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 133(11), pp 1229-1240.
  • Laursen, E.M. 1963. An analysis of relief bridge scour. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 89, No. HY3, pp. 93-118.
  • Melville, B. W., Chiew Y.M. 1999. Time scale for local scour at bridge piers, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.125, Nยฐ1, 59โ€“65.
  • Oliveto, G., Hager, W. H. 2002. Temporal evolution of clear-water pier and abutment scour. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 128 nยฐ 9, Sep.
  • Oliveto, G., Hager, W. H. 2005. Further results to time-dependent local scour at bridge elements. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 131(2), pp 97-105.
  • Radice, A., Franzetti, S., Balio, F. 2002. Local scour at bridge abutments. River Flow 2002, Bousmar & Zech (eds.), Balkema Publishers, The Netherlands, 1059-1068.

Expert Q&A: Your Top Questions Answered

Q1: ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜(Eq. 1) ๋Œ€์‹  6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜(Eq. 2)๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€์š”?

A1: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Figure 3์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด, 4-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•œ ํ›„์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ ํŽธ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์ฒด ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์ ํ•ฉ(fit)์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ฌดํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ์‚ฝํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ข… ํ‰ํ˜• ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ๋•Œ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋„์ž…๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q2: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 46์ผ์ด ์ง€๋‚œ ํ›„์—๋„ ํ‰ํ˜•์— “๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค”๊ณ  ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด ์‹ค์ œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฌด์—‡์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋‚˜์š”?

A2: ์ด๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ์ ๊ทผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰ํ˜•์— ์ ‘๊ทผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ฝ” ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋ฉˆ์ถ”์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ์ž์—ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋„ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ, ์„ธ๊ตด ์†๋„๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ทน๋„๋กœ ๋А๋ ค์ง€์ง€๋งŒ 0์ด ๋˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ณตํ•™์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋” ์ด์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ์œ„ํ˜‘์ด ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์ตœ์ข… ํ•œ๊ณ„ ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์ด ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ด ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋„๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q3: Table 2๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด Cardoso and Bettess (1999)์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ทธ๋ƒฅ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์•ˆ ๋˜๋‚˜์š”?

A3: ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ์ค€๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ -2%์—์„œ -13%์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ณผ์†Œํ‰๊ฐ€ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์—์„œ ‘๊ณ ์›(plateau)’ ์ฆ‰, ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ์˜์กดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ง€์ ํ–ˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณ ์›์€ ์ผ์‹œ์ ์ธ ํ˜„์ƒ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ดํ›„์— ์„ธ๊ตด์ด ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ํ‰ํ˜• ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์˜คํ•ด์˜ ์†Œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋” ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์ด ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q4: ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ–ˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A4: ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Table 2์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜์—์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰๋˜์—ˆ๋“ฏ์ด, ๋” ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜(์‹คํ—˜ #1, #2)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ต๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ๋” ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ์œ ์‹ค์‹œํ‚ฌ ๋งŒํผ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ ํ† ์‚ฌ ์ง€๋ฐ˜์—์„œ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กœ์šด ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋„ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Q5: ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ก์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋‚ด๋ ธ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์„ 15์ผ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋” ๊ธธ๊ฒŒ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋ฉด ์–ด๋–ค ์ด์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‚˜์š”?

A5: Table 4์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์„ 7์ผ์—์„œ 15์ผ๋กœ ๋Š˜๋ ธ์„ ๋•Œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์€ “๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•œ(marginal)” ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๊ทธ์ณค์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ 8์ผ ๋™์•ˆ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ๊ณ„์†ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋“œ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋น„์šฉ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ •ํ™•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ด์ ์ด ํฌ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ๋•Œ, 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ์‹คํ—˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


Conclusion: Paving the Way for Higher Quality and Productivity

๊ต๊ฐ์˜ ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ์ธ ํ‰ํ˜• ํŒ๋‹จ ๊ธฐ์ค€์ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‹จ 7์ผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ 6-๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋‹คํ•ญ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์™ธ์‚ฝ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์ข… ์„ธ๊ตด ์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ R&D ๋ฐ ์šด์˜ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ•œ์ธต ๋” ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์—†์–ด์„œ ์šฉ์—ญ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ „๋ฌธ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFD consulting services๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท€ํ•˜๊ป˜์„œ ๋‹น๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜ : 02-2026-0442
  • ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

Copyright Information

  • This content is a summary and analysis based on the paper “Assessing equilibrium clear water scour around single cylindrical piers” by “Rui Lanรงa, Cristina Fael, Antรณnio Cardoso”.
  • Source: The time records of the scour depth are available at http://w3.ualg.pt/~rlanca/riverflow2010.htm

This material is for informational purposes only. Unauthorized commercial use is prohibited. Copyright ยฉ 2025 STI C&D. All rights reserved.

Intel CPU i9

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ CPU, ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ณจ๋ผ์•ผ ํ• ๊นŒ?

๊ตฌ๋งค์ „ ์ฃผ์š” CPU ๋น„๊ต ๋‚ด์šฉ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ

์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ฏผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ, ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์ตœ์‹  CPU, Memory, Chipset, HDD/SSD, Power Supply ๋“ฑ, ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ๋‹น์—ฐ์ฝ” ์„ ํƒ ๊ณ ๋ฏผ์€ CPU ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Š” ์ˆ˜ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ์š”์ธ์ค‘์— ํ•ด์„ ์†๋„์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง์ ‘ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹คํ–‰ํžˆ ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ „๋ฌธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ๋น„๊ต์ž๋ฃŒ>

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ๋Œ€ Intel i9-14900HX

์•„๋ž˜ ๋‘ CPU ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž‘๋…„์— ์ถœ์‹œ(๋˜๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ)๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , Intel Core i9-14900HX๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ(CPU ๋งˆํฌ) ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์•ฝ 22% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ , ์‹ฑ๊ธ€์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ฝ 7% ๋” ๋น ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370์€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ์ ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋น„๊ต์—์„œ ์„ ํƒ๋œ CPU๋Š” ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ, ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ CPU ํด๋ž˜์Šค์— ์†ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ CPU ํด๋ž˜์Šค์—์„œ CPU๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ์•„๋ž˜ ๊ฐ’์€ PerformanceTest ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์™€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์ œ์ถœ๋œ 1202๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ์นœ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ œ์ถœ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋งค์ผ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์„น์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ ํƒํ•œ ๊ฐ CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋Š” ์„ ํƒ๋œ ๊ฐ CPU์˜ CPU ๋งˆํฌ ๋ฐ ๋‹จ์ผ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋‹น CPU ๋งˆํฌ/์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋น„์šฉ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ์„น์…˜์—์„œ๋Š” CPU์˜ ๋Œ€๋žต์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ์šด์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
Itemร—AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370ร—Intel Core i9-14900HX
PriceSearch Online Search Online 
Socket TypeFP8FCBGA1964
CPU ClassDesktop, LaptopLaptop
Clockspeed2.0 GHz2.2 GHz
Turbo SpeedUp to 5.1 GHzUp to 5.8 GHz
# of Physical Cores12 (Threads: 24)24 (Threads: 32)
CacheL1: 960KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 8MBL1: 2,176KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 36MB
TDP28W55W
Yearly Running Cost$5.11$10.04
Otherw/ Radeon 890MIntel UHD Graphics for 14th Gen Intel Processors
First Seen on ChartQ3 2024Q1 2024
# of Samples1441058
CPU Value0.067.2
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)4007(-6.8%)4301(0.0%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)35487(-22.3%)45647(0.0%)

1 – Last seen price from our affiliates NewEgg.com & Amazon.com.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 37035,487
Intel Core i9-14900HX45,647
PassMark Software ยฉ 2008-2024
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370NA
Intel Core i9-14900HX67.2
PassMark Software ยฉ 2008-2024
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 3704,007
Intel Core i9-14900HX4,301
PassMark Software ยฉ 2008-2024

Estimated Energy Usage Cost

Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
825

1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core i9-14900HX
Max TDP28W55W
Power consumption per day (kWh)0.060.11
Running cost per day$0.014$0.028
Power consumption per year (kWh)20.440.1
Running cost per year$5.11$10.04

Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.

CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋น„๊ต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์•„๋ž˜ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ž…์„ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๊ต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์•„๋ž˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ “Add other CPU:” ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์ฐฝ์— ์›ํ•˜๋Š” CPU ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์„ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•œ ํ›„ “Compare” ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๋ฉด ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐœ์˜ CPU ๋น„๊ต ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleCompare.php

CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋น„๊ต ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

Itemร—AMD Ryzen 7 7435HSร—Intel Core i7-13620Hร—Intel Core i5-1235Uร—Intel Core i9-14900HX
PriceSearch Online Search Online Search Online Search Online 
Socket TypeFP7r2FCBGA1744FCBGA1744FCBGA1964
CPU ClassDesktop, LaptopLaptopLaptop, Mobile/EmbeddedLaptop
Clockspeed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz1.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Turbo SpeedUp to 4.5 GHzUp to 4.9 GHzUp to 4.4 GHzUp to 5.8 GHz
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 16)10 (Threads: 16)10 (Threads: 12)24 (Threads: 32)
CacheL1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 16MBL1: 864KB, L2: 9.5MB, L3: 24MBL1: 928KB, L2: 6.5MB, L3: 12MBL1: 2,176KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 36MB
TDP45W45W15W55W
Yearly Running Cost$8.21$8.21$2.74$10.04
OtherIntel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel Iris Xe GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics for 14th Gen Intel Processors
First Seen on ChartQ2 2024Q1 2023Q1 2022Q1 2024
# of Samples87104123241058
CPU Value0.049.543.367.2
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)3228(-25.0%)3689(-14.2%)3218(-25.2%)4301(0.0%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)23985(-47.5%)24844(-45.6%)13388(-70.7%)45647(0.0%)

CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด ๋ฐ ์„ ํƒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

last update : 2021-12-15

์ž๋ฃŒ์ถœ์ฒ˜ : ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” PCWorld Australia์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ๊ณผ www.itworld.co.kr์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ฐ€ํ•„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒŒ์žฌํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋จผ์ € ์„ ํƒํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. AMD์ธ๊ฐ€, ์ธํ…”์ธ๊ฐ€? ๋‘ ์—…์ฒด๋Š” CPU ์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ์–‘๋Œ€์‚ฐ๋งฅ๊ณผ๋„ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์ด ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์ถœ์‹œํ•œ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ CPU ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๊ฐ€ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ๊นผ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ง€๋‚œํ•ด ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ AMD์˜ ๋ผ์ด์   5000 ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ฆด๋งŒํ•œ ์ด์œ ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD CPU๋ฅผ ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž.

โ“’ Gordon Mah Ung


๋น„๊ต ๋Œ€์ƒ ์ œํ’ˆ 

2021.11.09

PC ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฐ˜๋„์ฒด ์ˆ˜๊ธ‰๋‚œ์—์„œ CPU๋ฅผ ์ •๊ฐ€์— ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD ์ œํ’ˆ ์„ ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์••์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์„ฑ๋Šฅ/ํšจ์œจ ์ฝ”์–ด์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ
Core i9 12900K/KF8/824590๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ/570๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i7 12700K/KF8/420410๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ/390๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i5 12600K/KF6/416290๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ/270๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
AMD  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฝ”์–ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ    ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ   
Ryzen 9 5950X1632800๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Ryzen 9 5900X1224550๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Ryzen 7 5800X816450๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Ryzen 5 5600X612300๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ

๋น„๊ต์  ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ์ธํ…” CPU์ธ F ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์—†์–ด ๋ณ„๋„์˜ GPU๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ์™ธ์žฅ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์™€ ์ง์„ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์ด โ€˜ํ•œ ๋ฐฉโ€™์„ ๋…ธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด ๋น„๊ต์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ์ƒ๊ธ‰์ธ 16์ฝ”์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณผ ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค. 12900KF๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 8์ฝ”์–ด์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X์™€ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ๋น„๊ต ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…”์€ AMD์™€ ๊ฝค ๋Œ€๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹ธ์šฐ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. CPU์—๋งŒ 80๋งŒ์›์„ ์ง€์ถœํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋ผ๋ฉด ๋” ํฐ ํŒŒ์›Œ ์„œํ”Œ๋ผ์ด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด CPU ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๋ฉด ์ฟผ๋“œ(Quad) ์ฝ”์–ด, ํ•˜์ดํผ-์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ(Hyper-Threading), ํ„ฐ๋ณด-๋ถ€์ŠคํŒ…(Turbo-Boosting), ์บ์‹œ(Cache) ํฌ๊ธฐ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šฉ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i3, i5, i7, i9๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ๊นŒ?
์นฉ์…‹์—๋Š” ์„ธ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ์˜๋ฏธ์™€ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ผ๊นŒ?
ํ•˜์ดํผ-์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ด๊ณ  ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ์ ํ•ฉํ• ๊นŒ?

์ƒˆ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ๋จผ์ € ํ˜„์žฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ธํ…” CPU๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•ด๋ณด์ž.
์ง€๊ธˆ ๋‚ด PC ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„์ธ์ง€ ์•Œ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ์ด๋‹ค.
๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ œ์–ดํŒ > ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์•ˆ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์—์„œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ํ˜„์žฌ PC์— ์„ค์น˜๋œ CPU, RAM, ์šด์˜์ฒด์ œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์•„๋ž˜์— ํ˜„์žฌ ์„ค์น˜๋œ ์ธํ…” CPU๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ์ง€, ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-4790, ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-8500U ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ Ghz๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์œ„์ธ CPU ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์ค‘์— ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•ด ๋” ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…์„ ํ•˜๊ฒ ๋‹ค.

์ผ๋‹จ CPU๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์ž.
CPU ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์—๋Š” ์ˆซ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ ๋ณด์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด ์ˆซ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์Šจ ์˜๋ฏธ์ธ์ง€ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์ผ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์˜ ์•ž ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ธ โ€œ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ดโ€๋Š” ์ธํ…”์ด ๋งŒ๋“  ์ฝ”์–ด ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ผ๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ์ธํ…”์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฌ๊ณ , ์ธ๊ธฐ์žˆ๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ์ธํ…” ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ๊ณผ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด๋ผ๋Š” ํ‘œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ๊ณ  : ์ธํ…”์€ ์…€๋ฃฐ๋ก (Celeron), ํŽœํ‹ฐ์—„(Pentium), ์ œ์˜จ(Xeon) ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์„ ํŒ๋งคํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ โ€œi7โ€์€ CPU ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜ ๋””์ž์ธ์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์ด๋‹ค.
์ž๋™์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํด๋ž˜์Šค์™€ ์—”์ง„ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ ์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค โ€˜์—”์ง„โ€™์ด ํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ์€ ๋™์ผํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ผ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค.
์ธํ…”์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ CPU์˜ ํด๋ž˜์Šค์ธ i3, i5, i7์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด๋ž€ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ˆ˜, ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„, ์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ, ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ 2.0๊ณผ ํ•˜์ดํผ์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ง€์› ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๋งํ•œ๋‹ค.
์ฝ”์–ด i5์™€ i7 ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ ์ฟผ๋“œ ์ฝ”์–ด(์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 4๊ฐœ)์ด๊ณ , ๋กœ์šฐ์—”๋“œ(์ €๊ฐ€) ์ฝ”์–ด i3 ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ๋“€์–ผ ์ฝ”์–ด(์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 2๊ฐœ)๋‹ค.

์ด์ œ SKU์™€ ์„ธ๋Œ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์ž. ์•ž์„œ ์˜ˆ๋กœ ๋“ค์€ โ€œ4790โ€์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ฒ ๋‹ค.
์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ˆซ์ž์ธ โ€œ4โ€๋Š” CPU์˜ ์„ธ๋Œ€์ด๊ณ , โ€œ790โ€๋Š” ์ผ์ข…์˜ ์ผ๋ จ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ, ๋˜๋Š” ID ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7์ด 4์„ธ๋Œ€ CPU๋ผ๋Š” ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ์ด๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ๋ฐ โ€˜์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌโ€™๊ฐ€ ๋ถ™๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์—์„œ ์˜ˆ๋กœ ๋“  ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์—†์ง€๋งŒ โ€œIntel Core i7-8650Uโ€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋์— ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ถ™์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ “U”๋Š” โ€œUltra Low Power(์ดˆ์ €์ „๋ ฅ)โ€๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.
์ธํ…”์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์„ธ๋Œ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ”๋€Œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ˜„์žฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” CPU ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๋งํฌ๋œ ์ธํ…”์˜ โ€˜์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ ๋ชฉ๋กโ€™ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์ž.

CPU์˜ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ• ๊นŒ?

๊ฝค ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ๋งํ•ด, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก, ์ฆ‰ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šธ ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋” ์ข‹๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ณ„๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ์ •๋„๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ธฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ตœ์‹  8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” 7์„ธ๋Œ€๋ณด๋‹ค ์ตœ๋Œ€ 40%๊นŒ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๋น„๊ต ๋Œ€์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค. SKU๊ฐ€ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ณ„๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-8850U๋Š” ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-7850U๋Š” ์—†๋‹ค.

์„ธ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ตœ์‹  ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์›์น™์ด๋‹ค. ๋” ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ์ด์ ์„ ๋ˆ„๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋ฉฐ, PC ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ข‹์„๊นŒ?
๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ๋Œ€๋‹ตํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์€ ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 1๊ฐœ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ 1๊ฐœ๋งŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 2๊ฐœ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” 2๊ฐœ๋ฅผ, ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 4๊ฐœ์ธ ์ฟผ๋“œ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” 4๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค๋ฉด ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ(Thread)๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ผ๊นŒ? ์•„์ฃผ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉด, ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋Š” ํŠน์ • ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์—์„œ ๋‚˜์™€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ์†๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋งํ•œ๋‹ค. PC์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋กœ ๊ท€๊ฒฐ๋œ๋‹ค.

์ฆ‰, ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๋‹ค. PC๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ช…๋ น์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ƒˆ CPU๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์—๋งŒ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”๋ฉด ์ž์นซ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋งŒํผ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

CPU์˜ ๊ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด์—๋Š” Ghz๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์œ„์ธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” CPU ์‹คํ–‰ ์†๋„๋‹ค. ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋น ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ก, CPU๊ฐ€ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ช…๋ น์ด ๋งŽ๋‹ค.

ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ ๋†’์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋” ์ข‹๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐœ์—ด๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ œ์•ฝ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ด์œ ๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ PC๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์•Œ๋งž์€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„์ผ๊นŒ?


ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” PC๋กœ ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์ผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ถ€ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์€ ์‹ฑ๊ธ€์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋กœ ์‹คํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋””์˜ค ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์ด๋‚˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ํ•ด๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์ง€๋งŒ ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋†’๋‹ค.
์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋งŽ์€ ํฐ ํ•ด์„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•˜๋‹ค.

์›น ๋ธŒ๋ผ์šฐ์ง• ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ์ƒ์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋Š” ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ i5 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ i7๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋†’๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ณด๋‹ค ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ๋†’๊ณ  ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ›จ์”ฌ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ดํผ-์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์ด๋ž€?

์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ–ˆ๋“ฏ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋งŒ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, CPU๊ฐ€ ๋“€์–ผ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ผ๋ฉด ๋™์‹œ์— ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€ 2๊ฐœ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ธํ…”์€ ํ•˜์ดํผ-์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•ด ๋„์ž…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์šด์˜์ฒด์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ 2๋ฐฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋™์‹œ์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด๋‹ค.

์ฆ‰ i5์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋Š” 4๊ฐœ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์‹คํ–‰์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉด ํ•˜์ดํผ-์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์ด ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 2๋ฐฐ ๋Š˜๋ ค์„œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค.

ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ(Turbo Boost)๋ž€?

์ธํ…”์˜ ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด๋‹ค. ํ„ฐ๋ถ€ ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ๋กœ ๋†’์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ํ™œ์„ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ˆ˜, ์ถ”์ •๋˜๋Š” ์ „๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰, ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค.

์•Œ๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ธํ…” ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง, ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ โ€˜์—ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ „๋ ฅโ€™์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์น˜์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์ด ๋„๋‹ฌํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํŒ๋‹จํ•œ ํ›„ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ธ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„์™€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ˜„์žฌ ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํ…Œํฌ๋†€๋กœ์ง€ 2.0 ๋ฒ„์ „์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ 7์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ฐ 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7๊ณผ i5 CPU์—์„œ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค.

i3, i5, i7, i9 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„, ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ธฐ์–ตํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ

CPU๊ฐ€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์† ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, CPU๋Š” ์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ธ ์บ์‹œ๋ผ๋Š” ๊ณณ์— ์ €์žฅ๋œ๋‹ค. ์บ์‹œ๋Š” RAM๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ CPU์— ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค.
์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋ฉด ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ, ์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ฌด์กฐ๊ฑด ํด ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋” ์ข‹๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์„ ์ˆ˜๋ก CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค.

7์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i3 ๋ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด i5 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ U ๋ฐ Y ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” 3MB, 4MB์ด๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i7์˜ ์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” 4MB์ด๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ์บ์‹œ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 6MB, 8MB, 9MB, 12MB์ด๋‹ค.

์ฝ”์–ด i3, i5, i7, i9์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ผ๊นŒ?
์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด i7์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i5, ์ฝ”์–ด i5๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i3๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚˜์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i7์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋Š” 7๊ฐœ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i3 ์—ญ์‹œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜๋‹ค.

2017๋…„ ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ€์˜ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ƒ๊ธ‰์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-7980X์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์™€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 18๊ฐœ์™€ 2.6GHz, ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋Š” 32๊ฐœ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-7900X์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 10์ฝ”์–ด, 3.3GHz(๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„), 20 ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ์ด๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ตœ์‹ ์ฝ”์–ด์ธ i7๊ณผ i9์„ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” CPU๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด์ง€๋งŒ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์„ ํƒ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค.

editor@itworld.co.kr


AMD CPU ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด

์ธ๋„ค์ผ
์ธ๋„ค์ผ

AMDย CPUย ์ด๋ฆ„ย ๊ทœ์น™ย ๋ฐย ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ช…,ย ์ข…๋ฅ˜,ย ์„ธ๋Œ€,ย ์†Œ์ผ“ย ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ

AMD 1600, AMD 2400G, Athlon 240GE, AMD 3990X ๋“ฑ AMD์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ cpu๋“ค์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. AMD cpu, apu์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์™€ ์„ธ๋Œ€, ์†Œ์ผ“์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด ๊ธ€์—์„œ๋Š” 2017๋…„ 3์›” 3์ผ ์ดํ›„ ๋‚˜์˜จ ‘๋ผ์ด์  ’ ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์˜ cpu, apu์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋„๋ก ํ•˜๊ฒ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD ๋ผ์ด์   ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ 3์„ธ๋Œ€๊นŒ์ง€ ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ cpu, ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ cpu(์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ), ์ผ๋ฐ˜ APU, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ APU์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์†Œ์ผ“์€ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‚˜์˜จ cpu ์ค‘ ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ cpu๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ cpu๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ am4์†Œ์ผ“์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD CPU ์ด๋ฆ„ ๊ทœ์น™

์ด๋ฆ„ ๊ทœ์น™

ย 

์ด๋ฆ„ ๊ทœ์น™

AMD ๋ผ์ด์   ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ‘AMD ๋ผ์ด์   7 1700X’๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ๋กœ ๋“ค๋ฉด, ์•ž์˜ ‘AMD’๋Š” ํšŒ์‚ฌ ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ

๋’ค์— ‘๋ผ์ด์   7’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
‘๋ผ์ด์   3’์€ ๋ฉ”์ธ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ,
‘๋ผ์ด์   5’๋Š” ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ,
‘๋ผ์ด์   7’์€ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋’ค์— ‘1’์€ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
‘1700’์€ Zen 1์„ธ๋Œ€์ด๋ฉฐ,
‘AMD ๋ผ์ด์   5 2400G’์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด APU๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์„ธ๋Œ€์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ธด ํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค์Œ ์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ •๋„๊นŒ์ง€์— ๊ฐœ์„ ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ์„œ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋Š” ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ, ‘400G’์•ž์— ๋ถ™๋Š” ์ˆซ์ž๋Š” 1์ด ๋”ํ•ด์ ธ์„œ ๋‚˜์˜ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ž๋ฆฌ ‘7’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
‘2,3’์€ ๋ฉ”์ธ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ,
‘4,5,6’์€ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ,
‘7,8’์€ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์„ธ๋„ค๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ž๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„ธ์„ธํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜, ์„ธ์„ธํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์ •๋„๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜์‹œ๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://minikupa.com/52 [๋ฏธ๋‹ˆ์ฟ ํŒŒ]

ย 

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ | ์™•์ขŒ ํƒˆํ™˜ ๋…ธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ‘์ธํ…”์˜ ๊ท€ํ™˜’

2021.11.09

Gordon Mah Ung | PCWorld๊ตฌ์› ์„œ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ข‹์•„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์€ ์—†๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ํšŒ์ž๋  ๊ท€ํ™˜ ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฃผ์ธ๊ณต์ด๋‹ค. ํ•œ๋•Œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ๋“์˜์–‘์–‘ํ–ˆ๋˜ ์ฑ”ํ”ผ์–ธ์€ ์ˆ˜ ๋…„ ์ „ ๋ถ€ํ™œํ•œ AMD ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ์†์— ๊ตด์š•์ ์ธ ํŒจ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒช์—ˆ๊ณ  ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ•ด์„œ๋“  ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ ์‹ธ์šธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฐพ์•„ ๋งˆ์นจ๋‚ด ์Šน๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์™ธ์น˜๋ ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ œ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๊ฐ€ ํŽ˜์ด๋“œ์•„์›ƒ ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ์—”๋”ฉ ํฌ๋ ˆ๋”ง์œผ๋กœ ๋„˜์–ด๊ฐ„ ์…ˆ์ด๋‹ค.

์ธ์ƒ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ํ—๋ฆฌ์šฐ๋“œ์‹ ๊ฒฐ๋ง์„ ๋งบ๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋“œ๋ผ๋งˆ์˜ ์ฃผ์ธ๊ณต ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์ž˜ ํ•ด๋‚ธ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ ๋ช‡ ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ AMD ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์— ๋‘๋“ค๊ฒจ ๋งž์€ ํ›„ ํƒœ์–ด๋‚œ 12900K๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ œํ’ˆ์ธ ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ CPU๋กœ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ™œ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์•ˆ๊ฒผ๋‹ค. ํ™”๋ˆํ•œ KO ์Šน๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ๋‘” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ „ํ˜€ ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์žฅ์ ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์˜ค๋Š˜ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋‹ค. 


12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋Š” ์–ด๋–ค CPU?

์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋Š” ๊ทผ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…” 7 ๊ณต์ •์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ CPU ์„ค๊ณ„๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์‹ค ์ด๊ฒƒ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์—„์ฒญ๋‚œ ์ผ์ด๋‹ค. 14๋‚˜๋…ธ ํŠธ๋žœ์ง€์Šคํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— 5๋…„ ์ด์ƒ์„ ํ—ˆ๋น„ํ•œ ๋์—, ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋Š” ๋งˆ์นจ๋‚ด ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋…ธ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. (๊ธฐ์กด 10๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์ด ๋ฆฌ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ๋œ ํ›„ ์ธํ…” 7์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ด๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฐ๋‹ค.)

์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ๋” ์ž‘์•„์ง„ ํšจ์œจ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋Œ€ ์ „๋ ฅ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์žฌ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ํฐ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ธํ…” 7 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ CPU๋ผ๊ณ  ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์‰ฝ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ด์ „ 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋งŒํผ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋Š” PCIe 5.0, DDR5 ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ, LGA1700 ์†Œ์ผ“์„ ๋น„๋กฏํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ‘œ์ค€์„ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค.

CPU ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

์ธํ…”์˜ ์ „ํ†ต์  ๊ฐ•์ ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ์—ˆ๋˜ 3D ๋ Œ๋”๋ง๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์ž. ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” PC์—์„œ 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ์‹ค์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ง€ ์•Š์•„์„œ, ์ด๋“ค ์ „๋ฌธ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ์‹คํ–‰ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ํฐ ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ๋‘์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฃผ์žฅ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   CPU์˜ ๋ˆˆ๋ถ€์‹  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋’ค์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋งŒ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ ํ”ผ๋ฒ—์„ ๋บ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋„ ๋งŽ๋‹ค.

๋งฅ์Šจ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R23๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งฅ์Šจ ์‹œ๋„ค๋งˆ4D ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ์—”์ง„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ์—”์ง„์ด ์ผ๋ถ€ ์–ด๋„๋น„ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์—๋„ ๋‚ด์žฅ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ตœ์‹  ๋ฒ„์ „์€ 10๋ถ„ ์“ฐ๋กœํ‹€๋ง ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” 10์„ธ๋Œ€, 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์นฉ๊ณผ ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 11 ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์—†์ง€๋งŒ, ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 10๊ณผ 10์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9-10900K๊ฐ€ 1๋งŒ 4,336์ ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜๊ณ  8์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9-11900K๋Š” 1๋งŒ 6,264์ ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์‹ค ๋‘˜ ๋‹ค 2๋งŒ 2,168์ ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ AMD 12์ฝ”์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   9 5900X๊ณผ๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€๊ฐ€ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๊ตณ์ด 16์ฝ”์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ˆˆ๊ธธ์„ ๋„๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K์˜ ๊ธด ํŒŒ๋ž€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์ด ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ง์ด ๋งŽ์•˜์ง€๋งŒ, 12900K๋Š” ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ๋ผ์ด์  ์˜ ํ™ˆ๊ทธ๋ผ์šด๋“œ์˜€๋˜ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์—์„œ AMD์˜ 1, 2์œ„ CPU๋ฅผ ์•„์ฃผ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์ด๋‚˜๋งˆ ๋Šฅ๊ฐ€ํ•ด ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€์˜ ์ž…์„ ๋‹จ์†ํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ธํ…”์ด ์˜ณ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  CPU ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค ์“ฐ๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์€ ๊ทธ๋‹ค์ง€ ๋งŽ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜๋กœ ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋ฃธ ํด๋ž˜์‹ ์˜ฌ์ฝ”์–ด ์˜์ƒ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ์ด๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ์ง„ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ๊ณ , ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R23 ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๊ทธ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜คํ”ผ์Šค๋‚˜ ํฌํ† ์ƒต ์‹คํ–‰์— ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋” ๊ฐ€๊น๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฝ”์–ด i9-10900K์™€ ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 11 ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์—†์ง€๋งŒ, 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1,325์ , 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ 1,640์ ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•œ AMD ๋ผ์ด์  ๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ธํ…” ์ตœ์‹  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด 19% ๋†’๊ณ , ๊ตฌํ˜• 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์นฉ๋ณด๋‹ค 31%๋‚˜ ๋‚˜์•„์ ธ ๋‹นํ˜น์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šธ ์ •๋„์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งฅ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ M1 ๋งฅ์Šค์™€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ์–ด๋–จ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ถ๊ธˆํ•ด ํ•˜๋Š” ์ด์—๊ฒŒ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ์ž๋ฉด, ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๊ฐ€ ์šฐ์„ธํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์นฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์นฉ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ CPU๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ ์ตœ์‹  M1 ์นฉ๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ฝ 20%๋‚˜ ๋” ๋นจ๋ž๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ธํ…” ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์šฉ ์นฉ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ CPU๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜๋ฉด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋งฅ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์••์ถ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

CPU์˜ ์••์ถ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ธ๊ธฐ์žˆ๊ณ  ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ์ธ 7-Zip ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋Š” CPU ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ  ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ž์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฒˆ ์Šคํ’€๋ง์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์••์ถ• ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์ „๋ถ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์••์ถ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ 24%, ์••์ถ• ํ•ด์ œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ 35% ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€ ๋ผ์ด์  ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์Šน์ž๋‹ค.

7-cpu.com์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์••์ถ• ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์บ์‹œ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ TLB(translation look ahead buffer)๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์••์ถ•์„ ํ’€ ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„๊ธฐ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์‹คํŒจ ํŒจ๋„ํ‹ฐ(branch misprediction penalties)๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ, ์‹ค์ œ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ ์••์ถ•ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์••์ถ•์„ ํ‘ธ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณดํ†ต ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์ด๋ก ์— ๊ทธ์นœ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ง€์–ด ์••์ถ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ ํ™”๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์€ ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 10 ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ 7,916์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ผ์ด์   9์ด 7-zip ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์••์ถ• ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์šฐ์œ„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒฌ์€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ธฐ DDR5 ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ 7-Zip์ด ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ๋ช…๋ น์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ด์œ ๋„ ์žˆ๊ฒ ์ง€๋งŒ, ์–ด์จŒ๋“  ์••์ถ• ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์  ์ด ์Šน๋ฆฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

CPU ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ์ด์ž ์˜คํ”ˆ์†Œ์Šค์ธ ํ•ธ๋“œ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ํŠธ๋žœ์Šค์ฝ”๋”/์ธ์ฝ”๋”๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ์ด์ž ์˜คํ”ˆ์†Œ์Šค์ธ 4K ํ‹ฐ์–ด์Šค ์˜ค๋ธŒ ์Šคํ‹ธ(Tears of Steel) ์˜์ƒ์„ H.265 ์ฝ”๋ฑ๊ณผ 1080p ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9์€ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ์„ ์•ฝ 6% ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋๋‚ด๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹ค์‹œ 1์œ„๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์••๋„์ ์ธ ์Šน๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์–ด์จŒ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ 1๋“ฑ์ด๋‹ค. 

ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ

์ด์ œ ๊ธฑ๋ฒค์น˜ 5๋กœ ์˜ฎ๊ฒจ๊ฐ„๋‹ค. ์ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” 21๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž‘์€ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋ฃจํ”„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์ธ๋ฐ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž์ธ ํ”„๋ผ์ด๋ฉ”์ดํŠธ ๋žฉ์Šค(Primate Labs)๋Š” ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์—์„œ HDR, ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ์–ธ์–ด ๋ฐ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ธฐ์žˆ๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฑ๋ฒค์น˜๋Š” ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๋…ผ๋ž€์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋‹ค. 3D ๋ Œ๋”๋ง๊ณผ ์••์ถ•, ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ์ˆœ์œ„๊ฐ€ ์˜ค๋ฅด๋‚ด๋ ธ๋˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋ณด๋‹ค 8%๊ฐ€๋Ÿ‰ 

๊ธฑ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋Š” ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์— ๋…ผ๋ž€์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚ ์—๋Š” ๋น„๋‚œ๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ์„œ ์–ด๋–ค ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์–ด๋ฆฌ์„๊ฒŒ๋„ ์ธ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋‹น์‹ ์ด ๊ธฑ๋ฒค์น˜ 5์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋“  ๊ฐ„์—, ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์€ CPU๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ๋ณด๊ณ  ์‹ถ์–ดํ•œ๋‹ค. 3D ๋ Œ๋”๋ง, ์••์ถ• ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ์„ ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๊ฐ€ ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋ณด๋‹ค ์•ฝ 8% ์•ž์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.

์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ 

์ „์ฒด ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๊ฐ€ ๋ผ์ด์   9 59050X์— ๋น„ํ•ด 4% ๋” ์•ž์„ ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์–ธ 2.0์€ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ณด์ •(retouch)์™€ ์ผ๊ด„ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ๋ผ๋Š” 2๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜๋ˆˆ๋‹ค. ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์–ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ณด์ •์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ณผ ๋ผ์ด์   9์ด ๋™์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋ฃธ ํด๋ž˜์‹ ์‚ฌ์ง„ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‹œํ—˜ํ•œ ์ผ๊ด„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 5%๊นŒ์ง€ ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋ฃธ ์‚ฌ์ง„ ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋†€๋ž๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9์˜ ์Šน๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค.ย 

์‹ค์ƒํ™œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

๋น„์‹ผ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋กœ ์ธ๋”” ์˜ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํŠน์ˆ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ด๊ตญ์ ์ธ ์—ฌํ–‰์—์„œ ์ฐ์€ ์‚ฌ์ง„์„ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ƒ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ์ง€๋งŒ, ์„ธ์ƒ ์ผ์˜ ๋Œ€๋‹ค์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ฒญ๊ตฌ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋ถˆํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€๋ฃจํ•œ ์ž‘์—…๊ณผ ๋” ์—ฐ๊ด€์ด ๊นŠ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ ์˜คํ”ผ์Šค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ UL์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์–ธ 2.0 ์˜คํ”ผ์Šค ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์–ด๋„๋น„์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ, ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ ์›Œ๋“œ, ์—‘์…€, ํŒŒ์›Œํฌ์ธํŠธ ๋ฐ ์•„์›ƒ๋ฃฉ์—์„œ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด๋ฅผ ๋งŽ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์‹ค์ด ์ง€๋ฃจํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ž‘์—…์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์˜คํ”ผ์Šค๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ๋ฌด์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋”ฑ๋”ฑํ•œ ์•„์›ƒ๋ฃฉ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์—ด๊ด‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์  ๋ณด๋‹ค 16% ๋น ๋ฅธ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๊ฐ€ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ์›Œ๋“œ์—์„œ 14%, ์—‘์…€์—์„œ 19%, ํŒŒ์›Œํฌ์ธํŠธ์—์„œ 10%, ์•„์›ƒ๋ฃฉ์—์„œ 19% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค. 

๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฐจํŠธ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ์ถ• ๋ˆˆ๊ธˆ์€ 60์™€ํŠธ์—์„œ 340์™€ํŠธ๊นŒ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, 0์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์ถ•์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ๋ชจ๋“  ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R20์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, 12900K(๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰) ๋ง‰๋Œ€๊ฐ€ 320์™€ํŠธ์˜ ์ด์†Œ๋น„๋Ÿ‰๊นŒ์ง€ ์˜ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X(๋ณด๋ผ์ƒ‰)์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์น˜๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฑฐ์˜ 100์™€ํŠธ ๋” ๋งŽ๋‹ค. ์•ฝ 45% ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์ด๋‹ค. ์ผ๋‹จ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ฝ”์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‘ ์นฉ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜๋ฅผ ์™„๋ฃŒํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋‹จ์ผ ์ฝ”์–ด๋‚˜ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์นฉ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ œ 115์™€ํŠธ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ์ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋ผ์ด์   9๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 10์™€ํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋” ์†Œ๋น„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋๋‚ด๊ณ  ๋ผ์ด์   9 ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๋„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ย 

์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋ง

์ธํ…”์˜ 11์„ธ๋Œ€๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 12์„ธ๋Œ€๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ณ„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์ด๋กญ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ์ด์ „ ์ œํ’ˆ๋ณด๋‹ค 42% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ์†๋„์—์„œ ์กฐ๊ธˆ ์˜ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ„๋‹ค. 8๊ฐœ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ์—์„œ ์ตœ์‹  ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์ตœ๋Œ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•  ๋•Œ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์€ ๋†€๋ž๊ฒŒ๋„ 82% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ 3์›” ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์นฉ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋†€๋ผ์šด ๋ณ€ํ™”๋‹ค. ์ง์ ‘ ์ „๋ ฅ ์–‘์„ ์ถ”์ ํ•ด๋ณด์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด์ „ 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-11900K๋Š” ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R20 ์‹คํ–‰์— ๊ฑฐ์˜ 380์™€ํŠธ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ์•ฝ 320์™€ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ํ›จ์”ฌ ์ ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K, ๊ฒฐ๋ก 

์กฐ๊ธˆ ์˜์™ธ์ผ์ง€๋„ ๋ชจ๋ฅด๊ฒ ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ CPU๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ด๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ํŠน์ • ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ CPU๊ฐ€ ๊ณง ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ CPU๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธด ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ ์š”๊ตฌ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ 6๊ฐœ ๋ถ€๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ  ๊ฐ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ค ์นฉ์ด ์Šน๋ฆฌํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์— ์ข‹์€ ์†Œ์‹์€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ถ€๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ข‹์€ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

๋ Œ๋”๋ง / ํ•˜์ด์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์นด์šดํŠธ 
ํ•˜์ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์นด์šดํŠธ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R23 ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์Šค๋กœ ์Šน๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ƒˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ CPU ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋ฏธ๋ฌ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜์™”๋‹ค. ์†”์งํžˆ 90% ๋ Œ๋”๋ง PC์šฉ ์นฉ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๊ฐ€ ์•„๋งˆ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ ํƒ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 
์Šน๋ฆฌ : ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X.

์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘
์•ž์„œ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๋ฐ”์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด, ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์ผ ๋งŽ๊ธฐ๋งŒ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๊ณ , 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์€ ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌํ† ์ƒต, ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๋ฃธ ํด๋ž˜์‹, ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด ํ”„๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ธํ…”์ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ ํƒ์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. 
์Šน๋ฆฌ : ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K.

์‹ค์ƒํ™œ
์˜คํ”ผ์Šค ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํฌ๋กฌ์˜ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ฑ์ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ธํ…” CPU๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋™์˜ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๋„ ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ก€๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ ๋„ ๋ฏฟ๋Š”๋‹ค. ์•„์›ƒ๋ฃฉ, ์›Œ๋“œ ์‹คํ–‰์ด๋‚˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์ด ์ฃผ ์ž‘์—…์ธ ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ์„ ์กฐ๋ฆฝํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถฐ๋„ ๋  ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.
์Šน๋ฆฌ: ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K.

๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ
์‹ค์ œ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์—์„œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ ค๋ฉด CPU๋ณด๋‹ค GPU์— ๋” ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ๋ผ์ด์  ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋™์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜์‹ฌ์˜ ์—ฌ์ง€์—†์ด ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ CPU๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์–ด๋А ์ชฝ์„ ํƒํ•ด๋„ ์ข‹์€ ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‹ค.
์Šน๋ฆฌ : ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K.

๊ธฐ๋Šฅ
์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ PCIe 5.0 ๋ฐ DDR5 ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์„ธ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์—ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด 6E๊นŒ์ง€๋„ ํ†ตํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก , DDR5์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ์ด๋“ค๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ์ฃผ์žฅ์—๋„ ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฒ ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…”๋กœ์„œ๋Š” ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. 
์Šน๋ฆฌ : ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K.

๊ฐ€์น˜
์•„์ง๋„ AMD ๋ผ์ด์   9 5950X๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ ๋Œ€๋‹จํ•œ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์ „ ํ•ด์— 2,000๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ–ˆ๋˜ CPU์™€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋™๋“ฑํ•œ๋ฐ๋„ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด 750๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ์นญ์ฐฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์•ฝ ๋ผ์ด์   9์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ํ„ฐ๋ฌด๋‹ˆ์—†์ด ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ชฝ์ด๋ผ๋ฉด, 589๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K์˜ ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ  ๋‹น์žฅ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•˜๊ฒ ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์†Œ๋ฆฌ์น  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ๋Œ€๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ๋งค์‹œ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐ’์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€๋งŒ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€๋Ÿ‰๊ตฌ๋งค ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ •๋˜๋ฉด ์‹œ์ค‘๊ฐ€์™€ ๋ช‡ ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฐจ์ด ๋‚˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์ธํ…”์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์•ผ๋ง๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฐ€ ์„œ์ชฝ์—์„œ ๋œฐ ๊ธฐ์„ธ๋‹ค.
์Šน๋ฆฌ : ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K.

์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900K๋Š” ์œ„๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๋ช…์„ฑ์„ ํšŒ๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์‹œ ์™•์ขŒ๋ฅผ ํƒˆํ™˜ํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ๋‚˜์„ฐ๋‹ค. ์•จ๋” ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ฆด ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ•์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‚ธ๋‹ค, ๋ธŒ๋ผ๋ณด. editor@itworld.co.kr 

Fig. 6. Air core forming process display.

FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์นจ์ „์ง€์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ ๋ฐ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

๋ณธ ์†Œ๊ฐœ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ Journal of Marine Science and Technology์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ–‰ํ•œ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ “NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF WATER SURFACE PROFILES AND VORTEX STRUCTURE IN A VORTEX SETTLING BASIN BY USING FLOW-3D”์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 6. Air core forming process display.
Fig. 6. Air core forming process display.

1. ์„œ๋ก 

  • ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์นจ์ „์ง€(Vortex Settling Basin, VSB)๋Š” ๋ถ€์œ  ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์žฅ์น˜๋กœ, ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ์ฑ”๋ฒ„, ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ, ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ์œ ์ถœ๊ตฌ ๋ฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ์œ„์–ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋จ.
  • ์™€๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ธก์ •์ด ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ž„.
  • ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ VSB ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•จ.

2. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

FLOW-3D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

  • VOF(Volume of Fluid) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์„ ์ถ”์ .
  • LES(Large Eddy Simulation) ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ•ด์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
  • FAVOR(Fractional Area/Volume Obstacle Representation) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์˜.
  • ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์„ค์ •:
    • ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€: ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰(Volume flow rate) ์กฐ๊ฑด ์ ์šฉ.
    • ์œ ์ถœ๋ถ€: ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค(Bottom Orifice) ๋ฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ์œ„์–ด(Overflow Weir) ์„ค์ •.
    • ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด: No-slip ์กฐ๊ฑด ์ ์šฉ.
  • ๊ฒฉ์ž ํ•ด์ƒ๋„:
    • 2.38๋ฐฑ๋งŒ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฒฉ์ž๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ, ์ตœ์†Œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ 0.25cm(z ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ), ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฒฉ์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ 1cm.

3. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„

  • ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ ๋น„๊ต
    • ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•จ.
    • ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์œ„(17.10cm)๊ฐ€ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(17.03cm)์™€ ยฑ0.5cm ์ด๋‚ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„.
  • ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ถ„์„
    • ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์—์„œ ํƒฑ์  ์…œ ์†๋„(Vt), ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ์†๋„(Vr), ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„(Vz)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋น„๊ต.
    • ํƒฑ์  ์…œ ์†๋„(Vt): ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ๊ฐˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์œ  ์™€๋ฅ˜, ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„.
    • ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ์†๋„(Vr): ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๊นฅ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์ง„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šธ์ˆ˜๋ก ์„ธ๊ตด ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€.
    • ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„(Vz): ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ํ•˜๊ฐ• ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ•  ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
  • ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด(Air Core) ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ณผ์ • ๋ถ„์„
    • ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋จ.
    • ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ยฑ1.5cm ์ด๋‚ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„.
    • ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ง„๋™์ด ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ์œ ๋™์žฅ์—๋Š” ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์Œ.
  • ์œ ์ž…๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”
    • ์œ ์ž…๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€(Qcc = 1.5 ร— 10โปยณ ~ 4.0 ร— 10โปยณ cms)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๋ณ€ํ™”.
    • ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ปค์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋จ.
  • ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์œ ๋„ํŒ(Horizontal Deflector) ์ ์šฉ ํšจ๊ณผ
    • ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์œ ๋„ํŒ์„ ์„ค์น˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์œ ์ฒด ์ฒด๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ ธ ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋จ.
    • ์œ ๋„ํŒ์ด ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ณง๋ฐ”๋กœ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ์œ„์–ด๋ฅผ ๋„˜์–ด๊ฐ€ ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ.

4. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ์ œ์•ˆ

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

  • FLOW-3D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด VSB ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์œ ๋™ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ.
  • ํƒฑ์  ์…œ ์†๋„, ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ ์†๋„, ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„ ๋“ฑ ์ฃผ์š” ์œ ๋™ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์ด ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„.
  • ์—์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ง„๋™์ด ์ „์ฒด ์œ ๋™์žฅ์—๋Š” ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์ง€๋งŒ, ํŠน์ • ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตญ์†Œ์ ์ธ ์œ ๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒ.
  • ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋จ.
  • ์ˆ˜ํ‰ ์œ ๋„ํŒ ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ, ์œ ๋™ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ •ํ™”๋˜๋ฉฐ ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ.

ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ

  • ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ VSB ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜(์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ํฌ๊ธฐ, ์œ ์ž… ๊ฐ๋„ ๋“ฑ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ•„์š”.
  • LES ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ(k-ฮต ๋“ฑ) ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
  • ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ค์ฆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€์ฆ ํ•„์š”.

5. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์˜์˜

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์นจ์ „์ง€(VSB)์˜ ์œ ๋™ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ‡ด์ ๋ฌผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ ํšจ์œจ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๋ฐ VSB ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.

Fig. 2. Boundary conditions of VSB in FLOW-3D.
Fig. 2. Boundary conditions of VSB in FLOW-3D.
Fig. 6. Air core forming process display.
Fig. 6. Air core forming process display.

6. ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ

  1. Athar, M., U. C. Kothyari, and R. J. Garde (2002). “Sediment removal efficiency of vortex chamber type sediment extractor.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 128(12), 1051-1059.
  2. Cecen, K. and N. Akmandor (1973). “Circular settling basins with horizontal floor.” MAG Report No. 183, TETAK, Ankara, Turkey.
  3. Chapokpour, J. and J. Farhoudi (2011). “Turbulent flow measurement in vortex settling basin.” Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 2(4), 382-389.
  4. Chapokpour, J., F. Ghasemzadeh, and J. Farhoudi (2012). “The numerical investigation on vortex flow behavior using FLOW-3D.” Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 3(1), 88-96.
  5. Hajiahmadi, A., M. Saneie, and M. A. Moghadam (2014). “Effects of curvature submerge vane in efficiency of vortex settling basin.” Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 1(2), 80-85.
  6. Hite, E. J. Jr. and W. C. Mih (1994). “Velocity of air-core vortices at hydraulic intakes.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 120(3), 284-297.
  7. Wang, S. J., Z. Zhou, J. Hou, and X. Y. Qiu (2002). “Flow field characteristics of the sand funnel and its mechanics of sediment transport.” Journal of Hydrodynamics Ser. B, 3, 130-134.
  8. Ziaei, A. N. and J. M. McDonough (2007). “Using vorticity to define conditions at multiple open boundaries for simulating flow in a simplified vortex settling basin.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 54, 1-28.
Crossbar

FLOW-3D: Flow-Based Computing on 3D Nanoscale Crossbars with Minimal Semiperimeter

FLOW-3D: ์ตœ์†Œ ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…


์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

  • ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜: ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ง‘์•ฝ์  ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ธ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๋Œ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ 2D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์ €ํ•ญ ๋ฐ ์ปคํŒจ์‹œํ„ด์Šค ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„์— ์ง๋ฉดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.
  • ๋ชฉํ‘œ: Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋กœ ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ(semiperimeter)๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฉด์ , ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„, ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด 2D ๋„๊ตฌ๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์ด๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

  1. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด ๋ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ ์ •์˜
    • Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด BDD(Binary Decision Diagram)์™€ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉ.
    • BDD์˜ ๋…ธ๋“œ์™€ ์—์ง€์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์™€์ด์–ด์™€ ๋ฉค๋ฆฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ ์ ˆํžˆ ๋งคํ•‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ “L-labeling ๋ฌธ์ œ”๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ILP(์ •์ˆ˜ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ณ„ํš๋ฒ•)๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•œ๋‹ค.
  2. FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ
    • ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ: ์ž…๋ ฅ๋œ BDD๋ฅผ DAG(Directed Acyclic Graph)๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ 0 ํ„ฐ๋ฏธ๋„ ๋…ธ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐ.
    • L-labeling ๋‹จ๊ณ„: ๊ฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ• ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ธˆ์† ์ธต์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธ์ ‘ ์ธต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์ œ์•ฝ(์—์ง€ ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ ์ œ์•ฝ)์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ์ˆ˜ํ–‰.
    • ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ํ• ๋‹น: ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๋ง ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ œ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ๋„์ถœ.
  3. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€
    • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” 2D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ, ๋ฉด์ , ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„, ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 61%, 84%, 37%, 41%์˜ ๊ฐœ์„  ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„.
    • RevLib ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

  • ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ ์ œ์•ˆ: Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ” ์„ค๊ณ„๋กœ ์ž๋™ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆ.
  • ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ: FLOW-3D๋Š” ILP ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ L-labeling ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 3D ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”์˜ ๋ฐ˜๋‘˜๋ ˆ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฉด์  ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋น„๋ฅผ ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ด.
  • ๋น„๊ต ํ‰๊ฐ€: ๊ธฐ์กด 2D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๋„๊ตฌ ๋Œ€๋น„, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ๊ณผ ์‘๋‹ต ์†๋„ ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ„.

๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

  • ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ FLOW-3D ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” 3D ๋‚˜๋…ธ ํฌ๋กœ์Šค๋ฐ”๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์—์„œ Boolean ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆ.
  • ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํšŒ๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

Reference

  1. John Backus. 1978. Can programming be liberated from the von Neumann style?CACM 21, 8 (1978), 613โ€“641.
  2. ABC Berkeley. 2009. A system for sequential synthesis and verification.
  3. Debjyoti Bhattacharjee et al. 2020. CONTRA: area-constrained technology mapping framework for memristive memory processing unit. In ICCADโ€™20. 1โ€“9.
  4. Dwaipayan Chakraborty et al. 2017. Automated synthesis of compact crossbarsfor sneak-path based in-memory computing. In DATEโ€™17. IEEE, 770โ€“775.
  5. IBM ILOG Cplex. 2020. IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio 20.1. InternationalBusiness Machines Corporation (2020). https://www.ibm.com/products/ilog-cplexoptimization-studio
  6. Hadi Esmaeilzadeh et al. 2011. Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling. InISCAโ€™11. IEEE, 365โ€“376.
  7. Miao Hu et al. 2018. Memristor-based analog computation and neural networkclassification with a dot product engine. Advanced Materials 30, 9 (2018), 1705914.
  8. Sumit Jha et al. 2016. Computation of boolean formulas using sneak paths incrossbar computing. US Patent 9,319,047.
  9. Shahar Kvatinsky et al. 2013. Memristor-based material implication (IMPLY)logic: Design principles and methodologies. IEEE VLSI 22, 10 (2013), 2054โ€“2066.
  10. Shahar Kvatinsky et al. 2014. MAGICโ€”Memristor-aided logic. IEEE TCAS-II 61,11 (2014), 895โ€“899.
  11. Shuangchen Li et al. 2016. Pinatubo: A processing-in-memory architecture forbulk bitwise operations in emerging non-volatile memories. In DAC. IEEE, 1โ€“6.
  12. Yibo Li et al. 2018. Review of memristor devices in neuromorphic computing:materials sciences and device challenges. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 51, 50 (2018),503002.
  13. Jiale Liang, Stanley Yeh, S Simon Wong, and H-S Philip Wong. 2013. Effect ofwordline/bitline scaling on the performance, energy consumption, and reliabilityof cross-point memory array. ACM JETC 9, 1 (2013), 1โ€“14.
  14. Thomas N Theis and H-S Philip Wong. 2017. The end of mooreโ€™s law: A newbeginning for information technology. CiSE 19, 2 (2017), 41โ€“50.
  15. Sven Thijssen et al. 2021. COMPACT: Flow-Based Computing on NanoscaleCrossbars with Minimal Semiperimeter. In DATEโ€™21. IEEE, 232โ€“237.
  16. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2014. Parallel computing using memristivecrossbar networks: Nullifying the processor-memory bottleneck. In IDTโ€™14. IEEE,147โ€“152.
  17. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2015. Automated synthesis of crossbars fornanoscale computing using formal methods. In NANOARCHโ€™15. IEEE, 130โ€“136.
  18. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2016. Parallel boolean matrix multiplication inlinear time using rectifying memristors. In ISCASโ€™16. IEEE, 1874โ€“1877.
  19. Alvaro Velasquez and Sumit Jha. 2018. Brief announcement: Parallel transitiveclosure within 3d crosspoint memory. In SPAAโ€™18. 95โ€“98.
  20. Robert Wille et al. 2008. RevLib: An online resource for reversible functions andreversible circuits. In ISMVLโ€™08. IEEE, 220โ€“225.
  21. Cong Xu et al. 2015. Overcoming the challenges of crossbar resistive memoryarchitectures. In HPCAโ€™15. IEEE, 476โ€“488.
The Fastest Laptops for 2024

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์„ ํƒ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ

2024๋…„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ

PCMag์ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์†Œ๊ฐœ : ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์›๋ณธ ์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-fastest-laptops

 MSI Titan 18 HX

Fastest Cost-Is-No-Object Laptop : MSI Titan 18 HX

The Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9 16

Fastest High-End Gaming Laptop: Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9 16

Acer Nitro V 15 (ANV15-51-59MT)

Fastest Value-Priced Gaming Laptop

Acer Nitro V 15 (ANV15-51-59MT)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024)

Fastest Compact Gaming Laptop: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Touch (UM3406) right angle

Fastest Ultraportable Laptop: Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Touch (UM3406)

Apple MacBook Pro 16-Inch (2024, M4 Pro)

Fastest Mac Laptop: Apple MacBook Pro 16-Inch (2024, M4 Pro)

The Dell Precision 5490

Fastest Business Laptop: Dell Precision 5490

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 9 left angle

Fastest Big-Screen Productivity Laptop: Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 9:

The Asus ProArt P16 (H7606)

Fastest Content-Creation Laptop: Asus ProArt P16 (H7606)

HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 right angle

Fastest Workstation Laptop: HP ZBook Fury 16 G11

๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ CPU ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช… ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ

์ถœ์ฒ˜: ๋ณธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” IT WORLD์—์„œ ์ธ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

https://www.itworld.co.kr/ 2024.12.18

์ดˆ๋‹จ๊ฐ„ ์š”์•ฝ

์ตœ์‹  ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์œˆ๋„์šฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์›ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž.

  • ์ธํ…” : ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์ด โ€˜2โ€™๋กœ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๊ณ  โ€˜Vโ€™๋กœ ๋๋‚˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ 2(Core Ultra Series 2). ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค๋ฉด ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ 5 226V(์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ2)๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
  • AMD : ๋ผ์ด์   AI 300 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ. ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ AMD ๋ผ์ด์   AI 7 ํ”„๋กœ 360.
  • ํ€„์ปด : ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์˜ ํ”Œ๋Ÿฌ์Šค(Plus) ๋˜๋Š” ์—˜๋ฆฌํŠธ(Elite) ์ œํ’ˆ

์ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช… ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์• ํ”Œ ๋งฅ๋ถ์˜ M ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์™€ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ

์ธํ…”์˜ ์ตœ์‹  ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฒ”์ฃผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰œ๋‹ค.

  • ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ(Intel Core Ultra) : ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์—„ ์นฉ์œผ๋กœ, AI ์ „์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค(์˜ˆ : ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ 7 155U).
  • ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด(Intel Core) : ์ฃผ๋ฅ˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์นฉ์œผ๋กœ, ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์•„๋ž˜๋‹ค(์˜ˆ : ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด 7 150U).
  • ์ธํ…” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ(Intel Processor) : ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ํŽœํ‹ฐ์—„๊ณผ ์…€๋Ÿฌ๋ก  ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๋Š” ์ €๊ฐ€ํ˜• PC ์นฉ์ด๋‹ค(์˜ˆ : ์ธํ…” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ N200).

์ธํ…”์€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ โ€˜3โ€™, โ€˜5โ€™, โ€˜7โ€™, โ€˜9โ€™๋กœ ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆซ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ์ž‘์—… ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด 5์™€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ 5 ์นฉ์€ ์›น ๋ธŒ๋ผ์šฐ์ง• ๋ฐ ์˜คํ”ผ์Šค ์ž‘์—…์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค.

Intel Core Ultra 9 processor 185H with different parts of the model name broken down.

Intel

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช… ๋’ค์— ๋ถ™๋Š” ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ๋„ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธ€์ž๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ๊ธด ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ ๋ชฉ๋ก ์ค‘์— ์•Œ์•„๋‘์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ฃผ์š” ๋‹จ์–ด๋Š” โ€˜Uโ€™์™€ โ€˜Hโ€™๋‹ค. U๋Š” ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„, H๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ 5 226V์˜ โ€˜Vโ€™๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ผ์ธ์—๋งŒ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ ‘๋ฏธ์‚ฌ๋‹ค.

๊ตฌํ˜• ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i5 1235U์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ด๋ฆ„์— โ€˜iโ€™์™€ ์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. 14์„ธ๋Œ€์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Ÿฌ ์ธํ…”์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒƒ์„ ์žฌ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด์ œ โ€˜์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ 1โ€™๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์„ธ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ๋‹ค(์˜ˆ : ์ฝ”์–ด ์šธํŠธ๋ผ 155U). ์ฆ‰, ์ตœ์‹  ์ธํ…” ์นฉ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์€ ๊ตฌํ˜• ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ์งง๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์ ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ผ๋ฉด ๊ตฌํ˜• ๋ชจ๋ธ๋„ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด ๋ณผ๋งŒํ•˜๋‹ค.

AMD ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ

AMD๋Š” ์ธํ…”๋งŒํผ ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋”ฉ ๊ฐœํŽธ์— ์ ๊ทน์ ์ด์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋‹ค. ์• ํ”Œ ๋ฐ ํ€„์ปด๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•˜๋Š” AI 300 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ ์™ธ์— ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” 2023๋…„ ๋„์ž…๋œ ๋” ๊ธธ๊ณ  ํ˜ผ๋ž€์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋ช…๋ช… ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

AMD processor name with various attributes broken down

AMD

์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ AMD ๋ผ์ด์   5 8640HS๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ๋‹ค.

  • ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ˆซ์ž โ€˜8โ€™์€ ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋ฉฐ, 2024๋…„์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ์นฉ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค(7735HS๋Š” 2023๋…„ ์ œํ’ˆ).
  • โ€˜5โ€™๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ, ์ธํ…”๊ณผ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ˆซ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ข‹๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด 5์™€ ์ฝ”์–ด 7 ์ฒด๊ณ„์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ™€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ๋‹ค.
  • ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ๊ธ€์ž๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด๋‹ค. โ€˜Uโ€™๋Š” ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…, โ€˜Hโ€™๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์šฐ์„ ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋ช…๋ช… ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋Š” ์นฉ์€ AMD์˜ ๊ตฌํ˜• ์   4(Zen 4) ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ตœ์‹  AI 300 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ์   5 ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. AMD๊ฐ€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ๋ผ์ธ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์ตœ์‹  ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด์— ๋งž๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค.

ํ€„์ปด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ

ํ€„์ปด์€ ์˜ฌํ•ด ์ดˆ ์ „๋ ฅ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ์ค‘์ ์„ ๋‘๊ณ  PC CPU ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์— ํ•ฉ๋ฅ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ€„์ปด์˜ ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค X ์นฉ์€ ํœด๋Œ€ํฐ, ํƒœ๋ธ”๋ฆฟ, ์• ํ”Œ์˜ M ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•œ Arm ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ PC ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ธด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์—‡๋ณด๋‹ค ํ€„์ปด์˜ ์ง๊ด€์ ์ธ ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ ์ „๋žต์ด ์‹ ์„ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๊ฐ€์˜จ๋‹ค.

  • ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค X ์—˜๋ฆฌํŠธ(Snapdragon X Elite) : ์ตœ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๋ชจ๋ธ
  • ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค X ํ”Œ๋Ÿฌ์Šค(Snapdragon X Plus) : ๊ทธ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ

๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ ์„œํ”ผ์Šค ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ํƒ‘์žฌ๋œ ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค X ํ”Œ๋Ÿฌ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ฃจ ์ข…์ผ ์ง€์†๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋งŒ, Arm ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋“  ์œˆ๋„์šฐ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์™€ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šค๋ƒ…๋“œ๋ž˜๊ณค PC์—์„œ Arm์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ์•ฑ์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์˜ ์—๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์—”์ง„์—์„œ๋„ ํ˜ธํ™˜์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ Arm ๋ฒ„์ „์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ถœ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด ์ ์  ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒช์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ๋  ๊ณจ์นซ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

CPU ์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”

๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ˜ผ๋ž€์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  AI์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์†Œ ๊ณผ์žฅ๋œ ๋ฉด์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, PC ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•˜๋Š” ๋•๋ถ„์— ์ƒํ™ฉ์€ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ 4๋…„๊ฐ„ ์• ํ”Œ์€ ์ „๋ ฅ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋…๋ณด์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์คฌ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ธํ…”, AMD, ํ€„์ปด์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๋‚ด๋†“์œผ๋ฉฐ ์• ํ”Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌผ๋ก  ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ์™€ ๋ช…๋ช… ์ฒด๊ณ„๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๋•๋ถ„์— ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋‹ค.
dl-itworldkorea@foundryco.com

์•„๋ž˜ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋„ ์„ ํƒ์— ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

2023๋…„ 01์›” 11์ผ

๋ณธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” IT WORLD์—์„œ ์ธ์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ฃผ ์—…๋ฌด๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ ๋งŽ์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ 100%๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ด์„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ๋ฐœ์—ด๊ณผ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํƒ‘์ด๋‚˜ HPC์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ€๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋™ ํŽธ์˜์„ฑ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ฐœํ‘œ,  Demo ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—…๋ฌด ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์ด ์ž์ฃผ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์งง์€ ๊ฒฝ๋Ÿ‰ ํ•ด์„์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ด์ ์ด ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณดํ†ต ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ CPU์˜ Core์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ํด๋Ÿญ, ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ, ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ ๋“ฑ์„ ์‹ ์ค‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒƒ์ด ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ์ง๊ฒฐ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์‹œ ์–ด๋–ค ๊ฒƒ์„ ์„ ์ • ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„์— ๋‘๋Š”์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•ด์„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ณดํ†ต CPU์˜ ํด๋Ÿญ์€ ๋น„๊ต์  ์„ ํƒ ๊ธฐ์ค€์ด ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์ •ํ•ด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๊ฒƒ๋„ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์ธ๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ์ด๋‚˜ ํฌํ† ์ƒต์œผ๋กœ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์™€ 3์ฐจ์› CAD/CAE์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์—…๋ฌด์šฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ†ต์ƒ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ POST ์ž‘์—…์‹œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์ข…์ข… ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ํƒ ์šฐ์„  ์ˆœ์œ„์—์„œ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ํ™•์ธ์„ ํ•œ ํ›„ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D๋Š” OpenGL ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ ํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ OpenGL 3.0์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FlowSight๋Š” DirectX 11 ์ด์ƒ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž˜ ์ž‘๋™ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ถŒ์žฅ ์˜ต์…˜์€ NVIDIA์˜ Quadro K ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์™€ AMD์˜ Fire Pro W ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ ์ฟผ๋“œ๋กœ(NVIDIA Quadro)๋Š” ์—”๋น„๋””์•„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ๋„(์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜)์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ์— ์ดˆ์ ์ด ๋งž์ถฐ์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฟผ๋“œ๋กœ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋„๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณ„์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ๋””์ž์ธ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์˜์ƒ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ๊ณผํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์˜๋ฃŒ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ถ„์•ผ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์—…์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€ํฌ์Šค ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ณ„ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณ„์— ํฌ์ปค์Šค ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์‹ธ์„œ ๋„์ž…์‹œ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

MSI, CES 2023์„œ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-13980HX ํƒ‘์žฌ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๊ณต๊ฐœ

2023.01.11

Mark Hachman  | PCWorld

MSI๊ฐ€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ CPU ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ทธ CPU๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด์žฅ๋ผ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ CES 2023์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. CES์—์„œ ์ธํ…”์€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์šฉ 13์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ, ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ช… ๋žฉํ„ฐ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ์™€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์ œํ’ˆ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-13980HX๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์šฉ 13์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์ด ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์—์„œ 12% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค๋Š” ์ •๋„์˜ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋Š” ์ด๋ฏธ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์‹ค์ œ CPU๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๋ณดํ†ต ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ ์ถœ์‹œ๊ฐ€ ์ž„๋ฐ•ํ•ด์„œ์•ผ ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ณดํ†ต์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ฌํ•ด๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค.

CES 2023์—์„œ MSI๋Š” ์ธํ…” ์ตœ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-13980HX ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋œ ํƒ€์ดํƒ„ GT77 HX๊ณผ ๋ ˆ์ด๋” GE78 HX๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ก€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ํ•ด PCI ์ต์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์„œ 5 SSD์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํฌ๋ฆฌ์Šคํ„ธ๋””์Šคํฌ๋งˆํฌ, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์‹คํ–‰ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์ ์ˆ˜๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋งํ•˜์ž๋ฉด ์ธํ…” ์ตœ์‹  ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ํฐ ํญ์œผ๋กœ ๋”ฐ๋Œ๋ฆด ๋งŒํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋‹ค.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/3kvrOIEOUlw

MSI๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด๋” GE78 HX ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋ ˆ์ด๋” GE68 HX ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๊ฐ™์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์™ธ๊ด€์˜ ์Šคํ…”์Šค 16 ์ŠคํŠœ๋””์˜ค, ์Šคํ…”์Šค 14, ์‚ฌ์ด๋ณด๊ทธ 14 ๋“ฑ 2023๋…„์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋„ ์ „์‹œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋ž˜๋œ PC ์• ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€๋ผ๋ฉด MSI ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ „๋ฉด์„ ์žฅ์‹ํ•œ ํ™”๋ คํ•œ ๋ณต๊ณ ํ’์˜ ๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ดํŠธ(Lite Brite) LED๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜๊ฐ€์›Œํ• ์ง€๋„ ๋ชจ๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ๋ฉด ์„€์‹œ๊ฐ€ ํˆฌ๋ช…ํ•œ ํ”Œ๋ผ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์†Œ์žฌ๋กœ MSI ๋กœ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์ƒˆ๊ฒจ์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ, ์ถœ์‹œ์ผ, ์‚ฌ์–‘ ๋“ฑ์€ ์ถ”ํ›„ ๊ณต๊ฐœ ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค.
editor@itworld.co.kr 

์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ:
https://www.itworld.co.kr/news/272199#csidx870364b15ea6aa28b53a990bc5c0697 

‘์ฝ”์–ด i7 vs. ์ฝ”์–ด i9’ ๋‚˜์—๊ฒŒ ๋งž๋Š” ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ CP

2021.06.14

๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i7๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์„ ํƒ์˜ ๊ฐˆ๋ฆผ๊ธธ์— ์„œ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i7 CPU๋„ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ CPU์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ณดํ†ต ๊ทธ์— ์ƒ์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋Œ€๋กœ ํŒ๋งค๋œ๋‹ค.

CPU์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋‘”๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ด€๊ฑด์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด๋‹ค. ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ขŒ์šฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š”์†Œ๋Š” CPU์˜ ๋™์ž‘ ํด๋ก ์†๋„(MHz), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํƒ‘์žฌ๋œ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ˆ˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ œ์•ฝ ์š”์†Œ๋Š” ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ด ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ ์“ธ๋ชจ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๋„๋ก ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ง€๋‚œ 3๊ฐœ ์„ธ๋Œ€ CPU์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i7๊ณผ i9์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ตœ์‹  ์„ธ๋Œ€๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ด ์—ญ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž.

11์„ธ๋Œ€: ์ฝ”์–ด i9 vs. ์ฝ”์–ด i7

์ธํ…”์˜ 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ํƒ€์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ(Tiger Lake) H๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํฐ ์ด์ •ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์ด 2015๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ H๊ธ‰ CPU์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ์˜จ 14nm ๊ณต์ •์„ ๋งˆ์นจ๋‚ด ์ตœ์‹  10nm ์Šˆํผํ•€(SuperFin) ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ”๊พผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ ค์˜จ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์ด ์ž๋ž‘ํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ 10nm ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์นฉ์„ ๋‚ด๋†“์ž ํƒ€์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ H๋ฅผ ์žฅ์ฐฉํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋„ ์†์† ๋ฐœํ‘œ๋๋‹ค. ์–‡๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋ณ๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์ƒ์™ธ๋กœ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋„ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ์—์ด์„œ ํ”„๋ ˆ๋ฐํ„ฐ ํŠธ๋ผ์ดํ†ค(Acer Predator Triton) 300 SE๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•ด ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋ฒŒ์จ ๋งค์žฅ์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ํƒ€์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ H ์นฉ์ด 8์ฝ”์–ด CPU๋ผ๋Š” ์ ๋„ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์ „ ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์— ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‘ฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

ํด๋ก ์ฐจ์ด๋„ ํฌ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i7-11800H์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํด๋ก์€ 4.6GHz, ์ฝ”์–ด i9-11980HK๋Š” 5GHz๋กœ, ํด๋ก ์†๋„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํญ์€ ์•ฝ 8.6% ์ฐจ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋‘˜ ๋‹ค 8์ฝ”์–ด CPU์ž„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ํฐ ๋งค๋ ฅ์€ ์—†๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์— ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ํ•˜๋‚˜ ๋” ๊ผฝ์ž๋ฉด ์ฝ”์–ด i9-11980HK๊ฐ€ 65W์˜ ์—ด์„ค๊ณ„์ „๋ ฅ(TDP)์„ ์˜ต์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ TDP๋Š” ์ตœ์ƒ์œ„ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์—๋งŒ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์š”๊ตฌ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i7 ๋ฒ„์ „๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ง€์† ํด๋ก ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

๋Œ€์‹  ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ๋‘๊ป๊ณ  ํฌ๊ธฐ๋„ ํด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์–‡์€ ๋žฉํ†ฑ ์ค‘์—์„œ(ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9, ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i7) ๊ณ ๋ฏผํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์—๊ฒ ์—ด ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ์—ฌ์œ ๋ถ„์€ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํฌ์ƒํ•  ๋งŒํผ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋Š” ์—†์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

*11์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ์Šน์ž: ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i7

10์„ธ๋Œ€: ์ฝ”์–ด i9 vs. ์ฝ”์–ด i7

์ธํ…”์€ 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”๋ฉง ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ(Comet Lake) H ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์—์„œ 14nm๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๋Œ€์‹  ์ฝ”์–ด i9 CPU ์™ธ์— ์ฝ”์–ด i7์—๋„ 8์ฝ”์–ด CPU๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋น„์‹ผ ์ตœ์ƒ์œ„ CPU๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ ๋„ ๋” ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ˆ„๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

11์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ๋‚˜์˜ค๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ 10์„ธ๋Œ€ CPU ์ œํ’ˆ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ์•„์ง ๊ดœ์ฐฎ์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ๋งŽ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด MSI GE76 ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ๋น ๋ฅธ CPU์™€ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ 155W GPU๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ–ˆ๊ณ , ์ „๋ฉด ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ์—๋Š” RGB ๋ผ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ ค ์žˆ๋‹ค.

11์„ธ๋Œ€ ์นฉ๊ณผ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ํด๋ก ์†๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํฌ์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i7๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i9-10980HK์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํด๋ก์€ 5.3GHz, ์ฝ”์–ด i7-10870H๋Š” 5GHz๋กœ, ๋‘ ์นฉ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์•ฝ 6%๋‹ค. PC๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ•œ๊ณ„๊นŒ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ๋ฉด ๋” ๋น„์‹ผ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋“ค์—ฌ 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•  ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค.

*10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์Šน์ž: ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ฝ”์–ด i7

9์„ธ๋Œ€: ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i7

์ธํ…”์€ 9์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ปคํ”ผ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ๋ฆฌํ”„๋ ˆ์‹œ(Coffee Lake Refresh) ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ H๊ธ‰ CPU์—์„œ 14nm ๊ณต์ •์„ ๊ณ„์† ์œ ์ง€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ํด๋ก ์†๋„(์ตœ๋Œ€ 5GHz)๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋ฉฐ 8๊ฐœ์˜ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ด ์นฉ์€ 2๋…„ ์ „์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋์ง€๋งŒ ์ธํ…”์ด ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋„์šด XPG ์ œ๋‹ˆ์•„(Xenia) 15 ๋“ฑ ์•„์ง ๊ดœ์ฐฎ์€ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์–‡๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋ณ๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉฐ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ RTX GPU๋ฅผ ๋‚ด์žฅํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

8์ฝ”์–ด 4.8GHz ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9880HK์™€ 4.6GHz 6์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i7-9850์˜ ํด๋ก ์†๋„ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์•ฝ 4%๋กœ, ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์‹œ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ทน์†Œ์ˆ˜๋‹ค. ๋‘ CPU ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ธฐ์—…์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์†Œ๋น„์ž์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—๋Š” 8์ฝ”์–ด 5GHz ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9880HK์™€ 6์ฝ”์–ด 4.5GHz ์ฝ”์–ด i7-9750H๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋๋‹ค. ์ด ๋‘ CPU์˜ ํด๋ก ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์•ฝ 11%๋กœ, ์ด ์ •๋„๋ฉด ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ฒด๊ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์—์„œ ํฐ ์ฒด๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๋‹ค. 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์ธ ์”จ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜(Cinebench) R20์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9980HK๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•œ ๊ตฌํ˜• XPS 15์˜ ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-9750H๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋ณด๋‹ค 42% ๋” ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. 8์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ๋ฐœ์—ด์„ ์‹ฌํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด ๋ถ€ํ•˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 7%๋กœ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์–ด์จŒ๋“  ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋Š” 8์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 6์ฝ”์–ด๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•˜๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ค‘์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด POST ์ž‘์—…์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์•„๋ž˜ ์˜์ƒํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋„ ์„ ํƒ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค.

์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ 9์„ 

Brad Chacos, Ashley Biancuzzo, Sam Singleton | PCWorld

2022.12.29

์˜์ƒ์„ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๋‹ค ๋ณด๋ฉด ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋งˆ๋ จ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ PC์—์„œ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๋ ค ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด PC๋งŒํผ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. 

์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น„์‹ผ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ํ•„์š”๋Š” ์—†๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ, ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ, ํฌํŠธ ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์€ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ถ”์ฒœ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ ํ›„ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ํŒ๋„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์ž. 

1. ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์šฉ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, ๋ธ XPS 17(2022)

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ
โ€ข ๋ฐ๊ณ  ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์ƒ‰์ฑ„์˜ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด
โ€ข ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ 4 ํฌํŠธ 4๊ฐœ ์ œ๊ณต
โ€ข ๊ธด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช… 
โ€ข ์‹œ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ GPU์ธ RTX 3060

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ๋ฌด๊ฒ๊ณ  ๋‘๊บผ์›€
โ€ข ํ‰๋ฒ”ํ•œ ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ
โ€ข USB-A, HDMI, ์ด๋”๋„ท ๋ฏธ์ง€์›

๋ธ XPS 17(2022)์ด์•ผ๋ง๋กœ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i7-12700H ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ๋ฐ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX 3060๋Š” ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. 1TB SSD๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ง€์›๋˜๊ธฐ์— ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์˜ฎ๊ธธ ๋•Œ๋„ ํŽธํ•˜๋‹ค. 

XPS 17์€ SD์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋”, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ 4 ํฌํŠธ, 3840ร—2400 ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ 17์ธ์น˜ ํ„ฐ์น˜์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ ํŒจ๋„, 16:10 ํ™”๋ฉด ๋น„์œจ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋„ 2.5kg ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋น„๊ต์  ๊ฐ€๋ณ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ง€์† ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ ์ถฉ์ „ ์‹œ 11์‹œ๊ฐ„์ธ๋ฐ, ์ด์ „ XPS 17 ๋ฒ„์ „๋ณด๋‹ค 1์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ด์ƒ ๋Š˜์–ด๋‚œ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋‹ค. 

2. ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ, ๋ธ XPS 15 9520

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ OLED ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด
โ€ข ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฉ‹์ง„ ์„€์‹œ(Chassis)
โ€ข ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์˜ค๋””์˜ค
โ€ข ๋„“์€ ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ ๋ฐ ํ„ฐ์น˜ํŒจ๋“œ

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ๋‹ค์†Œ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ํ™”๋ฉด ํฌ๊ธฐ
โ€ข ์‹ค๋ง์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…
โ€ข ์‹œ๋Œ€์— ๋’ค๋–จ์–ด์ง„ ์›น์บ 
โ€ข ์ œํ•œ๋œ ํฌํŠธ

๋ธ XPS 15 9520์€ ๋†€๋ผ์šด OLED ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ์‹  ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-12700H CPU ๋ฐ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX 3050 Ti ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์ด ํƒ‘์žฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ปจํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘ ๋ฐ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•˜๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋„ ์ข‹์ง€๋งŒ ํˆฌ๋ฐ•ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ์†Œ์žฌ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ์™ธ๊ด€์ด ํŠนํžˆ ๋งค๋ ฅ์ ์ด๋‹ค. 

15์ธ์น˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๋งค์ผ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋‹ˆ๊ธฐ์— ๋‹ค์†Œ ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋‹จ์ ์ด๋‹ค. XPS 17 ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋Š” ํฌํŠธ๋„ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฉ‹์ง„ OLED ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์—ฐ ๋‹๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, 3456X2160 ํ•ด์ƒ๋„, 16:10 ํ™”๋ฉด ๋น„์œจ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋งค์šฐ ์„ ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ƒ‰์ƒ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ์ข‹๋‹ค. 

3. ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๋“€์–ผ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ ์ง€์›, ์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ์  ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ 14 ๋“€์˜ค ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ๋“œ

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋†€๋ผ์šด ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์™€ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ณด์กฐ ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด 
โ€ข ํƒ์›”ํ•œ I/O ์˜ต์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฌด์„  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ
โ€ข ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์— ์•Œ๋งž์€ CPU ๋ฐ GPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ 

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์น˜๊ณ ๋Š” ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…
โ€ข ์ž‘๊ณ  ์–ด์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ ํŠธ๋ž™ํŒจ๋“œ
โ€ข ๋‹ฟ๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ํฌํŠธ ์œ„์น˜

์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ์  ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ 14 ๋“€์˜ค(Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED)๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด๋‹ค. ์ผ๋‹จ ์‚ฌ์–‘์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i7 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ, ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX 3050 ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ, 16GB DDR5 ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ, ๋น ๋ฅธ 1TB NVMe SSD๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ž๋ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ดˆ๊ด‘๋„์˜ 547๋‹ˆํŠธ๋กœ ๋น›์„ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œํŽธ DCI-P3 ์ƒ‰์˜์—ญ์˜ 100%๋ฅผ ์ปค๋ฒ„ํ•˜๋Š” 14.5์ธ์น˜ 4K ํ„ฐ์น˜ OLED ํŒจ๋„์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ง„ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋ผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์œ„์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•œ 12.7์ธ์น˜ 2880ร—864 ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ์ด๋‹ค. ์œˆ๋„์šฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋ฒˆ๋“ค๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ ์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ํŠธ๋ž™ํŒจ๋“œ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์–ด๋„๋น„ ์•ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ„ฐ์น˜ ์ œ์–ด ํŒจ๋„์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์–ด๋–ค ์ž‘์—…์ด๋“  ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์จ๋จน์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์  ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ 14 ๋“€์˜ค ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํœด๋Œ€์šฉ์ด์ž ์ค‘๊ฐ„๊ธ‰ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹จ, ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž‘์—… ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ์ถฉ์ „ ์ผ€์ด๋ธ”์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋…€์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์  ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ 14 ๋“€์˜ค ์˜ฌ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋Š” 3D ๋ Œ๋”๋ง ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ํƒ์›”ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๋งž์ถคํ™” ๋œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์ด๋‹ค. ๋“€์–ผ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ์€ ์—ญ๋Œ€ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด๋‹ค.

4. ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ข‹์€ ํฌํ„ฐ๋ธ” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ 14(2021)

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข AAA ๊ฒŒ์ž„์—์„œ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ
โ€ข ํ›Œ๋ฅญํ•œ QHD ํŒจ๋„
โ€ข ์œ ๋‚œํžˆ ์ ์€ ์†Œ์Œ 

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข 700g์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด AC ์–ด๋Œ‘ํ„ฐ
โ€ข ๋น„์‹ผ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ
โ€ข ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ 4 ๋ฏธ์ง€์›

ํœด๋Œ€์„ฑ์ด ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด๋ผ๋ฉด, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ 14(Razer Blade 14) (2021)๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•ด ๋ณด์ž. ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๋‘๊ป˜๋Š” 1.5cm, ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋Š” 1.7kg์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๊ฐ€๋ณ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์–‘์€ AMD์˜ 8-์ฝ”์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   9 5900HX CPU, ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ 8GB ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX 3080, 1TB NVMe SSD, 16GB ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ์‚ฌ์–‘๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ์ข‹๋‹ค. 

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํœด๋Œ€์„ฑ์„ ๋Œ€๊ฐ€๋กœ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์ ์„ ํฌ๊ธฐํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋‹จ 14์ธ์น˜ IPS ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ์€ ๊ณต์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ณด์ •๋œ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋Š” 2560ร—1440๋‹ค. ๋˜ ํ’€ DCI-P3 ์ƒ‰์˜์—ญ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ 4K ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ์— ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ 14๋Š” SD ์นด๋“œ ์Šฌ๋กฏ๋„ ์—†๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋ฐฉ์— ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋„ฃ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค. 

5. ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์ด ๊ธด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, ๋ธ ์ธ์Šคํ”ผ๋ก  16

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋„‰๋„‰ํ•œ 16์ธ์น˜ 16:10 ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด
โ€ข ๊ธด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…
โ€ข ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๋ ฅ ์žˆ๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ 
โ€ข ํŽธ์•ˆํ•œ ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ ๋ฐ ๊ฑฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ„ฐ์น˜ํŒจ๋“œ 
โ€ข ์ฟผ๋“œ ์Šคํ”ผ์ปค(Quad speakers)

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข GPU ์—…๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ ์–ด๋ ค์›€
โ€ข 512GB SSD ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€
โ€ข ํƒœ๋ธ”๋ฆฟ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ๋Š” ์–ด์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋А๊ปด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํฐ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ 

๊ธด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ์šฐ์„ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๋ธ ์ธ์Šคํ”ผ๋ก  16(Dell Inspiron 16)์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž. ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘ ์ž‘์—…์„ ํ•˜๋ฉฐํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด๋ณด๋‹ˆ, ์ธ์Šคํ”ผ๋ก  16์€ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ ์ถฉ์ „์œผ๋กœ 16.5์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์™ธ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ž‘์—…์„ ๋งˆ์Œ๊ป ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๊ฐ€ 2.1 kg์— ๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋‹ˆ๊ธฐ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ํŽธ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋‹จ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-1260P CPU, ์ธํ…” ์•„์ด๋ฆฌ์Šค Xe ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ, 16GB ๋žจ, 512GB SSD ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ์ง€๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ •๋„ ์‚ฌ์–‘์œผ๋กœ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์ž‘์—…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ์ง€ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์˜์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ €์žฅํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์™ธ์žฅ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ธ ์ธ์Šคํ”ผ๋ก  16์ด ์ง„์ •์œผ๋กœ ๋น›์„ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๋‹จ์—ฐ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์ฟผ๋“œ ์Šคํ”ผ์ปค ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด๋ฉด ๋งŒ์กฑํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํฌํŠธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, USB ํƒ€์ž…-C 2๊ฐœ, USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 1๊ฐœ, HDMI 1๊ฐœ, SD ์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋” 1๊ฐœ, 3.5mm ์˜ค๋””์˜ค ์žญ 1๊ฐœ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ๋‹ค. 

6. ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ๊ณผ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋ชจ๋‘์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, MSI GE76 ๋ ˆ์ด๋”

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜๋Š” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900HK
โ€ข ํŒฌ ์†Œ์Œ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์ด๋Š” AI ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ชจ๋“œ
โ€ข 1080p ์›น์บ ๊ณผ ํ›Œ๋ฅญํ•œ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ ๋ฐ ์˜ค๋””์˜ค๋กœ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํ™”์ƒ ํšŒ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ์ œ๊ณต

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฒ„์ „
โ€ข ์–ด์ˆ˜์„ ํ•œ UI
โ€ข ๋น„์‹ผ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 

์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ์ œ์ผ ์ข‹์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํฌ๊ณ  ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•ด ๋ณด์ž. MSI GE76 ๋ ˆ์ด๋”(Raider)๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ 14-์ฝ”์–ด ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9-12900HK ์นฉ, 175์™€ํŠธ์˜ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ RTX 3080 Ti๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋๊ณ , ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋•๋ถ„์— UL์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์˜จ(Procyon) ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์˜ ์–ด๋„๋น„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. MSI GE76 ๋ ˆ์ด๋”๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ง€์–ด ๊ณ ์† ์นด๋“œ ์ „์†ก์„ ์œ„ํ•ด PCle ๋ฒ„์Šค์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ SD ์ต์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์Šค(SD Express) ์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋”๋„ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋™์ผํ•œ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์ž‘๋…„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋จธ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ 360Hz 1080p ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋‹ฅ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ด์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 2022๋…„์˜ 12UHS ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๋ฒ„์ „์€ 4K, 120Hz ํŒจ๋„์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ํŒจ๋„์€ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋งž์ถฐ ํŠœ๋‹ ๋˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋‚˜ 17.3์ธ์น˜์˜ ๋„“์€ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ์ด๊ธฐ์— ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๊ฝค ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋‹ค. 

7. ๊ฐ€์„ฑ๋น„ ์ข‹์€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, HP ์—”๋น„ 14t-eb000(2021) 

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ
โ€ข ํ™˜์ƒ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ˆ˜๋ช…
โ€ข ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ •๋„์˜ ์ €์†Œ์Œ ํŒฌ 
โ€ข ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ 4 ์ง€์›

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ํŠน์ดํ•œ ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ ๋ ˆ์ด์•„์›ƒ
โ€ข ๋น„ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์›น์บ ์˜ ์‹œ๊ทธ๋‹ˆ์ฒ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋ฐ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ์›ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด์— ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋“ค์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์ด ๋„‰๋„‰ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ๋•Œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋•Œ HP ์—”๋น„(Envy) 14 14t-eb000) (2021)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด๋ณด๋ฉด ์ข‹๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ํŽธ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ปจํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์— ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋‹ค. 

์—”ํŠธ๋ฆฌ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์˜ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค GTX 1650 Ti GPU ๋ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด i5-1135G7 ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ ์ž์ฒด๋กœ ์—…๊ณ„ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํŽธ์ง‘ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ช… ๊ฐ€์„ฑ๋น„ ์ข‹์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋‹ค. 14์ธ์น˜ 1900ร—1200 ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋Š” 16:10 ํ™”๋ฉด ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ณต์žฅ ์ƒ‰ ๋ณด์ •๊ณผ DCI-P3๋Š” ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์ง€๋งŒ 100% sRGB ์ง€์›์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, HP ์—”๋น„ 14์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ SD ์นด๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ ํฌํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๋†€๋ผ์šธ ์ •๋„๋กœ ์กฐ์šฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹คํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. 

8. ์ปจํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์— ์•Œ๋งž์€ ๋˜๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, ์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ROG ์ œํ”ผ๋Ÿฌ์Šค S17

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ CPU ๋ฐ GPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ
โ€ข ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ๋””์ž์ธ
โ€ข ํŽธ์•ˆํ•œ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ์•ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ์••๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํŠธ๋ž™ํŒจ๋“œ
โ€ข ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ

์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ROG ์ œํ”ผ๋Ÿฌ์Šค(Zephyrus) S17์€ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์ž์˜ ๊ถ๊ทน์ ์ธ ๊ฟˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ์ดˆ๊ณ ์† GPU ๋ฐ CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ 120Hz ํ™”๋ฉด ์žฌ์ƒ๋ฅ ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ๋†€๋ผ์šด 17.3์ธ์น˜ 4K ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ธˆ์† ์„€์‹œ, 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์Šคํ”ผ์ปค ์‚ฌ์šด๋“œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ๋Š” ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์—„๊ธ‰ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ๋”์šฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ๋‹ค SD ์นด๋“œ ์Šฌ๋กฏ ๋ฐ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์ฌ๋”๋ณผํŠธ ํฌํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ๋”์šฑ ์ข‹๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ง€๋ถˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์ด ๋„‰๋„‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์›ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ œํ”ผ๋ฃจ์Šค S17์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๋œ๋‹ค. 

9. ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํœด๋Œ€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ, XPG ์ œ๋‹ˆ์•„ 15 KC 

์žฅ์ 
โ€ข ๊ฐ€๋ฒผ์šด ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ
โ€ข ์กฐ์šฉํ•จ
โ€ข ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์†๋„

๋‹จ์ 
โ€ข ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜์ค€ ์ดํ•˜์˜ RGB
โ€ข ํ‰๋ฒ”ํ•œ ์˜ค๋””์˜ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ
โ€ข ๋А๋ฆฐ SD ์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋” 

์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ์ข‹์€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ณ  ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์›Œ์„œ ์ข…์ข… 2.2kg ๋˜๋Š” 2.7kg๋ฅผ ๋„˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. XPG ์ œ๋‹ˆ์•„ 15 KC(XPG Xenia 15 KC)๋งŒ์€ ์˜ˆ์™ธ๋‹ค. XPG ์ œ๋‹ˆ์•„ 15 KC์˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ๋Š” 1.8kg๊ฐ€ ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋„˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ, ํƒ€์ œํ’ˆ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๊ฐ€๋ณ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์†Œ์Œ๋„ ๋ณ„๋กœ ์—†๋‹ค. ์›๋ž˜ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์†Œ์Œ์ด ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋น„๊ตํ•ด๋ณด๋ฉด ํฐ ์žฅ์ ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. 1440p ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์™€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋А๋ฆฐ SD ์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์ž๋“ค์ด ๊ตฌ๋งค๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์ €ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์กฐ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ํœด๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ข‹์€ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ œ๋‹ˆ์•„ 15 KC๊ฐ€ ์ข‹์€ ์„ ํƒ์ง€๋‹ค. 

์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์‹œ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ

์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์‹œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์€ CPU ๋ฐ GPU๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋นจ๋ผ์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ํŽธ์ง‘ ์†๋„๋„ ๋นจ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ํ•„์ž๋Š” UL ํ”„๋กœ์‹œ์˜จ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ(UL Procyon Video Editing Test)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋Š” 2๊ฐœ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜์ƒ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์™€ ์ƒ‰์ƒ ๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด๋”ฉ ๋ฐ ์ „ํ™˜๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ์  ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ, 1080p์™€ 4K ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ H.264, H.265๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋‚ด๋ณด๋‚ด๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์„ ์–ด๋„๋น„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•œ๋‹ค. 

์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ธํ…”์˜ 11์„ธ๋Œ€ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ํฌ๊ณ  ๋ฌด๊ฑฐ์šด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์•˜๊ณ , AMD์˜ ๋น„ํ”ผ ๋ผ์ด์   9(beefy Ryzen 9) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ๋ฐ”๋กœ ๋’ค๋ฅผ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 10์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ธํ…” ์นฉ์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ์ฐจํŠธ์—๋Š” ์—†์œผ๋‚˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ตœ์‹  ์ธํ…” CPU ๋ฐ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ RTX 30 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ GPU๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋‘ ๊ธฐ์—… ๋ชจ๋‘ ์–ด๋„๋น„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋งŽ์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค๋ฅผ ํˆฌ์žํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋†€๋ผ์šด ์ผ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

GPU๋Š” ์–ด๋„๋น„ ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์—์„œ CPU๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ™•์ฒด๊ฐ ์ง€์ ์— ๋‹ค๋‹ค๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ RTX 3080 ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ RTX 3060 ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ๋ณด๋‹ค ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‚˜, ์†๋„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํฌ์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ธ XPS 17 9710์˜ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด, ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX 3060 ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ GPU๋Š” MSI GE76 ๋ ˆ์ด๋”์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ RTX 3080๋ณด๋‹ค 14% ๋” ๋А๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ GE76 ๋ ˆ์ด๋”๊ฐ€ ๋ธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋” ํฌ๊ณ  ๋‘๊บผ์šด์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ๋•Œ ์ˆ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ํฌ์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ๊ณผ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ ์–ด๋„ RTX 3060์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ”๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์€ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠน์ • ์ž‘์—… ๋ฐ ๋„๊ตฌ๋Š” CPU ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด๋ณด๋‹ค GPU์— ๋” ์˜์กดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์šฐ์„ ์ˆœ์œ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธธ ๋ฐ”๋ž€๋‹ค. ์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ ๋ชฉ๋ก์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์„œ ๋งŒ๋“  ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ๋ฐ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ํ€ต ์‹ฑํฌ(Quick Sync) ๋ฐ ์ฟ ๋‹ค(CUDA)์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋…„์„ ๋ณด๋ƒˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘ ์•ฑ์˜ ์†๋„๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. AMD ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‚˜ ํŠนํžˆ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์—…์ฒด๋ณ„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ํ•œ ์ธํ…” ๋ฐ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ถ”์ฒœํ•œ๋‹ค. 

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋งŒ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ์จ์„œ๋Š” ์•ˆ๋œ๋‹ค. PC์›”๋“œ์˜ ์˜์ƒ ๋””๋ ‰ํ„ฐ์ธ ์•„๋‹ด ํŒจํŠธ๋ฆญ ๋จธ๋ ˆ์ด๋Š” โ€œ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์— ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—๋Š” ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ ์ค‘ ์˜์ƒ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ €์žฅํ•˜๋Š” SD ์นด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋”๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹คโ€๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋จธ๋ ˆ์ด๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์— ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ณ ์† 1080p ํŒจ๋„๋ณด๋‹ค 4k, 60Hz ํŒจ๋„์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ถ”์ฒœํ•œ๋‹ค.

4K ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ž˜ ํŽธ์ง‘ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด 4K ํŒจ๋„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ดˆ๊ณ ์† ํ™”๋ฉด ์žฌ์ƒ๋ฅ ์€ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์—์„œ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์˜์ƒ ํŽธ์ง‘์—๋Š” ์•„๋ฌด๋Ÿฐ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ๊ฐœ์ธ ์œ ํŠœ๋ธŒ ์ฑ„๋„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์ƒ์ ์ธ ์˜์ƒ๋งŒ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒ‰์ƒ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ƒ‰์ƒ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ธํƒ€ E < 2 ์ƒ‰์ƒ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด DCI-P3 ์ƒ‰ ์˜์—ญ ์ง€์›์€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. 

๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ์ข‹์ง€๋งŒ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•ด ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ๊ณผ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์“ฐ๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์›ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๊ฒŒ์ž„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ํ•œ ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ‰์ƒ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. 
editor@itworld.co.kr

์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ:
https://www.itworld.co.kr/topnews/269913#csidxa12f167cd9eef5abfb1b6d099fb54ea 

๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ

AMD FirePro Naver Shopping ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

2021-12-15 ๊ธฐ์ค€

ํ˜„์žฌ NVIDIA Quadro pro graphic card : ๋„ค์ด๋ฒ„ ์‡ผํ•‘ (naver.com)

์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์ƒ์ƒ ์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋น ๋ฅผ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ข‹๊ฒ ์ง€๋งŒ ์–ด๋””๊นŒ์ง€๋‚˜ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ๋งž์ถฐ ๊ตฌ๋งค๋ฅผ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์‹ค์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ–์— ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•œ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ์˜ํ•  ์ ์€ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ GTX ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์˜ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์˜ค๋™์ž‘ ๋“ฑ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ œํ•œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ๋‚ด์žฅ๋œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ฒœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 512MB ์ด์ƒ์ด์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ณ  1GB์ด์ƒ์„ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


2021-12-15 ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ˆœ์œ„๋Š” ์œ„์™€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

์ฃผ์š” Notebook

์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋˜์–ด ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ํ˜„์žฌ ์˜คํ”ˆ๋งˆ์ผ“ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋„ค์ด๋ฒ„์—์„œ Lenovo Quadro ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋ฉด ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ์‹œ์ ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒ์œ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์žฅ์ฐฉํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์˜ ๋Œ€๋žต์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•>
๋„ค์ด๋ฒ„ ์‡ผํ•‘ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ : ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์ œ์กฐ์‚ฌ + ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ ๋ชจ๋ธ + NoteBook ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰
Lenovo quadro notebook or HP quadro notebook ๋˜๋Š” Lenovo firepro notebook or HP firepro notebook


( 2021-12-15๊ธฐ์ค€)

๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰ ์‹œ์ ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ตœ์‹  CPU์™€ ์ตœ์‹  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ์ ๋‹นํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์ž์‹ ์—๊ฒŒ ๋งž๋Š” ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์–ด๋ ต์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋”” ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์„ ํƒ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ

Top 20 Fastest Desktops for 2024

Top 20 Fastest Desktops for 2024

Edit: 2024-11-28

์›๋ฌธ ์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://www.pcbenchmarks.net/fastest-desktop.html

PositionScoreBL#CPU TypeCPU speed (MHz)#Phys. CPUsOSMotherboardRAMVideo cardDate uploaded
126331.82512517Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 50902025-03-27 13:04:55
225231.92667231Intel Core i9-14900KS31881Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE49.0 GBGeForce RTX 50902025-06-01 19:02:22
325140.32102766Intel Core i9-14900KS31881Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE49.0 GBGeForce RTX 40902024-05-16 19:37:40
425070.22912009Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36871Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-09-16 06:38:14
525006.12547265Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-04-11 08:42:11
624725.52460587AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X32001Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI130.6 GBGeForce RTX 50902025-03-05 20:36:17
724689.82094503Intel Core i9-14900KF31881Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE49.0 GBGeForce RTX 40902024-05-05 15:30:09
824613.32539005Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-04-07 19:05:52
924598.32725366Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 22000 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.6 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-06-27 08:44:08
1024550.71756060Intel Core i9-13900KS31881Windows 10 Home build 19045 (64-bit)Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)32.5 GBGeForce RTX 40902023-02-27 01:36:21
1124401.73038462Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26200 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-11-08 16:59:04
1224359.62808704Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 22621 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-08-02 10:29:04
1324190.32538133Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36861Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z890 APEX48.7 GBGeForce RTX 40902025-04-07 10:56:35
1424034.13007434Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36871Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Z890 AYW GAMING WIFI W48.5 GBRadeon RX 7900 XTX2025-10-27 00:37:31
1524008.82086170Intel Core i9-14900KF31871Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 22631 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE32.6 GBGeForce RTX 40902024-04-25 01:38:41
1623924.41989560Intel Core i9-13900KS31881Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 22631 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE32.6 GBGeForce RTX 40902024-01-06 11:51:42
1723682.33059816Intel Core Ultra 9 285K36871Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z890 AERO G48.6 GBRadeon RX 7900 XTX2025-11-17 01:14:07
1823223.22424595AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X31951Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI130.6 GBGeForce RTX 50802025-02-18 11:51:03
1923193.02424914AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X31961Windows 11 Professional Edition build 26100 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI130.6 GBGeForce RTX 50802025-02-18 14:23:51
2023117.01986111Intel Core i9-14900K31871Windows 11 Pro for Workstations build 22631 (64-bit)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE32.6 GBGeForce RTX 40902024-01-02 23:37:24

CPU ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ

์•„๋ž˜๋Š” ์ฐจํŠธ์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์†Œ์ผ“ CPU ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๋ชฉ๋ก์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ดํŠน์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์ด๋ฆ„์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•˜๋ฉด ํ•ด๋‹น ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์ฐจํŠธ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/CPU_mega_page.html

CPU NameCoresCPU MarkThread Mark TDP (W) SocketCategory
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9J45128201,3353,488NAUnknownServer
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 965596200,5553,869400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9575F64200,1974,255400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9755128198,5883,505500SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9K65192187,9233,176NASP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9965192183,2143,106500SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 955564182,4713,743360SP5Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX96176,3414,575350sTR5Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9745128173,7173,157400SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9755128166,3283,503500SP5Server
AMD EPYC Embedded 9755128164,0103,508500UnknownMobile/Embedded
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6960P72160,7853,164500FCLGA7529Server
AMD EPYC 9965192160,7783,210500SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9655P96160,4903,849400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9475F48159,7653,6834000SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9B4532158,7903,540390SP5Server
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H60157,1562,925350FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6767P64157,0283,298350FCLGA4710Server
AMD EPYC 965596156,1103,847400SP5Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX64154,3614,512350sTR5Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9845160153,2653,105390SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6760P64153,1873,214330FCLGA4710Server
AMD EPYC 9845160152,9853,144390SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9684X96150,9742,893400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6787P86148,8963,137350FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9474F48147,8983,212360SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9575F64147,5414,152400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 965496145,4212,786360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9B1496145,3972,859NAUnknownServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX96143,0173,830350sTR5Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 955464142,4922,948360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 963484142,2812,863290SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6747P48142,2573,227330FCLGA4710Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X64142,0694,526350sTR5Desktop
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+64139,9243,215350FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 857056137,5883,224350FCLGA4677Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X64135,7874,014350sTR5Desktop
AMD EPYC 9555P64135,4413,736360SP5Server
AMD EPYC 956572135,2213,696400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 953464135,0592,882280SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8558P48133,2233,217350FCLGA4677Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX64132,9463,962350sTR5Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 933532132,4383,741210SP5Server
[Quad CPU] AMD Instinct MI300A Accelerator24132,0202,926550UnknownServer
AMD EPYC 9745128130,6982,806400SP5Server
Intel Xeon 6960P72130,6593,287500FCLGA7529Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9734112130,0342,369340SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9754128130,0152,362360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 945448129,7012,982290SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8488C48127,2073,096385UnknownServer
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+48127,1723,033350FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6737P32127,0753,366270FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+56126,3532,996350FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 9B1496126,2882,897NAUnknownServer
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6736P36125,4443,445205FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9374F32125,2593,264320SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9J1496124,6372,903NASP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6530P32124,4343,453225FCLGA4710Server
[Quad CPU] Intel Xeon Gold 6448H32123,3612,664250FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 9475F48122,4763,7794000SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6740P48122,1653,185270FCLGA4710Server
AMD EPYC 9684X96122,0172,892400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9384X32121,5603,085320SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 846848121,2192,967350FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 965496119,2462,898360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7J1364119,1342,594NAUnknownServer
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6730P32118,8743,215250FCLGA4710Server
Intel Xeon 6781P80117,9463,152350FCLGA4710Server
AMD EPYC 9V7480117,6062,888400SP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8458P44117,1362,841350FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 9455P48116,9263,747300SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9R1496116,4752,920NAUnknownServer
AMD EPYC 9654P96116,3242,731360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7T8364115,5222,540280SP3Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 858060114,4072,402350FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 9D25126114,2752,481NAUnknownServer
[Dual CPU] AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX64113,6932,559280sWRX8Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 935432113,5442,934280SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 776364113,4412,446280SP3Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9274F24112,9433,371NASP5Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8462Y+32111,2343,054300FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Max 948056111,2132,528350FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7B1364110,9442,461240UnknownServer
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Gold 6554S36110,8353,267270FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7773X64110,4122,445280SP3Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8457C48109,9052,564NAFCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 847052109,6102,485350FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7R1348109,3482,438NAUnknownServer
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 771364109,2072,454225SP3Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 933432109,1093,042NASP5Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X32108,4404,536350sTR5Desktop
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7Y8364108,2812,622280SP3Mobile/Embedded
AMD EPYC 963484107,9442,924290SP5Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX32106,9424,439350sTR5Desktop, Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 855848105,5342,554330FCLGA4677Server
AMD EPYC 9554P64104,9202,737360SP5Server
AMD EPYC 955464104,3362,909360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7573X32103,4662,665280SP3Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Platinum 8562Y+32102,8772,912300FCLGA4677Server
[8-Way CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz24102,4112,211165LGA2011-v3Server
AMD EPYC 9734112102,2862,310340SP5Server
AMD EPYC 9474F48102,2553,155360SP5Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7K8364102,0532,458NAUnknownServer
Intel Xeon 6747P48101,6853,236330FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 75F332101,4292,664280SP3Server
Intel Xeon 6741P48100,6603,195300FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y32100,6423,065225FCLGA4677Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 7V1364100,3182,171240SP3Server
[Dual CPU] AMD EPYC 9175F1699,8063,610320SP5Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X3299,1824,169350sTR5Desktop
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon 6520P2499,0163,349210FCLGA4710Server
[Dual CPU] AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX3298,8112,676280sWRX8Desktop, Server

Hardware Selection for FLOW-3D Products – FLOW-3D

๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ / ใˆœ์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋”” ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€

In this blog, Flow Scienceโ€™s IT Manager Matthew Taylor breaks down the different hardware components and suggests some ideal configurations for getting the most out of your FLOW-3D products.

๊ฐœ์š”

๋ณธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” Flow Science์˜ IT ๋งค๋‹ˆ์ € Matthew Taylor๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ STI C&D์—์„œ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์™„ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด FLOW-3D ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๋•Œ ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋“ค์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฌด์ฒ™ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ค€๋น„๋‹จ๊ณ„์™€ ๋ถ„์„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋“ค์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋‹น์—ฐํžˆ ์••๋„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์†Œ๋ชจํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ์„ ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๋‹จ์œ„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋‹น ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์˜ ์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰, ์‘๋‹ต์‹œ๊ฐ„, ํ‰๊ท  ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ ๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ CPU ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์†๋„์ธ Flops/sec ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋””์Šคํฌ์— ์ €์žฅํ•˜๊ณ , ํ•ด์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ขŒ์šฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— SSD ๋””์Šคํฌ์™€ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์นด๋“œ์—๋„ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW SCIENCE, INC. ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์†Œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์–‘๊ณผ O/S ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋„์ž… ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ•ด์„ ์—…๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉด ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์žฅ๋น„ ๋„์ž…์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” 2022๋…„ ํ˜„์žฌ FLOW-3D ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์„ ํƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์ „์— ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋‚ด์šฉ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹คํ–‰ ์ค‘์ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์œ ํ˜•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์•„์ด๋””์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CPU ์ตœ์‹  ๋‰ด์Šค

2025๋…„ 11์›” 26์ผ ๊ธฐ์ค€

CPU Benchmarks
์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ถœ์ฒ˜ : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

CPU์˜ ์„ ํƒ

CPU๋Š” ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋ฉฐ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํƒ‘ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•  ๋•Œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋ฉด Intel ๊ณผ AMD์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฒˆํ˜ธ์™€ ์‚ฌ์–‘์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ ๋ณด์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ , CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ฅธ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•ด๋„ ๋ณด๋“œ์™€, ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ, ์ฃผ๋ณ€ Chip ๋“ฑ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ์˜ํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์„ฑ๋Šฅํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋‹จ์ผ CPU๋‚˜ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆœ์œ„๊ฐ€ ์ •ํ•ด์ง„ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ „์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์ˆœ์œ„ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ  ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€ํ˜œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<์ถœ์ฒ˜>https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” CPU์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ Core๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ง€ ์•Š์€ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณดํ†ต Core๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•ด์„ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•ด์„ ์ผ€์ด์Šค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ ์ • Core์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ๋งž๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— Single thread Performance ๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋„ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ๋งž๋Š” ์ตœ์  CPU๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ Computer์˜ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

  • SPECfp ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPECfp์ฐธ๊ณ ๋กœ โ€œSPEC CPU2017โ€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์ค€(ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ์‹  ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ธฐ์ค€์ž„)์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋œ 2018๋…„ 2๋ถ„๊ธฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ชฉ๋ก์€ ์•„๋ž˜ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ์—์„œ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
    https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q2/
  • LINPACK ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK_benchmarks

FLOW-3D์˜ CFD ์†”๋ฒ„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ CPU์˜ ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์ „์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ขŒ์šฐ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  CPU๋ฅผ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํ‚นํ•  ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—†์ง€๋งŒ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•  ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ, ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด FLOW-3D ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ CPU ์˜ต์…˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์˜ต์…˜์€ Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation์˜ SPEC CPU2017 ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ(ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ์‹  ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ธฐ์ค€์ž„)์ด๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ SPECspeed 2017 Floating Point ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ CFD Solver ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋งค์šฐ ์ž˜ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Š” ์œ ๋ฃŒ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  CPU ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณดํ†ต ์ œ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ASUS, Dell, Lenovo, HP, Huawei ์ •๋„์˜ ์ œํ’ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด RAM์ด ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์†Œ์ผ“ Intel Xeon ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฐ’๋น„์‹ผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋œ ์žฅ๋น„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CPU ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜ต์…˜์€ Passmark Software์˜ CPU ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. PerformanceTest ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์€ ์œ ๋ฃŒ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํŒ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ CPU๋Š” ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚˜์—ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์˜ ํ•œ ์ธก๋ฉด์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋“œ์—์„œ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” CPU๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•œ ํ›„์—๋Š” ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<์ฐธ๊ณ >

SPEC์˜ ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌhttps://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html#cpu )

SPEC CPU 2017 (ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ธก์ • ๊ธฐ์ค€)

๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ธ ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก์ •์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ SPEC CPU 2017์—๋Š” SPECspeed 2017 ์ •์ˆ˜, SPECspeed 2017 ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์ , SPECrate 2017 ์ •์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ SPECrate 2017 ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์ ์˜ 4 ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ 43 ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฒค์น˜ ๋งˆํฌ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. SPEC CPU 2017์—๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„ ์ธก์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ ํƒ์  ๋ฉ”ํŠธ๋ฆญ๋„ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<SPEC CPU ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ>

๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋Š” ์ œ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ณ„, ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณ„๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์•„๋ž˜ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ์— ๊ฐ€๋ฉด ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

https://www.spec.org/cgi-bin/osgresults

<๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ>

  • SPEC CPU 2017

Designed to provide performance measurements that can be used to compare compute-intensive workloads on different computer systems, SPEC CPU 2017 contains 43 benchmarks organized into four suites: SPECspeed 2017 Integer, SPECspeed 2017 Floating Point, SPECrate 2017 Integer, and SPECrate 2017 Floating Point. SPEC CPU 2017 also includes an optional metric for measuring energy consumption.

๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ค€ FLOP์˜ ์ดํ•ด

์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://www.itworld.co.kr/article/4113033

ํ”Œ๋กญ์€ ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์—ฐ์‚ฐ 1ํšŒ๋ฅผ ๋œปํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์†Œ์ˆ˜์ ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆซ์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์˜ ์‚ฐ์ˆ  ๊ณ„์‚ฐ(๋ง์…ˆ, ๋บ„์…ˆ, ๊ณฑ์…ˆ, ๋‚˜๋ˆ—์…ˆ)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํ‚น์—์„œ ์ •์ˆ˜๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์ ์„ ์“ฐ๋Š” ์ด์œ ๋Š” ์ •์ˆ˜๋ณด๋‹ค ์ธก์ • ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ์„œ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

ํ”Œ๋กญ ์•ž์—๋Š” 1์ดˆ ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ ‘๋‘์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋ถ™์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฉ”๊ฐ€ํ”Œ๋กญ(1์ดˆ๋‹น 100๋งŒ ํšŒ)๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ํ”Œ๋กญ(10์–ต), ํ…Œ๋ผํ”Œ๋กญ(1์กฐ), ํŽ˜ํƒ€ํ”Œ๋กญ(1์ฒœ์กฐ), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์—‘์‚ฌํ”Œ๋กญ(100๊ฒฝ)๊นŒ์ง€ ํ™•์žฅ๋๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ช‡ ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์—…๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์—‘์‚ฌํ”Œ๋กญ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์— ๋งค๋‹ฌ๋ฆฐ ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๋งˆ๋ฒ• ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋„์•ฝ์ด๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๋‹จ์ง€ ์ž๋ž‘๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค.

์ปดํ“จํŒ…์—์„œ ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” FP4, ์ฆ‰ 4๋น„ํŠธ ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์ ์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ด FP64๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‘ ๋ฐฐ์”ฉ ์ปค์ง„๋‹ค. ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ FP128๋„ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ์“ฐ์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. FP64๋Š” IEEE 754 ํ‘œ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ 64๋น„ํŠธ ๋ฐฐ์ •๋ฐ€๋„(double-precision) ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ์ด๋‹ค.

FP64๋Š” ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. FP64 ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ FP32์˜ 2๋ฐฐ, FP16์˜ 4๋ฐฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” FP32์˜ 2๋ฐฐ, FP16์˜ 4๋ฐฐ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰๋„ ๊ฐ™์€ ์›๋ฆฌ๋กœ FP64๊ฐ€ FP32์˜ 2๋ฐฐ, FP16์˜ 4๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค.

๋งค๋…„ 6์›”๊ณผ 11์›”์— ์ง‘๊ณ„ยท๋ฐœํ‘œ๋˜๋Š” ํ†ฑ500 ์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋ชฉ๋ก์€ ์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ FP64 ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ€ํ˜นํ•œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ†ฑ500 ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด 32๋น„ํŠธ๋‚˜ 16๋น„ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ 64๋น„ํŠธ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜๋Š” ์ด์œ ๋Š” ํ†ฑ500 ๋ชฉ๋ก์ด ๊ณผํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ๋Œ€๋ฆฌ ์ง€ํ‘œ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ณผํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์—์„œ 64๋น„ํŠธ ์ •ํ™•๋„์— ์ฃผ๋กœ ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. HPCยท์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์ „๋ฌธ ์‹œ์žฅ์กฐ์‚ฌ์—…์ฒด ์ธํ„ฐ์„นํŠธ 360์˜ CEO ์• ๋””์Šจ ์Šค๋„ฌ์€ โ€œ์ผ๋ถ€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚ฎ์ถฐ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋” ๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋А๋ƒ๋Š” ์ง€์ ๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋А๋ƒ๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ๋„ ๋‚˜์˜ค์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณผํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์—์„œ๋Š” 64๋น„ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ํ‘œ์ค€์ด๋‹คโ€๋ผ๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์Šค๋„ฌ์€ FP64๊ฐ€ ๊ณผํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์˜ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์“ฐ์ธ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋ผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ด์–‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜, ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋‚ ๊ฐœ ๊ณต๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„, ์„์œ  ์‹œ์ถ” ์ง€์ ์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํƒ„์„ฑํŒŒ ๋ถ„์„, ์‹ ์•ฝ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ถ„์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ฐ™์€ ํญ๋„“์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๊ณผํ•™์  ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์š”๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” FP32, ์ฆ‰ ๋‹จ์ •๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ถ€๋™์†Œ์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. FP32๋Š” ์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๊ธˆ์œต ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์—๋„ ์“ฐ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋ชจ๋ธ ์š”๊ตฌ ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ ์—„๊ฒฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„ FP32๋ฅผ ์จ๋„ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค.

FP16์€ AI ์ถ”๋ก ์—์„œ ์ผ์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์“ฐ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, AI ํ•™์Šต์€ FP64์— ์ „์ ์œผ๋กœ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์œ ๋Š” ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด AI๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋‚˜ ๊ณ ์–‘์ด ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•™์Šต์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•ด ๋ณด์ž. ๊ฐœ๋‚˜ ๊ณ ์–‘์ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด FP64์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•™์Šต์ด ๋๋‚˜๋ฉด ์ž‘์—…์€ ํŒจํ„ด ๋งค์นญ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ”๋€Œ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐœ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์ธ์ง€ ๊ณ ์–‘์ด ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์ธ์ง€ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ๋Š” ๋œ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด FP16์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์Šค๋„ฌ์€ ์–ธ์–ด ํ•™์Šต์ด๋‚˜ ์ธ์‹์—์„œ๋„ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๊ฒŒ, ๋งํ•  ๋•Œ ๋‹จ์–ด ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ฅผ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ํ‹€๋ฆฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์Œํ•ด๋„ AI๋Š” ๋Œ€์ฒด๋กœ ์˜๋„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

16๋น„ํŠธ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„์—๋Š” bfloat16์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. bfloat๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ธ€์˜ ํ…์„œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜์Œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋์ง€๋งŒ, ์ดํ›„ ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD, ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์— ๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค. bfloat๋Š” ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ํ˜•์‹์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด FP16์€ ๋งค๋ฒˆ ๋™์ผํ•œ 16๋น„ํŠธ ํ˜•์‹์ด๋‹ค. ์Šค๋„ฌ์€ โ€œ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์€ bfloat๊ฐ€ FP16๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๋‚ฎ๊ณ  ์†๋„๋Š” ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ฃผ์š” ์นฉ ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ bfloat๋ฅผ ์“ด๋‹คโ€๋ผ๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ FP8๊ณผ FP4๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. FP8์€ ์ •๋ฐ€๋„ ์š”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ถ”๋ก  ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์šฉ๋„๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํ•™์Šต์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์ด ์ ์€ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฃ์ง€ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์—์„œ๋„ ์“ฐ์ธ๋‹ค. FP8์€ GPU์—์„œ๋งŒ ์“ฐ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์—์„œ๋Š” ์“ฐ์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค.

ํด๋Ÿญ ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์นฉ์€ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋” ์ ๊ฒŒ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ž˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋””์Šคํฌ ์“ฐ๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ž‘์—…์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ผ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์ด ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ข…์ข… ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ, ๋” ๋†’์€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ์†Œ์ผ“์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์€ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํ—ค๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ž‘์€ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ํ•ด์„์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œํ•œํ•˜๋ฉด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CPU ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜

CPU ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์‹  CPU๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ดํด๋‹น ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ํ˜„์žฌ ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ CPU๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„์—์„œ ์ด์ „ CPU๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ „๋ ฅ ํšจ์œจ์ด ๋†’์•„์ ธ ์™€ํŠธ๋‹น ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Flow Science์—๋Š” ๊ตฌํ˜• ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์†Œ์ผ“ 12, 16, 24 ์ฝ”์–ด Xeon๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์„ธ๋Œ€ 10~12 Core i9 CPU ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋ณด์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญ

ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์žฅ๋น„์—์„œ๋Š” CPU๋ฅผ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋…„๊ฐ„์˜ ํˆฌ์ž๋ผ๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญํ™”๋Š” ๋ฐœ์—ด์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CPU์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋„ ์ €ํ•˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CPU๋ฅผ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญ ํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์„ธ์‹ฌํ•œ ์—ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ดํผ์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ

<์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์ถœ์ฒ˜:https://gameabout.com/krum3/4586040>

ํ•˜์ดํผ์Šค๋ ˆ๋”ฉ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ 1๊ฐœ์˜ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 2๊ฐœ์˜ CPU์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ดํ”„๋ผ์ธ์˜ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๊ณ  ๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ์งง์„๋•Œ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ CPU๋ฅผ 100% ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ค‘์ธ ์žฅ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ Hyper Threading์ด ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ๋œ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋Š” 100% CPU ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฅ ์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ƒˆ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•  ๋•Œ Hyper Threading์„ ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค์ •์€ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ BIOS ์„ค์ •์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋“œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” Hyper Threading์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๋Ÿฐํƒ€์ž„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์ค‘์—์„œ ์–ด๋А ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์ด ๋” ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ์ง€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์œ ํ˜•์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋ง

์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด 12 ์ฝ”์–ด CPU์—์„œ 24 ์ฝ”์–ด CPU๋กœ ์—…๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œํ•ด๋„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋Ÿฐํƒ€์ž„์ด ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์œ ํ˜•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ 16~32๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” FLOW-3D ๋ฐ FLOW-3D CAST์˜ HPC ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ FLOW-3D CLOUD๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD Ryzen ๋˜๋Š” Epyc CPU

AMD๋Š” ์ผ๋ถ€ CPU๋กœ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์ฐจํŠธ๋ฅผ ์„๊ถŒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW SCIENCE, INC. ์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ์ˆ˜์˜ AMD CPU๋กœ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ Epyc CPU๋Š” ์ด์ƒ์ ์ด์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  Ryzen์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐœ์—ด์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์‹ ์ค‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ค„์ ธ์•ผ ํ•  ๋ฌธ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

<๊ด€๋ จ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ>

https://www.techspot.com/news/78122-report-software-fix-can-double-threadripper-2990wx-performance.html

Graphics ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ

FLOW-3D๋Š” OpenGL ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ OpenGL 3.0์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ถŒ์žฅ ์˜ต์…˜์€ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ ์ฟผ๋“œ๋กœ K ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์™€ AMD์˜ ํŒŒ์ด์–ด ํ”„๋กœ W ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ ์ฟผ๋“œ๋กœ(NVIDIA Quadro)๋Š” ์—”๋น„๋””์•„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ๋„(์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜)์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ์— ์ดˆ์ ์ด ๋งž์ถฐ์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฟผ๋“œ๋กœ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋„๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณ„์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ๋””์ž์ธ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์˜์ƒ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ œ์ž‘ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ๊ณผํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ, ์˜๋ฃŒ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ถ„์•ผ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์—…์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€ํฌ์Šค ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ณ„ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณ„์— ํฌ์ปค์Šค ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋น„์‹ธ์„œ ๋„์ž…์‹œ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ์˜ํ•  ์ ์€ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ GTX ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์˜ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์˜ค๋™์ž‘ ๋“ฑ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ œํ•œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— ๋‚ด์žฅ๋œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ฒœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 512MB ์ด์ƒ์„ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ถœ์ฒ˜ : https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

์›๊ฒฉ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํƒ‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์‹œ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ

Flow Science๋Š” nVidia ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„ ๋ฒ„์ „์ด 341.05 ์ด์ƒ์ธ nVidia Quadro K, M ๋˜๋Š” P ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์นด๋“œ์™€ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ์™„์ „ํ•œ 3D ๊ฐ€์† ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์‹คํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์„ธ์…˜์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•  ๋•Œ nVidia Quadro ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ ์นด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์„ค์น˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด Windows๋Š” ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D ๊ฐ€ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด FLOW-3D ๋„์›€๋ง ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์—์„œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค. GDI Generic์„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ GL_RENDERER ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์˜ต์…˜์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์ฝ˜์†”์—์„œ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ ์›๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์„ธ์…˜์„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Nice Software DCV ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ๋ถ€ VNC ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋ Œ๋”๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

RAM ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ

ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด๋‹น ์ตœ์†Œ 4GB์˜ RAM์€ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ข‹์€ ์ถœ๋ฐœ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. POST Processor๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์ž‘์—…์„ ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์–‘์˜ RAM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

DDR5 ๋žจ์˜ ๊ณต์‹ ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ์€ 2020๋…„ 7์›” 14์ผ์— ๋ฐœํ‘œ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์†Œ๋น„์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์ธํ…” 12์„ธ๋Œ€ CPU(Alder Lake)์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ 2021๋…„ ํ•˜๋ฐ˜๊ธฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด์„์„ ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒฉ์ž(Mesh)์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์ ์ • ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๋ณด๊ธฐ

  • ์ดˆ๋Œ€ํ˜• (2์–ต๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์…€) : ์ตœ์†Œ 128GB
  • ๋Œ€ํ˜• (60 ~ 1์–ต 5์ฒœ๋งŒ ์…€) : 64 ~ 128GB
  • ์ค‘๊ฐ„ (30-60๋ฐฑ๋งŒ ์…€) : 32-64GB
  • ์ž‘์Œ (3 ์ฒœ๋งŒ ์…€ ์ดํ•˜) : ์ตœ์†Œ 32GB

HDD ๊ณ ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์€ ํ•ด์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์–‘์ด ๋งค์šฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ฝ๊ณ  ์“ฐ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์†๋„๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅธ SSD๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋ฉด์—์„œ ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ SSD ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๋น„์‹ธ์„œ ๊ฐ€์„ฑ๋น„ ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ •์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CPU์™€ ์ €์žฅ์žฅ์น˜ ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์˜ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๋Š” ํ†ต๋กœ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ผ ๋ถ€๋ฅด๋ฉฐ SSD๋Š” ํ”ํžˆ PCI-Express ์™€ SATA ํ†ต๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ”ํžˆ ๋งํ•˜๋Š” NVMe๋Š” PCI-Express3.0 ์ง€์› SSD์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ SSD์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ NVMe (NonVolatile Memory Express) ์ „์†ก ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์˜ํ•  ์ ์€ MVMe์ค‘์—์„œ SATA3 ๋ฐฉ์‹๋„ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ž˜ ๊ตฌ๋ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  SSD๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ SSD ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ์ค‘์—์„œ PCI Express ํƒ€์ž…์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๊ณ ๊ฐ€์˜€์ง€๋งŒ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ €๋ ดํ•ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋‚ด์—์„œ NVMe SSD๋“ฑ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์„ ํƒ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ข‹์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
( ์ฐธ๊ณ  : ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ SSD ๊ณ ๋ฅด๊ธฐ ์ฐธ์กฐ )

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ํ•˜๋“œ ๋””์Šคํฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋””์Šคํฌ์— ๊ธฐ๋ก๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฝ์–ด๋‚ด๋Š” ํ—ค๋“œ(๋ฐ”๋Š˜)๊ฐ€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ๋ก๋œ ์œ„์น˜๊นŒ์ง€ ์ด๋™ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ด๋™์— ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์†Œ์š”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ง€์—ฐ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ํ˜น์€ ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ด์‹œ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ€๋ฆ„) ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ•˜๋“œ ๋””์Šคํฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์š”์ฒญ์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋’ค์— ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ฝ๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„(์•ฝ 10ms)์ดํ•˜๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šฐ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํ”Œ๋ž˜ํ„ฐ์— ์‹ค์ œ ๊ธฐ๋ก๋œ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ HDD์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ๊ฐ•์ ์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋Œ€๋น„ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ์ƒ์šฉํ™”๋˜์–ด ํŒ๋งคํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ HDD๋Š” 12TB ~ 15TB๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ €์žฅ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ฐฑ์—…์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ ์„ ํƒ์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ฝ๊ณ  ์“ฐ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๋Š” SSD๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด๊ด€ํ•˜๋Š” ์šฉ๋„์˜ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ HDD๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์„ ํƒ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

PassMark – Disk Rating High End Drives

์ถœ์ฒ˜ : https://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/high_end_drives.html

์ƒ๊ธฐ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ทธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ณก์„ ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด Windows7, windows8, windows10 , windows11 ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ท ํ•œ ์ ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ž์‹ ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ O/S์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์•„๋ž˜ ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ๊ณ  : ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ

ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๋ณด๊ธฐ

Omega-Liutex Method

Prediction of the Vortex Evolution and Influence Analysis of Rough Bed in a Hydraulic Jump with the Omega-Liutex Method

Omega-Luitex๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅ์ ํ”„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ ๋Ÿฌํ”„ ๋ฒ ๋“œ์˜ ์™€๋ฅ˜ ์ง„ํ™” ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„

Cong Trieu Tran, Cong Ty Trinh

Abstract

The dissipation of energy downstream of hydropower projects is a significant issue. The hydraulic jump is exciting and widely applied in practice to dissipate energy. Many hydraulic jump characteristics have been studied, such as length of jump Lj and sequent flow depth y2. However, understanding the evolution of the vortex structure in the hydraulic jump shows a significant challenge. This study uses the RNG k-e turbulence model to simulate hydraulic jumps on the rough bed. The Omega-Liutex method is compared with Q-criterion for capturing vortex structure in the hydraulic jump. The formation, development, and shedding of the vortex structure at the rough bed in the hydraulic jumper are analyzed. The vortex forms and rapidly reduces strength on the rough bed, resulting in fast dissipation of energy. At the rough block rows 2nd and 3rd, the vortex forms a vortex rope that moves downstream and then breaks. The vortex-shedding region represents a significant energy attenuation of the flow. Therefore, the rough bed dissipates kinetic energy well. Adding reliability to the vortex determined by the Liutex method, the vorticity transport equation is used to compare the vorticity distribution with the Liutex distribution. The results show a further comprehension of the hydraulic jump phenomenon and its energy dissipation.

Keywords

flow-3D; hydraulic Jump; omega-liutex method; vortex breakdown

References

[1] Viti, N., Valero, D., & Gualtieri, C. (2019). Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Jumps. Part 2: Recent Results and Future Outlook. Water, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010028
[2] Peterka, A. J. (1978.) Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Energy Dissipators. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
[3] Bejestan, M. S. & Neisi, K. (2009). A new roughened bed hydraulic jump stilling basin. Asian journal of applied sciences, 2(5), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2009.436.445
[4] Tokyay, N. D. (2005). Effect of channel bed corrugations on hydraulic jumps. Impacts of Global Climate Change, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1061/40792(173)408
[5] Nikmehr, S. & Aminpour, Y. (2020). Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Jump over Rough Beds. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 64(2), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.15292
[6] Hunt, J. C., Wray, A. A., & Moin, P. (1988). Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Studying turbulence using numerical simulation databases. 2. Proceedings of the 1988 summer program.
[7] Gao, Y. & Liu, C. (2018). Rortex and comparison with eigenvalue-based vortex identification criteria. Physics of Fluids, 30(8), 085107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5040112
[8] Liu, C., Gao, Y., Tian, S., & Dong, X. (2018). Rortex – A new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions. Physics of Fluids, 30(3), 035103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023001
[9] Liu, C. et al. (2019). Third generation of vortex identification methods: Omega and Liutex/Rortex based systems. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 31(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0022-4
[10] Liu, C., Wang, Y., Yang, Y. et al (2016). New omega vortex identification method. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, (8), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-016-0022-6
[11] Tran, C. T. & Pham, D. C. (2022). Application of Liutex and Entropy Production to Analyze the Influence of Vortex Rope in the Francis-99 Turbine Draft Tube. Tehniฤki vjesnik, 29(4), 1177-1183. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20210821070801
[12] Dong, X., Gao, Y., & Liu, C. (2019). New normalized Rortex/vortex identification method. Physics of Fluids, 31(1), 011701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066016
[13] Wang, L., Zheng, Z., Cai, W. et al. (2019). Extension Omega and Omega-Liutex methods applied to identify vortex structures in viscoelastic turbulent flow. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 31(5), 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0045-x
[14] Xu, H., Cai, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Liutex (vortex) core definition and automatic identification for turbulence vortex structures. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 31(5), 857-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0066-5
[15] Tran, C. T. et al. (2020). Prediction of the precessing vortex core in the Francis-99 draft tube under off-design conditions by using Liutex/Rortex method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 32, 623-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0031-3
[16] Liu, C. et al. (2019). A Liutex based definition of vortex axis line. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.10094. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.10094
[17] Samadi-Boroujeni, H. et al. (2013). Effect of triangular corrugated beds on the hydraulic jump characteristics. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(9), 841-847. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0019
[18] Ghaderi, A. et al. (2020). Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 22(6), 1554-1572. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.298
[19] Wu, Z. et al. (2021). Analysis of the influence of transverse groove structure on the flow of a flat-plate surface based on Liutex parameters. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 15(1), 1282-1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1968955
[20] Ji, B., et al. (2014). Numerical simulation of threedimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation – vortex interaction. Ocean Engineering, 87, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.05.005
[21] Tran, C., Bin, J., & Long, X. (2019). Simulation and Analysis of Cavitating Flow in the Draft Tube of the Francis Turbine with Splitter Blades at Off-Design Condition. Tehnicki vjesnik – Technical Gazette, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20190316042929
An investigation of the effect of the pulse width and amplitude on sand bed scouring by a vertical submerged pulsed jet

An investigation of the effect of the pulse width and amplitude on sand bed scouring by a vertical submerged pulsed jet

์ˆ˜์ง ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํŽ„์Šค ์ œํŠธ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์ธต ์ •๋ จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŽ„์Šค ํญ๊ณผ ์ง„ํญ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

Chuanย Wangย abc,ย Haoย Yuย b,ย Yangย Yangย b,ย Zhenjunย Gaoย c,ย Binย Xiย b,ย Huiย Wangย b,ย Yulongย Yaoย b

aInternational Shipping Research Institute, GongQing Institute of Science and Technology, Jiujiang, 332020, ChinabCollege of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, ChinacCollege of Mechanical and Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117324

Highlights

  • Numerical simulations and experiments were combined to investigate pulsed jet scour.
  • The effect mechanism of pulse amplitude on the variation of scour hole depth was analyzed.
  • Models for the prediction of relative low pulse width with the inlet pulse amplitude have been developed.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of the pulse width and amplitude on the scouring of sand beds by vertical submerged pulsed jets using a combination of experimental and numerical calculations. The reliability of the numerical calculations is verified through a comparison between the numerical simulations with the sedimentation scour model and the experimental data at a low pulse width T2 of 0, with the result that the various errors are within 5%. The results show that the scour hole depth |hmin| grows with the relative low pulse width T3 throughout three intervals: a slowly increasing zone I, a rapidly increasing zone II, and a decreasing zone III, producing a unique extreme value of |hmin|. The optimal scouring effect equation was obtained by analytically fitting the relationship curve between the pulse amplitude V and the relatively low pulse width T3. Including the optimal T3 and optimal duty cycle ฦž. The difference in the scour hole depth |hmin| under different pulse amplitudes is reflected in the initial period F of the jet. With an increasing pulse amplitude, |hmin| goes through three intervals: an increasing zone M, decreasing zone N, and rebound zone R. It is found that the scouring effect in the pulse jet is not necessarily always stronger with a larger amplitude. The results of the research in this paper can provide guidance for optimizing low-frequency pulsed jets for related engineering practices, such as dredging and rock-breaking projects.

Introduction

Submerged jet scouring technology is widely used in marine engineering and dredging projects due to its high efficiency and low cost, and a wide range of research exists on the topic (Zhang et al., 2017; Thaha et al., 2018; Lourenรงo et al., 2020). Numerous scholars studied the scouring caused by different forms of jets, such as propeller jets (Curulli et al., 2023; Wei et al., 2020), plane jets (Sharafati et al., 2020; Mostaani and Azimi, 2022), free-fall jets (Salmasi and Abraham, 2022; Salmasi et al., 2023), and moving jets (Wang et al., 2021). Among them, vertical jets were more popular than inclined jets due to theirs simple equipment and good silt-scouring performance (Chen et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2017). So, a large number of scholars have proposed relevant static and dynamic empirical equations for the scour depth of submerged jets. Among them, Chen et al. (2022) and Mao et al. (2023) investigated the influence of jet diameters, jet angles, exit velocities, and impinging distances on scouring effects. Finally, based on a large amount of experimental data and theoretical analysis, a semi-empirical equation for the dynamic scour depth in equilibrium was established. Amin et al. (2021) developed semi-empirical prediction equations for asymptotic lengths and empirical equations for the temporal development of lengths. Shakya et al. (2021, 2022) found that the ANN model in dimensionless form performs better than the ANN model in dimensioned form and proposed an equation for predicting the depth of static scour under submerged vertical jets using MNLR. Kartal and Emiroglu (2021) proposed an empirical equation for predicting the maximum dynamic scour depth for a submerged vertical jet with a plate at the nozzle. The effect of soil properties on jet scour has also been studied by numerous scholars. Among them, Nguyen et al. (2017) investigated the effects of compaction dry density and water content on the scour volume, critical shear stress, linear scour coefficient, and volumetric scour coefficient using a new jet-scour test device. Dong et al. (2020) investigated the effect of water content on scour hole size through experiments with a vertical submerged jet scouring a cohesive sediment bed. It was found that the depth and width of the scour holes increased with the increasing water content of the cohesive sediments, and equations for the scour depth and width in the initial stage of scouring and the calculation of the scouring rate were proposed. Kartal and Emiroglu (2023) studied the scouring characteristics of different nozzle types produced in non-cohesive sands. The results of the study found that the air entrainment rate of venturi nozzles was 2โ€“6.5 times higher than that of circular nozzles. Cihan et al. (2022) investigated the effect of different proportions of clay and sand on propeller water jet scouring. And finally, he proposed an estimation equation for the maximum depth and length of the scour hole under equilibrium conditions. From the above summary, it is clear that a great deal of research has been carried out on submerged jet scouring under continuous jet flows.

Pulsed jets have advantages such as higher erosion rates and entrainment rates compared to continuous jets and have therefore received more attention in the development of engineering fields such as cleaning and rock breaking (Raj et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Kang et al., 2022; Y. Zhang et al., 2023). In the study of jet structure, Li et al. (2018, 2019a, 2019b, 2023) investigated the effects of the jet hole diameter, the number of jet holes, the jet distance, and the tank pressure on pulse jet cleaning. It was found that the transient pressure below the injection hole gradually increased along the airflow direction of the injection pipe, and the peak positive pressure at the inner surface of the injection pipe also increased. Liu and Shen (2019) investigated the effect of a new venturi structure on the performance of pulse jet dust removal. It was found that the longer the length of the venturi or the shorter the throat diameter of the venturi, the greater the energy loss. Zhang et al. (2023b) studied jet scouring at different angles based on FLOW-3D. It was found that counter flow scouring is better than down flow scouring. In the study of pulsed structure, Li et al. (2020) investigated the effects of different pulse amplitudes, pulse frequencies, and circumferential pressures on the rock-breaking performance. It was found that the rock-breaking performance of the jet increased with increasing pulse amplitude. However, due to the variation in pulse frequency, the rock-breaking performance does not show a clear pattern. The effect of Reynolds number on pulsating jets impinging on a plane was systematically investigated by H. H Medina et al. (2013) It was found that pulsation leads to a shorter core region of the jet, a faster decrease in the centerline axial velocity component, and a wider axial velocity distribution. Bi and Zhu (2021) investigated the effect of nozzle geometry on jet performance at low Reynolds numbers, while Luo et al. (2020) studied pulse jet propulsion at high Reynolds numbers and finally found that higher Reynolds numbers accelerate the formation of irregular vortices and symmetry-breaking instabilities. Cao et al. (2019) investigated the effect of four different pulse flushing methods on diamond core drilling efficiency. It was found that the use of intermittent rinsing methods not only increases penetration rates but also reduces rinse fluid flow and saves power.

Previous research on vertical submerged jet scouring has primarily focused on the effect of jet structure on scouring under continuous jet conditions. However, there have been fewer studies conducted on scouring under pulsed jet conditions. We found that the pulsed jet has a high erosion rate and entrainment rate, which can significantly enhance the scouring effect of the jet. Therefore, to address the research gap, this paper utilizes a combination of numerical calculations and experiments to investigate the effects of high pulse width, low pulse width, and amplitude on the scouring of vertically submerged jets. The study includes analyzing the structure of the pulsed jet flow field, studying the evolution of the scouring effect over time, and examining the relationship between the optimal pulse width, duty cycle, and amplitude. The study’s conclusions of the study can provide a reference for optimizing the performance of pulse jets in the fields of jet scouring applications, such as dredger dredging and pulse rock breaking, as well as a theoretical basis for the development of submerged pulse jets.

Section snippets

Model and calculation settings

Fig. 1 shows the geometric model of the submerged vertical jet impinging on the sand bed, which was built in Flow-3D on a 1:1 dimensional scale corresponding to the experiment. The jet scour simulation was set up between four baffles, where the top baffle was used to ensure that the jet entered only from the brass tube, and the remaining three tank baffles were used to fix the sediment and water body. The computational domain consisted of only solid and liquid components, with the specific

The effects of the pulse width on submerged jet scouring

The blocking pulsed jet, indicated as A and C in Fig. 8(a)โ€“is discontinuous and divided into a water section and a pulse interval section. The water section in region A is not a regular shape, due to part of the water section near the side wall being affected by the wall friction and the falling speed being lower, but this also shows that the wall plays a certain buffer role. Region B of Fig. 8(a) shows the symmetrical vortex generation that occurs below the nozzle as the water section is

conclusions

In this paper, the effects of the pulse width and pulse amplitude on jet scour under submerged low-frequency pulse conditions are discussed and investigated, and the following conclusions have been reached.

  • (1)The errors of between the Flow-3D simulation and the experimental measurements were within 5%, which proves that the sedimentation scouring model of Flow-3D can reliably perform numerical calculation of the type considered in this paper.
  • (2)The change in the high pulse width T1 in the pulse cycle 

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chuan Wang: Data curation, Conceptualization. Hao Yu: Writing โ€“ original draft. Yang Yang: Writing โ€“ review & editing, Supervision. Zhenjun Gao: Supervision, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Bin Xi: Resources, Project administration. Hui Wang: Software, Data curation. Yulong Yao: Validation, Software.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (44)

Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

Estimating maximum initial wave amplitude of subaerial landslide tsunamis: A three-dimensional modelling approach

ํ•ด์ € ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ์“ฐ๋‚˜๋ฏธ์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ง„ํญ ์ถ”์ •: 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•

Ramtin Sabeti a, Mohammad Heidarzadeh ab

aDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA27AY, UK
bHydroCoast Consulting Engineers Ltd, Bath, UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102360

Highlights

  • โ€ขLandslide travel distance is considered for the first time in a predictive equation.
  • โ€ขPredictive equation derived from databases using 3D physical and numerical modeling.
  • โ€ขThe equation was successfully tested on the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami event.
  • โ€ขThe developed equation using three-dimensional data exhibits a 91โ€ฏ% fitting quality.

Abstract

Landslide tsunamis, responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage in recent years, necessitate the allocation of sufficient time and resources for studying these extreme natural hazards. This study offers a step change in the field by conducting a large number of three-dimensional numerical experiments, validated by physical tests, to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides. We first conducted a few 3D physical experiments in a wave basin which were then applied for the validation of a 3D numerical model based on the Flow3D-HYDRO package. Consequently, we delivered 100 simulations using the validated model by varying parameters such as landslide volume, water depth, slope angle and travel distance. This large database was subsequently employed to develop a predictive equation for the maximum initial tsunami amplitude. For the first time, we considered travel distance as an independent parameter for developing the predictive equation, which can significantly improve the predication accuracy. The predictive equation was tested for the case of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami and produced satisfactory results.

Keywords

Tsunami, Subaerial landslide, Physical modelling, Numerical simulation, FLOW-3D HYDRO

1. Introduction and literature review

The Anak Krakatau landslide tsunami on 22nd December 2018 was a stark reminder of the dangers posed by subaerial landslide tsunamis (Ren et al., 2020Mulia et al. 2020a; Borrero et al., 2020Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 2021). The collapse of the volcano’s southwest side into the ocean triggered a tsunami that struck the Sunda Strait, leading to approximately 450 fatalities (Syamsidik et al., 2020Mulia et al., 2020b) (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1, landslide tsunamis (both submarine and subaerial) have been responsible for thousands of deaths and significant damage to coastal communities worldwide. These incidents underscored the critical need for advanced research into landslide-generated waves to aid in hazard prediction and mitigation. This is further emphasized by recent events such as the 28th of November 2020 landslide tsunami in the southern coast mountains of British Columbia (Canada), where an 18 million m3 rockslide generated a massive tsunami, with over 100โ€ฏm wave run-up, causing significant environmental and infrastructural damage (Geertsema et al., 2022).

Fig 1

Physical modelling and numerical simulation are crucial tools in the study of landslide-induced waves due to their ability to replicate and analyse the complex dynamics of landslide events (Kim et al., 2020). In two-dimensional (2D) modelling, the discrepancy between dimensions can lead to an artificial overestimation of wave amplification (e.g., Heller and Spinneken, 2015). This limitation is overcome with 3D modelling, which enables the scaled-down representation of landslide-generated waves while avoiding the simplifications inherent in 2D approaches (Erosi et al., 2019). Another advantage of 3D modelling in studying landslide-generated waves is its ability to accurately depict the complex dynamics of wave propagation, including lateral and radial spreading from the slide impact zone, a feature unattainable with 2D models (Heller and Spinneken, 2015).

Physical experiments in tsunami research, as presented by authors such as Romano et al. (2020), McFall and Fritz (2016), and Heller and Spinneken (2015), have supported 3D modelling works through validation and calibration of the numerical models to capture the complexities of wave generation and propagation. Numerical modelling has increasingly complemented experimental approach in tsunami research due to the latter’s time and resource-intensive nature, particularly for 3D models (Li et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021). Various numerical approaches have been employed, from Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks to depth-averaged and Navierโ€“Stokes models, enhancing our understanding of tsunami dynamics (Si et al., 2018Grilli et al., 2019Heidarzadeh et al., 20172020Iorio et al., 2021Zhang et al., 2021Kirby et al., 2022Wang et al., 20212022Hu et al., 2022). The sophisticated numerical techniques, including the Particle Finite Element Method and the Immersed Boundary Method, have also shown promising results in modelling highly dynamic landslide scenarios (Mulligan et al., 2020Chen et al., 2020). Among these methods and techniques, FLOW-3D HYDRO stands out in simulating landslide-generated tsunami waves due to its sophisticated technical features such as offering Tru Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for precise free surface tracking (e.g., Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). TruVOF distinguishes itself through a split Lagrangian approach, adeptly reducing cumulative volume errors in wave simulations by dynamically updating cell volume fractions and areas with each time step. Its intelligent adaptation of time step size ensures precise capture of evolving free surfaces, offering unparalleled accuracy in modelling complex fluid interfaces and behaviour (Flow Science, 2023).

Predictive equations play a crucial role in assessing the potential hazards associated with landslide-generated tsunami waves due to their ability to provide risk assessment and warnings. These equations can offer swift and reasonable evaluations of potential tsunami impacts in the absence of detailed numerical simulations, which can be time-consuming and expensive to produce. Among multiple factors and parameters within a landslide tsunami generation, the initial maximum wave amplitude (Fig. 1) stands out due to its critical role. While it is most likely that the initial wave generated by a landslide will have the highest amplitude, it is crucial to clarify that the term “initial maximum wave amplitude” refers to the highest amplitude within the first set of impulse waves. This parameter is essential in determining the tsunami’s impact severity, with higher amplitudes signalling a greater destructive potential (Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022a). Additionally, it plays a significant role in tsunami modelling, aiding in the prediction of wave propagation and the assessment of potential impacts.

In this study, we initially validate the FLOW-3D HYDRO model through a series of physical experiments conducted in a 3D wave tank at University of Bath (UK). Upon confirmation of the model’s accuracy, we use it to systematically vary parameters namely landslide volume, water depth, slope angle, and travel distance, creating an extensive database. Alongside this, we perform a sensitivity analysis on these variables to discern their impacts on the initial maximum wave amplitude. The generated database was consequently applied to derive a non-dimensional predictive equation aimed at estimating the initial maximum wave amplitude in real-world landslide tsunami events.

Two innovations of this study are: (i) The predictive equation of this study is based on a large number of 3D experiments whereas most of the previous equations were based on 2D results, and (ii) For the first time, the travel distance is included in the predictive equation as an independent parameter. To evaluate the performance of our predictive equation, we applied it to a previous real-world subaerial landslide tsunami, i.e., the Anak Krakatau 2018 event. Furthermore, we compare the performance of our predictive equation with other existing equations.

2. Data and methods

The methodology applied in this research is a combination of physical and numerical modelling. Limited physical modelling was performed in a 3D wave basin at the University of Bath (UK) to provide data for calibration and validation of the numerical model. After calibration and validation, the numerical model was employed to model a large number of landslide tsunami scenarios which allowed us to develop a database for deriving a predictive equation.

2.1. Physical experiments

To validate our numerical model, we conducted a series of physical experiments including two sets in a 3D wave basin at University of Bath, measuring 2.50โ€ฏm in length (WL), 2.60โ€ฏm in width (WW), and 0.60โ€ฏm in height (WH) (Fig. 2a). Conducting two distinct sets of experiments (Table 1), each with different setups (travel distance, location, and water depth), provided a robust framework for validation of the numerical model. For wave measurement, we employed a twin wire wave gauge from HR Wallingford (https://equipit.hrwallingford.com). In these experiments, we used a concrete prism solid block, the dimensions of which are outlined in Table 2. In our experiments, we employed a concrete prism solid block with a density of 2600โ€ฏkg/m3, chosen for its similarity to the natural density of landslides, akin to those observed with the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami, where the landslide composition is predominantly solid rather than granular. The block’s form has also been endorsed in prior studies (Watts, 1998Najafi-Jilani and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2008) as a suitable surrogate for modelling landslide-induced waves. A key aspect of our methodology was addressing scale effects, following the guidelines proposed by Heller et al. (2008) as it is described in Table 1. To enhance the reliability and accuracy of our experimental data, we conducted each physical experiment three times which revealed all three experimental waveforms were identical. This repetition was aimed at minimizing potential errors and inconsistencies in laboratory measurements.

Fig 2

Table 1. The locations and other information of the laboratory setups for making landslide-generated waves in the physical wave basin. This table details the specific parameters for each setup, including slope range (ฮฑ), slide volume (V), kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ), water depth (h), travel distance (D), surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ), Reynolds number (R), Weber number (W), and the precise coordinates of the wave gauges (WG).

Labฮฑ(ยฐ)V (mยณ)h (m)D (m)WG’s Location(ฮฝ) (mยฒ/s)(ฯƒ) (N/m)Acceptable range for avoiding scale effects*Observed values of W and R โŽโŽ
Lab 1452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2470.070X1=1.090 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R > 3.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105R1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.80โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y1=1.210 m
W1โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.19โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z1=0.050mW >5.0โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ103
Lab 2452.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’30.2460.045X2=1.030 m1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’60.073R2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ3.78โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Y2=1.210โ€ฏmW2โ€ฏ=โ€ฏ8.13โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ105
Z2=0.050 m

โŽ

The acceptable ranges for avoiding scale effects are based on the study by Heller et al. (2008).โŽโŽ

The Reynolds number (R) is given by g0.5h1.5/ฮฝ, with ฮฝ denoting the kinematic viscosity. The Weber number (W) is Wโ€ฏ=โ€ฏฯgh2/ฯƒ, where ฯƒ represents surface tension coefficient and ฯโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ1000kg/m3โ€…is the density of water. In our experiments, conducted at a water temperature of approximately 20โ€ฏยฐC, the kinematic viscosity (ฮฝ) and the surface tension coefficient of water (ฯƒ) are 1.01โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’6 mยฒ/s and 0.073โ€ฏN/m, respectively (Kestin et al., 1978).

Table 2. Specifications of the solid block used in physical experiments for generating subaerial landslides in the laboratory.

Solid-block attributesProperty metricsGeometric shape
Slide width (bs)0.26 mImage, table 2
Slide length (ls)0.20 m
Slide thickness (s)0.10 m
Slide volume (V)2.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3
Specific gravity, (ฮณs)2.60
Slide weight (ms)6.86 kg

2.2. Numerical simulations applying FLOW-3D hydro

The detailed theoretical framework encompassing the governing equations, the computational methodologies employed, and the specific techniques used for tracking the water surface in these simulations are thoroughly detailed in the study by Sabeti et al. (2024). Here, we briefly explain some of the numerical details. We defined a uniform mesh for our flow domain, carefully crafted with a fine spatial resolution of 0.005โ€ฏm (i.e., grid size). The dimensions of the numerical model directly matched those of our wave basin used in the physical experiment, being 2.60โ€ฏm wide, 0.60โ€ฏm deep, and 2.50โ€ฏm long (Fig. 2). This design ensures comprehensive coverage of the study area. The output intervals of the numerical model are set at 0.02โ€ฏs. This timing is consistent with the sampling rates of wave gauges used in laboratory settings. The friction coefficient in the FLOW-3D HYDRO is designated as 0.45. This value corresponds to the Coulombic friction measurements obtained in the laboratory, ensuring that the simulation accurately reflects real-world physical interactions.

In order to simulate the landslide motion, we applied coupled motion objects in FLOW-3D-HYDRO where the dynamics are predominantly driven by gravity and surface friction. This methodology stands in contrast to other models that necessitate explicit inputs of force and torque. This approach ensures that the simulation more accurately reflects the natural movement of landslides, which is heavily reliant on gravitational force and the interaction between sliding surfaces. The stability of the numerical simulations is governed by the Courant Number criterion (Courant et al., 1928), which dictates the maximum time step (ฮ”t) for a given mesh size (ฮ”x) and flow speed (U). According to Courant et al. (1928), this number is required to stay below one to ensure stability of numerical simulations. In our simulations, the Courant number is always maintained below one.

In alignment with the parameters of physical experiments, we set the fluid within the mesh to water, characterized by a density of 1000โ€ฏkg/mยณ at a temperature of 20 ยฐC. Furthermore, we defined the top, front, and back surfaces of the mesh as symmetry planes. The remaining surfaces are designated as wall types, incorporating no-slip conditions to accurately simulate the interaction between the fluid and the boundaries. In terms of selection of an appropriate turbulence model, we selected the kโ€“ฯ‰ model that showed a better performance than other turbulence methods (e.g., Renormalization-Group) in a previous study (Sabeti et al., 2024). The simulations are conducted using a PC Intelยฎ Coreโ„ข i7-10510U CPU with a frequency of 1.80โ€ฏGHz, and a 16 GB RAM. On this PC, completion of a 3-s simulation required approximately 12.5โ€ฏh.

2.3. Validation

The FLOW-3D HYDRO numerical model was validated using the two physical experiments (Fig. 3) outlined in Table 1. The level of agreement between observations (Oi) and simulations (Si) is examined using the following equation:(1)๏ฟฝ=|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ|ร—100where ฮต represents the mismatch error, Oi denotes the observed laboratory values, and Si represents the simulated values from the FLOW-3D HYDRO model. The results of this validation process revealed that our model could replicate the waves generated in the physical experiments with a reasonable degree of mismatch (ฮต): 14โ€ฏ% for Lab 1 and 8โ€ฏ% for Lab 2 experiments, respectively (Fig. 3). These values indicate that while the model is not perfect, it provides a sufficiently close approximation of the real-world phenomena.

Fig 3

In terms of mesh efficiency, we varied the mesh size to study sensitivity of the numerical results to mesh size. First, by halving the mesh size and then by doubling it, we repeated the modelling by keeping other parameters unchanged. This analysis guided that a mesh size of โˆ†xโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ0.005โ€ฏm is the most effective for the setup of this study. The total number of computational cells applying mesh size of 0.005โ€ฏm is 9.269โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ106.

2.4. The dataset

The validated numerical model was employed to conduct 100 simulations, incorporating variations in four key landslide parameters namely water depth, slope angle, slide volume, and travel distance. This methodical approach was essential for a thorough sensitivity analysis of these variables, and for the creation of a detailed database to develop a predictive equation for maximum initial tsunami amplitude. Within the model, 15 distinct slide volumes were established, ranging from 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 to 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3 (Table 3). The slope angle varied between 35ยฐ and 55ยฐ, and water depth ranged from 0.24โ€ฏm to 0.27โ€ฏm. The travel distance of the landslides was varied, spanning from 0.04โ€ฏm to 0.07โ€ฏm. Detailed configurations of each simulation, along with the maximum initial wave amplitudes and dominant wave periods are provided in Table 4.

Table 3. Geometrical information of the 15 solid blocks used in numerical modelling for generating landslide tsunamis. Parameters are: ls, slide length; bs, slide width; s, slide thickness; ฮณs, specific gravity; and V, slide volume.

Solid blockls (m)bsโ€…(m)sโ€…(m)V (m3)ฮณs
Block-10.3100.2600.1556.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-20.3000.2600.1505.85โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-30.2800.2600.1405.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-40.2600.2600.1304.39โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-50.2400.2600.1203.74โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-60.2200.2600.1103.15โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-70.2000.2600.1002.60โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-80.1800.2600.0902.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-90.1600.2600.0801.66โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-100.1400.2600.0701.27โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-110.1200.2600.0600.93โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-120.1000.2600.0500.65โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-130.0800.2600.0400.41โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-140.0600.2600.0300.23โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60
Block-150.0400.2600.0200.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’32.60

Table 4. The numerical simulation for the 100 tests performed in this study for subaerial solid-block landslide-generated waves. Parameters are aM, maximum wave amplitude; ฮฑ, slope angle; h, water depth; D, travel distance; and T, dominant wave period. The location of the wave gauge is X=1.030โ€ฏm, Y=1.210โ€ฏm, and Z=0.050โ€ฏm. The properties of various solid blocks are presented in Table 3.

Test-Block Noฮฑ (ยฐ)h (m)D (m)T(s)aM (m)
1Block-7450.2460.0290.5100.0153
2Block-7450.2460.0300.5050.0154
3Block-7450.2460.0310.5050.0156
4Block-7450.2460.0320.5050.0158
5Block-7450.2460.0330.5050.0159
6Block-7450.2460.0340.5050.0160
7Block-7450.2460.0350.5050.0162
8Block-7450.2460.0360.5050.0166
9Block-7450.2460.0370.5050.0167
10Block-7450.2460.0380.5050.0172
11Block-7450.2460.0390.5050.0178
12Block-7450.2460.0400.5050.0179
13Block-7450.2460.0410.5050.0181
14Block-7450.2460.0420.5050.0183
15Block-7450.2460.0430.5050.0190
16Block-7450.2460.0440.5050.0197
17Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0199
18Block-7450.2460.0460.5050.0201
19Block-7450.2460.0470.5050.0191
20Block-7450.2460.0480.5050.0217
21Block-7450.2460.0490.5050.0220
22Block-7450.2460.0500.5050.0226
23Block-7450.2460.0510.5050.0236
24Block-7450.2460.0520.5050.0239
25Block-7450.2460.0530.5100.0240
26Block-7450.2460.0540.5050.0241
27Block-7450.2460.0550.5050.0246
28Block-7450.2460.0560.5050.0247
29Block-7450.2460.0570.5050.0248
30Block-7450.2460.0580.5050.0249
31Block-7450.2460.0590.5050.0251
32Block-7450.2460.0600.5050.0257
33Block-1450.2460.0450.5050.0319
34Block-2450.2460.0450.5050.0294
35Block-3450.2460.0450.5050.0282
36Block-4450.2460.0450.5050.0262
37Block-5450.2460.0450.5050.0243
38Block-6450.2460.0450.5050.0223
39Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0196
40Block-8450.2460.0450.5050.0197
41Block-9450.2460.0450.5050.0198
42Block-10450.2460.0450.5050.0184
43Block-11450.2460.0450.5050.0173
44Block-12450.2460.0450.5050.0165
45Block-13450.2460.0450.4040.0153
46Block-14450.2460.0450.4040.0124
47Block-15450.2460.0450.5050.0066
48Block-7450.2020.0450.4040.0220
49Block-7450.2040.0450.4040.0219
50Block-7450.2060.0450.4040.0218
51Block-7450.2080.0450.4040.0217
52Block-7450.2100.0450.4040.0216
53Block-7450.2120.0450.4040.0215
54Block-7450.2140.0450.5050.0214
55Block-7450.2160.0450.5050.0214
56Block-7450.2180.0450.5050.0213
57Block-7450.2200.0450.5050.0212
58Block-7450.2220.0450.5050.0211
59Block-7450.2240.0450.5050.0208
60Block-7450.2260.0450.5050.0203
61Block-7450.2280.0450.5050.0202
62Block-7450.2300.0450.5050.0201
63Block-7450.2320.0450.5050.0201
64Block-7450.2340.0450.5050.0200
65Block-7450.2360.0450.5050.0199
66Block-7450.2380.0450.4040.0196
67Block-7450.2400.0450.4040.0194
68Block-7450.2420.0450.4040.0193
69Block-7450.2440.0450.4040.0192
70Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0190
71Block-7450.2480.0450.5050.0189
72Block-7450.2500.0450.5050.0187
73Block-7450.2520.0450.5050.0187
74Block-7450.2540.0450.5050.0186
75Block-7450.2560.0450.5050.0184
76Block-7450.2580.0450.5050.0182
77Block-7450.2590.0450.5050.0183
78Block-7450.2600.0450.5050.0191
79Block-7450.2610.0450.5050.0192
80Block-7450.2620.0450.5050.0194
81Block-7450.2630.0450.5050.0195
82Block-7450.2640.0450.5050.0195
83Block-7450.2650.0450.5050.0197
84Block-7450.2660.0450.5050.0197
85Block-7450.2670.0450.5050.0198
86Block-7450.2700.0450.5050.0199
87Block-7300.2460.0450.5050.0101
88Block-7350.2460.0450.5050.0107
89Block-7360.2460.0450.5050.0111
90Block-7370.2460.0450.5050.0116
91Block-7380.2460.0450.5050.0117
92Block-7390.2460.0450.5050.0119
93Block-7400.2460.0450.5050.0121
94Block-7410.2460.0450.5050.0127
95Block-7420.2460.0450.4040.0154
96Block-7430.2460.0450.4040.0157
97Block-7440.2460.0450.4040.0162
98Block-7450.2460.0450.5050.0197
99Block-7500.2460.0450.5050.0221
100Block-7550.2460.0450.5050.0233

In all these 100 simulations, the wave gauge was consistently positioned at coordinates X=1.09โ€ฏm, Y=1.21โ€ฏm, and Z=0.05โ€ฏm. The dominant wave period for each simulation was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function in MATLAB (MathWorks, 2023). Furthermore, the classification of wave types was carried out using a wave categorization graph according to Sorensen (2010), as shown in Fig. 4a. The results indicate that the majority of the simulated waves are on the border between intermediate and deep-water waves, and they are categorized as Stokes waves (Fig. 4a). Four sample waveforms from our 100 numerical experiments are provided in Fig. 4b.

Fig 4

The dataset in Table 4 was used to derive a new predictive equation that incorporates travel distance for the first time to estimate the initial maximum tsunami amplitude. In developing this equation, a genetic algorithm optimization technique was implemented using MATLAB (MathWorks 2023). This advanced approach entailed the use of genetic algorithms (GAs), an evolutionary algorithm type inspired by natural selection processes (MathWorks, 2023). This technique is iterative, involving selection, crossover, and mutation processes to evolve solutions over several generations. The goal was to identify the optimal coefficients and powers for each landslide parameter in the predictive equation, ensuring a robust and reliable model for estimating maximum wave amplitudes. Genetic Algorithms excel at optimizing complex models by navigating through extensive combinations of coefficients and exponents. GAs effectively identify highly suitable solutions for the non-linear and complex relationships between inputs (e.g., slide volume, slope angle, travel distance, water depth) and the output (i.e., maximum initial wave amplitude, aM). MATLAB’s computational environment enhances this process, providing robust tools for GA to adapt and evolve solutions iteratively, ensuring the precision of the predictive model (Onnen et al., 1997). This approach leverages MATLAB’s capabilities to fine-tune parameters dynamically, achieving an optimal equation that accurately estimates aM. It is important to highlight that the nondimensionalized version of this dataset is employed to develop a predictive equation which enables the equation to reproduce the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM) for various subaerial landslide cases, independent of their dimensional differences (e.g., Heler and Hager 2014Heller and Spinneken 2015Sabeti and Heidarzadeh 2022b). For this nondimensionalization, we employed the water depth (h) to nondimensionalize the slide volume (V/h3) and travel distance (D/h). The slide thickness (s) was applied to nondimensionalize the water depth (h/s).

2.5. Landslide velocity

In discussing the critical role of landslide velocity for simulating landslide-generated waves, we focus on the mechanisms of landslide motion and the techniques used to record landslide velocity in our simulations (Fig. 5). Also, we examine how these methods were applied in two distinct scenarios: Lab 1 and Lab 2 (see Table 1 for their details). Regarding the process of landslide movement, a slide starts from a stationary state, gaining momentum under the influence of gravity and this acceleration continues until the landslide collides with water, leading to a significant reduction in its speed before eventually coming to a stop (Fig. 5) (e.g., Panizzo et al. 2005).

Fig 5

To measure the landslide’s velocity in our simulations, we attached a probe at the centre of the slide, which supplied a time series of the velocity data. The slide’s velocity (vs) peaks at the moment it enters the water (Fig. 5), a point referred to as the impact time (tImp). Following this initial impact, the slides continue their underwater movement, eventually coming to a complete halt (tStop). Given the results in Fig. 5, it can be seen that Lab 1, with its longer travel distance (0.070โ€ฏm), exhibits a higher peak velocity of 1.89โ€ฏm/s. This increase in velocity is attributed to the extended travel distance allowing more time for the slide to accelerate under gravity. Whereas Lab 2, featuring a shorter travel distance (0.045โ€ฏm), records a lower peak velocity of 1.78โ€ฏm/s. This difference underscores how travel distance significantly influences the dynamics of landslide motion. After reaching the peak, both profiles show a sharp decrease in velocity, marking the transition to submarine motion until the slides come to a complete stop (tStop). There are noticeable differences observable in Fig. 5 between the Lab-1 and Lab-2 simulations, including the peaks at 0.3โ€ฏs . These variations might stem from the placement of the wave gauge, which differs slightly in each scenario, as well as the water depth’s minor discrepancies and, the travel distance.

2.6. Effect of air entrainment

In this section we examine whether it is required to consider air entrainment for our modelling or not as the FLOW-3D HYDRO package is capable of modelling air entrainment. The process of air entrainment in water during a landslide tsunami and its subsequent transport involve two key components: the quantification of air entrainment at the water surface, and the simulation of the air’s transport within the fluid (Hirt, 2003). FLOW-3D HYDRO employs the air entrainment model to compute the volume of air entrained at the water’s surface utilizing three approaches: a constant density model, a variable density model accounting for bulking, and a buoyancy model that adds the Drift-FLUX mechanism to variable density conditions (Flow Science, 2023). The calculation of the entrainment rate is based on the following equation:(2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’2๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)]1/2where parameters are: Vair, volume of air; Cair, entrainment rate coefficient; As, surface area of fluid; ฯ, fluid density; k, turbulent kinetic energy; gn, gravity normal to surface; Lt, turbulent length scale; and ฯƒ, surface tension coefficient. The value of k is directly computed from the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) (kw) calculations in our model.

In this study, we selected the variable densityโ€ฏ+โ€ฏDrift-FLUX model, which effectively captures the dynamics of phase separation and automatically activates the constant density and variable density models. This method simplifies the air-water mixture, treating it as a single, homogeneous fluid within each computational cell. For the phase volume fractions f1and f2โ€‹, the velocities are expressed in terms of the mixture and relative velocities, denoted as u and ur, respectively, as follows:(3)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0(4)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ)โˆ’๏ฟฝ.(๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

The outcomes from this simulation are displayed in Fig. 6, which indicates that the influence of air entrainment on the generated wave amplitude is approximately 2โ€ฏ%. A value of 0.02 for the entrained air volume fraction means that, in the simulated fluid, approximately 2โ€ฏ% of the volume is composed of entrained air. In other words, for every unit volume of the fluid-air mixture at that location, 2โ€ฏ% is air and the remaining 98โ€ฏ% is water. The configuration of Test-17 (Table 4) was employed for this simulation. While the effect of air entrainment is anticipated to be more significant in models of granular landslide-generated waves (Fritz, 2002), in our simulations we opted not to incorporate this module due to its negligible impact on the results.

Fig 6

3. Results

In this section, we begin by presenting a sequence of our 3D simulations capturing different time steps to illustrate the generation process of landslide-generated waves. Subsequently, we derive a new predictive equation to estimate the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide-generated waves and assess its performance.

3.1. Wave generation and propagation

To demonstrate the wave generation process in our simulation, we reference Test-17 from Table 4, where we employed Block-7 (Tables 34). In this configuration, the slope angle was set to 45ยฐ, with a water depth of 0.246โ€ฏm and a travel distance at 0.045โ€ฏm (Fig. 7). At 0.220โ€ฏs, the initial impact of the moving slide on the water is depicted, marking the onset of the wave generation process (Fig. 7a). Disturbances are localized to the immediate area of impact, with the rest of the water surface remaining undisturbed. At this time, a maximum water particle velocity of 1.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.2โ€ฏm/s is seen around the impact zone (Fig. 7d). Moving to 0.320โ€ฏs, the development of the wave becomes apparent as energy transfer from the landslide to the water creates outwardly radiating waves with maximum water particle velocity of up to around 1.6โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 1.8โ€ฏm/s (Fig. 7b, e). By the time 0.670โ€ฏs, the wave has fully developed and is propagating away from the impact point exhibiting maximum water particle velocity of up to 2.0โ€ฏm/s โ€“ 2.1โ€ฏm/s. Concentric wave fronts are visible, moving outwards in all directions, with a colour gradient signifying the highest wave amplitude near the point of landslide entry, diminishing with distance (Fig. 7c, f).

Fig 7

3.2. Influence of landslide parameters on tsunami amplitude

In this section, we investigate the effects of various landslide parameters namely slide volume (V), water depth (h), slipe angle (ฮฑ) and travel distance (D) on the maximum initial wave amplitude (aM). Fig. 8 presents the outcome of these analyses. According to Fig. 8, the slide volume, slope angle, and travel distance exhibit a direct relationship with the wave amplitude, meaning that as these parameters increase, so does the amplitude. Conversely, water depth is inversely related to the maximum initial wave amplitude, suggesting that the deeper the water depth, the smaller the maximum wave amplitude will be (Fig. 8b).

Fig 8

Fig. 8a highlights the pronounced impact of slide volume on the aM, demonstrating a direct correlation between the two variables. For instance, in the range of slide volumes we modelled (Fig. 8a), The smallest slide volume tested, measuring 0.10โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, generated a low initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0066โ€ฏm) (Table 4). In contrast, the largest volume tested, 6.25โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ10โˆ’3 m3, resulted in a significantly higher initial wave amplitude (aM= 0.0319โ€ฏm) (Table 4). The extremities of these results emphasize the slide volume’s paramount impact on wave amplitude, further elucidated by their positions as the smallest and largest aM values across all conducted tests (Table 4). This is corroborated by findings from the literature (e.g., Murty, 2003), which align with the observed trend in our simulations.

The slope angle’s influence on aM was smooth. A steady increase of wave amplitude was observed as the slope angle increased (Fig. 8c). In examining travel distance, an anomaly was identified. At a travel distance of 0.047โ€ฏm, there was an unexpected dip in aM, which deviates from the general increasing trend associated with longer travel distances. This singular instance could potentially be attributed to a numerical error. Beyond this point, the expected pattern of increasing aM with longer travel distances resumes, suggesting that the anomaly at 0.047โ€ฏm is an outlier in an otherwise consistent trend, and thus this single data point was overlooked while deriving the predictive equation. Regarding the inverse relationship between water depth and wave amplitude, our result (Fig. 8b) is consistent with previous reports by Fritz et al. (2003), (2004), and Watts et al. (2005).

The insights from Fig. 8 informed the architecture of the predictive equation in the next Section, with slide volume, travel distance, and slope angle being multiplicatively linked to wave amplitude underscoring their direct correlations with wave amplitude. Conversely, water depth is incorporated as a divisor, representing its inverse relationship with wave amplitude. This structure encapsulates the dynamics between the landslide parameters and their influence on the maximum initial wave amplitude as discussed in more detail in the next Section.

3.3. Predictive equation

Building on our sensitivity analysis of landslide parameters, as detailed in Section 3.2, and utilizing our nondimensional dataset, we have derived a new predictive equation as follows:(5)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.90(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11where, V is sliding volume, h is water depth, ฮฑ is slope angle, and s is landslide thickness. It is important to note that this equation is valid only for subaerial solid-block landslide tsunamis as all our experiments were for this type of waves. The performance of this equation in predicting simulation data is demonstrated by the satisfactory alignment of data points around a 45ยฐ line, indicating its accuracy and reliability with regard to the experimental dataset (Fig. 9). The quality of fit between the dataset and Eq. (5) is 91โ€ฏ% indicating that Eq. (5) represents the dataset very well. Table 5 presents Eq. (5) alongside four other similar equations previously published. Two significant distinctions between our Eq. (5) and these others are: (i) Eq. (5) is derived from 3D experiments, whereas the other four equations are based on 2D experiments. (ii) Unlike the other equations, our Eq. (5) incorporates travel distance as an independent parameter.

Fig 9

Table 5. Performance comparison among our newly-developed equation and existing equations for estimating the maximum initial amplitude (aM) of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Parameters: aM, initial maximum wave amplitude; h, water depth; vs, landslide velocity; V, slide volume; bs, slide width; ls, slide length; s, slide thickness; ฮฑ, slope angle; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ, volume of the final immersed landslide. We considered ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ= V as the slide volume.

EventPredictive equationsAuthor (year)Observed aM (m) โŽโŽCalculated aM (m)Error, ฮต (%) โŽโŽโŽโŽ
2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami (Subaerial landslide) *๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=1.32๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„ŽNoda (1970)1341340
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.667(0.5(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž)2)0.334(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.754(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)0.506(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)1.631Bolin et al. (2014) โŽโŽโŽ13459424334
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.25(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž2)0.8Robbe-Saule et al. (2021)1343177
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.4545(tan๏ฟฝ)0.062(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.296(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.235Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022b)1341266
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/โ„Ž=0.015(tan๏ฟฝ)0.10(๏ฟฝโ„Ž3)0.911(๏ฟฝโ„Ž)0.10(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)โˆ’0.11This study1341302.9

โŽ

Geometrical and kinematic parameters of the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide based on Heidarzadeh et al. (2020)Grilli et al. (2019) and Grilli et al. (2021)V=2.11โ€ฏร—โ€ฏ107 m3h= 50โ€ฏm; s= 114โ€ฏm; ฮฑ= 45ยฐ; ls=1250โ€ฏm; bs= 2700โ€ฏm; vs=44.9โ€ฏm/s; D= 2500โ€ฏm; aM= 100โ€ฏm โˆ’150โ€ฏm.โŽโŽ

aM= An average value of aMโ€ฏ=โ€ฏ134โ€ฏm is considered in this study.โŽโŽโŽ

The equation of Bolin et al. (2014) is based on the reformatted one reported by Lindstrรธm (2016).โŽโŽโŽโŽ

Error is calculated using Eq. (1), where the calculated aM is assumed as the simulated value.

Additionally, we evaluated the performance of this equation using the real-world data from the 2018 Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami. Based on previous studies (Heidarzadeh et al., 2020Grilli et al., 20192021), we were able to provide a list of parameters for the subaerial landslide and associated tsunami for the 2018 Anak Krakatau event (see footnote of Table 5). We note that the data of the 2018 Anak Krakatau event was not used while deriving Eq. (5). The results indicate that Eq. (5) predicts the initial amplitude of the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami as being 130โ€ฏm indicating an error of 2.9โ€ฏ% compared to the reported average amplitude of 134โ€ฏm for this event. This performance indicates an improvement compared to the previous equation reported by Sabeti and Heidarzadeh (2022a) (Table 5). In contrast, the equations from Robbe-Saule et al. (2021) and Bolin et al. (2014) demonstrate higher discrepancies of 4200โ€ฏ% and 77โ€ฏ%, respectively (Table 5). Although Noda’s (1970) equation reproduces the tsunami amplitude of 134โ€ฏm accurately (Table 5), it is crucial to consider its limitations, notably not accounting for parameters such as slope angle and travel distance.

It is essential to recognize that both travel distance and slope angle significantly affect wave amplitude. In our model, captured in Eq. (5), we integrate the slope angle (ฮฑ) through the tangent function, i.e., tanโ€…ฮฑ. This choice diverges from traditional physical interpretations that often employ the cosine or sine function (e.g., Heller and Hager, 2014Watts et al., 2003). We opted for the tangent function because it more effectively reflects the direct impact of slope steepness on wave generation, yielding superior estimations compared to conventional methods.

The significance of this study lies in its application of both physical and numerical 3D experiments and the derivation of a predictive equation based on 3D results. Prior research, e.g. Heller et al. (2016), has reported notable discrepancies between 2D and 3D wave amplitudes, highlighting the important role of 3D experiments. It is worth noting that the suitability of applying an equation derived from either 2D or 3D data depends on the specific geometry and characteristics inherent in the problem being addressed. For instance, in the case of a long, narrow dam reservoir, an equation derived from 2D data would likely be more suitable. In such contexts, the primary dynamics of interest such as flow patterns and potential wave propagation are predominantly two-dimensional, occurring along the length and depth of the reservoir. This simplification to 2D for narrow dam reservoirs allows for more accurate modelling of these dynamics.

This study specifically investigates waves initiated by landslides, focusing on those characterized as solid blocks instead of granular flows, with slope angles confined to a range of 25ยฐ to 60ยฐ. We acknowledge the additional complexities encountered in real-world scenarios, such as dynamic density and velocity of landslides, which could affect the estimations. The developed equation in this study is specifically designed to predict the maximum initial amplitude of tsunamis for the aforementioned specified ranges and types of landslides.

4. Conclusions

Both physical and numerical experiments were undertaken in a 3D wave basin to study solid-block landslide-generated waves and to formulate a predictive equation for their maximum initial wave amplitude. At the beginning, two physical experiments were performed to validate and calibrate a 3D numerical model, which was subsequently utilized to generate 100 experiments by varying different landslide parameters. The generated database was then used to derive a predictive equation for the maximum initial wave amplitude of landslide tsunamis. The main features and outcomes are:

  • โ€ขThe predictive equation of this study is exclusively derived from 3D data and exhibits a fitting quality of 91โ€ฏ% when applied to the database.
  • โ€ขFor the first time, landslide travel distance was considered in the predictive equation. This inclusion provides more accuracy and flexibility for applying the equation.
  • โ€ขTo further evaluate the performance of the predictive equation, it was applied to a real-world subaerial landslide tsunami (i.e., the 2018 Anak Krakatau event) and delivered satisfactory performance.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ramtin Sabeti: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Software, Visualization, Writing โ€“ review & editing. Mohammad Heidarzadeh: Methodology, Data curation, Software, Writing โ€“ review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

RS is supported by the Leverhulme Trust Grant No. RPG-2022-306. MH is funded by open funding of State Key Lab of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, grant number SKHL2101. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund. MH is also funded by the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation grant no. 6217 (awarded in 2023).

Acknowledgements

Authors are sincerely grateful to the laboratory technician team, particularly Mr William Bazeley, at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Bath for their support during the laboratory physical modelling of this research. We appreciate the valuable insights provided by Mr. Brian Fox (Senior CFD Engineer at Flow Science, Inc.) regarding air entrainment modelling in FLOW-3D HYDRO. We acknowledge University of Bath Institutional Open Access Fund.

Data availability

  • All data used in this study are given in the body of the article.

References

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

Modeling and numerical studies of high-precision laser powder bed fusion

Yi Weiย ;Genyu Chen;Nengru Tao;Wei Zhou
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191504

In order to comprehensively reveal the evolutionary dynamics of the molten pool and the state of motion of the fluid during the high-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) process, this study aims to deeply investigate the specific manifestations of the multiphase flow, solidification phenomena, and heat transfer during the process by means of numerical simulation methods. Numerical simulation models of SS316L single-layer HP-LPBF formation with single and double tracks were constructed using the discrete element method and the computational fluid dynamics method. The effects of various factors such as Marangoni convection, surface tension, vapor recoil, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool have been paid attention to during the model construction process. The results show that the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ shape, in which the temperature gradient at the front end of the pool is significantly larger than that at the tail end, with the highest temperature gradient up to 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. It is also found that the depth of the second track is larger than that of the first one, and the process parameter window has been determined preliminarily. In addition, the application of HP-LPBF technology helps to reduce the surface roughness and minimize the forming size.

Topics

Heat transfer,ย Nonequilibrium thermodynamics,ย Solidification process,ย Computer simulation,ย Discrete element method,ย Lasers,ย Mass transfer,ย Fluid mechanics,ย Computational fluid dynamics,ย Multiphase flows

I. INTRODUCTION

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has become a research hotspot in the field of additive manufacturing of metals due to its advantages of high-dimensional accuracy, good surface quality, high density, and high material utilization.1,2 With the rapid development of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics, the demand for microfabrication technology is increasing day by day.3 High-precision laser powder bed fusion (HP-LPBF) is one of the key manufacturing technologies for tiny parts in the fields of electronics, medical, automotive, biotechnology, energy, communication, and optics because of its process characteristics such as small focal spot diameter, small powder particle size, and thin powder layup layer thickness.4โ€“13 Compared with LPBF, HP-LPBF has the significant advantages of smaller focal spot diameter, smaller powder particle size, and thinner layer thickness. These advantages make HP-LPBF perform better in producing micro-fine parts, high surface quality, and parts with excellent mechanical properties.

HP-LPBF is in the exploratory stage, and researchers have already done some exploratory studies on the focal spot diameter, the amount of defocusing, and the powder particle size. In order to explore the influence of changing the laser focal spot diameter on the LPBF process characteristics of the law, Wildman et al.14 studied five groups of different focal spot diameter LPBF forming 316L stainless steel (SS316L) processing effect, the smallest focal spot diameter of 26โ€‰ฮผm, and the results confirm that changing the focal spot diameter can be achieved to achieve the energy control, so as to control the quality of forming. Subsequently, Mclouth et al.15 proposed the laser out-of-focus amount (focal spot diameter) parameter, which characterizes the distance between the forming plane and the laser focal plane. The laser energy density was controlled by varying the defocusing amount while keeping the laser parameters constant. Sample preparation at different focal positions was investigated, and their microstructures were characterized. The results show that the samples at the focal plane have finer microstructure than those away from the focal plane, which is the effect of higher power density and smaller focal spot diameter. In order to explore the influence of changing the powder particle size on the characteristics of the LPBF process, Qian et al.16 carried out single-track scanning simulations on powder beds with average powder particle sizes of 70 and 40โ€‰ฮผm, respectively, and the results showed that the melt tracks sizes were close to each other under the same process parameters for the two particle-size distributions and that the molten pool of powder beds with small particles was more elongated and the edges of the melt tracks were relatively flat. In order to explore the superiority of HP-LPBF technology, Xu et al.17 conducted a comparative analysis of HP-LPBF and conventional LPBF of SS316L. The results showed that the average surface roughness of the top surface after forming by HP-LPBF could reach 3.40โ€‰ฮผm. Once again, it was verified that HP-LPBF had higher forming quality than conventional LPBF. On this basis, Wei et al.6 comparatively analyzed the effects of different laser focal spot diameters on different powder particle sizes formed by LPBF. The results showed that the smaller the laser focal spot diameter, the fewer the defects on the top and side surfaces. The above research results confirm that reducing the laser focal spot diameter can obtain higher energy density and thus better forming quality.

LPBF involves a variety of complex systems and mechanisms, and the final quality of the part is influenced by a large number of process parameters.18โ€“24 Some research results have shown that there are more than 50 factors affecting the quality of the specimen. The influencing factors are mainly categorized into three main groups: (1) laser parameters, (2) powder parameters, and (3) equipment parameters, which interact with each other to determine the final specimen quality. With the continuous development of technologies such as computational materials science and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the method of studying the influence of different factors on the forming quality of LPBF forming process has been shifted from time-consuming and laborious experimental characterization to the use of numerical simulation methods. As a result, more and more researchers are adopting this approach for their studies. Currently, numerical simulation studies on LPBF are mainly focused on the exploration of molten pool, temperature distribution, and residual stresses.

  1. Finite element simulation based on continuum mechanics and free surface fluid flow modeling based on fluid dynamics are two common approaches to study the behavior of LPBF molten pool.25โ€“28 Finite element simulation focuses on the temperature and thermal stress fields, treats the powder bed as a continuum, and determines the molten pool size by plotting the elemental temperature above the melting point. In contrast, fluid dynamics modeling can simulate the 2D or 3D morphology of the metal powder pile and obtain the powder size and distribution by certain algorithms.29 The flow in the molten pool is mainly affected by recoil pressure and the Marangoni effect. By simulating the molten pool formation, it is possible to predict defects, molten pool shape, and flow characteristics, as well as the effect of process parameters on the molten pool geometry.30โ€“34 In addition, other researchers have been conducted to optimize the laser processing parameters through different simulation methods and experimental data.35โ€“46 Crystal growth during solidification is studied to further understand the effect of laser parameters on dendritic morphology and solute segregation.47โ€“54 A multi-scale system has been developed to describe the fused deposition process during 3D printing, which is combined with the conductive heat transfer model and the dendritic solidification model.55,56
  2. Relevant scholars have adopted various different methods for simulation, such as sequential coupling theory,57 Lagrangian and Eulerian thermal models,58 birthโ€“death element method,25 and finite element method,59 in order to reveal the physical phenomena of the laser melting process and optimize the process parameters. Luo et al.60 compared the LPBF temperature field and molten pool under double ellipsoidal and Gaussian heat sources by ANSYS APDL and found that the diffusion of the laser energy in the powder significantly affects the molten pool size and the temperature field.
  3. The thermal stresses obtained from the simulation correlate with the actual cracks,61 and local preheating can effectively reduce the residual stresses.62 A three-dimensional thermodynamic finite element model investigated the temperature and stress variations during laser-assisted fabrication and found that powder-to-solid conversion increases the temperature gradient, stresses, and warpage.63 Other scholars have predicted residual stresses and part deflection for LPBF specimens and investigated the effects of deposition pattern, heat, laser power, and scanning strategy on residual stresses, noting that high-temperature gradients lead to higher residual stresses.64โ€“67 

In short, the process of LPBF forming SS316L is extremely complex and usually involves drastic multi-scale physicochemical changes that will only take place on a very small scale. Existing literature employs DEM-based mesoscopic-scale numerical simulations to investigate the effects of process parameters on the molten pool dynamics of LPBF-formed SS316L. However, a few studies have been reported on the key mechanisms of heating and solidification, spatter, and convective behavior of the molten pool of HP-LPBF-formed SS316L with small laser focal spot diameters. In this paper, the geometrical properties of coarse and fine powder particles under three-dimensional conditions were first calculated using DEM. Then, numerical simulation models for single-track and double-track cases in the single-layer HP-LPBF forming SS316L process were developed at mesoscopic scale using the CFD method. The flow genesis of the melt in the single-track and double-track molten pools is discussed, and their 3D morphology and dimensional characteristics are discussed. In addition, the effects of laser process parameters, powder particle size, and laser focal spot diameter on the temperature field, characterization information, and defects in the molten pool are discussed.

II. MODELING

A. 3D powder bed modeling

HP-LPBF is an advanced processing technique for preparing target parts layer by layer stacking, the process of which involves repetitive spreading and melting of powders. In this process, both the powder spreading and the morphology of the powder bed are closely related to the results of the subsequent melting process, while the melted surface also affects the uniform distribution of the next layer of powder. For this reason, this chapter focuses on the modeling of the physical action during the powder spreading process and the theory of DEM to establish the numerical model of the powder bed, so as to lay a solid foundation for the accuracy of volume of fluid (VOF) and CFD.

1. DEM

DEM is a numerical technique for calculating the interaction of a large number of particles, which calculates the forces and motions of the spheres by considering each powder sphere as an independent unit. The motion of the powder particles follows the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, including translational and rotational,38,68โ€“70 which are expressed as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+โˆ‘๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝij,

(1)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ=โˆ‘๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝijร—๏ฟฝij),

(2)

where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the mass of unit particle i in kg, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the advective acceleration in m/s2, And g is the gravitational acceleration in m/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the force in contact with the neighboring particle ๏ฟฝ in N. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the rotational inertia of the unit particle ๏ฟฝ in kg ยท m2. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝยจ is the unit particle ๏ฟฝ angular acceleration in rad/s2. ๏ฟฝij is the vector pointing from unit particle ๏ฟฝ to the contact point of neighboring particle ๏ฟฝโ .

Equations (1) and (2) can be used to calculate the velocity and angular velocity variations of powder particles to determine their positions and velocities. A three-dimensional powder bed model of SS316L was developed using DEM. The powder particles are assumed to be perfect spheres, and the substrate and walls are assumed to be rigid. To describe the contact between the powder particles and between the particles and the substrate, a non-slip Hertzโ€“Mindlin nonlinear spring-damping model71 was used with the following expression:๏ฟฝhz=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝijโˆ’๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ’(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝeff๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)],

(3)

where ๏ฟฝhz is the force calculated using the Hertzian in M. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the radius of unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ in m, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the overlap size of the two powder particles in m. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the elastic constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝij is the unit vector connecting the centerlines of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝeff is the effective mass of the two powder particles in kg. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the viscoelastic damping constants in the normal and tangential directions, respectively. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the components of the relative velocities of the two powder particles. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the displacement vector between two spherical particles. The schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles is shown in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of overlapping powder particles.

Because the particle size of the powder used for HP-LPBF is much smaller than 100โ€‰ฮผm, the effect of van der Waals forces must be considered. Therefore, the cohesive force ๏ฟฝjkr of the Hertzโ€“Mindlin model was used instead of van der Waals forces,72 with the following expression:๏ฟฝjkr=โˆ’4๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ1.5+4๏ฟฝ*3๏ฟฝ*๏ฟฝ3,

(4)1๏ฟฝ*=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(5)1๏ฟฝ*=1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,

(6)

where ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent Young’s modulus in GPa; ๏ฟฝ* is the equivalent particle radius in m; ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface energy of the powder particles in J/m2; ฮฑ is the contact radius in m; ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Young’s modulus of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, in GPa; and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are the Poisson’s ratio of the unit particles ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝโ , respectively.

2. Model building

Figure 2 shows a 3D powder bed model generated using DEM with a coarse powder geometry of 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰30โ€‰ฮผm3. The powder layer thickness is 30โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity is 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 31.7โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 15โ€“53โ€‰ฮผm. The geometry of the fine powder was 1000โ€‰ร—โ€‰400โ€‰ร—โ€‰20โ€‰ฮผm3, with a layer thickness of 20โ€‰ฮผm, and the powder bed porosity of 40%. The average particle size of this spherical powder is 11.5โ€‰ฮผm and is normally distributed in the range of 5โ€“25โ€‰ฮผm. After the 3D powder bed model is generated, it needs to be imported into the CFD simulation software for calculation, and the imported geometric model is shown in Fig. 3. This geometric model is mainly composed of three parts: protective gas, powder bed, and substrate. Under the premise of ensuring the accuracy of the calculation, the mesh size is set to 3โ€‰ฮผm, and the total number of coarse powder meshes is 1โ€‰704โ€‰940. The total number of fine powder meshes is 3โ€‰982โ€‰250.

FIG. 2.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Three-dimensional powder bed model: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

FIG. 3.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Geometric modeling of the powder bed computational domain: (a) coarse powder, (b) fine powder.

B. Modeling of fluid mechanics simulation

In order to solve the flow, melting, and solidification problems involved in HP-LPBF molten pool, the study must follow the three governing equations of conservation of mass, conservation of energy, and conservation of momentum.73 The VOF method, which is the most widely used in fluid dynamics, is used to solve the molten pool dynamics model.

1. VOF

VOF is a method for tracking the free interface between the gas and liquid phases on the molten pool surface. The core idea of the method is to define a volume fraction function F within each grid, indicating the proportion of the grid space occupied by the material, 0โ€‰โ‰คโ€‰Fโ€‰โ‰คโ€‰1 in Fig. 4. Specifically, when Fโ€‰=โ€‰0, the grid is empty and belongs to the gas-phase region; when Fโ€‰=โ€‰1, the grid is completely filled with material and belongs to the liquid-phase region; and when 0โ€‰<โ€‰Fโ€‰<โ€‰1, the grid contains free surfaces and belongs to the mixed region. The direction normal to the free surface is the direction of the fastest change in the volume fraction F (the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction), and the direction of the gradient of the volume fraction can be calculated from the values of the volume fractions in the neighboring grids.74 The equations controlling the VOF are expressed as follows:๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโ‹…(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0,

(7)

where t is the time in s and ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the liquid velocity in m/s.

FIG. 4.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of VOF.

The material parameters of the mixing zone are altered due to the inclusion of both the gas and liquid phases. Therefore, in order to represent the density of the mixing zone, the average density ๏ฟฝยฏ is used, which is expressed as follows:72๏ฟฝยฏ=(1โˆ’๏ฟฝ1)๏ฟฝgas+๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝmetal,

(8)

where ๏ฟฝ1 is the proportion of liquid phase, ๏ฟฝgas is the density of protective gas in kg/m3, and ๏ฟฝmetal is the density of metal in kg/m3.

2. Control equations and boundary conditions

Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the HP-LPBF melting process. First, the laser light strikes a localized area of the material and rapidly heats up the area. Next, the energy absorbed in the region is diffused through a variety of pathways (heat conduction, heat convection, and surface radiation), and this process triggers complex phase transition phenomena (melting, evaporation, and solidification). In metals undergoing melting, the driving forces include surface tension and the Marangoni effect, recoil due to evaporation, and buoyancy due to gravity and uneven density. The above physical phenomena interact with each other and do not occur independently.

FIG. 5.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of HP-LPBF melting process.

  1. Laser heat sourceThe Gaussian surface heat source model is used as the laser heat source model with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=2๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2exp(โˆ’2๏ฟฝ12๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2),(9)where ๏ฟฝ is the heat flow density in W/m2, ๏ฟฝ0 is the absorption rate of SS316L, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the radius of the laser focal spot in m, and ๏ฟฝ1 is the radial distance from the center of the laser focal spot in m. The laser focal spot can be used for a wide range of applications.
  2. Energy absorptionThe formula for calculating the laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 of SS316L is as follows:๏ฟฝ0=0.365(๏ฟฝ0[1+๏ฟฝ0(๏ฟฝโˆ’20)]/๏ฟฝ)0.5,(10)where ๏ฟฝ0 is the direct current resistivity of SS316L at 20โ€‰ยฐC in ฮฉ m, ๏ฟฝ0 is the resistance temperature coefficient in ppm/ยฐC, ๏ฟฝ is the temperature in ยฐC, and ๏ฟฝ is the laser wavelength in m.
  3. Heat transferThe basic principle of heat transfer is conservation of energy, which is expressed as follows:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(11)where ๏ฟฝ is the density of liquid phase SS316L in kg/m3, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the specific heat capacity of SS316L in J/(kg K), ๐›ป๏ฟฝ is the gradient operator, t is the time in s, T is the temperature in K, ๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the temperature gradient, ๏ฟฝโ†’ is the velocity vector, ๏ฟฝ0 is the coefficient of thermal conduction of SS316L in W/(m K), and โ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the thermal energy dissipation term in the molten pool.
  4. Molten pool flowThe following three conditions need to be satisfied for the molten pool to flow:
    • Conservation of mass with the following expression:๐›ป๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)=0.(12)
    • Conservation of momentum (Navierโ€“Stokes equation) with the following expression:๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๐›ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโ†’ยท๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝโ†’=๏ฟฝยท[โˆ’pI+๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’+(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ†’)๏ฟฝ)]+๏ฟฝ,(13)where ๏ฟฝ is the pressure in Pa exerted on the liquid phase SS316L microelement, ๏ฟฝ is the unit matrix, ๏ฟฝ is the fluid viscosity in N s/m2, and ๏ฟฝ is the volumetric force (gravity, atmospheric pressure, surface tension, vapor recoil, and the Marangoni effect).
    • Conservation of energy, see Eq. (11)
  5. Surface tension and the Marangoni effectThe effect of temperature on the surface tension coefficient is considered and set as a linear relationship with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝdT(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),(14)where ๏ฟฝ is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature T in N/m, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the melting temperature of SS316L in K, ๏ฟฝ0 is the surface tension of the molten pool at temperature ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ in Pa, and ฯƒdฯƒ/ dT is the surface tension temperature coefficient in N/(m K).In general, surface tension decreases with increasing temperature. A temperature gradient causes a gradient in surface tension that drives the liquid to flow, known as the Marangoni effect.
  6. Metal vapor recoilAt higher input energy densities, the maximum temperature of the molten pool surface reaches the evaporation temperature of the material, and a gasification recoil pressure occurs vertically downward toward the molten pool surface, which will be the dominant driving force for the molten pool flow.75 The expression is as follows:๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=0.54๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ€‰expโ€‰๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(15)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the gasification recoil pressure in Pa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the ambient pressure in kPa, ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of evaporation in J/kg, ๏ฟฝ0 is the gas constant in J/(mol K), T is the surface temperature of the molten pool in K, and Te is the evaporation temperature in K.
  7. Solidโ€“liquidโ€“gas phase transitionWhen the laser hits the powder layer, the powder goes through three stages: heating, melting, and solidification. During the solidification phase, mutual transformations between solid, liquid, and gaseous states occur. At this point, the latent heat of phase transition absorbed or released during the phase transition needs to be considered.68 The phase transition is represented based on the relationship between energy and temperature with the following expression:๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ),๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ,(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ),,(16)where ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ are solid and liquid phase density, respectively, of SS316L in kg/m3. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ unit volume of solid and liquid phase-specific heat capacity, respectively, of SS316L in J/(kg K). ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ and ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , respectively, are the solidification temperature and melting temperature of SS316L in K. ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ is the latent heat of the phase transition of SS316L melting in J/kg.

3. Assumptions

The CFD model was computed using the commercial software package FLOW-3D.76 In order to simplify the calculation and solution process while ensuring the accuracy of the results, the model makes the following assumptions:

  1. It is assumed that the effects of thermal stress and material solid-phase thermal expansion on the calculation results are negligible.
  2. The molten pool flow is assumed to be a Newtonian incompressible laminar flow, while the effects of liquid thermal expansion and density on the results are neglected.
  3. It is assumed that the surface tension can be simplified to an equivalent pressure acting on the free surface of the molten pool, and the effect of chemical composition on the results is negligible.
  4. Neglecting the effect of the gas flow field on the molten pool.
  5. The mass loss due to evaporation of the liquid metal is not considered.
  6. The influence of the plasma effect of the molten metal on the calculation results is neglected.

It is worth noting that the formulation of assumptions requires a trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. In the above models, some physical phenomena that have a small effect or high difficulty on the calculation results are simplified or ignored. Such simplifications make numerical simulations more efficient and computationally tractable, while still yielding accurate results.

4. Initial conditions

The preheating temperature of the substrate was set to 393โ€‰K, at which time all materials were in the solid state and the flow rate was zero.

5. Material parameters

The material used is SS316L and the relevant parameters required for numerical simulations are shown in Table I.46,77,78

TABLE I.

SS316L-related parameters.

PropertySymbolValue
Density of solid metal (kg/m3๏ฟฝmetal 7980 
Solid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1658 
Liquid phase line temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 1723 
Vaporization temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 3090 
Latent heat of melting (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 2.60ร—105 
Latent heat of evaporation (โ  J/kgโ ) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 7.45ร—106 
Surface tension of liquid phase (N /mโ ) ๏ฟฝ 1.60 
Liquid metal viscosity (kg/m s) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 6ร—10โˆ’3 
Gaseous metal viscosity (kg/mโ€‰s) ๏ฟฝgas 1.85ร—10โˆ’5 
Temperature coefficient of surface tension (N/m K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝT 0.80ร—10โˆ’3 
Molar mass (โ  kg/molโ ) 0.05โ€‰593 
Emissivity ๏ฟฝ 0.26 
Laser absorption ๏ฟฝ0 0.35 
Ambient pressure (kPa) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 101โ€‰325 
Ambient temperature (K) ๏ฟฝ0 300 
Stefanโ€“Boltzmann constant (W/m2 K4๏ฟฝ 5.67ร—10โˆ’8 
Thermal conductivity of metals (โ  W/mโ€‰Kโ ) ๏ฟฝ 24.55 
Density of protective gas (kg/m3๏ฟฝgas 1.25 
Coefficient of thermal expansion (/K) ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ 16ร—10โˆ’6 
Generalized gas constant (โ  J/molโ€‰Kโ ) 8.314 

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

With the objective of studying in depth the evolutionary patterns of single-track and double-track molten pool development, detailed observations were made for certain specific locations in the model, as shown in Fig. 6. In this figure, P1 and P2 represent the longitudinal tangents to the centers of the two melt tracks in the XZ plane, while L1 is the transverse profile in the YZ plane. The scanning direction is positive and negative along the X axis. Points A and B are the locations of the centers of the molten pool of the first and second melt tracks, respectively (xโ€‰=โ€‰1.995โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’4, yโ€‰=โ€‰5โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’7, and zโ€‰=โ€‰โˆ’4.85โ€‰ร—โ€‰10โˆ’5).

FIG. 6.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic diagram of observation position.

A. Single-track simulation

A series of single-track molten pool simulation experiments were carried out in order to investigate the influence law of laser power as well as scanning speed on the HP-LPBF process. Figure 7 demonstrates the evolution of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the single-track molten pool in the time period of 50โ€“500โ€‰ฮผs under a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The powder bed is in the natural cooling state. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the powder is heated by the laser heat and rapidly melts and settles to form the initial molten pool. This process is accompanied by partial melting of the substrate and solidification together with the melted powder. The molten pool rapidly expands with increasing width, depth, length, and temperature, as shown in Fig. 7(a). When tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands more obviously, and the temperature starts to transfer to the surrounding area, forming a heat-affected zone. At this point, the width of the molten pool tends to stabilize, and the temperature in the center of the molten pool has reached its peak and remains largely stable. However, the phenomenon of molten pool spatter was also observed in this process, as shown in Fig. 7(b). As time advances, when tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, solidification begins to occur at the tail of the molten pool, and tiny ripples are produced on the solidified surface. This is due to the fact that the melt flows toward the region with large temperature gradient under the influence of Marangoni convection and solidifies together with the melt at the end of the bath. At this point, the temperature gradient at the front of the bath is significantly larger than at the end. While the width of the molten pool was gradually reduced, the shape of the molten pool was gradually changed to a โ€œcometโ€ shape. In addition, a slight depression was observed at the top of the bath because the peak temperature at the surface of the bath reached the evaporation temperature, which resulted in a recoil pressure perpendicular to the surface of the bath downward, creating a depressed region. As the laser focal spot moves and is paired with the Marangoni convection of the melt, these recessed areas will be filled in as shown in Fig. 7(c). It has been shown that the depressed regions are the result of the coupled effect of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension.79 By tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the width and height of the molten pool stabilize and show a โ€œcometโ€ shape in Fig. 7(d).

FIG. 7.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Single-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

Figure 8 depicts the velocity vector diagram of the P1 profile in a single-track molten pool, the length of the arrows represents the magnitude of the velocity, and the maximum velocity is about 2.36โ€‰m/s. When tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool takes shape, and the velocities at the two ends of the pool are the largest. The variation of the velocities at the front end is especially more significant in Fig. 8(a). As the time advances to tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ฮผs, the molten pool expands rapidly, in which the velocity at the tail increases and changes more significantly, while the velocity at the front is relatively small. At this stage, the melt moves backward from the center of the molten pool, which in turn expands the molten pool area. The melt at the back end of the molten pool center flows backward along the edge of the molten pool surface and then converges along the edge of the molten pool to the bottom center, rising to form a closed loop. Similarly, a similar closed loop is formed at the front end of the center of the bath, but with a shorter path. However, a large portion of the melt in the center of the closed loop formed at the front end of the bath is in a nearly stationary state. The main cause of this melt flow phenomenon is the effect of temperature gradient and surface tension (the Marangoni effect), as shown in Figs. 8(b) and 8(e). This dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ pool. At tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the tendency of the above two melt flows to close the loop is more prominent and faster in Fig. 8(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the velocity vector of the molten pool shows a stable trend, and the closed loop of melt flow also remains stable. With the gradual laser focal spot movement, the melt is gradually solidified at its tail, and finally, a continuous and stable single track is formed in Fig. 8(d).

FIG. 8.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of single-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) molten pool flow.

In order to explore in depth the transient evolution of the molten pool, the evolution of the single-track temperature field and the melt flow was monitored in the YZ cross section. Figure 9(a) shows the state of the powder bed at the initial moment. When tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ฮผs, the laser focal spot acts on the powder bed and the powder starts to melt and gradually collects in the molten pool. At this time, the substrate will also start to melt, and the melt flow mainly moves in the downward and outward directions and the velocity is maximum at the edges in Fig. 9(b). When tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool increase due to the recoil pressure. At this time, the melt flows more slowly at the center, but the direction of motion is still downward in Fig. 9(c). When tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ฮผs, the width and depth of the molten pool further increase, at which time the intensity of the melt flow reaches its peak and the direction of motion remains the same in Fig. 9(d). When tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ฮผs, the melt starts to move upward, and the surrounding powder or molten material gradually fills up, causing the surface of the molten pool to begin to flatten. At this time, the maximum velocity of the melt is at the center of the bath, while the velocity at the edge is close to zero, and the edge of the melt starts to solidify in Fig. 9(e). When tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ฮผs, the melt continues to move upward, forming a convex surface of the melt track. However, the melt movement slows down, as shown in Fig. 9(f). When tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ฮผs, the melt further moves upward and its speed gradually becomes smaller. At the same time, the melt solidifies further, as shown in Fig. 9(g). When tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ฮผs, the melt track is basically formed into a single track with a similar โ€œmountainโ€ shape. At this stage, the velocity is close to zero only at the center of the molten pool, and the flow behavior of the melt is poor in Fig. 9(h). At tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ฮผs, the melt stops moving and solidification is rapidly completed. Up to this point, a single track is formed in Fig. 9(i). During the laser action on the powder bed, the substrate melts and combines with the molten state powder. The powder-to-powder fusion is like the convergence of water droplets, which are rapidly fused by surface tension. However, the fusion between the molten state powder and the substrate occurs driven by surface tension, and the molten powder around the molten pool is pulled toward the substrate (a wetting effect occurs), which ultimately results in the formation of a monolithic whole.38,80,81

FIG. 9.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of single-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰0โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

The wetting ability between the liquid metal and the solid substrate in the molten pool directly affects the degree of balling of the melt,82,83 and the wetting ability can be measured by the contact angle of a single track in Fig. 10. A smaller value of contact angle represents better wettability. The contact angle ฮฑ can be calculated by๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ1โˆ’๏ฟฝ22,

(17)

where ๏ฟฝ1 and ๏ฟฝ2 are the contact angles of the left and right regions, respectively.

FIG. 10.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Schematic of contact angle.

Relevant studies have confirmed that the wettability is better at a contact angle ฮฑ around or below 40ยฐ.84 After measurement, a single-track contact angle ฮฑ of about 33ยฐ was obtained under this process parameter, which further confirms the good wettability.

B. Double-track simulation

In order to deeply investigate the influence of hatch spacing on the characteristics of the HP-LPBF process, a series of double-track molten pool simulation experiments were systematically carried out. Figure 11 shows in detail the dynamic changes of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool in the time period of 2050โ€“2500โ€‰ฮผs under the conditions of laser power of 100โ€‰W, scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. By comparing the study with Fig. 7, it is observed that the basic characteristics of the 3D morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track. However, there are subtle differences between them. The first track exhibits a basically symmetric shape, but the second track morphology shows a slight deviation influenced by the difference in thermal diffusion rate between the solidified metal and the powder. Otherwise, the other characteristic information is almost the same as that of the first track. Figure 12 shows the velocity vector plot of the P2 profile in the double-track molten pool, with a maximum velocity of about 2.63โ€‰m/s. The melt dynamics at both ends of the pool are more stable at tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ฮผs, where the maximum rate of the second track is only 1/3 of that of the first one. Other than that, the rest of the information is almost no significant difference from the characteristic information of the first track. Figure 13 demonstrates a detailed observation of the double-track temperature field and melts flow in the YZ cross section, and a comparative study with Fig. 9 reveals that the width of the second track is slightly wider. In addition, after the melt direction shifts from bottom to top, the first track undergoes four time periods (50โ€‰ฮผs) to reach full solidification, while the second track takes five time periods. This is due to the presence of significant heat buildup in the powder bed after the forming of the first track, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt and an increased molten pool lifetime. In conclusion, the level of specimen forming can be significantly optimized by adjusting the laser power and hatch spacing.

FIG. 11.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool process: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 12.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Vector plot of double-track molten pool velocity in XZ longitudinal section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2050โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2150โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

FIG. 13.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Evolution of double-track molten pool temperature and melt flow in the YZ cross section: (a) tโ€‰=โ€‰2250โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (b) tโ€‰=โ€‰2300โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (c) tโ€‰=โ€‰2350โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (d) tโ€‰=โ€‰2400โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (e) tโ€‰=โ€‰2450โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (f) tโ€‰=โ€‰2500โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (g) tโ€‰=โ€‰2550โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (h) tโ€‰=โ€‰2600โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ , (i) tโ€‰=โ€‰2650โ€‰ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ .

In order to quantitatively detect the molten pool dimensions as well as the remolten region dimensions, the molten pool characterization information in Fig. 14 is constructed by drawing the boundary on the YZ cross section based on the isothermal surface of the liquid phase line. It can be observed that the heights of the first track and second track are basically the same, but the depth of the second track increases relative to the first track. The molten pool width is mainly positively correlated with the laser power as well as the scanning speed (the laser line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ). However, the remelted zone width is negatively correlated with the hatch spacing (the overlapping ratio). Overall, the forming quality of the specimens can be directly influenced by adjusting the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing.

FIG. 14.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Double-track molten pool characterization information on YZ cross section.

In order to study the variation rule of the temperature in the center of the molten pool with time, Fig. 15 demonstrates the temperature variation curves with time for two reference points, A and B. Among them, the red dotted line indicates the liquid phase line temperature of SS316L. From the figure, it can be seen that the maximum temperature at the center of the molten pool in the first track is lower than that in the second track, which is mainly due to the heat accumulation generated after passing through the first track. The maximum temperature gradient was calculated to be 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s. When the laser scanned the first track, the temperature in the center of the molten pool of the second track increased slightly. Similarly, when the laser scanned the second track, a similar situation existed in the first track. Since the temperature gradient in the second track is larger than that in the first track, the residence time of the liquid phase in the molten pool of the first track is longer than that of the second track.

FIG. 15.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Temperature profiles as a function of time for two reference points A and B.

C. Simulation analysis of molten pool under different process parameters

In order to deeply investigate the effects of various process parameters on the mesoscopic-scale temperature field, molten pool characteristic information and defects of HP-LPBF, numerical simulation experiments on mesoscopic-scale laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing of double-track molten pools were carried out.

1. Laser power

Figure 16 shows the effects of different laser power on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. When Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, a smaller molten pool is formed due to the lower heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time. This leads to a smaller track width, which results in adjacent track not lapping properly and the presence of a large number of unmelted powder particles, resulting in an increase in the number of defects, such as pores in the specimen. The surface of the track is relatively flat, and the depth is small. In addition, the temperature gradient before and after the molten pool was large, and the depression location appeared at the biased front end in Fig. 16(a). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, the surface of the track is flat and smooth with excellent lap. Due to the Marangoni effect, the velocity field of the molten pool is in the form of โ€œvortex,โ€ and the melt has good fluidity, and the maximum velocity reaches 2.15โ€‰m/s in Fig. 16(b). When Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W, the heat generated by the Gaussian light source per unit time is too large, resulting in the melt rapidly reaching the evaporation temperature, generating a huge recoil pressure, forming a large molten pool, and the surface of the track is obviously raised. The melt movement is intense, especially the closed loop at the center end of the molten pool. At this time, the depth and width of the molten pool are large, leading to the expansion of the remolten region and the increased chance of the appearance of porosity defects in Fig. 16(c). The results show that at low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool is dominant. At high laser power, recoil pressure is its main role.

FIG. 16.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different laser powers: (a) Pโ€‰=โ€‰50โ€‰W, (b) Pโ€‰=โ€‰100โ€‰W, (c) Pโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰W.

Table II shows the effect of different laser powers on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool at a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. The negative overlapping ratio in the table indicates that the melt tracks are not lapped, and 26/29 indicates the melt depth of the first track/second track. It can be seen that with the increase in laser power, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, and remelted zone show a gradual increase. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also increases. Especially in the process of laser power from 50 to 200โ€‰W, the melting depth and melting width increased the most, which increased nearly 2 and 1.5 times, respectively. Meanwhile, the overlapping ratio also increases with the increase in laser power, which indicates that the melting and fusion of materials are better at high laser power. On the other hand, the dimensions of the molten pool did not change uniformly with the change of laser power. Specifically, the depth-to-width ratio of the molten pool increased from about 0.30 to 0.39 during the increase from 50 to 120โ€‰W, which further indicates that the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is greater than that in the horizontal direction with the increase in laser power. This dimensional response to laser power is mainly affected by the recoil pressure and also by the difference in the densification degree between the powder layer and the metal substrate. In addition, according to the experimental results, the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then decrease during the process of laser power increase, and always stays within the range of less than 33ยฐ. Therefore, in practical applications, it is necessary to select the appropriate laser power according to the specific needs in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE II.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different laser powers.

Laser power (W)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
50 16 54 11 โˆ’10 23 
100 26/29 74 14 18 23.33 33 
200 37/45 116 21 52 93.33 28 

2. Scanning speed

Figure 17 demonstrates the effect of different scanning speeds on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool at a laser power of 100โ€‰W and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. With the gradual increase in scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. When ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, the slow scanning speed causes the material to absorb too much heat, which is very easy to trigger the overburning phenomenon. At this point, the molten pool is larger and the surface morphology is uneven. This situation is consistent with the previously discussed scenario with high laser power in Fig. 17(a). However, when ๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s, the scanning speed is too fast, resulting in the material not being able to absorb sufficient heat, which triggers the powder particles that fail to melt completely to have a direct effect on the bonding of the melt to the substrate. At this time, the molten pool volume is relatively small and the neighboring melt track cannot lap properly. This result is consistent with the previously discussed case of low laser power in Fig. 17(b). Overall, the ratio of the laser power to the scanning speed (the line energy density ๏ฟฝโ ) has a direct effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 17.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different scanning speed: (a) โ€‰๏ฟฝโ€‰=โ€‰200โ€‰mm/s, (b) โ€‰๏ฟฝ =โ€‰1600โ€‰mm/s.

Table III shows the effects of different scanning speed on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. It can be seen that the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. With the increase in scanning speed, the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remelted zone, and overlapping ratio show a gradual decreasing trend. Among them, the melt depth and melt width decreased faster, while the melt height and remolten region decreased relatively slowly. In addition, when the scanning speed was increased from 200 to 800โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were significantly accelerated, while the decreasing speeds of overlapping ratio were relatively slow. When the scanning speed was further increased to 1600โ€‰mm/s, the decreasing speeds of melt depth and melt width were further accelerated, and the un-lapped condition of the melt channel also appeared. In addition, the contact angle increases and then decreases with the scanning speed, and both are lower than 33ยฐ. Therefore, when selecting the scanning speed, it is necessary to make reasonable trade-offs according to the specific situation, and take into account the factors of melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio, in order to achieve the best processing results.

TABLE III.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different scanning speeds.

Scanning speed (mm/s)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
200 55/68 182 19/32 124 203.33 22 
1600 13 50 11 โˆ’16.67 31 

3. Hatch spacing

Figure 18 shows the effect of different hatch spacing on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. The surface morphology and temperature field of the first track and second track are basically the same, but slightly different. The first track shows a basically symmetric morphology along the scanning direction, while the second track shows a slight offset due to the difference in the heat transfer rate between the solidified material and the powder particles. When the hatch spacing is too small, the overlapping ratio increases and the probability of defects caused by remelting phenomenon grows. When the hatch spacing is too large, the neighboring melt track cannot overlap properly, and the powder particles are not completely melted, leading to an increase in the number of holes. In conclusion, the ratio of the line energy density ๏ฟฝ to the hatch spacing (the volume energy density E) has a significant effect on the temperature field and surface morphology of the molten pool.

FIG. 18.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool under different hatch spacings: (a) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.03โ€‰mm, (b) Hโ€‰=โ€‰0.12โ€‰mm.

Table IV shows the effects of different hatch spacing on the characteristic information of the double-track molten pool under the condition of laser power of 100โ€‰W and scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s. It can be seen that the hatch spacing has little effect on the melt depth, melt width, and melt height, but has some effect on the remolten region. With the gradual expansion of hatch spacing, the remolten region shows a gradual decrease. At the same time, the overlapping ratio also decreased with the increase in hatch spacing. In addition, it is observed that the contact angle shows a tendency to increase and then remain stable when the hatch spacing increases, which has a more limited effect on it. Therefore, trade-offs and decisions need to be made on a case-by-case basis when selecting the hatch spacing.

TABLE IV.

Double-track molten pool characterization information at different hatch spacings.

Hatch spacing (mm)Depth (ฮผm)Width (ฮผm)Height (ฮผm)Remolten region (ฮผm)Overlapping ratio (%)Contact angle (ยฐ)
0.03 25/27 82 14 59 173.33 30 
0.12 26 78 14 โˆ’35 33 

In summary, the laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing have a significant effect on the formation of the molten pool, and the correct selection of these three process parameters is crucial to ensure the forming quality. In addition, the melt depth of the second track is slightly larger than that of the first track at higher line energy density ๏ฟฝ and volume energy density E. This is mainly due to the fact that a large amount of heat accumulation is generated after the first track, forming a larger molten pool volume, which leads to an increase in the melt depth.

D. Simulation analysis of molten pool with powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter

Figure 19 demonstrates the effect of different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters on the morphology and temperature field of the double-track molten pool under a laser power of 100โ€‰W, a scanning speed of 800โ€‰mm/s, and a hatch spacing of 0.06โ€‰mm. In the process of melting coarse powder with small laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy cannot completely melt the larger powder particles, resulting in their partial melting and further generating excessive pore defects. The larger powder particles tend to generate zigzag molten pool edges, which cause an increase in the roughness of the melt track surface. In addition, the molten pool is also prone to generate the present spatter phenomenon, which can directly affect the quality of forming. The volume of the formed molten pool is relatively small, while the melt depth, melt width, and melt height are all smaller relative to the fine powder in Fig. 19(a). In the process of melting fine powders with a large laser focal spot diameter, the laser energy is able to melt the fine powder particles sufficiently, even to the point of overmelting. This results in a large number of fine spatters being generated at the edge of the molten pool, which causes porosity defects in the melt track in Fig. 19(b). In addition, the maximum velocity of the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes compared to small powder particle sizes, which indicates that the temperature gradient in the molten pool is larger for large powder particle sizes and the melt motion is more intense. However, the size of the laser focal spot diameter has a relatively small effect on the melt motion. However, a larger focal spot diameter induces a larger melt volume with greater depth, width, and height. In conclusion, a small powder size helps to reduce the surface roughness of the specimen, and a small laser spot diameter reduces the minimum forming size of a single track.

FIG. 19.

VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Simulation results of double-track molten pool with different powder particle size and laser focal spot diameter: (a) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰25โ€‰ฮผm, coarse powder, (b) focal spotโ€‰=โ€‰80โ€‰ฮผm, fine powder.

Table V shows the maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder sizes and laser focal spot diameters. As can be seen from the table, the maximum temperature gradient is lower than that of HP-LPBF for both coarse powders with a small laser spot diameter and fine powders with a large spot diameter, a phenomenon that leads to an increase in the heat transfer rate of HP-LPBF, which in turn leads to a corresponding increase in the cooling rate and, ultimately, to the formation of finer microstructures.

TABLE V.

Maximum temperature gradient at the reference point for different powder particle sizes and laser focal spot diameters.

Laser power (W)Scanning speed (mm/s)Hatch spacing (mm)Average powder size (ฮผm)Laser focal spot diameter (ฮผm)Maximum temperature gradient (ร—107โ€‰K/s)
100 800 0.06 31.7 25 7.89 
11.5 80 7.11 

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the geometrical characteristics of 3D coarse and fine powder particles were first calculated using DEM and then numerical simulations of single track and double track in the process of forming SS316L from monolayer HP-LPBF at mesoscopic scale were developed using CFD method. The effects of Marangoni convection, surface tension, recoil pressure, gravity, thermal convection, thermal radiation, and evaporative heat dissipation on the heat and mass transfer in the molten pool were considered in this model. The effects of laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing on the dynamics of the single-track and double-track molten pools, as well as on other characteristic information, were investigated. The effects of the powder particle size on the molten pool were investigated comparatively with the laser focal spot diameter. The main conclusions are as follows:

  1. The results show that the temperature gradient at the front of the molten pool is significantly larger than that at the tail, and the molten pool exhibits a โ€œcometโ€ morphology. At the top of the molten pool, there is a slightly concave region, which is the result of the coupling of Marangoni convection, recoil pressure, and surface tension. The melt flow forms two closed loops, which are mainly influenced by temperature gradients and surface tension. This special dynamic behavior of the melt tends to form an โ€œellipticalโ€ molten pool and an almost โ€œmountainโ€ shape in single-track forming.
  2. The basic characteristics of the three-dimensional morphology and temperature field of the second track are similar to those of the first track, but there are subtle differences. The first track exhibits a basically symmetrical shape; however, due to the difference in thermal diffusion rates between the solidified metal and the powder, a slight asymmetry in the molten pool morphology of the second track occurs. After forming through the first track, there is a significant heat buildup in the powder bed, resulting in a longer dynamic time of the melt, which increases the life of the molten pool. The heights of the first track and second track remained essentially the same, but the depth of the second track was greater relative to the first track. In addition, the maximum temperature gradient was 1.69โ€‰ร—โ€‰108โ€‰K/s during HP-LPBF forming.
  3. At low laser power, the surface tension in the molten pool plays a dominant role. At high laser power, recoil pressure becomes the main influencing factor. With the increase of laser power, the effective heat transfer in the vertical direction is superior to that in the horizontal direction. With the gradual increase of scanning speed, the surface morphology of the molten pool evolves from circular to elliptical. In addition, the scanning speed has a significant effect on the melt depth, melt width, melt height, remolten region, and overlapping ratio. Too large or too small hatch spacing will lead to remelting or non-lap phenomenon, which in turn causes the formation of defects.
  4. When using a small laser focal spot diameter, it is difficult to completely melt large powder particle sizes, resulting in partial melting and excessive porosity generation. At the same time, large powder particles produce curved edges of the molten pool, resulting in increased surface roughness of the melt track. In addition, spatter occurs, which directly affects the forming quality. At small focal spot diameters, the molten pool volume is relatively small, and the melt depth, the melt width, and the melt height are correspondingly small. Taken together, the small powder particle size helps to reduce surface roughness, while the small spot diameter reduces the forming size.

REFERENCES

  1. S. L. Sing and W. Y. Yeong , โ€œ Laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing: Perspectives on recent developments,โ€ Virtual Phys. Prototyping. 15, 359โ€“370 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1779999
    Google ScholarCrossref
  2. A. M. Khorasani , I. G. Jithin , J. K. Veetil , and A. H. Ghasemi , โ€œ A review of technological improvements in laser-based powder bed fusion of metal printers,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108, 191โ€“209 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05361-3
    Google ScholarCrossref
  3. Y. Qin , A. Brockett , Y. Ma , A. Razali , J. Zhao , C. Harrison , W. Pan , X. Dai , and D. Loziak , โ€œ Micro-manufacturing: Research, technology outcomes and development issues,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47, 821โ€“837 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2411-2
    Google ScholarCrossref
  4. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Development of micro selective laser melting: The state of the art and future perspectives,โ€ Engineering. 5, 702โ€“720 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  5. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , J. Xu , and W. Zhou , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of SS316L: Single tracks, defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 145, 107469 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107469
    Google ScholarCrossref
  6. Y. Wei , G. Chen , W. Li , M. Li , Y. Zhou , Z. Nie , and J. Xu , โ€œ Process optimization of micro selective laser melting and comparison of different laser diameter for forming different powder,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 150, 107953 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107953
    Google ScholarCrossref
  7. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Formation of SS316L single tracks in micro selective laser melting: Surface, geometry, and defects,โ€ Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 9451406.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9451406
    Crossref
  8. B. Nagarajan , Z. Hu , S. Gao , X. Song , R. Huang , M. Seita , and J. Wei , โ€œ Effect of in-situ laser remelting on the microstructure of SS316L fabricated by micro selective laser melting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 330โ€“336.
    Google ScholarCrossref
  9. H. Zhiheng , B. Nagarajan , X. Song , R. Huang , W. Zhai , and J. Wei , โ€œ Tailoring surface roughness of micro selective laser melted SS316L by in-situ laser remelting,โ€ in Advanced Surface Enhancement, edited by Sho Itoh and Shashwat Shukla , Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ( Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 337โ€“343.
    Google Scholar
  10. J. Fu , Z. Hu , X. Song , W. Zhai , Y. Long , H. Li , and M. Fu , โ€œ Micro selective laser melting of NiTi shape memory alloy: Defects, microstructures and thermal/mechanical properties,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 131, 106374 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106374
    Google ScholarCrossref
  11. E. Abele and M. Kniepkamp , โ€œ Analysis and optimisation of vertical surface roughness in micro selective laser melting,โ€ Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 3, 034007 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/3/3/034007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  12. S. Qu , J. Ding , J. Fu , M. Fu , B. Zhang , and X. Song , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion processing of pure copper,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 48, 102417 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102417
    Google ScholarCrossref
  13. Y. Wei , G. Chen , M. Li , W. Li , Y. Zhou , J. Xu , and Z. wei , โ€œ High-precision laser powder bed fusion of 18Ni300 maraging steel and its SiC reinforcement composite materials,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 84, 750โ€“763 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.049
    Google ScholarCrossref
  14. B. Liu , R. Wildman , T. Christopher , I. Ashcroft , and H. Richard , โ€œ Investigation the effect of particle size distribution on processing parameters optimisation in selective laser melting process,โ€ in 2011 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium ( University of Texas at Austin, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  15. T. D. McLouth , G. E. Bean , D. B. Witkin , S. D. Sitzman , P. M. Adams , D. N. Patel , W. Park , J.-M. Yang , and R. J. Zaldivar , โ€œ The effect of laser focus shift on microstructural variation of Inconel 718 produced by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 149, 205โ€“213 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.019
    Google ScholarCrossref
  16. Y. Qian , Y. Wentao , and L. Feng , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulations of powder bed fusion: Research progresses and conditions,โ€ Electromachining Mould 06, 46โ€“52 (2017).https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-279X.2017.06.012
    Google Scholar
  17. J. Fu , S. Qu , J. Ding , X. Song , and M. W. Fu , โ€œ Comparison of the microstructure, mechanical properties and distortion of stainless Steel 316L fabricated by micro and conventional laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Addit. Manuf. 44, 102067 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  18. N. T. Aboulkhair , I. Maskery , C. Tuck , I. Ashcroft , and N. M. Everitt , โ€œ The microstructure and mechanical properties of selectively laser Melted AlSi10Mg: The effect of a conventional T6-like heat treatment,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 667, 139โ€“146 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.092
    Google ScholarCrossref
  19. S. Y. Chen , J. C. Huang , C. T. Pan , C. H. Lin , T. L. Yang , Y. S. Huang , C. H. Ou , L. Y. Chen , D. Y. Lin , H. K. Lin , T. H. Li , J. S. C. Jang , and C. C. Yang , โ€œ Microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cell porous Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by selective laser melting,โ€ J. Alloys Compd. 713, 248โ€“254 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.190
    Google ScholarCrossref
  20. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , D. Wang , and M. Zhang , โ€œ Influence mechanism of parameters process and mechanical properties evolution mechanism of Maraging steel 300 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 703, 116โ€“123 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.033
    Google ScholarCrossref
  21. Y. Bai , Y. Yang , Z. Xiao , M. Zhang , and D. Wang , โ€œ Process optimization and mechanical property evolution of AlSiMg0.75 by selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 140, 257โ€“266 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.045
    Google ScholarCrossref
  22. Y. Liu , M. Zhang , W. Shi , Y. Ma , and J. Yang , โ€œ Study on performance optimization of 316L stainless steel parts by high-efficiency selective laser melting,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 138, 106872 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106872
    Google ScholarCrossref
  23. D. Gu , Y.-C. Hagedorn , W. Meiners , G. Meng , R. J. S. Batista , K. Wissenbach , and R. Poprawe , โ€œ Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and wear performance of selective laser melting processed commercially pure titanium,โ€ Acta Mater. 60, 3849โ€“3860 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.006
    Google ScholarCrossref
  24. N. Read , W. Wang , K. Essa , and M. M. Attallah , โ€œ Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: Process optimisation and mechanical properties development,โ€ Mater. Des. 65, 417โ€“424 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  25. I. A. Roberts , C. J. Wang , R. Esterlein , M. Stanford , and D. J. Mynors , โ€œ A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49(12โ€“13), 916โ€“923 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.07.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  26. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Finite element analysis of the effect of volume shrinkage during laser densification,โ€ Acta Mater. 53(18), 4743โ€“4754 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.014
    Google ScholarCrossref
  27. K. Carolin , E. Attar , and P. Heinl , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(6), 978โ€“987 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016
    Google ScholarCrossref
  28. F.-J. Gรผrtler , M. Karg , K.-H. Leitz , and M. Schmidt , โ€œ Simulation of laser beam melting of steel powders using the three-dimensional volume of fluid method,โ€ Phys. Procedia 41, 881โ€“886 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.162
    Google ScholarCrossref
  29. P. Meakin and R. Jullien , โ€œ Restructuring effects in the rain model for random deposition,โ€ J. Phys. France 48(10), 1651โ€“1662 (1987).https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198700480100165100
    Google ScholarCrossref
  30. J-m Wang , G-h Liu , Y-l Fang , and W-k Li , โ€œ Marangoni effect in nonequilibrium multiphase system of material processing,โ€ Rev. Chem. Eng. 32(5), 551โ€“585 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2015-0067
    Google ScholarCrossref
  31. W. Ye , S. Zhang , L. L. Mendez , M. Farias , J. Li , B. Xu , P. Li , and Y. Zhang , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the melting and alloying processes of elemental titanium and boron powders using selective laser alloying,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 64, 1235โ€“1247 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.044
    Google ScholarCrossref
  32. U. S. Bertoli , A. J. Wolfer , M. J. Matthews , J.-P. R. Delplanque , and J. M. Schoenung , โ€œ On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 113, 331โ€“340 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037
    Google ScholarCrossref
  33. W. E. King , H. D. Barth , V. M. Castillo , G. F. Gallegos , J. W. Gibbs , D. E. Hahn , C. Kamath , and A. M. Rubenchik , โ€œ Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(12), 2915โ€“2925 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  34. L. Cao , โ€œ Numerical simulation of the impact of laying powder on selective laser melting single-pass formation,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 141, 1036โ€“1048 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  35. L. Huang , X. Hua , D. Wu , and F. Li , โ€œ Numerical study of keyhole instability and porosity formation mechanism in laser welding of aluminum alloy and steel,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 252, 421โ€“431 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.011
    Google ScholarCrossref
  36. K. Q. Le , C. Tang , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ On the study of keyhole-mode melting in selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Therm. Sci. 145, 105992 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.105992
    Google ScholarCrossref
  37. J.-H. Cho and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Theoretical analysis of keyhole dynamics in polarized laser drilling,โ€ J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40(24), 7638 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/24/007
    Google ScholarCrossref
  38. W. Ye , โ€œ Mechanism analysis of selective laser melting and metallurgy process based on base element powder of titanium and boron,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Nanchang University, 2021).
    Google Scholar
  39. R. Ammer , M. Markl , U. Ljungblad , C. Kรถrner , and U. Rรผde , โ€œ Simulating fast electron beam melting with a parallel thermal free surface lattice Boltzmann method,โ€ Comput. Math. Appl. 67(2), 318โ€“330 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.10.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  40. H. Chen , Q. Wei , S. Wen , Z. Li , and Y. Shi , โ€œ Flow behavior of powder particles in layering process of selective laser melting: Numerical modeling and experimental verification based on discrete element method,โ€ Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 123, 146โ€“159 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  41. F. Verhaeghe , T. Craeghs , J. Heulens , and L. Pandelaers , โ€œ A pragmatic model for selective laser melting with evaporation,โ€ Acta Mater. 57(20), 6006โ€“6012 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.027
    Google ScholarCrossref
  42. C. H. Fu and Y. B. Guo , โ€œ Three-dimensional temperature gradient mechanism in selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V,โ€ J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136(6), 061004 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028539
    Google ScholarCrossref
  43. Y. Xiang , Z. Shuzhe , L. Junfeng , W. Zhengying , Y. Lixiang , and J. Lihao , โ€œ Numerical simulation and experimental verification for selective laser single track melting forming of Ti6Al4V,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 53(11), 2102โ€“2109โ€‰+โ€‰2117 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2019.11.007
    Google Scholar
  44. Q. He , H. Xia , J. Liu , X. Ao , and S. Lin , โ€œ Modeling and numerical studies of selective laser melting: Multiphase flow, solidification and heat transfer,โ€ Mater. Des. 196, 109115 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109115
    Google ScholarCrossref
  45. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical simulation including the influence of process parameters on SLM single-layer multi-pass formation,โ€ Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 4130โ€“4145 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05831-z
    Google ScholarCrossref
  46. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale numerical investigation including the influence of process parameters on LPBF multi-layer multi-path formation,โ€ Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 126(1), 5โ€“23 (2021).https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.014693
    Google ScholarCrossref
  47. H. Yin and S. D. Felicelli , โ€œ Dendrite growth simulation during solidification in the LENS process,โ€ Acta Mater. 58(4), 1455โ€“1465 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.053
    Google ScholarCrossref
  48. P. Nie , O. A. Ojo , and Z. Li , โ€œ Numerical modeling of microstructure evolution during laser additive manufacturing of a nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 77, 85โ€“95 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.039
    Google ScholarCrossref
  49. Z. Liu and H. Qi , โ€œ Effects of substrate crystallographic orientations on crystal growth and microstructure formation in laser powder deposition of nickel-based superalloy,โ€ Acta Mater. 87, 248โ€“258 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.046
    Google ScholarCrossref
  50. L. Wei , L. Xin , W. Meng , and H. Weidong , โ€œ Cellular automaton simulation of the molten pool of laser solid forming process,โ€ Acta Phys. Sin. 64(01), 018103โ€“018363 (2015).https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.64.018103
    Google ScholarCrossref
  51. R. Acharya , J. A. Sharon , and A. Staroselsky , โ€œ Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Acta Mater. 124, 360โ€“371 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018
    Google ScholarCrossref
  52. M. R. Rolchigo and R. LeSar , โ€œ Modeling of binary alloy solidification under conditions representative of additive manufacturing,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 535โ€“545 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.004
    Google ScholarCrossref
  53. S. Geng , P. Jiang , L. Guo , X. Gao , and G. Mi , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of grain/sub-grain structure evolution during solidification in laser welding of aluminum alloys,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119252 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119252
    Google ScholarCrossref
  54. W. L. Wang , W. Q. Liu , X. Yang , R. R. Xu , and Q. Y. Dai , โ€œ Multi-scale simulation of columnar-to-equiaxed transition during laser selective melting of rare earth magnesium alloy,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 119, 11โ€“24 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.029
    Google ScholarCrossref
  55. Q. Xia , J. Yang , and Y. Li , โ€œ On the conservative phase-field method with the N-component incompressible flows,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 012120 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135490
    Google ScholarCrossref
  56. Q. Xia , G. Sun , J. Kim , and Y. Li , โ€œ Multi-scale modeling and simulation of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition technique,โ€ Phys. Fluids 35, 034116 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141316
    Google ScholarCrossref
  57. A. Hussein , L. Hao , C. Yan , and R. Everson , โ€œ Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting,โ€ Mater. Des. 52, 638โ€“647 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070
    Google ScholarCrossref
  58. J. Ding , P. Colegrove , J. Mehnen , S. Ganguly , P. M. Sequeira Almeida , F. Wang , and S. Williams , โ€œ Thermo-mechanical analysis of wire and arc additive layer manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 50(12), 3315โ€“3322 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.06.023
    Google ScholarCrossref
  59. Y. Du , X. You , F. Qiao , L. Guo , and Z. Liu , โ€œ A model for predicting the temperature field during selective laser melting,โ€ Results Phys. 12, 52โ€“60 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.031
    Google ScholarCrossref
  60. X. Luo , M. Liu , L. Zhenhua , H. Li , and J. Shen , โ€œ Effect of different heat-source models on calculated temperature field of selective laser melted 18Ni300,โ€ Chin. J. Lasers 48(14), 1402005โ€“1402062 (2021).https://doi.org/10.3788/CJL202148.1402005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  61. J. F. Li , L. Li , and F. H. Stott , โ€œ Thermal stresses and their implication on cracking during laser melting of ceramic materials,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(14), 4385โ€“4398 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.005
    Google ScholarCrossref
  62. P. Aggarangsi and J. L. Beuth , โ€œ Localized preheating approaches for reducing residual stress in additive manufacturing,โ€ paper presented at the 2006 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, The University of Texas in Austin on August 14โ€“16, 2006.
  63. K. Dai and L. Shaw , โ€œ Thermal and mechanical finite element modeling of laser forming from metal and ceramic powders,โ€ Acta Mater. 52(1), 69โ€“80 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.028
    Google ScholarCrossref
  64. A. H. Nickel , D. M. Barnett , and F. B. Prinz , โ€œ Thermal stresses and deposition patterns in layered manufacturing,โ€ Mater. Sci. Eng. A 317(1โ€“2), 59โ€“64 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01179-0
    Google ScholarCrossref
  65. M. F. Zaeh and G. Branner , โ€œ Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting,โ€ Prod. Eng. 4(1), 35โ€“45 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y
    Google ScholarCrossref
  66. P. Bian , J. Shi , Y. Liu , and Y. Xie , โ€œ Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel,โ€ Opt. Laser Technol. 132, 106477 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106477
    Google ScholarCrossref
  67. B. M. Marques , C. M. Andrade , D. M. Neto , M. C. Oliveira , J. L. Alves , and L. F. Menezes , โ€œ Numerical analysis of residual stresses in parts produced by selective laser melting process,โ€ Procedia Manuf. 47, 1170โ€“1177 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.167
    Google ScholarCrossref
  68. W. Mu , โ€œ Numerical simulation of SLM forming process and research and prediction of forming properties,โ€ MA thesis ( Anhui Jianzhu University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  69. Y. Zhang , โ€œ Multi-scale multi-physics modeling of laser powder bed fusion process of metallic materials with experiment validation,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Purdue University, 2018).
    Google Scholar
  70. Y. Qian , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation studies of key processing issues for powder bed fusion technology,โ€ Ph.D. dissertation ( Tsinghua University, 2019).
    Google Scholar
  71. N. V. Brilliantov , S. Frank , J.-M. Hertzsch , and T. Pรถschel , โ€œ Model for collisions in granular gases,โ€ Phys. Rev. E 53(5), 5382โ€“5392 (1996).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5382
    Google ScholarCrossref
  72. Z. Xiao , โ€œ Research on microscale selective laser melting process of high strength pure copper specimens,โ€ MA thesis ( Hunan University, 2022).
    Google Scholar
  73. Z. Li , K. Mukai , M. Zeze , and K. C. Mills , โ€œ Determination of the surface tension of liquid stainless steel,โ€ J. Mater. Sci. 40(9โ€“10), 2191โ€“2195 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1931-x
    Google ScholarCrossref
  74. R. Scardovelli and S. Zaleski , โ€œ Analytical relations connecting linear interfaces and volume fractions in rectangular grids,โ€ J. Comput. Phys. 164(1), 228โ€“237 (2000).https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6567
    Google ScholarCrossref
  75. D.-W. Cho , W.-I. Cho , and S.-J. Na , โ€œ Modeling and simulation of arc: Laser and hybrid welding process,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 16(1), 26โ€“55 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.06.012
    Google ScholarCrossref
    76.Flow3D. Version 11.1.0: User Manual ( FlowScience, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2015).
  76. Y. Tian , L. Yang , D. Zhao , Y. Huang , and J. Pan , โ€œ Numerical analysis of powder bed generation and single track forming for selective laser melting of ss316l stainless steel,โ€ J. Manuf. Process. 58, 964โ€“974 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.002
    Google ScholarCrossref
  77. C. Tang , K. Q. Le , and C. H. Wong , โ€œ Physics of humping formation in laser powder bed fusion,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149, 119172 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172
    Google ScholarCrossref
  78. L. Cao , โ€œ Mesoscopic-scale simulation of pore evolution during laser powder bed fusion process,โ€ Comput. Mater. Sci. 179, 109686 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109686
    Google ScholarCrossref
  79. R. Li , J. Liu , Y. Shi , W. Li , and W. Jiang , โ€œ Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process,โ€ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 59(9โ€“12), 1025โ€“1035 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3566-1
    Google ScholarCrossref
  80. S. A. Khairallah and A. Anderson , โ€œ Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(11), 2627โ€“2636 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001
    Google ScholarCrossref
  81. J. Liu , D. Gu , H. Chen , D. Dai , and H. Zhang , โ€œ Influence of substrate surface morphology on wetting behavior of tracks during selective laser melting of aluminum-based alloys,โ€ J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 19(2), 111โ€“121 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1700599
    Google ScholarCrossref
  82. L. Li , J. Li , and T. Fan , โ€œ Phase-field modeling of wetting and balling dynamics in powder bed fusion process,โ€ Phys. Fluids 33, 042116 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046771
    Google ScholarCrossref
  83. X. Nie , Z. Hu , H. Zhu , Z. Hu , L. Ke , and X. Zeng , โ€œ Analysis of processing parameters and characteristics of selective laser melted high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloys: from single tracks to cubic samples,โ€ J. Mater. Process. Technol. 256, 69โ€“77 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.030
    Google ScholarCrossref

Lab-on-a-Chip ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† : ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง ๊ด€์ 

Review on Blood Flow Dynamics in Lab-on-a-Chip Systems: An Engineering Perspective

  • Bin-Jie Lai
  • ,ย 
  • Li-Tao Zhu
  • ,ย 
  • Zhe Chen*
  • ,ย 
  • Bo Ouyang*
  • ,ย andย 
  • Zheng-Hong Luo*

Abstract

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ํ•˜์—์„œ, “LOC(lab-on-a-chip)” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ์ „๋‹จ ์†๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ ํ˜ˆ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋™์  ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ ๋„ ๋ฐ ํƒ„์„ฑ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ์•ก ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜์ , ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ ์‚ผํˆฌ์•• ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š” ๊ต๋ž€์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜ˆ์•ก ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ํ•˜๋Š” LOC ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋…ผ์˜๋˜๊ณ  ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ์™€ ์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํšจ๊ณผ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ ํƒ„์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์กฐ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ LOC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ํ•˜์—์„œ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์ œํƒ€ ์ „์œ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€์ •๋„ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ๋ฐ ์ „๊ธฐ์‚ผํˆฌ์••์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ตฌ๋™๋˜๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๋ฅ˜ ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ•™์ œ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

KEYWORDS:ย 

1. Introduction

1.1. Microfluidic Flow in Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) Systems

Over the past several decades, the ability to control and utilize fluid flow patterns at microscales has gained considerable interest across a myriad of scientific and engineering disciplines, leading to growing interest in scientific research of microfluidics. 

(1) Microfluidics, an interdisciplinary field that straddles physics, engineering, and biotechnology, is dedicated to the behavior, precise control, and manipulation of fluids geometrically constrained to a small, typically submillimeter, scale. 

(2) The engineering community has increasingly focused on microfluidics, exploring different driving forces to enhance working fluid transport, with the aim of accurately and efficiently describing, controlling, designing, and applying microfluidic flow principles and transport phenomena, particularly for miniaturized applications. 

(3) This attention has chiefly been fueled by the potential to revolutionize diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in the biomedical and pharmaceutical sectorsUnder various driving forces in microfluidic flows, intriguing transport phenomena have bolstered confidence in sustainable and efficient applications in fields such as pharmaceutical, biochemical, and environmental science. The โ€œlab-on-a-chipโ€ (LOC) system harnesses microfluidic flow to enable fluid processing and the execution of laboratory tasks on a chip-sized scale. LOC systems have played a vital role in the miniaturization of laboratory operations such as mixing, chemical reaction, separation, flow control, and detection on small devices, where a wide variety of fluids is adapted. Biological fluid flow like blood and other viscoelastic fluids are notably studied among the many working fluids commonly utilized by LOC systems, owing to the optimization in small fluid sample volumed, rapid response times, precise control, and easy manipulation of flow patterns offered by the system under various driving forces. 

(4)The driving forces in blood flow can be categorized as passive or active transport mechanisms and, in some cases, both. Under various transport mechanisms, the unique design of microchannels enables different functionalities in driving, mixing, separating, and diagnosing blood and drug delivery in the blood. 

(5) Understanding and manipulating these driving forces are crucial for optimizing the performance of a LOC system. Such knowledge presents the opportunity to achieve higher efficiency and reliability in addressing cellular level challenges in medical diagnostics, forensic studies, cancer detection, and other fundamental research areas, for applications of point-of-care (POC) devices. 

(6)

1.2. Engineering Approach of Microfluidic Transport Phenomena in LOC Systems

Different transport mechanisms exhibit unique properties at submillimeter length scales in microfluidic devices, leading to significant transport phenomena that differ from those of macroscale flows. An in-depth understanding of these unique transport phenomena under microfluidic systems is often required in fluidic mechanics to fully harness the potential functionality of a LOC system to obtain systematically designed and precisely controlled transport of microfluids under their respective driving force. Fluid mechanics is considered a vital component in chemical engineering, enabling the analysis of fluid behaviors in various unit designs, ranging from large-scale reactors to separation units. Transport phenomena in fluid mechanics provide a conceptual framework for analytically and descriptively explaining why and how experimental results and physiological phenomena occur. The Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, along with other governing equations, is often adapted to accurately describe fluid dynamics by accounting for pressure, surface properties, velocity, and temperature variations over space and time. In addition, limiting factors and nonidealities for these governing equations should be considered to impose corrections for empirical consistency before physical models are assembled for more accurate controls and efficiency. Microfluidic flow systems often deviate from ideal conditions, requiring adjustments to the standard governing equations. These deviations could arise from factors such as viscous effects, surface interactions, and non-Newtonian fluid properties from different microfluid types and geometrical layouts of microchannels. Addressing these nonidealities supports the refining of theoretical models and prediction accuracy for microfluidic flow behaviors.

The analytical calculation of coupled nonlinear governing equations, which describes the material and energy balances of systems under ideal conditions, often requires considerable computational efforts. However, advancements in computation capabilities, cost reduction, and improved accuracy have made numerical simulations using different numerical and modeling methods a powerful tool for effectively solving these complex coupled equations and modeling various transport phenomena. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical technique used to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of various flow parameters. It serves as a critical approach to provide insights and reasoning for decision-making regarding the optimal designs involving fluid dynamics, even prior to complex physical model prototyping and experimental procedures. The integration of experimental data, theoretical analysis, and reliable numerical simulations from CFD enables systematic variation of analytical parameters through quantitative analysis, where adjustment to delivery of blood flow and other working fluids in LOC systems can be achieved.

Numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element-Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) are heavily employed in CFD and offer diverse approaches to achieve discretization of Eulerian flow equations through filling a mesh of the flow domain. A more in-depth review of numerical methods in CFD and its application for blood flow simulation is provided in Section 2.2.2.

1.3. Scope of the Review

In this Review, we explore and characterize the blood flow phenomena within the LOC systems, utilizing both physiological and engineering modeling approaches. Similar approaches will be taken to discuss capillary-driven flow and electric-osmotic flow (EOF) under electrokinetic phenomena as a passive and active transport scheme, respectively, for blood transport in LOC systems. Such an analysis aims to bridge the gap between physical (experimental) and engineering (analytical) perspectives in studying and manipulating blood flow delivery by different driving forces in LOC systems. Moreover, the Review hopes to benefit the interests of not only blood flow control in LOC devices but also the transport of viscoelastic fluids, which are less studied in the literature compared to that of Newtonian fluids, in LOC systems.

Section 2 examines the complex interplay between viscoelastic properties of blood and blood flow patterns under shear flow in LOC systems, while engineering numerical modeling approaches for blood flow are presented for assistance. Sections 3 and 4 look into the theoretical principles, numerical governing equations, and modeling methodologies for capillary driven flow and EOF in LOC systems as well as their impact on blood flow dynamics through the quantification of key parameters of the two driving forces. Section 5 concludes the characterized blood flow transport processes in LOC systems under these two forces. Additionally, prospective areas of research in improving the functionality of LOC devices employing blood and other viscoelastic fluids and potentially justifying mechanisms underlying microfluidic flow patterns outside of LOC systems are presented. Finally, the challenges encountered in the numerical studies of blood flow under LOC systems are acknowledged, paving the way for further research.

2. Blood Flow Phenomena

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


2.1. Physiological Blood Flow Behavior

Blood, an essential physiological fluid in the human body, serves the vital role of transporting oxygen and nutrients throughout the body. Additionally, blood is responsible for suspending various blood cells including erythrocytes (red blood cells or RBCs), leukocytes (white blood cells), and thrombocytes (blood platelets) in a plasma medium.Among the cells mentioned above, red blood cells (RBCs) comprise approximately 40โ€“45% of the volume of healthy blood. 

(7) An RBC possesses an inherent elastic property with a biconcave shape of an average diameter of 8 ฮผm and a thickness of 2 ฮผm. This biconcave shape maximizes the surface-to-volume ratio, allowing RBCs to endure significant distortion while maintaining their functionality. 

(8,9) Additionally, the biconcave shape optimizes gas exchange, facilitating efficient uptake of oxygen due to the increased surface area. The inherent elasticity of RBCs allows them to undergo substantial distortion from their original biconcave shape and exhibits high flexibility, particularly in narrow channels.RBC deformability enables the cell to deform from a biconcave shape to a parachute-like configuration, despite minor differences in RBC shape dynamics under shear flow between initial cell locations. As shown in Figure 1(a), RBCs initiating with different resting shapes and orientations displaying display a similar deformation pattern 

(10) in terms of its shape. Shear flow induces an inward bending of the cell at the rear position of the rim to the final bending position, 

(11) resulting in an alignment toward the same position of the flow direction.

Figure 1. Images of varying deformation of RBCs and different dynamic blood flow behaviors. (a) The deforming shape behavior of RBCs at four different initiating positions under the same experimental conditions of a flow from left to right, (10) (b) RBC aggregation, (13) (c) CFL region. (18) Reproduced with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2011 Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2022 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.

The flexible property of RBCs enables them to navigate through narrow capillaries and traverse a complex network of blood vessels. The deformability of RBCs depends on various factors, including the channel geometry, RBC concentration, and the elastic properties of the RBC membrane. 

(12) Both flexibility and deformability are vital in the process of oxygen exchange among blood and tissues throughout the body, allowing cells to flow in vessels even smaller than the original cell size prior to deforming.As RBCs serve as major components in blood, their collective dynamics also hugely affect blood rheology. RBCs exhibit an aggregation phenomenon due to cell to cell interactions, such as adhesion forces, among populated cells, inducing unique blood flow patterns and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems. For blood flow in large vessels between a diameter of 1 and 3 cm, where shear rates are not high, a constant viscosity and Newtonian behavior for blood can be assumed. However, under low shear rate conditions (0.1 s

โ€“1) in smaller vessels such as the arteries and venules, which are within a diameter of 0.2 mm to 1 cm, blood exhibits non-Newtonian properties, such as shear-thinning viscosity and viscoelasticity due to RBC aggregation and deformability. The nonlinear viscoelastic property of blood gives rise to a complex relationship between viscosity and shear rate, primarily influenced by the highly elastic behavior of RBCs. A wide range of research on the transient behavior of the RBC shape and aggregation characteristics under varied flow circumstances has been conducted, aiming to obtain a better understanding of the interaction between blood flow shear forces from confined flows.

For a better understanding of the unique blood flow structures and rheological behaviors in microfluidic systems, some blood flow patterns are introduced in the following section.

2.1.1. RBC Aggregation

RBC aggregation is a vital phenomenon to be considered when designing LOC devices due to its impact on the viscosity of the bulk flow. Under conditions of low shear rate, such as in stagnant or low flow rate regions, RBCs tend to aggregate, forming structures known as rouleaux, resembling stacks of coins as shown in Figure 1(b). 

(13) The aggregation of RBCs increases the viscosity at the aggregated region, 

(14) hence slowing down the overall blood flow. However, when exposed to high shear rates, RBC aggregates disaggregate. As shear rates continue to increase, RBCs tend to deform, elongating and aligning themselves with the direction of the flow. 

(15) Such a dynamic shift in behavior from the cells in response to the shear rate forms the basis of the viscoelastic properties observed in whole blood. In essence, the viscosity of the blood varies according to the shear rate conditions, which are related to the velocity gradient of the system. It is significant to take the intricate relationship between shear rate conditions and the change of blood viscosity due to RBC aggregation into account since various flow driving conditions may induce varied effects on the degree of aggregation.

2.1.2. Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist Effect

The Fรฅhrรฆusโ€“Lindqvist (FL) effect describes the gradual decrease in the apparent viscosity of blood as the channel diameter decreases. 

(16) This effect is attributed to the migration of RBCs toward the central region in the microchannel, where the flow rate is higher, due to the presence of higher pressure and asymmetric distribution of shear forces. This migration of RBCs, typically observed at blood vessels less than 0.3 mm, toward the higher flow rate region contributes to the change in blood viscosity, which becomes dependent on the channel size. Simultaneously, the increase of the RBC concentration in the central region of the microchannel results in the formation of a less viscous region close to the microchannel wall. This region called the Cell-Free Layer (CFL), is primarily composed of plasma. 

(17) The combination of the FL effect and the following CFL formation provides a unique phenomenon that is often utilized in passive and active plasma separation mechanisms, involving branched and constriction channels for various applications in plasma separation using microfluidic systems.

2.1.3. Cell-Free Layer Formation

In microfluidic blood flow, RBCs form aggregates at the microchannel core and result in a region that is mostly devoid of RBCs near the microchannel walls, as shown in Figure 1(c). 

(18) The region is known as the cell-free layer (CFL). The CFL region is often known to possess a lower viscosity compared to other regions within the blood flow due to the lower viscosity value of plasma when compared to that of the aggregated RBCs. Therefore, a thicker CFL region composed of plasma correlates to a reduced apparent whole blood viscosity. 

(19) A thicker CFL region is often established following the RBC aggregation at the microchannel core under conditions of decreasing the tube diameter. Apart from the dependence on the RBC concentration in the microchannel core, the CFL thickness is also affected by the volume concentration of RBCs, or hematocrit, in whole blood, as well as the deformability of RBCs. Given the influence CFL thickness has on blood flow rheological parameters such as blood flow rate, which is strongly dependent on whole blood viscosity, investigating CFL thickness under shear flow is crucial for LOC systems accounting for blood flow.

2.1.4. Plasma Skimming in Bifurcation Networks

The uneven arrangement of RBCs in bifurcating microchannels, commonly termed skimming bifurcation, arises from the axial migration of RBCs within flowing streams. This uneven distribution contributes to variations in viscosity across differing sizes of bifurcating channels but offers a stabilizing effect. Notably, higher flow rates in microchannels are associated with increased hematocrit levels, resulting in higher viscosity compared with those with lower flow rates. Parametric investigations on bifurcation angle, 

(20) thickness of the CFL, 

(21) and RBC dynamics, including aggregation and deformation, 

(22) may alter the varying viscosity of blood and its flow behavior within microchannels.

2.2. Modeling on Blood Flow Dynamics

2.2.1. Blood Properties and Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology

Under different shear rate conditions in blood flow, the elastic characteristics and dynamic changes of the RBC induce a complex velocity and stress relationship, resulting in the incompatibility of blood flow characterization through standard presumptions of constant viscosity used for Newtonian fluid flow. Blood flow is categorized as a viscoelastic non-Newtonian fluid flow where constitutive equations governing this type of flow take into consideration the nonlinear viscometric properties of blood. To mathematically characterize the evolving blood viscosity and the relationship between the elasticity of RBC and the shear blood flow, respectively, across space and time of the system, a stress tensor (ฯ„) defined by constitutive models is often coupled in the Navierโ€“Stokes equation to account for the collective impact of the constant dynamic viscosity (ฮท) and the elasticity from RBCs on blood flow.The dynamic viscosity of blood is heavily dependent on the shear stress applied to the cell and various parameters from the blood such as hematocrit value, plasma viscosity, mechanical properties of the RBC membrane, and red blood cell aggregation rate. The apparent blood viscosity is considered convenient for the characterization of the relationship between the evolving blood viscosity and shear rate, which can be defined by Cassonโ€™s law, as shown in eq 1.

๐œ‡=๐œ0๐›พห™+2๐œ‚๐œ0๐›พห™โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš+๐œ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝห™+๏ฟฝ

(1)where ฯ„

0 is the yield stressโ€“stress required to initiate blood flow motion, ฮท is the Casson rheological constant, and ฮณฬ‡ is the shear rate. The value of Cassonโ€™s law parameters under blood with normal hematocrit level can be defined as ฯ„

0 = 0.0056 Pa and ฮท = 0.0035 Paยทs. 

(23) With the known property of blood and Cassonโ€™s law parameters, an approximation can be made to the dynamic viscosity under various flow condition domains. The Power Law model is often employed to characterize the dynamic viscosity in relation to the shear rate, since precise solutions exist for specific geometries and flow circumstances, acting as a fundamental standard for definition. The Carreau and Carreauโ€“Yasuda models can be advantageous over the Power Law model due to their ability to evaluate the dynamic viscosity at low to zero shear rate conditions. However, none of the above-mentioned models consider the memory or other elastic behavior of blood and its RBCs. Some other commonly used mathematical models and their constants for the non-Newtonian viscosity property characterization of blood are listed in Table 1 below. 

(24โˆ’26)Table 1. Comparison of Various Non-Newtonian Models for Blood Viscosity 

(24โˆ’26)

ModelNon-Newtonian ViscosityParameters
Power Law(2)n = 0.61, k = 0.42
Carreau(3)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 3.1736 s, m = 2.406, a = 0.254
Walburnโ€“Schneck(4)C1 = 0.000797 Paยทs, C2 = 0.0608 Paยทs, C3 = 0.00499, C4 = 14.585 gโ€“1, TPMA = 25 g/L
Carreauโ€“Yasuda(5)ฮผ0 = 0.056 Paยทs, ฮผโˆž = 0.00345 Paยทs, ฮป = 1.902 s, n = 0.22, a = 1.25
Quemada(6)ฮผp = 0.0012 Paยทs, kโˆž = 2.07, k0 = 4.33, ฮณฬ‡c = 1.88 sโ€“1

The blood rheology is commonly known to be influenced by two key physiological factors, namely, the hematocrit value (H

t) and the fibrinogen concentration (c

f), with an average value of 42% and 0.252 gdยทL

โ€“1, respectively. Particularly in low shear conditions, the presence of varying fibrinogen concentrations affects the tendency for aggregation and rouleaux formation, while the occurrence of aggregation is contingent upon specific levels of hematocrit. 

(27) The study from Apostolidis et al. 

(28) modifies the Casson model through emphasizing its reliance on hematocrit and fibrinogen concentration parameter values, owing to the extensive knowledge of the two physiological blood parameters.The viscoelastic response of blood is heavily dependent on the elasticity of the RBC, which is defined by the relationship between the deformation and stress relaxation from RBCs under a specific location of shear flow as a function of the velocity field. The stress tensor is usually characterized by constitutive equations such as the Upper-Convected Maxwell Model 

(29) and the Oldroyd-B model 

(30) to track the molecule effects under shear from different driving forces. The prominent non-Newtonian features, such as shear thinning and yield stress, have played a vital role in the characterization of blood rheology, particularly with respect to the evaluation of yield stress under low shear conditions. The nature of stress measurement in blood, typically on the order of 1 mPa, is challenging due to its low magnitude. The occurrence of the CFL complicates the measurement further due to the significant decrease in apparent viscosity near the wall over time and a consequential disparity in viscosity compared to the bulk region.In addition to shear thinning viscosity and yield stress, the formation of aggregation (rouleaux) from RBCs under low shear rates also contributes to the viscoelasticity under transient flow 

(31) and thixotropy 

(32) of whole blood. Given the difficulty in evaluating viscoelastic behavior of blood under low strain magnitudes and limitations in generalized Newtonian models, the utilization of viscoelastic models is advocated to encompass elasticity and delineate non-shear components within the stress tensor. Extending from the Oldroyd-B model, Anand et al. 

(33) developed a viscoelastic model framework for adapting elasticity within blood samples and predicting non-shear stress components. However, to also address the thixotropic effects, the model developed by Horner et al. 

(34) serves as a more comprehensive approach than the viscoelastic model from Anand et al. Thixotropy 

(32) typically occurs from the structural change of the rouleaux, where low shear rate conditions induce rouleaux formation. Correspondingly, elasticity increases, while elasticity is more representative of the isolated RBCs, under high shear rate conditions. The model of Horner et al. 

(34) considers the contribution of rouleaux to shear stress, taking into account factors such as the characteristic time for Brownian aggregation, shear-induced aggregation, and shear-induced breakage. Subsequent advancements in the model from Horner et al. often revolve around refining the three aforementioned key terms for a more substantial characterization of rouleaux dynamics. Notably, this has led to the recently developed mHAWB model 

(35) and other model iterations to enhance the accuracy of elastic and viscoelastic contributions to blood rheology, including the recently improved model suggested by Armstrong et al. 

(36)

2.2.2. Numerical Methods (FDM, FEM, FVM)

Numerical simulation has become increasingly more significant in analyzing the geometry, boundary layers of flow, and nonlinearity of hyperbolic viscoelastic flow constitutive equations. CFD is a powerful and efficient tool utilizing numerical methods to solve the governing hydrodynamic equations, such as the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation, continuity equation, and energy conservation equation, for qualitative evaluation of fluid motion dynamics under different parameters. CFD overcomes the challenge of analytically solving nonlinear forms of differential equations by employing numerical methods such as the Finite-Difference Method (FDM), Finite-Element Method (FEM), and Finite-Volume Method (FVM) to discretize and solve the partial differential equations (PDEs), allowing for qualitative reproduction of transport phenomena and experimental observations. Different numerical methods are chosen to cope with various transport systems for optimization of the accuracy of the result and control of error during the discretization process.FDM is a straightforward approach to discretizing PDEs, replacing the continuum representation of equations with a set of finite-difference equations, which is typically applied to structured grids for efficient implementation in CFD programs. 

(37) However, FDM is often limited to simple geometries such as rectangular or block-shaped geometries and struggles with curved boundaries. In contrast, FEM divides the fluid domain into small finite grids or elements, approximating PDEs through a local description of physics. 

(38) All elements contribute to a large, sparse matrix solver. However, FEM may not always provide accurate results for systems involving significant deformation and aggregation of particles like RBCs due to large distortion of grids. 

(39) FVM evaluates PDEs following the conservation laws and discretizes the selected flow domain into small but finite size control volumes, with each grid at the center of a finite volume. 

(40) The divergence theorem allows the conversion of volume integrals of PDEs with divergence terms into surface integrals of surface fluxes across cell boundaries. Due to its conservation property, FVM offers efficient outcomes when dealing with PDEs that embody mass, momentum, and energy conservation principles. Furthermore, widely accessible software packages like the OpenFOAM toolbox 

(41) include a viscoelastic solver, making it an attractive option for viscoelastic fluid flow modeling. 

(42)

2.2.3. Modeling Methods of Blood Flow Dynamics

The complexity in the blood flow simulation arises from deformability and aggregation that RBCs exhibit during their interaction with neighboring cells under different shear rate conditions induced by blood flow. Numerical models coupled with simulation programs have been applied as a groundbreaking method to predict such unique rheological behavior exhibited by RBCs and whole blood. The conventional approach of a single-phase flow simulation is often applied to blood flow simulations within large vessels possessing a moderate shear rate. However, such a method assumes the properties of plasma, RBCs and other cellular components to be evenly distributed as average density and viscosity in blood, resulting in the inability to simulate the mechanical dynamics, such as RBC aggregation under high-shear flow field, inherent in RBCs. To accurately describe the asymmetric distribution of RBC and blood flow, multiphase flow simulation, where numerical simulations of blood flows are often modeled as two immiscible phases, RBCs and blood plasma, is proposed. A common assumption is that RBCs exhibit non-Newtonian behavior while the plasma is treated as a continuous Newtonian phase.Numerous multiphase numerical models have been proposed to simulate the influence of RBCs on blood flow dynamics by different assumptions. In large-scale simulations (above the millimeter range), continuum-based methods are wildly used due to their lower computational demands. 

(43) Eulerian multiphase flow simulations offer the solution of a set of conservation equations for each separate phase and couple the phases through common pressure and interphase exchange coefficients. Xu et al. 

(44) utilized the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM) to replicate the dynamic behavior and distortion of RBCs subjected to fluidic forces, utilizing the Johnsonโ€“Kendallโ€“Roberts model 

(45) to define the adhesive forces of cell-to-cell interactions. The iterative direct-forcing immersed boundary method (IBM) is commonly employed in simulations of the fluidโ€“cell interface of blood. This method effectively captures the intricacies of the thin and flexible RBC membranes within various external flow fields. 

(46) The study by Xu et al. 

(44) also adopts this approach to bridge the fluid dynamics and RBC deformation through IBM. Yoon and You utilized the Maxwell model to define the viscosity of the RBC membrane. 

(47) It was discovered that the Maxwell model could represent the stress relaxation and unloading processes of the cell. Furthermore, the reduced flexibility of an RBC under particular situations such as infection is specified, which was unattainable by the Kelvinโ€“Voigt model 

(48) when compared to the Maxwell model in the literature. The Yeoh hyperplastic material model was also adapted to predict the nonlinear elasticity property of RBCs with FEM employed to discretize the RBC membrane using shell-type elements. Gracka et al. 

(49) developed a numerical CFD model with a finite-volume parallel solver for multiphase blood flow simulation, where an updated Maxwell viscoelasticity model and a Discrete Phase Model are adopted. In the study, the adapted IBM, based on unstructured grids, simulates the flow behavior and shape change of the RBCs through fluid-structure coupling. It was found that the hybrid Eulerโ€“Lagrange (Eโ€“L) approach 

(50) for the development of the multiphase model offered better results in the simulated CFL region in the microchannels.To study the dynamics of individual behaviors of RBCs and the consequent non-Newtonian blood flow, cell-shape-resolved computational models are often adapted. The use of the boundary integral method has become prevalent in minimizing computational expenses, particularly in the exclusive determination of fluid velocity on the surfaces of RBCs, incorporating the option of employing IBM or particle-based techniques. The cell-shaped-resolved method has enabled an examination of cell to cell interactions within complex ambient or pulsatile flow conditions 

(51) surrounding RBC membranes. Recently, Rydquist et al. 

(52) have looked to integrate statistical information from macroscale simulations to obtain a comprehensive overview of RBC behavior within the immediate proximity of the flow through introduction of respective models characterizing membrane shape definition, tension, bending stresses of RBC membranes.At a macroscopic scale, continuum models have conventionally been adapted for assessing blood flow dynamics through the application of elasticity theory and fluid dynamics. However, particle-based methods are known for their simplicity and adaptability in modeling complex multiscale fluid structures. Meshless methods, such as the boundary element method (BEM), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), and dissipative particle dynamics (DPD), are often used in particle-based characterization of RBCs and the surrounding fluid. By representing the fluid as discrete particles, meshless methods provide insights into the status and movement of the multiphase fluid. These methods allow for the investigation of cellular structures and microscopic interactions that affect blood rheology. Non-confronting mesh methods like IBM can also be used to couple a fluid solver such as FEM, FVM, or the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) through membrane representation of RBCs. In comparison to conventional CFD methods, LBM has been viewed as a favorable numerical approach for solving the Nโ€“S equations and the simulation of multiphase flows. LBM exhibits the notable advantage of being amenable to high-performance parallel computing environments due to its inherently local dynamics. In contrast to DPD and SPH where RBC membranes are modeled as physically interconnected particles, LBM employs the IBM to account for the deformation dynamics of RBCs 

(53,54) under shear flows in complex channel geometries. 

(54,55) However, it is essential to acknowledge that the utilization of LBM in simulating RBC flows often entails a significant computational overhead, being a primary challenge in this context. Krรผger et al. 

(56) proposed utilizing LBM as a fluid solver, IBM to couple the fluid and FEM to compute the response of membranes to deformation under immersed fluids. This approach decouples the fluid and membranes but necessitates significant computational effort due to the requirements of both meshes and particles.Despite the accuracy of current blood flow models, simulating complex conditions remains challenging because of the high computational load and cost. Balachandran Nair et al. 

(57) suggested a reduced order model of RBC under the framework of DEM, where the RBC is represented by overlapping constituent rigid spheres. The Morse potential force is adapted to account for the RBC aggregation exhibited by cell to cell interactions among RBCs at different distances. Based upon the IBM, the reduced-order RBC model is adapted to simulate blood flow transport for validation under both single and multiple RBCs with a resolved CFD-DEM solver. 

(58) In the resolved CFD-DEM model, particle sizes are larger than the grid size for a more accurate computation of the surrounding flow field. A continuous forcing approach is taken to describe the momentum source of the governing equation prior to discretization, which is different from a Direct Forcing Method (DFM). 

(59) As no body-conforming moving mesh is required, the continuous forcing approach offers lower complexity and reduced cost when compared to the DFM. Piquet et al. 

(60) highlighted the high complexity of the DFM due to its reliance on calculating an additional immersed boundary flux for the velocity field to ensure its divergence-free condition.The fluidโ€“structure interaction (FSI) method has been advocated to connect the dynamic interplay of RBC membranes and fluid plasma within blood flow such as the coupling of continuumโ€“particle interactions. However, such methodology is generally adapted for anatomical configurations such as arteries 

(61,62) and capillaries, 

(63) where both the structural components and the fluid domain undergo substantial deformation due to the moving boundaries. Due to the scope of the Review being blood flow simulation within microchannels of LOC devices without deformable boundaries, the Review of the FSI method will not be further carried out.In general, three numerical methods are broadly used: mesh-based, particle-based, and hybrid meshโ€“particle techniques, based on the spatial scale and the fundamental numerical approach, mesh-based methods tend to neglect the effects of individual particles, assuming a continuum and being efficient in terms of time and cost. However, the particle-based approach highlights more of the microscopic and mesoscopic level, where the influence of individual RBCs is considered. A review from Freund et al. 

(64) addressed the three numerical methodologies and their respective modeling approaches of RBC dynamics. Given the complex mechanics and the diverse levels of study concerning numerical simulations of blood and cellular flow, a broad spectrum of numerical methods for blood has been subjected to extensive review. 

(64โˆ’70) Ye at al. 

(65) offered an extensive review of the application of the DPD, SPH, and LBM for numerical simulations of RBC, while Rathnayaka et al. 

(67) conducted a review of the particle-based numerical modeling for liquid marbles through drawing parallels to the transport of RBCs in microchannels. A comparative analysis between conventional CFD methods and particle-based approaches for cellular and blood flow dynamic simulation can be found under the review by Arabghahestani et al. 

(66) Literature by Li et al. 

(68) and Beris et al. 

(69) offer an overview of both continuum-based models at micro/macroscales and multiscale particle-based models encompassing various length and temporal dimensions. Furthermore, these reviews deliberate upon the potential of coupling continuum-particle methods for blood plasma and RBC modeling. Arciero et al. 

(70) investigated various modeling approaches encompassing cellular interactions, such as cell to cell or plasma interactions and the individual cellular phases. A concise overview of the reviews is provided in Table 2 for reference.

Table 2. List of Reviews for Numerical Approaches Employed in Blood Flow Simulation

ReferenceNumerical methods
Li et al. (2013) (68)Continuum-based modeling (BIM), particle-based modeling (LBM, LB-FE, SPH, DPD)
Freund (2014) (64)RBC dynamic modeling (continuum-based modeling, complementary discrete microstructure modeling), blood flow dynamic modeling (FDM, IBM, LBM, particle-mesh methods, coupled boundary integral and mesh-based methods, DPD)
Ye et al. (2016) (65)DPD, SPH, LBM, coupled IBM-Smoothed DPD
Arciero et al. (2017) (70)LBM, IBM, DPD, conventional CFD Methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Arabghahestani et al. (2019) (66)Particle-based methods (LBM, DPD, direct simulation Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics), SPH, conventional CFD methods (FDM, FVM, FEM)
Beris et al. (2021) (69)DPD, smoothed DPD, IBM, LBM, BIM
Rathnayaka (2022) (67)SPH, CG, LBM

3. Capillary Driven Blood Flow in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


3.1. Capillary Driven Flow Phenomena

Capillary driven (CD) flow is a pivotal mechanism in passive microfluidic flow systems 

(9) such as the blood circulation system and LOC systems. 

(71) CD flow is essentially the movement of a liquid to flow against drag forces, where the capillary effect exerts a force on the liquid at the borders, causing a liquidโ€“air meniscus to flow despite gravity or other drag forces. A capillary pressure drops across the liquidโ€“air interface with surface tension in the capillary radius and contact angle. The capillary effect depends heavily on the interaction between the different properties of surface materials. Different values of contact angles can be manipulated and obtained under varying levels of surface wettability treatments to manipulate the surface properties, resulting in different CD blood delivery rates for medical diagnostic device microchannels. CD flow techniques are appealing for many LOC devices, because they require no external energy. However, due to the passive property of liquid propulsion by capillary forces and the long-term instability of surface treatments on channel walls, the adaptability of CD flow in geometrically complex LOC devices may be limited.

3.2. Theoretical and Numerical Modeling of Capillary Driven Blood Flow

3.2.1. Theoretical Basis and Assumptions of Microfluidic Flow

The study of transport phenomena regarding either blood flow driven by capillary forces or externally applied forces under microfluid systems all demands a comprehensive recognition of the significant differences in flow dynamics between microscale and macroscale. The fundamental assumptions and principles behind fluid transport at the microscale are discussed in this section. Such a comprehension will lay the groundwork for the following analysis of the theoretical basis of capillary forces and their role in blood transport in LOC systems.

At the macroscale, fluid dynamics are often strongly influenced by gravity due to considerable fluid mass. However, the high surface to volume ratio at the microscale shifts the balance toward surface forces (e.g., surface tension and viscous forces), much larger than the inertial force. This difference gives rise to transport phenomena unique to microscale fluid transport, such as the prevalence of laminar flow due to a very low Reynolds number (generally lower than 1). Moreover, the fluid in a microfluidic system is often assumed to be incompressible due to the small flow velocity, indicating constant fluid density in both space and time.Microfluidic flow behaviors are governed by the fundamental principles of mass and momentum conservation, which are encapsulated in the continuity equation and the Navierโ€“Stokes (Nโ€“S) equation. The continuity equation describes the conservation of mass, while the Nโ€“S equation captures the spatial and temporal variations in velocity, pressure, and other physical parameters. Under the assumption of the negligible influence of gravity in microfluidic systems, the continuity equation and the Eulerian representation of the incompressible Nโ€“S equation can be expressed as follows:

โˆ‡ยท๐ฎโ‡€=0โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(7)

โˆ’โˆ‡๐‘+๐œ‡โˆ‡2๐ฎโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๐‰โ‡€โˆ’๐…โ‡€=0โˆ’โˆ‡๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝโˆ‡2๏ฟฝโ‡€+โˆ‡ยท๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€=0

(8)Here, p is the pressure, u is the fluid viscosity, 

๐‰โ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ represents the stress tensor, and F is the body force exerted by external forces if present.

3.2.2. Theoretical Basis and Modeling of Capillary Force in LOC Systems

The capillary force is often the major driving force to manipulate and transport blood without an externally applied force in LOC systems. Forces induced by the capillary effect impact the free surface of fluids and are represented not directly in the Navierโ€“Stokes equations but through the pressure boundary conditions of the pressure term p. For hydrophilic surfaces, the liquid generally induces a contact angle between 0ยฐ and 30ยฐ, encouraging the spread and attraction of fluid under a positive cosโ€ฏฮธ condition. For this condition, the pressure drop becomes positive and generates a spontaneous flow forward. A hydrophobic solid surface repels the fluid, inducing minimal contact. Generally, hydrophobic solids exhibit a contact angle larger than 90ยฐ, inducing a negative value of cosโ€ฏฮธ. Such a value will result in a negative pressure drop and a flow in the opposite direction. The induced contact angle is often utilized to measure the wall exposure of various surface treatments on channel walls where different wettability gradients and surface tension effects for CD flows are established. Contact angles between different interfaces are obtainable through standard values or experimental methods for reference. 

(72)For the characterization of the induced force by the capillary effect, the Youngโ€“Laplace (Yโ€“L) equation 

(73) is widely employed. In the equation, the capillary is considered a pressure boundary condition between the two interphases. Through the Yโ€“L equation, the capillary pressure force can be determined, and subsequently, the continuity and momentum balance equations can be solved to obtain the blood filling rate. Kim et al. 

(74) studied the effects of concentration and exposure time of a nonionic surfactant, Silwet L-77, on the performance of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannel in terms of plasma and blood self-separation. The study characterized the capillary pressure force by incorporating the Yโ€“L equation and further evaluated the effects of the changing contact angle due to different levels of applied channel wall surface treatments. The expression of the Yโ€“L equation utilized by Kim et al. 

(74) is as follows:

๐‘ƒ=โˆ’๐œŽ(cos๐œƒb+cos๐œƒtโ„Ž+cos๐œƒl+cos๐œƒr๐‘ค)๏ฟฝ=โˆ’๏ฟฝ(cosโก๏ฟฝb+cosโก๏ฟฝtโ„Ž+cosโก๏ฟฝl+cosโก๏ฟฝr๏ฟฝ)

(9)where ฯƒ is the surface tension of the liquid and ฮธ

bฮธ

tฮธ

l, and ฮธ

r are the contact angle values between the liquid and the bottom, top, left, and right walls, respectively. A numerical simulation through Coventor software is performed to evaluate the dynamic changes in the filling rate within the microchannel. The simulation results for the blood filling rate in the microchannel are expressed at a specific time stamp, shown in Figure 2. The results portray an increasing instantaneous filling rate of blood in the microchannel following the decrease in contact angle induced by a higher concentration of the nonionic surfactant treated to the microchannel wall.

Figure 2. Numerical simulation of filling rate of capillary driven blood flow under various contact angle conditions at a specific timestamp. (74) Reproduced with permission from ref (74). Copyright 2010 Elsevier.

When in contact with hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces, blood forms a meniscus with a contact angle due to surface tension. The Lucasโ€“Washburn (Lโ€“W) equation 

(75) is one of the pioneering theoretical definitions for the position of the meniscus over time. In addition, the Lโ€“W equation provides the possibility for research to obtain the velocity of the blood formed meniscus through the derivation of the meniscus position. The Lโ€“W equation 

(75) can be shown below:

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘ก2๐œ‡โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ

(10)Here L(t) represents the distance of the liquid driven by the capillary forces. However, the generalized Lโ€“W equation solely assumes the constant physical properties from a Newtonian fluid rather than considering the non-Newtonian fluid behavior of blood. Cito et al. 

(76) constructed an enhanced version of the Lโ€“W equation incorporating the power law to consider the RBC aggregation and the FL effect. The non-Newtonian fluid apparent viscosity under the Power Law model is defined as

๐œ‡=๐‘˜ยท(๐›พห™)๐‘›โˆ’1๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝยท(๏ฟฝห™)๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(11)where ฮณฬ‡ is the strain rate tensor defined as 

๐›พห™=12๐›พห™๐‘–๐‘—๐›พห™๐‘—๐‘–โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝห™=12๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝห™๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ. The stress tensor term ฯ„ is computed as ฯ„ = ฮผฮณฬ‡

ij. The updated Lโ€“W equation by Cito 

(76) is expressed as

๐ฟ(๐‘ก)=๐‘…[(๐‘›+13๐‘›+1)(๐œŽcos(๐œƒ)๐‘…๐‘˜)1/๐‘›๐‘ก]๐‘›/๐‘›+1๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ[(๏ฟฝ+13๏ฟฝ+1)(๏ฟฝโกcos(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)1/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ+1

(12)where k is the flow consistency index and n is the power law index, respectively. The power law index, from the Power Law model, characterizes the extent of the non-Newtonian behavior of blood. Both the consistency and power law index rely on blood properties such as hematocrit, the appearance of the FL effect, the formation of RBC aggregates, etc. The updated Lโ€“W equation computes the location and velocity of blood flow caused by capillary forces at specified time points within the LOC devices, taking into account the effects of blood flow characteristics such as RBC aggregation and the FL effect on dynamic blood viscosity.Apart from the blood flow behaviors triggered by inherent blood properties, unique flow conditions driven by capillary forces that are portrayed under different microchannel geometries also hold crucial implications for CD blood delivery. Berthier et al. 

(77) studied the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn condition, the condition to initiate the spontaneous capillary flow within a V-groove microchannel, as shown in Figure 3(a) both experimentally and numerically. Through experimental studies, the spontaneous Concusโ€“Finn filament development of capillary driven blood flow is observed, as shown in Figure 3(b), while the dynamic development of blood flow is numerically simulated through CFD simulation.

Figure 3. (a) Sketch of the cross-section of Berthierโ€™s V-groove microchannel, (b) experimental view of blood in the V-groove microchannel, (78) (c) illustration of the dynamic change of the extension of filament from FLOW 3D under capillary flow at three increasing time intervals. (78) Reproduced with permission from ref (78). Copyright 2014 Elsevier.

Berthier et al. 

(77) characterized the contact angle needed for the initiation of the capillary driving force at a zero-inlet pressure, through the half-angle (ฮฑ) of the V-groove geometry layout, and its relation to the Concusโ€“Finn filament as shown below:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๎€๎€๐œƒ<๐œ‹2โˆ’๐›ผsin๐›ผ1+2(โ„Ž2/๐‘ค)sin๐›ผ<cos๐œƒ{๏ฟฝ<๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝsinโก๏ฟฝ1+2(โ„Ž2/๏ฟฝ)โกsinโก๏ฟฝ<cosโก๏ฟฝ

(13)Three possible regimes were concluded based on the contact angle value for the initiation of flow and development of Concusโ€“Finn filament:

๎€๎€Œ๎€Ž๎€๎€๐œƒ>๐œƒ1๐œƒ1>๐œƒ>๐œƒ0๐œƒ0no SCFSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filamentSCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament{๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ1no SCF๏ฟฝ1>๏ฟฝ>๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament๏ฟฝ0SCF without a Concusโˆ’Finn filament

(14)Under Newtonโ€™s Law, the force balance with low Reynolds and Capillary numbers results in the neglect of inertial terms. The force balance between the capillary forces and the viscous force induced by the channel wall is proposed to derive the analytical fluid velocity. This relation between the two forces offers insights into the average flow velocity and the penetration distance function dependent on time. The apparent blood viscosity is defined by Berthier et al. 

(78) through Cassonโ€™s law, 

(23) given in eq 1. The research used the FLOW-3D program from Flow Science Inc. software, which solves transient, free-surface problems using the FDM in multiple dimensions. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method 

(79) is utilized to locate and track the dynamic extension of filament throughout the advancing interface within the channel ahead of the main flow at three progressing time stamps, as depicted in Figure 3(c).

4. Electro-osmotic Flow (EOF) in LOC Systems

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


The utilization of external forces, such as electric fields, has significantly broadened the possibility of manipulating microfluidic flow in LOC systems. 

(80) Externally applied electric field forces induce a fluid flow from the movement of ions in fluid terms as the โ€œelectro-osmotic flowโ€ (EOF).Unique transport phenomena, such as enhanced flow velocity and flow instability, induced by non-Newtonian fluids, particularly viscoelastic fluids, under EOF, have sparked considerable interest in microfluidic devices with simple or complicated geometries within channels. 

(81) However, compared to the study of Newtonian fluids and even other electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flows, the literature focusing on the theoretical and numerical modeling of electro-osmotic blood flow is limited due to the complexity of blood properties. Consequently, to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex blood flow behavior under EOF, theoretical and numerical studies of the transport phenomena in the EOF section will be based on the studies of different viscoelastic fluids under EOF rather than that of blood specifically. Despite this limitation, we believe these studies offer valuable insights that can help understand the complex behavior of blood flow under EOF.

4.1. EOF Phenomena

Electro-osmotic flow occurs at the interface between the microchannel wall and bulk phase solution. When in contact with the bulk phase, solution ions are absorbed or dissociated at the solidโ€“liquid interface, resulting in the formation of a charge layer, as shown in Figure 4. This charged channel surface wall interacts with both negative and positive ions in the bulk sample, causing repulsion and attraction forces to create a thin layer of immobilized counterions, known as the Stern layer. The induced electric potential from the wall gradually decreases with an increase in the distance from the wall. The Stern layer potential, commonly termed the zeta potential, controls the intensity of the electrostatic interactions between mobile counterions and, consequently, the drag force from the applied electric field. Next to the Stern layer is the diffuse mobile layer, mainly composed of a mobile counterion. These two layers constitute the โ€œelectrical double layerโ€ (EDL), the thickness of which is directly proportional to the ionic strength (concentration) of the bulk fluid. The relationship between the two parameters is characterized by a Debye length (ฮป

D), expressed as

๐œ†๐ท=๐œ–๐‘˜B๐‘‡2(๐‘๐‘’)2๐‘0โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโˆš๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝB๏ฟฝ2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)2๏ฟฝ0

(15)where ฯต is the permittivity of the electrolyte solution, k

B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the electron temperature, Z is the integer valence number, e is the elementary charge, and c

0 is the ionic density.

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of an electro-osmotic flow in a microchannel with negative surface charge. (82) Reproduced with permission from ref (82). Copyright 2012 Woodhead Publishing.

When an electric field is applied perpendicular to the EDL, viscous drag is generated due to the movement of excess ions in the EDL. Electro-osmotic forces can be attributed to the externally applied electric potential (ฯ•) and the zeta potential, the system wall induced potential by charged walls (ฯˆ). As illustrated in Figure 4, the majority of ions in the bulk phase have a uniform velocity profile, except for a shear rate condition confined within an extremely thin Stern layer. Therefore, EOF displays a unique characteristic of a โ€œnear flatโ€ or plug flow velocity profile, different from the parabolic flow typically induced by pressure-driven microfluidic flow (Hagenโ€“Poiseuille flow). The plug-shaped velocity profile of the EOF possesses a high shear rate above the Stern layer.Overall, the EOF velocity magnitude is typically proportional to the Debye Length (ฮป

D), zeta potential, and magnitude of the externally applied electric field, while a more viscous liquid reduces the EOF velocity.

4.2. Modeling on Electro-osmotic Viscoelastic Fluid Flow

4.2.1. Theoretical Basis of EOF Mechanisms

The EOF of an incompressible viscoelastic fluid is commonly governed by the continuity and incompressible Nโ€“S equations, as shown in eqs 7 and 8, where the stress tensor and the electrostatic force term are coupled. The electro-osmotic body force term F, representing the body force exerted by the externally applied electric force, is defined as 

๐นโ‡€=๐‘๐ธ๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€, where ฯ

E and 

๐ธโ‡€๏ฟฝโ‡€ are the net electric charge density and the applied external electric field, respectively.Numerous models are established to theoretically study the externally applied electric potential and the system wall induced potential by charged walls. The following Laplace equation, expressed as eq 16, is generally adapted and solved to calculate the externally applied potential (ฯ•).

โˆ‡2๐œ™=0โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=0

(16)Ion diffusion under applied electric fields, together with mass transport resulting from convection and diffusion, transports ionic solutions in bulk flow under electrokinetic processes. The Nernstโ€“Planck equation can describe these transport methods, including convection, diffusion, and electro-diffusion. Therefore, the Nernstโ€“Planck equation is used to determine the distribution of the ions within the electrolyte. The electric potential induced by the charged channel walls follows the Poissonโ€“Nernstโ€“Plank (PNP) equation, which can be written as eq 17.

โˆ‡ยท[๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡๐‘›๐‘–โˆ’๐‘ขโ‡€๐‘›๐‘–+๐‘›๐‘–๐ท๐‘–๐‘ง๐‘–๐‘’๐‘˜๐‘๐‘‡โˆ‡(๐œ™+๐œ“)]=0โˆ‡ยท[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝโ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡(๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ)]=0

(17)where D

in

i, and z

i are the diffusion coefficient, ionic concentration, and ionic valence of the ionic species I, respectively. However, due to the high nonlinearity and numerical stiffness introduced by different lengths and time scales from the PNP equations, the Poissonโ€“Boltzmann (PB) model is often considered the major simplified method of the PNP equation to characterize the potential distribution of the EDL region in microchannels. In the PB model, it is assumed that the ionic species in the fluid follow the Boltzmann distribution. This model is typically valid for steady-state problems where charge transport can be considered negligible, the EDLs do not overlap with each other, and the intrinsic potentials are low. It provides a simplified representation of the potential distribution in the EDL region. The PB equation governing the EDL electric potential distribution is described as

โˆ‡2๐œ“=(2๐‘’๐‘ง๐‘›0๐œ€๐œ€0)sinh(๐‘ง๐‘’๐œ“๐‘˜b๐‘‡)โˆ‡2๏ฟฝ=(2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0)โกsinh(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝb๏ฟฝ)

(18)where n

0 is the ion bulk concentration, z is the ionic valence, and ฮต

0 is the electric permittivity in the vacuum. Under low electric potential conditions, an even further simplified model to illustrate the EOF phenomena is the Debyeโ€“Hรผckel (DH) model. The DH model is derived by obtaining a charge density term by expanding the exponential term of the Boltzmann equation in a Taylor series.

4.2.2. EOF Modeling for Viscoelastic Fluids

Many studies through numerical modeling were performed to obtain a deeper understanding of the effect exhibited by externally applied electric fields on viscoelastic flow in microchannels under various geometrical designs. Bello et al. 

(83) found that methylcellulose solution, a non-Newtonian polymer solution, resulted in stronger electro-osmotic mobility in experiments when compared to the predictions by the Helmholtzโ€“Smoluchowski equation, which is commonly used to define the velocity of EOF of a Newtonian fluid. Being one of the pioneers to identify the discrepancies between the EOF of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, Bello et al. attributed such discrepancies to the presence of a very high shear rate in the EDL, resulting in a change in the orientation of the polymer molecules. Park and Lee 

(84) utilized the FVM to solve the PB equation for the characterization of the electric field induced force. In the study, the concept of fractional calculus for the Oldroyd-B model was adapted to illustrate the elastic and memory effects of viscoelastic fluids in a straight microchannel They observed that fluid elasticity and increased ratio of viscoelastic fluid contribution to overall fluid viscosity had a significant impact on the volumetric flow rate and sensitivity of velocity to electric field strength compared to Newtonian fluids. Afonso et al. 

(85) derived an analytical expression for EOF of viscoelastic fluid between parallel plates using the DH model to account for a zeta potential condition below 25 mV. The study established the understanding of the electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow under low zeta potential conditions. Apart from the electrokinetic forces, pressure forces can also be coupled with EOF to generate a unique fluid flow behavior within the microchannel. Sousa et al. 

(86) analytically studied the flow of a standard viscoelastic solution by combining the pressure gradient force with an externally applied electric force. It was found that, at a near wall skimming layer and the outer layer away from the wall, macromolecules migrating away from surface walls in viscoelastic fluids are observed. In the study, the Phan-Thien Tanner (PTT) constitutive model is utilized to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the solution. The approach is found to be valid when the EDL is much thinner than the skimming layer under an enhanced flow rate. Zhao and Yang 

(87) solved the PB equation and Carreau model for the characterization of the EOF mechanism and non-Newtonian fluid respectively through the FEM. The numerical results depict that, different from the EOF of Newtonian fluids, non-Newtonian fluids led to an increase of electro-osmotic mobility for shear thinning fluids but the opposite for shear thickening fluids.Like other fluid transport driving forces, EOF within unique geometrical layouts also portrays unique transport phenomena. Pimenta and Alves 

(88) utilized the FVM to perform numerical simulations of the EOF of viscoelastic fluids considering the PB equation and the Oldroyd-B model, in a cross-slot and flow-focusing microdevices. It was found that electroelastic instabilities are formed due to the development of large stresses inside the EDL with streamlined curvature at geometry corners. Bezerra et al. 

(89) used the FDM to numerically analyze the vortex formation and flow instability from an electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow in a microchannel with a nozzle geometry and parallel wall geometry setting. The PNP equation is utilized to characterize the charge motion in the EOF and the PTT model for non-Newtonian flow characterization. A constriction geometry is commonly utilized in blood flow adapted in LOC systems due to the change in blood flow behavior under narrow dimensions in a microchannel. Ji et al. 

(90) recently studied the EOF of viscoelastic fluid in a constriction microchannel connected by two relatively big reservoirs on both ends (as seen in Figure 5) filled with the polyacrylamide polymer solution, a viscoelastic fluid, and an incompressible monovalent binary electrolyte solution KCl.

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of a negatively charged constriction microchannel connected to two reservoirs at both ends. An electro-osmotic flow is induced in the system by the induced potential difference between the anode and cathode. (90) Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

In studying the EOF of viscoelastic fluids, the Oldroyd-B model is often utilized to characterize the polymeric stress tensor and the deformation rate of the fluid. The Oldroyd-B model is expressed as follows:

๐œ=๐œ‚p๐œ†(๐œโˆ’๐ˆ)๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝp๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(19)where ฮท

p, ฮป, c, and I represent the polymer dynamic viscosity, polymer relaxation time, symmetric conformation tensor of the polymer molecules, and the identity matrix, respectively.A log-conformation tensor approach is taken to prevent convergence difficulty induced by the viscoelastic properties. The conformation tensor (c) in the polymeric stress tensor term is redefined by a new tensor (ฮ˜) based on the natural logarithm of the c. The new tensor is defined as

ฮ˜=ln(๐œ)=๐‘ln(๐šฒ)๐‘ฮ˜=ln(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝโกln(๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ

(20)in which ฮ› is the diagonal matrix and R is the orthogonal matrix.Under the new conformation tensor, the induced EOF of a viscoelastic fluid is governed by the continuity and Nโ€“S equations adapting the Oldroyd-B model, which is expressed as

โˆ‚๐šฏโˆ‚๐‘ก+๐ฎยทโˆ‡๐šฏ=๐›€ฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๐+1๐œ†(eฮ˜โˆ’๐ˆ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝยทโˆ‡๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝฮ˜โˆ’ฮ˜ฮฉ+2๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ(eฮ˜โˆ’๏ฟฝ)

(21)where ฮฉ and B represent the anti-symmetric matrix and the symmetric traceless matrix of the decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor โˆ‡u, respectively. The conformation tensor can be recovered by c = exp(ฮ˜). The PB model and Laplace equation are utilized to characterize the charged channel wall induced potential and the externally applied potential.The governing equations are numerically solved through the FVM by RheoTool, 

(42) an open-source viscoelastic EOF solver on the OpenFOAM platform. A SIMPLEC (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations-Consistent) algorithm was applied to solve the velocity-pressure coupling. The pressure field and velocity field were computed by the PCG (Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient) solver and the PBiCG (Preconditioned Biconjugate Gradient) solver, respectively.Ranging magnitudes of an applied electric field or fluid concentration induce both different streamlines and velocity magnitudes at various locations and times of the microchannel. In the study performed by Ji et al., 

(90) notable fluctuation of streamlines and vortex formation is formed at the upper stream entrance of the constriction as shown in Figure 6(a) and (b), respectively, due to the increase of electrokinetic effect, which is seen as a result of the increase in polymeric stress (ฯ„

xx). 

(90) The contraction geometry enhances the EOF velocity within the constriction channel under high E

app condition (600 V/cm). Such phenomena can be attributed to the dependence of electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow on the system wall surface and bulk fluid properties. 

(91)

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of vortex formation and streamlines of EOF depicting flow instability at (a) 1.71 s and (b) 1.75 s. Spatial distribution of the elastic normal stress at (c) high Eapp condition. Streamline of an electro-osmotic flow under Eapp of 600 V/cm (90) for (d) non-Newtonian and (e) Newtonian fluid through a constriction geometry. Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2021 The Authors, under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

As elastic normal stress exceeds the local shear stress, flow instability and vortex formation occur. The induced elastic stress under EOF not only enhances the instability of the flow but often generates an irregular secondary flow leading to strong disturbance. 

(92) It is also vital to consider the effect of the constriction layout of microchannels on the alteration of the field strength within the system. The contraction geometry enhances a larger electric field strength compared with other locations of the channel outside the constriction region, resulting in a higher velocity gradient and stronger extension on the polymer within the viscoelastic solution. Following the high shear flow condition, a higher magnitude of stretch for polymer molecules in viscoelastic fluids exhibits larger elastic stresses and enhancement of vortex formation at the region. 

(93)As shown in Figure 6(c), significant elastic normal stress occurs at the inlet of the constriction microchannel. Such occurrence of a polymeric flow can be attributed to the dominating elongational flow, giving rise to high deformation of the polymers within the viscoelastic fluid flow, resulting in higher elastic stress from the polymers. Such phenomena at the entrance result in the difference in velocity streamline as circled in Figure 6(d) compared to that of the Newtonian fluid at the constriction entrance in Figure 6(e). 

(90) The difference between the Newtonian and polymer solution at the exit, as circled in Figure 6(d) and (e), can be attributed to the extrudate swell effect of polymers 

(94) within the viscoelastic fluid flow. The extrudate swell effect illustrates that, as polymers emerge from the constriction exit, they tend to contract in the flow direction and grow in the normal direction, resulting in an extrudate diameter greater than the channel size. The deformation of polymers within the polymeric flow at both the entrance and exit of the contraction channel facilitates the change in shear stress conditions of the flow, leading to the alteration in streamlines of flows for each region.

4.3. EOF Applications in LOC Systems

4.3.1. Mixing in LOC Systems

Rather than relying on the micromixing controlled by molecular diffusion under low Reynolds number conditions, active mixers actively leverage convective instability and vortex formation induced by electro-osmotic flows from alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) electric fields. Such adaptation is recognized as significant breakthroughs for promotion of fluid mixing in chemical and biological applications such as drug delivery, medical diagnostics, chemical synthesis, and so on. 

(95)Many researchers proposed novel designs of electro-osmosis micromixers coupled with numerical simulations in conjunction with experimental findings to increase their understanding of the role of flow instability and vortex formation in the mixing process under electrokinetic phenomena. Matsubara and Narumi 

(96) numerically modeled the mixing process in a microchannel with four electrodes on each side of the microchannel wall, which generated a disruption through unstable electro-osmotic vortices. It was found that particle mixing was sensitive to both the convection effect induced by the main and secondary vortex within the micromixer and the change in oscillation frequency caused by the supplied AC voltage when the Reynolds number was varied. Qaderi et al. 

(97) adapted the PNP equation to numerically study the effect of the geometry and zeta potential configuration of the microchannel on the mixing process with a combined electro-osmotic pressure driven flow. It was reported that the application of heterogeneous zeta potential configuration enhances the mixing efficiency by around 23% while the height of the hurdles increases the mixing efficiency at most 48.1%. Cho et al. 

(98) utilized the PB model and Laplace equation to numerically simulate the electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid mixing process within a wavy and block layout of microchannel walls. The Power Law model is adapted to describe the fluid rheological characteristic. It was found that shear-thinning fluids possess a higher volumetric flow rate, which could result in poorer mixing efficiency compared to that of Newtonian fluids. Numerous studies have revealed that flow instability and vortex generation, in particular secondary vortices produced by barriers or greater magnitudes of heterogeneous zeta potential distribution, enhance mixing by increasing bulk flow velocity and reducing flow distance.To better understand the mechanism of disturbance formed in the system due to externally applied forces, known as electrokinetic instability, literature often utilize the Rayleigh (Ra) number, 

(1) as described below:

๐‘…๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ=๐‘ขev๐‘ขeo=(๐›พโˆ’1๐›พ+1)2๐‘Š๐›ฟ2๐ธel2๐ป2๐œ๐›ฟRa๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝev๏ฟฝeo=(๏ฟฝโˆ’1๏ฟฝ+1)2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝel2๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(22)where ฮณ is the conductivity ratio of the two streams and can be written as 

๐›พ=๐œŽel,H๐œŽel,L๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝel,H๏ฟฝel,L. The Ra number characterizes the ratio between electroviscous and electro-osmotic flow. A high Ra

v value often results in good mixing. It is evident that fluid properties such as the conductivity (ฯƒ) of the two streams play a key role in the formation of disturbances to enhance mixing in microsystems. At the same time, electrokinetic parameters like the zeta potential (ฮถ) in the Ra number is critical in the characterization of electro-osmotic velocity and a slip boundary condition at the microchannel wall.To understand the mixing result along the channel, the concentration field can be defined and simulated under the assumption of steady state conditions and constant diffusion coefficient for each of the working fluid within the system through the convectionโ€“diffusion equation as below:

โˆ‚๐‘๐’Šโˆ‚๐‘ก+โˆ‡โ‡€(๐‘๐‘–๐‘ขโ‡€โˆ’๐ท๐‘–โˆ‡โ‡€๐‘๐’Š)=0โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‡โ‡€(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ‡€โˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‡โ‡€๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)=0

(23)where c

i is the species concentration of species i and D

i is the diffusion coefficient of the corresponding species.The standard deviation of concentration (ฯƒ

sd) can be adapted to evaluate the mixing quality of the system. 

(97) The standard deviation for concentration at a specific portion of the channel may be calculated using the equation below:

๐œŽsd=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)โˆ’๐ถm)2d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ๎€ค๎€ข๎€ฃ๎€ฃ๏ฟฝsd=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)โˆ’๏ฟฝm)2d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*

(24)where C*(y*) and C

m are the non-dimensional concentration profile and the mean concentration at the portion, respectively. C* is the non-dimensional concentration and can be calculated as 

๐ถโˆ—=๐ถ๐ถref๏ฟฝ*=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝref, where C

ref is the reference concentration defined as the bulk solution concentration. The mean concentration profile can be calculated as 

๐ถm=โˆซ10(๐ถโˆ—(๐‘ฆโˆ—)d๐‘ฆโˆ—โˆซ10d๐‘ฆโˆ—๏ฟฝm=โˆซ01(๏ฟฝ*(๏ฟฝ*)d๏ฟฝ*โˆซ01d๏ฟฝ*. With the standard deviation of concentration, the mixing efficiency 

(97) can then be calculated as below:

๐œ€๐‘ฅ=1โˆ’๐œŽsd๐œŽsd,0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=1โˆ’๏ฟฝsd๏ฟฝsd,0

(25)where ฯƒ

sd,0 is the standard derivation of the case of no mixing. The value of the mixing efficiency is typically utilized in conjunction with the simulated flow field and concentration field to explore the effect of geometrical and electrokinetic parameters on the optimization of the mixing results.

5. Summary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


5.1. Conclusion

Viscoelastic fluids such as blood flow in LOC systems are an essential topic to proceed with diagnostic analysis and research through microdevices in the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries. The complex blood flow behavior is tightly controlled by the viscoelastic characteristics of blood such as the dynamic viscosity and the elastic property of RBCs under various shear rate conditions. Furthermore, the flow behaviors under varied driving forces promote an array of microfluidic transport phenomena that are critical to the management of blood flow and other adapted viscoelastic fluids in LOC systems. This review addressed the blood flow phenomena, the complicated interplay between shear rate and blood flow behaviors, and their numerical modeling under LOC systems through the lens of the viscoelasticity characteristic. Furthermore, a theoretical understanding of capillary forces and externally applied electric forces leads to an in-depth investigation of the relationship between blood flow patterns and the key parameters of the two driving forces, the latter of which is introduced through the lens of viscoelastic fluids, coupling numerical modeling to improve the knowledge of blood flow manipulation in LOC systems. The flow disturbances triggered by the EOF of viscoelastic fluids and their impact on blood flow patterns have been deeply investigated due to their important role and applications in LOC devices. Continuous advancements of various numerical modeling methods with experimental findings through more efficient and less computationally heavy methods have served as an encouraging sign of establishing more accurate illustrations of the mechanisms for multiphase blood and other viscoelastic fluid flow transport phenomena driven by various forces. Such progress is fundamental for the manipulation of unique transport phenomena, such as the generated disturbances, to optimize functionalities offered by microdevices in LOC systems.

The following section will provide further insights into the employment of studied blood transport phenomena to improve the functionality of micro devices adapting LOC technology. A discussion of the novel roles that external driving forces play in microfluidic flow behaviors is also provided. Limitations in the computational modeling of blood flow and electrokinetic phenomena in LOC systems will also be emphasized, which may provide valuable insights for future research endeavors. These discussions aim to provide guidance and opportunities for new paths in the ongoing development of LOC devices that adapt blood flow.

5.2. Future Directions

5.2.1. Electro-osmosis Mixing in LOC Systems

Despite substantial research, mixing results through flow instability and vortex formation phenomena induced by electro-osmotic mixing still deviate from the effective mixing results offered by chaotic mixing results such as those seen in turbulent flows. However, recent discoveries of a mixing phenomenon that is generally observed under turbulent flows are found within electro-osmosis micromixers under low Reynolds number conditions. Zhao 

(99) experimentally discovered a rapid mixing process in an AC applied micromixer, where the power spectrum of concentration under an applied voltage of 20 V

p-p induces a โˆ’5/3 slope within a frequency range. This value of the slope is considered as the Oโ€“C spectrum in macroflows, which is often visible under relatively high Re conditions, such as the Taylor microscale Reynolds number Re > 500 in turbulent flows. 

(100) However, the Re value in the studied system is less than 1 at the specific location and applied voltage. A secondary flow is also suggested to occur close to microchannel walls, being attributed to the increase of convective instability within the system.Despite the experimental phenomenon proposed by Zhao et al., 

(99) the range of effects induced by vital parameters of an EOF mixing system on the enhanced mixing results and mechanisms of disturbance generated by the turbulent-like flow instability is not further characterized. Such a gap in knowledge may hinder the adaptability and commercialization of the discovery of micromixers. One of the parameters for further evaluation is the conductivity gradient of the fluid flow. A relatively strong conductivity gradient (5000:1) was adopted in the system due to the conductive properties of the two fluids. The high conductivity gradients may contribute to the relatively large Rayleigh number and differences in EDL layer thickness, resulting in an unusual disturbance in laminar flow conditions and enhanced mixing results. However, high conductivity gradients are not always achievable by the working fluids due to diverse fluid properties. The reliance on turbulent-like phenomena and rapid mixing results in a large conductivity gradient should be established to prevent the limited application of fluids for the mixing system. In addition, the proposed system utilizes distinct zeta potential distributions at the top and bottom walls due to their difference in material choices, which may be attributed to the flow instability phenomena. Further studies should be made on varying zeta potential magnitude and distribution to evaluate their effect on the slip boundary conditions of the flow and the large shear rate condition close to the channel wall of EOF. Such a study can potentially offer an optimized condition in zeta potential magnitude through material choices and geometrical layout of the zeta potential for better mixing results and manipulation of mixing fluid dynamics. The two vital parameters mentioned above can be varied with the aid of numerical simulation to understand the effect of parameters on the interaction between electro-osmotic forces and electroviscous forces. At the same time, the relationship of developed streamlines of the simulated velocity and concentration field, following their relationship with the mixing results, under the impact of these key parameters can foster more insight into the range of impact that the two parameters have on the proposed phenomena and the microfluidic dynamic principles of disturbances.

In addition, many of the current investigations of electrokinetic mixers commonly emphasize the fluid dynamics of mixing for Newtonian fluids, while the utilization of biofluids, primarily viscoelastic fluids such as blood, and their distinctive response under shear forces in these novel mixing processes of LOC systems are significantly less studied. To develop more compatible microdevice designs and efficient mixing outcomes for the biomedical industry, it is necessary to fill the knowledge gaps in the literature on electro-osmotic mixing for biofluids, where properties of elasticity, dynamic viscosity, and intricate relationship with shear flow from the fluid are further considered.

5.2.2. Electro-osmosis Separation in LOC Systems

Particle separation in LOC devices, particularly in biological research and diagnostics, is another area where disturbances may play a significant role in optimization. 

(101) Plasma analysis in LOC systems under precise control of blood flow phenomena and blood/plasma separation procedures can detect vital information about infectious diseases from particular antibodies and foreign nucleic acids for medical treatments, diagnostics, and research, 

(102) offering more efficient results and simple operating procedures compared to that of the traditional centrifugation method for blood and plasma separation. However, the adaptability of LOC devices for blood and plasma separation is often hindered by microchannel clogging, where flow velocity and plasma yield from LOC devices is reduced due to occasional RBC migration and aggregation at the filtration entrance of microdevices. 

(103)It is important to note that the EOF induces flow instability close to microchannel walls, which may provide further solutions to clogging for the separation process of the LOC systems. Mohammadi et al. 

(104) offered an anti-clogging effect of RBCs at the blood and plasma separating device filtration entry, adjacent to the surface wall, through RBC disaggregation under high shear rate conditions generated by a forward and reverse EOF direction.

Further theoretical and numerical research can be conducted to characterize the effect of high shear rate conditions near microchannel walls toward the detachment of binding blood cells on surfaces and the reversibility of aggregation. Through numerical modeling with varying electrokinetic parameters to induce different degrees of disturbances or shear conditions at channel walls, it may be possible to optimize and better understand the process of disrupting the forces that bind cells to surface walls and aggregated cells at filtration pores. RBCs that migrate close to microchannel walls are often attracted by the adhesion force between the RBC and the solid surface originating from the van der Waals forces. Following RBC migration and attachment by adhesive forces adjacent to the microchannel walls as shown in Figure 7, the increase in viscosity at the region causes a lower shear condition and encourages RBC aggregation (cellโ€“cell interaction), which clogs filtering pores or microchannels and reduces flow velocity at filtration region. Both the impact that shear forces and disturbances may induce on cell binding forces with surface walls and other cells leading to aggregation may suggest further characterization. Kinetic parameters such as activation energy and the rate-determining step for cell binding composition attachment and detachment should be considered for modeling the dynamics of RBCs and blood flows under external forces in LOC separation devices.

Figure 7. Schematic representations of clogging at a microchannel pore following the sequence of RBC migration, cell attachment to channel walls, and aggregation. (105) Reproduced with permission from ref (105). Copyright 2018 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

5.2.3. Relationship between External Forces and Microfluidic Systems

In blood flow, a thicker CFL suggests a lower blood viscosity, suggesting a complex relationship between shear stress and shear rate, affecting the blood viscosity and blood flow. Despite some experimental and numerical studies on electro-osmotic non-Newtonian fluid flow, limited literature has performed an in-depth investigation of the role that applied electric forces and other external forces could play in the process of CFL formation. Additional studies on how shear rates from external forces affect CFL formation and microfluidic flow dynamics can shed light on the mechanism of the contribution induced by external driving forces to the development of a separate phase of layer, similar to CFL, close to the microchannel walls and distinct from the surrounding fluid within the system, then influencing microfluidic flow dynamics.One of the mechanisms of phenomena to be explored is the formation of the Exclusion Zone (EZ) region following a โ€œSelf-Induced Flowโ€ (SIF) phenomenon discovered by Li and Pollack, 

(106) as shown in Figure 8(a) and (b), respectively. A spontaneous sustained axial flow is observed when hydrophilic materials are immersed in water, resulting in the buildup of a negative layer of charges, defined as the EZ, after water molecules absorb infrared radiation (IR) energy and break down into H and OH

+โ€“.

Figure 8. Schematic representations of (a) the Exclusion Zone region and (b) the Self Induced Flow through visualization of microsphere movement within a microchannel. (106) Reproduced with permission from ref (106). Copyright 2020 The Authors under the terms of the Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Despite the finding of such a phenomenon, the specific mechanism and role of IR energy have yet to be defined for the process of EZ development. To further develop an understanding of the role of IR energy in such phenomena, a feasible study may be seen through the lens of the relationships between external forces and microfluidic flow. In the phenomena, the increase of SIF velocity under a rise of IR radiation resonant characteristics is shown in the participation of the external electric field near the microchannel walls under electro-osmotic viscoelastic fluid flow systems. The buildup of negative charges at the hydrophilic surfaces in EZ is analogous to the mechanism of electrical double layer formation. Indeed, research has initiated the exploration of the core mechanisms for EZ formation through the lens of the electrokinetic phenomena. 

(107) Such a similarity of the role of IR energy and the transport phenomena of SIF with electrokinetic phenomena paves the way for the definition of the unknown SIF phenomena and EZ formation. Furthermore, Li and Pollack 

(106) suggest whether CFL formation might contribute to a SIF of blood using solely IR radiation, a commonly available source of energy in nature, as an external driving force. The proposition may be proven feasible with the presence of the CFL region next to the negatively charged hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer, coating the luminal side of blood vessels. 

(108) Further research can dive into the resonating characteristics between the formation of the CFL region next to the hydrophilic endothelial glycocalyx layer and that of the EZ formation close to hydrophilic microchannel walls. Indeed, an increase in IR energy is known to rapidly accelerate EZ formation and SIF velocity, depicting similarity to the increase in the magnitude of electric field forces and greater shear rates at microchannel walls affecting CFL formation and EOF velocity. Such correlation depicts a future direction in whether SIF blood flow can be observed and characterized theoretically further through the lens of the relationship between blood flow and shear forces exhibited by external energy.

The intricate link between the CFL and external forces, more specifically the externally applied electric field, can receive further attention to provide a more complete framework for the mechanisms between IR radiation and EZ formation. Such characterization may also contribute to a greater comprehension of the role IR can play in CFL formation next to the endothelial glycocalyx layer as well as its role as a driving force to propel blood flow, similar to the SIF, but without the commonly assumed pressure force from heart contraction as a source of driving force.

5.3. Challenges

Although there have been significant improvements in blood flow modeling under LOC systems over the past decade, there are still notable constraints that may require special attention for numerical simulation applications to benefit the adaptability of the designs and functionalities of LOC devices. Several points that require special attention are mentioned below:

1.The majority of CFD models operate under the relationship between the viscoelasticity of blood and the shear rate conditions of flow. The relative effect exhibited by the presence of highly populated RBCs in whole blood and their forces amongst the cells themselves under complex flows often remains unclearly defined. Furthermore, the full range of cell populations in whole blood requires a much more computational load for numerical modeling. Therefore, a vital goal for future research is to evaluate a reduced modeling method where the impact of cellโ€“cell interaction on the viscoelastic property of blood is considered.
2.Current computational methods on hemodynamics rely on continuum models based upon non-Newtonian rheology at the macroscale rather than at molecular and cellular levels. Careful considerations should be made for the development of a constructive framework for the physical and temporal scales of micro/nanoscale systems to evaluate the intricate relationship between fluid driving forces, dynamic viscosity, and elasticity.
3.Viscoelastic fluids under the impact of externally applied electric forces often deviate from the assumptions of no-slip boundary conditions due to the unique flow conditions induced by externally applied forces. Furthermore, the mechanism of vortex formation and viscoelastic flow instability at laminar flow conditions should be better defined through the lens of the microfluidic flow phenomenon to optimize the prediction of viscoelastic flow across different geometrical layouts. Mathematical models and numerical methods are needed to better predict such disturbance caused by external forces and the viscoelasticity of fluids at such a small scale.
4.Under practical situations, zeta potential distribution at channel walls frequently deviates from the common assumption of a constant distribution because of manufacturing faults or inherent surface charges prior to the introduction of electrokinetic influence. These discrepancies frequently lead to inconsistent surface potential distribution, such as excess positive ions at relatively more negatively charged walls. Accordingly, unpredicted vortex formation and flow instability may occur. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to these discrepancies and how they could trigger the transport process and unexpected results of a microdevice.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


  • Corresponding Authors
    • Zhe Chen – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: zaccooky@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Bo Ouyang – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Email: bouy93@sjtu.edu.cn
    • Zheng-Hong Luo – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-6020; Email: luozh@sjtu.edu.cn
  • Authors
    • Bin-Jie Lai – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-8133-5381
    • Li-Tao Zhu – Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;  Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6514-8864
  • NotesThe authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22238005) and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. GZC20231576).

Vocabulary

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


Microfluidicsthe field of technological and scientific study that investigates fluid flow in channels with dimensions between 1 and 1000 ฮผm
Lab-on-a-Chip Technologythe field of research and technological development aimed at integrating the micro/nanofluidic characteristics to conduct laboratory processes on handheld devices
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)the method utilizing computational abilities to predict physical fluid flow behaviors mathematically through solving the governing equations of corresponding fluid flows
Shear Ratethe rate of change in velocity where one layer of fluid moves past the adjacent layer
Viscoelasticitythe property holding both elasticity and viscosity characteristics relying on the magnitude of applied shear stress and time-dependent strain
Electro-osmosisthe flow of fluid under an applied electric field when charged solid surface is in contact with the bulk fluid
Vortexthe rotating motion of a fluid revolving an axis line

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS

Jump To


This article references 108 other publications.

  1. 1Neethirajan, S.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M.; Wu, D.; Nandagopal, S.; Lin, F. Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip 201111 (9), 1574โ€“ 1586,  DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00230eViewGoogle Scholar
  2. 2Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006442 (7101), 368โ€“ 373,  DOI: 10.1038/nature05058ViewGoogle Scholar
  3. 3Burklund, A.; Tadimety, A.; Nie, Y.; Hao, N.; Zhang, J. X. J. Chapter One – Advances in diagnostic microfluidics; Elsevier, 2020; DOI:  DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2019.08.001 .ViewGoogle Scholar
  4. 4Abdulbari, H. A. Chapter 12 – Lab-on-a-chip for analysis of blood. In Nanotechnology for Hematology, Blood Transfusion, and Artificial Blood; Denizli, A., Nguyen, T. A., Rajan, M., Alam, M. F., Rahman, K., Eds.; Elsevier, 2022; pp 265โ€“ 283.ViewGoogle Scholar
  5. 5Vladisavljeviฤ‡, G. T.; Khalid, N.; Neves, M. A.; Kuroiwa, T.; Nakajima, M.; Uemura, K.; Ichikawa, S.; Kobayashi, I. Industrial lab-on-a-chip: Design, applications and scale-up for drug discovery and delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 201365 (11), 1626โ€“ 1663,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  6. 6Kersaudy-Kerhoas, M.; Dhariwal, R.; Desmulliez, M. P. Y.; Jouvet, L. Hydrodynamic blood plasma separation in microfluidic channels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20108 (1), 105โ€“ 114,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-009-0450-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  7. 7Popel, A. S.; Johnson, P. C. Microcirculation and Hemorheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 43โ€“ 69,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.042604.133933ViewGoogle Scholar
  8. 8Fedosov, D. A.; Peltomรคki, M.; Gompper, G. Deformation and dynamics of red blood cells in flow through cylindrical microchannels. Soft Matter 201410 (24), 4258โ€“ 4267,  DOI: 10.1039/C4SM00248BViewGoogle Scholar
  9. 9Chakraborty, S. Dynamics of capillary flow of blood into a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 20055 (4), 421โ€“ 430,  DOI: 10.1039/b414566fViewGoogle Scholar
  10. 10Tomaiuolo, G.; Guido, S. Start-up shape dynamics of red blood cells in microcapillary flow. Microvascular Research 201182 (1), 35โ€“ 41,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.03.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  11. 11Sherwood, J. M.; Dusting, J.; Kaliviotis, E.; Balabani, S. The effect of red blood cell aggregation on velocity and cell-depleted layer characteristics of blood in a bifurcating microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 20126 (2), 24119,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4717755ViewGoogle Scholar
  12. 12Nader, E.; Skinner, S.; Romana, M.; Fort, R.; Lemonne, N.; Guillot, N.; Gauthier, A.; Antoine-Jonville, S.; Renoux, C.; Hardy-Dessources, M.-D. Blood Rheology: Key Parameters, Impact on Blood Flow, Role in Sickle Cell Disease and Effects of Exercise. Frontiers in Physiology 201910, 01329,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01329ViewGoogle Scholar
  13. 13Trejo-Soto, C.; Lรกzaro, G. R.; Pagonabarraga, I.; Hernรกndez-Machado, A. Microfluidics Approach to the Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cell Membrane and Their Effect on Blood Rheology. Membranes 202212 (2), 217,  DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020217ViewGoogle Scholar
  14. 14Wagner, C.; Steffen, P.; Svetina, S. Aggregation of red blood cells: From rouleaux to clot formation. Comptes Rendus Physique 201314 (6), 459โ€“ 469,  DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  15. 15Kim, H.; Zhbanov, A.; Yang, S. Microfluidic Systems for Blood and Blood Cell Characterization. Biosensors 202313 (1), 13,  DOI: 10.3390/bios13010013ViewGoogle Scholar
  16. 16Fรฅhrรฆus, R.; Lindqvist, T. THE VISCOSITY OF THE BLOOD IN NARROW CAPILLARY TUBES. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 193196 (3), 562โ€“ 568,  DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1931.96.3.562ViewGoogle Scholar
  17. 17Ascolese, M.; Farina, A.; Fasano, A. The Fรฅhrรฆus-Lindqvist effect in small blood vessels: how does it help the heart?. J. Biol. Phys. 201945 (4), 379โ€“ 394,  DOI: 10.1007/s10867-019-09534-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  18. 18Bento, D.; Fernandes, C. S.; Miranda, J. M.; Lima, R. In vitro blood flow visualizations and cell-free layer (CFL) measurements in a microchannel network. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2019109, 109847,  DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109847ViewGoogle Scholar
  19. 19Namgung, B.; Ong, P. K.; Wong, Y. H.; Lim, D.; Chun, K. J.; Kim, S. A comparative study of histogram-based thresholding methods for the determination of cell-free layer width in small blood vessels. Physiological Measurement 201031 (9), N61,  DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/N01ViewGoogle Scholar
  20. 20Hymel, S. J.; Lan, H.; Fujioka, H.; Khismatullin, D. B. Cell trapping in Y-junction microchannels: A numerical study of the bifurcation angle effect in inertial microfluidics. Phys. Fluids (1994) 201931 (8), 082003,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5113516ViewGoogle Scholar
  21. 21Li, X.; Popel, A. S.; Karniadakis, G. E. Blood-plasma separation in Y-shaped bifurcating microfluidic channels: a dissipative particle dynamics simulation study. Phys. Biol. 20129 (2), 026010,  DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/2/026010ViewGoogle Scholar
  22. 22Yin, X.; Thomas, T.; Zhang, J. Multiple red blood cell flows through microvascular bifurcations: Cell free layer, cell trajectory, and hematocrit separation. Microvascular Research 201389, 47โ€“ 56,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.05.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  23. 23Shibeshi, S. S.; Collins, W. E. The Rheology of Blood Flow in a Branched Arterial System. Appl. Rheol 200515 (6), 398โ€“ 405,  DOI: 10.1515/arh-2005-0020ViewGoogle Scholar
  24. 24Sequeira, A.; Janela, J. An Overview of Some Mathematical Models of Blood Rheology. In A Portrait of State-of-the-Art Research at the Technical University of Lisbon; Pereira, M. S., Ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2007; pp 65โ€“ 87.ViewGoogle Scholar
  25. 25Walburn, F. J.; Schneck, D. J. A constitutive equation for whole human blood. Biorheology 197613, 201โ€“ 210,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1976-13307ViewGoogle Scholar
  26. 26Quemada, D. A rheological model for studying the hematocrit dependence of red cell-red cell and red cell-protein interactions in blood. Biorheology 198118, 501โ€“ 516,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1981-183-615ViewGoogle Scholar
  27. 27Varchanis, S.; Dimakopoulos, Y.; Wagner, C.; Tsamopoulos, J. How viscoelastic is human blood plasma?. Soft Matter 201814 (21), 4238โ€“ 4251,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SM00061AViewGoogle Scholar
  28. 28Apostolidis, A. J.; Moyer, A. P.; Beris, A. N. Non-Newtonian effects in simulations of coronary arterial blood flow. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2016233, 155โ€“ 165,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.03.008ViewGoogle Scholar
  29. 29Luo, X. Y.; Kuang, Z. B. A study on the constitutive equation of blood. J. Biomech. 199225 (8), 929โ€“ 934,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90233-QViewGoogle Scholar
  30. 30Oldroyd, J. G.; Wilson, A. H. On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1950200 (1063), 523โ€“ 541,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1950.0035ViewGoogle Scholar
  31. 31Prado, G.; Farutin, A.; Misbah, C.; Bureau, L. Viscoelastic transient of confined red blood cells. Biophys J. 2015108 (9), 2126โ€“ 2136,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.046ViewGoogle Scholar
  32. 32Huang, C. R.; Pan, W. D.; Chen, H. Q.; Copley, A. L. Thixotropic properties of whole blood from healthy human subjects. Biorheology 198724 (6), 795โ€“ 801,  DOI: 10.3233/BIR-1987-24630ViewGoogle Scholar
  33. 33Anand, M.; Kwack, J.; Masud, A. A new generalized Oldroyd-B model for blood flow in complex geometries. International Journal of Engineering Science 201372, 78โ€“ 88,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.06.009ViewGoogle Scholar
  34. 34Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Investigation of blood rheology under steady and unidirectional large amplitude oscillatory shear. J. Rheol. 201862 (2), 577โ€“ 591,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5017623ViewGoogle Scholar
  35. 35Horner, J. S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J.; Beris, A. N. Measurements of human blood viscoelasticity and thixotropy under steady and transient shear and constitutive modeling thereof. J. Rheol. 201963 (5), 799โ€“ 813,  DOI: 10.1122/1.5108737ViewGoogle Scholar
  36. 36Armstrong, M.; Tussing, J. A methodology for adding thixotropy to Oldroyd-8 family of viscoelastic models for characterization of human blood. Phys. Fluids 202032 (9), 094111,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0022501ViewGoogle Scholar
  37. 37Crank, J.; Nicolson, P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 194743 (1), 50โ€“ 67,  DOI: 10.1017/S0305004100023197ViewGoogle Scholar
  38. 38Clough, R. W. Original formulation of the finite element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 19907 (2), 89โ€“ 101,  DOI: 10.1016/0168-874X(90)90001-UViewGoogle Scholar
  39. 39Liu, W. K.; Liu, Y.; Farrell, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X. S.; Fukui, Y.; Patankar, N.; Zhang, Y.; Bajaj, C.; Lee, J.Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006195 (13), 1722โ€“ 1749,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.049ViewGoogle Scholar
  40. 40Lopes, D.; Agujetas, R.; Puga, H.; Teixeira, J.; Lima, R.; Alejo, J. P.; Ferrera, C. Analysis of finite element and finite volume methods for fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow in a real stenosed artery. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2021207, 106650,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106650ViewGoogle Scholar
  41. 41Favero, J. L.; Secchi, A. R.; Cardozo, N. S. M.; Jasak, H. Viscoelastic flow analysis using the software OpenFOAM and differential constitutive equations. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2010165 (23), 1625โ€“ 1636,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.08.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  42. 42Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Stabilization of an open-source finite-volume solver for viscoelastic fluid flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2017239, 85โ€“ 104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.12.002ViewGoogle Scholar
  43. 43Chee, C. Y.; Lee, H. P.; Lu, C. Using 3D fluid-structure interaction model to analyse the biomechanical properties of erythrocyte. Phys. Lett. A 2008372 (9), 1357โ€“ 1362,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.067ViewGoogle Scholar
  44. 44Xu, D.; Kaliviotis, E.; Munjiza, A.; Avital, E.; Ji, C.; Williams, J. Large scale simulation of red blood cell aggregation in shear flows. J. Biomech. 201346 (11), 1810โ€“ 1817,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.010ViewGoogle Scholar
  45. 45Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of the royal society of London. A. mathematical and physical sciences 1971324 (1558), 301โ€“ 313,  DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1971.0141ViewGoogle Scholar
  46. 46Shi, L.; Pan, T.-W.; Glowinski, R. Deformation of a single red blood cell in bounded Poiseuille flows. Phys. Rev. E 201285 (1), 016307,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.016307ViewGoogle Scholar
  47. 47Yoon, D.; You, D. Continuum modeling of deformation and aggregation of red blood cells. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2267โ€“ 2279,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  48. 48Mainardi, F.; Spada, G. Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. European Physical Journal Special Topics 2011193 (1), 133โ€“ 160,  DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01387-1ViewGoogle Scholar
  49. 49Gracka, M.; Lima, R.; Miranda, J. M.; Student, S.; Melka, B.; Ostrowski, Z. Red blood cells tracking and cell-free layer formation in a microchannel with hyperbolic contraction: A CFD model validation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022226, 107117,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107117ViewGoogle Scholar
  50. 50Aryan, H.; Beigzadeh, B.; Siavashi, M. Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation of improved magnetic drug delivery in a three-dimensional CT-based carotid artery bifurcation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2022219, 106778,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106778ViewGoogle Scholar
  51. 51Czaja, B.; Zรกvodszky, G.; Azizi Tarksalooyeh, V.; Hoekstra, A. G. Cell-resolved blood flow simulations of saccular aneurysms: effects of pulsatility and aspect ratio. J. R Soc. Interface 201815 (146), 20180485,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0485ViewGoogle Scholar
  52. 52Rydquist, G.; Esmaily, M. A cell-resolved, Lagrangian solver for modeling red blood cell dynamics in macroscale flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2022461, 111204,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111204ViewGoogle Scholar
  53. 53Dadvand, A.; Baghalnezhad, M.; Mirzaee, I.; Khoo, B. C.; Ghoreishi, S. An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann approach to study the dynamics of elastic membranes in viscous shear flows. Journal of Computational Science 20145 (5), 709โ€“ 718,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2014.06.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  54. 54Krรผger, T.; Holmes, D.; Coveney, P. V. Deformability-based red blood cell separation in deterministic lateral displacement devicesโ”€A simulation study. Biomicrofluidics 20148 (5), 054114,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4897913ViewGoogle Scholar
  55. 55Takeishi, N.; Ito, H.; Kaneko, M.; Wada, S. Deformation of a Red Blood Cell in a Narrow Rectangular Microchannel. Micromachines 201910 (3), 199,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10030199ViewGoogle Scholar
  56. 56Krรผger, T.; Varnik, F.; Raabe, D. Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann finite element method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 201161 (12), 3485โ€“ 3505,  DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.057ViewGoogle Scholar
  57. 57Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Umundum, T.; Saeedipour, M. A reduced-order model for deformable particles with application in bio-microfluidics. Computational Particle Mechanics 20207 (3), 593โ€“ 601,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-019-00283-8ViewGoogle Scholar
  58. 58Balachandran Nair, A. N.; Pirker, S.; Saeedipour, M. Resolved CFD-DEM simulation of blood flow with a reduced-order RBC model. Computational Particle Mechanics 20229 (4), 759โ€“ 774,  DOI: 10.1007/s40571-021-00441-xViewGoogle Scholar
  59. 59Mittal, R.; Iaccarino, G. IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 200537 (1), 239โ€“ 261,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175743ViewGoogle Scholar
  60. 60Piquet, A.; Roussel, O.; Hadjadj, A. A comparative study of Brinkman penalization and direct-forcing immersed boundary methods for compressible viscous flows. Computers & Fluids 2016136, 272โ€“ 284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  61. 61Akerkouch, L.; Le, T. B. A Hybrid Continuum-Particle Approach for Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Red Blood Cells in Fluid Flows. Fluids 20216 (4), 139,  DOI: 10.3390/fluids6040139ViewGoogle Scholar
  62. 62Barker, A. T.; Cai, X.-C. Scalable parallel methods for monolithic coupling in fluid-structure interaction with application to blood flow modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 2010229 (3), 642โ€“ 659,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  63. 63Cetin, A.; Sahin, M. A monolithic fluid-structure interaction framework applied to red blood cells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 201935 (2), e3171  DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3171ViewGoogle Scholar
  64. 64Freund, J. B. Numerical Simulation of Flowing Blood Cells. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 201446 (1), 67โ€“ 95,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141349ViewGoogle Scholar
  65. 65Ye, T.; Phan-Thien, N.; Lim, C. T. Particle-based simulations of red blood cellsโ”€A review. J. Biomech. 201649 (11), 2255โ€“ 2266,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.050ViewGoogle Scholar
  66. 66Arabghahestani, M.; Poozesh, S.; Akafuah, N. K. Advances in Computational Fluid Mechanics in Cellular Flow Manipulation: A Review. Applied Sciences 20199 (19), 4041,  DOI: 10.3390/app9194041ViewGoogle Scholar
  67. 67Rathnayaka, C. M.; From, C. S.; Geekiyanage, N. M.; Gu, Y. T.; Nguyen, N. T.; Sauret, E. Particle-Based Numerical Modelling of Liquid Marbles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 202229 (5), 3021โ€“ 3039,  DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09683-7ViewGoogle Scholar
  68. 68Li, X.; Vlahovska, P. M.; Karniadakis, G. E. Continuum- and particle-based modeling of shapes and dynamics of red blood cells in health and disease. Soft Matter 20139 (1), 28โ€“ 37,  DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26891DViewGoogle Scholar
  69. 69Beris, A. N.; Horner, J. S.; Jariwala, S.; Armstrong, M. J.; Wagner, N. J. Recent advances in blood rheology: a review. Soft Matter 202117 (47), 10591โ€“ 10613,  DOI: 10.1039/D1SM01212FViewGoogle Scholar
  70. 70Arciero, J.; Causin, P.; Malgaroli, F. Mathematical methods for modeling the microcirculation. AIMS Biophysics 20174 (3), 362โ€“ 399,  DOI: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.362ViewGoogle Scholar
  71. 71Maria, M. S.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow-driven blood plasma separation and on-chip analyte detection in microfluidic devices. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201721 (4), 72,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-1907-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  72. 72Huhtamรคki, T.; Tian, X.; Korhonen, J. T.; Ras, R. H. A. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat. Protoc. 201813 (7), 1521โ€“ 1538,  DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-zViewGoogle Scholar
  73. 73Young, T., III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 180595, 65โ€“ 87,  DOI: 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005ViewGoogle Scholar
  74. 74Kim, Y. C.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, D.; Park, S.-J.; Park, J.-K. Plasma extraction in a capillary-driven microfluidic device using surfactant-added poly(dimethylsiloxane). Sens. Actuators, B 2010145 (2), 861โ€“ 868,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.017ViewGoogle Scholar
  75. 75Washburn, E. W. The Dynamics of Capillary Flow. Physical Review 192117 (3), 273โ€“ 283,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.17.273ViewGoogle Scholar
  76. 76Cito, S.; Ahn, Y. C.; Pallares, J.; Duarte, R. M.; Chen, Z.; Madou, M.; Katakis, I. Visualization and measurement of capillary-driven blood flow using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Microfluid Nanofluidics 201213 (2), 227โ€“ 237,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-0950-6ViewGoogle Scholar
  77. 77Berthier, E.; Dostie, A. M.; Lee, U. N.; Berthier, J.; Theberge, A. B. Open Microfluidic Capillary Systems. Anal Chem. 201991 (14), 8739โ€“ 8750,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01429ViewGoogle Scholar
  78. 78Berthier, J.; Brakke, K. A.; Furlani, E. P.; Karampelas, I. H.; Poher, V.; Gosselin, D.; Cubizolles, M.; Pouteau, P. Whole blood spontaneous capillary flow in narrow V-groove microchannels. Sens. Actuators, B 2015206, 258โ€“ 267,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.040ViewGoogle Scholar
  79. 79Hirt, C. W.; Nichols, B. D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 198139 (1), 201โ€“ 225,  DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5ViewGoogle Scholar
  80. 80Chen, J.-L.; Shih, W.-H.; Hsieh, W.-H. AC electro-osmotic micromixer using a face-to-face, asymmetric pair of planar electrodes. Sens. Actuators, B 2013188, 11โ€“ 21,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.012ViewGoogle Scholar
  81. 81Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electrokinetics of non-Newtonian fluids: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2013201-202, 94โ€“ 108,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.001ViewGoogle Scholar
  82. 82Oh, K. W. 6 – Lab-on-chip (LOC) devices and microfluidics for biomedical applications. In MEMS for Biomedical Applications; Bhansali, S., Vasudev, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing, 2012; pp 150โ€“ 171.ViewGoogle Scholar
  83. 83Bello, M. S.; De Besi, P.; Rezzonico, R.; Righetti, P. G.; Casiraghi, E. Electroosmosis of polymer solutions in fused silica capillaries. ELECTROPHORESIS 199415 (1), 623โ€“ 626,  DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150150186ViewGoogle Scholar
  84. 84Park, H. M.; Lee, W. M. Effect of viscoelasticity on the flow pattern and the volumetric flow rate in electroosmotic flows through a microchannel. Lab Chip 20088 (7), 1163โ€“ 1170,  DOI: 10.1039/b800185eViewGoogle Scholar
  85. 85Afonso, A. M.; Alves, M. A.; Pinho, F. T. Analytical solution of mixed electro-osmotic/pressure driven flows of viscoelastic fluids in microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2009159 (1), 50โ€“ 63,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.01.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  86. 86Sousa, J. J.; Afonso, A. M.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Effect of the skimming layer on electro-osmoticโ”€Poiseuille flows of viscoelastic fluids. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 201110 (1), 107โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1007/s10404-010-0651-yViewGoogle Scholar
  87. 87Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electro-osmotic mobility of non-Newtonian fluids. Biomicrofluidics 20115 (1), 014110,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3571278ViewGoogle Scholar
  88. 88Pimenta, F.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic instabilities in cross-shaped microchannels. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2018259, 61โ€“ 77,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.04.004ViewGoogle Scholar
  89. 89Bezerra, W. S.; Castelo, A.; Afonso, A. M. Numerical Study of Electro-Osmotic Fluid Flow and Vortex Formation. Micromachines (Basel) 201910 (12), 796,  DOI: 10.3390/mi10120796ViewGoogle Scholar
  90. 90Ji, J.; Qian, S.; Liu, Z. Electroosmotic Flow of Viscoelastic Fluid through a Constriction Microchannel. Micromachines (Basel) 202112 (4), 417,  DOI: 10.3390/mi12040417ViewGoogle Scholar
  91. 91Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Exact solutions for electro-osmotic flow of viscoelastic fluids in rectangular micro-channels. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2009211 (2), 502โ€“ 509,  DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.068ViewGoogle Scholar
  92. 92Gerum, R.; Mirzahossein, E.; Eroles, M.; Elsterer, J.; Mainka, A.; Bauer, A.; Sonntag, S.; Winterl, A.; Bartl, J.; Fischer, L. Viscoelastic properties of suspended cells measured with shear flow deformation cytometry. Elife 202211, e78823,  DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78823ViewGoogle Scholar
  93. 93Sadek, S. H.; Pinho, F. T.; Alves, M. A. Electro-elastic flow instabilities of viscoelastic fluids in contraction/expansion micro-geometries. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2020283, 104293,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104293ViewGoogle Scholar
  94. 94Spanjaards, M.; Peters, G.; Hulsen, M.; Anderson, P. Numerical Study of the Effect of Thixotropy on Extrudate Swell. Polymers 202113 (24), 4383,  DOI: 10.3390/polym13244383ViewGoogle Scholar
  95. 95Rashidi, S.; Bafekr, H.; Valipour, M. S.; Esfahani, J. A. A review on the application, simulation, and experiment of the electrokinetic mixers. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification 2018126, 108โ€“ 122,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2018.02.021ViewGoogle Scholar
  96. 96Matsubara, K.; Narumi, T. Microfluidic mixing using unsteady electroosmotic vortices produced by a staggered array of electrodes. Chemical Engineering Journal 2016288, 638โ€“ 647,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.013ViewGoogle Scholar
  97. 97Qaderi, A.; Jamaati, J.; Bahiraei, M. CFD simulation of combined electroosmotic-pressure driven micro-mixing in a microchannel equipped with triangular hurdle and zeta-potential heterogeneity. Chemical Engineering Science 2019199, 463โ€“ 477,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.034ViewGoogle Scholar
  98. 98Cho, C.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Chen, C. o.-K. Mixing enhancement in crisscross micromixer using aperiodic electrokinetic perturbing flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 201255 (11), 2926โ€“ 2933,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.006ViewGoogle Scholar
  99. 99Zhao, W.; Yang, F.; Wang, K.; Bai, J.; Wang, G. Rapid mixing by turbulent-like electrokinetic microflow. Chemical Engineering Science 2017165, 113โ€“ 121,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.027ViewGoogle Scholar
  100. 100Tran, T.; Chakraborty, P.; Guttenberg, N.; Prescott, A.; Kellay, H.; Goldburg, W.; Goldenfeld, N.; Gioia, G. Macroscopic effects of the spectral structure in turbulent flows. Nat. Phys. 20106 (6), 438โ€“ 441,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys1674ViewGoogle Scholar
  101. 101Toner, M.; Irimia, D. Blood-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 20057, 77โ€“ 103,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108ViewGoogle Scholar
  102. 102Maria, M. S.; Rakesh, P. E.; Chandra, T. S.; Sen, A. K. Capillary flow of blood in a microchannel with differential wetting for blood plasma separation and on-chip glucose detection. Biomicrofluidics 201610 (5), 054108,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4962874ViewGoogle Scholar
  103. 103Tripathi, S.; Varun Kumar, Y. V. B.; Prabhakar, A.; Joshi, S. S.; Agrawal, A. Passive blood plasma separation at the microscale: a review of design principles and microdevices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 201525 (8), 083001,  DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/25/8/083001ViewGoogle Scholar
  104. 104Mohammadi, M.; Madadi, H.; Casals-Terrรฉ, J. Microfluidic point-of-care blood panel based on a novel technique: Reversible electroosmotic flow. Biomicrofluidics 20159 (5), 054106,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4930865ViewGoogle Scholar
  105. 105Kang, D. H.; Kim, K.; Kim, Y. J. An anti-clogging method for improving the performance and lifespan of blood plasma separation devices in real-time and continuous microfluidic systems. Sci. Rep 20188 (1), 17015,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35235-4ViewGoogle Scholar
  106. 106Li, Z.; Pollack, G. H. Surface-induced flow: A natural microscopic engine using infrared energy as fuel. Science Advances 20206 (19), eaba0941  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0941ViewGoogle Scholar
  107. 107Mercado-Uribe, H.; Guevara-Pantoja, F. J.; Garcรญa-Muรฑoz, W.; Garcรญa-Maldonado, J. S.; Mรฉndez-Alcaraz, J. M.; Ruiz-Suรกrez, J. C. On the evolution of the exclusion zone produced by hydrophilic surfaces: A contracted description. J. Chem. Phys. 2021154 (19), 194902,  DOI: 10.1063/5.0043084ViewGoogle Scholar
  108. 108Yalcin, O.; Jani, V. P.; Johnson, P. C.; Cabrales, P. Implications Enzymatic Degradation of the Endothelial Glycocalyx on the Microvascular Hemodynamics and the Arteriolar Red Cell Free Layer of the Rat Cremaster Muscle. Front Physiol 20189, 168,  DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00168ViewGoogle Scholar
Fig. 9 From: An Investigation on Hydraulic Aspects of Rectangular Labyrinth Pool and Weir Fishway Using FLOW-3D

An Investigation on Hydraulic Aspects of Rectangular Labyrinth Pool and Weir Fishway Using FLOW-3D

Abstract

์›จ์–ด์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฐ์—ด(์ฆ‰, ์ง์„ ํ˜• ์›จ์–ด์™€ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์›จ์–ด ๋ชจ์–‘, ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ, ์›จ์–ด์˜ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ์กด์žฌ, ํ๋ฆ„ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ ํ‰๊ท  ์†๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๋ถ„ํฌ, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํŠน์„ฑ, ์–ด๋„์—์„œ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ. ํ๋ฆ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3Dยฎ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๊ณผ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋œ ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ธ‰๋ฝ์œ ๋™์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๊ณผ ํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๋œ ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‰๊ท  ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ ์˜ค์ฐจ์™€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.014m์™€ 3.11%๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ๊ณผ ๋‘‘์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83(L: ์›จ์–ด ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ, B: ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํญ) ๊ฐ’์—์„œ ๊ธ‰๋ฝ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61์—์„œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ๋ณด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ฌด์ฐจ์› ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰(Q+)์ด ๋” ํฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ณด์™€ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ๋ณด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Q๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 1.56๊ณผ 1.47h์— ๋น„๋ก€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(h: ๋ณด ์œ„ ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ). ๊ธฐ์กด ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํ’€ ๋‚ด ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„๋Š” ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰, ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€(TKE) ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„(TI) ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์›จ์–ด์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์›จ์–ด๋Š” ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด๋ณด๋‹ค ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ด ๋” ๋‚ฎ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ TKE ๋ฐ TI ๊ฐ’์€ ๋ฏธ๋กœ ์›จ์–ด ์ƒ๋‹จ, ์›จ์–ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ๋ฒฝ ๋ชจ์„œ๋ฆฌ, ์›จ์–ด ์ธก๋ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ฒฝ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด์™€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’ ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์˜์žฅ์˜ ์ฒด์  ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‘‘์— ๊ฐœ๊ตฌ๋ถ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉด ํ‰๊ท  ๊นŠ์ด ์†๋„์™€ TI ๊ฐ’์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ’€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ TKE ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๊ณ ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํœด์‹ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ด ๋” ๋„“์–ด์ง€๊ณ (TKE๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง) ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์œจ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Two different arrangements of the weir (i.e., straight weir and rectangular labyrinth weir) were used to evaluate the effects of geometric parameters such as weir shape, weir spacing, presence of an orifice at the weir, and bed slope on the flow regime and the relationship between discharge and depth, variation and distribution of depth-averaged velocity, turbulence characteristics, and energy dissipation at the fishway. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed using FLOW-3Dยฎ software to examine the effects on flow conditions. The numerical model was validated by comparing the calculated surface profiles and velocities with experimentally measured values from the literature. The results of the numerical model and experimental data showed that the root-mean-square error and mean absolute percentage error for the surface profiles and normalized velocity profiles of plunging flows were 0.014 m and 3.11%, respectively, confirming the ability of the numerical model to predict the flow characteristics of the pool and weir. A plunging flow can occur at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83 (L: distance of the weir, B: width of the channel) and streaming flow at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 for each model. The rectangular labyrinth weir model has larger dimensionless discharge values (Q+) than the conventional model. For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir at submerged flow, Q is proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively (h: the water depth above the weir). The average depth velocity in the pool of a conventional weir is higher than that of a rectangular labyrinth weir. However, for a given discharge, bed slope, and weir spacing, the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and turbulence intensity (TI) values are higher for a rectangular labyrinth weir compared to conventional weir. The conventional weir has lower energy dissipation than the rectangular labyrinth weir. Lower TKE and TI values were observed at the top of the labyrinth weir, at the corner of the wall downstream of the weir, and between the side walls of the weir and the channel wall. As the distance between the weirs and the bottom slope increased, the average depth velocity, the average value of turbulent kinetic energy and the turbulence intensity increased, and the volumetric energy dissipation in the pool decreased. The presence of an opening in the weir increased the average depth velocity and TI values and decreased the range of highest TKE within the pool, resulted in larger resting areas for fish (lower TKE), and decreased the energy dissipation rates in both models.

1 Introduction

Artificial barriers such as detour dams, weirs, and culverts in lakes and rivers prevent fish from migrating and completing the upstream and downstream movement cycle. This chain is related to the life stage of the fish, its location, and the type of migration. Several riverine fish species instinctively migrate upstream for spawning and other needs. Conversely, downstream migration is a characteristic of early life stages [1]. A fish ladder is a waterway that allows one or more fish species to cross a specific obstacle. These structures are constructed near detour dams and other transverse structures that have prevented such migration by allowing fish to overcome obstacles [2]. The flow pattern in fish ladders influences safe and comfortable passage for ascending fish. The flowโ€™s strong turbulence can reduce the fishโ€™s speed, injure them, and delay or prevent them from exiting the fish ladder. In adult fish, spawning migrations are usually complex, and delays are critical to reproductive success [3].

Various fish ladders/fishways include vertical slots, denil, rock ramps, and pool weirs [1]. The choice of fish ladder usually depends on many factors, including water elevation, space available for construction, and fish species. Pool and weir structures are among the most important fish ladders that help fish overcome obstacles in streams or rivers and swim upstream [1]. Because they are easy to construct and maintain, this type of fish ladder has received considerable attention from researchers and practitioners. Such a fish ladder consists of a sloping-floor channel with series of pools directly separated by a series of weirs [4]. These fish ladders, with or without underwater openings, are generally well-suited for slopes of 10% or less [12]. Within these pools, flow velocities are low and provide resting areas for fish after they enter the fish ladder. After resting in the pools, fish overcome these weirs by blasting or jumping over them [2]. There may also be an opening in the flooded portion of the weir through which the fish can swim instead of jumping over the weir. Design parameters such as the length of the pool, the height of the weir, the slope of the bottom, and the water discharge are the most important factors in determining the hydraulic structure of this type of fish ladder [3]. The flow over the weir depends on the flow depth at a given slope S0 and the pool length, either โ€œplungingโ€ or โ€œstreaming.โ€ In plunging flow, the water column h over each weir creates a water jet that releases energy through turbulent mixing and diffusion mechanisms [5]. The dimensionless discharges for plunging (Q+) and streaming (Q*) flows are shown in Fig. 1, where Q is the total discharge, B is the width of the channel, w is the weir height, S0 is the slope of the bottom, h is the water depth above the weir, d is the flow depth, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The maximum velocity occurs near the top of the weir for plunging flow. At the waterโ€™s surface, it drops to about half [6].

figure 1
Fig. 1

Extensive experimental studies have been conducted to investigate flow patterns for various physical geometries (i.e., bed slope, pool length, and weir height) [2]. Guiny et al. [7] modified the standard design by adding vertical slots, orifices, and weirs in fishways. The efficiency of the orifices and vertical slots was related to the velocities at their entrances. In the laboratory experiments of Yagci [8], the three-dimensional (3D) mean flow and turbulence structure of a pool weir fishway combined with an orifice and a slot is investigated. It is shown that the energy dissipation per unit volume and the discharge have a linear relationship.

Considering the beneficial characteristics reported in the limited studies of researchers on the labyrinth weir in the pool-weir-type fishway, and knowing that the characteristics of flow in pool-weir-type fishways are highly dependent on the geometry of the weir, an alternative design of the rectangular labyrinth weir instead of the straight weirs in the pool-weir-type fishway is investigated in this study [79]. Kim [10] conducted experiments to compare the hydraulic characteristics of three different weir types in a pool-weir-type fishway. The results show that a straight, rectangular weir with a notch is preferable to a zigzag or trapezoidal weir. Studies on natural fish passes show that pass ability can be improved by lengthening the weirโ€™s crest [7]. Zhong et al. [11] investigated the semi-rigid weirโ€™s hydraulic performance in the fishwayโ€™s flow field with a pool weir. The results showed that this type of fishway performed better with a lower invert slope and a smaller radius ratio but with a larger pool spacing.

Considering that an alternative method to study the flow characteristics in a fishway with a pool weir is based on numerical methods and modeling from computational fluid dynamics (CFD), which can easily change the geometry of the fishway for different flow fields, this study uses the powerful package CFD and the software FLOW-3D to evaluate the proposed weir design and compare it with the conventional one to extend the application of the fishway. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic performance of the rectangular labyrinth pool and the weir with submerged openings in different hydraulic configurations. The primary objective of creating a new weir configuration for suitable flow patterns is evaluated based on the swimming capabilities of different fish species. Specifically, the following questions will be answered: (a) How do the various hydraulic and geometric parameters relate to the effects of water velocity and turbulence, expressed as turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and turbulence intensity (TI) within the fishway, i.e., are conventional weirs more affected by hydraulics than rectangular labyrinth weirs? (b) Which weir configurations have the greatest effect on fish performance in the fishway? (c) In the presence of an orifice plate, does the performance of each weir configuration differ with different weir spacing, bed gradients, and flow regimes from that without an orifice plate?

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Physical Model Configuration

This paper focuses on Ead et al. [6]โ€™s laboratory experiments as a reference, testing ten pool weirs (Fig. 2). The experimental flume was 6 m long, 0.56 m wide, and 0.6 m high, with a bottom slope of 10%. Field measurements were made at steady flow with a maximum flow rate of 0.165 m3/s. Discharge was measured with magnetic flow meters in the inlets and water level with point meters (see Ead et al. [6]. for more details). Table 1 summarizes the experimental conditions considered for model calibration in this study.

figure 2
Fig. 2

Table 1 Experimental conditions considered for calibration

Full size table

2.2 Numerical Models

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using FLOW-3Dยฎ v11.2 to validate a series of experimental liner pool weirs by Ead et al. [6] and to investigate the effects of the rectangular labyrinth pool weir with an orifice. The dimensions of the channel and data collection areas in the numerical models are the same as those of the laboratory model. Two types of pool weirs were considered: conventional and labyrinth. The proposed rectangular labyrinth pool weirs have a symmetrical cross section and are sized to fit within the experimental channel. The conventional pool weir model had a pool length of lโ€‰=โ€‰0.685 and 0.342 m, a weir height of wโ€‰=โ€‰0.141 m, a weir width of Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.56 m, and a channel slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰5 and 10%. The rectangular labyrinth weirs have the same front width as the offset, i.e., aโ€‰=โ€‰bโ€‰=โ€‰cโ€‰=โ€‰0.186 m. A square underwater opening with a width of 0.05 m and a depth of 0.05 m was created in the middle of the weir. The weir configuration considered in the present study is shown in Fig. 3.

figure 3
Fig. 3

2.3 Governing Equations

FLOW-3Dยฎ software solves the Navierโ€“Stokesโ€“Reynolds equations for three-dimensional analysis of incompressible flows using the fluid-volume method on a gridded domain. FLOW -3Dยฎ uses an advanced free surface flow tracking algorithm (TruVOF) developed by Hirt and Nichols [12], where fluid configurations are defined in terms of a VOF function F (xyzt). In this case, F (fluid fraction) represents the volume fraction occupied by the fluid: Fโ€‰=โ€‰1 in cells filled with fluid and Fโ€‰=โ€‰0 in cells without fluid (empty areas) [413]. The free surface area is at an intermediate value of F. (Typically, Fโ€‰=โ€‰0.5, but the user can specify a different intermediate value.) The equations in Cartesian coordinates (xyz) applicable to the model are as follows:

๏ฟฝfโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝx)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝy)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝz)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝSOR

(1)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝx+๏ฟฝx

(2)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝy+๏ฟฝy

(3)

โˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝz+๏ฟฝz

(4)

where (uvw) are the velocity components, (AxAyAz) are the flow area components, (Gx, Gy, Gz) are the mass accelerations, and (fxfyfz) are the viscous accelerations in the directions (xyz), ฯ is the fluid density, RSOR is the spring term, Vf is the volume fraction associated with the flow, and P is the pressure. The kโ€“ฮต turbulence model (RNG) was used in this study to solve the turbulence of the flow field. This model is a modified version of the standard kโ€“ฮต model that improves performance. The model is a two-equation model; the first equation (Eq. 5) expresses the turbulenceโ€™s energy, called turbulent kinetic energy (k) [14]. The second equation (Eq. 6) is the turbulent dissipation rate (ฮต), which determines the rate of dissipation of kinetic energy [15]. These equations are expressed as follows Dasineh et al. [4]:

โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=โˆ‚โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝฮต

(5)

โˆ‚(๏ฟฝฮต)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‚(๏ฟฝฮต๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=โˆ‚โˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ[๏ฟฝฮต๏ฟฝeffโˆ‚ฮตโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ]+๏ฟฝ1ฮตฮต๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝkโˆ’๏ฟฝ2ฮต๏ฟฝฮต2๏ฟฝ

(6)

In these equations, k is the turbulent kinetic energy, ฮต is the turbulent energy consumption rate, Gk is the generation of turbulent kinetic energy by the average velocity gradient, with empirical constants ฮฑฮตโ€‰=โ€‰ฮฑkโ€‰=โ€‰1.39, C1ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰1.42, and C2ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰1.68, eff is the effective viscosity, ฮผeffโ€‰=โ€‰ฮผโ€‰+โ€‰ฮผt [15]. Here, ฮผ is the hydrodynamic density coefficient, and ฮผt is the turbulent density of the fluid.

2.4 Meshing and the Boundary Conditions in the Model Setup

The numerical area is divided into three mesh blocks in the X-direction. The meshes are divided into different sizes, a containing mesh block for the entire spatial domain and a nested block with refined cells for the domain of interest. Three different sizes were selected for each of the grid blocks. By comparing the accuracy of their results based on the experimental data, the reasonable mesh for the solution domain was finally selected. The convergence index method (GCI) evaluated the mesh sensitivity analysis. Based on this method, many researchers, such as Ahmadi et al. [16] and Ahmadi et al. [15], have studied the independence of numerical results from mesh size. Three different mesh sizes with a refinement ratio (r) of 1.33 were used to perform the convergence index method. The refinement ratio is the ratio between the larger and smaller mesh sizes (rโ€‰=โ€‰Gcoarse/Gfine). According to the recommendation of Celik et al. [17], the recommended number for the refinement ratio is 1.3, which gives acceptable results. Table 2 shows the characteristics of the three mesh sizes selected for mesh sensitivity analysis.Table 2 Characteristics of the meshes tested in the convergence analysis

Full size table

The results of u1โ€‰=โ€‰umax (u1โ€‰=โ€‰velocity component along the x1 axis and umaxโ€‰=โ€‰maximum velocity of u1 in a section perpendicular to the invert of the fishway) at Qโ€‰=โ€‰0.035 m3/s,โ€‰ร—โ€‰1/lโ€‰=โ€‰0.66, and Y1/bโ€‰=โ€‰0 in the pool of conventional weir No. 4, obtained from the output results of the software, were used to evaluate the accuracy of the calculation range. As shown in Fig. 4x1โ€‰=โ€‰the distance from a given weir in the x-direction, Y1โ€‰=โ€‰the water depth measured in the y-direction, Y0โ€‰=โ€‰the vertical distance in the Cartesian coordinate system, hโ€‰=โ€‰the water column at the crest, bโ€‰=โ€‰the distance between the two points of maximum velocity umax and zero velocity, and lโ€‰=โ€‰the pool length.

figure 4
Fig. 4

The apparent index of convergence (p) in the GCI method is calculated as follows:

๏ฟฝ=lnโก(๏ฟฝ3โˆ’๏ฟฝ2)(๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝ1)/lnโก(๏ฟฝ)

(7)

f1f2, and f3 are the hydraulic parameters obtained from the numerical simulation (f1 corresponds to the small mesh), and r is the refinement ratio. The following equation defines the convergence index of the fine mesh:

GCIfine=1.25|ฮต|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(8)

Here, ฮตโ€‰=โ€‰(f2โ€‰โˆ’โ€‰f1)/f1 is the relative error, and f2 and f3 are the values of hydraulic parameters considered for medium and small grids, respectively. GCI12 and GCI23 dimensionless indices can be calculated as:

GCI12=1.25|๏ฟฝ2โˆ’๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ1|๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’1

(9)

Then, the independence of the network is preserved. The convergence index of the network parameters obtained by Eqs. (7)โ€“(9) for all three network variables is shown in Table 3. Since the GCI values for the smaller grid (GCI12) are lower compared to coarse grid (GCI23), it can be concluded that the independence of the grid is almost achieved. No further change in the grid size of the solution domain is required. The calculated values (GCI23/rpGCI12) are close to 1, which shows that the numerical results obtained are within the convergence range. As a result, the meshing of the solution domain consisting of a block mesh with a mesh size of 0.012 m and a block mesh within a larger block mesh with a mesh size of 0.009 m was selected as the optimal mesh (Fig. 5).Table 3 GCI calculation

Full size table

figure 5
Fig. 5

The boundary conditions applied to the area are shown in Fig. 6. The boundary condition of specific flow rate (volume flow rate-Q) was used for the inlet of the flow. For the downstream boundary, the flow output (outflow-O) condition did not affect the flow in the solution area. For the Zmax boundary, the specified pressure boundary condition was used along with the fluid fractionโ€‰=โ€‰0 (P). This type of boundary condition considers free surface or atmospheric pressure conditions (Ghaderi et al. [19]). The wall boundary condition is defined for the bottom of the channel, which acts like a virtual wall without friction (W). The boundary between mesh blocks and walls were considered a symmetrical condition (S).

figure 6
Fig. 6

The convergence of the steady-state solutions was controlled during the simulations by monitoring the changes in discharge at the inlet boundary conditions. Figure 7 shows the time series plots of the discharge obtained from the Model A for the three main discharges from the numerical results. The 8 s to reach the flow equilibrium is suitable for the case of the fish ladder with pool and weir. Almost all discharge fluctuations in the models are insignificant in time, and the flow has reached relative stability. The computation time for the simulations was between 6 and 8 h using a personal computer with eight cores of a CPU (Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20 GHz and 16 GB RAM).

figure 7
Fig. 7

3 Results

3.1 Verification of Numerical Results

Quantitative outcomes, including free surface and normalized velocity profiles obtained using FLOW-3D software, were reviewed and compared with the results of Ead et al. [6]. The fourth pool was selected to present the results and compare the experiment and simulation. For each quantity, the percentage of mean absolute error (MAPE (%)) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) are calculated. Equations (10) and (11) show the method used to calculate the errors.

MAPE(%)100ร—1๏ฟฝโˆ‘1๏ฟฝ|๏ฟฝexpโˆ’๏ฟฝnum๏ฟฝexp|

(10)

RMSE(โˆ’)1๏ฟฝโˆ‘1๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝexpโˆ’๏ฟฝnum)2

(11)

Here, Xexp is the value of the laboratory data, Xnum is the numerical data value, and n is the amount of data. As shown in Fig. 8, let x1โ€‰=โ€‰distance from a given weir in the x-direction and Y1โ€‰=โ€‰water depth in the y-direction from the bottom. The trend of the surface profiles for each of the numerical results is the same as that of the laboratory results. The surface profiles of the plunging flows drop after the flow enters and then rises to approach the next weir. The RMSE and MAPE error values for Model A are 0.014 m and 3.11%, respectively, indicating acceptable agreement between numerical and laboratory results. Figure 9 shows the velocity vectors and plunging flow from the numerical results, where x and y are horizontal and vertical to the flow direction, respectively. It can be seen that the jet in the fish ladder pool has a relatively high velocity. The two vortices, i.e., the enclosed vortex rotating clockwise behind the weir and the surface vortex rotating counterclockwise above the jet, are observed for the regime of incident flow. The point where the jet meets the fish passage bed is shown in the figure. The normalized velocity profiles upstream and downstream of the impact points are shown in Fig. 10. The figure shows that the numerical results agree well with the experimental data of Ead et al. [6].

figure 8
Fig. 8
figure 9
Fig. 9
figure 10
Fig. 10

3.2 Flow Regime and Discharge-Depth Relationship

Depending on the geometric shape of the fishway, including the distance of the weir, the slope of the bottom, the height of the weir, and the flow conditions, the flow regime in the fishway is divided into three categories: dipping, transitional, and flow regimes [4]. In the plunging flow regime, the flow enters the pool through the weir, impacts the bottom of the fishway, and forms a hydraulic jump causing two eddies [220]. In the streamwise flow regime, the surface of the flow passing over the weir is almost parallel to the bottom of the channel. The transitional regime has intermediate flow characteristics between the submerged and flow regimes. To predict the flow regime created in the fishway, Ead et al. [6] proposed two dimensionless parameters, Qt* and L/w, where Qt* is the dimensionless discharge, L is the distance between weirs, and w is the height of the weir:

๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ—=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(12)

Q is the total discharge, B is the width of the channel, S0 is the slope of the bed, and g is the gravity acceleration. Figure 11 shows different ranges for each flow regime based on the slope of the bed and the distance between the pools in this study. The results of Baki et al. [21], Ead et al. [6] and Dizabadi et al. [22] were used for this comparison. The distance between the pools affects the changes in the regime of the fish ladder. So, if you decrease the distance between weirs, the flow regime more likely becomes. This study determined all three flow regimes in a fish ladder. When the corresponding range of Qt* is less than 0.6, the flow regime can dip at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83. If the corresponding range of Qt* is greater than 0.5, transitional flow may occur at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22. On the other hand, when Qt* is greater than 1, streamwise flow can occur at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61. These observations agree well with the results of Baki et al. [21], Ead et al. [6] and Dizabadi et al. [22].

figure 11
Fig. 11

For plunging flows, another dimensionless discharge (Q+) versus h/w given by Ead et al. [6] was used for further evaluation:

๏ฟฝ+=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ„Ž๏ฟฝโ„Ž=23๏ฟฝd๏ฟฝ

(13)

where h is the water depth above the weir, and Cd is the discharge coefficient. Figure 12a compares the numerical and experimental results of Ead et al. [6]. In this figure, Rehbockโ€™s empirical equation is used to estimate the discharge coefficient of Ead et al. [6].

๏ฟฝd=0.57+0.075โ„Ž๏ฟฝ

(14)

figure 12
Fig. 12

The numerical results for the conventional weir (Model A) and the rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B) of this study agree well with the laboratory results of Ead et al. [6]. When comparing models A and B, it is also found that a rectangular labyrinth weir has larger Qโ€‰+โ€‰values than the conventional weir as the length of the weir crest increases for a given channel width and fixed headwater elevation. In Fig. 12b, Models A and Bโ€™s flow depth plot shows the plunging flow regime. The power trend lines drawn through the data are the best-fit lines. The data shown in Fig. 12b are for different bed slopes and weir geometries. For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir at submerged flow, Q can be assumed to be proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively. In the results of Ead et al. [6], Q is proportional to 1.5h. If we assume that the flow through the orifice is Qo and the total outflow is Q, the change in the ratio of Qo/Q to total outflow for models A and B can be shown in Fig. 13. For both models, the flow through the orifice decreases as the total flow increases. A logarithmic trend line was also found between the total outflow and the dimensionless ratio Qo/Q.

figure 13
Fig. 13

3.3 Depth-Averaged Velocity Distributions

To ensure that the target fish species can pass the fish ladder with maximum efficiency, the average velocity in the fish ladder should be low enough [4]. Therefore, the average velocity in depth should be as much as possible below the critical swimming velocities of the target fishes at a constant flow depth in the pool [20]. The contour plot of depth-averaged velocity was used instead of another direction, such as longitudinal velocity because fish are more sensitive to depth-averaged flow velocity than to its direction under different hydraulic conditions. Figure 14 shows the distribution of depth-averaged velocity in the pool for Models A and B in two cases with and without orifice plates. Model Aโ€™s velocity within the pool differs slightly in the spanwise direction. However, no significant variation in velocity was observed. The flow is gradually directed to the sides as it passes through the rectangular labyrinth weir. This increases the velocity at the sides of the channel. Therefore, the high-velocity zone is located at the sides. The low velocity is in the downstream apex of the weir. This area may be suitable for swimming target fish. The presence of an opening in the weir increases the flow velocity at the opening and in the poolโ€™s center, especially in Model A. The flow velocity increase caused by the modelsโ€™ opening varied from 7.7 to 12.48%. Figure 15 illustrates the effect of the inverted slope on the averaged depth velocity distribution in the pool at low and high discharge. At constant discharge, flow velocity increases with increasing bed slope. In general, high flow velocity was found in the weir toe sidewall and the weir and channel sidewalls.

figure 14
Fig. 14
figure 15
Fig. 15

On the other hand, for a constant bed slope, the high-velocity area of the pool increases due to the increase in runoff. For both bed slopes and different discharges, the most appropriate path for fish to travel from upstream to downstream is through the middle of the cross section and along the top of the rectangular labyrinth weirs. The maximum dominant velocities for Model B at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% were 0.83 and 1.01 m/s; at S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, they were 1.12 and 1.61 m/s at low and high flows, respectively. The low mean velocities for the same distance and S0โ€‰=โ€‰5 and 10% were 0.17 and 0.26 m/s, respectively.

Figure 16 shows the contour of the averaged depth velocity for various distances from the weir at low and high discharge. The contour plot shows a large variation in velocity within short distances from the weir. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, velocities are low upstream and downstream of the top of the weir. The high velocities occur in the side walls of the weir and the channel. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22, the low-velocity zone displaces the higher velocity in most of the pool. Higher velocities were found only on the sides of the channel. As the discharge increases, the velocity zone in the pool becomes wider. At L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, there is an area of higher velocities only upstream of the crest and on the sides of the weir. At high discharge, the prevailing maximum velocities for L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 were 1.46, 1.65, and 1.84 m/s, respectively. As the distance between weirs increases, the range of maximum velocity increases.

figure 16
Fig. 16

On the other hand, the low mean velocity for these distances was 0.27, 0.44, and 0.72 m/s, respectively. Thus, the low-velocity zone decreases with increasing distance between weirs. Figure 17 shows the pattern distribution of streamlines along with the velocity contour at various distances from the weir for Qโ€‰=โ€‰0.05 m3/s. A stream-like flow is generally formed in the pool at a small distance between weirs (L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61). The rotation cell under the jet forms clockwise between the two weirs. At the distances between the spillways (L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22), the transition regime of the flow is formed. The transition regime occurs when or shortly after the weir is flooded. The rotation cell under the jet is clockwise smaller than the flow regime and larger than the submergence regime. At a distance L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, a plunging flow is formed so that the plunging jet dips into the pool and extends downstream to the center of the pool. The clockwise rotation of the cell is bounded by the dipping jet of the weir and is located between the bottom and the side walls of the weir and the channel.

figure 17
Fig. 17

Figure 18 shows the average depth velocity bar graph for each weir at different bed slopes and with and without orifice plates. As the distance between weirs increases, all modelsโ€™ average depth velocity increases. As the slope of the bottom increases and an orifice plate is present, the average depth velocity in the pool increases. In addition, the average pool depth velocity increases as the discharge increases. Among the models, Model Aโ€™s average depth velocity is higher than Model Bโ€™s. The variation in velocity ranged from 8.11 to 12.24% for the models without an orifice plate and from 10.26 to 16.87% for the models with an orifice plate.

figure 18
Fig. 18

3.4 Turbulence Characteristics

The turbulent kinetic energy is one of the important parameters reflecting the turbulent properties of the flow field [23]. When the k value is high, more energy and a longer transit time are required to migrate the target species. The turbulent kinetic energy is defined as follows:

๏ฟฝ=12(๏ฟฝxโ€ฒ2+๏ฟฝyโ€ฒ2+๏ฟฝzโ€ฒ2)

(15)

where uxuy, and uz are fluctuating velocities in the xy, and z directions, respectively. An illustration of the TKE and the effects of the geometric arrangement of the weir and the presence of an opening in the weir is shown in Fig. 19. For a given bed slope, in Model A, the highest TKE values are uniformly distributed in the weirโ€™s upstream portion in the channelโ€™s cross section. In contrast, for the rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B), the highest TKE values are concentrated on the sides of the pool between the crest of the weir and the channel wall. The highest TKE value in Models A and B is 0.224 and 0.278 J/kg, respectively, at the highest bottom slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%). In the downstream portion of the conventional weir and within the crest of the weir and the walls of the rectangular labyrinth, there was a much lower TKE value that provided the best conditions for fish to recover in the pool between the weirs. The average of the lowest TKE for bottom slopes of 5 and 10% in Model A is 0.041 and 0.056 J/kg, and for Model B, is 0.047 and 0.064 J/kg. The presence of an opening in the weirs reduces the area of the highest TKE within the pool. It also increases the resting areas for fish (lower TKE). The highest TKE at the highest bottom slope in Models A and B with an orifice is 0.208 and 0.191 J/kg, respectively.

figure 19
Fig. 19

Figure 20 shows the effect of slope on the longitudinal distribution of TKE in the pools. TKE values significantly increase for a given discharge with an increasing bottom slope. Thus, for a low bed slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%), a large pool area has expanded with average values of 0.131 and 0.168 J/kg for low and high discharge, respectively. For a bed slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, the average TKE values are 0.176 and 0.234 J/kg. Furthermore, as the discharge increases, the area with high TKE values within the pool increases. Lower TKE values are observed at the apex of the labyrinth weir, at the corner of the wall downstream of the weir, and between the side walls of the weir and the channel wall for both bottom slopes. The effect of distance between weirs on TKE is shown in Fig. 21. Low TKE values were observed at low discharge and short distances between weirs. Low TKE values are located at the top of the rectangular labyrinth weir and the downstream corner of the weir wall. There is a maximum value of TKE at the large distances between weirs, L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83, along the center line of the pool, where the dip jet meets the bottom of the bed. At high discharge, the maximum TKE value for the distance L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 was 0.246, 0.322, and 0.417 J/kg, respectively. In addition, the maximum TKE range increases with the distance between weirs.

figure 20
Fig. 20
figure 21
Fig. 21

For TKE size, the average value (TKEave) is plotted against q in Fig. 22. For all models, the TKE values increase with increasing q. For example, in models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and a slope of 10%, the TKE value increases by 41.66 and 86.95%, respectively, as q increases from 0.1 to 0.27 m2/s. The TKE values in Model B are higher than Model A for a given discharge, bed slope, and weir distance. The TKEave in Model B is higher compared to Model A, ranging from 31.46 to 57.94%. The presence of an orifice in the weir reduces the TKE values in both weirs. The intensity of the reduction is greater in Model B. For example, in Models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.1 m2/s, an orifice reduces TKEave values by 60.35 and 19.04%, respectively. For each model, increasing the bed slope increases the TKEave values in the pool. For example, for Model B with qโ€‰=โ€‰0.18 m2/s, increasing the bed slope from 5 to 10% increases the TKEave value by 14.34%. Increasing the distance between weirs increases the TKEave values in the pool. For example, in Model B with S0โ€‰=โ€‰10% and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.3 m2/s, the TKEave in the pool increases by 34.22% if you increase the distance between weirs from L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 to L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.183.

figure 22
Fig. 22

Cotel et al. [24] suggested that turbulence intensity (TI) is a suitable parameter for studying fish swimming performance. Figure 23 shows the plot of TI and the effects of the geometric arrangement of the weir and the presence of an orifice. In Model A, the highest TI values are found upstream of the weirs and are evenly distributed across the cross section of the channel. The TI values increase as you move upstream to downstream in the pool. For the rectangular labyrinth weir, the highest TI values were concentrated on the sides of the pool, between the top of the weir and the side wall of the channel, and along the top of the weir. Downstream of the conventional weir, within the apex of the weir, and at the corners of the walls of the rectangular labyrinth weir, the percentage of TI was low. At the highest discharge, the average range of TI in Models A and B was 24โ€“45% and 15โ€“62%, respectively. The diversity of TI is greater in the rectangular labyrinth weir than the conventional weir. Fish swimming performance is reduced due to higher turbulence intensity. However, fish species may prefer different disturbance intensities depending on their swimming abilities; for example, Salmo trutta prefers a disturbance intensity of 18โ€“53% [25]. Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26] found a higher range of TI for fishways, such as natural rock weirs, of 40โ€“60%. The presence of an orifice in the weir increases TI values within the pool, especially along the middle portion of the cross section of the fishway. With an orifice in the weir, the average range of TI in Models A and B was 28โ€“59% and 22โ€“73%, respectively.

figure 23
Fig. 23

The effect of bed slope on TI variation is shown in Fig. 24. TI increases in different pool areas as the bed slope increases for a given discharge. For a low bed slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%), a large pool area has increased from 38 to 63% and from 56 to 71% for low and high discharge, respectively. For a bed slope of S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, the average values of TI are 45โ€“67% and 61โ€“73% for low and high discharge, respectively. Therefore, as runoff increases, the area with high TI values within the pool increases. A lower TI is observed for both bottom slopes in the corner of the wall, downstream of the crest walls, and between the side walls in the weir and channel. Figure 25 compares weir spacing with the distribution of TI values within the pool. The TI values are low at low flows and short distances between weirs. A maximum value of TI occurs at long spacing and where the plunging stream impinges on the bed and the area around the bed. TI ranges from 36 to 57%, 58โ€“72%, and 47โ€“76% for the highest flow in a wide pool area for L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83, respectively.

figure 24
Fig. 24
figure 25
Fig. 25

The average value of turbulence intensity (TIave) is plotted against q in Fig. 26. The increase in TI values with the increase in q values is seen in all models. For example, the average values of TI for Models A and B at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and slope of 10% increased from 23.9 to 33.5% and from 42 to 51.8%, respectively, with the increase in q from 0.1 to 0.27 m2/s. For a given discharge, a given gradient, and a given spacing of weirs, the TIave is higher in Model B than Model A. The presence of an orifice in the weirs increases the TI values in both types. For example, in Models A and B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.1 m2/s, the presence of an orifice increases TIave from 23.9 to 37.1% and from 42 to 48.8%, respectively. For each model, TIave in the pool increases with increasing bed slope. For Model B with qโ€‰=โ€‰0.18 m2/s, TIave increases from 37.5 to 45.8% when you increase the invert slope from 5 to 10%. Increasing the distance between weirs increases the TIave in the pool. In Model B with S0โ€‰=โ€‰10% and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.3 m2/s, the TIave in the pool increases from 51.8 to 63.7% as the distance between weirs increases from L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61 to L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.183.

figure 26
Fig. 26

3.5 Energy Dissipation

To facilitate the passage of various target species through the pool of fishways, it is necessary to pay attention to the energy dissipation of the flow and to keep the flow velocity in the pool slow. The average volumetric energy dissipation (k) in the pool is calculated using the following basic formula:

๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ

(16)

where ฯ is the water density, and H is the average water depth of the pool. The change in k versus Q for all models at two bottom slopes, S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%, and S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%, is shown in Fig. 27. Like the results of Yagci [8] and Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26], at a constant bottom slope, the energy dissipation in the pool increases with increasing discharge. The trend of change in k as a function of Q from the present study at a bottom gradient of S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% is also consistent with the results of Kupferschmidt and Zhu [26] for the fishway with rock weir. The only difference between the results is the geometry of the fishway and the combination of boulders instead of a solid wall. Comparison of the models shows that the conventional model has lower energy dissipation than the rectangular labyrinth for a given discharge. Also, increasing the distance between weirs decreases the volumetric energy dissipation for each model with the same bed slope. Increasing the slope of the bottom leads to an increase in volumetric energy dissipation, and an opening in the weir leads to a decrease in volumetric energy dissipation for both models. Therefore, as a guideline for volumetric energy dissipation, if the value within the pool is too high, the increased distance of the weir, the decreased slope of the bed, or the creation of an opening in the weir would decrease the volumetric dissipation rate.

figure 27
Fig. 27

To evaluate the energy dissipation inside the pool, the general method of energy difference in two sections can use:

ฮต=๏ฟฝ1โˆ’๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ1

(17)

where ฮต is the energy dissipation rate, and E1 and E2 are the specific energies in Sects. 1 and 2, respectively. The distance between Sects. 1 and 2 is the same. (L is the distance between two upstream and downstream weirs.) Figure 28 shows the changes in ฮต relative to q (flow per unit width). The rectangular labyrinth weir (Model B) has a higher energy dissipation rate than the conventional weir (Model A) at a constant bottom gradient. For example, at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5%, L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.08 m3/s.m, the energy dissipation rate in Model A (conventional weir) was 0.261. In Model B (rectangular labyrinth weir), however, it was 0.338 (22.75% increase). For each model, the energy dissipation rate within the pool increases as the slope of the bottom increases. For Model B with L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83 and qโ€‰=โ€‰0.178 m3/s.m, the energy dissipation rate at S0โ€‰=โ€‰5% and 10% is 0.305 and 0.358, respectively (14.8% increase). Figure 29 shows an orificeโ€™s effect on the poolsโ€™ energy dissipation rate. With an orifice in the weir, both modelsโ€™ energy dissipation rates decreased. Thus, the reduction in energy dissipation rate varied from 7.32 to 9.48% for Model A and from 8.46 to 10.57 for Model B.

figure 28
Fig. 28
figure 29
Fig. 29

4 Discussion

This study consisted of entirely of numerical analysis. Although this study was limited to two weirs, the hydraulic performance and flow characteristics in a pooled fishway are highlighted by the rectangular labyrinth weir and its comparison with the conventional straight weir. The study compared the numerical simulations with laboratory experiments in terms of surface profiles, velocity vectors, and flow characteristics in a fish ladder pool. The results indicate agreement between the numerical and laboratory data, supporting the reliability of the numerical model in capturing the observed phenomena.

When the configuration of the weir changes to a rectangular labyrinth weir, the flow characteristics, the maximum and minimum area, and even the location of each hydraulic parameter change compared to a conventional weir. In the rectangular labyrinth weir, the flow is gradually directed to the sides as it passes the weir. This increases the velocity at the sides of the channel [21]. Therefore, the high-velocity area is located on the sides. In the downstream apex of the weir, the flow velocity is low, and this area may be suitable for swimming target fish. However, no significant change in velocity was observed at the conventional weir within the fish ladder. This resulted in an average increase in TKE of 32% and an average increase in TI of about 17% compared to conventional weirs.

In addition, there is a slight difference in the flow regime for both weir configurations. In addition, the rectangular labyrinth weir has a higher energy dissipation rate for a given discharge and constant bottom slope than the conventional weir. By reducing the distance between the weirs, this becomes even more intense. Finally, the presence of an orifice in both configurations of the weir increased the flow velocity at the orifice and in the middle of the pool, reducing the highest TKE value and increasing the values of TI within the pool of the fish ladder. This resulted in a reduction in volumetric energy dissipation for both weir configurations.

The results of this study will help the reader understand the direct effects of the governing geometric parameters on the hydraulic characteristics of a fishway with a pool and weir. However, due to the limited configurations of the study, further investigation is needed to evaluate the position of the weirโ€™s crest on the flow direction and the difference in flow characteristics when combining boulders instead of a solid wall for this type of labyrinth weir [26]. In addition, hydraulic engineers and biologists must work together to design an effective fishway with rectangular labyrinth configurations. The migration habits of the target species should be considered when designing the most appropriate design [27]. Parametric studies and field observations are recommended to determine the perfect design criteria.

The current study focused on comparing a rectangular labyrinth weir with a conventional straight weir. Further research can explore other weir configurations, such as variations in crest position, different shapes of labyrinth weirs, or the use of boulders instead of solid walls. This would help understand the influence of different geometric parameters on hydraulic characteristics.

5 Conclusions

A new layout of the weir was evaluated, namely a rectangular labyrinth weir compared to a straight weir in a pool and weir system. The differences between the weirs were highlighted, particularly how variations in the geometry of the structures, such as the shape of the weir, the spacing of the weir, the presence of an opening at the weir, and the slope of the bottom, affect the hydraulics within the structures. The main findings of this study are as follows:

  • The calculated dimensionless discharge (Qt*) confirmed three different flow regimes: when the corresponding range of Qt* is smaller than 0.6, the regime of plunging flow occurs for values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.83. (L: distance of the weir; B: channel width). When the corresponding range of Qt* is greater than 0.5, transitional flow occurs at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰1.22. On the other hand, if Qt* is greater than 1, the streaming flow is at values of L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61.
  • For the conventional weir and the rectangular labyrinth weir with the plunging flow, it can be assumed that the discharge (Q) is proportional to 1.56 and 1.47h, respectively (h: water depth above the weir). This information is useful for estimating the discharge based on water depth in practical applications.
  • In the rectangular labyrinth weir, the high-velocity zone is located on the side walls between the top of the weir and the channel wall. A high-velocity variation within short distances of the weir. Low velocity occurs within the downstream apex of the weir. This area may be suitable for swimming target fish.
  • As the distance between weirs increased, the zone of maximum velocity increased. However, the zone of low speed decreased. The prevailing maximum velocity for a rectangular labyrinth weir at L/Bโ€‰=โ€‰0.61, 1.22, and 1.83 was 1.46, 1.65, and 1.84 m/s, respectively. The low mean velocities for these distances were 0.27, 0.44, and 0.72 m/s, respectively. This finding highlights the importance of weir spacing in determining the flow characteristics within the fishway.
  • The presence of an orifice in the weir increased the flow velocity at the orifice and in the middle of the pool, especially in a conventional weir. The increase ranged from 7.7 to 12.48%.
  • For a given bottom slope, in a conventional weir, the highest values of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are uniformly distributed in the upstream part of the weir in the cross section of the channel. In contrast, for the rectangular labyrinth weir, the highest TKE values were concentrated on the sides of the pool between the crest of the weir and the channel wall. The highest TKE value for the conventional and the rectangular labyrinth weir was 0.224 and 0.278 J/kg, respectively, at the highest bottom slope (S0โ€‰=โ€‰10%).
  • For a given discharge, bottom slope, and weir spacing, the average values of TI are higher for the rectangular labyrinth weir than for the conventional weir. At the highest discharge, the average range of turbulence intensity (TI) for the conventional and rectangular labyrinth weirs was between 24 and 45% and 15% and 62%, respectively. This reveals that the rectangular labyrinth weir may generate more turbulent flow conditions within the fishway.
  • For a given discharge and constant bottom slope, the rectangular labyrinth weir has a higher energy dissipation rate than the conventional weir (22.75 and 34.86%).
  • Increasing the distance between weirs decreased volumetric energy dissipation. However, increasing the gradient increased volumetric energy dissipation. The presence of an opening in the weir resulted in a decrease in volumetric energy dissipation for both model types.

Availability of data and materials

Data is contained within the article.

References

  1. Katopodis C (1992) Introduction to fishway design, working document. Freshwater Institute, Central Arctic Region
  2. Marriner, B.A.; Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Thiem, J.D.; Cooke, S.J.; Katopodis, C.: Field and numerical assessment of turning pool hydraulics in a vertical slot fishway. Ecol. Eng. 63, 88โ€“101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.010Article Google Scholar 
  3. Dasineh, M.; Ghaderi, A.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Ahmadi, M.; Kuriqi, A.: Prediction of hydraulic jumps on a triangular bed roughness using numerical modeling and soft computing methods. Mathematics 9, 3135 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  4. Silva, A.T.; Bermรบdez, M.; Santos, J.M.; Rabuรฑal, J.R.; Puertas, J.: Pool-type fishway design for a potamodromous cyprinid in the Iberian Peninsula: the Iberian barbelโ€”synthesis and future directions. Sustainability 12, 3387 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083387Article Google Scholar 
  5. Santos, J.M.; Branco, P.; Katopodis, C.; Ferreira, T.; Pinheiro, A.: Retrofitting pool-and-weir fishways to improve passage performance of benthic fishes: effect of boulder density and fishway discharge. Ecol. Eng. 73, 335โ€“344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.065Article Google Scholar 
  6. Ead, S.; Katopodis, C.; Sikora, G.; Rajaratnam, N.J.J.: Flow regimes and structure in pool and weir fishways. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 3, 379โ€“390 (2004)Article Google Scholar 
  7. Guiny, E.; Ervine, D.A.; Armstrong, J.D.: Hydraulic and biological aspects of fish passes for Atlantic salmon. J. Hydraul. Eng. 131, 542โ€“553 (2005)Article Google Scholar 
  8. Yagci, O.: Hydraulic aspects of pool-weir fishways as ecologically friendly water structure. Ecol. Eng. 36, 36โ€“46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.007Article Google Scholar 
  9. Dizabadi, S.; Hakim, S.S.; Azimi, A.H.: Discharge characteristics and structure of flow in labyrinth weirs with a downstream pool. Flow Meas. Instrum. 71, 101683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101683Article Google Scholar 
  10. Kim, J.H.: Hydraulic characteristics by weir type in a pool-weir fishway. Ecol. Eng. 16, 425โ€“433 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00125-7Article Google Scholar 
  11. Zhong, Z.; Ruan, T.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Xu, W.: Experimental and numerical assessment of hydraulic characteristic of a new semi-frustum weir in the pool-weir fishway. Ecol. Eng. 170, 106362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106362Article Google Scholar 
  12. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201โ€“225 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5Article Google Scholar 
  13. Roache, P.J.: Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J. Fluids Eng. 1994(116), 405โ€“413 (1994)Article Google Scholar 
  14. Guo, S.; Chen, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, S.: CFD and experimental investigations of drag force on spherical leak detector in pipe flows at high Reynolds number. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 101(1), 59โ€“80 (2014)Google Scholar 
  15. Ahmadi, M.; Kuriqi, A.; Nezhad, H.M.; Ghaderi, A.; Mohammadi, M.: Innovative configuration of vertical slot fishway to enhance fish swimming conditions. J. Hydrodyn. 34, 917โ€“933 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0071-yArticle Google Scholar 
  16. Ahmadi, M.; Ghaderi, A.; MohammadNezhad, H.; Kuriqi, A.; Di Francesco, S.J.W.: Numerical investigation of hydraulics in a vertical slot fishway with upgraded configurations. Water 13, 2711 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  17. Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J.; Freitas, C.J.J.: Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953Article Google Scholar 
  18. Li, S.; Yang, J.; Ansell, A.: Evaluation of pool-type fish passage with labyrinth weirs. Sustainability (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031098Article Google Scholar 
  19. Ghaderi, A.; Dasineh, M.; Aristodemo, F.; Aricรฒ, C.: Numerical simulations of the flow field of a submerged hydraulic jump over triangular macroroughnesses. Water 13(5), 674 (2021)Article Google Scholar 
  20. Branco, P.; Santos, J.M.; Katopodis, C.; Pinheiro, A.; Ferreira, M.T.: Pool-type fishways: two different morpho-ecological cyprinid species facing plunging and streaming flows. PLoS ONE 8, e65089 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065089Article Google Scholar 
  21. Baki, A.B.M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Harwood, A.; Lewis, A.; Healey, K.: Rock-weir fishway I: flow regimes and hydraulic characteristics. J. Ecohydraulics 2, 122โ€“141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2017.1369182Article Google Scholar 
  22. Dizabadi, S.; Azimi, A.H.: Hydraulic and turbulence structure of triangular labyrinth weir-pool fishways. River Res. Appl. 36, 280โ€“295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3581Article Google Scholar 
  23. Faizal, W.M.; Ghazali, N.N.N.; Khor, C.Y.; Zainon, M.Z.; Ibrahim, N.B.; Razif, R.M.: Turbulent kinetic energy of flow during inhale and exhale to characterize the severity of obstructive sleep apnea patient. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 136(1), 43โ€“61 (2023)Google Scholar 
  24. Cotel, A.J.; Webb, P.W.; Tritico, H.: Do brown trout choose locations with reduced turbulence? Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135, 610โ€“619 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1577/T04-196.1Article Google Scholar 
  25. Hargreaves, D.M.; Wright, N.G.: On the use of the kโ€“ฮต model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 95, 355โ€“369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.08.002Article Google Scholar 
  26. Kupferschmidt, C.; Zhu, D.Z.: Physical modelling of pool and weir fishways with rock weirs. River Res. Appl. 33, 1130โ€“1142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3157Article Google Scholar 
  27. Romรฃo, F.; Quaresma, A.L.; Santos, J.M.; Amaral, S.D.; Branco, P.; Pinheiro, A.N.: Multislot fishway improves entrance performance and fish transit time over vertical slots. Water (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030275Article Google Scholar 

Download references

๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŒŒ๋ ฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ž”ํ•ด ์–ธ๋• ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ถ„์„

๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŒŒ๋ ฅ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ž”ํ•ด ์–ธ๋• ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ถ„์„

Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Rubble Mound Breakwater Geometry Under the Effect of Nonlinear Wave Force

Arabian Journal for Science and EngineeringAims and scopeSubmit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Assessing the interaction of waves and porous offshore structures such as rubble mound breakwaters plays a critical role in designing such structures optimally. This study focused on the effect of the geometric parameters of a sloped rubble mound breakwater, including the shape of the armour, method of its arrangement, and the breakwater slope. Thus, three main design criteria, including the wave reflection coefficient (Kr), transmission coefficient (Kt), and depreciation wave energy coefficient (Kd), are discussed. Based on the results, a decrease in wavelength reduced the Kr and increased the Kt and Kd. The rubble mound breakwater with the Coreloc armour layer could exhibit the lowest Kr compared to other armour geometries. In addition, a decrease in the breakwater slope reduced the Kr and Kd by 3.4 and 1.25%, respectively. In addition, a decrease in the breakwater slope from 33 to 25ยฐ increased the wave breaking height by 6.1% on average. Further, a decrease in the breakwater slope reduced the intensity of turbulence depreciation. Finally, the armour geometry and arrangement of armour layers on the breakwater with its different slopes affect the wave behaviour and interaction between the wave and breakwater. Thus, layering on the breakwater and the correct use of the geometric shapes of the armour should be considered when designing such structures.

ํŒŒ๋„์™€ ์ž”ํ•ด ๋”๋ฏธ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ํ•ด์–‘ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์„ ์ตœ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์ง„ ์ž”ํ•ด ๋‘”๋• ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๊ฐ‘์˜ท์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ๋“ฑ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํŒŒ๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Kr), ํˆฌ๊ณผ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Kt) ๋ฐ ๊ฐ๊ฐ€์ƒ๊ฐํŒŒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜(Kd)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋…ผ์˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ํŒŒ์žฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด K๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.r๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  K๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผฐ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹คt ๋ฐ Kd. Coreloc ์žฅ๊ฐ‘ ์ธต์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž”ํ•ด ์–ธ๋• ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ K๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.r ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฐ‘์˜ท ํ˜•์ƒ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ K๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.r ๋ฐ Kd ๊ฐ๊ฐ 3.4%, 1.25% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ 33ยฐ์—์„œ 25ยฐ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ๋„ ํŒŒ์‡„ ๋†’์ด๊ฐ€ ํ‰๊ท  6.1% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฐ๊ฐ€์ƒ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ์žฅ๊ฐ‘ ํ˜•์ƒ๊ณผ ์žฅ๊ฐ‘ ์ธต์˜ ๋ฐฐ์—ด์€ ํŒŒ๋„ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ํŒŒ๋„์™€ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์— ์ธต์„ ์Œ“๊ณ  ๊ฐ‘์˜ท์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ์–‘์„ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords

  • Rubble mound breakwater
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Armour layer
  • Wave reflection coefficient
  • Wave transmission coefficient
  • Wave energy dissipation coefficient

References

  1. Sollitt, C.K.; Cross, R.H.: Wave transmission through permeable breakwaters. In Coastal Engineering. pp. 1827โ€“1846. (1973)
  2. Sulisz, W.: Wave reflection and transmission at permeable breakwaters of arbitrary cross-section. Coast. Eng. 9(4), 371โ€“386 (1985)Article  Google Scholar 
  3. Kobayashi, N.; Wurjanto, A.: Numerical model for waves on rough permeable slopes. J. Coast. Res.149โ€“166. (1990)
  4. Wurjanto, A.; Kobayashi, N.: Irregular wave reflection and runup on permeable slopes. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 119(5), 537โ€“557 (1993)Article  Google Scholar 
  5. van Gent, M.R.: Numerical modelling of wave interaction with dynamically stable structures. In Coastal Engineering 1996. pp. 1930โ€“1943. (1997)
  6. Liu, P.L.F.; Wen, J.: Nonlinear diffusive surface waves in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 347, 119โ€“139 (1997)Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 
  7. Troch, P.; De Rouck, J.: Development of two-dimensional numerical wave flume for wave interaction with rubble mound breakwaters. In Coastal Engineering. pp. 1638โ€“1649. (1999)
  8. Liu, P.L.F.; Lin, P.; Chang, K.A.; Sakakiyama, T.: Numerical modeling of wave interaction with porous structures. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 125(6), 322โ€“330 (1999)Article  Google Scholar 
  9. Abdolmaleki, K.; Thiagarajan, K.P.; Morris-Thomas, M.T.: Simulation of the dam break problem and impact flows using a Navier-Stokes solver. Simulation 13, 17 (2004)Google Scholar 
  10. Higuera, P.; Lara, J.L.; Losada, I.J.: Realistic wave generation and active wave absorption for Navier-Stokes models: application to OpenFOAMยฎ. Coast. Eng. 71, 102โ€“118 (2013)Article  Google Scholar 
  11. Higuera, P.; Lara, J.L.; Losada, I.J.: Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using OpenFOAMยฎ. Part II: application. Coast. Eng. 83, 259โ€“270 (2014)Article  Google Scholar 
  12. Gui, Q.; Dong, P.; Shao, S.; Chen, Y.: Incompressible SPH simulation of wave interaction with porous structure. Ocean Eng. 110, 126โ€“139 (2015)Article  Google Scholar 
  13. Dentale, F.; Donnarumma, G.; Carratelli, E.P.; Reale, F.: A numerical method to analyze the interaction between sea waves and rubble mound emerged breakwaters. WSEAS Trans. Fluid Mech 10, 106โ€“116 (2015)Google Scholar 
  14. Dentale, F.; Reale, F.; Di Leo, A.; Carratelli, E.P.: A CFD approach to rubble mound breakwater design. Int. J. Naval Archit. Ocean Eng. 10(5), 644โ€“650 (2018)Article  Google Scholar 
  15. Koley, S.: Wave transmission through multilayered porous breakwater under regular and irregular incident waves. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 108, 393โ€“401 (2019)Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 
  16. Koley, S.; Panduranga, K.; Almashan, N.; Neelamani, S.; Al-Ragum, A.: Numerical and experimental modeling of water wave interaction with rubble mound offshore porous breakwaters. Ocean Eng. 218, 108218 (2020)Article  Google Scholar 
  17. Pourteimouri, P.; Hejazi, K.: Development of an integrated numerical model for simulating wave interaction with permeable submerged breakwaters using extended Navier-Stokes equations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8(2), 87 (2020)Article  Google Scholar 
  18. Cao, D.; Yuan, J.; Chen, H.: Towards modelling wave-induced forces on an armour layer unit of rubble mound coastal revetments. Ocean Eng. 239, 109811 (2021)Article  Google Scholar 
  19. Dรญaz-Carrasco, P.; Eldrup, M.R.; Andersen, T.L.: Advance in wave reflection estimation for rubble mound breakwaters: the importance of the relative water depth. Coast. Eng. 168, 103921 (2021)Article  Google Scholar 
  20. Vieira, F.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Rosa-Santos, P.: Damage evolution in single-layer cube armoured breakwaters with a regular placement pattern. Coast. Eng. 169, 103943 (2021)Article  Google Scholar 
  21. Booshi, S.; Ketabdari, M.J.: Modeling of solitary wave interaction with emerged porous breakwater using PLIC-VOF method. Ocean Eng. 241, 110041 (2021)Article  Google Scholar 
  22. Aristodemo, F.; Filianoti, P.; Tripepi, G.; Gurnari, L.; Ghaderi, A.: On the energy transmission by a submerged barrier interacting with a solitary wave. Appl. Ocean Res. 122, 103123 (2022)Article  Google Scholar 
  23. Teixeira, P.R.; Didier, E.: Numerical analysis of performance of an oscillating water column wave energy converter inserted into a composite breakwater with rubble mound foundation. Ocean Eng. 278, 114421 (2023)Article  Google Scholar 
  24. Burgan, H.I.: Numerical modeling of structural irregularities on unsymmetrical buildings. Tehniฤki vjesnik 28(3), 856โ€“861 (2021)Google Scholar 
  25. Jones, I.P.: CFDS-Flow3D user guide. (1994)
  26. Al Shaikhli, H.I.; Khassaf, S.I.: Stepped mound breakwater simulation by using flow 3D. Eurasian J. Eng. Technol. 6, 60โ€“68 (2022)Google Scholar 
  27. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39(1), 201โ€“225 (1981)Article  MATH  Google Scholar 
  28. Ghaderi, A.; Dasineh, M.; Aristodemo, F.; Aricรฒ, C.: Numerical simulations of the flow field of a submerged hydraulic jump over triangular macroroughnesses. Water 13(5), 674 (2021)Article  Google Scholar 
  29. Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.A.; Thangam, S.; Gatski, T.B.; Speziale, C.G.: Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Phys. Fluids A 4(7), 1510โ€“1520 (1992)Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 
  30. Van der Meer, J.W.; Stam, C.J.M.: Wave runup on smooth and rock slopes of coastal structures. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 118(5), 534โ€“550 (1992)Article  Google Scholar 
  31. Goda, Y.; Suzuki, Y. Estimation of incident and reflected waves in random wave experiments. In: ASCE, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, (Honolulu, Hawaii). vol. 1, pp. 828โ€“845. (1976)
  32. Zanuttigh, B.; Van der Meer, J.W.: Wave reflection from coastal structures. In: AA.VV., Proceedings of the XXX International Conference on Coastal Engineering, World Scientific, (San Diego, CA, USA, September 2006). pp. 4337โ€“4349. (2006)
  33. Seelig W.N.; Ahrens J.P.: Estimation of wave reflection and energy dissipation coefficients for beaches, revetments, and breakwaters. CERC, Technical Paper, Fort Belvoir. vol. 81, p. 41 (1981)
  34. Mase, H.: Random wave runup height on gentle slope. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 115(5), 649โ€“661 (1989)Article  Google Scholar 
Figure 11. Sketch of scour mechanism around USAF under random waves.

Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around Umbrella Suction Anchor Foundation under Random Waves

byย Ruigeng Huย 1,Hongjun Liuย 2,Hao Lengย 1,Peng Yuย 3ย andXiuhai Wangย 1,2,*

1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266000, China

2Key Lab of Marine Environment and Ecology (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266000, China

3Qingdao Geo-Engineering Survering Institute, Qingdao 266100, China

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 20219(8), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080886

Received: 6 July 2021 / Revised: 8 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021

(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)

Download 

Abstract

A series of numerical simulation were conducted to study the local scour around umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF) under random waves. In this study, the validation was carried out firstly to verify the accuracy of the present model. Furthermore, the scour evolution and scour mechanism were analyzed respectively. In addition, two revised models were proposed to predict the equilibrium scour depth Seq around USAF. At last, a parametric study was carried out to study the effects of the Froude number Fr and Euler number Eu for the Seq. The results indicate that the present numerical model is accurate and reasonable for depicting the scour morphology under random waves. The revised Raaijmakersโ€™s model shows good agreement with the simulating results of the present study when KCs,p < 8. The predicting results of the revised stochastic model are the most favorable for n = 10 when KCrms,a < 4. The higher Fr and Eu both lead to the more intensive horseshoe vortex and larger Seq.

Keywords: 

scournumerical investigationrandom wavesequilibrium scour depthKC number

1. Introduction

The rapid expansion of cities tends to cause social and economic problems, such as environmental pollution and traffic jam. As a kind of clean energy, offshore wind power has developed rapidly in recent years. The foundation of offshore wind turbine (OWT) supports the upper tower, and suffers the cyclic loading induced by waves, tides and winds, which exerts a vital influence on the OWT system. The types of OWT foundation include the fixed and floating foundation, and the fixed foundation was used usually for nearshore wind turbine. After the construction of fixed foundation, the hydrodynamic field changes in the vicinity of the foundation, leading to the horseshoe vortex formation and streamline compression at the upside and sides of foundation respectively [1,2,3,4]. As a result, the neighboring soil would be carried away by the shear stress induced by vortex, and the scour hole would emerge in the vicinity of foundation. The scour holes increase the cantilever length, and weaken the lateral bearing capacity of foundation [5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, the natural frequency of OWT system increases with the increase of cantilever length, causing the resonance occurs when the system natural frequency equals the wave or wind frequency [10,11,12]. Given that, an innovative foundation called umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF) has been designed for nearshore wind power. The previous studies indicated the USAF was characterized by the favorable lateral bearing capacity with the low cost [6,13,14]. The close-up of USAF is shown in Figure 1, and it includes six parts: 1-interal buckets, 2-external skirt, 3-anchor ring, 4-anchor branch, 5-supporting rod, 6-telescopic hook. The detailed description and application method of USAF can be found in reference [13].

Jmse 09 00886 g001 550

Figure 1. The close-up of umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF).

Numerical and experimental investigations of scour around OWT foundation under steady currents and waves have been extensively studied by many researchers [1,2,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The seabed scour can be classified as two types according to Shields parameter ฮธ, i.e., clear bed scour (ฮธ < ฮธcr) or live bed scour (ฮธ > ฮธcr). Due to the set of foundation, the adverse hydraulic pressure gradient exists at upstream foundation edges, resulting in the streamline separation between boundary layer flow and seabed. The separating boundary layer ascended at upstream anchor edges and developed into the horseshoe vortex. Then, the horseshoe vortex moved downstream gradually along the periphery of the anchor, and the vortex shed off continually at the lee-side of the anchor, i.e., wake vortex. The core of wake vortex is a negative pressure center, liking a vacuum cleaner. Hence, the soil particles were swirled into the negative pressure core and carried away by wake vortexes. At the same time, the onset of scour at rear side occurred. Finally, the wake vortex became downflow when the turbulence energy could not support the survival of wake vortex. According to Tavouktsoglou et al. [25], the scale of pile wall boundary layer is proportional to 1/ln(Rd) (Rd is pile Reynolds), which means the turbulence intensity induced by the flow-structure interaction would decrease with Rd increases, but the effects of Rd can be neglected only if the flow around the foundation is fully turbulent [26]. According to previous studies [1,15,27,28,29,30,31,32], the scour development around pile foundation under waves was significantly influenced by Shields parameter ฮธ and KC number simultaneously (calculated by Equation (1)). Sand ripples widely existed around pile under waves in the case of live bed scour, and the scour morphology is related with ฮธ and KC. Compared with ฮธKC has a greater influence on the scour morphology [21,27,28]. The influence mechanism of KC on the scour around the pile is reflected in two aspects: the horseshoe vortex at upstream and wake vortex shedding at downstream.

KC=UwmTD๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝwm๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(1)

where, Uwm is the maximum velocity of the undisturbed wave-induced oscillatory flow at the sea bottom above the wave boundary layer, T is wave period, and D is pile diameter.

There are two prerequisites to satisfy the formation of horseshoe vortex at upstream pile edges: (1) the incoming flow boundary layer with sufficient thickness and (2) the magnitude of upstream adverse pressure gradient making the boundary layer separating [1,15,16,18,20]. The smaller KC results the lower adverse pressure gradient, and the boundary layer cannot separate, herein, there is almost no horseshoe vortex emerging at upside of pile. Sumer et al. [1,15] carried out several sets of wave flume experiments under regular and irregular waves respectively, and the experiment results show that there is no horseshoe vortex when KC is less than 6. While the scale and lifespan of horseshoe vortex increase evidently with the increase of KC when KC is larger than 6. Moreover, the wake vortex contributes to the scour at lee-side of pile. Similar with the case of horseshoe vortex, there is no wake vortex when KC is less than 6. The wake vortex is mainly responsible for scour around pile when KC is greater than 6 and less than O(100), while horseshoe vortex controls scour nearly when KC is greater than O(100).

Sumer et al. [1] found that the equilibrium scour depth was nil around pile when KC was less than 6 under regular waves for live bed scour, while the equilibrium scour depth increased with the increase of KC. Based on that, Sumer proposed an equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (2)). Carreiras et al. [33] revised Sumerโ€™s equation with m = 0.06 for nonlinear waves. Different with the findings of Sumer et al. [1] and Carreiras et al. [33], Corvaro et al. [21] found the scour still occurred for KC โ‰ˆ 4, and proposed the revised equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (3)) for KC > 4.

Rudolph and Bos [2] conducted a series of wave flume experiments to investigate the scour depth around monopile under waves only, waves and currents combined respectively, indicting KC was one of key parameters in influencing equilibrium scour depth, and proposed the equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (4)) for low KC (1 < KC < 10). Through analyzing the extensive data from published literatures, Raaijmakers and Rudolph [34] developed the equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (5)) for low KC, which was suitable for waves only, waves and currents combined. Khalfin [35] carried out several sets of wave flume experiments to study scour development around monopile, and proposed the equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (6)) for low KC (0.1 < KC < 3.5). Different with above equations, the Khalfinโ€™s equation considers the Shields parameter ฮธ and KC number simultaneously in predicting equilibrium scour depth. The flow reversal occurred under through in one wave period, so sand particles would be carried away from lee-side of pile to upside, resulting in sand particles backfilled into the upstream scour hole [20,29]. Considering the backfilling effects, Zanke et al. [36] proposed the equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (7)) around pile by theoretical analysis, and the equation is suitable for the whole range of KC number under regular waves and currents combined.

S/D=1.3(1โˆ’exp([โˆ’m(KCโˆ’6)])๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=1.3(1โˆ’exp(โˆ’๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’6))(2)

where, m = 0.03 for linear waves.

S/D=1.3(1โˆ’exp([โˆ’0.02(KCโˆ’4)])๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=1.3(1โˆ’exp(โˆ’0.02(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’4))(3)

S/D=1.3ฮณKwaveKhw๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=1.3๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwave๏ฟฝโ„Žw(4)

where, ฮณ is safety factor, depending on design process, typically ฮณ = 1.5, Kwave is correction factor considering wave action, Khw is correction factor considering water depth.

S/D=1.5[tanh(hwD)]KwaveKhw๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=1.5tanh(โ„Žw๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝwave๏ฟฝโ„Žw(5)

where, hw is water depth.

S/D=0.0753(ฮธฮธcrโˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆšโˆ’0.5)0.69KC0.68๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=0.0753(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝcrโˆ’0.5)0.69๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ0.68(6)

where, ฮธ is shields parameter, ฮธcr is critical shields parameter.

S/D=2.5(1โˆ’0.5u/uc)xrelxrel=xeff/(1+xeff)xeff=0.03(1โˆ’0.35ucr/u)(KCโˆ’6)โŽซโŽญโŽฌโŽชโŽช๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=2.5(1โˆ’0.5๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/(1+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=0.03(1โˆ’0.35๏ฟฝcr/๏ฟฝ)(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’6)(7)

where, u is near-bed orbital velocity amplitude, uc is critical velocity corresponding the onset of sediment motion.

S/D=1.3{1โˆ’exp[โˆ’0.03(KC2lnn+36)1/2โˆ’6]}๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ=1.31โˆ’expโˆ’0.03(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2ln๏ฟฝ+36)1/2โˆ’6(8)

where, n is the 1/nโ€™th highest wave for random waves

For predicting equilibrium scour depth under irregular waves, i.e., random waves, Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] found itโ€™s suitable to take Equation (2) to predict equilibrium scour depth around pile under random waves with the root-mean-square (RMS) value of near-bed orbital velocity amplitude Um and peak wave period TP to calculate KC. Khalfin [35] recommended the RMS wave height Hrms and peak wave period TP were used to calculate KC for Equation (6). References [37,38,39,40] developed a series of stochastic theoretical models to predict equilibrium scour depth around pile under random waves, nonlinear random waves plus currents respectively. The stochastic approach thought the 1/nโ€™th highest wave were responsible for scour in vicinity of pile under random waves, and the KC was calculated in Equation (8) with Um and mean zero-crossing wave period Tz. The results calculated by Equation (8) agree well with experimental values of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] if the 1/10โ€ฒth highest wave was used. To authorโ€™s knowledge, the stochastic approach proposed by Myrhaug and Rue [37] is the only theoretical model to predict equilibrium scour depth around pile under random waves for the whole range of KC number in published documents. Other methods of predicting scour depth under random waves are mainly originated from the equation for regular waves-only, waves and currents combined, which are limited to the large KC number, such as KC > 6 for Equation (2) and KC > 4 for Equation (3) respectively. However, situations with relatively low KC number (KC < 4) often occur in reality, for example, monopile or suction anchor for OWT foundations in ocean environment. Moreover, local scour around OWT foundations under random waves has not yet been investigated fully. Therefore, further study are still needed in the aspect of scour around OWT foundations with low KC number under random waves. Given that, this study presents the scour sediment model around umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF) under random waves. In this study, a comparison of equilibrium scour depth around USAF between this present numerical models and the previous theoretical models and experimental results was presented firstly. Then, this study gave a comprehensive analysis for the scour mechanisms around USAF. After that, two revised models were proposed according to the model of Raaijmakers and Rudolph [34] and the stochastic model developed by Myrhaug and Rue [37] respectively to predict the equilibrium scour depth. Finally, a parametric study was conducted to study the effects of the Froude number (Fr) and Euler number (Eu) to equilibrium scour depth respectively.

2. Numerical Method

2.1. Governing Equations of Flow

The following equations adopted in present model are already available in Flow 3D software. The authors used these theoretical equations to simulate scour in random waves without modification. The incompressible viscous fluid motion satisfies the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation, so the present numerical model solves RANS equations:

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚uโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚uโˆ‚z)=โˆ’1ฯfโˆ‚pโˆ‚x+Gx+fxโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝfโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(9)

โˆ‚vโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚vโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚vโˆ‚z)=โˆ’1ฯfโˆ‚pโˆ‚y+Gy+fyโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝfโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(10)

โˆ‚wโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚wโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚wโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=โˆ’1ฯfโˆ‚pโˆ‚z+Gz+fzโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=โˆ’1๏ฟฝfโˆ‚๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(11)

where, VF is the volume fraction; uv, and w are the velocity components in xyz direction respectively with Cartesian coordinates; Ai is the area fraction; ฯf is the fluid density, fi is the viscous fluid acceleration, Gi is the fluid body acceleration (i = xyz).

2.2. Turbulent Model

The turbulence closure is available by the turbulent model, such as one-equation, the one-equation k-ฮต model, the standard k-ฮต model, RNG k-ฮต turbulent model and large eddy simulation (LES) model. The LES model requires very fine mesh grid, so the computational time is large, which hinders the LES model application in engineering. The RNG k-ฮต model can reduce computational time greatly with high accuracy in the near-wall region. Furthermore, the RNG k-ฮต model computes the maximum turbulent mixing length dynamically in simulating sediment scour model. Therefore, the RNG k-ฮต model was adopted to study the scour around anchor under random waves [41,42].

โˆ‚kTโˆ‚T+1VF(uAxโˆ‚kTโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚kTโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚kTโˆ‚z)=PT+GT+DiffkTโˆ’ฮตkTโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(12)

โˆ‚ฮตTโˆ‚T+1VF(uAxโˆ‚ฮตTโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚ฮตTโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚ฮตTโˆ‚z)=CDIS1ฮตTkT(PT+CDIS3GT)+Diffฮตโˆ’CDIS2ฮต2TkTโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ1๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ3๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)+๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(13)

where, kT is specific kinetic energy involved with turbulent velocity, GT is the turbulent energy generated by buoyancy; ฮตT is the turbulent energy dissipating rate, PT is the turbulent energy, Diffฮต and DiffkT are diffusion terms associated with VFAiCDIS1CDIS2 and CDIS3 are dimensionless parameters, and CDIS1CDIS3 have default values of 1.42, 0.2 respectively. CDIS2 can be obtained from PT and kT.

2.3. Sediment Scour Model

The sand particles may suffer four processes under waves, i.e., entrainment, bed load transport, suspended load transport, and deposition, so the sediment scour model should depict the above processes efficiently. In present numerical simulation, the sediment scour model includes the following aspects:

2.3.1. Entrainment and Deposition

The combination of entrainment and deposition determines the net scour rate of seabed in present sediment scour model. The entrainment lift velocity of sand particles was calculated as [43]:

ulift,i=ฮฑinsd0.3โˆ—(ฮธโˆ’ฮธcr)1.5โˆฅgโˆฅdi(ฯiโˆ’ฯf)ฯfโˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš๏ฟฝlift,i=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ*0.3(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝcr)1.5๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝf)๏ฟฝf(14)

where, ฮฑi is the entrainment parameter, ns is the outward point perpendicular to the seabed, d* is the dimensionless diameter of sand particles, which was calculated by Equation (15), ฮธcr is the critical Shields parameter, g is the gravity acceleration, di is the diameter of sand particles, ฯi is the density of seabed species.

dโˆ—=di(โˆฅgโˆฅฯf(ฯiโˆ’ฯf)ฮผ2f)1/3๏ฟฝ*=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝf(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝf)๏ฟฝf2)1/3(15)

where ฮผf is the fluid dynamic viscosity.

In Equation (14), the entrainment parameter ฮฑi confirms the rate at which sediment erodes when the given shear stress is larger than the critical shear stress, and the recommended value 0.018 was adopted according to the experimental data of Mastbergen and Von den Berg [43]. ns is the outward pointing normal to the seabed interface, and ns = (0,0,1) according to the Cartesian coordinates used in present numerical model.

The shields parameter was obtained from the following equation:

ฮธ=U2f,m(ฯi/ฯfโˆ’1)gd50๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝf,m2(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝfโˆ’1)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ50(16)

where, Uf,m is the maximum value of the near-bed friction velocity; d50 is the median diameter of sand particles. The detailed calculation procedure of ฮธ was available in Soulsby [44].

The critical shields parameter ฮธcr was obtained from the Equation (17) [44]

ฮธcr=0.31+1.2dโˆ—+0.055[1โˆ’exp(โˆ’0.02dโˆ—)]๏ฟฝcr=0.31+1.2๏ฟฝ*+0.0551โˆ’exp(โˆ’0.02๏ฟฝ*)(17)

The sand particles begin to deposit on seabed when the turbulence energy weaken and cannโ€™t support the particles suspending. The setting velocity of the particles was calculated from the following equation [44]:

usettling,i=ฮฝfdi[(10.362+1.049d3โˆ—)0.5โˆ’10.36]๏ฟฝsettling,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝf๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(10.362+1.049๏ฟฝ*3)0.5โˆ’10.36(18)

where ฮฝf is the fluid kinematic viscosity.

2.3.2. Bed Load Transport

This is called bed load transport when the sand particles roll or bounce over the seabed and always have contact with seabed. The bed load transport velocity was computed by [45]:

ubedload,i=qb,iฮดicb,ifb๏ฟฝbedload,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝb,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝb,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝb(19)

where, qb,i is the bed load transport rate, which was obtained from Equation (20), ฮดi is the bed load thickness, which was calculated by Equation (21), cb,i is the volume fraction of sand i in the multiple species, fb is the critical packing fraction of the seabed.

qb,i=8[โˆฅgโˆฅ(ฯiโˆ’ฯfฯf)d3i]1/2๏ฟฝb,๏ฟฝ=8๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝf๏ฟฝf)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ31/2(20)

ฮดi=0.3d0.7โˆ—(ฮธฮธcrโˆ’1)0.5di๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=0.3๏ฟฝ*0.7(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝcrโˆ’1)0.5๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(21)

2.3.3. Suspended Load Transport

Through the following transport equation, the suspended sediment concentration could be acquired.

โˆ‚Cs,iโˆ‚t+โˆ‡(us,iCs,i)=โˆ‡โˆ‡(DfCs,i)โˆ‚๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝโˆ‚๏ฟฝ+โˆ‡(๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ)=โˆ‡โˆ‡(๏ฟฝf๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ)(22)

where, Cs,i is the suspended sand particles mass concentration of sand i in the multiple species, us,i is the sand particles velocity of sand iDf is the diffusivity.

The velocity of sand i in the multiple species could be obtained from the following equation:

us,i=uยฏยฏ+usettling,ics,i๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝยฏ+๏ฟฝsettling,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ(23)

where, uยฏ๏ฟฝยฏ is the velocity of mixed fluid-particles, which can be calculated by the RANS equation with turbulence model, cs,i is the suspended sand particles volume concentration, which was computed from Equation (24).

cs,i=Cs,iฯi๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝs,๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(24)

3. Model Setup

The seabed-USAF-wave three-dimensional scour numerical model was built using Flow-3D software. As shown in Figure 2, the model includes sandy seabed, USAF model, sea water, two baffles and porous media. The dimensions of USAF are shown in Table 1. The sandy bed (210 m in length, 30 m in width and 11 m in height) is made up of uniform fine sand with median diameter d50 = 0.041 cm. The USAF model includes upper steel tube with the length of 20 m, which was installed in the middle of seabed. The location of USAF is positioned at 140 m from the upstream inflow boundary and 70 m from the downstream outflow boundary. Two baffles were installed at two ends of seabed. In order to eliminate the wave reflection basically, the porous media was set at the outflow side on the seabed.

Jmse 09 00886 g002 550

Figure 2. (a) The sketch of seabed-USAF-wave three-dimensional model; (b) boundary condation:Wv-wave boundary, S-symmetric boundary, O-outflow boundary; (c) USAF model.

Table 1. Numerical simulating cases.

Table

3.1. Mesh Geometric Dimensions

In the simulation of the scour under the random waves, the model includes the umbrella suction anchor foundation, seabed and fluid. As shown in Figure 3, the model mesh includes global mesh grid and nested mesh grid, and the total number of grids is 1,812,000. The basic procedure for building mesh grid consists of two steps. Step 1: Divide the global mesh using regular hexahedron with size of 0.6 ร— 0.6. The global mesh area is cubic box, embracing the seabed and whole fluid volume, and the dimensions are 210 m in length, 30 m in width and 32 m in height. The details of determining the grid size can see the following mesh sensitivity section. Step 2: Set nested fine mesh grid in vicinity of the USAF with size of 0.3 ร— 0.3 so as to shorten the computation cost and improve the calculation accuracy. The encryption range is โˆ’15 m to 15 m in x direction, โˆ’15 m to 15 m in y direction and 0 m to 32 m in z direction, respectively. In order to accurately capture the free-surface dynamics, such as the fluid-air interface, the volume of fluid (VOF) method was adopted for tracking the free water surface. One specific algorithm called FAVORTM (Fractional Area/Volume Obstacle Representation) was used to define the fractional face areas and fractional volumes of the cells which are open to fluid flow.

Jmse 09 00886 g003 550

Figure 3. The sketch of mesh grid.

3.2. Boundary Conditions

As shown in Figure 2, the initial fluid length is 210 m as long as seabed. A wave boundary was specified at the upstream offshore end. The details of determining the random wave spectrum can see the following wave parameters section. The outflow boundary was set at the downstream onshore end. The symmetry boundary was used at the top and two sides of the model. The symmetric boundaries were the better strategy to improve the computation efficiency and save the calculation cost [46]. At the seabed bottom, the wall boundary was adopted, which means the u = v = w= 0. Besides, the upper steel tube of USAF was set as no-slip condition.

3.3. Wave Parameters

The random waves with JONSWAP wave spectrum were used for all simulations as realistic representation of offshore conditions. The unidirectional JONSWAP frequency spectrum was described as [47]:

S(ฯ‰)=ฮฑg2ฯ‰5exp[โˆ’54(ฯ‰pฯ‰)4]ฮณexp[โˆ’(ฯ‰โˆ’ฯ‰p)22ฯƒ2ฯ‰2p]๏ฟฝ(๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝ5expโˆ’54(๏ฟฝp๏ฟฝ)4๏ฟฝexpโˆ’(๏ฟฝโˆ’๏ฟฝp)22๏ฟฝ2๏ฟฝp2(25)

where, ฮฑ is wave energy scale parameter, which is calculated by Equation (26), ฯ‰ is frequency, ฯ‰p is wave spectrum peak frequency, which can be obtained from Equation (27). ฮณ is wave spectrum peak enhancement factor, in this study ฮณ = 3.3. ฯƒ is spectral width factor, ฯƒ equals 0.07 for ฯ‰ โ‰ค ฯ‰p and 0.09 for ฯ‰ > ฯ‰p respectively.

ฮฑ=0.0076(gXU2)โˆ’0.22๏ฟฝ=0.0076(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)โˆ’0.22(26)

ฯ‰p=22(gU)(gXU2)โˆ’0.33๏ฟฝp=22(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ)(๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ2)โˆ’0.33(27)

where, X is fetch length, U is average wind velocity at 10 m height from mean sea level.

In present numerical model, the input key parameters include X and U for wave boundary with JONSWAP wave spectrum. The objective wave height and period are available by different combinations of X and U. In this study, we designed 9 cases with different wave heights, periods and water depths for simulating scour around USAF under random waves (see Table 2). For random waves, the wave steepness ฮต and Ursell number Ur were acquired form Equations (28) and (29) respectively

ฮต=2ฯ€gHsT2a๏ฟฝ=2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝs๏ฟฝa2(28)

Ur=Hsk2h3w๏ฟฝr=๏ฟฝs๏ฟฝ2โ„Žw3(29)

where, Hs is significant wave height, Ta is average wave period, k is wave number, hw is water depth. The Shield parameter ฮธ satisfies ฮธ > ฮธcr for all simulations in current study, indicating the live bed scour prevails.

Table 2. Numerical simulating cases.

Table

3.4. Mesh Sensitivity

In this section, a mesh sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the influence of mesh grid size to results and make sure the calculation is mesh size independent and converged. Three mesh grid size were chosen: Mesh 1โ€”global mesh grid size of 0.75 ร— 0.75, nested fine mesh grid size of 0.4 ร— 0.4, and total number of grids 1,724,000, Mesh 2โ€”global mesh grid size of 0.6 ร— 0.6, nested fine mesh grid size of 0.3 ร— 0.3, and total number of grids 1,812,000, Mesh 3โ€”global mesh grid size of 0.4 ร— 0.4, nested fine mesh grid size of 0.2 ร— 0.2, and total number of grids 1,932,000. The near-bed shear velocity U* is an important factor for influencing scour process [1,15], so U* at the position of (4,0,11.12) was evaluated under three mesh sizes. As the Figure 4 shown, the maximum error of shear velocity โˆ†U*1,2 is about 39.8% between the mesh 1 and mesh 2, and 4.8% between the mesh 2 and mesh 3. According to the mesh sensitivity criterion adopted by Pang et al. [48], itโ€™s reasonable to think the results are mesh size independent and converged with mesh 2. Additionally, the present model was built according to prototype size, and the mesh size used in present model is larger than the mesh size adopted by Higueira et al. [49] and Corvaro et al. [50]. If we choose the smallest cell size, it will take too much time. For example, the simulation with Mesh3 required about 260 h by using a computer with Intel Xeon Scalable Gold 4214 CPU @24 Cores, 2.2 GHz and 64.00 GB RAM. Therefore, in this case, considering calculation accuracy and computation efficiency, the mesh 2 was chosen for all the simulation in this study.

Jmse 09 00886 g004 550

Figure 4. Comparison of near-bed shear velocity U* with different mesh grid size.

The nested mesh block was adopted for seabed in vicinity of the USAF, which was overlapped with the global mesh block. When two mesh blocks overlap each other, the governing equations are by default solved on the mesh block with smaller average cell size (i.e., higher grid resolution). It is should be noted that the Flow 3D software used the moving mesh captures the scour evolution and automatically adjusts the time step size to be as large as possible without exceeding any of the stability limits, affecting accuracy, or unduly increasing the effort required to enforce the continuity condition [51].

3.5. Model Validation

In order to verify the reliability of the present model, the results of present study were compared with the experimental data of Khosronejad et al. [52]. The experiment was conducted in an open channel with a slender vertical pile under unidirectional currents. The comparison of scour development between the present results and the experimental results is shown in Figure 5. The Figure 5 reveals that the present results agree well with the experimental data of Khosronejad et al. [52]. In the first stage, the scour depth increases rapidly. After that, the scour depth achieves a maximum value gradually. The equilibrium scour depth calculated by the present model is basically corresponding with the experimental results of Khosronejad et al. [52], although scour depth in the present model is slightly larger than the experimental results at initial stage.

Jmse 09 00886 g005 550

Figure 5. Comparison of time evolution of scour between the present study and Khosronejad et al. [52], Petersen et al. [17].

Secondly, another comparison was further conducted between the results of present study and the experimental data of Petersen et al. [17]. The experiment was carried out in a flume with a circular vertical pile in combined waves and current. Figure 4 shows a comparison of time evolution of scour depth between the simulating and the experimental results. As Figure 5 indicates, the scour depth in this study has good overall agreement with the experimental results proposed in Petersen et al. [17]. The equilibrium scour depth calculated by the present model is 0.399 m, which equals to the experimental value basically. Overall, the above verifications prove the present model is accurate and capable in dealing with sediment scour under waves.

In addition, in order to calibrate and validate the present model for hydrodynamic parameters, the comparison of water surface elevation was carried out with laboratory experiments conducted by Stahlmann [53] for wave gauge No. 3. The Figure 6 depicts the surface wave profiles between experiments and numerical model results. The comparison indicates that there is a good agreement between the model results and experimental values, especially the locations of wave crest and trough. Comparison of the surface elevation instructs the present model has an acceptable relative error, and the model is a calibrated in terms of the hydrodynamic parameters.

Jmse 09 00886 g006 550

Figure 6. Comparison of surface elevation between the present study and Stahlmann [53].

Finally, another comparison was conducted for equilibrium scour depth or maximum scour depth under random waves with the experimental data of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Schendel et al. [22]. The Figure 7 shows the comparison between the numerical results and experimental data of Run01, Run05, Run21 and Run22 in Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and test A05 and A09 in Schendel et al. [22]. As shown in Figure 7, the equilibrium scour depth or maximum scour depth distributed within the ยฑ30 error lines basically, meaning the reliability and accuracy of present model for predicting equilibrium scour depth around foundation in random waves. However, compared with the experimental values, the present model overestimated the equilibrium scour depth generally. Given that, a calibration for scour depth was carried out by multiplying the mean reduced coefficient 0.85 in following section.

Jmse 09 00886 g007 550

Figure 7. Comparison of equilibrium (or maximum) scour depth between the present study and Sumer and Fredsรธe [16], Schendel et al. [22].

Through the various examination for hydrodynamic and morphology parameters, it can be concluded that the present model is a validated and calibrated model for scour under random waves. Thus, the present numerical model would be utilized for scour simulation around foundation under random waves.

4. Numerical Results and Discussions

4.1. Scour Evolution

Figure 8 displays the scour evolution for case 1โ€“9. As shown in Figure 8a, the scour depth increased rapidly at the initial stage, and then slowed down at the transition stage, which attributes to the backfilling occurred in scour holes under live bed scour condition, resulting in the net scour decreasing. Finally, the scour reached the equilibrium state when the amount of sediment backfilling equaled to that of scouring in the scour holes, i.e., the net scour transport rate was nil. Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] proposed the following formula for the scour development under waves

St=Seq(1โˆ’exp(โˆ’t/Tc))๏ฟฝt=๏ฟฝeq(1โˆ’exp(โˆ’๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝc))(30)

where Tc is time scale of scour process.

Jmse 09 00886 g008 550

Figure 8. Time evolution of scour for case 1โ€“9: (a) Case 1โ€“5; (b) Case 6โ€“9.

The computing time is 3600 s and the scour development curves in Figure 8 kept fluctuating, meaning itโ€™s still not in equilibrium scour stage in these cases. According to Sumer and Fredsรธe [16], the equilibrium scour depth can be acquired by fitting the data with Equation (30). From Figure 8, it can be seen that the scour evolution obtained from Equation (30) is consistent with the present study basically at initial stage, but the scour depth predicted by Equation (30) developed slightly faster than the simulating results and the Equation (30) overestimated the scour depth to some extent. Overall, the whole tendency of the results calculated by Equation (30) agrees well with the simulating results of the present study, which means the Equation (30) is applicable to depict the scour evolution around USAF under random waves.

4.2. Scour Mechanism under Random Waves

The scour morphology and scour evolution around USAF are similar under random waves in case 1~9. Taking case 7 as an example, the scour morphology is shown in Figure 9.

Jmse 09 00886 g009 550

Figure 9. Scour morphology under different times for case 7.

From Figure 9, at the initial stage (t < 1200 s), the scour occurred at upstream foundation edges between neighboring anchor branches. The maximum scour depth appeared at the lee-side of the USAF. Correspondingly, the sediments deposited at the periphery of the USAF, and the location of the maximum accretion depth was positioned at an angle of about 45ยฐ symmetrically with respect to the wave propagating direction in the lee-side of the USAF. After that, when t > 2400 s, the location of the maximum scour depth shifted to the upside of the USAF at an angle of about 45ยฐ with respect to the wave propagating direction.

According to previous studies [1,15,16,19,30,31], the horseshoe vortex, streamline compression and wake vortex shedding were responsible for scour around foundation. The Figure 10 displays the distribution of flow velocity in vicinity of foundation, which reflects the evolving processes of horseshoe vertex.

Jmse 09 00886 g010a 550
Jmse 09 00886 g010b 550

Figure 10. Velocity profile around USAF: (a) Flow runup and down stream at upstream anchor edges; (b) Horseshoe vortex at upstream anchor edges; (c) Flow reversal during wave through stage at lee side.

As shown in Figure 10, the inflow tripped to the upstream edges of the USAF and it was blocked by the upper tube of USAF. Then, the downflow formed the horizontal axis clockwise vortex and rolled on the seabed bypassing the tube, that is, the horseshoe vortex (Figure 11). The Figure 12 displays the turbulence intensity around the tube on the seabed. From Figure 12, it can be seen that the turbulence intensity was high-intensity with respect to the region of horseshoe vortex. This phenomenon occurred because of drastic water flow momentum exchanging in the horseshoe vortex. As a result, it created the prominent shear stress on the seabed, causing the local scour at the upstream edges of USAF. Besides, the horseshoe vortex moved downstream gradually along the periphery of the tube and the wake vortex shed off continually at the lee-side of the USAF, i.e., wake vortex.

Jmse 09 00886 g011 550

Figure 11. Sketch of scour mechanism around USAF under random waves.

Jmse 09 00886 g012 550

Figure 12. Turbulence intensity: (a) Turbulence intensity of horseshoe vortex; (b) Turbulence intensity of wake vortex; (c) Turbulence intensity of accretion area.

The core of wake vortex is a negative pressure center, liking a vacuum cleaner [11,42]. Hence, the soil particles were swirled into the negative pressure core and carried away by wake vortex. At the same time, the onset of scour at rear side occurred. Finally, the wake vortex became downflow at the downside of USAF. As is shown in Figure 12, the turbulence intensity was low where the downflow occurred at lee-side, which means the turbulence energy may not be able to support the survival of wake vortex, leading to accretion happening. As mentioned in previous section, the formation of horseshoe vortex was dependent with adverse pressure gradient at upside of foundation. As shown in Figure 13, the evaluated range of pressure distribution is โˆ’15 m to 15 m in x direction. The t = 450 s and t = 1800 s indicate that the wave crest and trough arrived at the upside and lee-side of the foundation respectively, and the t = 350 s was neither the wave crest nor trough. The adverse gradient pressure reached the maximum value at t = 450 s corresponding to the wave crest phase. In this case, itโ€™s helpful for the wave boundary separating fully from seabed, which leads to the formation of horseshoe vortex with high turbulence intensity. Therefore, the horseshoe vortex is responsible for the local scour between neighboring anchor branches at upside of USAF. Whatโ€™s more, due to the combination of the horseshoe vortex and streamline compression, the maximum scour depth occurred at the upside of the USAF with an angle of about 45ยฐ corresponding to the wave propagating direction. This is consistent with the findings of Pang et al. [48] and Sumer et al. [1,15] in case of regular waves. At the wave trough phase (t = 1800 s), the pressure gradient became positive at upstream USAF edges, which hindered the separating of wave boundary from seabed. In the meantime, the flow reversal occurred (Figure 10) and the adverse gradient pressure appeared at downstream USAF edges, but the magnitude of adverse gradient pressure at lee-side was lower than the upstream gradient pressure under wave crest. In this way, the intensity of horseshoe vortex behind the USAF under wave trough was low, which explains the difference of scour depth at upstream and downstream, i.e., the scour asymmetry. In other words, the scour asymmetry at upside and downside of USAF was attributed to wave asymmetry for random waves, and the phenomenon became more evident for nonlinear waves [21]. Briefly speaking, the vortex system at wave crest phase was mainly related to the scour process around USAF under random waves.

Jmse 09 00886 g013 550

Figure 13. Pressure distribution around USAF.

4.3. Equilibrium Scour Depth

The KC number is a key parameter for horseshoe vortex emerging and evolving under waves. According to Equation (1), when pile diameter D is fixed, the KC depends on the maximum near-bed velocity Uwm and wave period T. For random waves, the Uwm can be denoted by the root-mean-square (RMS) value of near-bed velocity amplitude Uwm,rms or the significant value of near-bed velocity amplitude Uwm,s. The Uwm,rms and Uwm,s for all simulating cases of the present study are listed in Table 3 and Table 4. The T can be denoted by the mean up zero-crossing wave period Ta, peak wave period Tp, significant wave period Ts, the maximum wave period Tm, 1/10โ€ฒth highest wave period Tn = 1/10 and 1/5โ€ฒth highest wave period Tn = 1/5 for random waves, so the different combinations of Uwm and T will acquire different KC. The Table 3 and Table 4 list 12 types of KC, for example, the KCrms,s was calculated by Uwm,rms and Ts. Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] conducted a series of wave flume experiments to investigate the scour depth around monopile under random waves, and found the equilibrium scour depth predicting equation (Equation (2)) for regular waves was applicable for random waves with KCrms,p. It should be noted that the Equation (2) is only suitable for KC > 6 under regular waves or KCrms,p > 6 under random waves.

Table 3. Uwm,rms and KC for case 1~9.

Table

Table 4. Uwm,s and KC for case 1~9.

Table

Raaijmakers and Rudolph [34] proposed the equilibrium scour depth predicting model (Equation (5)) around pile under waves, which is suitable for low KC. The format of Equation (5) is similar with the formula proposed by Breusers [54], which can predict the equilibrium scour depth around pile at different scour stages. In order to verify the applicability of Raaijmakersโ€™s model for predicting the equilibrium scour depth around USAF under random waves, a validation of the equilibrium scour depth Seq between the present study and Raaijmakersโ€™s equation was conducted. The position where the scour depth Seq was evaluated is the location of the maximum scour depth, and it was depicted in Figure 14. The Figure 15 displays the comparison of Seq with different KC between the present study and Raaijmakersโ€™s model.

Jmse 09 00886 g014 550

Figure 14. Sketch of the position where the Seq was evaluated.

Jmse 09 00886 g015a 550
Jmse 09 00886 g015b 550

Figure 15. Comparison of the equilibrium scour depth between the present model and the model of Raaijmakers and Rudolph [34]: (aKCrms,sKCrms,a; (bKCrms,pKCrms,m; (cKCrms,n = 1/10KCrms,n = 1/5; (dKCs,sKCs,a; (eKCs,pKCs,m; (fKCs,n = 1/10KCs,n = 1/5.

As shown in Figure 15, there is an error in predicting Seq between the present study and Raaijmakersโ€™s model, and Raaijmakersโ€™s model underestimates the results generally. Although the error exists, the varying trend of Seq with KC obtained from Raaijmakersโ€™s model is consistent with the present study basically. Whatโ€™s more, the error is minimum and the Raaijmakersโ€™s model is of relatively high accuracy for predicting scour around USAF under random waves by using KCs,p. Based on this, a further revision was made to eliminate the error as much as possible, i.e., add the deviation value โˆ†S/D in the Raaijmakersโ€™s model. The revised equilibrium scour depth predicting equation based on Raaijmakersโ€™s model can be written as

Sโ€ฒeq/D=1.95[tanh(hD)](1โˆ’exp(โˆ’0.012KCs,p))+ฮ”S/D๏ฟฝeqโ€ฒ/๏ฟฝ=1.95tanh(โ„Ž๏ฟฝ)(1โˆ’exp(โˆ’0.012๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝs,p))+โˆ†๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ(31)

As the Figure 16 shown, through trial-calculation, when โˆ†S/D = 0.05, the results calculated by Equation (31) show good agreement with the simulating results of the present study. The maximum error is about 18.2% and the engineering requirements have been met basically. In order to further verify the accuracy of the revised model for large KC (KCs,p > 4) under random waves, a validation between the revised model and the previous experimental results [21]. The experiment was conducted in a flume (50 m in length, 1.0 m in width and 1.3 m in height) with a slender vertical pile (D = 0.1 m) under random waves. The seabed is composed of 0.13 m deep layer of sand with d50 = 0.6 mm and the water depth is 0.5 m for all tests. The significant wave height is 0.12~0.21 m and the KCs,p is 5.52~11.38. The comparison between the predicting results by Equation (31) and the experimental results of Corvaro et al. [21] is shown in Figure 17. From Figure 17, the experimental data evenly distributes around the predicted results and the prediction accuracy is favorable when KCs,p < 8. However, the gap between the predicting results and experimental data becomes large and the Equation (31) overestimates the equilibrium scour depth to some extent when KCs,p > 8.

Jmse 09 00886 g016 550

Figure 16. Comparison of Seq between the simulating results and the predicting values by Equation (31).

Jmse 09 00886 g017 550

Figure 17. Comparison of Seq/D between the Experimental results of Corvaro et al. [21] and the predicting values by Equation (31).

In ocean environment, the waves are composed of a train of sinusoidal waves with different frequencies and amplitudes. The energy of constituent waves with very large and very small frequencies is relatively low, and the energy of waves is mainly concentrated in a certain range of moderate frequencies. Myrhaug and Rue [37] thought the 1/nโ€™th highest wave was responsible for scour and proposed the stochastic model to predict the equilibrium scour depth around pile under random waves for full range of KC. Noteworthy is that the KC was denoted by KCrms,a in the stochastic model. To verify the application of the stochastic model for predicting scour depth around USAF, a validation between the simulating results of present study and predicting results by the stochastic model with n = 2,3,5,10,20,500 was carried out respectively.

As shown in Figure 18, compared with the simulating results, the stochastic model underestimates the equilibrium scour depth around USAF generally. Although the error exists, the varying trend of Seq with KCrms,a obtained from the stochastic model is consistent with the present study basically. Whatโ€™s more, the gap between the predicting values by stochastic model and the simulating results decreases with the increase of n, but for large n, for example n = 500, the varying trend diverges between the predicting values and simulating results, meaning itโ€™s not feasible only by increasing n in stochastic model to predict the equilibrium scour depth around USAF.

Jmse 09 00886 g018 550

Figure 18. Comparison of Seq between the simulating results and the predicting values by Equation (8).

The Figure 19 lists the deviation value โˆ†Seq/Dโ€ฒ between the predicting values and simulating results with different KCrms,a and n. Then, fitted the relationship between the โˆ†Sโ€ฒand n under different KCrms,a, and the fitting curve can be written by Equation (32). The revised stochastic model (Equation (33)) can be acquired by adding โˆ†Seq/Dโ€ฒ to Equation (8).

ฮ”Seq/D=0.052*exp(โˆ’n/6.566)+0.068โˆ†๏ฟฝeq/๏ฟฝ=0.052*exp(โˆ’๏ฟฝ/6.566)+0.068(32)

Sโ€ฒeqยฏ/D=Sโ€ฒeq/D+0.052*exp(โˆ’n/6.566)+0.068๏ฟฝeqโ€ฒยฏ/๏ฟฝ=๏ฟฝeqโ€ฒ/๏ฟฝ+0.052*exp(โˆ’๏ฟฝ/6.566)+0.068(33)

Jmse 09 00886 g019 550

Figure 19. The fitting line between โˆ†Sโ€ฒand n.

The comparison between the predicting results by Equation (33) and the simulating results of present study is shown in Figure 20. According to the Figure 20, the varying trend of Seq with KCrms,a obtained from the stochastic model is consistent with the present study basically. Compared with predicting results by the stochastic model, the results calculated by Equation (33) is favorable. Moreover, comparison with simulating results indicates that the predicting results are the most favorable for n = 10, which is consistent with the findings of Myrhaug and Rue [37] for equilibrium scour depth predicting around slender pile in case of random waves.

Jmse 09 00886 g020 550

Figure 20. Comparison of Seq between the simulating results and the predicting values by Equation (33).

In order to further verify the accuracy of the Equation (33) for large KC (KCrms,a > 4) under random waves, a validation was conducted between the Equation (33) and the previous experimental results of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21]. The details of experiments conducted by Corvaro et al. [21] were described in above section. Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] investigated the local scour around pile under random waves. The experiments were conducted in a wave basin with a slender vertical pile (D = 0.032, 0.055 m). The seabed is composed of 0.14 m deep layer of sand with d50 = 0.2 mm and the water depth was maintained at 0.5 m. The JONSWAP wave spectrum was used and the KCrms,a was 5.29~16.95. The comparison between the predicting results by Equation (33) and the experimental results of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21] are shown in Figure 21. From Figure 21, contrary to the case of low KCrms,a (KCrms,a < 4), the error between the predicting values and experimental results increases with decreasing of n for KCrms,a > 4. Therefore, the predicting results are the most favorable for n = 2 when KCrms,a > 4.

Jmse 09 00886 g021 550

Figure 21. Comparison of Seq between the experimental results of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21] and the predicting values by Equation (33).

Noteworthy is that the present model was built according to prototype size, so the errors between the numerical results and experimental data of References [16,21] may be attribute to the scale effects. In laboratory experiments on scouring process, it is typically impossible to ensure a rigorous similarity of all physical parameters between the model and prototype structure, leading to the scale effects in the laboratory experiments. To avoid a cohesive behaviour, the bed material was not scaled geometrically according to model scale. As a consequence, the relatively large-scaled sediments sizes may result in the overestimation of bed load transport and underestimation of suspended load transport compared with field conditions. Whatโ€™s more, the disproportional scaled sediment presumably lead to the difference of bed roughness between the model and prototype, and thus large influences for wave boundary layer on the seabed and scour process. Besides, according to Corvaro et al. [21] and Schendel et al. [55], the pile Reynolds numbers and Froude numbers both affect the scour depth for the condition of non fully developed turbulent flow in laboratory experiments.

4.4. Parametric Study

4.4.1. Influence of Froude Number

As described above, the set of foundation leads to the adverse pressure gradient appearing at upstream, leading to the wave boundary layer separating from seabed, then horseshoe vortex formatting and the horseshoe vortex are mainly responsible for scour around foundation (see Figure 22). The Froude number Fr is the key parameter to influence the scale and intensity of horseshoe vortex. The Fr under waves can be calculated by the following formula [42]

Fr=UwgDโˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš๏ฟฝr=๏ฟฝw๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(34)

where Uw is the mean water particle velocity during 1/4 cycle of wave oscillation, obtained from the following formula. Noteworthy is that the root-mean-square (RMS) value of near-bed velocity amplitude Uwm,rms is used for calculating Uwm.

Uw=1T/4โˆซ0T/4Uwmsin(t/T)dt=2ฯ€Uwm๏ฟฝw=1๏ฟฝ/4โˆซ0๏ฟฝ/4๏ฟฝwmsin(๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝ)๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ=2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝwm(35)

Jmse 09 00886 g022 550

Figure 22. Sketch of flow field at upstream USAF edges.

Tavouktsoglou et al. [25] proposed the following formula between Fr and the vertical location of the stagnation y

yhโˆFer๏ฟฝโ„Žโˆ๏ฟฝr๏ฟฝ(36)

where e is constant.

The Figure 23 displays the relationship between Seq/D and Fr of the present study. In order to compare with the simulating results, the experimental data of Corvaro et al. [21] was also depicted in Figure 23. As shown in Figure 23, the equilibrium scour depth appears a logarithmic increase as Fr increases and approaches the mathematical asymptotic value, which is also consistent with the experimental results of Corvaro et al. [21]. According to Figure 24, the adverse pressure gradient pressure at upstream USAF edges increases with the increase of Fr, which is benefit for the wave boundary layer separating from seabed, resulting in the high-intensity horseshoe vortex, hence, causing intensive scour around USAF. Based on the previous study of Tavouktsoglou et al. [25] for scour around pile under currents, the high Fr leads to the stagnation point is closer to the mean sea level for shallow water, causing the stronger downflow kinetic energy. As mentioned in previous section, the energy of downflow at upstream makes up the energy of the subsequent horseshoe vortex, so the stronger downflow kinetic energy results in the more intensive horseshoe vortex. Therefore, the higher Fr leads to the more intensive horseshoe vortex by influencing the position of stagnation point y presumably. Qi and Gao [19] carried out a series of flume tests to investigate the scour around pile under regular waves, and proposed the fitting formula between Seq/D and Fr as following

lg(Seq/D)=Aexp(B/Fr)+Clg(๏ฟฝeq/๏ฟฝ)=๏ฟฝexp(๏ฟฝ/๏ฟฝr)+๏ฟฝ(37)

where AB and C are constant.

Jmse 09 00886 g023 550

Figure 23. The fitting curve between Seq/D and Fr.

Jmse 09 00886 g024 550

Figure 24. Sketch of adverse pressure gradient at upstream USAF edges.

Took the Equation (37) to fit the simulating results with A = โˆ’0.002, B = 0.686 and C = โˆ’0.808, and the results are shown in Figure 23. From Figure 23, the simulating results evenly distribute around the Equation (37) and the varying trend of Seq/D and Fr in present study is consistent with Equation (37) basically, meaning the Equation (37) is applicable to express the relationship of Seq/D with Fr around USAF under random waves.

4.4.2. Influence of Euler Number

The Euler number Eu is the influencing factor for the hydrodynamic field around foundation. The Eu under waves can be calculated by the following formula. The Eu can be represented by the Equation (38) for uniform cylinders [25]. The root-mean-square (RMS) value of near-bed velocity amplitude Um,rms is used for calculating Um.

Eu=U2mgD๏ฟฝu=๏ฟฝm2๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ(38)

where Um is depth-averaged flow velocity.

The Figure 25 displays the relationship between Seq/D and Eu of the present study. In order to compare with the simulating results, the experimental data of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21] were also plotted in Figure 25. As shown in Figure 25, similar with the varying trend of Seq/D and Fr, the equilibrium scour depth appears a logarithmic increase as Eu increases and approaches the mathematical asymptotic value, which is also consistent with the experimental results of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21]. According to Figure 24, the adverse pressure gradient pressure at upstream USAF edges increases with the increasing of Eu, which is benefit for the wave boundary layer separating from seabed, inducing the high-intensity horseshoe vortex, hence, causing intensive scour around USAF.

Jmse 09 00886 g025 550

Figure 25. The fitting curve between Seq/D and Eu.

Therefore, the variation of Fr and Eu reflect the magnitude of adverse pressure gradient pressure at upstream. Given that, the Equation (37) also was used to fit the simulating results with A = 8.875, B = 0.078 and C = โˆ’9.601, and the results are shown in Figure 25. From Figure 25, the simulating results evenly distribute around the Equation (37) and the varying trend of Seq/D and Eu in present study is consistent with Equation (37) basically, meaning the Equation (37) is also applicable to express the relationship of Seq/D with Eu around USAF under random waves. Additionally, according to the above description of Fr, it can be inferred that the higher Fr and Eu both lead to the more intensive horseshoe vortex by influencing the position of stagnation point y presumably.

5. Conclusions

A series of numerical models were established to investigate the local scour around umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF) under random waves. The numerical model was validated for hydrodynamic and morphology parameters by comparing with the experimental data of Khosronejad et al. [52], Petersen et al. [17], Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Schendel et al. [22]. Based on the simulating results, the scour evolution and scour mechanisms around USAF under random waves were analyzed respectively. Two revised models were proposed according to the model of Raaijmakers and Rudolph [34] and the stochastic model developed by Myrhaug and Rue [37] to predict the equilibrium scour depth around USAF under random waves. Finally, a parametric study was carried out with the present model to study the effects of the Froude number Fr and Euler number Eu to the equilibrium scour depth around USAF under random waves. The main conclusions can be described as follows.(1)

The packed sediment scour model and the RNG kโˆ’ฮต turbulence model were used to simulate the sand particles transport processes and the flow field around UASF respectively. The scour evolution obtained by the present model agrees well with the experimental results of Khosronejad et al. [52], Petersen et al. [17], Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Schendel et al. [22], which indicates that the present model is accurate and reasonable for depicting the scour morphology around UASF under random waves.(2)

The vortex system at wave crest phase is mainly related to the scour process around USAF under random waves. The maximum scour depth appeared at the lee-side of the USAF at the initial stage (t < 1200 s). Subsequently, when t > 2400 s, the location of the maximum scour depth shifted to the upside of the USAF at an angle of about 45ยฐ with respect to the wave propagating direction.(3)

The error is negligible and the Raaijmakersโ€™s model is of relatively high accuracy for predicting scour around USAF under random waves when KC is calculated by KCs,p. Given that, a further revision model (Equation (31)) was proposed according to Raaijmakersโ€™s model to predict the equilibrium scour depth around USAF under random waves and it shows good agreement with the simulating results of the present study when KCs,p < 8.(4)

Another further revision model (Equation (33)) was proposed according to the stochastic model established by Myrhaug and Rue [37] to predict the equilibrium scour depth around USAF under random waves, and the predicting results are the most favorable for n = 10 when KCrms,a < 4. However, contrary to the case of low KCrms,a, the predicting results are the most favorable for n = 2 when KCrms,a > 4 by the comparison with experimental results of Sumer and Fredsรธe [16] and Corvaro et al. [21].(5)

The same formula (Equation (37)) is applicable to express the relationship of Seq/D with Eu or Fr, and it can be inferred that the higher Fr and Eu both lead to the more intensive horseshoe vortex and larger Seq.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. (Hongjun Liu); Data curation, R.H. and P.Y.; Formal analysis, X.W. and H.L. (Hao Leng); Funding acquisition, X.W.; Writingโ€”original draft, R.H. and P.Y.; Writingโ€”review & editing, X.W. and H.L. (Hao Leng); The final manuscript has been approved by all the authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 202061027) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 41572247).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J.; Christiansen, N. Scour Around Vertical Pile in Waves. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 1992118, 15โ€“31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rudolph, D.; Bos, K. Scour around a monopile under combined wave-current conditions and low KC-numbers. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1โ€“3 November 2006; pp. 582โ€“588. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nielsen, A.W.; Liu, X.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Flow and bed shear stresses in scour protections around a pile in a current. Coast. Eng. 201372, 20โ€“38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmad, N.; Bihs, H.; Myrhaug, D.; Kamath, A.; Arntsen, ร˜.A. Three-dimensional numerical modelling of wave-induced scour around piles in a side-by-side arrangement. Coast. Eng. 2018138, 132โ€“151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Ong, M.C.; Leira, B.J.; Myrhaug, D. Effects of Soil Profile Variation and Scour on Structural Response of an Offshore Monopile Wind Turbine. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2018140, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, S. Dynamic analysis of umbrella suction anchor foundation embedded in seabed for offshore wind turbines. Gรฉomรฉch. Energy Environ. 201710, 12โ€“20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Vanem, E.; Carvalho, H.; Correia, J.A.F.D.O. Editorial: Advanced research on offshore structures and foundation design: Part 1. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Marit. Eng. 2019172, 118โ€“123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chavez, C.E.A.; Stratigaki, V.; Wu, M.; Troch, P.; Schendel, A.; Welzel, M.; Villanueva, R.; Schlurmann, T.; De Vos, L.; Kisacik, D.; et al. Large-Scale Experiments to Improve Monopile Scour Protection Design Adapted to Climate Changeโ€”The PROTEUS Project. Energies 201912, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Wu, M.; De Vos, L.; Chavez, C.E.A.; Stratigaki, V.; Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Troch, P. Large Scale Experimental Study of the Scour Protection Damage Around a Monopile Foundation Under Combined Wave and Current Conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 20208, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sรธrensen, S.P.H.; Ibsen, L.B. Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour. Ocean Eng. 201363, 17โ€“25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prendergast, L.; Gavin, K.; Doherty, P. An investigation into the effect of scour on the natural frequency of an offshore wind turbine. Ocean Eng. 2015101, 1โ€“11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  12. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Chambel, J.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Giannini, G.; Haerens, P. Scour Protections for Offshore Foundations of Marine Energy Harvesting Technologies: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 20219, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Q.; Yu, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Q. Scour characteristics of an offshore umbrella suction anchor foundation under the combined actions of waves and currents. Ocean Eng. 2020202, 106701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, P.; Hu, R.; Yang, J.; Liu, H. Numerical investigation of local scour around USAF with different hydraulic conditions under currents and waves. Ocean Eng. 2020213, 107696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sumer, B.M.; Christiansen, N.; Fredsรธe, J. The horseshoe vortex and vortex shedding around a vertical wall-mounted cylinder exposed to waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1997332, 41โ€“70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Scour around Pile in Combined Waves and Current. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2001127, 403โ€“411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Petersen, T.U.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Time scale of scour around a pile in combined waves and current. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Paris, France, 27โ€“31 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Petersen, T.U.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J.; Raaijmakers, T.C.; Schouten, J.-J. Edge scour at scour protections around piles in the marine environmentโ€”Laboratory and field investigation. Coast. Eng. 2015106, 42โ€“72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qi, W.; Gao, F. Equilibrium scour depth at offshore monopile foundation in combined waves and current. Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci. 201457, 1030โ€“1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Larsen, B.E.; Fuhrman, D.R.; Baykal, C.; Sumer, B.M. Tsunami-induced scour around monopile foundations. Coast. Eng. 2017129, 36โ€“49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Corvaro, S.; Marini, F.; Mancinelli, A.; Lorenzoni, C.; Brocchini, M. Hydro- and Morpho-dynamics Induced by a Vertical Slender Pile under Regular and Random Waves. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 2018144, 04018018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schendel, A.; Welzel, M.; Schlurmann, T.; Hsu, T.-W. Scour around a monopile induced by directionally spread irregular waves in combination with oblique currents. Coast. Eng. 2020161, 103751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Romรฃo, X.; Reis, M.; das Neves, L. Reliability assessment of offshore dynamic scour protections using copulas. Wind. Eng. 201843, 506โ€“538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Welzel, M.; Schendel, A.; Baelus, L.; Santos, P.R.; Pinto, F.T. Extended characterization of damage in rubble mound scour protections. Coast. Eng. 2020158, 103671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tavouktsoglou, N.S.; Harris, J.M.; Simons, R.R.; Whitehouse, R.J.S. Equilibrium Scour-Depth Prediction around Cylindrical Structures. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 2017143, 04017017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Ettema, R.; Melville, B.; Barkdoll, B. Scale Effect in Pier-Scour Experiments. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1998124, 639โ€“642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Umeda, S. Scour Regime and Scour Depth around a Pile in Waves. J. Coast. Res. Spec. Issue 201164, 845โ€“849. [Google Scholar]
  28. Umeda, S. Scour process around monopiles during various phases of sea storms. J. Coast. Res. 2013165, 1599โ€“1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baykal, C.; Sumer, B.; Fuhrman, D.R.; Jacobsen, N.; Fredsรธe, J. Numerical simulation of scour and backfilling processes around a circular pile in waves. Coast. Eng. 2017122, 87โ€“107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Miles, J.; Martin, T.; Goddard, L. Current and wave effects around windfarm monopile foundations. Coast. Eng. 2017121, 167โ€“178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Miozzi, M.; Corvaro, S.; Pereira, F.A.; Brocchini, M. Wave-induced morphodynamics and sediment transport around a slender vertical cylinder. Adv. Water Resour. 2019129, 263โ€“280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shi, Z.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Tang, Y. Experimental study on scour around a composite bucket foundation due to waves and current. Ocean Eng. 2019189, 106302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Carreiras, J.; Larroudรฉ, P.; Seabra-Santos, F.; Mory, M. Wave Scour Around Piles. In Proceedings of the Coastal Engineering 2000, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Sydney, Australia, 16โ€“21 July 2000; pp. 1860โ€“1870. [Google Scholar]
  34. Raaijmakers, T.; Rudolph, D. Time-dependent scour development under combined current and waves conditionsโ€”Laboratory experiments with online monitoring technique. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Tokyo, Japan, 5โ€“7 November 2008; pp. 152โ€“161. [Google Scholar]
  35. Khalfin, I.S. Modeling and calculation of bed score around large-diameter vertical cylinder under wave action. Water Resour. 200734, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Zanke, U.C.; Hsu, T.-W.; Roland, A.; Link, O.; Diab, R. Equilibrium scour depths around piles in noncohesive sediments under currents and waves. Coast. Eng. 201158, 986โ€“991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Myrhaug, D.; Rue, H. Scour below pipelines and around vertical piles in random waves. Coast. Eng. 200348, 227โ€“242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Myrhaug, D.; Ong, M.C.; Fรธien, H.; Gjengedal, C.; Leira, B.J. Scour below pipelines and around vertical piles due to second-order random waves plus a current. Ocean Eng. 200936, 605โ€“616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Myrhaug, D.; Ong, M.C. Random wave-induced onshore scour characteristics around submerged breakwaters using a stochastic method. Ocean Eng. 201037, 1233โ€“1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ong, M.C.; Myrhaug, D.; Hesten, P. Scour around vertical piles due to long-crested and short-crested nonlinear random waves plus a current. Coast. Eng. 201373, 106โ€“114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.A. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J. Sci. Comput. 19861, 3โ€“51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yakhot, V.; Smith, L.M. The renormalization group, the e-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. J. Sci. Comput. 19927, 35โ€“61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mastbergen, D.R.; Berg, J.V.D. Breaching in fine sands and the generation of sustained turbidity currents in submarine canyons. Sedimentology 200350, 625โ€“637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soulsby, R. Dynamics of Marine Sands; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van Rijn, L.C. Sediment Transport, Part I: Bed Load Transport. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1984110, 1431โ€“1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  46. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, X.-L.; Wang, J.-H. Numerical investigation of local scour around three adjacent piles with different arrangements under current. Ocean Eng. 2017142, 625โ€“638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, Y.X.; Liu, S.X. Random Wave and Its Applications to Engineering, 4th ed.; Dalian University of Technology Press: Dalian, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pang, A.; Skote, M.; Lim, S.; Gullman-Strand, J.; Morgan, N. A numerical approach for determining equilibrium scour depth around a mono-pile due to steady currents. Appl. Ocean Res. 201657, 114โ€“124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Higuera, P.; Lara, J.L.; Losada, I.J. Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using Open-FOAMยฎ. Part I: Formulation and validation. Coast. Eng. 201483, 243โ€“258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Corvaro, S.; Crivellini, A.; Marini, F.; Cimarelli, A.; Capitanelli, L.; Mancinelli, A. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamics around a Vertical Cylinder in Waves. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 20197, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Flow3D User Manual, version 11.0.3; Flow Science, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2013.
  52. Khosronejad, A.; Kang, S.; Sotiropoulos, F. Experimental and computational investigation of local scour around bridge piers. Adv. Water Resour. 201237, 73โ€“85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stahlmann, A. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Scour at Foundation Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines. Ph.D. Thesis, Franzius-Institute for Hydraulic, Estuarine and Coastal Engineering, Leibniz Universitรคt Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Breusers, H.N.C.; Nicollet, G.; Shen, H. Local Scour Around Cylindrical Piers. J. Hydraul. Res. 197715, 211โ€“252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schendel, A.; Hildebrandt, A.; Goseberg, N.; Schlurmann, T. Processes and evolution of scour around a monopile induced by tidal currents. Coast. Eng. 2018139, 65โ€“84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisherโ€™s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ยฉ 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

      

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, R.; Liu, H.; Leng, H.; Yu, P.; Wang, X. Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around Umbrella Suction Anchor Foundation under Random Waves. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 20219, 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080886

AMA Style

Hu R, Liu H, Leng H, Yu P, Wang X. Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around Umbrella Suction Anchor Foundation under Random Waves. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(8):886. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080886Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Ruigeng, Hongjun Liu, Hao Leng, Peng Yu, and Xiuhai Wang. 2021. “Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around Umbrella Suction Anchor Foundation under Random Waves” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9, no. 8: 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080886

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

For more information on the journal statistics, clickย here.

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.

Numerical simulation on molten pool behavior of narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding

์ข์€ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ……์Šคํ… ์•„ํฌ ์šฉ์ ‘์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ฑฐ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

Numerical simulation on molten pool behavior of narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

As a highly efficient thick plate welding resolution, narrow gap gas tungsten arc welding (NG-GTAW) is in the face of a series of problems like inter-layer defects like pores, lack of fusion, inclusion of impurity, and the sensitivity to poor sidewall fusion, which is hard to be repaired after the welding process. This study employs numerical simulation to investigate the molten pool behavior in NG-GTAW root welding. A 3D numerical model was established, where a body-fitted coordinate system was applied to simulate the electromagnetic force, and a bridge transition model was developed to investigate the wireโ€“feed root welding. The simulated results were validated experimentally. Results show that the molten pool behavior is dominated by electromagnetic force when the welding current is relatively high, and the dynamic change of the vortex actually determines the molten pool morphology. For self-fusion welding, there are two symmetric inward vortices in the cross-section and one clockwise vortex in the longitudinal section. With the increasing welding current, the vortices in the cross-section gradually move to the arc center with a decreasing range, while the vortex in the longitudinal section moves backward. With the increasing traveling speed, the vortices in the cross-section move toward the surface of the molten pool with a decreasing range, and the horizontal component of liquid metal velocity changes in the longitudinal section. For wireโ€“feed welding, the filling metal strengthens the downward velocity component; as a result, the vortex formation is blocked in the cross-section and is strengthened in the longitudinal section.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

The raw/processed data required cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. Wang X, Nan Y, Xie Z, Tsai Y, Yang J, Shang C (2017) Influence of welding pass on microstructure and toughness in the reheated zone of multi-pass weld metal of 550 MPa offshore engineering steel. Mater Sci Eng : A 702:196โ€“205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.081Article Google Scholar 
  2. Bunaziv I, Akselsen OM, Frostevarg J, Kaplan AFH (2018) Deep penetration fiber laser-arc hybrid welding of thick HSLA steel. J Mater Process Technol 256:216โ€“228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.026Article Google Scholar 
  3. Josefson BL, Karlsson CT (1989) FE-calculated stresses in a multi-pass butt-welded pipe-a simplified approach. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip 38:227โ€“243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(89)90017-3Article Google Scholar 
  4. Mitra A, Rajan Babu V, Puthiyavinayagam P, Varier NV, Ghosh M, Desai H, Chellapandi P, Chetal SC (2012) Design and development of thick plate concept for rotatable plugs and technology development for future Indian FBR. Nucl Eng Des 246:245โ€“255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.01.008Article Google Scholar 
  5. Alemdar ASA, Jalal SR, Mulapeer MMS (2022) Influence of friction stir welding process on the mechanical characteristics of the hybrid joints aa2198-t8 to aa2024-t3. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2022:1โ€“11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7055446Article Google Scholar 
  6. Anant R, Ghosh PK (2017) Advancement in narrow gap GMA weld joint of thick section of austenitic stainless steel to HSLA steel. Mater Today: Proc 4:10169โ€“10173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.342Article Google Scholar 
  7. Wang J, Zhu J, Fu P, Su R, Han W, Yang F (2012) A swing arc system for narrow gap GMA welding. ISIJ Int 52:110โ€“114. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.110Article Google Scholar 
  8. Jiang L, Shi L, Lu Y, Xiang Y, Zhang C, Gao M (2022) Effects of sidewall grain growth on pore formation in narrow gap oscillating laser welding. Optics Laser Technol 156:108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108483Article Google Scholar 
  9. Ohnishi T, Kawahito Y, Mizutani M, Katayama S (2013) Butt welding of thick, high strength steel plate with a high power laser and hot wire to improve tolerance to gap variance and control weld metal oxygen content. Sci Technol Welding Join 18:314โ€“322. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171813Y.0000000108Article Google Scholar 
  10. Cai C, Li L, Tai L (2017) Narrow-gap laser-MIG hybrid welding of thick-section steel with different shielding gas nozzles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:909โ€“916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0179-3Article Google Scholar 
  11. Yang T, Liu J, Zhuang Y, Sun K, Chen W (2020) Studies on the formation mechanism of incomplete fusion defects in ultra-narrow gap laser wire filling welding. Optics Laser Technol 129:106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106275Article Google Scholar 
  12. Miao R, Shan Z, Zhou Q, Wu Y, Ge L, Zhang J, Hu H (2022) Real-time defect identification of narrow overlap welds and application based on convolutional neural networks. J Manuf Syst 62:800โ€“810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.012Article Google Scholar 
  13. Nรคsstrรถm J, Brueckner F, Kaplan AFH (2020) Imperfections in narrow gap multi-layer welding – potential causes and countermeasures. Optics Lasers Eng 129:106011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106011Article Google Scholar 
  14. Li W, Yu R, Huang D, Wu J, Wang Y, Hu T, Wang J (2019) Numerical simulation of multi-layer rotating arc narrow gap MAG welding for medium steel plate. J Manuf Proc 45:460โ€“471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.035Article Google Scholar 
  15. Han S, Liu G, Tang X, Xu L, Cui H, Shao C (2022) Effect of molten pool behaviors on welding defects in tandem NG-GMAW based on CFD simulation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 195:123165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123165Article Google Scholar 
  16. Mikihito H, Yoshito I (2016) A simplified Fe simulation method with shell element for welding deformation and residual stress generated by multi-pass butt welding. Int J Steel Struct 16:51โ€“58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-3005-0Article Google Scholar 
  17. Cai W, Saez M, Spicer P, Chakraborty D, Skurkis R, Carlson B, Okigami F, Robertson J (2023) Distortion simulation of gas metal arc welding (gmaw) processes for automotive body assembly. Weld World 67:109โ€“139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-022-01369-3Article Google Scholar 
  18. Pazilova UA, Il In AV, Kruglova AA, Motovilina GD, Khlusova EI (2015) Influence of the temperature and strain rate on the structure and fracture mode of high-strength steels upon the simulation of the thermal cycle of welding and post-welding tempering. Phys Metals Metallogr 116:606โ€“614. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X1506006XArticle Google Scholar 
  19. Zhang Z, Wu Q, Grujicic M et al (2016) Monte Carlo simulation of grain growth and welding zones in friction stir welding of aa6082-t6. J Mater Sci 51:1882โ€“1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9495-xArticle Google Scholar 
  20. Ikram A, Chung H (2021) Numerical simulation of arc, metal transfer and its impingement on weld pool in variable polarity gas metal arc welding. J Manuf Process 64:1529โ€“1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.001Article Google Scholar 
  21. Zhao B, Chen J, Wu C, Shi L (2020) Numerical simulation of bubble and arc dynamics during underwater wet flux-cored arc welding. J Manuf Process 59:167โ€“185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.054Article Google Scholar 
  22. Zeng Z, Wang Z, Hu S, Wu S (2022) Dynamic molten pool behavior of pulsed gas tungsten arc welding with filler wire in horizontal position and its characterization based on arc voltage. J Manuf Proc 75:1โ€“12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.051Article Google Scholar 
  23. Zhu C, Cheon J, Tang X, Na S, Cui H (2018) Molten pool behaviors and their influences on welding defects in narrow gap GMAW of 5083 Al-alloy. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126:1206โ€“1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.132Article Google Scholar 
  24. Gu H, Vรคistรถ T, Li L (2020) Numerical and experimental study on the molten pool dynamics and fusion zone formation in multi-pass narrow gap laser welding. Optics Laser Technol 126:106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106081Article Google Scholar 
  25. Ma C, Chen B, Meng Z, Tan C, Song X, Li Y (2023) Characteristic of keyhole, molten pool and microstructure of oscillating laser TIG hybrid welding. Optics Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109142.161:109142
  26. Ai Y, Liu X, Huang Y, Yu L (2020) Numerical analysis of the influence of molten pool instability on the weld formation during the high speed fiber laser welding. Int J Heat Mass Trans 160:120103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120103Article Google Scholar 
  27. Meng X, Artinov A, Bachmann M, รœstรผndaฤŸ ร–, Gumenyuk A, Rethmeier M (2022) The detrimental molten pool narrowing phenomenon in wire feed laser beam welding and its suppression by magnetohydrodynamic technique. Int J Heat Mass Transf 193:122913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122913Article Google Scholar 
  28. Li X, Wei X, Zhang L, Lv Q (2023) Numerical simulation for the effect of scanning speed and in situ laser shock peening on molten pool and solidification characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125:5031โ€“5046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10897-1Article Google Scholar 
  29. Ye W, Bao J, Lei J Huang Y, Li Z, Li P, Zhang Y (2022) Multiphysics modeling of thermal behavior of commercial pure titanium powder during selective laser melting. Met Mater Int 28:282-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01019-1.
  30. Cheng H, Kang L, Wang C, Li Q, Chang B, Chang B (2022) Dynamic behavior of molten pool backside during full-penetration laser welding of Ni-based superalloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:4587โ€“4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08187-9Article Google Scholar 
  31. Jeong H, Park K, Cho J (2016) Numerical analysis of variable polarity arc weld pool. J Mech Sci Technol 30:4307โ€“4313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0845-7Article Google Scholar
Figure 15. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on a wall under different Reynolds numbers.

Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment

byย Hongbo Miย 1,2, Chuan Wangย 1,3, Xuanwen Jiaย 3,*, Bo Huย 2, Hongliang Wangย 4, Hui Wangย 3ย and Yong Zhuย 5

1College of Mechatronics Engineering, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China

2Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

3College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

4School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering/Flight College, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, China

5National Research Center of Pumps, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.Sustainability2023,ย 15(6), 5159;ย https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

Received: 30 January 2023ย /ย Revised: 4 March 2023ย /ย Accepted: 10 March 2023ย /ย Published: 14 March 2023(This article belongs to the Special Issueย Advanced Technologies of Renewable Energy and Water Management for Sustainable Environment

Abstract

Due to their high efficiency, low heat loss and associated sustainability advantages, impinging jets have been used extensively in marine engineering, geotechnical engineering and other engineering practices. In this paper, the flow structure and impact characteristics of impinging jets with different Reynolds numbers and impact distances are systematically studied by Flow-3D based on PIV experiments. In the study, the relevant state parameters of the jets are dimensionlessly treated, obtaining not only the linear relationship between the length of the potential nucleation zone and the impinging distance, but also the linear relationship between the axial velocity and the axial distance in the impinging zone. In addition, after the jet impinges on the flat plate, the vortex action range caused by the wall-attached flow of the jet gradually decreases inward with the increase of the impinging distance. By examining the effect of Reynolds number Re on the hydraulic characteristics of the submerged impact jet, it can be found that the structure of the continuous submerged impact jet is relatively independent of the Reynolds number. At the same time, the final simulation results demonstrate the applicability of the linear relationship between the length of the potential core region and the impact distance. This study provides methodological guidance and theoretical support for relevant engineering practice and subsequent research on impinging jets, which has strong theoretical and practical significance.

Keywords: 

PIV;ย Flow-3D;ย impinging jet;ย hydraulic characteristics;ย impinging distance

Sustainability 15 05159 g001 550

Figure 1. Geometric model.

Sustainability 15 05159 g002 550

Figure 2.ย Model grid schematic.

Sustainability 15 05159 g003 550

Figure 3.ย (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup; (b) PIV images of vertical impinging jets with velocity fields.

Sustainability 15 05159 g004 550

Figure 4. (a) Velocity distribution verification at the outlet of the jet pipe; (b) Distribution of flow angle in the mid-axis of the jet [39].

Sustainability 15 05159 g005 550

Figure 5. Along-range distribution of the dimensionless axial velocity of the jet at different impact distances.Figure 6 shows the variation of H

Sustainability 15 05159 g006 550

Figure 6.ย Relationship between the distribution of potential core region and the impact heightย H/D.

Sustainability 15 05159 g007 550

Figure 7. The relationship between the potential core length 

Sustainability 15 05159 g008 550

Figure 8.ย Along-range distribution of the flow angleย ฯ†ย of the jet at different impact distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g009 550

Figure 9.ย Velocity distribution along the axis of the jet at different impinging regions.

Sustainability 15 05159 g010 550

Figure 10. The absolute value distribution of slope under different impact distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g011a 550
Sustainability 15 05159 g011b 550

Figure 11. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on wall under different impinging distances.

Sustainability 15 05159 g012 550

Figure 12.ย Along-range distribution of the dimensionless axial velocity of the jet at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g013 550

Figure 13. Along-range distribution of the flow angle ฯ† of the jet at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g014 550

Figure 14. Velocity distribution along the jet axis at different Reynolds numbers.

Sustainability 15 05159 g015 550

Figure 15. Velocity distribution of impinging jet on a wall under different Reynolds numbers.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F.; Liang, C.; Tan, S. Using a high-pressure water jet-assisted tunnel boring machine to break rock. Adv. Mech. Eng. 202012, 1687814020962290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shi, X.; Zhang, G.; Xu, G.; Ma, Y.; Wu, X. Inactivating Microorganism on Medical Instrument Using Plasma Jet. High Volt. Eng. 200935, 632โ€“635. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gao, Y.; Han, P.; Wang, F.; Cao, J.; Zhang, S. Study on the Characteristics of Water Jet Breaking Coal Rock in a Drilling Hole. Sustainability 202214, 8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Ge, J.; Zhang, D.; Gao, Z. Numerical study of continuous jet impinging on a rotating wall based on Wrayโ€”Agarwal turbulence model. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 202244, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, B.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ge, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y. Numerical Simulation Study of the Horizontal Submerged Jet Based on the Wrayโ€”Agarwal Turbulence Model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 202210, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dahiya, A.K.; Bhuyan, B.K.; Kumar, S. Perspective study of abrasive water jet machining of compositesโ€”A review. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 202236, 213โ€“224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abushanab, W.S.; Moustafa, E.B.; Harish, M.; Shanmugan, S.; Elsheikh, A.H. Experimental investigation on surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy during abrasive water jet machining process. Alex. Eng. J. 202261, 7529โ€“7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, C.; Ge, J.; Zhang, Y. A numerical study of a submerged water jet impinging on a stationary wall. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 202210, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, J.; Shen, H.; Xie, W.; Zhai, S.; Xi, G. Influence of flow fluctuation characteristics on flow and heat transfer in different regions. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 826โ€“833. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhai, S.; Xie, F.; Yin, G.; Xi, G. Effect of gap ratio on vortex-induced vibration characteristics of different blunt bodies near-wall. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 1132โ€“1138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Tao, L. PIV experiment and numerical simulation of trailing vortex structure of improved INTER-MIG impeller. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 158โ€“164. [Google Scholar]
  12. Han, B.; Yao, Z.; Tang, R.; Xu, H. On the supersonic impinging jet by laser Doppler velocimetry. Exp. Meas. Fluid Mech. 200216, 99โ€“103. [Google Scholar]
  13. Darisse, A.; Lemay, J.; Benaissa, A. LDV measurements of well converged third order moments in the far field of a free turbulent round jet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 201344, 825โ€“833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Kumar, A. Effect of initial conditions on mean flow characteristics of a three dimensional turbulent wall jet. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2021235, 6177โ€“6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tao, D.; Zhang, R.; Ying, C. Development and application of the pollutant diffusion testing apparatus based on the image analysis. J. Saf. Environ. 201616, 247โ€“251. [Google Scholar]
  16. Seo, H.; Kim, K.C. Experimental study on flow and turbulence characteristics of bubbly jet with low void fraction. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2021142, 103738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wen, Q.; Sha, J.; Liu, Y. TR-PIV measurement of the turbulent submerged jet and POB analysis of the dynamic structure. J. Exp. Fluid Mech. 20144, 16โ€“24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Shi, W.; He, Z.; Han, Y.; Xiao, Y. Interstage difference of pressure pulsation in a three-stage electrical submersible pump. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2021196, 107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, S. An improved convolutional neural network with an adaptable learning rate towards multi-signal fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump. Adv. Eng. Inform. 202150, 101406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, Y.; Song, X.; Li, K.; Yan, X. Hybrid modeling for submergence depth of the pumping well using stochastic configuration networks with random sampling. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2022208, 109423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, S. A novel adaptive convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump with acoustic images. Adv. Eng. Inform. 202252, 101554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Long, J.; Song, X.; Shi, J.; Chen, J. Optimization and CFD Analysis on Nozzle Exit Position of Two-phase Ejector. J. Refrig. 202243, 39โ€“45. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ni, Q.; Ruan, W. Optimization design of desilting jet pump parameters based on response surface model. J. Ship Mech. 202226, 365โ€“374. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, K.; Zhu, X.; Ren, X.; Qiu, Q.; Shen, S. Numerical investigation on the effect of nozzle position for design of high performance ejector. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017126, 594โ€“601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Tang, Y. Numerical study for the influences of primary steam nozzle distance and mixing chamber throat diameter on steam ejector performance. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2018132, 509โ€“516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lucas, C.; Rusche, H.; Schroeder, A.; Koehler, J. Numerical investigation of a two-phase CO2 ejector. Int. J. Refrigeration 201443, 154โ€“166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, X.; Zhu, T.; Fu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Chen, W. Numerical simulation of rock breaking by abrasive water jet. J. Coast. Res. 201993, 274โ€“283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, L.; Liu, Y.; Shen, K.; Yang, X.; Ba, Q.; Xiong, W. Numerical research on the dynamic rock-breaking process of impact drilling with multi-nozzle water jets. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021207, 109145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lei, C.; Zhou, Y.; Qiu, X. Numerical Simulation on Internal Flow Field of a Self-excited Oscillation Pulsed Jet Nozzle with Back-flow. Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerosp. Eng. 202241, 998โ€“1002. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, J.; Ni, F.; Gu, L. Numerical method of FLOW-3D for sediment erosion simulation. China Harb. Eng. 201939, 6โ€“11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Al Shaikhli, H.I.; Khassaf, S.I. Using of flow 3d as CFD materials approach in waves generation. Mater. Today Proc. 202249, 2907โ€“2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kosaj, R.; Alboresha, R.S.; Sulaiman, S.O. Comparison Between Numerical Flow3d Software and Laboratory Data, For Sediment Incipient Motion. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022961, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Du, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, X.; Yu, X. Long-distance water hammer protection of pipeline after pump being first lowered and then rasied. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 1248โ€“1253, 1267. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao, F.; Li, X.; Gao, Q. Experiment and numerical simulation on hydraulic characteristics of novel trapezoidal measuring weir. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202240, 1104โ€“1111. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tu, A.; Nie, X.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Experimental and simulation study on water infiltration characteristics of layered red soil. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 1243โ€“1249. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen, J.; Zeng, B.; Liu, L.; Tao, K.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, D. Investigating the anchorage performance of full-grouted anchor bolts with a modified numerical simulation method. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022141, 106640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, B.; Yao, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y. Flow and Performance of the Disk Cavity of a Marine Gas Turbine at Varying Nozzle Pressure and Low Rotation Speeds: A Numerical Investigation. Machines 202311, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Jin, B.; Ding, S. Orthogonal test of important parameters affecting hydraulic performance of negative pressure feedback jet sprinkler. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 202139, 966โ€“972. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Lu, W.; Tan, S.K.; Zhou, L. Experimental investigation on impingement of a submerged circular water jet at varying impinging angles and Reynolds numbers. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 201789, 189โ€“198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Speziale, C.G.; Thangam, S. Analysis of an RNG based turbulence model for separated flows. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 199230, 1379โ€“1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Hassan, M.; Assoum, H.H.; Sobolik, V.; Vรฉtel, J.; Abed-Meraim, K.; Garon, A.; Sakout, A. Experimental investigation of the wall shear stress and the vortex dynamics in a circular impinging jet. Exp. Fluids 201252, 1475โ€“1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fairweather, M.; Hargrave, G. Experimental investigation of an axisymmetric, impinging turbulent jet. 1. Velocity field. Exp. Fluids 200233, 464โ€“471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ashforth-Frost, S.; Jambunathan, K. Effect of nozzle geometry and semi-confinement on the potential core of a turbulent axisymmetric free jet. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 199623, 155โ€“162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, M.; Huang, H.; Wang, D.; Lv, S.; Chen, Y. PIV tests for flow characteristics of impinging jet in a semi-closed circular pipe. J. Vib. Shock 202140, 90โ€“97, 113. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisherโ€™s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

ยฉ 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

      

MDPI and ACS Style

Mi, H.; Wang, C.; Jia, X.; Hu, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y. Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment. Sustainability 202315, 5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

AMA Style

Mi H, Wang C, Jia X, Hu B, Wang H, Wang H, Zhu Y. Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6):5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159Chicago/Turabian Style

Mi, Hongbo, Chuan Wang, Xuanwen Jia, Bo Hu, Hongliang Wang, Hui Wang, and Yong Zhu. 2023. “Hydraulic Characteristics of Continuous Submerged Jet Impinging on a Wall by Using Numerical Simulation and PIV Experiment” Sustainability 15, no. 6: 5159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065159

Figure 3 Fuel Element - Tie-Tube Structure (Tie-tubes are black)

Nerva-derived reactor coolant channel model for Mars mission applications

ํ™”์„ฑ ์ž„๋ฌด ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ Nerva ํŒŒ์ƒ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ˆ˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ

Edward W PortaUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas

Abstract

ํ™”์„ฑ ๋ฏธ์…˜ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ NERVA ํŒŒ์ƒ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ˆ˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ 1.3m NERVA ํŒŒ์ƒ ์›์ž๋กœ(NDR) ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ˆ˜ ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(CFD) ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD ์ฝ”๋“œ FLOW-3D๋Š” NDR ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ฒด ์ˆ˜์†Œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์†Œ๋Š” ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ œ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋…ธ์‹ฌ์„ ํ†ต๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ์›์ž๋กœ์˜ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ œ ๋ฐ ๋กœ์ผ“์˜ ์ถ”์ง„์ œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์†Œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„/์ €์˜จ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ฑ„๋„์— ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๊ณ  ์ €๋ฐ€๋„/๊ณ ์˜จ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ๋น ์ ธ๋‚˜์˜ค๋ฏ€๋กœ ์••์ถ•์„ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฌธ์„œ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ธธ์ด์— ๊ฑธ์นœ ์••๋ ฅ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ์ด์ „์— ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ(0.9MPa)๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์ˆ˜ ํŽŒํ”„๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‚ฌ์–‘์„ ์žฌํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•จ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

NERVA-Derived Reactor Coolant Channel Model for Mars Mission Applications presents the results of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study of a 1.3m NERVA-Derived Reactor (NDR) coolant channel; The CFD code FLOW-3D was used to model the flow of gaseous hydrogen through the core of a NDR. Hydrogen passes through the core by way of coolant channels, acting as the coolant for the reactor as well as the propellant for the rocket. Hydrogen enters the channel in a high density/low temperature state and exits in a low density/high temperature state necessitating the use of a compressible model. Design specifications from a technical paper were used for the model; It was determined that the pressure drop across the length of the channel was higher than previously estimated (0.9 MPa), indicating the possible need for more powerful coolant pumps and a re-evaluation of the design specifications.

Keywords

Application; Channel; Coolant; Derived; Mars; Mission; Model; Nerva; Reactor

Figure 1 Nuclear Rocket Schematic Diagram
Figure 1 Nuclear Rocket Schematic Diagram
Figure 2 Fuel Element - Tip View
Figure 2 Fuel Element – Tip View
Figure 3 Fuel Element - Tie-Tube Structure (Tie-tubes are black)
Figure 3 Fuel Element – Tie-Tube Structure (Tie-tubes are black)
Figure 5 Three-Dimensional Coolant Channel Model
Figure 5 Three-Dimensional Coolant Channel Model
Figure 6 Two-Dimensional Coolant Channel Model
Figure 6 Two-Dimensional Coolant Channel Model

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. D., Jr., (1990) Modern Compressible Flow, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, New
York.
Avallone E. A. and T. Baumeister III, eds., (1987) Mark’s Standard Handbookfor
Mechanical Engineers, 9th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bennett, G. L. and T. J. Miller (1992) “Nuclear Propulsion: A Key Transportation
Technology for the Exploration of Mars,” Proceedings o f the 9th Symposium on
Space Nuclear Power Systems, CONF-920104, M. S. El-Genk and M. D. Hoover,
eds., American Institute of Physics, New York, AIP Conference Proceedings No.
246, 2: 383-388.
Black, D. L., and S. V. Gunn (1991) โ€œA Technical Summary of Engine and Reactor
Subsystem Design Performance during the NERVA Program,โ€ AIAA-91-3450,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, D. C.
Borowski, S. K., et al. (1992) โ€œNuclear Thermal Rockets: Key to Moon-Mars
Exploration,โ€ Aerospace America, July 1992, pp. 34(5).
Borowski, S. K., et al. (1993) โ€œ Nuclear Thermal Rocket/Vehicle Design Options for
Future NASA Missions to the Moon and Mars,โ€ AIAA-93-4170, American Institute
of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, D. C.
Borowski, S. K., et al. (1994) โ€œNuclear Thermal Rocket/Stage Technology Options for
NASAโ€™s Future Human Exploration Missions to the Moon and Mars,โ€ Proceedings
o f the 11th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion, CONF-940101, M.
S. El-Genk and M. D. Hoover, eds., American Institute of Physics, New York, NY,
AIP Conference Proceedings No. 301, 2: 745 – 758.
Burmeister, L. C. (1993) Convective Heat Transfer, 2d ed., John Wiley & Sons, New
York.
Chi, J., R. Holman, and B. Pierce (1989) โ€œNerva Derivative Reactors for Thermal and
Electrical Propulsion,โ€ AIAA-89-2770, American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, Washington, D. C.
FIDAP (1993) FIDAP 7.0 User’s Manual, Fluid Dynamics International, Inc.
FL0W-3D (1994) FL0W-3D Version 6.0 Quick Reference Guide, Flow Science, Inc.,
Los Alamos, NM.
Hill, P. G. and C. R. Peterson (1970) Mechanics and Thermodynamics o f Propulsion,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Lamarsh, J. R. (1983) Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 2d ed., Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
Nassersharif, B. (1991) Notes from a Nuclear Propulsion Short Course, 3-5 January
1991, American Institute of Physics.
Nassersharif, B., E. Porta, and D. Hailes (1994) โ€œA Proposal Entitled: Scenario Based
Design of Nuclear Propulsion for Manned Mars Mission,โ€ NSCEE, Las Vegas, NV.
Shepard, K., et al. (1992) โ€œA Split Sprint Mission to Mars,โ€ Proceedings o f the 9th
Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, CONF-920104, M. S. El-Genk and M.
D. Hoover, eds., American Institute of Physics, New York, AIP Conference
Proceedings No. 246, 1: 58 – 63.
Sutton, G. P. (1986) Rocket Propulsion Elements: An Introduction to the Engineering
o f Rockets, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
U.S. President (1989) โ€œRemarks on the 20th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon
Landing July 20, 1989,โ€ Administration o f George Bush, Office of the Federal
Register. National Archives and Records Service, 1989, Washington D. C., George
Bush, 1989, p. 992.
VSAERO (1994) VSAERO Userโ€™s Manual E.5, Analytical Methods, Inc., Redmond,
WA.
White, F. M. (1991) Viscous Fluid Flow, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
Zweig, H. R. and M. H. Cooper (1993) โ€œNERVA-Derived Rocket Module for Solar
System Exploration,โ€ AIAA-93-2110, American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, Washington, D. C.

Figure 5 A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

Physical and Numerical Modeling of the Impeller Construction Impact on the Aluminum Degassing Process

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํƒˆ๊ธฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ž„ํŽ ๋Ÿฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Kamil Kuglin,1 Michaล‚ Szucki,2 Jacek Pieprzyca,3 Simon Genthe,2 Tomasz Merder,3 and Dorota Kalisz1,*

Mikael Ersson, Academic Editor

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Go to:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of tests on the suitability of designed heads (impellers) for aluminum refining. The research was carried out on a physical model of the URO-200, followed by numerical simulations in the FLOW 3D program. Four design variants of impellers were used in the study. The degree of dispersion of the gas phase in the model liquid was used as a criterion for evaluating the performance of each solution using different process parameters, i.e., gas flow rate and impeller speed. Afterward, numerical simulations in Flow 3D software were conducted for the best solution. These simulations confirmed the results obtained with the water model and verified them.

Keywords: aluminum, impeller construction, degassing process, numerical modeling, physical modeling

Go to:

1. Introduction

Constantly increasing requirements concerning metallurgical purity in terms of hydrogen content and nonmetallic inclusions make casting manufacturers use effective refining techniques. The answer to this demand is the implementation of the aluminum refining technique making use of a rotor with an original design guaranteeing efficient refining [1,2,3,4]. The main task of the impeller (rotor) is to reduce the contamination of liquid metal (primary and recycled aluminum) with hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions. An inert gas, mainly argon or a mixture of gases, is introduced through the rotor into the liquid metal to bring both hydrogen and nonmetallic inclusions to the metal surface through the flotation process. Appropriately and uniformly distributed gas bubbles in the liquid metal guarantee achieving the assumed level of contaminant removal economically. A very important factor in deciding about the obtained degassing effect is the optimal rotor design [5,6,7,8]. Thanks to the appropriate geometry of the rotor, gas bubbles introduced into the liquid metal are split into smaller ones, and the spinning movement of the rotor distributes them throughout the volume of the liquid metal bath. In this solution impurities in the liquid metal are removed both in the volume and from the upper surface of the metal. With a well-designed impeller, the costs of refining aluminum and its alloys can be lowered thanks to the reduced inert gas and energy consumption (optimal selection of rotor rotational speed). Shorter processing time and a high degree of dehydrogenation decrease the formation of dross on the metal surface (waste). A bigger produced dross leads to bigger process losses. Consequently, this means that the choice of rotor geometry has an indirect impact on the degree to which the generated waste is reduced [9,10].

Another equally important factor is the selection of process parameters such as gas flow rate and rotor speed [11,12]. A well-designed gas injection system for liquid metal meets two key requirements; it causes rapid mixing of the liquid metal to maintain a uniform temperature throughout the volume and during the entire process, to produce a chemically homogeneous metal composition. This solution ensures effective degassing of the metal bath. Therefore, the shape of the rotor, the arrangement of the nozzles, and their number are significant design parameters that guarantee the optimum course of the refining process. It is equally important to complete the mixing of the metal bath in a relatively short time, as this considerably shortens the refining process and, consequently, reduces the process costs. Another important criterion conditioning the implementation of the developed rotor is the generation of fine diffused gas bubbles which are distributed throughout the metal volume, and whose residence time will be sufficient for the bubbles to collide and adsorb the contaminants. The process of bubble formation by the spinning rotors differs from that in the nozzles or porous molders. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion splits the bubbles into smaller ones. Here, the rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and fluid density have a key effect on the bubble size. The velocity of the bubbles, which depends mainly on their size and shape, determines their residence time in the reactor and is, therefore, very important for the refining process, especially since gas bubbles in liquid aluminum may remain steady only below a certain size [13,14,15].

The impeller designs presented in the article were developed to improve the efficiency of the process and reduce its costs. The impellers used so far have a complicated structure and are very pricey. The success of the conducted research will allow small companies to become independent of external supplies through the possibility of making simple and effective impellers on their own. The developed structures were tested on the water model. The results of this study can be considered as pilot.

Go to:

2. Materials and Methods

Rotors were realized with the SolidWorks computer design technique and a 3D printer. The developed designs were tested on a water model. Afterward, the solution with the most advantageous refining parameters was selected and subjected to calculations with the Flow3D package. As a result, an impeller was designed for aluminum refining. Its principal lies in an even distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of liquid metal, with the largest possible participation of the bubble surface, without disturbing the metal surface. This procedure guarantees the removal of gaseous, as well as metallic and nonmetallic, impurities.

2.1. Rotor Designs

The developed impeller constructions, shown in Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3 and Figure 4, were printed on a 3D printer using the PLA (polylactide) material. The impeller design models differ in their shape and the number of holes through which the inert gas flows. Figure 1Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the same impeller model but with a different number of gas outlets. The arrangement of four, eight, and 12 outlet holes was adopted in the developed design. A triangle-shaped structure equipped with three gas outlet holes is presented in Figure 4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g001.jpg

Figure 1

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with four holesโ€”variant B4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g002.jpg

Figure 2

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with eight holesโ€”variant B8.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g003.jpg

Figure 3

A 3D modelโ€”impeller with twelve holesโ€”variant B12.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g004.jpg

Figure 4

A 3D modelโ€”โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller with three holesโ€”variant RT3.

2.2. Physical Models

Investigations were carried out on a water model of the URO 200 reactor of the barbotage refining process (see Figure 5).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g005.jpg

Figure 5

A schematic of the water model of reactor URO 200.

The URO 200 reactor can be classified as a cyclic reactor. The main element of the device is a rotor, which ends the impeller. The whole system is attached to a shaft via which the refining gas is supplied. Then, the shaft with the rotor is immersed in the liquid metal in the melting pot or the furnace chamber. In URO 200 reactors, the refining process lasts 600 s (10 min), the gas flow rate that can be obtained ranges from 5 to 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, and the speed at which the rotor can move is 0 to 400 rpm. The permissible quantity of liquid metal for barbotage refining is 300 kg or 700 kg [8,16,17]. The URO 200 has several design solutions which improve operation and can be adapted to the existing equipment in the foundry. These solutions include the following [8,16]:

  • URO-200XRโ€”used for small crucible furnaces, the capacity of which does not exceed 250 kg, with no control system and no control of the refining process.
  • URO-200SAโ€”used to service several crucible furnaces of capacity from 250 kg to 700 kg, fully automated and equipped with a mechanical rotor lift.
  • URO-200KAโ€”used for refining processes in crucible furnaces and allows refining in a ladle. The process is fully automated, with a hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200KXโ€”a combination of the XR and KA models, designed for the ladle refining process. Additionally, refining in heated crucibles is possible. The unit is equipped with a manual hydraulic rotor lift.
  • URO-200PAโ€”designed to cooperate with induction or crucible furnaces or intermediate chambers, the capacity of which does not exceed one ton. This unit is an integral part of the furnace. The rotor lift is equipped with a screw drive.

Studies making use of a physical model can be associated with the observation of the flow and circulation of gas bubbles. They require meeting several criteria regarding the similarity of the process and the object characteristics. The similarity conditions mainly include geometric, mechanical, chemical, thermal, and kinetic parameters. During simulation of aluminum refining with inert gas, it is necessary to maintain the geometric similarity between the model and the real object, as well as the similarity related to the flow of liquid metal and gas (hydrodynamic similarity). These quantities are characterized by the Reynolds, Weber, and Froude numbers. The Froude number is the most important parameter characterizing the process, its magnitude is the same for the physical model and the real object. Water was used as the medium in the physical modeling. The factors influencing the choice of water are its availability, relatively low cost, and kinematic viscosity at room temperature, which is very close to that of liquid aluminum.

The physical model studies focused on the flow of inert gas in the form of gas bubbles with varying degrees of dispersion, particularly with respect to some flow patterns such as flow in columns and geysers, as well as disturbance of the metal surface. The most important refining parameters are gas flow rate and rotor speed. The barbotage refining studies for the developed impeller (variants B4, B8, B12, and RT3) designs were conducted for the following process parameters:

  • Rotor speed: 200, 300, 400, and 500 rpm,
  • Ideal gas flow: 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1,
  • Temperature: 293 K (20 ยฐC).

These studies were aimed at determining the most favorable variants of impellers, which were then verified using the numerical modeling methods in the Flow-3D program.

2.3. Numerical Simulations with Flow-3D Program

Testing different rotor impellers using a physical model allows for observing the phenomena taking place while refining. This is a very important step when testing new design solutions without using expensive industrial trials. Another solution is modeling by means of commercial simulation programs such as ANSYS Fluent or Flow-3D [18,19]. Unlike studies on a physical model, in a computer program, the parameters of the refining process and the object itself, including the impeller design, can be easily modified. The simulations were performed with the Flow-3D program version 12.03.02. A three-dimensional system with the same dimensions as in the physical modeling was used in the calculations. The isothermal flow of liquidโ€“gas bubbles was analyzed. As in the physical model, three speeds were adopted in the numerical tests: 200, 300, and 500 rpm. During the initial phase of the simulations, the velocity field around the rotor generated an appropriate direction of motion for the newly produced bubbles. When the required speed was reached, the generation of randomly distributed bubbles around the rotor was started at a rate of 2000 per second. Table 1 lists the most important simulation parameters.

Table 1

Values of parameters used in the calculations.

ParameterValueUnit
Maximum number of gas particles1,000,000
Rate of particle generation20001ยทsโˆ’1
Specific gas constant287.058Jยทkgโˆ’1ยทKโˆ’1
Atmospheric pressure1.013 ร— 105Pa
Water density1000kgยทmโˆ’3
Water viscosity0.001kgยทmโˆ’1ยทsโˆ’1
Boundary condition on the wallsNo-slip
Size of computational cell0.0034m

Open in a separate window

In the case of the CFD analysis, the numerical solutions require great care when generating the computational mesh. Therefore, computational mesh tests were performed prior to the CFD calculations. The effect of mesh density was evaluated by taking into account the velocity of water in the tested object on the measurement line A (height of 0.065 m from the bottom) in a characteristic cross-section passing through the object axis (see Figure 6). The mesh contained 3,207,600, 6,311,981, 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 cells.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g006.jpg

Figure 6

The velocity of the water depending on the size of the computational grid.

The quality of the generated computational meshes was checked using the criterion skewness angle QEAS [18]. This criterion is described by the following relationship:

QEAS=max{ฮฒmaxโˆ’ฮฒeq180โˆ’ฮฒeq,ฮฒeqโˆ’ฮฒminฮฒeq},

(1)

where ฮฒmaxฮฒmin are the maximal and minimal angles (in degrees) between the edges of the cell, and ฮฒeq is the angle corresponding to an ideal cell, which for cubic cells is 90ยฐ.

Normalized in the interval [0;1], the value of QEAS should not exceed 0.75, which identifies the permissible skewness angle of the generated mesh. For the computed meshes, this value was equal to 0.55โ€“0.65.

Moreover, when generating the computational grids in the studied facility, they were compacted in the areas of the highest gradients of the calculated values, where higher turbulence is to be expected (near the impeller). The obtained results of water velocity in the studied object at constant gas flow rate are shown in Figure 6.

The analysis of the obtained water velocity distributions (see Figure 6) along the line inside the object revealed that, with the density of the grid of nodal points, the velocity changed and its changes for the test cases of 7,889,512, 11,569,230, and 14,115,049 were insignificant. Therefore, it was assumed that a grid containing not less than 7,900,000 (7,889,512) cells would not affect the result of CFD calculations.

A single-block mesh of regular cells with a size of 0.0034 m was used in the numerical calculations. The total number of cells was approximately 7,900,000 (7,889,512). This grid resolution (see Figure 7) allowed the geometry of the system to be properly represented, maintaining acceptable computation time (about 3 days on a workstation with 2ร— CPU and 12 computing cores).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g007.jpg

Figure 7

Structured equidistant mesh used in numerical calculations: (a) mesh with smoothed, surface cells (the so-called FAVOR method) used in Flow-3D; (b) visualization of the applied mesh resolution.

The calculations were conducted with an explicit scheme. The timestep was selected by the program automatically and controlled by stability and convergence. From the moment of the initial velocity field generation (start of particle generation), it was 0.0001 s.

When modeling the degassing process, three fluids are present in the system: water, gas supplied through the rotor head (impeller), and the surrounding air. Modeling such a multiphase flow is a numerically very complex issue. The necessity to overcome the liquid backpressure by the gas flowing out from the impeller leads to the formation of numerical instabilities in the volume of fluid (VOF)-based approach used by Flow-3D software. Therefore, a mixed description of the analyzed flow was used here. In this case, water was treated as a continuous medium, while, in the case of gas bubbles, the discrete phase model (DPM) model was applied. The way in which the air surrounding the system was taken into account is later described in detail.

The following additional assumptions were made in the modeling:

  • โ€”The liquid phase was considered as an incompressible Newtonian fluid.
  • โ€”The effect of chemical reactions during the refining process was neglected.
  • โ€”The composition of each phase (gas and liquid) was considered homogeneous; therefore, the viscosity and surface tension were set as constants.
  • โ€”Only full turbulence existed in the liquid, and the effect of molecular viscosity was neglected.
  • โ€”The gas bubbles were shaped as perfect spheres.
  • โ€”The mutual interaction between gas bubbles (particles) was neglected.

2.3.1. Modeling of Liquid Flow 

The motion of the real fluid (continuous medium) is described by the Navierโ€“Stokes Equation [20].

dudt=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+13ฮฝโˆ‡(โˆ‡โ‹… u)+F,

(2)

where du/dt is the time derivative, u is the velocity vector, t is the time, and F is the term accounting for external forces including gravity (unit components denoted by XYZ).

In the simulations, the fluid flow was assumed to be incompressible, in which case the following equation is applicable:

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+(uโ‹…โˆ‡)u=โˆ’1ฯโˆ‡p+ฮฝโˆ‡2u+F.

(3)

Due to the large range of liquid velocities during flows, the turbulence formation process was included in the modeling. For this purpose, the kโ€“ฮต model turbulence kinetic energy k and turbulence dissipation ฮต were the target parameters, as expressed by the following equations [21]:

โˆ‚(ฯk)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯkvi)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒk)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+Gk+Gbโˆ’ฯฮตโˆ’Ym+Sk,

(4)

โˆ‚(ฯฮต)โˆ‚t+โˆ‚(ฯฮตui)โˆ‚xi=โˆ‚โˆ‚xj[(ฮผ+ฮผtฯƒฮต)โ‹…โˆ‚kโˆ‚xi]+C1ฮตฮตk(Gk+G3ฮตGb)+C2ฮตฯฮต2k+Sฮต,

(5)

where ฯ is the gas density, ฯƒฮบ and ฯƒฮต are the Prandtl turbulence numbers, k and ฮต are constants of 1.0 and 1.3, and Gk and Gb are the kinetic energy of turbulence generated by the average velocity and buoyancy, respectively.

As mentioned earlier, there are two gas phases in the considered problem. In addition to the gas bubbles, which are treated here as particles, there is also air, which surrounds the system. The boundary of phase separation is in this case the free surface of the water. The shape of the free surface can change as a result of the forming velocity field in the liquid. Therefore, it is necessary to use an appropriate approach to free surface tracking. The most commonly used concept in liquidโ€“gas flow modeling is the volume of fluid (VOF) method [22,23], and Flow-3D uses a modified version of this method called TrueVOF. It introduces the concept of the volume fraction of the liquid phase fl. This parameter can be used for classifying the cells of a discrete grid into areas filled with liquid phase (fl = 1), gaseous phase, or empty cells (fl = 0) and those through which the phase separation boundary (fl โˆˆ (0, 1)) passes (free surface). To determine the local variations of the liquid phase fraction, it is necessary to solve the following continuity equation:

dfldt=0.

(6)

Then, the fluid parameters in the region of coexistence of the two phases (the so-called interface) depend on the volume fraction of each phase.

ฯ=flฯl+(1โˆ’fl)ฯg,

(7)

ฮฝ=flฮฝl+(1โˆ’fl)ฮฝg,

(8)

where indices l and g refer to the liquid and gaseous phases, respectively.

The parameter of fluid velocity in cells containing both phases is also determined in the same way.

u=flul+(1โˆ’fl)ug.

(9)

Since the processes taking place in the surrounding air can be omitted, to speed up the calculations, a single-phase, free-surface model was used. This means that no calculations were performed in the gas cells (they were treated as empty cells). The liquid could fill them freely, and the air surrounding the system was considered by the atmospheric pressure exerted on the free surface. This approach is often used in modeling foundry and metallurgical processes [24].

2.3.2. Modeling of Gas Bubble Flow 

As stated, a particle model was used to model bubble flow. Spherical particles (gas bubbles) of a given size were randomly generated in the area marked with green in Figure 7b. In the simulations, the gas bubbles were assumed to have diameters of 0.016 and 0.02 m corresponding to the gas flow rates of 10 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1, respectively.

Experimental studies have shown that, as a result of turbulent fluid motion, some of the bubbles may burst, leading to the formation of smaller bubbles, although merging of bubbles into larger groupings may also occur. Therefore, to be able to observe the behavior of bubbles of different sizes (diameter), the calculations generated two additional particle types with diameters twice smaller and twice larger, respectively. The proportion of each species in the system was set to 33.33% (Table 2).

Table 2

Data assumed for calculations.

NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
NoRotor Speed (Rotational Speed)
rpm
Bubbles Diameter
m
Corresponding Gas Flow Rate
dm3ยทminโˆ’1
A2000.01610D2000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
B3000.01610E3000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04
C5000.01610F5000.0230
0.0080.01
0.0320.04

Open in a separate window

The velocity of the particle results from the generated velocity field (calculated from Equation (3) in the liquid ul around it and its velocity resulting from the buoyancy force ub. The effect of particle radius r on the terminal velocity associated with buoyancy force can be determined according to Stokesโ€™ law.

ub=29 (ฯgโˆ’ฯl)ฮผlgr2,

(10)

where g is the acceleration (9.81).

The DPM model was used for modeling the two-phase (waterโ€“air) flow. In this model, the fluid (water) is treated as a continuous phase and described by the Navierโ€“Stokes equation, while gas bubbles are particles flowing in the model fluid (discrete phase). The trajectories of each bubble in the DPM system are calculated at each timestep taking into account the mass forces acting on it. Table 3 characterizes the DPM model used in our own research [18].

Table 3

Characteristic of the DPM model.

MethodEquations
Eulerโ€“LagrangeBalance equation:
dugdt=FD(uโˆ’ug)+g(ฯฑgโˆ’ฯฑ)ฯฑg+F.
FD (u โˆ’ up) denotes the drag forces per mass unit of a bubble, and the expression for the drag coefficient FD is of the form
FD=18ฮผCDReฯฑโ‹…gd2g24.
The relative Reynolds number has the form
Reโ‰กฯdg|ugโˆ’u|ฮผ.
On the other hand, the force resulting from the additional acceleration of the model fluid has the form
F=12dฯdtฯg(uโˆ’ug),
where ug is the gas bubble velocity, u is the liquid velocity, dg is the bubble diameter, and CD is the drag coefficient.

Open in a separate window

Go to:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Calculations of Power and Mixing Time by the Flowing Gas Bubbles

One of the most important parameters of refining with a rotor is the mixing power induced by the spinning rotor and the outflowing gas bubbles (via impeller). The mixing power of liquid metal in a ladle of height (h) by gas injection can be determined from the following relation [15]:

pgVm=ฯโ‹…gโ‹…uB,

(11)

where pg is the mixing power, Vm is the volume of liquid metal in the reactor, ฯ is the density of liquid aluminum, and uB is the average speed of bubbles, given below.

uB=nโ‹…Rโ‹…TAcโ‹…Pmโ‹…t,

(12)

where n is the number of gas moles, R is the gas constant (8.314), Ac is the cross-sectional area of the reactor vessel, T is the temperature of liquid aluminum in the reactor, and Pm is the pressure at the middle tank level. The pressure at the middle level of the tank is calculated by a function of the mean logarithmic difference.

Pm=(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)โˆ’Paln(Pa+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…h)Pa,

(13)

where Pa is the atmospheric pressure, and h is the the height of metal in the reactor.

Themelis and Goyal [25] developed a model for calculating mixing power delivered by gas injection.

pg=2Qโ‹…Rโ‹…Tโ‹…ln(1+mโ‹…ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hP),

(14)

where Q is the gas flow, and m is the mass of liquid metal.

Zhang [26] proposed a model taking into account the temperature difference between gas and alloy (metal).

pg=QRTgVm[ln(1+ฯโ‹…gโ‹…hPa)+(1โˆ’TTg)],

(15)

where Tg is the gas temperature at the entry point.

Data for calculating the mixing power resulting from inert gas injection into liquid aluminum are given below in Table 4. The design parameters were adopted for the model, the parameters of which are shown in Figure 5.

Table 4

Data for calculating mixing power introduced by an inert gas.

ParameterValueUnit
Height of metal column0.7m
Density of aluminum2375kgยทmโˆ’3
Process duration20s
Gas temperature at the injection site940K
Cross-sectional area of ladle0.448m2
Mass of liquid aluminum546.25kg
Volume of ladle0.23M3
Temperature of liquid aluminum941.15K

Open in a separate window

Table 5 presents the results of mixing power calculations according to the models of Themelis and Goyal and of Zhang for inert gas flows of 10, 20, and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The obtained calculation results significantly differed from each other. The difference was an order of magnitude, which indicates that the model is highly inaccurate without considering the temperature of the injected gas. Moreover, the calculations apply to the case when the mixing was performed only by the flowing gas bubbles, without using a rotor, which is a great simplification of the phenomenon.

Table 5

Mixing power calculated from mathematical models.

Mathematical ModelMixing Power (Wยทtโˆ’1)
for a Given Inert Gas Flow (dm3ยทminโˆ’1)
102030
Themelis and Goyal11.4923.3335.03
Zhang0.821.662.49

Open in a separate window

The mixing time is defined as the time required to achieve 95% complete mixing of liquid metal in the ladle [27,28,29,30]. Table 6 groups together equations for the mixing time according to the models.

Table 6

Models for calculating mixing time.

AuthorsModelRemarks
Szekely [31]ฯ„=800ฮตโˆ’0.4ฮตโ€”Wยทtโˆ’1
Chiti and Paglianti [27]ฯ„=CVQlVโ€”volume of reactor, m3
Qlโ€”flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1
Iguchi and Nakamura [32]ฯ„=1200โ‹…Qโˆ’0.4D1.97hโˆ’1.0ฯ…0.47ฯ…โ€”kinematic viscosity, m2ยทsโˆ’1
Dโ€”diameter of ladle, m
hโ€”height of metal column, m
Qโ€”liquid flow intensity, m3ยทsโˆ’1

Open in a separate window

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the liquid column in the ladle and mixing power values.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g008.jpg

Figure 8

Mixing time as a function of gas flow rate for various heights of the metal column (Iguchi and Nakamura model).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g009.jpg

Figure 9

Mixing time as a function of mixing power (Szekly model).

3.2. Determining the Bubble Size

The mechanisms controlling bubble size and mass transfer in an alloy undergoing refining are complex. Strong mixing conditions in the reactor promote impurity mass transfer. In the case of a spinning rotor, the shear force generated by the rotor motion separates the bubbles into smaller bubbles. Rotational speed, mixing force, surface tension, and liquid density have a strong influence on the bubble size. To characterize the kinetic state of the refining process, parameters k and A were introduced. Parameters kA, and uB can be calculated using the below equations [33].

k=2Dโ‹…uBdBโ‹…ฯ€โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš,

(16)

A=6Qโ‹…hdBโ‹…uB,

(17)

uB=1.02gโ‹…dB,โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆ’โˆš

(18)

where D is the diffusion coefficient, and dB is the bubble diameter.

After substituting appropriate values, we get

dB=3.03ร—104(ฯ€D)โˆ’2/5gโˆ’1/5h4/5Q0.344Nโˆ’1.48.

(19)

According to the last equation, the size of the gas bubble decreases with the increasing rotational speed (see Figure 10).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g010.jpg

Figure 10

Effect of rotational speed on the bubble diameter.

In a flow of given turbulence intensity, the diameter of the bubble does not exceed the maximum size dmax, which is inversely proportional to the rate of kinetic energy dissipation in a viscous flow ฮต. The size of the gas bubble diameter as a function of the mixing energy, also considering the Weber number and the mixing energy in the negative power, can be determined from the following equations [31,34]:

  • โ€”Sevik and Park:

dBmax=We0.6krโ‹…(ฯƒโ‹…103ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)0.6โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’0.4โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(20)

  • โ€”Evans:

dBmax=โŽกโŽฃWekrโ‹…ฯƒโ‹…1032โ‹…(ฯโ‹…10โˆ’3)13โŽคโŽฆ35 โ‹…(10โ‹…ฮต)โˆ’25โ‹…10โˆ’2.

(21)

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble dBmax determined from Equation (21) are given in Table 7.

Table 7

The results of calculating the maximum diameter of the bubble using Equation (21).

ModelMixing Energy
ฤบ (m2ยทsโˆ’3)
Weber Number (Wekr)
0.591.01.2
Zhang and Taniguchi
dmax
0.10.01670.02300.026
0.50.00880.01210.013
1.00.00670.00910.010
1.50.00570.00780.009
Sevik and Park
dBmax
0.10.2650.360.41
0.50.1390.190.21
1.00.1060.140.16
1.50.0900.120.14
Evans
dBmax
0.10.2470.3400.38
0.50.1300.1780.20
1.00.0980.1350.15
1.50.0840.1150.13

Open in a separate window

3.3. Physical Modeling

The first stage of experiments (using the URO-200 water model) included conducting experiments with impellers equipped with four, eight, and 12 gas outlets (variants B4, B8, B12). The tests were carried out for different process parameters. Selected results for these experiments are presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g011.jpg

Figure 11

Impeller variant B4โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g012.jpg

Figure 12

Impeller variant B8โ€”gas bubbles dispersion registered for a gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and rotor speed of (a) 200, (b) 300, (c) 400, and (d) 500 rpm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g013.jpg

Figure 13

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant B12).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g014.jpg

Figure 14

Gas bubble dispersion registered for different processing parameters (impeller variant RT3).

The analysis of the refining variants presented in Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13 and Figure 14 reveals that the proposed impellers design model is not useful for the aluminum refining process. The number of gas outlet orifices, rotational speed, and flow did not affect the refining efficiency. In all the variants shown in the figures, very poor dispersion of gas bubbles was observed in the object. The gas bubble flow had a columnar character, and so-called dead zones, i.e., areas where no inert gas bubbles are present, were visible in the analyzed object. Such dead zones were located in the bottom and side zones of the ladle, while the flow of bubbles occurred near the turning rotor. Another negative phenomenon observed was a significant agitation of the water surface due to excessive (rotational) rotor speed and gas flow (see Figure 13, cases 20; 400, 30; 300, 30; 400, and 30; 500).

Research results for a โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller equipped with three gas supply orifices (variant RT3) are presented in Figure 14.

In this impeller design, a uniform degree of bubble dispersion in the entire volume of the modeling fluid was achieved for most cases presented (see Figure 14). In all tested variants, single bubbles were observed in the area of the water surface in the vessel. For variants 20; 200, 30; 200, and 20; 300 shown in Figure 14, the bubble dispersion results were the worst as the so-called dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further applications. Interestingly, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model. This means that the presented model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Its design with sharp edges also differed from previously analyzed models, which is beneficial for gas bubble dispersion, but may interfere with its suitability in industrial conditions due to possible premature wear.

3.4. Qualitative Comparison of Research Results (CFD and Physical Model)

The analysis (physical modeling) revealed that the best mixing efficiency results were obtained with the RT3 impeller variant. Therefore, numerical calculations were carried out for the impeller model with three outlet orifices (variant RT3). The CFD results are presented in Figure 15 and Figure 16.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g015.jpg

Figure 15

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 1 s: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g016.jpg

Figure 16

Simulation results of the impeller RT3, for given flows and rotational speeds after a time of 5.4 s.: simulation variants (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) D, (e) E, and (f) F.

CFD results are presented for all analyzed variants (impeller RT3) at two selected calculation timesteps of 1 and 5.40 s. They show the velocity field of the medium (water) and the dispersion of gas bubbles.

Figure 15 shows the initial refining phase after 1 s of the process. In this case, the gas bubble formation and flow were observed in an area close to contact with the rotor. Figure 16 shows the phase when the dispersion and flow of gas bubbles were advanced in the reactor area of the URO-200 model.

The quantitative evaluation of the obtained results of physical and numerical model tests was based on the comparison of the degree of gas dispersion in the model liquid. The degree of gas bubble dispersion in the volume of the model liquid and the areas of strong turbulent zones formation were evaluated during the analysis of the results of visualization and numerical simulations. These two effects sufficiently characterize the required course of the process from the physical point of view. The known scheme of the below description was adopted as a basic criterion for the evaluation of the degree of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid.

  • Minimal dispersionโ€”single bubbles ascending in the region of their formation along the ladle axis; lack of mixing in the whole bath volume.
  • Accurate dispersionโ€”single and well-mixed bubbles ascending toward the bath mirror in the region of the ladle axis; no dispersion near the walls and in the lower part of the ladle.
  • Uniform dispersionโ€”most desirable; very good mixing of fine bubbles with model liquid.
  • Excessive dispersionโ€”bubbles join together to form chains; large turbulence zones; uneven flow of gas.

The numerical simulation results give a good agreement with the experiments performed with the physical model. For all studied variants (used process parameters), the single bubbles were observed in the area of water surface in the vessel. For variants presented in Figure 13 (200 rpm, gas flow 20 and dm3ยทminโˆ’1) and relevant examples in numerical simulation Figure 16, the worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use. The areas where swirls and gas bubble chains formed were identified only for the inert gas flows of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm in the analyzed model (physical model). This means that the presented impeller model had the best performance in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. The worst bubble dispersion results were obtained because the dead zones were identified in the area near the bottom and side walls of the vessel, which disqualifies these work parameters for further use.

Figure 17 presents exemplary results of model tests (CFD and physical model) with marked gas bubble dispersion zones. All variants of tests were analogously compared, and this comparison allowed validating the numerical model.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is materials-15-05273-g017.jpg

Figure 17

Compilations of model research results (CFD and physical): Aโ€”single gas bubbles formed on the surface of the modeling liquid, Bโ€”excessive formation of gas chains and swirls, Cโ€”uniform distribution of gas bubbles in the entire volume of the tank, and Dโ€”dead zones without gas bubbles, no dispersion. (a) Variant B; (b) variant F.

It should be mentioned here that, in numerical simulations, it is necessary to make certain assumptions and simplifications. The calculations assumed three particle size classes (Table 2), which represent the different gas bubbles that form due to different gas flow rates. The maximum number of particles/bubbles (Table 1) generated was assumed in advance and related to the computational capabilities of the computer. Too many particles can also make it difficult to visualize and analyze the results. The size of the particles, of course, affects their behavior during simulation, while, in the figures provided in the article, the bubbles are represented by spheres (visualization of the results) of the same size. Please note that, due to the adopted Lagrangianโ€“Eulerian approach, the simulation did not take into account phenomena such as bubble collapse or fusion. However, the obtained results allow a comprehensive analysis of the behavior of gas bubbles in the system under consideration.

The comparative analysis of the visualization (quantitative) results obtained with the water model and CFD simulations (see Figure 17) generated a sufficient agreement from the point of view of the trends. A precise quantitative evaluation is difficult to perform because of the lack of a refraction compensating system in the water model. Furthermore, in numerical simulations, it is not possible to determine the geometry of the forming gas bubbles and their interaction with each other as opposed to the visualization in the water model. The use of both research methods is complementary. Thus, a direct comparison of images obtained by the two methods requires appropriate interpretation. However, such an assessment gives the possibility to qualitatively determine the types of the present gas bubble dispersion, thus ultimately validating the CFD results with the water model.

A summary of the visualization results for impellers RT3, i.e., analysis of the occurring gas bubble dispersion types, is presented in Table 8.

Table 8

Summary of visualization results (impeller RT3)โ€”different types of gas bubble dispersion.

No Exp.ABCDEF
Gas flow rate, dm3ยทminโˆ’11030
Impeller speed, rpm200300500200300500
Type of dispersionAccurateUniformUniform/excessiveMinimalExcessiveExcessive

Open in a separate window

Tests carried out for impeller RT3 confirmed the high efficiency of gas bubble distribution in the volume of the tested object at a low inert gas flow rate of 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1. The most optimal variant was variant B (300 rpm, 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1). However, the other variants A and C (gas flow rate 10 dm3ยทminโˆ’1) seemed to be favorable for this type of impeller and are recommended for further testing. The above process parameters will be analyzed in detail in a quantitative analysis to be performed on the basis of the obtained efficiency curves of the degassing process (oxygen removal). This analysis will give an unambiguous answer as to which process parameters are the most optimal for this type of impeller; the results are planned for publication in the next article.

It should also be noted here that the high agreement between the results of numerical calculations and physical modelling prompts a conclusion that the proposed approach to the simulation of a degassing process which consists of a single-phase flow model with a free surface and a particle flow model is appropriate. The simulation results enable us to understand how the velocity field in the fluid is formed and to analyze the distribution of gas bubbles in the system. The simulations in Flow-3D software can, therefore, be useful for both the design of the impeller geometry and the selection of process parameters.

Go to:

4. Conclusions

The results of experiments carried out on the physical model of the device for the simulation of barbotage refining of aluminum revealed that the worst results in terms of distribution and dispersion of gas bubbles in the studied object were obtained for the black impellers variants B4, B8, and B12 (multi-orifice impellersโ€”four, eight, and 12 outlet holes, respectively).

In this case, the control of flow, speed, and number of gas exit orifices did not improve the process efficiency, and the developed design did not meet the criteria for industrial tests. In the case of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller (variant RT3), uniform gas bubble dispersion was achieved throughout the volume of the modeling fluid for most of the tested variants. The worst bubble dispersion results due to the occurrence of the so-called dead zones in the area near the bottom and sidewalls of the vessel were obtained for the flow variants of 20 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. For the analyzed model, areas where swirls and gas bubble chains were formed were found only for the inert gas flow of 20 and 30 dm3ยทminโˆ’1 and 200 rpm. The model impeller (variant RT3) had the best performance compared to the previously presented impellers in terms of dispersion of gas bubbles in the model liquid. Moreover, its design differed from previously presented models because of its sharp edges. This can be advantageous for gas bubble dispersion, but may negatively affect its suitability in industrial conditions due to premature wearing.

The CFD simulation results confirmed the results obtained from the experiments performed on the physical model. The numerical simulation of the operation of the โ€˜red triangleโ€™ impeller model (using Flow-3D software) gave good agreement with the experiments performed on the physical model. This means that the presented model impeller, as compared to other (analyzed) designs, had the best performance in terms of gas bubble dispersion in the model liquid.

In further work, the developed numerical model is planned to be used for CFD simulations of the gas bubble distribution process taking into account physicochemical parameters of liquid aluminum based on industrial tests. Consequently, the obtained results may be implemented in production practice.

Go to:

Funding Statement

This paper was created with the financial support grants from the AGH-UST, Faculty of Foundry Engineering, Poland (16.16.170.654 and 11/990/BK_22/0083) for the Faculty of Materials Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Poland.

Go to:

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and D.K.; methodology, J.P. and T.M.; validation, M.S. and S.G.; formal analysis, D.K. and T.M.; investigation, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; resources, M.S., J.P. and K.K.; writingโ€”original draft preparation, D.K. and T.M.; writingโ€”review and editing, D.K. and T.M.; visualization, J.P., K.K. and S.G.; supervision, D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Go to:

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Go to:

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Go to:

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Go to:

Footnotes

Publisherโ€™s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Go to:

References

1. Zhang L., Xuewei L., Torgerson A.T., Long M. Removal of Impurity Elements from Molten Aluminium: A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2011;32:150โ€“228. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2010.483396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Saternus M. Impurities of liquid aluminium-methods on their estimation and removal. Met. Form. 2015;23:115โ€“132. [Google Scholar]

3. ลปak P.L., Kalisz D., Lelito J., Gracz B., Szucki M., Suchy J.S. Modelling of non-metallic particle motion process in foundry alloys. Metalurgija. 2015;54:357โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

4. Kalisz D., Kuglin K. Efficiency of aluminum oxide inclusions rmoval from liquid steel as a result of collisions and agglomeration on ceramic filters. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2020;20:43โ€“48. [Google Scholar]

5. Kuglin K., Kalisz D. Evaluation of the usefulness of rotors for aluminium refining. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021;1178:012036. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1178/1/012036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modeling of the impeller construction impact o the aluminium refining process. Materials. 2022;15:575. doi: 10.3390/ma15020575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Saternus M., Merder T. Physical modelling of aluminum refining process conducted in batch reactor with rotary impeller. Metals. 2018;8:726. doi: 10.3390/met8090726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Saternus M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J. The influence of impeller geometry on the gas bubbles dispersion in uro-200 reactorโ€”RTD curves. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015;60:2887โ€“2893. doi: 10.1515/amm-2015-0461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Hernรกndez-Hernรกndez M., Camacho-Martรญnez J., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A. Impeller design assisted by physical modeling and pilot plant trials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016;236:1โ€“8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Mancilla E., Cruz-Mรฉndez W., Garduรฑo I.E., Gonzรกlez-Rivera C., Ramรญrez-Argรกez M.A., Ascanio G. Comparison of the hydrodynamic performance of rotor-injector devices in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017;118:158โ€“169. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.11.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Michalek K., Socha L., Gryc K., Tkadleckova M., Saternus M., Pieprzyca J., Merder T. Modelling of technological parameters of aluminium melt refining in the ladle by blowing of inert gas through the rotating impeller. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2018;63:987โ€“992. [Google Scholar]

12. Walek J., Michalek K., Tkadleckovรก M., Saternus M. Modelling of Technological Parameters of Aluminium Melt Refining in the Ladle by Blowing of Inert Gas through the Rotating Impeller. Metals. 2021;11:284. doi: 10.3390/met11020284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Michalek K., Gryc K., Moravka J. Physical modelling of bath homogenization in argon stirred ladle. Metalurgija. 2009;48:215โ€“218. [Google Scholar]

14. Michalek K. The Use of Physical Modeling and Numerical Optimization for Metallurgical Processes. VSB; Ostrawa, Czech Republic: 2001. [Google Scholar]

15. Chen J., Zhao J. Light Metals. TMS; Warrendale, PA, USA: 1995. Bubble distribution in a melt treatment water model; pp. 1227โ€“1231. [Google Scholar]

16. Saternus M. Model Matematyczny do Sterowania Procesem Rafinacji Ciekล‚ych Stopรณw Aluminium Przy Zastosowaniu URO-200. Katowice, Poland: 2004. Research Project Nr 7 T08B 019 21. [Google Scholar]

17. Pietrewicz L., Wฤ™ลผyk W. Urzฤ…dzenia do rafinacji gazowej typu URO-200 szeล›ฤ‡ lat produkcji i doล›wiadczeล„; Proceedings of the Aluminum Conference; Zakopane, Poland. 12โ€“16 October 1998. [Google Scholar]

18. Flow3d Userโ€™s Guide. Flow Science, Inc.; Santa Fe, NM, USA: 2020. [Google Scholar]

19. Sinelnikov V., Szucki M., Merder T., Pieprzyca J., Kalisz D. Physical and numerical modeling of the slag splashing process. Materials. 2021;14:2289. doi: 10.3390/ma14092289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. White F. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 2010. (McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering). [Google Scholar]

21. Yang Z., Yang L., Cheng T., Chen F., Zheng F., Wang S., Guo Y. Fluid Flow Characteristic of EAF Molten Steel with Different Bottom-Blowing Gas Flow Rate Distributions. ISIJ. 2020;60:1957โ€“1967. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Nichols B.D., Hirt C.W. Methods for calculating multi-dimensional, transient free surface flows past bodies; Proceedings of the First International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics; Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 20โ€“22 October 1975. [Google Scholar]

23. Hirt C.W., Nichols B.D. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981;39:201โ€“255. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Szucki M., Suchy J.S., Lelito J., Malinowski P., Sobczyk J. Application of the lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of the mold filling process in the casting industry. Heat Mass Transf. 2017;53:3421โ€“3431. doi: 10.1007/s00231-017-2069-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Themelis N.J., Goyal P. Gas injection in steelmaking. Candian Metall. Trans. 1983;22:313โ€“320. [Google Scholar]

26. Zhang L., Jing X., Li Y., Xu Z., Cai K. Mathematical model of decarburization of ultralow carbon steel during RH treatment. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing. 1997;4:19โ€“23. [Google Scholar]

27. Chiti F., Paglianti A., Bujalshi W. A mechanistic model to estimate powder consumption and mixing time in aluminium industries. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2004;82:1105โ€“1111. doi: 10.1205/cerd.82.9.1105.44156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Bouaifi M., Roustan M. Power consumption, mixing time and homogenization energy in dual-impeller agitated gas-liquid reactors. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011;40:87โ€“95. doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(00)00128-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Kang J., Lee C.H., Haam S., Koo K.K., Kim W.S. Studies on the overall oxygen transfer rate and mixing time in pilot-scale surface aeration vessel. Environ. Technol. 2001;22:1055โ€“1068. doi: 10.1080/09593332208618215. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Moucha T., Linek V., Prokopov E. Gas hold-up, mixing time and gas-liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient of various multiple-impeller configurations: Rushton turbine, pitched blade and techmix impeller and their combinations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003;58:1839โ€“1846. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00682-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Szekely J. Flow phenomena, mixing and mass transfer in argon-stirred ladles. Ironmak. Steelmak. 1979;6:285โ€“293. [Google Scholar]

32. Iguchi M., Nakamura K., Tsujino R. Mixing time and fluid flow phenomena in liquids of varying kinematic viscosities agitated by bottom gas injection. Metall. Mat. Trans. 1998;29:569โ€“575. doi: 10.1007/s11663-998-0091-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Hjelle O., Engh T.A., Rasch B. Removal of Sodium from Aluminiummagnesium Alloys by Purging with Cl2. Aluminium-Verlag GmbH; Dusseldorf, Germany: 1985. pp. 343โ€“360. [Google Scholar]

34. Zhang L., Taniguchi S. Fundamentals of inclusion removal from liquid steel by bubble flotation. Int. Mat. Rev. 2000;45:59โ€“82. doi: 10.1179/095066000101528313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Numerical analysis of energy dissipator options using computational fluid dynamics modeling โ€” a case study of Mirani Dam

์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์ž ์˜ต์…˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ํ•ด์„ โ€” Mirani ๋Œ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

Arabian Journal of Geosciences volume 15, Article number: 1614 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ FLOW 3D ์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™(CFD) ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒํ‚ค์Šคํƒ„ Mirani ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ ์˜ต์…˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋งค๋ฆฝ์ง€(USBR) ์œ ํ˜• II ๋ฐ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์œ ์—ญ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 3D Reynolds ํ‰๊ท  Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์ด ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ„์˜ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์บก์ฒ˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์œ ์ž…, ๋ฐ€๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ-ํ”Œ๋Ÿญ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•˜์œ„ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.ย ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 39.5m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ 44.2m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 3๋ฒˆ์งธ์™€ 4ย ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 48.8m์ธ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II ์ •์ˆ˜์กฐ์™€ 39.5m์˜ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์ •์ˆ˜์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋„ค ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ๋ฐ ์ŠˆํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋†’์ด๊ฐ€ 0.3m ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ FLOW 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ 0.9m์—์„œ ์ตœ์†Œ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ์†Œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒ€์ฆ์€ USBR ์œ ํ˜• II( Lย = 48.8m), USBR ์œ ํ˜• III(ย Lย = 35.5m) ๋ฐ USBR ์œ ํ˜• III ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ์„ย 0.3m ๋ธ”๋ก ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(ย L= 35.5m).ย ํ†ต๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํ‰๊ท  ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” 2.5%, RMSE(์ œ๊ณฑ ํ‰๊ท  ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ ์˜ค์ฐจ) ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” 3% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ 4ย ๋ฒˆ์งธย ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ๊ธฐ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” 5% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

In this study, the FLOW 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software was used to estimate the performance of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) type II and USBR type III stilling basins as energy dissipation options for the Mirani Dam spillway, Pakistan. The 3D Reynolds-averaged Navierโ€“Stokes equations were solved, which included sub-grid models for air entrainment, density evaluation, and driftโ€“flux, to capture free-surface flow over the spillway. Five models were considered in this research. The first model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 39.5 m. The second model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 44.2 m. The 3rd and 4thย models have a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 48.8 m and a 39.5 m USBR type III stilling basin, respectively. The fifth model is identical to the fourth, but the friction and chute block heights have been increased by 0.3 m. To set up the best FLOW 3D model conditions, mesh sensitivity analysis was performed, which yielded a minimum error at a mesh size of 0.9 m. Three sets of boundary conditions were tested and the set that gave the minimum error was employed. Numerical validation was done by comparing the physical model energy dissipation of USBR type II (Lย = 48.8 m), USBR type III (Lย =35.5 m), and USBR type III with 0.3-m increments in blocks (Lย = 35.5 m). The statistical analysis gave an average error of 2.5% and a RMSE (root mean square error) index of less than 3%. Based on hydraulics and economic analysis, the 4thย model was found to be an optimized energy dissipator. The maximum difference between the physical and numerical models in terms of percentage energy absorbed was found to be less than 5%.

Keywords

  • Numerical modeling
  • Spillway
  • Hydraulic jump
  • Energy dissipation
  • FLOW 3D

References

  • Abbasi S, Fatemi S, Ghaderi A, Di Francesco S (2021) The effect of geometric parameters of the antivortex on a triangular labyrinth side weir. Water (Switzerland) 13(1).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010014
  • Amorim JCC, Amante RCR, Barbosa VD (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow in a stilling basin. Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress 28 Juneโ€“3 July, the Hague, the Netherlands, 1, 1โ€“6
  • Asaram D, Deepamkar G, Singh G, Vishal K, Akshay K (2016) Energy dissipation by using different slopes of ogee spillway. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 4(3):18โ€“22Google Scholarย 
  • Boes RM, Hager WH (2003) Hydraulic design of stepped spillways. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):671โ€“679.ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:9(671)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130(7):0780011โ€“0780014.ย https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Chen Q, Dai G, Liu H (2002) Volume of fluid model for turbulence numerical simulation of stepped spillway overflow. J Hydraul Eng 128(7):683โ€“688. 10.1061/ๅ…ฑASCEๅ…ฒ0733-9429ๅ…ฑ2002ๅ…ฒ128:7ๅ…ฑ683ๅ…ฒ CE
  • Damiron R (2015) CFD modelling of dam spillway aerator. Lund University Sweden
  • Dunlop SL, Willig IA, Paul GE (2016) Cabinet Gorge Dam spillway modifications for TDG abatement โ€“ design evolution and field performance. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3650628160, 460โ€“470. 10.15142/T3650628160853
  • Fleit G, Baranya S, Bihs H (2018) CFD modeling of varied flow conditions over an ogee-weir. Period Polytech Civ Eng 62(1):26โ€“32.ย https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10821Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Frizell KW, Frizell KH (2015) Guidelines for hydraulic design of stepped spillways. Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2015-06, May
  • Ghaderi A, Abbasi S (2021) Experimental and numerical study of the effects of geometric appendance elements on energy dissipation over stepped spillway. Water (Switzerland) 13(7).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070957
  • Ghaderi A, Dasineh M, Aristodemo F, Ghahramanzadeh A (2020) Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. J Hydroinform 22(6):1554โ€“1572.ย https://doi.org/10.2166/HYDRO.2020.298Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Gรผven A, Mahmood AH (2021) Numerical investigation of flow characteristics over stepped spillways. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 21(3):1344โ€“1355.ย https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.283Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Herrera-Granados O, Kostecki SW (2016) Numerical and physical modeling of water flow over the ogee weir of the new Niedรณw barrage. J Hydrol Hydromech 64(1):67โ€“74.ย https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0013Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Ho DKH, Riddette KM (2010) Application of computational fluid dynamics to evaluate hydraulic performance of spillways in australia. Aust J Civ Eng 6(1):81โ€“104.ย https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2010.11463946Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Kocaer ร–, Yarar A (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow over ogee spillway. Water Resour Manag 34(13):3949โ€“3965.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02558-9Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Kumcu SY (2017) Investigation of flow over spillway modeling and comparison between experimental data and CFD analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(3):994โ€“1003.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1257-zArticleย Google Scholarย 
  • Li S, Li Q, Yang J (2019) CFD modelling of a stepped spillway with various step layouts. Math Prob Eng 2019:1โ€“12.ย https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Muthukumaran N, Prince Arulraj G (2020) Experimental investigation on augmenting the discharge over ogee spillways with nanocement. Civ Eng Archit 8(5):838โ€“845.ย https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080511Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Naderi V, Farsadizadeh D, Lin C, Gaskin S (2019) A 3D study of an air-core vortex using HSPIV and flow visualization. Arab J Sci Eng 44(10):8573โ€“8584.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03764-3Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Nangare PB, Kote AS (2017) Experimental investigation of an ogee stepped spillway with plain and slotted roller bucket for energy dissipation. Int J Civ Eng Technol 8(8):1549โ€“1555Google Scholarย 
  • Parsaie A, Moradinejad A, Haghiabi AH (2018) Numerical modeling of flow pattern in spillway approach channel. Jordan J Civ Eng 12(1):1โ€“9Google Scholarย 
  • Pasbani Khiavi M, Ali Ghorbani M, Yusefi M (2021) Numerical investigation of the energy dissipation process in stepped spillways using finite volume method. J Irrig Water Eng 11(4):22โ€“37Google Scholarย 
  • Peng Y, Zhang X, Yuan H, Li X, Xie C, Yang S, Bai Z (2019) Energy dissipation in stepped spillways with different horizontal face angles. Energies 12(23).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234469
  • Raza A, Wan W, Mehmood K (2021) Stepped spillway slope effect on air entrainment and inception point location. Water (Switzerland) 13(10).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101428
  • Reeve DE, Zuhaira AA, Karunarathna H (2019) Computational investigation of hydraulic performance variation with geometry in gabion stepped spillways. Water Sci Eng 12(1):62โ€“72.ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.04.002Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Rice CE, Kadavy KC (1996) Model study of a roller compacted concrete stepped spillway. J Hydraul Eng 122(6):292โ€“297.ย https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:6(292)Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Rong Y, Zhang T, Peng L, Feng P (2019) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam discharge and flood routing in Wudu reservoir. Water (Switzerland) 11(10).ย https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102157
  • Saqib N, Akbar M, Pan H, Ou G, Mohsin M, Ali A, Amin A (2022) Numerical analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved risers. Appl Sci 12(448):1โ€“18Google Scholarย 
  • Saqib N, Ansari K, Babar M (2021) Analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved treads using computational fluid dynamics. Intl Conf Adv Mech Eng :1โ€“10
  • Saqib Nu, Akbar M, Huali P, Guoqiang O (2022) Numerical investigation of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across the stepped spillway having curved treads using FLOW 3D. Arab J Geosci 15(1):1363โ€“1400.ย https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10505-8Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sarkardeh H, Marosi M, Roshan R (2015) Stepped spillway optimization through numerical and physical modeling. Int J Energy Environ 6(6):597โ€“606Google Scholarย 
  • Serafeim A, Avgeris V, Hrissanthou V (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow over a spillway. Eur Water Publ 14(2015):55โ€“59.ย https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-63248-042-2-11Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Sorensen RM (1986) Stepped spillway model investigation. J Hydraul Eng I(12):1461โ€“1472.ย https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-
  • Tabbara M, Chatila J, Awwad R (2005) Computational simulation of flow over stepped spillways. Comput Struct 83(27):2215โ€“2224.ย https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.04.005Articleย Google Scholarย 
  • Valero D, Bung DB, Crookston BM, Matos J (2016) Numerical investigation of USBR type III stilling basin performance downstream of smooth and stepped spillways. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3406281608, 635โ€“646.ย https://doi.org/10.15142/T340628160853
  • Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (1979) An introduction to computational fluid mechanics. (Vol. 2).ย https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(80)90010-7
  • WAPDA model studies cell, IRI Lahore (2003) Mirani Dam Project hydraulic model studies for the spillway. November 2003
  • Yakhot V, Orszag S (1986) Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J Sci Comput 1(1):3โ€“51Articleย Google Scholarย 
Fig 3. Front view of the ejected powder particles due to the plume movement. Powder particles are colored by their respective temperature while trajectory colors show their magnitude at 0.007 seconds.

316-L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ์ค‘ ์ฝœ๋“œ ์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

316-L ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค๊ฐ•์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ์ค‘ ์ฝœ๋“œ ์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ ํ˜•์„ฑ์˜ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

M. BAYAT1,* , AND J. H. HATTEL1

  • Corresponding author
    1 Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 425, Kgs. 2800 Lyngby, Denmark

ABSTRACT

Spatter and denudation are two very well-known phenomena occurring mainly during the laser powder bed fusion process and are defined as ejection and displacement of powder particles, respectively. The main driver of this phenomenon is the formation of a vapor plume jet that is caused by the vaporization of the melt pool which is subjected to the laser beam. In this work, a 3-dimensional transient turbulent computational fluid dynamics model coupled with a discrete element model is developed in the finite volume-based commercial software package Flow-3D AM to simulate the spatter phenomenon. The numerical results show that a localized low-pressure zone forms at the bottom side of the plume jet and this leads to a pseudo-Bernoulli effect that drags nearby powder particles into the area of influence of the vapor plume jet. As a result, the vapor plume acts like a momentum sink and therefore all nearby particles point are dragged towards this region. Furthermore, it is noted that due to the jetโ€™s attenuation, powder particles start diverging from the central core region of the vapor plume as they move vertically upwards. It is moreover observed that only particles which are in the very central core region of the plume jet get sufficiently accelerated to depart the computational domain, while the rest of the dragged particles, especially those which undergo an early divergence from the jet axis, get stalled pretty fast as they come in contact with the resting fluid. In the last part of the work, two simulations with two different scanning speeds are carried out, where it is clearly observed that the angle between the departing powder particles and the vertical axis of the plume jet increases with increasing scanning speed.

์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ์™€ denudation์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ˜„์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๋ฐ ๋ณ€์œ„๋กœ ์ •์˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋™์ธ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ๊ธฐํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ ์ด์‚ฐ ์š”์†Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณผ๋„ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ โ€‹โ€‹์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ํ•œ ์ฒด์  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ƒ์šฉ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€ Flow-3D AM์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ”Œ๋ฃธ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ๋ฉด์— ๊ตญ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ์ €์•• ์˜์—ญ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ํ”Œ๋ฃธ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ์–ด๋“ค์ด๋Š” ์˜์‚ฌ-๋ฒ ๋ฅด๋ˆ„์ด ํšจ๊ณผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง„๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ์€ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ํก์ˆ˜์›์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ž…์ž ์ง€์ ์ด ์ด ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ๊ฐ์‡ ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ง์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋‘ฅ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ฝ”์–ด ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”์šฑ์ด ํ”Œ๋ฃธ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ฝ”์–ด ์˜์—ญ์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž…์ž๋งŒ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚  ๋งŒํผ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ฐ€์†๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋“œ๋ž˜๊ทธ๋œ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ์ž…์ž, ํŠนํžˆ ์ œํŠธ ์ถ•์—์„œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐœ์‚ฐ์„ ๊ฒช๋Š” ์ž…์ž๋Š” ์ •์ฒด๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ํœด์‹ ์œ ์ฒด์™€ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฝค ๋น ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž‘์—…์˜ ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์ถœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž์™€ ์—ฐ๊ธฐ ์ œํŠธ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง ์ถ• ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig 1. Two different views of the computational domain for the fluid domain. The vapor plume is simulated by a moving momentum source with a prescribed temperature of 3000 K.
Fig 1. Two different views of the computational domain for the fluid domain. The vapor plume is simulated by a moving momentum source with a prescribed temperature of 3000 K.
Fig 2. (a) and (b) are two snapshots taken at an x-y plane parallel to the powder layer plane before and 0.008 seconds after the start of the scanning process. (c) Shows a magnified view of (b) where detailed powder particles' movement along with their velocity magnitude and directions are shown.
Fig 2. (a) and (b) are two snapshots taken at an x-y plane parallel to the powder layer plane before and 0.008 seconds after the start of the scanning process. (c) Shows a magnified view of (b) where detailed powder particles’ movement along with their velocity magnitude and directions are shown.
Fig 3. Front view of the ejected powder particles due to the plume movement. Powder particles are colored by their respective temperature while trajectory colors show their magnitude at 0.007 seconds.
Fig 3. Front view of the ejected powder particles due to the plume movement. Powder particles are colored by their respective temperature while trajectory colors show their magnitude at 0.007 seconds.

References

[1] T. DebRoy et al., โ€œAdditive manufacturing of metallic components โ€“ Process, structure
and properties,โ€ Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 92, pp. 112โ€“224, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001.
[2] M. Markl and C. Kรถrner, โ€œMultiscale Modeling of Powder Bedโ€“Based Additive
Manufacturing,โ€ Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 93โ€“123, 2016, doi:
10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032158.
[3] A. Zinoviev, O. Zinovieva, V. Ploshikhin, V. Romanova, and R. Balokhonov, โ€œEvolution
of grain structure during laser additive manufacturing. Simulation by a cellular automata
method,โ€ Mater. Des., vol. 106, pp. 321โ€“329, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.125.
[4] Y. Zhang and J. Zhang, โ€œModeling of solidification microstructure evolution in laser
powder bed fusion fabricated 316L stainless steel using combined computational fluid
dynamics and cellular automata,โ€ Addit. Manuf., vol. 28, no. July 2018, pp. 750โ€“765,
2019, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.024.
[5] A. A. Martin et al., โ€œUltrafast dynamics of laser-metal interactions in additive
manufacturing alloys captured by in situ X-ray imaging,โ€ Mater. Today Adv., vol. 1, p.
100002, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.01.001.
[6] Y. C. Wu et al., โ€œNumerical modeling of melt-pool behavior in selective laser melting
with random powder distribution and experimental validation,โ€ J. Mater. Process.
Technol., vol. 254, no. July 2017, pp. 72โ€“78, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.032.
[7] W. Gao, S. Zhao, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, F. Liu, and X. Lin, โ€œNumerical simulation of
thermal field and Fe-based coating doped Ti,โ€ Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 92, pp. 83โ€“
90, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.082.
[8] A. Charles, M. Bayat, A. Elkaseer, L. Thijs, J. H. Hattel, and S. Scholz, โ€œElucidation of
dross formation in laser powder bed fusion at down-facing surfaces: Phenomenonoriented multiphysics simulation and experimental validation,โ€ Addit. Manuf., vol. 50,
2022, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102551.
[9] C. Meier, R. W. Penny, Y. Zou, J. S. Gibbs, and A. J. Hart, โ€œThermophysical phenomena
in metal additive manufacturing by selective laser melting: Fundamentals, modeling,
simulation and experimentation,โ€ arXiv, 2017, doi:
10.1615/annualrevheattransfer.2018019042.
[10] W. King, A. T. Anderson, R. M. Ferencz, N. E. Hodge, C. Kamath, and S. A. Khairallah,
โ€œOverview of modelling and simulation of metal powder bed fusion process at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory,โ€ Mater. Sci. Technol. (United Kingdom), vol. 31, no. 8,
pp. 957โ€“968, 2015, doi: 10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000728.

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

Hyung Ju Yoo1, Sung Sik Joo2, Beom Jae Kwon3, Seung Oh Lee4*

์œ  ํ˜•์ฃผ1, ์ฃผ ์„ฑ์‹2, ๊ถŒ ๋ฒ”์žฌ3, ์ด ์Šน์˜ค4*

1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA
3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN
4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University

1ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๊ณผ์ •
2ใˆœํ—ฅ์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„ ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
3ใˆœ์ด์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ž์›๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
4ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜

ABSTRACT

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐ•์šฐ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋ฟ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋„์ถœ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77% ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ๋œ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ : ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ, FLOW-3D, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ

1. ์„œ ๋ก 

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ 24๊ฐœ ๋Œ์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด์œ„ํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ทน์‹ฌํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์‹ ์„ค ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ ๋“ฑ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทนํ•œํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋กœ์จ ๋น„์ƒ์ƒํ™ฉ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ (K-water, 2021), ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ ์ฐจ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(Jeon et al., 2006Kim, 2007Kim et al., 2008). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Jeon et al.(2006)์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ ๋ฐ”์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์„ค๊ณ„์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Kim et al.(2008)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Kim and Kim(2013)์€ ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒยทํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Zeng et al.(2017)์€ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Li et al.(2011)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ์‹ ๊ทœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Lee et al.(2019)๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜(FLOW-3D)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด 7.6%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ . ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋ถ„์„์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

2. ๋ณธ ๋ก 

2.1 ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

2.1.1 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ก 

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ Flow Science, Inc์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)์œผ๋กœ ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„๋ชจ์˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ•ด์„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ , ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ•ด์„์—๋„ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค(Flow Science, 2011). ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D(version 12.0)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

2.1.2 ์œ ๋™ํ•ด์„์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹

1) ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ƒ์ˆ˜ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (1)(2)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(1)

โˆ‡ยทv=0

(2)

โˆ‚โˆ‚x(uAx)+โˆ‚โˆ‚y(vAy)+โˆ‚โˆ‚z(wAz)=RSORฯ

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ€๋„(kg/m3), u, v, w๋Š” x, y, z๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์œ ์†(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az๋Š” ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฉด์ (m2), RSOR๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์„ฑ/์†Œ๋ฉธ(mass source/sink)ํ•ญ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Momentum Equation)

๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„์„ฑ๋ถ„ u, v, w์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ Eqs. (3)(4)(5)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(3)

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORฯVFu

(4)

โˆ‚vโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚y+Gy+fy-by-RSORฯVFv

(5)

โˆ‚wโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORฯVFw

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, Gx, Gy, Gz๋Š” ์ฒด์ ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, fx, fy, fz๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, bx, by, bz๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์†์‹ค์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2.1.3 ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์— ์ €ํ•ญํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ• ์„ ํƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ํ•˜ ์‹œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (6)(7)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

1) Schoklitsch ๊ณต์‹

Schoklitsch(1934)๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

(6)

ฯ„=ฮณRI=ฮณC2V2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), I๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, C๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) Manning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ณต์‹

Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‹ ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

(7)

ฯ„=ฮณn2V2R1/3

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ์œ ์†์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Maning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กค ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค.

2.2 ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€

ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์€ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์œ ์ˆ˜์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด ํ™•๋ณด๋˜๋„๋ก ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ™•๋ณด์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์‹œ๊ณต์ƒ์˜ ์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ตด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตด์š”์„ฑ(flexibility) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ์‹œ๊ณต๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„ํƒˆ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ASTM(๋ฏธ๊ตญ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์‹œํ—˜ํ•™ํšŒ)์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ๋งคํŠธ ์‹œํ—˜๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ๋ณ„๋กœ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ•์†Œ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ตญ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์€ Table 1์— ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)๊ณผ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (ฯ„p, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)
Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment5.0

2.3. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„

2.3.1 ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3D ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋นˆ๋„(100๋…„) ๋ฐ 200๋…„๋นˆ๋„ ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์ด์ƒ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ์€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ํ•œ 2011๋…„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์˜ ํ‘œ์ธต ์œ ์‹ค ๋ฐ ์˜น๋ฒฝ ๋ฐ€๋ฆผํ˜„์ƒ ๋“ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์–ด ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ˆ˜ยท๋ณด๊ฐ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์„ 0.99 ~ 8.16 m์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ฒฉ์ž์ˆ˜๋Š” 49,102,500๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์œ ์ž…์œ ๋Ÿ‰(inflow), ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์€ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด(wall), ํ•˜๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์œ„(water surface elevation)์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Table 2Fig. 1 ์ฐธ์กฐ). FLOW-3D ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์—๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๊ธธ์ด ๋ชจํ˜•, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ชจํ˜•, k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, LES ๋ชจํ˜• ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์˜(Flow Science, 2011)ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” RNG k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” Table 3์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์ด ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 1 ๋ฐ Case 2๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 3 ~ Case 6). ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 7 ~ Case 10) ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’(Chow, 1959)์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹(Vanoni, 2006)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ๊ณ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹์€ Eq. (8)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์œผ๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๊ณ ๋Š” Table 4์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, kS๋Š” ์กฐ๊ณ  (m), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, g๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ฐ€์†๋„(m/s2)๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ(Time Step)์€ 0.0001์ดˆ๋กœ ์„ค์ •(CFL number < 1.0) ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”, ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’ ์—ญ์‹œ 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1.0%์˜ ์œ ์†๋ณ€๋™์€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์œ ์†์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case์—์„œ 2400์ดˆ ์ด๋‚ด์— ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
โˆ†X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
โˆ†Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
โˆ†Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case ๋ณ„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 2 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด(L)๋Š” ์ด 1.3 km๋กœ 10 m ๋“ฑ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Case 1 – Case 6๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†(Vmax)์€ ์•ฝ 3% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณด๋‹ค 7ยฐ์ž‘์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์ž…ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์†์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ์ถ•์†Œ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰(Qa)์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์†(Vp)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Qp)์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜(Case 5 & 6)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(ฯ„p)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2) ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 4 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” Table 5์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทmax)๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 2% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ถ€๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜(Case 1)์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทref)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 58%๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(Fig. 5 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์–ด ์ง„๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ฮทmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation
in terms of Vp
Evaluation
in terms of ฯ„p
1
(Qa = 0)
9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)
8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)
6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)
6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)
4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)
4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด(ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ)์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์กฐํ•ฉ(Case 7 ~ Case 10)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 7์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ท ๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ด๊ณ , Case 8์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Case 9๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ ๊ทœ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) ์œ ์†์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 6 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 7 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Qa>Qe)์—์„œ Section 2์— ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 10)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์€ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ (Fig. 8 ์ฐธ์กฐ), ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 9 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 6์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp
8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp
8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp
6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp
6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ณ ์ •์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 10Fig. 11 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 7์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 12 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp
3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp
5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp
6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp
6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ง€ํ˜•์€ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์•„์ง€๊ณ , ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)๊ณผ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์— ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ท ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 7) ๋ฐ ํŽธ์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 8 & Case 9)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†, ์ตœ๋Œ€์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 42%, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 58%๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 1)์—์„œ 3.63 m/s, ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 2)์—์„œ 4.53 m/s๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๋„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.09 kN/m2 ๋ฐ 0.26 kN/m2๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ์น˜์ˆ˜์ฆ๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ ์™„๊ณต๋œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋„์ถœ์— ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ , ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Acknowledgements

๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ K-water์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ทœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํšจ์œจ์  ์—ฐ๊ณ„์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋งˆ๋ จ(2021-WR-GP-76-149)์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.

2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.

3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.

4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.

5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.

6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548.ย 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.

9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.

10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593

11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279

12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.

15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.

16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE.ย 10.1061/9780784408230

17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and Gonzรกlez-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13.ย 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 ๊ฑด์„ค๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ยทํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2004). ๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ฆ๋Œ€๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

2 ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ…๋‹จ (2003). ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ… ๋ฐฑ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค.

3 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2016). ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

4 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2019). ํ•˜์ฒœ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€ํ•ด์„ค. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.

5 ๊น€๋Œ€๊ทผ, ๋ฐ•์„ ์ค‘, ์ด์˜์‹, ํ™ฉ์ข…ํ›ˆ (2008). ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ – ์•ˆ๋™๋‹ค๋ชฉ์ ๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1604-1608.

6 ๊น€์ƒํ˜ธ, ๊น€์ง€์„ฑ (2013). ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ ์ƒํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„. ๋Œ€ํ•œํ† ๋ชฉํ•™ํšŒ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ง‘. 33(2): 537-548.ย 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

7 ๊น€์ฃผ์„ฑ (2007). ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜ ๋น„๊ต ๊ณ ์ฐฐ. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

8 ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ (2009). ๋‚™๋™๊ฐ•์ˆ˜๊ณ„ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(๋ณ€๊ฒฝ). ๋ถ€์‚ฐ: ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ.

9 ์ „ํƒœ๋ช…, ๊น€ํ˜•์ผ, ๋ฐ•ํ˜•์„ญ, ๋ฐฑ์šด์ผ (2006). ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„-์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1726-1731.

10 ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2021). ๋Œ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ทœ์ •. ๋Œ€์ „: ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ.

Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation

Understanding dry-out mechanism in rod bundles of boiling water reactor

๋“๋Š” ๋ฌผ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋ด‰ ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์˜ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ์ดํ•ด

Liril D.SilviaDinesh K.ChandrakercSumanaGhoshaArup KDasb
aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
cReactor Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

Abstract

Present work reports numerical understanding of interfacial dynamics during co-flow of vapor and liquid phases of water inside a typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), consisting of a nuclear fuel rod bundle assembly of 7 pins in a circular array. Two representative spacings between rods in a circular array are used to carry out the simulation. In literature, flow boiling in a nuclear reactor is dealt with mechanistic models or averaged equations. Hence, in the present study using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) based multiphase model, a detailed numerical understanding of breaking and making in interfaces during flow boiling in BWR is targeted. Our work will portray near realistic vapor bubble and liquid flow dynamics in rod bundle scenario. Constant wall heat flux for fuel rod and uniform velocity of the liquid at the inlet patch is applied as a boundary condition. The saturation properties of water are taken at 30 bar pressure. Flow boiling stages involving bubble nucleation, growth, merging, local dry-out, rewetting with liquid patches, and complete dry-out are illustrated. The dry-out phenomenon with no liquid presence is numerically observed with phase fraction contours at various axial cut-sections. The quantification of the liquid phase fraction at different axial planes is plotted over time, emphasizing the progressive dry-out mechanism. A comparison of liquid-vapor distribution for inner and outer rods reveals that the inner rod’s dry-out occurs sooner than that of the outer rod. The heat transfer coefficient to identify the heat dissipation capacity of each case is also reported.

ํ˜„์žฌ ์ž‘์—…์€ ์›ํ˜• ๋ฐฐ์—ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” 7๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•€์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ํ•ต์—ฐ๋ฃŒ๋ด‰ ๋‹ค๋ฐœ ์–ด์…ˆ๋ธ”๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋“๋Š” ๋ฌผ ์›์ž๋กœ(BWR) ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด์ƒ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ณ„๋ฉด ์—ญํ•™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›ํ˜• ๋ฐฐ์—ด์˜ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ ์›์ž๋กœ์˜ ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„๋ก ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋˜๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ VOF(Volume of Fluid) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค์ƒ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” BWR์—์„œ ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ณ„๋ฉด์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ๋ฐ ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ž‘์—…์€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ ๋ฒˆ๋“ค ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ฆ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐํฌ ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„ ์—ญํ•™์„ ๋ฌ˜์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ๋ด‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๋ฒฝ ์—ด์œ ์†๊ณผ ์ž…๊ตฌ ํŒจ์น˜์—์„œ ์•ก์ฒด์˜ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์˜ ํฌํ™” ํŠน์„ฑ์€ 30bar ์••๋ ฅ์—์„œ ์ทจํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐํฌ ํ•ต ์ƒ์„ฑ, ์„ฑ์žฅ, ๋ณ‘ํ•ฉ, ๊ตญ์†Œ ๊ฑด์กฐ, ์•ก์ฒด ํŒจ์น˜๋กœ ์žฌ์Šต์œค ๋ฐ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ๋™ ๋น„๋“ฑ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์„ค๋ช…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ก์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฑด์กฐ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ถ• ๋‹จ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์œ„์ƒ ๋ถ„์œจ ์œค๊ณฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ถ• ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ ์•ก์ƒ ๋ถ„์œจ์˜ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋Š” ์ ์ง„์ ์ธ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์™€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์˜ ์•ก-์ฆ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€์˜ ๊ฑด์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ง‰๋Œ€๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์—ด ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋„ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; qห™ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 ร— (for a and b), 1.5 ร— (for c and d)
Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 ร— (for a and b), 1.5 ร— (for c and d)
Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (uยฏz); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.
Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (uยฏz); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.

References

[1] J. Wรผrtz, An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Annular Steam-Water Flow in Tubes and Annuli at 30 to 90 Bar, Risรธ National Laboratory,
Roskilde, 1978.
[2] W. Tian, A. Myint, Z. Li, S. Qiu, G.H. Su, D. Jia, Experimental study on dryout point in vertical narrow annulus under low flow conditions, in: International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 4689, 2004, pp. 643โ€“648. Jan
1Vol.
[3] K.M. Becker, C.H. Ling, S. Hedberg, G. Strand, An experimental investigation of
post dryout heat transfer, R. Inst. Technol. (1983).
[4] K.M. Becker, A Burnout Correlation for Flow of Boiling Water in Vertical Rod
Bundles, AB Atomenergi, 1967.
[5] Jr J.R. Barbosa, G.F. Hewitt, S.M. Richardson, High-speed visualisation of nucleate boiling in vertical annular flow, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46 (26) (2003)
5153โ€“5160 1, doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00255-2.
[6] Y. Mizutani, A. Tomiyama, S. Hosokawa, A. Sou, Y. Kudo, K. Mishima, Twophase flow patterns in a four by four rod bundle, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 (6)
(2007) 894โ€“901 1, doi:10.1080/18811248.2007.9711327.
[7] S.S. Paranjape, Two-Phase Flow Interfacial Structures in a Rod Bundle Geometry, Purdue University, 2009.
[8] D. Lavicka, J. Polansky, Model of the cooling of a nuclear reactor fuel rod, Multiph. Sci. Technol. 25 (2-4) (2013), doi:10.1615/MultScienTechn.v25.i2-4.90.
[9] M. Thurgood, J. Kelly, T. Guidotti, R. Kohrt, K. Crowell, Tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1983.
[10] S. Sugawara, Droplet deposition and entrainment modeling based on the
three-fluid model, Nucl. Eng. Des. 122 (1-3) (1990) 67โ€“84, doi:10.1016/
0029-5493(90)90197-6.
[11] C. Adamsson, J.M. Le Corre, Modeling and validation of a mechanistic tool
(MEFISTO) for the prediction of critical power in BWR fuel assemblies, Nucl.
Eng. Des. 241 (8) (2011) 2843โ€“2858, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.033.
[12] S. Talebi, H. Kazeminejad, A mathematical approach to predict dryout in a rod
bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 249 (2012) 348โ€“356, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.04.
016.
[13] H. Anglart, O. Nylund, N. Kurul, M.Z. Podowski, CFD prediction of flow and
phase distribution in fuel assemblies with spacers, Nucl. Eng. Des. 177 (1-3)
(1997) 215โ€“228, doi:10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00195-7.
[14] H. Li, H. Anglart, CFD model of diabatic annular two-phase flow using the
Eulerianโ€“Lagrangian approach, Ann. Nucl. Energy 77 (2015) 415โ€“424, doi:10.
1016/j.anucene.2014.12.002.
[15] G. Sorokin, A. Sorokin, Experimental and numerical investigation of liquid metal boiling in fuel subassemblies under natural circulation conditions, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47 (1-4) (2005) 656โ€“663, doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.
05.069.
[16] W.D. Pointer, A. Tentner, T. Sofu, D. Weber, S. Lo, A. Splawski, Eulerian
two-phase computational fluid dynamics for boiling water reactor core analysis, Joint International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computation and
Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M and Cยฑ SNA), 2007.
[17] K. Podila, Y. Rao, CFD modelling of supercritical water flow and heat transfer
in a 2 ร— 2 fuel rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 301 (2016) 279โ€“289, doi:10.1016/j.
nucengdes.2016.03.019.
[18] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, Numerical investigation of subcooled flow boiling in an annulus under the influence of eccentricity, Appl. Therm. Eng. 129 (2018) 1604โ€“1617, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.
2017.10.105.
[19] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, CFD modeling of
critical heat flux in flow boiling: validation and assessment of closure models,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 150 (2019) 651โ€“665, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.
030.
[20] W. Fan, H. Li, H. Anglart, A study of rewetting and conjugate heat transfer
influence on dryout and post-dryout phenomena with a multi-domain coupled CFD approach, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 163 (2020) 120503, doi:10.1016/j.
ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120503.
[21] R. Zhang, T. Cong, G. Su, J. Wang, S. Qiu, Investigation on the critical heat
flux in typical 5 by 5 rod bundle at conditions prototypical of PWR based
on CFD methodology, Appl. Therm. Eng. 179 (2020) 115582, doi:10.1016/j.
applthermaleng.2020.115582.

[22] L.D. Silvi, A. Saha, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, Numerical analysis of
pre-dryout sequences through the route of interfacial evolution in annular gasliquid two-phase flow with phase change, Chem. Eng. Sci. 212 (2020) 115356,
doi:10.1016/j.ces.2019.115356.
[23] L.D. Silvi, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, On-route to dryout through sequential interfacial dynamics in annular flow boiling around temperature and
heat flux controlled heater rod, Chem. Eng. Sci. 229 (2021) 116014, doi:10.1016/
j.ces.2020.116014.
[24] J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface
tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100 (2) (1992) 335โ€“354, doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)
90240-Y.
[25] B. Lafaurie, C. Nardone, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modelling merging
and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER, J. Comput. Phys. 113 (1)
(1994) 134โ€“147, doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1123.
[26] I. Tanasawa, Advances in condensation heat transfer, Ad. Heat Transf. 21 (1991)
55โ€“139 Vol, doi:10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70334-4.
[27] V.H. Del Valle, D.B. Kenning, Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transf. 28 (10) (1985) 1907โ€“1920, doi:10.1016/0017-9310(85)
90213-3.
[28] B. Matzner, G.M. Latter, Reduced pressure drop space for boiling water reactor
fuel bundles, US Patent US5375154A, (1993)
[29] C. Unal, O. Badr, K. Tuzla, J.C. Chen, S. Neti, Pressure drop at rod-bundle spacers
in the post-CHF dispersed flow regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20 (3) (1994)
515โ€“522, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(94)90025-6.
[30] D.K. Chandraker, A.K. Nayak, V.P. Krishnan, Effect of spacer on the dryout of
BWR fuel rod assemblies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 294 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.
2015.09.004.
[31] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, A comprehensive review of the spacer
effect on performance of nuclear fuel bundle using computational fluid dynamics methodology, Mater. Today: Proc. 4 (2017) 100030โ€“110034, doi:10.
1016/j.matpr.2017.06.315.
[32] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, Experimental investigation on the effect
of space on the turbulent mixing in vertical pressure tube-type boiling water
reactor, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 190 (2) (2018), doi:10.1080/00295639.2017.1413874.
[33] T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer characteristics of subcooled boiling in a single rod channel with/without spacer grid,
Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 20 (2020) 100644, doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100644.
[34] K.M. Becker, G. Hernborg, M. Bode, O. Eriksson, Burnout data for flow of boiling water in vertical round ducts, annuli and rod clusters, AB Atomenergi
(1965).
[35] A. Saha, A.K. Das, Numerical study of boiling around wires and influence of
active or passive neighbours on vapour film dynamics, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
130 (2019) 440โ€“454, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.117.
[36] M. Reimann, U. Grigull, Heat transfer with free convection and film boiling in
the critical area of water and carbon dioxide, Heat Mass Transf. 8 (1975) 229โ€“
239, doi:10.1007/BF01002151.
[37] M.S. Plesset, S.A. Zwick, The growth of vapor bubbles in superheated liquids, J.
Appl. Phys. 25 (4) (1954) 493โ€“500, doi:10.1063/1.1721668.
[38] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, Numerical simulation of superheated vapor bubble rising in stagnant liquid, Heat Mass Transf. 53 (9) (2017) 2885โ€“2899,
doi:10.1007/S00231-017-2031-6.
[39] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, The evaluation of the diffuse interface method
for phase change simulations using OpenFOAM, Heat Transf. Asian Res. 46 (8)
(2017) 1173โ€“1203, doi:10.1002/htj.21268.
[40] P. Goel, A.K. Nayak, M.K. Das, J.B. Joshi, Bubble departure characteristics in a
horizontal tube bundle under cross flow conditions, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 100
(2018) 143โ€“154, doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.12.013.
[41] K.M. Becker, J. Engstorm, B.Scholin Nylund, B. Sodequist, Analysis of the dryout
incident in the Oskarshamn 2 boiling water reactor, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 16 (6)
(1990) 959โ€“974, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(90)90101-N.
[42] H.G. Weller, A New Approach to VOF-Based Interface Capturing Methods
for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, A New Approach to VOF-Based
Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, 4,
OpenCFD Ltd., 2008 Report TR/HGW.
[43] G. Boeing, Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, fractals, selfsimilarity and the limits of prediction, Systems 4 (4) (2016) 37, doi:10.3390/
systems4040037.

Figure 3.10: Snapshots of Temperature Profile for Single Track in Keyhole Regime (P = 250W and V = 0.5m/s) at the Preheating Temperature of 100 ยฐC

Multiscale Process Modeling of Residual Deformation and Defect Formation for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

Qian Chen, PhD
University of Pittsburgh, 2021

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ํ“จ์ „(L-PBF) ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ(AM)๋Š” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์  ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฌผ ๋ชจ์–‘์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋นŒ๋“œ ์‹คํŒจ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์›์น˜ ์•Š๋Š” ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์™œ๊ณก์ด L-PBF์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ ์šฉ์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

L-PBF์˜ ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. L-PBF์˜ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ์œ  ๋ณ€ํ˜• โ€‹โ€‹๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ์ถฉ์‹ค๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๋‹ค์ธต ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ถ”์ถœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ท ์ผํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋ฐฉ์„ฑ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์€ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์™œ๊ณก ๋ฐ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ค€ ์ •์  ํ‰ํ˜• ์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ๋ถ„์„(FEA)์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์–ด๋ณ„๋กœ L-PBF ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์— ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ์‘๋ ฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜, ์˜ˆ์—ด ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์ŠคํŒจํ„ฐ๋ง ์ž…์ž์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋ณ€๋™ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”์ธ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์™œ๊ณก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํฐ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ํŒŒ์†์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ์† ๋ฐ ์•„์ผ๋žœ๋“œ ์Šค์บ๋‹ ์ „๋žต์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์šธ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš์ด ๊ณต์‹ํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ๊ณต์‹ํ™”๋œ ์ปดํ”Œ๋ผ์ด์–ธ์Šค ๋ฐ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ „์ฒด ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์€ AconityONE L-PBF ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ํ•™์Šต์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ L-PBF์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ์—ด ์ด๋ ฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์—ด ์ด๋ ฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์œ„ํ•ด CNN(Convolutional Neural Network)๊ณผ RNN(Recurrent Neural Network)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆœ์ฐจ์  ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ 100๋ฐฐ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์†๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์ด ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์‹ค์ œ ์ œ์ž‘ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น ๋ฅธ ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์˜จ๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) is capable of producing complex parts near net shape with good mechanical properties. However, undesired residual stress and distortion that lead to build failure and defects such as porosity are preventing broader applications of L-PBF. To realize the full potential of L-PBF, a multiscale modeling methodology is developed to predict residual deformation, melt pool, and porosity formation. To predict the residual deformation and stress in L-PBF at part-scale, a multiscale process modeling framework based on inherent strain method is proposed.

Inherent strain vectors are extracted from detailed multi-layer process simulation with high fidelity at micro-scale. Uniform but anisotropic strains are then applied to L-PBF part in a layer-by-layer fashion in a quasi-static equilibrium finite element analysis (FEA) to predict residual distortion and stress. Besides residual distortion and stress prediction at part scale, multiphysics modeling at powder scale is performed to study the melt pool variation and defect formation induced by process parameters, preheating temperature and spattering particles. Melt pool dynamics and porosity formation mechanisms associated with these factors are revealed through simulation and experiments.

Based on the proposed part-scale residual stress and distortion model, path planning method is developed to tailor the laser scanning path for a given geometry to prevent large residual deformation and building failures. Gradient based path planning for continuous and island scanning strategy is formulated and full sensitivity analysis for the formulated compliance- and stress-minimization problem is performed.

The feasibility and effectiveness of this proposed path planning method is demonstrated experimentally using the AconityONE L-PBF system. In addition, a data-driven framework utilizing machine learning is developed to predict the thermal history at part-scale for L-PBF.

In this work, a sequential machine learning model including convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN), long shortterm memory unit, is proposed for real-time thermal history prediction. A 100x prediction speed improvement is achieved compared to the finite element analysis which makes the prediction faster than real fabrication process and real-time temperature profile available.

Figure 1.1: Schematic Overview of Metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process [2]
Figure 1.1: Schematic Overview of Metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process [2]
Figure 1.2: Commercial Powder Bed Fusion Systems
Figure 1.2: Commercial Powder Bed Fusion Systems
Figure 1.3: Commercial Metal Components Fabricated by Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: (a) GE Fuel Nozzle; (b) Stryker Hip Biomedical Implant.
Figure 1.3: Commercial Metal Components Fabricated by Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: (a) GE Fuel Nozzle; (b) Stryker Hip Biomedical Implant.
Figure 2.1: Proposed Multiscale Process Simulation Framework
Figure 2.1: Proposed Multiscale Process Simulation Framework
Figure 2.2: (a) Experimental Setup for In-situ Thermocouple Measurement in the EOS M290 Build Chamber; (b) Themocouple Locations on the Bottom Side of the Substrate.
Figure 2.2: (a) Experimental Setup for In-situ Thermocouple Measurement in the EOS M290 Build Chamber; (b) Themocouple Locations on the Bottom Side of the Substrate.
Figure 2.3: (a) Finite Element Model for Single Layer Thermal Analysis; (b) Deposition Layer
Figure 2.3: (a) Finite Element Model for Single Layer Thermal Analysis; (b) Deposition Layer
Figure 2.4: Core-skin layer: (a) Surface Morphology; (b) Scanning Strategy; (c) Transient Temperature Distribution and Temperature History at (d) Point 1; (e) Point 2 and (f) Point 3
Figure 2.4: Core-skin layer: (a) Surface Morphology; (b) Scanning Strategy; (c) Transient Temperature Distribution and Temperature History at (d) Point 1; (e) Point 2 and (f) Point 3
Figure 2.5: (a) Scanning Orientation of Each Layer; (b) Finite Element Model for Micro-scale Representative Volume
Figure 2.5: (a) Scanning Orientation of Each Layer; (b) Finite Element Model for Micro-scale Representative Volume
Figure 2.6: Bottom Layer (a) Thermal History; (b) Plastic Strain and (c) Elastic Strain Evolution History
Figure 2.6: Bottom Layer (a) Thermal History; (b) Plastic Strain and (c) Elastic Strain Evolution History
Figure 2.7: Bottom Layer Inherent Strain under Default Process Parameters along Horizontal Scanning Path
Figure 2.7: Bottom Layer Inherent Strain under Default Process Parameters along Horizontal Scanning Path
Figure 2.8: Snapshots of the Element Activation Process
Figure 2.8: Snapshots of the Element Activation Process
Figure 2.9: Double Cantilever Beam Structure Built by the EOS M290 DMLM Process (a) Before and (b) After Cutting off; (c) Faro Laser ScanArm V3 for Distortion Measurement
Figure 2.9: Double Cantilever Beam Structure Built by the EOS M290 DMLM Process (a) Before and (b) After Cutting off; (c) Faro Laser ScanArm V3 for Distortion Measurement
Figure 2.10: Square Canonical Structure Built by the EOS M290 DMLM Process
Figure 2.10: Square Canonical Structure Built by the EOS M290 DMLM Process
Figure 2.11: Finite Element Mesh for the Square Canonical and Snapshots of Element Activation Process
Figure 2.11: Finite Element Mesh for the Square Canonical and Snapshots of Element Activation Process
Figure 2.12: Simulated Distortion Field for the Double Cantilever Beam before Cutting off the Supports: (a) Inherent Strain Method; (b) Simufact Additive 3.1
Figure 2.12: Simulated Distortion Field for the Double Cantilever Beam before Cutting off the Supports: (a) Inherent Strain Method; (b) Simufact Additive 3.1
Figure 3.10: Snapshots of Temperature Profile for Single Track in Keyhole Regime (P = 250W and V = 0.5m/s) at the Preheating Temperature of 100 ยฐC
Figure 3.10: Snapshots of Temperature Profile for Single Track in Keyhole Regime (P = 250W and V = 0.5m/s) at the Preheating Temperature of 100 ยฐC
s) at the Preheating Temperature of 500 ยฐC
s) at the Preheating Temperature of 500 ยฐC
Figure 3.15: Melt Pool Cross Section Comparison Between Simulation and Experiment for Single Track
Figure 3.15: Melt Pool Cross Section Comparison Between Simulation and Experiment for Single Track

Bibliography

[1] I. Astm, ASTM52900-15 Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturingโ€”General
Principlesโ€”Terminology, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 3(4) (2015) 5.
[2] W.E. King, A.T. Anderson, R.M. Ferencz, N.E. Hodge, C. Kamath, S.A. Khairallah, A.M.
Rubenchik, Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational,
and materials challenges, Applied Physics Reviews 2(4) (2015) 041304.
[3] W. Yan, Y. Lu, K. Jones, Z. Yang, J. Fox, P. Witherell, G. Wagner, W.K. Liu, Data-driven
characterization of thermal models for powder-bed-fusion additive manufacturing, Additive
Manufacturing (2020) 101503.
[4] K. Dai, L. Shaw, Thermal and stress modeling of multi-material laser processing, Acta
Materialia 49(20) (2001) 4171-4181.
[5] K. Dai, L. Shaw, Distortion minimization of laser-processed components through control of
laser scanning patterns, Rapid Prototyping Journal 8(5) (2002) 270-276.
[6] S.S. Bo Cheng, Kevin Chou, Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in
selective laser melting, Additive Manufacturing (2017).
[7] C. Fu, Y. Guo, Three-dimensional temperature gradient mechanism in selective laser melting
of Ti-6Al-4V, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 136(6) (2014) 061004.
[8] P. Prabhakar, W.J. Sames, R. Dehoff, S.S. Babu, Computational modeling of residual stress
formation during the electron beam melting process for Inconel 718, Additive Manufacturing 7
(2015) 83-91.
[9] A. Hussein, L. Hao, C. Yan, R. Everson, Finite element simulation of the temperature and
stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting, Materials & Design
(1980-2015) 52 (2013) 638-647.
[10] P.Z. Qingcheng Yang, Lin Cheng, Zheng Min, Minking Chyu, Albert C. To, articleFinite
element modeling and validation of thermomechanicalbehavior of Ti-6Al-4V in directed energy
deposition additivemanufacturing, Additive Manufacturing (2016).
[11] E.R. Denlinger, J. Irwin, P. Michaleris, Thermomechanical Modeling of Additive
Manufacturing Large Parts, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 136(6) (2014)
061007.
[12] E.R. Denlinger, M. Gouge, J. Irwin, P. Michaleris, Thermomechanical model development
and in situ experimental validation of the Laser Powder-Bed Fusion process, Additive
Manufacturing 16 (2017) 73-80.
[13] V.J. Erik R Denlinger, G.V. Srinivasan, Tahany EI-Wardany, Pan Michaleris, Thermal
modeling of Inconel 718 processed with powder bed fusionand experimental validation using in
situ measurements, Additive Manufacturing 11 (2016) 7-15.
[14] N. Patil, D. Pal, H.K. Rafi, K. Zeng, A. Moreland, A. Hicks, D. Beeler, B. Stucker, A
Generalized Feed Forward Dynamic Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Derefinement Finite Element
Framework for Metal Laser Sinteringโ€”Part I: Formulation and Algorithm Development, Journal
of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 137(4) (2015) 041001.
[15] D. Pal, N. Patil, K.H. Kutty, K. Zeng, A. Moreland, A. Hicks, D. Beeler, B. Stucker, A
Generalized Feed-Forward Dynamic Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Derefinement FiniteElement Framework for Metal Laser Sinteringโ€”Part II: Nonlinear Thermal Simulations and
Validations, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 138(6) (2016) 061003.
[16] N. Keller, V. Ploshikhin, New method for fast predictions of residual stress and distortion of
AM parts, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, 2014, pp. 1229-1237.
[17] S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, W.E. King, Laser powder-bed fusion additive
manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and
denudation zones, Acta Materialia 108 (2016) 36-45.
[18] M.J. Matthews, G. Guss, S.A. Khairallah, A.M. Rubenchik, P.J. Depond, W.E. King,
Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes, Acta Materialia 114
(2016) 33-42.
[19] A.A. Martin, N.P. Calta, S.A. Khairallah, J. Wang, P.J. Depond, A.Y. Fong, V. Thampy, G.M.
Guss, A.M. Kiss, K.H. Stone, Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive
manufacturing, Nature communications 10(1) (2019) 1987.
[20] R. Shi, S.A. Khairallah, T.T. Roehling, T.W. Heo, J.T. McKeown, M.J. Matthews,
Microstructural control in metal laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using laser beam
shaping strategy, Acta Materialia (2019).
[21] S.A. Khairallah, A.A. Martin, J.R. Lee, G. Guss, N.P. Calta, J.A. Hammons, M.H. Nielsen,
K. Chaput, E. Schwalbach, M.N. Shah, Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics
and defect generation in metal 3D printing, Science 368(6491) (2020) 660-665.
[22] W. Yan, W. Ge, Y. Qian, S. Lin, B. Zhou, W.K. Liu, F. Lin, G.J. Wagner, Multi-physics
modeling of single/multiple-track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting, Acta
Materialia 134 (2017) 324-333.
[23] S. Shrestha, Y. Kevin Chou, A Numerical Study on the Keyhole Formation During Laser
Powder Bed Fusion Process, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 141(10) (2019).
[24] S. Shrestha, B. Cheng, K. Chou, An Investigation into Melt Pool Effective Thermal
Conductivity for Thermal Modeling of Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing.
[25] D. Rosenthal, Mathematical theory of heat distribution during welding and cutting, Welding
journal 20 (1941) 220-234.
[26] P. Promoppatum, S.-C. Yao, P.C. Pistorius, A.D. Rollett, A comprehensive comparison of the
analytical and numerical prediction of the thermal history and solidification microstructure of
Inconel 718 products made by laser powder-bed fusion, Engineering 3(5) (2017) 685-694.
[27] M. Tang, P.C. Pistorius, J.L. Beuth, Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed
fusion, Additive Manufacturing 14 (2017) 39-48.
[28] T. Moran, P. Li, D. Warner, N. Phan, Utility of superposition-based finite element approach
for part-scale thermal simulation in additive manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 21 (2018)
215-219.
[29] Y. Yang, M. Knol, F. van Keulen, C. Ayas, A semi-analytical thermal modelling approach
for selective laser melting, Additive Manufacturing 21 (2018) 284-297.
[30] B. Cheng, S. Shrestha, K. Chou, Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy
effect in selective laser melting, Additive Manufacturing 12 (2016) 240-251.
[31] L.H. Ahmed Hussein, Chunze Yan, Richard Everson, Finite element simulation of the
temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting,
Materials and Design 52 (2013) 638-647.
[32] H. Peng, D.B. Go, R. Billo, S. Gong, M.R. Shankar, B.A. Gatrell, J. Budzinski, P. Ostiguy,
R. Attardo, C. Tomonto, Part-scale model for fast prediction of thermal distortion in DMLS
additive manufacturing; Part 2: a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model, Austin, Texas (2016).
[33] M.F. Zaeh, G. Branner, Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser
melting, Production Engineering 4(1) (2010) 35-45.
[34] C. Li, C. Fu, Y. Guo, F. Fang, A multiscale modeling approach for fast prediction of part
distortion in selective laser melting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 229 (2016) 703-
712.
[35] C. Li, Z. Liu, X. Fang, Y. Guo, On the Simulation Scalability of Predicting Residual Stress
and Distortion in Selective Laser Melting, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
140(4) (2018) 041013.
[36] S. Afazov, W.A. Denmark, B.L. Toralles, A. Holloway, A. Yaghi, Distortion Prediction and
Compensation in Selective Laser Melting, Additive Manufacturing 17 (2017) 15-22.
[37] Y. Lee, W. Zhang, Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of
nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing 12 (2016)
178-188.
[38] L. Scime, J. Beuth, A multi-scale convolutional neural network for autonomous anomaly
detection and classification in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process, Additive
Manufacturing 24 (2018) 273-286.
[39] L. Scime, J. Beuth, Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative
of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process, Additive
Manufacturing 25 (2019) 151-165.
[40] X. Xie, J. Bennett, S. Saha, Y. Lu, J. Cao, W.K. Liu, Z. Gan, Mechanistic data-driven
prediction of as-built mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing, npj Computational
Materials 7(1) (2021) 1-12.
[41] C. Wang, X. Tan, S. Tor, C. Lim, Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-theart and perspectives, Additive Manufacturing (2020) 101538.
[42] J. Li, R. Jin, Z.Y. Hang, Integration of physically-based and data-driven approaches for
thermal field prediction in additive manufacturing, Materials & Design 139 (2018) 473-485.
[43] M. Mozaffar, A. Paul, R. Al-Bahrani, S. Wolff, A. Choudhary, A. Agrawal, K. Ehmann, J.
Cao, Data-driven prediction of the high-dimensional thermal history in directed energy deposition
processes via recurrent neural networks, Manufacturing letters 18 (2018) 35-39.
[44] A. Paul, M. Mozaffar, Z. Yang, W.-k. Liao, A. Choudhary, J. Cao, A. Agrawal, A real-time
iterative machine learning approach for temperature profile prediction in additive manufacturing
processes, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA),
IEEE, 2019, pp. 541-550.
[45] S. Clijsters, T. Craeghs, J.-P. Kruth, A priori process parameter adjustment for SLM process
optimization, Innovative developments on virtual and physical prototyping, Taylor & Francis
Group., 2012, pp. 553-560.
[46] R. Mertens, S. Clijsters, K. Kempen, J.-P. Kruth, Optimization of scan strategies in selective
laser melting of aluminum parts with downfacing areas, Journal of Manufacturing Science and
Engineering 136(6) (2014) 061012.
[47] J.-P. Kruth, J. Deckers, E. Yasa, R. Wauthlรฉ, Assessing and comparing influencing factors of
residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method, Proceedings of the
institution of mechanical engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 226(6) (2012)
980-991.
[48] Y. Lu, S. Wu, Y. Gan, T. Huang, C. Yang, L. Junjie, J. Lin, Study on the microstructure,
mechanical property and residual stress of SLM Inconel-718 alloy manufactured by differing
island scanning strategy, Optics & Laser Technology 75 (2015) 197-206.
[49] E. Foroozmehr, R. Kovacevic, Effect of path planning on the laser powder deposition process:
thermal and structural evaluation, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology 51(5-8) (2010) 659-669.
[50] L.H. Ahmed Hussein, Chunze Yan, Richard Everson, Finite element simulation of the
temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting,
Materials and Design (2013).
[51] J.-P. Kruth, M. Badrossamay, E. Yasa, J. Deckers, L. Thijs, J. Van Humbeeck, Part and
material properties in selective laser melting of metals, Proceedings of the 16th international
symposium on electromachining, 2010, pp. 1-12.
[52] L. Thijs, K. Kempen, J.-P. Kruth, J. Van Humbeeck, Fine-structured aluminium products with
controllable texture by selective laser melting of pre-alloyed AlSi10Mg powder, Acta Materialia
61(5) (2013) 1809-1819.
[53] D. Ding, Z.S. Pan, D. Cuiuri, H. Li, A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive
manufacturing, The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 73(1-4) (2014)
173-183.
[54] B.E. Carroll, T.A. Palmer, A.M. Beese, Anisotropic tensile behavior of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V
components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing, Acta Materialia
87 (2015) 309-320.
[55] D. Ding, Z. Pan, D. Cuiuri, H. Li, A practical path planning methodology for wire and arc
additive manufacturing of thin-walled structures, Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing 34 (2015) 8-19.
[56] D. Ding, Z. Pan, D. Cuiuri, H. Li, S. van Duin, N. Larkin, Bead modelling and implementation
of adaptive MAT path in wire and arc additive manufacturing, Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing 39 (2016) 32-42.
[57] R. Ponche, O. Kerbrat, P. Mognol, J.-Y. Hascoet, A novel methodology of design for Additive
Manufacturing applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing process, Robotics and ComputerIntegrated Manufacturing 30(4) (2014) 389-398.
[58] D.E. Smith, R. Hoglund, Continuous fiber angle topology optimization for polymer fused
fillament fabrication, Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. Austin, TX, 2016.
[59] J. Liu, J. Liu, H. Yu, H. Yu, Concurrent deposition path planning and structural topology
optimization for additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping Journal 23(5) (2017) 930-942.
[60] Q. Xia, T. Shi, Optimization of composite structures with continuous spatial variation of fiber
angle through Shepard interpolation, Composite Structures 182 (2017) 273-282.
[61] C. Kiyono, E. Silva, J. Reddy, A novel fiber optimization method based on normal distribution
function with continuously varying fiber path, Composite Structures 160 (2017) 503-515.
[62] C.J. Brampton, K.C. Wu, H.A. Kim, New optimization method for steered fiber composites
using the level set method, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 52(3) (2015) 493-505.
[63] J. Liu, A.C. To, Deposition path planning-integrated structural topology optimization for 3D
additive manufacturing subject to self-support constraint, Computer-Aided Design 91 (2017) 27-
45.
[64] H. Shen, J. Fu, Z. Chen, Y. Fan, Generation of offset surface for tool path in NC machining
through level set methods, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
46(9-12) (2010) 1043-1047.
[65] C. Zhuang, Z. Xiong, H. Ding, High speed machining tool path generation for pockets using
level sets, International Journal of Production Research 48(19) (2010) 5749-5766.
[66] K.C. Mills, Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial
alloys, Woodhead Publishing2002.
[67] S.S. Sih, J.W. Barlow, The prediction of the emissivity and thermal conductivity of powder
beds, Particulate Science and Technology 22(4) (2004) 427-440.
[68] L. Dong, A. Makradi, S. Ahzi, Y. Remond, Three-dimensional transient finite element
analysis of the selective laser sintering process, Journal of materials processing technology 209(2)
(2009) 700-706.
[69] J.J. Beaman, J.W. Barlow, D.L. Bourell, R.H. Crawford, H.L. Marcus, K.P. McAlea, Solid
freeform fabrication: a new direction in manufacturing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell,
MA 2061 (1997) 25-49.
[70] G. Bugeda Miguel Cervera, G. Lombera, Numerical prediction of temperature and density
distributions in selective laser sintering processes, Rapid Prototyping Journal 5(1) (1999) 21-26.
[71] T. Mukherjee, W. Zhang, T. DebRoy, An improved prediction of residual stresses and
distortion in additive manufacturing, Computational Materials Science 126 (2017) 360-372.
[72] A.J. Dunbar, E.R. Denlinger, M.F. Gouge, P. Michaleris, Experimental validation of finite
element modeling for laser powderbed fusion deformation, Additive Manufacturing 12 (2016)
108-120.
[73] J. Goldak, A. Chakravarti, M. Bibby, A new finite element model for welding heat sources,
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 15(2) (1984) 299-305.
[74] J. Liu, Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, W. Xiong, A. To, Quantitative Texture Prediction of Epitaxial
Columnar Grains in Alloy 718 Processed by Additive Manufacturing, Proceedings of the 9th
International Symposium on Superalloy 718 & Derivatives: Energy, Aerospace, and Industrial
Applications, Springer, 2018, pp. 749-755.
[75] J. Irwin, P. Michaleris, A line heat input model for additive manufacturing, Journal of
Manufacturing Science and Engineering 138(11) (2016) 111004.
[76] M. Gouge, J. Heigel, P. Michaleris, T. Palmer, Modeling forced convection in the thermal
simulation of laser cladding processes, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology 79 (2015).
[77] J. Heigel, P. Michaleris, E. Reutzel, Thermo-mechanical model development and validation
of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Tiโ€“6Alโ€“4V, Additive manufacturing 5
(2015) 9-19.
[78] E.R. Denlinger, J.C. Heigel, P. Michaleris, Residual stress and distortion modeling of electron
beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,
Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 229(10) (2015) 1803-1813.
[79] X. Liang, Q. Chen, L. Cheng, Q. Yang, A. To, A modified inherent strain method for fast
prediction of residual deformation in additive manufacturing of metal parts, 2017 Solid Freeform
Fabrication Symposium Proceedings, Austin, Texas, 2017.
[80] X. Liang, L. Cheng, Q. Chen, Q. Yang, A. To, A Modified Method for Estimating Inherent
Strains from Detailed Process Simulation for Fast Residual Distortion Prediction of Single-Walled
Structures Fabricated by Directed Energy Deposition, Additive Manufacturing 23 (2018) 471-486.
[81] L. Sochalski-Kolbus, E.A. Payzant, P.A. Cornwell, T.R. Watkins, S.S. Babu, R.R. Dehoff,
M. Lorenz, O. Ovchinnikova, C. Duty, Comparison of residual stresses in Inconel 718 simple parts
made by electron beam melting and direct laser metal sintering, Metallurgical and Materials
Transactions A 46(3) (2015) 1419-1432.
[82] P. Mercelis, J.-P. Kruth, Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser
melting, Rapid Prototyping Journal 12(5) (2006) 254-265.
[83] N. Hodge, R. Ferencz, J. Solberg, Implementation of a thermomechanical model for the
simulation of selective laser melting, Computational Mechanics 54(1) (2014) 33-51.
[84] A.S. Wu, D.W. Brown, M. Kumar, G.F. Gallegos, W.E. King, An experimental investigation
into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316L stainless steel, Metallurgical and
Materials Transactions A 45(13) (2014) 6260-6270.
[85] C. Li, J. liu, Y. Guo, Efficient predictive model of part distortion and residual stress in
selective laser melting, Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016, 2017.
[86] Y. Zhao, Y. Koizumi, K. Aoyagi, D. Wei, K. Yamanaka, A. Chiba, Molten pool behavior and
effect of fluid flow on solidification conditions in selective electron beam melting (SEBM) of a
biomedical Co-Cr-Mo alloy, Additive Manufacturing 26 (2019) 202-214.
[87] J.-H. Cho, S.-J. Na, Implementation of real-time multiple reflection and Fresnel absorption of
laser beam in keyhole, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 39(24) (2006) 5372.
[88] Q. Guo, C. Zhao, M. Qu, L. Xiong, L.I. Escano, S.M.H. Hojjatzadeh, N.D. Parab, K. Fezzaa,
W. Everhart, T. Sun, In-situ characterization and quantification of melt pool variation under
constant input energy density in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing process, Additive
Manufacturing (2019).
[89] E. Assuncao, S. Williams, D. Yapp, Interaction time and beam diameter effects on the
conduction mode limit, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 50(6) (2012) 823-828.
[90] R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, C. Kantzos, J. Pauza, K. Fezzaa, T. Sun, A.D. Rollett,
Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging,
Science 363(6429) (2019) 849-852.
[91] W. Tan, N.S. Bailey, Y.C. Shin, Investigation of keyhole plume and molten pool based on a
three-dimensional dynamic model with sharp interface formulation, Journal of Physics D: Applied
Physics 46(5) (2013) 055501.
[92] W. Tan, Y.C. Shin, Analysis of multi-phase interaction and its effects on keyhole dynamics
with a multi-physics numerical model, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 47(34) (2014)
345501.
[93] R. Fabbro, K. Chouf, Keyhole modeling during laser welding, Journal of applied Physics
87(9) (2000) 4075-4083.
[94] Q. Guo, C. Zhao, M. Qu, L. Xiong, S.M.H. Hojjatzadeh, L.I. Escano, N.D. Parab, K. Fezzaa,
T. Sun, L. Chen, In-situ full-field mapping of melt flow dynamics in laser metal additive
manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing 31 (2020) 100939.
[95] Y. Ueda, K. Fukuda, K. Nakacho, S. Endo, A new measuring method of residual stresses with
the aid of finite element method and reliability of estimated values, Journal of the Society of Naval
Architects of Japan 1975(138) (1975) 499-507.
[96] M.R. Hill, D.V. Nelson, The inherent strain method for residual stress determination and its
application to a long welded joint, ASME-PUBLICATIONS-PVP 318 (1995) 343-352.
[97] H. Murakawa, Y. Luo, Y. Ueda, Prediction of welding deformation and residual stress by
elastic FEM based on inherent strain, Journal of the society of Naval Architects of Japan 1996(180)
(1996) 739-751.
[98] M. Yuan, Y. Ueda, Prediction of residual stresses in welded T-and I-joints using inherent
strains, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME 118(2)
(1996) 229-234.
[99] L. Zhang, P. Michaleris, P. Marugabandhu, Evaluation of applied plastic strain methods for
welding distortion prediction, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 129(6) (2007)
1000-1010.
[100] M. Bugatti, Q. Semeraro, Limitations of the Inherent Strain Method in Simulating Powder
Bed Fusion Processes, Additive Manufacturing 23 (2018) 329-346.
[101] L. Cheng, X. Liang, J. Bai, Q. Chen, J. Lemon, A. To, On Utilizing Topology Optimization
to Design Support Structure to Prevent Residual Stress Induced Build Failure in Laser Powder Bed
Metal Additive Manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing (2019).
[102] Q. Chen, X. Liang, D. Hayduke, J. Liu, L. Cheng, J. Oskin, R. Whitmore, A.C. To, An
inherent strain based multiscale modeling framework for simulating part-scale residual
deformation for direct metal laser sintering, Additive Manufacturing 28 (2019) 406-418.
[103] S. Osher, J.A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based
on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations, Journal of computational physics 79(1) (1988) 12-49.
[104] M.Y. Wang, X. Wang, D. Guo, A level set method for structural topology optimization,
Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 192(1) (2003) 227-246.
[105] G. Allaire, F. Jouve, A.-M. Toader, Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a
level-set method, Journal of computational physics 194(1) (2004) 363-393.
[106] Y. Wang, Z. Luo, Z. Kang, N. Zhang, A multi-material level set-based topology and shape
optimization method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 283 (2015)
1570-1586.
[107] P. Dunning, C. Brampton, H. Kim, Simultaneous optimisation of structural topology and
material grading using level set method, Materials Science and Technology 31(8) (2015) 884-894.
[108] P. Liu, Y. Luo, Z. Kang, Multi-material topology optimization considering interface
behavior via XFEM and level set method, Computer methods in applied mechanics and
engineering 308 (2016) 113-133.
[109] J. Liu, Q. Chen, Y. Zheng, R. Ahmad, J. Tang, Y. Ma, Level set-based heterogeneous object
modeling and optimization, Computer-Aided Design (2019).
[110] J. Liu, Q. Chen, X. Liang, A.C. To, Manufacturing cost constrained topology optimization
for additive manufacturing, Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering 14(2) (2019) 213-221.
[111] Z. Kang, Y. Wang, Integrated topology optimization with embedded movable holes based
on combined description by material density and level sets, Computer methods in applied
mechanics and engineering 255 (2013) 1-13.
[112] P.D. Dunning, H. Alicia Kim, A new hole insertion method for level set based structural
topology optimization, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 93(1) (2013)
118-134.
[113] J.A. Sethian, A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(4) (1996) 1591-1595.
[114] J.A. Sethian, Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in
computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science, Cambridge
university press1999.
[115] C. Le, J. Norato, T. Bruns, C. Ha, D. Tortorelli, Stress-based topology optimization for
continua, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 41(4) (2010) 605-620.
[116] A. Takezawa, G.H. Yoon, S.H. Jeong, M. Kobashi, M. Kitamura, Structural topology
optimization with strength and heat conduction constraints, Computer Methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering 276 (2014) 341-361.
[117] S. Hochreiter, J. Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory, Neural computation 9(8) (1997)
1735-1780.
[118] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional
neural networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012) 1097-1105.
[119] K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image
recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[120] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, Proceedings
of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770-778.
[121] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A.
Khosla, M. Bernstein, Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge, International journal of
computer vision 115(3) (2015) 211-252.
[122] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, J. Sun, Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with
region proposal networks, Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015) 91-99.
[123] E.J. Schwalbach, S.P. Donegan, M.G. Chapman, K.J. Chaput, M.A. Groeber, A discrete
source model of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing thermal history, Additive
Manufacturing 25 (2019) 485-498.
[124] D.G. Duffy, Green’s functions with applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC2015.
[125] J. Martรญnez-Frutos, D. Herrero-Pรฉrez, Efficient matrix-free GPU implementation of fixed
grid finite element analysis, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 104 (2015) 61-71.
[126] F. Dugast, P. Apostolou, A. Fernandez, W. Dong, Q. Chen, S. Strayer, R. Wicker, A.C. To,
Part-scale thermal process modeling for laser powder bed fusion with matrix-free method and GPU
computing, Additive Manufacturing 37 (2021) 101732.
[127] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, ล. Kaiser, I.
Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017,
pp. 5998-6008.
[128] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional
transformers for language understanding, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).

Figure 15. Localized deformations on revetment due to run-down and sliding of armor from body laboratory model (left) and numerical modeling (right).

์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ•ด์•ˆ ๋ณดํ˜ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ์„œ ๊ตด์ ˆ์‹ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋งคํŠธ๋ฆฌ์Šค์˜ ์†์ƒ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

Numerical Modeling of Failure Mechanisms in Articulated Concrete Block Mattress as a Sustainable Coastal Protection Structure

Author

Ramin Safari Ghaleh(Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran)

Omid Aminoroayaie Yamini(Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran)

S. Hooman Mousavi(Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran)

Mohammad Reza Kavianpour(Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran)

Abstract

ํ•ด์•ˆ์„  ๋ณดํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์šฐ์„  ์ˆœ์œ„๋กœ ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด์•ˆ ์ง€์—ญ์€ ์„ํšŒ์•”๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„์ž์—ฐ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ง€์† ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๋ณดํ˜ธ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์‹œ๊ณต ์†๋„์™€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์นœํ™”์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฐ ๋ณด๊ฐ•์žฌ์˜ ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก์„ ACB ๋งคํŠธ(Articulated Concrete Block Mattress)๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ ๋˜๋Š” ํ•ด์•ˆ์„  ๋ณดํ˜ธ์˜ ๋‘‘์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํ•ด์•ˆ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์™€ ์žฅ์• ๋ฌผ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ๋„์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์—์„œ์˜ ํŒŒ๋„ ์ „ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ ,ย VOF๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” Flow-3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ดย ACB Mat์˜ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ํŒŒ๊ดดํŒŒ๋™, ์˜น๋ฒฝ์˜ ํ”๋“ค๋ฆผ, ํŒŒ์†์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ธ์–‘๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์žฅ๊ฐ‘์˜ ๋ณ€์œ„ ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์น˜ Flow-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์—ฐ์•ˆ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ์žฅ๊ฐ‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ๋™์˜ ์ƒ์Šน ๊ฐ’์€ ํŒŒ๋‹จ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜( 0.5 < ฮพ m – 1 , 0 < 3.3 )๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€(R u 2 % H m 0 = 1.6) ) ์ตœ๋Œ€๊ฐ’์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ฐจ๋‹จํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ํŒŒ๊ดดํŒŒ(ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 > 3.3 ) ์œ ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ•๊ดดํŒŒ/ํ•ด์ผํŒŒ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋ธ”๋ก ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€ํŒŒ ์ƒ์Šน ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์ ์ฐจ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํŒŒ๋™(0.5 < ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 < 3.3 )์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฐจ๋‹จ๊ธฐ ์ง€์ˆ˜(ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜)๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋ฉด ์ƒ๋Œ€ํŒŒ ๋Ÿฐ๋‹ค์šด์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฐ’์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ฒœ์ด์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒŒ๋‹จํŒŒ๋™์ด ์‡„๋„ํŒŒ์—์„œ ๋ถ•๊ดด/์„œ์ง•์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”( 3.3 < ฮพ m – 1 , 0 < 5.0 )์—์„œ ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ๋Ÿฐ๋‹ค์šด ๊ณผ์ •์ด ๋” ์ ์€ ๊ฐ•๋„๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Shoreline protection remains a global priority. Typically, coastal areas are protected by armoring them with hard, non-native, and non-sustainable materials such as limestone. To increase the execution speed and environmental friendliness and reduce the weight of individual concrete blocks and reinforcements, concrete blocks can be designed and implemented as Articulated Concrete Block Mattress (ACB Mat). These structures act as an integral part and can be used as a revetment on the breakwater body or shoreline protection. Physical models are one of the key tools for estimating and investigating the phenomena in coastal structures. However, it does have limitations and obstacles; consequently, in this study, numerical modeling of waves on these structures has been utilized to simulate wave propagation on the breakwater, via Flow-3D software with VOF. Among the factors affecting the instability of ACB Mat are breaking waves as well as the shaking of the revetment and the displacement of the armor due to the uplift force resulting from the failure. The most important purpose of the present study is to investigate the ability of numerical Flow-3D model to simulate hydrodynamic parameters in coastal revetment. The run-up values of the waves on the concrete block armoring will multiply with increasing break parameter ( 0.5 < ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 < 3.3 ) due to the existence of plunging waves until it ( R u 2 % H m 0 = 1.6 ) reaches maximum. Hence, by increasing the breaker parameter and changing breaking waves ( ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 > 3.3 ) type to collapsing waves/surging waves, the trend of relative wave run-up changes on concrete block revetment increases gradually. By increasing the breaker index (surf similarity parameter) in the case of plunging waves ( 0.5 < ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 < 3.3 ), the low values on the relative wave run-down are greatly reduced. Additionally, in the transition region, the change of breaking waves from plunging waves to collapsing/surging ( 3.3 < ฮพ m โˆ’ 1 , 0 < 5.0 ), the relative run-down process occurs with less intensity.

Figure 1.  Armor  geometric  characteristics  and  drawing  three-dimensional  geometry  of  a  breakwater section  in SolidWorks software.
Figure 1. Armor geometric characteristics and drawing three-dimensional geometry of a breakwater section in SolidWorks software.
Figure  5.  Wave  overtopping on  concrete block  mattress in (a)  laboratory  and (b)  numerical  model.
Figure 5. Wave overtopping on concrete block mattress in (a) laboratory and (b) numerical model.
Figure  7.  Mesh  block  for  calibrated  numerical  model  with  686,625  cells  and  utilization  of  FAVOR  tab to assess ๏ฌgure geometry.
Figure 7. Mesh block for calibrated numerical model with 686,625 cells and utilization of FAVOR tab to assess ๏ฌgure geometry.
Figure  10.  How to place different layers  (core, ๏ฌlter,  and revetment)  of the structure on slope.
Figure 10. How to place different layers (core, ๏ฌlter, and revetment) of the structure on slope.

Suggested Citation

Figure 11. Wave run-up on ACB Mat blocks in (a) laboratory model and (b) numerical modeling.
Figure 11. Wave run-up on ACB Mat blocks in (a) laboratory model and (b) numerical modeling.
Figure  15.  Localized  deformations  on  revetment  due  to  run-down  and  sliding  of  armor  from  body  laboratory  model  (left) and  numerical  modeling (right).
Figure 15. Localized deformations on revetment due to run-down and sliding of armor from body laboratory model (left) and numerical modeling (right).

References

  1. Capobianco, V.; Robinson, K.; Kalsnes, B.; Ekeheien, C.; Hรธydal, ร˜. Hydro-Mechanical Effects of Several Riparian Vegetation Combinations on the Streambank Stabilityโ€”A Benchmark Case in Southeastern Norway. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4046. [CrossRef]
  2. MarCom Working Group 113. PIANC Report No 113: The Application of Geosynthetics in Waterfront Areas; PIANC: Brussels, Belgium, 2011; p. 113, ISBN 978-2-87223-188-1.
  3. Hunt, W.F.; Collins, K.A.; Hathaway, J.M. Hydrologic and Water Quality Evaluation of Four Permeable Pavements in North Carolina, USA. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 18โ€“21 October 2009.
  4. Kirkpatrick, R.; Campbell, R.; Smyth, J.; Murtagh, J.; Knapton, J. Improvement of Water Quality by Coarse Graded Aggregates in Permeable Pavements. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 18โ€“21 October 2009.
  5. Chinowsky, P.; Helman, J. Protecting Infrastructure and Public Buildings against Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10538. [CrossRef]
  6. Breteler, M.K.; Pilarczyk, K.W.; Stoutjesdijk, T. Design of alternative revetments. Coast. Eng. 1998 1999, 1587โ€“1600. [CrossRef]
  7. Pilarczyk, K.W. Design of Revetments; Dutch Public Works Department (Rws), Hydraulic Engineering Division: Delft, The Netherlands, 2003.
  8. Hughes, S.A. Combined Wave and Surge Overtopping of Levees: Flow Hydrodynamics and Articulated Concrete Mat Stability; Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg Ms Coastal and Hydraulics Lab: Vicksburg, MS, USA, 2008.
  9. Gier, F.; Schรผttrumpf, H.; Mรถnnich, J.; Van Der Meer, J.; Kudella, M.; Rubin, H. Stability of Interlocked Pattern Placed Block Revetments. Coast. Eng. Proc. 2012, 1, Structures-46. [CrossRef]
  10. Naja๏ฌ, J.A.; Monshizadeh, M. Laboratory Investigations on Wave Run-up and Transmission over Breakwaters Covered by Antifer Units; Scientia Iranica: Tehran, Iran, 2010.
  11. Oumeraci, H.; Staal, T.; Pfรถrtner, S.; Ludwigs, G.; Kudella, M. Hydraulic Performance, Wave Loading and Response of Elastocoast Revetments and their Foundationโ€”A Large Scale Model Study; LeichtweiรŸ Institut fรผr Wasserbau: Braunschweig, Germany, 2010.
  12. Tripathy, S.K. Signi๏ฌcance of Traditional and Advanced Morphometry to Fishery Science. J. Hum. Earth Future 2020, 1, 153โ€“166. [CrossRef]
  13. Nut, N.; Mihara, M.; Jeong, J.; Ngo, B.; Sigua, G.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Reyes, M.R. Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Its Impact on Soil Erosion in Stung Sangkae Catchment of Cambodia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9276. [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, C.; Pu, L.; Kong, F.; Li, B. Spatio-Temporal Change of Land Use in a Coastal Reclamation Area: A Complex Network Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8690. [CrossRef]
  15. Mousavi, S.; Kavianpour, H.M.R.; Yamini, O.A. Experimental analysis of breakwater stability with antifer concrete block. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2017, 35, 426โ€“434. [CrossRef]
  16. Yamini, O.; Aminoroayaie, S.; Mousavi, H.; Kavianpour, M.R. Experimental Investigation of Using Geo-Textile Filter Layer In Articulated Concrete Block Mattress Revetment On Coastal Embankment. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2019, 5, 119โ€“133. [CrossRef]
  17. Ghasemi, A.; Far, M.S.; Panahi, R. Numerical Simulation of Wave Overtopping From Armour Breakwater by Considering Porous Effect. J. Mar. Eng. 2015, 11, 51โ€“60. Available online: http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17357608.1394.11.22.8.4 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  18. Nourani, O.; Askar, M.B. Comparison of the Effect of Tetrapod Block and Armor X block on Reducing Wave Overtopping in Breakwaters. Open J. Mar. Sci. 2017, 7, 472โ€“484. [CrossRef]
  19. Aminoroaya, A.O.; Kavianpour, M.R.; Movahedi, A. Performance of Hydrodynamics Flow on Flip Buckets Spillway for Flood Control in Large Dam Reservoirs. J. Hum. Earth Future 2020, 1, 39โ€“47.
  20. Milanian, F.; Niri, M.Z.; Naja๏ฌ-Jilani, A. Effect of hydraulic and structural parameters on the wave run-up over the berm breakwaters. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2017, 9, 282โ€“291. [CrossRef]
  21. Yamini, O.A.; Kavianpour, M.R.; Mousavi, S.H. Experimental investigation of parameters affecting the stability of articulated concrete block mattress under wave attack. Appl. Ocean Res. 2017, 64, 184โ€“202. [CrossRef]
  22. Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.A.; Thangam, S.; Gatski, T.B.; Speziale, C.G. Development of turbulence models for shear ๏ฌ‚ows by a double expansion technique. Phys. Fluids 1992, 4, 1510โ€“1520. [CrossRef]
  23. Bayon, A.; Valero, D.; Garcรญa-Bartual, R.; Lรณpez-Jimรฉnez, P.A. Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 80, 322โ€“335. [CrossRef]
  24. Jin, J.; Meng, B. Computation of wave loads on the superstructures of coastal highway bridges. Ocean Eng. 2011, 38, 2185โ€“2200. [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, S.; Yang, W.; Qin, S.; Li, Q.; Yang, B. Numerical study on characteristics of dam-break wave. Ocean Eng. 2018, 159, 358โ€“371. [CrossRef]
  26. Ersoy, H.; Karahan, M.; Geliยธsli, K.; Akgรผn, A.; Anฤฑlan, T.; Sรผnnetci, M.O.; Yahยธsi, B.K. Modelling of the landslide-induced impulse waves in the Artvin Dam reservoir by empirical approach and 3D numerical simulation. Eng. Geol. 2019, 249, 112โ€“128. [CrossRef]
  27. Zhan, J.M.; Dong, Z.; Jiang, W.; Li, Y.S. Numerical simulation of wave transformation and runup incorporating porous media wave absorber and turbulence models. Ocean Eng. 2010, 37, 1261โ€“1272. [CrossRef]
  28. Owen, M.W. The Hydroulic Design of Seawall Pro๏ฌles, Proceedings Conference on Shoreline Protection; ICE: London, UK, 1980; pp. 185โ€“192.
  29. Pilarczyk, K.W. Geosythetics and Geosystems in Hydraulic and Coastal Engineering; CRC Press: Balkema, FL, USA, 2000; p. 913, ISBN 90.5809.302.6.
  30. Van der Meer, J.W.; Allsop, N.W.H.; Bruce, T.; De Rouck, J.; Kortenhaus, A.; Pullen, T.; Schรผttrumpf, H.; Troch, P.; Zanuttigh, B. (Eds.) Manual on Wave Overtopping of Sea Defences and Related Structuresโ€“Assessment Manual; EurOtop.: London, UK, 2016; Available online: www.Overtopping-manual.com (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  31. Battjes, J.A. Computation of Set-up, Longshore Currents, Run-up and Overtopping Due to Wind-Generated Waves; TU Delft Library: Delft, The Netherlands, 1974.
  32. Van der Meer, J.W. Rock Slopes and Gravel Beaches under Wave Attack; Delft Hydraulics: Delft, The Netherlands, 1988.
  33. Ten Oever, E. Theoretical and Experimental Study on the Placement of Xbloc; Delft Hydraulics: Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
  34. Flow Science, Inc. FLOW-3D User Manual Version 9.3; Flow Science, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2008.
  35. Lebaron, J.W. Stability of A-Jacksarmored Rubble-Mound Break Waters Subjected to Breaking and Non-Breaking Waves with No Overtopping; Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1999.
  36. McLaren RW, G.; Chin, C.; Weber, J.; Binns, J.; McInerney, J.; Allen, M. Articulated Concrete Mattress block size stability comparison in omni-directional current. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, Monterey, CA, USA, 19โ€“23 September 2016; pp. 1โ€“6. [CrossRef]
e) ํ‘œ์‹œ ํƒญ์—์„œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์Šฌ๋ผ์ด์Šค ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŠน์ • ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™ ๋ฐ ์‘์šฉ ์œ ์•• ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง(CFD)์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต ๋งค๋‰ด์–ผ

This manual was developed with the purpose of presenting and executing basic numerical models in the software known as Flow 3D within the virtual laboratories of Fluid Mechanics and Applied Hydraulics, to complement and reinforce what was learned in class, the development of the manual covers a theoretical content and an exemplified prรกctical part for the handling of the software, besides including some feedback for the students, in order to mark the characteristics that the software has. With the handling of the Flow 3D program, the student will be introduced to the concept of Computational Fluid Dynamics or CFD, and a simple procedure to represent numerically and graphically the behavior of hydraulic structures. The hydraulic structures presented in the laboratory manual are: thin and thick wall orifices, gates with free and submerged discharge, thin and thick wall spillways with free and submerged discharge, WES type spillway, submerged intake with pressure conduction and as a complement, hydrostatic pressures on vertical, curved and inclined walls were added. Each of the mentioned hydraulic structures obtained a prรกctical verification as a verification within the Flow 3D software, presenting a consistency in the results obtained in both ways.

์ด ๋งค๋‰ด์–ผ์€ Fluid Mechanics ๋ฐ Applied Hydraulics์˜ ๊ฐ€์ƒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์‹ค ๋‚ด์—์„œ Flow 3D๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์—…์—์„œ ๋ฐฐ์šด ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋งค๋‰ด์–ผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์ด๋ก ์ ์ธ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃน๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ผ๋ถ€ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ์—๋„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ ๋ฐ ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋œ ์‹ค์ œ์ ์ธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„. Flow 3D ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋ฉด์„œ ํ•™์ƒ์€ ์ „์‚ฐ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™(Computational Fluid Dynamics) ๋˜๋Š” CFD์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…๊ณผ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค ๋งค๋‰ด์–ผ์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์œ ์•• ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ์–‡๊ณ  ๋‘๊บผ์šด ๋ฒฝ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค, ์ž์œ  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ, ์ž์œ  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์–‡๊ณ  ๋‘๊บผ์šด ๋ฒฝ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ, WES ์œ ํ˜• ๋ฐฉ์ˆ˜๋กœ, ์••๋ ฅ ์ „๋„ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์™„์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์œ ์ž…์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค‘ ํก์ž…๊ตฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง, ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ ๋ฒฝ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์–ธ๊ธ‰๋œ ๊ฐ ์ˆ˜๋ ฅํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” Flow 3D ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ํš๋“ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์ผ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Keywords: Flow 3D, numerical modeling, manual, practice, Fluid Mechanics.

e) ํ‘œ์‹œ ํƒญ์—์„œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์Šฌ๋ผ์ด์Šค ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŠน์ • ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
e) ํ‘œ์‹œ ํƒญ์—์„œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์Šฌ๋ผ์ด์Šค ์˜ต์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŠน์ • ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

REFERENCIAS

Anguisa, M., & Maza, X.(2012). Estudio de los procesos de flujo en una obra de
camptaciรณn mediante experimentaciรณn de un modelo fรญsico de escala reducida.
[Tesis de grado,Universidad de Cuenca]. Archivo Digital
http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/775/1/ti901.pdf
Arreaga, W., & Mantilla, D. (2016). Determinaciรณn de coeficientes de descarga en
orificios circulares, de pared delgada en descarga libre para diferentes
diรกmetros en modelos fรญsicos. [Tesis de grado,Universidad de Guayaquil].
Archivo Digital
http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/15855/1/ARREAGA_WILLIAM_
MANTILLA_DIEGO_TRABAJO_TITULACIร“N_HIDRรULICA_DICIEMB
RE_2016.pdf
Arrecis, J., (2018). Evaluaciรณn de las carรกcterรญsticas del prefil tipo Creager. [Tesis de
grado,Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala]. Archivo Digital
http://www.repositorio.usac.edu.gt/11372/1/Jared%20Alexander%20V%C3%A
9liz%20Arrecis.pdf
Barba, C. A. B. (2020). Modelaciรณn numรฉrica (CDF) del flujo combinado superior e
inferior en una compuerta plana con el program Flow 3D. [Tesis de
Maestria,Escuela Politรฉnica Nacional]. Archivo Digital
Bureau of Reclamation, (2007). Traducida por: Martรญnez, M., Batanero, A., Martรญnez,
G., Martรญnez, O., Gonzรกles, O.: Diseรฑo de Presas Peuqeรฑas(3ra ed). Espaรฑa:
Editorial Bellisco.
Calderon, F. V., Cazares, L. G., & Camacho, F. F. (2017). Dificultades conceptuales
para la comprensiรณn de la Ecuaciรณn de Bernoulli. Revista Eureka Sobre
Enseรฑanza y Divulgaciรณn de Las Ciencias, 14(12), 339โ€“352.
Fernรกndez, J.(2012).Tรฉcnicas numรฉricas en ingenierรญa de fluido: Introducciรณn a la
dinรกmica de fluidos computacional (CFD) por el mรฉtodo de volรบmenes
finitos.Barcelona , Espaรฑa.:Editorial Revertรฉ, S.A.
Flow Science. (2008). Manual de Flow 3D.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=r
ja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwie6p3mpfTsAhWJpFkKHRWpAHcQFjADegQIBh
AC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fprofile%2FAli_Agha7%
2Fpost%2FSomebody_can_recommend_me_the_tutorials_pdf_video_of_Flow_
3d_v101_software%2Fattachment%2F59d6285e79197b8077986bf3%2FAS%2
53A330000659173377%25401455689696420%2Fdownload%2F%255BFlow_
Science%255D_FLOW3D_V9.3_User_Manual%252C_Volume_1%2528BookZZ.org%2529.pdf&usg
=AOvVaw3ALDHf9jsqn-wDYnhAXNB1
Intituto Internacional de la Investigaciรณn de Tecnologรญa Educativa INITE. (2006).
Ecuaciones fundamentales de la hidrรกulica.
https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r144r/w226w/Problema_2/Problema2_Hi
draulica_Ecuaciones.pdf
Inciso, C. (2016). Anรกlisis comparativo de las descargas en orificios y boquillas en
laboratorio de Hidrรกulica de un UPN, Cajamarca. [Tesis de grado,Universidad
Privada del Norte, Cajamarca. Perรบ]. Archivo Digital
https://repositorio.upn.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11537/9980/Inciso%20Pajares%
20%20Carlos%20Jonathan.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Gutiรฉrrez, Y. (2016). Modelaciรณn numรฉrica computacional del diseรฑo de un vertedor
de pared delgada de secciรณn compuesta. [Tesis de grado,Universidad Central
Marta Abreu de las Villas]. Archivo Digital
https://dspace.uclv.edu.cu/bitstream/handle/123456789/6671/Tesis%20Yunior%
20Gutierrez.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Guncay, K. (2017). Estudio del desempeรฑo hidrรกulico del canal multipropรณsito del
laboratorio de hidrรกulica y dinรกmica de fluidos LH&DF del campus Balzay.
[Tesis de grado,Universidad de Cuenca]. Archivo Digital
Jimรฉnez, J., Jimรฉnez J. (2018). Elaboraciรณn del modelo fรญsico y la guia metodolรณgica
para la prรกctica: vertederos de pared delgada, de la asignatura Mecรกnica de
Fluidos de la Universidad de Azuay. [Tesis de grado,Universidad de Cuenca].
Archivo Digital
http://dspace.uazuay.edu.ec/bitstream/datos/8371/1/14091.pdf
Monroy, M. (2010). Medidores De Flujo En Canales Abiertos. [Tesis de
grado,Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala]. Archivo Digital
http://biblioteca.usac.edu.gt/tesis/08/08_3165_C.pdf
Penagos, D. F. R. (2012). Diseรฑo y modelaciรณn de las uniones soldadas de las
compuertas planas para presas. [Tesis de posgrado,Universidad Libre de
Colombia]. Archivo Digital
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/198447125.pdf
Sotelo, A. (1997). Hidrรกulica General, Volumen 1(18va ed). Balderas 95, Mรฉxico,
D.F.: Editorial Limusa, S.A.
Vega, D. (2004). Vertederos de pared delgada.Centro Andino para la gestiรณn y uso
del agua. Cochabamba.
https://www.academia.edu/6129654/Serie_T%C3%A9cnica_Agua_y_Suelo_N_
1_VERTEDEROS_DE_PARED_DELGADA_Rectangular_y_Triangular
Ven Te Chow. (1994). Hidrรกulica de canales abiertos. Santafรฉ de Bogotรก, Colombia.:
Editorial Martha Edna Suรกrez R.

Figure 9. Scour morphology under different times for case 7.

Scour Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Depth Prediction around Umbrella Suction Anchor Foundation under Random Waves

๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ํŒŒ๋™์—์„œ ์šฐ์‚ฐ ํก์ž… ์•ต์ปค ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ์„ธ๊ตด ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ˆ์ธก

Ruigeng Hu 1
, Hongjun Liu 2
, Hao Leng 1
, Peng Yu 3 and Xiuhai Wang 1,2,*

1 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266000, China;
huruigeng@stu.ouc.edu.cn (R.H.); lh4517@stu.ouc.edu.cn (H.L.)
2 Key Lab of Marine Environment and Ecology (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education,
Qingdao 266000, China; hongjun@ouc.edu.cn
3 Qingdao Geo-Engineering Survering Institute, Qingdao 266100, China; yp6650@stu.ouc.edu.cn

Abstract

๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ํŒŒ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ ์šฐ์‚ฐ ํก์ž… ์•ต์ปค ๊ธฐ์ดˆ(USAF) ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๊ตญ๋ถ€ ์„ธ๊ตด์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋จผ์ € ๋ณธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ, ์„ธ๊ตด ์ง„ํ™”์™€ ์„ธ๊ตด ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ USAF ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ‰ํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด ๊นŠ์ด Seq๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ˆ˜์ •๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ Seq์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ Froude ์ˆ˜ Fr๊ณผ Euler ์ˆ˜ Eu์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ํŒŒ๋™์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ตด ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ฌ˜์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ž„์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์ •๋œ Raaijmaker์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ KCs,p < 8์ผ ๋•Œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ •๋œ ํ™•๋ฅ ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” KCrms,a < 4์ผ ๋•Œ n = 10์ผ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Fr๊ณผ Eu๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋‘˜ ๋‹ค ๋” ์ง‘์ค‘์  ์ธ ๋ง๊ตฝ ์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด์™€ ๋” ํฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1. The close-up of umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF).
Figure 1. The close-up of umbrella suction anchor foundation (USAF).
Figure 2. (a) The sketch of seabed-USAF-wave three-dimensional model; (b) boundary condation:Wvwave boundary, S-symmetric boundary, O-outflow boundary; (c) USAF model.
Figure 2. (a) The sketch of seabed-USAF-wave three-dimensional model; (b) boundary condation:Wvwave boundary, S-symmetric boundary, O-outflow boundary; (c) USAF model.
Figure 5. Comparison of time evolution of scour between the present study and Khosronejad et al. [52], Petersen et al. [17].
Figure 5. Comparison of time evolution of scour between the present study and Khosronejad et al. [52], Petersen et al. [17].
Figure 9. Scour morphology under different times for case 7.
Figure 9. Scour morphology under different times for case 7.

References

  1. Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J.; Christiansen, N. Scour Around Vertical Pile in Waves. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 1992, 118, 15โ€“31.
    [CrossRef]
  2. Rudolph, D.; Bos, K. Scour around a monopile under combined wave-current conditions and low KC-numbers. In Proceedings of
    the 6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1โ€“3 November 2006; pp. 582โ€“588.
  3. Nielsen, A.W.; Liu, X.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Flow and bed shear stresses in scour protections around a pile in a current. Coast.
    Eng. 2013, 72, 20โ€“38. [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmad, N.; Bihs, H.; Myrhaug, D.; Kamath, A.; Arntsen, ร˜.A. Three-dimensional numerical modelling of wave-induced scour
    around piles in a side-by-side arrangement. Coast. Eng. 2018, 138, 132โ€“151. [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Ong, M.C.; Leira, B.J.; Myrhaug, D. Effects of Soil Profile Variation and Scour on Structural Response of an Offshore
    Monopile Wind Turbine. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2018, 140, 042001. [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, S. Dynamic analysis of umbrella suction anchor foundation embedded in seabed for offshore wind turbines.
    Gรฉomรฉch. Energy Environ. 2017, 10, 12โ€“20. [CrossRef]
  7. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Vanem, E.; Carvalho, H.; Correia, J.A.F.D.O. Editorial: Advanced research
    on offshore structures and foundation design: Part 1. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Marit. Eng. 2019, 172, 118โ€“123. [CrossRef]
  8. Chavez, C.E.A.; Stratigaki, V.; Wu, M.; Troch, P.; Schendel, A.; Welzel, M.; Villanueva, R.; Schlurmann, T.; De Vos, L.; Kisacik,
    D.; et al. Large-Scale Experiments to Improve Monopile Scour Protection Design Adapted to Climate Changeโ€”The PROTEUS
    Project. Energies 2019, 12, 1709. [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, M.; De Vos, L.; Chavez, C.E.A.; Stratigaki, V.; Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Troch, P. Large Scale
    Experimental Study of the Scour Protection Damage Around a Monopile Foundation Under Combined Wave and Current
    Conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 417. [CrossRef]
  10. Sรธrensen, S.P.H.; Ibsen, L.B. Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour. Ocean Eng. 2013,
    63, 17โ€“25. [CrossRef]
  11. Prendergast, L.; Gavin, K.; Doherty, P. An investigation into the effect of scour on the natural frequency of an offshore wind
    turbine. Ocean Eng. 2015, 101, 1โ€“11. [CrossRef]
  12. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Chambel, J.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Giannini, G.; Haerens, P. Scour Protections
    for Offshore Foundations of Marine Energy Harvesting Technologies: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 297. [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Q.; Yu, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Q. Scour characteristics of an offshore umbrella suction anchor foundation
    under the combined actions of waves and currents. Ocean Eng. 2020, 202, 106701. [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, P.; Hu, R.; Yang, J.; Liu, H. Numerical investigation of local scour around USAF with different hydraulic conditions under
    currents and waves. Ocean Eng. 2020, 213, 107696. [CrossRef]
  15. Sumer, B.M.; Christiansen, N.; Fredsรธe, J. The horseshoe vortex and vortex shedding around a vertical wall-mounted cylinder
    exposed to waves. J. Fluid Mech. 1997, 332, 41โ€“70. [CrossRef]
  16. Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Scour around Pile in Combined Waves and Current. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2001, 127, 403โ€“411. [CrossRef]
  17. Petersen, T.U.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J. Time scale of scour around a pile in combined waves and current. In Proceedings of the
    6th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Paris, France, 27โ€“31 August 2012.
  18. Petersen, T.U.; Sumer, B.M.; Fredsรธe, J.; Raaijmakers, T.C.; Schouten, J.-J. Edge scour at scour protections around piles in the
    marine environmentโ€”Laboratory and field investigation. Coast. Eng. 2015, 106, 42โ€“72. [CrossRef]
  19. Qi, W.; Gao, F. Equilibrium scour depth at offshore monopile foundation in combined waves and current. Sci. China Ser. E Technol.
    Sci. 2014, 57, 1030โ€“1039. [CrossRef]
  20. Larsen, B.E.; Fuhrman, D.R.; Baykal, C.; Sumer, B.M. Tsunami-induced scour around monopile foundations. Coast. Eng. 2017, 129,
    36โ€“49. [CrossRef]
  21. Corvaro, S.; Marini, F.; Mancinelli, A.; Lorenzoni, C.; Brocchini, M. Hydro- and Morpho-dynamics Induced by a Vertical Slender
    Pile under Regular and Random Waves. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 2018, 144, 04018018. [CrossRef]
  22. Schendel, A.; Welzel, M.; Schlurmann, T.; Hsu, T.-W. Scour around a monopile induced by directionally spread irregular waves in
    combination with oblique currents. Coast. Eng. 2020, 161, 103751. [CrossRef]
  23. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Romรฃo, X.; Reis, M.; das Neves, L. Reliability assessment of offshore dynamic scour
    protections using copulas. Wind. Eng. 2018, 43, 506โ€“538. [CrossRef]
  24. Fazeres-Ferradosa, T.; Welzel, M.; Schendel, A.; Baelus, L.; Santos, P.R.; Pinto, F.T. Extended characterization of damage in rubble
    mound scour protections. Coast. Eng. 2020, 158, 103671. [CrossRef]
  25. Tavouktsoglou, N.S.; Harris, J.M.; Simons, R.R.; Whitehouse, R.J.S. Equilibrium Scour-Depth Prediction around Cylindrical
    Structures. J. Waterw. Port. Coast. Ocean Eng. 2017, 143, 04017017. [CrossRef]
  26. Ettema, R.; Melville, B.; Barkdoll, B. Scale Effect in Pier-Scour Experiments. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1998, 124, 639โ€“642. [CrossRef]
  27. Umeda, S. Scour Regime and Scour Depth around a Pile in Waves. J. Coast. Res. Spec. Issue 2011, 64, 845โ€“849.
  28. Umeda, S. Scour process around monopiles during various phases of sea storms. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 165, 1599โ€“1604. [CrossRef]
  29. Baykal, C.; Sumer, B.; Fuhrman, D.R.; Jacobsen, N.; Fredsรธe, J. Numerical simulation of scour and backfilling processes around a
    circular pile in waves. Coast. Eng. 2017, 122, 87โ€“107. [CrossRef]
  30. Miles, J.; Martin, T.; Goddard, L. Current and wave effects around windfarm monopile foundations. Coast. Eng. 2017, 121,
    167โ€“178. [CrossRef]
  1. Miozzi, M.; Corvaro, S.; Pereira, F.A.; Brocchini, M. Wave-induced morphodynamics and sediment transport around a slender
    vertical cylinder. Adv. Water Resour. 2019, 129, 263โ€“280. [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shi, Z.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Tang, Y. Experimental study on scour around a composite bucket foundation
    due to waves and current. Ocean Eng. 2019, 189, 106302. [CrossRef]
  3. Carreiras, J.; Larroudรฉ, P.; Seabra-Santos, F.; Mory, M. Wave Scour Around Piles. In Proceedings of the Coastal Engineering 2000,
    American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Sydney, Australia, 16โ€“21 July 2000; pp. 1860โ€“1870.
  4. Raaijmakers, T.; Rudolph, D. Time-dependent scour development under combined current and waves conditionsโ€”Laboratory
    experiments with online monitoring technique. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Tokyo,
    Japan, 5โ€“7 November 2008; pp. 152โ€“161.
  5. Khalfin, I.S. Modeling and calculation of bed score around large-diameter vertical cylinder under wave action. Water Resour. 2007,
    34, 357. [CrossRef]
  6. Zanke, U.C.; Hsu, T.-W.; Roland, A.; Link, O.; Diab, R. Equilibrium scour depths around piles in noncohesive sediments under
    currents and waves. Coast. Eng. 2011, 58, 986โ€“991. [CrossRef]
  7. Myrhaug, D.; Rue, H. Scour below pipelines and around vertical piles in random waves. Coast. Eng. 2003, 48, 227โ€“242. [CrossRef]
  8. Myrhaug, D.; Ong, M.C.; Fรธien, H.; Gjengedal, C.; Leira, B.J. Scour below pipelines and around vertical piles due to second-order
    random waves plus a current. Ocean Eng. 2009, 36, 605โ€“616. [CrossRef]
  9. Myrhaug, D.; Ong, M.C. Random wave-induced onshore scour characteristics around submerged breakwaters using a stochastic
    method. Ocean Eng. 2010, 37, 1233โ€“1238. [CrossRef]
  10. Ong, M.C.; Myrhaug, D.; Hesten, P. Scour around vertical piles due to long-crested and short-crested nonlinear random waves
    plus a current. Coast. Eng. 2013, 73, 106โ€“114. [CrossRef]
  11. Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.A. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J. Sci. Comput. 1986, 1, 3โ€“51. [CrossRef]
  12. Yakhot, V.; Smith, L.M. The renormalization group, the e-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. J. Sci. Comput. 1992, 7,
    35โ€“61. [CrossRef]
  13. Mastbergen, D.R.; Berg, J.V.D. Breaching in fine sands and the generation of sustained turbidity currents in submarine canyons.
    Sedimentology 2003, 50, 625โ€“637. [CrossRef]
  14. Soulsby, R. Dynamics of Marine Sands; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 1998. [CrossRef]
  15. Van Rijn, L.C. Sediment Transport, Part I: Bed Load Transport. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1984, 110, 1431โ€“1456. [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, X.-L.; Wang, J.-H. Numerical investigation of local scour around three adjacent piles with different arrangements
    under current. Ocean Eng. 2017, 142, 625โ€“638. [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, Y.X.; Liu, S.X. Random Wave and Its Applications to Engineering, 4th ed.; Dalian University of Technology Press: Dalian,
    China, 2011.
  18. Pang, A.; Skote, M.; Lim, S.; Gullman-Strand, J.; Morgan, N. A numerical approach for determining equilibrium scour depth
    around a mono-pile due to steady currents. Appl. Ocean Res. 2016, 57, 114โ€“124. [CrossRef]
  19. Higuera, P.; Lara, J.L.; Losada, I.J. Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using Open-FOAMยฎ.
    Part I: Formulation and validation. Coast. Eng. 2014, 83, 243โ€“258. [CrossRef]
  20. Corvaro, S.; Crivellini, A.; Marini, F.; Cimarelli, A.; Capitanelli, L.; Mancinelli, A. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the
    Hydrodynamics around a Vertical Cylinder in Waves. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 453. [CrossRef]
  21. Flow3D User Manual, version 11.0.3; Flow Science, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2013.
  22. Khosronejad, A.; Kang, S.; Sotiropoulos, F. Experimental and computational investigation of local scour around bridge piers. Adv.
    Water Resour. 2012, 37, 73โ€“85. [CrossRef]
  23. Stahlmann, A. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Scour at Foundation Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines. Ph.D. Thesis,
    Franzius-Institute for Hydraulic, Estuarine and Coastal Engineering, Leibniz Universitรคt Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 2013.
  24. Breusers, H.N.C.; Nicollet, G.; Shen, H. Local Scour Around Cylindrical Piers. J. Hydraul. Res. 1977, 15, 211โ€“252. [CrossRef]
  25. Schendel, A.; Hildebrandt, A.; Goseberg, N.; Schlurmann, T. Processes and evolution of scour around a monopile induced by
    tidal currents. Coast. Eng. 2018, 139, 65โ€“84. [CrossRef]

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ตœ์  ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

Hyung Ju Yoo1ย Sung Sik Joo2ย Beom Jae Kwon3ย Seung Oh Lee4*
์œ  ํ˜•์ฃผ1ย ์ฃผ ์„ฑ์‹2ย ๊ถŒ ๋ฒ”์žฌ3ย ์ด ์Šน์˜ค4*
1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
1ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๊ณผ์ •
2ใˆœํ—ฅ์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„ ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์—…๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
3ใˆœ์ด์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ž์›๋ถ€ ์ด์‚ฌ
4ํ™์ต๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ ๊ต์ˆ˜*Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ฐ•์šฐ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฐ ๋นˆ๋„์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ตฌ์ถ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋ฟ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค.

์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋„์ถœ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77% ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ๋œ๋‹ค.

ํ‚ค์›Œ๋“œ

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ,ย FLOW-3D,ย ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜,ย ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ,ย ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ

Recently, as the occurrence frequency of sudden floods due to climate change increased and the aging of the existing spillway, it is necessary to establish a plan to utilize an auxiliary spillway to minimize the flood damage of downstream rivers. Most studies have been conducted on the review of flow characteristics according to the operation of auxiliary spillway through the hydraulic experiments and numerical modeling. However, the studies on examination of flood damage in the downstream rivers and the stability of the revetment according to the operation of the auxiliary spillway were relatively insufficient in the literature. In this study, the stability of the revetment on the downstream river according to the outflow conditions of the existing and auxiliary spillway was examined by using 3D numerical model, FLOW-3D. The velocity, water surface elevation and shear stress results of FLOW-3D were compared with the permissible velocity and shear stress of design criteria. It was assumed the sluice gate was fully opened. As a result of numerical simulations of various auxiliary spillway operations during flood season, the single operation of the auxiliary spillway showed the reduction effect of maximum velocity and the water surface elevation compared with the single operation of the existing spillway. The stability of the revetment on downstream was satisfied under the condition of outflow less than 45% of the design flood discharge. However, the potential overtopping damage was confirmed in the case of exceeding the 45% of the design flood discharge. Therefore, the simultaneous operation with the existing spillway was important to ensure the stability on design flood discharge condition. As a result of examining the allocation ratio and the total allowable outflow, the reduction effect of maximum velocity was confirmed on the condition, where the amount of outflow on auxiliary spillway was more than that on existing spillway. It is because the flow of downstream rivers was concentrated in the center due to the outflow of existing spillway. The permissible velocity and shear stress were satisfied under the condition of less than 77% of the design flood discharge with simultaneous operation. It was found that the flood damage of downstream rivers can be minimized by setting the amount allocated to the auxiliary spillway to be larger than the amount allocated to the existing spillway for the total outflow with simultaneous operation condition. However, this study only reviewed the flow characteristics around the revetment according to the outflow of spillway under the full opening of the sluice gate condition. Therefore, the various sluice opening conditions and outflow scenarios will be asked to derive more efficient utilization of the auxiliary spillway in th future.KeywordsAuxiliary spillway FLOW-3D Numerical simulation Revetment stability Shear stress

1. ์„œ ๋ก 

์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ˜ธ์šฐ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ 24๊ฐœ ๋Œ์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ถ•๊ดด์œ„ํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ทน์‹ฌํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์‹ ์„ค ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ ๋“ฑ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทนํ•œํ™์ˆ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ฆ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด๋Œ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด ๋ฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋™์‹œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ„๋„ ์šด์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋กœ์จ ๋น„์ƒ์ƒํ™ฉ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ณ (K-water, 2021), ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ„ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ ์ฐจ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(Jeon et al., 2006Kim, 2007Kim et al., 2008). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Jeon et al.(2006)์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ ๋ฐ”์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์„ค๊ณ„์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Kim et al.(2008)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Kim and Kim(2013)์€ ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ์˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ƒยทํ•˜๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ Zeng et al.(2017)์€ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Li et al.(2011)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ์‹ ๊ทœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๋ถ€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• Fluent๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , Lee et al.(2019)๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜• ์‹คํ—˜(FLOW-3D)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์šด์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋ฐฐ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด 7.6%๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ . ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋ถ„์„์„ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ์ค€๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

2. ๋ณธ ๋ก 

2.1 ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ

2.1.1 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ก 

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ Flow Science, Inc์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋ฒ”์šฉ ์œ ์ฒด์—ญํ•™ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)์œผ๋กœ ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„๋ชจ์˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ•ด์„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ , ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํ•ด์„์—๋„ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค(Flow Science, 2011). ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” FLOW-3D(version 12.0)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

2.1.2 ์œ ๋™ํ•ด์„์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹

1) ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ์ƒ์ˆ˜ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์† ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (1)(2)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(1)

โˆ‡ยทv=0

(2)

โˆ‚โˆ‚x(uAx)+โˆ‚โˆ‚y(vAy)+โˆ‚โˆ‚z(wAz)=RSORฯ

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ€๋„(kg/m3), u, v, w๋Š” x, y, z๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์œ ์†(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az๋Š” ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฉด์ (m2), RSOR๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์„ฑ/์†Œ๋ฉธ(mass source/sink)ํ•ญ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹(Momentum Equation)

๊ฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„์„ฑ๋ถ„ u, v, w์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์Œ Eqs. (3)(4)(5)์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(3)

โˆ‚uโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORฯVFu

(4)

โˆ‚vโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚y+Gy+fy-by-RSORฯVFv

(5)

โˆ‚wโˆ‚t+1VF(uAxโˆ‚uโˆ‚x+vAyโˆ‚vโˆ‚y+wAzโˆ‚wโˆ‚z)=-1ฯโˆ‚pโˆ‚z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORฯVFw

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, Gx, Gy, Gz๋Š” ์ฒด์ ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, fx, fy, fz๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ญ, bx, by, bz๋Š” ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์ฒด์—์„œ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์†์‹ค์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2.1.3 ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ™•๋ณด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์— ์ €ํ•ญํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ• ์„ ํƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ํ•˜ ์‹œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ •์‹์€ Eqs. (6)(7)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

1) Schoklitsch ๊ณต์‹

Schoklitsch(1934)๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

(6)

ฯ„=ฮณRI=ฮณC2V2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), I๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ, C๋Š” Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

2) Manning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๊ณต์‹

Chezy ์œ ์†๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‹ ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

(7)

ฯ„=ฮณn2V2R1/3

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, ฯ„๋Š” ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(N/m2), R์€ ๋™์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ(m), ฮณ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์ค‘๋Ÿ‰(10.0 kN/m3), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, V๋Š” ํ‰๊ท ์œ ์†(m/s)์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ์œ ์†์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” Maning ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กค ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์œ ์† ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ๋ฉด ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค.

2.2 ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€

ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์€ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์œ ์ˆ˜์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์ด ํ™•๋ณด๋˜๋„๋ก ๊ณ„ํšํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ™•๋ณด์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์‹œ๊ณต์ƒ์˜ ์šฉ์ด์„ฑ, ์„ธ๊ตด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตด์š”์„ฑ(flexibility) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ์‹œ๊ณต๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๊ณต๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„ํƒˆ๊ฒฝ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์™ธ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ASTM(๋ฏธ๊ตญ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์‹œํ—˜ํ•™ํšŒ)์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ๋งคํŠธ ์‹œํ—˜๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ œํ’ˆ๋ณ„๋กœ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ•์†Œ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ๋ธ”๋ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ์—๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ ฅ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์„ธ๊ตด์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(MOLIT, 2019). ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ตญ๋‚ดยท์™ธ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์€ Table 1์— ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น(MOLIT, 2016)๊ณผ ASTM ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (ฯ„p, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)
Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment5.0

2.3. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„

2.3.1 ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋Œ€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด FLOW-3D ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„๋นˆ๋„(100๋…„) ๋ฐ 200๋…„๋นˆ๋„ ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ด๋‚ด๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด์˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์ด์ƒ ํ™์ˆ˜์กฐ์ ˆ์€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ํ•œ 2011๋…„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ •๋ฐ€์•ˆ์ „์ง„๋‹จ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋ฉด์˜ ํ‘œ์ธต ์œ ์‹ค ๋ฐ ์˜น๋ฒฝ ๋ฐ€๋ฆผํ˜„์ƒ ๋“ฑ์ด ํ™•์ธ๋˜์–ด ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ˆ˜ยท๋ณด๊ฐ•์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ๋Œ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์„ 0.99 ~ 8.16 m์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ฒฉ์ž์ˆ˜๋Š” 49,102,500๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์œ ์ž…์œ ๋Ÿ‰(inflow), ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์€ ๋ฒฝ๋ฉด(wall), ํ•˜๋ฅ˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์œ„(water surface elevation)์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Table 2Fig. 1 ์ฐธ์กฐ). FLOW-3D ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ชจํ˜•์—๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๊ธธ์ด ๋ชจํ˜•, ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ชจํ˜•, k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•, LES ๋ชจํ˜• ๋“ฑ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จํ๋ฆ„์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์˜(Flow Science, 2011)ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” RNG k-ฯต๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” Table 3์— ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์ด ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 1 ๋ฐ Case 2๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์ด ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 3 ~ Case 6). ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 7 ~ Case 10) ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’(Chow, 1959)์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋Œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ FLOW-3D์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹(Vanoni, 2006)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์กฐ๊ณ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Manning-Strickler ๊ณต์‹์€ Eq. (8)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์œผ๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๊ณ ๋Š” Table 4์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ, kS๋Š” ์กฐ๊ณ  (m), n์€ Manning์˜ ์กฐ๋„๊ณ„์ˆ˜, g๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ฐ€์†๋„(m/s2)๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ(Time Step)์€ 0.0001์ดˆ๋กœ ์„ค์ •(CFL number < 1.0) ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์—ฐ์†๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”, ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’์ด 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ ์†์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ ๊ฐ’ ์—ญ์‹œ 1.0%์ด๋‚ด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1.0%์˜ ์œ ์†๋ณ€๋™์€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์œ ์†์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case์—์„œ 2400์ดˆ ์ด๋‚ด์— ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
โˆ†X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
โˆ†Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
โˆ†Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜ Case ๋ณ„ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 2 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€)์˜ ๊ธธ์ด(L)๋Š” ์ด 1.3 km๋กœ 10 m ๋“ฑ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์ง€๋ฐฐ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„, ์œ ์†, ์ˆ˜์‹ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ Case 1 – Case 6๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†(Vmax)์€ ์•ฝ 3% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ณด๋‹ค 7ยฐ์ž‘์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์ž…ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์†์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ต๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์˜ ์ถ•์†Œ๋กœ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰(Qa)์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์†(Vp)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰(Qp)์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜(Case 5 & 6)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 3 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(ฯ„p)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2) ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 4 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” Table 5์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทmax)๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 2% ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œ„์น˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ถ€๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์‹œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜(Case 1)์˜ ์ˆ˜์œ„(ฮทref)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 58%๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณด๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(Fig. 5 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์–ด ์ง„๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ฮทmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation
in terms of Vp
Evaluation
in terms of ฯ„p
1
(Qa = 0)
9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)
8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)
6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)
6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)
4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)
4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด(ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ)์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ์ƒ์Šน์œผ๋กœ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์กฐํ•ฉ(Case 7 ~ Case 10)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Case 7์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ท ๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ด๊ณ , Case 8์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, Case 9๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์„ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณด์กฐ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) ์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ ๊ทœ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ธก(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) ์œ ์†์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 6 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์œ ์†๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํฌ๋ฉด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ๋Š” ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 7 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ์กฐ๊ฑด(Qa>Qe)์—์„œ Section 2์— ์œ ์† ์ €๊ฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๊ฒ€ํ† (Case 10)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์œ ๋Ÿ‰์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ๋ฆ„์ด ํ•˜์ฒœ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์†์€ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ (Fig. 8 ์ฐธ์กฐ), ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๋„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 9 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 6์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp
8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp
8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp
6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp
6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒ€ํ† 

๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ณ ์ •์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 10Fig. 11 ์ฐธ์กฐ). ๊ฐ Case ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์†๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ Table 7์— ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Case ๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ(ฮทmax/ฮทref<0.97(=๊ธฐ์„ค์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณ ))์€ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(Fig. 12 ์ฐธ์กฐ).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)
Maximum Shear
(ฯ„max, kN/m2)
Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of ฯ„p
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp
3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp
5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp
6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp
6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก 

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์ธ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ง€ํ˜•์€ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™„๊ณต๋œ โ—‹โ—‹๋Œ์˜ ์ œ์›์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ์กฐ๋„ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์€ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜๋ฌธ์€ ์™„์ „ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‹จ๋… ์šด์˜ ์‹œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ž…๊ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์•„์ง€๊ณ , ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ํ•˜์ฒœํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์†(5.0 m/s)๊ณผ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ(0.28 kN/m2)๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 45% ์ดํ•˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ์— ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ฒ˜์˜ค๋ฆ„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์›”๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๊ท ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 7) ๋ฐ ํŽธ์ค‘ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„(Case 8 & Case 9)์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰๋ณด๋‹ค ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†, ์ตœ๋Œ€์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ตœ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์œ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋™์‹œ ์šด์˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ฒด ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 42%, ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ๋น„์œจ์„ 58%๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ—ˆ์šฉ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ณ„ํšํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ 77%์ดํ•˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€์œ ์†์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์ง€๋ฐฐ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 1)์—์„œ 3.63 m/s, ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์™€ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„(section 2)์—์„œ 4.53 m/s๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์œ ์† ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ๋„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.09 kN/m2 ๋ฐ 0.26 kN/m2๋กœ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€ ํ˜ธ์•ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋…ธํ›„ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™์ˆ˜ ์‹œ ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋…์šด์˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์ฒœ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ์น˜์ˆ˜์ฆ๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ์—…์œผ๋กœ ์™„๊ณต๋œ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ณ„ํš ํ™์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰ ์œ ์ž… ์‹œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๋น„์œจ ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰ ๋„์ถœ์— ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ œ๋ฐฉ์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ถฉ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ , ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์œ ์† ๋ฐ ํ—ˆ์šฉ์†Œ๋ฅ˜๋ ฅ์€ ์ œ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์œ ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ์ „๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์€ ๋ถ„๋ช…ํžˆ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ํ–ฅํ›„์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธ ๊ฐœ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ , ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ณด์กฐ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Acknowledgements

๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์€ K-water์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ทœ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ํšจ์œจ์  ์—ฐ๊ณ„์šด์˜ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋งˆ๋ จ(2021-WR-GP-76-149)์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.
2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.
3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.
4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.
5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.
6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.
9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.
10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593
11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279
12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.
15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.
16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE. 10.1061/9780784408230
17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and Gonzรกlez-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 ๊ฑด์„ค๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ยทํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2004). ๋Œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฌธํ•™์  ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋ฐ ์น˜์ˆ˜๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ฆ๋Œ€๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
2 ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ…๋‹จ (2003). ์ˆ˜ํ•ด๋ฐฉ์ง€๋Œ€์ฑ… ๋ฐฑ์„œ. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญ๋ฌด์ด๋ฆฌ์‹ค.
3 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2016). ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ณต์‚ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„์‹ค๋ฌด์š”๋ น. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
4 ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€ (2019). ํ•˜์ฒœ์„ค๊ณ„๊ธฐ์ค€ํ•ด์„ค. ์„ธ์ข…: ๊ตญํ† ๊ตํ†ต๋ถ€.
5 ๊น€๋Œ€๊ทผ, ๋ฐ•์„ ์ค‘, ์ด์˜์‹, ํ™ฉ์ข…ํ›ˆ (2008). ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ – ์•ˆ๋™๋‹ค๋ชฉ์ ๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1604-1608.
6 ๊น€์ƒํ˜ธ, ๊น€์ง€์„ฑ (2013). ์ถฉ์ฃผ๋Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋Œ ์ƒํ•˜๋ฅ˜ ํ™์ˆ˜์œ„ ์˜ํ–ฅ ๋ถ„์„. ๋Œ€ํ•œํ† ๋ชฉํ•™ํšŒ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ง‘. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
7 ๊น€์ฃผ์„ฑ (2007). ๋Œ ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜ ๋น„๊ต ๊ณ ์ฐฐ. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
8 ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ (2009). ๋‚™๋™๊ฐ•์ˆ˜๊ณ„ ํ•˜์ฒœ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๊ณ„ํš(๋ณ€๊ฒฝ). ๋ถ€์‚ฐ: ๋ถ€์‚ฐ๊ตญํ† ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ฒญ.
9 ์ „ํƒœ๋ช…, ๊น€ํ˜•์ผ, ๋ฐ•ํ˜•์„ญ, ๋ฐฑ์šด์ผ (2006). ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋น„์ƒ์—ฌ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„-์ž„ํ•˜๋Œ. ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›ํ•™ํšŒ ํ•™์ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œํšŒ. 1726-1731.
10 ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ (2021). ๋Œ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ทœ์ •. ๋Œ€์ „: ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ž์›๊ณต์‚ฌ.

FLOW DEM

FLOW-3D DEM Module ๊ฐœ์š”

FLOW DEMย ์€ย FLOW-3Dย ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ฒด ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„์— DEM(Discrete Element Method : ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•)๊ณต๋ฒ•์ธย ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem9

dem10
์ฃผ์š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ :๊ณ ์ฒด ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ, ์Šคํ”„๋ง(Spring) / ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ(Dash Pot) ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ ์šฉ Void, 1 fluid, 2 fluid(์ž์œ  ๊ณ„๋ฉด ํฌํ•จ) ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ๋ฐ€๋„ / ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ์ง๊ฒฝ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ์กฐ์ ˆ๋กœ ์ž…์ž ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ DEM์˜ Sub Time Step ์ด์šฉ

Discreteย Elementย Method : ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•

๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์šด๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋„์— ์‘์šฉ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem1

์ž…์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ

Voigt model์€ ์Šคํ”„๋ง(Spring) ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ(Dash pot)์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ž…์ž ์ถฉ๋Œ ์‹œ์˜ ํž˜์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํƒ„์„ฑ๋ ฅ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์Šคํ”„๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ,
๋น„ํƒ„์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์€ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์™ธ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋“œ

๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์šด๋™ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ย FLOW-3Dย ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์šด๋™ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— DEM์œผ๋กœ
ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜๊ธฐ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ๋Š” โ€˜void + DEMโ€™, โ€˜1 Fluid + DEMโ€™ , โ€˜ย 1 Fluid ์ž์œ ๊ณ„๋ฉด + DEM โ€˜์„ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์œ ๋™ ๋ชจ๋“œ๋กœ ์ทจ๊ธ‰์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem4

์ž…์ž ์œ ํ˜•

์ž…์ž ํƒ€์ž…๋„ ํ‘œ์ค€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ (๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ)์™€ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ, ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธย ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ ๋“ฑ๋„ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ‘œ์ค€ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž…์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ย ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ๋“  ์•„๋ž˜์— ๊ฐ€๋ผ ์•‰์•„ ๋ฒ„๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, FLOW DEM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem7

์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ

1. Mechanical Engineering ๋ถ„์•ผ

์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ถฉ์ „, ์Šค์ฟ ๋ฅ˜ ์ด์†ก, ๋ถ„๋ง ์ด์†ก / Resin filling, screw conveyance, powder conveyance

2. Civil Engineering๋ถ„์•ผ

3. Civil Engineering ๋ถ„์•ผ

ํŒŒํŽธ, ์ž๊ฐˆ, ๋‚™ ์„ฑ/ Debris flow, gravel, falling rock

dem11

3. Chemical Engineering, Pharmaceutics ๋ถ„์•ผ

์œ ๋™์ธต, ์‚ฌ์ดํด๋ก , ๊ต๋ฐ˜๊ธฐ / Fluidized bed, cyclone, stirrer

dem12

4. MEMS,ย Electrical Engineering ๋ถ„์•ผ

ํ•˜์ „ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐ์žฅ ํ•ด์„ ๋“ฑ

dem15

์ž…์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”

๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”

DEM์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ƒ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 
๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„ ์ง€๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ž์›์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋งŽ์•„ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ž…์ž์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆซ์ž๋ฅผ ์ค„์—ฌ ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .
์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์œ ๋™ํ•ด์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ์ˆ˜ ๋งŽ์Œ (๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ํผ) โ†’ ์†Œ (๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ์ ์Œ)
์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜ ๋‹ค (๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ํผ) โ†’ ์†Œ (๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ์ ์Œ)

์›๋ž˜ ์ž…์ž์ˆ˜

์ž…์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ํ‚ค์šด๊ฒฝ์šฐ

๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”

  • ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ทธ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ž…๊ฒฝ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒํ–ˆ์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™” ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ๋น„๊ต.
  • ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ž…์ž ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฑฐ๋™์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค.ย (๋ณธ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ ฅ์ด ์ปค์ง„๋‹ค.)
  • ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ๋™์ผ ์›๋ž˜์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ ๋Œ€์ฒด๋กœ ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์กฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— DEM ์ ์šฉ

๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™” ๋น„๊ต ์˜ˆ

๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ€์‹œํ™”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์ž…๊ฒฝ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ž…๊ฒฝ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒํ•˜๋ฉด
๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ž…์ž ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฑฐ๋™์ด ๋ฐ”๋€Œ์–ด ๋ฒ„๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‹ค์ œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ค‘์ž ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ๋ถ„์„

DEM์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ž…์ž๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์ œํ•œ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์„œ๋ธŒํƒ€์ž„์Šคํ…์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ํƒ€์ž„์Šคํ…์„ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๊ณ  ํ•„์š”์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋“ค์ด์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด ์ค‘์ž์‚ฌ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ž์ฃผ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋น™์—„ ์œ ์ฒด์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ์˜ ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์ด ๋ณ„๋กœ ์ข‹์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹น์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์ „๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž…์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ์†์ฒด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ๋„ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ์˜ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•ด์™”๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋ฒˆ์— DEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.

Reference :

  • Lefebvre D., Mackenbrock A., Vidal V., Pavan V. and Haigh PM, 2004,
  • Development and use of simulation in the Design of Blown Cores and Moulds

FLOW-3D AM

FLOW-3D WELD 2025R1 ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์ 

์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ–ฅ์ƒ

User Interface ํ†ต์ผ

FLOW-3D AM 2025R1์€ FLOW-3D, FLOW-3D WELD, FLOW-3D DEM์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋งค๋„๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํš๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํŽธ์˜์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”๋œ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋‹จ์ผ ๋˜๋Š” ์ด์ค‘ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ ๊ทœ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ํƒฌํ”Œ๋ฆฟ

FLOW-3D AM 2025R1์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋กœ๋“œ ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์„ค์ •์„ ๊ทธ ์–ด๋А ๋•Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž‘์—…, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต, ๋Šฅ๋™ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดํ›„์—๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ„์„ ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D AM ๋‚ด์—์„œ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ์„ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Restrat ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ–ฅ์ƒ

๋ชจ๋“  ์ž…์ž ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ด์ œ Restart ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ง์ ‘ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ด์ „ ๋ถ„๋ง์ธต ์ ์ธต ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋œ ์ž…์ž์ธต์„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค ํ–ฅ์ƒ

์ด๋ฒˆ ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด FLOW-3D AM 2025R1์€ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…(HPC) ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋Œ€ํญ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด ์†”๋ฒ„์˜ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ OpenMP โ€“ MPI ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, HPC ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์—์„œ์˜ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ(AM) ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์•ฝ 9๋ฐฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์‹คํ–‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์€ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์œผ๋กœ ํ•ต์‹ฌ AM ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ถœ์‹œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋‹จ์ผ ํŠธ๋ž™ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋ง ๋น„๊ต

๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ–ฅ์ƒ

์šฉ์œต ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ํ‚คํ™€ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D WELD์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ด์› ํ†ตํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ์„ 

์—…๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ๋œ ์—ด์› ์ •์˜ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‚˜์„ ํ˜• ๋ฐ ์Šคํ ๋ผ์ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์†Œ์Šค ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ด์› ์†์„ฑ์„ ์ „์†กํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ ˆ์•ฝํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ค„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž…์ž-์ž…์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ

FLOW-3D AM์— ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ํ†ตํ•ฉ๋œ DEM ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ์ด์ œ ํŒŒํ‹ฐํด ์œ„์ ฏ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž…์ž ํด๋ž˜์Šค์—์„œ ์ง€์›๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. DEM ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™”๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…(HPC) ํ”Œ๋žซํผ๊ณผ๋„ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ํ‚คํ™€(keyhole) ์—ญํ•™์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•จ

FLOW-3D POST ์ง€์›

์œ ์ฒด, ์šฉ์œต ์˜์—ญ, ์—ด์›, ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‚ฌ์ „ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๊ฐ์ฒด๋Š” FLOW-3D WELD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”๋ฅผ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ถœ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฃผ์„์€ FLOW-3D POST์—์„œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์—ด๋ฉด ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

flow3d AM-product
FLOW-3D AM-product

์™€์ด์–ด ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED | Wire Powder Based DED

์ผ๋ถ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฐ ์™€์ด์–ด ์ด์†ก ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ด…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์™€์ด์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED | Wire Based DED

์™€์ด์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋†’๊ณ  ๋‚ญ๋น„๊ฐ€ ์ ์ง€๋งŒ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM ์€ ์™€์ด์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ DED์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋นŒ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์™€์ด์–ด ์ด์†ก ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ์ง๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D AM์€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ (L-PBF), ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ œํŠธ ๋ฐ DED (Directed Energy Deposition)์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ • ( additive manufacturing )์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” CFD ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM ์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ง ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์••์ถ•, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™, L-PBF ๋ฐ DED์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ํ˜•์„ฑ, ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ง€ ์นจํˆฌ ๋ฐ ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

3D ํ”„๋ฆฐํŒ…์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ(additive manufacturing)๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธต๋ณ„ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ถ„๋ง ๋˜๋Š” ์™€์ด์–ด๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ์ œ์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์† ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์€ ์ง€๋‚œ ๋ช‡ ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์‹œ์ž‘๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” 3 ๋Œ€ ๊ธˆ์† ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์€ PBF (Powder Bed Fusion), DED (Directed Energy Deposition) ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ œํŠธ ( Binder jetting ) ๊ณต์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  FLOW-3D  AM  ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ์œ  ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ์ง์ ‘ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋˜๋Š” ์ „์ž ๋น”์„ ์—ด์›์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ชจ๋‘ PBF์šฉ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ DED ๊ณต์ •์šฉ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋˜๋Š” ์™€์ด์–ด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๊ธˆ์†์„ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋…น์—ฌ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธต๋ณ„๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์ ฏํŒ…(Binder jetting)์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์ œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ง€๊ฐ€ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ„๋ง์— ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ์ฐฉ๋˜์–ด ์ธต๋ณ„๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์€ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์น˜๋ฐ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์†Œ๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D AM ์˜ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ถ”์  ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ (L-PBF) ๊ณต์ • ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. DED ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐœ๋… ์ฆ๋ช… ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋„ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ํ“จ์ „ (L-PBF)

LPBF ๊ณต์ •์—๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„, ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ, ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ์‘๊ณ ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ๊ณต์ • ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋นŒ๋“œ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰, ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ณด์กด ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ํŒจํ‚น ๋น„์œจ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D DEM ๋ฐ FLOW-3D WELD ๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. L-PBF ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋†“๊ธฐ, ๋ถ„๋ง ์šฉ์œต ๋ฐ ์‘๊ณ ,์ด์–ด์„œ ์ด์ „์— ์‘๊ณ  ๋œ ์ธต์— ์‹ ์„ ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ๋†“๋Š” ๊ฒƒ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ ์ƒˆ ์ธต์„ ์ด์ „ ์ธต์— ๋…น์ด๊ณ  ์œตํ•ฉ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM  ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋ถ€์„ค ๊ณต์ •

FLOW-3D DEM์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ง ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ, ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ, ์‘์ง‘ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๋กค๋Ÿฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์••์ถ•์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ›„์† ์ธ์‡„ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํŒจํ‚น ๋ฐ€๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์••์ถ•์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฒ ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋†“๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์••์ถ•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” Case 2์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์••์ถ•์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ
์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋ฐฐ์น˜
ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์••์ถ• ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์••์ถ•

์ž…์ž-์ž…์ž ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ, ์œ ์ฒด-์ž…์ž ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๋ฐ ์ž…์ž ์ด๋™ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์€ FLOW-3D DEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์„ธํžˆ ๋ถ„์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค . ๋˜ํ•œ ์ž…์ž๊ฐ„ ํž˜์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„๋ง ์‚ดํฌ ์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด FLOW-3D AM  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ด์‚ฐ ์š”์†Œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (DEM)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ญ ํšŒ์ „ํ•˜๋Š” ์›ํ†ตํ˜• ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ถ„๋ง ํ™•์‚ฐ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋””์˜ค ์‹œ์ž‘ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋นŒ๋“œ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ์œ„๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๋ถ„๋ง ์ €์žฅ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋ž˜๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์งํ›„, ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž (์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒ‰์ƒ์ด ์ง€์ •๋จ)๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ธต์ด ๋…น๊ณ  ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋  ์ค€๋น„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ตฌ์ถ• ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์œผ๋กœ ํŽผ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ €์žฅ์†Œ์—์„œ ๋นŒ๋“œ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์†ก๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž์˜ ์„ ํ˜ธ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Melting | ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์šฉํ•ด

DEM ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉด STL ํŒŒ์ผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ถœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” CFD๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต ๊ณต์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”๊ณผ ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์—๋Š” ์ ์„ฑ ํ๋ฆ„, ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋‚ด์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ (๊ด‘์„  ์ถ”์ ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด), ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ, ์‘๊ณ , ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํ™”, ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ, ์ฐจํ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์€ ์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด TruVOF ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ 200W, ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„ 3.0m / s, ์Šคํฟ ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ 100ฮผm์—์„œ ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ์˜ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๋ถ„์„.

์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๋ฉด FLOW-3D AM  ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ Abaqus ๋˜๋Š” MSC Nastran๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ FEA ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์™€ ์‘๋ ฅ ์œค๊ณฝ ๋ฐ ๋ณ€์œ„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋ถ„์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Multilayer | ๋‹ค์ธต ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ

์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ํŠธ๋ž™์ด ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๋ฉด DEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ „์— ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์ธต์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ถ„๋ง ์ธต์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ, ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ถ„๋ง ์ธต์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ํ›„์† ์ธต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œตํ•ฉ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ถ„์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•ด์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์šฉ์œต์ธต์ด ์‘๊ณ ๋˜๋ฉด ์ž…์ž์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ธต์ด ์‘๊ณ  ์ธต์— ์ฆ์ฐฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ถ„๋ง ์ž…์ž ์ธต์— ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ง€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๋‹ค์‹œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฒˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ์ธต ๊ฐ„์˜ ์œตํ•ฉ, ๋นŒ๋“œ ๋‚ด ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค์ธต ์ ์ธต ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜

LPBF์˜ ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ง | Keyholing in LPBF

ํ‚คํ™€๋ง ์ค‘ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ์€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ? ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ TU Denmark์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›๋“ค์ด FLOW-3D AM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ต๋ณ€ํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น”์˜ ์ ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํŒ์ด ๋…น์œผ๋ฉด ๊ธฐํ™” ๋ฐ ์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์„ ์••๋ฐ•ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•˜ํ–ฅ ํ๋ฆ„๊ณผ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํก์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ณต์กดํ•˜๋ฉด ํญ์ฃผ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์ด Keyholing์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ, ํ‚คํ™€ ๋ฒฝ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์žฅ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฒฝ์ด ๋ญ‰์ณ์ ธ์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ์‘๊ณ  ์ „์„ ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฐ‡ํž ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ทน์ด ์ƒ๊ฒจ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ ๊ณต์ • ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์€ ํ‚คํ™€๋ง ๋ฐ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋ณด์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ถ„์‚ฌ (Binder jetting)

Binder jetting ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋ชจ์„ธ๊ด€ ํž˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„๋ฐ›๋Š” ํŒŒ์šฐ๋” ๋ฒ ๋“œ์—์„œ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฐ ์นจํˆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ • ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ๋ฐ ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ณต์ •์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Scan Strategy | ์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต

์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต์€ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ ๋ฐ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์†๋„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›๋“ค์€ FLOW-3D AM ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์‘๊ณ ๋œ ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŠธ๋ž™ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์žฌ ์šฉ์œต์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM ์€ ํ•˜๋‚˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ๋•Œ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Beam Shaping | ๋น” ํ˜•์„ฑ

๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์Šค์บ” ์ „๋žต ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ๋ชจ์–‘๊ณผ ์—ด์œ ์† ๋ถ„ํฌ๋Š” LPBF ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. AM ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๋Š” ๊ณต์ • ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ์ž„์˜ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ๋น” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D AM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ์ž„์˜ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋น” ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋œ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ž‘์—…์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์•Œ์•„ ๋ณด๋ ค๋ฉด “The Next Frontier of Metal AM”์›จ๋น„๋‚˜๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ฒญํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

Multi-material Powder Bed Fusion | ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ถ„๋ง ๋ฒ ๋“œ ์œตํ•ฉ

์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์Šคํ…Œ์ธ๋ฆฌ์Šค ๊ฐ• ๋ฐ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ๋ถ„๋ง์€ FLOW-3D AM ์ด ์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ์—ญํ•™์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ถ”์ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜ ๋œ ์˜จ๋„ ์˜์กด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์—์„œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค์ค‘ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ์šฉ์ ‘ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์กฐ์‚ฌ

GM๊ณผ University of Utah์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›๋“ค์€ FLOW-3D WELD ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ Marangoni ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ์™€ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์ถœ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์Šค์บ” ์†๋„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ ๋‚ด์˜ ์ ˆ๋‹จ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋†๋„ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์ข‹์€ ์ผ์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์กฐ์‚ฌ
์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์กฐ์‚ฌ
์ฐธ์กฐ : Wenkang Huang, Hongliang Wang, Teresa Rinker, Wenda Tan, ์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์กฐ์‚ฌ , Materials & Design, Volume 195, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109056
์ฐธ์กฐ : Wenkang Huang, Hongliang Wang, Teresa Rinker, Wenda Tan, ์ด์ข… ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ํ‚คํ™€ ์šฉ์ ‘์—์„œ ๊ธˆ์† ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ์กฐ์‚ฌ , Materials & Design, Volume 195, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109056

๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ฑ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ

FLOW-3D AM ์˜ ๋‚ด์žฅ ์ž…์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง์ ‘ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฆ์ฐฉ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ง ์ฃผ์ž… ์†๋„์™€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธฐ์งˆ์— ์ž…์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ์—ด์œ ์†์„ ์ง€์ •ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ž…์ž๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰, ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธˆ์† ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์— ์ฃผ์ž…๋˜๊ณ  ๊ธฐํŒ์—์„œ ์šฉ์œต ํ’€์˜ ํ›„์† ์‘๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1

A survey of electromagnetic metal casting computation designs, present approaches, future possibilities, and practical issues

The European Physical Journal Plus volume 136, Article number: 704 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Electromagnetic metal casting (EMC) is a casting technique that uses electromagnetic energy to heat metal powders. It is a faster, cleaner, and less time-consuming operation. Solid metals create issues in electromagnetics since they reflect the electromagnetic radiation rather than consume itโ€”electromagnetic energy processing results in sounded pieces with higher-ranking material properties and a more excellent microstructure solution. For the physical production of the electromagnetic casting process, knowledge of electromagnetic material interaction is critical. Even where the heated material is an excellent electromagnetic absorber, the total heating quality is sometimes insufficient. Numerical modelling works on finding the proper coupled effects between properties to bring out the most effective operation. The main parameters influencing the quality of output of the EMC process are: power dissipated per unit volume into the material, penetration depth of electromagnetics, complex magnetic permeability and complex dielectric permittivity. The contact mechanism and interference pattern also, in turn, determines the quality of the process. Only a few parameters, such as the environment’s temperature, the interference pattern, and the rate of metal solidification, can be controlled by AI models. Neural networks are used to achieve exact outcomes by stimulating the neurons in the human brain. Additive manufacturing (AM) is used to design mold and cores for metal casting. The models outperformed the traditional DFA optimization approach, which is susceptible to local minima. The system works only offline, so real-time analysis and corrections are not yet possible.

Korea Abstract

์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ (EMC)๋Š” ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธˆ์† ๋ถ„๋ง์„ ๊ฐ€์—ดํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๊นจ๋—ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋œ ์†Œ์š”๋˜๋Š” ์ž‘์—…์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ ์ฒด ๊ธˆ์†์€ ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๋น„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์‹  ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „์ž๊ธฐํ•™์—์„œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋“ฑ๊ธ‰์˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์‚ฌ์šด๋“œ ์กฐ๊ฐ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ „์ž๊ธฐ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์—ด๋œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ „์ž๊ธฐ ํก์ˆ˜์žฌ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ ์ „์ฒด ๊ฐ€์—ด ํ’ˆ์งˆ์ด ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ๋ถˆ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ด๋Œ์–ด ๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์†์„ฑ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

EMC ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ถœ๋ ฅ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋‹น ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ, ์ „์ž๊ธฐ์˜ ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด, ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์ž๊ธฐ ํˆฌ๊ณผ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์œ ์ „์œจ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ‘์ด‰ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํŒจํ„ด ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์˜จ๋„, ๊ฐ„์„ญ ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ๊ธˆ์† ์‘๊ณ  ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋งŒ AI ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ œ์–ด ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์€ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋‰ด๋Ÿฐ์„ ์ž๊ทนํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ ์ธต ์ œ์กฐ (AM)๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ์šฉ ๋ชฐ๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋กœ์ปฌ ์ตœ์†Œ๊ฐ’์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๊ธฐ์กด DFA ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๋Šฅ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ๋งŒ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ •์€ ์•„์ง ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig1
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig2
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig2
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig3
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig3
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig4
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig4
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig5
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig5
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig6
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig6
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig7
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig7
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig8
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig8
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig9
electromagnetic metal casting computation designs Fig9

References

  1. 1.J. Sun, W. Wang, Q. Yue, Review on electromagnetic-matter interaction fundamentals and efficient electromagnetic-associated heating strategies. Materials 9(4), 231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040231ADS Article Google Scholar 
  2. 2.E. Ghasali, A. Fazili, M. Alizadeh, K. Shirvanimoghaddam, T. Ebadzadeh, Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-TiC metal matrix composite prepared by conventional, electromagnetic and spark plasma sintering methods. Materials 10(11), 1255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111255ADS Article Google Scholar 
  3. 3.D. Agrawal, Latest global developments in electromagnetic materials processing. Mater. Res. Innov. 14(1), 3โ€“8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1179/143307510×12599329342926Article Google Scholar 
  4. 4.S. Singh, P. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, R. Kumar, S. Kaushal, Development and characterization of electromagnetic processed cast iron joint. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.10.012Article Google Scholar 
  5. 5.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Electromagnetic melting and processing of metalโ€“ceramic composite castings. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 232(7), 1235โ€“1243 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416666900Article Google Scholar 
  6. 6.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Novel electromagnetic composite casting process: theory, feasibility and characterization. Mater. Des. 111, 51โ€“59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.071Article Google Scholar 
  7. 7.J. Lucas, J, What are electromagnetics? LiveScience. (2018). https://www.livescience.com/50259-Electromagnetics.html
  8. 8.R. Samyal, A.K. Bagha, R. Bedi, the casting of materials using electromagnetic energy: a review. Mater. Today Proc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.255Article Google Scholar 
  9. 9.S. Singh, D. Gupta, V. Jain, Processing of Ni-WC-8Co MMC casting through electromagnetic melting. Mater. Manuf. Process. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1291954Article Google Scholar 
  10. 10.R. Singh, S. Singh, V. Mahajan, Investigations for dimensional accuracy of investment casting process after cycle time reduction by advancements in shell moulding. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6, 859โ€“865 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.103Article Google Scholar 
  11. 11.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, On melting characteristics of bulk Al-7039 alloy during in-situ electromagnetic casting. Appl. Therm. Eng. 111, 660โ€“675 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.122Article Google Scholar 
  12. 12.S. Zhang, 10 Different types of casting process. (2021). MachineMfg.com, https://www.machinemfg.com/types-of-casting/
  13. 13.Envirocare, Foundry health risks. (2013). https://envirocare.org/foundry-health-risks/
  14. 14.S.S. Gajmal, D.N. Raut, A review of opportunities and challenges in electromagnetic assisted casting. Recent Trends Product. Eng. 2(1) (2019)
  15. 15.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Electromagnetic-material interaction phenomena: heating mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in material processing. Compos. Part A (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.035Article Google Scholar 
  16. 16.S. Chandrasekaran, T. Basak, S. Ramanathan, Experimental and theoretical investigation on electromagnetic melting of metals. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(3), 482โ€“487 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.001Article Google Scholar 
  17. 17.C.R. Bird, J.M. Mertz, U.S. Patent No. 4655276. (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 1987)
  18. 18.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Experimental investigation on in-situ electromagnetic casting of copper. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 346, 012052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/346/1/012052Article Google Scholar 
  19. 19.V. Gangwar, S. Kumar, V. Singh, H. Singh, Effect of process parameters on hardness of AA-6063 in-situ electromagnetic casting by using taguchi method, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 804(1) (IOP Publishing, 2020), p. 012019
  20. 20.X. Ye, S. Guo, L. Yang, J. Gao, J. Peng, T. Hu, L. Wang, M. Hou, Q. Luo, New utilization approach of electromagnetic thermal energy: preparation of metallic matrix diamond tool bit by electromagnetic hot-press sintering. J. Alloy. Compd. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.183Article Google Scholar 
  21. 21.S. Das, A.K. Mukhopadhyay, S. Datta, D. Basu, Prospects of Electromagnetic processing: an overview. Bull. Mater. Sci. 32(1), 1โ€“13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0001-4Article Google Scholar 
  22. 22.K.L. Glass, D.M. Ashby, U.S. Patent No. 9050656. (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2015)
  23. 23.S. Verma, P. Gupta, S. Srivastava, S. Kumar, A. Anand, An overview: casting/melting of non ferrous metallic materials using domestic electromagnetic oven. J. Mater. Sci. Mech. Eng. 4(4), (2017). p-ISSN: 2393-9095; e-ISSN: 2393-9109
  24. 24.S.S. Panda, V. Singh, A. Upadhyaya, D. Agrawal, Sintering response of austenitic (316L) and ferritic (434L) stainless steel consolidated in conventional and electromagnetic furnaces. Scripta Mater. 54(12), 2179โ€“2183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.034Article Google Scholar 
  25. 25.Y. Zhang, S. Yang, S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, Microwave/freeze casting assisted fabrication of carbon frameworks derived from embedded upholder in tremella for superior performance supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.006Article Google Scholar 
  26. 26.D. Thomas, P. Abhilash, M.T. Sebastian, Casting and characterization of LiMgPO4 glass free LTCC tape for electromagnetic applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33(1), 87โ€“93 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.002Article Google Scholar 
  27. 27.M.H. Awida, N. Shah, B. Warren, E. Ripley, A.E. Fathy, Modeling of an industrial Electromagnetic furnace for metal casting applications. 2008 IEEE MTT-S Int. Electromagn. Symp. Digest. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/mwsym.2008.4633143Article Google Scholar 
  28. 28.P.K. Loharkar, A. Ingle, S. Jhavar, Parametric review of electromagnetic-based materials processing and its applications. J. Market. Res. 8(3), 3306โ€“3326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.004Article Google Scholar 
  29. 29.E.B. Ripley, J.A. Oberhaus, WWWeb search power page-melting and heat treating metals using electromagnetic heating-the potential of electromagnetic metal processing techniques for a wide variety of metals and alloys is. Ind. Heat. 72(5), 65โ€“70 (2005)Google Scholar 
  30. 30.J. Campbell, Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Metallurgy, Techniques and Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015)Google Scholar 
  31. 31.B. Ravi, Metal Casting: Computer-Aided Design and Analysis, 1st edn. (PHI Learning Ltd, 2005)Google Scholar 
  32. 32.D.E. Clark, W.H. Sutton, Electromagnetic processing of materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26(1), 299โ€“331 (1996)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  33. 33.A.D. Abdullin, New capabilities of software package ProCAST 2011 for modeling foundry operations. Metallurgist 56(5โ€“6), 323โ€“328 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-012-9578-8Article Google Scholar 
  34. 34.J. Ha, P. Cleary, V. Alguine, T. Nguyen, Simulation of die filling in gravity die casting using SPH and MAGMAsoft, in Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on CFD in Minerals & Process Industries (1999) pp. 423โ€“428
  35. 35.M. Sirviรถ, M. Woล›, Casting directly from a computer model by using advanced simulation software FLOW-3D Cast ลฝ. Arch. Foundry Eng. 9(1), 79โ€“82 (2009)Google Scholar 
  36. 36.NOVACAST Systems, Nova-Solid/Flow Brochure, NOVACAST, Ronneby (2015)
  37. 37.AutoCAST-X1 Brochure, 3D Foundry Tech, Mumbai
  38. 38.EKK, Inc. Metal Casting Simulation Software and Consulting Services, CAPCAST Brochure
  39. 39.P. Muenprasertdee, Solidification modeling of iron castings using SOLIDCast (2007)
  40. 40.CasCAE, CT-CasTest Inc. Oy, Kerava
  41. 41.E. Dominguez-Tortajada, J. Monzo-Cabrera, A. Diaz-Morcillo, Uniform electric field distribution in electromagnetic heating applicators by means of genetic algorithms optimization of dielectric multilayer structures. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Theory Tech. 55(1), 85โ€“91 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmtt.2006.886913ADS Article Google Scholar 
  42. 42.B. Warren, M.H. Awida, A.E. Fathy, Electromagnetic heating of metals. IET Electromagn. Antennas Propag. 6(2), 196โ€“205 (2012)Article Google Scholar 
  43. 43.S. Ashouri, M. Nili-Ahmadabadi, M. Moradi, M. Iranpour, Semi-solid microstructure evolution during reheating of aluminum A356 alloy deformed severely by ECAP. J. Alloy. Compd. 466(1โ€“2), 67โ€“72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.010Article Google Scholar 
  44. 44.Penn State, Metal Parts Made In The Electromagnetic Oven. ScienceDaily. (1999) Retrieved May 8, 2021, from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/06/990622055733.htm
  45. 45.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, A review of research trends in electromagnetic processing of metal-based materials and opportunities in electromagnetic metal casting. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 41(3), 217โ€“255 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2016.1142421ADS Article Google Scholar 
  46. 46.D.K. Ghodgaonkar, V.V. Varadan, V.K. Varadan, Free-space measurement of complex permittivity and complex permeability of magnetic materials at Electromagnetic frequencies. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 39(2), 387โ€“394 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/19.52520Article Google Scholar 
  47. 47.J. Baker-Jarvis, E.J. Vanzura, W.A. Kissick, Improved technique for determining complex permittivity with the transmission/reflection method. Microw. Theory Tech. IEEE Trans. 38, 1096โ€“1103 (1990)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  48. 48.M. Bologna, A. Petri, B. Tellini, C. Zappacosta, Effective magnetic permeability measurementin composite resonator structures. Instrum. Meas. IEEE Trans. 59, 1200โ€“1206 (2010)Article Google Scholar 
  49. 49.B. Ravi, G.L. Datta, Metal castingโ€“back to future, in 52nd Indian Foundry Congress, (2004)
  50. 50.D. El Khaled, N. Novas, J.A. Gazquez, F. Manzano-Agugliaro. Microwave dielectric heating: applications on metals processing. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 2880โ€“2892 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.043Article Google Scholar 
  51. 51.H. Sekiguchi, Y. Mori, Steam plasma reforming using Electromagnetic discharge. Thin Solid Films 435, 44โ€“48 (2003)ADS Article Google Scholar 
  52. 52.J. Sun, W. Wang, C. Zhao, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, Q. Yue, Study on the coupled effect of wave absorption and metal discharge generation under electromagnetic irradiation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 2042โ€“2051 (2014)Article Google Scholar 
  53. 53.K.I. Rybakov, E.A. Olevsky, E.V. Krikun, Electromagnetic sintering: fundamentals and modeling. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96(4), 1003โ€“1020 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12278Article Google Scholar 
  54. 54.A.K. Shukla, A. Mondal, A. Upadhyaya, Numerical modeling of electromagnetic heating. Sci. Sinter. 42(1), 99โ€“124 (2010)Article Google Scholar 
  55. 55.M. Chiumenti, C. Agelet de Saracibar, M. Cervera, On the numerical modeling of the thermomechanical contact for metal casting analysis. J. Heat Transf. 130(6), (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2897923Article MATH Google Scholar 
  56. 56.B. Ravi, Metal Casting: Computer-Aided Design and Analysis. (PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2005)
  57. 57.J.H. Lee, S.D. Noh, H.-J. Kim, Y.-S. Kang, Implementation of cyber-physical production systems for quality prediction and operation control in metal casting. Sensors 18, 1428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051428ADS Article Google Scholar 
  58. 58.B. Aksoy, M. Koru, Estimation of casting mold interfacial heat transfer coefficient in pressure die casting process by artificial intelligence methods. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45, 8969โ€“8980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04648-7Article Google Scholar 
  59. 59.S.S. Miriyala, V.R. Subramanian, K. Mitra, TRANSFORM-ANN for online optimization of complex industrial processes: casting process as case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(1), 294โ€“309 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.026MathSciNet Article MATH Google Scholar 
  60. 60.J.K. Kittu, G.C.M. Patel, M. Parappagoudar, Modeling of pressure die casting process: an artificial intelligence approach. Int. J. Metalcast. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-015-0001-7Article Google Scholar 
  61. 61.W. Chen, B. Gutmann, C.O. Kappe, Characterization of electromagnetic-induced electric discharge phenomena in metal-solvent mixtures. ChemistryOpen 1, 39โ€“48 (2012)Article Google Scholar 
  62. 62.J. Walker, A. Prokop, C. Lynagh, B. Vuksanovich, B. Conner, K. Rogers, J. Thiel, E. MacDonald, Real-time process monitoring of core shifts during metal casting with wireless sensing and 3D sand printing. Addit. Manuf. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.018Article Google Scholar 
  63. 63.G.C. Manjunath Patel, A.K. Shettigar, M.B. Parappagoudar, A systematic approach to model and optimize wear behaviour of castings produced by squeeze casting process. J. Manuf. Process. 32, 199โ€“212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.02.004Article Google Scholar 
  64. 64.G.C. Manjunath Patel, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, An intelligent system for squeeze casting processโ€”soft computing based approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86, 3051โ€“3065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8416-8Article Google Scholar 
  65. 65.M. Ferguson, R. Ak, Y.T. Lee, K.H. Law, Automatic localization of casting defects with convolutional neural networks, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (Boston, MA, USA, 2017), pp. 1726โ€“1735. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2017.8258115.
  66. 66.P.K.D.V. Yarlagadda, Prediction of die casting process parameters by using an artificial neural network model for zinc alloys. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(1), 119โ€“139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400189617Article MATH Google Scholar 
  67. 67.G.C. ManjunathPatel, A.K. Shettigar, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, Back propagation genetic and recurrent neural network applications in modelling and analysis of squeeze casting process. Appl. Soft Comput. 59, 418โ€“437 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.018Article Google Scholar 
  68. 68.J. Zheng, Q. Wang, P. Zhao et al., Optimization of high-pressure die-casting process parameters using artificial neural network. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44, 667โ€“674 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1886-6Article Google Scholar 
  69. 69.E. Mares, J. Sokolowski, Artificial intelligence-based control system for the analysis of metal casting properties. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 40, 149โ€“154 (2010)Google Scholar 
  70. 70.K.S. Senthil, S. Muthukumaran, C. Chandrasekhar Reddy, Suitability of friction welding of tube to tube plate using an external tool process for different tube diametersโ€”a study. Exp. Tech. 37(6), 8โ€“14 (2013)Article Google Scholar 
  71. 71.N.K. Bhoi, H. Singh, S. Pratap, P.K. Jain, Electromagnetic material processing: a clean, green, and sustainable approach. Sustain. Eng. Prod. Manuf. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816564-5.00001-3Article Google Scholar 
  72. 72.K.S. Senthil, D.A. Daniel, An investigation of boiler grade tube and tube plate without block by using friction welding process. Mater. Today Proc. 5(2), 8567โ€“8576 (2018)Article Google Scholar 
  73. 73.E. Hetmaniok, D. Sล‚ota, A. Zielonka, Restoration of the cooling conditions in a three-dimensional continuous casting process using artificial intelligence algorithms. Appl. Math. Modell. 39(16), 4797โ€“4807 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.056Article MATH Google Scholar 
  74. 74.C.V. Kumar, S. Muthukumaran, A. Pradeep, S.S. Kumaran, Optimizational study of friction welding of steel tube to aluminum tube plate using an external tool process. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 6(2), 300โ€“306 (2011)Google Scholar 
  75. 75.T. Adithiyaa, D. Chandramohan, T. Sathish, Optimal prediction of process parameters by GWO-KNN in stirring-squeeze casting of AA2219 reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater. Today Proc. 150, 1598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.051Article Google Scholar 
  76. 76.B.P. Pehrson, A.F. Moore (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8708031 (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC, 2014)
  77. 77.Liu, J., & Rynerson, M. L. (2008). U.S. Patent No. 7,461,684. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  78. 78.K. Salonitis, B. Zeng, H.A. Mehrabi, M. Jolly, The challenges for energy efficient casting processes. Procedia CIRP 40, 24โ€“29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.043Article Google Scholar 
  79. 79.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Effect of solidification environment on microstructure and indentation hardness of Alโ€“Znโ€“Mg alloy casts developed using electromagnetic heating. Int. J. Metal Cast. 10, 1โ€“13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0176-1Article Google Scholar 
  80. 80.R.R. Mishra, A.K. Sharma, Effect of susceptor and Mold material on microstructure of in-situ electromagnetic casts of Alโ€“Znโ€“Mg alloy. Mater. Des. 131, 428โ€“440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.038Article Google Scholar 
  81. 81.S. Kaushal, S. Bohra, D. Gupta, V. Jain, On processing and characterization of Cuโ€“Mo-based castings through electromagnetic heating. Int. J. Metalcast. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00481-8Article Google Scholar 
  82. 82.S. Nandwani, S. Vardhan, A.K. Bagha, A literature review on the exposure time of electromagnetic based welding of different materials. Mater. Today Proc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.056Article Google Scholar 
  83. 83.F.J.B. Brum, S.C. Amico, I. Vedana, J.A. Spim, Electromagnetic dewaxing applied to the investment casting process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(7), 3166โ€“3171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.024Article Google Scholar 
  84. 84.M.P. Reddy, R.A. Shakoor, G. Parande, V. Manakari, F. Ubaid, A.M.A. Mohamed, M. Gupta, Enhanced performance of nano-sized SiC reinforced Al metal matrix nanocomposites synthesized through electromagnetic sintering and hot extrusion techniques. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 27(5), 606โ€“614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.08.015Article Google Scholar 
  85. 85.V.R. Kalamkar, K. Monkova, (Eds.), Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7
  86. 86.V. Bist, A.K. Sharma, P. Kumar, Development and microstructural characterisations of the lead casting using electromagnetic technology. Managerโ€™s J. Mech. Eng. 4(4), 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.26634/jme.4.4.2840Article Google Scholar 
  87. 87.A. Sharma, A. Chouhan, L. Pavithran, U. Chadha, S.K. Selvaraj, Implementation of LSS framework in automotive component manufacturing: a review, current scenario and future directions. Mater Today: Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.374Article Google Scholar 
Fig. 1.Schematic of wire feeding in a melting line.

Evaluation on the Efficiency of Cored Wire Feeding in Addition of Alloying Elements into Cu Melt

Bok-Hyun Kang*, Ki-Young Kim
Korea University of Technology and Education

์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด ํ”ผ๋”ฉ์— ์˜ํ•œ Cu ์šฉํƒ•์—์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํšจ์œจ ํ‰๊ฐ€

Abstract

To add alloying elements into a pure copper melt, the wire-feeding efficiency of cored (alloy containing) wire was evaluated using a commercial, computational fluid-dynamics program. The model design was based on an industrial-scale production line. The variables calculated included wire feed rate, melt temperature, wire diameter, melt flow rate and wire temperature. Efficiency was evaluated after a series of calculations based on the penetration depth of the alloy-wire into the molten copper bath. Of the five variables investigated, the wire feed rate and wire diameter were the most influential factors affecting the feeding efficiency of the cored-wire.

Keywords: Cored wire feeding, Cu melt, Efficiency, Alloying elements

1. ์„œ๋ก 

์†Œ์žฌ์‚ฐ์—…์ด ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์นœํ™”์ ,์ €์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ณ ํšจ์œจ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์„ธ์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒ ๊ฐ•์ด๋‚˜ ๋น„์ฒ ์†Œ์žฌ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋„ ํƒˆ์‚ฐ, ํƒˆํ™ฉ, ๊ฐœ์žฌ๋ฌผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆํ™” ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ฒญ์ •ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉํƒ• ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ๋ชฉํ‘œํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ํ™”ํ•™ ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋ถ„๋ง ์›์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธˆ์† ํ”ผ๋ณต์žฌ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์‹ธ์„œ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฆด์— ๊ฐ์€ ํ›„ ์ˆœ์ฐจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ’€์–ด์„œ ์šฉํƒ•์— ํˆฌ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด(cored wire)๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ์›์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์†์‹ค์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋†’์€ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์šฉ๊ฐ•์˜ ํƒˆ์‚ฐ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ Caํˆฌ์ž… ์‹œ์—๋„ Ca๋ถ„๋ง์„ ํ”ผ๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์ด ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ ,๋ฏธ๋Ÿ‰์˜ V๋‚˜ Al๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์›์†Œ๋กœ์ฐธ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ์—๋„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค[1-5]. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์šฉํ•ด ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์—ด์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋‹ค[6-9].

๋˜ํ•œ ์ฒ ๊ฐ•์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ฃผ์ฒ  ์ œ์กฐ์‹œ์—๋„ ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด๋ฒ•์ด ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ฃผ์ฒ ์˜ ๊ตฌ์ƒํ™” ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ[10], ์„ ์ฒ ์˜ ํƒˆํ™ฉ[11]๋“ฑ์—์„œ๋„ ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•œํŽธ, ๋น„์ฒ ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด๋ฒ•์ด ์•„์ง ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ฑ„์šฉ์ด ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‚˜, ์ „์ž๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ์šฉ๋™ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์†Œ์žฌ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‚ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„๋ง๋กœ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ ์‹œ ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์›์†Œ์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์‹œ ๊ทธ ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ค์ œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์žฅ์ž… ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ํˆฌ์ž… ํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ์ตœ์ข… ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์กฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์‰ฝ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์‚ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ์‰ฌ์šด์›์†Œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์šฉํƒ•์— ํˆฌ์ž…ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ์‹ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆํ™”(micro alloying)์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ ๋‹ค๋ฉด ํ™”ํ•™์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ด ๋”์šฑ ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ , ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋˜ํ•œ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค.

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋™ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ œ์กฐ์‹œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์›์†Œ๋Š” ์šฉํ•ด ๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ณต์ •๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ์˜ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆํ™”๋Š” ๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋กœ์—์„œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์›์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ฉ์–ด๋ฆฌ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ถ„๋งํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ํˆฌ์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ๋ถ„์ง„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์—… ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๋‚˜์˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ณ , ํŠนํžˆ ๋ถ„๋ง์˜ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์šฉํƒ•๊ณผ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‚ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜์—ฌ ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์ด ์‹ฌํ•œ ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋™ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ œ์กฐ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด๋ฒ•์˜ ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜[12], ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณต์ •๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋™ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์šฉํ•ด, ์—ฐ์ฃผ๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ ์‹คํ—˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์šฐ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ „์‚ฐ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์ค‘์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค.

๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ Cu ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์˜ ์ œ์กฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด ํ”ผ๋”ฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ „์‚ฐ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™€์ด์–ด ํ”ผ๋”ฉ ์‹œ์˜ํšจ์œจ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ณต์ •๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

2.์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

Fig. 1์€ ์šฉํ•ด๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ์˜ ์™€์ด์–ดํ”ผ๋”ฉ ๋ชจ์‹๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ฐฐํ•ฉ๋กœ์—์„œ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ์„ ํˆฌ์ž…ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฉํƒ•์˜์œ ์†์€ ์—ฐ์ฃผ๋˜๋Š” ์Šฌ๋ผ๋ธŒ์˜ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์šฉํƒ•์œ ๋กœ์˜ ๋‹จ๋ฉด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋กœ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ์šฉํƒ•์œ ์†์„ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ฒด์˜X+ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์œ ์†์„ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Fig. 2๋Š”๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ 100ร—500ร—20 mm ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ธธ์ด ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ 50๊ฐœ, ๋†’์ด ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ 250๊ฐœ, ๋‘๊ป˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ 10๊ฐœ์˜ ์†Œ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฉํƒ•์€ ์ˆœ Cu๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์žฌ์งˆ์€ Cu์ด๋ฉฐ, ํŠœ๋ธŒ ์•ˆ์— Cu ๋ถ„๋ง์ด ๋“ค์–ด์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ƒ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ๋ถ„๋ง์€ ์ •์˜๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๋ฒŒํฌ ์žฌ์งˆ ๋ฐ€๋„์˜60%์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์žฌ์งˆ๋ณ„ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์€T able 1๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.

์šฉํƒ•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„, Cu์šฉํƒ•๊ณผ ์™€์ด์–ด ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ด ์ด๋™์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์œ ์ฒดํ•ด์„ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์ธ Flow-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์†ก๊ธ‰์†๋„, ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ์˜จ๋„, ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์˜จ๋„๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒ์„ธ๋Š” Table2์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์†ก๊ธ‰ ์†๋„๋Š” Z- ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹น๊ฒจ์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…๋ ฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

Fig. 1.Schematic of wire feeding in a melting line.
Fig. 1.Schematic of wire feeding in a melting line.

<์ค‘๋žต>…….

Flg. 2.Three dimensional model for wire feeding simulation
Flg. 2.Three dimensional model for wire feeding simulation
Fig. 3.Change in solid fraction of the cored wire during feeding: (I)initial heating, (II) transient melting, (III) steady statemelting
Fig. 3.Change in solid fraction of the cored wire during feeding: (I)initial heating, (II) transient melting, (III) steady statemelting
Fig. 4.Solid fraction contours with wire feed rate at steady state: melt temp. 1473 K, wire dia. 10 mm, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wire temp.303 K
Fig. 4.Solid fraction contours with wire feed rate at steady state: melt temp. 1473 K, wire dia. 10 mm, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wire temp.303 K

Fig. 5.Effect of wire feed rate on the penetration depth of wire at itssolid fraction of 0.7.
Fig. 5.Effect of wire feed rate on the penetration depth of wire at itssolid fraction of 0.7.
ig. 6.Solid fraction contours with melt temperature at steady state: wire feed rate 7 m/s, wire dia. 10 mm, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wire temp.303 K
ig. 6.Solid fraction contours with melt temperature at steady state: wire feed rate 7 m/s, wire dia. 10 mm, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wire temp.303 K
Fig. 7.Solid fraction contours with wire diameter at steady state: wire feed rate 7 m/s, melt temp. 1473 K, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wiretemp.303 K
Fig. 7.Solid fraction contours with wire diameter at steady state: wire feed rate 7 m/s, melt temp. 1473 K, melt flow rate 1.7 m/s, wiretemp.303 K
Fig. 8.Effect of wire diameter on the penetration depth of wire at itssolid fraction of 0.7
Fig. 8.Effect of wire diameter on the penetration depth of wire at itssolid fraction of 0.7
ig. 9.Effect of melt flow rate on the penetration depth of wire.
ig. 9.Effect of melt flow rate on the penetration depth of wire.
Fig. 10.Effect of wire temperature on the penetration depth of wire
Fig. 10.Effect of wire temperature on the penetration depth of wire

<์ค‘๋žต>…

4. ๊ฒฐ๋ก 

์ฝ”์–ด๋“œ์™€์ด์–ด ํ”ผ๋”ฉ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์†ก๊ธ‰ ์†๋„, ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ์˜จ๋„, ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ, ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณต์ •๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์‚ฐ ๋ชจ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ , ํ”ผ๋”ฉ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํšจ์œจ์€ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์†ก๊ธ‰ ์†๋„์™€ ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์นจํˆฌ ๊นŠ์ด์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ํฐ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ์™€์ด์–ด๊ฐ€ ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ์ƒ๋ฉด ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์ด์—์„œ ์šฉํ•ด๋˜์–ด ๋ฒ„๋ฆฌ๋ฉด ์‚ฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ , ๋ถ€์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์Šฌ๋ž˜๊ทธ ์ค‘์œผ๋กœ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šฐ๋ฏ€๋กœ ํšจ์œจ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋‚˜, ์šฉํƒ•์˜ ์ €๋ถ€์—์„œ ์šฉํ•ด๋˜๋ฉด, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ Cu ์šฉํƒ• ์ค‘์œผ๋กœ ๋…น์•„ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์›์†Œ์˜ ํšŒ์ˆ˜์œจ์ด ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋จ์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ผ์ธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋นŒ๋ ›์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ์กฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์กฐ์ ˆ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ๋ฐ, ์™€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ ์ • ์†ก๊ธ‰ ์†๋„์˜ ์กฐํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.

References

[1] P. Murray, Metallurgist, โ€œUse of cored wire to introducemetallic powders into molten metalโ€,41(1997) 53-55.
[2] S. Basak, R. Kumar Dhal and G. G. Roy, Ironmaking andSteelmaking, โ€œEfficacy and recovery of calcium during CaSicored wire injection in steel meltsโ€,37(2010) 161-168.
[3] D.A. Dyudkin, V.V. Kisilenko, V.P. Onishchuk, A.A. Larionov,and B.V. Neboga, Metallurgist, โ€œEffectiveness of alloyingsteel with vanadium from cored wireโ€,46(2002) 203-204.
[4] Y. Heikiki and M. Juha, Scandinavian J. of Metallurgy, โ€œSteelcomposition adjustment by wire feeding at Rautaruukki OyRaaha steel worksโ€,19(1990) 142-145.
[5] S.V. Kazakov, A.A. Neretin, S.M. Chumakov, S.D. Zinchenkoand A. B. Lyatin, Metallurgist, โ€œTreatment of converter steelwith calcium-aluminum wireโ€,42(1998) 173-175.
[6] S. Sanyal, S. Chandra, S. Kumar and G.G. Roy, Steel ResearchInt., โ€œDissolution kinetics of cored wire in molten steelโ€,77(2006) 541-549.
[7] S. Sanyal, S. Chandra, S. Kumar and G.G. Roy, ISIJ Int., โ€œAnImproved Model of Cored Wire Injection in Steel Meltsโ€,44(2004) 1157-1166.
[8] S. Sanyal, J.K. Saha, S. Chandra and C. Bhanu, ISIJ Int.,โ€œModel based optimazation of aluminum wire injection insteel meltsโ€,46(2006) 779-781.
[9] M.G. Kim, D.C. Hwang, J.J. Choi, S.Y. Yoon, B.J. Ye, J.H.Kim and W.B. Kim, J. KFS, โ€œHeat Flow Analysis of FerriticStainless Steel Melt during Ti wire feedingโ€,29(2009) 277-283.
[10] I. Ruiz, F. Wolfsgruber and J. L. Enriquez, Inter. J. of CastMetals Research, โ€œProduction of ductile iron with the coredwire technologyโ€,16(2003) 7-10.
[11] A.M. Zborshchik, Metallurgist, โ€œCost-effectiveness of de-sulfurizing pig iron with magnesium-bearing cored wireโ€,45(2001) 360-362.
[12] B.H. Kang, W.H. Lee, J.Y. Cho, M.J. Lee and K.Y. Kim,Advanced Mater. Reasearch, โ€œYield of alloying elements fedby cored wire into a copper meltโ€,690-693(2013) 62-65

Mixing Tank with FLOW-3D

CFD Stirs Up Mixing ์ผ๋ฐ˜

CFD (์ „์‚ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™) ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋•Œ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ช‡ ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ฏน์‹ฑ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ์‹œ๋Œ€๋Š” ์˜ค๋ž˜ ์ „์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์—„์ฒญ๋‚œ ๋„์•ฝ์— ํž˜ ์ž…์–ด Ansys, Comsol ๋ฐ Flow Science์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์˜ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฏน์‹ฑ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€œ๋ณ‘๋ ฌํ™” ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟํ™”๋Š” ๋น„์ „๋ฌธ ํ™”ํ•™ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์—๊ฒŒ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ CFD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ€๋ผ๊ณ  ํŽœ์‹ค๋ฒ ์ด๋‹ˆ์•„ ์ฃผ ํ”ผ์ธ ๋ฒ„๊ทธ์—์žˆ๋Š” Ansys Inc.์˜ ์ˆ˜์„ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋งˆ์ผ€ํŒ… ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์ž์ธ Bill Kulp๋Š” ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ฐœ์„ ์„์œ„ํ•œ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์ง€์นจ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์‹ญ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ? ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ํ™”ํ•™ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์˜ eHandbook์„ ์ง€๊ธˆ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋„์ „ ์‹ธ์šฐ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•!

์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ํœด์Šคํ„ด์—์žˆ๋Š” Nalco Champion๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ํ™”ํ•™ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์—๊ฒŒ Ansys Fluent ๋ฐ ACT (๋ถ„์„ ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ) ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์•ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๊ถŒํ•œ์„ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„์œ„ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Giving Mixing Its Due

โ€œํ™”ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…์€ CFD์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ„๊ณผ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ตœ์‹  ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ€๋ผ๊ณ  Flow Science Inc. , Santa Fe, NM์˜ CFD ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์ธ Ioannis Karampelas๋Š” ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํšŒ์‚ฌ์˜ Flow-3D Multiphysics ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€์™€ ์ „์šฉ ํฌ์ŠคํŠธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋„๊ตฌ ์ธ FlowSight์— ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€œ๋ชจ๋“  ์ƒ์—…์šฉ CFD ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€๋Š” ์–ด๋–ค ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋„๊ตฌ์™€ ๋ฒˆ๋“ค๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์ง€๋งŒ FlowSight๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์žฌ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ง๊ด€์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ€๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Š” ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ธก์ •์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ณต์ • (์˜ˆ : ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ • ํ•  ์ˆ˜์—†๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ๋…์„ฑ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์กด์žฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ณธ์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๊ณต์ •)์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํŠนํžˆ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋™์ผํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฏน์„œ ๊ด€๋ จ ์žฅ๋น„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ๊ฐ ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ œํ’ˆ์„๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ๋งž์ถคํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. โ€œ์ด๋Š” ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœํ†  ํƒ€์ดํ•‘ ๋น„์šฉ์ด๋‚˜ ์ž ์žฌ์  ์ธ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์—…์ฒด์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ€๋ผ๊ณ  Karampelas๋Š” ๋งํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CFD ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์ž์ฒด๋Š” ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ๋•Œ ๊ตฌํ˜• ์ž…์ž์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ด์‚ฐ ์š”์†Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, LES ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์š”์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  Karampelas๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ „์ฒด ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ LES๋Š” ์ด๋ฏธ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ํ•™๊ณ„์™€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์‚ฐ์—… (์˜ˆ : ์ „๋ ฅ ๊ณตํ•™)์—์„œ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. .

๊ทธ๋Ÿผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  CFD์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋น„์‹ค์šฉ์  ์ผ ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ํ™•์‹คํžˆ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋‚˜๋…ธ ์ž…์ž์—์„œ ๋ฒŒํฌ ์œ ์ฒด ์ฆ๋ฐœ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ด€์‹ฌ์˜ ๊ทœ๋ชจ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์งˆ ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ์•„์ง ์•Œ๋ ค์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ์ดํ•ด๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์•„๋งˆ๋„ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ (์˜ˆ : ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง)๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Œ ํŽจ๋ฐ” ํšจ๊ณผโ€๋ผ๊ณ  Karampelas๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด์™€ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ ๋œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ถœํ˜„์€ CFD ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณผ๋‹คํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•œ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Š” ๋ฏฟ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€œ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์—ด๊ตํ™˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ ์  ๋” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ณต์ •์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ์žฅ๋ž˜์— ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ผ์„ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์‚ฌ์šฉ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์ด์ ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž๊ฐ€ ์ƒ์ƒ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ๋งŒ ์ œํ•œ๋˜์–ด ์†Œ๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋ฏน์„œ์—์„œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์ฆ๋ฅ˜ ์ปฌ๋Ÿผ์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ™”ํ•™ ํ”Œ๋žœํŠธ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธธ์„ ์—ด์–ด ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ํ•ญ์ƒ ๊ด€๋ จ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ CFD๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ฅผ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ ํƒ ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ™•์‹ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.โ€๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆฝ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.



Seรกn Ottewell์€ Chemical Processing์˜ ํŽธ์ง‘์žฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. sottewell@putman.net์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฉ”์ผ์„ ๋ณด๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์›๋ฌธ : https://www.chemicalprocessing.com/articles/2017/cfd-stirs-up-mixing/

Granular Media

Granular ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด

๊ฐ€๊ณต ๋ฐ ์ œ์กฐ ์—…๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ The granular media model๋ฅผ ์ ‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠน์ดํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ž…์ƒ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ „๋‹ฌ, ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋˜๋Š” ์กฐ์ž‘ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์—๊ฒŒ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ธฐ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…์ƒ ๋งค์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ž…์ž์™€ ๊ธฐ์ฒด ๋˜๋Š” ์•ก์ฒด (์˜ˆ : ๋ชจ๋ž˜์™€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜์™€ ๋ฌผ) ์ผ ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…์ƒ ๊ณ ์ฒด์™€ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜๋ฃŒ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œํ•œ ๋  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„์••์ถ•์„ฑ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ ์ทจ๊ธ‰๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž…์ƒ ๋งค์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ ๋†์ถ• ์ž…์ƒ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ “์—ฐ์†”์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ชจ๋ž˜์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ ์œ ์ฒด ํ‘œํ˜„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Sand flowing under gravity in two-dimensional hour glass
2 ์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ค‘๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜. ์ž‘์€ ๊ฒ€์€ ์ƒ‰ ์„ ์€ ์†๋„ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ฑ„์›Œ์ง„ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Granular๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

๋ชจ๋ž˜์™€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์˜ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์†๋„๋กœ ํ๋ฅด์ง€๋งŒ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ ์„ฑ ์‘๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตํ™˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜๋Š” 2 ์ƒ ํ๋ฆ„์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ „ํ˜•์ ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ชจ๋ž˜์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์ง๊ฒฝ์€ ์•ฝ 10 ๋ถ„์˜ 1 ๋ฐ€๋ฆฌ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ณต๋™์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ ๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ๋ถ„์œจ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 50 % ์ด์ƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฒ”์œ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜์™€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ทธ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ์†๋„ ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ 2 ์ƒ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” Drift-Flux๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€ ์†๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ์น˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๋ช…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒ๋Œ€ ์†๋„ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ด ๋ณตํ•ฉ ํ๋ฆ„์€ ์ž…์ƒ ๋งค์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์„ ํƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ž˜/๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ์™€์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์— ๋‚ ์นด๋กœ์šด ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์œ ์ฒด๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์œ ์ฒด๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋‹ค์ง ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ท ์ผํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ ๋„๋Š” ๋ฐ€๋„์™€ ์ „๋‹จ ์‘๋ ฅ์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ์ „๋‹ฌ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์ž…์ž-์ž…์ž ์ถฉ๋Œ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์€ ์ „๋‹จ ๋†์ถ• ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์บ๋น„ํ‹ฐ์˜ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์˜์—ญ์„ ๋ฐฐ์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹จ์—ด ๊ธฐํฌ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์—ด ๊ธฐํฌ๋Š” ์œ ์ฒด ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•œ ๋ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋‘˜๋Ÿฌ์‹ธ์ธ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์˜์—ญ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐํฌ์˜ ์••๋ ฅ์€ ๊ธฐํฌ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ท ์ผ ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ฐ–์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ†ตํ’๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐํฌ ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๋™ ์™ธ๋ถ€๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋˜๋„๋ก ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Sand Core Blowing Applications

์œ ์ฒด์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ์ž…์ƒ๋งค์งˆ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ 2 ์ฐจ์› ์๊ธฐ ๋ชจ์–‘ ํ˜ธํผ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์— 1cm ๋„ˆ๋น„ ํŠœ๋ธŒ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ ํŠœ๋ธŒ๊ฐ€ ๋น„์–ด์žˆ๋Š” ์ฑ„๋กœ ์‹œ์ž‘๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Granular media model
 
Figures 1-4 (From left to right): Initial 2D hopper configuration; Time 1.75s โ€” Vectors are black; Time 3.0s; Time 5.0s

๋ชจ๋ž˜๋Š” 0.63 ๋ถ€ํ”ผ ๋ถ„์œจ์˜ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ํฌ์žฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ดˆ๊ธฐํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ด€ ์ž…๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์—์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜๋Š” ์ค‘๋ ฅ์˜ ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์œ„์˜ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ชจ๋ž˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1-4, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์ƒ‰์ƒ์€ ํŒจํ‚น์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„ ์ €ํ•ญ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰์€ ์™„๋ฒฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‹จ๋‹จํ•จ). ์งง์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๊ฑฐํ’ˆ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์˜์—ญ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ž˜์˜ ์œ—๋ฉด์„ ํ–ฅํ•ด ์˜ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋‹จ์— ๋„๋‹ฌ ํ•  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ธฐํฌ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ฃผ์œ„์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋งŒ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์ด ๋ถ•๊ดด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋‹จ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ์›€ํ‘น ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ„ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์ธก๋ฉด์„ 34 ยฐ์˜ ์ง€์ •๋œ ์•ˆ์‹๊ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ถ€์  ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ์ด ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์— ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฑฐํ’ˆ์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ ์šฉ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด D. Lefebvre, A. Mackenbrock, V. Vidal, V์— ์˜ํ•ด “๋‚ ๋ฆฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ๊ธˆํ˜• ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ”๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Pavan and PM Haigh., Hommes & Fonderie, 2004 ๋…„ 12 ์›”. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ถฉ์ „ ํฌํŠธ๊ฐ€์žˆ๋Š” 2 ์ฐจ์› ๋‹ค์ด ํ˜•์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ด์˜ ๋ฒคํŒ…์€ ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์ ์ด ์–ด์„œ ๋ฒคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ์ „ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํญ 30cm, ๋†’์ด 15cm, ๋‘๊ป˜ 1cm์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ€๋„ 1.508 gm/cc์˜ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ / ๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์ž ์ž…๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ ˆ๋Œ€ 2 ๊ธฐ์••์˜ ์••๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ž์— ๋„ฃ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์ž์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ์—๋Š” 5 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ด๋ฆฐ ํ†ตํ’๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์ƒ์ž์˜ ์•„๋ž˜์ชฝ๊ณผ ์™ผ์ชฝ์—๋Š” 6 ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ†ตํ’๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋” ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฐ์—ด์€ ์ƒ์ž์˜ ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์ฑ„์šฐ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Sand core blowing continuum model simulation
ย 
Figure 5:ย  ์—ฐ์†์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋น„๊ต ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” 0.035s, 0.047s ๋ฐ 0.055s์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ‰์กฐ๋Š” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๋“œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜ํ‰์œผ๋กœ 80 ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ์…€๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ง์œผ๋กœ 40 ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ฑ„์›Œ์ง„ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ 0.07 ์ดˆ ์˜€๊ณ  3.2GHz Pentium 4 PC ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ง๋ ฌ ๋ชจ๋“œ๋กœ ์‹คํ–‰๋˜๋Š” CPU ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์•ฝ 8.9 ์ดˆ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๋งŒ์กฑํ•  ์ •๋„๋กœ ์ž‘์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ 2D ์ผ€์ด์Šค์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์˜์—ญ์— 3200 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์…€์ด ์žˆ์Œ).

์—ฐ์†์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ Lefebvre ๋“ฑ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์‚ฌ์ง„์„ ๋น„๊ต ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๊ฐ์  ์ผ์น˜๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ์ข‹์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์™ผ์ชฝ์— ํ†ตํ’๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ซํ˜€์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„๋Œ€์นญ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ถ„์•ผ

Metal Casting

์ฃผ์กฐ์ œํ’ˆ, ๊ธˆํ˜•์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ FLOW-3D์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ํšŒ์‚ฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต์„ฑ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
(์ฃผ)์—์Šคํ‹ฐ์•„์ด์”จ์•ค๋””์—์„œ๋Š” ย FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์ „๋ฌธ ์ง€์‹์„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์™€ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฐ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์•ˆ์— ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ํ• ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋Š” ํŠน๋ณ„ํžˆ ์ฃผ์กฐํ•ด์„์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” Lost Foam ์ฃผ์กฐ, Non-newtonian ์œ ์ฒด ๋ฐ ๊ธˆํ˜•์˜ ๋‹ค์ด์‹ธ์ดํด๋ง ํ•ด์„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๋“ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ฃผ์กฐ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, FLOW-3D๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ถ„๋“ค์˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Ladle Pour Simulation by Nemak Poland Sp. z o.o.

ย 
ย 
Models
  • Cooling Channels
  • Core Gas
  • Thermal Stress Evolution
  • More Modeling Capabilities
Case Studies

๊ด€๋ จ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ

The Fastest Laptops for 2024

FLOW-3D ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์šฉ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์„ ํƒ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ

2024๋…„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ PCMag์ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ์†Œ๊ฐœ : ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์›๋ณธ ์ถœ์ฒ˜: https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-fastest-laptops CFD๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์„ ์ • ๊ธฐ์ค€์€ ๋ณ„๋„๋กœ ...
The experimental layout

Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation

ํŽ„๋ผ์ดํŠธ ๋ผ๋ฉœ๋ผ ํ‘์—ฐ ์ฒ ์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก: ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฒ€์ฆ Vasilios Fourlakidis, Ilia Belov, Attila Diรณszegi Abstract The present work provides validation ...
Fig. 1. Protection matt over the scour pit.

Numerical study of the flow at a vertical pile with net-like scourprotection matt

๊ทธ๋ฌผํ˜• ์„ธ๊ตด๋ฐฉ์ง€ ๋งคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ง๋ง๋š์˜ ์œ ๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ Minxi Zhanga,b, Hanyan Zhaoc, Dongliang Zhao d, Shaolin Yuee, Huan Zhoue,Xudong ...
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2.1 ๊ฐ€๊ณต ํ›„ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ ๋ณด๊ธฐ

1 m/s๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น ๋ฅธ ์†๋„์—์„œ ์•ก์ฒด ๊ธˆ์†์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

ESTUDIO MOVIMIENTO DE METAL LIQUIDO A VELOCIDADES MAYORES DE 1 M/S Author: Primitivo Carranza TormeSupervised by :Dr. Jesus Mยช Blanco ...
Figure 14. Defects: (a) Unmelt defects(Scheme NO.4);(b) Pores defects(Scheme NO.1); (c); Spattering defect (Scheme NO.3); (d) Low overlapping rate defects(Scheme NO.5).

Molten pool structure, temperature and velocity
flow in selective laser melting AlCu5MnCdVA alloy

์šฉ์œต ํ’€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์„ ํƒ์  ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฐ ์†๋„ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์šฉ์œต AlCu5MnCdVA ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ Pan Lu1 , Zhang Cheng-Lin2,6,Wang Liang3, Liu Tong4 ...
Figure 4.24 - Model with virtual valves in the extremities of the geometries to simulate the permeability of the mold promoting a more uniformed filling

Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by Flow-3D

Dissertaรงรฃo de MestradoCiclo de Estudos Integrados Conducentes aoGrau de Mestre em Engenharia MecรขnicaTrabalho efectuado sob a orientaรงรฃo doDoutor Hรฉlder de ...
Figure 1: Mold drawings

3D Flow and Temperature Analysis of Filling a Plutonium Mold

ํ”Œ๋ฃจํ† ๋Š„ ์ฃผํ˜• ์ถฉ์ „์˜ 3D ์œ ๋™ ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ถ„์„ Authors: Orenstein, Nicholas P. [1] Publication Date:2013-07-24Research Org.: Los Alamos National Lab ...
Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.

Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process using FLOW-3D

Aneesh Kumar J1, a, K. Krishnakumar1, b and S. Savithri2, c 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram, ...
Fig. 1. (a) Dimensions of the casting with runners (unit: mm), (b) a melt flow simulation using Flow-3D software together with Reilly's model[44], predicted that a large amount of bifilms (denoted by the black particles) would be contained in the final casting. (c) A solidification simulation using Pro-cast software showed that no shrinkage defect was contained in the final casting.

AZ91 ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ์ฃผ๋ฌผ ๋‚ด ์—ฐํ–‰ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์บ๋ฆฌ์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

TianLiabJ.M.T.DaviesaXiangzhenZhucaUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United KingdombGrainger and Worrall Ltd, Bridgnorth WV15 5HP, United KingdomcBrunel Centre for Advanced Solidification ...
Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process

Gating System Design Based on Numerical Simulation and Production Experiment Verification of Aluminum Alloy Bracket Fabricated by Semi-solid Rheo-Die Casting Process

๋ฐ˜๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ ˆ์˜ค ๋‹ค์ด ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘๋œ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ํ•ฉ๊ธˆ ๋ธŒ๋ž˜ํ‚ท์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŒ… ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ...

Simulation of Joule heating-based Core Drying

This article was contributed by Eric Riedel 1,2

1Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Institute of Manufacturing Technology and Quality Management, Germany

2Soplain GmbH, Germany

ํ˜„๋Œ€์˜ ์ฃผ์กฐ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์—๋Š” ์ƒŒ๋“œ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ธ์‹์˜ ํ™•๋Œ€๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ก  ๊ทœ์ œ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ์—ด๋กœ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์น˜์œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌด๊ธฐ, ๋ฌด๋ฐฐ์ถœ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ณต์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์—์„œ ์—ด์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒŒ๋“œ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ณต์ •์€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ์ ์€ ์•ฝ 1 W/(mยทK)์˜ ์„์˜ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์˜ ์—ด์ „๋„์œจ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ณต์ •์— ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๋งŽ์ด ์†Œ์š”๋˜๊ณ  ์‰˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ตœ๋Œ€ 523.15K ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์€ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ๊ฐ€์†ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์—ด์ƒ์ž ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ์ ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ์ž์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋””์ง€ํ„ธํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋Œ€์‹  ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์—์„œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•ด์•ผ๋งŒ ์ˆ˜๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ACS ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค

ํŠนํ—ˆ๋ฐ›์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ACS(Advanced Core Solution) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์ด ๋†’์€ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฐ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ACS ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฌด๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ฃผ์š” ์š”์ธ์€ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ์žฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋กœ, ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ „๋„๋„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ „์••์ด ์ธ๊ฐ€๋˜๋ฉด ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1์—์„œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์™€ ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ท ์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ข€ ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ๋งํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ „๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์•Œ๊ฐฑ์ด ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ €ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€๋Š” ์…ธ ํ˜•์„ฑ ์—†์ด ๊ท ์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์—ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย Joule heating์ด๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ทธ ์ด๋ฉด์˜ ๊ณผํ•™์  ์›๋ฆฌ๋Š” Joule ์˜ ์ œ1๋ฒ•์น™์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ง๋ ฌ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๋Š” Joule heating์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ€์—ด๋˜์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ด๋Š” ACS ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ฐ€์—ด ์žฅ์น˜๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ด์ƒ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ™”๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋”์šฑ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์žฅ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์—ด์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ณณ, ์ฆ‰ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ง์ ‘ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์—ด์€ ๊ท ์งˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋œ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์ธ์ ‘ ๋ชจ๋ž˜๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์„์˜ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์—ด์ „๋„์œจ์€ ๋” ์ด์ƒ ์ œํ•œ ๊ณต์ • ์ธ์ž๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ตœ์ดˆ๋กœ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋ณ„ ์ „๊ธฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ฑด์กฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์ž์ฒด๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ACS ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ํŽธ์ต์˜ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—…์  ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1: ์ „๋ฅ˜ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋น„๊ต: a) ๋ฏธํฌํ•จ, b) ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์ •

๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค๋ช…

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ Starobin ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ž‘์—…์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย [1], ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ย FLOW-3D์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ-๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „์œ„(์ฆ‰, ๋ƒ„๋น„ = 1)๋ฅผ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ „๊ธฐ-์—ด ํšจ๊ณผ, ์ฆ‰ ์ค„ ๊ฐ€์—ด(์—ํ…Œ๋ฅด๋ชจ = 1)์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์ •๋ณด๋Š” [2]์—์„œ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„(์ดˆ)์™€ ์œ ์ „ ์ „์œ„(์˜ค๋””์—˜)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋™์  ์ „์œ„(์˜ค์ดํฌํ…œ = 1)๋ฅผ ํ• ๋‹น๋ฐ›์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด์—๋„ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

์ „๊ทน์—๋Š” ํ•œ ์ „๊ทน์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณ ์ • ์ „์œ„(์™ธ์ „ = 0), ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„, ์Œ์ „์œ„(์™ธ์ „)๊ฐ€ ํ• ๋‹น๋˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ „๊ทน์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์–‘์˜ ์ „์œ„(์™ธ์ „)๊ฐ€ ํ• ๋‹น๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜จ๋„์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์˜๋Š” ์•„์ง ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์žฌ์‹œ๋™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๋Šฅ๋™ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ œ์–ด๋กœ ์ž‘์—…ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ฐ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„๋„, ์ฆ‰ 293.15 ~ 303.15 K, 303.15 ~ 313.15 K ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” 1์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ์ฆ‰ purgingย ์€ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜ˆ์ œ

์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์ด ๊ฐ€์—ด ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์œ ํšจ์„ฑ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

373.15 K์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด์— ์ž…๋ ฅ๋˜๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.ย ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์žฌ๋Ÿ‰๊ถŒ์„ ์ด์œ ๋กœ, ๊ธฐ์ดˆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ๋‹ค.ย ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2์— ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋†’์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Comparison of experimental and simulation results
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2: ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต.
ย ์ธก์ • ์ง€์ ์€ 293.15 K: a) ์˜จ๋„ ์ƒ์Šน ์ „๋ ฅ ์ž…๋ ฅ- ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ํŽธ์ฐจ: 0,95 %, b) ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ž…๋ ฅ – ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ํŽธ์ฐจ: 4.8 %์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ 10 ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ง€์ •๋œ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์˜จ๋„์˜ ๋„๋‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๊ฐ€ ํฐ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ACS ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ณ ์ „์ ์ธ ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ง„๋ณด๋œ ACS ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์™€ ๋†’์€ ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์„ ์ž˜ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ์ •๋ ฌ์€ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3์—์„œ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย (1) ๊ณ ์ „์ ์ธ ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค, (2) ์ฝœ๋“œ ํˆด์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ACS ์ฝœ๋“œ ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค(293.15 K), (3) ์ค„ ํšจ๊ณผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ณต๊ตฌ ๋‚œ๋ฐฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ACS ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋“ฑ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ชจ๋“  3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ 1mm ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ์…€๋กœ ๋ถ„์‡„๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํ‘œ 1์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์š”์•ฝํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Geometric alignment of simulation setup
๊ทธ๋ฆผ 3: ์ „๋„์„ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์—ด ๋ฐ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์„ค์ •์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ์ •๋ ฌ
Overview of calculated core drying cases
ํ‘œ 1: ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ๊ฐœ์š”.
ย ๊ฐ’์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ƒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ํ† ๋ก 

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4๋Š” ๊ณ ์ „์ ์ธ ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ณต์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ถ„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋ฉฐ,ย ์™ธ๋ถ€ย ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ์— ์ƒ์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ถ„ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์— ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์„ผํ„ฐ์— ์ˆ˜๋ถ„์ด ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ 120์ดˆ ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์ดํด ํƒ€์ž„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์„ผํ„ฐ์— ์‰˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์ˆ˜๋ถ„์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฑด์กฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ์กฐ๊ธฐ ์ข…๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋‹จ, ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ACS ์ฝœ๋“œ ์Šคํƒ€ํŠธ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜(์ฝ”์–ด ์ŠˆํŒ… ๋จธ์‹ ์„ ๊ฐ€๋™ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ƒท์— ๋Œ€์‘)์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์›๋ฆฌ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ heating์ด ๋‚ด๋ถ€ย ์•„์›ƒย ์ˆ˜๋ถ„ ์ˆ˜์†ก์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ย ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ ๊ฐ€์—ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ง๋ ฌ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๋Š” Jouleย heating์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 373.15 K ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์˜จ ๋ฐ•์Šค์™€ ACS ๊ณต์ •์ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์ด ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

ACS ์˜์ƒ ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 6์— ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ํ•ซ๋ฐ•์Šค ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ 120์ดˆ๊ฐ€ ์ง€๋‚˜๋„ ๋ชจ๋ž˜์‹ฌ์ด ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋‚ซ์ง€ ์•Š์ง€๋งŒ, ACS ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ๋Š” 72์ดˆ๋‚˜ 45์ดˆ ํ›„์— ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๊ฑด์กฐ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ๋‚ฎ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ์—์„œ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๊ฐ€์†๋„์™€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ํฐ ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์š” ์ด์ ์€ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์š”๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ทธ์— ์ƒ์‘ํ•˜๋Š” CO2ย ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์ดํด ํƒ€์ž„์˜ ๋Œ€ํญ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์†Œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ๋ชจ๋ž˜์‹ฌ์— ์œ ์ž…๋œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์‹ค์ œ ๊ณต์ • ์ค‘์—๋„ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ํˆฌ๋ช…์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํฐ ์žฅ์ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย 

๋˜ํ•œ, ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์‹œํ—˜ ํ‘œ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋…๋ฆฝ์  ๋™์งˆ ๋‚œ๋ฐฉ์„ ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์Šต๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ๊ฐ‡ํžˆ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์…ธ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•จ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณต์ •์€ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์—์„œ๋„ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋„ํ‘œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 7์— ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์š”์•ฝ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ง

์‹œ์—ฐ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐย ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” FLOW-3D์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ•ซ ๋ฐ•์Šค ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋ฐ ์–‘์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์„ค์ •์ด ์•„์ง ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ์žˆ๊ณ  ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ ๊ฑด์กฐ ๋™์ž‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๋งค์šฐ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ˜„์žฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์€ ์„์˜๋ชจ๋ž˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์‹ค์ œ ์ธก์ •๋œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์— ํ•ด๋‹น๋œ๋‹ค.ย ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ „์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์„ค๋ช…๋˜๋ฉฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ข€ ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์‹ค์ œ ์ „๋„์„ฑ ๊ณก์„ ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์˜จ๋„์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ ์ „๋„์„ฑ(์˜ˆ: ๋ชจ๋ž˜-๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋ฌผ)์„ ์ ˆ์•ฝํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋Š” 2์œ ์ฒด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.ย ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ์ข‹์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•„์ง ์ทจํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์กฐ์น˜์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ,ย FLOW-3D๋กœ ACS ๊ณต์ •์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์ค„ ๊ฐ€์—ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฑด์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ด์ •ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์„ธ์šฐ๊ณ  ๋ฌด๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ œ์กฐ์— ์ด ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์ด์ ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

References

  • Starobin, C.W. Hirt, H. Lang, M. Todte, Core Drying Simulation and Validation, AFS Proceedings, Schaumburg, IL USA, 2011
  • FLOW-3D from Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA

์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค(Core Gas)

์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค(Core Gas)

ย 

์ฝ”์–ด๋กœ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง (Modeling Castings with Cores)

๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์†์˜ ํ™”ํ•™ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์ œ๋Š” ์šฉ์œต ๋œ ๊ธˆ์†์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์—ด ๋  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์Šค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ™˜๊ธฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ธˆ์†์œผ๋กœ ํ˜๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์—ด๋˜๊ณ  ๊ธด ํ™˜๊ธฐ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ฃผ๋ฌผ์˜ ์–‡์€ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ํŠน์ง•์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D CAST์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๊ฒฐํ•จ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ์ฝ”์–ด์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ‡ํžˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค๋“ค์„ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฒคํŒ…์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ย 

์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ๋ฐ ์ฒ  ์ฃผ์กฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง (Modeling Defects in Aluminum and Iron Castings)

‘Core Gas’ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ฒ  ์ฃผ๋ฌผ (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1)๊ณผ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„ ์ฃผ๋ฌผ (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2) ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ง€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ์ „ ๋ฐ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ž‘๋™์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ฃผ์กฐ์˜ ์ถฉ์ „ ์ค‘ ๋ฐ ์ถฉ์ „ ํ›„ ๊ฐ‡ํžˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ย 

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1 : ์—ด๋ฆฐ ํ”Œ๋ผ์Šคํฌ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ V8 Al ๋ธ”๋ก ์–ด์…ˆ๋ธ”๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ฑ„์šฐ๊ธฐ. ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ๋ธ”๋ก์˜ ์›Œํ„ฐ ์žฌํ‚ท ๊ณต๋™์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ”Œ๋ผ์Šคํฌ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์— Al์ด 20 ์ดˆ ์•ˆ์— ์ฑ„์›Œ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2 : ํ™˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์„ ๋•Œ ์›Œํ„ฐ ์žฌํ‚ท ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” ์ถฉ์ „ ์ค‘์— ๊ธˆ์†์— ๊ฐ€์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ถˆ์–ด ๋„ฃ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Spraying

Spraying

Dispensing Liquids with Swirl Spray Nozzles

์†Œ์šฉ๋Œ์ด-์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด(Swirl-spray) ๋…ธ์ฆ์€ ํ™”ํ•™ ์ฒญ์†Œ๊ธฐ, ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ์— ์•ก์ฒด๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ก์ฒด์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์ธ ๋ถ„๋ฌดํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋…ธ์ฆ์— ์นจํˆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ฝ”์–ด(air core)๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD๋Š” ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ์ฝ˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™, ์Šค์›” ์†๋„(swirl velocity) ๋ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ํŠน์„ฑ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D simulation of a swirl spray nozzle

์ด ์˜ˆ์—์„œ๋Š” 2์ฐจ์› ์ถ• ๋Œ€์นญ ์Šค์›” ํ๋ฆ„(axisymmetric swirl flow)์ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์นญ ์ถ•์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋…ธ์ฆ ์ „์ฒด ๊ธธ์ด๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์นจํˆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์™ผ์ชฝ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์€ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ํ‰๋ฉด์—์„œ ์†๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์••๋ ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์€ ์†๋„์˜ ์Šค์›” ์„ฑ๋ถ„์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ƒ‰์ƒ์ด ์ง€์ •๋˜๊ณ  ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰์€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ์ฝ˜๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์šธ ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ˆˆ๊ธˆ์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋„“๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด์˜ ์ „์ฒด ๋ถ„์ž๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์›์žํ™”๋Š” ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋™์š”, ๋…ธ์ฆ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ ํ˜ผ๋ž€์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๊ณผ์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ์ฝ˜์ด ๋…ธ์ฆ์„ ๋น ์ ธ๋‚˜๊ฐˆ ๋•Œ(์ฆ‰, ๋ฒฝ ๋‘๊ป˜, ์›๋ฟ” ๊ฐ๋„, ์ถ• ์†๋„ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ์œ„๊ฐ ์†๋„) ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ์ฝ˜์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ์žฅ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›์ž๋ ฅ ์‹œ์„ค๋ฌผ์˜ ์ž”ํ•ด๋ฌผ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ์˜ˆ์ธก

Debris Transport in a Nuclear Reactor Containment Building

์›์ž๋กœ ๊ฒฉ๋ฆฌ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์—์„œ ํŒŒํŽธ ์šด์†ก

์ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” FLOW-3D๊ฐ€ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์‹œ์„ค์—์„œ ๋ด‰์‡„ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, Alion Science and Technology์˜ Tim Sande & Joe Tezak์ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ  ํ•œ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฐ€์••์ˆ˜ํ˜• ์›์ž๋กœ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ์—์„œ ์›์ž๋กœ ๋…ธ์‹ฌ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆœํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์€ ์•ฝ 2,080 psi ๋ฐ 585ยฐF์˜ ์••๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„๋กœ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋Š” 1์ฐจ ๋ฐฐ๊ด€ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ๋ฐ€ํ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์••์ด ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐฐ๊ด€์ด ํŒŒ์†๋˜๋ฉด ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋‚ด์— ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ ์œ ํ˜•์ด ์ƒ์„ฑ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ ˆ์—ฐ์žฌ๊ฐ€ ์žฅ๋น„์™€ ๊ท ์—ด ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ด€์—์„œ ๋–จ์–ด์ ธ ๋‚˜๊ฐ€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ์„ฑ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(์˜ค๋ฅธ์ชฝ).

Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)

ํŒŒ์ดํ”„ ํŒŒ์† ํ›„ ECCS (๋น„์ƒ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ)๊ฐ€ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฉ๋ฆฌ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๊ณ  ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฒฉ๋ฆฌ ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด๋ฅผ ์ผค ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ์€ ๋ถ€์‹ ์—ด์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฉ์œต์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฝ”์–ด์— ์ฃผ์ž…๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌผ์€ ์ดํ›„ ํŒŒ์ดํ”„ ํŒŒ์† ๋ถ€์œ„์—์„œ ํ˜๋Ÿฌ ๋‚˜์˜ต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด์™€ ๋ถ€์‹ ์—ด ์ œ๊ฑฐ์—์„œ ๋‚˜์˜จ ๋ฌผ์€ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ํƒฑํฌ์—์„œ ECCS ํŽŒํ”„์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ์šฉ๊ธฐ๋กœ ํŽŒํ•‘๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์Šคํ”„๋ ˆ์ด ๋ฐ ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒฉ๋ฆฌ์‹ค๋กœ ํŽŒํ•‘๋œ ๋ฌผ์˜ ์–‘์€ ๊ฒฉ๋ฆฌ์‹ค ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์— ๋ชจ์ด๊ณ  ํ’€์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Sump Strainers and Debris

์™ธ๋ถ€ ํƒฑํฌ์˜ ๋ฌผ์ด ๊ณ ๊ฐˆ๋œ ํ›„์—๋Š” ECCS ํŽŒํ”„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํก์ž…๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ๋‚ด ํ•˜๋‚˜ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์„ฌํ”„๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ฌํ”„ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ ์˜ˆ๊ฐ€ ์™ผ์ชฝ์— ํ‘œ์‹œ๋จ). ์„ฌํ”„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ์›์ž๋กœ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ํ’€์—์„œ ํŽŒํ”„ ํก์ž…๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ฌผ์„ ์žฌ์ˆœํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์„ฌํ”„์—๋Š” ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์ด ECCS ํŽŒํ”„๋กœ ๋นจ๋ ค ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋ง‰ํž˜์ด๋‚˜ ์†์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ์— ์Œ“์ธ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํŽŒํ”„๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆœ์ • ํก์ˆ˜ํ—ค๋“œ(NPSH)๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋Š” ํ—ค๋“œ ์†์‹ค์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์—ฌ ํŽŒํ”„๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์žฅ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๊ณ  ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ๋ฅผ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •์ง€์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ทœ์ œ์œ„์›ํšŒ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์•ˆ์ „๋ฌธ์ œ(GSI) 191์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D Applied to Evaluate Performance

FLOW-3D๋Š” ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ์šฉ๊ธฐ ํ’€์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์–‘์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ์ดํ”„ ํŒŒ์†, ์ง์ ‘ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋น„์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ POOL์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ), ์œ ์ถœ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ๊ตฌ์—ญ(๋ถ„๋ฌด์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ณ ๋„์—์„œ ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์—์„œ ํ˜๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜์™€ ํญํฌ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ POOL์— ์œ ์ž…๋˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ)์€ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰-๋ชจ๋ฉ˜ํ…€ ์†Œ์Šค ์ž…์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ€์ง‘๋œ ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ํ• ๋‹น๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›„์ž๋Š” POOL ํ‘œ๋ฉด๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์ž์œ  ๋‚™ํ•˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ณผ๊ธฐ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ์šฉ๊ธฐ POOL์—์„œ ๋ฌผ์„ ๋Œ์–ด์˜ค๋Š” ํก์ž…๊ตฌ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Containment pool simulation

๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ (ํ’€์˜ ์„ฌํ”„ ํก์ž… ๋˜๋Š” ์ดˆํฌ ํฌ์ธํŠธ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ) ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ , RNG ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ’€์˜ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ๊ดด๋œ ์ ˆ์—ฐ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ์šฉ๊ธฐ ํ’€์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์ •์ฐฉ ์†๋„(์ •์ง€ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ)์™€ ํ…€๋ธ”๋ง ์†๋„(๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ์งˆ๋Ÿฌ ์ด๋™ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ)์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ˆ์ฐฉ ์†๋„๋Š” ์ ˆ์—ฐ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์šด๋™ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์˜ ์–‘๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์•ˆ์ฐฉ ๋ฐ ํ…€๋ธ”๋ง ์†๋„๋Š” ์—ฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ํƒฑํฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜๋ฉฐ, FLOW-3D ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ๊ฐ’์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•œ ํ›„์—๋Š” FLOW-3D ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ํ›„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋˜์–ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ ์œ ํ˜•์„ POOL ๋ฐ”๋‹ฅ(๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋จ)์œผ๋กœ ๋„˜์–ด๋œจ๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ์ •๋„๋กœ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์˜์—ญ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์„œ์ŠคํŽœ์…˜์˜ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ์šด๋ฐ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ์ •๋„๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์˜์—ญ(๋…ธ๋ž€์ƒ‰์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋จ)์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์†๋„ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋นจ๊ฐ„์ƒ‰ ๋ฐ ๋…ธ๋ž€์ƒ‰ ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๋ฆ„์ด ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ ์ชฝ์œผ๋กœ ์šด๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋ถ„ํฌ ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์œ ํ˜• ๋ฐ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šด์†ก ๋ถ„์œจ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Conclusions

์ด๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ž”ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์†ก ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ CFD ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด ECCS ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฌ๋”œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ์ž”ํ•ด ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•ด์•ผํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€๋‚˜์น˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์ˆ˜์ ์ธ ๊ฐ’์—์„œ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CFD๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋‘ ์†์‹ค ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ECCS ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋„ˆ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ํŒจํ„ด, ์ˆ˜๋‘ ์†์‹ค ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ ํ”Œ๋žœํŠธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ˆ˜์ •์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์žˆ์–ด ๊ฒฉ๋‚ฉ์šฉ POOL ์ˆ˜์œ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•จ์ด ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Alion logo

1Alion Science and Technology is a consulting engineering company with the ITS Operation comprised of engineering professionals skilled at developing and completing diverse projects vital to power plant operations. Alion ITSO provides engineering, program management, system integration, human-systems integration, design review, testing, and analysis for nuclear, electrical and mechanical systems, as well as environmental services. Alion ITSO has developed a meticulous Quality Assurance Program, which is compliant with 10CFR50 Appendix B, 10CFR21, ASME NQA-1, ANSI N45.2 and applicable daughter standards. Alion ITSO has provided a myriad of turnkey services to customers, delivering the highest levels of satisfaction for almost 15 years.

Optofluidics

Optofluidics

๊ด‘์œ ์ฒดํ•™(Optofluidics)์€ ๊ด‘ํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ์™€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ์œ ์ฒดํ•™ ๋ถ„์•ผ๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ์นœ ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๊ด‘์œ ์ฒด ์‘์šฉ์€ ๋ Œ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ตด์ ˆ๋ฅ ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์žฅ์ ์€ ๋ Œ์ฆˆ์˜ ๋™์  ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ํ๋ฆ„์€ ์ด์ „์—๋Š” ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋˜ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์— ์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด ์†Œ์ž์— ๋น›์„ ์ง‘์ค‘์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์œ ์ฒด ์†Œ์ž ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘ํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋žฉ์˜จ ์–ด ์นฉ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ์ฑ„๋„์—์„œ ๋‚˜์˜ค๋Š” ๋น›์˜ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์กฐ๋ช…๊ณผ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋Š” ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D๋Š” L2 (Liquid core-liquid cladding) ๋ Œ์ฆˆ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์œ ์ฒด ๋ Œ์ฆˆ์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Casting Case Study

Casting Case Study

๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฐ€๋ณ๊ณ  ํŠผํŠผํ•œ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์ธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ž‘์—…์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ๋‹น์‚ฌ์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž‘์—… ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ณ ์ฒ  ๋น„์œจ์„ ์ค„์ž„์œผ๋กœ์จ ์กฐ์ง์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ ˆ๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œํ’ˆ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ถœ์‹œ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์šฐ์œ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•ด ์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Customer Case Studies

Increasing Productivity by Reducing Ejection Times
Realizing Da Vinciโ€™s Il Cavallo
Aluminum Integral Foam Molding Process

FLOW-3D CAST Bibliography

FLOW-3D CAST bibliography

์•„๋ž˜๋Š” FSI์˜ ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ์— ์ˆ˜๋ก๋œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ๋ชจ์Œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—๋Š” FLOW-3D CAST ํ•ด์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ก๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FLOW-3D CAST๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ ์‚ฐ์—…์˜ ์‘์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Metal Casting Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D CAST results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D CAST can be used to successfully simulate applications for the Metal Casting Industry.

33-20     Eric Riedel, Martin Liepe Stefan Scharf, Simulation of ultrasonic induced cavitation and acoustic streaming in liquid and solidifying aluminum, Metals, 10.4; 476, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10040476

20-20   Wu Yue, Li Zhuo and Lu Rong, Simulation and visual tester verification of solid propellant slurry vacuum plate casting, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2020. doi.org/10.1002/prep.201900411

17-20   C.A. Jones, M.R. Jolly, A.E.W. Jarfors and M. Irwin, An experimental characterization of thermophysical properties of a porous ceramic shell used in the investment casting process, Supplimental Proceedings, pp. 1095-1105, TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, San Diego, CA, February 23-27, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_102

12-20   Franz Josef Feikus, Paul Bernsteiner, Ricardo Fernรกndez Gutiรฉrrez and Michal Luszczak , Further development of electric motor housings, MTZ Worldwide, 81, pp. 38-43, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s38313-019-0176-z

09-20   Mingfan Qi, Yonglin Kang, Yuzhao Xu, Zhumabieke Wulabieke and Jingyuan Li, A novel rheological high pressure die-casting process for preparing large thin-walled Alโ€“Siโ€“Feโ€“Mgโ€“Sr alloy with high heat conductivity, high plasticity and medium strength, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 776, art. no. 139040, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139040

07-20   Stefan Heugenhauser, Erhard Kaschnitz and Peter Schumacher, Development of an aluminum compound casting process โ€“ Experiments and numerical simulations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 279, art. no. 116578, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116578

05-20   Michail Papanikolaou, Emanuele Pagone, Mark Jolly and Konstantinos Salonitis, Numerical simulation and evaluation of Campbell running and gating systems, Metals, 10.1, art. no. 68, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10010068

102-19   Ferencz Peti and Gabriela Strnad, The effect of squeeze pin dimension and operational parameters on material homogeneity of aluminium high pressure die cast parts, Acta Marisiensis. Seria Technologica, 16.2, 2019. doi.org/0.2478/amset-2019-0010

94-19   E. Riedel, I. Horn, N. Stein, H. Stein, R. Bahr, and S. Scharf, Ultrasonic treatment: a clean technology that supports sustainability incasting processes, Procedia, 26th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, May 7-9, 2019. 

93-19   Adrian V. Catalina, Liping Xue, Charles A. Monroe, Robin D. Foley, and John A. Griffin, Modeling and Simulation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AlSi- and AlCu-based Alloys, Transactions, 123rd Metalcasting Congress, Atlanta, GA, USA, April 27-30, 2019. 

84-19   Arun Prabhakar, Michail Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Salonitis, and Mark Jolly, Sand casting of sheet lead: numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 1-13, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04522-3

72-19   Santosh Reddy Sama, Eric Macdonald, Robert Voigt, and Guha Manogharan, Measurement of metal velocity in sand casting during mold filling, Metals, 9:1079, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/met9101079

71-19   Sebastian Findeisen, Robin Van Der Auwera, Michael Heuser, and Franz-Josef Wรถstmann, GieรŸtechnische Fertigung von E-Motorengehรคusen mit interner Kรผhling (Casting production of electric motor housings with internal cooling), Geisserei, 106, pp. 72-78, 2019 (in German).

58-19     Von Malte Leonhard, Matthias Todte, and Jรถrg Schรคffer, Realistic simulation of the combustion of exothermic feeders, Casting, No. 2, pp. 28-32, 2019. In English and German.

52-19     S. Lakkum and P. Kowitwarangkul, Numerical investigations on the effect of gas flow rate in the gas stirred ladle with dual plugs, International Conference on Materials Research and Innovation (ICMARI), Bangkok, Thailand, December 17-21, 2018. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 526, 2019. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/526/1/012028

47-19     Bing Zhou, Shuai Lu, Kaile Xu, Chun Xu, and Zhanyong Wang, Microstructure and simulation of semisolid aluminum alloy castings in the process of stirring integrated transfer-heat (SIT) with water cooling, International Journal of Metalcasting, Online edition, pp. 1-13, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00357-6

31-19     Zihao Yuan, Zhipeng Guo, and S.M. Xiong, Skin layer of A380 aluminium alloy die castings and its blistering during solution treatment, Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1906-1916, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.011

25-19     Stefano Mascetti, Raul Pirovano, and Giulio Timelli, Interazione metallo liquido/stampo: Il fenomeno della metallizzazione, La Metallurgia Italiana, No. 4, pp. 44-50, 2019. In Italian.

20-19     Fu-Yuan Hsu, Campbellology for runner system design, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 187-199, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_19

19-19     Chengcheng Lyu, Michail Papanikolaou, and Mark Jolly, Numerical process modelling and simulation of Campbell running systems designs, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 53-64, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_5

18-19     Adrian V. Catalina, Liping Xue, and Charles Monroe, A solidification model with application to AlSi-based alloys, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 201-213, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_20

17-19     Fu-Yuan Hsu and Yu-Hung Chen, The validation of feeder modeling for ductile iron castings, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 227-238, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_22

04-19   Santosh Reddy Sama, Tony Badamo, Paul Lynch and Guha Manogharan, Novel sprue designs in metal casting via 3D sand-printing, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, pp. 563-578, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.009

02-19   Jingying Sun, Qichi Le, Li Fu, Jing Bai, Johannes Tretter, Klaus Herbold and Hongwei Huo, Gas entrainment behavior of aluminum alloy engine crankcases during the low-pressure-die-casting-process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 266, pp. 274-282, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.016

92-18   Fast, Flexibleโ€ฆ More Versatile, Foundry Management Technology, March, 2018. 

82-18   Xu Zhao, Ping Wang, Tao Li, Bo-yu Zhang, Peng Wang, Guan-zhou Wang and Shi-qi Lu, Gating system optimization of high pressure die casting thin-wall AlSi10MnMg longitudinal loadbearing beam based on numerical simulation, China Foundry, Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 436-442, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s41230-018-8052-z

80-18   Michail Papanikolaou, Emanuele Pagone, Konstantinos Salonitis, Mark Jolly and Charalampos Makatsoris, A computational framework towards energy efficient casting processes, Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2018: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (KES-SDM-18), Gold Coast, Australia, June 24-26 2018, SIST 130, pp. 263-276, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04290-5_27

64-18   Vasilios Fourlakidis, Ilia Belov and Attila Diรณszegi, Strength prediction for pearlitic lamellar graphite iron: Model validation, Metals, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2018. doi.org/10.3390/met8090684

51-18   Xue-feng Zhu, Bao-yi Yu, Li Zheng, Bo-ning Yu, Qiang Li, Shu-ning Lรผ and Hao Zhang, Influence of pouring methods on filling process, microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91 Mg alloy pipe by horizontal centrifugal casting, China Foundry, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.196-202, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s41230-018-7256-6

47-18   Santosh Reddy Sama, Jiayi Wang and Guha Manogharan, Non-conventional mold design for metal casting using 3D sand-printing, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 34-B, pp. 765-775, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.049

42-18   M. Koru and O. Serรงe, The Effects of Thermal and Dynamical Parameters and Vacuum Application on Porosity in High-Pressure Die Casting of A383 Al-Alloy, International Journal of Metalcasting, pp. 1-17, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0214-7

41-18   Abhilash Viswanath, S. Savithri, U.T.S. Pillai, Similitude analysis on flow characteristics of water, A356 and AM50 alloys during LPC process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 257, pp. 270-277, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.031

29-18   Seyboldt, Christoph and Liewald, Mathias, Investigation on thixojoining to produce hybrid components with intermetallic phase, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1960, no. 1, 2018. doi.org/10.1063/1.5034992

28-18   Laura Schomer, Mathias Liewald and Kim Rouven Riedmรผller, Simulation of the infiltration process of a ceramic open-pore body with a metal alloy in semi-solid state to design the manufacturing of interpenetrating phase composites, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1960, no. 1, 2018. doi.org/10.1063/1.5034991

41-17   Y. N. Wu et al., Numerical Simulation on Filling Optimization of Copper Rotor for High Efficient Electric Motors in Die Casting Process, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 898, pp. 1163-1170, 2017.

12-17   A.M.  Zarubin and O.A. Zarubina, Controlling the flow rate of melt in gravity die casting of aluminum alloys, Liteynoe Proizvodstvo (Casting Manufacturing), pp 16-20, 6, 2017. In Russian.

10-17   A.Y. Korotchenko, Y.V. Golenkov, M.V. Tverskoy and D.E. Khilkov, Simulation of the Flow of Metal Mixtures in the Mold, Liteynoe Proizvodstvo (Casting Manufacturing), pp 18-22, 5, 2017. In Russian.

08-17   Morteza Morakabian Esfahani, Esmaeil Hajjari, Ali Farzadi and Seyed Reza Alavi Zaree, Prediction of the contact time through modeling of heat transfer and fluid flow in compound casting process of Al/Mg light metals, Journal of Materials Research, ยฉ Materials Research Society 2017

04-17   Huihui Liu, Xiongwei He and Peng Guo, Numerical simulation on semi-solid die-casting of magnesium matrix composite based on orthogonal experiment, AIP Conference Proceedings 1829, 020037 (2017); doi.org/10.1063/1.4979769.

100-16  Robert Watson, New numerical techniques to quantify and predict the effect of entrainment defects, applied to high pressure die casting, PhD Thesis: University of Birmingham, 2016.

88-16   M.C. Carter, T. Kauffung, L. Weyenberg and C. Peters, Low Pressure Die Casting Simulation Discovery through Short Shot, Cast Expo & Metal Casting Congress, April 16-19, 2016, Minneapolis, MN, Copyright 2016 American Foundry Society.

61-16   M. Koru and O. Serรงe, Experimental and numerical determination of casting mold interfacial heat transfer coefficient in the high pressure die casting of a 360 aluminum alloy, ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, Vol. 129 (2016)

59-16   R. Pirovano and S. Mascetti, Tracking of collapsed bubbles during a filling simulation, La Metallurgia Italiana โ€“ n. 6 2016

43-16   Kevin Lee, Understanding shell cracking during de-wax process in investment casting, Ph.D Thesis: University of Birmingham, School of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2016.

35-16   Konstantinos Salonitis, Mark Jolly, Binxu Zeng, and Hamid Mehrabi, Improvements in energy consumption and environmental impact by novel single shot melting process for casting, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.165, Open Access funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, June 29, 2016

20-16   Fu-Yuan Hsu, Bifilm Defect Formation in Hydraulic Jump of Liquid Aluminum, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2016, Band: 47, Heft 3, 1634-1648.

15-16   Mingfan Qia, Yonglin Kanga, Bing Zhoua, Wanneng Liaoa, Guoming Zhua, Yangde Lib,and Weirong Li, A forced convection stirring process for Rheo-HPDC aluminum and magnesium alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 234 (2016) 353โ€“367

112-15   Josรฉ Miguel Gonรงalves Ledo Belo da Costa, Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by FLOW-3D, Dissertaรงรฃo de mestrado integrado em Engenharia Mecรขnica, 2015.

89-15   B.W. Zhu, L.X. Li, X. Liu, L.Q. Zhang and R. Xu, Effect of Viscosity Measurement Method to Simulate High Pressure Die Casting of Thin-Wall AlSi10MnMg Alloy Castings, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Published online, November 2015, doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1783-8, ยฉ ASM International.

88-15   Peng Zhang, Zhenming Li, Baoliang Liu, Wenjiang Ding and Liming Peng, Improved tensile properties of a new aluminum alloy for high pressure die casting, Materials Science & Engineering A651(2016)376โ€“390, Available online, November 2015.

83-15   Zu-Qi Hu, Xin-Jian Zhang and Shu-Sen Wu, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Die-Filling Behavior of High-Performance Die-Cast Alโ€“Mgโ€“Siโ€“Mn Alloy, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), doi.org/10.1007/s40195-015-0332-7, ยฉ The Chinese Society for Metals and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.

82-15   J. Mรผller, L. Xue, M.C. Carter, C. Thoma, M. Fehlbier and M. Todte, A Die Spray Cooling Model for Thermal Die Cycling Simulations, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

81-15   M. T. Murray, L.F. Hansen, L. Chilcott, E. Li and A.M. Murray, Case Studies in the Use of Simulation- Improved Yield and Reduced Time to Market, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

80-15   R. Bhola, S. Chandra and D. Souders, Predicting Castability of Thin-Walled Parts for the HPDC Process Using Simulations, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

76-15   Prosenjit Das, Sudip K. Samanta, Shashank Tiwari and Pradip Dutta, Die Filling Behaviour of Semi Solid A356 Al Alloy Slurry During Rheo Pressure Die Casting, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, pp 1-6, October 2015

74-15   Murat KORU and Orhan SERร‡E, Yรผksek Basฤฑnรงlฤฑ Dรถkรผm Prosesinde Enjeksiyon Parametrelerine BaฤŸlฤฑ Olarak Dรถkรผm Simรผlasyon, Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science, Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 5 (2015) ISSN: 1300-1949, May 2015

69-15   A. Viswanath, S. Sivaraman, U. T. S. Pillai, Computer Simulation of Low Pressure Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 45-48, September 2015

68-15   J. Aneesh Kumar, K. Krishnakumar and S. Savithri, Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 53-56, September 2015

59-15   F. Hosseini Yekta and S. A. Sadough Vanini, Simulation of the flow of semi-solid steel alloy using an enhanced model, Metals and Materials International, August 2015.

44-15   Ulrich E. Klotz, Tiziana Heiss and Dario Tiberto, Platinum investment casting material properties, casting simulation and optimum process parameters, Jewelry Technology Forum 2015

41-15   M. Barkhudarov and R. Pirovano, Minimizing Air Entrainment in High Pressure Die Casting Shot Sleeves, GIFA 2015, Dรผsseldorf, Germany

40-15   M. Todte, A. Fent, and H. Lang, Simulation in support of the development of innovative processes in the casting industry, GIFA 2015, Dรผsseldorf, Germany

19-15   Bruce Morey, Virtual casting improves powertrain design, Automotive Engineering, SAE International, March 2015.

15-15   K.S. Oh, J.D. Lee, S.J. Kim and J.Y. Choi, Development of a large ingot continuous caster, Metall. Res. Technol. 112, 203 (2015) ยฉ EDP Sciences, 2015, doi.org/10.1051/metal/2015006, www.metallurgical-research.org

14-15   Tiziana Heiss, Ulrich E. Klotz and Dario Tiberto, Platinum Investment Casting, Part I: Simulation and Experimental Study of the Casting Process, Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2015, 59, (2), 95, doi.org/10.1595/205651315ร—687399

138-14 Christopher Thoma, Wolfram Volk, Ruben Heid, Klaus Dilger, Gregor Banner and Harald Eibisch, Simulation-based prediction of the fracture elongation as a failure criterion for thin-walled high-pressure die casting components, International Journal of Metalcasting, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 47-54, 2014. doi.org/10.1007/BF03355594

107-14  Mehran Seyed Ahmadi, Dissolution of Si in Molten Al with Gas Injection, ProQuest Dissertations And Theses; Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Toronto (Canada), 2014; Publication Number: AAT 3637106; ISBN: 9781321195231; Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: B.; 191 p.

99-14   R. Bhola and S. Chandra, Predicting Castability for Thin-Walled HPDC Parts, Foundry Management Technology, December 2014

92-14   Warren Bishenden and Changhua Huang, Venting design and process optimization of die casting process for structural components; Part II: Venting design and process optimization, Die Casting Engineer, November 2014

90-14   Kenโ€™ichi Kanazawa, Kenโ€™ichi Yano, Junโ€™ichi Ogura, and Yasunori Nemoto, Optimum Runner Design for Die-Casting using CFD Simulations and Verification with Water-Model Experiments, Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2014, November 14-20, 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, IMECE2014-37419

89-14   P. Kapranos, C. Carney, A. Pola, and M. Jolly, Advanced Casting Methodologies: Investment Casting, Centrifugal Casting, Squeeze Casting, Metal Spinning, and Batch Casting, In Comprehensive Materials Processing; McGeough, J., Ed.; 2014, Elsevier Ltd., 2014; Vol. 5, pp 39โ€“67.

77-14   Andrei Y. Korotchenko, Development of Scientific and Technological Approaches to Casting Net-Shaped Castings in Sand Molds Free of Shrinkage Defects and Hot Tears, Post-doctoral thesis: Russian State Technological University, 2014. In Russian.

69-14   L. Xue, M.C. Carter, A.V. Catalina, Z. Lin, C. Li, and C. Qiu, Predicting, Preventing Core Gas Defects in Steel Castings, Modern Casting, September 2014

68-14   L. Xue, M.C. Carter, A.V. Catalina, Z. Lin, C. Li, and C. Qiu, Numerical Simulation of Core Gas Defects in Steel Castings, Copyright 2014 American Foundry Society, 118th Metalcasting Congress, April 8 โ€“ 11, 2014, Schaumburg, IL

51-14   Jesus M. Blanco, Primitivo Carranza, Rafael Pintos, Pedro Arriaga, and Lakhdar Remaki, Identification of Defects Originated during the Filling of Cast Pieces through Particles Modelling, 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI), 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V), 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI), E. Oรฑate, J. Oliver and A. Huerta (Eds)

47-14   B. Vijaya Ramnatha, C.Elanchezhiana, Vishal Chandrasekhar, A. Arun Kumarb, S. Mohamed Asif, G. Riyaz Mohamed, D. Vinodh Raj , C .Suresh Kumar, Analysis and Optimization of Gating System for Commutator End Bracket, Procedia Materials Science 6 ( 2014 ) 1312 โ€“ 1328, 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation (ICMPC 2014)

42-14  Bing Zhou, Yong-lin Kang, Guo-ming Zhu, Jun-zhen Gao, Ming-fan Qi, and Huan-huan Zhang, Forced convection rheoforming process for preparation of 7075 aluminum alloy semisolid slurry and its numerical simulation, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24(2014) 1109โˆ’1116

37-14    A. Karwinski, W. Lesniewski, P. Wieliczko, and M. Malysza, Casting of Titanium Alloys in Centrifugal Induction Furnaces, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, Volume 59, Issue 1, doi.org/10.2478/amm-2014-0068, 2014.

26-14    Bing Zhou, Yonglin Kang, Mingfan Qi, Huanhuan Zhang and Guoming ZhuR-HPDC Process with Forced Convection Mixing Device for Automotive Part of A380 Aluminum Alloy, Materials 2014, 7, 3084-3105; doi.org/10.3390/ma7043084

20-14  Johannes Hartmann, Tobias Fiegl, Carolin Kรถrner, Aluminum integral foams with tailored density profile by adapted blowing agents, Applied Physics A, doi.org/10.1007/s00339-014-8377-4, March 2014.

19-14    A.Y. Korotchenko, N.A. Nikiforova, E.D. Demjanov, N.C. Larichev, The Influence of the Filling Conditions on the Service Properties of the Part Side Frame, Russian Foundryman, 1 (January), pp 40-43, 2014. In Russian.

11-14 B. Fuchs and C. Kรถrner, Mesh resolution consideration for the viability prediction of lost salt cores in the high pressure die casting process, Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2014, Copyright ยฉ 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

08-14 FY Hsu, SW Wang, and HJ Lin, The External and Internal Shrinkages in Aluminum Gravity Castings, Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014. Available online at Google Books

103-13  B. Fuchs, H. Eibisch and C. Kรถrner, Core Viability Simulation for Salt Core Technology in High-Pressure Die Casting, International Journal of Metalcasting, July 2013, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 39โ€“45

94-13    Randall S. Fielding, J. Crapps, C. Unal, and J.R.Kennedy, Metallic Fuel Casting Development and Parameter Optimization Simulations, International Conference on Fast reators and Related Fuel Cycles (FR13), 4-7 March 2013, Paris France

90-13  A. Karwiล„skia, M. Maล‚yszaa, A. Tchรณrza, A. Gila, B. Lipowska, Integration of Computer Tomography and Simulation Analysis in Evaluation of Quality of Ceramic-Carbon Bonded Foam Filter, Archives of Foundry Engineering, doi.org/10.2478/afe-2013-0084, Published quarterly as the organ of the Foundry Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ISSN, (2299-2944), Volume 13, Issue 4/2013

88-13  Litie and Metallurgia (Casting and Metallurgy), 3 (72), 2013, N.V.Sletova, I.N.Volnov, S.P.Zadrutsky, V.A.Chaikin, Modeling of the Process of Removing Non-metallic Inclusions in Aluminum Alloys Using the FLOW-3D program, pp 138-140. In Russian.

85-13    Michaล‚ Szucki,Tomasz Goraj, Janusz Lelito, Jรณzef S. Suchy, Numerical Analysis of Solid Particles Flow in Liquid Metal, XXXVII International Scientific Conference Foundrymanโ€™ Day 2013, Krakow, 28-29 November 2013

84-13  Kรถrner, C., Schwankl, M., Himmler, D., Aluminum-Aluminum compound castings by electroless deposited zinc layers, Journal of Materials Processing Technology (2014), doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.01483-13.

77-13  Antonio Armillotta & Raffaello Baraggi & Simone Fasoli, SLM tooling for die casting with conformal cooling channels, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5523-7, December 2013.

64-13   Johannes Hartmann, Christina Blรผmel, Stefan Ernst, Tobias Fiegl, Karl-Ernst Wirth, Carolin Kรถrner, Aluminum integral foam castings with microcellular cores by nano-functionalization, J Mater Sci, doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7668-z, September 2013.

46-13  Nicholas P. Orenstein, 3D Flow and Temperature Analysis of Filling a Plutonium Mold, LA-UR-13-25537, Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Los Alamos Annual Student Symposium 2013, 2013-07-24 (Rev.1)

42-13   Yang Yue, William D. Griffiths, and Nick R. Green, Modelling of the Effects of Entrainment Defects on Mechanical Properties in a Cast Al-Si-Mg Alloy, Materials Science Forum, 765, 225, 2013.

39-13  J. Crapps, D.S. DeCroix, J.D Galloway, D.A. Korzekwa, R. Aikin, R. Fielding, R. Kennedy, C. Unal, Separate effects identification via casting process modeling for experimental measurement of U-Pu-Zr alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 15 July 2013.

35-13   A. Pari, Real Life Problem Solving through Simulations in the Die Casting Industry โ€“ Case Studies, ยฉ Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

34-13  Martin Lagler, Use of Simulation to Predict the Viability of Salt Cores in the HPDC Process โ€“ Shot Curve as a Decisive Criterion, ยฉ Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

24-13    I.N.Volnov, Optimizatsia Liteynoi Tekhnologii, (Casting Technology Optimization), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), 3, 2013, 27-29. In Russian

23-13  M.R. Barkhudarov, I.N. Volnov, Minimizatsia Zakhvata Vozdukha v Kamere Pressovania pri Litie pod Davleniem, (Minimization of Air Entrainment in the Shot Sleeve During High Pressure Die Casting), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), 3, 2013, 30-34. In Russian

09-13  M.C. Carter and L. Xue, Simulating the Parameters that Affect Core Gas Defects in Metal Castings, Copyright 2012 American Foundry Society, Presented at the 2013 CastExpo, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2013

08-13  C. Reilly, N.R. Green, M.R. Jolly, J.-C. Gebelin, The Modelling Of Oxide Film Entrainment In Casting Systems Using Computational Modelling, Applied Mathematical Modelling, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.061, April 2013.

03-13  Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A fast simulation of transient metal flow and solidification in a narrow channel. Part II. Model validation and parametric study, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.061.

02-13  Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A fast simulation of transient metal flow and solidification in a narrow channel. Part I: Model development using lubrication approximation, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.060.

116-12  Jufu Jianga, Ying Wang, Gang Chena, Jun Liua, Yuanfa Li and Shoujing Luo, โ€œComparison of mechanical properties and microstructure of AZ91D alloy motorcycle wheels formed by die casting and double control forming, Materials & Design, Volume 40, September 2012, Pages 541-549.

107-12  F.K. Arslan, A.H. Hatman, S.ร–. Ertรผrk, E. Gรผner, B. Gรผner, An Evaluation for Fundamentals of Die Casting Materials Selection and Design, IMMCโ€™16 International Metallurgy & Materials Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.

103-12 WU Shu-sen, ZHONG Gu, AN Ping, WAN Li, H. NAKAE, Microstructural characteristics of Alโˆ’20Siโˆ’2Cuโˆ’0.4Mgโˆ’1Ni alloy formed by rheo-squeeze casting after ultrasonic vibration treatment, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22 (2012) 2863-2870, November 2012. Full paper available online.

109-12 Alexandre Reikher, Numerical Analysis of Die-Casting Process in Thin Cavities Using Lubrication Approximation, Ph.D. Thesis: The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Engineering Department (2012) Theses and Dissertations. Paper 65.

97-12 Hong Zhou and Li Heng Luo, Filling Pattern of Step Gating System in Lost Foam Casting Process and its Application, Advanced Materials Research, Volumes 602-604, Progress in Materials and Processes, 1916-1921, December 2012.

93-12  Liangchi Zhang, Chunliang Zhang, Jeng-Haur Horng and Zichen Chen, Functions of Step Gating System in the Lost Foam Casting Process, Advanced Materials Research, 591-593, 940, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.591-593.940, November 2012.

91-12  Hong Yan, Jian Bin Zhu, Ping Shan, Numerical Simulation on Rheo-Diecasting of Magnesium Matrix Composites, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.287, Solid State Phenomena, 192-193, 287.

89-12  Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A Fast Numerical Simulation for Modeling Simultaneous Metal Flow and Solidification in Thin Cavities Using the Lubrication Approximation, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology, 63:2, 75-100, November 2012.

82-12  Jufu Jiang, Gang Chen, Ying Wang, Zhiming Du, Weiwei Shan, and Yuanfa Li, Microstructure and mechanical properties of thin-wall and high-rib parts of AM60B Mg alloy formed by double control forming and die casting under the optimal conditions, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.086, October 2012.

78-12   A. Pari, Real Life Problem Solving through Simulations in the Die Casting Industry โ€“ Case Studies, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, ยฉ NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

77-12  Y. Wang, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian and R.A. Miller, Rheological behavior models of metal matrix alloys in semi-solid casting process, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, ยฉ NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

76-12  A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Analysis of Solidification Parameters During the Die Cast Process, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, ยฉ NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

75-12 R.A. Miller, Y. Wang and K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, Estimating Cavity Fill Time, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, ยฉ NADCA, October 8-10, 2012Indianapolis, IN.

65-12  X.H. Yang, T.J. Lu, T. Kim, Influence of non-conducting pore inclusions on phase change behavior of porous media with constant heat flux boundaryInternational Journal of Thermal Sciences, Available online 10 October 2012. Available online at SciVerse.

55-12  Hejun Li, Pengyun Wang, Lehua Qi, Hansong Zuo, Songyi Zhong, Xianghui Hou, 3D numerical simulation of successive deposition of uniform molten Al droplets on a moving substrate and experimental validation, Computational Materials Science, Volume 65, December 2012, Pages 291โ€“301.

52-12 Hongbing Ji, Yixin Chen and Shengzhou Chen, Numerical Simulation of Inner-Outer Couple Cooling Slab Continuous Casting in the Filling Process, Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 557-559), Advanced Materials and Processes II, pp. 2257-2260, July 2012.

47-12    Petri Vรคyrynen, Lauri Holappa, and Seppo Louhenkilpi, Simulation of Melting of Alloying Materials in Steel Ladle, SCANMET IV โ€“ 4th International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, Lulea, Sweden, June 10-13, 2012.

46-12  Bin Zhang and Dave Salee, Metal Flow and Heat Transfer in Billet DC Casting Using Wagstaffยฎ Optifillโ„ข Metal Distribution Systems, 5th International Metal Quality Workshop, United Arab Emirates Dubai, March 18-22, 2012.

45-12 D.R. Gunasegaram, M. Givord, R.G. Oโ€™Donnell and B.R. Finnin, Improvements engineered in UTS and elongation of aluminum alloy high pressure die castings through the alteration of runner geometry and plunger velocity, Materials Science & Engineering.

44-12    Antoni Drys and Stefano Mascetti, Aluminum Casting Simulations, Desktop Engineering, September 2012

42-12   Huizhen Duan, Jiangnan Shen and Yanping Li, Comparative analysis of HPDC process of an auto part with ProCAST and FLOW-3D, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 184-185 (2012) pp 90-94, Online available since 2012/Jun/14 at www.scientific.net, ยฉ (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.184-185.90.

41-12    Deniece R. Korzekwa, Cameron M. Knapp, David A. Korzekwa, and John W. Gibbs, Co-Design โ€“ Fabrication of Unalloyed Plutonium, LA-UR-12-23441, MDI Summer Research Group Workshop Advanced Manufacturing, 2012-07-25/2012-07-26 (Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States)

29-12  Dario Tiberto and Ulrich E. Klotz, Computer simulation applied to jewellery casting: challenges, results and future possibilities, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.33 012008. Full paper available at IOP.

28-12  Y Yue and N R Green, Modelling of different entrainment mechanisms and their influences on the mechanical reliability of Al-Si castings, 2012 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 33,012072.Full paper available at IOP.

27-12  E Kaschnitz, Numerical simulation of centrifugal casting of pipes, 2012 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 33 012031, Issue 1. Full paper available at IOP.

15-12  C. Reilly, N.R Green, M.R. Jolly, The Present State Of Modeling Entrainment Defects In The Shape Casting Process, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Available online 27 April 2012, ISSN 0307-904X, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.032.

12-12   Andrei Starobin, Tony Hirt, Hubert Lang, and Matthias Todte, Core drying simulation and validation, International Foundry Research, GIESSEREIFORSCHUNG 64 (2012) No. 1, ISSN 0046-5933, pp 2-5

10-12  H. Vladimir Martรญnez and Marco F. Valencia (2012). Semisolid Processing of Al/ฮฒ-SiC Composites by Mechanical Stirring Casting and High Pressure Die Casting, Recent Researches in Metallurgical Engineering โ€“ From Extraction to Forming, Dr Mohammad Nusheh (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0356-1, InTech

07-12     Amir H. G. Isfahani and James M. Brethour, Simulating Thermal Stresses and Cooling Deformations, Die Casting Engineer, March 2012

06-12   Shuisheng Xie, Youfeng He and Xujun Mi, Study on Semi-solid Magnesium Alloys Slurry Preparation and Continuous Roll-casting Process, Magnesium Alloys โ€“ Design, Processing and Properties, ISBN: 978-953-307-520-4, InTech.

04-12 J. Spangenberg, N. Roussel, J.H. Hattel, H. Stang, J. Skocek, M.R. Geiker, Flow induced particle migration in fresh concrete: Theoretical frame, numerical simulations and experimental results on model fluids, Cement and Concrete Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.01.007, February 2012.

01-12   Lee, B., Baek, U., and Han, J., Optimization of Gating System Design for Die Casting of Thin Magnesium Alloy-Based Multi-Cavity LCD Housings, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Springer New York, Issn: 1059-9495, 10.1007/s11665-011-0111-1, Volume 1 / 1992 โ€“ Volume 21 / 2012. Available online at Springer Link.

104-11  Fu-Yuan Hsu and Huey Jiuan Lin, Foam Filters Used in Gravity Casting, Metall and Materi Trans B (2011) 42: 1110. doi:10.1007/s11663-011-9548-8.

99-11    Eduardo Trejo, Centrifugal Casting of an Aluminium Alloy, thesis: Doctor of Philosophy, Metallurgy and Materials School of Engineering University of Birmingham, October 2011. Full paper available upon request.

93-11  Olga Kononova, Andrejs Krasnikovs ,Videvuds Lapsa,Jurijs Kalinka and Angelina Galushchak, Internal Structure Formation in High Strength Fiber Concrete during Casting, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 59 2011

76-11  J. Hartmann, A. Trepper, and C. Kรถrner, Aluminum Integral Foams with Near-Microcellular Structure, Advanced Engineering Materials 2011, Volume 13 (2011) No. 11, ยฉ Wiley-VCH

71-11  Fu-Yuan Hsu and Yao-Ming Yang Confluence Weld in an Aluminum Gravity Casting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Available online 23 November 2011, ISSN 0924-0136, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.11.006.

65-11     V.A. Chaikin, A.V. Chaikin, I.N.Volnov, A Study of the Process of Late Modification Using Simulation, in Zagotovitelnye Proizvodstva v Mashinostroenii, 10, 2011, 8-12. In Russian.

54-11  Ngadia Taha Niane and Jean-Pierre Michalet, Validation of Foundry Process for Aluminum Parts with FLOW-3D Software, Proceedings of the 2011 International Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, 2011.

51-11    A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Cast Part, 2011 Die Casting Congress & Tabletop, Columbus, OH, September 19-21, 2011

50-11   Y. Wang, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, and R.A. Miller, Runner design optimization based on CFD simulation for a die with multiple cavities, 2011 Die Casting Congress & Tabletop, Columbus, OH, September 19-21, 2011

48-11 A. Karwiล„ski, W. Leล›niewski, S. Pysz, P. Wieliczko, The technology of precision casting of titanium alloys by centrifugal process, Archives of Foundry Engineering, ISSN: 1897-3310), Volume 11, Issue 3/2011, 73-80, 2011.

46-11  Daniel Einsiedler, Entwicklung einer Simulationsmethodik zur Simulation von Strรถmungs- und Trocknungsvorgรคngen bei Kernfertigungsprozessen mittels CFD (Development of a simulation methodology for simulating flow and drying operations in core production processes using CFD), MSc thesis at Technical University of Aalen in Germany (Hochschule Aalen), 2011.

44-11  Bin Zhang and Craig Shaber, Aluminum Ingot Thermal Stress Development Modeling of the Wagstaffยฎ EpsilonTM Rolling Ingot DC Casting System during the Start-up Phase, Materials Science Forum Vol. 693 (2011) pp 196-207, ยฉ 2011 Trans Tech Publications, July, 2011.

43-11 Vu Nguyen, Patrick Rohan, John Grandfield, Alex Levin, Kevin Naidoo, Kurt Oswald, Guillaume Girard, Ben Harker, and Joe Rea, Implementation of CASTfill low-dross pouring system for ingot casting, Materials Science Forum Vol. 693 (2011) pp 227-234, ยฉ 2011 Trans Tech Publications, July, 2011.

40-11  A. Starobin, D. Goettsch, M. Walker, D. Burch, Gas Pressure in Aluminum Block Water Jacket Cores, ยฉ 2011 American Foundry Society, International Journal of Metalcasting/Summer 2011

37-11 Ferencz Peti, Lucian Grama, Analyze of the Possible Causes of Porosity Type Defects in Aluminum High Pressure Diecast Parts, Scientific Bulletin of the Petru Maior University of Targu Mures, Vol. 8 (XXV) no. 1, 2011, ISSN 1841-9267

31-11  Johannes Hartmann, Andrรฉ Trepper, Carolin Kรถrner, Aluminum Integral Foams with Near-Microcellular Structure, Advanced Engineering Materials, 13: n/a. doi: 10.1002/adem.201100035, June 2011.

27-11  A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation Case Studies, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

26-11    A. Reikher, H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast Parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Die Casting Part, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

21-11 Thang Nguyen, Vu Nguyen, Morris Murray, Gary Savage, John Carrig, Modelling Die Filling in Ultra-Thin Aluminium Castings, Materials Science Forum (Volume 690), Light Metals Technology V, pp 107-111, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.690.107, June 2011.

19-11 Jon Spangenberg, Cem Celal Tutum, Jesper Henri Hattel, Nicolas Roussel, Metter Rica Geiker, Optimization of Casting Process Parameters for Homogeneous Aggregate Distribution in Self-Compacting Concrete: A Feasibility Study, ยฉ IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, New Orleans, USA

16-11  A. Starobin, C.W. Hirt, H. Lang, and M. Todte, Core Drying Simulation and Validations, AFS Proceedings 2011, ยฉ American Foundry Society, Presented at the 115th Metalcasting Congress, Schaumburg, Illinois, April 2011.

15-11  J. J. Hernรกndez-Ortega, R. Zamora, J. Lรณpez, and F. Faura, Numerical Analysis of Air Pressure Effects on the Flow Pattern during the Filling of a Vertical Die Cavity, AIP Conf. Proc., Volume 1353, pp. 1238-1243, The 14th International Esaform Conference on Material Forming: Esaform 2011; doi:10.1063/1.3589686, May 2011. Available online.

10-11 Abbas A. Khalaf and Sumanth Shankar, Favorable Environment for Nondentric Morphology in Controlled Diffusion Solidification, DOI: 10.1007/s11661-011-0641-z, ยฉ The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2011, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, March 11, 2011.

08-11 Hai Peng Li, Chun Yong Liang, Li Hui Wang, Hong Shui Wang, Numerical Simulation of Casting Process for Gray Iron Butterfly Valve, Advanced Materials Research, 189-193, 260, February 2011.

04-11  C.W. Hirt, Predicting Core Shooting, Drying and Defect Development, Foundry Management & Technology, January 2011.

76-10  Zhizhong Sun, Henry Hu, Alfred Yu, Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Squeeze Casting Magnesium Alloy AM50, Magnesium Technology 2010, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & ExhibitionFebruary 14-18, 2010, Seattle, WA.

68-10  A. Reikher, H. Gerber, K.M. Pillai, T.-C. Jen, Natural Convectionโ€”An Overlooked Phenomenon of the Solidification Process, Die Casting Engineer, January 2010

54-10    Andrea Bernardoni, Andrea Borsi, Stefano Mascetti, Alessandro Incognito and Matteo Corrado, Fonderia Leonardo aveva ragione! Lโ€™enorme cavallo dedicato a Francesco Sforza era materialmente realizzabile, A&C โ€“ Analisis e Calcolo, Giugno 2010. In  Italian.

48-10  J. J. Hernรกndez-Ortega, R. Zamora, J. Palacios, J. Lรณpez and F. Faura, An Experimental and Numerical Study of Flow Patterns and Air Entrapment Phenomena During the Filling of a Vertical Die Cavity, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., October 2010, Volume 132, Issue 5, 05101, doi:10.1115/1.4002535.

47-10  A.V. Chaikin, I.N. Volnov, and V.A. Chaikin, Development of Dispersible Mixed Inoculant Compositions Using the FLOW-3D Program, Liteinoe Proizvodstvo, October, 2010, in Russian.

42-10  H. Lakshmi, M.C. Vinay Kumar, Raghunath, P. Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, K.S.S. Murthy, P. Dutta, Induction reheating of A356.2 aluminum alloy and thixocasting as automobile component, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 20(20101) s961-s967.

41-10  Pamela J. Waterman, Understanding Core-Gas Defects, Desktop Engineering, October 2010. Available online at Desktop Engineering. Also published in the Foundry Trade Journal, November 2010.

39-10  Liu Zheng, Jia Yingying, Mao Pingli, Li Yang, Wang Feng, Wang Hong, Zhou Le, Visualization of Die Casting Magnesium Alloy Steering Bracket, Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, ISSN: 1001-2249, CN: 42-1148/TG, 2010-04. In Chinese.

37-10  Morris Murray, Lars Feldager Hansen, and Carl Reinhardt, I Have Defects โ€“ Now What, Die Casting Engineer, September 2010

36-10  Stefano Mascetti, Using Flow Analysis Software to Optimize Piston Velocity for an HPDC Process, Die Casting Engineer, September 2010. Also available in Italian: Ottimizzare la velocita del pistone in pressofusione.  A & C, Analisi e Calcolo, Anno XII, n. 42, Gennaio 2011, ISSN 1128-3874.

32-10  Guan Hai Yan, Sheng Dun Zhao, Zheng Hui Sha, Parameters Optimization of Semisolid Diecasting Process for Air-Conditionerโ€™s Triple Valve in HPb59-1 Alloy, Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 129 โ€“ 131), Vol. Material and Manufacturing Technology, pp. 936-941, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.129-131.936, August 2010.

29-10 Zheng Peng, Xu Jun, Zhang Zhifeng, Bai Yuelong, and Shi Likai, Numerical Simulation of Filling of Rheo-diecasting A357 Aluminum Alloy, Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, DOI: CNKI:SUN:TZZZ.0.2010-01-024, 2010.

27-10 For an Aerospace Diecasting, Littler Uses Simulation to Reveal Defects, and Win a New Order, Foundry Management & Technology, July 2010

23-10 Michael R. Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment, The Canadian Die Caster, June 2010

15-10 David H. Kirkwood, Michel Suery, Plato Kapranos, Helen V. Atkinson, and Kenneth P. Young, Semi-solid Processing of Alloys, 2010, XII, 172 p. 103 illus., 19 in color., Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-642-00705-7.

09-10  Shannon Wetzel, Fullfilling Da Vinciโ€™s Dream, Modern Casting, April 2010.

08-10 B.I. Semenov, K.M. Kushtarov, Semi-solid Manufacturing of Castings, New Industrial Technologies, Publication of Moscow State Technical University n.a. N.E. Bauman, 2009 (in Russian)

07-10 Carl Reilly, Development Of Quantitative Casting Quality Assessment Criteria Using Process Modelling, thesis: The University of Birmingham, March 2010 (Available upon request)

06-10 A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation โ€“ Case Studies, CastExpo โ€™10, NADCA, Orlando, Florida, March 2010

05-10 M.C. Carter, S. Palit, and M. Littler, Characterizing Flow Losses Occurring in Air Vents and Ejector Pins in High Pressure Die Castings, CastExpo โ€™10, NADCA, Orlando, Florida, March 2010

04-10 Pamela Waterman, Simulating Porosity Factors, Foundry Management Technology, March 2010, Article available at Foundry Management Technology

03-10 C. Reilly, M.R. Jolly, N.R. Green, JC Gebelin, Assessment of Casting Filling by Modeling Surface Entrainment Events Using CFD, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition (Jim Evans Honorary Symposium), Seattle, Washington, USA, February 14-18, 2010

02-10 P. Vรคyrynen, S. Wang, J. Laine and S.Louhenkilpi, Control of Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer and Inclusions in Continuous Casting โ€“ CFD and Neural Network Studies, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition (Jim Evans Honorary Symposium), Seattle, Washington, USA, February 14-18, 2010

60-09   Somlak Wannarumon, and Marco Actis Grande, Comparisons of Computer Fluid Dynamic Software Programs applied to Jewelry Investment Casting Process, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 55 2009.

59-09   Marco Actis Grande and Somlak Wannarumon, Numerical Simulation of Investment Casting of Gold Jewelry: Experiments and Validations, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol:3 2009-07-24

56-09  Jozef Kasala, Ondrej Hรญreลก, Rudolf Pernis, Start-up Phase Modeling of Semi Continuous Casting Process of Brass Billets, Metal 2009, 19.-21.5.2009

51-09  In-Ting Hong, Huan-Chien Tung, Chun-Hao Chiu and Hung-Shang Huang, Effect of Casting Parameters on Microstructure and Casting Quality of Si-Al Alloy for Vacuum Sputtering, China Steel Technical Report, No. 22, pp. 33-40, 2009.

42-09  P. Vรคyrynen, S. Wang, S. Louhenkilpi and L. Holappa, Modeling and Removal of Inclusions in Continuous Casting, Materials Science & Technology 2009 Conference & Exhibition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, October 25-29, 2009

41-09 O.Smirnov, P.Vรคyrynen, A.Kravchenko and S.Louhenkilpi, Modern Methods of Modeling Fluid Flow and Inclusions Motion in Tundish Bath โ€“ General View, Proceedings of Steelsim 2009 โ€“ 3rd International Conference on Simulation and Modelling of Metallurgical Processes in Steelmaking, Leoben, Austria, September 8-10, 2009

21-09 A. Pari, Case Studies โ€“ Optimization of HPDC Process Using Flow Simulation, Die Casting Engineer, July 2009

20-09 M. Sirvio, M. Wos, Casting directly from a computer model by using advanced simulation software, FLOW-3D Cast, Archives of Foundry Engineering Volume 9, Issue 1/2009, 79-82

19-09 Andrei Starobin, C.W. Hirt, D. Goettsch, A Model for Binder Gas Generation and Transport in Sand Cores and Molds, Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Solidification Processes XII, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Minerals Society), June 2009

11-09 Michael Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment in a Shot Sleeve during Slow-Shot Stage, Die Casting Engineer (The North American Die Casting Association ISSN 0012-253X), May 2009

10-09 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, Application of One-Dimensional Numerical Simulation to Optimize Process Parameters of a Thin-Wall Casting in High Pressure Die Casting, Die Casting Engineer (The North American Die Casting Association ISSN 0012-253X), May 2009

7-09 Andrei Starobin, Simulation of Core Gas Evolution and Flow, presented at the North American Die Casting Association โ€“ 113th Metalcasting Congress, April 7-10, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

6-09 A.Pari, Optimization of HPDC PROCESS: Case Studies, North American Die Casting Association โ€“ 113th Metalcasting Congress, April 7-10, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

2-09 C. Reilly, N.R. Green and M.R. Jolly, Oxide Entrainment Structures in Horizontal Running Systems, TMS 2009, San Francisco, California, February 2009

30-08 I.N.Volnov, Computer Modeling of Casting of Pipe Fittings, ยฉ 2008, Pipe Fittings, 5 (38), 2008. Russian version

28-08 A.V.Chaikin, I.N.Volnov, V.A.Chaikin, Y.A.Ukhanov, N.R.Petrov, Analysis of the Efficiency of Alloy Modifiers Using Statistics and Modeling, ยฉ 2008, Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), October, 2008

27-08 P. Scarber, Jr., H. Littleton, Simulating Macro-Porosity in Aluminum Lost Foam Castings, American Foundry Society, ยฉ 2008, AFS Lost Foam Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, October, 2008

25-08 FMT Staff, Forecasting Core Gas Pressures with Computer Simulation, Foundry Management and Technology, October 28, 2008 ยฉ 2008 Penton Media, Inc. Online article

24-08 Core and Mold Gas Evolution, Foundry Management and Technology, January 24, 2008 (excerpted from the FM&T May 2007 issue) ยฉ 2008 Penton Media, Inc.

22-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, Modern Casting/September 2008

21-08 X. Chen, D. Penumadu, Permeability Measurement and Numerical Modeling for Refractory Porous Materials, AFS Transactions ยฉ 2008 American Foundry Society, CastExpo โ€™08, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

20-08 Rolf Krack, Using Solidification Simulations for Optimising Die Cooling Systems, FTJ July/August 2008

19-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Software Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, ECS Casting Innovations, July/August 2008

13-08 T. Yoshimura, K. Yano, T. Fukui, S. Yamamoto, S. Nishido, M. Watanabe and Y. Nemoto, Optimum Design of Die Casting Plunger Tip Considering Air Entrainment, Proceedings of 10th Asian Foundry Congress (AFC10), Nagoya, Japan, May 2008

08-08 Stephen Instone, Andreas Buchholz and Gerd-Ulrich Gruen, Inclusion Transport Phenomena in Casting Furnaces, Light Metals 2008, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), 2008

07-08 P. Scarber, Jr., H. Littleton, Simulating Macro-Porosity in Aluminum Lost Foam Casting, AFS Transactions 2008 ยฉ American Foundry Society, CastExpo โ€™08, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

06-08 A. Reikher, H. Gerber and A. Starobin, Multi-Stage Plunger Deceleration System, CastExpo โ€™08, NADCA, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

05-08 Amol Palekar, Andrei Starobin, Alexander Reikher, Die-casting end-of-fill and drop forge viscometer flow transients examined with a coupled-motion numerical model, 68th World Foundry Congress, Chennai, India, February 2008

03-08 Petri J. Vรคyrynen, Sami K. Vapalahti and Seppo J. Louhenkilpi, On Validation of Mathematical Fluid Flow Models for Simulation of Tundish Water Models and Industrial Examples, AISTech 2008, May 2008

53-07   A. Kermanpur, Sh. Mahmoudi and A. Hajipour, Three-dimensional Numerical Simulation of Metal Flow and Solidification in the Multi-cavity Casting Moulds of Automotive Components, International Journal of Iron & Steel Society of Iran, Article 2, Volume 4, Issue 1, Summer and Autumn 2007, pages 8-15.

36-07 Duque Mesa A. F., Herrera J., Cruz L.J., Fernรกndez G.P. y Martรญnez H.V., Caracterizaciรณn Defectolรณgica de Piezas Fundida por Lost Foam Casting Mediante Simulaciรณn Numรฉrica, 8ยฐ Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingenieria Mecanica, Cusco, Peru, 23 al 25 de Octubre de 2007 (in Spanish)

27-07 A.Y. Korotchenko, A.M. Zarubin, I.A.Korotchenko, Modeling of High Pressure Die Casting Filling, Russian Foundryman, December 2007, pp 15-19. (in Russian)

26-07 I.N. Volnov, Modeling of Casting Processes with Variable Geometry, Russian Foundryman, November 2007, pp 27-30. (in Russian)

16-07 P. Vรคyrynen, S. Vapalahti, S. Louhenkilpi, L. Chatburn, M. Clark, T. Wagner, Tundish Flow Model Tuning and Validation โ€“ Steady State and Transient Casting Situations, STEELSIM 2007, Graz/Seggau, Austria, September 12-14 2007

11-07 Marco Actis Grande, Computer Simulation of the Investment Casting Process โ€“ Widening of the Filling Step, Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, May 2007

09-07 Alexandre Reikher and Michael Barkhudarov, Casting: An Analytical Approach, Springer, 1st edition, August 2007, Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-84628-849-4. U.S. Order Form; Europe Order Form.

07-07 I.N. Volnov, Casting Modeling Systems โ€“ Current State, Problems and Perspectives, (in Russian), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), June 2007

05-07 A.N. Turchin, D.G. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, Solidification under Forced-Flow Conditions in a Shallow Cavity, DOI: 10.1007/s1161-007-9183-9, ยฉ The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2007

04-07 A.N. Turchin, M. Zuijderwijk, J. Pool, D.G. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, Feathery grain growth during solidification under forced flow conditions, ยฉ Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.030, April 2007

03-07 S. Kuyucak, Sponsored Research โ€“ Clean Steel Casting Productionโ€”Evaluation of Laboratory Castings, Transactions of the American Foundry Society, Volume 115, 111th Metalcasting Congress, May 2007

02-07 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Mark R. Jolly and John Campbell, The Design of L-Shaped Runners for Gravity Casting, Shape Casting: 2nd International Symposium, Edited by Paul N. Crepeau, Murat Tiryakioรฐlu and John Campbell, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), Orlando, FL, Feb 2007

30-06 X.J. Liu, S.H. Bhavnani, R.A. Overfelt, Simulation of EPS foam decomposition in the lost foam casting process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 182 (2007) 333โ€“342, ยฉ 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

25-06 Michael Barkhudarov and Gengsheng Wei, Modeling Casting on the Move, Modern Casting, August 2006; Modeling of Casting Processes with Variable Geometry, Russian Foundryman, December 2007, pp 10-15. (in Russian)

24-06 P. Scarber, Jr. and C.E. Bates, Simulation of Core Gas Production During Mold Fill, ยฉ 2006 American Foundry Society

7-06 M.Y.Smirnov, Y.V.Golenkov, Manufacturing of Cast Iron Bath Tubs Castings using Vacuum-Process in Russia, Russiaโ€™s Foundryman, July 2006. In Russian.

6-06 M. Barkhudarov, and G. Wei, Modeling of the Coupled Motion of Rigid Bodies in Liquid Metal, Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes โ€“ XI, May 28 โ€“ June 2, 2006, Opio, France, eds. Ch.-A. Gandin and M. Bellet, pp 71-78, 2006.

2-06 J.-C. Gebelin, M.R. Jolly and F.-Y. Hsu, โ€˜Designing-inโ€™ Controlled Filling Using Numerical Simulation for Gravity Sand Casting of Aluminium Alloys, Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2006, Vol.19 No.1

1-06 Michael Barkhudarov, Using Simulation to Control Microporosity Reduces Die Iterations, Die Casting Engineer, January 2006, pp. 52-54

30-05 H. Xue, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, R.A. Miller, Modeling Dynamic Cavity Pressure and Impact Spike in Die Casting, Cast Expo โ€™05, April 16-19, 2005

22-05 Blas Melissari & Stavros A. Argyropoulous, Measurement of Magnitude and Direction of Velocity in High-Temperature Liquid Metals; Part I, Mathematical Modeling, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Volume 36B, October 2005, pp. 691-700

21-05 M.R. Jolly, State of the Art Review of Use of Modeling Software for Casting, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 337-346

20-05 J-C Gebelin, M.R. Jolly & F-Y Hsu, โ€˜Designing-inโ€™ Controlled Filling Using Numerical Simulation for Gravity Sand Casting of Aluminium Alloys, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 355-364

19-05 F-Y Hsu, M.R. Jolly & J Campbell, Vortex Gate Design for Gravity Castings, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 73-82

18-05 M.R. Jolly, Modelling the Investment Casting Process: Problems and Successes, Japanese Foundry Society, JFS, Tokyo, Sept. 2005

13-05 Xiaogang Yang, Xiaobing Huang, Xiaojun Dai, John Campbell and Joe Tatler, Numerical Modelling of the Entrainment of Oxide Film Defects in Filling of Aluminium Alloy Castings, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 17 (6), 2004, 321-331

10-05 Carlos Evaristo Esparza, Martha P. Guerro-Mata, Roger Z. Rรญos-Mercado, Optimal Design of Gating Systems by Gradient Search Methods, Computational Materials Science, October 2005

6-05 Birgit Hummler-Schaufler, Fritz Hirning, Jurgen Schaufler, A World First for Hatz Diesel and Schaufler Tooling, Die Casting Engineer, May 2005, pp. 18-21

4-05 Rolf Krack, The W35 Topicโ€”A World First, Die Casting World, March 2005, pp. 16-17

3-05 Joerg Frei, Casting Simulations Speed Up Development, Die Casting World, March 2005, p. 14

2-05 David Goettsch and Michael Barkhudarov, Analysis and Optimization of the Transient Stage of Stopper-Rod Pour, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2005

36-04  Ik Min Park, Il Dong Choi, Yong Ho Park, Development of Light-Weight Al Scroll Compressor for Car Air Conditioner, Materials Science Forum, Designing, Processing and Properties of Advanced Engineering Materials, 449-452, 149, March 2004.

32-04 D.H. Kirkwood and P.J Ward, Numerical Modelling of Semi-Solid Flow under Processing Conditions, steel research int. 75 (2004), No. 8/9

30-04 Haijing Mao, A Numerical Study of Externally Solidified Products in the Cold Chamber Die Casting Process, thesis: The Ohio State University, 2004 (Available upon request)

28-04 Z. Cao, Z. Yang, and X.L. Chen, Three-Dimensional Simulation of Transient GMA Weld Pool with Free Surface, Supplement to the Welding Journal, June 2004.

23-04 State of the Art Use of Computational Modelling in the Foundry Industry, 3rd International Conference Computational Modelling of Materials III, Sicily, Italy, June 2004, Advances in Science and Technology,  Eds P. Vincenzini & A Lami, Techna Group Srl, Italy, ISBN: 88-86538-46-4, Part B, pp 479-490

22-04 Jerry Fireman, Computer Simulation Helps Reduce Scrap, Die Casting Engineer, May 2004, pp. 46-49

21-04 Joerg Frei, Simulationโ€”A Safe and Quick Way to Good Components, Aluminium World, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 42-43

20-04 J.-C. Gebelin, M.R. Jolly, A. M. Cendrowicz, J. Cirre and S. Blackburn, Simulation of Die Filling for the Wax Injection Process โ€“ Part II Numerical Simulation, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, Volume 35B, August 2004

14-04 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov, Charles H. Sherwin, and Ruel A. Overfelt, Hot Distortion Studies In Phenolic Urethane Cold Box System, American Foundry Society, 108th Casting Congress, June 12-15, 2004, Rosemont, IL, USA

13-04 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov and Ruel A. Overfelt, First V-Process Casting of Magnesium, American Foundry Society, 108th Casting Congress, June 12-15, 2004, Rosemont, IL, USA

5-04 C. Schlumpberger & B. Hummler-Schaufler, Produktentwicklung auf hohem Niveau (Product Development on a High Level), Druckguss Praxis, January 2004, pp 39-42 (in German).

3-04 Charles Bates, Dealing with Defects, Foundry Management and Technology, February 2004, pp 23-25

1-04 Laihua Wang, Thang Nguyen, Gary Savage and Cameron Davidson, Thermal and Flow Modeling of Ladling and Injection in High Pressure Die Casting Process, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, vol. 16 No 4 2003, pp 409-417

2-03 J-C Gebelin, AM Cendrowicz, MR Jolly, Modeling of the Wax Injection Process for the Investment Casting Process โ€“ Prediction of Defects, presented at the Third International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Minerals and Process Industries, December 10-12, 2003, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 415-420

29-03 C. W. Hirt, Modeling Shrinkage Induced Micro-porosity, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-03-TN66)

28-03 Thixoforming at the University of Sheffield, Diecasting World, September 2003, pp 11-12

26-03 William Walkington, Gas Porosity-A Guide to Correcting the Problems, NADCA Publication: 516

22-03 G F Yao, C W Hirt, and M Barkhudarov, Development of a Numerical Approach for Simulation of Sand Blowing and Core Formation, in Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Process-Xโ€, Ed. By Stefanescu et al pp. 633-639, 2003

21-03 E F Brush Jr, S P Midson, W G Walkington, D T Peters, J G Cowie, Porosity Control in Copper Rotor Die Castings, NADCA Indianapolis Convention Center, Indianapolis, IN September 15-18, 2003, T03-046

12-03 J-C Gebelin & M.R. Jolly, Modeling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes,  Trans AFS, 2002, 110, pp. 109-120

11-03 M.R. Jolly, Casting Simulation โ€“ How Well Do Reality and Virtual Casting Match โ€“ A State of the Art Review, Intl. J. Cast Metals Research, 2002, 14, pp. 303-313

10-03 Gebelin., J-C and Jolly, M.R., Modeling of the Investment Casting Process, Journal of  Materials Processing Tech., Vol. 135/2-3, pp. 291 โ€“ 300

9-03 Cox, M, Harding, R.A. and Campbell, J., Optimised Running System Design for Bottom Filled Aluminium Alloy 2L99 Investment Castings, J. Mat. Sci. Tech., May 2003, Vol. 19, pp. 613-625

8-03 Von Alexander Schrey and Regina Reek, Numerische Simulation der Kernherstellung, (Numerical Simulation of Core Blowing), Giesserei, June 2003, pp. 64-68 (in German)

7-03 J. Zuidema Jr., L Katgerman, Cyclone separation of particles in aluminum DC Casting, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 607-614

6-03 Jean-Christophe Gebelin and Mark Jolly, Numerical Modeling of Metal Flow Through Filters, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 431-438

5-03 N.W. Lai, W.D. Griffiths and J. Campbell, Modelling of the Potential for Oxide Film Entrainment in Light Metal Alloy Castings, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 415-422

21-02 Boris Lukezic, Case History: Process Modeling Solves Die Design Problems, Modern Casting, February 2003, P 59

20-02 C.W. Hirt and M.R. Barkhudarov, Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002, pp 31-33

19-02 Mark Jolly, Mike Cox, Ric Harding, Bill Griffiths and John Campbell, Quiescent Filling Applied to Investment Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002 pp. 36-38

18-02 Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Foundry Management and Technology, October 2002, pp 13-15

17-02 G Messmer, Simulation of a Thixoforging Process of Aluminum Alloys with FLOW-3D, Institute for Metal Forming Technology, University of Stuttgart

16-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Lost Foam Process, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 319-324

15-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Inclusion Tracking, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 341-346

14-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Advanced Simulation of the Flow and Heat Transfer of an Alternator Housing, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 219-228

8-02 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov, and Ruel A. Overfelt, Experimental and Numerical Study of Bonded Sand-Air Two-Phase Flow in PUA Process, Auburn University, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-091, Kansas City, MO

7-02 A Habibollah Zadeh, and J Campbell, Metal Flow Through a Filter System, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-020, Kansas City, MO

6-02 Phil Ward, and Helen Atkinson, Final Report for EPSRC Project: Modeling of Thixotropic Flow of Metal Alloys into a Die, GR/M17334/01, March 2002, University of Sheffield

5-02 S. I. Bakhtiyarov and R. A. Overfelt, Numerical and Experimental Study of Aluminum Casting in Vacuum-sealed Step Molding, Auburn University, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-050, Kansas City, MO

4-02 J. C. Gebelin and M. R. Jolly, Modelling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society AFS Transactions 02-079, Kansas City, MO

3-02 Mark Jolly, Mike Cox, Jean-Christophe Gebelin, Sam Jones, and Alex Cendrowicz, Fundamentals of Investment Casting (FOCAST), Modelling the Investment Casting Process, Some preliminary results from the UK Research Programme, IRC in Materials, University of Birmingham, UK, AFS2001

49-01   Hua Bai and Brian G. Thomas, Bubble formation during horizontal gas injection into downward-flowing liquid, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1143-1159, 2001. doi.org/10.1007/s11663-001-0102-y

45-01 Jan Zuidema; Laurens Katgerman; Ivo J. Opstelten;Jan M. Rabenberg, Secondary Cooling in DC Casting: Modelling and Experimental Results, TMS 2001, New Orleans, Louisianna, February 11-15, 2001

43-01 James Andrew Yurko, Fluid Flow Behavior of Semi-Solid Aluminum at High Shear Rates,Ph.D. thesis; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2001. Abstract only; full thesis available at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8451 (for a fee).

33-01 Juang, S.H., CAE Application on Design of Die Casting Dies, 2001 Conference on CAE Technology and Application, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, November 2001, (article in Chinese with English-language abstract)

32-01 Juang, S.H. and C. M. Wang, Effect of Feeding Geometry on Flow Characteristics of Magnesium Die Casting by Numerical Analysis, The Preceedings of 6th FADMA Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, July 2001, Chinese language with English abstract

26-01 C. W. Hirt., Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, December 13, 2001

21-01 P. Scarber Jr., Using Liquid Free Surface Areas as a Predictor of Reoxidation Tendency in Metal Alloy Castings, presented at the Steel Foundersโ€™ Society of American, Technical and Operating Conference, October 2001

20-01 P. Scarber Jr., J. Griffin, and C. E. Bates, The Effect of Gating and Pouring Practice on Reoxidation of Steel Castings, presented at the Steel Foundersโ€™ Society of American, Technical and Operating Conference, October 2001

19-01 L. Wang, T. Nguyen, M. Murray, Simulation of Flow Pattern and Temperature Profile in the Shot Sleeve of a High Pressure Die Casting Process, CSIRO Manufacturing Science and Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Presented by North American Die Casting Association, Oct 29-Nov 1, 2001, Cincinnati, To1-014

18-01 Rajiv Shivpuri, Venkatesh Sankararaman, Kaustubh Kulkarni, An Approach at Optimizing the Ingate Design for Reducing Filling and Shrinkage Defects, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, Presented by North American Die Casting Association, Oct 29-Nov 1, 2001, Cincinnati, TO1-052

5-01 Michael Barkhudarov, Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Diecasting World, March 2001, pp. 5-6

2-01 J. Grindling, Customized CFD Codes to Simulate Casting of Thermosets in Full 3D, Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding 2000 Conference, October 31-November 2, 20

20-00 Richard Schuhmann, John Carrig, Thang Nguyen, Arne Dahle, Comparison of Water Analogue Modelling and Numerical Simulation Using Real-Time X-Ray Flow Data in Gravity Die Casting, Australian Die Casting Association Die Casting 2000 Conference, September 3-6, 2000, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

15-00 M. Sirvio, Vainola, J. Vartianinen, M. Vuorinen, J. Orkas, and S. Devenyi, Fluid Flow Analysis for Designing Gating of Aluminum Castings, Proc. NADCA Conf., Rosemont, IL, Nov 6-8, 1999

14-00 X. Yang, M. Jolly, and J. Campbell, Reduction of Surface Turbulence during Filling of Sand Castings Using a Vortex-flow Runner, Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August 2000

13-00 H. S. H. Lo and J. Campbell, The Modeling of Ceramic Foam Filters, Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August 2000

12-00 M. R. Jolly, H. S. H. Lo, M. Turan and J. Campbell, Use of Simulation Tools in the Practical Development of a Method for Manufacture of Cast Iron Camshafts,โ€ Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August, 2000

14-99 J Koke, and M Modigell, Time-Dependent Rheological Properties of Semi-solid Metal Alloys, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Aachen University of Technology, Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials 3: 15-30, 1999

12-99 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, Schneider, Wolfgang, Ray, Steven, Marthinusen, Jan-Olaf, Recent Improvements in Ceramic Foam Filter Design by Coupled Heat and Fluid Flow Modeling, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1999, pp. 1041-1047

10-99 Bongcheol Park and Jerald R. Brevick, Computer Flow Modeling of Cavity Pre-fill Effects in High Pressure Die Casting, NADCA Proceedings, Cleveland T99-011, November, 1999

8-99 Brad Guthrie, Simulation Reduces Aluminum Die Casting Cost by Reducing Volume, Die Casting Engineer Magazine, September/October 1999, pp. 78-81

7-99 Fred L. Church, Virtual Reality Predicts Cast Metal Flow, Modern Metals, September, 1999, pp. 67F-J

19-98 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, & Schneider, Wolfgang, Numerical Modeling of Fluid Flow Phenomena in the Launder-integrated Tool Within Casting Unit Development, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1998, pp. 1175-1182

18-98 X. Yang & J. Campbell, Liquid Metal Flow in a Pouring Basin, Int. J. Cast Metals Res, 1998, 10, pp. 239-253

15-98 R. Van Tol, Mould Filling of Horizontal Thin-Wall Castings, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1998

14-98 J. Daughtery and K. A. Williams, Thermal Modeling of Mold Material Candidates for Copper Pressure Die Casting of the Induction Motor Rotor Structure, Proc. Intโ€™l Workshop on Permanent Mold Casting of Copper-Based Alloys, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Oct. 15-16, 1998

10-98 C. W. Hirt, and M.R. Barkhudarov, Lost Foam Casting Simulation with Defect Prediction, Flow Science Inc, presented at Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes VIII Conference, June 7-12, 1998, Catamaran Hotel, San Diego, California

9-98 M. R. Barkhudarov and C. W. Hirt, Tracking Defects, Flow Science Inc, presented at the 1st International Aluminum Casting Technology Symposium, 12-14 October 1998, Rosemont, IL

5-98 J. Righi, Computer Simulation Helps Eliminate Porosity, Die Casting Management Magazine, pp. 36-38, January 1998

3-98 P. Kapranos, M. R. Barkhudarov, D. H. Kirkwood, Modeling of Structural Breakdown during Rapid Compression of Semi-Solid Alloy Slugs, Dept. Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, U.K. and Flow Science Inc, USA, Presented at the 5th International Conference Semi-Solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 23-25 June 1998

1-98 U. Jerichow, T. Altan, and P. R. Sahm, Semi Solid Metal Forming of Aluminum Alloys-The Effect of Process Variables Upon Material Flow, Cavity Fill and Mechanical Properties, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, published in Die Casting Engineer, p. 26, Jan/Feb 1998

8-97 Michael Barkhudarov, High Pressure Die Casting Simulation Using FLOW-3D, Die Casting Engineer, 1997

15-97 M. R. Barkhudarov, Advanced Simulation of the Flow and Heat Transfer Process in Simultaneous Engineering, Flow Science report, presented at the Casting 1997 โ€“ International ADI and Simulation Conference, Helsinki, Finland, May 28-30, 1997

14-97 M. Ranganathan and R. Shivpuri, Reducing Scrap and Increasing Die Life in Low Pressure Die Casting through Flow Simulation and Accelerated Testing, Dept. Welding and Systems Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, presented at 19th International Die Casting Congress & Exposition, November 3-6, 1997

13-97 J. Koke, Modellierung und Simulation der FlieรŸeigenschaften teilerstarrter Metallegierungen, Livt Information, Institut fรผr Verfahrenstechnik, RWTH Aachen, October 1997

10-97 J. P. Greene and J. O. Wilkes, Numerical Analysis of Injection Molding of Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics โ€“ Part 2 Fiber Orientation, Body-in-White Center, General Motors Corp. and Dept. Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 37, No. 6, June 1997

9-97 J. P. Greene and J. O. Wilkes, Numerical Analysis of Injection Molding of Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics. Part 1 โ€“ Injection Pressures and Flow, Manufacturing Center, General Motors Corp. and Dept. Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, March 1997

8-97 H. Grazzini and D. Nesa, Thermophysical Properties, Casting Simulation and Experiments for a Stainless Steel, AT Systemes (Renault) report, presented at the Solidification Processing โ€™97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

7-97 R. Van Tol, L. Katgerman and H. E. A. Van den Akker, Horizontal Mould Filling of a Thin Wall Aluminum Casting, Laboratory of Materials report, Delft University, presented at the Solidification Processing โ€™97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

6-97 M. R. Barkhudarov, Is Fluid Flow Important for Predicting Solidification, Flow Science report, presented at the Solidification Processing โ€™97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

22-96 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich & Schneider, Wolfgang, 3-D Modeling of the Start-up Phase of DC Casting of Sheet Ingots, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1996, pp. 971-981

9-96 M. R. Barkhudarov and C. W. Hirt, Thixotropic Flow Effects under Conditions of Strong Shear, Flow Science report FSI96-00-2, to be presented at the โ€œMaterials Week โ€™96โ€ TMS Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 7-10 October 1996

4-96 C. W. Hirt, A Computational Model for the Lost Foam Process, Flow Science final report, February 1996 (FSI-96-57-R2)

3-96 M. R. Barkhudarov, C. L. Bronisz, C. W. Hirt, Three-Dimensional Thixotropic Flow Model, Flow Science report, FSI-96-00-1, published in the proceedings of (pp. 110- 114) and presented at the 4th International Conference on Semi-Solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, The University of Sheffield, 19-21 June 1996

1-96 M. R. Barkhudarov, J. Beech, K. Chang, and S. B. Chin, Numerical Simulation of Metal/Mould Interfacial Heat Transfer in Casting, Dept. Mech. & Process Engineering, Dept. Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield and Flow Science Inc, 9th Int. Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Thermal-Fluid Engineering, June 25-28, 1996, Singapore

11-95 Barkhudarov, M. R., Hirt, C.W., Casting Simulation Mold Filling and Solidification-Benchmark Calculations Using FLOW-3D, Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, pp 935-946

10-95 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, & Schneider, Wolfgang, Optimal Design of a Distribution Pan for Level Pour Casting, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1995, pp. 1061-1070

9-95 E. Masuda, I. Itoh, K. Haraguchi, Application of Mold Filling Simulation to Die Casting Processes, Honda Engineering Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan, presented at the Modelling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1995

6-95 K. Venkatesan, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Process Parameters on the Erosive Wear of Die Casting Dies, presented for Ph.D. degree at Ohio State University, 1995

5-95 J. Righi, A. F. LaCamera, S. A. Jones, W. G. Truckner, T. N. Rouns, Integration of Experience and Simulation Based Understanding in the Die Design Process, Alcoa Technical Center, Alcoa Center, PA 15069, presented by the North American Die Casting Association, 1995

2-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Simulation and Comparison with Water Modeling Studies of the Inertia Dominated Cavity Filling in Die Casting, NUMIFORM, 1995

1-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Gate Velocity and Gate Size on the Quality of Die Casting Parts, NAMRC, 1995.

15-94 D. Liang, Y. Bayraktar, S. A. Moir, M. Barkhudarov, and H. Jones, Primary Silicon Segregation During Isothermal Holding of Hypereutectic AI-18.3%Si Alloy in the Freezing Range, Dept. of Engr. Materials, U. of Sheffield, Metals and Materials, February 1994

13-94 Deniece Korzekwa and Paul Dunn, A Combined Experimental and Modeling Approach to Uranium Casting, Materials Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, presented at the Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, El Dorado Hotel, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1994

12-94 R. van Tol, H. E. A. van den Akker and L. Katgerman, CFD Study of the Mould Filling of a Horizontal Thin Wall Aluminum Casting, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, HTD-Vol. 284/AMD-Vol. 182, Transport Phenomena in Solidification, ASME 1994

11-94 M. R. Barkhudarov and K. A. Williams, Simulation of โ€˜Surface Turbulenceโ€™ Fluid Phenomena During the Mold Filling Phase of Gravity Castings, Flow Science Technical Note #41, November 1994 (FSI-94-TN41)

10-94 M. R. Barkhudarov and S. B. Chin, Stability of a Numerical Algorithm for Gas Bubble Modelling, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K., International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 19, 415-437 (1994)

16-93 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Simulation of Die Cavity Filling in Die Castings and an Evaluation of Process Parameters on Die Wear, Dept. of Industrial Systems Engineering, Presented by: N.A. Die Casting Association, Cleveland, Ohio, October 18-21, 1993

15-93 K. Venkatesen and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Modeling of Filling and Solidification for Improved Quality of Die Casting: A Literature Survey (Chapters II and III), Engineering Research Center for Net Shape Manufacturing, Report C-93-07, August 1993, Ohio State University

1-93 P-E Persson, Computer Simulation of the Solidification of a Hub Carrier for the Volvo 800 Series, AB Volvo Technological Development, Metals Laboratory, Technical Report No. LM 500014E, Jan. 1993

13-92 D. R. Korzekwa, M. A. K. Lewis, Experimentation and Simulation of Gravity Fed Lead Castings, in proceedings of a TMS Symposium on Concurrent Engineering Approach to Materials Processing, S. N. Dwivedi, A. J. Paul and F. R. Dax, eds., TMS-AIME Warrendale, p. 155 (1992)

12-92 M. A. K. Lewis, Near-Net-Shaiconpe Casting Simulation and Experimentation, MST 1992 Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory

2-92 M. R. Barkhudarov, H. You, J. Beech, S. B. Chin, D. H. Kirkwood, Validation and Development of FLOW-3D for Casting, School of Materials, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, presented at the TMS/AIME Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 3, 1992

1-92 D. R. Korzekwa and L. A. Jacobson, Los Alamos National Laboratory and C.W. Hirt, Flow Science Inc, Modeling Planar Flow Casting with FLOW-3D, presented at the TMS/AIME Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 3, 1992

12-91 R. Shivpuri, M. Kuthirakulathu, and M. Mittal, Nonisothermal 3-D Finite Difference Simulation of Cavity Filling during the Die Casting Process, Dept. Industrial and Systems Engineering, Ohio State University, presented at the 1991 Winter Annual ASME Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Dec. 1-6, 1991

3-91 C. W. Hirt, FLOW-3D Study of the Importance of Fluid Momentum in Mold Filling, presented at the 18th Annual Automotive Materials Symposium, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, May 1-2, 1991 (FSI-91-00-2)

11-90 N. Saluja, O.J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, On the Calculation of the Electromagnetic Force Field in the Circular Stirring of Metallic Melts, accepted in J. Appl. Physics, 1990

10-90 N. Saluja, O. J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, On the Calculation of the Electromagnetic Force Field in the Circular Stirring of Metallic Molds in Continuous Castings, presented at the 6th Iron and Steel Congress of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Nagoya, Japan, October 1990

9-90 N. Saluja, O. J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, Fluid Flow in Phenomena in the Electromagnetic Stirring of Continuous Casting Systems, Part I. The Behavior of a Cylindrically Shaped, Laboratory Scale Installation, accepted for publication in Steel Research, 1990

8-89 C. W. Hirt, Gravity-Fed Casting, Flow Science Technical Note #20, July 1989 (FSI-89-TN20)

6-89 E. W. M. Hansen and F. Syvertsen, Numerical Simulation of Flow Behaviour in Moldfilling for Casting Analysis, SINTEF-Foundation for Scientific and Industrial Research at the Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Report No. STS20 A89001, June 1989

1-88 C. W. Hirt and R. P. Harper, Modeling Tests for Casting Processes, Flow Science report, Jan. 1988 (FSI-88-38-01)

2-87 C. W. Hirt, Addition of a Solidification/Melting Model to FLOW-3D, Flow Science report, April 1987 (FSI-87-33-1)

Sand Core Making Workspace, ์‚ฌํ˜• ์ค‘์ž์„ฑํ˜•

Sand Core Making Workspace Highlights, ์‚ฌํ˜• ์ค‘์ž์„ฑํ˜•

  • ์„ธ๋ถ„ํ™”๋œ ํ๋ฆ„ ๊ณต๊ธฐ/๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ถฉ์ „
  • ์••๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ฐฐ ๋ฏธ์ถฉ์ง„๋ถ€ ์˜ˆ์ธก
  • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์œ ๊ธฐ(๊ณ ์˜จ ๋ฐ ์ €์˜จ ๋ฐ•์Šค)๋ฐ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ณด์œ 

Workspace Overview

Sand Core Making Workspace๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ค‘์ž์˜ ์ถฉ์ง„ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝํ™” ํ•ด์„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์กฐํ•ฉ์˜ shooting์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ฑ„์›Œ์ง€๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์ถฉ์ „์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์„ ์ฐพ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ ๋ฐฐ๊ธฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ตฌ์—ญ์˜ ์ถฉ์ „์„ ๊ฐœ์„  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 

์ฝœ๋“œ ๋ฐ•์Šค, ํ•ซ ๋ฐ•์Šค ๋ฐ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฒฝํ™” ๊ณต์ •์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ํ๋ฆ„๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ shooting ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.  

Sand Sand Core Drying | FLOW-3D CAST

Sand Core Blowing Simulation | FLOW-3D CAST
Sand Core Shooting | FLOW-3D CAST
Sand Core Shooting | FLOW-3D CAST
Sand Core Blowing Simulation | FLOW-3D CAST

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค

  • ์ฝœ๋“œ ๋ฐ•์Šค
  • ํ•ซ ๋ฐ•์Šค
  • ๋ฌด๊ธฐ
 

์—ด ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

  • ์ฝœ๋“œ ๋ฐ•์Šค
  • ํ•ซ ๋ฐ•์Šค
  • ๋ฌด๊ธฐ
 

๋Œ€๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐ ๋ณต์‚ฌ์—ด ์ „๋‹ฌ

 

๋งํฌ ๋œ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์™€ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฉ”์‹œ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ๋ธ”๋ก ๋ฉ”์‹œ

 

์™„๋ฒฝํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ํŒจํ‚ค์ง€

  • ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋ทฐํฌํŠธ๊ฐ€์žˆ๋Š” ์• ๋‹ˆ๋ฉ”์ด์…˜-3D, 2D, ํžˆ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ ํ”Œ๋กฏ, ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๋ Œ๋”๋ง
  • ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„ ๋„๊ตฌ
  • ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ต
  • ์šฉ์œต ์˜จ๋„, ๊ณ ์ฒด ๋ถ„์œจ ์ธก์ • ์šฉ ์„ผ์„œ
  • ์ž…์ž ์ถ”์ ๊ธฐ
  • ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ํ›„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ
  • ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์ƒ์„ฑ

Gravity Die Casting Workspace, ์ค‘๋ ฅ์ฃผ์กฐ

Gravity Die Casting Workspace Highlights, ์ค‘๋ ฅ์ฃผ์กฐ

  • ์ตœ์ฒจ๋‹จ ๋‹ค์ด ์—ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๋™์  ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์ฑ„๋„, ๋ถ„๋ฌด ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์—ด ์ˆœํ™˜
  • Ladle ์ฃผ์ž… ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋™์  Ladle ๋ชจ์…˜์ด ์žˆ๋Š” Ladle ์ฃผ์ž…
  • ์ฒจ๋‹จ ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๊ฐ‡ํž˜ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ์ œ๊ณต

Workspace Overview

Gravity Die Casting Workspace(์ค‘๋ ฅ์ฃผ์กฐ)๋Š” ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๊ฐ€ FLOW-3D CAST๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘๋ ฅ์ฃผ์กฐ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ ์ง๊ด€์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Ladle ๋ชจ์…˜, ๋ฒคํŠธ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์••์ด ์ถฉ์ง„ํ•ด์„์— ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๊ฐ‡ํž˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฏธ์„ธ ์‘๊ณ ์ˆ˜์ถ•๊ณต์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ณผ ๊ธˆํ˜•์˜จ๋„๋ถ„ํฌ ๋ฐ ์ƒํƒœ ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.-์ฒจ๋‹จ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ Workspace์˜ ํ•˜์œ„ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถฉ์ค€ํ•ด์„๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Gravity Die Casting Workspace๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์™„์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์†”๋ฃจ์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

PROCESSES MODELED

  • Gravity die casting
  • Vacuum die casting

FLEXIBLE MESHING

  • FAVORโ„ข simple mesh generation tool
  • Multi-block meshing
  • Nested meshing

MOLD MODELING

  • Localized die heating elements and cooling channels
  • Spray cooling of the die surface
  • Ceramic filters
  • Air vents

ADVANCED SOLIDIFICATION

  • Porosity
  • Shrinkage
  • Hot spots
  • Mechanical property
  • Microstructure

SAND CORES

  • Core gas evolution
  • Material definitions for core properties

DIE THERMAL MANAGEMENT

  • Thermal die cycling
  • Heat saturation
  • Full heat transfer

LADLE MOTION

  • 6 degrees of freedom motion definition

DEFECT PREDICTION

  • Macro and micro porosity
  • Gas porosity
  • Early solidification
  • Oxide formation
  • Surface defect analysis

VACUUM AND VENTING

  • Interactive probe placement
  • Area and loss coefficient calculator

MACRO AND MICRO POROSITY

  • Gas porosity
  • Early solidification
  • Oxide formation
  • Surface defect analysis

FILLING ACCURACY

  • Gas and bubble entrapment
  • Surface oxide calculation
  • RNG and LES turbulence models
  • Backpressure

COMPLETE ANALYSIS PACKAGE

  • Animations with multi-viewports – 3D, 2D, history plots, volume rendering
  • Porosity analysis tool
  • Side-by-side simulation results comparison
  • Sensors for measuring melt temperature, solid fraction
  • Particle tracers
  • Batch post-processing
  • Report generation

2019๋…„ ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ PC ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์†Œ๊ฐœ

๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…(HPC)

๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…(HPC)์€ ๊ณผํ•™, ๊ณตํ•™ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น„์ง€๋‹ˆ์Šค ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ๋“ค์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํ”ํžˆ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํƒ‘ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋‚˜ ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜๋ณด๋‹ค ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ํŒŒ์›Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด๋‚˜ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ HPCย  ์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์†๋„, ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋‚˜ ์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ผ๊ณ ๋„ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ HPC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๊ณ ์†์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์„œ๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ™•์žฅ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๋“ค์„ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
HPC ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—๋Š” ๊ด€๋ จ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด, ๋„๊ตฌ, ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์š”์†Œ, ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ์ง€ ๋ฐ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ

  • 100Gbps์˜ ์ดˆ๊ณ ์† ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํ‚น
  • ํ™•์žฅ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ์ง€
  • ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์Šคํ… (์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ Linux๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€์„ธ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ ์žก์Œ)
  • ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ
  • GPU ๊ฐ€์†์ง€์›

๋“ฑ์ด ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์–ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๊ณ ๊ฐ€์ด๊ณ  ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ๋“ค์€ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ ‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์€ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก UI๋‚˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•ด์ ธ์„œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์—…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ตญ์ฑ… ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ด€์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›๋“ค์ด ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ HPC์™€๋Š” ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๋‹จ์ผ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์—์„œ๋„ ๋งŽ์€ core๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ, ์ˆ˜ํผ์ปด์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋‹จ์ผ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ PC๊ฐ€ ํŒ๋งค๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ PC ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ „์„ธ๊ณ„์˜ ์ตœ์‹  ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” PC ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” itworld ์—์„œ ์ž‘์„ฑ๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD ๋ผ์ด์   3000 ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ | ์ธํ…”์˜ ์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋๋‚ด๋Ÿฌ ์™”๋‹ค

ํผ์Šค๋„ ์ปดํ“จํŒ… PCWorld
2019.07.09
์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ค‘ 3D ๋ทฐํฌํŠธ์™€ ์‹œ๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‹œ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ”์–ด(Cinescore) ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋”ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์™ธ์ ์ธ ์ด์œ ๋กœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋˜ ํŒŒ ํฌ๋ผ์ด(Far Cry) 5์™€ ๋ฐ์šฐ์Šค ์—‘์Šค: ๋งจ์นด์ธ๋“œ ์œ ๋‚˜์ดํ‹ฐ๋“œ(Deus Ex: Mankind United)์—์„œ์˜ ๊ตฌํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   ์นฉ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ์ฐจํŠธ๋„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD์˜ 12์ฝ”์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X CPU ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ•œ๋งˆ๋””๋กœ ์š”์•ฝํ•œ ๋ฌธ์žฅ์€ ์ด๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์„๊นŒ?โ€œ์™€, ์ด CPU ์ง„์งœ ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค.โ€

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋งŒ ๋ณด๊ธฐ๋Š” ์•„์‰ฝ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋Š” 1GHz๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๋„˜์–ด์„ฐ๋˜ AMD์˜ ์˜ค๋ฆฌ์ง€๋„ K7 ์• ์Šฌ๋ก  ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ CPU, ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ PC์˜ 64๋น„ํŠธ ์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์—ด์—ˆ๋˜ ์• ์Šฌ๋ก  64 CPU๋งŒํผ์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ, ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” CPU๊ฐ€ ๋  ๋ฌผ๊ฑด์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์•ž์œผ๋กœ ์ €๋Ÿฐ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ์„ธ์šด ์œ„๋Œ€ํ•จ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šธ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ• ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ์ด์ „ ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ๋ฌด์‹œ๋ฌด์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ๋Š” ์ •๋„๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ฐœ๋งค ์งํ›„์˜ ํ˜ผ๋ž€์ด ๊ฐ€๋ผ์•‰์œผ๋ฉด AMD ๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ˆจ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ธ๊ธฐ ์žˆ๋Š” CPU๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋Š” ์–ด์ฐŒ๋๋“  7๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋œ ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž x86 ์นฉ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์นฉ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์•„์ง๋„ 14๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘๋œ๋‹ค. ์˜ฌํ•ด ๋ง์ฏค ๋˜์–ด์•ผ 10๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ด์ „์ด ์‹œ์ž‘๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. AMD๊ฐ€ 7๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋จผ์ € ๋„๋‹ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ถ€๋Ÿฌ์›Œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ง์ด๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์ธ ์šฐ์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ AMD๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   3000์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์žฌ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ์   ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ „ ๋ผ์ด์   2000 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด 2๋ฐฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๊ณ , ํด๋Ÿญ๋‹น ๋ช…๋ น์–ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํšŸ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 15% ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD๋Š” ๋ช…๋ น ํ”„๋ฆฌ-ํŒจ์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ–ˆ๊ณ , ๋ช…๋ น ์บ์‹œ๋ฅผ ํ•œ์ธต ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ–ˆ๊ณ , ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ-op ์บ์‹œ๋ฅผ 2๋ฐฐ๋กœ ๋Š˜๋ ธ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” ๋ถ€๋™ ์†Œ์ˆ˜์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ 2๋ฐฐ๋กœ ๋Š˜๋ฆฐ ๊ฒƒ์— ๋”ํ•ด ์ด์ œ AVX-256๊นŒ์ง€ ๋„์ž…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค(256๋น„ํŠธ ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ํ™•์žฅ). ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” AVX-512์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  AVX๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋™์˜์ƒ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ๋„ ์ง„๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.

AMD๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์นฉ์—์„œ L3 ์บ์‹œ๋ฅผ 2๋ฐฐ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ , ์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์บ์‹œ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฅด๋ฉด์„œ ์• ํ”Œ๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋งˆ์ผ€ํŒ…์„ ํŽผ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X์—์„œ 70MB๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ด ์บ์‹œ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ง€์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์ธ๋‹ค. ๋˜ CPU์˜ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์บ์‹œ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฅด๋ฉด์„œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋•๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ย ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์บ์‹œ๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐœ์„ ์—๋„ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์•ฑ ์บ์‹œ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ €์„ ๋•Œ ๊ธฐ๋ปํ•  ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์€ ์•„๋ฌด๋„ ์—†์„ ํ…Œ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ.

โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์—๋Š” 7๋‚˜๋…ธ CCD๊ฐ€ 2๊ฐœ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ„๋‹ค. โ“’AMD

์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์นฉ์…‹ ์„ค๊ณ„๋„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์†์„ ๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ์˜ ์   ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ผ์ด์  ์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ PCIe ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ ์ธํ”ผ๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ํŒจ๋ธŒ๋ฆญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋œ 2๊ฐœ์˜ 14 ๋‚˜๋…ธ CCD๋ฅผ ํŠน์ง•์œผ๋กœ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์   2์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๋ผ์ด์   3000์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ์™€ PCIe 4.0 ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณ„๊ฐœ์˜ IO ๋‹ค์ด๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•œ๋‹ค. 7๋‚˜๋…ธ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ IO ๋‹ค์ด๋Š” 12๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” CPU์˜ ์ „์ฒด ์›๊ฐ€ ์ ˆ๊ฐ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. 7๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ • ์›จ์ดํผ๊ฐ€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, AMD์˜ ํŒน ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์‚ฌ์ธ TSMC๊ฐ€ IO ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ œ์ž‘์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ GPU๊ฐ€ ์ œํ•œ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ, ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ๋ผ์ด์   ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋ชฉ์„ ์žก์•˜๋˜ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋งˆ์นจ๋‚ด ํ•ด์†Œ๋˜์—ˆ๋А๋ƒ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์ด์ œ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ทผ์†Œํ•ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ์‹ฌ์ง€์–ด ์—”๋น„๋””์•„์˜ ๋ฌด์ž๋น„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋น ๋ฅธ RTX 2080 Ti๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ๋™ํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ๊ฑฐ์˜ 99% ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์—†์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

PCIe4.0?!

๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค. PCIe4.0์ด๋‹ค. PCIe์˜ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ฒ„์ „ PCIe4.0์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„์™€ ์Šค๋ฃจํ’‹์„ PCIe3.0๋ณด๋‹ค 2๋ฐฐ๋กœ ๋Š˜๋ฆฐ๋‹ค. AMD๊ฐ€ PCIe4.0์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋™ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๋„ ๋˜ ํ•œ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ CPU์—์„œ PCIe3.0 ์†๋„๋กœ ์ •์ฒด๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„๋„ PCIe3.0 ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ GPU๋งŒ์„ ๋ณด์œ ํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด๋‹ค.

ํ˜„์žฌ PCIe 4.0 ์‹ค์ œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ SSD๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šธ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ƒˆ ํ‘œ์ค€์€ PC์—์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํฌํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. PCIe4.0 SSD์˜ ํ˜œํƒ์„ ์›ํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด AMD์˜ ๋ผ์ด์   3000๊ณผ ์ƒˆ X570 ์นฉ์…‹์ด ์œ ์ผํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์ด๋‹ค.

PCIe์˜ ์„ค๋ช… ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค(all about PCIe 4.0). ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ธ PCIe5.0๊ณผ PCIe6.0์ด ๋™์‹œ์— ์กด์žฌํ•ด ํ˜ผ๋ž€์„ ์ค€๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์–‘์ด ์‹ค์ œ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆฐ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๊ธฐ์–ตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋ฐ”๋ž€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ PCIe 4.0๊ฐ€ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์œ ์ผํ•œ ํ•ด๋ฒ•์ด๊ณ , AMD๋Š” ์ด ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž๋ž‘ํ• ๋งŒํ•˜๋‹ค.

๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ

์•„์ง ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๋‚จ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์˜ ํ”Œ๋ž˜๊ทธ์‹ญ ์ œํ’ˆ์ธ 8์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K๋Š” 488๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด์ง€๋Š” ์•Š๋”๋ผ๋„ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜๋Š” AMD์˜ 12์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” 499๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์— RGB ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋”ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹
AMD ๋ผ์ด์   3000 ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…” ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์••๋ฐ•ํ•œ๋‹ค. โ“’AMD

์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ AMD๊ฐ€ ์ธํ…”๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์„ธํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฐ์ข… CPU์˜ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ฐจํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋Š” ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น 21๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ด๊ณ , ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K๋Š” 31๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋กœ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์ด ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ง€๊ฒฝ์ด๋‹ค.

โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹
โ“’AMD

๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ, ํ™˜์ƒ์ ์ธ 7๋‚˜๋…ธ ๊ณต์ •๋„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿผ ์ด์ œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋น ๋ฅธ์ง€ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž.

ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์ด๋ฒˆ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์—๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์  CPU 3๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ๋‹ค. AMD์˜ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700X๊ฐ€ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ž์ธ 488๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์˜ ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K์ด๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์€ AMD์˜ 499๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์งœ๋ฆฌ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900K์ด๋‹ค.

CPU๋Š” ๋‚˜๋ž€ํžˆ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700X๋Š” MSI X470 ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ M7 AC์—, ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K๋Š” ์•„์ˆ˜์Šค ๋ง‰์Šค๋ฌด์Šค XI ํžˆ์–ด๋กœ์—, ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋Š” MSI X5700 ๊ฐ€๋“œ๋ผ์ดํฌ์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ ํƒ‘์žฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ดˆ๋ฐ˜ CPU์™€ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ํŒŒ์šด๋”์Šค ์—๋””์…˜ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค GTX 1080๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์  ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒŒ์šด๋”์Šค ์—๋””์…˜ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค RTX2080 Ti ์นด๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์„ธ PC ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ตœ์‹  UEFI/BIOS์™€ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๊ณ , ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 10 ํ”„๋กœํŽ˜์…”๋„ 1903์„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œˆ๋„์šฐ ๋ฒ„์ „์€ ํŠนํžˆ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. AMD๊ฐ€ ์ด์ œ ๋ฒ„์ „ 1903์— ์Šค์ผ€์ค„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ๋ผ์ด์   3000์—์„œ ๋” ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์–ตํ•  ์ ์€ AMD์˜ CPU๋Š” CPU ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์ž‘์€ ์ง‘๋‹จ๊ณผ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋„๋ก ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋˜์ง€๋งŒ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด ์ง‘๋‹จ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ์†๋„๋Š” ๋” ๋А๋ฆฌ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ ๋ฒ„์ „ ์œˆ๋„์šฐ์—์„œ ์Šค์ผ€์ค„๋Ÿฌ๋Š” ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ๋‚ด์˜ ํ•œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œˆ๋„์šฐ๋Š” ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ๋‹ค์ด ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋กœ ์ „์†กํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๊ณ  ์ด๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๋Š” ์›์ธ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ๋‘ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ™์€ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋กœ ์ „์†กํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฉด, ๋‘ ์ฝ”์–ด ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ต์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋А๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์ œ ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํ•ด์†Œ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œˆ๋„์šฐ 1903์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋™์ผํ•œ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ๋กœ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ „์†กํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. AMD์˜ ์ฃผ์žฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์œˆ๋„์šฐ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ 15%์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ, ๋ชจ๋“  ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์—์„œ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๋งˆ๋‹ค ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ „ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€‹โ€‹
โ“’AMD

์„ธ ๋นŒ๋“œ์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋“€์–ผ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋“œ์˜ DDR4๋ฅผ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ด์šฉํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‘์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ดi9-9900K์™€ ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700X๋Š” 16GB DDR4/3200 CL 14๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ–ˆ๊ณ , ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900K๋Š” 16GB DDR4/3600 CL 15๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ํด๋Ÿญ์ธ 3,600MHz๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. 3,200 MHz์—์„œ๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ์ œ์•ฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋จผ์ € DDR4/3600 ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋งŒ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ํ—ˆ๋ฝํ•˜๋ฉด DDR4/3200 ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ AMD๊ฐ€ PCWorld์— ๋ฐํžŒ ๋ฐ”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด DDR4/3200CL14๋Š” DDR4/3600CL15์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ €์žฅ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ด๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   7๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์€ ์ดˆ๊ณ ์† MLC ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‚ผ์„ฑ 960 ํ”„๋กœ 512GB SSD์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด PCIe3์˜ 3์„ธ๋Œ€ ์†๋„๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋Š” PCIe4.0์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ CPU์ด์ž ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด๋‹ค. PCIe4.0์€ ์ƒˆ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ CPU์˜ PCI ๋ ˆ์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ง์ ‘ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ 2TB์˜ ์ปค์„ธ์–ด MP600 PCIe 4.0 SSD๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฒˆ์— PCWorld๊ฐ€ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ์ง€๋Š” CPU ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

โ€‹โ€‹
์ปค์„ธ์–ด MP600 โ“’AMD

MCE์ธ๊ฐ€, ์•„๋‹Œ๊ฐ€?

์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ด๋ฒˆ์—๋„ โ€˜๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ•ํ™”(Multi-Core Enhancement, MCE)โ€™ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋†“๊ณ  ์˜๊ฒฌ์ด ์—‡๊ฐˆ๋ ธ๋‹ค. MCE๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ ์ง€์› ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ, ์ธํ…” โ€˜Kโ€™ CPU๋ฅผ ๋” ๋†’์€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋กœ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ „๋ ฅ ์†Œ๋น„๋„ ๋” ํฌ๊ณ  ์—ด๋„ ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. MCE๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…”์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ์„ ๋„˜๊ธด โ€˜์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญโ€™์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋œ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋„๋ฉด ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋А๋ƒ๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ๋ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ค‘๊ธ‰ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ธํ…” ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ๋Š” ์ฆ‰์‹œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก MCE๊ฐ€ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ˆ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ƒˆ CPU๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋  ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K์˜ ์ง„์ •ํ•œ ์†๋„์™€๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ€ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์ผ  ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ๋‘๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋” ๋‚œ๊ฐํ•˜๋‹ค. ์™œ๋ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ ์—…์ฒด๋งˆ๋‹ค ์ด ์„ค์ •์„ ์กฐ๊ธˆ์”ฉ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. MCE๊ฐ€ ์ผœ์ง„ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ธก์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์—†๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์ธํ…” CPU์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด MCE๋ฅผ ๋ˆ ์ฑ„๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ–ˆ๊ณ , AMD์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ์˜ค๋ฒ„๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ(Precision Boost Overdrive) ์—ญ์‹œ ๋ˆ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ด ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ํ•œ์ธต ๊นŠ์ด ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋‹ค๋ฃฐ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” MCE๋ฅผ ๋ˆ ์ฑ„ ์ธํ…” CPU๋ฅผ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ PBO๋ฅผ ๋ˆ ์ฑ„ AMD CPU๋ฅผ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ธํ…” CPU์— ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์€ ์œ ์˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ด์ œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฐจํŠธ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„๋กœ ๋‚˜๊ฐ€๋„๋ก ํ•˜์ž.

๋ผ์ด์   9 3900x 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

โ€‹โ€‹
12์ฝ”์–ด CPU๊ฐ€ 8์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์••๋„ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์€ ๊ทธ๋‹ค์ง€ ๋†€๋ž์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X์˜ ์‹ฑ๊ธ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ธ์ƒ์ ์ด๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R20์œผ๋กœ ์˜ฎ๊ฒจ๊ฐ€๋ฉด ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X์˜ ์‹ฑ๊ธ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋” ๋‹๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋ฅผ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ ์••๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์–ด์ฉŒ๋ฉด ๋‹น์—ฐํ•˜๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
์ฝ”๋กœ๋‚˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋Ÿฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋„ 8์ฝ”์–ด๋ณด๋‹ค 12์ฝ”์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜์™”๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋‹ค. V๋ ˆ์ด ๋„ฅ์ŠคํŠธ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋„ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์•ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณ„๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
๋†€๋ž์ง€๋„ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9๊ฐ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ๋…ธ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
5GHz ํด๋Ÿญ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ๋ผ์ด์   9๋ฅผ ์‹ฑ๊ธ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋กœ ์„ค์ •๋œ POV๋ ˆ์ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ ๊ทผ์†Œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
H.265 ์ฝ”๋ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ 4K ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋„ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์›”๋“ฑํ–ˆ๋‹ค. โ“’

๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ

โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋Š” H.265 ์ฝ”๋ฑ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ 4K ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ดi9๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ์•ž์งˆ๋ €๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
์‹œ๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‹œ๋„ค์Šค์ฝ”์–ด 10.4 ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋„ ๋ผ์ด์   9์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์„ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด CC 2019 ์ž‘์—…์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ๋” ์šฐ์„ธํ•˜๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์–ด HEVC ์ธ์ฝ”๋” ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ์—์„œ๋„ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ์šฐ์„ธํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์กฐ๊ธˆ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG

ํฌํ† ์ƒต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ

โ€‹โ€‹
ํฌํ† ์ƒต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   9 2900X๊ฐ€ ๊ทผ์†Œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG

์••์ถ• ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ

โ€‹โ€‹
์••์ถ• ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ. ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X์™€ ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700X์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
WinRAR๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ข‹๊ฒŒ๋„ ๋‚˜์˜๊ฒŒ๋„ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700X ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋“ฏ, WinRAR๋Š” ์ „ํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…” CPU์™€ ์ƒ์„ฑ์ด ์ข‹์•˜๋Š”๋ฐ,ย ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์™€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ์ด๋‚˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹โ€‹
7ZIP ์••์ถ• ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ฑ๊ธ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋” ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๋ผ์ด์   9๊ฐ€ ์••๋„์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
์••์ถ• ํ’€๊ธฐ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ์ „ํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ™•์ธ์˜ ์ •์ˆ˜์ด์ž CPU๊ฐ€ ๋ธŒ๋žœ์น˜ ์˜ค์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์ž˜ ๊ฐ๋‹นํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.ย  โ“’IDGโ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹
โ€‹
7Zip ์••์ถ• ํ’€๊ธฐ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” 3๊ฐœ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ๋ชจ๋‘ ์—‡๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜€๋‹ค. โ“’IDG

๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X์˜ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ

โ€‹
์„€๋„์šฐ ์˜ค๋ธŒ ํˆผ ๋ ˆ์ด๋”๋Š” 1,920×1,080 ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์—์„œ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ๋„ GPU์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ‘๋ชฉ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
์ตœ์‹  ๊ฒŒ์ž„์„ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ๋‘ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋น ๋ฅธ GPU๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋” ์˜ค๋ž˜๋œ ๋ผ์ด์ฆˆ ์˜ค๋ธŒ ๋” ํˆผ๋ ˆ์ด๋”๋กœ ์˜ฎ๊ฒจ ๊ฐ€๋ฉด ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ตฌํ˜•์ธ ์ง€ํฌ์Šค GTX 1080 FE๊ฐ€ ๋ณ‘๋ชฉ ํ˜„์ƒ์ž„์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๊ฐ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋ฅผ ์•ž์„œ์ง€๋Š” ๋ชปํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์•„์ฃผ ๊ทผ์†Œํ•˜๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
โ“’IDG
โ€‹
ํŒŒ ํฌ๋ผ์ด 5๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9๊ฐ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์•ž์„  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋‹ค. โ“’IDG
โ€‹
๋ฐ์šฐ์Šค ์—‘์Šค ๋งจ์นด์ธ๋“œ ๋””๋ฐ”์ด๋””๋“œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ. ๋ผ์ด์   7๊ณผ ๋ผ์ด์   9์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์—์„œ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐœ์„  ํญ์„ ์ง์ž‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ย  โ“’IDG
โ€‹
๋ ˆ์ธ๋ณด์šฐ ์‹์Šค ์‹œ์ง€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ โ“’IDG
โ€‹
CPU ํฌ์ปค์Šค๋“œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ „์ ์œผ๋กœ CPU ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋‚˜ ๋‹ค๋ฆ„ ์—†๋‹ค. ์ง€ํฌ์Šค GTX 1080๊ณผ RTX 2080Ti์—์„œ์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.ย  โ“’IDG

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

1์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ์—์„œ 24 ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋กœ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ์น˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R20์€ 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ๋กœ์„œ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด๋‚˜ ์—ฌํƒ€ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒŒ์ž„๊ณผ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์ด ํ˜„๋Œ€ CPU์˜ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜œํƒ์„ ๋ˆ„๋ฆด ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—†๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R20์ด ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. CPU๋ฅผ 1๊ฐœ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ์—์„œ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•ด ๋๊นŒ์ง€ ๋กœ๋”ฉ ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

์•„๋ž˜์˜ ์ฐจํŠธ์—์„œ AMD๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฐจํŠธ ์šฐ์ธก์—์„œ ๋‘๋“œ๋Ÿฌ์ง„๋‹ค. ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์–ธ์ œ๋‚˜ ์ธํ…” ์นฉ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ์šฐ์„ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์ธํ…”์€ ํ†ต์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ์ธก์—์„œ๋Š” ํŒจ๋ฐฐํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ขŒ์ธก์—์„œ๋Š” ์Šน๋ฆฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” ์นฉ์€ AMD ์นฉ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„์™€ IPC๊ฐ€ ์šฐ์„ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์ด ๊ฐ•์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ๋ฟ์ด๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์€ ์ฐจํŠธ์˜ ์ขŒ์ธก์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900K์™€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-9900K ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ฐจํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด ๊ทธ ๊ฐ•์ ์€ ์ด์ œ ์‚ฌ๋ผ์กŒ๋‹ค.

โ€‹
์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ r20์„ 1์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ์—์„œ 24์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋Œ๋ฆฌ์ž, ์ „ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900x์˜ ์ง„์ •ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์ ์ด ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG

๋™์ผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์šฐ์„ธ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„์œจ๋กœ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ฐจํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฐจํŠธ์—์„œ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋“ฏ์ด 12์ฝ”์–ด๋Š” 8์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํžˆ ์••๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฒˆ์—๋„ ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚˜์œ ์†Œ์‹์€ ์ฐจํŠธ์˜ ์ขŒ์ธก์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ๋„ ์ธํ…”์˜ ์šฐ์œ„๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ๋ผ์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋‘ CPU๋Š” 6์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋Œ€๋“ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์ดํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ผ์ด์   9๊ฐ€ ์•ž์„œ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค.

โ€‹
๋ผ์ด์   9๋Š” 8์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์ดํ›„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋ฅผ ์ œ์••ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. โ“’IDG

์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ๋ด๋„ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900K๋Š” ์–ธ์ œ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 9900K๋งŒํผ์ด๋‚˜ ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์ œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์„ ์‚ฌ์•ผ ํ•  ์ด์œ ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚จ์€ ์ด์œ ๋„ ๋ถ„๋ช… ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž 10๋ช… ์ค‘ 9๋ช…์€ ๋ผ์ด์   9 3900X๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ‹€๋ฆผ์—†๋‹ค. editor@itworld.co.kr


์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค 2018์—์„œ ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋œ ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ PC ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์†Œ๊ฐœ

๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” PCWorld ๋ฐ itworld์—์„œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๋ฐœ์ทŒ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค 2018์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ์ด ๋œจ๊ฒ๋‹ค.
PC์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์นฉ๋“ค์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์˜€๋‹ค.

์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ(Threadripper) 2 ์ธํ…”์˜ ๋ฐœํ‘œ ์งํ›„, AMD๋Š” 32์ฝ”์–ด 64์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ํ”Œ๋ž˜๊ทธ์‹ญ์ธ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2๋ฅผ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ „์Ÿ์— ๋ถˆ์„ ๋ถ™์˜€๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ 24์ฝ”์–ด CPU๋„ ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ƒˆ ์นฉ๋“ค์€ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์  (Ryzen)๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ AMD๋Š” ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ ๋งˆ์Šคํ„ฐ์™€ ํ˜‘๋ ฅํ•˜์—ฌ 32์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณต๋ƒ‰์‹ ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ์ธ ๋ ˆ์ด์Šค ๋ฆฌํผ(Wraith Ripper)๋ฅผ ์ œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD๋ฅผ ์ „๊ฒฉ ์ฑ„์šฉํ•œ ์—์ด์„œ ํ—ฌ๋ฆฌ์˜ค์Šค(Acer Helios) 500 ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ AMD์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์˜ˆ์ƒ์น˜ ๋ชปํ•œ ๊ณณ์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. AMD๋ฅผ ์ „๊ฒฉ ์ฑ„์šฉํ•œ ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์—๋Š” 6์ฝ”์–ด 12์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๋ผ์ด์   7 2700 ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋ฟ๋งŒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ผ๋ฐ์˜จ ๋ฒ ๊ฐ€(Radeon Vega) 56 ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์ด ํƒ‘์žฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์™ธ์žฅ ๋ฒ ๊ฐ€ GPU๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋œ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์€ ์ด๋ฒˆ์ด ์ฒ˜์Œ์ด๋‹ค. ์—์ด์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์— 144Hz ํ”„๋ฆฌ์‹ฑํฌ ๋””์Šคํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋ฅผ ๋งค์น˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฒ ๊ฐ€์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

MSI ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ(์น˜ํ„ฐ(Cheater) ๋ชจ๋“œ ์ ์šฉ) MSI๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๋Œ€์˜ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. MSI๊ฐ€ ์—”๋น„๋””์•„ GTX 1050 ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์„ ๋‚ด์žฅํ•œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์Šคํ‹ฐ์ง€(Prestige) PS42๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งค์šฐ ์ธ์ƒ์ ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ธ‰ํ˜•์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ MSI GF63์€ 999๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ž€ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— 6์ฝ”์–ด 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด CPU์™€ GTX 1050์ด ๋‚ด์žฅ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋…ํŠนํ•œ ์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์—์ด์ˆ˜์Šค๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ ํ”„๋ฆฌ์ฝ”๊ทธ ์™ธ์—๋„ ํ˜์‹ ์ ์ธ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŠธ๋ž™ํŒจ๋“œ(Trackpad)๋ฅผ ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ PC์šฉ ๋ณด์กฐ ํ™”๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€์‹ ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” “์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐํŒจ๋“œ(ScreenPad)” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ ์  ๋ถ ํ”„๋กœ(ZenBook Pro) 15์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

2017๋…„ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋˜๋Š” ์ตœ์‹  ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์†Œ์‹

์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„๋“ค์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ์˜ ์ „์Ÿ์„ ์น˜๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ข€ ๋” ๋นจ๋ฆฌ, ์ข€ ๋” ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„๋“ค์ด ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์ด ํ—ˆ๋ฝํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ข‹์€ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ตœ๋Œ€์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

ํ•œ ๋™์•ˆ AMD๊ฐ€ ์ธํ…”์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ž๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋‘ ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์„ ์˜์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์„ ์น˜์—ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ „๊ฐœํ•ด ์™”๋Š”๋ฐ, AMD๊ฐ€ ์„œ์„œํžˆ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๋ ฅ์„ ์žƒ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ์   CPU๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์‹œ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์— ๋ถˆ์„ ์ง€ํ”ผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋‘ ํšŒ์‚ฌ์˜ ์ตœ์‹  ์ฃผ๋ ฅ CPU ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์ธ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.


์ธํ…”, 18์ฝ”์–ด 36์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ ๋ฐœํ‘œ “AMD ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ์™€ ์ „๋ฉด์ „” (๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์ถœ์ฒ˜ : itworld)

ํผ์Šค๋„ ์ปดํ“จํŒ…
PCWorld

์ธํ…”์ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9์„ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋กœ ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ AMD์™€์˜ ์ „์Ÿ์— ๋Œ์ž…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ 30์ผ ๋Œ€๋งŒ ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ PC์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ AMD์˜ 16์ฝ”์–ด 32์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ(Threadripper)์™€ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•  18์ฝ”์–ด 36์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ์˜ ‘๋ชฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ’๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์—๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์ต์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ ์—๋””์…˜ i9-7980XE๋ผ๋Š” ์ด๋ฆ„์ด ๋ถ™์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ…Œ๋ผํ”Œ๋กญ(Teraflop) ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ PCํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋กœ ์•„์ฃผ ๊ณ ๊ฐ€์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ฌํ•ด ๋ง ์ถœํ•˜๋˜๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 1,999๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ ์ œํ’ˆ๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋” ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๋‹ค. 10์ฝ”์–ด, 12์ฝ”์–ด, 14์ฝ”์–ด, 16์ฝ”์–ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 999~1,699๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‚ฌ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋‘ ์Šค์นด์ด๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ธŒ๋กœ๋“œ์›ฐ-E๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์‹ฑ๊ธ€์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์•ฑ์€ 15%, ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋Š” 10% ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์€ ‘๋ฒ ์ด์ง„ ํด์Šค(Basin Falls)”๋ผ๋Š” ์ฝ”๋“œ ๋„ค์ž„์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋น„์‹ผ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 3์ข…์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i7 X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ(339~599๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ)๊ณผ 1์ข…์˜ ์ฟผ๋“œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i5(242๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ)๋„ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ๋ช‡ ์ฃผ ์ด๋‚ด์— ์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ ์นฉ์„ ์ถœํ•˜ํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์นฉ์— ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋งฅ์Šค ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ(Updated Turbo Boost Max Technology) 3.0์ด ํƒ‘์žฌ๋  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค. ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋งฅ์Šค๋Š” ์นฉ์ด ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด 2๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์—ฌ ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿฌํ‚น์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด๋‹ค. ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ 130๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ์ง€์› ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ๊ฐ€ ์ถœ์‹œ๋  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ 165W, 140W, 112W ์นฉ์€ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์†Œ์ผ“์ธ R4์— ๋งž์ถฐ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. 2,066ํ•€ LGA ์†Œ์ผ“๊ณผ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ์ธํ…” ์นฉ์…‹์€ X299๊ฐ€ ์œ ์ผํ•˜๋‹ค.

๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ, ์ธํ…”๊ณผ AMD๊ฐ€ ์ œ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ•œ ํŒ ๋ถ™์„ ์ „๋ง์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์ค‘ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ์Šน๋ฆฌํ• ์ง€ ์ง€์ผœ๋ณด๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ด€์‹ฌ๋„ ๋œจ๊ฒ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์„ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ‘๊ทผํ–ˆ๋‹ค. AMD๋„ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ์˜ 10์ฝ”์–ด, 12์ฝ”์–ด, 14์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฒ„์ „๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ•  ์ˆ˜๋ฐ–์— ์—†๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์ด ๋จผ์ € ํŒจ๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ์ž„์€ ์ด์ œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹œ์ž‘์ด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์˜ ์ƒˆ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์€ ๋ชจ๋“  PC๊ด€๋ จ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ์ „์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ์ข…ํ•ฉ ์ „์‹œํšŒ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „ํ•œ ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐœํ‘œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ๊ผฝํ˜”๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋˜๋Š” ์†Œ์‹์€ ์•„์ง ๋งŽ์ด ๋‚จ์•„์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ™๋ณด ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ธํ…” ๊ฒฝ์˜์ง„์ด ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ 10nm ์นฉ์ธ ์บ๋…ผ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์ผ€์ด๋น„ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ์นฉ๋ณด๋‹ค 30% ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ž๋ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋‹ค.

๋˜, HTC ๋ฐ”์ด๋ธŒ VR ํ—ค๋“œ์…‹์„ WiGig ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๋ฌด์„  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋” ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœํ‘œ๋  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”๊ณผ HTC๋Š” ์ง€๋‚œ 1์›” CES์—์„œ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์‹ญ ์ฒด๊ฒฐ์„ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ๋˜ 8์›”๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ปดํ“จํŠธ ์นด๋“œ(Compute Card)๋ฅผ ์ถœ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค.

์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ์†๋„์™€ ํ”ผ๋“œ
ํด๋ก ์†๋„๊ฐ€ 4GHz๋ฅผ ๋„˜์œผ๋ฉด์„œ, ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๋“ค์ด ์ง๋ฉดํ•œ ๋„์ „ ๊ณผ์ œ๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์•ž์„œ ๋งํฌ๋œ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋“ฏ, ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ์ฝ”์–ด๋งŒ ์ง‘์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ž„๋“ค์ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งŽ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ก , ๊ฒŒ์ž„์— ์ด์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฝ”์–ด๋กœ ํŠธ์œ„์น˜๋‚˜ ์œ ํŠœ๋ธŒ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฐ์„ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉํ•˜๊ณ , ๋” ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฑ๊ทธ๋ผ์šด๋“œ์—์„œ ์Œ์•…๋„ ์žฌ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์„ธ๋Œ€์˜ ‘์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋จธ(Streamer)’๋กœ ๋ˆˆ๊ธธ์„ ๋Œ๋ ธ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๋™์‹œ๋‹ค๋ฐœ ์ž‘์—…์— ‘๋ฉ”๊ฐ€ํƒœ์Šคํ‚น’์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ช…์นญ์„ ๋ถ™์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ‘์ˆ˜์š”’๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์•„์ฃผ ์ข‹์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ, X์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ๋งˆ์ผ€ํŒ… ๋งค๋‹ˆ์ €์ธ ํ† ๋‹ˆ ๋ฒ ๋ผ๋Š” “๊ฒŒ์ด๋จธ๊ฐ€ ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ์ฐฝ์ž‘์ž๋กœ ๋ณ€๋ชจํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์„ธ”๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ œํ’ˆ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ์ž์—ฐ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ ์ตœ๊ณ  2,000๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋กœ ์•„์ฃผ ๋น„์‹ธ๊ณ , ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์—…์˜ ํ›„์›์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋งŒ ์ตœ์‹  ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์ œํ’ˆ๋“ค์„ ๊ตฌ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ์ „๋ง์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์€ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ณ„ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด, ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฆฌํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด๋‹ค.

Core i9-7980XE: 18์ฝ”์–ด/ 36์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 1,999๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i9-7960X: 16์ฝ”์–ด/ 32์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 1,699๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i9-7940X: 14์ฝ”์–ด/ 28์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 1,399๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i9-7920X: 12์ฝ”์–ด/ 24์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 1,199๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i9-7900X (3.3GHz): 10์ฝ”์–ด/ 20์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 999๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ

์ธํ…”์€ ๋˜ ํ•œ์ •๋œ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์— ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 3์ข…์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i7 X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ์„ ํŒ๋งคํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค.

Core i7 7820X (3.6GHZ), 8์ฝ”์–ด/ 16์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 599๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i7-7800X (3.5GHz), 6์ฝ”์–ด/ 12์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 389๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
Core i7-7740X (4.3GHz), 4์ฝ”์–ด/ 8์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ, 339๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ
์ผ€์ด๋น„ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ์ฝ”์–ด์— ๋งž์ถฐ ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ i7-7740X๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์นฉ์ด ์ธํ…”์˜ ‘์Šค์นด์ด๋ ˆ์ดํฌ-X’์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์„ ๋‘๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒˆ ์นฉ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋งฅ์Šค ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ 3.0์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋“  ๋งˆ ์›…์ด ์ธํ…” ๋ธŒ๋กœ๋“œ์›ฐ-E ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์—์„œ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ, ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋งฅ์Šค ๊ธฐ์ˆ  3.0์€ (์นฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ) ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  CPU ์ง‘์•ฝ์  ์‹ฑ๊ธ€ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์ด ์ฝ”์–ด๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•ด ์ „์ฒด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค.
๋˜, ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด 2๊ฐœ๋ฅผ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฐ€์žฅ CPU ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ธ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ์— ํ• ๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ž„๊ณผ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์— ๋„์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์นฉ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ 6์ฝ”์–ด, 2์ข…์˜ 4์ฝ”์–ด X์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ์ด ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค์Œ์€ ์†๋„์™€ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์š”์•ฝ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ ํ‘œ๋‹ค.

์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿญ์ด ํฌ์ธํŠธ
์ธํ…”์€ ์ƒˆ X์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์— ๊ณต๋ƒ‰ ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ฒœํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ 165W์™€ 140W์˜ ์ƒˆ ์นฉ์ด ๋ฐฉ์ถœํ•  ์—ด์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ƒ‰๊ฐ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” TS13X ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ํŒ๋งคํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ด๋‹ค.

TS13X๋Š” PG(Propylene Glycol)์„ ์ด์šฉ, ์—ด์„ 73.84-CFM ํŒฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ์ด ํŒฌ์˜ ์†Œ์Œ์€ 21~35dBA์ด๊ณ , ํšŒ์ „ ์†๋„๋Š” 800~2,200rpm์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณ„๋„ ํŒ๋งค๋  TS13X์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 85~100๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‚ฌ์ด์ด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์€ ๋˜ XTU(Extreme Tuning Utility)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉ, ์ฝ”์–ด ๋‹น ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿฌํ‚น๊ณผ ์ „์•• ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ๊ณ„์† ์ง€์›ํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค. AVX 512 ๋น„์œจ ์˜คํ”„์…‹, ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ „์•• ์กฐ์ ˆ, PEG/DMI ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿฌํ‚น ๋“ฑ ์ƒˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.
๋˜ ‘์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํŠœ๋‹ ๋ณด์ฆ ์„œ๋น„์Šค(Performance tuning protection plan)’๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋กœํ‚น ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ผ์ข…์˜ ‘๋ณดํ—˜’์ด๋‹ค. ์นฉ์ด ๊ณ ์žฅ ๋‚  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, 1ํšŒ ๊ต์ฒด๋ฅผ ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๋ณด์ฆ ์„œ๋น„์Šค์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ๋Š” ์œ ๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ „์†ก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•œ ์ƒˆ X299 ์นฉ์…‹
ํ…Œ๋ผํ”Œ๋กญ๊ธ‰ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ PC์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ „์†ก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์•„์ฃผ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. x299 ์นฉ์…‹์€ ์ตœ์‹  DMI 3.0์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•ด SATA 3.0ํฌํŠธ์™€ USB ํฌํŠธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ์„ 2๋ฐฐ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. X299 ์นฉ์…‹์—๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ 8๊ฐœ์˜ SATA 3.0ํฌํŠธ, 10๊ฐœ์˜ USB 3.0 ํฌํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์žฅ์ฐฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด X99 ์นฉ์…‹์˜ USB 3.0ํฌํŠธ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ 6๊ฐœ์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ธŒ๋กœ๋“œ์›ฐ-E X99 ์นฉ์…‹์€ 8๊ฐœ์˜ PCIe ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ์ง€์›ํ–ˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ X299์€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 24๊ฐœ์˜ PCIe 3.0 ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ์† PCIe NVM3 ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ ๋“ฑ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ PCIe๋ฅผ CPU์™€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ PCI3์— ์ง์ ‘ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ 10๊ฐœ ์ด์ƒ์ธ CPU์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ตœ๋Œ€ 44๊ฐœ์˜ PCIe 3.0 ๋ ˆ์ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

X299๋Š” ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋นจ๋ผ์ง„ DDR4-2066์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„ RAM ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์‹คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์บ์‹œ ๊ณ„์ธต(Cache Hierarchy)์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์บ์‹œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ์บ์‹œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์บ์‹œ์˜ ‘ํžˆํŠธ(Hit)’ ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’๋‹ค๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์นฉ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ค„์˜€์ง€๋งŒ ์บ์‹œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ์ด๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฒˆ ์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ ์†Œ์‹์€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9, ์ฝ”์–ด i7 X ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๋ชจ๋‘ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ๋ปํ•  ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ์™€ PC ์ œ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋„ ํ•˜์ด์—”๋“œ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ์ˆ˜์ต์„ ์ฆ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์ œํ’ˆ๋“ค์„ ์ถœ์‹œํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฒˆ ์ฃผ ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ ์ „ํ•ด์งˆ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์†Œ์‹์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ์ ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. editor@itworld.co.kr


2018๋…„ ์ธํ…” 6์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9 CPU ๋ฐœํ‘œ

๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š”ย itworld.co.kr ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ธ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์•„๋ž˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด ์ด์   ํ•ด์„์šฉ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋„ ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ItWorld์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฒŒ์žฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด 6์ฝ”์–ด ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ CPU๋กœ, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i9-8950HK์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 2.9GHz์ด๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— โ€œ์—ด ์†๋„ ๊ฐ€์†(Thermal Velocity Boost)โ€์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์‹ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ 4.8GHz๊นŒ์ง€ ์˜ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ„๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์–ธ๋ฝ 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ƒ์œ„ ์ œํ’ˆ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ ์•„๋ž˜์— 5๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜• ์ฝ”์–ด i5์™€ ์ฝ”์–ด i7 ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ H ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ €์ „๋ ฅ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ 4๊ฐœ์˜ U ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์ด ํฌ์ง„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋‘ 14๋‚˜๋…ธ ์ปคํ”ผ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ์นฉ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ PC ๋‚ด์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋‚ด์žฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ธŒ๋žœ๋“œ ๋กœ๊ณ (์ฝ”์–ด i7+)๋„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” 7์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์žฌ์ƒ๋ฅ  ๊ธฐ์ค€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 41% ๋” ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฐ ๋ฐ ๋…นํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ 32% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ์–ธ๋ฝ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ PC ์ œ์กฐ ์—…๊ณ„์—์„œ 5GHz ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋„ ์ถœ์‹œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜๋ฉด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ํญ์€ ๋”์šฑ ์ปค์ง„๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ธํ…”์ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋น„๊ต์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ 7์„ธ๋Œ€ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—๋Š” SSD๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ๋А๋ฆฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„์‹ ํ•˜๋“œ ๋“œ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋ผ ์žˆ์–ด SSD์—์„œ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์ด ์–ด๋А ์ •๋„์ธ์ง€๋Š” ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ํ”„๋ฆฌ๋ฏธ์—„ ๋ฐ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๋ถ€๋ฌธ ์ด๊ด„ ์ฑ…์ž„์ž์ธ ํ”„๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆญ ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” โ€œ์ฝ”์–ด i9๋Š” ์ธํ…”์ด ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œโ€๋ผ๋ฉฐ, โ€œ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ์— ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ทผ์ ‘ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹คโ€๊ณ  ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์€ ์ธํ…”์ด ์ŠคํŽ™ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฉœํŠธ๋‹ค์šด ์ทจ์•ฝ์ ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŒจ์น˜ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์™„ํ™”์ฑ…์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค(์ดํ›„ ๋‚˜์˜ฌ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์žฌ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค). ์ธํ…” ์ธก์€ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ˆ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์™„ํ™”์ฑ…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์ด ์ถœ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡๋“ฏ์ด, ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ ์€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”์€ ๋ณดํ†ต ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์นฉ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์„ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฒˆ์—๋„ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ์ƒ์œ„ ๊ธฐ์ข…์—๋งŒ ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐˆ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์™ธ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์นฉ์€ ํ›จ์”ฌ ๋” ํญ๋„“๊ฒŒ ๋ณด๊ธ‰๋  ์ „๋ง์ด๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด H ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ CPU

์ธํ…”์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ํญ๋ฐœ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅ ์ค‘์ธ PC ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ๋…ธ๊ณจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์กฐ์ค€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์„ ๋‚ด์žฅํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ํŒ๋งค์šฉ ๊ฒŒ์ž„ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์ด ์ „๋…„ ๋Œ€๋น„ 45% ์„ฑ์žฅํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด 45W H ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ์—๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 2์ข…์˜ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i7๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด i5 ์นฉ ๋ฐ ์‹ ํ˜• ์ œ์˜จ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์‹ค ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์€ ์ œ์˜จ E-2186๊ณผ ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ํก์‚ฌํ•ด ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„, ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜, ์—ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ „๋ ฅ ๋“ฑ์ด ๋™์ผํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์–ธ๋ฝ๋œ ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด i9์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋ถ€๋‹ด์Šค๋Ÿฝ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๋™์ผํ•œ 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ 12๊ฐœ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ํƒ‘์žฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด i7-8850H์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒˆ๋กœ ์ถœ์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ์นฉ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ธํ…”์ด ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐ์—…์šฉ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ vPro ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์˜ต์…˜์œผ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋œ๋‹ค.
์ธํ…”์˜ ๋ผ๋ฐ์˜จ RX ๋ฒ ๊ฐ€(โ€œ์ผ€์ด๋น„๋ ˆ์ดํฌ-Gโ€) ์นฉ์€ ์šธํŠธ๋ผ๋ถ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ 1080p ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋์ง€๋งŒ, ์‹ ํ˜• 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด i9 ์นฉ์€ ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„๋Œ€๋กœ๋ผ๋ฉด โ€œ๋จธ์Šฌ๋ถ(Musclebook)โ€์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ผ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ ˆ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์ตœ๊ณ ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” โ€œ์ด ์นฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค๋ฉด ์–ด๋–ค ์นฉ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•  ๊ฒƒโ€์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ง๋ถ™์˜€๋‹ค.

Intel

์ธํ…”์€ ์ด๋ฒˆ์— ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฅธ๋ฐ” โ€œ์—ด ์†๋„ ๊ฐ€์†โ€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์ •์ƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋†’์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ํ‰์ƒ์‹œ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-8950HK์—์„œ ํ„ฐ๋ณด ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋œ ํ›„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 4.6GHz๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” ์นฉ์˜ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†๋„๋กœ ์ž‘๋™ ์ค‘์ด๋ผ๋ฉด, ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•œ์ธต ๋” ์˜ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ„๋‹ค๋ฉด์„œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ 200MHz ๋” ๋†’์—ฌ 4.8GHz๋กœ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ์•ฝ 100MHz ๋†’์—ฌ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๋‹ค๋งŒ ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” ์—ด ์†๋„ ๊ฐ€์† ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด โ€œ์ž๋™์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ๊ธฐํšŒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅโ€์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ธํ…”์€ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์˜จ๋„ ์„ญ์”จ 50๋„ ์ดํ•˜์—์„œ ์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋“ญ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ–„๋ฒ„๊ฑฐ๋Š” โ€œOEM ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ „๋ ฅ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ด ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋” ๋Œ์–ด์˜ฌ๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํˆฌ์žํ–ˆ๋‹คโ€๋ฉด์„œ โ€œ์ง€๊ธˆ์˜ ์ถ”์„ธ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์–‡๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๋” ์˜ค๋ž˜ ์ง€์†๋˜๋Š” ๋” ์–‡์€ ๊ทœ๊ฒฉ์— ๋” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ง‘์–ด๋„ฃ๋Š” ๊ฒƒโ€์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด U ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ CPU

์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ์ข€ ๋‚ฎ์•„๋„ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์˜ค๋ž˜ ๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธํ…”์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด U ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ 4์ข…๋„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ถœ์‹œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. 28W TDP ์ €์ „๋ ฅ 8์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ์นฉ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ 4์ฝ”์–ด 8์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์˜ ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Intel

๋ชจ๋“  ์นฉ์€ ์ธํ…”์ด ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด 300 ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ ์นฉ์…‹์ธ H370, H310, Q370, B360์— ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ธํ…” ๋Œ€๋ณ€์ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋ชจ๋“  ์นฉ์€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์˜ค๋””์˜ค ๋ฐ I/O, ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€๋น„ํŠธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์ธํ…” 802.11ac ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด, 10Gbit/s ํ†ตํ•ฉ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ USB 3.1 I/O ๋“ฑ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ํŒ๋งค๊ฐ€ โ€œํญ์ฆโ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ์žฅ ์„ฑ์žฅ์— ๋ณด์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋งž์ถฐ ์œ ํ†ต์—…์ฒด๋“ค๋„ ๋งค์žฅ ์ง„์—ด๋Œ€์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๋น„์ค‘์„ ๊ณ„์† ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธํ…”๋„ ํˆฌ์ž๋ฅผ ์ง€์†ํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ์ด๋ฐ ๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ์—์„œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ณ  5GHz ๋ฒฝ์„ ๋ŒํŒŒํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ์ธํ…”์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ™•์‹คํžˆ ๋” ๋†’์ด๊ฒŒ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.ย  editor@itworld.co.kr

์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ:
http://www.itworld.co.kr/news/108803#csidx218d62dae70faefa8f8cdc4efd8ea92ย 


AMD ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜ (๊ธฐ์‚ฌ ์ถœ์ฒ˜ : itworld)

AMD ๋ผ์ด์   3์›” 2์ผ ์ถœ์‹œโ€ฆ์ฝ”์–ด i7๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋„ โ€œ์šฐ์„ธโ€

Mark Hachman | PCWorld

โ€œ40% ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒโ€์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ง์€ ๋ณด์ˆ˜์ ์ธ ์ž์ฒด ํ‰๊ฐ€์˜€๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ 3๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฅผ ์˜ค๋Š” 3์›” 2์ผ ์ถœ์‹œํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์„ ๋Šฅ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๋„ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์ด ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๋‹ค.

22์ผ ์—ด๋ฆฐ ๋ผ์ด์   ์ถœ์‹œ ํ–‰์‚ฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ‘œ์— ๋‚˜์„  AMD ์ž„์›๋“ค์€ ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7์„ ๊ณต๋žตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํ†ฑ์šฉ CPU๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ ํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   CPU๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณณ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ ์—…์ฒด์™€ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์šฉ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• PC ์—…์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ AMD๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋” ์ ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ œํ’ˆ์ธ ๋ผ์ด์   7 1800X๋Š” ์ธํ…”์˜ 1,000๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์งœ๋ฆฌ ์ฝ”์–ด i7-6900K์˜ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜์—๋„ ๋ชป ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์€ ๋” ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚˜๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”๊ณผ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ AMD์˜ ๋ผ์ด์   ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์—ญ์‹œ ์—ญ์‹œ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   7, ์ค‘๊ธ‰ํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   5, ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๋ณด๊ธ‰ํ˜• ๋ผ์ด์   3์ด ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ผ์ด์   7๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋จผ์ € ์ถœ์‹œํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, 1800X(499๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ), 1700X(399๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ), 1700(329๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ)์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ผ์ด์   5์™€ ๋ผ์ด์   3์€ ์˜ฌํ•ด ํ•˜๋ฐ˜๊ธฐ์— ์ถœ์‹œํ•  ์˜ˆ์ •์ธ๋ฐ, ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ถœ์‹œ ์ผ์ •์€ ๋ฐํžˆ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฒˆ ํ–‰์‚ฌ ์ง์ „๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ผ์ด์   ๊ด€๋ จ ์ •๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ณผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถœ์‹œ์ผ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์• ๋„๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋“ค์€ AMD๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‹ค์ฑ…์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธํ…”์€ ์ž์นซ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์ด ๋˜๋Š” PC์šฉ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ ์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ์ ์œ ์œจ์„ ์žƒ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜์— ์ฒ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ธํ…”๋„ ๋Œ€์‘์ฑ…์€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ธํ•˜๋„ ๊ทธ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋‚˜ ์˜ตํ…Œ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ ๊ทน ๋‚ด์„ธ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์ด ์ง€๋‚œ 1์›” ์ผ€์ด๋น„ ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ์นฉ 40๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถœ์‹œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ AMD๋Š” ์„œ๋‘๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฒˆ์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ๋ผ์ด์   7 ์นฉ์˜ ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์‚ฌ์–‘์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์ž.

Mark Hachman

๋ผ์ด์   7 1800X. 95์™€ํŠธ 8์ฝ”์–ด 16์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋กœ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 3.6GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ๋Š” 4GHz๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. 499๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ 1800X์˜ ๋Œ€์‘ ์ œํ’ˆ์€ 8์ฝ”์–ด ์ธํ…” ์ฝ”์–ด i7-6900K๋กœ ๋ฌด๋ ค 1,089๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์งœ๋ฆฌ์ด๋‹ค. AMD์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, 1800X๋Š” ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ์ƒ์—์„œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 162๋กœ ๋™์ ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ตฌ๋™ํ•˜์ž 1,601์ ์œผ๋กœ 6900K๋ณด๋‹ค 9% ๋†’์€ ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ผ์ด์   7 1700X. 95์™€ํŠธ 8์ฝ”์–ด 16์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋กœ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 3.4GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ๋Š” 3.8GHz๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. AMD์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, 399๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ 1700X๋Š” ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ 1,537์ ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•ด 6900K๋ณด๋‹ค 4% ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.

๋ผ์ด์   7 1700. 655์™€ํŠธ 8์ฝ”์–ด 16์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์„œ๋กœ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ ์†๋„๋Š” 3GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ์—์„œ๋Š” 3.7GHz๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. AMD์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, 1700์€ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ 1,410์ ์œผ๋กœ 339๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์งœ๋ฆฌ ์ฝ”์–ด i7 7700K๋ณด๋‹ค 46% ๋” ๋†’์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ธ๋“œ๋ธŒ๋ ˆ์ดํฌ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” 1700์€ 61.8์ดˆ๋ฅผ, 7700K๋Š” 71.8์ดˆ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

Mark Hachman

AMD์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋ผ์ด์   7 1700์€ ์‹ ํ˜• ๋ ˆ์ด์Šค ์ŠคํŒŒ์ด์–ด(Wraith Spire) ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ฟจ๋Ÿฌ๋กœ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ด ์†Œ์Œ์ด 32๋ฐ์‹œ๋ฒจ์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋‹ค.

๋ผ์ด์  ์˜ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์—๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„ํŒ€์˜ ์—ญํ• ์ด ์ปธ๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” ์ž์‚ฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ ์   ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜์˜ ํด๋Ÿญ๋‹น ๋ช…๋ น์–ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์ˆ˜(IPC, instructions per clock)๋ฅผ 40% ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฐํžŒ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ AMD๋Š” IPC๋ฅผ 52% ํ–ฅ์ƒํ–ˆ๋‹ค. CEO ๋ฆฌ์‚ฌ ์ˆ˜๋Š” โ€œ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋งž์ถ˜ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ๋‹คโ€๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ•์กฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. editor@itworld.co.kr

์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ:
http://www.itworld.co.kr/news/103594#csidx36e903474b838daa0638fbf87957a25


CFD ์—…๋ฌด์— ์ข…์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์€ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋Š” ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์‹ถ์€ ํ’ˆ๋ชฉ1์œ„๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹๊นŒ ์‹ถ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์†Œ์œ„ ์Šˆํผ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ฆด๋งŒํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ฐ์Šคํฌํƒ‘ CPU ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ๋†€๋ผ์šด๋ฐ, ์ด๋ฒˆ์— AMD์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ CPU๋„ ๋†€๋ผ์šธ ์ •๋„์˜ ๊ฐ€๋ฒฝ ๋Œ€๋น„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์ž๋ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” CPU๋ฅผ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ฑ…์ƒ์œ„์˜ ์Šˆํผ์ปด์„ ์žฅ๋งŒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐํšŒ๊ฐ€ ์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์•„๋ž˜ ITWOLD์—์„œ 2018.08.07์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ธ์šฉ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

AMD 32์ฝ”์–ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ, ์ฝ”์–ด์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…”์— ์ •๋ฉด ์Šน๋ถ€

Gordon Mah Ung | PCWorld
์ž๋ฃŒ์ถœ์ฒ˜ : ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋Š” ITWORLD์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ธ์šฉ๊ฒŒ์žฌํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (์›๋ฌธ๋ณด๊ธฐ)
AMD๊ฐ€ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ(Ryzen Threadrippers, ๋˜๋Š” ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2)๋ฅผ ๊ณต์‹ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ”์–ด์ˆ˜๋„ ๋†€๋ž์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ์ธํ…”์„ ์ •์กฐ์ค€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.

2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2990WX๋Š” 32์ฝ”์–ด 64์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋กœ, ๊ถŒ์žฅ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 1,799๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ(๋‰ด์—๊ทธ๋‚˜ ์•„๋งˆ์กด ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์ฃผ๋ฌธ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ)์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์—„์ฒญ๋‚œ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ตœ์ƒ์œ„ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋ฉด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ ํ•ด ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-7980XE๋Š” 18์ฝ”์–ด ์ œํ’ˆ์ด์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 2,000๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ด๋‹ค.

์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋”ฐ์ง€๋ฉด, ์ธํ…”์˜ ์ฝ”์–ด i9-7980XE๋Š” ์•ฝ 55๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ธ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2๋Š” ์•ฝ 28๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•˜๋‹ค.

IDG
๋งˆ์น˜ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ํ• ์ธํŒ๋งค์ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์„์ˆ˜๋ก, ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‹น ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ ๋–จ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค.

32์ฝ”์–ด 2990WX๋Š” ์ฃผ๋ ฅ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด๋ฉฐ, AMD๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

โ€“ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2920X, 12์ฝ”์–ด 24์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 3.5GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 4.3GHz, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 649๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ.
โ€“ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2950X, 16์ฝ”์–ด 32์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 3.5GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 4.4GHz, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 899๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ.
โ€“ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2970WX, 24์ฝ”์–ด 48์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 3.0GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 4.2GHz, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 1,299๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ.
โ€“ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2990WX, 32์ฝ”์–ด 64์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 3.0GHz, ๋ถ€์ŠคํŠธ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 4.2GHz, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ 1,799๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ.

32์ฝ”์–ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2990WX๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ์˜ˆ์•ฝ ์ฃผ๋ฌธ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ •์‹ ์ถœํ•˜์ผ์€ 8์›” 13์ผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. 16์ฝ”์–ด 2950X์˜ ์ถœ์‹œ์ผ์€ 8์›” 31์ผ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ 24์ฝ”์–ด, 12์ฝ”์–ด ์ œํ’ˆ์€ 10์›”์— ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ๋‹ค.

2์„ธ๋Œ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ AMD๊ฐ€ ์˜ฌํ•ด ์ดˆ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ผ์ด์   ์นฉ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‚ด๋†“์€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ 12๋‚˜๋…ธ ์  + ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  CPU๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด X399 ๋ฉ”์ธ๋ณด๋“œ์™€ ํ˜ธํ™˜๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ตฌํ˜• CPU ์—†์ด๋„ BIOS ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์‹ ํ˜• CPU๋Š” 1์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ œํ’ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ํ™•์—ฐํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋™๊ธ‰ ์ธํ…” ์ œํ’ˆ๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ๋ถˆํ—ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” 32์ฝ”์–ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2990WX๊ฐ€ ์‹œ๋„ค๋ฒค์น˜ R15๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ…”์˜ 18์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i9-7980XE๋ณด๋‹ค 50% ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. POV-Ray ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์—์„œ๋„ 47% ์•ž์„ฐ๋‹ค.

๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ W
์‚ฌ์‹ค AMD๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ 2์„ธ๋Œ€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์— W๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์ด ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. AMD๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜๊ณผ ๊ฒŒ์ž„์ด ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด์ˆ˜๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๋” ๋†’์€ ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉฐ, W๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

24์ฝ”์–ด์™€ 32์ฝ”์–ด ์ œํ’ˆ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ช…์— WX๋ฅผ ๋ถ™์ธ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ด๋“ค CPU๊ฐ€ ์ฐฝ์ž‘์ž๋‚˜ ํ˜์‹ ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ •์กฐ์ค€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ W๊ฐ€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ํ”ฝ์…€์ด๋‚˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ด‘์„ ์„ ๊ทนํ•œ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ, ์ด๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์š” ์ด์ •ํ‘œ
์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์†Œ๋น„์ž์šฉ CPU์— 32์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ CPU ์ „์Ÿ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ „๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋งž์ดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ถˆ๊ณผ 2๋…„ ์ „, ์ธํ…”์€ 10์ฝ”์–ด ์ฝ”์–ด i7-6950X๋ฅผ ๋ฌด๋ ค 1,723๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์— ์ถœ์‹œํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ง€๊ธˆ์€ 32์ฝ”์–ด CPU๊ฐ€ 1,799๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์— ๋‚˜์™”๋‹ค.

IDG
๋‚ ๋กœ ์น˜์—ดํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ์ „์Ÿ

์กฐ๋งŒ๊ฐ„ ๋‚˜์˜ฌ ์ธํ…”์˜ ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€
๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ธํ…”์ด ํ•œ๊ฐ€๋กœ์ด ์•‰์•„ ๋ ˆ๋ชจ๋„ค์ด๋“œ๋‚˜ ํ™€์ง๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์•„๋‹ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์€ ์น˜์—ดํ•˜๋‹ค. AMD๊ฐ€ ์ง€๋‚œ ์ปดํ“จํ…์Šค์—์„œ 32์ฝ”์–ด ๊ดด๋ฌผ์„ ๊ณต๊ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ํ•˜๋ฃจ ์ „๋‚ , ์ธํ…”์€ 28์ฝ”์–ด์— ํด๋Ÿญ์†๋„ 5GHz์งœ๋ฆฌ ๊ดด๋ฌผ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ œํ’ˆ์€ ์˜ฌํ•ด๋ง ์ถœ์‹œ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค.

์ธํ…”์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์ด CPU์˜ ์‹œ์—ฐ์„ ์†”์งํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธํ…” ์ž„์›์€ 28์ฝ”์–ด CPU๊ฐ€ 5GHz๋กœ ๋™์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜”์ง€๋งŒ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ์ˆ˜๋žญ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์ค‘์— ์ธํ…”์€ ์‹œ์—ฐ์ด๋ž€ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์–ธ์ œ๋‚˜ ๊ทธ๋ ‡๋“ฏ์ด ์˜ค๋ฒ„ํด๋Ÿฌํ‚น ์‹œ์—ฐ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋Ÿฐ ๋…ผ๋ž€๊ณผ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†์ด AMD ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฆฌํผ 2990WX๋Š” ๋ช‡ ๊ฐœ์›” ๋จผ์ € ์ถœ์‹œ๋œ ์ƒํƒœ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”๊ตฌ๋‚˜ ์ธํ…”์ด 28์ฝ”์–ด CPU๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ค๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์— ํŒ๋งคํ•ด์•ผ AMD์˜ ์‹ ์ž‘๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„์ง€๋„ ์˜๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์—… ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์™€์˜ ํ˜•ํ‰์„ฑ์ด ๊ฑธ๋ฆผ๋Œ์ด ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ํ˜„์žฌ 28์ฝ”์–ด ์ œ์˜จ ํ”Œ๋ž˜ํ‹ฐ๋„˜ 8176์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์€ 8,719๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ์ด๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์กด ์›Œํฌ์Šคํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์„ ๊ฑฑ์ •ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” AMD๋Š” ๋‹ค์‹œ ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ํŒŒ๊ดด ์ „๋žต์„ ํŽผ์น˜๊ณ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์‹์œผ๋กœ AMD๋Š” ์ธํ…”๊ณผ ์ฝ”์–ด์™€ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋ฉด ๋Œ€๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์›ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ธํ…”์€ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ง์ ‘ ๋Œ€๊ฒฐ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ”ผํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.ย  editor@itworld.co.kr

FLOW-3D DEM

FLOW DEM

 

FLOW DEM ์€ FLOW-3D ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ฒด ๋ฐ ์•ก์ฒด ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„์— DEM(Discrete Element Method : ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ธ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ์ œํ’ˆ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ž…์ž – ์ž…์ž ๊ฐ„, ์ž…์ž – ๋ฒฝ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ ‘์ด‰์ด๋‚˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ž…์ž ๊ฑฐ๋™์˜ ํ•ด์„์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 
๋˜ํ•œ ์œ ์ฒด ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์ „๋ฌธ์ ์ธ FLOW-3D ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์œ ์ฒด ์™€ ์ž…์ž๊ฑฐ๋™์˜ ์—ฐ์„ฑํ•ด์„์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜ํ•œ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฃผ์š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ :
  • ๊ณ ์ฒด ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ, ์Šคํ”„๋ง(Spring) / ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ(Dash Pot) ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ ์šฉ
  • Void, 1 fluid, 2 fluid(์ž์œ  ๊ณ„๋ฉด ํฌํ•จ) ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€์‘
  • ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ๋ฐ€๋„ / ๊ฐ€๋ณ€ ์ง๊ฒฝ
  • ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ์กฐ์ ˆ๋กœ ์ž…์ž ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ
  • ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ DEM์˜ Sub Time Step ์ด์šฉ

Discrete Element Method : ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•

๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ ์šด๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ๋™ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์šฉ๋„์— ์‘์šฉ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem1
dem2

์ž…์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ

Voigt model์€ ์Šคํ”„๋ง(Spring) ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ(Dash pot)์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ž…์ž ์ถฉ๋Œ ์‹œ์˜ ํž˜์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํƒ„์„ฑ๋ ฅ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ์Šคํ”„๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ,
๋น„ํƒ„์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ์‚ฐ๋ถ€๋ถ„์€ ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ํ•ญ๋ ฅ์€ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์™ธ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

 
  • ์Šคํ”„๋ง : ๋ณ€ํ˜•์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํž˜
  • ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ : ์ถฉ๋Œ์‹œ์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€ ์†๋„์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํž˜
    (์ ์„ฑ ๊ฐ์‡ )
  • ์Šคํ”„๋ง ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์‹œ ํฌํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ
    โ‡’ Voigt model
  • ํž˜์€ ๋ฒ•์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์ ‘์„  ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด์ง„๋‹ค

๋ถ„์„ ๋ชจ๋“œ

๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์šด๋™ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ FLOW-3D ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž์˜ ์šด๋™ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— DEM์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์ด ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ‘void + DEM’, ‘1 Fluid + DEM’ , ‘ 1 Fluid ์ž์œ ๊ณ„๋ฉด + DEM ‘์„ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์œ ๋™ ๋ชจ๋“œ๋กœ ์ทจ๊ธ‰์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem4
dem5
dem6
void + DEM1-fluid + DEM1-fluid ์ž์œ ๊ณ„๋ฉด + DEM

์ž…์ž ์œ ํ˜•

์ž…์ž ํƒ€์ž…๋„ ํ‘œ์ค€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ (๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ)์™€ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ฒƒ ์™ธ, ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ ๋“ฑ๋„ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ‘œ์ค€ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž…์ž ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž…์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ชจ๋“  ์•„๋ž˜์— ๊ฐ€๋ผ ์•‰์•„ ๋ฒ„๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, FLOW DEM์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

dem7-๊ท ์ผ
-๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”
-์ž…์žํฌ๊ธฐ ๋ณ€ํ™”

์‘์šฉ ๋ถ„์•ผ

1. Mechanical Engineering ๋ถ„์•ผ

Resin filling, screw conveyance, powder conveyance

dem8
dem9
dem10

2. Civil Engineering๋ถ„์•ผ

Debris flow, gravel, falling rock

dem11
dem2

3. Chemical Engineering, Pharmaceutics ๋ถ„์•ผ

Fluidized bed, cyclone, stirrer

dem12
dem13
dem14

4. MEMS, Electrical Engineering ๋ถ„์•ผ

์ „๊ธฐ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ „๊ธฐ์žฅ ํ•ด์„ ๋“ฑ

dem15

dem16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coarse Graining

DEM์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ž…์ž๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ด์„์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋งŒ ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง€๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ž์›์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด, ์ž…์ž ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ค„์—ฌ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค .

Particle Size Increase ๊ฒฝ์šฐ

 

์ค‘์ž ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ๋ถ„์„

DEM์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ž…์ž๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์ œํ•œ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์„œ๋ธŒํƒ€์ž„์Šคํ…์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ž…์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ํƒ€์ž„์Šคํ…์„ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๊ณ  ํ•„์š”์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋“ค์ด์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด ์ค‘์ž์‚ฌ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ž์ฃผ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋น™์—„ ์œ ์ฒด์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ์˜ ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์ด ๋ณ„๋กœ ์ข‹์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹น์‚ฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์ „๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž…์ƒ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ์†์ฒด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์—์„œ๋„ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ์˜ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•ด์™”๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋ฒˆ์— DEM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.

Reference :

  • Lefebvre D., Mackenbrock A., Vidal V., Pavan V. and Haigh PM, 2004,
  • Development and use of simulation in the Design of Blown Cores and Moulds

Detecting Porosity with the Core Gas Model

Detecting Porosity with the Core Gas Model

Producing High Quality Castings

 

Results options such as core gas flux, binder weight fraction and out-gassing rate can be analyzed using the core gas model

์ฃผ์กฐ๊ณต์žฅ์˜ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ ์ฃผ์กฐ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋ง์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ํ๋ฆ„, ์‘๊ณ , ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ง„ํ™” ๋ฐ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์‘๋ ฅ์„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ณดํŽธํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์•„์ง ์™„์ „ํžˆ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ถˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์€ ๊ธˆ์†, ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ๊ณ ์ฒ  ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ๋†’์•„์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ณ ์˜จ์˜ ์ฃผ์ž… ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์— ๋ฒฝ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Designing the Optimum Break-Down

๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์—๋Š” ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ์ฃผ์กฐ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๊ฐ€ ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฒ„๋ธ”๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ค„์ด๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ™˜๊ธฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด ํ™˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ๊ตฝ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ๋”ฐ๋ผ๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์™„์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ธด ์ธ์ถœ ๊ณผ์ •์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์— ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ๋งˆ๋‹ค ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•ด์•ผ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๊ฐ€๊ณต ์ผ์ •์„ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์žฅ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ฃผ์กฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์ œ์กฐ์— ๋ชจ๋‘ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋‚ญ๋น„ ์—†์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์กฐ ๊ณต์žฅ์ด ํ™˜๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก Flow Science๋Š” ์ฃผ์กฐ ํ•ด์„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

GM engine block water jacket, showing binder weight fraction

Applying CFD Methods to Core Gas Flow

์ˆ˜์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”์˜ ํ™”ํ•™์  ๋ณต์žก์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒŒ๋“œ ์ฝ”์–ด ์—ด ์ฐจ๋‹จ ํ›„ ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋””์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ์ง€ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ Flow Science๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ํ˜‘๋ ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” General Motors, Graham-White Manufacturing ๋ฐ AlchemCast์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ๋ฃจ๋ฏธ๋Š„, ์ฒ  ๋ฐ ๊ฐ•์ฒ ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ์ˆ˜์ง€ ์ฝ”์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

GM Powertrain์˜ ์บ์ŠคํŒ… ๋ถ„์„ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด ์ธ David Goettsch ๋ฐ•์‚ฌ๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์ฃผ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ถฉ์ง„ ๋ฐ ์‘๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 15 ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ž์ผ“ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋“  ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์ธํ™”๋ฌผ์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ•์Šค์— vent tracks๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ต์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ย “ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ–‰ ๋ถ„์„ ์ž‘์—…์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹œ๋™ ์‹œ ๋†’์€ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ๋ฅ ๋กœ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.”๋ผ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Š” ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. “์•„๋งˆ๋„ ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์‹œ์ ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ์˜ค๋žœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. “

ํ˜„์žฌ FLOW-3D์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด Goettsch๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‚ฝ์ž… ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒ ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์Šค๊ฐ€ ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š”์ง€, ์–ด๋””๋กœ ๊ฐ€๋Š”์ง€, ๊ธˆ์† ํ”„๋ŸฐํŠธ๊ฐ€ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์žก๊ธฐ ์ „์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋งŒํผ ๋น ์ ธ ๋‚˜์˜ค๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์‹ญ์‹œ์˜ค.

Multi-Core Challenges

Core prints for casting with internal geometries

GM Powertrain jacket slab assembly

๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋…ธ๋ จํ•œ ์ฃผ์กฐ๊ณต์žฅ ์—”์ง€๋‹ˆ์–ด์ธ Graham-White Manufacturing Co.์˜ Elizabeth Ryder๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ์€ ํ•ญ์ƒ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์› ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋…€๋Š” “ํŠนํžˆ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์–ด๋–ค ์ฝ”์–ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ์›์ธ์ธ์ง€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฐพ์•„ ๋‚ด๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์› ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. “

1700๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ 10,000๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, Graham-White๋Š” ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์กฐ ๊ณต์ •์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ต์ˆ™ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Graham-White๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ € ์Šค์บ๋‹์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•œ ํšŒ์ฃผ์ฒ  ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ(์•ฝ 3 x 4in)์˜ 3D ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ์ž‘์—…ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ˜„์žฌ vent ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํƒ•๊ตฌ ๋””์ž์ธ์€ ์ˆ˜ํ‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„ํ• ๋œ ๊ธˆํ˜•์—์„œ ํŒจํ„ด ํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ๋‹น 4๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธ์ƒ์ด ํฌํ•จ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ์ธ์ƒ์€ ๊ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ vent๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์•™ sprue๋Š” 2 ์ดˆ ์ด๋‚ด์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋ชฐ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์ง„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•ด์ฃผ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

FLOW-3D๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์ฃผ์ž…๋ฅ ์„ ํ™•์ธ์‹œ์ผœ ์ฃผ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋˜ํ•œ ํ•œ ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. Graham-White๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ถ„์ถœ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ€์Šค๋ฅผ ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ฝ”์–ด์— ๊นŠ์€ ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์„ ๋šซ๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด vent ๋””์ž์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•œ ์ดํ›„, ํšŒ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ธ”๋กœ์šฐ ์Šคํฌ๋žฉ์„ ์•ฝ 30% ๊ฐ์†Œ ์‹œ์ผฐ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Ryder๋Š” FLOW-3D ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋””์ž์ธ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ฃผ์—ˆ๊ณ , ์–ด๋–ค ์ฝ”์–ด (๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ์ฝ”์–ด ๋””์ž์ธ)๊ฐ€ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜€๋Š”์ง€, ์ฝ”์–ด์˜ ์–ด๋А ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๊ทผ์›์ธ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Learn more about the versatility and power ofย modeling metal casting processes withย FLOW-3Dย Cast>

Interaction Between Waves and Breakwaters

Interaction Between Waves and Breakwaters

This article is an adapted version of an articleย  published in the journal of the Engineering Association for Offshore and Marine in Italy by Fabio Dentale, E. Pugliese Carratelli, S.D. Russo, and Stefano Mascetti. The first three authors are users at the University of Salerno; Mr. Mascetti is an engineer at XC Engineering, Flow Scienceโ€™s associate for Italy and France.

 

๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ž์—ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ (๋ฐ”๋‹ค์™€ ํ•ด์•ˆ)๊ณผ ์ธ๊ณต ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ (๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ)์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์™„์ „ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ž‘์—…์€ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค๊ณ  ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์˜ค๋ž˜ ๊ฑธ๋ฆด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ธก๋ฉด์€ ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ์–ด๋ ค์› ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ฌผ์ด ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๋ฅด๋Š” ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋˜๋Š” ์•”์„ ๋ธ”๋ก์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํŠนํžˆ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ปดํ“จํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ง„๋ณด๋กœ ์ˆ˜์น˜, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒฉ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ขํ˜€์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋ธ”๋ก์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ธ”๋ก ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋นˆ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์— ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋™ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฅ˜์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ท ์ผํ•œ ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ ๋งค์งˆ๋กœ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” Classical Darcy ์ฃผ์ œ์— ๊ณ ๋ ค๋  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ฅ˜ํ•ญ ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ „์ฒด ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์  ๊ฑฐ๋™์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

Modeling Rubble Mound Breakwaters

The following examples describe cases where rubble mound breakwaters are modelled on the basis of their real geometry, taking into account the hydrodynamic interactions with the wave motion.

์ž”์žฌ๋ฌผ ๋ถ„์‡„๊ธฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ์ž”ํ•ด ๋ถ„์‡„๋ฌผ์ด ํŒŒ๋„ ์šด๋™๊ณผ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์  ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜•์ƒ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figure 1: Artificial blocks

Figure 2a: Submerged Breakwaters

Figures 2b and 2c: Emerged Breakwater – Accropode regular & Accropode irregular

 

๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋žต์ ์ธ ํ‘œํ˜„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์ฒด ์„ธํŠธ๋กœ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ the cube, the modified cube, the antifer, the tetrapod, the accropode, the accropode II, the coreloc, the xbloc,and the xbloc base ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต ๋ธ”๋ก์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1).

๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์— ์ž ๊ธฐ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ž ๊ธด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๋ฌธํ—Œ์— ๋‚˜์™€ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ‘œ์ค€ ์‹คํ—˜์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ค์ œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ํฌ๊ธฐ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค (๊ทธ๋ฆผ. 2).

์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ ˆ์ฐจ์˜ ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์นจ์ˆ˜๋œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ถ€์œ , ๋‹ค๊ณต์„ฑ, ๊ณ ํ˜•๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋ถ€์œ ๋ฌผ(๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2a)์ด ์ถœํ˜„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค(Fig. 2b โ€“ 2c).

๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜๋ฉด ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์„ FLOW-3D๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ ธ ์™€์„œ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์  ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ Wave propagation์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ RNG ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ coarse๊ฒฉ์ž ์•ˆ์ชฝ์— ์ค‘์ฒฉ๋œ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•œ ๊ฒฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ „์‚ฐ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Navier-Stokes ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ 3 ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์žฅ๋ฒฝ (๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์˜์—ญ: 90 ร— 1.9 ร— 6.5m)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๋ฉ”์‰ฌ ๋ธ”๋ก์€ ๋™์ผํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ (0.30 ร— 0.27 ร— 0.30m)์˜ 46,200 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ค‘์ฒฉ๋œ ๋ธ”๋ก์€ 2,353,412 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์š”์†Œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(0.061 ร— 0.055 ร— 0.061m).

๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์—๋„ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์ด ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๊ฒฉ์ž ๋ธ”๋ก์€ 150,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์š”์†Œ(0.50ร—0.20ร—0.30m)๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘์ฒฉ๋œ ๋ธ”๋ก์€ 2,025,000๊ฐœ์˜ ์š”์†Œ(0.10ร— 0.10ร—0.10m)๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figures 3a and 3b: Mesh views of submerged breakwater (3a above) & emerged breakwater (3b below)

Figures 4b: Emerged Breakwater – Accropode regular

Figures 4a: Submerged breakwater

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ค‘ ์ผ๋ถ€๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์— ์š”์•ฝ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 4์—์„œ 3 ์ฐจ์› ์˜์—ญ์˜ 2 ์ฐจ์› ๋‹จ๋ฉด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์••๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5์—๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„์— ์žกํžŒ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ 3 ์ฐจ์› ํ˜•์ƒ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ ๋™๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์†”๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์š”์†Œ์˜ ์œค๊ณฝ์˜ ์œ ์ฒด ์—ญํ•™์— ์˜ํ•œ ์œ ๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ฒ€์ถœ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ 3 ์ฐจ์› ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž˜ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜๋ฉฐ (๊ทธ๋ฆผ 5) ๋ฐฉํŒŒ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŒŒ๋™ ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž์„ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ‘œํ˜„๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Figures 5a: Submerged breakwater.

Figures 5b: Emerged Breakwater – Accropode regular.

Figures 5c: Emerged Breakwater – Accropode irregular ย 

Conclusions

์ž ์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ด์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ Navier-Stoke๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์œ ์ฒด ์›€์ง์ž„์ด ์ž…์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ๋‚œ๋ฅ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ RANS์™€ ์ž์œ  ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒจ๋‹จ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์œ ์ฒด ๋™์  ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(FLOW-3D)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ธ”๋ก ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์œ ์ฒด ์šด๋™์˜ ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ธ”๋ก์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ˆ„์„ค ํ๋ฆ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์›์น™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ถ€ํ’ˆ(ํ•„ํ„ฐ, ์ฝ”์–ด ๋ฐ ํ† ์šฐ)์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์ด ๋ฌผ์— ์ž ๊ธฐ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ œํ•œ์€ ์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Further studies will be aimed at assessing the stability of individual blocks through the use of the Moving Object model in FLOW-3D.